Monday, June 19, 2023

Minette Batters: ‘We need a success story for wild spaces but also for farmers and food’


Tim Adams
Sun, 18 June 2023

A colleague of Minette Batters used to offer her a favourite piece of grandmother’s wisdom: “Things will never be as good as you hope they are going to be and will never be as bad as you fear they are going to be.” In the five years since Batters became the first female president of the National Farmers’ Union, the latter part of that saying has, she says, not been much use at all. “Things have been much worse in the sector than any of us could have imagined,” she says. “We had hard Brexit, the pandemic, and then Russia invaded Ukraine.” Among the most visible results of that tragic trio have been soaring food prices and sometimes empty supermarket shelves, failing farms and labour shortages. Faced with the madness of government ministers suggesting “let them eat turnips” and desperate face-saving “global” trade deals that threaten the livelihoods of her 47,000 members, Batters has been a voice of admirable sanity and composure.

The week in which we meet for lunch is not atypical for her, she says. She’s been up early morning and late at night helping with the lambing at her farm in Wiltshire, as well as keeping on top of her day job at the NFU in London. After a round of media on the latest eye-watering inflation figures that morning, she is due to appear before the environmental audit committee of MPs that afternoon – so, tempting though it is, she won’t have a glass of wine. She is in training for a marathon at the weekend, however, so carbs are welcome.

We are at a restaurant called Rabbit just off the King’s Road in west London, run by the Gladwin brothers, one a farmer, one a chef and one a restaurateur. Batters has chosen it for its commitment to fresh, seasonal British produce, much of which comes from the Gladwin family farm in Sussex (some of the wine list, in which British wines feature heavily, is also a family concern). Batters brought a group of regional farmers here for an awards ceremony last year, in part to model what was possible. The food – halibut and artichoke, tender beef sirloin with foraged mushrooms, fabulous spring greens and “salt baked” spuds – more than lives up to its “local and wild” billing.


As we eat, Batters talks me through some of her more surreal and dramatic moments in office. Calling Jamie Oliver on his birthday at the beginning of lockdown to enlist his urgent support to save the UK’s speciality cheese industry; listening to environment minister Thérèse Coffey telling poultry farmers that the fact they now produced a billion fewer eggs than two years ago didn’t represent any kind of crisis. The short Liz Truss debacle was probably her lowest point. “The government had just agreed the disastrous deals [on importing sheepmeat] with Australia and New Zealand and they announced they were opening discussions with Canada based on [importing] 100,000 tonnes of beef.” She shakes her head in remembered disbelief. “I was also in the middle of trying to sell my house, and interest rates rocketed so that obviously fell through …”



Farming is also about community, the pub, the vet, the post office and the school

That she had an idea of what was coming didn’t make it any easier to handle. “I remember asking Kwasi Kwarteng when he was business minister if he was going to look into the sale of Morrisons supermarkets to American private equity,” she says. Kwarteng told her that “he couldn’t be a free marketeer one day of the week and not the next”. She replied: “What if they wanted to buy Stonehenge?”

“What I find bizarre,” she says, “in that approach is that in ‘free market’ America, say, the government intervenes on behalf of the food sector everywhere, all the time. We just seem to think, well, if you leave it alone, it’ll be fine. But that often just means we are open to abuse from everyone.”

Batters has grown up with some of these issues. Her father took on a farm business in partnership with a landowner in south Wiltshire. He always told her and her brother that it would never be something they were guaranteed to inherit, and they should get other skills. Her first ambition was to be a showjumper or a jockey (she was considered for the British junior eventing team and rode racehorses at trainer David Elsworth’s stable). When that didn’t work out she went to catering college in London, before returning home. She eventually persuaded the landowner to let her take on her parents’ farm in 1998, when she was 32, sealing the deal with a promise that she would also renovate a pair of derelict 17th-century cottages. Batters is divorced and has 19-year-old twin children. To provide an additional income she started a wedding venue business at the farm, but that became a nightmare during Covid. “We obviously have honoured all the cancellations,” she says, “although one or two couples had split up and a few now had babies.”

Working the farm has kept her close to the challenges that her members face. That means steering between business survival and shifting environmental policy. Despite anxieties around food security, “net zero means the government is currently focused on actually producing less food”, she says. She argues that “it actually has to be more about sustainable intensification”, referencing Gabe Brown’s book From Dirt to Soil, about how with proper support, regenerative methods can revolutionise yields, restore ecology and save farms. “We have to deliver a success story for all our land. That is about wild spaces, but it is also about farmers and about food. What we shouldn’t be saying is we will just do the food bit in Norfolk and give up on the rest.”

The real challenge, she suggests, is around something on which the government has nothing much to say: the joined-up commitment to a food culture more like that of France or Italy, that puts ordinary people in close touch with the story behind what they eat. “The question still really is how do we cut out highly processed food and learn to cook again from scratch,” she says. “That connection has to be where it starts.”

Minette ate Line-caught halibut £33 Tim ate Beef sirloin £34 They shared Salt-baked potatoes £6.50; spring greens £6; cheeseboard £15 They drank Sparkling water £3.40. Photograph: Antonio Olmos/The Observer

The follow-on becomes, of course, how do you make that healthy and local principle affordable for everyone – even those whose first priority is to put any food on the table?

That, Batters suggests, is the thing nobody wants to talk about. Everyone wants higher standards, but who will pay for them? There is profit in the system – why else would private equity be so keen to buy in? – but that is too often supported by the squeeze on those at either end of it, particularly those farmers forced to absorb rising costs to protect cut-throat supermarket profit margins. “There’s only so long that is sustainable,” Batters says. “And that’s where we are at the moment.”

That thought returns us to the food in front of us, a shared plate of British cheeses, Wookey Hole cheddar, Bath soft, rosary goat’s cheese from Salisbury. Each one, unquestionably, worth preserving.

How much of what she says about this crisis, I wonder, ever lands with ministers keener to talk about small boats than smallholdings?

Her meetings with ministers have often proved frustrating, she says. She recalls how Jeremy Hunt once prefaced a conversation by saying: “You’ll have to excuse me, I don’t know much about the agriculture sector.” Well, she said: “You eat food? That’s what we provide.” She looks for allies wherever she can find them: Jeremy Clarkson, the sheep farmer James Rebanks, the new king. “They all realise that farming is also about community,” she says. “It’s not the diddly squat percentage of GDP, it’s also the pub and the vet and the post office and the school … I get officials and ministers saying: ‘We need to take X amount of land out of production’ and I say: ‘What about the people?’ And they just look at the floor.”

Batters is, it seems to me, full of clear ideas about how to protect that way of life and sustain the land on which it depends. It comes as a bit of a shock then, when she mentions in passing that from next year she will no longer be part of that debate as head of the Farmers’ Union. She hasn’t made a formal announcement, but after 10 years as deputy and then leader, she says she won’t stand again for reelection and will let someone else take up the battles she has joined.

“It’s become an exhausting job,” she says. “A decade seems about the right time to end.” She would make a natural politician, but she has no plans in that direction. There’s the farm, of course, but the only other thing she has signed up for is to chair her local agricultural show. I imagine, in some ways, she can’t wait.
Armenian Resistance fighter joins France's Pantheon greats

Valerie LEROUX
Sun, 18 June 2023 

This fresco shows French-Armenian Missak Manouchian, who was executed by Nazi forces in 1944
(JOEL SAGET)

An Armenian poet and communist fighter in World War II will enter the Pantheon mausoleum and join an elite group of France's revered historical figures, French President Emmanuel Macron said Sunday.

