Sunday, January 30, 2022

‘No British justice’: Northern Ireland marks 50 years since ‘Bloody Sunday’

Issued on: 30/01/2022

A memorial engraved with the names of the 13 who died during the 1972 Bloody Sunday killings, and John Johnston who died later, in the Bogside area of Londonderry (Derry), in Northern Ireland on January 29, 2022. © Paul Faith, AFP

The Northern Irish city of Londonderry commemorates one of the darkest days in modern UK history on Sunday when, 50 years ago, British troops opened fire without provocation on civil rights protesters.

The anniversary of “Bloody Sunday” comes with Northern Ireland’s fragile peace destabilised by Brexit, and with families of the victims despondent over whether the soldiers involved will ever face trial.

Charlie Nash saw his 19-year-old cousin William Nash killed by one of more than 100 high-velocity rounds fired by members of the British Parachute Regiment on January 30, 1972.

“We thought there might be rioting, but nothing, nothing like what happened. We thought at first they were rubber bullets,” Nash, now 73, told AFP.

“But then we saw Hugh Gilmour (one of six 17-year-old victims) lying dead. We couldn’t take it in. Everyone was running,” he said.

“It’s important for the rest of the world to see what they done to us that day. But will we ever see justice? Never, especially not from Boris Johnson.”
























A British soldier drags a Catholic protester during Northern Ireland's "Bloody Sunday" killings on January 30, 1972 - 
Copyright AFP/File THOPSON

Amnesty?

The UK prime minister this week called Bloody Sunday a “tragic day in our history”. But his government is pushing legislation that critics say amounts to an amnesty for all killings during Northern Ireland’s three decades of sectarian unrest, including by security forces.

Thirteen protesters died on Bloody Sunday, when the paratroopers opened fire through narrow streets and across open wasteland.

Some of the victims were shot in the back, or while on the ground, or while waving white handkerchiefs.

At the entrance to the city’s Catholic Bogside area stands a wall that normally proclaims in large writing: “You are now entering Free Derry.”

But this weekend, as relatives of the victims prepare to retrace the 1972 civil rights march, the mural says: “There is no British justice.”

After an initial government report largely exonerated the paratroopers and authorities, a landmark 12-year inquiry running to 5,000 pages found in 2010 that the victims were unarmed and posed no threat, and that the soldiers’ commander on the ground violated his orders.

“We in the inquiry came to the conclusion that the shootings were unjustified and unjustifiable,” its chairman Mark Saville, a former judge and member of the UK House of Lords, told BBC radio on Saturday.

“And I do understand, people feel that in those circumstances justice has yet to be done,” he said, while expressing concern that with the surviving soldiers now elderly, the government should have launched any prosecution “a very long time ago”.

Then as now, Londonderry – known as Derry to pro-Irish nationalists – was a largely Catholic city. But housing, jobs and education were segregated in favour of the pro-British Protestant minority.

Simmering tensions over the inequality made Londonderry the cradle of the “Troubles” in Northern Ireland starting in the late 1960s, which finally ended with the 1998 Good Friday Agreement.

‘Reckless’

The UK’s divorce from the European Union has unsettled the fragile post-1998 consensus.

Protestant unionists want Johnson’s government to scrap a protocol governing post-Brexit trade for Northern Ireland, which treats the province differently from the UK mainland (comprising England, Scotland and Wales).

The government, which is in protracted talks with the EU on the issue, is sympathetic to their demands.

Heading into regional elections in May, some nationalists hope that Brexit could help achieve what the Irish Republican Army (IRA) never did—a united Ireland, a century after the UK carved out a Protestant statelet in the north.

Sinn Fein, which was once the political wing of the IRA, is running ahead of the once dominant unionists in opinion polls.

“Northern Ireland finds itself again in the eye of a political storm where we appear to be collateral damage for a prime minister whose future is hanging in the balance,” said professor Deirdre Heenan, a Londonderry resident who teaches social policy at Ulster University.

“The government’s behaviour around the peace process has been reckless in the extreme,” she added.

Protestant hardliners have issued their own reminders of where they stand: leading up to the anniversary, Parachute Regiment flags have been flying in one unionist stronghold of Londonderry, to the revulsion of nationalists.

“How can they do that, this weekend of all weekends? These are innocent boys killed by the Paras,” said George Ryan, 61, a tour guide and local historian.

“Will any of the troops ever stand up in a court of law?” he added.

“It’s looking more unlikely than ever, but it’s important as ever.”

(AFP)

'Bloody Sunday': 10 minutes of killing that shook N.Ireland



'
Bloody Sunday: What happened on January 30, 1972
 (AFP/Kenan AUGEARD)

Sat, January 29, 2022

"Bloody Sunday" was a turning point in three decades of violence in Northern Ireland known as the "Troubles".

On Sunday January 30, 1972, British paratroopers shot dead 13 Catholic demonstrators in the province's second city, Londonderry.

Here is how events unfolded:



- Peaceful march -


The Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association (NICRA) organised an anti-internment march to take place that day in the city Catholics call Derry.

They were angry at the increasing internment without trial of Catholic nationalists since the previous August.

The march was illegal. Northern Ireland's Protestant authorities had declared a year-long ban on all marches amid spiralling unrest since civil rights protesters began demanding an end to voting, housing and job discrimination against the minority Catholic community in 1968.

Nevertheless, at least 15,000 people joined the march, which set off in a carnival-like mood from the Creggan Estate, a few kilometres from the city centre, through the Catholic Bogside district to Guildhall Square.

Crack troops from the British 1st Battalion Parachute Regiment, drafted in that day, were waiting at barricades to stop the march reaching the city centre.

- Confrontation -


A section of the crowd turned into William Street and youths began throwing stones at a British army barricade.

Troops were ordered to begin arrests and armoured cars drove into the crowd.

Around 4:10 pm soldiers started firing.

Within about 10 minutes 13 people were dead and a further 15 injured. Six of the dead were aged 17.


- 'Whitewash' -


The troops claimed to have come under sustained gunfire as well as attacks with nail bombs. They said they aimed away from the demonstrators.

Their claims, largely accepted in the official report by senior English judge John Widgery, published later that year, were not backed up by independent accounts.

