Friday, March 03, 2023

MINING IS NOT GREEN OR SUSTAINABLE
Global mining budgets rose in 2022, but SA has dropped off the radar
Employees near an underground mining truck at the South Deep Gold mine on 12 October 2022, located west of Johannesburg in Gauteng. (Photo: Felix Dlangamandla)

By Ed Stoddard
02 Mar 2023 

Global mining exploration budgets rose in 2022, with the scramble for ‘green metals’ such as lithium leading the pack in terms of growth. This is according to S&P Global’s World Exploration Trends 2023 report. Pointedly, it makes absolutely no mention of South Africa, which remains off the radar.

Around five years ago, an exploration company drilled in the US state of Nevada and hit pay dirt.

In January 2022, JSE-listed AngloGold Ashanti completed its acquisition of Corvus Gold in the Beatty district of southern Nevada where the find was made, giving it a low-cost, long-life production base that includes 4.2 million ounces of extractable gold at its Silicon deposit, for a total of 8.4 million ounces, with significant potential for future growth.

What’s intriguing on this front is that one would have thought the US West was a heavily explored region with little to offer in the way of rich, new deposits. The California Gold Rush took place in the mid-19th century and America became the world’s leading industrial power, first through the exploitation of its own natural resources.

In an interview with Business Maverick after the release of the company’s annual results last month, AngloGold CEO Alberto Calderon said that thought had also crossed his mind:

“I asked, how were we able to acquire this? And I’m not going to tell you names, but I know that since we are in that territory, very large competitors of ours have returned and are saying, ‘what the hell did those guys find over there?’” Calderon said.

“We are going to build a multidecade, really significant operation over there.

“Because it had been explored, I actually visited the site, and the competitors that are back had been very close, and this is the story of exploration and geologists. And they just did not look in the right place. And then there was this very smart company that five years ago drilled in the right place, and then they contacted our exploration team, and our exploration team took over,” he said.

That’s the name of the exploration game: you can hit a mother lode or nada, and close means no cigar. The bottom line is that a lot of the world’s mineral and metal wealth remains untapped and unknown.

This includes a heavily explored jurisdiction such as the US, which in 2023 achieved its highest ranking yet – 4th – on S&P Global’s World Exploration Trends 2023 report, an annual analysis of exploration data that began in 1997. “Gold remained the exploration target of choice, accounting for over half of the region’s budget at $881.6-million,” the report, released this week, said.

THE BRIGHT PRETTY COLORS ARE SILT AND TAILINGS FROM MINING



Global exploration budgets rose 16% in 2022 on top of a 34% rebound in 2021 following the hard lockdowns to contain the pandemic in 2020.

“After budgets fell 10% year over year to $8.35-billion in 2020 due to the Covid shock, nonferrous global exploration budgets hit a nine-year high of $13.01-billion in 2022,” the report says.

“Nonferrous” effectively means all metals that do not include significant amounts of iron.

“… nonferrous global exploration budgets hit a nine-year high of $13.01-billion in 2022. The increase was driven by escalating interest in the global energy transition as part of global decarbonisation efforts and by the ongoing pandemic recovery, and was supported by strong metals prices and healthy financing conditions.

“While allocations for most commodities increased in 2022, budgets for gold and copper posted the largest dollar increases, while energy transition efforts saw lithium increase to its highest total ever.”



Visit Daily Maverick’s home page for more news, analysis and investigations

A number of factors are at play here. Gold producers need to “replace” the ounces they mine – either through exploration or acquisitions – or else they eventually go out of business, and gold remains a big business.

This also applies more widely to the sector. And in the cases of copper and lithium, both are seen as “green metals” crucial to decarbonisation efforts and the green energy transition in the face of rapid climate change linked to greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels.

It’s also interesting to note how the report defines a “region”.

“We define Canada, Australia and the United States as regions as well as countries, due to their size and significance to the mining industry and the fact that they consistently account for around half of the global exploration budget,” it says.

The “Big Four” regions for exploration are Latin America, Canada, Australia and now, for the first time since the survey began in 1997, the US. Exploration budgets among the four amounted to almost $10-billion last year.

Which brings us to Africa, where export allocations only rose by 11.6% – “the second year in a row the region has underperformed the global average”.