Known as being "pantheonised", the rare tribute is reserved for those who have played an important role in the country's history.

Missak Manouchian, who arrived in France in 1925 as a stateless refugee after fleeing violence, later joined the communist Resistance during World War II.

He led a small group of foreign Resistance fighters against the Nazi occupation, carrying out attacks on German forces and acts of sabotage in Nazi-occupied France in 1943.

Macron said Manouchian "embodies the universal values" of France and "carries a part of our greatness".

In 1944, the group, which included a number of Jews, was put out of action when 23 of its members were rounded up and sentenced to death by a German military court.

Manouchian was shot by the Nazis on February 21, 1944.

The collaborationist Vichy regime later tried to discredit the group and defuse the anger over the executions in an infamous red poster depicting the dead fighters as terrorists.

Macron paid tribute to Manouchian's "bravery" and "quiet heroism", as well as to other foreign Resistance fighters.

Other major French figures to be reburied in the Pantheon include Victor Hugo, Voltaire and Marie Curie.

By entering the Pantheon, Manouchian will become both the first foreign and communist Resistance fighter to be awarded the honour.

Manouchian will enter the Pantheon alongside his wife Melinee, who survived him by 45 years and is buried alongside him at the Ivry-sur-Seine cemetery.

- 'Quiet heroism' -


On Sunday, Macron also decorated Robert Birenbaum -- part of the foreign Resistance fighter group -- at the Mont Valerien site where Manouchian and hundreds of other "resistants" were executed by the Nazis.

The memorial coincided with the anniversary of the dramatic appeal of June 18, 1940, when Charles de Gaulle made a historic call to defy the Nazi occupiers after making his escape from a defeated France.

The call -- widely seen as the start of the country's resistance movement -- is marked every year at Mont Valerien by French leaders.

On Sunday, Macron and assembled members of the government including Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne, listened to the Appeal of June 18 read by French actor Philippe Torreton, before holding a period of reflection at the site.

The pantheonisation of Manouchian had been long called for by the French left, particularly the Communist Party.

The party's national secretary in France, Fabien Roussel, said on Twitter that Manouchian symbolised a "certain idea of France: a political nation, made up of citizens of all origins, united by universal values".

Since 2017, Macron has pantheonised three others including the French-American dancer and rights activist Josephine Baker, who became the first black woman to be honoured at the site.

Baker was also just the fifth woman to be honoured with a place in the secular temple to the heroes of the French Republic, which sits on a hill in the Left Bank of Paris.

The move followed years of campaigning by her family and admirers for her place in French history to be recognised.

The tribute on Sunday also marks part of a long series of memorials leading up to the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, which are set to continue next year with events to commemorate the liberation of Paris.

vl/jmt/rox/kjm
Bill Simmons Calls Prince Harry and Meghan Markle ‘F—ing Grifters’ After They End $20 Million Podcast Deal

Sharon Knolle
Sat, June 17, 2023 



After Prince Harry and Meghan Markle pulled the plug on their $20 million podcast deal with Spotify this week, Bill Simmons, the streamer’s head of podcast innovation and monetization and CEO of The Ringer, called them “f—ing grifters” on the latest episode of his podcast.

The deal, which was struck in 2020, resulted in only one show, the one-season, Markle-hosted “Archetypes.”

“I wish I had been involved in the ‘Meghan and Harry’ leave Spotify negotiation, the f–ing grifters,” he told guest Joe House on Friday’s episode of “The Bill Simmons Podcast.” “I gotta get drunk one night and tell the story of the Zoom I had with Harry to help him with a podcast idea. It’s one of my best stories. F— the grifters.”

The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday that Harry and Meghan would not receive the full $20 million from their payout. The two signed a deal with Netflix in 2020 to produce documentaries and series, and released their first show — a docuseries called “Harry & Meghan” — earlier this year.

Simmons, who founded sports and pop culture website The Ringer, sold it to Spotify in 2020 for $250 million. He’s in charge of several Ringer-branded podcasts at the podcast giant.



Also Read:
Spotify Slashes Podcast Division by 200, or About 2% of Audio Streamer’s Total Workforce
UK 
‘Mountain’ of unused PPE dumped in nature reserve


Ewan Somerville
Sun, 18 June 2023 

Local MP has condemned the 'unauthorised disposal of such a huge quantity of medical aprons' - Simon Czapp/Solent News & Photo Agency

Thousands of packs of personal protective equipment (PPE) have been found dumped in a mountainous heap in the New Forest.

Pictures show hoards of aprons and suspected face masks left in a giant pile in the town of Calmore, bordering the Testwood Lakes Nature Reserve and AFC Totton Football Club.

The “large-scale” discovery was made public at a Hampshire County Council (HCC) meeting, where councillors said they reacted with “horror” and are demanding answers, though it is not yet known if the items are linked to the Covid-19 pandemic.

During the pandemic, the Department for Health and Social Care spent £15 billion on PPE that proved unusable and is now being burned, including masks and gowns for NHS staff, prompting Whitehall’s spending watchdog to condemn the “extraordinary waste”.

Now, a report from the HCC’s regulatory committee has revealed that the discovery was made following an investigation by New Forest District Council into use of land at Little Testwood Farm Caravan Park, Hants.

The report said: “Following their own investigations into the use of land as a caravan park, New Forest District Council reported the large-scale storage of packs of old PPE.

“It became apparent that thousands of packs of medical aprons had been dumped on the land with no obvious signs that they were being protected or stored for some future use.

“The concern is that they have been dumped with no intention of removal to a proper facility.”

Councillor Peter Latham, the chairman of the committee, said: “It was a surprise to put it mildly – a reaction of horror. That something like that could have happened in Hampshire and nobody knew about it.”

Mr Latham, who has been chair of the Regulatory Committee for six years, added: “I’ve never seen anything like this before. None of us have.”

The council has now launched an “enforcement activity” with the Environment Agency, police and New Forest District Council to establish who is responsible and “whether it was discarded by a Health Trust as substandard during the Covid procurement”.

Julian Lewis, the Conservative MP for New Forest East, said: “The unauthorised disposal of such a huge quantity of medical aprons should be relatively easy to investigate and its history traced.

“One long-term lesson from all this is that never again should the United Kingdom be caught without strategic reserve stocks of protective medical clothing.”

A spokesman for the Environment Agency confirmed its officials were due to visit the site next week, adding: “We are unable to comment further in order to not prejudice any investigations or subsequent enforcement decisions.”



UK
Unions vow to carry on fight for better wages and working conditions



Miles Brignall
Sun, 18 June 2023 

Photograph: Carl Court/Getty Images

Union leaders have vowed to carry on the fight for better wages and working conditions ahead of the first anniversary of the biggest wave of industrial action seen in Britain for three decades.

This coming Wednesday will mark 12 months since members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union staged their first stoppage in a dispute over pay, jobs and conditions.

That dispute, which a year on remains unresolved, is regarded by unions as the start of the most significant uprising by UK workers since 1989 – a year with many of the same economic difficulties as today, when interest rates were rising, inflation had surged and demonstrators took to the streets to protest against Margaret Thatcher’s poll tax.

