Monday, April 25, 2022

Highly contagious marine epidemic rips through Caribbean’s coral reefs

Scientists collect coral samples at the Yellow Bank reef near the Bahamas’ Exumas Islands. SCTLD has now been confirmed in 22 countries and territories across the Caribbean and can spread at the rate of a mile a month.
Photograph: Chicago Tribune/TNS/Getty

Frustration among scientists as many islands, hard hit by Covid and hurricanes, struggle to fight stony coral tissue loss disease



CJ Clouse
Sat 23 Apr 2022
THE GUARDIAN

Krista Sherman understands ocean conservation work takes a good deal of patience. But the Bahamian-born marine scientist had never encountered a foe like stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD), and after efforts to monitor and treat the highly contagious outbreak in the Bahamas’ corals stalled, her patience was running thin.

“The disease is spreading really quickly. In some areas where we’ve been able to assess the rate of spread, we’re looking at a mile a month,” says Sherman, a researcher with the Bahamas-based Perry Institute for Marine Science.

“There’s a shift taking place at some sites, from healthy, vibrant reefs to what looks like a coral graveyard. And it’s really devastating to see; it’s just heartbreaking.”

A researcher cuts a Pseudodiploria strigosa, or brain coral, with a chisel to remove a portion being killed by SCTLD in the US Virgin Islands.
 Photograph: Lucas Jackson/Reuters

First discovered in Florida in 2014, the disease, which scientists believe is carried by ocean currents and commercial ships, has now been confirmed in 22 countries and territories across the Caribbean, according to data compiled by the Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment (AGRRA), a conservation organisation that has been tracking the outbreak.

SCTLD afflicts more than 20 coral species – including some of the largest and most important reef-building corals, which can take centuries to grow – eating away at their soft tissue until nothing but a skeleton remains. Infected colonies can be wiped out in months. Algae moves in, leaving large swaths of a once-colourful reef covered in dull grey-green or red-brown fuzz.

Scientists have yet to pinpoint the pathogen that causes the disease. So far, the only effective treatment involves applying antibiotic paste on to individual corals, a labour-intensive and expensive method. Once SCTLD infects a colony, any delay in response means more dead coral. Yet those involved in treatment efforts across the Caribbean say obstacles to their work are common – from pandemic lockdowns to lack of funding and government bureaucracy.

In the Bahamas, where SCTLD was first confirmed in December 2019, efforts to slow the spread were held up while researchers waited for the government to issue the permit required for them to study and treat the illness.

Composite showing the advance of SCTLD in a single coral colony of the Meandrina meandrites species off Puerto Rico. From left: healthy, diseased and dead coral. Photograph: Catalina Morales

Local conservationists grew so frustrated that they began sounding the alarm publicly. The pressure seemed to work. On 18 March, the Bahamas’ Department of Environmental Planning and Protection permitted work to go ahead until June, when researchers will have to re-apply.

Across the Caribbean, “pretty much everybody is lagging behind because of how quickly this disease progresses”, says Miguel Figuerola Hernández, a coral reef specialist with the Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (DNER). “You really need to have an emergency fund just waiting for these kinds of disasters.”

SCTLD was also confirmed in Puerto Rico in December 2019, and in the two years since then, efforts to treat the disease have not matched the scale of the problem, largely because of funding constraints. There are now outbreaks of the disease all around the main island as well as on reefs near the smaller islands of Vieques and Culebra.

Despite the threat to the island’s environment and economy, it was not until August 2021 that the governor of Puerto Rico, Pedro Pierluisi, declared an ecological state of emergency over the coral disease, allocating $1m (£750,000) in emergency funding to the DNER to tackle the crisis. The agency submitted a strategic response plan in December, which was approved in March.
I hate the idea [of using antibiotics]. But you know what I hate more? Watching everything dieSimon Walsh, dive-shop owner in Dominica

The funding would allow the DNER to to conduct crucial research and to support 11 small groups of volunteers with the resources they needed, Figuerola Hernández says, including a long-term study of corals’ response to the antibiotic treatment. So far, Figuerola Hernández and his colleagues have seen up to 70% effectiveness.

Meanwhile, the DNER has teamed up with local conservation organisations, and corporate donations have helped provide antibiotics, scuba gear and other supplies to volunteers. Nevertheless, there has not been enough money for key necessities, such as fuel for boats, says Nilda Jiménez-Marrero, the agency’s endangered species programme coordinator.

