Saturday, October 30, 2021

On Alberta's dryland farms, reflections on a devastating year and an eye to what's next

Several municipalities declared agricultural disasters this

summer due to drought

Lee Markert, director of operations for Markert Seeds in Vulcan, Alta., says the summer brought the worst drought conditions he's seen in his agricultural career. Markert says the situation is leading to mental health challenges among many dryland farmers in southern Alberta. (Joel Dryden/CBC)

Just north of the town of Vulcan, Alta., snow is falling on Markert Seeds, a dryland operation that grows wheat, barley, canola, peas and flax.

The first snowfall of the year means fall work on the farm is done. The moisture comes as a welcome relief after the summer, which saw droughts devastate operations across southern Alberta.

Ron Markert, president of Markert Seeds, just took out his 50th crop on the operation. He's seen good years and bad, and his experience has taught him how to prepare for the latter.

But like all dryland farming operations — which refers to the growing of crops without the use of irrigation in dry areas — the challenges of the past year in southern Alberta have hit hard.

"Looking at the numbers, roughly we had a third of a crop of what is an average crop," Markert said. "Some were worse, canola was probably worse than anything. But wheat, barley and peas were all down."

Ron Markert, president of Markert Farms, says most of the grain bins on the property are usually full. But this year, he can knock on some of the bins and hear echoes reverberating from within because they're empty. (Joel Dryden/CBC)

Alberta experienced scorching heat above 35 C for days this summer, setting record-breaking temperatures. A number of provincial municipalities declared agricultural disasters due to drought.

Farmers in southern Alberta saw a better harvest than expected in 2020. That made some cautiously optimistic after three previous years of drought-like conditions.

This year, crop insurance is important. But for less experienced farmers, even one challenging summer like this past one can lead to high levels of stress.

"The more [drought] you have, the worse it gets. It just drives you down further and further," Markert said.

Impact on mental health

Markert's son, Lee, who is the business's director of operations, said farmers his age across the province are now facing some difficult decisions.

"People in my generation are really coming into that time in their life when they've got kids to look after and trying to get them through school and sports," he said.

"You throw it all together, and you've potentially got a stressful situation when the crop isn't there to support them."

Lee Markert says farmers his age across the province are now facing some difficult decisions. When you add the drought conditions to the pressures of raising a family, he says, 'you've potentially got a stressful situation when the crop isn't there to support them.' (Joel Dryden/CBC)

Humphrey Banack is a grain farmer in central Alberta and a board member of the Alberta Federation of Agriculture. He said when weather doesn't co-operate, all dryland farmers can do is watch their crops wither.

"It really plays hard mentally on people, when you see this happening," Banack said. "There's your livelihood in the field, you've made your plans, and all of a sudden those plans are changing."

Economic impact on local businesses

The impacts aren't just being felt by the farming population.

Ghassan Hamdan, owner of Mama's Pizza & Pasta in Vulcan, says the effect of struggling crops, paired with the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, has spread to businesses in the community.

"We lost more than 55 per cent of the business," Hamdan said. "And we're trying to stay open, but I don't know for how long we can fight this."

Ghassan Hamdan, owner of Mama's Pizza & Pasta in Vulcan, says the downturn in the farming industry has seriously affected his bottom line. (Joel Dryden/CBC)

Local farmers used to come into his business twice a week for supper. Now, Hamdan said, he sees those same people twice a month, if that.

"The situation affects everybody. The workers, the farmers, everybody," he said.

Several worsening growing conditions

Stefan Kienzle is a geography professor at the University of Lethbridge who created an interactive website that lets Albertans explore how the climate is changing.

Dryland farmers in southern Alberta, particularly those living west of Lethbridge, are facing several worsening growing conditions, he said.

"Number one, they have less annual precipitation, especially during the summer," Kienzle said. "The key thing there is, the change in precipitation may just be a natural cycle, so at the moment we cannot make a clear link to climate change."

Stefan Kienzle, a geography professor at the University of Lethbridge, says dryland farmers in southern Alberta are facing several worsening growing conditions. He created an interactive website that lets Albertans explore how the climate is changing. (Google Meets)

At the same time, dryland farmers are facing higher evaporation rates due to higher temperatures and a longer growing season, he said, which results in dryer soils.

"The increase in evaporation is 100 per cent linked to climate change," he said. "Then, of course, we have heat waves, such as the one we faced this year.... That heat wave sucked the remaining soil moisture out of the soils and really gave a lot of stress to the dryland farmers."

On top of that, dryland farmers are also facing an increased risk of pests, such as a grasshopper infestation observed this past summer, owing to the favourable conditions presented by very warm and dry soil conditions.

"The last four out of five years, we had summer drought conditions," Kienzle said. "So that means there was stress for the dryland farmers, not just in 2021 but quite a few years before."

A universal experience on dryland operations

When it comes to other dryland operations in southern Alberta, the sentiment is the same: This year was challenging, and many are taking the cold season ahead as a chance to reset.

Nichole Neubauer owns and operates Neubauer Farms with her husband. She said her family farm has been in existence since 1910.

"Our dryland crops only produced at a fraction of what they would," she said. "It was probably about a quarter of what we would average over the last 10 years."

Snow recently fell on devastated dryland farms in southern Alberta. It was welcome moisture after a summer of extremely challenging weather conditions. Alberta experienced scorching heat above 35 C for days this summer, setting record-breaking temperatures. (Joel Dryden/CBC)

Garry Lentz, who farms on a dryland operation 16 kilometres east of Medicine Hat, said crop insurance basically covers only the costs of production.