Related: Rail strikes: London to Scotland journeys face disruption in July

Since 21 June 2022, almost every area of the public and private sector has been disrupted by staff battling to ensure their pay keeps place with the fastest rate of inflation since the early 1980s. Barristers, teachers, nurses, junior doctors, university lecturers and civil servants in almost every government department – from driving examiners to rural food inspectors – have all gone on strike.

In the private sector, the GMB union has organised warehouse strikes at Amazon, as staff push for union recognition, and Royal Mail has been repeatedly hit by industrial action, while lorry drivers and factory workers have either joined in the stoppages or threatened to do so.

Over 3.7m working days were lost between June 2022 and April 2023, according to latest available data from the Office for National Statistics, the highest for any 11-month period since May 1990, when 4.8m working days were lost.

On 1 February alone, 100,000 civil servants at 124 government departments all stopped work. While some groups have settled and called off strikes, many key workers have not.

Faced with a cost of living crisis and inflation running at over 10%, and food prices that have doubled, unions have been turning down government offers that have typically ranged from 3% to 5%.

On Saturday the National Education Union vowed to bring more coordinated strikes that will shut many schools completely in July. Representatives are calling for negotiations with the government to resume, saying they will only strike as a “last resort”.

“This first anniversary marks an important milestone in the UK’s contemporary industrial relations history,” said Peter Turnbull, professor of management and industrial relations at the University of Bristol Business School, in an interview with PA Media.

“More than three-quarters of the days lost came from transport, storage, information and communications, but daily life has also been affected by strikes in our schools and universities, the NHS and civil service.

Related: ‘Nobody’s happy’: junior doctors in Oxford voice NHS frustrations

“After the longest period of falling real wages since records began, pay has understandably dominated the headlines, but the causes of these ongoing disputes run much deeper after years of austerity, consequent work intensification and falling standards of service provision. All strikes are eventually ‘settled’, but workers will remain unsettled by this prolonged period of industrial action for years to come.”

More than half a million NHS appointments, operations and procedures have been postponed in England as a result of strikes by health service staff.

The first mass walkout of nurses in history took place in mid-December, with ambulance workers, physiotherapists and other health workers following suit in subsequent weeks. More recently they have been joined by junior doctors from the British Medical Association.

Across the board, union leaders have attacked the government’s role in industrial disputes.

Mark Serwotka, of the Public and Commercial Services Union, said: “There is no doubt that the government is completely to blame, fuelled by an unprecedented cost of living crisis in which workers have been squeezed like never before.

“Ministers have been appalling. They assumed there would not be the stomach for a fight, but they made a catastrophic mistake.

The TUC general secretary, Paul Nowak, said the level of industrial action was unprecedented, and workers have decided they do not want to accept continued real-terms pay cuts.

He believes the government has “clearly been pulling the strings” of the rail dispute and thought the public would turn against striking unions, but there is no evidence of a public backlash.

Christina McAnea, of Unison, praised her NHS members, whose biggest strike action in decades “won the hearts of the public”.

“Our members braved hours of freezing weather to stand up for what’s right – not only for themselves, but for their colleagues and for the future of our public services.”

A government spokesperson said ministers wanted to ensure pay settlements were “fair, affordable for the taxpayer and reasonable” and that they allowed inflation to fall.

“Industrial action should always be a last resort. The government will continue to engage constructively with trade unions and is prepared to agree reasonable and affordable settlements if unions come to the table.”


Teachers in England to take fresh strike action next month

Keith Perry
Sat, 17 June 2023 

Striking teachers and supporters marched to Trafalgar Square on March 15 - 
Dan Kitwood/Getty Images Europe

Teachers in England are to stage fresh strikes next month in their long-running dispute over pay.

Members of the National Education Union (NEU) in schools in England have voted for two further days of strike action this term on July 5 and 7.

The NEU is currently re-balloting its members to see if they want to continue taking industrial action for the rest of the year.

The other education unions - ASCL, NAHT and NASUWT - are also balloting their members for strikes over pay and funding for teachers in England.

The unions have warned of co-ordinated action in the autumn term if there is no settlement to the dispute.

Teachers in the NEU have held three regional and five national strike days since February, the most recent of which affected more schools than ever.

Dr Mary Bousted and Kevin Courtney, Joint General Secretaries of the National Education Union, said: “It is within Gillian Keegan’s grasp for this action to be halted.

“Time and again the National Education Union, alongside its sister unions, have called for the Education Secretary to get around the negotiation table to settle this dispute for a fully-funded teacher pay increase. Time and again our calls have fallen on stony ground.

“The Education Secretary refused to re-enter negotiation on the grounds that she and her department were waiting for the publication of the School Teachers’ Review Body’s recommendation on pay.”

Members of the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) and the NASUWT are also being re-balloted in England, after neither union reached the threshold to hold strikes earlier in the year.

NASUWT members in 56 sixth-form colleges in England have voted in favour of strike action and action short of strike.

The Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) has said it will ballot members on national strike action in England for the first time in its history. Voting is from 19 June to 31 July.

Any action taken by the ASCL, NASUWT or NAHT would be in the autumn term and would be coordinated with the NEU, which could lead to full school closures.

No further strike dates are scheduled in Wales or Northern Ireland, and the dispute has been resolved in Scotland.

In England, schools should open if possible, the government says.

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “Further strike action will cause real damage to pupil learning and even more disruption for parents right across the country.

“Thousands of schools are receiving significant additional funding as part of the extra £2 billion of investment we are providing for both 2023/24 and 2024/25 which will take school funding to its highest level in history next year, as measured by the IFS.

“As part of the normal process, the independent School Teachers’ Review Body has submitted its recommendations to the government on teacher pay for 2023/24. We will be considering the recommendations and will publish our response in the usual way.”
Ancient Amazon Charcoal Seen as Next Big Thing in Carbon Markets

Sheryl Tian Tong Lee, Peter Millard and Heesu Lee
Sun, June 18, 2023 





(Bloomberg) -- A type of charcoal first used by Amazonian tribes thousands of years ago is becoming a key component of net-zero goals set by Microsoft Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and other blue chip companies eager to offset their carbon emissions.

Known as biochar, this black substance created by heating biomass and other agricultural waste can store carbon for hundreds of years and improve soil quality at the same time. It’s a “true carbon removal solution at scale,” according to Microsoft, and the tech giant along with BlackRock Inc. and JPMorgan are among those that have bought biochar credits.

The market for biochar remains small for now, thought it seems poised to soar as more farmers use it as a soil additive and companies seek new ways to meet net-zero targets. Biochar has the potential to sequester up to 2 billion tons of carbon dioxide annually by 2050, or almost as much as India emits in a year.

Biochar’s popularity stems from a shift in the voluntary carbon markets toward projects that actually remove carbon, instead of the so-called avoidance offsets that keep existing trees standing, for example. Some firms are warming to the idea that you “put a ton in, you take a ton out,” said Rich Gilmore, chief executive officer of investment manager Carbon Growth Partners.

Among removals, biochar offsets are sought for their “co-benefits to the ecosystem, biodiversity and soil,” said Melissa Leung, director of carbon at biochar consultancy GECA Environnement in Quebec City.

Biochar is produced by heating wood and other biomass in a low-oxygen chamber that limits emissions, in a process known as pyrolysis. As the biomass heats, bio-oils and gas are also produced, which can be used for power generation. Biochar can be buried in the ground as a soil amendment, or integrated into building materials, among other uses. For every ton of biochar produced, roughly three tons of carbon dioxide are sequestered.