Gold accounted for over half of the region’s exploration capital in 2022, while copper, diamonds and lithium posted the strongest percentage increases.

“Mali was the top exploration destination in Africa for the first time … with a 19.1% increase in 2022,” the report said.

And what about South Africa?

One would have presumed not so long ago – not even a fraction of a blink in geological time – that South Africa would surely be counted as a “region” on its own on this front. South Africa still has mineral wealth galore.

About 70% of the world’s known platinum reserves and 80% of the manganese are found here.

South Africa now ranks barely in the top 10 among the world’s top gold producers, but about a third of the precious metal that has been produced in history was pulled from the earth here, and mountains of the stuff remain buried deep underground. There’s also lots of coal, plenty of iron ore, a few diamond deposits and so on.

And the Northern Cape, if you think about it, is a lot like Nevada, even if Springbok is not exactly Vegas. It is big, arid and sparsely populated, and is widely believed to have lots of undiscovered mineral wealth, including copper.

Yet South Africa does not merit even a single mention in the report – as revealed in a word search of the document. It is simply not on the exploration radar screen, and it’s not because its geology has been so thoroughly scrutinised.

This surely stands among a long list of examples that underscore how the government – notably the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE) – has rendered South Africa a no-go zone for exploration and mining investment.

Mali, by the way, has challenges of its own. A brutal insurgency by militant Islamists comes to mind. But it’s way ahead of South Africa when it comes to exploration investment.

In June 2019, DMRE Minister Gwede Mantashe laid down the following target for South Africa’s exploration sector:

“Integral to investment attraction, the Council for Geoscience’s mapping programme is critical to identify and affirm new mineralisation systems… The programme aims to secure a minimum of 5% of the global exploration budget within the next three to five years.”

Here’s a hint: whenever Mantashe publicly sets a target date for the mining industry or for his own department, add some geological time. The S&P Global report does not provide the latest estimate – at least in the document made available to journalists – but no surprise given that South Africa is not even mentioned.

But the latest estimates from 2021 suggest it remains below 1%, so almost four years after Mantashe threw out the 5% minimum goal – minimum, nogal – within three to five years, it’s not even close.

The reasons for this deplorable state of affairs are well known: crippling power shortages, rising levels of social unrest (see first factor), Transnet’s woes, the rise of procurement mafias and their penchant for murdering mining executives, policy uncertainty, and the DMRE’s inability to get anything done that might actually help to attract investment.

For exploration, South Africa’s lack of a functioning mining cadastre that provides gin-clear clarity to the state of play of mining and prospecting rights and the country’s geological resources is seen as one of the key obstacles to investment.

Yet the DMRE, as we have extensively reported, has dithered for years on the issue, and it will likely take at least another year before one is in place – and who knows, the end product may not provide the level of transparency provided by the cadastral systems used by neighbouring Namibia, Botswana and Mozambique.

Read more in Daily Maverick: “Another day, another mining cadastre procurement delay

Returning to AngloGold, what kind of exploration has it done of late in its home base? Well, only the search for a new property for its company HQ in Rosebank, as it joined the exodus of mining companies out of the Johannesburg CBD.

In 2020, AngloGold sold off the last of its operational assets in South Africa to Harmony Gold while hightailing it out of Dodge.

So, will South Africa rate a mention in next year’s World Exploration Trends report? Here’s a safe timeline target: almost certainly not. DM/BM
Rhode Island Democrats seek to decriminalize 'magic mushrooms'

Psilocybin has been floated as potential treatment for mental health disorders



Published March 2, 2023 

A pair of Rhode Island Democrats have introduced legislation that would decriminalize the use of so-called "magic mushrooms" in the state.

State Rep. Brandon Potter and state Sen. Meghan Kallman are sponsoring legislation that would legalize the personal use of psilocybin, or psychedelic mushrooms. Contingent on approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), their bill would also permit psilocybin to be used to treat chronic mental health disorders.

"Veterans and many others in our community are struggling with chronic PTSD, depression and other mental health disorders that can be totally debilitating," Potter said in a statement. "We should give them the freedom to try every tool available and not criminalize a natural, effective remedy."

