Tuesday, February 27, 2024

California utility will pay $80M to settle claims its equipment sparked devastating 2017 wildfire



 A motorists on Highway 101 watches flames from the Thomas Fire leap above the roadway north of Ventura, Calif., on Dec. 6, 2017. Southern California Edison will pay $80 million to settle claims connected to a massive wildfire that destroyed more than a thousand homes and other structures in 2017, federal prosecutors said Monday, Feb. 26, 2024. (AP Photo/Noah Berger, File)Read More

 Roger Kelton searches through the remains of his mother-in-law’s home leveled by the Woolsey fire, Nov. 13, 2018, in the southern California city of Agoura Hills. Southern California Edison will pay $80 million to settle claims connected to a massive wildfire that destroyed more than a thousand homes and other structures in 2017, federal prosecutors said Monday, Feb. 26, 2024. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong, File)

February 26, 2024

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Southern California Edison will pay $80 million to settle claims on behalf of the U.S. Forest Service connected to a massive wildfire that destroyed more than a thousand homes and other structures in 2017, federal prosecutors said Monday.

The utility agreed to the settlement on Friday without admitting wrongdoing or fault in connection with the Thomas fire, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said in a statement.

Investigations found utility equipment sparked the fire in two canyon locations on Dec. 4, 2017. The Thomas fire, which burned across 439 square miles (1,137 square kilometers) in Ventura and Santa Barbara counties, is the seventh largest blaze in California history, according to state fire officials.

The settlement is a “reasonable resolution,” said Gabriela Ornelas, a spokesperson for Southern California Edison.

US government may sue PacifiCorp, a Warren Buffett utility, for nearly $1B in wildfire costs


Hawaii state and county officials seeking $1B from Legislature for Maui recovery


Storms bring destructive winds and ignite wildfires across Australian state of Victoria

“We continue to protect our communities from the risk of wildfire with grid hardening, situational awareness and enhanced operational practices,” Ornelas said Monday.

Federal prosecutors sued the utility in 2020 to recover costs incurred fighting the fire and for the extensive damage caused on public lands within the Los Padres National Forest. The lawsuit alleged Edison power lines and a transformer ignited dry brush during powerful winds.

The agreement “provides significant compensation to taxpayers,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph T. McNally said in a statement.

It’s the latest settlement by Edison over the Thomas fire. The utility has also settled claims related to the enormous Woolsey fire in 2018. Edison estimated in 2021 that total expected losses for both blazes would exceed $4.5 billion.

California has seen increasingly destructive wildfires in recent years, made worse by climate change and drought. Utility equipment has been blamed for sparking some the state’s worst fires.

In 2022, former executives and directors of Pacific Gas & Electric agreed to pay $117 million to settle a lawsuit over devastating Northern California wildfires sparked by that utility’s equipment in 2017 and 2018.
Myanmar: Young people attempt to flee ahead of conscription order

By Kelly Ng
BBC News, Singapore
On 1 February, Myanmar entered its fourth year since the coup

A deadly stampede outside a passport office that took two lives and unending lines outside embassies - these are just some examples of what has been happening in Myanmar since the announcement of mandatory conscription into the military.

Myanmar's military government is facing increasingly effective opposition to its rule and has lost large areas of the country to armed resistance groups.

On 1 February 2021, the military seized power in a coup, jailing elected leaders and plunging much of the country into a bloody civil war that continues today.

Thousands have been killed and the UN estimates that around 2.6 million people been displaced.

Young Burmese, many of whom have played a leading role protesting and resisting the junta, are now told they will have to fight for the regime.

Many believe that this is a result of the setbacks suffered by the military in recent months, with anti-government groups uniting to defeat them in some key areas.

"It is nonsense to have to serve in the military at this time, because we are not fighting foreign invaders. We are fighting each other. If we serve in the military, we will be contributing to their atrocities," Robert, a 24-year-old activist, told the BBC.

Many of them are seeking to leave the country instead.

"I arrived at 03:30 [20:30 GMT] and there were already about 40 people queuing for the tokens to apply for their visa," recalled a teenage girl who was part of a massive crowd outside the Thai embassy in Yangon earlier in February. Within an hour, the crowd in front of the embassy expanded to more than 300 people, she claims.

