Pangolin immune system may hold clues to COVID-19 treatment
Research suggests the new coronavirus moved from bats to pangolins sold in a Chinese market, and jumped to humans. Photo courtesy of HealthDay News
They're small spiny mammals that look like anteaters with scales.
And pangolins -- which some credit with playing a role in the emergence of the new coronavirus -- might hold clues to fighting COVID-19.
Genetic research into the new coronavirus has suggested that it originated in bats, found its way into pangolins sold at Chinese "wet markets," and then migrated into humans.
So why doesn't the virus sicken and kill pangolins?
RELATED Research shines camera on little-known, much abused pangolins
In a new study, researchers at the Medical University of Vienna in Austria analyzed the genomic blueprint of pangolins and compared it to other mammals including humans, cats, dogs and cattle.
In most mammals, certain genes detect when a virus enters the body, triggering an immune response against the invader.
But pangolins lack two of these virus-sensing genes, the research team reported in the May 8 issue of the journal Frontiers in Immunology. Whether or not that difference shields the creatures from COVID-19 isn't known, but warrants further investigation.
RELATED New bat species are close relatives of the one that carries COVID-19
The Austrian scientists believe their findings are important because it means that while pangolins can be carriers of the new coronavirus, they may have ways to keep its nastier effects at bay.
Learning more about this evolutionary advantage in pangolins may suggest possible treatments for coronavirus in humans, the team said.
"Our work shows that pangolins have survived through millions of years of evolution without a type of antiviral defense that is used by all other mammals," study co-author Dr. Leopold Eckhart said in a journal news release.
RELATED Pangolin wanders into family's home in India
"Further studies of pangolins will uncover how they manage to survive viral infections, and this might help to devise new treatment strategies for people with viral infections," Eckhart added.
In humans, the new coronavirus can cause an inflammatory immune response called a cytokine storm, which results in more severe illness.
An overactivated immune system can be moderated, however, "by reducing the intensity or by changing the timing of the defense reaction," Eckhart said.
Drugs that suppress gene signaling might therefore be a possible treatment option for severe cases of COVID-19, Eckhart said. But there's a hitch: Any immune-suppressing drug could make patients more vulnerable to other infections.
So, "the main challenge is to reduce the response to the pathogen while maintaining sufficient control of the virus," Eckhart said.
More information
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on COVID-19.
Copyright 2020 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Saturday, May 09, 2020
Is Philippines muzzling free press amid coronavirus lockdown?
The Philippine government's move to shut the nation's largest broadcaster is the latest affront to press freedom that has left millions of Filipinos cut off from access to vital information in the middle of a pandemic.
ABS-CBN television and radio operations went off-air on Tuesday after the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) issued a cease-and-desist order following the expiration of its legislative franchise on May 4. The station's cable news and digital operations continue to operate.
Vergel Santos, chairperson of the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility (CMFR), told DW that the ABS-CBN shutdown was tantamount to a news blackout.
"The TV and radio programs of ABS-CBN reach millions of Filipinos in the most remote parts of the country. Where will they get their news now?" said Santos.
Read more: Coronavirus: Vulnerable Filipinos fight for survival during lockdown
The veteran journalist also said the timing of the closure was problematic. "The government is taking advantage of this pandemic, which has all of us confined to our homes. Otherwise, we would be protesting on the streets," Santos added.
Media organizations and citizens widely condemned the government's move to shutter the network. Hours before the station aired its final news broadcast, people gathered outside the ABS-CBN headquarters in the capital of Manila, lighting candles and holding protest signs.
"The decision is unfair to the network and the thousands who depend on the network for their livelihood. It creates an unnecessary distraction for both the government and the private sector from focusing on saving lives and keeping people safe," the Philippine Broadcasters Guild (KBP) said in a statement.
Presidential spokesperson Harry Roque backed the NTC's decision to issue a closure order and said, "ABS-CBN is free to exhaust all legal remedies available to it."
Government suppression?
In 2017, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte accused ABS-CBN of swindling him for not airing his paid political ads during his presidential campaign. Since then, Duterte has consistently been threatening not to renew the network's legislative franchise.
"Your franchise will end next year. If you expect it to be renewed, I'm sorry. I will see to it that you're out," Duterte said last December.
Media outlets, electricity companies and cable TV providers are required by law to secure a legislative franchise to operate. Neng Juliano Tamayo, president of the national organization of cable TV operators, FICTAP, is opposing the renewal of the ABS-CBN's franchise because of the station's alleged anomalous charging for its cable programs.
ABS-CBN's 25-year legislative franchise expired on May 4. The renewal of its broadcast franchise is subject to a congressional review. However, both the Senate and the House of Representatives issued a resolution stating that ABS-CBN should be allowed to operate while their franchise renewal is pending in Congress.
Duterte has a long track record of cracking down on the media, especially those that exposed the brutality of the nation's war on drugs, his administration's centerpiece campaign. The Duterte government has threatened media outlets like the Philippine Daily Inquirer and online news network, Rappler, with closure.
Hours before the station aired its final news broadcast, people gathered outside the ABS-CBN headquarters, lighting candles and holding protest signs
Maria Ressa, chief executive officer of Rappler, has been the target of relentless political harassment and intimidation. Ressa has been arrested twice and has at least seven cases against her pending in court.
When Katherine Bautista's son, John, was killed in the state-sanctioned drug war, she turned to the media for help. "The media was my only platform to let others know the truth about the war on drugs waged by the government," Bautista told DW.
Deteriorating press freedom
The Philippines was known to have one of the freest presses in Asia following years of media suppression under former dictator Ferdinand Marcos who was ousted in a peaceful people power revolt in 1986.
ABS-CBN was ordered to close in 1972 following Marcos' declaration of martial law. Its closure yesterday heightened fears of media suppression and harassment.
Just as the largest TV network signed off, radio reporter Cornelio Pepino was shot dead in Dumagete City, southern Philippines. "Aside from the media killings, there is a high level of intimidation and harassment against journalists, especially online. We may see less critical reporting as a result of all of this," Nonoy Espina, president of the National Union of Journalists in the Philippines (NUJP), told DW.
