Thursday, October 28, 2021

This TikTok user infiltrated 'white lives matter' groups – and uncovered a wellspring of racism

Travis Gettys
October 28, 2021

A Black TikTok user who goes by "Aunt Karen" is exposing the blatant racism in "white lives matter" social media groups -- and they hate it.



Denise Bradley infiltrated the groups, sometimes with friends who she says spam the boards with messages of "unity and positivity," and found a barrage or racist messages stereotyping Black people as "lazy" and other white supremacist content, reported Daily Dot.

"We have to take this group down," Bradley says in an Oct. 10 video that went viral.

She shared screenshots of posts from the White Lives Matter 2.0 group showing members saying they're "terrified" of Superman being Black, alongside a photo of actor Michael B. Jordan in the comic book superhero's costume, and Facebook ended up deleting the page after reviewing the racist commentary.

"I want them to feel uncomfortable," Bradley said. "They shouldn't be able to display so much hate and bigotry. They don't deserve a space on any platform."

Facebook Is Changing Its Name To Meta, And People Have Some Strong — And Hilarious — Feelings About It



Thu, October 28, 2021, 6:30 PM·2 min read

Facebook just announced that they'll be changing their name to "Meta." In a virtual meeting about the corporation's future, Mark Zuckerberg said he hopes they can eventually be seen as a "metaverse company."

According to Investopedia (a website I never thought I'd find myself perusing), a metaverse is "a digital reality that combines aspects of social media, online gaming, augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and cryptocurrencies to allow users to interact virtually."

This rebranding comes after a wave of scrutiny towards the company for its alleged spread of hate speech and misinformation. So as you can probably imagine, the internet has some thoughts. Here are 15 tweets that sum up people's reactions:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

What do you think about the name change? Let us know in the comments

Journalists roast Facebook's 'Meta' rebranding: 'A virtual reality where Mark Zuckerberg has a black friend'
Brad Reed
October 28, 2021

Screen cap

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Thursday announced that his company would be rebranding as "Meta" and would have more focus on virtual reality in which people could connect more directly in a simulated digital space.

In a video released to demonstrate the concept, a virtual Zuckerberg walks onto a simulation of a space station in which he plays cards with some of his friends, who also appear as cartoon avatars.

Many journalists were not impressed, however, as they believe it's just as likely that the toxic experiences that have consumed Facebook for years would soon come to infect the company's giant virtual reality platform.

"If you hate 'Facebook,' you'll love 'Meta,' an immersive, unceasing universe of Facebook," wrote the New York Times' Amanda Hess.

Elaborating on this, journalist Justin Ling predicted that Meta would come to consist of getting "accosted by a group of neo-Nazi anti-vaxxers in the metaverse."

The Columbia Journalism Review's Mathew Ingram, meanwhile, predicted that the execution of Meta would face the same pitfalls that befell virtual reality platform Second Life.

"I assume Facebook -- er, Meta -- has already licensed the code from Second Life that tried to stop people from using giant penises as their virtual avatars," he wrote.

Freelance writer Neri Zilber took issue with the video demonstration of Meta and said that he was "recovering from food poisoning and this is just what my fever dreams were like."

Other journalists simply took the Meta announcement as an opportunity to post jokes at Mark Zuckerberg's expense.

"They had to spend billions to create a virtual reality where Mark Zuckerberg has a black friend," wrote Nation columnist Jeet Heer.

"I never thought I'd be physically pained with embarrassment for a billionaire, but here we are," wrote Discourse Blog's Rafi Schwartz.

Facebook Name Change Is Example Of Marketing Tactic Used By Companies Under Fire

Edward Segal
Senior Contributor
FORBES


This illustration photo taken in Los Angeles on October 28, 2021,

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s announcement today that the company has changed its name to Meta — Greek for “beyond” —is an example of a marketing tactic that has been used to divert attention from an organization that has received negative publicity and is confronting a crisis situation.

Zuckerberg said the name change was made to “reflect who we are and what we hope to build...Building our social media apps will always be an important focus for us. But right now, our brand is so tightly linked to one product that it can’t possibly represent everything that we’re doing today, let alone in the future.