Biochar credits sell for about €111 ($120) each, according to a tracker by Puro.earth, a Helsinki-based carbon registry that was bought by Nasdaq Inc. in 2021. That’s a hundred times more than nature-based offsets, but still only a fraction of the current price of other kinds of removal offsets such as electrochemical ocean carbon capture.

Even after prices jumped 29% last year, biochar credit retirements more than doubled on Puro.earth, signaling strong demand. Puro.earth CEO Antti Vihavainen expects the market value to double this year as interest soars from US companies, which make up half the platform’s buyers.

JPMorgan, which has been buying biochar credits since 2021, deems it an attractive option because of its “longer-term durability, relative affordability and co-benefits,” Brian DiMarino, head of operational sustainability, said by email.

Biochar’s origins date back centuries when ancient Amerindians in the Amazon used charcoal, broken ceramics, compost and other household waste to make Terra Preta de Indio, or Amazonian Dark Earth. Either by accident or design, these societies created a porous topsoil that retains water and hosts nutrients. Settlers in the 19th and 20th centuries gravitated to Dark Earth sites because land in the rest of the Amazon is acidic and not suited for agriculture.

Rainbow Bee Eater is one of Puro.earth’s biggest suppliers of biochar credits in Australia. Peter Burgess, who co-founded the company in 2007, says the goal was always to take biomass that would otherwise be thrown away and turn it into biochar.

The company struggled for years as part of a backyard industry with low volume and a negligible climate impact. Farmers, used to boom and bust weather cycles, were reluctant to adopt new techniques and averse to extra costs, given that a truck load of biochar can cost up to 10 times more than regular soil amendments.

But in 2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recognized biochar as a source of carbon sequestration. Because biochar decomposes far more slowly than biomass, the locked-up carbon won’t re-enter the atmosphere for hundreds of years, making it a viable method of carbon capture.

Biochar offsets “changed everything,” Burgess said. The additional income allowed him to drop the price of biochar by 60% to 80%, encouraging more farmers to try it. Rainbow Bee Eater now has two pyrolysis plants, and the plan is to “build more projects, hire more people, make more money and build even more projects,” Burgess said.

Other countries are getting on board. The US Department of Agriculture has funding available for farmers who apply biochar and meet certain conditions. Production surged fivefold from 2015 through 2021, when it reached about 800,000 tons, with the fastest growth in China, according to Verra, the largest carbon offsets verifier. By value, the market may almost triple to about $633 million by 2032, according to Precedence Research.

The challenges for biochar include gaining scale and boosting reliability. Biochar remains a “very small niche” in a more than $1 billion offsets market, Vihavainen said.

As biochar grows in popularity, experts worry the industry will attract developers that aren’t following biochar production and offset standards. Australia-based Pyrocal Pty, which sells biochar systems, says inquiries for its technology have grown fivefold since the boom in offsets two years ago. Yet many operators aren’t managing their emissions to global standards, according to Managing Director Durell Hammond.

Still, the credits sit at an “interesting intersection between technology and nature,” said Frederick Teo, CEO at Temasek Holdings Pte-backed GenZero, which has S$5 billion ($3.7 billion) to spend on climate projects.

“We are very constructive on biochar,” he said in Singapore. “It has promise. It is scalable.”

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek
What to Know About Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's Newly-Signed Laws Restricting Trans, DEI, and Labor Rights

Solcyre Burga
Sun, June 18, 2023 

Texas Governor Abbott Holds Border Security Bill Signing At Texas Capitol

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott speaks at a news conference in the state Capitol in Austin, Texas, on June 08, 2023. Credit - Brandon Bell—Getty Images

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed numerous bills this week, including some that restrict labor rights, ban transgender women from competing in sports, and bar universities and colleges from having their own diversity offices and training.

Much of the new legislation would ban state-funded entities from earning state funding if they fail to comply with the newest rules. The laws reflect similar bills passed in other Republican-led legislatures that have especially targeted queer rights and curriculums in schools. The signing of the laws marks the end of Texas’ state legislature for the next two years because lawmakers meet on a biennial system.

Here’s the rundown of the bills he signed.

Transgender Athlete Ban

On Thursday, Gov. Abbott signed a new law banning transgender women from competing in college sports, adding to the existing law that requires high school athletes to participate in sports teams that match the sex they were assigned at birth.

Senate Bill 15, which is also called the “Save Women’s Sports Act,” refers to transgender women as men and says that a student’s biological sex is the biological sex correctly stated on” the student’s birth certificate or any other document that “accurately states” their sex. A person who reports a possible violation of the law cannot be retaliated against.

“Women’s sports are being threatened. Some women are being forced to compete against biological men,” Gov. Abbott said while signing the bill on Thursday.

Individuals can also sue schools that allow transgender athletes to participate on teams that match their gender identity.

At least 22 states bar transgender athletes from competing in sports that affirm their gender identity, according to nonprofit think tank Movement Advancement Project. The U.S. House of Representatives passed similar legislation along party lines in April.

In April, The Biden administration presented a proposed rule that would stop colleges or schools from receiving federal funding if they “categorically ban” transgender students from sports teams.

Labor Regulation Limits

On Tuesday, Abbott signed a new law that helps reaffirm the state as the “exclusive regulator” of commerce and trade in the state. The law targets local jurisdictions that have tried to enact their own regulations that are different from the state’s.

The law specifically affects ordinances that establish minimum breaks at work, the Texas Tribune reports. In Dallas and Austin, ordinances requiring construction workers to take 10-minute breaks every four hours due to the heat will now be annulled.

“Construction is a deadly industry. Whatever the minimum protection is, it can save a life. We are talking about a human right,” Ana Gonzalez, deputy director of policy and politics at the Texas AFL-CIO told the Tribune. “We will see more deaths, especially in Texas’ high temperatures.”

Texas has the highest numbers of workers die from high temperatures. The law goes into effect on Sep. 1.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Ban

On Wednesday, the governor signed a bill that bans offices and programs that promote diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) at public universities and colleges beginning in January 2024, or they will lose state funding.

Texas has become the latest Republican-led legislature to pass a law targeting DEI. In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a law in May that prohibits funding for colleges and universities’s DEI initiatives. It also calls for the end of any majors or minors related to critical race theory or gender.

The decision comes amid a soon-to-be-released Supreme Court opinion that will target affirmative action.

“Texas is leading the nation and ensuring our campuses return to focusing on the strength of diversity and promoting a merit-based approach where individuals are judged on their qualifications, skills, and contributions,” said Republican state Senator Brandon Creighton, an author on the bill, in a statement.
Immigration detention continues in Canada despite the end of provincial agreements


Linda Mussell, Lecturer, Political Science and International Relations, University of Canterbury  Jessica Evans, Assistant Professor, Sociology, Toronto Metropolitan University
THE CONVERSATION
Wed, June 14, 2023 a

The peace arch monument on the Canadian side of the Canada-U.S. border crossing, in Surrey, B.C. Several provinces will no longer allow the CBSA to detain immigrants in provincial jails. 
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck

Despite its reputation as a refugee-welcoming and multicultural country, Canada imprisons thousands of people on immigration-related grounds every year. Many of these people are held in provincial jails under agreements between the provinces and the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA).

Several Canadian provinces are terminating their immigration detention agreements with the CBSA.

