Most developed African countries suffered worst during pandemic, study suggests
Thomas Hornall
Wed, 15 September 2021
The most developed African countries were the hardest hit by Covid, the study suggests (Hugh Macknight/PA) (PA Archive)
Countries in Africa rated as being better prepared for a pandemic were the worst hit by Covid-19, a study has suggested.
Nations in the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Africa Region assessed as having more resilient health systems and the least vulnerable to infectious disease had higher mortality rates and higher levels of restrictions imposed, the findings indicated.
Predictors of higher death rates included large urban populations, stronger pre-pandemic international travel links, and a higher prevalence of HIV among the 42 nations evaluated.
The research, led by the University of Edinburgh and the WHO African Region body, offers “compelling results which challenge accepted views of epidemic preparedness and resilience in Africa”, study authors say.
To view this content, you'll need to update your privacy settings.Please click here to do so.
Findings show South Africa had the highest mortality rate during the first wave between May and August last year, at 33.3 deaths recorded per 100,000 people.
Cape Verde and Eswatini, commonly known as Swaziland, had the next highest rates at 17.5 and 8.6 deaths per 100,000, respectively.
Uganda recorded the lowest mortality rate at 0.26 deaths recorded per 100,000, in the first wave.
South Africa also had the highest death rate during the second wave between December and February at 55.4 per 100,000, while Mauritius had the lowest, with no reported deaths.
Second wave mortality rates could be predicted from the first wave, the study said, although deaths were higher during the second.
Researchers from the NIHR Global Health Research Unit Tackling Infections to Benefit Africa (TIBA),an African-led programme at the University of Edinburgh, said the pandemic had highlighted “unanticipated vulnerabilities to infectious disease in Africa that should be taken into account in future pandemic preparedness planning.”
Our results show that we should not equate high levels of preparedness and resilience with low vulnerability
Professor Mark Woolhouse
Professor Mark Woolhouse, who co-led the study, said: “Our study shows very clearly that multiple factors influence the extent to which African countries are affected by Covid-19.
“These findings challenge our understanding of vulnerability to pandemics.
“Our results show that we should not equate high levels of preparedness and resilience with low vulnerability.
“That seemingly well-prepared, resilient countries have fared worst during the pandemic is not only true in Africa, the result is consistent with a global trend that more developed countries have often been particularly hard hit by Covid-19.”
Dr Matshidiso Moeti, WHO Regional Director for Africa, added: “The early models which predicted how Covid-19 would lead to a massive number of cases in Africa were largely the work of institutions not from our continent.
“This collaboration between researchers in Africa and Europe underlines the importance of anchoring analysis on Africa’s epidemics firmly here.”
Researchers say deaths were higher during the second wave compared to the first. Some 675 deaths were reported on the second-wave peak on January 18, compared with 323 during the initial wave peak on August 5 last year.
Potential under-reporting was accounted for in the analysis, the study added.
It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Thursday, September 16, 2021
The magnificent life of anti-Nazi heiress Muriel Gardiner, the most thrilling person you’ve never heard of
Jessie Thompson
Wed, 15 September 2021
Muriel Gardiner’s Italian driving license (©Connie Harvey, courtesy of Freud Museum London)
Muriel Gardiner might be the most thrilling person you’ve never heard of. She was born an heiress in Chicago in 1901, but her life was far from fur stoles and taking taxis everywhere. Instead, she became an undercover resistance fighter, working against the Nazi regime in Vienna, before training as a psychoanalyst. She later formed a friendship with Freud’s most famous patient, the so-called ‘Wolf Man’, and eventually helped found (and fund) the Freud Museum... phew.
A new exhibition at the museum, Code Name Mary (so-called because of her secret resistance alias), will bring her story to a whole new audience. Opening this weekend it will uncover the extraordinary lengths that Gardiner went to in order to protect her comrades and fugitives from the Nazis, but also reveal a woman who was determined to use her wealth for good throughout her life. But where to begin with a woman who did so much?
Carol Siegel, the director of the Freud Museum, says it’s a question she’s grappled with often while putting the exhibition together. “It does feel as if there are all these different facets to her life, but I think the key is really fighting against fascism in the 1930s and becoming a resistance worker,” she says. “That’s evidence of her being that very unusual person who genuinely wants to do good and help people, without there really being any personal benefit to herself at all, and putting herself in danger.”
Muriel Gardiner, 1920s (©Connie Harvey. Image courtesy Freud Museum London)
Gardiner came to Vienna in the 1930s, just as Hitler was rising to power, in pursuit of Sigmund Freud. She wanted to be analysed by him, but ended up in analysis with a colleague of his instead. In the event, she only met Freud once – he invited her to tea – but he had a profound impact on her life and career, and she had an enduring friendship with his daughter and child psychology expert, Anna Freud, until the latter’s death. It was the money from Gardiner’s foundation that enabled Freud’s Hampstead home to be turned into the museum, and subsequently finance it for many years. The exhibition, says Siegel, is a way of saying thank you.
While in Vienna, Gardiner began studying medicine, had a brief failed marriage to a British musician and had a daughter, Connie. Before she met her second husband, socialist and anti-fascist Joseph Buttinger, she had an affair with the poet Stephen Spender. Meanwhile, she was tracking down passports and smuggling money to help people escape from the Nazis, as well as offering her cottage in Vienna as a safe house.
Muriel Gardiner’s cottage in the Vienna Woods, 1930s
Muriel Gardiner, c.1960
Jessie Thompson
Wed, 15 September 2021
Muriel Gardiner’s Italian driving license (©Connie Harvey, courtesy of Freud Museum London)
Muriel Gardiner might be the most thrilling person you’ve never heard of. She was born an heiress in Chicago in 1901, but her life was far from fur stoles and taking taxis everywhere. Instead, she became an undercover resistance fighter, working against the Nazi regime in Vienna, before training as a psychoanalyst. She later formed a friendship with Freud’s most famous patient, the so-called ‘Wolf Man’, and eventually helped found (and fund) the Freud Museum... phew.
A new exhibition at the museum, Code Name Mary (so-called because of her secret resistance alias), will bring her story to a whole new audience. Opening this weekend it will uncover the extraordinary lengths that Gardiner went to in order to protect her comrades and fugitives from the Nazis, but also reveal a woman who was determined to use her wealth for good throughout her life. But where to begin with a woman who did so much?
Carol Siegel, the director of the Freud Museum, says it’s a question she’s grappled with often while putting the exhibition together. “It does feel as if there are all these different facets to her life, but I think the key is really fighting against fascism in the 1930s and becoming a resistance worker,” she says. “That’s evidence of her being that very unusual person who genuinely wants to do good and help people, without there really being any personal benefit to herself at all, and putting herself in danger.”
Muriel Gardiner, 1920s (©Connie Harvey. Image courtesy Freud Museum London)
Gardiner came to Vienna in the 1930s, just as Hitler was rising to power, in pursuit of Sigmund Freud. She wanted to be analysed by him, but ended up in analysis with a colleague of his instead. In the event, she only met Freud once – he invited her to tea – but he had a profound impact on her life and career, and she had an enduring friendship with his daughter and child psychology expert, Anna Freud, until the latter’s death. It was the money from Gardiner’s foundation that enabled Freud’s Hampstead home to be turned into the museum, and subsequently finance it for many years. The exhibition, says Siegel, is a way of saying thank you.
While in Vienna, Gardiner began studying medicine, had a brief failed marriage to a British musician and had a daughter, Connie. Before she met her second husband, socialist and anti-fascist Joseph Buttinger, she had an affair with the poet Stephen Spender. Meanwhile, she was tracking down passports and smuggling money to help people escape from the Nazis, as well as offering her cottage in Vienna as a safe house.
Muriel Gardiner’s cottage in the Vienna Woods, 1930s
(© Connie Harvey. Image courtesy Freud Museum London)
Siegel believes that Gardiner’s background was part of what inspired her to take great risks to help people. Both her parents were from families that owned big meat-packing firms – Morris & Company and Swift & Company. Initially, as a young person, she hated her family’s wealth, finding it unfair – but later she realised what it would allow her to do for others. “I think she did have this real, passionate belief in freedom, fighting repression and dictatorships and people being treated unfairly. Although she was born into a very wealthy family, she always had this sense of social justice. I think the fact she chose to act on that is really the heart of her story,” she says.