“Over time, I hope that we are seen as a metaverse company. I want to anchor our work and our identity on what we’re building towards,” he said.

Michael Grimm is vice president of national strategic communications firm Reputation Partners, “Conveniently, in the wake of intense scrutiny from Congress, whistleblowers, the media and public at large for the negative impact Facebook, Instagram, and its other social media websites may have on its billions of users, Facebook announced it is planning to rebrand the company with a new name,” he said.


“This is interesting because it is an apt example of an often-used marketing tactic to divert attention away from negative publicity by rebranding or introducing a new identity for the company.

‘Can Help Divert Negative Publicity’

Grimm noted that, “Introducing a new name that can act as a parent company overseeing subsidiary groups like Instagram, WhatsApp, Oculus, and of course, Facebook, can help divert negative publicity to each business unit while trying to keep the overarching new brand name clean from blame and 

“We’ve seen other companies like Google do this with the creation of Alphabet. It will be up to “Meta” and Mark Zuckerberg to prove that this switch wasn’t an obvious crisis communication strategy to divert from the crises plaguing Facebook, and that it backs up its rebranding explanations for the switch with real value for consumers and shareholders,” he concluded.

‘Facebook Will Still Be Facebook’

Elie Jacobs, president of EJ Strategies, said, “The ‘meta-answer’ is that a name change will have no bearing whatsoever on the crisis situations Facebook is facing.

“Think of how few people refer to Google as Alphabet or how many people still call Altria Phillip Morris. Facebook will still be Facebook and each week will uncover yet another scandalous thing Zuckerberg & Co. have tried to cover up,” he said.

Jacobs observed that, Meanwhile the stock is likely going to continue to rise until the government takes real action. While there is a long-standing Jewish tradition to rename a person going through life-threatening medical challenges, I don't think Zuckerberg had that in mind. I don't think the lesson for business leaders here is renaming equals rebirth...”

‘Timing Feels Strange’

Business consultant Jeff Pedowitz said, “I think the timing feels strange given the recent scrutiny the company is under. Name change aside, the company has a lot of work to do to rebuild trust and confidence in consumers and demonstrate that it can really protect privacy while maintaining balanced and fair standards that are applied to everyone, not just select individuals.

“They need to take tangible steps to reaffirm the brand promise. Demonstrate real transparency and accountability. Right now they are papering over the issues and everyone sees right through it. They should consider replacing some of their key executives and invest in outside agencies to review and provide oversight of their changes. That would go a long way to demonstrating they are serious about improving their image and what they really stand for,”he predicted.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez slams Facebook as 'a cancer to democracy' after Meta rebrand

Tim Levin
Thu, October 28, 2021,
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Photo by TOM WILLIAMS/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called Facebook a "cancer to democracy."

She made the comments after Facebook announced it would change its name to Meta.

The name change came after numerous negative reports about Facebook's business practices.


Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York had some harsh words for Facebook after its name change to Meta on Thursday.

"Meta as in 'we are a cancer to democracy metastasizing into a global surveillance and propaganda machine for boosting authoritarian regimes and destroying civil society...for profit,'" Ocasio-Cortez tweeted in response to the news.

Facebook on Thursday said it would change its name to Meta, which underscores its efforts to build a virtual space populated by digital avatars that Mark Zuckerberg calls the metaverse. The company's services, including Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, will now exist under the Meta umbrella, but the company said it corporate structure wasn't changing.

Facebook will start trading under the new stock ticker MVRS in December.

The name change came amid a firestorm of revelations about Facebook's business practices detailed in thousands of pages of documents leaked to the press. The documents, provided to the media and US government by the former Facebook product manager Frances Haugen, paint a picture of a company that struggles to stem misinformation and illegal and dangerous activity on its platform, especially outside the US.

Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat, has been critical of Facebook and other tech giants in the past. Following Amazon founder Jeff Bezos' journey to space in July, she blasted the online retailer's low wages and "inhumane workplace." Earlier in October, she criticized Facebook's "monopolistic mission" as having "incredibly destructive effects on free society and democracy."