In 2022, British Columbia became the first province to review the immigration detention system and end its agreement with the CBSA. AlbertaSaskatchewanManitoba and Nova Scotia have since followed suit. Québec and New Brunswick have also recently announced they’re ending their agreements.

Provincial jails are notorious for their poor conditions. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have found the detention of persons without criminal charges in these jails is unjust.

According to the CBSA’s data, the majority of immigration detainees posed no risk to public safety in 2021-22 .

Read more: The detention of migrants in Canadian jails is a public health emergency


Facilities where immigration detainees are held across Canada. (Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International)

While these provincial terminations signal a move in the right direction, they do not mean an end to immigration detention in Canada.

We’ve been studying the recent regional shifts in immigration detention in North America. Advocates have worked hard to place pressure on provincial governments to end their agreements with the CBSA. To maintain this momentum, action is needed at the federal level.
Immigration detention

The CBSA makes contracts with provinces to deliver immigration detention under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. This means the agency can detain permanent residents, foreign nationals and refugee claimants and has sole discretion over where detainees are held.

That might be a provincial prison, immigration detention centre, RCMP detachment, a port of entry, inland enforcement cell, immigration holding centre or federal prison.

The CBSA has sweeping powers including arrest, detention and search-and-seizure without a warrant. It is the only major law enforcement agency without independent civilian oversight to review policies and investigate misconduct.

Figures from the CBSA show that the number of immigration detainees in Canada has increased every fiscal year between 2016 and 2020. More than 32,000 people were detained during that time period. Between 2019 and 2020, 8,825 people were detained, including 136 children, 73 of whom were under the age of six.

In many cases, the CBSA has separated children from their detained parents. This is a violation of international law and goes against the best interests of the child. The CBSA does not track how many children are separated from parents.


A protest at the Surrey Immigration Holding Centre in April 2020 calling for detainees to be released during the COVID-19 pandemic. (Prisoners’ Justice Day Committee Vancouver)

Research has found that even brief amounts of time imprisoned is associated with increased stress, depression and anxiety. Migrants with mental health conditions are more likely to be detained in provincial jails and in isolation, where their conditions tend to worsen. Mental health issues become a barrier for release and are then used to justify continued detention.

Immigration detainees endure harsh conditions including solitary confinement and no set release date. Since 2013, more than 1,623 detainees have been held for longer than a year.

People from racialized communities, particularly people who are Black, are subject to profiling by the CBSA and imprisoned for longer periods.

With provinces ending agreements, the CBSA has indicated it will transfer more detainees to immigration holding centres operated by the CBSA. In our research, we have found that the CBSA is considering building more holding centres to expand its capacity to imprison people across Canada.


A graph showing where immigration detainees in Canada come from and how long they have been detained. (Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International)

Federal government must also act

New rules under the Safe Third Country Agreement came into effect in March 2023. These rules bar migrants seeking entry to Canada via the U.S. from claiming asylum after crossing the land border. They make it more dangerous for people to cross and increase the risk of being detained.

The end of provincial agreements is not the end of immigration detention. Rights violations will continue regardless of where people are held. The ability to detain people for administrative purposes, the lack of a legal limit for detention and absence of oversight are all problems that remain in place.

Importantly, this change may provide impetus for the privatization of immigration detention, something that has been raised as a concern south of the border.

Federal changes are needed to end immigration detention, including practices like solitary confinement, imprisoning families and indefinite sentences.

The CBSA released imprisoned people at unprecedented rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is already an Alternatives to Detention program. While the current alternative is not without problems and continues the surveillance of migrants, it’s a step in the direction of humane treatment.

There must be greater community-based case management and funding for community supports as an alternative to detention. Through community engagement, we can prioritize housing, health care and education, and help migrants and asylum-seekers navigate the bureaucratic and legal systems. The focus should be on providing support, rather than policing and imprisonment.

This article is republished from The Conversation, an independent nonprofit news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts. The Conversation has a variety of fascinating free newsletters.

It was written by: Linda MussellUniversity of Canterbury and Jessica EvansToronto Metropolitan University.


Read more:

Roxham Road: Asylum seekers won’t just get turned back, they’ll get forced underground — Podcast

How smaller cities can integrate newcomers into their labour markets

Montreal refugee advocacy groups, migrants begin 3-day protest march to Roxham Road

CBC
Sat, June 17, 2023 

Protesters in Montreal took off for Roxham Road on Saturday. They will walk in three 25-kilometre stretches and are expected at the border on Monday. (Rowan Kennedy/CBC - image credit)

Despite the rain trickling down Saturday morning, about 100 protesters gathered at La Fontaine park in Montreal with plastic rain ponchos, umbrellas, signs and flags to set off on a three-day march toward Roxham Road, in the Montérégie.

Refugee advocacy groups, migrants and supporters will be walking 73 kilometres to protest the recent closure of Quebec's irregular border crossing to asylum seekers arriving in Canada from the U.S.

"It's a symbolic walk for us," said Maryne Poisson, the director of social initiatives at Welcome Collective, a group that helps asylum seekers in Montreal.

Poisson says she meets families every day that walked or hitchhiked from places like Brazil, Chile and other countries in "horrible conditions," suffering relentlessly along the way.

"So this is a super small walk, but we're doing it thinking about them," she said.

Refugee advocacy groups and migrants delivered speeches at La Fontaine park Saturday before taking off.
 (Rowan Kennedy/CBC)

Claudia Aranda claimed asylum in Canada after fleeing persecution in Chile. She says refugee rights are a matter of life and death.

"I walk because human rights are rights of all people … human rights are not relative," she said.

Protesters will walk in three stretches, roughly 25-kilometres each. They will stay under church roofs overnight and are expected at the border on Monday.

Supreme Court upholds controversial agreement

The start of the journey comes a day after the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) is constitutional — at least as it relates to the right to life, liberty and security.

The agreement, which came into force in 2004, stipulates that asylum seekers must make their claims in the first safe country they reach, allowing Canada to turn back most asylum seekers coming from the U.S.

Roxham Road, a well-travelled unofficial border crossing for asylum seekers, was previously exempt from this treaty, which only covered official border crossings. A renegotiation of the agreement expanded the pact in March to cover the entire land border, closing the loophole.

Lauren Lallemand, co-director of the Canadian Council for Refugees, argues the situation will only get worse now that the border is closed. She wants to see the agreement withdrawn altogether.

"We've seen that there are people who have died trying to make irregular crossings. So this isn't just a matter of an agreement, it's really a matter of life and death for vulnerable migrants," she said.

Before the new treaty went into effect, the Canadian government reported that since December of 2022, about 4,500 people were crossing through Roxham Road every month.

On Friday, the top court sided with the Canadian government which argued the U.S. is a safe place for migrants, despite groups saying they face deportation and detention there.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court did not, however, rule on whether the STCA violates Section 15 of the Charter of Rights — the section that guarantees equality under the law.

Refugee groups have argued the U.S. often denies refugee claims that cite gender-based violence as the reason for the claim.

The case was ordered back to Federal Court for a review of the policy in light of equality concerns. Poisson says there's still hope the agreement will be scrapped when it's back in court.

'Closing our borders is not the solution'


Marisa Berry Mendez, a campaigner with Amnesty International who left for Roxham Road Saturday, argues Canada must step up.

"We have international human rights obligations to respect the right to asylum," she said.

"Closing our borders is not the solution; it doesn't stop people seeking protection. It just makes them take more dangerous routes to get there."

