Friday, May 27, 2022

Ban the Damn Guns


 
 MAY 27, 2022

Photograph Source: David Ohmer – CC BY 2.0

I haven’t fired a gun since I was nineteen years old. It was a .22 caliber pistol with a long barrel and a wooden grip. I held it with two hands at first and then one. My aim still sucked. When I was a boy of ten or so my brother and I took a couple of gun safety courses where we fired single-shot rifles that were also .22 caliber and a single-barreled shotgun that was loaded with buckshot cartridges. With both guns, we had to reload each time. I would shoot at paper targets at a range on the military base my father was stationed at. I was a very poor shot. My brother hit the bullseye almost every time. I fared better with a standard bow and arrow. In fact, when I was in Boy Scouts I was able to get the archery merit badge, but failed at the rifleman badge. My brother still owns guns. So do his sons. A couple are regular hunters. He only hunts with a crossbow.

I mention the above to show that I am not unfamiliar with guns. Indeed, back when I was nineteen and thought the revolution was coming, I would go into the woods in Howard County, MD. and shoot beer cans lined up on a log—the same thing I did when my father first introduced me to shooting. Never in my life did I even think about shooting people, which is why I realized that my role in that revolution that never came would most likely involve unarmed situations.

It’s obviously a damning statement that killing children in their schoolhouses, churchgoers in their churches and Black and Latino people in the places where they shop is something that happens with relative frequency in the United States. What’s even more damning, however, is that so many politicians essentially support this sociopathic behavior. Sure, they may make statements deploring the bloodshed and tragedy, but they sure as hell don’t do a damn thing about ending it. In their minds, there is nothing to be done about men (yes, it’s usually men) walking into a school wearing a bulletproof vest and carrying an arsenal more suitable to an invading soldier and murdering a couple dozen people. Then again, politicians claim there is also nothing to be done about hiring young men, arming them to the teeth and sending them off to kick in the doors of innocent families and killing everyone inside. It’s American democracy, goddammit. Take it in the face or we’ll kill you.

This is a country built on violence and determined to survive by violence or take the world down with it. It consistently rejects peace talks in favor of war, nonviolent approaches to crime in favor of killer cops, and open borders in favor of heavily militarized border enforcement. Then it cries when its children are killed. Then it sells more guns. It’s a twisted place to live and most of its residents have no clue how twisted.

I don’t usually write about guns or the easy acceptance of their violence, but between the forty billion dollars of weaponry going to the Ukrainian military to fight a war that should and could have been resolved with a little compromise and the mass murder of nineteen young children in their school by an eighteen-year-old lad who should never have been able to obtain not one but two assault weapons, I have to say something. End the sale, manufacture, and importation of these weapons. Curtail the sale of all ammunition and tell those who oppose this—the accessories to every crime committed by those using these weapons—their argument has been killed in the last two weeks. As dead as those children murdered in Uvalde, Texas. As dead as the shoppers murdered in the Top’s Supermarket in Buffalo, NY.

People may kill people, but people with assault weapons kill a lot of people. Ending their manufacture, importation and sale would lower the body count in a very measurable way. Then we can talk about the rest of the crap that’s screwed up.

Ron Jacobs is the author of Daydream Sunset: Sixties Counterculture in the Seventies published by CounterPunch Books. His latest offering is a pamphlet titled Capitalism: Is the Problem.  He lives in Vermont. He can be reached at: ronj1955@gmail.com.

‘If more guns were the solution, we would be the safest country in the world’ • FRANCE 24



US weapons industry 'creating misperception' that most Americans reject gun violence prevention



COMMENTARY
After Buffalo and Uvalde, America feels broken: Where do we go from here?

Feeling grief, confusion and despair right now is normal. How do we turn that into something constructive?


By CHAUNCEY DEVEGA
SALON
PUBLISHED MAY 27, 2022 

MAY 24: People mourn outside of the SSGT Willie de Leon Civic Center following the mass shooting at Robb Elementary School on May 24, 2022 in Uvalde, Texas. (Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

America is in big trouble. I think we all feel that way.

The country will not somehow "be fine" or find healing any time soon. Do not listen to anyone who tells you otherwise. They are lying to you. Although the clinical language may not apply perfectly, it feels as though we are experiencing a national nervous breakdown, a collective mental health crisis on a grand scale. It feels both societal and personal.

Less than two weeks ago in Buffalo, an apparent white supremacist terrorist killed 10 Black people at a supermarket. Ten days later in Uvalde, Texas, a deranged gunman attacked an elementary School, killing 19 children and two teachers. In both cases, the shooters used the AR-15 assault-style rifle, for all intents and purposes the same weapon used by the U.S. military. It fires standard 5.56mm bullets, which would typically strike the human body at a speed of 3,251 feet per second with 1,300 foot-pounds of kinetic energy. Some of the parents in Uvalde had to provide DNA samples so their children could be identified.