Read more: Rappler's Maria Ressa: Duterte government 'weaponizing' information and law
A personal loss
Beyond the legal and political uproar, the closure of the network is an emotional loss for millions of viewers like Lina Bacalando, a 58-year-old community worker and grandmother.
When she turned on her TV earlier today and was greeted by a black screen, Bacalando felt "like something in me had died."
Bacalando told DW that her family tuned into ABS-CBN nearly 24 hours a day for news and entertainment. "The network's telenovelas entertain us and help make quarantine bearable."
But Bacalando's sadness quickly turned to anger and fear. "This government is too much. Too oppressive. Too vindictive. They silenced a media giant. What more can they do to us ordinary people?"
DW RECOMMENDS
Journalists under threat: April's 10 most urgent cases
Every month, the One Free Press Coalition draws attention to unresolved cases of crimes against journalists. In April, the list includes the cases of Mohammad Mosaed, Maria Ressa and Alaa Abdelfattah. (02.04.2020)
Coronavirus: Demand for Filipino nurses increases in Europe
Germany's alleged attempt to fly in Filipino nurses to provide assistance to COVID-19 patients has irked many in the Philippines. The country is facing a shortage of health workers as it tries to combat the disease. (26.03.2020)
Date 06.05.2020
Germany bans gay 'conversion therapy' for minors
Dubious programs that claim to "cure" LGBT+ youths have now been banned in Germany after parliament approved a new law. Failing to comply with the ban carries a one-year prison sentence.
German lawmakers voted to pass a law on Thursday banning so called "conversion therapies" that are aimed at suppressing sexual orientation or gender identity.
"Homosexuality is not an illness," said Health Minister Jens Spahn, who is openly gay. "Therefore the term therapy is already misleading."
Under the new law, advertising or offering conversion therapy will be prohibited for children up to the age of 18. Violators can be fined up to up to €30,000 ($33,000) or sentenced to up to one year in prison.
Read more: Opinion: Homosexuality is not a disease
Parents and guardians who force their children to undergo the programs can also be charged for violating their duty of care.
The practices have long been criticized for causing severe psychological and physical suffering.
Although the new law does not constitute a complete ban of the practice, it carries punishments as well if an adult consented to the therapy after being deceived, coerced or threatened.
Law sends 'a clear signal'
German Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives and their Social Democrat (SPD) coalition partners voted in favor of the ban, as well as the business-friendly Free Democrats (FDP).
The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) largely abstained, except for one vote against the law. The Left Party and the Greens also abstained from the vote, but argued that the law didn't go far enough to protect young adults.
Read more: Surviving 'conversion therapy' for LGBT+ people in Germany
Prior to the vote in the Bundestag, Spahn defended against criticism that the ban does not protect young adults between the ages of 18 and 26, saying he wanted the ban to be able to hold up in court if challenged.
Although Spahn did not specify his reasons for putting an age limit on the ban, it's easier to protect minors under German law, but the legal justification enters more of a gray area for adults when freedom of speech and conscience laws are taken into account.
"Young people are being forced into conversion therapies," he said, "and so it is very important that they should find support in the existence of this law: a clear signal that the state does not want this to happen."
rs/rt (dpa, Reuters, KNA)
DW
Dubious programs that claim to "cure" LGBT+ youths have now been banned in Germany after parliament approved a new law. Failing to comply with the ban carries a one-year prison sentence.
German lawmakers voted to pass a law on Thursday banning so called "conversion therapies" that are aimed at suppressing sexual orientation or gender identity.
"Homosexuality is not an illness," said Health Minister Jens Spahn, who is openly gay. "Therefore the term therapy is already misleading."
Under the new law, advertising or offering conversion therapy will be prohibited for children up to the age of 18. Violators can be fined up to up to €30,000 ($33,000) or sentenced to up to one year in prison.
Read more: Opinion: Homosexuality is not a disease
Parents and guardians who force their children to undergo the programs can also be charged for violating their duty of care.
The practices have long been criticized for causing severe psychological and physical suffering.
Although the new law does not constitute a complete ban of the practice, it carries punishments as well if an adult consented to the therapy after being deceived, coerced or threatened.
Law sends 'a clear signal'
German Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives and their Social Democrat (SPD) coalition partners voted in favor of the ban, as well as the business-friendly Free Democrats (FDP).
The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) largely abstained, except for one vote against the law. The Left Party and the Greens also abstained from the vote, but argued that the law didn't go far enough to protect young adults.
Read more: Surviving 'conversion therapy' for LGBT+ people in Germany
Prior to the vote in the Bundestag, Spahn defended against criticism that the ban does not protect young adults between the ages of 18 and 26, saying he wanted the ban to be able to hold up in court if challenged.
Although Spahn did not specify his reasons for putting an age limit on the ban, it's easier to protect minors under German law, but the legal justification enters more of a gray area for adults when freedom of speech and conscience laws are taken into account.
"Young people are being forced into conversion therapies," he said, "and so it is very important that they should find support in the existence of this law: a clear signal that the state does not want this to happen."
rs/rt (dpa, Reuters, KNA)
DW
Friday, May 08, 2020
To avoid the next pandemic, you need to know the difference between a black swan and a grey rhino
Some disasters we never see coming, but others we should have seen all along
A man wearing a protective mask walks past a mural depicting a nurse in Shoreditch, amid the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, in London, Britain. REUTERS
Despite a chorus of financiers, politicians and self-satisfied pundits claiming that the Covid-19 pandemic is an unforeseen and even unforeseeable black swan, this crisis is a different beast entirely.
It is an obvious grey rhino – that is, a high-impact scenario that was always highly likely to occur. The pandemic was sending clear signals that it was getting ready to charge, and too many people with the power to head it off ignored those warnings for too long.
Unlike the black swan that appears only in hindsight, grey rhino theory is forward-looking. It is about actively seeing what’s in front of us and challenging ourselves to act.
A woman wearing a face mask walks past an advertisement of a hair shop at a shopping district in Seoul. AFP
The coronavirus crisis is a catalyst for an urgently needed reset of our global mentality, reminding us to hold both governments and ourselves as citizens responsible for stepping up to the clear and present dangers that threaten our survival.