In a statement following the Supreme Court's decision Friday, Canada's immigration minister said the government will continue to promote safe and regular pathways.

"We will continue to work with the United States to ensure that the STCA reflects our commitment with respect to our domestic and international obligations in its application," said Sean Fraser.

For her part, Poisson is hoping asylum seekers are given the opportunity to plead their case in Canada.

"We don't want them to have status right away; we want them to have a chance to be heard, to have a chance to explain why they need protection," she said.

Explainer-How a Canada Supreme Court ruling could affect U.S.-Canada refugee flows



FILE PHOTO: Roxham Road, an unofficial crossing point from New York State to Quebec for asylum seekers in Champlain

Sat, June 17, 2023 
By Anna Mehler Paperny

TORONTO (Reuters) - Canada's Supreme Court on Friday upheld a border pact under which Canada and the United States send back asylum seekers crossing the land border, finding the agreement does not violate asylum seekers' right to life, liberty and security of the person.

But it sent the case back to a lower court to determine whether the contested agreement violates asylum seekers' right to equal treatment under the law.

The ruling came as Canada was taking steps to more tightly manage its border with the United States. In March the two countries amended the Safe Third Country Agreement so it applies to the length of the 4,000-mile (6,440-km) land border, rather than just at formal crossings.

WHAT DOES THE RULING SAY?

The Supreme Court found that built-in "safety valves" that allow some asylum seekers to avoid being turned back in certain circumstances mean the agreement does not violate their right to life, liberty and security of the person under Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

But the court also found an unaddressed question when it comes to whether the agreement violates equality rights.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

The agreement stands and the case will return to federal court to determine whether the agreement violates asylum seekers' right to equal treatment under the law.

Refugee advocates claimed the agreement violates that right because they argue the United States is less receptive to refugee claims predicated on gender.

A lower court could find in favour of refugee advocates or the government, a decision that could be appealed either way. The case could wind up back at the Supreme Court, lawyers told Reuters.

WHAT PRECEDENT DOES THE RULING SET?

It could prompt courts to pay closer attention to challenges under the equal treatment section of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, said lawyer Jamie Chai Yun Liew, who represented some of the parties intervening in this case.

"Now the court is saying, 'You should do the work.' ... By ignoring it, you're dismissing very important claims."

HOW HAVE MIGRANT MOVEMENTS CHANGED?

The expansion of the Safe Third Country Agreement is already having an impact on migrant flows into Canada. In March, Royal Canadian Mounted Police intercepted 4,173 asylum seekers on their way to file refugee claims in Canada after crossing irregularly. Last year, almost 40,000 people crossed into Canada between formal crossings to file refugee claims.

Between March 25, when the amendments took effect, and May 28, 618 asylum seekers crossed between ports of entry and were referred to the Canada Border Services Agency, according to agency figures. As many as 283 were sent back to the U.S., 247 were allowed to file refugee claims in Canada under exceptions to the agreement, and another 88 were being processed.

At the same time, the number of people caught crossing southbound into the United States spiked in March to 992 from 630 in February and stayed high in April, U.S. Customs and Border Patrol figures show.

The number of people apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol near the northern border in the first seven months of fiscal 2023, which began in October, is more than double the total for fiscal 2022, the figures show.

A Customs and Border Patrol spokesperson could not give a reason for the increase.

(Reporting by Anna Mehler Paperny; Editing by Denny Thomas and Jonathan Oatis)




















Biden's plan to fix a broken border? Asylum seekers should remain in Canada


Eduardo Cuevas, USA TODAY
Sat, June 17, 2023 

President Joe Biden's plan to fix a broken border just got the green light in Canada.

For months, Biden and his Canadian counterpart Prime Minister Justin Trudeau relied on their recently-hatched plan to restrict asylum seekers entering either country. But in Canada, the plan, a renegotiated Safe Third Country Agreement, faced a court challenge on the basis of whether the U.S. was in fact a safe country to return people due to its dysfunctional immigration system.

On Friday, Canada's highest court unanimously upheld in part that the agreement was safe to send asylum seekers back to the U.S., but the unanimous decision kicked back the issue of gender-based persecution, which the U.S. has not recognized in asylum claims, to a lower court.

The decision comes as liberal governments in both countries have sought to limit migrants amid mounting pressure from conservatives, while Biden has tried to walk a fine line on immigration – between opening legal pathways and border enforcement – in the run-up to the 2024 presidential election.


Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau greets President Joe Biden as he arrives at Parliament Hill, Friday, March 24, 2023, in Ottawa, Canada. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

The agreement with Canada better aligns the northern border with the asylum process at the southern border after Biden ended the pandemic-era Title 42 policy, once invoked by former President Donald Trump, in May. At the same time, Biden implemented new measures to stem the flow of migrants. Now, for people seeking to enter the U.S. from Canada or Mexico, they must seek asylum in the first country they set foot in, either in Canada or Mexico.

“We now have consistency between our policies at the northern and southern borders,” Muzaffar Chishti, a senior fellow at the Migration Policy Institute, a U.S. think-tank, told USA TODAY.

Chishti called the agreement a “Biden-Trudeau success,” with negotiations occurring in 2022 that now largely survived Supreme Court of Canada scrutiny with Friday’s ruling. Biden and Trudeau unveiled their agreement in late March, during Biden’s first official visit to Ottawa, to clamp down on immigration in both countries.

Still, the debate around immigration won’t end especially as people flee from their homes in Venezuela, Haiti and other parts of Central and South America, said Christopher Kirkey, the director of the Center for the Study of Canada and Québec Studies at the State University of New York at Plattsburgh.

“This Supreme Court ruling may say this agreement is valid and is consistent with the Canadian Constitution, but the truth is that’s a bit of a snapshot,” he said

“This is going to continue to be a vexing public policy issue for Ottawa and Washington,” he said.


FILE - In this Aug. 7, 2017, file photo, Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers greet migrants as they enter into Canada at an unofficial border crossing at the end of Roxham Road in Champlain, N.Y. A Canadian court on Wednesday, July 22, 2020, invalidated the country's Safe Third Country Agreement with the United States. Under the agreement, immigrants who want to seek asylum in Canada at ground ports of entry from the United States are returned to the U.S. and told to seek asylum there. But if they request asylum on Canadian soil at a location other than an official crossing, the process is allowed to go forward.
 (AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File)


What's the Safe Third Country Agreement between US and Canada?


The 2004 Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) allows the U.S. and Canada to turn away asylum seekers from either country because both were designated as “safe” countries to send people. Under the agreement, Canadian officials could return asylum seekers seeking to enter their country from the U.S., and vice versa.

For two decades, the agreement had a loophole that allowed asylum seekers to enter Canada from the U.S. via irregular ports of entry, such as at Roxham Road, a remote path in Upstate New York that passes forests and farms leading to Quebec. Roxham Road became a pathway for tens of thousands of people for two decades to cross into Canada, which led to upsurges in people crossing at the rural road from the U.S.
Why are migrants headed to the northern border?

The Trump administration enacted hardline immigration policies such as moving to end Temporary Protected Status, resulted in thousands of people – many from Haiti – heading to Canada for asylum. The waves of asylum seekers have shifted from continents and countries, though many have chosen to leave a backlogged U.S. immigration system that takes years to get in front of an immigration judge.

In contrast, Canada has been seen as more welcoming and easier to resettle in the diverse country of 40 million people.