Both alleged killers were 18 years old. What personal, social or psychological emptiness leads such a young person to commit such a horrific act? We look for answers and do not find them.

We know that too many Americans love guns more than they love children, or life itself. They are possessed by the totemic power of the gun and what it represents in American history and society. Guns provide a temporary cure for death anxiety by conferring the ability to deliver death to others. These pathological attachments are camouflaged by all sorts of nonsensical rhetoric about "freedom." It is almost too perverse to be credible: The "freedom" to own as many guns as one wants trumps the freedom to live without reasonable fear of dying by gunfire.

Too many Americans love guns more than they love children. The mass murder of children at their schools is now a feature of American society, which hardly happens anywhere else.

The mass murder of children and young people at their schools is now a feature of American society. No other country experiences such gun violence anywhere near so frequently. It has become something we "must learn to live with" as the price of "freedom."

After the Sandy Hook massacre in 2012 — the only school shooting with more dead than in Uvalde — Garry Wills wrote a memorable essay for the New York Review of Books, describing the dead children in Connecticut as "the sacrifice we as a culture made, and continually make, to our demonic god":

We guarantee that crazed man after crazed man will have a flood of killing power readily supplied him. We have to make that offering, out of devotion to our Moloch, our god. The gun is our Moloch. We sacrifice children to him daily — sometimes, as at Sandy Hook, by directly throwing them into the fire-hose of bullets from our protected private killing machines, sometimes by blighting our children's lives by the death of a parent, a schoolmate, a teacher, a protector. Sometimes this is done by mass killings (eight this year), sometimes by private offerings to the god (thousands this year)….

Adoration of Moloch permeates the country, imposing a hushed silence as he works his will. One cannot question his rites, even as the blood is gushing through the idol's teeth. The White House spokesman invokes the silence of traditional religious ceremony. "It is not the time" to question Moloch. No time is right for showing disrespect for Moloch.

As others have observed, perhaps the only way for America to achieve effective gun control measures, or for gun violence is treated as a public health emergency is for Black and brown people and Muslims to buy AR-15s and other guns in large numbers, and then carry them openly everywhere it is legal to do so.

For many of us who think and write publicly about politics and other social concerns, there is considerable pressure to have "something to say." That punishes contemplation, deep thinking and true expertise, and rewards 30-second soundbites and "hot takes." Sometimes it's better to say simply that we feel lost and broken, that we feel doom and despair, that we feel America's myths, fantasies and falsehoods coming unglued.

For me, that answer is to ask more questions and to be admit that I don't know. I am hurting just like everyone else and I am likely no less than most people in America, We are all trying toward a destination that has not yet been determined. In an effort to orient myself after Buffalo and Texas, amid this moment of apparent implosion in America, I reached out to several people from a range of backgrounds whose voices I respect most.
ward for his work on "March," becoming the first cartoonist to win that award.

It's now considered cliché to state that Americans have been forced to become numb to this atrocity — but that notion is also false. The overwhelming majority of us are absolutely not numb to regular mass shootings in our schools and public spaces. Lawmakers, lobbyists and capital tied to the gun industry want us to be numb to it so badly that they reinforce how we already are — when in fact it's their inaction, their exploitation of fear and violence which reveals the depths of their own numbness, their own cynicism, their own inhumanity.

This is an everyday dread for every parent as their kids go to school. That fear isn't abstract: America has been forced to accept that regularly occurring mass death is unpreventable.

This is an everyday dread for every parent as their kids go to school. That fear isn't abstract. We can go about our daily lives, but we're just waiting for each day to bring the worst news because America has been forced to accept this bleak reality of regularly occurring mass death as unpreventable, making it easier to normalize death and lethal militarized force in every facet of life. If the humans controlling legislation cannot or will not implement measures to prevent this everyday nightmare, they should be expunged from power.

My opinion and experiences here are not unique at all, and that's the point. There's truly nothing left to say. It is fundamentally unacceptable for the young people of America and their loved ones to live in a merciless grinder of death and power.

Jared Yates Sexton is a political commentator and analyst. He is the author of "The People Are Going to Rise Like the Waters Upon Your Shore: A Story of American Rage." His most recent book is "American Rule: How a Nation Conquered the World But Failed Its People."

Yet again, Americans see the consequences of valuing their guns and their conspiracy theories over safety and peace and generally open society. Each of these tragedies takes on a new and awful dimension. Children. Mothers. Friends. Neighbors. And each of them come and go, erasing what little hope there is that something, anything, could be done by those in power.

I'm heartbroken. Because we deserve better. Because these children, these families, deserved so, so much better.