"There's no profit to be had this year in farming," he said. "It's a big disappointment. It puts everything on hold that you have planned."

Dryland farms in other provinces, such as Grace Hill Farms in southwest Saskatchewan, were similarly hit hard by this year's drought. (Submitted by Hart Smith)

And the challenges extend to dryland farms outside Alberta, too.

Hart Smith farms with his dad on Grace Hill Farms, a multi-generational organic grain farm in southwest Saskatchewan.

"Most of our crops and neighbours' crops did not fare well," Smith said. "This is my first year farming. For me, this year is one of my best and hopefully worst years ever."


Trudeau files last-ditch appeal against billions for Indigenous children

Tribunal ordered Canadian government to pay compensation to children who suffered discrimination in welfare system


Justin Trudeau in The Hague on Friday. Indigenous leaders have long criticized the prime minister’s decision to fight both of these rulings. Photograph: Piroschka van de Wouw/Reuters

Rights and freedom is supported by


Leyland Cecco in Toronto
Fri 29 Oct 2021

Justin Trudeau’s government has launched a last-minute court appeal against a ruling that would require it pay billions of dollars to First Nations children who suffered discrimination in the welfare system.

Minutes before a court deadline on Friday afternoon, the government filed papers indicating it planned once again to fight a human rights tribunal decision ordering the compensation payment.

Soon after, however, the government released a statement saying it would pause litigation as it negotiated with First Nations groups to determine how compensation should be paid out.

The decision to fight the tribunal ruling – and the subsequent pause in litigation – was swiftly condemned by prominent Indigenous voices.

“Feds had years to sit and negotiate. Courts have told them to negotiate. Instead feds refused to abide by tribunal orders. Discrimination and harm continued to our kids. Now, before feds agree to negotiate, they wait till Friday 4.30pm and get their appeal in first. Wow,” tweeted Pam Palmater, Mi’kmaw lawyer and chair in Indigenous governance at Ryerson University.

In 2019, the Canadian human rights tribunal argued the federal government had “willfully and recklessly” discriminated against First Nations children living on reserve by underfunding child and family services. Children were taken from their communities and put into government-run programs.

The tribunal had ordered Ottawa to pay C$40,000, the maximum the tribunal can award, to each child as well as their parents and grandparents, but the federal government appealed the ruling.

That appeal was dismissed by a federal court judge who found that the government had failed to demonstrate the tribunal’s decision was unreasonable.

The battle for compensation dates back 14 years, when Cindy Blackstock, executive director of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society and the Assembly of First Nations, argued that by underfunding child welfare on reserve, Ottawa’s conduct amounted to racial discrimination.

Indigenous leaders have long criticized the prime minister’s decision to fight both of these rulings – but had recently expressed hope the Liberal government would end the multi-year battle.

In its submission, the government says it “acknowledges the finding of systemic discrimination and does not oppose the general principle that compensation to First Nations individuals who experienced pain and suffering” – but said it found the way compensation was determined was problematic.

In its statement on Friday, the government said it hoped to reach a settlement by December.
First Nations leaders say they'll work with feds on child compensation but appeal 'not productive'

Brooklyn Neustaeter
CTVNews.ca Writer
Saturday, October 30, 2021 

Important to end discrimination: AFN chief


NOW PLAYING
AFN National Chief RoseAnne Archibald says compensation is just one part of a long-term solution but calls for discrimination against Indigenous people to end in Canada.


TORONTO -- First Nations leaders say they are disappointed by the federal government's decision to appeal a ruling ordering Ottawa to compensate Indigenous children removed from their homes, but will "work together" with officials to reach a resolution.

David Pratt, vice-chief of the Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations (FSIN), told CTV News Channel on Saturday that the appeal is "not productive" in working towards reconciliation. Pratt said FSIN's position is that the federal government "needs to fully comply with the tribunal rulings."

"Let's start working to make sure that there's equitable funding for Indigenous children and to just stop the discriminatory practices that continue to be perpetuated by the Government of Canada," Pratt said.

The federal government appealed a Federal Court decision to uphold a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) order requiring Ottawa compensate First Nations children, but says it plans to resolve the dispute outside of court.

Late Friday evening, the government filed a notice of appeal arguing the Federal Court erred in finding that the CHRT acted "reasonably" by ordering complete compensation for children, their parents, or grandparents for being unnecessarily removed from their communities since 2006.

Moments later, Indigenous Services Minister Patty Hajdu published a statement noting that Ottawa and the Indigenous groups on the other side of the lawsuit have agreed to "sit down immediately" to reach a resolution by December.

The appeal is active, but the government says it will pause the litigation for two months.

The two sides will look to agree on: providing "fair, equitable compensation" to First Nations children on-reserve and in the Yukon who were removed from their homes by child and family services agencies; achieving "long-term reform" of the First Nations and Family Service program; and, delivering funding for the "purchase and/or construction of capital assets" that support the delivery of child and family services.

In 2016, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal found that Ottawa discriminated against First Nations children by knowingly underfunding child and family services for those living on reserve. Litigants in the case first brought forward in 2007 say this led to thousands of kids being apprehended from their families and enduring abuse in provincial foster care systems.

The tribunal ordered Ottawa to pay $40,000, the maximum the tribunal can award, to each child as well as their parents and grandparents.

In 2019, the federal government asked the Federal Court to dismiss the tribunal's decisions, but it upheld the orders last month. Friday was the final day for the government to file an appeal.

