Monday, November 20, 2023

New contract will put N.L. Hydro workers on par with utilities in the Maritimes

CBC
Sun, November 19, 2023 

Jabez Lane, business manager of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1615, says the union achieved all its bargaining goals in negotiating a new deal. (Terry Roberts/CBC - image credit)

Roughly 650 unionized N.L. Hydro employees have accepted a new contract that will see their wages climb to a level equivalent to other public utility workers in Atlantic Canada.

The workers include power line technicians, the people who operate power generating stations and substations, and administrative employees.

The employees are are represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1615.

A tentative agreement was reached in September offering annual increases of two per cent over four years, which is consistent with the pattern bargaining for other public service unions in the province.

N.L. Hydro also agreed to a so-called "Atlantic adjustment" that will increase remuneration by roughly five per cent more during the contract, which expires in 2026.

Employees will also receive a $2,000 signing bonus.

"I don't think I'm calling the windfall, but it's just a matter of bringing [unionized workers] to where they should be in comparison to other people in the industry," said Local 1615 business manager Jabez Lane.

"We are a utility industry. We are at Crown Corporation. We deserve to be paid the same as other people in our industry, and that's where we'll be."

The old contract expired in April 2022, which means the the new agreement will include retroactive pay.

A tentative agreement was reached in September, with the help of a conciliator, with ratification votes taking place throughout the province in recent weeks.

There are three separate collective agreements, said Lane, and the acceptance rate for each was above 75 per cent.

Lane said the union achieved all three of its goals: no concessions, no two-tiered wage increases, and Atlantic parity with Crown-owned utilities in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.

But Lane said efforts to provide more job security for the 80-plus union members who work at the Holyrood thermal generating station have so far fallen short.

US-based Liberty Consulting Group was known for keeping a watchful eye on N.L. Hydro.

The new collective agreement between N.L. Hydro and IBEW 1615 is retroactive to April 2022 and includes increases that will bring unionized employees up to par with their counterparts who work at public utilities in other Atlantic provinces. (Patrick Butler/Radio-Canada)

The station has a capacity of 490 megawatts, uses heavily polluting fuel oil, and is a critical power supply for the Avalon Peninsula.

One of the arguments for building Muskrat Falls and the Labrador-Island Link — commonly known as the LIL — was that it would allow for the closure of Holyrood and eliminate the emissions that result from its operation. But there are reliability concerns with the LIL, and Hydro and the utility regulator have both said Holyrood will be needed until at least 2030.

Because of the uncertainty over its future, Hydro has been reluctant to grant full-time employee status to workers at Holyrood, and roughly half of the workforce receive full benefits but have term employment status.

The union was hoping to convert more of those jobs to full time because Holyrood will be operating for up to another decade, said Lane, but Hydro resisted.

He said both sides agreed to continue talks on the matter, and "we intend on pursuing that fairly quickly."

The new contract expires in 2026.
Dozens gather in Halifax in support of striking Pete's Frootique workers

CBC
Sun, November 19, 2023 

Workers at Pete's Frootique in downtown Halifax went on strike on Saturday. (Vernon Ramesar/CBC - image credit)

Dozens gathered on Dresden Row in downtown Halifax on Sunday afternoon in solidarity with striking Pete's Frootique workers.

The strike began Saturday.

The workers at the Dresden Row location voted to join the Service Employees International Union in 2022. The union says it has been unable to negotiate a contract with Sobeys, which owns Pete's Frootique.

Pete's Frootique announced on social media Saturday that its downtown store is closing indefinitely.

The workers are seeking better pay. Union representatives at the rally told those gathered that most workers are now working for minimum wage and that the last offer made to them by the company called for a wage increase of five cents per hour.

Terry Armour, who works in the market's produce department, said the show of solidarity is important and would show Sobeys that workers are serious about their demands.

Terry Armour works in the produce department of the supermarket.

Terry Armour works in the market's produce department. (Vernon Ramesar/CBC),

Armour said he wasn't surprised when the company announced it was closing the Dresden Row location indefinitely.

"I don't think they have much choice," he said. "They can't run the place without us and we're standing out here demanding a better wage."

He said had the union accepted the last offer from Sobeys it would have meant an increase of $4.55 in his cheque based on his 91-hour pay period.

Serena Gagne, the picket captain for the striking workers, is a front-end supervisor at the store and has worked there for four years.

Serena Gagne has worked at Pete's Frootique for four years. (Vernon Ramesar/CBC)

She said she was excited and happy about the number of people who attended the rally. Gagne said it was heartwarming to see the community come out in support.

"We have lots of employees who, including myself, only make $15 an hour and we all know that right now in Halifax a livable wage is $26.50," she said.

"That's just not acceptable for Pete's and Sobeys, who have offered us a five-cent raise. I believe that we're all here fighting to get a better raise than that."

Wynn Meaney used to work at the market and came to the rally to support his former colleagues. (Vernon Ramesar/CBCr?CBNC)

Wynn Meaney, a former worker at the store, said he came out to support his former colleagues because he didn't want them "to have to struggle anymore."

He said he left because of low wages and a lack of support from upper management at the store.

He said he believes the union will achieve its goals and thinks it will likely be achieved because of pressure from the public and not because of any goodwill from the company.

In a statement emailed to CBC News late Sunday evening, a spokesperson for Sobeys said the company is disappointed in the decision to strike. The company said it worked hard to reach an agreement it considers "fair and competitive."

"We are hopeful this will be resolved as quickly as possible and are ready and willing to get back to the table with the union as soon as the SEIU Local 2 leadership is ready," the email said.

The Pete's Frootique location in Bedford remains open.
ONTARIO
Plan to bring in South Korean workers for NextStar battery plant sparks backlash



CBC
Mon, November 20, 2023

The NextStar EV battery plant in Windsor, Ont., is shown under construction in the summer of 2023. ( Patrick Morrell/CBC - image credit)

Workers from South Korea will be coming to work on Windsor's NextStar EV battery factory, sparking backlash from politicians who say the jobs should go to Canadians because of the massive taxpayer subsidies the companies received.

The NextStar EV battery factory, a partnership between Stellantis and LG Energy Solution, received about $15 billion in subsidies from the federal and provincial governments.

Windsor's police chief met with the South Korean ambassador last week ahead of the arrival of the workers next year. According to a social media post from the police service, about 1,600 South Korean workers are coming to Windsor for the project.

When asked for comment, the company said in a statement that it was "fully committed" to hiring more than 2,500 Canadians and 2,300 local tradespeople for the construction and equipment installation.

"The equipment installation phase of the project requires additional temporary specialized global supplier staff who have proprietary knowledge and specialized expertise that is critical to the successful construction and launch of Canada's first large-scale battery manufacturing facility," said NextStar CEO Danis Lee in a statement.

Federal Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre raised the issue in a news conference on Monday, calling for an inquiry into how many of the jobs will go to temporary foreign workers.

"And now we learn that the $15-billion grant to the Stellantis plant will fund mostly jobs for non Canadians — not immigrants, we love jobs for immigrants — jobs for people who are not Canadian citizens and will not be Canadian citizens," he said.

"They will come here, get a taxpayer-funded paycheque and take it back to their country."

Over the summer, NextStar began hiring for the first 130 jobs at the facility, including for roles in HR, communications and finance as well as engineers.

On Monday, Unifor national president Lana Payne said reports on the matter raised "serious flags" for the union, which represents workers at Stellantis' Windsor Assembly Plant.

"We believe the shift to electric vehicles must be led by good jobs, with union contracts, for workers in Canada," Payne said. "Workers should not be subject to exploitative hiring programs, like the Temporary Foreign Workers Program, that was significantly expanded under the Harper Conservatives but also endorsed by consecutive federal governments, Payne said.

But, she said, clarifying statements from the company have "alleviated some of our union's immediate concerns."

"To be clear, our union will closely monitor the hiring process to ensure Canadian workers are first to benefit from this historic investment in the auto sector and that NextStar fulfils its stated commitment to good jobs in Canada."

On Friday, MPP Lisa Gretzky (NDP-Windsor West) wrote to Premier Doug Ford and provincial labour minister David Piccini noting "significant concern that NextStar and potentially many others in the EV battery supply chain will be relying on temporary foreign workers rather than local workers to build and operate the facility."

More to come.
FRIENDLY FIRE
IDF combat helicopter targeting Hamas fighters at Nova festival massacre shot some partygoers by mistake, says Haaretz


Rebecca Rommen
Updated Mon, November 20, 2023 

An aerial view shows the burnt cars of festival-goers at the site of an attack on the Nova Festival by Hamas gunmen from Gaza, near Israel's border with the Gaza Strip, in southern Israel, October 12, 2023.REUTERS

The IDF mistakenly hit Nova festival attendees while aiming for Hamas militants, Haaretz reported.