Seven-foot bronze Harambe statue stares down Zuckerberg's Facebook

A 7-foot bronze statue of Harambe, the gorilla shot and killed in 2016 at the Cincinnati Zoo, appeared outside Facebook's California headquarters Tuesday to reportedly protest the power the social networking giant wields.

The gorilla, which appeared with about 10,000 bananas, was placed at the base of the company's blue logo to "stare down the Facebook-Zuckerberg machine," according to a Twitter post from the Sapien Tribe, the group that installed the statue.

The group defines itself as "the first sovereign digital nation dedicated to putting the needs of human beings/our planet first."

The effigy of the fallen primate was last seen earlier in October facing down the Charging Bull statue on Wall Street in New York City, according to a report.

The Harambe statue is a temporary piece whose presence works to "show that the dominant power structures created by financial institutions like Wall Street and technology empires like Facebook have become wholly out of touch with the needs of everyday people," according to a press release by the Sapien Tribe.


The statue, which was taken down outside Facebook's headquarters, is a form of peaceful protest, the group said.

Despite its installation in New York City not being permitted by the city, the police there were "supportive" of the effort and "made accommodations," according to the report.

A statue of Harambe, the gorilla from the Cincinnati Zoo, faces Arturo Di Modica's "Charging Bull," surrounded by bananas, in New York's Financial District, Monday, Oct. 18, 2021. The gorilla statue and bananas were part of a protest against wealth disparity by Sapien.Network, who says that the fruit will later be distributed to local food banks. (AP Photo/Richard Drew) Richard Drew/AP

The Harambe statue is likely to appear in other cities across the nation, the group said.

Minnesota-based companies Outshaped and Wood + Metal Fabrications constructed the 7-foot statue, and the bananas have reportedly been provided by food banks.

Katie Porter uses elaborate visual props to school oil executives during congressional hearing

Matthew Chapman
RAW STORY
October 28, 2021

Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA).

On Thursday, Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA) schooled oil company executives over their demand for greater access to federal lands for drilling — using some stark props as visual aids.

"How many acres of public land are already leased by fossil fuel companies and not even used yet?" asked Porter, standing in front of a car parked in a driveway. "Just available for drilling whenever you decide?"

"Congresswoman," said one of the oil executives in the hearing. "Again, I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding as to how this process works and the time and resources—"

"Reclaiming my time," cut in Porter. "Reclaiming my time, the answer is 13.9 million acres. To visualize how much land that is, if each grain of rice were one acre, that would be 479 pounds of rice.

She then flipped open the trunk of the car to reveal several bags containing a combined 479 pounds of rice.

"The American Petroleum Institute even opposed pausing more leasing on our lands and even sued to stop it," she continued. "Because apparently, this acreage wasn't enough. Mr. Worth, you serve on the American Petroleum Institute's executive committee. Do you support a pause on new oil and gas leases on federal land?"

"Congresswoman, access to a resource in this country is essential to ensure the energy security of our country, and—" the executive began.

"Mr. Waller, do you support a pause?" asked Porter, turning to another executive.

"The administration — it's our hope that the pause ends soon," said the executive. "We think it's important to go forward—"

"I reclaim my time, thank you for your answer, the answer there is no," said Porter.

She then went around asking all of the executives the same question, and all of them responded they did not.

"You already have 13.9 million acres!" said Porter, holding up one of the bags of rice. "This is equivalent to Maryland and New Jersey combined. How much more do you need? How much more acreage? You have two of our 50 states at a price that makes the Louisiana Purchase look like a ripoff, and you're not even using it. What more do you need? Iowa? Colorado? Virginia? Our public land belongs to the American people, not to Big Oil. When you lobby and you sue so that you can take more of our public land, you're saying too much is never enough. The American people are tired of this charade."

Watch below:




Chicago just approved one of the US's largest basic-income pilots: $500 monthly payments for 5,000 people
chicago worker
Marquisha Byrd makes face shields for frontline responders at Dimo's Pizza in Chicago, April 16, 2020. Kamil Krzaczynski/AFP/Getty Images

Chicago just became the latest city to offer residents monthly cash payments, no strings attached.