What a life. But if she was so fascinating, why hasn’t there been a film about her? In fact, there has – and even that has a gripping story of its own. The 1977 film Julia was based on a chapter from Lilian Hellman’s book Pentimento; Vanessa Redgrave won an Oscar for her performance in the eponymous role, as a woman who fights against the Nazis. Gardiner was made aware that the film bore an uncanny similarity to her own life story, but Hellman always claimed it was fictional and that she’d never met her (the fact that they shared a mutual friend in lawyer Wolf Schwabacher, a man who was aware of Gardiner’s resistance fighting past, has been widely noted). The incident encouraged Gardiner to finally write her own memoirs and own her story; Code Name Mary will be republished when the exhibition opens. As Gardiner’s editor put it: what were the chances that there were two American women who were millionaires, medical students AND anti-Nazi activists in Vienna in the 1930s?
Siegel believes that Gardiner’s background was part of what inspired her to take great risks to help people. Both her parents were from families that owned big meat-packing firms – Morris & Company and Swift & Company. Initially, as a young person, she hated her family’s wealth, finding it unfair – but later she realised what it would allow her to do for others. “I think she did have this real, passionate belief in freedom, fighting repression and dictatorships and people being treated unfairly. Although she was born into a very wealthy family, she always had this sense of social justice. I think the fact she chose to act on that is really the heart of her story,” she says.
What a life. But if she was so fascinating, why hasn’t there been a film about her? In fact, there has – and even that has a gripping story of its own. The 1977 film Julia was based on a chapter from Lilian Hellman’s book Pentimento; Vanessa Redgrave won an Oscar for her performance in the eponymous role, as a woman who fights against the Nazis. Gardiner was made aware that the film bore an uncanny similarity to her own life story, but Hellman always claimed it was fictional and that she’d never met her (the fact that they shared a mutual friend in lawyer Wolf Schwabacher, a man who was aware of Gardiner’s resistance fighting past, has been widely noted). The incident encouraged Gardiner to finally write her own memoirs and own her story; Code Name Mary will be republished when the exhibition opens. As Gardiner’s editor put it: what were the chances that there were two American women who were millionaires, medical students AND anti-Nazi activists in Vienna in the 1930s?
Muriel Gardiner, c.1960
(© Connie Harvey. Image courtesy Freud Museum London)
Gardiner’s has stayed with Redgrave, regardless. In 2019, she included her as a character in her play, Vienna 1934 - Munich 1938. She will be at the Freud Museum on the exhibition’s opening weekend as part of a launch event, discussing why more of us should know about Gardiner’s life with Lord Alf Dubs, who was rescued by Nicholas Winton on the Kindertransport in 1939.
As Siegel says, stories like Gardiner’s and Winton’s and Oskar Schindler’s began as “important personal stories, but they didn’t necessarily become part of the wider consciousness.” That came later. If anything, Gardiner’s life is a reminder that, before Hollywood films and national treasure status are bestowed, history is made up of good people quietly doing good things, simply because they feel they must.
Code Name Mary is at the Freud Museum, 18 Sept 2021 to 23 Jan 2022; freud.org.uk
Gardiner’s has stayed with Redgrave, regardless. In 2019, she included her as a character in her play, Vienna 1934 - Munich 1938. She will be at the Freud Museum on the exhibition’s opening weekend as part of a launch event, discussing why more of us should know about Gardiner’s life with Lord Alf Dubs, who was rescued by Nicholas Winton on the Kindertransport in 1939.
As Siegel says, stories like Gardiner’s and Winton’s and Oskar Schindler’s began as “important personal stories, but they didn’t necessarily become part of the wider consciousness.” That came later. If anything, Gardiner’s life is a reminder that, before Hollywood films and national treasure status are bestowed, history is made up of good people quietly doing good things, simply because they feel they must.
Code Name Mary is at the Freud Museum, 18 Sept 2021 to 23 Jan 2022; freud.org.uk
UK
Nurses say 3% pay award is ‘unacceptable’
Alan Jones, PA Industrial Correspondent
Wed, 15 September 2021,
The Government is being urged to reconsider its 3% pay award to NHS staff after nurses overwhelmingly described it as “unacceptable”.
More than nine out of 10 members of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) in England and Wales voted in a consultative ballot saying the controversial award was not acceptable.
RCN general secretary Pat Cullen said: “Just a week after Boris Johnson talked about ‘good wages’ for nursing staff, they are delivering a clear verdict on his NHS pay award.
“We are placing the matter back in the hands of politicians and asking what they are going to do next.
“Ministers must avoid a further escalation of this situation. Faced with this result, they can signal they intend to listen and do the right thing.
“Our members expect to see action from governments across the UK to pay nursing staff fairly.
“It is against the best interests of the health service, staff and patients for this issue to remain unaddressed – ministers are pushing people out of nursing when there are tens of thousands of unfilled jobs and patient care is being impacted.”
Graham Revie, who chairs the RCN Trade Union Committee, said: “RCN members have made their voice heard and ministers in Westminster and Cardiff must think again about how they are treating nursing staff.
“Members deserve to be paid fairly – nursing has earned it and our patients deserve it.
“Unsafe staffing levels hamper patient care. Fair pay is one major way of keeping people in work and attracting the next generation into our profession.
“The future of this campaign will always be determined by RCN members – this campaign is led by members like me in the interests of the whole profession.”
The RCN said nursing staff in Northern Ireland will have to wait until next month to see if additional funding requested from the Northern Ireland Executive will be made available.
In Scotland, RCN members are in a dispute with the Scottish government and NHS Scotland employers after they rejected an offer which gave them an average 4% pay increase.
Nurses say 3% pay award is ‘unacceptable’
Alan Jones, PA Industrial Correspondent
Wed, 15 September 2021,
The Government is being urged to reconsider its 3% pay award to NHS staff after nurses overwhelmingly described it as “unacceptable”.
More than nine out of 10 members of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) in England and Wales voted in a consultative ballot saying the controversial award was not acceptable.
RCN general secretary Pat Cullen said: “Just a week after Boris Johnson talked about ‘good wages’ for nursing staff, they are delivering a clear verdict on his NHS pay award.
“We are placing the matter back in the hands of politicians and asking what they are going to do next.
“Ministers must avoid a further escalation of this situation. Faced with this result, they can signal they intend to listen and do the right thing.
“Our members expect to see action from governments across the UK to pay nursing staff fairly.
“It is against the best interests of the health service, staff and patients for this issue to remain unaddressed – ministers are pushing people out of nursing when there are tens of thousands of unfilled jobs and patient care is being impacted.”
Graham Revie, who chairs the RCN Trade Union Committee, said: “RCN members have made their voice heard and ministers in Westminster and Cardiff must think again about how they are treating nursing staff.
“Members deserve to be paid fairly – nursing has earned it and our patients deserve it.
“Unsafe staffing levels hamper patient care. Fair pay is one major way of keeping people in work and attracting the next generation into our profession.
“The future of this campaign will always be determined by RCN members – this campaign is led by members like me in the interests of the whole profession.”
The RCN said nursing staff in Northern Ireland will have to wait until next month to see if additional funding requested from the Northern Ireland Executive will be made available.
In Scotland, RCN members are in a dispute with the Scottish government and NHS Scotland employers after they rejected an offer which gave them an average 4% pay increase.
EU commissioner calls for urgent action against Pegasus spyware
Didier Reynders
Daniel Boffey in Strasbourg
Wed, 15 September 2021
Photograph: Yves Herman/EPA
The EU must swiftly legislate to further protect the rights of activists, journalists and politicians following the Pegasus spyware scandal, and the perpetrators of illegal tapping must be prosecuted, the bloc’s justice commissioner has told the European parliament.
Didier Reynders told MEPs that the European Commission “totally condemned” alleged attempts by national security services to illegally access information on political opponents through their phones.