No soldiers were injured in the operation and no guns or bombs recovered.

The victims' families derided the report as a "whitewash".

- Explosion in violence -


The killings proved a boon to the nascent Provisional Irish Republican Army, fighting for Northern Ireland's reunification with Ireland, whose ranks swelled with new recruits.

On February 2, an angry crowd set fire to the British embassy in Dublin.

On March 24, London suspended the Protestant-dominated Northern Ireland provincial government, leading to decades of direct rule from the British capital.

- Apology -


In June 2010 a new report published after a 12-year investigation said British troops fired first and had given misleading accounts of what happened.

The report by senior British judge Mark Saville concluded that none of the victims was armed, soldiers gave no warnings before opening fire and the shootings were a "catastrophe" for Northern Ireland and led to increased violence.

Following the report then British prime minister David Cameron apologised for the killings, saying: "There is no doubt... what happened on 'Bloody Sunday' was both unjustified and unjustifiable. It was wrong."

- Ex-soldier charged -

On March 14, 2018 an ex-paratrooper, known only as Soldier F, was charged with murdering two people and the attempted murder of four others.

But the charges were dropped in July 2021 after a backlash by MPs from Britain's ruling Conservative Party.

"Bloody Sunday", immortalised by a song by Irish rock group U2, was one of the darkest episodes in the conflict between Northern Ireland's Catholic nationalists -- who want a united Ireland -- and Protestant unionists loyal to Britain.




The victims have been remembered in gable-end murals and memorials in Londonderry (AFP/Paul Faith)


Northern Ireland marks 50 years since Bloody Sunday

A walk of remembrance has taken place for the 13 unarmed civilians killed by British soldiers in January 1972. The massacre was a major turning point in Northern Ireland's era of violence known as the Troubles.




Several hundred people, including relatives of the victims, retraced the fateful 1972 march that preceded the tragedy, walking in sombre silence

Commemorations took place in Northern Ireland on Sunday to mark the 50th anniversary of the Bloody Sunday massacre where British troops killed 13 unarmed protesters.

Families of the victims retraced the steps of the original 1972 civil rights march, through the city of Londonderry, also known as Derry.

In a show of solidarity, crowds lined the streets as relatives walked to the Bloody Sunday Monument, where the killings took place.

Children bearing white roses and portraits of the victims joined the poignant procession.

The anniversary comes as Northern Ireland's fragile peace has been destabilized by Brexit, and with families angry that no one has been convicted for the murders.

In a reminder of the tensions that remain in the province, protestant unionist hardliners flew flags of the British army's Parachute Regiment in an area of Londonderry ahead of the anniversary.


Some of the victims were shot in the back, or while on the ground, or while waving white handkerchiefs as the shots ripped through narrow streets
What happened on Bloody Sunday?

The killings were one of the darkest episodes in the conflict between Northern Ireland's Catholic nationalists — who want a united Ireland — and Protestant unionists loyal to Britain.

They occurred during a march on January 30, 1972, in opposition to the detention without trial of Catholic nationalists during the so-called Troubles that began four years earlier.

Despite a ban on protesting, more than 15,000 people set off from a housing estate towards the city center. When youths began throwing stones at a British army barricade, the troops were ordered to move in.

A few minutes later, soldiers started firing, killing 13 people and injuring 15 others.



The soldiers claimed to have been attacked by nail bombs and gunfire and insisted they aimed away from the demonstrators.

While their claims were accepted in the official report published later that year, they were not backed up by independent accounts.

The victims' families derided the report as a "whitewash," and the killings spurred recruitment to the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA), the paramilitary group fighting for reunification with Ireland.

The IRA stepped up its campaign of terror in Northern Ireland, the British mainland and abroad, which lasted until 1998 — the same year as the signing of the Good Friday Agreement peace deal.


Fourteen Catholic demonstrators were shot dead by British paratroopers during a peaceful but banned rally in Londonderry
What has happened since?

The UK government apologized in 2010 after a second official inquiry found that the soldiers fired without justification on unarmed, fleeing civilians and then lied about it for decades.

The 5,000-page report, which followed a 12-year inquiry, concluded that the protesters posed no threat, and that the soldiers' commander on the ground violated his orders.

But five decades on, relatives are still searching for the justice they believe is needed for a scarred society to heal.

One former British soldier was charged in 2019 in the killing of two of the protesters and the injury of four others.

But last year, the current British government announced a plan to halt all prosecutions of soldiers and militants in a bid to draw a line under the conflict.

The decision has angered victims' families and has been rejected by all the main political parties in Northern Ireland.

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson told Parliament on Wednesday that Bloody Sunday was "one of the darkest days in our history" and that the country "must learn from the past."




How is Brexit threatening peace in Northern Ireland?

The UK's divorce from the European Union has unsettled the fragile post-1998 consensus.

Protestant unionists want Johnson's government to scrap a protocol governing post-Brexit trade for Northern Ireland, which treats the province differently from the UK mainland.

The government, which is in protracted talks with the EU on the issue, is sympathetic to their demands.

Heading into regional elections in May, some nationalists hope that Brexit could help achieve what the Irish Republican Army (IRA) never did — a united Ireland, a century after the UK carved out a Protestant statelet in the north.

Memories of Troubles slow to fade in Northern Ireland


Northern Ireland marks 50 years since Bloody Sunday

PHOTO'S   1 of 20
People take part in a march to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the 'Bloody Sunday' shootings with the photographs of some of the victims in Londonderry, Sunday, Jan. 30, 2022. In 1972 British soldiers shot 28 unarmed civilians at a civil rights march, killing 13 on what is known as Bloody Sunday or the Bogside Massacre. Sunday marks the 50th anniversary of the shootings in the Bogside area of Londonderry .(AP Photo/Peter Morrison)

LONDON (AP) — Hundreds of people gathered Sunday in Northern Ireland to mark 50 years since “Bloody Sunday,” one of the deadliest days in the conflict known as The Troubles.

Thirteen people were killed and 15 others wounded when British soldiers fired on civil rights protesters on Jan. 30, 1972, in the city of Derry, also known as Londonderry.