A police source told the outlet that helicopter fire may have missed its mark.


Israeli officials pushed back against the report after it was published.

An Israeli police investigation into the music-festival massacre on October 7 indicates that the IDF mistakenly shot some festival attendees while firing at Hamas, a report suggested.

The alleged debacle was reported by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, citing an unnamed police source.

The source told Haaretz that their police investigation said an IDF combat helicopter fired at Hamas fighters after arriving on the scene. While targeting the perpetrators, the helicopter also hit some festivalgoers, the source said.

Business Insider reached out to Josh Breiner, the Haaretz journalist who broke this story, for comment.

After Haaretz published its report, Israel Police released a statement pushing back. It said, per The Times of Israel, that the actions of the IDF were beyond the remit of the investigation the source was speaking about.

It also asked that media outlets only report information from government officials.

364 people were killed at the festival, a third of the fatalities from Hamas militants' coordinated terrorist attacks on Israel on October 7, per The Times of Israel.

Israeli security's assessment is that Hamas did not have advance knowledge of the Nova music festival next to Kibbutz Re'im, and targeted it spontaneously after infiltrating Gaza's border, Haaretz reported.

The festival was initially billed to end on Friday night and only extended to Saturday, late in the day, it said.

Approximately 3,500 people attended the psychedelic trance festival three miles away from the Gaza border, per The New York Times.

Alongside the fatalities, dozens of festival attendees were kidnapped and taken to Gaza. A video of 25-year-old Noa Argamani being hoisted onto a motorcycle by militants while calling for her boyfriend went viral on social media.


Israeli helicopter opened fire on Israelis in festival during Hamas attack on October 7: Report



November 19, 2023 

An Israeli air force attack helicopter on November 17, 2023 [JACK GUEZ/AFP via Getty Images]


A new report revealed Saturday that an Israeli military helicopter opened fire on Palestinian gunmen but wounded Israelis participating in a festival during an October 7 attack by Hamas against Israel.

The Haaretz newspaper said an Israeli security assessment was based on an investigation by police with Hamas gunmen who were arrested October 7.


Haaretz reported that the military helicopter arrived at the site of the festival and opened fire on the gunmen but also wounded several festival participants.

It said, according to the assessment, the gunmen had no prior information about the festival which was held close to the Kibbutz Re’im, near the borders with Gaza.

Israel’s Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper also published a report on Israeli Air Force helicopters intervening in the attack carried out by Hamas from Gaza on October 7.

The newspaper reported that the Israeli forces “found it difficult to identify Hamas militants,” adding that helicopter pilots “used artillery” against civilians at the festival.

“The Hamas terrorists were instructed to slowly blend in with the crowd and not to move under any circumstances,” the newspaper said in its report.

“In this way, they tried to fool the air force into believing that those below were Israelis. This deception worked for a while, until the Apache helicopters had to break free of all restraints. The pilots found it difficult to distinguish who was a terrorist and who was an Israeli,” the report added.

READ: Hamas didn’t know about music festival in advance says Israel police

The newspaper said that “when they realised that, some of them decided to use artillery shells against the terrorists independently, without getting permission from their superiors.”

Police estimated that the number killed in the festival was 364, but did not reveal their identities.

The investigation details are contrary to the official Israeli narrative on the attack by the Palestinian resistance group which claimed Hamas gunmen slaughtered the revelers in the festival.

Hundreds of Hamas fighters crossed into Israel in a surprise operation named “Al-Aqsa Flood,” triggering an Israeli retaliatory bloody onslaught on the Gaza Strip.

Israel has killed more than 12,300 Palestinians in its air and ground attacks on the Gaza Strip since the surprise offensive by Hamas. The official Israeli death toll, meanwhile, stands at about 1,200.

Thousands of buildings, including hospitals, mosques, and churches, have either been damaged or destroyed in Israel’s relentless strikes on the besieged enclave.

An Israeli blockade has also cut Gaza off from fuel, electricity, and water supplies, and reduced aid deliveries to a trickle.

Israel has rejected growing calls for a cease-fire until the release of hostages held by Hamas.


INTER IMPERIALIST RIVALRY FOR HEGEMONY

In Africa, Trump saw 'huts.' Biden sees opportunity to curb President Xi's growing influence


Michael Collins, USA TODAY
Sun, November 19, 2023 


WASHINGTON – When Donald Trump looked at Africa, he crudely dismissed its significance and fretted African immigrants would never “go back to their huts” once they entered the United States.

When Joe Biden looks at Africa, he sees opportunities to curb China’s growing influence in the world.

Biden has sought to move beyond Trump’s dismissive, sometimes confrontational approach and focus instead on deepening ties with a continent that is home to a rapidly growing population and stands as a potentially important geopolitical partner.

“Our eyes are fixed squarely on the future,” Biden told a small group of African leaders in Washington last year.

But beneath the promissory oratory lies a more strategic reason for the shift in attitude and approach to U.S.-Africa policy.

“It’s about China,” said Mark Green, former ambassador to Tanzania and president of the Wilson Center, a nonpartisan think tank that focuses on global affairs. “It’s about great power, competition.”

On Wednesday, Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping met in person for the second time since Biden became president. The four-hour meeting, held on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperative conference in San Francisco, comes as the two leaders work to repair relations deeply strained by a trade war that started when Trump was in office and by clashes over technology, China’s aggression against Taiwan and a Chinese spy balloon that flew over the United States earlier this year until a U.S. fighter jet shot it down.

In his opening remarks, Biden told Xi the two leaders must ensure that competition between their countries “does not veer into conflict.”

“We have to manage it responsibly – that competition,” Biden said. “That’s what the United States want and what we intend to do. I also believe that's what the world wants from both of us: candid exchange.”

Xi said that while the China-U.S. relationship has never been smoothing sailing, “it has kept moving forward amid twists and turns.”

“Planet Earth is big enough for the two countries to succeed, and one country’s success is an opportunity for the other,” he said.

Neither leader acknowledged, at least not publicly, the newest arena in the competition between the two economic giants: Africa.

'You're going to be seeing a lot of us': China has far surpassed the US as an economic player in Africa. Can Biden change that?

President Joe Biden greets Senegalese President Macky Sall during the U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit in Washington last December.


'New kid on the block in Africa'

China, an economic and military rival of the United States, has made significant gains in Africa over the past two decades, setting off alarms in the U.S. and among European countries who fear Beijing’s growing influence in the world.

“China in the 2000s became the new kid on the block in Africa,” said Amaka Anku, who heads the Africa practice for the Eurasia Group, a global political risk consulting firm based in New York City.

China has far surpassed the U.S. as an economic player in Africa. Trade between China and Africa hit $254 billion in 2021 – four times the trade between the U.S. and Africa, according to the United States Institute of Peace, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization founded by Congress.

China is the largest provider of foreign direct investment in Africa, supporting hundreds of thousands of African jobs – roughly double the level of U.S. foreign direct investment on the continent. China is also by far the largest lender to African countries, often providing loans that come with much more favorable terms than those offered by U.S. lenders.

What’s more, the Chinese have been pushing to establish a military base on Africa’s western coast – a particular concern for the Biden administration, which sees China as the most consequential threat to U.S. national security.

“This is a crossroads moment for U.S.-Africa relations,” Green said. “And I think it’s important that we continue to build relationships.”

The best way to do that, he said, is for the president to set foot in Africa – “quite frankly, the sooner, the better.”

'All in on Africa's future': Biden announces trade, infrastructure investments in Africa

Biden has said he plans to visit Africa this year, although no plans have been announced, and with just six weeks left in 2023, a trip there this year seems unlikely. The White House, pressed by reporters on whether Biden plans to keep his promise to visit before the end of the year, has simply said that it has no update on his travel schedule.

Biden insists his goal is not to contain China, and his administration has downplayed suggestions that his interest in Africa is tied to a desire to curb Chinese influence there.

Besides the economy, analysts say there are multiple reasons for the U.S. to engage with Africa, not the least of which is the rise of authoritarianism on the continent – a concern for the U.S. and other democracies. Africa also has the world’s youngest population. The top 10 countries with the lowest median age are there, according to the Wilson Center.

The African Union, which represents the continent’s 54 countries, is pushing for a permanent seat or seats on the U.N. National Security Council, which would provide some of the respect the continent has long sought on the world stage.

Biden has publicly supported not only giving Africa a permanent seat at the U.N. but adding the African Union to the Group of 20 nations. South Africa is currently the only African member of the G-20, a governmental forum made up of the world’s major industrial and emerging countries.