“We will lose a lot,” she says. “This is a very aggressive condition.

“The reefs will not be the same. But we will save what we can and hope they can come back from that.”

Scale is a big challenge across the region. Puerto Rico alone has nearly 5,000 sq km (2,000 sq miles) of coral reefs. Treatment involves identifying priority sites with the greatest abundance of large, old corals, then treating thousands of individuals. The quantity of amoxicillin antibiotic ointment necessary to treat 30 to 90 corals costs nearly $1,000.

In some cases, government action may also be delayed because officials resist publicly acknowledging the disease for fear that it will affect tourism, says Judith Lang, a marine biologist who heads AGRRA.

Antibiotic paste is applied to corals at risk from SCTLD at the University of the Virgin Islands in St Thomas. 
Photograph: L Jackson/Reuters

“They’re already suffering the consequences of the Covid pandemic, and the thought of tourists staying away because of this is really scary,” she says.

Travel and tourism contribute more than 15% of the Caribbean’s GDP and nearly 14% of its jobs. For some, Covid shutdowns came on the heels of extreme weather events.

“First it was [Hurricane] Maria, then Covid, and now this,” says Simon Walsh, a dive-shop owner in Dominica who has been spearheading SCTLD treatment efforts there.

In March, Resilient Dominica (REZDM), a local programme created in response to Hurricane Maria, agreed to provide $90,000 to pay three marine park wardens to monitor and treat SCTLD for a year.

This was welcome news, says Walsh. Until now, he has been working with other volunteers to treat the coral, financed by revenue from the island’s Soufriere-Scott’s Head marine reserve, private donations and their own money. Walsh does the work despite not being a fan of antibiotics in the water. “I hate the idea,” he says. “But you know what I hate more? Watching everything die.”

Some countries, such as the Dominican Republic, prohibit antibiotics in the open ocean due to concerns about long-term effects such as antibiotic resistance, and some scientists share this apprehension.

“We may be controlling the advance of the disease, but we may be killing some of the essential bacteria that corals and other organisms need,” says Ernesto Weil, a professor of marine science at the University of Puerto Rico.


Scientists recreate reefs in labs to stem the plague killing coral – in pictures


Because SCTLD is so aggressive, he believes treating infected coral may not be the best use of resources, especially as researchers still do not know the exact cause. “We should concentrate our resources and energy after the disease goes through the reefs and then work with the survivors, because those survivors are resistant colonies,” he says.

Back in the Bahamas, researchers and volunteers have begun treating coral, starting in the waters around New Providence island. The Perry Institute and its partners also aim to establish a coral “gene bank” to preserve Bahamian corals in the Atlantis resort aquarium. Though smaller in scale, it will be similar to coral rescue efforts in Florida, where scientists have collected vulnerable corals and sent them to aquariums around the country in the hope of one day repopulating Florida’s reefs.

“There are so many people tackling these issues, so that gives me hope,” Sherman says. “I don’t know exactly what coral reefs will look like in the future, but their continued existence really depends on us.”

Environmental DNA reveals secret reef inhabitants

coral reef
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

An international research team uses a global sampling of seawater to reveal which tropical reef fish occur where. To identify species and families, they successfully used the residual DNA shed by the animals present in the water. But not all fish can be traced in this way.

Tropical  are colorful, beautiful—and rich in species. The diversity among fish is particularly high: researchers estimate that coral reefs are home to as many as 8,000 species of fish worldwide.

However,  and human activities are causing coral reefs to disappear at an alarming rate, and how many species of reef fish there are and where they are distributed has not yet been accurately quantified.

One reason is that many fish species lead very secretive lives, are very similar to each other or live partly in the open sea and are therefore difficult to detect. To record the presence of fish in an area, biodiversity research has mostly depended on visual observations by divers (or catching fish).

Now, a new method is making its way into ecology that circumvents such difficulties: environmental DNA (eDNA). The idea of this new approach is that organisms leave their genetic material or parts of it in the environment.

With this approach, the researchers have only to take water samples at one location, isolate the DNA (fragments) contained therein and sequence them, i.e. determine the order of DNA building blocks. Then they can compare the sequences with reference DNA sequences that come from reliably identified specimens—and can determine whether a species occurs at the location in question.

This is the method used by an international team led by researchers from the University of Montpellier (France) and ETH Zurich to study the occurrence of reef fish.

