Saturday, February 26, 2022

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M HEALTHCARE
Company officers accused of bilking customers of $190 million indicted in southern IL



Carolyn P. Smith
Thu, February 24, 2022

A federal grand jury in an East St. Louis courtroom on Wednesday indicted a pair of Florida businessmen in a health insurance scheme that generated more than $190 million in revenue for their company.

According to the complaint, which was filed by the Federal Trade Commission in the U.S. Court of the Southern District of Illinois, Simple Health Plans LLC sold policies to more than 400,000 people nationwide, including 1,175 of them in all 38 counties that comprise Southern Illinois.

Simple Health Plans also is known as Health Benefits One.


The company’s former owner, Steven Dorfman, 27, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, former Chief Compliance Officer Candida L. Girouard, 45 of Valrico, Florida, and former Vice President of Sales John A. Sand, 47, of Fort Lauderdale, each face single counts of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, four counts of mail fraud, and eight counts of wire fraud.

The three Florida men are scheduled to appear at the federal courthouse in East St. Louis on March 7 for arraignments. If convicted, they face potential sentencing of up to 30 years on the conspiracy charges and 20 years on each of the mail and wire fraud counts.

“We credit the Federal Trade Commission for their continued vigilance to protect the community from predatory and unscrupulous businesses operating online,” United States Attorney Steven Weinhoeft said in a statement Thursday. “Crimes like those alleged in the indictment rob people of their hard-earned money, but worse, they have catastrophic consequences when expected insurance benefits aren’t there in a time of need. These offenses ruin lives and must be dealt with harshly.”

According to federal court documents, Simple Health Plans sold health insurance policies over the phone, most of which were indemnity plans with a low cap on the amount of medical expenses they cover. After the caps are reached, patients are responsible for 100% of the balance out of pocket.

The indictment alleges that the company’s sales agents were scripted with a deceptive sales pitch.

“The whole idea of this plan is to make your out-of-pocket expenses as low as possible,” the script said, according to the court records. “When all is said and done, you end up with pennies on the dollar.”

According to the indictment, it wasn’t long after the indemnity plans were purchased that customers called Simple Health to complain:


That they had incurred “significant medical expense” for treatments and services they were led to believe were covered


That their doctors and hospitals did not accept the limited indemnity plans


That prescription drug costs were not covered, contrary to what the company had told them.

The alleged fraud occurred between 2013 and October of 2018, when the FTC filed a complaint with the federal court in southern Florida, which granted a temporary restraining order halting the company’s operation and freezing its assets.

Earlier this month, the court certified a nationwide class-action lawsuit it anticipates could sign on as many as 200,000 former customers as plaintiffs. In the meantime, federal courts are prosecuting the company’s officers criminally in their local districts.

The St. Louis Office of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service is investigating the case. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Scott Verseman and Peter Reed are prosecuting the case.
Ukrainian soldier blows himself up on bridge to stop Russian tanks from advancing

A Ukrainian soldier blew up a bridge that connects Russia-occupied Crimea to mainland Ukraine in order to stop Russian tanks from advancing. In the process, he sacrificed his own life.


India Today Web Desk 
Kyiv
February 26, 2022

A Ukrainian soldier died after he blew up a bridge to stop the advancement of Russian tanks. (Photo: Facebook)

To stop Russian tanks from invading his country, a Ukrainian soldier blew up the bridge that connects Russian-occupied Crimea to mainland Ukraine. In the process, he sacrificed his own life.

Marine battalion engineer Vitaly Skakun Volodymyrovych was deployed to the Henichesk bridge in the southern province of Kherson when Russian tanks invaded, as per the Ukrainian military.

The army decided that the only way to block the Russian tanks would be to blow up the bridge and, accordingly, Volodymyrovych volunteered to do the needful, the General Staff of the Armed Forces said in a statement.

However, he soon realised he would not be able to get back to safety and died in the blast. His act of bravery forced the Russian forces to take a longer route, thereby giving the Ukrainian military more time to respond.


UKRAINE MILITARY'S STATEMENT

“On this difficult day for our country, when the Ukrainian people give away to the Russian occupiers in all directions, one of the hardest places on the map of Ukraine was the Crimean intersection, where one of the first enemies met a separate marine battalion. In order to stop the promotion of the tank column, a decision was made to overthrow the Geniche Car Bridge,” the Ukrainian military wrote in a statement.