Relatives of those killed and injured half a century ago took part in a remembrance walk Sunday, retracing the steps of the original march. Crowds gathered at the Bloody Sunday Monument, where political leaders including Irish Premier Micheal Martin laid wreaths in a ceremony.

The names of those who were killed and wounded were read out during the 45-minute memorial service.

Britain’s government apologized in 2010 after an official inquiry found that the soldiers fired without justification on unarmed, fleeing civilians and then lied about it for decades. The report refuted an initial investigation that took place soon after the slayings that said the soldiers had been defending themselves against Irish Republican Army bombers and gunmen.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson told Parliament on Wednesday that Bloody Sunday was “one of the darkest days in our history” and that the country “must learn from the past.”

One former British soldier was charged in 2019 in the killing of two of the protesters and the injury of four others. But prosecutors decided last year not to proceed with the case because there was no longer a prospect of conviction. Families of one of the victims have brought a legal challenge against that decision.

Martin, the Irish leader, said Sunday that there should be full accountability in all legacy issues.

“I don’t believe this will be any amnesty for anybody,” he said after meeting with the families of victims. “It is important because time is moving on too for many, many families and families need closure.”

Michael McKinney, whose brother William was among the victims, criticized the British government’s plans to make it harder to prosecute military veterans for alleged offenses committed years earlier.

“They are trying to deny us justice because they are scared to face justice. But we want to send a very clear warning to the British government. If they pursue their proposals, the Bloody Sunday families will be ready to meet them head on,” McKinney said.

Irish President Michael D. Higgins is expected to deliver a message to the affected families later Sunday.


Elderly Ukrainian couple left behind in bombed out eastern village





Residents of a deserted village live near the frontline in the Donetsk region

Sat, January 29, 2022,
By Maksym Levin

NEVELSKE, Ukraine (Reuters) - Elderly couple Kateryna and Dmytro Shklyar are among the last residents of Nevelske, a village near the frontlines in east Ukraine where years of fighting have left them without running water, electricity or neighbours.

Nevelske sits some 25 km (15 miles) from Donetsk, the biggest city in the contested eastern Ukraine region where Russia has backed separatist rebels fighting government troops since 2014. The conflict has killed 15,000 people to date.

The village had around 300 inhabitants 20 years ago but most have fled. After the latest shelling in November, part of the most recent escalation of the conflict between Russia and the West over Ukraine, only five inhabitants are still here.

The Shklyars live without running water or a stable power supply, relying on the Ukrainian military and aid workers to deliver basic goods.



Their neighbourhood is mostly made up of destroyed houses. The nearest shop is too risky to reach across military roadblocks and the largely dormant but still dangerous line separating Ukraine from the territory under rebel control.

"It cannot get any worse," said Kateryna, her wrinkled face framed by a red hair scarf. "He is 86 and I am 76 years old. And we live on nothing. Well, we have of course our own potatoes carrots and onions. But that's all we have."



A little food cellar where they keep glass jars with pickled fruits and vegetables also serves as their bomb shelter. A cat and a dog are all the company they have left.

Russia has spooked Ukraine and the West in recent weeks by massing some 120,000 troops near its border with the former Soviet republic that now wants to join NATO.

Russia has already annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014 and the West has threatened Moscow with grave sanctions if it invades again, something Russia has repeatedly denied it plans to do.



Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday the West has not addressed Moscow's main security demands in the crisis over Ukraine but that he is ready to keep talking to avert a further escalation.

Kateryna Shklyar, sitting next to her husband in their house, its walls adorned with thick carpets, wiped away tears.

PEASANT FATALISM

"I don't have any words or tears anymore," she said. "Everybody has left. Those who had money and could afford to buy something somewhere - they all left. And where would we go, two old people, who needs us?"

"You'd better shoot us."

(Writing by Gabriela Baczynska; Editing by Christina Fincher)
Ukraine’s Top Military General Fighting Russia Said He Fears Washington Has Ghosted Him



Christopher Miller
Fri, January 28, 2022

BAKHMUT, Ukraine — Lt. Gen. Oleksandr Pavliuk, the top military commander on Ukraine’s eastern front, is used to getting what he asks for. So when he and his fellow military brass were asked by their American partners to provide a wish list of weapons needed to defend Ukraine against a potential large-scale Russian military offensive, he was sure he’d at least get a response.

But after weeks with no reply, he said, he now fears that he may have been ghosted by the Biden administration.

“We already declared to our partners which weapons we need … and we did it more than once,” Pavliuk, the head of Ukraine’s Joint Forces Operation in the eastern Donbas region, told BuzzFeed News in an interview inside a military base. “We are still waiting for a response.”

Pavliuk specified what exactly he would like to get from the US.

“We need weapons now,” Pavliuk said. “First of all it’s anti-aircraft equipment because we will need to fight back air attacks and ballistic cruise missiles.”

“Of course, we have some of our own such weapons but in the event of a massive attack from Russia we need more support,” he said. “And if we are able to fight back an air attack they will have very little opportunity to be successful over land.”

Pavliuk would not say who from the US sent the request or what channel he used to respond to them, saying it was sensitive information.

The US Department of Defense did not respond when asked specifically about Pavliuk’s comments. But a spokesperson referred BuzzFeed News to Pentagon press secretary John Kirby’s remarks on Thursday.

“We talked about the fact that we had an air and missile defense assessment team [in Ukraine] not long ago — in the last month or so. And they had extensive conversations with their Ukrainian counterparts about those very kinds of capability concerns,” he said. “This is an iterative process, it's ongoing.”

To be sure, the US has sent $2.7 billion of security assistance to Ukraine over nearly eight years. It’s also sent $200 million worth of aid, including lethal weapons, this month alone. The latest shipment arrived in Kyiv on Friday with more than 81 tons of military supplies, Defense Minister Oleksiy Reznikov tweeted.

As the US proclaims that Russian President Vladimir Putin is preparing for a new incursion into Ukraine — and that it is likely to happen in the coming weeks — Ukrainian leaders say that Washington should put up or hush up.

President Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday had sharp words for the country’s US and European allies, telling foreign reporters that Western powers were making loud pronouncements of impending war but, in his opinion, not helping Ukraine to the extent that they could. That, he said, only serves the Kremlin’s purposes and risks sowing panic and chaos when calm and unity are needed.