In 2017 and 2019, the researchers collected 226 water samples at 26 sites in 5 tropical marine regions. They isolated and analyzed the DNA, which they then assigned to the corresponding species or families.

One-sixth greater diversity detected

Using eDNA, the researchers found a 16 percent higher diversity of reef fishes than through conventional survey methods such as visual observations during dives. "Thanks to the eDNA method, we can detect many fish species and families much faster than with observations alone," says Loïc Pellissier, Professor of Ecosystems and Landscape Evolution at ETH Zurich. He is one of the two lead authors of a study that has just been published in the scientific journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. The DNA analyses were completed after only two years, but the visual observations that informed the study came from countless observers and cover 13 years of observation activity.

With the new approach, the researchers discovered more species swimming in the open water (pelagic), reef-bound species, and species that inhabit the numerous caves and crevices in reefs (cryptobenthic). Divers see or identify such fish with less frequency.

Many of the recorded pelagic species prefer the open sea or greater depths. Some belong to families that avoid divers or do not live permanently in coral reefs, such as mackerel and tuna in the family Scombridae as well as sharks from the family Carcharhinidae (requiem sharks, e.g. the blacktip reef shark).

The discovery of these species is important because they are actively involved in the function of a coral reef through their pelagic larval stages or their nocturnal migrations to the reef. The role these fishes play in the ecosystem is thus often underestimated.

Visual observations are (still) necessary

However, not all species can be recorded equally easily using eDNA, such as wrasses (Labridae) or blennies (Blenniidae). Reference databases cover these species-rich families only partially, Pellissier says. Because of these gaps, a considerable part of the eDNA found in the  has not yet been assigned.

To further develop the approach, the researchers are hard at work sequencing the DNA of more  and feeding the data into the reference databases. Nevertheless, dives will still be needed to record some species that are poorly detected with eDNA, but also to gather supplementary information such as fish sizes or biomass, which cannot (yet) be recovered from eDNA.

Extraordinary diversity in the Coral Triangle

The researchers also confirmed earlier findings that the composition of species varies widely among marine bioregions. Fish diversity is exceptionally high in the "Coral Triangle" between Borneo, Papua New Guinea and the Philippines—up to five times higher than in the Caribbean, for example. Herbivores (including coral-eating species) are particularly abundant there.

According to Pellissier, this has to do with the fact that throughout Earth's history, the Coral Triangle was (and still is) very tectonically active, producing a wide range of habitats. The surface temperature of this marine area was also more stable during the ice ages, which is why an especially  was able to unfold.

The Caribbean, on the other hand, was more subject to the regime of the ice ages, and its coral reefs and fish stocks shrank during the cold periods. In addition, the Isthmus of Panama was formed more than 2.7 million years ago, which, among other things, changed the ocean currents in the Caribbean. Both events led to higher extinctions.Delicate balance of coral reef processes creates management challenges

More information: Laetitia Mathon et al, Cross-ocean patterns and processes in fish biodiversity on coral reefs through the lens of eDNA metabarcoding, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2022). DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0162

Journal information: Proceedings of the Royal Society B 

Provided by ETH Zurich 

What Did Neanderthals Evolve From?

Scientists search for the missing link between humans and Neanderthals.

By Sara Novak
Apr 21, 2022 

(Credit: GAS-photo/Shutterstock)

Experts suggest Neanderthals are our closest extinct relative. In many ways, we’re alike: We are both hunter gatherers who have mastered the use of stone tools and weapons. But experts also agree that we have our differences.

Those differences are seen in a split from a common ancestor more than half a million years ago. Still, the species that connects us has long eluded scientists.

Experts thought Homo heidelbergensis was the missing link — an early human species known to be the first to build shelters — but newer research has called this theory into question.

The age of H. heidelbergensis fossils revealed that some of the specimens were too young to be the common ancestor, says Chris Stringer, a paleoanthropologist at the London Natural History Museum. Rather, H. heidelbergensis was more likely a contemporary of modern humans and Neanderthals, not an ancestral link, says Stringer.

"Frankly, we no longer know where the ancestry of the Neanderthal lies," he says.

Laser Dating Technology

Experts think that a common ancestor goes back to around 600,000 years ago, far older than Kabwe 1, for example, a H. heidelbergensis skull found in Zambia in 1921.

In the study published last year, Stringer and his team used laser dating to uncover that the skull, which was formerly thought to be much older, was only around 300,000 years old. This was when both modern humans and Neanderthals already existed.