MORE THAN COMPENSATION

Pratt said it is important that the federal government recognize the treatment of Indigenous children within the child welfare system as wrong and go beyond compensation.

"Let's work together to not only compensate those that have been in the system, but also to ensure that our children are receiving the best quality of care and funding and resourcing that they need," he said.

If the federal government is "serious" about its commitment to reconciliation, Pratt said, officials should stop prolonging this process.

"Let's deal with these discriminatory practices, ending them once and for all against Indigenous children in all of Canada," he said.

However, if negotiations fail, Pratt said, the matter will be back in court.

"If things don't go our way, then the government will file their appeal in January, they'll take it back into the courts, and… our lawyers have assured us that we're going to win," Pratt said, adding that the federal government will eventually "exhaust all their legal avenues."

Assembly of First Nations Chief RoseAnne Archibald released a statement Friday night echoing the same sentiment of disappointment, but said the organization is "encouraged that a deadline will be set to negotiate a settlement of this matter."

"Our priority remains to ensure that our children and families are supported to thrive. First Nations children and families have waited far too long for justice and healing. In order to walk the healing path together, Canada must acknowledge the harms that discrimination has had on our children and families. Our collective goal is to ensure that discrimination ends and never happens again," she said.

Archibald told CTV News Channel that compensation for Indigenous children is "just one part of a long-term solution."

"The other part that's extraordinarily important for us is to make sure that discrimination has in fact ended, that we can point to it and say 'this is in fact in the past'," Archibald said in an interview Saturday.

Archibald said it is important that the federal government and First Nations "determine together that discrimination has indeed ended," and, more importantly, that measures are put in place to ensure discrimination doesn't "creep back up into the system."

"This system that First Nations are in… is rife with systemic racism," she said. "So we really have to look at this larger question of how we're going to end discrimination and make sure it doesn't happen again, and that can only be done when you sit down in a true partnership with government."

Archibald said First Nations care for their children as much as other Canadians, and want to ensure they grow up in a "just society" that includes access to clean drinking water, high-standard housing and safe schooling.

"We have a similar vision of happy, healthy children, surrounded by the love and care of their families living in vibrant and safe communities, but First Nations have a lot of catching up to do in order to ensure that equality and equity exists in our communities," she said.

With files from CTVNews.ca's Sarah Turnbull and The Canadian Press



FILE - Indigenous children carry a flag as they march following the National Day of Truth and Reconciliation ceremonies on Parliament Hill, Thursday, September 30, 2021 in Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

Compensation for Indigenous children does not equate to justice: AFN chief

By Staff The Canadian Press
Posted October 30, 2021 


WATCH  Feds appeal ruling to compensate for Indigenous children.


Talks set to start Monday between Indigenous leaders and the federal government about a possible settlement over court-ordered compensation to First Nations children could signal the clearing of the road to reconciliation, the Assembly of First Nations National chief said Saturday.

RoseAnne Archibald said the talks are scheduled to last until December and Indigenous leaders are prepared to meet face-to-face with government representatives.

The federal government filed notice it plans to challenge in the Federal Court of Appeal a ruling ordering Ottawa to pay compensation to First Nations children removed from their homes, but also said the parties have agreed to work towards a resolution by December.

READ MORE: Ottawa pausing court appeal filed on Indigenous compensation, will work to strike deal

“We are closer than we have been previously,” said Archibald. “So. that’s an important part of why the AFN executive committee, which is all the regional chiefs across Canada, has agreed to enter into these intense negotiations to see if we can get to a settlement that is fair.”

In 2016, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal found Ottawa discriminated against First Nations children by knowingly underfunding child and family services for those living on reserve.

In a joint statement Friday after the appeal was filed, Indigenous Services Minister Patty Hajdu, Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Marc Miller and Justice Minister David Lametti said the parties “have agreed to pause litigation” on the tribunal’s decision.

5:11Miller says ‘serious discussion’ needed to determine how compensation would be distributed

Archibald said she could not discuss in-depth details of the impending talks, but supported the human rights tribunal’s statement that the children were eligible for $40,000 in federal compensation.

The tribunal said each First Nations child, along with their parents or grandparents, who were separated because of this chronic underfunding were eligible to receive $40,000 in federal compensation, which was the maximum amount it could award.

It has been estimated some 54,000 children and their families could qualify, meaning Ottawa could be in line to pay more than $2 billion.

Archibald said any federal compensation paid to Indigenous children removed from their homes would be a recognition of the harms that were caused, but does not make amends for the damage done in the process.

She said compensation does not equate to justice.

But the national chief said a compensation settlement would signal the government is on the path toward that goal as well as ending discrimination against First Nations children.

“Compensation is a legal recognition that you have been harmed and that you deserve to be compensated from that harm,” Archibald said. “If we can get to a settlement, this will signal we are on the right path.”
4:41Miller details why government pausing court appeal filed on Indigenous compensation


Archibald, elected national chief in July, said she has “reasonable and fair” expectation the federal government and Indigenous nations will walk together toward reconciliation.


“That healing path forward together will be based upon concrete actions, more than it will be on discussions and words,” she said.

Indigenous groups have been highly critical of the federal government’s decision to appeal, with some welcoming the settlement talks, while others called it a stalling tactic.

“Our First Nations children are our most vital and valuable resource,” said Chief Bobby Cameron in a statement from Saskatchewan’s Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations.

READ MORE: Ottawa should not appeal tribunal order to pay Indigenous kids: advocates

“This federal government has taken them from their homes and communities and then dragged them through years of litigation and court,” he said. “Enough is enough.”