He said: “Any indication that such intrusion of privacy actually occurred needs to be thoroughly investigated and all responsible for a possible breach have to be brought to justice. This is, of course, the responsibility of each and every member state of the EU, and I expect that in the case of Pegasus, the competent authorities will thoroughly examine the allegations and restore trust.”
Related: What is Pegasus spyware and how does it hack phones?
He added that the EU’s executive branch was closely following an investigation by Hungary’s data protection authority into claims that Viktor Orbán’s far-right government had been among those targeting journalists, media owners and opposition political figures with invasive Pegasus spyware.
Reynders said that it was already the case, as confirmed by the European court of justice, that governments could not “restrict the confidentiality and integrity of communications”, except in “very strictly limited” scenarios.
But he added that a pending EU privacy regulation would further tighten the rules, and called for MEPs and the member states to urgently agree on the details of that new law in light of the spyware scandal.
Reynders said: “Various reports have shown that certain national security services used Pegasus spyware, to have direct access to citizens, equipment, including political opponents and journalists.
“Let me say right at the start that the commission totally condemns any illegal access to systems or any kind of illegal trapping or interception of community users communications. It’s a crime in the whole of the European Union.”
A consortium of 17 media outlets, including the Guardian, revealed in July that global clients of the Israeli surveillance firm NSO Group had used hacking software to target human rights activists, journalists and lawyers.
The investigation was based on forensic analysis of phones and analysis of a leaked database of 50,000 numbers, including that of the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and European Council president Charles Michel, along with other heads of state and senior government, diplomatic and military officials, in 34 countries.
Reynders, a former Belgian justice minister, was speaking at the start of a debate in the European parliament on the scandal.
Sophie In ‘t Veld, a Dutch MEP in the liberal D66 party, said the parliament’s civil liberties, justice and home committee, of which she is a leading member, would launch an investigation into the use of Pegasus within the EU.
“We want total clarity and honesty now,” she said. “The European commission denies having had any contacts with the company, but I find that hard to believe. At our initiative, [the committee] will start a quick investigation into the allegations.
“I would also like to reiterate our call for a proper European intel service, subject to full democratic scrutiny of the European parliament. Europe is not the wild west. We have to protect our citizens and our democracy.”
Last month Hungary’s data protection authority, the NAIH, said it had launched an official investigation into allegations about the Hungarian government’s use of the Pegasus software.
At least five Hungarian journalists appeared on a leaked list reviewed by the Pegasus papers consortium. Also on the list was the number of the opposition politician György Gémesi, the mayor of the town of Gödöllő and head of a nationwide association of mayors.
Hungarian law provides that in cases where national security is at stake, the intelligence services can order surveillance with no judicial oversight, only the signature of the minister of justice.
Hungary’s justice minister, Judit Varga, has declined to comment, but said “every country needs such tools”.
In ‘t Veld said: “The reports that the Hungarian government used Pegasus spyware are very troubling. They merit a full and independent investigation. Journalists, politicians and activists must be able to do their work without being spied on by an increasingly authoritarian government. If proven otherwise, this constitutes a massive infringement of civil liberties.”
Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield, an MEP in the French Europe Ecologie Les Verts party, said: “So far, the Hungarian government still hasn’t reacted to the Pegasus project revelations. Neither transparency nor accountability has been brought to the public debate.”
NSO have denied that the inclusion of a number on the leaked list was indicative of whether it was selected for surveillance. “The list is not a list of Pegasus targets or potential targets,” the company said. “The numbers in the list are not related to NSO Group in any way.”
NSO is an Israeli surveillance company regulated by the country’s ministry of defence, which approves sale of its spyware technology to government clients around the world.
The company says it sells only to military, law enforcement and intelligence agencies in 40 unnamed countries for the purpose of terrorism and crime investigations.
It further claims to rigorously vet its customers’ human rights records before allowing them to use its spy tools. NSO says it “does not operate the systems that it sells to vetted government customers, and does not have access to the data of its customers’ targets”.
Didier Reynders
Daniel Boffey in Strasbourg
Wed, 15 September 2021
Photograph: Yves Herman/EPA
The EU must swiftly legislate to further protect the rights of activists, journalists and politicians following the Pegasus spyware scandal, and the perpetrators of illegal tapping must be prosecuted, the bloc’s justice commissioner has told the European parliament.
Didier Reynders told MEPs that the European Commission “totally condemned” alleged attempts by national security services to illegally access information on political opponents through their phones.
He said: “Any indication that such intrusion of privacy actually occurred needs to be thoroughly investigated and all responsible for a possible breach have to be brought to justice. This is, of course, the responsibility of each and every member state of the EU, and I expect that in the case of Pegasus, the competent authorities will thoroughly examine the allegations and restore trust.”
Related: What is Pegasus spyware and how does it hack phones?
He added that the EU’s executive branch was closely following an investigation by Hungary’s data protection authority into claims that Viktor Orbán’s far-right government had been among those targeting journalists, media owners and opposition political figures with invasive Pegasus spyware.
Reynders said that it was already the case, as confirmed by the European court of justice, that governments could not “restrict the confidentiality and integrity of communications”, except in “very strictly limited” scenarios.
But he added that a pending EU privacy regulation would further tighten the rules, and called for MEPs and the member states to urgently agree on the details of that new law in light of the spyware scandal.
Reynders said: “Various reports have shown that certain national security services used Pegasus spyware, to have direct access to citizens, equipment, including political opponents and journalists.
“Let me say right at the start that the commission totally condemns any illegal access to systems or any kind of illegal trapping or interception of community users communications. It’s a crime in the whole of the European Union.”
A consortium of 17 media outlets, including the Guardian, revealed in July that global clients of the Israeli surveillance firm NSO Group had used hacking software to target human rights activists, journalists and lawyers.
The investigation was based on forensic analysis of phones and analysis of a leaked database of 50,000 numbers, including that of the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and European Council president Charles Michel, along with other heads of state and senior government, diplomatic and military officials, in 34 countries.
Reynders, a former Belgian justice minister, was speaking at the start of a debate in the European parliament on the scandal.
Sophie In ‘t Veld, a Dutch MEP in the liberal D66 party, said the parliament’s civil liberties, justice and home committee, of which she is a leading member, would launch an investigation into the use of Pegasus within the EU.
“We want total clarity and honesty now,” she said. “The European commission denies having had any contacts with the company, but I find that hard to believe. At our initiative, [the committee] will start a quick investigation into the allegations.
“I would also like to reiterate our call for a proper European intel service, subject to full democratic scrutiny of the European parliament. Europe is not the wild west. We have to protect our citizens and our democracy.”
Last month Hungary’s data protection authority, the NAIH, said it had launched an official investigation into allegations about the Hungarian government’s use of the Pegasus software.
At least five Hungarian journalists appeared on a leaked list reviewed by the Pegasus papers consortium. Also on the list was the number of the opposition politician György Gémesi, the mayor of the town of Gödöllő and head of a nationwide association of mayors.
Hungarian law provides that in cases where national security is at stake, the intelligence services can order surveillance with no judicial oversight, only the signature of the minister of justice.
Hungary’s justice minister, Judit Varga, has declined to comment, but said “every country needs such tools”.
In ‘t Veld said: “The reports that the Hungarian government used Pegasus spyware are very troubling. They merit a full and independent investigation. Journalists, politicians and activists must be able to do their work without being spied on by an increasingly authoritarian government. If proven otherwise, this constitutes a massive infringement of civil liberties.”
Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield, an MEP in the French Europe Ecologie Les Verts party, said: “So far, the Hungarian government still hasn’t reacted to the Pegasus project revelations. Neither transparency nor accountability has been brought to the public debate.”
NSO have denied that the inclusion of a number on the leaked list was indicative of whether it was selected for surveillance. “The list is not a list of Pegasus targets or potential targets,” the company said. “The numbers in the list are not related to NSO Group in any way.”
NSO is an Israeli surveillance company regulated by the country’s ministry of defence, which approves sale of its spyware technology to government clients around the world.