"I was scared that if I waited any longer, the embassy would suspend the processing of visas amid the chaos," she told the BBC, adding that some people had to wait for three days before even getting a queue number.

In Mandalay, where the two deaths occurred outside the passport office, the BBC was told that there were also serious injuries - one person broke their leg after falling into a drain while another broke their teeth. Six others reported breathing difficulties.

People gathering outside the Thai embassy in Yangon

Justine Chambers, a Myanmar researcher at the Danish Institute of International Studies, says mandatory conscription is a way of removing young civilians leading the revolution.

"We can analyse how the conscription law is a sign of the Myanmar military's weakness, but it is ultimately aimed at destroying lives... Some will manage to escape, but many will become human shields against their compatriots," she said.

Myanmar's conscription law was first introduced in 2010 but had not been enforced until on 10 February the junta said it would mandate at least two years of military service for all men aged 18 to 35 and women aged 18 to 27.

Maj-Gen Zaw Min Tun, the spokesperson for the military government, said in a statement that about a quarter of the country's 56 million population were eligible for military service under the law.

The regime later said it did not plan to include women in the conscript pool "at present" but did not specify what that meant.

The government spokesperson told BBC Burmese that call-ups would start after the Thingyan festival marking the Burmese New Year in mid-April, with an initial batch of 5,000 recruits.

The regime's announcement has dealt yet another blow to Myanmar's young people.

Many had their education disrupted by the coup, which came on top of school closures at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.

In 2021, the junta suspended 145,000 teachers and university staff over their support for the opposition, according to the Myanmar Teachers' Federation, and some schools in opposition-held areas have been destroyed by the fighting or by air strikes.

Then there are those who have fled across borders seeking refuge, among them young people looking for jobs to support their families.


Why India wants to fence its troubled Myanmar border

In response to the conscription law, some have said on social media that they would enter the monkhood or get married early to dodge military service.

The junta says permanent exemptions will be given to members of religious orders, married women, people with disabilities, those assessed to be unfit for military service and "those who are exempted by the conscription board". For everyone else, evading conscription is punishable by three to five years in prison and a fine.

But Mr Min doubts the regime will honour these exemptions. "The junta can arrest and abduct anyone they want. There is no rule of law and they do not have to be accountable to anyone," he said.

Wealthier families are considering moving their families abroad - Thailand and Singapore being popular options, but some are even looking as far afield as Iceland - with the hope that their children would get permanent residency or citizenship there by the time they are of conscription age.

Myanmar people step on photos of military junta leader Gen Min Aung Hlaing during a gathering marking three years since the coup

Others have instead joined the resistance forces, said Aung Sett, from the All Burma Federation of Student Unions, which has a long history of fighting military rule.

"When I heard the news that I would have to serve in the military, I felt really disappointed and at the same time devastated for the people, especially for those who are young like me. Many young people have now registered themselves to fight against the junta," the 23-year-old told the BBC from exile.

Some observers say the enforcement of the law now reveals the junta's diminishing grip on the country.

Last October, the regime suffered its most serious setback since the coup. An alliance of ethnic insurgents overran dozens of military outposts along the border with India and China. It has also lost large areas of territory to insurgents along the Bangladesh and Indian borders.

According to the National Unity Government, which calls itself Myanmar's government in exile, more than 60% of Myanmar's territory is now under the control of resistance forces.

"By initiating forced conscription following a series of devastating and humiliating defeats to ethnic armed organisations, the military is publicly demonstrating just how desperate it has become," said Jason Tower, country director for the Burma programme at the United States' Institute of Peace.


Who are the rulers who executed Myanmar activists?

Mr Tower expects the move to fail because of growing resentment against the junta.

"Many youth dodging conscription will have no choice but to escape into neighbouring countries, intensifying regional humanitarian and refugee crises. This could result in frustration growing in Thailand, India, China and Bangladesh, all of which could tilt away from what remains of their support for the junta," he said.

Even if the military does manage to increase troop numbers by force, this will do little to address collapsing morale in the ranks. It will also take months to train up the new troops, he said.

Protesters gather in front of the Myanmar Embassy in Bangkok, Thailand

The junta had a long history of "forced recruitment" even before the law was enacted, said Ye Myo Hein, a global fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.


"So the law may merely serve as a facade for forcibly conscripting new recruits into the military. With a severe shortage of manpower, there is no time to wait for the lengthy and gradual process of recruiting new soldiers, prompting [officials] to exploit the law to swiftly coerce people into service," he said.

Even for those who will manage to escape, many will carry injuries and emotional pain for the rest of their lives.

"It has been really difficult for young people in Myanmar, both physically and mentally. We've lost our dreams, our hopes and our youth. It just can't be the same like before," said Aung Sett, the student leader.

"These three years have gone away like nothing. We've lost our friends and colleagues during the fight against the junta and many families have lost their loved ones. It has been a nightmare for this country. We are witnessing the atrocities committed by the junta on a daily basis. I just can't express it in words."

Additional reporting by BBC Burmese

Israeli journalist criticizes West Bank ‘apartheid’ at Berlin film festival ceremony

"I am Israeli; Basel is Palestinian. And in two days we will go back to a land where we are not equal,” Abraham said.

By TOBY AXELROD/JTA
FEBRUARY 27, 2024
Israel Apartheid Week at Columbia University.(photo credit: Courtesy)

An Israeli journalist says he has been receiving death threats after winning two major prizes at the Berlinale International Film Festival for his documentary about Israel’s expulsion of Palestinians from their West Bank villages.

The prizes were awarded during the film festival’s closing ceremony, during which multiple filmmakers — including a Jewish American — spoke out against Israel’s war in Gaza. Some called Israel’s actions a “genocide,” a common charge among pro-Palestinian activists that Israel vigorously denies and that Berlin’s mayor condemned.

The Israeli journalist, Yuval Abraham, spoke out about Israel’s occupation of the West Bank. Abraham was part of the team behind “No Other Land,” about Masafer Yatta, a collection of villages whose land Israel has sought to use as a military zone. In 2022, after a two-decade legal battle, the Israeli Supreme Court ruled that Israel had the right to the land and that the roughly 2,000 Palestinians living there could be forced to leave.

'Emergency gov't isn't stable': MK Deri discusses hostage deal, cabinet leaks, and wartime cabine

The documentary, a Palestinian-Norwegian coproduction, focuses on the Palestinian activist Basel Adra, who, together with Abraham, has documented Israel’s demolition of houses in his region. The film does not focus on the conflict’s broader context, concentrating on the view from inside the village.

On Sunday, “No Other Land” won the Berlinale’s best documentary award and the Panorama Audience Award, determined by the votes from 24,000 audience members.
Buildings in the Palestinian village of Nazlat Isa near Tulkarm, West Bank
 (credit: AMMAR AWAD/REUTERS)

In his acceptance speech, Abraham, who reports for left-wing publications in Israel and beyond, offered a harsh critique of Israel’s West Bank occupation.

“We are standing in front of you now, me and Basel are the same age. I am Israeli; Basel is Palestinian. And in two days we will go back to a land where we are not equal,” Abraham said.

“I am living under a civilian law and Basel is under military law. We live 30 minutes from one another, but I have voting rights. Basel is not having voting rights. I’m free to move where I want in this land. Basel is, like millions of Palestinians, locked in the occupied West Bank,” he continued. “This situation of apartheid between us, this inequality, it has to end.”

Adra, meanwhile, denounced what he said was Israel’s “massacre” of Palestinians and Germany’s arms sales to Israel.

The documentary received coverage by Israeli media

The Israeli news network Kann, Israel’s public broadcaster, aired a segment about Abraham’s comments in which the network characterized his comments as “antisemitic.” In the segment, the Israeli film critic Ron Fogel said he was uncomfortable because of the criticism dealt to Israel at the film festival.

“Israel’s channel 11 aired this 30 second segment from my speech, insanely called it ‘antisemitic’ — and I’ve been receiving death threats since,” Abraham tweeted late Sunday. “I stand behind every word.”

The award came as Israel has drawn international criticism over its war in Gaza and as Israeli lawmakers approve the construction of thousands of new West Bank settlement homes for the first time in years, despite U.S. opposition.

A “No Other Land” screening at the Berlinale drew protesters who shouted “From the river to the sea, Palestine must be free,” a statement criminalized in Germany because it is understood by many as calling for Israel’s destruction.

When another audience member praised the film, made by a team of Israelis and Palestinians, as an effort to “stop this cycle of horrible violence, which includes a horrible massacre of thousands of Jews by Hamas,” he was shouted down.

There were several other anti-Israel protests at the festival. Reportedly, some audience members held up “Free Gaza” signs at the opening gala; and on Feb. 18, a few dozen protesters unfurled a banner at the European Film Market that read, “Lights, Camera, Genocide.” At the closing event, several artists used their speaking slots to denounce the war and call for a ceasefire, including the American filmmaker Eliza Hittman, who won a prestigious prize at the festival in 2020.

“As a Jewish filmmaker who won the Silver Bear in 2020, it is important for me to be here,” she said, adding, “There is no just war, and the more people try to convince themselves there’s a just war, the more they commit a grotesque act of self-deception.”

The American filmmaker Ben Russell wore a keffiyeh, or Arab scarf often used to signify support for Palestinian, to the ceremony, where he won a prize for a film about French environmental activists that he co-directed.

Berlinale organizers rejected calls from some curators and artists to issue an official ceasefire call. But during the festival’s closing, its social media account briefly displayed antiwar messages. Festival officials said the account had been hacked and that they planned to file criminal charges in response to the incident.

“From our unresolved Nazi past to our genocidal present — we have always been on the wrong side of history,” said one message, which was quickly deleted but preserved in screenshots that circulated online. “But it’s not too late to change our future.”

Berlin’s mayor, Kai Wegner, called the comments at the closing ceremony an “intolerable relativization.” He tweeted, “Antisemitism has no place in Berlin, and that also applies to the art scene.”

The film festival was also home to an effort to promote constructive conversation about the Israel-Hamas war, through a “Tiny House” initiative operated by an Israeli and a Palestinian living in Germany that aims to create a safe space for dialogue.
EU’s top diplomat says Israeli government ‘facilitated the development of Hamas’

Josep Borrell questions why Tel Aviv freed Hamas leaders but not peaceful Fatah leaders in 2011 prisoner exchange

Alyssa Mcmurtry |27.02.2024 -
AA


OVIEDO, Spain

The European Union’s top diplomat criticized Israel on Monday for facilitating the Palestinian group Hamas instead of working toward a viable two-state solution.

“I’m not saying he (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu) wrote them a check, but he’s facilitated the development of Hamas,” said Josep Borrell, speaking at the Next EducaciĆ³n business school in Madrid.

“Israel has bet on the division of Palestinians, creating a force to oppose (the) Fatah (movement),” he said, saying Netanyahu has publicly stated this strategy.

“When there was a moment of prisoner exchange, the Israeli government released a founder of Hamas and the man who orchestrated the Oct. 7 attacks. But it never released the leaders of Fatah, who want a peaceful and negotiated solution,” he said.

“This is the objective reality. Interpret it as you wish.”

In 2011, the Israeli government struck a deal with Hamas to release Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit in exchange for 1,027 prisoners.

Borrell also referred to his recent trip to the G20 foreign ministers meeting in Brazil. He said that there, “every single country” said the only “solution to guarantee peace and stability in the Middle East is the two-state solution.”

However, he slammed Netanyahu’s government for doing all that they could to block it for the last 30 years.

“The Israeli government says what it doesn’t want. But it doesn’t say what it wants. What’s their solution besides a security guarantee? But do they want security solely based on military means? Frankly, I think there are better solutions,” he said, pointing to the need for a Palestinian state.

Borrell also expressed the unprecedented nature of Israel’s demands.

“Israel asks Palestine to guarantee its security. Fair enough. But Israel is the occupying force. This is the first time I heard of an occupier asking the occupied country for security guarantees. Usually it's the other way around,” he said.

At the same time, Borrell acknowledged that Israel does need security guarantees in this situation.

“And Palestinians need to have the possibility to organize themselves politically in a territory and sign a peace agreement that’s not just between Israel and Arab states,” he added.

Borrell, 76, is a member of the Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party and has been serving as the EU High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy since December 2019.
UK

Charlotte Church denies antisemitism accusations after leading choir in pro-Palestinian chant

The singer has previously been vocal about her support for Palestine and said she plans to organise more charity events in the future.

Monday 26 February 2024 22:39,

Charlotte Church at a pro-Palestinian protest in Cardiff in January. Pic: AP


Welsh singer Charlotte Church has said she is in "no way antisemitic" after taking part in a concert which featured a controversial pro-Palestinian chant.

Church led a choir of approximately 100 people in a rendition of "from the river to the sea" at a gig she co-organised with a Welsh choir in order to raise money for charity, the Middle East Children's Alliance.

But the singer faced a backlash after using the chant, which is viewed by some pro-Israel supporters as a way to call for the eradication of the Israeli state.

Some pro-Palestinian supporters reject this, saying it is simply expressing the need for equality for all inhabitants of historic Palestine.

In a live broadcast on Instagram on Monday, Church addressed "alarmist" reports relating to the Big Sing for Palestine event in Caerphilly.

"Just to clarify my intentions there, I am in no way antisemitic. I am fighting for the liberation of all people. I have a deep heart for all religions and all difference," she said.

"It was a beautiful, beautiful event. But unfortunately the powers that be can't have that. [They] can't have such a powerful symbol of resistance as what we worked towards on Saturday."

'I would do it again 100 times'



The 38-year-old confirmed the event had ended with a chant of the words "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" but claimed it is not antisemitic.

She said: "Clearly, if you know the history of it all, [it is] not an antisemitic chant calling for the obliteration of Israel. It is not that in any way shape or form. It is calling for the peaceful coexistence of Israelis and Palestinians."

Church said "lots of other beautiful songs… of liberation and freedom" were performed at the event, including Arabic songs, Welsh songs, and South African songs from the anti-Apartheid movement, which had lyrics "adapted to the situation in Palestine".

Appearing on the Novara Live political podcast later on Monday, Church said she stands by everything they sang at the event.

"It was a deeply spiritual experience for me and I would do it again 100 times - and plan to," she said.

The singer has previously been vocal about her support for Palestine.

Last month, she said she "is in tears daily" after watching videos that come out of the territory, adding that she would "fight like a lioness for their liberation".

The charity, the Campaign Against Antisemitism, described the chant as "genocidal," as it refers to the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea, saying it "only makes sense as a call for the destruction of the world's only Jewish state".



'From the river to the sea' explained


Responding to Church, a spokesperson for the charity said: "Singing From The River To The Sea is not standing up for human rights.

"At... worst Charlotte Church is using the voice for which she is so well known to fan the flames of hatred.

"You cannot stoop lower than using your stardom to teach kids to sing extremist lyrics in a village hall.

"We will be writing to the Charity Commission to ask them to investigate how this was allowed to take place on a charity's premises."


(Tamil families of the disappeared in Kilinochchi are marking seven years of continuous roadside protests, as they demand to know the whereabouts of their forcibly disappeared family members)

Marking 7 years of continuous protests by Tamil families of the disappeared, a statement from a coalition of organisations recalled how countless Sri Lankan government commissions have been appointed but none have brought answers or served justice, with many still to publish their findings.

Releasing a statement to mark the anniversary the International Trust and Justice Project, the Center for Human Rights and Development, Women’s Action Network and families of the disappeared noted that “victims say justice and accountability remains elusive”.

“Sri Lankan victims have lost count of the number of government commissions established to look into gross violations of human rights, as yet another one is about to be established,” said the organisations. “The Truth, Unity, and Reconciliation Commission is the latest in a line of at least 36 commissions established by the Government of Sri Lanka to look for the truth.”

The communique lists at least 36 past commissions set up by the Sri Lankan Government – more than a third of which never even published their reports. Additionally, very few are even displayed on any government website, despite being for a large part digitized. The organisations said it found only a handful of copies, approximately half - 11 - of the 22 published reports of past commissions.

“This raises serious concerns about the Sri Lankan President’s latest accountability initiative,” said the statement. “The first step towards truth would surely be for the Presidential website to acknowledge and endorse the content of past government investigations by publishing them online. In the spirit of truth, this should include reports that name the President, like the Batalanda Commission, which concluded inter alia that the torture and detention at the Batalanda torture site couldn't happen without Ranil Wickremesinghe’s knowledge.”

“We remember the 240 relatives who died tragically without learning the truth about their loved one's fate,” said the ITJP. “And we stand in solidarity with thousands of victims, witnesses, and human rights defenders in the country who are exhausted after spending decades already establishing the truth about different atrocities.”

The full statement is accessible here

Tamil families of the disappeared held black flags and photographs of their loved ones as they marched in Kilinochchi calling on the government to investigate and prosecute those responsible, as they marked seven years of protest last week. Read more here.

 

 

Column: Trumponomics? He would impose the equivalent of a huge tax hike


Doyle McManus
Mon, February 26, 2024

Former President Trump calls himself a "Tariff Man." But economists say his tariff proposals would take money out of consumers' pockets.
 (Paul Sancya / Associated Press)

If Donald Trump becomes president again, one of his first moves will take money out of your pocket just as a tax hike would.

Trump hasn't outlined much of an economic program, but he has promised to impose a massive increase in tariffs on imports from almost all foreign countries — everything from bananas and baby formula to computer chips and machine parts.

And that’s the equivalent of a tax hike, because the costs of tariffs are paid almost entirely by the buyers of imported goods, whether they are Walmart shoppers or U.S. businesses that rely on foreign components.

Trump boasts that the tariffs he imposed in 2018 and 2019 brought billions of dollars into the Treasury, and promises a similar revenue increase in a second term. “The United States will make an absolute FORTUNE,” his campaign website says.

Here’s the problem: Contrary to what the former president seems to think, tariffs aren’t paid by foreign companies or governments. They’re initially paid by the U.S. companies that import the goods, but those importers almost always pass the cost on to consumers in the form of higher prices.

Read more: Consumers are already seeing price hikes from the last round of Trump’s tariffs

This time, Trump is proposing a “universal” tariff of 10% on goods from every country in the world. He has also mused about megatariffs of more than 60% that he wants to slap on China in hopes of forcing Beijing to lower its tariffs and treat U.S. companies fairly.

Economists say that either of those proposed tariffs would produce price increases and push inflation upward.

That’s why traditional free-trade Republicans like Nikki Haley and Mike Pence think Trump’s proposal is a bad idea, as does almost every practicing economist.

“It’s lunacy,” said Adam Posen, president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

But wait — there’s more.

Read more: Trump claims his criminal indictments boosted his appeal to Black voters

Those increased costs would hit low-income people hardest, because they spend a larger share of their income on goods.

“If baby formula goes up 25%, low-income earners will feel it more than people on Wall Street,” Posen said. “The burden of the tax falls disproportionately on poor people.”

And when the United States imposes tariffs, the targeted country almost always reciprocates.

“They’re not just going to roll over,” Posen said. “And they’re going to be strategic; they’ll pick industries where the U.S. will lose huge market share, because the retaliatory tariffs will drive the price of American products up.”

Read more: Trump as the candidate of stability? That's how many voters now see it

We have recent experience with all of these problems, thanks to Trump’s earlier tariffs. Take California almonds, the state’s most valuable export crop.

Until 2018, China bought almost all its almonds from California. But after Trump slapped tariffs on a range of Chinese products that year, China retaliated with tariffs on U.S. agricultural exports, including nuts.

California almond sales plummeted, and Australian growers rushed in to fill the gap. In a report for the Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics at UC Davis, economists Sandro Steinbach and Colin A. Carter calculated that the episode cost the state’s almond growers about $875 million in lost income.

Other U.S. exporters to China, from soybean farmers to truck manufacturers, took similar hits.

Those costs might have been tolerable if the tariffs had accomplished their main goal, which was to protect and promote manufacturing jobs in the United States.

But they didn’t. A slew of economic studies found that Trump’s tariffs had little or no positive effect on the industries they were designed to protect — and that the negative consequences for the economy resulted in a net loss of jobs.

“Import tariffs on foreign goods neither raised nor lowered U.S. employment in newly-protected sectors,” a team of economists led by David Autor of MIT reported last month.

For example, Trump wanted to protect steel industry jobs from foreign competition, but his tariffs on foreign-made steel didn’t help much. By the end of his presidency in 2021, the steel industry had lost several thousand jobs.

Read more: Trump's steel tariffs were supposed to save the industry. They made things worse

Meanwhile, those tariffs hurt the more numerous jobs in industries that buy foreign-made steel, including automakers and appliance manufacturers.

“For every one steel-producing job, we have about 80 steel-consuming jobs,” Erica York of the conservative-leaning Tax Foundation noted. “All those industries got hit by higher costs, and many of them lost jobs ” — about 75,000 total positions, according to one study.

But Trump’s tariffs had an important side effect, Autor and his colleagues reported.

“Despite the trade war’s failure to generate substantial job gains, it appears to have benefited the Republican Party" in the Rust Belt, the economists wrote.

Trump "may have garnered support from voters who were skeptical about the favorable economic consequences of tariffs, but who appreciated [his] intention to confront Chinese competition and protect U.S. jobs," they wrote.

Trump has long described himself as a “Tariff Man” — convinced, in his words, that protectionism “will always be the best way to max out our economic power.”

He’s wrong about that.

The new tariffs he’s proposed won’t save the economy. But they may help Trump win industrial states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin — and that may have been the point all along.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.


Canadian cities 'not gatekeepers': Head of mayors' group pushes back on Poilievre


The Canadian Press
Mon, February 26, 2024 



OTTAWA — The president of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities says his members are community builders and not gatekeepers, a term Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has commonly used to attack municipal bureaucrats.

Scott Pearce made the comment at a news conference the federation held in Ottawa ahead of the spring budget, as the group calls for more federal infrastructure spending.

In response to a question on Poilievre's proposed housing plan, Pearce appeared to reject the Conservative leader's accusation that cities are standing in the way of home building.

He says regardless of who is in power federally, municipalities will need more infrastructure spending to ramp up home construction.

Municipalities have been warning that their communities can't build enough homes to match population growth without more money for things like pipes and roads.

In his housing plan, Poilievre has promised to tie federal dollars to the rate of home building and withhold funding from cities that fail to ramp up construction by 15 per cent each year.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 26, 2024.

The Canadian Press
Extremely rare’ treasure found at forgotten ancient Roman settlement in UK. See it

Aspen Pflughoeft
Mon, February 26, 2024 

Scoop by scoop, archaeologists sifted through the tan-brown dirt of the United Kingdom and dumped it into a bucket. They were excavating the ruins of a medieval coastal community.

But their search revealed a different lost settlement — one with an “extremely rare” treasure.

Archaeologists unearthed the ruins of a forgotten ancient Roman settlement while excavating a medieval shipyard in Smallhythe Place, National Trust Archaeology said in a Feb. 23 Facebook post. The settlement was over 1,700 years old, dating from the first century A.D. to the third century A.D.

“We found tiles stamped with the mark of the Roman fleet (the Classis Britannica), ceramics including an intact pot, and evidence for buildings, boundary features and pits,” archaeologist Nathalie Cohen said in the post.

National Trust Archaeology and National Trust South East shared photos of these artifacts in Feb. 23 posts on X, formerly known as Twitter.



But one artifact stood out: a roughly 2-inch tall head carved from clay.

Archaeologists identified the head as part of a pipeclay figurine of the ancient Roman god Mercury, the organization said. A photo shows the creamy white carving.

“To come across a head of a figurine of Mercury, in pipeclay, is incredibly rare,” Cohen said.

Mercury was the ancient Roman deity for fine arts, commerce and trade. “While he is the most common god for metal figurines, pipeclay examples are extremely rare, with less than ten so far found from Roman Britain,” archaeologists said.

Matthew Fittock, an expert of ancient Roman ceramics, explained that “pipeclay figurines were mainly used by civilians for private religious practice in domestic shrines and occasionally in temples and the graves of often sick children.”

“Rather than pieces being discarded because they were broken, there is evidence to suggest that deliberately breaking some figurine heads was an important ritual practice,” he said in the post. “Whole figurines are usually found in graves.”

Archaeologists did not find any other fragments of the Mercury figurine.

“This complete figurine probably would have depicted Mercury standing, either draped with a chlamys (a short cloak), or naked, holding a caduceus (a staff with two intertwined snakes),” the National Trust wrote in a Feb. 22 news release.

The pipeclay head and other ancient Roman artifacts will be on display at Smallhythe Place starting Feb. 28, the organization said.

Smallhythe Place is in Kent, a county along the southeastern coast, and about 50 miles southeast of London.