B.C.’s First Nations Leadership Council, representing the political wing of the province’s three major Indigenous organizations, said in a statement the government must fulfill its obligations to the children.

“Nothing changes if nothing changes, and we demand this government put their money where their mouth is,” said Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs. “Stop fighting First Nations kids in court, uphold our rights, and take action that supports meaningful and real reconciliation.”


Ottawa appeals First Nations child welfare ruling but launches talks with parties

OTTAWA — The federal government is appealing a ruling ordering Ottawa to pay First Nations children removed from their homes, but the parties have agreed to sit down starting Monday in hopes they can reach a financial settlement outside of court.

  
© Provided by The Canadian Press

The government filed the notice of appeal late Friday before the Federal Court of Appeal closed, along with its legal window to do so.

Many Canadians, Indigenous leaders, parliamentarians and advocates were watching for what the government would do, as the case has been seen by some as a test of the Liberals' commitment to reconciliation.

In 2016, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal found Ottawa discriminated against First Nations children by knowingly underfunding child and family services for those living on reserve.

Litigants in the case first brought forward in 2007, say this led to thousands of kids being apprehended from their families and enduring abuse and suffering in provincial foster care systems.

The tribunal said each First Nations child, along with their parents or grandparents, who were separated because of this chronic underfunding were eligible to receive $40,000 in federal compensation, which was the maximum amount it could award.

It has been estimated some 54,000 children and their families could qualify, meaning Ottawa could be on the hook to pay more than $2 billion.


The tribunal also ruled that the criteria needed to be expanded so more First Nations children could be eligible for Jordan's Principle, a rule designed to ensure jurisdictional disputes over who pays for what doesn't prevent kids from accessing government services.

In 2019, the federal government asked the Federal Court to dismiss the tribunal's decisions. Part of its arguments, according to a court summary, was awarding individual compensation meant there needed to be proof of individual harm.


The Federal Court upheld the orders last month and Friday was the final day for the government to file an appeal.

In a joint statement Friday after the appeal was filed, Indigenous Services Minister Patty Hajdu, Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Marc Miller and Justice Minister David Lametti said the parties "have agreed to pause litigation" on the tribunal's decision.

"We have agreed to sit down immediately and work towards reaching a global resolution by December on outstanding issues that have been the subject of litigation," the statement said.

"This means that while Canada filed what is known as a protective appeal of the Federal Court decision … the appeal will be on hold and the focus will be squarely on reaching an agreement outside of court and at the table."

The parties to the case are the federal government, the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society and the Assembly of First Nations.


Cindy Blackstock, executive director of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, said in an interview she was disappointed by the federal government's appeal.

She said the pause for talks would focus on making child and family services "equitable," to ensure the federal government increases funding for First Nations families.

"We will not negotiate under any circumstances a reduction in the compensation," she said.

National Chief RoseAnne Archibald of the Assembly of First Nations said in a statement that while discouraged by another appeal, "we are encouraged that a deadline will be set to negotiate a settlement on this matter."

Deputy Grand Chief Bobby Narcisse of the Nishnawbe Aski Nation, which represents First Nations in northern Ontario and is also a party to the case, called the process frustrating.

The ministers' statement added that in addition to fair compensation for those who have been harmed, the government is also committing to significant investments to address long-term reform of First Nations child and family services.

At a news conference Friday evening, Miller said there was no intention to reduce any amounts paid to children who were removed from their homes, but acknowledged those fighting for compensation are skeptical.

"Trust is thin," he said. "I can't guarantee success on this, but I can guarantee you we'll do our utmost."

Miller said there is no simple answer as to why Ottawa doesn't just pay victims the money awarded by the tribunal.

He said if the government implemented the orders as is, members of other class-action lawsuits representing other groups of First Nations children would not receive compensation, and that the matter crosses into different jurisdictions.

"We could implement the (tribunal's) orders, as written, tomorrow," he said. "It would not fix the system which continues to be broken. It would advance very little on long-term reform."

"We are juggling very, very complex legal files and when people lawyer up, people get dug in."

He said the government is putting "a very significant financial package" forward to pay children who have suffered harm while in child-welfare systems, including those behind other class actions. He said he cannot disclose the specific amount but the government knows that proper compensation would amount to "billions of dollars."

Asked directly whether each First Nations child, their parents and grandparents impacted by the system would receive $40,000 each, he repeated that the details of the package were private.

"There are children who are entitled to more than $40,000, that's clear," he added later in the news conference.

Miller said the talks have the potential to be "messy," but he added: "Messy is good. That's where we figure things out."

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said it was "deeply disappointing" but sadly not surprising that the Liberal government decided to appeal the ruling.

"For the past six years, Justin Trudeau has said nice things about reconciliation, but unfortunately, at every opportunity, he fails to back that up with meaningful action," Singh said in a statement.

In the notice of appeal, the government says Canada acknowledges the finding of systemic discrimination and does not oppose the general principle that First Nations individuals who experienced pain and suffering as a result of government misconduct should be compensated.

"Awarding compensation to individuals in the manner ordered by the Tribunal, however, was inconsistent with the nature of the complaint, the evidence, past jurisprudence and the Canadian Human Rights Act," it says.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 29, 2021.

— with files from Marie Woolf

Stephanie Taylor, The Canadian Press
Report finds Alberta’s ‘fly-in, fly-out’ oilsands workers face significant stress, reluctant to seek help

By Phil Heidenreich Global News
Posted October 26, 2021 

 Oilfield workers who fly in and out of work camps can face immense pressures. A recent University of Alberta study is shedding light on the toll the stressful conditions can take on their mental health. 