'Well, look, he is': Biden calls China's Xi a dictator again, upsetting Beijing after high-stakes meeting
'African leaders don't want to be chess pieces'

Trump didn’t exactly endear himself to Africans during the four years he was in office. He never visited Africa during his presidency, making him the first president since Ronald Reagan to never set foot on the continent while in office.

Trump’s incendiary language didn’t help, either.

During an Oval Office meeting with lawmakers about immigration, he questioned why the U.S. would accept more migrants from Haiti and “sh**hole countries” in Africa rather than places like Norway. In a separate meeting a few months earlier, he reportedly groused that thousands of Haitians who’d entered the United States had AIDS and that Nigerian visitors would never “go back to their huts” in Africa. Critics called his remarks derogatory and racist.

Biden sought to reset relations with Africa upon taking office. Last December, the administration hosted the first U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit since 2014. Heads of state from 49 African nations and the African Union were invited to Washington for an opportunity to re-engage with the Biden administration.

To underscore its commitment to Africa, the U.S. has promised to send $55 billion to Africa over the next three years for initiatives to improve health care, mitigate the dangers of climate change, boost trade and investment and set up programs to help women entrepreneurs.

And while Biden has yet to visit, first lady Jill Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and other administration officials have traveled to the continent over the past year, promising the U.S. is serious about deepening its ties to Africa.

Whenever Biden makes the trip, African leaders will be looking for more than promises from the administration, analysts said.

They will be looking for a signal that the U.S. considers the region important – and not just as a buffer against China, Green said.

“African leaders don’t want to be chess pieces,” he said.

African countries need funding to help them finance critical development initiatives, infrastructure projects and climate change mitigation, said Rama Yade, senior director of the Atlantic Council’s Africa Center.

“They have development needs of $200 billion per year, and that is absolutely key,” she said. “Six hundred million people suffer from a lack of electricity, not to mention food insecurity, problems of housing, of transportation, of infrastructure. Those are critical.”

African leaders are willing to work so closely with China, Yade said, “because the Chinese – they bring money.”

The U.S. government’s announcement of funding programs for Africa in the past has always come with the promise of millions of dollars in accompanying investments from the private sector. But the private sector funding seldom materializes, Anku said.

For now, “I think what African countries would like to see is ‘show me the money,’” she said.

While Africa has many big-ticket needs, smaller projects or those that directly benefit communities can sometimes have the most lasting impact, Green said.

Green came to realize that soon after he was named ambassador to Tanzania and landed in Dar es Salaam to present his credentials. The arrival of a new ambassador is a big deal, with lots of limousines and a ceremony filled with pomp and circumstance. But what Green remembers most about that day is his cab driver.

“Before we took off, he turned around, leaned (over) to me and he said, ‘I was taught by a Peace Corps teacher,’ and he returned to the wheel,” Green said. “For him, that was the big deal, not the formalities. It was American compassion and action.”

“That, to me,” Green added, “is how you make a difference.”

Michael Collins covers the White House. Follow him on Twitter @mcollinsNEWS.

PEPFAR: Long a bipartisan effort, a program to fight global HIV is stuck in Washington gridlock

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Why Biden sees Africa as opportunity to curb China's influence
A look at why The Hate U Give was removed from Nova Scotia school curriculums


CBC
Sun, November 19, 2023 

The Hate U Give is about a Black high school student who struggles with identity and trauma after she witnesses a police officer shoot and kill her friend. (Harper Collins - image credit)

The decision to drop the American young adult novel The Hate U Give from Nova Scotia school curriculums appears to have been made before the Department of Education received or saw any formal complaints, according to newly released documents.

In September, CBC News reported the department removed the award-winning book, which is about a Black high school student who struggles with identity and trauma after she witnesses a police officer shoot and kill her friend, from its authorized learning resource list.

The book, however, is still available for students to read on their own if school libraries choose to carry it.

An official with the department's African Canadian services branch told CBC Radio's Information Morning Halifax that they had received two complaints about the book, including one from a parent and one from an employee of a regional centre for education, due to its use of the N-word and other profanities, which spurred the decision to delist the book.

"The resource was identified by some of our regional centres as being problematic," Paul Ash said in September.

"We reviewed the resource based on the concerns that they expressed and agreed, and we decided to remove it off of the authorized learning resources."

LISTEN | A full debrief about what was learned from the request:

Following that conversation, CBC News requested more information about the complaints and how the decision to drop the book was made by filing a freedom of information request.

That request yielded several pages of email correspondence between staff at the Department of Education that revealed some details about one complaint and more information about the process — as well as feedback from some educators who had questions about how a decision like this is made.

It also showed that the department delisted the book in October 2022, prior to the one complaint included in the records.

One complaint on record

The documents didn't contain any records of a complaint from a parent. The department said a regional centre for education received one but it did not forward a record directly.

The one complaint included in the documents came from an equity and human rights consultant employed by a regional centre for education. It's unclear if that is the same complaint from a regional centre that Ash referred to in his interview.

"This book is problematic given its language content," Joe Bishara wrote in an email to an official with the Education Department on Jan. 25, 2023. He continued to say that it failed to measure up against the department's Know the Signals assessment tool.

That assessment tool was implemented in 2021, and is used by the department to determine what resources are appropriate to use in schools when teaching topics that affect and reflect the Black community.

The documents revealed that the book had been reviewed using this guide during the 2021-22 school year, but staff couldn't come to a conclusion on it. The records released to CBC do not detail if anything specific prompted the review.

Tracy Griffin, the department official who responded to Bishara earlier this year, agreed that the book "does not pass Know the Signals," and that was the reason it was delisted.

The Know the Signals guide has three different categories, including Stop: Do Not Use, Wait: Consult and Go: Use.

The first category outlines criteria for when material shouldn't be used in schools, including any resource that "depicts violence towards a group of Black individuals and has the potential to expose students to traumatizing events and images."

It also says a material shouldn't be used if it uses racist terms or portrays Black and African Nova Scotians from a "deficit, stereotypical and racist perspective."

The Hate U Give does depict violence against a Black individual and some Black characters use the N-word.

Teacher weighs in

The documents showed that some teachers had concerns about the delisting process, including one who voiced her opinion to the department via email.

"It feels very uncomfortable to censor books (as a white teacher in particular) that are first voices like Angie Thomas, Nic Stone, Alice Walker, Lawrence Hill, etc.," Tammie Landry, a literacy facilitator for Halifax Regional Centre for Education, wrote in May 2023.

"Are we sending the message that the topics, experiences, language a Black author chooses to use are not welcome as a choice in high school? How do we address systemic racism and disrupt inequalities from our history, without the history?"

When CBC News first reported the delisting of The Hate U Give, an official with the Education Department said it's working closely with the African Canadian Services branch to select a number of resources that would provide education about African Nova Scotia cultures, histories and contributions.

The documents also noted that teachers had asked whether there was a central list of delisted resources, including the reasons, but officials said there was no such list — or at least not at the time.

CBC News contacted the Education Department for an interview to clarify how and when the decision was made, but it was unable to accommodate the request.

"The Department of Education and Early Childhood Development is committed to inclusive education," the spokesperson said in an email.

Education and understanding

Following CBC's coverage, Kesa Munroe-Anderson, a professor at Acadia University's School of Education, said before material like The Hate U Give can be taught in schools, there must be uniform and mandatory training that prepares all teachers to teach it in a culturally responsive way.

"The only way to improve that situation is through education and understanding. First of all, we must learn to be comfortable with uncomfortable topics of discussion like racism and anti-Black racism in this province and in this country," Munroe-Andrerson told Information Morning.

"We need to have critical, courageous conversations where we can engage in critical social justice using an equity lens and anti-racism lens in general in society and then specifically in schools."

For more stories about the experiences of Black Canadians — from anti-Black racism to success stories within the Black community — check out Being Black in Canada, a CBC project Black Canadians can be proud of. You can read more stories here.
'It's a huge honour': Amateur paleontologist from N.S. wins international award

CBC
Sun, November 19, 2023 

In 2020, Brian Hebert discovered a 315-million-year-old reptile fossil in Nova Scotia. (Brian Hebert - image credit)

Brian Hebert's life changed in an instant while out for a walk with his father about 30 years ago.

While walking around the small town of Joggins, N.S., a UNESCO world heritage site along the Bay of Fundy, Hebert stumbled upon a fossil.

He was fascinated from that moment. He began visiting the local library everyday to scan through hundreds of scientific journals and fossilized records.

In October, Hebert, 44, received an international award when he attended the Geological Survey of America Conference in Pittsburgh. The Harrell L. Strimple Award is given to an amateur paleontologist for their contributions to paleontology.

Hebert is the first Nova Scotian to receive the award.