Thomas Lecaque is an associate professor of history at Grand View University where he specializes in apocalyptic religion and political violence. His essays and other writing have been featured in the Washington Post, Religion Dispatches, the Bulwark and Foreign Policy.

We live in a country where half of the 500 or so people who make all the laws that govern this nation are begging the other half to help them save lives, and yet, no matter how many children die in a classroom, no matter how many people are murdered in a grocery store, no matter how many bodies pile up, the other half will say "thoughts and prayers," wash their hands of the whole affair and collect their 30 pieces of silver from the NRA. And we accept that this is a society. That this is a nation worth saving. That the Golden Calf that the Second Amendment has become to the right is worthy of the 

And when anyone yells at them to do something, they look down over the coffins and tell us not to politicize it, not yet, not now. But there is never a time, because in America in the 21st century, the next mass shooting is already happening before we've had a chance to process and grieve for the last. And so it remains, over and over and over again.

A nation that accepts the murder of children as the reasonable price for people owning a gun is not a nation that gets to claim morality or righteousness. It's not a city on a hill, it's a beacon of horror.

The Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II is president and senior lecturer at Repairers of the Breach. He is also the architect of the Forward Together Moral Movement, co-chair of the Poor People's Campaign and author of several books, including his most recent, "We Are Called to Be a Movement." He is a frequent guest on CNN, ABC and MSNBC as well as Democracy Now! His essays and other writing have been featured in leading publications, including the Washington Post and the New York Times.

As a nation, we must connect our tears and pain to a mass movement that creates a flood of transformation. In the Bible, the prophet Jeremiah says, "A voice is heard in Ramah, mourning and great weeping, Rachel weeping for her children and refusing to be comforted, because they are no more." We have to mourn, but like Emmett Till's mother, we have to turn our mourning into organizing and refuse to be consoled until change comes.

The tears of our pain from all this death must be united into a lament that invokes the assistance of God and makes possible the kind of change where justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.

The same extremism that refuses to protect voting rights also refuses to pass common-sense gun laws. It's the same people who refuse health care, a living wage and protection of a woman's right to choose.

The same political extremism that refuses to expand and protect voting rights also refuses to pass common sense gun laws. It's the same politicians who refuse health care, living wages and protection of a woman's right to choose. The same forces that refuse to address poverty also pretend we can ignore the climate crisis. The policies and politicians that create the very context for so many of our tears are the same.

If we know this, we need to come together, unite our tears and refuse to be comforted until change comes. As hard as these moments are, we know that throughout history, great weeping and great mourning often bring about movements that force monumental change — which isn't possible until the heartbroken become the heart of the movement of transformation.

The greatest danger right now is for people to cry for a moment and then put their tears away, or to cry about this and not connect it to the other tears cried by those who have been victims of all the regressive and extreme policies existing today. If we ever needed moral fusion, we sure do need it now. We need the Mass Poor People's and Low-Wage Workers' Assembly and Moral March on Washington. We need a mass nonviolent movement that collectively challenges all this violence with one mighty, long-term chorus of repentance.

Read more on gun violence and mass shootings in America:

What is "ecofascism" — and what does it have to do with the Buffalo shooting?

CHAUNCEY DEVEGA
Chauncey DeVega is a senior politics writer for Salon. His essays can also be found at Chaunceydevega.com. He also hosts a weekly podcast, The Chauncey DeVega Show. Chauncey can be followed on Twitter and Facebook.

COMMENTARY
Republicans' "solutions" to mass shootings are meant to make you feel helpless

Republicans won't do anything to stop mass shootings because they benefit from them


By AMANDA MARCOTTE
SALON
PUBLISHED MAY 26, 2022 
Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) uses imagees of handguns and rifles during a hearing about gun control on Capitol Hill January 30, 2013 in Washington, DC. Shooting victim and former U.S. Rep. Gabby Giffords (D-AZ) delivered an opening statment to the committee, which met for the first time since the mass shooting at a Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. 
(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

After the shooting in Uvalde, TX on Tuesday, the Republican response has been so glib and cold-hearted that one has to wonder if they want people to hate them.

Despite perfunctory rhetoric denouncing the shooting, Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas's overall message could be summed up as the shrug emoji. "More people shot every weekend in Chicago than there are in schools in Texas," he argued. He added some boilerplate Republican language about "mental health," even though everyone knows he is actively fighting to take away mental health care. Sen. Ted Cruz was equally facile, sneering that it was "crass" of Democrats to be angry and victim-blaming the school for having more than one door (yes, he said this). He also insisted that "armed law enforcement on the campus" is the answer, even though there were already multiple armed police officers on the scene who stayed outside the school while parents begged them to charge in and rescue the kids. Tucker Carlson of Fox News, of course, only speaks in Smarmy Jerk so he really leaned into the "there's nothing to be done" message Wednesday night. "A person who is intent on committing violence is very hard to stop," he claimed, adding that neither "act of Congress" nor "gun control" will do a thing to stop it. In reality, of course, international data shows the opposite, gun control is very effective at stopping gun violence.