Laser dating technology helped experts to uncover who our common ancestor was not. But it will take similar, more advanced technology, to finally pinpoint the link.

We must look back even further into the fossil record to unlock the mystery and we’re not there yet, says Stringer. "When we have a better fossil record from around 500,000 to 800,000 years ago, we’ll be in a better position to know for sure."

The Human and Neanderthal Split


To find this common ancestor, experts must uncover when the split occurred. The earliest known examples of Neanderthal fossils date back to around 430,000 years ago. The oldest Homo sapiens fossils date back to 300,000 years ago, but Stringer says that older modern human remains are still to be found.

The warm climate in Africa, where the earliest H. sapiens lived, has impacted the preservation of DNA more than Neanderthal remains found further north in Europe and Asia, he says.

Researchers use DNA evidence when they can, but when it’s not available, they rely on anatomy to note the differences between Neanderthals and H. sapiens.

Humans have a high and rounded brain case, with a small brow, a chin on the lower jaw and a slimmer bone structure, says Stringer. Neanderthals, by comparison, have a longer, lower skull, with a larger nose, brow and no chin.

"Humans have a clearly distinct skeletal shape from Neanderthals," says Stringer. "These differences suggest that there was a separate evolution for hundreds of thousands of years."

On the other hand, older modern human remains have a bigger brow, bulkier teeth and more robust skeletons. And the closer in age the remains are to the mystery ancestor, the difference in features is less pronounced.

After the two species evolved from a common ancestor, they became unmistakably separate in both appearance and DNA. But at the same time, before Neanderthals went extinct 40,000 years ago, they did many of the same things as humans. They hunted the same large game, had burial rituals, used similar tools and even interbred.

"We can’t know whether it was coerced or not, but we do know they interbred," says Erella Hovers, a professor of prehistoric archaeology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

No matter whether it was through love or war, says Hovers, we still hold the remnants of Neanderthals in our genes today. Depending on what part of the world you call home, you likely have around two percent Neanderthal DNA.

Nature Timespiral: The Evolution of Earth from the Big Bang



Since the dawn of humanity, we have looked questioningly to the heavens with great interest and awe. We’ve called on the stars to guide us, and have made some of humanity’s most interesting discoveries based on those observations. This also led us to question our existence and how we came to be in this moment in time.

That journey began some 14 billion years ago, when the Big Bang led to the universe emerging from a hot, dense sea of matter and energy. As the cosmos expanded and cooled, they spawned galaxies, stars, planets, and eventually, life.

In the above visualization, Pablo Carlos Buddassi illustrates this journey of epic proportions in the intricately designed Nature Timespiral, depicting the various eras that the Earth has gone through since the inception of the universe itself.


Evolutionary Timeline of the World


Not much is known about what came before the Big Bang, but we do know that it launched a sequence of events that gave rise to the universal laws of physics and the chemical elements that make up matter. How the Earth came about, and life subsequently followed, is a wondrous story of time and change.

Let’s look at what transpired after the Big Bang to trace our journey through the cosmos.


The Big Bang and Hadean Eon

The Big Bang formed the entire universe that we know, including the elements, forces, stars, and planets. Hydrogen and massive dissipation of heat dominated the initial stages of the universe.

During a time span known as the Hadean eon, our Solar System formed within a large cloud of gas and dust. The Sun’s gravitational pull brought together spatial particles to create the Earth and other planets, but they would take a long time to reach their modern forms.

Sometime during the first 800 million years of its history, the surface of the Earth changed from liquid to solid.

Archean Eon (4 – 2.5 billion years ago)


After its initial formation, the surface of the Earth was extremely hot. This subsequent eon saw the planet cool down massively, giving rise to oceans and continents, and the first recorded history of rocks.

It was early in the Archean eon that life first appeared on Earth. Our oldest discovered fossils date to roughly 3.5 billion years ago and consist of tiny, preserved microorganisms.

Paleoproterozoic Era (2.5 – 1.6 billion years ago)

The first era of the Proterozoic Eon, the Paleoproterozoic, was the longest in Earth’s geological history. Tectonic plates arose and landmasses shifted across the globe—it was the beginning of the formation of the Earth we know today.