US VETERANS WITH PTSD TURN TO PSYCHEDELIC DRUGS OVERSEAS AS VA FRUSTRATION GROWS



Rhode Island Democrat lawmakers have introduced legislation that would decriminalize the personal use of "magic mushrooms." (AP Photo / Peter Dejong / File)

The bill, H 5923, would permit Rhode Island residents to carry up to one ounce of psilocybin or grow mushrooms containing psilocybin at home for personal use. It would also require the Rhode Island Department of Health to craft regulations guiding the use of psilocybin as a medical treatment if the FDA approves such treatments.

Mushrooms containing psilocybin are naturally found in Mexico, Central America and the United States. They are available fresh or dried and are ingested orally or brewed as tea to produce hallucinations, according to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).

ILLINOIS LAWMAKER SEEKS LEGALIZATION OF PSYCHEDELIC MUSHROOMS



Some studies have suggested that psychedelic mushrooms could be used as an effective treatment for certain mental health disorders. (AP Photo / Richard Vogel / File)

Psilocybin is classified as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, along with harmful, addictive substances including fentanyl and cocaine. Rhode Island state law puts magic mushrooms in the same category as heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine.

The drug was criminalized in the 1970s when President Richard Nixon launched the "war on drugs," preventing researchers from exploring its value as a potential medication.

US STATES CONSIDERING THE LEGALIZATION OF PSYCHEDELIC MUSHROOMS FOR THERAPEUTIC USE


Colorado became the second state, after Oregon, to legalize psychedelic mushrooms. Could Rhode Island be the third? (AP Photo / iStock)

However, the FDA designated psilocybin as a "breakthrough therapy" in 2017 after research suggested the hallucinogen is safe when administered in controlled settings and could be used to relieve symptoms of depression, obsessive compulsive disorder and other mental health disorders. A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in November 2022 found a single 25-milligram dose of the drug reduced treatment-resistant depression over a period of three weeks, though it did have side effects including headaches, nausea and dizziness.

Advocates say psilocybin should not be classified as a Schedule I drug along with fentanyl or heroin, which are deadly drugs.

"Psilocybin is not addictive. It’s naturally occurring and people have been using it recreationally and medicinally for thousands of years," Kallman said. "It is only illegal because, over 50 years ago, President Nixon associated it with his political opponents. It’s time to undo that mistake and give our neighbors struggling with chronic mental illness, and all Rhode Islanders, the freedom to use psilocybin responsibly."

Ford wants to be able to shut down your air conditioner and radio if you miss a car payment—and the car could even drive away on its own

BYPAIGE SMITH AND BLOOMBERG
March 2, 2023 


What’s that aggravating beeping in your car? You might have missed a payment.

Ford Motor Co. has filed for a patent on technology that could remotely shut down your radio or air conditioning, lock you out of your vehicle, or prompt it to ceaselessly beep if you miss car payments. Ford said it has no plans to use the technology, contained in just one of the many patents filed by the auto-making giant.

Still, it emerges at a troubling time for car owners. Loan delinquencies have been steadily ticking back up from their pandemic lull. Cox Automotive data showed severely delinquent auto loans in January hitting their highest point since 2006. The use of technology to aid repossessions isn’t new, but the patent application is wide-ranging, even proposing the idea that an autonomous vehicle could drive itself to a “more convenient” location to be collected by a tow truck.

“It really seems like you’re opening up a can of worms that, as a manufacturer, you don’t really need to be doing,” said John Van Alst, a senior attorney with the National Consumer Law Center.

According to the Ford patent application for repossession-linked technology, cruise control and automated windows could be disabled if a consumer doesn’t acknowledge a notice of an overdue car payment. Ford could also shut down key fobs, door locks — even the accelerator or the engine itself.

“Disabling such components may cause an additional level of discomfort to a driver and occupants of the vehicle,” the patent application states.

Wes Sherwood, a spokesman for the Dearborn, Michigan-based automaker, said Ford has “no plan to deploy this.” Ford was granted more than 1,300 patents in 2022 as part of “encouraging a culture of innovation,” the automaker said in an email.

“We submit patents on new inventions as a normal course of business, but they aren’t necessarily an indication of new business or product plans,” Ford said in the statement.

The patent is concerning because by creating this technology, lenders with less-than-stellar reputations for repossessions could possibly take advantage of it, NCLC’s Van Alst said.