A new report looking at the mental health and well-being of “fly-in, fly-out” (FIFO) workers employed in Alberta’s oilsands suggests more needs to be done to help employees deal with significant stress that comes from living in work camps.

“The report I think in many ways solidifies things that people anecdotally know already about the impacts of fly-in, fly-out work on workers’ mental health and well-being,” said Sara Dorow, a sociologist at the University of Alberta who co-authored the report. “I would say that if anything surprised us it was some of the degree to which some of these issues were affecting workers.

“We know already that being away from home and family is difficult… What we didn’t anticipate perhaps is the degree to which people report that being a problem.”

The report saw 72 oilsands workers be interviewed in late 2019 and early 2020 before follow-up interviews were conducted a few months later. Most of those interviewed were workers who arrive from other places in Alberta and
across Canada “for rotations of six to 21 days, living in work camps while working 10- or 12-hour shifts at nearby worksites,” according to the report.

READ MORE: Inside the oilsands site that has seen Canada’s largest workplace COVID-19 outbreak

The study found 87 per of participants reported either some or a lot of stress from being far away from loved ones.

“The difficulty of establishing and maintaining relationships with family, feelings of loneliness and the inability to be at home for family events or emergencies are significant stressors among FIFO workers,” the report reads.

Seventy-seven per cent of the study’s participants reported either some or a lot of stress from living in work camps, either because they felt trapped, had limited or unhealthy food options, poor sleep or other reasons.

Over two-thirds of participants reported stress from their commute to work.

“Participants’ ratings of general mental health and daily stress are worse than is found in the population,” the report reads. “About half rated their mental health as very good or excellent (46%) or rated most days as somewhat or very stressful (51%).

“Nearly half (46%) of survey participants had diagnosed long-term health conditions, with half of these (51%) describing their conditions as mental or both mental and physical. These proportions are higher than is reported in the general population.

“More than one-third of participants (35%) had sought help for their mental health (counselling, medication, and/or information) in the past year — twice as high as reported in the general population. The most frequent reasons cited for seeking help were family and relationship issues, anxiety, depression, trauma, and general mental health.”

While over three-quarters of the study’s participants said they had access to health-care services while at work or in camp, over half of those people “indicated they would not use these services; this was especially true for
health care offered on site, where 57 per cent of participants with access to these services indicated they were ‘not likely’ to use them.”

“People were really concerned about losing a job or keeping a job if they were to report a serious health issue,” Dorow said. “This is exacerbated by the fact we had a lot of contract workers in the study.

“This is of grave concern… We do know that in the construction trades for example, there is a higher rate of suicide. And so actually making sure that there is a space for people to… report mental health issues is really crucial.”

READ MORE: Alberta documentary sheds light on men in the oilpatch and suicides

Dorow said some participants feared there would be repercussions for seeking mental support like damage to their reputation or being more likely to be laid off or not rehired.

“There can be kind of a tough guy thing: ‘You just have to tough it out,'” she said. “This is deepened by fly-in, fly-out.”

Dorow said the work is simply a way to make money for many employees and that there is a culture that pushes workers to accept the stress as simply part of the job.

“To say that this is not for the weak-minded is clearly a problem in the sense that there may be conditions that are being ignored,” she said.

Sexual harassment and discrimination

The report says over two-thirds of female participants reported experiencing discrimination at work.

“Some of the gendered findings are really important,” Dorow said. “I was surprised by how many women reported discrimination and harassment… But also the impacts of fly-in, fly-out on women… There was a much higher proportion of women who reported difficulty sleeping in camp.”

Dorow, who said she has been conducting research in the oilsands on and off for about 15 years, said she believes some of the issues highlighted in the report could be addressed relatively simply, like ensuring walls are thick enough that someone at a work camp can’t hear snoring in the room next to them, or ensuring healthy food choices are made available.

“We also found in our report some evidence of cumulative effects of the longer you do this, the more there might be cumulative effects of work/life imbalance and stress and strain,” she said. “It really needs to be looked at systematically.”

Dorow said ensuring workers feel comfortable accessing mental health supports is a key issue.

“How do we create a supportive environment…where psychosocial safety is front and centre… So people feel like they can come forward if they have issues and can get safe third-party help when they need it.”

Dorow said the study was “not as systematic as we would have hoped,” and she hopes more research is done on the subject to spur governments, companies and workers to work together to address the issues at hand.

© 2021 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

'They’re not listening': Alberta mayors and First Nations caution against provincial police force


Adam Lachacz
CTVNewsEdmonton.ca Digital Producer
Follow Contact
Updated Oct. 30, 2021 6:46 p.m. MDT

EDMONTON -

Groups across Alberta are cautioning the province against ditching the RCMP and creating its own police force.

Justice Minister Kaycee Madu said Friday that an Alberta police force would give the province more flexibility to respond to rural crime, as he released a third-party report from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC).

That report outlined it would cost Alberta about $735 million each year to operate its police force, in addition to a projected $366 million in startup costs.

According to the review, it costs Alberta about $500 million annually to pay for the RCMP. The federal government provides $170 million through a cost-sharing agreement to offload some costs.

Currently, the province has 1,480 Mounties that police rural areas, First Nations, and communities that do not have municipal forces.

“I’m still uncertain as to what is the problem the province is trying to solve by proposing a provincial police force,” said Tanya Thorn, Okotoks mayor and Alberta Urban Municipalities Association board member.

“I don’t understand why we need to create a whole new structure to solve a problem we’re already working on, and we’ve seen improvements on.”