The city council voted Wednesday to approve one of the largest basic-income programs in US history - a pilot that will give 5,000 low-income households $500 per month for one year. Participants will be chosen at random, but individuals must earn less than $35,000 per year to qualify.

The council authorized nearly $32 million for the pilot as part of the city's 2022 budget. The program's funding comes from $2 billion in COVID-19 relief dollars allocated to Chicago through the Biden administration's American Rescue Plan.

The pilot specifically aims to relieve financial burdens on families hard-hit by COVID-19. Hundreds of thousands of Chicago residents lost their jobs during the first six months of the pandemic, and around 18% of Chicago residents live below the federal poverty line.

"Growing up, I knew what it felt like to live check to check," Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot wrote earlier this month on Twitter. "When you're in need, every bit of income helps."

Several other Democratic mayors similarly see cash stipends as a promising way to address poverty in their cities. More than 50 have joined the coalition Mayors for a Guaranteed Income, the members of which all pledge to start basic-income pilots in their cities. The founder of that coalition is the former mayor Stockton, California, Michael Tubbs. He launched one of the US's first guaranteed-income pilots in 2019, a program that gave 125 residents $500 per month for two years.

Other cities have followed his lead. Saint Paul, Minnesota, approved a basic-income pilot last year, in which 150 low-income families get $500 a month for up to 18 months. Oakland, California, is now accepting applications for its basic-income pilot, which gives $500 monthly payments to 600 low-income families for 18 months. In Compton, California, 800 residents are already receiving a guaranteed income of $300 to $600 a month for two years. And Richmond, Virginia, is distributing $500 per month to 18 working families.

Critics worry that basic income can't address large-scale poverty

chicago thanksgiving
People wait in line to receive a free turkey ahead of Thanksgiving in Chicago, November 23, 2020. Kamil Krzaczynski/AFP/Getty Images

Critics of basic income argue that free stipends would reduce the incentive for people to find jobs or encourage them to make frivolous purchases. Several studies, however, have suggested that cash benefits don't keep people from entering the workforce.

After Stockton's program ended in January, researchers found that it reduced unemployment and increased full-time employment among participants. Stipend recipients also reported improvements in their emotional wellbeing and decreases in anxiety or depression. Most of them spent their money on basic necessities like food and merchandise, including trips to Walmart or dollar stores.

Chicago Alderman Gilbert Villegas told The Washington Post that his city's pilot will monitor how participants spend their stipends for the first six months. Depending on the results, the city may direct the stipends toward specific uses, such as covering heating bills or food.

Still, some members of the Chicago City Council were hesitant to back the program. Members of the Chicago Aldermanic Black Caucus argued that the money could be better spent on violence prevention or a reparations program. Alderman Nick Sposato, meanwhile, told Politico earlier this month that basic income is "a socialist idea that doesn't consider the mainstream."

Critics of basic income also sometimes point to the mixed results seen in larger-scale attempts at cash-transfer programs. A 2018 report found that the Alaska Permanent Fund, which has been distributing cash to state residents since 1982, increased part-time work by 17%. But the cash transfers had no effect on overall employment numbers (the share of people who had jobs).

Finland's basic-income trial, meanwhile, also found that employment rates between stipend recipients and those in the control group were about even. But the results of that program, conducted from January 2017 to December 2018, were complicated by the fact that participants had to give up part of their standard conditional benefits - things like housing allowances and illness compensation - to receive the monthly stipends.

Proponents of basic income still think it has the potential to reduce poverty on a national level.

"I am so proud of all the pilots, but I'm ready for policy," Michael Tubbs told Insider in March. "I've got all the evidence I need."


Los Angeles is launching the US' biggest guaranteed income pilot. The scheme will pay $1,000 a month to 3,000 families.

Grace Dean
Wed, October 27, 2021,

California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Los Angeles is launching a universal-basic income program, set to be the biggest in the US so far. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images


Los Angeles is launching a guaranteed income pilot program with $1,000 monthly payments.


Around 3,000 families will get the money for a year, and there are no rules for how they spend it.


A council member said it would be the largest guaranteed income program in the US' history.


Los Angeles is launching a guaranteed income pilot program, set to be the biggest in the US so far.