The company says it sells only to military, law enforcement and intelligence agencies in 40 unnamed countries for the purpose of terrorism and crime investigations.
It further claims to rigorously vet its customers’ human rights records before allowing them to use its spy tools. NSO says it “does not operate the systems that it sells to vetted government customers, and does not have access to the data of its customers’ targets”.
Emma Raducanu ‘in talks with luxury jewellery brand Tiffany & Co’
Lizzie Edmonds
Wed, 15 September 2021
Emma at the Met Ball (Getty Images)
Emma Raducanu is rumoured to be in talks with jewellery brand Tiffany & Co to become the high-end brand’s new ambassador.
Rumours of a potential deal began over the weekend after the 18-year-old from Bromley was seen wearing various pieces of the brand’s jewellery during her victorious US Open final.
The tennis champion stunned the world by winning the US Open on Saturday, beating Canadian Leylah Fernandez, 19, in straight sets.
She wore a set of £4,500 pearl and diamond earrings during the match, a white gold £3,275 ring and a £2,750 cross pendant. Ms Raducanu also wore a £17,100 diamond hinged bangle.
The star also wore jewellery by the brand when attending Monday night’s Met Gala alongside Jennifer Lopez, Billie Eilish and Kristen Stewart at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Ms Raducanu is also being linked with Chanel after she wore the French fashion house to the exclusive party.
Already the tennis player has a sponsorship deal with Nike and it is likely she will have received a bonus following her US Open win
The details of her deals are likely to remain private. She is being managed by Max Eisenbud, vice-president at IMG sports management group, who was behind Maria Sharapova’s reported £200 million career.
Experts have predicted Ms Raducanu - who only sat her A-Levels this summer - could be Britain’s first billion-dollar sports star.
The PR guru Mark Borkowski, who has worked with Michael Jackson, Joan Rivers and Led Zeppelin said: “This is the start of something epic. She is a billion-dollar girl, no doubt about it.
“She is the real deal. It’s not just that she plays extraordinary tennis, it’s also her background, her ethnicity, her freedom of spirit. People also love the fact that she is vulnerable, but laughs the pressures away.”
The money-savvy teen - who achieved an A in A-Level economics this year - comes from a financial background. Both her Chinese mother and Romanian father work in finance.
And, according to The Times, she registered Harbour 6 Limited - which is said to be the vehicle to manage her finances - when she was just 17.
On Tuesday, Raducanu ticked off another of her bucket list visits during her stay in New York.
Raducanu - who made history by becoming the first qualifier to win the US Open on Saturday - was pictured talking to trading floor staff during her tour of the New York Stock Exchange.
Lizzie Edmonds
Wed, 15 September 2021
Emma at the Met Ball (Getty Images)
Emma Raducanu is rumoured to be in talks with jewellery brand Tiffany & Co to become the high-end brand’s new ambassador.
Rumours of a potential deal began over the weekend after the 18-year-old from Bromley was seen wearing various pieces of the brand’s jewellery during her victorious US Open final.
The tennis champion stunned the world by winning the US Open on Saturday, beating Canadian Leylah Fernandez, 19, in straight sets.
She wore a set of £4,500 pearl and diamond earrings during the match, a white gold £3,275 ring and a £2,750 cross pendant. Ms Raducanu also wore a £17,100 diamond hinged bangle.
The star also wore jewellery by the brand when attending Monday night’s Met Gala alongside Jennifer Lopez, Billie Eilish and Kristen Stewart at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Ms Raducanu is also being linked with Chanel after she wore the French fashion house to the exclusive party.
Already the tennis player has a sponsorship deal with Nike and it is likely she will have received a bonus following her US Open win
The details of her deals are likely to remain private. She is being managed by Max Eisenbud, vice-president at IMG sports management group, who was behind Maria Sharapova’s reported £200 million career.
Experts have predicted Ms Raducanu - who only sat her A-Levels this summer - could be Britain’s first billion-dollar sports star.
The PR guru Mark Borkowski, who has worked with Michael Jackson, Joan Rivers and Led Zeppelin said: “This is the start of something epic. She is a billion-dollar girl, no doubt about it.
“She is the real deal. It’s not just that she plays extraordinary tennis, it’s also her background, her ethnicity, her freedom of spirit. People also love the fact that she is vulnerable, but laughs the pressures away.”
The money-savvy teen - who achieved an A in A-Level economics this year - comes from a financial background. Both her Chinese mother and Romanian father work in finance.
And, according to The Times, she registered Harbour 6 Limited - which is said to be the vehicle to manage her finances - when she was just 17.
On Tuesday, Raducanu ticked off another of her bucket list visits during her stay in New York.
Raducanu - who made history by becoming the first qualifier to win the US Open on Saturday - was pictured talking to trading floor staff during her tour of the New York Stock Exchange.
Five myths about drone warfare busted
Lily Hamourtziadou, Senior Lecturer in Security Studies, Birmingham City University
Wed, 15 September 2021
Burlingham/Shutterstock
Drones have become the signature tool of 21st-century warfare, particularly by US forces in the “war on terror”. The fundamental rationale for drone use relies on their “surgical precision”, supposedly saving civilian lives.
But headlines show us this isn’t true. A recent US drone strike in Kabul, Afghanistan mistakenly killed 43-year-old aid worker Zemari Ahmadi, along with nine members of his family, including seven children. This idea of precision is just one of many pervasive myths about drones that I’ve set out to dispel in my research.
Military technology aims to inflict maximum damage to the enemy while minimising our own losses of manpower and material. Drones have advantages compared to piloted aircraft, primarily that they protect the lives of those conducting strikes. This has lulled us into a false sense of security about the nature of war, suggesting that conflicts can be won from a distance, with minimum harm to civilians, in wars that are ethical and respect international law.
Addressing these myths can hopefully reduce harm to the unarmed population and bring the civilian body count from drone strikes down to zero.
Myth 1: it’s ‘precision bombing’
Drone pilots – humans operating the weapons remotely – wait for a target to appear then launch a missile. The process of identifying a target and carrying out an attack is minimised, with pilots potentially making grave decisions “on the fly”.
In Iraq, more than 13,000 civilians have been killed in coalition drone strikes since they resumed in 2014, when Islamic State (IS) captured areas of Iraq (they had ceased three years earlier with the withdrawal of US and UK troops).
By August 1 2019, in 1,773 days of 14,570 coalition drone strikes in Iraq and 19,785 in Syria, up to 13,000 civilians had been killed, of which 2,300 were children.
Figures from the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan show the number of civilian casualties from US drone strikes rose from 158 in the first half of 2018 to 430 in the same period in 2019. The total number of civilian casualties in the country rose by 39% to 519 by the end of 2019.
Myth 2: drone warfare is ethical
In drone strikes, the aim is to kill not capture. Human beings are denied the right to surrender and are instead executed for being members of a group defined by the killers as evil. Drones are thought to appear in a sticky situation to swiftly reward the just and punish the unjust. Those executed are presumed “guilty”, without arrest, questioning or subsequent conviction. Targeted killing becomes normalised, leading to increasing human rights abuses.
New York Times journalist David Rohde, who was kidnapped by the Taliban for months in 2008 and 2009, described the buzz of drones overhead during his captivity as “hell on earth”.
Myth 3: if the war is legal, so is the weapon
According to international law and the Geneva conventions, all parties to a conflict must distinguish between combatants and civilians – the latter being “protected persons”.
US President Barack Obama signed an executive order in 2016 to minimise civilian casualties in all uses of force. That year he published presidential policy guidance on “direct action against terrorists”, which laid out a process for authorising drone targets in line with the principles of just war theory, a tradition of military ethics that determines which actions are acceptable when waging war.
The use of drones was supposed to both respect the law and protect the vulnerable. Yet in Iraq the methods that killed the most civilians per event were drone strikes.
To protect civilians from indiscriminate harm, as required by international humanitarian law, military and civilian policies should prohibit aerial bombing in civilian areas, unless it can be demonstrated —- by monitoring civilian casualties —- that civilians are being protected.