RCMP Assistant Commissioner Curtis Zablocki, head of the Mounties in Alberta, said they look forward to hearing and acting on what Albertans have to say.

“We know that Albertans want an active role in community safety and in deciding how their policing services are provided,” Zablocki said.

In Thorn’s view, a provincial police force is a cost municipalities cannot afford to bear.

“If it’s not giving us better value, if it’s not allowing us to increase service levels to our residents, why would we take on more costs?”

Irfan Sabir, justice critic for the Opposition NDP, said Madu is misleading Albertans by suggesting a new police service would be cost-neutral. Sabir warned there would be a tax increase to pay for it.

“The report clearly states it will cost more,” Sabir said.

Madu said he believes the government could fund the police force and would not seek additional money from municipalities.

“We do have a responsibility beyond the monetary implications to defend and pursue our province’s best interests,” he added.

“Ontario has done this. Quebec has done this. Newfoundland and Labrador has done this. And I think the time has come for our province to do the same.”



For Marlene Poitras, Assembly of First Nations Alberta regional chief, a provincial police force would not solve issues facing Indigenous Albertans.

Three First Nations have their own police forces in Alberta, something Poitras believes is a better approach.

“First Nations know what the issues are, they're the experts in their communities as to what will work and what won’t work,” Poitras added. “It’s critical that First Nations are involved in these discussions at the outset.

“A lot of the First Nations are working on developing their own nationhood and asserting their jurisdiction and authority,” she said. “The federal government will be moving toward consulting with First Nations on developing legislation developing First Nations policing as an essential service.”

Alberta’s contract with the RCMP ends in 2032. The province says it wants to survey the public next year about what they think about a provincial police force.

“They’re not listening to what they’re being told already,” Thorn said. “From our members with AUMA, there’s a 90 per cent response that we do not want to shift.”

Kevin Zahara, Edson’s mayor, sent a letter to Madu stating the town’s opposition to an Alberta police force.

“We have worked hard as a municipality to build a strong working relationship with our local RCMP Detachment,” Zahara wrote. “They are our partners and an integral part of our community. We are happy with the level of service our RCMP provide.”

The mayor added that Edson would prefer to see the funds the province is currently using to research creating a police force to augment the partnership with the RCMP.

“The Province repeatedly encourages municipalities to work with each other and come up with new and collaborative ways to provide programs and services to our residents in a cost-effective manner,” Zahara said.

“We implore your Government (Madu) to do the same and work with your Federal counterparts to achieve the Province’s goals related to the RCMP and Policing and to emulate the principles in which they ask of municipal governments within the Province.”


With files from CTV News Edmonton’s Amanda Anderson and The Canadian Press’ Dean Bennett

02:09
Does Alberta need a provincial police force?

Alberta mayors raise concerns about provincial police force report
Author of the article:Dylan Short
Publishing date:Oct 30, 2021 •

Stock photo of Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) logo at K-Division headquarters in Edmonton. PHOTO BY LARRY WONG /Postmedia


Mayors of Alberta municipalities are raising concerns over future costs and are urging the province to hold better consultations after the justice ministry released a report on transitioning away from using RCMP to a provincial police department.


The Government of Alberta released the report conducted by PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLC on Friday showing a provincial police force could cost Albertans more but provide more services and front-line officers. The report found if the change is made, Alberta would pay between $734 million and $759 million annually and the transition itself would cost $366 million over a six-year term.


Currently, RCMP policing Alberta costs $672 million annually. Alberta pays $318 million towards that sum, while municipalities contribute $176 million and the federal government provides $170 million. Alberta Sheriffs currently cost an additional $41 million.


If Alberta were to move to a provincial police department, the province would no longer receive federal funding. Under the current model, RCMP provides policing services to 47 municipalities and 22 First Nation communities. There are several municipalities, including Calgary, with their own standalone police service.

Tanya Thorn, mayor of Okotoks, said Saturday she had looked over the report at a high level and was continuing to work through the rest of its100 pages. She said the potential loss of federal dollars is a concern for her.

Thorn also said she is concerned about what would happen to infrastructure in Alberta currently owned by RCMP.

“I think my initial reaction to (the report), which has been probably my reaction to the discussion through this all the way along is, what is the problem we are trying to solve?” said Thorn. “I don’t understand at the high level why we feel we need to reinvent a wheel from what we’ve currently got operating.”

The province commissioned the report — which does not make a recommendation on whether the province should change its policing model — in response to the Fair Deal Panel report that examined Alberta’s place within the Canadian federation. That report recommended Alberta should explore creating its own police service.

THIS CAN ONLY HAPPEN IF UCP PAYS PROVINCIAL COPS LESS THAN RCMP

Justice Minister Kaycee Madu said on Friday no decision has been made on whether the province will create its own police force. He said such a service would be more responsive than the RCMP, would better integrate operations and would train officers locally. The report found a provincial police department would increase the number of front-line officers to 4,189 from 4,030.

“At the end of the day, I am confident that it would be at the same amount or lower than what we currently spend on RCMP, but as a province, we do have a responsibility beyond the monetary implications to defend and pursue our province’s best interests,” said Madu during a news conference Friday.

He did not explicitly say how the province would make up for lost federal funds but said the cost to Alberta’s municipalities would not increase and there would not be a tax increase.

Thorn said Saturday those reassurance did little to comfort her concerns.