Cyanobacteria, the first organisms using photosynthesis, also appeared during this period. Their photosynthetic activity brought about a rapid upsurge in atmospheric oxygen, resulting in the Great Oxidation Event. This killed off many primordial anaerobic bacterial groups but paved the way for multicellular life to grow and flourish.

Mesoproterozoic Era (1.6 – 1 billion years ago)

The Mesoproterozoic occurred during what is known as the “boring billion” stage of Earth’s history. That is due to a lack of widespread geochemical activity and the relative stability of the ocean carbon reservoirs.

But this era did see the break-up of the supercontinents and the formation of new continents. This period also saw the first noted case of sexual reproduction among organisms and the probable appearance of multicellular organisms and green plants.

Neoproterozoic Era (1 billion – 542.0 million years ago)


The Neoproterozoic was arguably the most profound in Earth’s history. It stands at the intersection of the two great tracts of evolutionary time: on the one side, some three billion years of predominantly microbial life, and on the other the inception of a modern biosphere with its extraordinarily diverse large multicellular organisms.

At the same time, Earth also experienced severe glaciations known as the Cryogenian Period and its first ice age, also known as Snowball Earth.

The era saw the formation of the ozone layer and the earliest evidence of multicellular life, including the emergence of the first hard-shelled animals, such as trilobites and archaeocyathids.

Paleozoic Era (541 million – 252 million years ago)


The Paleozoic is best known for ushering in an explosion of life on Earth, with two of the most critical events in the history of animal life. At its beginning, multicellular animals underwent a dramatic Cambrian explosion in aquatic diversity, and almost all living animals appeared within a few millions of years.

At the other end of the Paleozoic, the largest mass extinction in history resulted in 96% of marine life and 70% of terrestrial life dying out. Halfway between these events, animals, fungi, and plants colonized the land, and the insects took to the air.

Mesozoic Era (252 million – 66 million years ago)

The Mesozoic was the Age of Reptiles. Dinosaurs, crocodiles, and pterosaurs ruled the land and air. This era can be subdivided into three periods of time:
Triassic (252 to 201.3 million years ago)
Jurassic (201.3 to 145 million years ago)
Cretaceous (145 to 66 million years ago)

The rise of the dinosaurs began at the end of the Triassic Period. A fossil of one of the earliest-known dinosaurs, a two-legged omnivore roughly three feet long-named Eoraptor, is dated all the way back to this time.

Scientists believe the Eoraptor (and a few other early dinosaurs still being discovered today) evolved into the many species of well-known dinosaurs that would dominate the planet during the Jurassic period. They would continue to flourish well into the Cretaceous period, when it is widely accepted that the Chicxulub impactor, the plummeting asteroid that crashed into Earth off the coast of Mexico, brought the reign of the dinosaurs to an abrupt and calamitous end.

Cenozoic Era (66 million – Present Day)


After the end of the Age of Dinosaurs, this era saw massive adaptations by natural flora and fauna to survive. The plants and animals that formed during this era look most like those on Earth today.

The earliest forms of modern mammals, amphibians, birds, and reptiles can be traced back to the Cenozoic. Human history is entirely contained within this period, as apes developed through evolutionary pressure and gave rise to the present-day human being or Homo sapiens.

Compared to the evolutionary timeline of the world, human history has risen quite rapidly and dramatically. Going from our first stone tools and the Age of the Kings to concrete jungles with modern technology may seem like a long journey, but compared to everything that came before it, is but a brief blink of an eye

Click to view a larger version of the graphic. For a full-size option or to inquire about posters, please visit Pablo Carlos Budassi’s website.


Published  April 22, 2022
By Pablo Carlos Budassi 


 Nova Scotia

Classes resume Monday at Université Sainte-Anne after 7-week strike ends

The university and faculty union have agreed to go ahead

 with binding arbitration

Faculty at Université Sainte-Anne in Church Point, N.S., had been on strike and walking the picket line since March 3. (Darryl Whetter)

Classes will resume Monday at Nova Scotia's only French language post-secondary institution, after a seven-week strike strike by professors and librarians ended.

A news release on the Université Sainte-Anne website on Thursday said following successful mediation, the university and the faculty union — the APPBUSA — agreed to go ahead with binding arbitration.

An email sent to the university community on Friday said the university's board of governors approved adding an extra week of classes to the winter term.

The faculty had been on strike at the Church Point university since March 3.

The union said it was seeking pay equity with professors in English-speaking institutions. It was also demanding their workload be rebalanced to meet the requirements of a new strategic plan announced by the university.