Unmanned aerial vehicles are the weapon of choice for the world’s most powerful militaries. aapsky/Shutterstock
Myth 4: drones are a triumph of technology
If only drones were used, goes the logic, wars would still be fought in far-off places, but without tens of thousands of boots on the ground. Yet despite their increasing use, drones have not fully enabled militaries to avoid the usual (dirty and costly) methods of fighting wars.
Iraq and Afghanistan started as high-tech wars, but rapidly evolved into widespread insurgencies. In response, the US and its allies committed hundreds of thousands of boots on the ground, resulting in casualties in the occupied countries and in the west.
In the last 15 years we have turned to the new technologies of eyes in the sky – armed drones and long-range strikes, but also special forces and privatised military corporations. With this has come the policy of training and arming local forces, while drones and special forces handle the counterinsurgency.
Myth 5: drones are effective
While no large-scale attack has taken place on US soil since 9/11, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians have been killed since the 2003 invasion as a result of drone strikes and other military action.
Aerial bombardment has not created peaceful states, nor defeated IS, nor stopped the violent deaths of innocents, nor abated sectarian conflicts, nor alleviated suffering. These wars have led to endemic anarchy, mass exodus of civilians, death, poverty and generations living with the trauma of war. They have contributed to the rise of theocracy and jihadism. Wars rage, as millions are radicalised, disillusioned and despairing.
The physically remote and concealed nature of drone tactics prevents state transparency regarding those killed and injured, denying individuals the dignity of recognition and obscuring the full human costs of warfare.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The Conversation
Lily Hamourtziadou is affiliated with Iraq Body Count, principal researcher since 2006.
Lily Hamourtziadou, Senior Lecturer in Security Studies, Birmingham City University
Wed, 15 September 2021
Burlingham/Shutterstock
Drones have become the signature tool of 21st-century warfare, particularly by US forces in the “war on terror”. The fundamental rationale for drone use relies on their “surgical precision”, supposedly saving civilian lives.
But headlines show us this isn’t true. A recent US drone strike in Kabul, Afghanistan mistakenly killed 43-year-old aid worker Zemari Ahmadi, along with nine members of his family, including seven children. This idea of precision is just one of many pervasive myths about drones that I’ve set out to dispel in my research.
Military technology aims to inflict maximum damage to the enemy while minimising our own losses of manpower and material. Drones have advantages compared to piloted aircraft, primarily that they protect the lives of those conducting strikes. This has lulled us into a false sense of security about the nature of war, suggesting that conflicts can be won from a distance, with minimum harm to civilians, in wars that are ethical and respect international law.
Addressing these myths can hopefully reduce harm to the unarmed population and bring the civilian body count from drone strikes down to zero.
Myth 1: it’s ‘precision bombing’
Drone pilots – humans operating the weapons remotely – wait for a target to appear then launch a missile. The process of identifying a target and carrying out an attack is minimised, with pilots potentially making grave decisions “on the fly”.
In Iraq, more than 13,000 civilians have been killed in coalition drone strikes since they resumed in 2014, when Islamic State (IS) captured areas of Iraq (they had ceased three years earlier with the withdrawal of US and UK troops).
By August 1 2019, in 1,773 days of 14,570 coalition drone strikes in Iraq and 19,785 in Syria, up to 13,000 civilians had been killed, of which 2,300 were children.
Figures from the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan show the number of civilian casualties from US drone strikes rose from 158 in the first half of 2018 to 430 in the same period in 2019. The total number of civilian casualties in the country rose by 39% to 519 by the end of 2019.
Myth 2: drone warfare is ethical
In drone strikes, the aim is to kill not capture. Human beings are denied the right to surrender and are instead executed for being members of a group defined by the killers as evil. Drones are thought to appear in a sticky situation to swiftly reward the just and punish the unjust. Those executed are presumed “guilty”, without arrest, questioning or subsequent conviction. Targeted killing becomes normalised, leading to increasing human rights abuses.
New York Times journalist David Rohde, who was kidnapped by the Taliban for months in 2008 and 2009, described the buzz of drones overhead during his captivity as “hell on earth”.
Myth 3: if the war is legal, so is the weapon
According to international law and the Geneva conventions, all parties to a conflict must distinguish between combatants and civilians – the latter being “protected persons”.
US President Barack Obama signed an executive order in 2016 to minimise civilian casualties in all uses of force. That year he published presidential policy guidance on “direct action against terrorists”, which laid out a process for authorising drone targets in line with the principles of just war theory, a tradition of military ethics that determines which actions are acceptable when waging war.
The use of drones was supposed to both respect the law and protect the vulnerable. Yet in Iraq the methods that killed the most civilians per event were drone strikes.
To protect civilians from indiscriminate harm, as required by international humanitarian law, military and civilian policies should prohibit aerial bombing in civilian areas, unless it can be demonstrated —- by monitoring civilian casualties —- that civilians are being protected.
Unmanned aerial vehicles are the weapon of choice for the world’s most powerful militaries. aapsky/Shutterstock
Myth 4: drones are a triumph of technology
If only drones were used, goes the logic, wars would still be fought in far-off places, but without tens of thousands of boots on the ground. Yet despite their increasing use, drones have not fully enabled militaries to avoid the usual (dirty and costly) methods of fighting wars.
Iraq and Afghanistan started as high-tech wars, but rapidly evolved into widespread insurgencies. In response, the US and its allies committed hundreds of thousands of boots on the ground, resulting in casualties in the occupied countries and in the west.
In the last 15 years we have turned to the new technologies of eyes in the sky – armed drones and long-range strikes, but also special forces and privatised military corporations. With this has come the policy of training and arming local forces, while drones and special forces handle the counterinsurgency.
Myth 5: drones are effective
While no large-scale attack has taken place on US soil since 9/11, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians have been killed since the 2003 invasion as a result of drone strikes and other military action.
Aerial bombardment has not created peaceful states, nor defeated IS, nor stopped the violent deaths of innocents, nor abated sectarian conflicts, nor alleviated suffering. These wars have led to endemic anarchy, mass exodus of civilians, death, poverty and generations living with the trauma of war. They have contributed to the rise of theocracy and jihadism. Wars rage, as millions are radicalised, disillusioned and despairing.
The physically remote and concealed nature of drone tactics prevents state transparency regarding those killed and injured, denying individuals the dignity of recognition and obscuring the full human costs of warfare.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The Conversation
Lily Hamourtziadou is affiliated with Iraq Body Count, principal researcher since 2006.
Bitcoin uses more power in 2021 than all of 2020 as climate debate on crypto mining heats up
Wed, 15 September 2021
Bitcoin has already used more power so far this year than it did in all of 2020, a new study has suggested, as the debate on the impact of cryptocurrency mining on the environment heats up.
Bitcoin is set to use 91TWh of energy by the end of this year, according to a Bloomberg report, which noted this is as much energy as Pakistan. Last year, Bitcoin was estimated to have consumed about 67TWh of electricity.
While tracking how much energy Bitcoin mining uses is difficult, the trend is clear. The Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index estimates that Bitcoin will consume 95.68 TW/h by the end of the year, which is about the same as the power consumption of the Philippines.
Could Cardano’s 'green' cryptocurrency ADA take over Bitcoin and Ethereum?
Why does Bitcoin use so much energy?
Bitcoin uses a system called "proof of work", the mechanism is used to confirm transactions and add new blocks to the chain. Its decentralised system requires a global network of computers to run at the same time when a transaction takes place. This is why it uses so much energy, as it is designed to encourage increased computing effort.
Bitcoin could switch to the less energy-consuming "Proof of Stake" mechanism, which randomly allocates coins to users who put up their own tokens as collateral.
The Bloomberg report said as the price of Bitcoin increases, more miners with less energy-efficient machines are joining the network, which then drives up energy use.
The report said it was "essential to improve the efficiency of crypto-mining and move to low-carbon energy sources for electricity".
In a crumbling economy, Venezuela’s cheap electricity is a blessing for its Bitcoin miners
Ukraine becomes the latest country to legalise Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies
Electronic waste
But it's not just the running of Bitcoin mining that is costing the environment. The computer equipment used for mining typically only lasts for one and a half years. It can not then thrown out afterwards because the equipment can only be used for mining.