The statement added, “The engineer of a separate battalion sailor Skakun Vitaliy Volodymyrovich was called to perform this task. The bridge was replaced, but he didn't have time to get out of there There was an explosion right away. Our brother was killed. His heroic act significantly slowed down the push of the enemy, allowing the unit to relocate and organize defense.”

The statement concluded, “We will fight as long as we live! And as long as we are alive we will fight!”

The soldier, Skakun Vitaliy Volodymyrovich, will be given a state award posthumously for his bravery.

Russia declared war on Ukraine on Thursday. Since then, more than 130 Ukrainian ‘heroes’ have been killed, according to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.


Garrison Of Ukrainian Soldiers Killed After Refusing Russian Demands To Surrender

Nick Visser
Thu, February 24, 2022, 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy holds a press conference Thursday in Kyiv on Russia's attack on Ukraine. (Photo: Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

An entire garrison of 13 Ukrainian border guards was killed in the first day of fighting on the nation’s Snake Island after the soldiers refused to surrender to invading Russian forces, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said.



Zelenskyy said in an address that the guards had attempted to protect the island, resisting demands from Russian forces to lay down their arms. Anton Gerashchenko, an adviser to the Ukrainian interior minister, posted audio to Facebook in which Russian forces can be heard telling the soldiers to surrender and “avoid bloodshed,” according to a translation by The Washington Post.

The garrison refused, with one soldier saying, “Russian warship, go fuck yourself,” and were all killed in an artillery strike.

Zelenskyy said the 13 soldiers would be honored posthumously with the Hero of Ukraine award.


Snake Island, also known as Zmiinyi Island, is about 30 miles off the coast of Ukraine and is less than 42 acres. The Post noted that the island marks the edge of Ukraine’s territorial waters and serves as a strategic post in the Black Sea.

Zelenskyy said at least 137 people have been killed in Ukraine since the beginning of Russia’s invasion and hundreds had been wounded. That tally was expected to climb as Russian forces closed in on the capital, Kyiv, and Zelenskyy said in his address that “the fate of the country depends fully on our army, security forces, all of our defenders.”

This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.

Feds rescind license extension for Florida nuclear plant


 In this Feb. 26, 2009 file photo, the Turkey Point nuclear plant south of Miami is shown. Federal officials have reversed a decision to allow a South Florida nuclear power plant to continue running for another 30 years by ordering a new review of potential environmental risks, including those posed by climate change. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued an order Thursday, Feb. 24, 2022. 
(AP Photo/Lynne Sladky, File) (ASSOCIATED PRESS)More

Thu, February 24, 2022, 5:41 PM·2 min read

MIAMI (AP) — Federal officials have reversed a decision to allow a South Florida nuclear power plant to continue running for another 30 years by ordering a new review of potential environmental risks, including those posed by climate change.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued an order Thursday to reverse a 2019 decision by a previous, Republican-led commission to extend Florida Power & Light’s operating license for two reactors at the Turkey Point nuclear power plant until 2052 and 2053, respectively. The reactors have been operating since 1972 and 1973, respectively.

The new decision shouldn't immediately affect operations at Turkey Point, which is south of Miami along Biscayne Bay. The NRC, which oversees commercial nuclear power plants, had previously granted FPL a 20-year extension that will allow the reactors to run until 2032 and 2033.

The reversal gives environmental groups a chance to reiterate concerns that federal regulators didn’t adequately consider the risks of climate change and flooding from sea level rise when granting the last extension. The NRC plans to hold hearings after staff completes a new site-specific environmental impact statement.

The environmental group Beyond Nuclear has challenged the adequacy of an outdated generic environmental impact statement that the NRC had previously relied on for the license extensions.

Attorney Diane Curran said the agency had been relying on an impact statement prepared in 1996 and revised in 2013 that addressed only the environmental impacts of extending reactor license terms from 40 years out to 60 years. Extending the licenses to 2052 and 2053 would mean 80 years of operation.

“NRC researchers have acknowledged, however, that operating a reactor beyond 60 years poses unique safety and environmental issues related to the age-related degradation of safety equipment," Curran said. "This decision paves the way for a hard look at those significant concerns.”

FPL has previously said rising sea levels and other climate factors won’t compromise operations of the reactors, the Miami Herald reported.