Carbon capture company founded by UBC geologists wins $1M international funding prize

​​​​​​​Carbin Minerals Inc. has figured out how to speed up the

mineralization of carbon dioxide in rocks

Tailings from the Clinton Creek mine in the Yukon, containing carbon dioxide. Since 2000, Carbin Minerals Inc. co-founder Greg Dipple began studying a natural process whereby rocks from under the earth's crust react with carbon dioxide by mineralizing it, and thus pulling it from the atmosphere. (Greg Dipple)

Our planet is changing. So is our journalism. This story is part of a CBC News initiative entitled "Our Changing Planet" to show and explain the effects of climate change. Keep up with the latest news on our Climate and Environment page.


A small company incorporated by geologists at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver got a big boost on Earth Day for their discoveries which speed the ability for rocks to capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

Carbin Minerals Inc., founded by Greg Dipple, Bethany Ladd and Peter Scheuermann, just this past September, earned $1 million US from a U.S. organization that has the backing of the Elon Musk Foundation.

XPRIZE awards millions of dollars to fund breakthroughs in technology and ingenuity that help solve some of the world's most pressing problems, most notably climate change.

Since 2000, Dipple, who has been a geology professor at UBC for 30 years, began studying a natural process whereby rocks from under the earth's crust react with carbon dioxide when unearthed by mineralizing it, and thus pulling it from the atmosphere.

  • Do you have a question about climate change and what is being done about it? Send an email to ask@cbc.ca 
One of Carbin Minerals Inc.'s carbon removal research sites at a legacy mine in the Western U.S. The company has won $1 million US from XPRIZE, which funds breakthroughs in technology and ingenuity that help solve some of the world's most pressing problems, most notably climate change. (Bethany Ladd)

The process, called weathering, can however take thousands of years. Dipple and his colleagues sought to find ways to expedite the process, especially at mining sites, so that massive fields of mine tailings, essentially pulverized rocks, could become huge carbon sinks.

"What we're doing with Carbin Minerals Inc. is understanding that those reaction rates are relatively slow, we have techniques that allow us to increase those rates by a factor of three or five so we get single sites doing hundreds of thousands of tonnes of CO2 per year," he said.

The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, measured last summer at 50 per cent higher than when the industrial age began, is a driver of climate change.

By monitoring mining sites, technicians can adjust the amount of water in tailing sites or simply stir up the bed of rocks to increase the pace of carbonization, in some cases, down to days.

After incorporating, the company scrambled to apply to XPRIZE for its $100 million carbon removal competition.

An image of rocks and materials at one of Carbin Minerals Inc.'s carbon removal research sites at a legacy mine located in the Western U.S. The company was named as one of 15 winners out of 1,133 entrants, judged by a panel of 70 experts and scientists from across the globe. (Bethany Ladd)

Entrants must prove that the technology actually works and "achieves net negative emissions, sequesters carbon dioxide durably over at least 100 years, and shows a sustainable path to ultimately achieving gigatonne scale," according to a release naming the winners.

'Huge for us as a company'

Dipple said being named as one of 15 winners out of an initial 1,133 entrants, all judged by a panel of 70 experts and scientists from across the globe, is a valuable endorsement for Carbin Minerals Inc. and its future.

"It's huge for us as a company," he said. "It allows us to really accelerate our R&D and technology development and also the deployment of it. We're working hard right now to place this technology out in the field and start working."

The XPRIZE money will help the company set up its first pilot, hire new employees beyond its current team of five, purchase equipment and start fulfilling carbon removal contracts. 

It also stands to earn a further $50 million from XPRIZE as part of an ongoing carbon removal competition.

The company recently signed its first contract with Ottawa-based Shopify to remove 200 tonnes of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as part of the company's corporate social responsibility plan.

More XPRIZE money for UBC

Also announced on Friday from XPRIZE was a further $1 million US for another UBC spinoff company, Takachar, which won the student version of the competition last year and will receive an additional $1 million this year.

The company has been recognized for its invention dubbed the "MiniTorr," which is an inexpensive and portable machine that uses a thermochemical process to transform biomass, such as crop by-products, into bio-products, like fuel and fertilizer, rather than be burned.