"It's a huge honour," he said. "People might not know how important the award is. In our world, it's the highest honour I'm ever going to get for paleontology."

In 2020, Hebert discovered a 315-million-year-old reptile fossil in Nova Scotia, which he called Dendromaia unamakiensis, meaning tree mother from Cape Breton. The discovery of an adult and baby reptile fossilized side by side was something nobody had ever seen before, he said.


'He's just remarkable'

John Calder, a Nova Scotian geologist, nominated Hebert after years of collaboration.

Calder met Hebert, then a teenager, while searching for fossils by the Joggins Cliffs. Calder had a conversation with him about paleontology and was struck with how knowledgeable he was.

"There's none like Brian," Calder said. "This gift to know where fossils might be is not chance discovery."

Hebert said a childhood friend reached out to him after the award was announced, saying people don't realize the hours that go into it.

"For a while it was going to school, coming home and then heading down to the beach to try to find something else," Hebert said.

Hebert said it takes a strong will to spend everyday exploring for rock formations, minerals or any signs of a potential fossil. He said he often didn't know if he would find anything, but that just made it fun.

'You're 12 years old and there's PhDs at your door'

A few years after their first encounter, Calder kept tabs on Hebert's progress. He recalled a time when he invited a visiting scientist from the United Kingdom to Hebert's home to see the prodigy's new discovery. Hebert presented the two men with a fossil wrapped in newspaper.

"He asked if we agreed with his preliminary identification that it was the skull roof of an ancient fish called haplolepis," Calder said.

"We didn't say anything, we just looked at each other, wide eyed, and then slowly turned our eyes back to Brian. Like, how did you know that?"

Calder said they were flabbergasted by the hypothesis and weren't sure if it was true.

"He was right," he said. "I don't know anyone else in the world that has this ability."
P.E.I. partners with researchers looking into STI testing at pharmacies

CBC
Mon, November 20, 2023

Blood test kit for sexually transmitted infections. A group of researchers with Memorial University's School of Pharmacy has partnered with organizations and government agencies across Canada — including Health P.E.I. — to explore testing for such diseases at community pharmacies. (Craig Chivers/CBC - image credit)

A new study wants to look into how making testing for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBIs) more accessible can impact the health of Prince Edward Islanders.

A group of researchers with Memorial University's School of Pharmacy has partnered with organizations and government agencies across Canada — including Health P.E.I. — to explore testing for such diseases at community pharmacies.

The team has been granted $2 million in federal funding. Some pharmacies in Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Alberta are already offering accessible testing for HIV, hepatitis C and syphilis as part of the study.

Debbie Kelly, director of the Medication Therapy Services Clinic at the MUN School of Pharmacy, is leading the project.

"Just like if you were going to get counselled about how to inject yourself with insulin, for example, you'd be taken into the private counselling room in the pharmacy," she said. "The pharmacist would describe to you … sort of the benefits and the limitations of the different tests, and then they would administer the tests."

Point-of-care tests for HIV, hepatitis C and syphilis tests provide patients with results right away, though if they're reactive they still have to be confirmed by a lab.

Results for dry spot tests, which only require the prick of a finger, take a couple of weeks, Kelly said.

"In the model that we've been studying, the pharmacist can provide a blood work requisition right away. So you can go to the lab and get your blood work done and a direct referral to a physician or a nurse," she said.

"If it's negative, then you can get education about how you can protect yourself in future."

More options

Kelly said the pharmacy model has shown to be especially successful for vulnerable populations and the LGBTQ community.

Providing easier access to STBBI diagnosis and testing is one of the key points of the provincial government's new strategy on the file, which the province's chief public health officer says is still under development.

Pharmacy plus originally launched with over 30 ailments that could be assessed by a pharmacist. The program expanded last month to now include hormonal contraception, shingles and impetigo.

Pharmacy Plus originally launched with over 30 ailments that could be assessed by a pharmacist. (Nicola MacLeod/CBC)

Dr. Heather Morrison told CBC News earlier this month the province has already improved the ability to treat STBBIs at P.E.I.'s Sexual Health, Options and Reproductive Services clinic and UPEI's Health and Wellness Centre.

Morrison said the CPHO is also working with other community organizations to make testing more accessible.

Meanwhile, the province is still working to fill gaps in primary care through its Pharmacy Plus program, which covers consultations for a couple dozen common ailments within pharmacists' scope of practice.

While there's been no funding commitment for Kelly's STBBI testing model in the province yet, the researcher said Health P.E.I. has shown some interest.

"We're looking to take it to the next level so that we can bring it to your community, especially for people that don't have a primary care provider or maybe have challenges with accessing care that way," Kelly said.

"It's just about offering another option and so far, we're hearing that people really like having it in their pharmacy."
ANOTHER LIBERAL SNAFU
Board president of federal green fund resigns amid conflict of interest probe

CBC
Mon, November 20, 2023 

Annette Verschuren, the president of the board of directors of Sustainable Development Technologies Canada, a federal foundation, resigned her position after an announcement that she is the subject of an investigation by the ethics commissioner.
(Tom Ayers/CBC - image credit)

The president of the board of directors of a federal foundation for green technology is leaving a few days after an announcement that she is the subject of an investigation by the ethics commissioner.

Appointed by the Liberal government to head Sustainable Development Technologies Canada (SDTC) in 2019, Annette Verschuren told Canadian Federal Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry François-Philippe Champagne she will be leaving Dec. 1.


Verschuren was heavily criticized by MPs from all political parties after confirming she had participated in the approval of a payment of more than $200,000 in subsidies to a private firm she runs.

Verschuren recently told a parliamentary committee that in 2020 and 2021 she moved a motion to grant additional financing to companies that had already concluded financing agreements with SDTC. The total funding of $40 million was intended to help businesses financially survive the problems caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

That decision resulted in additional funding of $217,000 to NRStor, a company in the field of energy storage, which Verschuren has led since 2012. She told MPs on the committee that NRStor pays her an annual salary of $120,000.

In response to a request from the Conservative Party, ethics commissioner Konrad von Finckenstein confirmed last week he was launching an investigation into whether or not Verschuren had placed herself in a conflict of interest.

Under questioning by MPs on the committee, Verschuren said she received a legal opinion supporting the decision to funnel additional financing to companies, including NRStor.

The reason she didn't have to recuse herself, she explained, is that her firm was part of a group of about 100 companies that received the same level of additional funding from SDTC during the COVID-19 pandemic.

NRStor, in this context, had not benefitted from preferential treatment, she said.

Controversial foundation

SDTC finances small- and medium-sized businesses in the field of environmental technologies, with the mandate to distribute $1 billion in federal funding over five years.

The foundation was the target of a whistleblower denunciation earlier this year due to its management of human resources and public funds. A report from the firm Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton noted several failures, including in the management of conflicts of interest.

In her resignation letter, Verschuren said the firm found no clear evidence of wrongdoing or misconduct on the part of SDTC.

"Continuous improvement is the foundation of any successful organization and these evaluations have provided useful recommendations for improving procedures, which we wholeheartedly accept. We can always do better," she wrote.

The president and CEO of SDTC, Leah Lawrence, resigned on Nov. 10.

"As we can see in media reports, testimony before House of Commons committees and the surrounding controversy, it is clear that there has been a sustained and malicious campaign to undermine my leadership," Lawrence said in a letter to its board of directors.

"This calls into question my ability to lead the organization and places me in an untenable situation. However, I want this organization to succeed."

ANARCHO-CAPITALI$T

Argentina's new president Javier Milei thinks adopting the US dollar can rescue its screwed economy

Huileng Tan
Mon, November 20, 2023 

A Javier Milei supporter at a pre-election rally in Buenos Aires.Tomas Cuesta/Getty Images

Right-wing economist Javier Milei won Argentina's presidential runoff Sunday.


He thinks replacing the peso with the dollar can tame hyperinflation and revive the battered economy.


Milei's supporters say it would tackle triple-digit inflation, but skeptics have their doubts.

Far-right economist Javier Milei's victory in Argentina's presidential runoff on Sunday means the country could abandon the peso — a radical move that would run counter to the country's dedollarization drive.

Provisional results showed Milei garnered nearly 56% of the vote, with most counted.

Milei's been hyping up his desire to dollarize Argentina's beleaguered economy. He argued the move would help tame runaway inflation that hit 143% in October after a slump in the peso that's wiped out 99% of its value against the US dollar this year.

The currency has been depreciating since 2008 due to various reasons including hyperinflation, debt, and political instability.

In October, Milei went as far as saying that the peso "can't be worth excrement."

Prominent economist Steve Hanke — a champion of Milei's dollarization drive — posted on X after the results were announced that the candidate's proposal was "clearly a vote-getter."