As we move past the initial shock of the pandemic, many of us are thinking about how best to emerge from this global public health, economic and human catastrophe. We don’t want to get “back to normal” because what we accepted as normal is what got us into this mess. Rather, we should want to create a new and better reality.
How could so many leaders across society have turned such a blind eye to giant, red warning flags for so long? Once we understand that, how can we use our knowledge to switch from a passive, fatalistic mode to an active, problem-solving frame?
The alarm bells rung by experts about how poorly prepared the world has been for the pandemics have been well documented. The situation was predicted by the World Health Organisation and even gamed out in a scenario-planning exercise in the US under the Trump administration. In a widely shared TED Talk in 2015, Bill Gates made the point before carefully proceeding to outline what the world needed to do.
Those in policy circles will give you all kinds of knowing reasons why pandemic warnings went ignored: politics, “the problem is too big and expensive and complicated”, entrenched bureaucracies and so on and so forth. They’ll rub their chins to look thoughtful, but have no real answers. They are there to tell you how things are, not how to change them.
Pleading ignorance was particularly fashionable in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, when leaders became too eager to call out, “Black swan! Nobody could have seen it coming!” even though many elements of that crisis were predictable, too.
Bill Gates, shown here in Berlin in 2015, warned the world that year of the dangers of a potential pandemic. AFP
Together, these attitudes have bred complacency and an accountability vacuum that have made it easy for everyone to dodge responsibility. But that is an explanation, not an excuse.
Instead of focusing mainly on why problems are not readily solvable, our priority needs to be on what it takes, from governments and civil society, to head off grey rhinos.
The solution begins with a reset of expectations. This requires building mutual trust between citizens and governments, beginning with two-way transparency involving governments sharing much more information and citizens consuming and using that information responsibly.
The uncomfortable truth is that governments often fail to make tough choices because citizens don’t want them to. People don’t want short-term pain even if it prevents something much worse down the road. They want to feel secure now. This toxic status quo encourages governments to drag their feet in the face of wicked problems, which in turn leads citizens to lower their expectations of what leaders expect them to do.
The coronavirus pandemic and its domino effect – the most wicked of wicked problems – has upended reality. It has exposed many other thorny and unaddressed challenges. Extreme inequality that puts the greatest burden on those who can least afford it. Deep financial fragilities, including dangerous levels of debt. Inadequate healthcare infrastructure.
When governments try to sweep problems under the rug for too long, they increase the chances of catastrophe when the dam finally breaks. That is why, as painful as it may be, it is better for governments to be open about challenges sooner rather than later.
We shouldn't want to get “back to normal” because what we accepted as normal is what got us into this mess.
The coronavirus also illustrates the power of regularly and publicly monitoring progress. Daily releases of epidemiological statistics provide a natural experiment in measuring how governments are doing in the fight to save lives. In every country, these figures are imprecise; because of test shortages, inconsistencies in counting and other technical challenges, they far understate the reality. But they give everyone a way to measure progress.
Contrary to the conclusions of some observers, differences in effectiveness are independent of whether a country’s political system is democratic or not. Rather, they depend upon how transparent and proactive governments are, and how much their populations both trust them to solve the problem and play their own roles in doing so.
Tracking focuses attention on issues while clarifying solutions and reassuring people that progress is possible. If a situation seems hopeless, citizens are less likely to do their part to help fix it or to approve of leaders expending resources to do so.
Hopelessness and a lack of information, moreover, leave the door open for citizens to make up their own, alternate realities. Social media has allowed everyone to become instant epidemiologists, market sages, economists and one-size-fits-all critics. Tribes assemble, picking and choosing the information that suits them.
Protesters in the US, for instance, have been endangering themselves and others by demanding that the government loosen stay-at-home orders. They see themselves as preserving their “liberty” to work and to be entertained.
Choosing one’s own reality is a way of asserting control over a situation when people feel they have none, and little in recent memory has made so many people feel so powerless as the coronavirus and the economic destruction it has wrought.
The key to confronting crises like coronavirus is for governments to communicate better with their citizens. EPA
Governments ought to recognise the benefits of being upfront about the nature of the problems they face, involving citizens in building solutions and then tracking their progress. Citizens, of course, must do their part, too. They ought to heed information and consume it responsibly, differentiating between what they need to hear and what they simply want to.
The rise of open-data projects and participatory budgeting have allowed governments to invite input from citizens more directly than ever before. Through these platforms, policymakers communicate the problem and the steps they are taking to fix it, then solicit feedback from citizen stakeholders. This can change citizens’ expectations of what can and should be done, making tough decisions easier.
Governments also are benefiting from comparing their own progress to that of their peers. Performance-tracking tools like Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index, the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index and the Programme for International Student Assessment (better known as PISA) all have helped to shape government policies for the better.
Similarly, the Sustainable Development Goals provide a powerful road map for tracking initiatives to address many of the grey rhino risks the world still faces: inequality, hunger, climate and 14 other worthy efforts.
There is one final benefit to these tools that ought to appeal to anyone in a position of power: they make it easier to give credit to leaders who work toward solutions to pressing policy problems, and hold accountable those who kick the crisis down the road.
Michele Wucker is a Chicago-based strategist and author of international bestseller The Gray Rhino: How to Recognize and Act on the Dangers We Ignore
Updated: April 23, 2020 07:28 PM
Astronomers find black hole just 1,000 light-years from Earth
An artistic rendering shows a star system centered around a totally invisible black hole. Photo by ESO
May 6 (UPI) -- Scientists have discovered the closest black hole to Earth, located just 1,000 light-years away.
Astronomers were able to pinpoint the black hole by tracking the trajectories of its two companion stars using a 2.2-meter telescope in Chile, managed by the European Southern Observatory and the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy.
"We were totally surprised when we realized that this is the first stellar system with a black hole that can be seen with the unaided eye," Petr Hadrava, an astronomer at the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic in Prague, said in a news release.
The newly discovered black hole is part of the star system that forms the constellation Telescopium. On a clear night in the Southern Hemisphere, the black hole's companion stars can be seen with the naked eye.