Migrants gather in an informal camp in El Paso, north of the Rio Grande and south of the border wall near Gate 40, on May 5.

During Biden's visit to Canada, he and Trudeau announced they would tighten the agreement to turn away irregular crossings, forcing people to regular ports of entry to make their claims under limited exceptions allowing them to enter. Under the new deal, Canada agreed to offer 15,000 more people from Western Hemisphere countries to seek asylum.

The agreement took effect March 25 at midnight, a day after Biden and Trudeau announced their new deal, officially closing Roxham Road. However, the two countries signed the expanded policy a year ago, as early as March 2022, per U.S. Federal Register rulemaking.

In 2022, close to 40,000 people crossed into Canada from the U.S. seeking asylum, according to Royal Canadian Mounted Police figures. Experts have noted nearly all came via Roxham Road, into Quebec.

In 2023, crossings into Canada, nearly all through Quebec, totaled more than 4,000 each month. But by April, the first full month the new agreement took effect, it dropped to 85 people.

Early in 2023, the U.S. saw increases in people crossing from Canada near a remote stretch of border from New Hampshire to New York, prompting outcries from House Republicans who formed the Northern Border Security Caucus.

Observers have warned that the new agreement, in closing Roxham Road, will force people to make more dangerous treks into either country, much like the border with Mexico.

The numbers at the northern border are far fewer than the southern border. The 2022 fiscal year saw U.S. border agents encounter 109,000 people at the northern border, compared to 2.3 million at the southern border.

How was the agreement challenged?

Canadian immigrant advocates and some left-leaning politicians questioned whether the U.S. was indeed a safe country under Canadian law because of the American process to claim asylum and the conditions of immigration detention systems that migrants often face when they’re rejected from Canada.

Conservative Canadian politicians and officials in French-speaking Quebec, meanwhile, have sought to clamp down on border crossings. Quebecois officials have complained about the disparate burden their province faced in accommodating asylum seekers.

The agreement faced court challenges for violating the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by sending people to the U.S., which often places migrants in immigration detention or deports them to the country they fled. The Supreme Court of Canada heard oral arguments in October.

“The Supreme Court holds the regulations designating the United States as a safe third country do not infringe refugee claimants’ rights to liberty and security of the person,” the Supreme Court's brief read.

The court upheld the basis that the U.S. was a safe country, though allowed the appeal in part, which said “refugee claimants may be exempted from return to the United States” if their charter rights for liberty and security were at risk.


Families of asylum seekers are led into the Ramada hotel in Yonkers May 15, 2023. The families were being housed in New York City.

What else did the court decide on?

In the unanimous court decision, Justice Nicholas Kasirer wrote that designating the U.S. as a safe third country doesn’t breach the charter. However, he did agree with the risk of detention of migrants returned to the U.S., and with some aspects of detention conditions. The court returned the issue of gender-based persecution, which advocates say the U.S. flouts international refugee standards, back to the lower federal court.

“We have to ensure this is not a race to the bottom,” said Maureen Silcoff, a Toronto immigration attorney who co-counseled to intervene in the case on behalf of the Canadian Association for Refugee Lawyers. “We see in multiple countries and regions that the door is being sealed, but we have to act in accordance with international standards, not what’s politically expedient at the moment.”

Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) speaks on border security and Title 42 during a press conference at the U.S. Capitol on May 11, 2023 in Washington, DC.


Biden restricts asylum claims at both borders

The updated agreement complements Biden administration policies at the United States’ other border, which has seen an influx of people seeking asylum, many from Venezuela and parts of South America.

In May, the U.S. ended Title 42, a public health law implemented by Trump during the COVID-19 pandemic to restrict people from entering the U.S., including with asylum claims.

For two years, Biden kept the policy in place before recently returning to prior immigration law that allows asylum seekers to present credible fears with asylum officers or before an immigration judge. The administration also now uses expedited removal for people who enter the U.S. without permission. Now, people seeking asylum are expected to use an app to schedule an appointment at ports of entry.

Eduardo Cuevas covers race and justice for the USA TODAY Network of New York. He can be reached at EMCuevas1@gannett.com and followed on Twitter @eduardomcuevas.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Biden's deal to keep migrants out of US greenlit by Canada court
Mass Immigration Experiment Gives Canada an Edge in Global Race for Labor











Randy Thanthong-Knight

Sun, June 18, 2023 

(Bloomberg) -- At a time industrialized countries around the world are confronting declining birth rates and aging workforces, Canada is at the forefront of betting on immigration to stave off economic decline.

A country about as populous as California has added more than all the residents in San
Francisco in a year. Last week, Canada surpassed 40 million people for the first time ever — with growth only expected to continue at a rapid pace as it welcomes more immigrant workers, refugees and foreign students across its borders.

For Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s administration, the massive immigration experiment is a way to broaden the labor market as global competition for skilled workers intensifies. It also reflects a longer-term ambition for Canada to expand its international presence and emerge from the shadow of the neighboring US — similar in size by land, but home to about eight times the population and almost 12 times the gross domestic product.

“We have lots of space for people to come and occupy,” said Usha George, a professor in Canadian immigration policy at Toronto Metropolitan University. “In order to expand our agricultural, industrial and technological base, we need more people to come here.”

Now, as people flow into the country like never before, Canada has an immediate challenge: how to propel growth in rural regions in dire need of newcomers while minimizing the strains to urban centers already bulging with people.

The rewards are apparent. Population gains have boosted hiring and consumption, helping the economy withstand a rate-hike campaign by the Bank of Canada — so much so that the central bank this month had to resume tightening after a pause. Yet in a country that’s long been home to one of the world’s hottest housing markets, the government’s plan has drawn criticism that increasing immigration targets merely boosts economic output without raising living standards for individuals.

Real GDP per capita has been little changed over the past decade, and is expected to fall from its 2022 peak, based on Bank of Canada output forecasts. Productivity growth has been stagnant, and disposable income hasn't kept up with home prices.

Even some prominent, pro-immigration economists are now saying Canada is going too far, too fast.

“It doesn’t make sense in this very short period of time to make such a rapid increase,” said David Dodge, a former Bank of Canada governor who decades ago worked on a system that’s a genesis of the current immigration program. “The speed of that adjustment exacerbates the costs and reduces the additional productivity because there’s less time for people to get adjusted.”

Fastest Growth

The Trudeau administration has set a target of adding about half a million permanent residents each year. Last year, foreign students, temporary workers and refugees made up another group that’s even larger, bringing total arrivals to a record one million. The inflow pushed Canada’s annual population growth rate to 2.7%, the fastest pace among advanced economies and rivaling developing nations Burkina Faso, Burundi and Sudan.

“You have to realize that if you don’t embrace immigration, there are whole hosts of social and economic consequences that will impact your community negatively,” Sean Fraser, Canada’s immigration minister, said in an interview. “The ability to successfully integrate people in large numbers doesn’t demand that you welcome fewer people, it demands that you advance smart immigration policies.”

Nearly one in four people in Canada are now immigrants, the largest proportion among the Group of Seven nations. At the current pace of growth, the smallest G-7 country by population would double its residents in about 26 years, and surpass Italy, France, the UK and Germany by 2050.

The looming threats of an aging population — leading to dwindling tax revenue and shrinking budgets — are playing out in different ways around the world. France’s plan to raise the retirement age by two years to 64 led to nationwide protests. Germany risks having 5 million fewer workers by the end of the decade, and already is struggling with strains in its industrial-heavy economy. Japan, where the government has long resisted immigration, is facing acute labor shortages, a rapid population decline, and dying rural towns.