“You’ve now created this device which is like the doomsday device in Dr. Strangelove,” he said.

And what about the beeping sound? Car owners would be unable to shut off the noise without first contacting their auto lender about a delinquency, the patent application shows.

Ford called the sound “incessant and unpleasant.”




See All the Hate? This Is Who the GOP Really Is

Why the GOP Is Trying to Make America Explode in Hate, Rage, and Fear

Image Credit: Fox News

I can’t be the only one who notes the painful, scorching irony of Ron DeSantis…publishing a new book. A man who bans books…is selling a new book. Called, no less, The Courage to Be Free. LOL. The publishing industry aided and abetted this…tragicomedy. They found him a ghostwriter, they paid him a small fortune, they’re marketing it, and that, my friends, is disgusting, on levels from moral to political. Why do I bring all this up?

Welcome to the GOP’s new strategy. You can see it emerging in plain sight now. I know I’ve talked a lot about American politics this week, and we’ll switch it up shortly. But first I want to crystallize some of what I’ve been discussing.

What’s the GOP up to? Well, it’s settling on a new strategy. That strategy has three parts, and they go like this. One, attack vulnerable groups, who are perfectly innocent, peaceful people — and turn them into scary, outsized, outlandishly dangerous monsters, who are an existential threat to “real” Americans. Two, whip its base into a frenzy with these manufactured moral panics and riptides. Three, use that to create the illusion of political movement, of turning a broken country around. Four, and this is a bonus point, use the Supreme Court to legitimize all the above.

The GOP’s plan is to make American life — and politics — as ugly as possible.

Let me sum that up another way. The GOP’s strategy for the foreseeable future? The next election, the one after that? Hate.

What am I talking about? By now you can’t have failed to notice who the GOP’s latest target. They’re not exactly hiding it. The LGBTQ. All over again. And this time, in absurd, almost funny ways — only it’s not a joke. If you’ve been on Twitter, you’ve seen the tweets: more than one GOP Congressman who’s out there railing violently against…drag queens…was caught dressing up in drag. LOL.

Drag queens? Have you ever been to a gay bar? To a drag night? Drag queens are about as threatening as, I don’t know, the ghost of Karl Lagerfeld, God bless his soul. I can’t ever remember having anything but fun with drag queens, at drag shows, because, guess what, they’re not exactly out there practicing, preaching, embodying, enacting even the faintest shred of anything violent.

This is how absurd American politics have become. The GOP’s latest incarnation of an existential threat is…people who dress up for fun and listen to music and act out little skits. Think for a second how completely ludicrous that actually is. It’s like being threatened by the Muppets, but then again, Tucker Carlson’s actually guilty of that, too.

It’s funny, on one level, to be threatened by people who are doing such fundamentally peaceful things. Dressing up? Wearing…glitter? Acting and telling jokes? Or sitting there reading books to kids? These are — let me say it again — fundamentally peaceful acts. It’s the GOP that’s out there inciting, endorsing, nudging with a wink-and-a-nod actual violence. Hey, you want to carry a grenade launcher to Starbucks? You might think I’m kidding, so here’s a picture. Totally cool! Normal! Peaceful! But dressing up and acting and telling jokes and reading books to kids — now that’s dangerous.

Like I said, ludicrous. But also profoundly sinister.

It’s not just drag queens who are being targeted, systematically. It’s the trans community, too. “In Oklahoma, House Republicans also approved a bill Tuesday that would prohibit any facility that receives public funds from offering gender-affirming care for minors or adults, as well as blocking insurance coverage for it.” Think about how crazily authoritarian that really is for a second. No public funds…just because…people want medical care…that you don’t like…for your own reasons?

Let’s go back to the point about asymmetry, because that’s what really drives home how ugly all this is. You see, none of us are out there blocking their healthcare. I don’t like using “us” vs “them” terms, but in this case, I have to. Nobody’s saying to them, hey, you, you’re not allowed to get a blood transfusion because you, I don’t know, have a certain name or wear certain kinds of clothes. None of us are saying, hey, just because you send your kids to Sunday school, means they don’t get healthcare. We’re not saying just because you believe in whatever — anything at all — means you don’t get that heart medication or organ transplant.

None of us are out there getting them in any way whatsoever. None of us. In any way.