“We have to be very careful in how we speak out every day, every minute, when we are trying to say the war will happen tomorrow. We are getting ready for any scenario and we have several,” Zelensky said. “I think it has to be quiet military preparation and quiet diplomacy.”

The president also took a swipe at the West for threatening sanctions only after a new Russian attack, saying those “are not designed to help our country” but instead meant to help the European Union.”

Zelensky underscored that he and President Joe Biden, with whom he spoke by phone on Thursday, didn’t disagree on the seriousness of the threat posed by Moscow. But he said they each employ different tactics when speaking about it publicly.

“We don’t have any misunderstanding with the president, but I just deeply understand what is going on in my country, just as he understands what is going on in his country,” Zelensky said of Biden. “I’m the president of Ukraine and I’m based here, and I think I know the details better here.”

Zelensky conceded that the Russian threat “is imminent. The threat is constant.” But he emphasized that’s how it has been in Ukraine since 2014, long before Moscow’s latest decision to move more than 100,000 troops along with heavy weapons to Ukraine’s borders.

While Zelensky told the US to cool down the rhetoric, he asked for more military assistance to help his soldiers fighting the larger and more powerful Russian army and its separatist proxies in the snow-covered trenches of the Donbas. They may soon, he said, face tens of thousands more streaming across the border.

Ukraine’s military is much bigger, better trained, and more equipped than it was when Russia first invaded in 2014.

With just 6,000 battle-ready soldiers, it folded quickly when undercover Russian troops covertly invaded Crimea and then spilled into the Donbas, where they used pro-Russian separatist proxies to fill out an army and occupying force.

Today, Ukraine’s military is equipped with state-of-the-art Ukrainian-made weaponry, as well as top-notch lethal aid from the US, the UK, and other NATO countries, including anti-tank missiles, so-called bunker busters, and armed Turkish drones.

But it’s still no match for Russia’s massive military.

Nevertheless, Ukrainian military leaders and independent experts say, it could inflict serious costs against Russian forces should they begin streaming over the border.

In an interview in Kyiv on Friday, the secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, Oleksiy Danilov, said the Ukrainian army is composed of some 260,000 active-duty troops and an even larger community of some 400,000 battle-hardened veterans who have done stints at the front line over the course of Russia’s eight-year-long war. Then there are the National Guard, National Police, newly formed Territorial Defense Forces, and, Danilov noted, “1 million registered hunting gun owners.”

“The Russian Federation can have several plans and we do understand them fully,” Danilov said. The possibilities, he added, included a full-scale, multipronged invasion of Ukraine; a combination of cyberwar, conventional war, and a limited incursion into some area of the country; an escalation of hostilities in the Donbas war zone; and several other potential and complex scenarios. “But as of today, the full-scale invasion of our country, with the resources they have on our borders, will definitely be insufficient."

“Only time will tell what happens,” he added. “But we are the bulwark for Europe against authoritarianism. And if this bulwark folds, other countries will fold.”
AstraZeneca China summoned over suspected fraud
CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS

An AstraZeneca sign is seen at the third China International Import Expo (CIIE) in Shanghai

Sat, January 29, 2022

BEIJING (Reuters) -Chinese authorities summoned officials of AstraZeneca China regarding an investigation of suspected medical insurance fraud by the company's employees, the National Healthcare Security Administration (NHSA) said on Saturday.

The regulator of the state medical insurance fund said authorities ordered the arrest of all suspects, but did not give details of the suspected violations or the size of funds involved.

It demanded that AstraZeneca China close loopholes in supervision of marketing activities, the NHSA added.

In a statement on Friday, the company said some employees in the southern city of Shenzhen had altered or participated in altering patients' testing reports, and were suspected of medical insurance fraud.

The NHSA and public security ministry held a meeting with company officials in December to brief them on the investigation, it added.

"AstraZeneca China takes such employee misconduct seriously and welcomes the recommendations by the NHSA and MOPS," it said.

An AstraZeneca spokesperson said all employees involved in the Shenzhen case were Chinese nationals.

The company has taken disciplinary action against those employees and has reported their violations to the authorities, the statement said.

Authorities will launch nationwide campaigns to stamp out fraud that involves altering genetic test results, the NHSA added, urging those responsible for such violations to turn themselves in.

(Reporting by Roxanne Liu and Brenda Goh; editing by Clarence Fernandez and Jason Neely)
Why Ethiopia has turned its back on one of its own, WHO chief Tedros

Sun, January 30, 2022

In 2017, when Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was appointed the World Health Organization's director general with an overwhelming two-thirds majority vote, Ethiopia was ecstatic.

One of their own, and the first African, had become the head of the UN health agency as the world was battling disease outbreaks such as Ebola.

But now the tide has turned in Addis Ababa, with Ethiopia accusing Tedros of supporting the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF), a group that the Ethiopian government defines as a terrorist organisation.

Ethiopia says it mobilised African and friendly nations to win Tedros his first term at the WHO, but as soon as the TPLF engaged in conflict, "he showed his true colours" - he chose his political affiliation to the TPLF over his country, the Ethiopian Permanent Mission to the United Nations in Geneva said.

The mission alleges that Tedros, who previously served as the Ethiopian health minister and foreign minister in the TPLF-dominated ruling coalition, "abused his office and the international nature of the director general to advance the TPLF's propaganda".

Ethiopia said it submitted a formal complaint to the WHO's executive board and was still waiting for acknowledgement of receipt of its complaint.

Its ambassador to the UN in Geneva, Zenebe Kebede Korcho, also tried to deliver a speech criticising Tedros but was cut off by the WHO executive board chairman.

On the first day of the executive board meeting on Monday, the chairman postponed a decision on a request from Addis Ababa to investigate Tedros over allegations that he had interfered in the internal affairs of Ethiopia and the Tigray war.

The civil war erupted in November 2020 after Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed's government accused the TPLF, a leftist political party, of attacking its military base to steal weapons.