Science Direct found that as a result, one transaction on the Bitcoin network produces 272 grams of electronic waste.
When governments and Elon Musk get involved
One of the most prominent figures to add to the crypto environmental debate is the Tesla chief executive officer Elon Musk.
Earlier this year he said the electric car company would accept Bitcoin as payment, but environmentalists later convinced Musk to backtrack on his decision.
Musk subsequently announced the company would not accept crypto payments for Tesla vehicles again until at least 50 per cent of mining operations using green energy. But this has not yet happened.
Bitcoin jumps as Elon Musk signals Tesla to start accepting the crypto when it becomes eco-friendly
Elon Musk wants Bitcoin to become environmentally friendly. Can he convince the crypto's devotees?
Cryptocurrency experts have previously told Euronews Next that crypto miners have no incentive to make greener choices.
Governments are also weighing in on the debate. China and Iran temporarily halted Bitcoin mining due to the massive energy use that was causing power cuts in some areas.
In the United States, Senator Elizabeth Warren butted heads with two cryptocurrency CEOs.
Earlier this month she tweeted a New York Times article on the environmental impact of cryptos and wrote: “Bitcoin mining consumes roughly the same amount of electricity as Washington state—putting pressure on our power grids and worsening the #ClimateCrisis. We need to protect our planet and crackdown on environmentally wasteful crypto mining practices.”
In response, CEO of MicroStrategy, Michael Saylor, tweeted: "#Bitcoin mining converts wasted & stranded energy into digital energy, the natural successor to chemical & electrical energy. It can be managed by any computer, transferred anywhere at the speed of light, and lasts forever, thereby improving our climate, economy & power grid".
Meanwhile, FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, responded to Warren in saying Bitcoin mining could be improved but that it is "in line with its economic impact".
Wed, 15 September 2021
Bitcoin has already used more power so far this year than it did in all of 2020, a new study has suggested, as the debate on the impact of cryptocurrency mining on the environment heats up.
Bitcoin is set to use 91TWh of energy by the end of this year, according to a Bloomberg report, which noted this is as much energy as Pakistan. Last year, Bitcoin was estimated to have consumed about 67TWh of electricity.
While tracking how much energy Bitcoin mining uses is difficult, the trend is clear. The Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index estimates that Bitcoin will consume 95.68 TW/h by the end of the year, which is about the same as the power consumption of the Philippines.
Could Cardano’s 'green' cryptocurrency ADA take over Bitcoin and Ethereum?
Why does Bitcoin use so much energy?
Bitcoin uses a system called "proof of work", the mechanism is used to confirm transactions and add new blocks to the chain. Its decentralised system requires a global network of computers to run at the same time when a transaction takes place. This is why it uses so much energy, as it is designed to encourage increased computing effort.
Bitcoin could switch to the less energy-consuming "Proof of Stake" mechanism, which randomly allocates coins to users who put up their own tokens as collateral.
The Bloomberg report said as the price of Bitcoin increases, more miners with less energy-efficient machines are joining the network, which then drives up energy use.
The report said it was "essential to improve the efficiency of crypto-mining and move to low-carbon energy sources for electricity".
In a crumbling economy, Venezuela’s cheap electricity is a blessing for its Bitcoin miners
Ukraine becomes the latest country to legalise Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies
Electronic waste
But it's not just the running of Bitcoin mining that is costing the environment. The computer equipment used for mining typically only lasts for one and a half years. It can not then thrown out afterwards because the equipment can only be used for mining.
Science Direct found that as a result, one transaction on the Bitcoin network produces 272 grams of electronic waste.
When governments and Elon Musk get involved
One of the most prominent figures to add to the crypto environmental debate is the Tesla chief executive officer Elon Musk.
Earlier this year he said the electric car company would accept Bitcoin as payment, but environmentalists later convinced Musk to backtrack on his decision.
Musk subsequently announced the company would not accept crypto payments for Tesla vehicles again until at least 50 per cent of mining operations using green energy. But this has not yet happened.
Bitcoin jumps as Elon Musk signals Tesla to start accepting the crypto when it becomes eco-friendly
Elon Musk wants Bitcoin to become environmentally friendly. Can he convince the crypto's devotees?
Cryptocurrency experts have previously told Euronews Next that crypto miners have no incentive to make greener choices.
Governments are also weighing in on the debate. China and Iran temporarily halted Bitcoin mining due to the massive energy use that was causing power cuts in some areas.
In the United States, Senator Elizabeth Warren butted heads with two cryptocurrency CEOs.
Earlier this month she tweeted a New York Times article on the environmental impact of cryptos and wrote: “Bitcoin mining consumes roughly the same amount of electricity as Washington state—putting pressure on our power grids and worsening the #ClimateCrisis. We need to protect our planet and crackdown on environmentally wasteful crypto mining practices.”
In response, CEO of MicroStrategy, Michael Saylor, tweeted: "#Bitcoin mining converts wasted & stranded energy into digital energy, the natural successor to chemical & electrical energy. It can be managed by any computer, transferred anywhere at the speed of light, and lasts forever, thereby improving our climate, economy & power grid".
Meanwhile, FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, responded to Warren in saying Bitcoin mining could be improved but that it is "in line with its economic impact".
Grasslands have key role to play in saving the planet
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
THE GUARDIAN
Ian Dunn CEO, Plantlife; Gill Perkins CEO, Bumblebee Conservation Trust;
Wed, 15 September 2021,
News that the perilous plight of endangered grasslands is not fully recognised in a EU draft anti-deforestation law (Leaked EU anti-deforestation law omits fragile grasslands and wetlands, 14 September) brings into sharp focus the dangerous underappreciation of a global habitat that has a crucial role in the fight against climate change. Grasslands aren’t just crucibles of biodiversity, playing home to a wealth of wild plants, fungi, butterflies and bees, they also possess an as-yet underreported ability to lock down carbon. Given that up to 30% of the Earth’s land carbon is stored in grassland, these sites are every bit as important as other ecosystems in the fight against greenhouse gases.
The Grasslands+ campaign, supported by some of Britain’s leading conservation charities including Plantlife, Butterfly Conservation and the Bumblebee Conservation Trust, is calling for international protections for our planet’s grasslands, savannas, plains, heaths, steppes and meadows to help mitigate the impact of climate change and increase biodiversity. The UK government, the EU and other world leaders must commit to restoring, enhancing and protecting these habitats at Cop26 in Glasgow.
News that the perilous plight of endangered grasslands is not fully recognised in a EU draft anti-deforestation law (Leaked EU anti-deforestation law omits fragile grasslands and wetlands, 14 September) brings into sharp focus the dangerous underappreciation of a global habitat that has a crucial role in the fight against climate change. Grasslands aren’t just crucibles of biodiversity, playing home to a wealth of wild plants, fungi, butterflies and bees, they also possess an as-yet underreported ability to lock down carbon. Given that up to 30% of the Earth’s land carbon is stored in grassland, these sites are every bit as important as other ecosystems in the fight against greenhouse gases.
The Grasslands+ campaign, supported by some of Britain’s leading conservation charities including Plantlife, Butterfly Conservation and the Bumblebee Conservation Trust, is calling for international protections for our planet’s grasslands, savannas, plains, heaths, steppes and meadows to help mitigate the impact of climate change and increase biodiversity. The UK government, the EU and other world leaders must commit to restoring, enhancing and protecting these habitats at Cop26 in Glasgow.
Ian Dunn CEO, Plantlife; Gill Perkins CEO, Bumblebee Conservation Trust;
Julie Williams CEO, Butterfly Conservation
Climate change, logging collide -- and a forest shrinks
Via AP news wire
Wed, 15 September 2021,
Logging Old Trees (Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.)
Looking down a hillside dotted with large stumps and nearly devoid of trees, a pair of retired U.S. Forest Service employees lamented logging policies they helped craft to deal with two harbingers of climate change -- pine beetles and wildfires.
Timber production dramatically ramped up two decades ago in the Black Hills National Forest along the South Dakota-Wyoming border, as beetles ravaged huge expanses of forest and worries grew over wildfires.