Hanke, a professor at Johns Hopkins University, said in August that Argentina should "mothball" its central bank and adopt the greenback as its currency to tame inflation.



However, replacing the peso with the dollar would diminish some of Argentina's autonomy in monetary policy. It would also be the first time an economy as large as Argentina officially adopted the greenback.

Despite its economic woes, Argentina's economy was worth $633 billion in 2022, making it the world's 23rd-largest economy.

Critics of Milei's dollarization plans cite major challenges for Argentina against its backdrop of hyperinflation, economic crises, and political instability.

There's also a fundamental problem with Milei's dollarization plan — Argentina doesn't have enough US dollar assets to finance a major purchase of the currency, wrote Markus Jaeger, a global economy analyst at intelligence firm Stratfor, in October.

In fact, Argentina is so short of US dollars that it used the Chinese yuan to repay part of an International Monetary Fund loan last month.

Coupled with political instability and a history of poor economic management, Argentina would better off reforming its economic regime, wrote Jaeger.

"Full dollarization is the second-best solution to the inflation and economic instability problem," he wrote. "It is also a solution that is fraught with very substantial risks."

The Argentine central bank did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider, sent outside regular business hours.


Javier Milei: outsider who ignited Argentine rage to become president

By AFP
November 19, 2023

Javier Milei's rants against the country's traditional political parties struck a nerve with voters weary of decades of economic decline and inflation which has hit 143 percent over the past 12 months. 

- Copyright AFP/File Patrick T. Fallon

Fran BLANDY

With his wild hair and powered-up chainsaw, the libertarian Javier Milei has upended Argentine politics in a meteoric rise from obscurity to the presidency, riding a wave of fury over decades of economic decline and rampant inflation.

“Long live freedom, damn it!” was his rallying cry throughout a campaign in which he railed against a “thieving and corrupt political class,” notably on TikTok and YouTube where he fired up the youth.

He has vowed to ditch the ailing peso for the US dollar, “dynamite” the central bank, and slash public spending.

His anti-establishment rants, pro-gun stance and abrasive style have seen comparisons drawn between him and former US President Donald Trump and Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro.

However unlike those two leaders, “Milei came from nowhere… and his popularity came from the disaster of the bad performance of the economy in the last 12 years,” said economist Andres Borenstein, with the Econviews think tank.

While there are those who are fervent supporters, many who backed him were merely expressing disgust with the long-dominant Peronist coalition and its inability to halt Argentina’s cycle of deficit, borrowing, money-printing and inflation.

“They’re not right-wing people, they are angry people and disenchanted people,” Michael Shifter of the Inter-American Dialogue think-tank in Washington said of Milei’s voters.

“This kind of anti-incumbent sentiment has really been everywhere… it’s really just been remarkable that Argentina has managed to avoid it until now,” said Benjamin Gedan, director of the Argentina Project at the Washington-based Wilson Center think-tank.

“What exists now doesn’t work for me,” said Milei supporter Matias Esoukourian, a 19-year-old economics student.

– ‘Anarcho-capitalist’ –


The 53-year-old economist with a rock-star persona blindsided experts when he first emerged as a serious contender by winning an August primary election with 30 percent.

While described alternately as libertarian, far right, or antiestablishment, Milei’s political views are hard to pin down.

He describes himself as an “anarcho-capitalist” who is “above all for freedom.”

He is opposed to abortion and sex education, does not believe humans are responsible for climate change, and thinks human organs should be sold freely.

After he placed second behind his rival Massa in the first-round vote, and allied with the center-right opposition, he toned down much of his more divisive rhetoric.

This includes insulting Pope Francis, a fellow Argentine, and vowing to ditch or privatize key government ministries.

His famed chainsaw — a symbol of cuts he wanted to make to public spending — was nowhere to be seen.

Milei has since said his dollarization program would be incremental, but he insists he will shut the central bank and end the “cancer of inflation.”

Most analysts are stumped as to what he will actually do next, saying most of his proposals are unlikely given his lack of power on Congress, even with his allies.

Political analyst Virginia Oliveros, speaking during an online webinar on the election, said that if Milei won, the transition would be “absolute chaos.”

“He has no team, no plan. It’s not clear what he’s going to do. I think that people are not going to have any patience with him, that the honeymoon is not going to last 15 minutes.”

– Cloned dogs –


Milei was born in Buenos Aires to a middle-class family with whom he admits a “complicated” relationship.

He is very close to his sister Karina, however.

The libertarian’s rock-star persona is no pose — he played in a Rolling Stones cover band in his youth and was also a keen footballer.

Milei began appearing on television shows in 2015, where his red-faced rants against the government gained traction on social media.

His party Libertad Avanza was only formed before 2021 elections when he became a lawmaker for Buenos Aires.

Unmarried and childless, he is known for his love of dogs, and owns four large mastiffs named after liberal economists. He has recently been dating actress and comedian Fatima Florez.

According to “Madman,” the unauthorized biography from journalist Juan Luis Gonzalez, Milei never accepted the death of his first dog, Conan, and all his other pooches are clones he had made in the United States.

When asked about being dubbed crazy, he says: “The difference between a genius and a madman is success.”

Far-right candidate Javier Milei wins Argentina election

Sarah K. Burris
November 19, 2023 

Far-right presidential candidate Javier Milei speaks while celebrating the results of the primary elections in Buenos Aires, Argentina on August 13, 2023. 
(Photo: Alejandro Pagni/AFP via Getty Images)

The man some called the Argentine Donald Trump has won Argentina's top post.

Sunday evening, Javier Milei was declared the winner of the presidency in the country that has experienced significant inflation after the global pandemic. Despite this, Milei promised to kill government services, including healthcare, transportation and eliminate subsidies for utility bills, like gas, electricity and water. He intends to ban abortion and will refuse to take any action around climate change.

In the past, the country has given funds to poor provinces in the country. Milei intends to cut those as well.

The austerity measures are so significant that one NPR report suggested that the markets could crash in the country as a result of the election. After winning the primary, the country saw a slide, but not a crash.

Donald Trump championed the win, posting on social media: "Congratulations to Javier Milei on a great race for President of Argentina. The whole world was watching! I am very proud of you. You will turn your Country around and truly Make Argentina Great Again!"



He followed it with a screen capture of a tweet showing the far-right libertarian standing behind a U.S. Gadsden flag




Javier Milei, right-wing pundit with a passion for Judaism, is elected president of Argentina

He has said he has considered converting to Judaism but worries about how Shabbat observance would clash with the duties of the presidency


Javier Milei speaks during his campaign’s closing rally in Cordoba, Argentina, Nov. 16, 2023. 
(Tomas Cuesta/Getty Images)

By Juan Melamed
November 19, 2023

BUENOS AIRES (JTA) — Javier Milei, a colorful right-wing populist who has said he would like to convert to Judaism, was elected president of Argentina on Sunday.

Early results showed he garnered over 55% of the national vote, defeating Sergio Massa, the current left-wing government’s economy minister.

Milei’s passionate love of Judaism and Israel has been one of the several unexpected qualities that Argentines and political analysts have become accustomed to during his rapid rise over the past year. Milei, 53, throughout his campaign blamed the outgoing government for soaring inflation and poverty rates. That government included Cristina Fernández de Kirchner — who has been accused of obstructing the investigation into the 1994 AMIA Jewish center bombing — as vice president.

“Today we will start the rebuilding of Argentina,” Milei said in his acceptance speech Sunday night.

Milei, an economist and former TV and radio pundit, calls himself an anarcho-capitalist. He has promised to close several government ministries, including Argentina’s national bank, a move that would make the country’s currency the American dollar. He calls climate change a hoax and has earned comparisons to Donald Trump.

He also studies Torah regularly.

In an interview with Spain’s El Pais newspaper over the summer, Milei talked about his study with Rabbi Shimon Axel Wahnish, who heads ACILBA, an Argentine-Moroccan Jewish community based in Buenos Aires. Milei said he has considered converting to Judaism but worries about how Shabbat observance would clash with the duties of the presidency.

He demonstrates his passion for Judaism at rallies and public events, often walking out on stage to the sound of a shofar, the ram’s horn blown on Rosh Hashanah. At one rally in August, the shofar sound was accompanied on a screen by a photo of a man wearing a Jewish prayer shawl.


He is also an outspoken supporter of Israel, having stated before the start of Israel’s war on Oct. 7 that he would like to make an early diplomatic trip to Jerusalem and to move Argentina’s embassy to that city. In one of his final public appearances before the election, Milei was seen waving an Israeli flag among a large crowd in Rosario.

This article originally appeared on JTA.org.