Months of fighting followed, with thousands killed and millions displaced. The Ethiopian military withdrew from most of Tigray at the end of June but Tedros, an ethnic Tigrayan, accused Abiy's government of blocking humanitarian access to northern Ethiopia, especially Tigray. At a briefing in mid-January, Tedros said people in Tigray were living under de facto blockade for over a year and were dying from lack of medicine and food.

"Nowhere in the world are we witnessing hell like in Tigray. Even in Syria, we have access during the worst of conflicts in Syria. In Yemen the same, we have access," Tedros said.

The Ethiopian government has denied the allegations and refused to nominate Tedros for a second term - usually a formality by the home country.

Instead, Tedros was nominated unopposed by 28 other countries including Germany, France, Kenya, Rwanda, Botswana, Indonesia and Oman.

That nomination was approved at a WHO executive board on Tuesday and will be put to the World Health Assembly in May for formal endorsement, according to WHO election protocol.

Millions of people have been displaced by the conflict in Tigray. 
Photo: Reuters

Lawrence Gostin, director of the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University in Washington, said the lack of support from Addis Ababa was unlikely to make much difference to the outcome.

"Ethiopia's refusal to support Tedros is a political and reputational problem but it is unlikely to affect his re-election as WHO director general," Gostin said.

"He is running unopposed and thus far there have been no major political calls for him to step aside from key member states."

Neither China nor the United States have formally opposed his re-election, and Tedros will attend the opening of the Winter Olympics in Beijing this week.

"China has probably soured on Tedros but that is only because he has recently stood up to the Chinese government," he said.

"All in all, I expect Tedros to be re-elected and think he has earned it. I wish there were a contested election because I think it is good for the democratic future of the WHO. Once he is re-elected I don't expect the issues with Ethiopia to affect his performance as DG."

Tedros has committed to building "a WHO that is even more effective, more efficient, more accountable and more transparent".

"After witnessing up close the world's response to the pandemic, I have a unique understanding of the dynamics that have brought us to where we are, and a deep commitment to making the global system fit for purpose, with WHO at its centre," he said, making the case for his re-election.

The re-election comes two years into the world's battle against the coronavirus pandemic. More than 350 million cases and over 5.5 million deaths have been reported - " and the numbers are an underestimate", according to Tedros.

Mukesh Kapila, professor emeritus in global health and humanitarian affairs at the University of Manchester, writing for the Australia-based website The Conversation, said "Ethiopia's endorsement is not needed to re-elect Tedros as his first-term performance stands on its own merits, and no candidates oppose him".

Nevertheless, "Ethiopia is determined to embarrass him, as a distracting political manoeuvre on the global stage", said Kapila.

He said Addis Ababa was acutely embarrassed when Tedros drew attention to the catastrophic health and humanitarian situation in Tigray, calling it a "hell" that is an "insult to humanity".

Astonishingly, Ethiopia's government is leaving no stone unturned to block Tedros's re-election, according to Seifudein Adem, a professor of global studies at Doshisha University in Japan.

"It is as though the government is eager to clip the wings of one of its most successful citizens," Adem, an Ethiopian, said.

"Tedros may be, for obvious reasons, sympathetic to the TPLF. And there can be question marks, too, on his record when he served as Ethiopia's minister of health."

But Adem questioned whether this disqualified him from continuing to serve as an African face on the global stage.

"In any case, has Prime Minister Abiy not asked the Ethiopian people for forgiveness on behalf of the ruling party in 2018 for the dismal record of the previous government?"
Sole candidate Tedros Ghebreyesus set to remain WHO chief

On whether Beijing would support Tedros's re-election, Adem said: "It is going to be a hard choice for China."

On the one hand, Tedros is a China-friendly director of the WHO, and, on the other, China's relationship with Ethiopia is strong, according to Adem.

"I think from China's point of view, at the end supporting Dr Tedros's re-election would be logical, both in terms of consequence and appropriateness," he said.

Still, Tedros' time at the WHO has not been plain sailing. Before he was appointed director general, there were allegations of cover-ups of cholera epidemics in Ethiopia.

And when the coronavirus struck, he came under heavy fire from the United States for defending China's handling of the pandemic.

In early 2020, the US accused the UN agency of "failing to obtain crucial information" from China about ­Covid-19, and for allegedly "colluding" with China in the early days of the pandemic.

As a result, the US president Donald Trump froze the US funding for the health body until that decision was overturned by his successor Joe Biden.

Copyright (c) 2022. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
FROM HUBRIS TO CROCODILE TEARS

‘I have been hard on staff’: WHO Asia chief accused of abuse and racism, secretly sharing data with Japan



Carl Samson
Fri, January 28, 2022

More than 30 current and former World Health Organization officials reportedly came together to accuse Dr. Kasai Takeshi, director of the Western Pacific arm, of abusive and racist behavior toward staff members.

The agency’s Western Pacific region, headquartered in the Philippine capital of Manila, covers nearly 1.9 billion people across 37 countries and territories.

These include the American Samoa, Australia, Brunei, Cambodia, China, Cook Islands, Fiji, French Polynesia, Guam, Hong Kong, Japan, Kiribati, Laos, Macao, Malaysia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Mongolia, Nauru, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Niue, Northern Mariana Islands, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Pitcairn, Samoa, Singapore, Solomon Islands, South Korea, Tokelau, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu, Vietnam, Wallis and Futuna.





The allegations

In an internal complaint filed in October of last year, staffers reportedly accused Takeshi of making racially-charged remarks toward Filipinos, as well as improperly sharing potentially sensitive COVID-19 data with Japan.

The complaint, which was obtained by the Associated Press, describes a coronavirus meeting in which Kasai allegedly demanded of a Filipino staffer, “How many people in the Pacific have you killed so far, and how many more do you want to kill further?”

Kasai then allegedly asked if she was “incapable of delivering good presentations, because she was a Filipina.”

The email containing the allegations was reportedly co-written by over 30 current and former officials. In it, they accused Kasai of blaming COVID-19 surges in some Pacific countries for their “lack of capacity due to their inferior culture, race and socioeconomic level.”

Kasai was also accused of abusing his power by sharing data to aid Japan — his home country — in vaccination planning.

According to the AP, a WHO vaccinations scientist working in Asia said Kasai helped Japan gain political advantage by informing its decisions on which countries it donated vaccines to.