Abbott didn't even bother to cancel a fundraiser in the hours after the shooting. The National Rifle Association, meanwhile, is having a convention in Houston this weekend, with Donald Trump, Abbott, and Cruz still scheduled to speak. Naturally, guns are banned at the convention, because Republicans are beyond pretending to believe their own "good guy with a gun" nonsense.

The message from Republicans, loud and clear, is the one made famous by Melania Trump's jacket: "I Really Don't Care, Do U?"

Demoralizing ordinary people is the best voter suppression — and nothing induces helplessness like our gun debate.

The GOP has a death grip on the federal courts and their near-absolute obstruction power in Congress, thanks to Democratic filibuster enthusiasts Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona. So it's hard not to feel total despair at this moment. As Brian Karem notes at Salon, while he may "refuse to grow numb," there "are many who've abandoned hope" altogether. The satirical site The Onion reflected this weariness, turning their front page the day after the shooting into nothing but headlines reading, "'No Way to Prevent This,' Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens." It is the same story they run after every mass shooting.

That numb feeling you're experiencing? That exhaustion? That tugging urge to just give up, abandon politics entirely, and just concentrate on your own life? That's what Republicans want you to feel. That's why they act this way, to exhaust you. The more that ordinary Americans feel that nothing we say or do can make a difference, the better the political landscape for Republicans.

And it's not just about the gun fight, where Republicans have browbeaten most of us into thinking that change is impossible. The goal of this demoralization project is much bigger than guns. Completing the authoritarian takeover of America isn't just about turning regular Republican voters into QAnon-addled fascists. It's also about sapping everyone else of the will to fight back, leaving the pathway to power cleared of anyone who might get in their way.

RELATED: Training children to attack school shooters is cowardly victim-blaming
Advertisement:


Parkland survivors marched for tighter gun laws. Will Washington listen?
Go To Video Page

That's why so many of the pro-gun arguments — like Cruz's "one door" nonsense — are both so glib and so very stupid. These aren't people trying to make reasonable arguments that can be debated and dissected. These are people saying stuff so obviously false, so obviously dumb, and so obviously in bad faith that it's a total waste of breath to argue back. This is why the term "gaslighting" became so popular in the Trump era because that's the basic rhetorical strategy here. This is not just garden variety lying, but being so adamant about an obviously untrue thing that your interlocutor gives up fighting for the truth out of sheer exhaustion.

The more that ordinary Americans feel that nothing we say or do can make a difference, the better the political landscape for Republicans.

Republicans aren't trying to persuade anyone who isn't on their team already. They're just trying to make you feel numb and demoralized. Dispirited people give up voting, protesting, and donating. Political engagement is hard work — and Republicans have made sure of that by passing voter suppression laws — and it feels hard to justify the effort when nothing gets better. You may support abortion rights and gun safety laws, but why give over a beautiful Saturday morning to a protest when you believe it will not move the needle? It's not "selfish" to want to use your free time enjoying your life instead, not when you are starting to believe that political action is a flat-out waste of time.

So the more that ordinary, decent people check out of politics entirely, the easier it is for Republicans to win not just elections, but political fights. The best opponent is, after all, the one who has no strength left in her to fight.

In April, Sarah Jones of New York magazine had an intriguing interview with Greg Yudin, a sociologist in Moscow, about how Russian politics got so degraded that the wholly evil and ill-advised invasion of Ukraine was even possible. It is not that there's widespread genocidal intent towards Ukrainians in Russia, Yudin argued, it's that most Russians of good will have checked out of politics entirely, removing all resistance to the ever more authoritarian and unhinged urges of President Vladimir Putin.

"Russia is a completely depoliticized country," Yudin explained to Jones. "Russians are completely certain that there is no possible way to change anything through politics, that no change is possible in general." So instead of engaging in politics, "people prefer to lead their private lives," to the point where "political activity is all just complete nonsense to a vast majority of Russians."


One can see how that's starting to happen in our country, as decent people pull away from politics and think about how to spend the rest of their precious time on Earth doing anything else but butting their heads against brick walls. It doesn't help that Democrats are widely perceived as totally impotent. A recent CBS poll shows that, while most Americans describe Republicans as "extreme" or "hateful," the favorite word for Democrats was "weak." Given a choice between the two, it's not nuts to choose instead to check out altogether.