Fiery right-wing populist Javier Milei wins Argentina's presidency and promises 'drastic' changes

The Canadian Press
Sun, November 19, 2023 


BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (AP) — Populist Javier Milei resoundingly won Argentina's presidential election Sunday, swinging the country to the right following a fiercely polarized campaign in which he promised a dramatic shake-up to the state to deal with soaring inflation and rising poverty.

With 99.4% of votes tallied in the presidential runoff, Milei had 55.7% and Economy Minister Sergio Massa 44.3%, according to Argentina's electoral authority. It is the widest victory margin in a presidential race since the South American country's return to democracy in 1983.

In the streets of Buenos Aires, drivers honked their horns and many took to the streets to celebrate in several neighborhoods. Outside Milei’s party headquarters, a hotel in downtown Buenos Aires, a full-on party kicked off with supporters singing, buying beers from vendors and setting off colored smoke bombs. They waved Argentine flags and the yellow Gadsden flag, emblazoned with the words “Don't Tread On Me,” which Milei's movement has adopted.

Inside, the self-described anarcho-capitalist who has been compared to former U.S. President Donald Trump, delivered his victory speech, saying the “reconstruction of Argentina begins today.”

“Argentina’s situation is critical. The changes our country needs are drastic. There is no room for gradualism, no room for lukewarm measures,” Milei told supporters, who chanted “Liberty, liberty!” and “Let them all leave” in a reference to the country's political class.

Massa of the ruling Peronist party had already conceded defeat, saying Argentines “chose another path.”

“Starting tomorrow ... guaranteeing the political, social and economic functions is the responsibility of the new president. I hope he does,” Massa said.

With a Milei victory, the country will take an abrupt shift rightward and a freshman lawmaker who got his start as a television talking head blasting what he called the “political caste” will assume the presidency.

Inflation has soared above 140% and poverty has worsened while Massa has held his post. Milei has said he would slash the size of the government, dollarize the economy and eliminate the Central Bank as a way to tackle galloping inflation that he blames on successive governments printing money indiscriminately in order to fund public spending. He also espouses several conservative social policies, including an opposition to sex education in schools and abortion, which Argentina’s Congress legalized in 2020.

“This is a triumph that is less due to Milei and his peculiarities and particularities and more to the demand for change,” said Lucas Romero, the head of Synopsis, a local political consulting firm. "What is being expressed at the polls is the weariness, the fatigue, the protest vote of the majority of Argentines.”

Massa's campaign cautioned Argentines that his libertarian opponent's plan to eliminate key ministries and otherwise sharply curtail the state would threaten public services, including health and education, and welfare programs many rely on. Massa also drew attention to his opponent's often aggressive rhetoric and openly questioned his mental acuity; ahead of the first round, Milei sometimes carried a revving chainsaw at rallies.

“There were lot of voters that weren’t convinced to vote Milei, who would vote no or blank. But come the day of the vote, they voted for Milei because they’re all pissed off,” Andrei Roman, CEO of Brazil-based pollster Atlas Intel, said by phone. “Everyone talked about the fear of Milei winning. I think this was a fear of Massa winning and economy continuing the way it is, inflation and all that.”

Milei accused Massa and his allies of running a “campaign of fear” and he walked back some of his most controversial proposals, such as loosening gun control. In his final campaign ad, Milei looks at the camera and assures voters he has no plans to privatize education or health care.

Milei’s screeds resonated widely with Argentines angered by their struggle to make ends meet, particularly young men.

“Incredibly happy, ecstatic, it’s a global historical phenomenon!” Luca Rodríguez, a 20-year-old law student, said outside Milei’s headquarters after spraying a bottle of champagne into the air onto those around him, who squealed with glee. “I want to break free from this ridiculous elite that takes away all our rights, all the tax money that pressures us and doesn’t let us live in peace.”

Two Milei supporters in the raucous crowd were 32-year-old identical twins, both dressed in matching grey tank tops with Argentine flags draped over their shoulders.

“We want a change, we want everything to improve,” Amilcar Rollo said beside his brother, Gabriel. “It’s the hope for something new from someone who hasn’t been there and has different ideas. Otherwise, it’s just the same as always.”

Most pre-election polls, which have been notoriously wrong at every step of this year’s campaign, showed a statistical tie between the two candidates or Milei slightly ahead.

Underscoring the bitter division this campaign has brought to the fore, Milei received both jeers and cheers on Friday night at the legendary Colón Theater in Buenos Aires.

The acrimony was also evident Sunday when Milei's running mate, Victoria Villaruel, went to vote and was met by protesters angry at her claims that the number of victims from Argentina's bloody 1976-1983 military dictatorship is far below what human rights organizations have long claimed, among other controversial positions.

The vote took place amid Milei’s allegations of possible electoral fraud, reminiscent of those from Trump and former far-right Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. Without providing evidence, Milei claimed that the first round of the presidential election was plagued by irregularities that affected the result. Experts say such irregularities cannot swing an election, and that his assertions were partly aimed at firing up his base and motivating his supporters to become monitors of voting stations. Many have expressed concerns they undermine democratic norms.

Both Bolsonaro and Trump congratulated Milei on social media.

“The whole world was watching! I am very proud of you,” Trump wrote on his platform, Truth Social. “You will turn your Country around and truly Make Argentina Great Again!”

And posting on on X, formerly Twitter, White House national security advisor Jake Sullivan also commended Milei, as well as Argentina for holding free and fair elections.

“We look forward to building on our strong bilateral relationship based on our shared commitment to human rights, democratic values, & transparency,” Sullivan wrote.

Daniel Politi And David Biller, The Associated Press

Milei's dilemma: how to solve a problem like Argentina?

Agence France-Presse
November 20, 2023

Argentina's president-elect Javier Milei surged to power on a wave of anger over decades of economic mismanagement, vowing to ditch the peso for the US dollar, shut down the central bank and slash spending (Luis ROBAYO)

Argentina's president-elect Javier Milei will have no time to bask in his Sunday victory as he inherits a country crippled by inflation and short on cash, creditors and international sympathy.

"Being president of Argentina has got to be one of the worst jobs in politics in the world," said Benjamin Gedan, director of the Argentina Project at the Washington-based Wilson Center.

"The problems have become so deep and complex and intertwined that they're not easily solvable, even if they're easily identifiable."

Milei surged to power on a wave of anger over decades of economic mismanagement, vowing to ditch the peso for the US dollar, shut down the central bank and slash spending.

He has promised "the end of Argentina's decline" and warned there is no time for "gradualism... or half-measures."

He will take office on December 10, and analysts predict a rocky ride with inflation at 143 percent and poverty levels of over 40 percent.

- How and when will he dollarize the economy? -


Milei has proposed the dollarization of the economy by 2025 to halt the "cancer of inflation", meaning he would drop the peso and Argentina would lose control over monetary policy such as setting interest rates.

Dollarization requires a hefty stock of greenbacks, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned Argentina's dollar reserves are dangerously low.

Even with the backing of the center-right opposition, political newcomer Milei has "very little legislative power," said analyst Carlos Gervasoni of the Torcuato Di Tella University.

"So there is no way to pass laws that, for example, require changing the country's currency or closing the central bank."

- What will happen with the peso? -

To try and keep a lid on inflation, the Argentine government has for years strictly controlled the exchange rate of the peso to the dollar, which was frozen for three months before the election and is now being allowed to devalue at three percent per month.

The exchange rate is "a total fiction. And to maintain it is extremely expensive. Argentina just has literally no money. It can't continue doing this," said Nicolas Saldias, a senior analyst with the Economist Intelligence Unit.

Between now and when Milei takes office, "things could rapidly scale out of control in those weeks. That's a period of a lot of instability," said political analyst Ana Iparraguirre of GBAO Strategies.

Saldias said people may panic believing dollarization is imminent, sparking a run on the peso.

Economy Minister Sergio Massa, whom Milei beat in Sunday's polls, may also implement a long overdue devaluation of the peso, making Milei "pay the political price."

"You'll probably see inflation ramp up very quickly," said Saldias, warning of possible hyperinflation.

- Will Milei take a chainsaw to state spending? -

Milei often appeared on stage at rallies with a chainsaw, vowing to slash public spending by 15 percent, privatize state companies and reduce subsidies on fuel, transport and electricity.

Such belt tightening has long been demanded by the IMF, which has bailed out Argentina 22 times, most recently with a loan of $44 billion dollars in 2018.

But Milei will face the same challenges as predecessors who have tried to get out of a vicious cycle of budget deficits, debt, money printing and inflation.

Untangling the country's economy is tricky. Removing subsidies or slashing welfare payouts would only further worsen poverty, and floating the currency would make imports much more expensive.