When I say “the GOP’s plan is to make American life as ugly as possible,” this asymmetry is exactly what I mean. Who’s “us”? Well, it’s anyone that’s not part of this crusade to purify society. Women, kids, men, adults, anyone and everyone. The point is to cause us moral injury. What’s moral injury? That’s a term psychologist use when you encounter ugliness. Of the spiritual kind.

When you meet hate, face to face. It injures you, deep down in the soul. It shakes you. People can really be like this? They can really just want to…get others…for existing? Hey, those people aren’t even doing anything to you. Disagree with them or disapprove of them all you like, your life, your choice. But trying to…annihilate them…as moral agents…as political agents…as social beings? Moral injury happens when you meet hate face to face, because its ugliness hurts. It’s like the old story of Medusa: just looking turns you into stone.

It’s sometimes said that the “point is the cruelty.” That’s almost true. The point is the hate. Hate, unfortunately, works as a political strategy. Especially in times like these — troubled ones. Take a hard look at Britain. It’s having food shortages. As in, tomatoes are so hard to get that Italian restaurants are close to, Mamma Mia, shutting down. Sorry, bad joke. It’s darkly comical on a deeply tragic level, to see a nation end up collapsing because of stupidity. Britain’s imploding because of hate. Europeans were blamed for Britain’s problems, it broke up with the EU, and the rest — hey, did you get your vegetable ration today, and that one isn’t a joke, it’s real — is history. Hate works.

The GOP’s strategy is this. Just this. Examine it carefully with me as a political organization. You’ll note something genuinely strange about it. It has no plan or vision or agenda for…anything. Not anything material, constructive, or modern, anyways. Hey, how should people get…healthcare…jobs…careers? What about the problem of multiple generations in downward mobility? What about crumbling infrastructure? I’d bring up Putin, but we all know that for the GOP, well, you don’t bite the hand that feeds you.

Now, you might know that, but I want you to get how genuinely unique and disturbing that is. It’s almost…impossible…to find another example of a political party, anywhere in the world, that has no plan for anything. Because it’s profoundly weird not to. You have to really, really stretch to find one, and you end up drawing comparisons to places like North Korea or Afghanistan, and then get accused of “hyperbole,” but hey, who else is taking people’s rights away this fast and hard, for fascist and theocratic reasons?

The GOP has only one agenda left, and that’s hate. In America, all this is often called “culture wars.” But that’s wrong. It’s deeply, foolishly inaccurate to call what the GOP is doing a “culture war.” It’s not just about cultural preferences, in some innocuous, inconsequential way. It’s not about what movies or music you like and I don’t, or what Hollywood starlet you think deserves an award and I don’t. That’s culture, or at least America’s pop version of it. This? This is hate.

It’s crucial to note how fast and far the GOP’s focus on hate has evolved. It’s like watching a demon be grown from a bunch of microbes, in hell’s laboratory. Think about it. Not so long ago, the GOP’s scapegoats were Mexican babies. That, too was absurd — think about it, what kind of fool is threatened by a baby? I mean, yeah, being a parent is hard, but what kinds of people take other people’s kids away from them? Scapegoating kids was a clear sign that something was very, very wrong. That this was proper and serious hate, fascism style.

Now the hate is evolving, the way it always does. We all know the old poem — Neimoller’s famous one. First they came for the Jews, then they came for me. This is exactly what’s happening in America, and you can literally see this vicious cycle of hate expanding by the day. First they came for the Mexican babies…then the Latinos…then the immigrants and refugees. And now? Now it doesn’t matter if you’re a “real” American or not. If you’re gay, if you dress up in drag, if you’re a woman, if you’re a trans kid, if you’re a parent of a trans kid — they’ll hate you all the same.

And that hate isn’t about a culture war. It never was. It’s not a “culture war” when kids are out there being denied healthcare. It’s not a culture war to not call someone by their name. Not one to give women the death penalty for having abortions or ban them from using the internet freely. It’s not a “culture war” when the point is taking basic freedoms — speech, privacy, expression, association — away from entire groups of people, and it’s happening right before our eyes. And it’s not a culture war, either, when the people being targeted and attacked are just peacefully existing.