The irony of this is, of course, is that change is possible, but only if the majority of Americans who aren't right-wing nuts show solidarity and work together, both to toss out Republicans and to reshape the Democratic party into a more effective one. That's the conundrum though: Before people put in that work, they want assurance that it will be worth it. But until the majority of people put in the work, fighting is not going to be worth it. It ultimately creates a feedback loop that leads to greater and greater inaction.

Nothing fuels this sense of helplessness and despair more than the aftermath of a mass shooting. It's exhausting, this predictable path of Republicans talking nonsense until the storm blows over, and then nothing happening to prevent the next one. That pathway feels the same whether people fight hard — as happened after the Parkland shooting — or whether they just sit on their hands and do nothing. And things aren't looking so hot right now, as Democrats in Congress have already acceded to the impossibility of passing any gun safety bills and are headed to vacation instead.

Of course, Republicans are fine with the status quo of routine mass shootings. Of course, they do everything in their power to make such crimes more common, like passing laws making it easier for killers to get guns. Almost nothing saps the hope out of politics more than a mass shooting. Demoralized is right where Republicans want Americans to be.

AMANDA MARCOTTE
Amanda Marcotte is a senior politics writer at Salon and the author of "Troll Nation: How The Right Became Trump-Worshipping Monsters Set On Rat-F*cking Liberals, America, and Truth Itself." Follow her on Twitter @AmandaMarcotte and sign up for her biweekly politics newsletter, Standing Room Only.

MORE FROM AMANDA MARCOTTE • FOLLOW AMANDAMARCOTTE


The Economy of Tolerable Massacres: The Uvalde Shootings


 
MAY 27, 2022
Facebook

Photograph Source: VOA – Public Domain

Societies generate their own economies of tolerable cruelties and injustices.  Poverty, for instance, will be allowed, as long a sufficient number of individuals are profiting.  To an extent, crime and violence can be allowed to thrive.  In the United States, the economy of tolerable massacres, executed by military-grade weapons, is considerable and seemingly resilient.  Its participants all partake in administering it, playing their bleak roles under the sacred banner of constitutional freedom and psychobabble.

Just as prison reform tends to keep pace with the expansion of the bloated system, the gun argument in the US keeps pace, barely, with each massacre.  With each round of killings, a script is activated: initial horror, hot tears of indignation of never again, and then, the stalemate on reform till the next round of killings can be duly accommodated. “It isn’t enough to reiterate the plain truth that the assault weapons used in mass shootings must be banned and confiscated,” observes Benjamin Kunkel.  “Instead, every fresh atrocity must be recruited into everyone’s preferred single-factor sociological narrative.”

In Uvalde, Texas, a teenage gunman (they do get younger) made his way into an elementary school and delivered an unforgettable May 24 lesson.  When he had finished at Robb Elementary School, 19 children and 2 adults had perished.  But even this effort, in the premier league ranking of school killings, failed to top the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut in December 2012.  On that occasion, 26 lost their lives.

The horror and indignant tears were duly cued.  President of the United States, Joe Biden: “Why are we willing to live with this carnage?  Why do we keep letting this happen?” he rhetorically intoned at a press conference.  “For every parent, for every citizen in this country, we have to make it clear to every elected official in this country: it’s time to act.”  This would involve the passing of “common sense gun laws” and combating the gun lobby.

The next day, Vice President Kamala Harris reiterated the formula.  “We must work together to create an America where everyone feels safe in their community, where children feel safe in their schools.”

The politicians are duly accompanied by the talking heads, such as Ron Avi Astor, described by NPR as “a mass shooting expert”.  With this unsavoury appellation, we are told that this UCLA professor is puzzled as to why negligible changes to gun laws have taken place since Sandy Hook.  In coping with such puzzlement, he suggests an old academic trick: reframe the problem to lessen its gravity.

With some gusto, Astor proceeds to say that schools in the US have been doing fabulously well in coping with violence – as long as you take the long view. “If you look over the last 20 years, really since Columbine, there’s been a massive, massive, massive … decrease in victimization and violence in schools.”  Diving into the silver lining in his own massive way, he finds “reductions” in violence in the order of 50 to 70 percent.

It never takes long for the economy of tolerable massacres to generate the next round of scrappy arguments, with the corpses barely cold.  The common one is that of shooting frequency.  Was this a good year relative to the last?  This year, the United States has suffered 27.

Since 2018, Education Week, showing how school deaths should very much feature in planning curricula, has taken a grim interest in the whole matter.  Reading its compiled figures – “heartbreaking, but important work”, the journal claims – is much like dipping into stock market returns with the requisite amount of sensitivity.  In 2021, there were 34 school shootings, a real bumper year.  In 2020, it was poor on that front: a modest 10.  Both 2019 and 2018 saw higher returns: 24 each.