"At this point everything you fix worsens a second problem," Gedan said.

"The pain will be acute and spread widely if there is a serious stabilization program and it's not clear that Argentines will see the upside."

There is also the danger of protests and social unrest, especially given that almost half the country did not want Milei in power.

- Is there any good news? -


Gedan said that if Milei and his allies in the opposition do manage to curtail spending and reduce welfare and subsidies while protecting the most vulnerable, "this could be a turning point for the good."

There are other positives on the horizon.

After Argentina's worst drought in a century, which saw agricultural exports plummet in the past two years leading to a $20 billion shortfall in revenue, the country is expecting a bumper harvest in 2024.

Milei will also benefit from an estimated $10 billion in annual savings in energy imports as a new gas pipeline ramps up production from southern Vaca Muerta -- a massive oil and gas reserve -- estimates economist Elizabeth Bacigalupo of the Abeceb firm.



Argentina’s Crossroads Election Reminds Us to Never Underestimate the Far Right

Argentina goes to the polls today to decide between the centrist candidate Sergio Massa and far-right libertarian Javier Milei. The stakes could not be higher.



The far-right Argentine presidential candidate Javier Milei threatens to take a chainsaw to the state budget during a rally on September 25, 2023, in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
(Tomas Cuesta / Getty Images)

BYMARTÍN MOSQUERA
11.19.2023
JACOBIN

Argentines and the world were shocked when far-right libertarian Javier Milei swept the August 13 primary elections, seemingly guaranteeing victory in the general election taking place on Sunday, October 22. However, in a further twist, the candidate for the governing Peronist coalition, Sergio Massa, ended up squeaking out a narrow victory over Milei, setting up a nail-biter runoff election on Sunday, November 19.

Massa’s win in the general election may have tempered some of the more pessimistic forecasts of a far-right takeover in Argentina; however, the fact remains that a free-market paleolibertarian is still a narrow favorite in most polling. There needs to be, in other words, a more honest reflection on the rise of the far right in a society long regarded as inoculated against just this kind of reactionary turn.

Historically, the Argentine far right has been excluded from the halls of power. Until months ago, Milei’s Avanza Libertad (Freedom Advances) was a virtually nonexistent political force with no party structure, provincial candidates, senators, or governors. Pointedly, Argentina’s electoral system was designed to prevent the entry of just these kinds of outsider forces.

Thus, the Argentine political class underestimated the tectonic shifts taking place in society and failed to track their political repercussions. Understanding the eruption of a vigorous far right amid Argentina’s social democratic consensus requires going below the surface.

Upon deeper inspection, Milei’s ascent is clearly related to what is truly the bellwether event of this political juncture: the once-in-a-lifetime crisis of Peronism, the big-tent, populist formation around which the Argentine political system has been orbiting since 1945.

Some will argue that Peronism was resuscitated with Massa’s victory; others will claim that only a candidate as bizarre as Milei — whose mental health has come into question in recent weeks — could give the wildly unpopular minister of economy a fighting chance, thus undercutting the idea of a far-right threat. The truth, however, is that both phenomena — Peronist collapse and the rise of the far right — are very real and deeply interrelated.
An Earthquake Hits Peronism

The Peronists are unlike any other political party. Peronism’s presence in all spheres and levels of social life, its proximity to state structures, its on-the-ground influence through party militants and patronage networks, and its close link with labor and social movements make it a political force whose resiliency invites few modern-day comparisons.

Between 1946 and 1983, Peronism never lost a competitive election (it was, however, banned for decades). In presidential elections, its electoral floor always hovered around 40 percent of the vote. Peronism’s worst result was in 2015, when it reached 38 percent — and that was because a competing Peronist candidate won 14 percent.

By contrast, on August 13, Peronism went to the polls completely unified and saw its vote share reduced to 27 percent. Now, for the first time, Peronism is on the verge of losing its majority in the Senate and is ceding control of governorships in provinces historically considered Peronist strongholds (Santa Cruz, San Juan, and Chaco are notable examples).The Peronists are unlike any other political party.

Since the restoration of democratic rule, Argentina has been rocked by several major capitalist crises (in 1989, 2001, and 2019). Each time, Peronism emerged as the “party of order,” the one force capable of providing the social ballast to keep the state from collapsing and restore governability. In that same sense, the current crisis of Peronism is very much a crisis of the Argentine state itself.

However, the tremors of the current political earthquake have been felt beyond the Peronist camp. Amid massive discontent with the incumbent Peronist government, the traditional right wing had until recently considered itself the heir apparent to the Casa Rosada. Now, with the appearance of Milei, the conservative coalition Juntos for el Cambio (Together for Change) is staring down the possibility of its own collapse.

Patricia Bullrich emerged as the winner of the Juntos primary. Were it not for the appearance of Milei, it would have been Bullrich — the most openly reactionary Juntos candidate — who would have attracted all the attention: for the first time since Argentina’s democratic restoration, a mainstream party was putting forward an openly ultra-right-wing candidate to compete in the general election.

Nevertheless, Juntos por el Cambio has experienced an electoral setback even worse than in 2019, when former president and Juntos leader Mauricio Macri was roundly denied a second term. The traditional Argentine right wing, once confident of returning to power, is now closer to extinction after losing the general election to Milei by a substantial margin.
The Economy and Its Discontents

As the Argentine economy continues to stagnate and inflation hovers at around 140 percent, the rise of the extreme right raises the possibility of the kind of neoliberal shock therapy that the social opposition has kept at bay. What is at stake, in the figure of Milei, is an attempt to smash the resistance that has kept Argentina from backsliding into the austerity politics of earlier decades; in other words, Argentina is facing what Antonio Gramsci called “an organic crisis” of the state, in which a political and social stalemate is overcome by economic and extra-economic force.

One explanation of the Argentine situation stands above all others: the long stagnation of Argentine capitalism beginning in 2011, which saw a recession become an open crisis in 2018. Through inflation, the purchasing power of wages in Argentina experienced a 25 percent decrease between December 2017 and 2023 — a reduction that was even more dramatic for informal workers. Although the most critical decline was recorded in 2018, during the Macri government, the downward trend continued under Peronism and saw the gap between formal and informal workers widen even further (a difference that became more pronounced with the pandemic).

During that period, Argentina saw a loss of formal private employment and an increase in informal employment. In other words, informal workers saw their purchasing power decline while, at the same time, they comprised a larger share of the overall labor force. This new labor landscape has been especially devastating for Peronism, which has overseen a growing crisis while also hurting its own social base through successive austerity measures. The ongoing deterioration of the working class under the country’s two main political coalitions laid the foundations for growing social unrest that finally turned into a general crisis of legitimacy — in the form of Milei.Peronism has overseen a growing crisis while also hurting its own social base through successive austerity measures.

While devastating, the current economic crisis is anything but unexpected. In fact, it is part of a history of recurring cycles. Argentina’s constant political and economic instability is caused by, among other things, the relative strength of its working class. The strength of organized labor in Argentina has acted as a breakwater against a far-reaching capitalist restructuring that would depress wages and resolve the country’s macroeconomic imbalances.

Argentina’s economic turmoil is also related to the transformations in global production in recent decades. The country’s tendency towards economic and social decline began almost half a century ago with the crisis of the Peronist welfare state. That crisis took place against the backdrop of the internationalization of production and the crisis of postwar national development models.

Since then, Argentine society has experienced historic leaps in poverty and inequality indexes. The country went from a 4 percent poverty rate in the 1970s to 40 percent in recent years, showing a trend of almost uninterrupted social regression with few parallels in the world. Although there would be precipitous drops followed by partial recoveries, at critical junctures the decline in standards of living was answered by massive social upheaval.

The Peronist-affiliated movement of Kirchnerism, named after Néstor and Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, emerged in 2003 as a political response to the economic crisis and subsequent social uprising of 2001. One of the defining features of the present situation is the dismantling of the very formation that emerged to manage the successive crises of the last two decades. Although the political crisis is most acutely affecting Kirchnerism, it is spreading to the broader umbrella of Peronism, with effects that are only just coming into view.

Critically, for the first time in its history, Peronism is tasked with dealing with the country’s crisis from a position of power. That seemingly minor detail is of inestimable importance: the extreme right cannot thrive unless a rupture between the popular classes and their traditional political representation has already taken place. Out of power and commanding the loyalty of large parts of the working class, Peronism has historically played a stabilizing role in mitigating the country’s recurrent tendency towards crises; the current political crisis within and without Peronism, which sees the populist formation in power but adrift from its base, is opening the door to a political crisis of greater magnitude.
A Popular Right-Wing Ideology

Early interpretations of Milei’s electoral success focused on the idea of a “protest vote”: that voters were rejecting the two establishment parties based on their chronic inability to tame inflation and revert stagnation. This does indeed explain part of the “Milei phenomenon”; a substantial electorate has expressed a “fluid” unrest and found in Milei the most effective instrument to make its discontent known.