RELATED Astronomers capture detailed photos of planet-forming disks around faraway stars
Scientists shared their discovery of Earth's matter-eating neighbor this week in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Astronomers set out to study the two Telescopium stars -- officially the HR 6819 system -- as part of a broader survey of binary star systems. The orbital pattern of the two stars revealed the presence of a third object, a black hole. Observations showed one of the two stars orbits the black hole once every 40 days, while the second star orbits the star-black hole pair at a large distance.
The stellar-mass black hole boasts a mass roughly four times that of the sun. It isn't violent enough to affect the surrounding environment, and so it is truly black. Most of the two dozen or so black holes found inside the Milky Way strongly interact with the gas and dust that surround them.
(ADD TO THE PILE OF EVIDENCE PROVING EINSTEIN'S GENERAL THEORY RIGHT, THAT'S WHY ITS A GENERAL THEORY AND NOT SPECIFIC)
"An invisible object with a mass at least 4 times that of the Sun can only be a black hole," said ESO scientist Thomas Rivinius, lead author of the new study.
The discovery of a quiet, totally invisible black hole so close to Earth suggests there are a massive population of black holes scattered throughout the galaxy and the cosmos.
"There must be hundreds of millions of black holes out there, but we know about only very few. Knowing what to look for should put us in a better position to find them," said Rivinius.
"An invisible object with a mass at least 4 times that of the Sun can only be a black hole," said ESO scientist Thomas Rivinius, lead author of the new study.
The discovery of a quiet, totally invisible black hole so close to Earth suggests there are a massive population of black holes scattered throughout the galaxy and the cosmos.
"There must be hundreds of millions of black holes out there, but we know about only very few. Knowing what to look for should put us in a better position to find them," said Rivinius.
Scientists unveil fossil fuel-free jet propulsion that uses microwave air plasmas
Researchers at Wuhan University have demonstrated a prototype jet engine that uses microwave air plasmas for propulsion instead of fossil fuels. Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo
May 6 (UPI) -- Engineers in China have developed a fossil fuel-free jet propulsion prototype design that uses microwave air plasmas. If scientists can figure out a way to turn their design into a working engine, the technology could dramatically shrink the carbon footprint of the transportation industry.
The team of researchers described their prototype design this week in the journal AIP Advances.
"The motivation of our work is to help solve the global warming problems owing to humans' use of fossil fuel combustion engines to power machinery, such as cars and airplanes," study author Jau Tang, professor at Wuhan University in China, said in a news release. "There is no need for fossil fuel with our design, and therefore, there is no carbon emission to cause greenhouse effects and global warming."
Plasma, a mix of charged ions, is the fourth state of matter. Plasma can be found in lightning bolts and on the surface of the sun, but it can also be generated on Earth's surface. The new prototype produces plasma by compressing air under high pressures and exposing the air to microwaves, which ionize the pressurized air stream.
RELATED Scientists pinpoint release of energy that powered series of solar flares
This isn't the first time scientists have demonstrated a thruster engine prototype fueled by microwave air plasmas. NASA's Dawn space probe uses a similar concept, but the space agency's engine relies on xenon plasma. In outer space, xenon plasma will work just fine, but on Earth's, xenon ions are unable to overcome friction to reach jet propulsion speeds.
The new design relies only on a high-temperature, high-pressure treatment combined with injected air and electricity -- no special gas.
The new prototype design uses microwaves to ionize compressed air and create jet-like thrust. Photo by Jau Tang and Jun Li
The prototype design features a thin quartz tube through which high-pressure air is pushed before being converted into a plasma jet by a microwave ionization chamber. Simulations showed the miniature thruster can lift a two pound ball over an inch-long tube -- scaled up, the equivalence of the thrusting pressure generated by a commercial airplane jet engine.
RELATED Fire at Firefly Aerospace interrupts rocket test
Currently, the team of engineers is working to improve the technology's efficiency. Moving forward, researchers plan to built and test actual real life thrusters with high-power microwave sources. The technology could ultimately be scaled up to a full-sized jet.
"Our results demonstrated that such a jet engine based on microwave air plasma can be a potentially viable alternative to the conventional fossil fuel jet engine," Tang said.
RELATED Bundle of diamond threads can store and release energy
upi.com/7002908
Researchers at Wuhan University have demonstrated a prototype jet engine that uses microwave air plasmas for propulsion instead of fossil fuels. Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo
May 6 (UPI) -- Engineers in China have developed a fossil fuel-free jet propulsion prototype design that uses microwave air plasmas. If scientists can figure out a way to turn their design into a working engine, the technology could dramatically shrink the carbon footprint of the transportation industry.
The team of researchers described their prototype design this week in the journal AIP Advances.
"The motivation of our work is to help solve the global warming problems owing to humans' use of fossil fuel combustion engines to power machinery, such as cars and airplanes," study author Jau Tang, professor at Wuhan University in China, said in a news release. "There is no need for fossil fuel with our design, and therefore, there is no carbon emission to cause greenhouse effects and global warming."
Plasma, a mix of charged ions, is the fourth state of matter. Plasma can be found in lightning bolts and on the surface of the sun, but it can also be generated on Earth's surface. The new prototype produces plasma by compressing air under high pressures and exposing the air to microwaves, which ionize the pressurized air stream.
RELATED Scientists pinpoint release of energy that powered series of solar flares
This isn't the first time scientists have demonstrated a thruster engine prototype fueled by microwave air plasmas. NASA's Dawn space probe uses a similar concept, but the space agency's engine relies on xenon plasma. In outer space, xenon plasma will work just fine, but on Earth's, xenon ions are unable to overcome friction to reach jet propulsion speeds.
The new design relies only on a high-temperature, high-pressure treatment combined with injected air and electricity -- no special gas.
The new prototype design uses microwaves to ionize compressed air and create jet-like thrust. Photo by Jau Tang and Jun Li
The prototype design features a thin quartz tube through which high-pressure air is pushed before being converted into a plasma jet by a microwave ionization chamber. Simulations showed the miniature thruster can lift a two pound ball over an inch-long tube -- scaled up, the equivalence of the thrusting pressure generated by a commercial airplane jet engine.