Besides the reversal at Turkey Point, the NRC also reversed a license extension for the Peach Bottom nuclear plant in Pennsylvania. Days after taking office in January 2021, President Joe Biden named Democrats to take over the NRC and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The agencies have been reevaluating decisions made by Republican-led panels under former President Donald Trump, including the 2019 decision on Turkey Point.

Guest Column: It’s time to end Florida’s “welfare for the wealthy” and expand solar power


Kevin Doyle
Sat, February 26, 2022

Kevin Doyle is the Florida Executive Director for Consumer Energy Alliance, which seeks to ensure American families and businesses have access to reliable, affordable, and environmentally sound resources.

As we continue our solid growth in solar usage all across the Sunshine state, it’s well past time for Florida lawmakers to get rid of what the Wall Street Journal calls “welfare for the wealthy” and make solar accessible for all of us. Because of outdated state laws called “net-metering,” now high-income Floridians who invest in solar to generate renewable energy for their homes are enjoying the financial benefits.

When solar was just getting started, net metering made sense. No, it does not. We are all paying for it, including the less fortunate, while more well-off Floridians reap the rewards.

A proposal is moving through the Florida Legislature to update Florida’s net metering laws and reduce this unfair subsidy.


Senate Bill 1024 by Sen. Jennifer Bradley and House Bill 741 by Rep. Lawrence McClure will bring balance back to utility bills so that all customers are equitably contributing to the grid’s infrastructure and have an equal opportunity to utilize solar energy.

Under Florida’s current net metering laws, utilities compensate rooftop solar customers for the excess energy they produce at retail rates. Retail rates can be up to 10 times higher than what a utility would pay for the same energy from other sources. In addition, customers with rooftop solar avoid much of the costs we all pay to support the power grid.

Maintaining a strong and resilient power grid is critically important to the reliability, especially in a state prone to hurricanes and other natural disasters. Even customers with rooftop solar depend on the grid to provide power when their solar panels cannot, such as during the night, during storms and when their demand for energy exceeds the supply their solar panels can produce.

When utilities pay more for power from rooftop solar homes and those same customers are not contributing to the grid’s infrastructure needs, costs are shifted to other customers. As a result, low-income households who can’t afford to invest in rooftop solar end up paying the lion’s share to maintain reliability.

Florida has made great strides in renewable energy production. Through investments in large-scale solar generation, we are now fourth in the nation for total solar power capacity. Florida continues to increase our portfolio of renewable energy sources, which benefits all customers, not just the wealthy. And more is on the way.

As residential solar power becomes less expensive to install and continues to grow in popularity, it is essential that we modernize net metering incentives and ensure all customers are treated equitably by the state’s power grid.

The proposed legislation directs the Florida Public Service Commission to review the current incentive structure to ensure all costs are fairly allocated, and that the wealthy don’t utilize solar under a system where the rest of us pay more. And to be fair the proposal also grandfathers in customers who have already invested in rooftop solar so they can maintain their current benefits for a decade.

It’s time to end Florida’s “welfare for the wealthy” and get serious about expanding our use of solar power. I am grateful for Senate Bill 1024 by Sen. Jennifer Bradley and House Bill 741 by Rep. Lawrence McClure, which will bring balance back to consumers’ utility bills and ensure all customers pay equitably for reliability.

This article originally appeared on Florida Times-Union: Outdated state laws need to change for solar energy
Pressure is mounting to strip secretive Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich as owner of Chelsea Football Club

Ashley Lutz
FORTUNE
Thu, February 24, 2022

Russia's invasion of Ukraine gives new ammunition to the argument that billionaire Roman Abramovich should be stripped of his ownership of Chelsea Football Club, one of the biggest and most successful soccer clubs in Europe.

The notoriously secretive Abramovich, who made his billions in oil and is reportedly close to Vladimir Putin, became the London club's outright owner in 2003. Since his investment, Chelsea has won 18 major trophies, including two Champions League titles, the most prestigious pan-European competition.

Over that nearly 20-year span, Abramovich has become a celebrity in the English media, and something of a stand-in for the many ultrawealthy Russians who have moved to England in general and London in particular. Earlier this month, The Times reported that £1.5 billion worth of UK property had been purchased by Russians with links to the Kremlin, nearly £430 million of which was in Westminster alone. Many critics have nicknamed the capital "Londongrad."