The scheme will give about 3,000 families in poverty $1,000 a month for a year, and there are no rules for how the families spend the money.

To be eligible, applicants need to live in the City of Los Angeles, be at least 18 years old, have an income at or below the federal poverty level, have at least one dependent minor or be pregnant, and have experienced either financial or medical hardships related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The federal poverty level depends on the size of a household. For a four-person household, a family earning less than $26,500 would fall under the federal poverty line. Poverty affects two out of every 10 residents in the City of Los Angeles - most of them people of color, according to a website for the program.

The program is called the Basic Income Guaranteed: Los Angeles Economic Assistance Pilot (BIG LEAP).

It has nearly $40 million in funding, South LA Councilman Curren Price said at a City Council meeting Tuesday, where council members approved the program.

Price said that the program would be "the largest guaranteed income economic assistance pilot program in our nation's history," and called it a "life-changing initiative."

The city said that the program would consist of "unconditional, regular, and direct cash payments," with "no restrictions on how the money can be spent." The payments would supplement existing welfare programs, the city said.

The concept of a guaranteed level of income, often in the form of a universal basic income (UBI) dates back to at least the 16th century, when Spanish-born humanist Juan Luis Vives advocated for a system of unconditional welfare. Since then, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. has declared his support for the concept, and it went on to become a cornerstone of Andrew Yang's run in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries.

More economists and lawmakers, including a coalition of US mayors, have been calling for the introduction of UBI schemes as the pandemic both exacerbated and exposed huge income inequalities.

"The idea of a guaranteed pilot program is one my office has been following for some time, and it gained momentum as we witnessed our country examine the racial disparities and social injustices during the COVID pandemic," Price said on Tuesday.

Other cities across the US have trialed UBI programs.

Stockton, California, ran a UBI scheme for two years which gave 125 residents $500 per month. After just a year, full-time employment among the participants had increased, and depression and anxiety had decreased, according to the results of the scheme.

Price told the City Council that the "positive results" from the Stockton program made it clear that one in Los Angeles was needed, too.

"It's my hope that following the conclusion of this pilot program, that it'll be replicated at the state and federal level," Price said.

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti had said in his annual "state of the city" address in April that the city was looking at launching a $24 million UBI program to support the city's poor residents.

Applications open on Friday and close on November 7.

The recipients of the funding will be chosen at random from the eligible candidates by the Center for Guaranteed Income Research at the University of Pennsylvania, and will be contacted by the city in January.




GREENWASHING
Climate Skeptic CEO Says His Gas Company Is 'Carbon Negative'
Gerson Freitas Jr
Thu, October 28, 2021


(Bloomberg) -- There are few CEOs in the energy industry as vocal about their disdain for climate activism as Nicholas DeIuliis.Rarely a day goes by without DeIuliis, the head of U.S. natural gas producer CNX Resources Corp., taking a shot on Twitter at the politicians and celebrities urging quicker action to halt global warming.

So it came as something of a surprise when DeIuliis unveiled a 55-page report back in July that made one of the industry’s most audacious claims about curbing emissions. CNX, according to the report, is “net carbon negative” and has been for years. This means the company is removing more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than it emits, precisely the kind of environmental progress that CNX's big financial backers like BlackRock Inc. and The Vanguard Group Inc. have been demanding.

The problem is that the report isn't true for the full scope of CNX’s emissions.

The company bases its claim on the fact that it has a business that captures methane — a far more potent greenhouse gas than CO₂ — that would otherwise be released from coal mines and sells it as fuel for power generation. But it's still relying on the burning of coal, a fossil fuel that pollutes the air so badly that researchers say it causes thousands of premature deaths each year. What’s more, using gas for electricity produces emissions not just of carbon dioxide but often of methane itself. CNX still drills for gas in shale basins. And its greenhouse-gas accounting also doesn’t include its customers, a category that makes up the biggest share of the energy industry’s emissions by far.

In the parlance of climate scientists, CNX's claim is greenwashing — and an extreme case of it. And the fact that a CEO skeptical of man-made climate change is spearheading the campaign to prove his company's environmental bonafides highlights just how great the pressure from investors is on the fossil fuel industry to reform and just how great the risk of greenwashing is becoming as a result.