Russia’s War Has Sparked A Coal Renaissance

  • It appears that the decline of coal, the dirtiest of all the fossil fuels, has been somewhat exaggerated in recent years, with the current energy shortage causing demand to soar.
  • Despite being significantly dirtier than both oil and natural gas, there is a huge demand for coal as a reliable and relatively cheap source of energy in an incredibly expensive market.
  • Sanctions on Russia due to its invasion of Ukraine have only added to the supply shortage, although some countries like India are taking advantage of discounts to buy up Russian coal.

Despite lots of talk about renewable energy acceleration, coal continues to dominate some markets. China is steadily increasing its coal output, while Indonesia looks to export to new European buyers. And while lots of countries are imposing sanctions on Russian coal, India is now backing up its cheap Russian oil imports with low-cost coal. 

China’s daily output of coal continues to rise, seeing a 15 percent increase in production in March from the same period last year. This equated to approximately 395.79 million tonnes, or 12.77 million tonnes every day. This goes beyond China’s target of 12.6 million tonnes a day throughout 2022. China is eager to keep production levels high due to the uncertainties created in the supply chain in response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. 

This rise comes despite several new lockdowns implemented across China in the wake of another Covid outbreak. The use of coal across utilities has dropped due to new Covid restrictions, allowing China to stockpile some of this increased coal output. Coal inventories rose from around 22 million tonnes at several major utilities in April 2021 to 28 million tonnes this year.

And as China ramps up production to ensure its energy security, Indonesia is looking to fill the gap left by sanctions on Russia by exporting its coal to Europe. The country’s second-largest coal miner PT Adaro Energy Indonesia has exported around 300,000 tonnes of coal to European buyers in response to sanctions on Russian coal. While Adaro says it will maintain its current coal trade links, European buyers could well be looking to Indonesia to fill the gap. 

Chief finance officer at Adaro, Lie Luckman, stated: “Indeed there has been some demand from Europe, but our market is mainly Asia. We will focus on fulfilling our commitments to our customers who already have long-term contracts with us.”. The list of customers includes Japan, China, South Korea, and India.

As part of its sanctions on Russian energy, the EU is banning coal imports from Russia starting in mid-August. Governments across the region are now racing to secure their energy sources by looking for more import options as well as ramping up national production of both fossil fuels and renewables. Indonesia’s coal exports reached record highs in March, a trend that is likely to continue because of the sanctions. 

The EU delayed its sanctions on Russian coal by around two months due to pressure from Germany, a major importer of Russian energy, to extend the period. In 2020, Germany imported around 21.5 percent of its coal from Russia, as well as 35.2 percent of its oil and 58.9 percent of its natural gas, showing its heavy reliance on the energy producer. While the EU is eager to impose sanctions in response to the conflict, this has not been an easy task and it acknowledges the importance of ensuring the region’s energy security before cutting Russia off completely. 

However, other countries are less steadfast in their condemnation of Russia and are using the situation as an opportunity to purchase low-cost energy. Having acquired cheap Russian oil, India is now eyeing affordable coal, as other countries turn their backs on Russia. 

India’s coal imports from Russia increased to a two-year high this March. And analysts believe that both India and China may continue to increase their coal imports from Russia as it offers lower prices in response to the loss of other export partners. Russia is selling its coal at around a $60-$65 per metric tonne discount, compared to Newcastle 5,500 kcal/kg NAR coal, making it increasingly attractive at a time when energy prices are continuing to rise to record levels. 

Head of trade at government relations consulting firm Vogel Group Samir N. Kapadia explained, “Despite warnings from the West, India continues to lean into their supply chain relationship with Russia for natural resources like oil and coal.” He believes a rupee-rouble currency swap could help India bypass the sanctions imposed on Russia, allowing them to continue importing low-cost coal. The White House is putting significant pressure on India to curb its imports, warning of potential consequences if it continues to support Russia. 

India has had low stockpiles of coal since last year, with several states across the country likely to experience power shortages. Although the government announced an aim to all stop coal imports by 2030, by boosting production from state-owned coal plants, it still relies heavily on foreign coal at present. It currently buys much of its coal from Australia, as its seventh-largest trading partner. But if Russia continues to offer cheaper energy alternatives, it may be hard to say no. 

Despite bold pledges to transition away from fossil fuels to renewable alternatives, new sanctions on Russia are exposing the world’s persistent reliance on coal. As European buyers look to Asian producers to meet their coal demands, others quickly turn to Russia – putting low-cost energy above geopolitics.

By Felicity Bradstock for Oilprice.com