If you wish to be entertained by the ghoulish nature of it all, Education Week also gives us some infotainment with a graphic on “Where the Shootings Happened.”  Dots feature on a map of the country.  “The size of the dots correlates to the number of people killed or injured.  Click on each dot for more information.”  Where would we be but for such valuable services?

To give credence to the seemingly immutable nature of this economy on shootings, platoons of commentators, equipped with various skills, argue about responses, most showing that common sense, in this field, is a noble dream.  The conservative National Review takes the view that “tougher background checks” would hardly have worked for the Uvalde shooter.  There was no paper trail flagging him as a threat, nothing to suggest that he should have been prevented as a “legal adult from purchasing a firearm.”  The implicit suggestion here: only nutters kill.

The business of guns is the business of a particular American sensibility.  With the school shooting still fresh, various members of the GOP and Donald Trump affirmed their interest in appearing at a Memorial Day weekend event hosted by the National Rifle Association.  In a statement on the shootings, the NRA expressed its “deepest sympathies” for the families and victims of “this horrific and evil crime” but preferred to describe the killings as the responsibility “of a lone, deranged criminal.”  Leave gun regulation alone; focus on school security instead.

With that brief formality discharged, the NRA expressed its delight at its forthcoming Annual Meetings and Exhibits event to take place at the George R. Brown Convention Center, Houston between May 27 and May 29.  “The Exhibit Hall is open all three days and will showcase over 14 acres of the latest guns and gear from the most popular companies in the Industry.”  It promises to be fun for the whole family.

Then comes the thorny matter of definitions, a sure way to kill off any sensible action.  From boffin to reactionary, no one can quite accept what a “school shooting” is.  Non-profit outfits such as the New York-based Everytown for Gun Safety include any discharge of a firearm at school as part of the definition.  “In 2022,” the organisation claims, “there were at least 77 incidents of gunfire on school grounds, resulting in 14 deaths and 45 injuries nationally.”

Everytown for Gun Safety is keen to paint a picture of annual murderous rampage: 3,500 children and teens being shot and killed; 15,000 shot and injured.  Some 3 million children in the US are exposed to shootings each year.

The tone underlying such a message is much at odds with the rest easy approach taken by Astor – what Australians would call the “she’ll be right, mate” caste of mind.  It is certainly Panglossian in nature, aligning with the views of cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker, optimist extraordinaire on the human condition.  Taken holistically, he keeps insisting, we live in far better, less violent times than our forebears.  Such massacres as those at Sandy Hook should not be taken to mean that schools have become less safe.  “People always think that violence has increased because they reason from memorable examples rather than global data.”  For Pinker, the 2013 joint survey by the Departments of Justice and Education on such statistics as rates of victimisation since 1992 to non-fatal victimisations was sufficient rebuke against the pessimists and moaners.

The Uvalde massacre will, in time, be absorbed by this economy of tolerable violence.  The anger will dissipate; collective amnesia, if not simple indifference, will exert its dulling sleep.  The dead, except for the personally affected, will go the way of others, buried in the confetti and scrapings of statistics.

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com


A Gun Message For Woke Corporations


GUNS USED BY THE ROBB SCHOOL SHOOTER



 
COUNTERPUNCH
MAY 27, 2022
Facebook
It is too early to hear the narratives from the families of the 19 children slain this week at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, near San Antonio, Texas. But narratives from the 1993 Long Island Rail Road shooting, the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre in Newtown, Connecticut and 16 other deadly gun violence events have just been published by Red Penguin books. “From Bullet to Bullhorn” is the second book published by Lois A. Schaffer whose first book, “The Unthinkable: Life, Loss, and a Mother’s Mission to Ban Illegal Guns,” chronicled the loss of her daughter to gun violence in 2008.

When it comes to gun massacres in the U.S., the public often anticipates — and wants— a “tipping point” in which bloodshed would be so shocking and intolerable, anti-gun violence laws would be enacted. At the top of the list for most gun safety advocates would be better background checks and the banning of military-style weapons such as “assault weapons” and large capacity magazines.

But if the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre in which 26 were killed, 20 children, the 2016 Orlando nightclub killing in which 49 people were killed and the 2017 Las Vegan massacre in which 60 were killed and 411 were wounded, weren’t tipping points, what are? Many thought when a member of Congress itself, Gabby Giffords, an Arizona representative, was shot in 2011, Congress would realize gun violence had come home to roost in their own nest but nothing happened. Despite the years and even decades-long efforts of anti-gun violence advocates writing in “From Bullet to Bullhorn,” massacres like that at Robb Elementary School are quickly forgotten and no gun safety laws are passed.