RELATED Fire at Firefly Aerospace interrupts rocket test
Currently, the team of engineers is working to improve the technology's efficiency. Moving forward, researchers plan to built and test actual real life thrusters with high-power microwave sources. The technology could ultimately be scaled up to a full-sized jet.
"Our results demonstrated that such a jet engine based on microwave air plasma can be a potentially viable alternative to the conventional fossil fuel jet engine," Tang said.
RELATED Bundle of diamond threads can store and release energy
upi.com/7002908
CAIRO STEPS
( Beredak برضاك) LIVE Concert at Cairo Opera House - 20 December 2015 - Subscribe to Cairo Steps official YouTube channel: https:bit.ly/CairoSteps
MARWA NAGY YOU TUBE CHANNEL https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfmgqr9mwpDmuFrMikyqKsQ
Idea & Concept : Basem Darwisch ( Oud ) Matthias Frey ( Piano ) Rageed William Duduk Max Klaas Percussions Hani Al Sawaf Req Stefan Hergenröder Bass Sebastian Müller- Schrobsdorff Keys Wolfgang Wittemann Saxophone Ahmed AbdelKader Stage Monitoring Engineer Mafdy Thabet Sound Engineer Andrew Dawood TV Air Mix Listen to Cairo Steps ft. Sheikh Ehab Younis in Gnossienne No.1 : https://youtu.be/FOpblB88D18 #CairoSteps #Orchestra #برضاك Cairo Steps merges and combines traditional Egyptian and oriental grooves with modern jazz improvisation, classical music and contemporary sounds. The music is influenced by spiritual ethnic music as well as European music traditions and alternates between strong unison rhythms, virtuoso solos and meditative soundscapes. The result is a unique music style and an exciting blend of various cultures. The ensemble has played numerous concerts in Egypt and Europe with musicians and artists from around the world including performances at Cairo Opera House in Egypt, Frankfurt „Alte Oper“ in Germany as well as international festivals and live TV shows.
Neanderthals preferred bovine bones for leather-making tools
Though the bones of deer were more readily available, Neanderthals preferred to make leather-making tools with the rib bones of bison. Photo by Naomi Martisius/UC Davi
May 8 (UPI) -- When it came to selecting bones for leather-making tools, Neanderthals were surprisingly choosy. New archaeological analysis shows Neanderthals preferentially selected bovine rib bones to make a tool called a lissoir.
Neanderthals used lissoirs, made from animal rib bones, to soften up animal hides and transform them into workable leather. Most lissoirs are so worn smooth that it is impossible to tell what animal the rib bones were sourced from.
For the new study, published this week in the journal Scientific Reports, researchers used highly sensitive mass spectrometry to analyze collagen protein residues on ancient lissoirs.
The technique -- called ZooMS, short for zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry -- involves the breakup of fossil samples into tiny fragments. By measuring the mass to charge ratio of each fragment, scientists can reconstruct their molecular origins.
Instead for drilling holes in fragile Neanderthal tools, scientists were able to collect tiny bone fragments from containers that were used to store lissoirs in museum collections.
The results of the novel analysis showed Neanderthals mostly made lissoirs from the ribs of animals belonging to the cattle family, including bison or aurochs, a wild relative of modern cattle that went extinct just a few hundred years ago.
The use of bovine bones is noteworthy because deer bones were much more plentiful. Archaeological remains suggest Neanderthals more frequently killed deer for food. The rib bones of cattle were heftier and more rigid.
RELATED Neanderthals had the teeth to eat hard plants
"I think this shows that Neandertals really knew what they were doing," lead study author Naomi Martisius, research associate in the department of anthropology at the University of California, Davis, said in a news release. "They were deliberately picking up these larger ribs when they happened to come across these animals while hunting and they may have even kept these rib tools for a long time, like we would with a favorite wrench or screwdriver."
The latest findings add to the growing body of research that suggests Neanderthals were not the bumbling brutes they're sometimes depicted to be. Studies have shown Neanderthals developed burial traditions, harvested seafood, produced art and utilized a variety of primitive technologies. They were also, apparently, exacting tool makers.
"Neandertals knew that for a specific task, they needed a very particular tool," Martisius said. "They found what worked best and sought it out when it was available."
RELATED Tool-making Neanderthals dove for the perfect clam shell
upi.com/7004519
Though the bones of deer were more readily available, Neanderthals preferred to make leather-making tools with the rib bones of bison. Photo by Naomi Martisius/UC Davi
May 8 (UPI) -- When it came to selecting bones for leather-making tools, Neanderthals were surprisingly choosy. New archaeological analysis shows Neanderthals preferentially selected bovine rib bones to make a tool called a lissoir.
Neanderthals used lissoirs, made from animal rib bones, to soften up animal hides and transform them into workable leather. Most lissoirs are so worn smooth that it is impossible to tell what animal the rib bones were sourced from.
For the new study, published this week in the journal Scientific Reports, researchers used highly sensitive mass spectrometry to analyze collagen protein residues on ancient lissoirs.
The technique -- called ZooMS, short for zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry -- involves the breakup of fossil samples into tiny fragments. By measuring the mass to charge ratio of each fragment, scientists can reconstruct their molecular origins.
Instead for drilling holes in fragile Neanderthal tools, scientists were able to collect tiny bone fragments from containers that were used to store lissoirs in museum collections.
The results of the novel analysis showed Neanderthals mostly made lissoirs from the ribs of animals belonging to the cattle family, including bison or aurochs, a wild relative of modern cattle that went extinct just a few hundred years ago.
The use of bovine bones is noteworthy because deer bones were much more plentiful. Archaeological remains suggest Neanderthals more frequently killed deer for food. The rib bones of cattle were heftier and more rigid.
RELATED Neanderthals had the teeth to eat hard plants
"I think this shows that Neandertals really knew what they were doing," lead study author Naomi Martisius, research associate in the department of anthropology at the University of California, Davis, said in a news release. "They were deliberately picking up these larger ribs when they happened to come across these animals while hunting and they may have even kept these rib tools for a long time, like we would with a favorite wrench or screwdriver."