“There’s been lots of statements made around how there will be no changes to x, and you can substitute a lot of examples in this province where they’ve turned around and changed x,” said Thorn. “There was going to be no changes to the big cities charters while they abolish them. We weren’t going to download any cost to municipalities but we’ve seen a significant downloading of costs in the last few years.”

Thorn said the report is also vague on how municipalities would be charged for their costs. She said Okotoks currently pays for 90 per cent of their police costs while the federal government pays the remaining 10 per cent, however other municipalities pay varying amounts. She said she was unsure how that would be affected moving forward without the RCMP.

ONLY KENNEY SPEAKS FOR UCP GOVT.

Requests for comment sent to the Madu’s office were not returned Saturday afternoon
MINISTERS MAKE ANNOUNCEMENTS ONLY

Edson Mayor Kevin Zahara went online Friday to reiterate his opposition to the provincial police report. He reposted a letter he penned to Madu as well as Premier Jason Kenney in May saying he supported the RCMP. He said he does not believe it is realistic that a switch to a provincial police would not cost municipalities more money.

“Just refer to our letter in your upcoming smoke and mirrors road show. This idea is driven by ideology and nothing else,” Zahara wrote on Twitter Friday.

The Alberta Urban Municipalities Association (AUMA) released a statement Friday saying it welcomed the report but that it believes some “important questions” were not asked by the authors and that the review may be missing key information. They called for a referendum to be put to Albertans before any decision is made on removing the RCMP.


“The AUMA maintains that a fair and democratic referendum on the establishment of a provincial police service should occur if the Government of Alberta decides it wants to go this route. Premier Jason Kenney said as much in November 2019, and we expect him to honour his commitment,” read the statement. “If all Albertans must pay for something, then all Albertans must have a say in the decision.”

A timeline provided by the report shows consultations with communities could begin as early as November.

— With files from Ashley Joannou and Lisa Johnson

dshort@postmedia.com

Treaty 8 rejects provincial police service contemplated by Alberta


Shari Narine
Windspeaker.com
The Local Journalism Initiative
Updated Oct. 29, 2021 9:57 p.m. MDT

Treaty 8 is not in favour of a provincial police force in Alberta, a sentiment Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Chief Allan Adam says was shared with Justice Minister and Solicitor General Kaycee Madu in July.

“We mentioned that to Minister Madu at a meeting in High Level. It was addressed to him there with all the chiefs at the table and I brought it to Minister Madu's attention. I told him we weren't interested,” said Adam, who also serves as grand chief of Justice for Treaty 8.

“Ever since then, Minister Madu hasn't answered my phone call or text messages at all.”


Today Madu announced the province's interest in following up on a report that it commissioned from Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC) to examine the transition of policing services from the RCMP to an Alberta Provincial Police Service (APPS). He committed to consulting with Indigenous communities.



“I have been clear from day one that it was important for me for all of our Indigenous communities and leaders to be fully consulted on what this would mean to their communities. Ultimately we want to partner with them, we want to collaborate with them to ensure their communities are safe. And I have directed my department to begin that particular effort,” said Madu in a news conference.

PwC undertook the transition study from October 2020 to April 2021.

In its 100-page final report, PwC reiterated the call by the Indigenous participants in the transition study for “fulsome engagement” by the province.

“This project had limited discussion with First Nations and Metis groups in Alberta in the development of this report (and) that is not considered sufficient engagement with those communities,” reads the report.

PwC has put forward a proposed model for APPS which it says focuses on “innovation, community engagement and collaboration, problem solving and proactive community policing.”

Presently police services for First Nations communities are provided by RCMP members in detachments off-reserve or through community tripartite agreements, which enhance police services (in place in 22 First Nations). As well, there are three standalone First Nations police services in Alberta-the Blood Tribe, Tsuut'ina First Nations and the Lakeshore Regional Police Service-that serve seven First Nations.

Policing for Metis Settlements is provided through Provincial Policing Service Agreements.

The new model proposed by PwC sets out concepts for policing in Indigenous communities to include increased autonomy of the communities to “lead and define” how policing is delivered; specialized police training; an Indigenous advisory panel that would report to the chief of police; and exploring ways that APPS could support the creation and viability of self-administered First Nations Police Services.

This is not what Treaty 8 is after, says Adam.

The support they want from the province would be for a tripartite agreement that sees help in funding a Treaty 8 police force.

“We've been treated wrong for a long time and it's time to fix the problem. And the only way we can do it is to have our own police force,” Adam said.

He sees no advantage in a provincial police force.

“I view the city police in Edmonton or in Calgary as far more dangerous than the RCMP are when it comes to handling reports to First Nations people just based on evidence that I see when it's being broadcast on the news or footage on postings on Facebook on behaviours,” he said.

Adam points to the recent dismantling of a protest tipi camp on the Alberta legislature grounds. Edmonton Police Service moved in and arrested the “elderly women” there.

“That's a provincial police. They have no respect,” he said.

Madu continually drew on the strength of the Ontario Provincial Police and Surete du Quebec for reason's why Alberta could have its own successful police force.

However, Windspeaker.com brought to the minister's attention strained relationships Indigenous peoples have with the provincial police forces in both Ontario and Quebec.

Madu said the same relationship would not happen in Alberta because “we are going to sit down with them to figure out with them the policing priorities of their communities that is culturally sensitive and in line with their expectations of safety and overall wellbeing of their people and their nations.”

Adam is concerned that a provincial police force would not know how to handle rural situations.

“The fact remains, the RCMP have a good understanding of what's going on. They know the areas outside of the cities. We rely on them still … They still answer to the calls. We have to continue to work with them,” he said.