The escalating conflict in Ukraine has intensified scrutiny around Abramovich's wealth and his close relationship to Putin. Last month, The Athletic reported that Chelsea owes Abramovich at least $2 billion right now; Abramovich's net worth is around $15 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

Labour MP Chris Bryant is leading the charge within Parliament to kick Abramovich out of his west London perch atop Chelsea. On Thursday, he said during Business Questions at the House of Commons that he had access to documents from 2019 linking Abramovich to "malign activity."

In 2021, Abramovich sued the author Catherine Belton for reporting in her book "Putin's People" that Abramovich had acted "covertly at his [Putin's] direction" in multiple business deals, including his acquisition of Chelsea. That lawsuit ultimately settled.

Chris Bryant has urged Boris Johnson's government to seize Abramovich's UK assets, including Chelsea and his London-based investment company Millhouse LLC, the BBC reports.

"Surely Mr Abramovich should no longer be able to own a football club in this country? Surely we should be looking at seizing some of his assets ... and making sure that other people who have had tier 1 visas like this are not engaged in malign activity in the UK," Bryant said, according to The Guardian.

Bryant told MPs that the Home Office document about Abramovich from 2019 suggests the oligarch shouldn't be allowed to live in the UK. His 15-bedroom mansion, just behind Kensington Palace, and other UK properties have been estimated to be worth more than $250 million.

"As part of HMG's [Her Majesty's Government] Russia strategy aimed at targeting illicit finance and malign activity, Abramovich remains of interest to HMG due to his links to the Russian state and his public association with corrupt activity and practices. An example of this is Abramovich admitting in court proceedings that he paid for political influence," the document reads.

On Tuesday, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said Abramovich was "already facing sanctions," but he later walked that back, with his spokesperson saying he had "misspoke." Abramovich was not part of the several series of sanctions announced by Johnson, the largest ever levied by the UK.

The UK has already announced sanctions targeting Russian banks and billionaires.

Abramovich's oil wealth has been under scrutiny for years, and in 2018, he withdrew his application for a UK investor visa amid mounting criticism. He's been using an Israeli passport to get into the country, and even lived a nomadic existence on his fleet of yachts for a while when he was denied entry to the UK.

After he was denied entry in 2018, Abramovich abandoned plans to build a new $1 billion stadium for Chelsea.

The new sanctions and calls to action against Russian money are just the beginning of a likely shake-up in Western Europe stemming from the war.

Political pressure had separately been building for Europe's top soccer body, the UEFA, to strip Russia of hosting the Champions League final in May, and to cut off its massive sponsorship deal with Gazprom, the Russian state-owned energy giant, with the EU Parliament one of the voices calling for action. After Thursday's invasion, The Athletic reported that UEFA will move the Champions League Final away from St. Petersburg's Gazprom Arena.

[This report has been updated with additional information on Chris Bryant's remarks about Abramovich, Boris Johnson's statement about potential sanctions, and the fate of the Champions League Final in St. Petersburg.]

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Wealthy Russians who parked money in Florida's 'Little Moscow' worry they'll be blacklisted from buying luxury real estate


Hillary Hoffower
Fri, February 25, 2022

Sunny Isles, Florida.Meinzahn/Getty Images


Sunny Isles, Florida, is known as "Little Moscow" because of the many Russian elites who live there.


They're worried sanctions could prevent them from buying real estate.


Experts say it's likely they won't be severely affected.


Sunny Isles, Florida, has long been an escape for Russia's wealthy and elite, who have purchased so much luxury property in the area that it's become known as "Little Moscow" and "Moscow by the Sea."

"They love to be here, and they like to spend their money and enjoy their life," Lana Bell, a Russian real-estate agent, told the News Nation correspondent Brian Entin on Monday.

President Joe Biden issued sanctions this week that target Russia's elite and their families and restrict the Kremlin's ability to access Western financial institutions. Though people in Little Moscow have been worried the escalating Russia-Ukraine conflict will threaten their lifestyle and blacklist them from buying American real estate, Entin reported, Bell said it hadn't been a problem. Experts told the Miami Herald's Michael Wilner the sanctions in place were unlikely to have a strong effect in South Florida. But Russia's invasion of Ukraine on Thursday showed the tensions were far from over.