The latest findings add to the growing body of research that suggests Neanderthals were not the bumbling brutes they're sometimes depicted to be. Studies have shown Neanderthals developed burial traditions, harvested seafood, produced art and utilized a variety of primitive technologies. They were also, apparently, exacting tool makers.
"Neandertals knew that for a specific task, they needed a very particular tool," Martisius said. "They found what worked best and sought it out when it was available."
RELATED Tool-making Neanderthals dove for the perfect clam shell
upi.com/7004519
Scientists find ‘breakthrough’ malaria microbe that can stop disease spread
Study finds microbe that stops mosquitoes carrying disease
Study finds microbe that stops mosquitoes carrying disease
A worker fumigates against the Aedes aegypti mosquito
in a neighbourhood in Panama City. AFP
A microbe found in mosquitoes could stop them from becoming malaria carriers and might offer a way to halt the spread of the disease to humans, researchers in Kenya and the UK have found.
A study published this week in the Nature Communications journal said the microbe offered “enormous potential” for controlling the disease, which kills about 400,000 people every year.
The microbe, Microsporidia MB, was found in mosquitoes on the shores of Lake Victoria in Kenya. While such microbes are common in mosquitos they can often harm or weaken the insects but some offer benefits creating a symbiotic relationship with their host.
Researchers studied the mosquitoes in the area and found many carried Microsporidia MB but were otherwise “very healthy” and so began to study the impact of this on the creatures.
Those carrying the microbe were found to be immune to contracting the malaria virus.
Dr Jeremy Herren, from the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology in Kenya who led the study, said the data suggests 100 per cent blockage of malaria.
“It's super promising at this stage, I've got no reason not to believe we can do something but of course there's still a lot of hurdles,” he told The National.
“I really think this has huge potential, but this is not an easy disease – it’s something we've been dealing with since the dawn of mankind and it's almost a bit strange to think that we'll be the generation that gets rid of it,” he added.
While the microbe interrupts the transition of malaria, Dr Herren said this wasn’t as important as the fact that it didn’t harm the mosquitos and they were passing it on to their offspring, potentially offering a way to halt the spread of malaria for good.
“I think there are many microbes which have the potential to interfere with the process of becoming infected with malaria for a mosquito, but there's probably very few that have the right characteristics to be useful in terms of a control strategy,” he said. “The breakthrough here is that it's also spread from mother to offspring. It also doesn't make the mosquitoes sick. So, it has all the characteristics which would allow us to potentially spread it through the mosquito population, and for it to be maintained in that mosquito population. So, I think altogether, those things are quite a big breakthrough.”
The next big challenge will be working out exactly how to spread Microsporidia MB through the general mosquito population.
The researchers said that at least 40 per cent of all mosquitoes in a region would likely need to be infected with Microsporidia MB to reduce malaria infections in humans.
The first possible way, Dr Herren explained, is to physically spread Microsporidia MB in the environment early in the annual cycle before rains lead to a population boom. Infecting the small more concentrated population before the rains would lead the offspring to carry Microsporidia and spread it across the whole swarm.
The second wave is through releasing infected male mosquitos.
“So, we could just mass rear mosquitoes and only release males because males can't transmit disease [like malaria], they pose no threat to anyone, you'd be able to release them on mass and they would then infect females [with Microsporidia MB]. And then females would, again, infect their offspring and sort of that cycle continues. So, so it does lend itself to a few different ways of potentially disseminating it in a way that's kind of economically and feasibly viable,” he said.
For now, they plan to conduct more tests and studies in Kenya to get a better understanding of how the microbe could be spread among mosquitoes. The other thing that they need to determine is quite how many generations of mosquito can continue to pass on Microsporidia MB – the more generations that are carriers the more viable this is as a malaria control method.
The next phase, he said, is to release a group of males carrying Microsporidia MB into a controlled mosquito cage to see how they then spread that through the population.
“And we'll be working quite closely with modelling teams to understand, okay, we've got a 50 square kilometre island here that has malaria, how many mosquitoes would we have to release? And what level of infection [of Microsporidia MB] do we need to protect this area of land from malaria transmission? So, it's really all about dissemination now - how can we get it out there and how would it be feasible to get it out there. What are we talking in terms of costs, what are we talking about in terms of longevity of protection, and those sorts of things,” he said.
But funding will now dictate the timeline for Dr Herrey and his team.
“The timelines are quite unpredictable,” he said. “The funding also is really a key thing - I know exactly what we have to do if we have… the resources. If we can get some good investment projects, we can really push things a lot faster.”
Another thing that gives Dr Herrey hope that this is a viable area to explore is that a similar method shows signs of stopping the spread of Dengue fever.
He said that the release of Wolbachia bacterium infected mosquitos is already proving to cause a “significant decline” in areas of the tropical disease that causes headaches, vomiting, fever and infects millions a year while killing thousands.
While there are Malaria drugs available that help to stop infections, they can be expensive, not 100 per cent effective and often come with significant side effects.
Mosquito nets and repellents are also widely used to try to prevent bites in the first place.
Over the last 15 years, huge insecticide programmes in at-risk countries have helped to bring the number of global cases down by 40 per cent.
The study said that these control measures “are insufficient and additional novel strategies are needed if we are to make further inroads in reducing malaria incidence”.
A microbe found in mosquitoes could stop them from becoming malaria carriers and might offer a way to halt the spread of the disease to humans, researchers in Kenya and the UK have found.
A study published this week in the Nature Communications journal said the microbe offered “enormous potential” for controlling the disease, which kills about 400,000 people every year.
The microbe, Microsporidia MB, was found in mosquitoes on the shores of Lake Victoria in Kenya. While such microbes are common in mosquitos they can often harm or weaken the insects but some offer benefits creating a symbiotic relationship with their host.
Researchers studied the mosquitoes in the area and found many carried Microsporidia MB but were otherwise “very healthy” and so began to study the impact of this on the creatures.
Those carrying the microbe were found to be immune to contracting the malaria virus.