However, he says Treaty 8's priority still is creating its own police force.

“(Alberta) would finally realize how easy it is to work with First Nations instead of going against them. We will work with the Alberta judicial system,” said Adam.

Madu was repeatedly pressed during the news conference to explain how a loss of $200 million from the federal government in RCMP funding to Alberta, would be made up. He insisted taxes would not rise.

“It will be more cost effective for this province to establish their own provincial police. But more than anything else it is important that I make this particular point: As Justice minister I took an oath to defend our province's best interest. And, ultimately this is part of that calculation,” said Madu.

Consultation, both virtual and in-person (depending on coronavirus pandemic measures), will take place from November to early spring 2022. A public survey will also be undertaken.

Madu insisted the government had not made a decision on transitioning from the RCMP to a provincial police services and more “analysis and consultation” was required.

If the nod is given, the transition will be a phased in over five to six years.

“The provincial government... and municipalities through the Police Funding Model... have made significant investments in the Alberta RCMP as their provincial police service, and we have been using those investments to respond to the needs of citizens and communities-moving forward many operational goals and innovative policing initiatives,” said Deputy Commissioner Curtis Zablocki, commanding officer of the Alberta RCMP.


Braid: UCP would kick out the Mounties, but maybe they want to go

What if the RCMP really wants to get out of all deals with provinces, cities and small municipalities?

Author of the article: Don Braid • Calgary Herald
Publishing date: Oct 29, 2021 • 
Members of the Canmore RCMP dressed in their ceremonial red serge march down Main Street in Canmore during a Canada Day parade. The provincial government is discussing creating a provincial police force to replace the RCMP. 
SunMedia

The little city of Dieppe, New Brunswick, population 25,000, may hold the key to Alberta’s gung-ho drive to create a provincial police force.


Mayor Yvon LaPierre said this week: “As we know now, in six years from now, they are going to withdraw — the RCMP is going to withdraw from municipal and provincial policing.

“The RCMP’s not going to be here doing municipal policing. We got that memo, as the old saying goes.”


Six years is exactly the time cited Friday by Alberta Justice Minister Kaycee Madu for creating a provincial force to replace the RCMP in rural and small communities all over Alberta.


UCP LIES

It’s a massive undertaking. No matter what Madu says (and he hotly denies it), a new provincial force could cost Albertans far more than the current system, in which the federal government contributes part of the funding.

Alberta Justice Minister and Solicitor General Kaycee Madu speaks to media in Calgary and online on Friday, October 29, 2021. Alberta is exploring the benefits of a provincial police service. Jim Wells/Postmedia

But the UCP is hell-bent to do this. To make sure it happens, whatever we think, they will not hold one of their beloved referendums.


It would all make sense, though, if the Mounties really are planning to pull out of community and provincial agreements in eight provinces and three territories — everywhere but Ontario and Quebec, which have their own provincial forces.

(Newfoundland and Labrador has its storied Constabulary, but the RCMP does a portion of the policing.)

If such a transition were thrust on the country, there would have to be massive federal assistance to provinces forced to convert. Maybe that’s why Madu sounds so confident about the cost.

The talk of a Mountie pullout plan is widely but quietly cited within the Alberta government as one rationale for a provincial force.

Some think it’s just talk, rather cynically used to propel the plan for an Alberta force.


In beautiful New Brunswick, other politicians said they’d heard about the Mountie pullout only as a rumour. The RCMP itself refused to comment.

But to several police sources, it’s a given — and certainly no secret in Ottawa.


In June, a Commons committee led by Justin Trudeau’s Liberals recommended that “the government of Canada explore the possibility of ending contract policing within the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and that the government work with the provinces, territories and municipalities to help those interested establish their own provincial and territorial police services.”

In Alberta, it’s widely assumed that the province would eject the Mounties by withdrawing from federal contracts that don’t officially expire until the 2030s.

But what if the RCMP really wants to get out of all deals with provinces, cities and small municipalities?
The Alberta government is exploring the benefits of a provincial police service that would replace the RCMP as the main law enforcement agency in the province.
 PHOTO BY MARK TAYLOR/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Police sources say community work has pulled the force away from its mandate to fight crime of national importance, including terrorism, anti-terrorism, organized crime, border security, major commercial crime, cybercrime and much else.

These areas are understaffed and underfunded, this argument goes, because so many recruits end up on contract work. At a time when recruitment is more difficult than ever, national problems need to take priority.

There’s also the problem of “getting stuck in the goo,” as one source said.

Mounties feel their reputation as upstanding defenders in red serge is being undercut by a stream of stories about local officers in trouble.

In Alberta, for instance, two officers are charged with manslaughter in the death of Clayton Crawford, who was shot multiple times inside his car on July 3, 2018.

In June 2020, a video showed an officer violently tackling Athabasca First Nations Chief Allan Adam, causing widespread outrage.

MORE ON THIS TOPIC

Survivors of Metis man fatally shot by Mounties file lawsuit alleging racial discrimination may have played a role


Northern Alberta chief accuses RCMP of beating him in casino parking lot


While they don’t deny that RCMP officers make mistakes, Mountie traditionalists say the force should no longer be involved in local policing at all.

The UCP, meanwhile, believe they’ll look like geniuses when the RCMP pullout is announced. Alberta would be far ahead of everybody else and eligible for transition money.

If it doesn’t happen? Well, they’d still have the provincial force as a symbol of Alberta’s “autonomy.”


Don Braid’s column appears regularly in the Calgary Herald.

Twitter: @DonBraid

Facebook: Don Braid Politics