However, the protest vote is not enough to explain the “Milei phenomenon.” First, the specific forms in which social unrest expresses itself are never completely innocuous. Milei’s fluctuating and heterogeneous electoral base should not obscure the consolidation of a popular right-wing ideology — an ideology that Milei has strengthened by bringing in social sectors ordinarily beyond the reach of the traditional right (some of them ordinarily the constituency of the Kirchnerist center left).

Moreover, the “liquid state” of Milei’s electorate is being shaped by a political process that is very much in motion, as his rise generates retroactive effects on his base. As Ernesto Laclau used to say, the “representative fulfills an active function” over the represented: political leaders are not just the result of public opinion and social relations but also shape and influence them.

But what does Milei represent? Milei’s rise poses some interesting parallels with the global populist reactionary movement while also revealing some important Argentine differences. Crucially, the windmills that he is tilting at are distinct from those of reactionary nationalists in Europe and abroad.

It’s true, on the one hand, that the incumbent Peronist government maintained the orthodox austerity measures of the previous Macri government, while it’s also the case that President Alberto Fernández adopted a socially progressive approach to issues like the legalization of abortion, the promotion of inclusive language, the implementation of job quotas for trans people, among others. In other words, the governing coalition’s apparent “neoliberal progressivism” could have made it the object of the same kind of nativist ire that has taken hold in Europe.

Peronism’s main difference with European social democracy is ideological: paradoxically, Peronism has embraced austerity in the name of the struggle against austerity. This is what Argentine sociologist Pablo Semán means when he refers to Peronism’s “mimicry of the state”: the incumbent government has branded itself a strong interventionist state, but only as an ideological cover for the progressive stagnation of state benefits, papered over by weak “income redistribution” measures and ineffective campaigns for “social justice.”

Thus, the current right-wing backlash in Argentina has taken a stridently anti-statist tone lacking in figures like Donald Trump, Marine Le Pen, and Giogia Meloni. While the latter were at least verbal critics of neoliberal globalism, Javier Milei is a flamboyant anarcho-capitalist who dreams of the complete elimination of the state. The deterioration of living conditions under a government that sells itself as progressive and redistributive has created a space for anti-statist politics to find a new base, crucially among those who depend significantly on state subsidies.The current right-wing backlash in Argentina has taken a stridently anti-statist tone lacking in figures like Donald Trump, Marine Le Pen, and Giogia Meloni.

Combining a rhetoric of redistribution with harsh austerity measures has sown confusion among the Argentine working class. On the one hand, it has led them to forget the source of financial orthodoxy in the Macri years. On the other, it is breeding disenchantment with the values themselves — now seen as hollow or corrupt — normally associated with the Argentine social state: progressive income redistribution, the active role of the state in industry, human rights, and social mobilization.

Milei garnered support across all social classes and age groups. Studies indicate that approximately one-third of his voters are avowedly ultraright; another third are classic free-market-oriented voters, while the remaining third come from the popular sector. It is, in other words, undeniable that there is an electoral base for the extreme right; it is equally true that this base remains fluid and unstable.


This fluid and mostly popular constituency has been the source of some misguided optimism. Resigning themselves to an eventual Milei government, many argue that it is a matter of time before Milei starts to hemorrhage that electoral base as he fails to deliver economic stability. But many things — a stabilization plan, the demoralization of the more combative popular sectors, and the political disaffection of the working class — could lead to an opposite situation closer to what happened with Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil. The former captain lost the 2022 elections in a very close second round but managed to consolidate his own base at the cost of Brazil’s traditional parties.

Worse still, this mindset, which argues that a Milei government will lack political support and crumble under the pressure of popular mobilization, has led certain fractions of the Left to cast a “scratch” or “voto en blanco” in the past. It would be a grave mistake to lodge a protest vote in the current circumstances.
The Bizzaro Right Must Be Taken Seriously

Some of Milei’s more outlandish proposals create a sense of disbelief and even denial: his call to allow the unregulated sale of human organs, to create a market for the buying and selling of minors, to privatize all the country’s streets, etc. Naturally, no one thinks these measures can be implemented. Even his bread-and-butter proposals, like the abandonment of the Argentine peso in favor of the US dollar, are hardly feasible.

But the extravagant proposals paper over another package of measures that are very real. These more closely resemble the policies of ultraliberal finance minister Paulo Guedes in Bolsonaro’s government: fiscal austerity led by the privatization or closure of public companies, the dismissal of state workers, and a large-scale attack on public education and health, among others. Moreover, the extreme right will clearly want to go on the offensive against gender equality and LGTBQ rights (by criminalizing abortion, eliminating sex education, implementing a trans quota, etc.) in a manner similar to Bolsonaro in power.

Such a shock policy will require an authoritarian hardening of state structures: the judicial persecution of social leaders, an endorsement of police violence, unregulated access to and carrying of weapons, the revitalization of the reviled armed forces, an attempt to weaken the influence of trade unions in the workplace and, above all, the fight to undermine the strength of Argentina’s social movements in poorer neighborhoods. In short, if these measures were to be successfully implemented, it would mean a strategic defeat for the working class.

It will also require some durable social base, which, again, some sectors of the Left have put in question. Here, though, it is critical to understand that Milei’s rise is taking place amid an economic crisis that brooks no comparison with those of other countries where the far right came to power. A catastrophic economic crisis can provide the excuse for drastic measures, as history has shown: Argentina’s hyperinflationary spiral of 1989–1991 allowed Carlos Menem to take office with a blank check to restore order by any means necessary. What followed was the fire sale of all the country’s state assets and one of the most savage neoliberal restructurings on historical record. As Perry Anderson once said about such stabilization plans in Latin America, “There is a functional equivalent to the trauma of the military dictatorship, inducing a people through democratic and non-coercive means to accept the most drastic neoliberal policies: hyperinflation.”

The extreme fragility of the Argentine economic situation puts Milei’s rise in a different category from the global wave of ultraright governments. A more fitting parallel would be Peru in the 1980s. There, after a similar decade of stagnation, a hyperinflationary peak arrived in the late 1980s. It was in that context that Alberto Fujimori took office with a marginal political force and with no great social or business support. The economic catastrophe provided him with the legitimacy to apply shock therapy: a stabilization plan, privatization of public companies, and the liberalization of the economy, capped by the closure of Congress. The neoliberal restructuring of Peruvian society and the massive violation of human rights under the Fujimori dictatorship constituted a historic turning point from which the Peruvian working class has still not recovered.The disastrous effects of Milei’s short-term measures could actually be part of an attempt to pave the way for long-term restructuring.

The interlocking dynamics of inflation and authoritarian government have not been given sufficient attention, especially in a country where monthly inflation rates are in the double digits and the net reserves of the central bank are negative. Nor can a large-scale banking crisis be ruled out, especially since Milei seems to be aware of the potential benefits of triggering panic by announcing radical “pro-market” proposals with catastrophic effects in the short term (such as an abrupt end to the country’s system of currency controls, the elimination of export taxes, dollarization, etc.). Milei’s victories have already led to panic in the “markets”: falling bond prices, an increase of the “country risk” status, and the stagnation of stocks. But the disastrous effects of those short-term measures could actually be part of an attempt to pave the way for long-term restructuring.

And the Argentine Left?

For years, Kirchnerism served as the breakwater that kept the Right at bay and maintained the poor in a unified anti-neoliberal bloc. But years of orthodox austerity under Peronism have altered the landscape and confused matters politically. To a certain extent, it is now the Argentine popular classes that are reacting against the austerity of Peronism — albeit in a decidedly confused manner.

The left must do everything it can to keep Milei from coming to power, but it must also prevent the slogan “all against the right” from becoming a disciplinary tactic that ends up justifying the orthodox policies pursued by the traditional political forces. In other words, the Argentine left must prevent the “extreme center” from finding in the extreme right the perfect antagonist that allows it to demobilize radical opposition while holding onto power.

Argentina has witnessed the cohering of a great social movement against the ultraright in the weeks before the election. This could play a fundamental role in changing the outcome of the contest. Indeed, a polarization between a democratic mass movement and the extreme right is key to altering the electoral outcome, particularly because no one is more disempowered than the government itself to sound the alarm “against fascism.” And even if the extreme right were to come to power, it is essential that it do so against a backdrop of broad democratic mobilization, which will be the fulcrum for the social and political battles to come.

Martín Mosquera is editor-in-chief of Revista Jacobin.