Dr Jeremy Herren, from the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology in Kenya who led the study, said the data suggests 100 per cent blockage of malaria.
“It's super promising at this stage, I've got no reason not to believe we can do something but of course there's still a lot of hurdles,” he told The National.
“I really think this has huge potential, but this is not an easy disease – it’s something we've been dealing with since the dawn of mankind and it's almost a bit strange to think that we'll be the generation that gets rid of it,” he added.
While the microbe interrupts the transition of malaria, Dr Herren said this wasn’t as important as the fact that it didn’t harm the mosquitos and they were passing it on to their offspring, potentially offering a way to halt the spread of malaria for good.
“I think there are many microbes which have the potential to interfere with the process of becoming infected with malaria for a mosquito, but there's probably very few that have the right characteristics to be useful in terms of a control strategy,” he said. “The breakthrough here is that it's also spread from mother to offspring. It also doesn't make the mosquitoes sick. So, it has all the characteristics which would allow us to potentially spread it through the mosquito population, and for it to be maintained in that mosquito population. So, I think altogether, those things are quite a big breakthrough.”
The next big challenge will be working out exactly how to spread Microsporidia MB through the general mosquito population.
The researchers said that at least 40 per cent of all mosquitoes in a region would likely need to be infected with Microsporidia MB to reduce malaria infections in humans.
The first possible way, Dr Herren explained, is to physically spread Microsporidia MB in the environment early in the annual cycle before rains lead to a population boom. Infecting the small more concentrated population before the rains would lead the offspring to carry Microsporidia and spread it across the whole swarm.
The second wave is through releasing infected male mosquitos.
“So, we could just mass rear mosquitoes and only release males because males can't transmit disease [like malaria], they pose no threat to anyone, you'd be able to release them on mass and they would then infect females [with Microsporidia MB]. And then females would, again, infect their offspring and sort of that cycle continues. So, so it does lend itself to a few different ways of potentially disseminating it in a way that's kind of economically and feasibly viable,” he said.
For now, they plan to conduct more tests and studies in Kenya to get a better understanding of how the microbe could be spread among mosquitoes. The other thing that they need to determine is quite how many generations of mosquito can continue to pass on Microsporidia MB – the more generations that are carriers the more viable this is as a malaria control method.
The next phase, he said, is to release a group of males carrying Microsporidia MB into a controlled mosquito cage to see how they then spread that through the population.
“And we'll be working quite closely with modelling teams to understand, okay, we've got a 50 square kilometre island here that has malaria, how many mosquitoes would we have to release? And what level of infection [of Microsporidia MB] do we need to protect this area of land from malaria transmission? So, it's really all about dissemination now - how can we get it out there and how would it be feasible to get it out there. What are we talking in terms of costs, what are we talking about in terms of longevity of protection, and those sorts of things,” he said.
But funding will now dictate the timeline for Dr Herrey and his team.
“The timelines are quite unpredictable,” he said. “The funding also is really a key thing - I know exactly what we have to do if we have… the resources. If we can get some good investment projects, we can really push things a lot faster.”
Another thing that gives Dr Herrey hope that this is a viable area to explore is that a similar method shows signs of stopping the spread of Dengue fever.
He said that the release of Wolbachia bacterium infected mosquitos is already proving to cause a “significant decline” in areas of the tropical disease that causes headaches, vomiting, fever and infects millions a year while killing thousands.
While there are Malaria drugs available that help to stop infections, they can be expensive, not 100 per cent effective and often come with significant side effects.
Mosquito nets and repellents are also widely used to try to prevent bites in the first place.
Over the last 15 years, huge insecticide programmes in at-risk countries have helped to bring the number of global cases down by 40 per cent.
The study said that these control measures “are insufficient and additional novel strategies are needed if we are to make further inroads in reducing malaria incidence”.
More than 900 COVID-19 cases at Cargill plant, but governments allow it to reopen
Karl Nerenberg May 7, 2020 RABBLE.CA
Cargill Incorporated is the largest privately held company in the United States, and that means it is essentially a family business.
You cannot buy Cargill shares on the Toronto, New York or any other stock exchange. The descendants of William Cargill, who founded the company in 1865 as a grain storage operation, own 90 per cent of the company.
But if it is a family business, Cargill is no mom-and-pop operation.
The company has grown over the past century and a half into a multi-tentacled corporate behemoth, involved in everything from grain to livestock to potash to steel to transport to financial services. In 2018, Cargill and its various subsidiaries reported revenues of over $110 billion.
Cargill has operations on five continents, in more than 70 countries, including Canada, and the company's meat-packing plant in High River, Alberta is a tiny piece of that worldwide empire.
In this country, however, the High River plant has an extremely high profile. It is one of the epicentres of COVID-19 in Canada -- in all of North America, in fact -- with over 900 reported cases out of 2,000 employees. That's almost half the workforce.
Two people have died in connection with the Cargill outbreak -- one, a plant worker originally from Vietnam; the other, an infected plant worker's father, who had been visiting from the Philippines.
Cargill initially resisted pleas from workers and their union to close the plant, but finally relented, in late April. After only two weeks, it hastily reopened, on Monday, May 4, giving the largely immigrant workforce the Hobson's choice of either going back to a potentially fatal workplace or losing their jobs.
Neither the workers, nor their union think the plant has become safe.
The union, the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), has gone to court to force a shutdown, until Cargill can absolutely guarantee safe and healthy conditions for all employees.
The UFCW does not think the notoriously low-paid plant workers should have to risk their lives to fatten the balance sheet of a U.S.-based transnational corporation that ranks number 15 on the Fortune 500.
Kenney and Trump on the same wavelength
Alberta Premier Jason Kenney has a different view from that of the union and the workers it represents.
The premier, and former Harper Conservative government cabinet minister, appropriates a concept meant to describe access to necessary basic foodstuffs we all need for sustenance – food security – and applies it to the much different situation of the High River plant. The Cargill workers have to do their part, the Alberta premier argues, to ensure food security for Canadians.
The truth is that Canada's food security does not depend on meat from Cargill or any other commercial operation.