Several survivors of gun violence in “From Bullet to Bullhorn” note that when other countries have a gun massacre, preventive laws are swiftly enacted and the bloodshed happens “never again.” They indict the NRA, whose influence way exceeds its membership, for the inability to get traction for anti-gun violence laws. Specifically, law makers have been afraid to support gun safety laws out of fear the mob-like black hand of the gun lobby would defeat their re-election efforts. Corporations have also refused to take a stand against gun violence because, as one unnamed CEO told me in 2018, “we don’t get involved in politics.”

But that was then! In the last few years, corporations are no longer afraid of taking political stands. They are boycotting bigoted states, relieving their backward executives of their command and taking stands unheard of a few years ago. From the boardroom on down, corporations are refusing to tolerate racial injustice, racially motivated violence, anti—LGBT sentiments and are speaking out about the urgent need for climate change actions.

Corporations can pull offices, if not headquarters, from states that refuse to pass the most rudimentary gun laws. Let the gun happy lawmakers explain to their constituents why they lost their jobs. Maybe they will permit, kicking and screaming, some gun safety laws to pass…for their state’s economic wellbeing.

The NRA membership is reportedly 5.5 million compared with over 50 million children in U.S. public schools and likely 100 million of their parents. Why should this be a contest? Why should lawmakers and corporations be held hostage by the small amount of gun lobbyists responsible for killing their children? Are you listening, woke corporations?


Martha Rosenberg is an investigative health reporter. She is the author of Born With A Junk Food Deficiency: How Flaks, Quacks and Hacks Pimp The Public Health (Prometheus).
THE VIEW FROM DOWNUNDER
The New Zealand Prime Minister discussed her country's gun laws in the wake of the Texas shooting that left 21 dead

Anna Fox
PUBLISHED Friday 27 May 2022

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern welcomed a standing ovation from Harvard University students yesterday who praised her government's diversity, decriminalisation of abortion and gun control laws.

Delivering the annual commencement address to over one thousand students yesterday, Ms Ardern highlighted the urgency for democratic systems and informed debate.

Her visit piles the pressure on US President Joe Biden, as she went to the university only days after the deadly Texas school massacre, which killed 19 students and two teachers.

Ms Ardern accepted loud cheers and a standing ovation, in commendation of her government's crackdown on gun ownership in the aftermath of the 2019 mosque attacks in Christchurch.

Ms Ardern received a standing ovation for her gun reform following the Christchurch mosque attacks in 2019. 
POOL New

US President Joe Biden Henry Nicholls

When speaking to the students, Ms Ardern said: "We knew we needed significant gun reform, and so that is what we did.

“But we also knew that if we wanted genuine solutions to the issue of violent extremism online, it would take government, civil society and the tech companies themselves to change the landscape."

Her comments come as pressure mounts on the White House to act in the wake of the shooting.

US journalist Megyn Kelly criticised Mr Biden on GB News earlier this week, saying that his role should be "comforter in chief" in the wake of such an atrocity.


Joe Biden calls for US 'to stand up to the gun lobby' with at least 19 children dead in Texas school shooting


Combating online extremism remained a key theme present in Ms Ardern's address, alongside the issue of defence democracy.

She called on tech companies to increase monitoring of social media platforms to prevent the spread of online disinformation and conspiracy theories, in an aim to reduce the rates of radicalisation.

Ms Ardern added: "The time has come for social media companies and other online providers to recognise their power and to act on it."

Ending her address, Ms Ardern acknowledged the need for kindness, and told students to set aside differences with others.

She concluded: "What we do as individuals in these spaces matters too ... we are the richer for our difference, and poorer for our division."

Ms Ardern's government is widely diverse and is comprised of 50 percent women, 20 percent Maori, she added how her deputy is "a proud gay man sitting among several other rainbow parliamentarians".

Following the commencement address, the New Zealand Prime Minister accepted a doctorate of law, as it remains a Harvard tradition for speakers to receive an honorary degree.


EDITORIAL
Distractions and agendas aside, US gun reform can be achieved


The Age's View
May 27, 2022 

When a gunman shot and killed 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook, Connecticut, in 2012, many believed it was an act of such shocking evil, even in light of earlier massacres, that the United States would finally act to tighten its gun laws in a bid to prevent future tragedies.


Crosses with the names of Tuesday’s shooting victims are placed outside Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas.
 CREDIT:AP

The hope was that its major parties would find the bipartisan will to set aside realpolitik for the greater good. That the United States would recognise that its creaky Second Amendment, enshrining the right to bear arms in 1791, was no longer fit for purpose in a society bristling with modern industrial-grade weaponry.

And that it would broadly acknowledge there was a clear – if not blindingly obvious – link between ease of access to guns and the monotonous regularity of mass shootings that are such a blight on its society.

We’re going to have to come together to meaningful action on this, regardless of the politics,” President Barack Obama stated at the time.