CROCODILE TEARS


Kasai’s response


Kasai has been the Western Pacific’s director since February 2019, according to AFP. Prior to his appointment, he served as the region’s No. 2, having worked more than 15 years with the WHO.

Kasai has denied the allegations in a statement in which he claimed that he has been asking “a lot” of himself and the staff amid the pandemic, but “it should not result in people feeling disrespected.”

The director also rejected claims about him being racist: “It is true that I have been hard on staff, but I reject the suggestion that I have targeted staff of any particular nationality,” he explained.

As for the data sharing claim, he responded, “At no time have I pressured staff to facilitate donations from Japan rather than COVAX.”



The WHO’s main headquarters in Geneva is reportedly aware of the allegations and is taking steps to follow up with an investigation.

Simon Manley, the U.K.’s Permanent Representative, stressed that there is “no place” for racism or discrimination in the WHO or any of their partners.

“We expect the WHO to investigate robustly all allegations of misconduct and to provide support to those affected. We will therefore monitor closely WHO’s response to these reports and continue to hold it to the highest ethical standards,” Manley said, according to AFP.

Kasai, for his part, said he is “ready to cooperate fully” with the investigation; however, the AP also reported seeing an internal WHO message that showed Kasai ordering all his senior directors to “reject” the allegations and to “totally support” him.
Lebanon will not 'hand over' Hezbollah arms at Gulf meeting, minister says


Lebanese Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib gestures as he speaks during an interview with Reuters in Beirut

Fri, January 28, 2022
By Laila Bassam

BEIRUT (Reuters) - Lebanon's foreign minister said he was not going "to hand over" Hezbollah's weapons during a meeting this weekend with Gulf Arab counterparts that want Beirut to rein in the Iran-backed Lebanese Shi'ite group in exchange for improved ties.

In a nod to Gulf concerns, Lebanon will however say that the country will not be "a launchpad for activities that violate Arab countries," according to sources familiar with a draft government letter responding to Gulf terms for improved ties.


Lebanon is due at the meeting in Kuwait on Saturday to deliver its response to the terms for thawing relations, which have suffered as the heavily armed Hezbollah has grown more powerful in Beirut and the region.

"I am not going (to Kuwait) to hand over Hezbollah's weapons. I am not going to end Hezbollah's existence, it is out of the question in Lebanon. We are going for dialogue," Lebanese Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib told Al Jazeera.

Hezbollah supports Iran in its regional struggle for influence with U.S.-allied Gulf Arab states, which say the group has aided the Iran-aligned Houthis who are fighting a Saudi-led coalition in Yemen.

Founded by Iran's Revolutionary Guards in 1982, Hezbollah has a militia more powerful than Lebanon's army and has backed pro-Iran allies in the region, including Syria.

The group and its allies also exercise major sway over Lebanese state policy.

DISASSOCIATION

The terms delivered to Beirut on Jan. 22 by the Kuwaiti foreign minister include setting a time frame for implementing U.N. Security Council resolutions, among them Resolution 1559 which was adopted in 2004 and calls for the disarmament of non-state militias in Lebanon.

A draft of the government's response seen by Reuters sidesteps the issue, expressing Lebanon's respect for U.N. resolutions "to ensure civil peace and national stability."

But it mentions no specific U.N. resolution or any steps to implement them.

Bou Habib told Al Jazeera implementing resolution 1559, which would require Hezbollah's disarmament, "will take time".

The Gulf rift has added to the difficulties facing Lebanon as it struggles with a financial crisis that the World Bank has described as one of the sharpest depressions ever recorded.

Saudi Arabia and its fellow Gulf Arab monarchies once spent billions of dollars in aid in Lebanon before ties soured.

Ties hit new lows last October when Saudi Arabia and several other Gulf states expelled Lebanese ambassadors in response to comments by a former Lebanese government minister criticising the Saudi-led coalition fighting in Yemen.

The visit to Beirut last week by Kuwaiti Foreign Minister Sheikh Ahmad Nasser al-Mohammad al-Sabah was the first since the rift. He said Lebanon must not be a platform for hostile acts or words toward Gulf Arab states, and that members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) were sympathetic to the Lebanese people.

In the draft letter, Lebanon commits "verbally and actually" to a policy of disassociation from regional conflicts - a policy adopted by successive governments even as Hezbollah has deployed fighters to Syria.

It also pledges to strengthen measures being taken by Lebanon in cooperation with other Arab states to prevent drug smuggling to Gulf Arab states.

Hezbollah's adversaries accuse it of links to regional drugs trade - something it denies. The GCC in December called on Lebanon to tighten border controls and take measures to deter drug smuggling via exports into Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states.

(Reporting by Laila Bassam, Tom Perry and Nayera Abdallah in Beirut and Alaa Swilam in Cairo; Writing by Nayera Abdallah and Tom Perry; Editing by Grant McCool and Matthew Lewis)
No one knows how many 'forever chemicals' could be in Maine's organic foods

Julia Bayly, Bangor Daily News, Maine
Sat, January 29, 2022,

Jan. 29—Mainers who have purchased food from local farms certified as organic have felt safe in the knowledge that the label meant they were getting a chemical-free product.

But the discovery of high levels of forever chemicals in soil and groundwater is throwing into question the safety of food grown or raised in the state.

Songbird Organic Farm in Unity halted all sales and pulled its products from store shelves earlier this week after its water, soil and produce tested positive for toxins known collectively as forever chemicals, or PFAS and PFOS.

The growing awareness of the problem — and the uncertainty of how widespread it is throughout the state — is quickly creating a regulatory nightmare for growers where the chemicals have been found. Whether the food is certified organic or not, there are no standards that clarify when it is unsafe to eat.

To have a product certified organic by the Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association, an advocacy group that promotes local and organic foods, a grower must prove that their land and practices meet the requirements laid out by the federal national organic program. Those include proving no prohibited substances like chemical pesticides or herbicides have been used in at least three years.

Proving that the food was free of forever chemicals has never been part of the certification process.

"Because there has been nothing in the national program about PFAS or PFOS it was never on anyone's radar," Sarah Alexander, executive director of MOFGA, said. "It was never anything we had to think about."