''That a company whose entire business model is based on fossil fuel extraction could be carbon negative is pretty laughable on its face,” said Tom Schuster, clean energy program director at the Sierra Club’s Pennsylvania chapter. ''Fracking and coal mining are simply not compatible with the urgent need to stabilize the climate, which requires us to be transitioning away from CO₂.”

DeIuliis, 53, dismisses the criticism of CNX’s carbon-negative assertion. Though investors didn’t shower the company with kudos for the claim and environmentalists were quick to poke holes in it, the CEO argues that CNX has been fully transparent about the “straightforward math” underlying it. What’s more, the company has stated publicly that it will likely never reach net-zero, let alone carbon negative, for emissions if customers are included. But DeIuliis is also convinced that no other company or industry — including wind and solar power — will ever be net zero if indirect emissions are part of the equation, and that only fossil fuel producers are being held accountable for them.

“That’s what is frustrating, going from bad to ugly, about ESG,” he said in an interview. There’s no universally accepted method of measuring corporate greenhouse-gas emissions, and capturing methane from coal mines is better for the environment than drilling new wells or letting methane leak into the atmosphere, said Rob Du Boff, an ESG analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. But that doesn’t mean CNX’s carbon-negative claim holds weight.

“At the end of the day, you are still bringing more gas to the market,” Du Boff said.

Publicly, at least, oil and gas executives increasingly are either embracing the narrative of the energy transition or simply keeping quiet on the subject. Not DeIuliis. Via Twitter, a podcast and personal website, he slams corporate green pledges, deems solar and wind power a bad idea and fiercely defends fossil fuels. In his crusade against what he calls “radical environmentalism,” the CEO targets everyone from Bono to Pope Francis. Climate activism is one of many subjects DeIuliis tackles in his book Precipice: The Left’s Campaign to Destroy America, to be published next year.

(Michael Bloomberg, the founder and majority owner of Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg News, has committed $500 million to launch Beyond Carbon, a campaign aimed at closing the remaining coal-powered plants in the U.S. by 2030.)

Toby Rice, CEO of EQT Corp., the largest U.S. gas producer, is measured in his assessment of DeIuliis’s views. But he stresses that EQT is taking a different path.

“It's very brave to be vocal because you put yourself out there and there's a lot of critics,” Rice said in an interview. “But I will tell you more of the guys in this industry are like us, are like me, in having a balanced approach” that is “more aligned with the demands of the public” in shifting to carbon-free energy sources. EQT set a goal earlier this year to zero out its own emissions by 2025, but like CNX, the company excluded pollution from its customers from the plan.

DeIuliis has deep roots in coal country. The men of his family, descended from Italian immigrants, toiled in and around western Pennsylvania’s mines, mills and railroads. Living almost his entire life within a 5-mile (8-kilometer) radius of Pittsburgh, where CNX is based, he saw firsthand the steep declines in the city’s economy as steel and other heavy industries moved out, leaving thousands without jobs.

He joined CNX’s predecessor company, Consol Energy Inc., as an engineer three decades ago, when it was primarily focused on coal mining. DeIuliis became CEO of Consol in 2014, as the company worked to transform itself into a gas driller and capitalize on surging output of the fuel from shale basins. Three years later, its coal assets were spun off and the renamed CNX became a pure-play Appalachian gas producer. Key to CNX’s carbon-negative claim is the Buchanan mine in Virginia, now owned by Coronado Global Resources Inc.

BlackRock and Vanguard are among the largest CNX shareholders. The investors, who declined to comment for this story, have pushed companies including Exxon Mobil Corp. to disclose their climate risks and plans for how to adapt to a low-carbon economy, following guidelines that include those set by the Financial Stability Board, an international body that monitors the global financial system. That’s what CNX did for the first time in the report it released in July.

“We had a handful of owners who thought it was worth pursuing,” DeIuliis said of CNX’s move. The executive said he was initially concerned that the Financial Stability Board’s framework might be “another gimmick or ESG veneer.” But “once we studied it, we thought it was a good move for us.”CNX rose as much as 8.6% on Thursday after reporting quarterly results that beat analysts’ estimates, along with a program to buy back an extra $1 billion in shares.