In the US, immigration is a divisive political issue that’s becoming even more polarizing as thousands of migrants traverse the Mexican border daily.

By contrast, Canada’s residents have long been welcoming of newcomers, thanks to the country’s framing of immigration as an economic policy and a relatively isolated geography that limits illegal crossings. Since 1967, it has relied on a system where immigrants are assigned points based on their age, education, employment opportunities and English or French abilities, allowing the country to target skilled workers.

But immigration has largely tilted toward Canada’s larger cities, which have developed strong ethnic communities that have in turn attracted more newcomers seeking a sense of belonging. Over a one-year period to July 1, the largest population centers had a net gain of more than 600,000 people from international migration, compared with just 21,000 settling in smaller communities.

That’s only strengthened real estate demand in cities where housing was already in short supply, raising homeownership barriers and pricing millions out of the market — hurting both international migrants and current residents, especially younger generations.

“We’re a free country. We’re not going to direct migration patterns to say you have to move to remote places,” said Bob Dhillon, founder and chief executive officer of Calgary-based real estate company Mainstreet Equity Corp., who’s a Sikh immigrant. “But we can encourage new immigrants and give them incentives to go to different parts of Canada other than big cities.”

His city exemplifies some of the strains. Even after a rise in interest rates last year, a benchmark measure of Calgary home values climbed almost 3% in May from a year earlier to a record. Prices are up almost 28% from just five years ago.

That’s in part because of a sudden surge in residents in Calgary’s home province of Alberta: Last year’s 3.7% jump in population — matching the pace of Niger, the world’s fastest-growing country — was unexpected even for a region known for its oil boomtowns.

Mortgage broker Matt Leggett said he has never seen this much housing demand since moving to Calgary nearly two decades ago. Leslie Echino, owner of Annabelle’s Kitchen, has spent months looking to add a third location in one of the city’s fast-growing suburbs, but newly empty commercial spaces are usually snapped up within days.

Rental-property builder Bucci Developments went from offering a month of free rent two years ago to now having a wait list for its units. The company is trying to catch up with soaring demand, doubling its construction target with plans to add four more towers near downtown.

“It’s these unexpected surges that force us to retool,” said Mike Bucci, the company’s vice president. “I want boring predictability. If you’re consistent, the industry can catch up. But it’s going to take us at least three years to do so,” he said, referring to the time it takes his firm to build an apartment building.

Those type of real estate shocks risk eroding support among Canadians for immigrants, said David Green, a professor at the University of British Columbia’s Vancouver School of Economics.

“We’re opening the door to the same kind of problems that we see in other countries,” Green said. “The hard-right wing is going to pick this up and run with it, and at least a modicum of what they’re going to say on the housing market strains is going to be true. That’s going to give credence to the rest of their narrative. This is a very dangerous game.”

A Canadian Value

Fraser, the immigration minister, said the government is trying to address the strains with measures such as regionalizing immigration programs to allocate people to areas that have more capacity, and a program to bring in more people who have skills that are in great demand, such as health-care workers and homebuilders.

“This is going to help us bring the skills that we need into the economy to help alleviate some of the social pressures rather than exacerbate them,” he said.

Public support also is holding strong. Canadians look at immigration “as a value and not a policy,” said Andrew Parkin, executive director of the Environics Institute for Survey Research, which conducts an annual survey on the subject. In the most recent one, almost 70% of respondents said they disagree with the statement “overall, there is too much immigration to Canada,” the highest since the poll began in 1977.

Among the 27% of survey respondents who agreed there’s too much immigration, the most common reason they gave was a threat to culture.

Concerns about the changing demographic are playing out in Quebec, Canada’s second-most populous province. The French-speaking region has resisted raising its permanent resident targets, keeping the pace at just half that of the federal government on a per capita basis. Premier François Legault has said that the province wouldn’t accept large increases of newcomers like the rest of the country on concern it would lead to a decline in French language, even though that could mean further losing its demographic weight within Canada.

At the same time, industry groups have repeatedly called for higher immigration to add more permanent workers to the economy. Quebec businesses are increasingly turning to temporary staff to fill jobs, with the number of temporary foreign workers jumping 65% in just three years.

Across all provinces, many accreditation and job processes can’t expand fast enough to cope with or take advantage of the rapid increases in newcomers. That has resulted in many skilled immigrants being forced to work at entry levels or wait around for their foreign qualifications to be recognized.

More than half of recent immigrants were admitted under the economic category — meaning skilled workers and entrepreneurs who are “selected on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada.” While these people are a key focus of the policy, alongside refugee resettlement, the number of temporary workers has soared in recent years, leading to criticism that they will hurt wage growth and increase income inequality.

But both high- and low-skilled jobs are needed throughout Canada, where the job market remains tight. The “vast majority” of immigrants are contributing to the economy, said Kevin McNichol, CEO of Prospect Human Services, which helps Albertans and newcomers get jobs.

“This isn’t a deficit game,” he said. “They’re not taking stuff away. They’re adding, and in adding then our economy grows for everybody, which means more work, more jobs, more money.”

Embracing Change


Those types of benefits are becoming clear in Nova Scotia, which knows the pains of a shrinking population. Up until about a decade ago, communities were slowly dying after key industries like steelmaking and coal mining shut down, taking working-age people with them. They left behind an older population and towns that struggled to support themselves.

The biggest Atlantic province now wants to double its residents to 2 million by 2060 — an ambitious target considering it took more than 150 years for Nova Scotia to reach a million people, in 2021.

In Pictou County, where Fraser is from, the influx of foreign business owners, health-care professionals and factory workers have changed the area dramatically. In less than a decade, the county added a mosque, Syrian restaurants and an Asian grocery store. It's also getting a Mexican restaurant later this year, to be run by former temporary worker Anabel Cameron.

“We as Canadians have a very wealthy neighbor to the south of us, and we want all the things that they want, but their population and tax base allow them to have really good roads, really good services and all these wonderful things,” said Jim Fitt, founder and CEO of Velsoft, an e-learning and training software company based in the county, which relies on immigrants to help serve its clients worldwide. “The only way we’re going to be able to achieve that is if we have a bigger tax base.”

Nova Scotia also is at the forefront of breaking down barriers for newcomers to work in jobs that match their potential. When Bahati Maganjo arrived in Pictou County from Kenya in 2021, she could only work as a continuing care assistant at a retirement home despite having been trained as a nurse. She is now part of the pilot fast-track program to integrate internationally-educated nurses, and is expected to start working in her profession by July.

“With my colleagues and patients, I see the appreciation for what I’m bringing to the table,” said Maganjo, who was born in Rwanda. “I can’t imagine having to wait years before I could make a contribution here.”

The provincial capital of Halifax, with a population of about 480,000, has set a target to increase its residents by 10% in 2027 and by 35% in 2037. Its expanded talent pool was key in attracting companies like Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., HuMetis Technologies Inc., Avanade Inc., and Wattpad Corp. in recent years.

The population gains contributed to a 9.3% annual jump in Halifax’s rents for a two-bedroom apartment as of October, the largest increase of any major Canadian city. But to Mayor Mike Savage, the strains are worth it.

As he put it: “Problems of growth are easier to manage than problems of stagnancy.”

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek