Wednesday, May 29, 2024


Damning chart sums up devastating impact on household incomes under Tories

Shocking chart shows just how badly incomes have been hit in the last five years under the Tories


Hannah Davenport 
Yesterday
Left Foot Forward


A shocking chart has laid out just how badly household incomes have been hit in the last five years under the Tories.

Since the 2019 general election, real household disposable income has actually fallen by 1% during this time, a chart by the think tank Resolution Foundation, using ONS data, has shown.

Comparing the figure for each Government since 1955, the last five years represent the only recorded drop in household income per person over this period.

Resolution Foundation believes this will make up one of the key economic arguments for Labour throughout the general election campaign, with a focus on the decline in disposable income as a measure of just how bad the Conservative economic record has been
.

The second slowest growth period recorded in the last 68 years was between 2015-2017, with the graph a devastating reminder of just how hard households have been hit in the last decade.

Of significance will be the next ONS figures for family income in early 2024, set to be announced on Friday 28 June. The Resolution Foundation predicts this will matter politically ahead of the election, although, “the substance won’t change: our incomes have stagnated over five long years.”

UK

Diane Abbott claims she’s been banned from standing as a Labour candidate in the general election

The veteran MP won't be a Labour candidate in the election




Chris Jarvis 
Today


UPDATE: This article was updated at 12:35 on 29 May 2024 to reflect Keir Starmer saying no decision had been taken to bar Diane Abbott from standing in the general election.

Veteran Labour MP Diane Abbott has confirmed to the BBC that she has been banned from standing as a Labour candidate in the 2024 general election.

Abbott has been sitting as an independent MP since April 2023 after she had the whip removed following a letter published under her name in the Observer which implied that Jews, Irish people and Gypsy, Roma and Traveller people do not experience racism.

On Tuesday 28 May, Abbott had the Labour whip restored, but has now said that she won’t be allowed to stand for Labour in the general election on July 4.

Abbott told the BBC’s Today programme: “Although the whip has been restored, I am banned from standing as a Labour candidate.”

The news follows days of speculation about Abbott’s future in the Labour Party. Revelations from BBC Newsnight showed that the investigation into Abbott’s comments had concluded in December 2023, but she did not have the whip restored until yesterday.

The letter that led to Abbott’s suspension said of Jews, Irish people and Gypsy, Roma and Traveller people: “They undoubtedly experience prejudice. This is similar to racism and the two words are often used as if they are interchangeable.

“It is true that many types of white people with points of difference, such as redheads, can experience this prejudice. But they are not all their lives subject to racism.”

Abbott immediately apologised following the publication of the letter, saying: “I wish to wholly and unreservedly withdraw my remarks and disassociated myself from them.

“The errors arose in an initial draft being sent. But there is no excuse and I wish to apologise for any anguish caused.

“Racism takes many forms, and it is completely undeniable that Jewish people have suffered its monstrous effects, as have Irish people, Travellers and many others.”

It is not yet clear whether Abbott will now contest the election in her constituency of Hackney North and Stoke Newington as an independent. The former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn – one of Abbott’s political allies in the Labour Party – will be standing as an independent in Islington North after he too was blocked from standing as a Labour candidate.

However, she has since tweeted to say that she will be ‘campaigning for a Labour victory’ in the general election. She said: “Naturally I am delighted to have the Labour Whip restored and to be a member of the PLP. Thank you to all those who supported me along the way. I will be campaigning for a Labour victory. But I am very dismayed that numerous reports suggest I have been barred as a candidate.”

The Labour leader Keir Starmer has denied that Abbott has been prevented from standing for Labour at the next election. He told reporters today that “no decision has been taken” to block Abbott’s candidacy.

Abbott was the first black woman elected to the House of Commons and is the UK’s longest standing black MP. She was shadow home secretary during Corbyn’s leadership of the Labour Party.

Chris Jarvis is head of strategy and development at Left Foot Forward


Diane Abbott: Selection ‘farce’ as Starmer says decision not made on blocking her

© UK Parliament/Roger Harris

Diane Abbott has said she is “delighted” to have had the Labour whip restored but is “very dismayed” about reports suggesting she has been barred from standing as a Labour candidate at the next general election.

But Sky News reports that Keir Starmer said this afternoon that “no decision has been taken to bar [Abbott] going forward”, and shadow minister Darren Jones even suggested at a press conference she could speak to the party about re-standing.

Labour faces heavy pressure to allow the first Black woman elected to parliament to re-stand however in her Hackney North and Stoke Newington constituency, with a rally due to be held at Hackney Town Hall on Wednesday night.

The veteran MP said in a statement on X this morning: “Naturally I am delighted to have the Labour whip restored and to be a member of the [Parliamentary Labour Party]. Thank you to all those who supported me along the way.

“I will be campaigning for a Labour victory. But I am very dismayed that numerous reports suggest I have been barred as a candidate.”

The news comes after a long suspension and on the eve of the general election.

The party declined to respond when asked if she would be allowed to stand for Labour. The Times reported party sources suggesting Labour will bar her from standing, prompting a wave of fresh criticism over the party’s handling of the case.

It follows another claim yesterday morning that the investigation that prompted her suspension had been wrapped up months ago, though Labour has also not responded to that allegation.

Train drivers’ union ASLEF today published a joint letter to Starmer from its general secretary Mick Whelan and the general secretaries of five other unions affiliated to Labour calling for Abbott to be confirmed as the candidate for Hackney North and Stoke Newington.

The letter is dated May 25th, prior to confirmation that the Labour whip had been restored to Abbott. Alongside Whelan, it has been signed by the TSSA’s Maryam Eslamdoust, Unite’s Sharon Graham, NUM’s Chris Kitchen, CWU’s Dave Ward and the FBU’s Matt Wrack.

VOTE HERE: Should Diane Abbott be allowed to stand again for Labour?

John McTernan, a former adviser to Tony Blair often supportive of Keir Starmer, said the briefing suggesting the first black female MP would not be able to restand was “disgraceful”.

Jess Barnard, a national executive committee member on the left of the party, called the situation a “farce”. Mirror associate editor Kevin Maguire said he hoped she could stand again.

Neal Lawson, director of cross-party campaign group Compass, said of reports she could be barred: “Even for those who don’t share her politics, it’s sad to see that the Labour’s so-called broad church is now so narrow it no longer has space for a figure like Diane Abbott.

“Meanwhile, it appears to have no qualms about welcoming in former Tories like Natalie Elphicke who clearly don’t share its values.”

Shadow Health Secretary Wes Streeting faced questions about whether the party had “stitched her up” on the BBC’s Today programme.

He said it was a decision for Labour’s national executive committee, and declined to say if he wanted her to remain as an MP.

But he added: “Keir Starmer when he talked about improving standards in the Labour party, he really meant it. I don’t know the specific factors that apply in Diane Abbott’s case. I was pleased actually that her suspension was lifted and the whip was restored.”

Pressed on the suggestion the investigation wrapped up months ago and why Labour figures had not disclosed this in recent broadcast interviews, he said he would not rely on “hearsay”.

What did Diane Abbott do to be suspended?

Abbott had the party whip suspended in April last year for suggesting in a letter to The Observer that Irish people, Jewish people and Travellers “are not all their lives subject to racism” as Black people are.

Abbott apologised and said she wished to “wholly and unreservedly withdraw” her remarks, which caused a significant backlash. A party spokesperson called the remarks “deeply offensive”.

But Abbott previously told LabourList that she suspected the party of using the disciplinary process to “bar me from standing at the next election”, despite her being selected by local members. “I wrote in September that my suspension was a factional manoeuvre aimed at silencing a Black woman on the left, a critic of the line of the current leadership. Nothing has substantially changed since.”


Diane Abbott at Stand Up To Racism event in London.

Backlash over threat to block Diane Abbott candidacy

‘Whoever is responsible for this should hang their head in shame’ – John McTernan

By the Labour Outlook team

News on Tuesday night that Diane Abbott MP had had the Labour Whip restored by the party leadership was soured as party sources briefed journalists she would be blocked from standing as the candidate in Hackney North and Stoke Newington – the seat she has represented since 1987.

Attempts by party spokespersons on Wednesday’s media, including an interview with leader Keir Starmer and a media round by Shadow Health Secretary Wes Streeting to distance themselves from any such decision held little water.

Starmer reportedly told journalists, “No decision has been taken to bar Diane Abbott. The process that we were going through ended with the restoration of the whip. No decision has been made in terms of barring her.”

Yet senior sources told The Times within minutes of her having the whip restored, that she would not be a candidate.

Labour’s candidates are formally signed off at an NEC meeting on Tuesday 4th June.

It is this meeting that could choose not to endorse individual candidates such as Diane Abbott with the majority of NEC members prepared to act in accordance with the views of the Leader’s Office.

The threat of Diane Abbott not being selected has caused a backlash within the party and from key figures outside it which threaten to cause political splits during an election campaign, if not resolved.

As covered already on Labour Outlook, six trade unions affiliated to the party, including largest union Unite, have urged Keir Starmer to confirm Diane will be the candidate at the General Election.

Leading legal figure Martin Forde KC, who authored the Forde Report on behalf of Keir Starmer, said the way Diane Abbott’s situation has been handled is “utterly shambolic” and “deeply disturbing”

Shabna Begum, CEO of the Runnymede Trust, said, ‘The double standards in the treatment of Diane Abbott is abhorrent. Racism and misogynoir against Black women in the workplace is rife across society; our political class is no exception.’

Tony Blair’s former adviser, John McTernan, said the Diane Abbott investigation ‘designed to humiliate’ her and that, ‘Whoever is responsible for this should hang their head in shame.’

Independent journalist and race correspondent, Nadine White, wrote, “Labour’s poor treatment of Diane Abbott, Britain’s first Black woman MP, has further damaged the party’s relationship with Black voters.”

Guardian journalist Rachel Shabi said, ‘Labour’s treatment of Diane Abbott is an absolute disgrace. Rotten, bullying factionalism that shows us the party views racism purely as a game, a thing to be weaponised when politically convenient’

Sitting NEC member, Jess Barnard, said ‘for 5 months, Starmer has been sitting on Diane’s resolved case, running the clock down apparently with one aim – to push her out. Another case of political interference. What happened to that independent processes called for by the EHRC?’

Fellow NEC member, Mish Rahman, said,
‘Keir Starmer doesn’t care about Black and Muslim people.

He has one rule for white MPs like Steve Reed, Barry Sheerman and Neil Coyle and another for Black and Brown MPs – especially women as we see with treatment of
@HackneyAbbott’

Liverpool MP Kim Johnson and chair of the BAME caucus in the PLP said, “Solidarity with Diane, undeniably a trailblazer & a hero of our movement. At a time when all our energy should be focussed on throwing the Tories out, this process looks nakedly factional. Diane should have the whip restored now so she can stand as Labour’s candidate in the GE.”

Outgoing Labour MP Beth Winter said, ‘I am glad Diane Abbott has finally had the Labour Whip restored. The way she has been treated is vindictive, factional and cruel. She should be allowed to decide whether she will re-stand as a candidate.’

Left members organisation Momentum said in a statment, ‘Keir Starmer’s treatment of Diane Abbott has been appalling, vindictive & cruel. It is a slap in the face not just to Diane, but to the millions inspired by her as Britain’s first Black woman MP.’


  • Supporters of Diane Abbott have called a community rally in support of Diane outside Hackney Town Hall in East London at 6.30pm, Wednesday 29th May. More info here.

Can Diane Abbott run for Labour? It really is up to Starmer

“This situation is insulting to both Diane Abbott and the membership of Hackney North CLP.  The disciplinary procedures should not be used in a factional way.”

Labour Women Leading


By Labour Hub

Will Diane Abbott have the Labour whip restored to her to enable her to run as a Labour candidate in the Hackney seat she has held for the last 37 years? Keir Starmer has always insisted it is not a matter for him – she is subject to a wholly independent disciplinary process.

But today Newsnight presenter Victoria Derbyshire made a mockery of that claim. She tweeted: “I can reveal Labour’s investigation into suspended MP Diane Abbott’s racism comments finished five months ago.”

According to Derbyshire’s, source, the MP was given a “formal warning” in December 2023. She was required to do an online “antisemitism course” – which she did in February this year.

Yet the source says she still hasn’t been told if she can stand as a Labour candidate at the upcoming election. Derbyshire says she understands Diane Abbott is “angry, depressed and worn out” by the way she feels she’s been treated by Labour. Who can blame her?

This new revelation is of the highest significance. If the internal disciplinary process concluded with Diane Abbott meeting the conditions she was set and thus remaining a Labour member,  responsibility would then be passed back to the Chief Whip who is appointed by and reports directly to Starmer.

If the Chief Whip has then dragged his heels, that is a breach of the requirement under the Parliamentary Labour Party standing orders that investigations must be completed within three months.

If the matter is therefore in the hands of the Chief Whip and Keir Starmer, then the latter has arguably not been entirely honest when he maintained it’s an independent process – the NEC investigation finished five months ago, and it has been in the leadership’s hands ever since.

Worse, while Diane Abbott was facing racist and sexist abuse from Frank Hester, Starmer made a show of support – yet all the while, the leadership was conspiring against her.

A Momentum spokesperson said:  “This is outrageous news which confirms that the Starmer leadership is trying to force Britain’s first Black woman MP out of Parliament. For months we have been told by Keir Starmer that the process is independent and it’s nothing to do with him. Today’s revelation confirms this is another brazen lie from Keir Starmer – the investigation was concluded months ago, Diane remains a Labour member and the whip should already have been restored as a result. Starmer’s conduct has already been insulting and demeaning to a woman he rightly called a ‘trailblazer’. The first step to making amends is to restore the whip and let Diane run as the Labour candidate, as local members wish.”

Labour Women Leading said: “This situation is insulting to both Diane Abbott and the membership of Hackney North CLP.  The disciplinary procedures should not be used in a factional way.”

Labour’s Former Executive Director of Policy and Research Andrew Fisher said: “The treatment of Diane Abbott – Britain’s first black woman MP – has been nothing short of disgraceful.”

A grassroots petition calling on Keir Starmer to restore the Parliamentary Labour Party whip to Diane Abbott has been signed by over 15,000 people. The petition can be signed here.

Before her suspension, all Hackney North and Stoke Newington Labour Party branches had voted overwhelmingly for Diane Abbott to remain their candidate. She won re-election on eight occasions since she first stood for office since becoming the first Black woman MPs in British history in 1987.



UK
Liz Truss appears on right-wing ‘conspiratorial’ platform

'This isn't the first time Liz Truss has flirted with the far-right, she must be immediately suspended from the Conservative Party'



Hannah Davenport 

A podcast set up by a misogynistic influencer and former UKIP candidate will host an interview with Liz Truss this afternoon according to the channel’s social media account.

The former Prime Minister is set to appear on an episode of Tomlinson Talks on the Lotus Eaters podcast. Lotus Eaters was set up by Carl Benjamin who had his YouTube account stripped of its ability to earn money in 2019 after he repeatedly joked about raping Labour MP Jess Phillips. He has also been accused of repeatedly using racial slurs against minorities in YouTube videos.

One of its contributors is Benjamin ‘Beau’ Dade, who was dropped from running as a Reform UK candidate after claims emerged that he had fantasised about deporting “millions” of British citizens to “rid itself of the foreign plague we have been diseased with”.

Anti-racism campaign group HOPE Not Hate claimed the podcast has also ‘promoted the Great Replacement Theory and claimed the World Economic Forum is trying to control society.’ Liz Truss has herself touted conspiracy theories like claiming the ‘Deep State’ was ousting her from power.

HOPE Not Hate has called for Truss to be immediately suspended from the Tory Party over her ‘flirtings with the far-right’.

Georgie Laming, Campaigns Director at HOPE Not Hate said: “It is completely irresponsible for any MP or candidate to share a platform with Lotus Eaters and their band of conspiracy theorists and far-right activists.

“This isn’t the first time Liz Truss has flirted with the far-right, she must be immediately suspended from the Conservative Party.”

Liz Truss will be interviewed by presenter Connor Tomlinson who also contributed frequently to Talk TV and GB News. She was widely condemned earlier in the year for cosying up with Steve Bannon, agreeing with him as he described Tommy Robinson as a “hero” during their discussion.

Hoping to get re-elected in her constituency of South West Norfolk, Truss launched her own general election campaign video last Thursday, which didn’t get the reactions she was perhaps hoping for. The MP was rinsed after listing her ‘record’, with many commentators quick to stress that she had omitted some major points, a glaring one being “tanking the economy”.

(Image credit: The Telegraph / Screenshot)
UK
Royal College of Nursing General Secretary stands down to enter politics

Professor Pat Cullen is seeking nomination to run for Sinn Féin

\

Hannah Davenport Today
General Election Left Foot Forward News

The General Secretary of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) has announced she will step down with immediate effect in order to seek election to Parliament in the general election.

Professor Pat Cullen has spent three years as General Secretary and Chief Executive of the UK’s largest nursing union, overseeing waves of historic industrial action when nursing staff in England went on strike for the first time in the RCN’s history in December 2022.

Ahead of the general election, Cullen is seeking nomination to stand as Sinn Féin candidate for the Fermanagh and South Tyrone constituency. She said it had been an “honour” to champion nurses’ rights and that she is now ready to lead as an MP “working to better the lives of workers, families and communities.”

In a statement she said: “This election is an opportunity to vote for a new and better future.It is also an opportunity to support better funding for our public services and to reject years of cruel Tory cuts which have targeted frontline services, particularly health.”

Commenting on her resignation from the RCN, Cullen said she “owed the RCN members a debt of gratitude”.

“This was the hardest decision to make, and we have achieved so much in 3 very different and difficult years,” said Professor Pat Cullen.

“I hope my legacy here will be to have helped the nursing profession use its voice and campaign for change, for ourselves and patients. I owe RCN members a debt of gratitude.”

Paul Vaughan, Chair of RCN Council, said: “Pat has been a tremendous leader for our profession and put the College on a journey to a brighter future. She has been fearless in rooting out longstanding cultural issues internally and speaking truth to power in the health service and politics alike.”

The RCN is seeking applicants for its permanent General Secretary and Chief Executive as the union looks to advocate for nursing over the next five week election campaign period.

Professor Nicola Ranger said: “We will ensure every party and candidate knows the value of nursing and RCN Congress next week is the ideal opportunity for that.

“Pat’s vision for the return of the RCN Institute of Nursing Excellence will be a lasting legacy as it provides support to many thousands of nursing staff. She has progressed the profession in so many ways and we’re thankful for her incredible hard work to advance the cause of the College.”

(Image credit: Good Morning Britain / Screenshot)

Hannah Davenport is news reporter at Left Foot Forward

Hong Kong's first domestic security arrest targets Tiananmen activist Chow Hang-tung and her supporters

Screenshot from Chow Hang-tung's club on Facebook. Fair use.

Detained Hong Kong rights activist Chow Hang-tung was among six people arrested by national security police on May 28, 2024, marking the first apprehensions under the city’s new security law, which was enacted in March.

Secretary for Security Chris Tang confirmed on May 28 that the arrests were made in connection with a Facebook group that called for support for barrister and human rights activist Chow, who has been detained under the Beijing-imposed national security law since September 2021. The group was created on May 18, 2023, and the primary location for those who managed it was the UK.

In an earlier statement, police said five men and one woman had been detained on suspicion of acting with seditious intent. One of them, a woman already in custody, was alleged to have continuously published anonymous “seditious” posts on a social media page with the help of the other five.

The posts were said to have made use of an “upcoming sensitive date” to incite hatred against the central and Hong Kong governments, as well as the Judiciary. Police also alleged that the posts were meant to incite netizens to organise or participate in illegal activities at a later time.

“Concerning the sensitive date, actually I think the date itself was not important,” Tang told reporters in Cantonese. “The most important thing is that these people who intend to endanger national security made use of this subject to incite hatred,” he continued.

The arrests came a week before June 4, which this year will mark the 35th anniversary of the Tiananmen crackdown, when hundreds, if not thousands, died as China’s People’s Liberation Army violently dispersed student protesters in Beijing.

The Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, which Chow used to be vice-chair of, organised annual vigils to remember the victims of the crackdown in Victoria Park until 2020, when the gathering was banned amid the COVID-19 pandemic in order to stop the spread of the virus.

The vigil was banned again in 2021, with police again citing COVID-19, and the Alliance disbanded in September 2021 after its leaders — Chow, Albert Ho and Lee Cheuk-yan — were arrested on suspicion of inciting subversion. There have been no official commemorations held since.

Police searched the homes of five arrestees and seized items related to the case, including electronic devices that were suspected of having been used to publish the alleged posts.

Under the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, more commonly known as Article 23 legislation, crimes related to seditious intention are punishable by up to seven years behind bars.

“Those who intend to endanger national security should not delude themselves into thinking that they can evade police investigation by posting online anonymously,” police said in a Chinese statement issued on Tuesday afternoon.

“The general public must recognise the truth and not be deceived by false and distorted information,” they added.

Separate from the 2020 Beijing-enacted security law, the homegrown Safeguarding National Security Ordinance targets treason, insurrection, sabotage, external interference, sedition, theft of state secrets and espionage. It allows for pre-charge detention of up to 16 days, and suspects’ access to lawyers may be restricted, with penalties involving up to life in prisonArticle 23 was shelved in 2003 amid mass protests, remaining taboo for years. But, on March 23, 2024, it was enacted, having been fast-tracked and unanimously approved at the city’s opposition-free legislature.

The law has been criticised by rights NGOsWestern states and the UN as vague, broad and “regressive.” Authorities, however, cited perceived foreign interference and a constitutional duty to “close loopholes” after the 2019 protests and unrest.