The beetles left, but the loggers haven’t — and they're now felling trees at twice the rate government scientists say is sustainable. That means the Black Hills forests are shrinking, with fewer and smaller trees.
Timber sales from federal forests nationwide more than doubled over the past 20 years, according to government data. In Washington, D.C., Republicans and Democrats alike have pushed more aggressive thinning of stands to reduce vegetation that fuels wildfires.
But critics of federal forest management say that in their fervor to do something about climate change, officials are allowing the removal of too many older trees that can actually better withstand fire.
In the Black Hills, stands of century-old ponderosa pines were thinned over the past two decades, then thinned again. In some areas, most of the remaining older and larger trees are being cut, leaving hillsides almost bare.
“Eventually you’re not going to have any big trees on the whole forest,” said Dave Mertz, who worked as a government natural resources officer overseeing Black Hills logging until retiring in 2017. “The timber industry is pulling the strings now. The Forest Service has lost its way.”
DIRE PREDICTIONS
Across the western U.S., more trees have been dying as climate change dramatically alters the landscape and leaves forests more susceptible. Wildfires, insects and disease are the top killers, researchers say.
A sweeping government review of forest health surveys since 1993 found that the rate of trees dying increased this century and outpaced new growth in all eight states examined — Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming. Timber harvested from Forest Service lands over the past two decades also increased.
In the Black Hills, those two trends have collided. With more trees being logged and even more killed by beetles and fires in recent years, government scientists say the forest can’t grow fast enough to keep up.
The timber industry and allies in Congress are pushing back against that conclusion. Timber company representatives predict dire economic consequences if forest managers sharply reduce harvest levels. And they say wildfires and beetle outbreaks would get worse.
One of the region's seven mills closed in March, eliminating 120 jobs in Hill City, South Dakota. Owner Neiman Enterprises said a recent slowdown in timber sales meant it wouldn't have enough logs.
"These companies aren’t tech startups. They are multi-generational family companies that want to be there for the long term.” said Ben Wudtke, director of the Black Hills Forest Resource Association of saw mills and logging companies.
FIGHTING FIRE
To counter growing havoc from western wildfires, Biden's administration wants to double the forest acreage thinned or treated with prescribed burns to 6 million acres (2.4 million hectares) annually — bigger than New Hampshire.
One method to reduce fire risk is to remove dense stands of small trees and thick underbrush that accumulated for decades as wildfires — a natural part of the landscape — were suppressed.
It’s expensive, labor-intensive work, and there’s little market value in small trees. When sworn in this summer, Forest Service Chief Randy Moore said combating climate change will require making it worthwhile to harvest smaller trees, such as using the vegetation as biomass to generate electricity.
“It doesn’t pay for itself and we don’t have markets that seem to be increasing quickly enough," he said.
The service's former deputy chief, Jim Furnish, criticized the agency as too focused on timber production and too slow to react to climate change, to the detriment of the forest.
There are signs of change under President Joe Biden including the administration’s move last month to end large-scale commercial logging of old-growth trees in Alaska’s Tongass National Forest.
But other projects that include old-growth removal are pending, including in Montana's Kootenai National Forest along the Canada border, the Kaibab National Forest just north of the Grand Canyon in Arizona and Idaho's Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forest.
“The Forest Service’s approach to date has been to attack this as a management problem: ‘We need to cut more trees,'” Furnish told The Associated Press. “You can’t cut your way out of this problem.”
Moore, the agency's chief, acknowledged the warming planet was forcing changes, but said he hoped to find a “sweet spot” between the environment and industry — while removing enough vegetation to reduce wildfire risk. In the Black Hills, officials said they would consider the latest science alongside economic impacts as they seek to make logging sustainable.
“We need the industry to help us,” Moore said, referring to climate change. “It’s not really about timber sales or cutting large trees.”
“BEAT TO HELL”
The Black Hills played an outsized role in the early formation of the nation's timber policies. In the 1890s, excessive logging to feed demand for timbers for a nearby gold mine helped spur creation of the national forest system. The first regulated logging sales in forest service history took place there in 1899.
When artist and environmentalist Mary Zimmerman bought property within the Black Hills in 1988, neighboring public lands where that first timber sale took place had regrown so successfully that huge branches overhead “were like a cathedral.”
The site was thinned in 1990, removing some big trees but leaving many. It was thinned more in 2016. Then logging crews returned last year and took out the remaining big trees. Cattle now graze the area.
“It’s just beat to hell,” said Zimmerman.
Her account was confirmed by Blaine Cook, forest management scientist for the Black Hills for more than two decades until his 2019 retirement.
EARLY WARNINGS
Cook said his monitoring began to show last decade that the forest’s growth rate wasn’t keeping up with aggressive logging that was a response to the pine beetle outbreak that began in 1998. The high harvest rate continued after the outbreak peaked in 2012 and even after it ended in 2017.
Cook said his warnings that the forest was being damaged were rejected by superiors who faced political pressure to provide a steady supply of logs to sawmills in South Dakota and Wyoming.
Disagreement within the agency over whether there was too much logging culminated in a report this April by scientists from the forest service’s research branch that was unequivocal: Black Hills logging needs to be cut back by at least half, possibly more, to be sustainable.
The problem is that the forest changed but logging rates have not, said Mike Battaglia, one of the lead authors.
“In the late 90's, you had twice as much volume” of trees in the forest, he said. “To take out the same amount now, you're taking too much."
Forest industry representatives criticized the government’s multi-year study for including only parts of the forest, saying that created an incomplete picture of how many trees are available to harvest.
They estimated up to 80% of the region’s timber industry jobs would be lost if the forest service reduced logging to recommended levels. If that happens, they said the agency would have difficulty finding companies willing to do less profitable thinning work for wildfire protection.
“You have to have somebody around to do it," said the forest industry's Wudtke. “It's really critical that we keep these companies going."
___
Follow Matthew Brown on Twitter: @MatthewBrownAP
___
Read more of AP’s climate coverage at http://www.apnews.com/Climate
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Via AP news wire
Wed, 15 September 2021,
Logging Old Trees (Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.)
Looking down a hillside dotted with large stumps and nearly devoid of trees, a pair of retired U.S. Forest Service employees lamented logging policies they helped craft to deal with two harbingers of climate change -- pine beetles and wildfires.
Timber production dramatically ramped up two decades ago in the Black Hills National Forest along the South Dakota-Wyoming border, as beetles ravaged huge expanses of forest and worries grew over wildfires.
The beetles left, but the loggers haven’t — and they're now felling trees at twice the rate government scientists say is sustainable. That means the Black Hills forests are shrinking, with fewer and smaller trees.
Timber sales from federal forests nationwide more than doubled over the past 20 years, according to government data. In Washington, D.C., Republicans and Democrats alike have pushed more aggressive thinning of stands to reduce vegetation that fuels wildfires.
But critics of federal forest management say that in their fervor to do something about climate change, officials are allowing the removal of too many older trees that can actually better withstand fire.
In the Black Hills, stands of century-old ponderosa pines were thinned over the past two decades, then thinned again. In some areas, most of the remaining older and larger trees are being cut, leaving hillsides almost bare.
“Eventually you’re not going to have any big trees on the whole forest,” said Dave Mertz, who worked as a government natural resources officer overseeing Black Hills logging until retiring in 2017. “The timber industry is pulling the strings now. The Forest Service has lost its way.”
DIRE PREDICTIONS
Across the western U.S., more trees have been dying as climate change dramatically alters the landscape and leaves forests more susceptible. Wildfires, insects and disease are the top killers, researchers say.
A sweeping government review of forest health surveys since 1993 found that the rate of trees dying increased this century and outpaced new growth in all eight states examined — Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming. Timber harvested from Forest Service lands over the past two decades also increased.
In the Black Hills, those two trends have collided. With more trees being logged and even more killed by beetles and fires in recent years, government scientists say the forest can’t grow fast enough to keep up.