The issue, according to Alexander, is not whether the presence of forever chemicals renders food non-organic. It's a matter of overall food safety.

"In terms of food and farms, this is a national issue and not just an organic issue," Alexander said.

Maine became the first state to establish thresholds for forever chemicals in food when it did so with milk and beef.

But similar thresholds do not exist for other foods such as produce and grains. Any lasting solution, according to Alexander, hinges on the state or federal government establishing specific food safety guidelines.

Without those guidelines, farmers must decide for themselves whether or how to take action.

"Songbird Organic Farm really set the example as the first farm to find out they had these high levels," Alexander said. "They have been incredibly and immediately responsive and transparent with voluntary pulling their food from the market until further testing can be done."

The state has begun testing food to establish PFAS and PFOS thresholds and guidelines, according to Nancy McBrady, director of the bureau of agriculture, food and rural resources at the Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry.

"We are now in a leading role nationally and it's lonely," McBrady said. "We want more help and really need federal help and we take every opportunity to explain that to them when we get the chance."

Once those forever chemical guidelines are set, MOFGA could start applying them to the organic certification process.

Many of the farmers dealing with potential forever chemical issues are victims of decisions and practices made decades before they even took ownership of their land. As the Maine Department of Environmental Protection continues testing sludge and septage sites around the state, the number of contaminated farms will likely increase.

"Even though they have been doing the best organic management practices, this is something that is outside their control," Alexander said. "And it can affect any farm no matter their current practices because these are chemicals that were applied through biosolids, in many cases decades ago, and they are just finding out about them."

Despite the lack of guidelines, there is no reason to panic, according to Tricia Rouleau, farm network director at Maine Farmland Trust.

"I know it feels like a scary issue because it is all new and constantly changing and we are learning so much on a daily basis," Rouleau said. "It's a moving target and we are trying to stay on top of all the changes."

Rouleau said she is confident solutions will be found, especially since multiple state agencies and groups like MOFGA and Farmland Trust are all working together on the issue.

"No, this is not the death knell for organic farming in Maine," Alexander said.
Study: Permian Basin 'super emitters' identified in aerial study



Adrian Hedden, Carlsbad Current-Argus
Sat, January 29, 2022, 

Thirty “super-emitting” oil and gas facilities were responsible for up to 100,000 metric tons of air pollution in the Permian Basin across southeast New Mexico and West Texas, per a recent study from the Energy Defense Fund (EDF).

The study was conducted between 2019 and 2021 by the EDF and nonprofit Carbon Mapper using aircraft surveys that tracked methane emissions from fossil fuel production sites throughout the region.

The 30 sites identified as having the highest emissions included well pads and pipelines, along with gas compressor and processing facilities.

More: Funds to plug abandoned oil wells headed to to New Mexico via Biden's infrastructure bill

The sites allegedly leaked methane and other air pollutants into the atmosphere, and fixing those leaks, per the study, would remove 100,000 metric tons of methane from the air per year, saving $26 million annually in wasted resources.

While that’s as much pollution as about half a million cars or trucks, the study found the 30 facilities made up less than 0.01 percent of the region’s oil and gas infrastructure.

Riley Duren, chief executive officer of Carbon Mapper and a research scientist at the University of Arizona, said fixing the leaks and curbing pollution was essential to mitigating the environmental and public safety risks of climate change.

More: Oil and gas expansions planned in Permian Basin as production forecast to rise this year

“In this decisive decade for reducing greenhouse gas emissions every molecule matters, and the fact that some facilities are persistently leaking methane for years without detection or repair highlights the urgent need for comprehensive and transparent methane monitoring,” Duren said.

“The magnitude of emissions coming from a handful of methane sources in one of the top oil- and gas-producing regions illustrates the opportunity to make significant near-term progress toward the stated methane reduction goals of the U.S., other countries, and companies around the world.”

In total, the study found about 1,100 facilities throughout the basin that contributed to about half of its total methane emissions.

More: Oil and gas mergers continue in 2022, focused on increased profits in the Permian Basin

The sources of these emissions could be hard to detect, scientists warned, as they tend to release large amounts of pollutants in short amounts of time.

David Lyon, senior scientist with the EDF said this means constant monitoring of the sites was needed to be able to tell exactly when and where a leak occurs.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) each plan to up such requirements imposed on operating with both the federal and state agencies in the midst of their own rulemakings.

More: Eddy County collects $5.5M in November oil and gas taxes, expects summer surplus

The EPA began to develop new regulations aimed at reducing methane emissions from not only new, but also existing sources and NMED hoped to finalize its rules this spring that would increase monitoring of air pollution and the release of ground-level ozone precursors like volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is parts of the state in exceedance of federal air quality standards.

Last year, the State’s Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD) enacted its own rules to require oil and gas operators capture 98 percent of produced gas by 2026.

“It takes a combination of ground-based inspections and frequent advanced screening, such as aerial monitoring, to effectively find and fix these recurring sources of methane emissions,” Lyon said. “

We know methane can be emitted across a wide range of infrastructure and can be cost-effectively reduced with a combination of strong regulations and available technologies.”

More: New Mexico's oil and gas regulators seek more funds from lawmakers to fight pollution
Oil and gas industry seeks to reduce pollution in response to concerns

As research such as the EDF’s and public policy shift toward stricter pollution controls, investors in the oil and gas sector called on companies to lower their environmental impacts and take action on climate change.

In response, one of the world’s largest energy companies ExxonMobil announced in January it planned to cut its emissions completely by 2050.

The company-wide plan followed a previous announcement by the fossil fuel giant that it would cut all emissions in the Permian Basin by 2030, focusing on developing “lower-emission solutions” like carbon capture and storage, hydrogen and biofuels, per a news release.

More: New Mexico to seek federal funds for cleaning up abandoned oil and gas wells

Chief Executive Officer Darren Woods said the company’s efforts were intended to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the Permian Basin and around the world.

“We are developing comprehensive roadmaps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from our operated assets around the world, and where we are not the operator, we are working with our partners to achieve similar emission-reduction results,” Woods said.