"We are extending the reach of US sanctions to prevent the elites close to Putin from using their kids to hide assets, evade costs, and squander the resources of the Russian people," a National Security Council official told the Miami Herald. "This is a new approach."

Anders Ã…slund, a Swedish economist and the author of "Russia's Crony Capitalism: The Path from Market Economy to Kleptocracy," doesn't think this will affect the Russian rich in the greater Miami region that Little Moscow is in. He told Wilner that the Miami Russians weren't powerful enough to feel the sanction burn.

"These are comfortable people, rather than the top people," he said.
Florida's Russian rich



In Sunny Isles, condos can cost as much as $35 million. The most expensive home in the area listed on Sotheby's is $13.9 million. It's an area where the Trump brand is dominant, which The Washington Post reported was part of the appeal among Russian investors looking to move their money in the post-Soviet economy.

Jose Lima, a salesperson for the company that developed the region's Trump towers, told The Post in 2016 that Russian speakers bought about one-third of the 500 units he sold.

But Russian influence stretches beyond Sunny Isles. From Hollywood to Fisher Island, Russians have spent years snapping up properties along Florida's southeastern coast. Experts told Wilner that illicit financing had helped fuel the trend, though it's not all related to dirty money. They estimated that Russia's elite had more than $1 trillion in offshore accounts, which they said was disproportionally held in South Florida property.

So far, Russia's richest billionaires have been affected by the rising conflict the most. Following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the richest 22 of them lost $39 billion in one day.

While many of the Little Moscow Russians didn't want to be identified when talking to News Nation's Entin, they did tell him off camera that they supported Russian President Vladimir Putin.

BABA YAGA
Ukrainian woman says Russian troops should carry seeds so flowers grow where they die



Sarah Sicard
Thu, February 24, 2022

As Russian troops continue to invade Ukraine in what President Vladimir Putin has called a “special military operation,” accounts of what is going on on the ground are beginning to surface.

With wailing air-raid sirens, families in Kharkiv sheltering in train stations, and lines forming at gas stations, the scene being painted is growing increasingly grim.

But one badass Ukrainian woman isn’t backing down, according to Ukraine World, a news organization run by Internews Ukraine.

According to a recording the news site obtained and shared to Twitter, the unidentified woman reportedly confronted Russian troops, asked why they were there, and suggested they place sunflower seeds in their pockets so that flowers may bloom where they fall on the soil of her country.



The video has been retweeted more than 5,000 times with viewers around the world lauding the Ukrainian woman for her bravery.


Oil companies, union reach deal on U.S. refinery workers pact


A Marathon Petroleum banner covers an Andeavor sign 
outside the El Paso refinery in El Paso

Fri, February 25, 2022
By Erwin Seba

HOUSTON (Reuters) -Oil companies led by Marathon Petroleum and the United Steelworkers (USW) agreed to a new national contract on Friday for 30,000 U.S. workers in refineries, chemical plants, and pipelines, the company and the union said.

Once the deal is ratified, workers will receive a 12% pay increase over its four-year term, said three sources familiar with the matter.

"We’re pleased to have reached a mutually satisfactory four-year pattern labor agreement with the United Steelworkers," Marathon spokesman Jamal Kheiry said.

USW International President Thomas Conway said in a statement the membership played a key role.

"The industry came to the table with demands that would have undermined generations of collective bargaining progress," Conway said. "Thanks to the solidarity of the membership and the hard work of our (national oil bargaining policy) committee, we have achieved a fair agreement."

Both sides did not disclose terms of the agreement.

Negotiations between Marathon and the Steelworkers had been stalled until early this week when meetings resumed, the sources said.

Talks stopped on Jan. 31 when USW negotiators rejected a 9% increase over three years and extended the current contract. basis. The current contract will remain in effect until the new contract is ratified.

USW local unions will now combine the national agreement with agreements on site-specific issues at each refinery, chemical plant and pipeline and put the combined contracts to ratification votes.

After talks stopped on Jan. 31, the USW carried out a series of protests outside refineries across the United States, which, the sources said, pushed other companies to pressure Marathon in restarting talks and increasing the pay offer as well as moving on other issues.

One issue long sought by the USW is agreement to appoint union health and safety representatives at each facility which is included in the new contract.

The pay increases are not evenly split between the four years, the sources said.