If our local butcher runs out of hamburger for the barbecue, we all have other nutritious options. There are, for instance, the protein-packed pulses -- chickpeas, lentils and the like -- that farmers in Saskatchewan grow in great quantity.
In the U.S., as in Canada, COVID-19 has been particularly hard on the meat-packing industry, forcing more than 20 plant closures, and causing meat shortages on grocery shelves. Some fast food chains have even had to take hamburgers off the menu.
Corporate executives in the meat industry told U.S. President Trump that they were reluctant to reopen their U.S.-based plants for fear of lawsuits. The U.S. is a far more litigious country than Canada.
The president's response was to give the corporations cover, by invoking the U.S. Defense Protection Act (DPA). In effect, the president is forcing the corporations to reopen their plants.
The purpose of the DPA is to allow a president to harness the resources of private industry to serve public needs in time of war or national emergency. Many have urged Trump to invoke the act to assure production of personal protective equipment for front-line workers during the pandemic, but he has refused.
Now, Trump is using the extraordinary powers of the DPA to force workers back to dangerous plants, while shielding their bosses from responsibility.
As for the High River Cargill plant workers, they fall under provincial labour jurisdiction. And the Alberta premier has already indicated he will not lift a finger to protect them. But there might be a way that federal authorities could step in.
Jagmeet Singh urges Trudeau government to act
In Canada, it is the federal government that has authority over food safety, and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh believes the Trudeau team should assertively use that power to protect the Cargill workers.
Singh put the question to Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland during the House of Commons' weekly face-to-face session on Wednesday, May 6.
"Food safety and worker safety cannot be divorced," Singh told the House. "Will the government ensure that the Cargill workers are in safe work conditions?"
Freeland, in a manner all-too-typical of Liberal politicians, dissimulated, offering sympathy but no action.
"The member opposite is quite right that where the federal government has particular authority in food processing is to guarantee the safety of the foods processed there for Canadians to eat," she said, and then expressed some vague sentiments of concern. "When it comes to Cargill and food processing, I agree with the member opposite that it's something we all need to be particularly concerned about, and we have been."
The NDP leader was not satisfied.
"Will the government commit to using the authority that it has under food safety to ensure that workers are also safe, because there's no way that food can truly be safe if workers are in dangerous conditions and if workers are contracting COVID-19?" Singh asked, adding: "If workers are dying, the food can't be safe."
Freeland would not budge. The Trudeau government wants to get credit for caring, without pushing the envelope in dealing with the most prickly and confrontational provincial government in the country, Alberta's.
"I think we all understand there is a very clear difference between the duty to inspect food which is produced and to ensure that that food is safe for Canadians, and even more sacred duty to ensure that workers are working in safe conditions," Freeland answered. "We take both of those extremely seriously and we are aware what falls specifically in our jurisdictions. Having said that, we care very much about all Canadian workers."
Freeland's assertion that responsibility for the safety of a product that consumers eat does not include making sure a processing plant is not an active breeder of a deadly virus reflects a narrow and limited understanding of the federal role.
There is no evidence of food borne transmission of COVID-19, or of food packaging carrying the virus, according to authorities in both the U.S. and Canada.
But experts have not always got it right about COVID-19 since the outbreak at the beginning of this year. At this stage, all we know for sure is that there remain many unanswered questions about it.
'The worst company in the world'
What is not in doubt is the kind of company we're dealing with.
Not too long ago the U.S. environmental organization Mighty Earth undertook a study of the social and environmental impact of Cargill's operations and issued a report they called "The Worst Company in the World."
The report opens by stating "when it comes to addressing the most important problems facing our world, including the destruction of the natural environment, the pollution of our air and water, the warming of the globe, the displacement of Indigenous peoples, child labor, and global poverty, Cargill is not only consistently in last place, but is driving these problems at a scale that dwarfs their closest competitors."
The report details how Cargill has become more powerful than governments and has betrayed repeated promises to adhere to high environmental standards.
"Nowhere is Cargill's pattern of deception and destruction more apparent than in its participation in the destruction of the lungs of the planet, the world's forests. Despite repeated and highly publicized promises to the contrary, Cargill has continued to bulldoze ancient ecosystems, sometimes within the bounds of lax laws -- and, too often, outside those bounds as well."
With the advent to power of virulently anti-environmental Trump in the U.S. and Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, there is now virtually no limit, Mighty Earth says, to Cargill's capacity to ravage rainforests, savannahs and other vital habitats.
Mighty Earth cites many examples.
One of those is that of "the Gran Chaco, a 110-million-hectare ecosystem spanning Argentina, Bolivia, and Paraguay."
This ecosystem "is one of the largest remaining continuous tracts of native vegetation in South America, second in size only to the Amazon rainforest. These forests are home to vibrant communities of Indigenous Peoples … who have depended on and coexisted with the Chaco forest for millennia."
Cargill, the report tells us, is now actively endangering both the people and other inhabitants of the Gran Chaco to produce a cash crop -- soy -- that feeds the animals which become Big Macs and Whoppers.
"Once the impenetrable stronghold of creatures like the screaming hairy armadillo, the jaguar, and the giant anteater, Cargill has infiltrated the Gran Chaco, bulldozing and burning to make way for vast fields of genetically modified soy."
Mighty Earth also documents Cargill's use of violence to subdue Indigenous peoples, its exploitative labour practices, including child labour, and its predatory practices that have driven competitors out of certain businesses.
This is the company that Jason Kenney says must be allowed to operate, uninhibited by health concerns, to assure our food security.
If you believe that, you might also believe that injecting bleach into your veins can cure COVID-19, or that, as many opinion leaders in the U.S. say, it is necessary to accept that thousands must die in the interests of what they call the economy.
The owners of Cargill are not personally offering to sacrifice their lives. They are offering their employees' lives instead.
Karl Nerenberg has been a journalist and filmmaker for more than 25 years. He is rabble's politics reporter.
FURTHER READING
Maybe it's time for Ottawa to use its power to close those meat-packing plants until their owners fix their COVID-19 mess
Ottawa has the power if it chooses to use it. It has regulatory jurisdiction over any meat-packing plant that sells meat outside its province of origin.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)