The timber industry and allies in Congress are pushing back against that conclusion. Timber company representatives predict dire economic consequences if forest managers sharply reduce harvest levels. And they say wildfires and beetle outbreaks would get worse.
One of the region's seven mills closed in March, eliminating 120 jobs in Hill City, South Dakota. Owner Neiman Enterprises said a recent slowdown in timber sales meant it wouldn't have enough logs.
"These companies aren’t tech startups. They are multi-generational family companies that want to be there for the long term.” said Ben Wudtke, director of the Black Hills Forest Resource Association of saw mills and logging companies.
FIGHTING FIRE
To counter growing havoc from western wildfires, Biden's administration wants to double the forest acreage thinned or treated with prescribed burns to 6 million acres (2.4 million hectares) annually — bigger than New Hampshire.
One method to reduce fire risk is to remove dense stands of small trees and thick underbrush that accumulated for decades as wildfires — a natural part of the landscape — were suppressed.
It’s expensive, labor-intensive work, and there’s little market value in small trees. When sworn in this summer, Forest Service Chief Randy Moore said combating climate change will require making it worthwhile to harvest smaller trees, such as using the vegetation as biomass to generate electricity.
“It doesn’t pay for itself and we don’t have markets that seem to be increasing quickly enough," he said.
The service's former deputy chief, Jim Furnish, criticized the agency as too focused on timber production and too slow to react to climate change, to the detriment of the forest.
There are signs of change under President Joe Biden including the administration’s move last month to end large-scale commercial logging of old-growth trees in Alaska’s Tongass National Forest.
But other projects that include old-growth removal are pending, including in Montana's Kootenai National Forest along the Canada border, the Kaibab National Forest just north of the Grand Canyon in Arizona and Idaho's Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forest.
“The Forest Service’s approach to date has been to attack this as a management problem: ‘We need to cut more trees,'” Furnish told The Associated Press. “You can’t cut your way out of this problem.”
Moore, the agency's chief, acknowledged the warming planet was forcing changes, but said he hoped to find a “sweet spot” between the environment and industry — while removing enough vegetation to reduce wildfire risk. In the Black Hills, officials said they would consider the latest science alongside economic impacts as they seek to make logging sustainable.
“We need the industry to help us,” Moore said, referring to climate change. “It’s not really about timber sales or cutting large trees.”
“BEAT TO HELL”
The Black Hills played an outsized role in the early formation of the nation's timber policies. In the 1890s, excessive logging to feed demand for timbers for a nearby gold mine helped spur creation of the national forest system. The first regulated logging sales in forest service history took place there in 1899.
When artist and environmentalist Mary Zimmerman bought property within the Black Hills in 1988, neighboring public lands where that first timber sale took place had regrown so successfully that huge branches overhead “were like a cathedral.”
The site was thinned in 1990, removing some big trees but leaving many. It was thinned more in 2016. Then logging crews returned last year and took out the remaining big trees. Cattle now graze the area.
“It’s just beat to hell,” said Zimmerman.
Her account was confirmed by Blaine Cook, forest management scientist for the Black Hills for more than two decades until his 2019 retirement.
EARLY WARNINGS
Cook said his monitoring began to show last decade that the forest’s growth rate wasn’t keeping up with aggressive logging that was a response to the pine beetle outbreak that began in 1998. The high harvest rate continued after the outbreak peaked in 2012 and even after it ended in 2017.
Cook said his warnings that the forest was being damaged were rejected by superiors who faced political pressure to provide a steady supply of logs to sawmills in South Dakota and Wyoming.
Disagreement within the agency over whether there was too much logging culminated in a report this April by scientists from the forest service’s research branch that was unequivocal: Black Hills logging needs to be cut back by at least half, possibly more, to be sustainable.
The problem is that the forest changed but logging rates have not, said Mike Battaglia, one of the lead authors.
“In the late 90's, you had twice as much volume” of trees in the forest, he said. “To take out the same amount now, you're taking too much."
Forest industry representatives criticized the government’s multi-year study for including only parts of the forest, saying that created an incomplete picture of how many trees are available to harvest.
They estimated up to 80% of the region’s timber industry jobs would be lost if the forest service reduced logging to recommended levels. If that happens, they said the agency would have difficulty finding companies willing to do less profitable thinning work for wildfire protection.
“You have to have somebody around to do it," said the forest industry's Wudtke. “It's really critical that we keep these companies going."
___
Follow Matthew Brown on Twitter: @MatthewBrownAP
___
Read more of AP’s climate coverage at http://www.apnews.com/Climate
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Australia bushfires: Devastating flames released more than twice the amount of CO2 than previously thought, says study
Wed, 15 September 2021,
The enormous and devastating Australian bushfires of 2019-2020 released more than twice the amount of carbon dioxide than previously thought, a new study has revealed.
During that Australian summer season, fires ripped through an especially large area in the coastal regions of Victoria and New South Wales.
Around 74,000 km2 - an area almost the size of Scotland - of eucalyptus forest went up in flames, triggering mass evacuations and killing or displacing three billion animals.
The fires were already known to have released large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere, but the latest analysis found in fact 715 teragrams of CO2 were emitted between November 2019 and January 2020.
This is more than twice the amount previously estimated and surpasses Australia's normal annual fire and fossil fuel emissions by 80%.
The report, published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature, said the fact that fires were "driven partly by climate change" makes "better-constrained emission estimates particularly important".
The link with climate change, and the expectation that fires will become more frequent in future, suggests that "part of the CO2 emitted by these fires will not be sequestered by vegetation regrowth".
It warned of a vicious cycle of carbon dioxide from the fires building up in the atmosphere, contributing to climate change, which in turn drives more fires.
Globally, wildfire emissions are roughly equivalent to 22% of all fossil fuel emissions, the report said.
The wildfires also released vast amounts of aerosols, containing nitrogen and iron.
These are likely to have fuelled vast plankton blooms thousands of kilometres away in the Southern Ocean, a separate study in Nature found, highlighting the complex links among wildfires, ecosystems and the climate.
"It has been suggested that the oceanic deposition of wildfire aerosols can relieve nutrient limitations and, consequently, enhance marine productivity but direct observations are lacking," the study into the blooms said.
Watch the Daily Climate Show at 6.30pm Monday to Friday on Sky News, the Sky News website and app, on YouTube and Twitter.
The show investigates how global warming is changing our landscape and highlights solutions to the crisis.
Wed, 15 September 2021,
The enormous and devastating Australian bushfires of 2019-2020 released more than twice the amount of carbon dioxide than previously thought, a new study has revealed.
During that Australian summer season, fires ripped through an especially large area in the coastal regions of Victoria and New South Wales.
Around 74,000 km2 - an area almost the size of Scotland - of eucalyptus forest went up in flames, triggering mass evacuations and killing or displacing three billion animals.
The fires were already known to have released large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere, but the latest analysis found in fact 715 teragrams of CO2 were emitted between November 2019 and January 2020.
This is more than twice the amount previously estimated and surpasses Australia's normal annual fire and fossil fuel emissions by 80%.
The report, published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature, said the fact that fires were "driven partly by climate change" makes "better-constrained emission estimates particularly important".
The link with climate change, and the expectation that fires will become more frequent in future, suggests that "part of the CO2 emitted by these fires will not be sequestered by vegetation regrowth".
It warned of a vicious cycle of carbon dioxide from the fires building up in the atmosphere, contributing to climate change, which in turn drives more fires.
Globally, wildfire emissions are roughly equivalent to 22% of all fossil fuel emissions, the report said.
The wildfires also released vast amounts of aerosols, containing nitrogen and iron.
These are likely to have fuelled vast plankton blooms thousands of kilometres away in the Southern Ocean, a separate study in Nature found, highlighting the complex links among wildfires, ecosystems and the climate.
"It has been suggested that the oceanic deposition of wildfire aerosols can relieve nutrient limitations and, consequently, enhance marine productivity but direct observations are lacking," the study into the blooms said.
Watch the Daily Climate Show at 6.30pm Monday to Friday on Sky News, the Sky News website and app, on YouTube and Twitter.
The show investigates how global warming is changing our landscape and highlights solutions to the crisis.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)