(Reporting by Erwin Seba; Editing by Leslie Adler, Jonathan Oatis, David Gregorio and Diane Craft)
I'm An OB-GYN. Here's Why I Decided To Learn How To Provide Abortions.


Sarah Garber
Fri, February 25, 2022


Training to be an obstetrician-gynecologist is both challenging and extraordinary. In a single 24-hour, sleepless shift as an OB-GYN resident, I might have the privilege of delivering a newborn to a joyfully tearful couple, bear witness to the unimaginable pain of a family processing an intrauterine fetal death, meet a patient in the emergency department and transport her to emergent surgery for an intra-abdominal bleed, and confirm the code status of a woman with terminal ovarian cancer.

On my toughest days, the days when physical and emotional exhaustion weigh heavy, blood soaks through my shoes, and my eyes well up with tears from the trauma I’ve witnessed, I think about why I chose to become an OB-GYN: to provide judgment-free, empathetic, supportive care to patients.

This care includes learning to provide abortions, a procedure I believe is an integral part of health care. In the United States, 1 in 4 women will have an abortion by the age of 45, so comprehensive reproductive health care must include abortion provision. As legislation across the country becomes increasingly hostile toward abortion providers, with threats of federal prison and cumbersome fines mounting and the possibility of Roe v. Wade being overturned, it feels important to share why I feel so strongly about protecting the right to provide abortion care.

Most anti-abortion legislators and advocates will go through their entire careers without ever spending significant time on a Labor and Delivery floor. I often wonder if Mike DeWine, the anti-abortion governor of Ohio, where I practice, understands how dangerous pregnancy can be to maternal life. I wonder if he can imagine what it’s like to watch a 14-year-old girl give birth while her abusive partner sits in the corner, to feel adrenaline flood your body while you struggle to gain control of a massive hemorrhage, to watch a patient seize from preeclampsia. Unfortunately, this happens more than it should where I work in Cleveland ― where people are dramatically affected by lack of access to care and the impact of systemic racism on health care. Training here is where I learned that pregnancy is not benign.

It strikes me as ironic that society has politicized the terms “pro-life” and “pro-choice” when I feel I am pro-life, working to protect the lives and health of the patients in front of me, while simultaneously understanding that not all patients truly have the “choice” to carry a pregnancy to term and care for themselves and their families.

If I’m being honest, I understand and acknowledge the perspective that there is moral complexity to terminating a pregnancy. It is not insignificant to me to end a potential life. However, that discomfort is far surpassed by my knowledge that for every termination I perform, the patient has been counseled thoroughly on all their options, including adoption, and that only they can understand what is best for themself, their body, and their current or future family.

I’m also aware that because patients understand what is best for themselves, their bodies and their families, prohibiting access to abortions will not stop abortions, but it will make access less equitable. Across the globe, mortality from complications of unsafe abortions is highest in areas where access is the most limited and where terminations occur outside of the clinical context. Legislators will not be the ones working in the emergency rooms and seeing the influx of sick patients coming in with complications from unsafe abortions because they decided to take matters into their own hands. It is us, young doctors, who will see the hemorrhages, perforated bowels and septic shock that our oldest teachers remember well.

I anticipate that if abortion restrictions increase in Ohio, my toughest days ― the ones where my physical and mental exhaustion is pushed to its limits ― will involve caring for patients affected by inequitable access to abortion care. Yes, self-managed medication abortions may pose a safe alternative to the traditional abortion provision that currently exists. But still, even with other options, it has been well-demonstrated that restrictive abortion legislation disproportionately burdens women of color, whether that be through delayed access and barriers to health care or through the known increased pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality that affects women of color in this country.

My job is both challenging and extraordinary. On the best days, I deliver healthy babies and cry tears of joy alongside happy couples welcoming new family members. On the worst days, I cry tears of sadness alongside devastated families who have lost the lives of their loved ones. For today, my hope is to paint a picture of the realities of what limiting access to abortion care looks like and feels like for patients and their providers, so that tomorrow I can continue to provide quality holistic care to the patients I serve.

Sarah Garber (she/her/hers) is an OB-GYN resident in Ohio. She graduated from the University of Michigan for medical school, where she completed the Global Health and Disparities Program. She is passionate about medical education, physician wellness, narrative medicine and reproductive justice for all. She has written and published multiple narrative essays in journals such as BMJ Opinion and Academic Medicine. All opinions expressed are her own.