In addition to its own commitments, ExxonMobil officials also voiced support for emission reduction policy like a price on carbon which would create market incentives to reduce pollution, along with investing in low-emission technology.

More: Permian Basin solar farm green-lit by State of New Mexico. Will power oil and gas operations

“As we invest in these important technologies, we will advocate for well-designed, high-impact policies that can accelerate the deployment of market-based, cost-effective solutions,” Woods said. “We will create shareholder value by adjusting investments between our existing low-cost portfolio and new lower-emission business opportunities to match the pace of the energy transition.”

As some of the largest energy companies in the world voice support for reducing emissions, operators on the ground also deployed new technologies hoped to reduce the impacts of fossil fuel production.

Evolution Well Services this month announced it contracted with Permian Basin operators to employ electric hydraulic fracturing equipment by the end of 2022, powered by natural gas rather than the traditional diesel engines.

More: Oil and gas leads record $141.8 million in revenue for New Mexico Land Office last month

Hydraulic fracturing or fracking is the process of pumping a combination of water, sand and chemicals underground to break up rock formations and extract crude oil and natural gas.

The technology will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions when completing Permian Basin wells, read a news release from the company, and increase safety by reducing the physical footprint of operation by 50 percent.

“We look forward to providing high-efficiency, lower carbon, and safe Simul-frac operations for our new partners in the Permian Basin,” said Steven Anderson, chief executive officer.

Adrian Hedden achedden@currentargus.com or @AdrianHedden on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on Carlsbad Current-Argus: Study: Permian Basin 'super emitters' identified in aerial study
Boomers have a drug problem, but not the kind you might think

Laurie Archbald-Pannone, Associate Professor of Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Virginia
Sat, January 29, 2022

Some boomers are on multiple medications. Combinations of those drugs could have serious side effects. Getty Images / Sporrer/Rupp

Baby boomers – that’s anyone born in the U.S. between 1946 and 1964 – are 20% of the population, more than 70 million Americans. Decades ago, many in that generation experimented with drugs that were both recreational and illegal. Although boomers may not be using those same drugs today, many are taking medications, often several of them. And even if those drugs are legal, there are still risks of interactions and side effects.

The taking of multiple medications is called polypharmacy, typically four or more at the same time. That includes prescriptions from doctors, over-the-counter medicines, supplements and herbs. Sometimes, polypharmacy can be dangerous.

I am a geriatrician, one of only 7,500 in the U.S. That’s not nearly enough to accommodate the surging number of elderly boomers who will need medical care over the next two to three decades – or help in dealing with the potential problems of multiple drug use.

Make sure your doctor is regularly reviewing your medication list. Getty Images / dszc

Reactions to medications can change over time

We geriatricians know that polypharmacy isn’t always bad; multiple medications may be necessary. If you’ve had a heart attack, you might be on four medications or more – beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, statins and aspirin, for instance. And that’s appropriate.

But about half of older adults take at least one medication that’s not necessary or no longer needed. Doctors need to periodically reevaluate to make sure each medication is still right for the patient and still the correct dose. During treatment, the patient’s weight may fluctuate, either up or down. Even if it stays the same, body composition might change; that occurs as people age. As a result, one may react differently to a drug. That can happen even with a medication a person has been on for years.

Polypharmacy often means higher health care costs and more drug interactions. Patients are more likely to miss medications or stop taking them altogether. Sometimes, physical activity diminshes; falls, cognitive impairment, malnourishment and urinary incontinence increase; there may be less ability to do daily tasks. Those on five or more medications have a much higher incidence of having an ADE – an adverse drug event – compared to those using fewer meds. Making matters worse, the symptoms of polypharmacy are sometimes masked and taken as signs of aging.
Check the list

Studies have suggested solutions, with better coordination among care providers being one. Making the pharmacist an integral part of routine care is another. The increasing use of electronic patient records helps. So do smartphone apps, sometimes an easier way for patients and providers to connect. But so far, there’s no magic pill, and as researchers and clinicians investigate improvements, much of the burden remains on patients and their families.

There are steps you can take to stay safe, however. Regularly clean out the medicine cabinet and get rid of expired medicines or those you’re no longer taking. Either throw them away or ask your doctor or pharmacist about the best way to dispose of them. When seeing the doctor, bring in the meds you take and review each one in detail. Make certain you need to continue taking them all and verify the right dose.


Make sure you regularly check the expiration dates on your medications. Getty Images / dszc

You can also check the PIMs list, also known as the Beer’s List. Published by the American Geriatric Society, it’s an index of medications potentially harmful to the elderly. Some are linked to increased risks of side effects, and not a few are sold over-the-counter without prescription.

That includes medicines containing antihistamines like diphenhydramine, or Benadryl. In the elderly population, Benadryl carries an increased risk of dizziness, confusion and urinary retention. Medicines that are part of the NSAID family (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) are also on the list. In some elderly patients, they can cause high blood pressure or kidney failure. Commonly used medicines in the NSAID family are those containing ibuprofen or naproxen.

Just because a medicine is on the Beer’s List doesn’t mean your doctor was wrong to prescribe it, or that you should stop using it. Instead, use the medication with caution and discuss with your doctor to make sure you need it. Determine with your doctor the lowest useful dose, monitor for side effects, and speak up if you have any.

As a geriatrician, I see patients in an outpatient setting, either as their primary care provider or as a specialist consultant. We review medications at every visit: the list, the dose and how often the patient is taking it. A true and accurate medication list is the critical first step in geriatric care.

This is especially important during care transitions, such as when a patient is coming out of the hospital or nursing home. Particularly at that time, we find out if the patient is using the medication as prescribed, or taking it more frequently or less or not at all. Which leads to my final piece of advice: If you’ve strayed with your meds, one way or another, know that we doctors don’t judge or punish patients. Just tell us the truth. That’s all we want to hear. Then we can move forward together to find the best regimen for you.

This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts. It was written by: Laurie Archbald-Pannone, University of Virginia.


Read more:


Teen use of cannabis has dropped in New Zealand, but legalisation could make access easier

Assisted dying is not the easy way out


What I’ve learnt about drug testing in Nigeria over the last 20 years

Laurie Archbald-Pannone is affiliated with American Geriatrics Society.