DeIuliis’s rise at CNX coincided with the advance of fracking — the process that revolutionized the U.S. energy industry by making it possible to extract oil and gas from shale rocks — and Consol’s move into natural gas. The shale revolution had a major impact on Pennsylvania, where gas output soared to about 7 trillion cubic feet last year — 35 times the amount produced in 2008. The state now produces almost 20% of U.S. gas output, second only to Texas. The industry accounts for about 245,000 direct and indirect jobs in the state, according to a July study by PricewaterhouseCoopers.

The gas industry “basically returned the middle class, the family-sustaining wages, the economic growth engines” for Appalachia, DeIuliis said.

While climate scientists warn of global warming’s world-destroying potential, DeIuliis says the Appalachian gas industry is facing an existential threat of its own — from the energy transition. He notes that the fuel has come under attack from environmental groups because of its impact on climate change, and in recent years, pipeline projects aimed at moving gas from Pennsylvania to markets such as New Jersey and New York have been killed because of such concerns, limiting the ability of CNX and other shale explorers to boost output. Unleashing the region's full production potential could help boost living standards in poor, energy-scarce countries, he added.

The energy crisis in Europe and Asia has left nations scrambling to secure reliable fuel supplies. A strained gas market contributed to Europe’s record-setting spike in electricity prices, though the energy transition amplified the volatility. Still, DeIuliis argues that underinvestment in natural gas will put the U.S. at risk of a similar energy crunch , boosting the risk of power outages.

“It’s inevitable that New York or Boston is going to face an energy crisis, if winter gets cold and if supply and demand is imbalanced in part because of these types of policies,” he said.

Regardless of rhetoric from climate-skeptical energy CEOs like DeIuliis, in the long term, companies that don’t heed investor demands to address climate change are likely to face a reckoning, Bloomberg Intelligence’s Du Boff said.

''Their personal beliefs are irrelevant as long as they act professionally in how they deal with these stakeholders,” he said. “It's the ones that continue to run their businesses counter to these demands that are problematic.”

(Updates with earnings results in 20th paragraph)

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek
European Corn Risks Being Left in Fields as Gas Crunch Bites

Megan Durisin and Volodymyr Verbyany
Thu, October 28, 2021


(Bloomberg) -- European corn farmers are facing the prospect of having to leave crops in fields because of the energy crunch, a fresh sign of how the crisis is heightening the risk of global food inflation.

The grain typically needs to be dried down after it’s collected to ensure the proper moisture content, a task that’s becoming more costly as gas prices surge. Most of the region’s harvest is collected through November, and the crop is in strong demand to vie against increasingly expensive wheat and offset shortages from Brazil.

But farmers in France, the European Union’s top producer, are being told by gas suppliers to prepare for shortages, use less of the fuel and even postpone collection if possible, growers group AGPM said Wednesday. In No. 4 exporter Ukraine, the gas rally is also contributing to a slower harvest than last year.

“It’s too expensive” for Ukraine’s farmers to dry corn after gathering it, said Mariya Kolesnyk, a deputy director at consultant ProAgro in Kyiv. “That’s why they seek to dry it, say, in a natural way, in a field.”

Runaway energy prices have already driven up fertilizer costs, while vegetable greenhouses in the Netherlands have cut back on lighting to reduce expenses. That’s threatening to curb future output or raise costs that could be passed onto consumers, and adding to inflation worries at a time when global food prices are at the highest in a decade.

Harvest Risk

Harvesting too late can deteriorate crop quality and reduce farmer incomes, which are already being hit by the “explosion” in drying costs, AGPM said. Winter is approaching, and wet or cold weather can also raise the risk of fungal problems like fusarium. Large Ukrainian farming companies are still opting to dry corn after harvesting, despite the high gas costs.

About a third of Ukraine’s corn has been harvested so far, versus more than 50% at the end of October 2020. French progress stood at 32% as of mid-October, down from 75% at the same time last year. Rains earlier on had also slowed collection.