Putin’s allies abandon him over Ukraine invasion


Erin Doherty
AXIOS
Sat, February 26, 2022


Several of Russia's closest allies and former Soviet satellite states have sharply rebuked President Vladimir Putin over his unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.

Why it matters: As the Western world seeks to make Putin an international pariah, even his closest allies are resisting showing support for his assault on Ukraine.

Get market news worthy of your time with Axios Markets. Subscribe for free.


Driving the news: Czech President Milos Zeman and Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, both historically strong pro-Russian voices in the European Union, condemned the affront as "an unprovoked act of aggression," AP reports.

"Russia has committed a crime against peace," Zeman said.

Zeman, who earlier this week insisted that Russia wouldn't attack Ukraine, changed course and has called for harsh sanctions against Russia, including pulling out of the SWIFT financial system.

Orban, who has pursued a diplomatic and economic strategy with Putin called "Eastern Opening," condemned "Russia's military action."

“Hungary’s position is clear: we stand by Ukraine, we stand by Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty,” said Hungary's Foreign Minister Peter Szijijarto, per AP.

What's happening: Kazakhstan, one of Russia's closest allies, denied a request for its troops to join the attack on Ukraine, per NBC News.

The Czech Republic closed Russian consulates in the country and stopped issuing visas to Russians except for humanitarian cases.

The president of Bulgaria, which was Russia's closest ally during the Cold War, said the invasion was "absolutely inadmissible."

The ruling coalition leaders in Romania called Russia "the architect of the worst security crisis since World War II."

Moldovan President Maia Sandu said Russia’s attacks were launched "in violation of international norms," and the international community "unanimously condemns these military actions."

And Germany and Italy, which have strong economic ties to Russia, are both poised to support a European Union measure to cut Russia from the international SWIFT financial system.

Between the lines: China, which has deepened economic and military ties with Russia in recent years, has straddled the fence between supporting Russia's "legitimate security concerns" and calling for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity to be respected.

China abstained from a UN resolution on Friday criticizing Russia's attack, a departure from its usual practice of vetoing Western-led measures.

Go deeper: The latest on the Russia-Ukraine crisis

Axios' Zachary Basu contributed reporting.




WAIT, WHAT?

White House Vows to Avoid Future Sanctions on Russian Crude Oil


Jennifer A. Dlouhy and Ari Natter
Fri, February 25, 2022

(Bloomberg) -- The Biden administration won’t sanction Russian crude oil because that would harm U.S. consumers and not Vladimir Putin, a U.S. State Department official said Friday.

“The sanctions will not target the oil flows as we go forward,” Amos Hochstein, the State Department’s senior energy security adviser, said in an interview on Bloomberg Television.

The remarks underscore the Biden administration’s approach to sanctions that are intended to maximize pain for the Russian president while minimizing the blowback for U.S. and European consumers.

“If we target the oil and gas sector for Putin, and in this case the Russian energy establishment, then prices would spike. Perhaps he would sell only half of his product, but for double the price,” Hochstein said. “That means he would not suffer the consequences while the United States and our allies would suffer the consequences.”

Oil prices have already eased in response, Hochstein said, and the administration “can see prices go down from here.”

Oil prices topped $100 a barrel for the first time since 2014 following Russia’s invasion on Ukraine on fears that the move would lead to harsher sanctions from the West. But those gains were mostly erased after Biden’s package of initial sanctions avoided the energy sector. On Friday, West Texas Intermediate slipped $1.10 to $91.71 a barrel while Brent crude dropped $1.69 to $97.39 a barrel at 10:05 a.m. in New York.

President Joe Biden and his Democratic Party already face political risks from record inflation that has spiked the costs of consumer goods from food to fuel. Last year, Biden authorized the release of 50 million barrels of crude from the U.S. emergency stockpile, and on Thursday the he pledged to discharge more of those supplies if needed.

Hochstein called the sanctions “significantly harder and harsher” than anything previously aimed at Putin, and said that they also have more international support.

He credited the administration’s efforts to persuade natural gas exporters and Asian allies to divert gas exports to Europe. That prevented Putin from timing “the invasion with rolling blackouts or economic distress in Europe,” Hochstein said. “And there’s enough natural gas supplies to get through the winter.”