New York City’s then-mayor, Michael Bloomberg, went even further: “Calling for ‘meaningful action’ is not enough. We need immediate action. We have heard all the rhetoric before. What we have not seen is leadership – not from the White House and not from Congress. That must end today.”

Ten years and countless shootings later, little has changed.

An 18-year-old was able to walk into a gun shop, purchase a military-style semi-automatic weapon and this week essentially reprise the Sandy Hook massacre, taking the lives of 19 young children and two adults at a primary school in Uvalde, Texas.

Once again, most Americans are demanding change. Nobody wants to live in a nation where children must practise drills in case an “active shooter” targets their classroom. Where gun deaths and gun suicide are now the single biggest cause of death for children and adolescents. President Joe Biden asked: “Why are we willing to live with this carnage?”

And yet. Haven’t we heard this all before? There was a sense of optimism after Sandy Hook, that something good could emerge from such darkness. This time, despite the clamour, there is already a depressing acknowledgement that nothing substantive can or will change.

Part of the problem is the powerful gun lobby, including weapons manufacturers and the National Rifle Association, which provide campaign funding for politicians who don’t rock the boat and hound with attack ads those who do.

As most Republicans in the Senate, according to the New York Times, “represent deeply conservative states where gun ownership is treated as a sacred privilege enshrined in the Constitution”, voting with the Democrats to even hint at tweaking gun laws would be career suicide.

Indeed, while it would be extremely difficult to get the numbers to amend the Constitution, there appears to be little appetite to even discuss what the Second Amendment actually means today, given the torrent of hate poured down on any lawmaker, commentator or even grieving parent who dares to suggest revisiting centuries-old legislation.

After Sandy Hook, a push to enact stronger background check legislation almost succeeded thanks to bipartisan support in the Congress but failed in the Senate. There is little to suggest any similar legislation would get through this time, with Republican lawmakers polled by the New York Times falling back on old tropes such as mental health to explain away this week’s tragedy.

RELATED ARTICLE


Explainer
Guns in America
Why can’t America fix its gun crisis?

“I’m willing to say that I’m very sorry it happened,” conceded Republican senator Tommy Tuberville. “But guns are not the problem, OK? People are the problem. That’s where it starts - and we’ve had guns forever.”

Another hurdle is the increasingly toxic culture war in which the gun lobby claims it is defending the inalienable rights of people in the name of freedom or the constitution or the American way, and that any move to curtail the free trade of deadly weapons, body armour and ammunition amounts to an attack on the founding fathers.

Pro-gun advocates have tried to deflect calls for gun control by proposing better security at schools, the arming of teachers and more screenings for mental health. Correspondingly, the investigation into the Uvalde, Texas massacre is focusing heavily on what measures had been taken by the school and police to mitigate the actions of the “active shooter”.

This all conveniently distracts from the broader picture that simply restricting the supply of guns has an immediate effect, as we know from our experience in Australia.

After a gunman killed 35 people in the Port Arthur massacre in 1996, the Howard government engineered a national firearms agreement that cracked down on gun ownership and sales, blocked the sale of certain weapons, required mandatory licensing and background checks and bought back thousands of guns. It can be done, in other words.

If you ignore the Second Amendment extremists, there does appear to be a broad will to enact tighter laws in the United States. But because of the electoral system they find themselves saddled with, it will take enormous courage on the part of moderate Republican lawmakers to push through change. We can only hope that, somehow, they find the wherewithal before we find ourselves here again.

Gay Alcorn sends an exclusive newsletter to subscribers each week.

Tucker Carlson accuses Texas cops of 'BS' lies over why school shooter wasn't taken down until more than an hour after he'd begun slaughter and says the way police handled bloodbath is a 'moral crime'

  • The Fox News host on Thursday night savaged Texas law enforcement for their confused and vague answers to the questions about Tuesday's school shooting

  • Carlson said it was inexcusable that they would initially say an armed security officer shot at the gunman, then say there was no one armed on site

  • He said he was normally supportive of law enforcement, but their delay in getting to the scene and delay in entering the building was inexcusable

  • Carlson said that Democrats were seizing on the issue to call for more gun control, but were not yet in possession of the full facts

  • Carlson argued that a knee-jerk call for more gun control was not the solution when there were glaring failures in the police response

THE MAIL ARTICLE INCLUDES, MULTIMEDIA, PHOTOS, BIOS OF THE VICTIMS



TUCKER IS CORRECT ABOUT THE POLICE RESPONSE 
AS FOR THE FULL FACTS THE FACT IS THE US NEEDS NOT ONLY GUN CONTROL BUT ABOLITION OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT WHICH WOULD ONLY IMPACT A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF WHITE FOLKS