Russian gas flows to Europe through Ukraine reportedly jumped nearly 40% on Thursday, underscoring the continent's dependence on Putin's energy

Russian President Vladimir Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin.Alexey Nikolsky/Getty Images
  • Russian gas exports to Europe via Ukraine spiked nearly 38% Thursday, Bloomberg reported.

  • European natural-gas prices soared as much as 62% on the same day.

  • Germany this week pulled out of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project with Russia.

Natural-gas exports flowing from Russia to Europe through Ukraine ramped up on Thursday, jumping by nearly 38% from a day earlier, according to data reported by Bloomberg.

Figures from Ukraine's grid operator further showed that these flows were expected to rise by about 24% on Friday compared with Thursday's levels, according to Bloomberg.

Western Europe is heavily reliant on Russian gas supplies, and the increased flow Thursday underscored that continuing dependency. Some 41% of the European Union's gas imports come from Russia, more than twice as much as Norway, the next-largest supplier, according to the most recent EU data.

The increased gas flows from Russia to Europe on Thursday came after Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops into Ukraine. World governments hit Russia with sanctions in response, but the US defended a decision not to include the energy sector in its measures.

The Russian state-owned energy giant Gazprom said Thursday that gas flows to Europe through Ukraine were as expected.

European gas prices soared as much as 62% on Thursday, the largest increase since 2005, according to data reported by Bloomberg.

Russia is the world's second-largest producer of natural gas, behind the US, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Earlier in the week, Germany, which relies on Russia for much of its natural gas, halted the Nord Stream 2 gas-pipeline deal with Moscow after Russian forces entered Donetsk and Luhansk, two eastern breakaway regions of Ukraine. The suspension of Nord Stream 2 had no impact on gas supplies because the pipeline wasn't operational.

Kenneth Griffin, the CEO of the hedge fund Citadel, wrote in The Wall Street Journal that Europe should reduce its reliance on Russian gas exports and the US should help the continent meet its energy needs by increasing oil production.

Biden Team to Hold Off on Sanctions Hitting Aluminum From Russia



Joe Deaux and Saleha Mohsin
Thu, February 24, 2022,


(Bloomberg) -- The Biden administration is holding off for now on sanctions against Russia that could disrupt global aluminum supplies, according to people familiar with the matter, as the market grapples with already severe shortages of the metal.

White House officials met with industry representatives in recent weeks and told them there was no U.S. intention for now of levying sanctions that would hit Russian aluminum, the people said, asking not to be named because the discussions weren’t public. Benchmark aluminum prices in London retreated from record highs after Bloomberg News reported the discussions.

Russian-supplied aluminum accounts for about 10% of total U.S. imports, highlighting the negative impact that sanctions could have for the U.S. and allies who rely on the metal for everything from iPhones to automobiles and fighter jets.

A spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council declined to comment.

Aluminum prices have surged more than 55% in the past year as plants across the globe tried to ramp up production to meet demand spurred by the reopening of economies from the pandemic. Benchmark prices hit a record on Thursday as Russia began armed conflict in Ukraine. The global market swung to a 1.9 million ton deficit last year, according to the World Bureau of Metals Statistics.

The supply situation hasn’t gotten any better as surging energy prices in Europe forced mills to shut down, while efforts by top producer China to curb its pollution led to output cuts. Almost four years ago, the U.S. levied sanctions on Russian aluminum producer United Co. Rusal International PJSC that sent prices surging and left buyers scrambling to find units.

Aluminum for delivery in three months fell 0.5% Friday to $3,378.50 a metric ton as of 11:18 a.m. on the London Metal Exchange. Prices jumped as much as 5.7% to a record $3,480 on Thursday before paring gains. Nickel -- with Russia also a major producer -- fell 2% to trade below its Wednesday close ahead of Russia’s invasion.

U.S. officials had previously disclosed concern that sanctions impacting aluminum supply could drive up the price of the metal, replicating chaos in the commodities market when the Trump administration in 2018 sanctioned Russian business tycoon Oleg Deripaska. Deripaska’s En+ Management LLC has a majority stake in Rusal, the world’s second-largest aluminum producer.

While sanctions were never ultimately implemented on Rusal due to repeated waivers from the U.S. Treasury Department, global aluminum prices shot up as much as 20% at one point, with each delay in imposing the sanctions causing more turbulence.

Russia is also a major exporter of oil, natural gas, wheat, crop nutrients and other metals.