You see, when we say that this just about “culture,” we are making a big mistake, one that creates the false impression of an equivalency on both sides. It is existential, not cultural. It’s existential for a woman, maybe, to be able to get healthcare, just like it is for a kid. It’s existential for a kid to be able to read books — lord knows they saved my life and every kid like me. It’s existential, too, for gay people to have communities and love the way they like. All of this existential, not cultural.

It’s only cultural for the other side. For them, it’s not existential. They just pretend like it is. But the drag queens aren’t the ones carrying AK-47s to Walmart. They’re not the ones shooting up gay clubs and massacring women — that’d be incels and Trumpists and Incel Trumpists. Nobody on earth’s existence is threatened in any way whatsoever by any of the following things: another person being a woman, being gay, reading a book. Nobody on earth’s existence is threatened in the tiniest shred of a way whatsoever by any of the following: calling someone by their name, other people dancing and singing and acting, teaching kids that people living their lives peacefully is perfectly OK. Nobody’s on earth’s existence is threatened by somebody else just living their life peacefully, in the way they see fit, that’s true for them.

Nobody.

And by the way, whether or not you “like” or “dislike” things like drag performances are besides the point. I’m not here to interfere with your taste or life, and that’s very much the point. Go, don’t go, doesn’t matter, even something as seemingly inconsequential as drag is free speech, expression, association. None of us should object in any way to people peacefully just expressing themselves, even if we — as we often do — don’t want to share in those particular expressions.

We don’t have to like or even believe in a thing to understand that it’s perfectly acceptable for people to do it, speak it, express it, enact it, and if the only things that are allowed for everybody — or else you’re a criminal — are those we ourselves like or believe in, then, well, that’s authoritarianism, fascism, and theocracy, in one fell swoop. In this case, in a democracy, we don’t ban people singing and dancing and acting, even if we ourselves are or aren’t fans, because, well, some pretty fundamental freedoms are at risk if you go down that road to fascism.

I really, really want you to see this asymmetry. It’s existential for us. But it’s not for them. For them, It’s…what? Maybe cultural. Maybe. Barely even that. Just because there’s a drag club in a city it doesn’t mean that your entire way of life right down to the Led Zeppelin is threatened. And what the hell do you think Jimmy Page and Robert Plant were wearing, anyways?

The other side pretends like it’s existentially threatened. And media, credulously, gullibly, buys that. But it’s not threatened existentially in any way. Nobody is coming for any of the following things: Sunday school, those weird movies on Amazon that say the world’s a giant Satanist conspiracy run by the UN and the liberals, your right to teach your kids that whatever holy book you believe in is holy, your family, your name, your relationships.

We’re not out there trying to ban Ron DeSantis’s book. But he’s banning ours. LOL. See the difference?

It’s crucial to get this point, because, like I said, in America, the media portrays all this exactly the wrong war. It calls it a “culture war,” even while buying the myth that the fascist side really is somehow existentially threatened by…drag queens…kids reading books…women using the internet…calling someone by their name. You can see that going on and on, most recently in the New York Times being dragged over its coverage of trans people. The media does a poor job explaining, even acknowledging this basic fact: no, nobody’s existentially threatening the fascist side.

Hell, it won’t even note the irony of a guy who bans books publishing his own, precisely because the rest of us don’t want to ban any books. It’s vivid proof that we’re peaceful, and nobody’s threatening them existentially. Not even remotely, not in any way, shape or form. But they are existentially threatening the rest of us.

In real ways, not philosophical ones. They’re taking rights away at light speed now. There’s a new scapegoat every few months, and we all know what direction that cycle takes. First they come for the most vulnerable, then go right up the ladder, until at last, society’s remolded in their image.

They’re threatening the rest of us existentially because that’s what hate does. That’s what hate is. They’re spreading a new Big Lie, or a very old one, take your pick. Not just “the election was stolen!!” Old news. Done. Over. The new Big Lie? The one that’s going to define this election cycle? “Those people are coming for you. Your kids, your wives, your freedom. You’d better take theirs away first.”

This is what the GOP’s strategy is. And that’s all the GOP’s strategy is. We are beginning to really live it now. And it’s different from before. There are no real grand political aspirations anymore. Even Trump had a few, like breaking things off with China, or what have you. Even if those were foolish, those are gone. The GOP has nothing left — but hate. The universe moves in circles, my friends, and the hardest thing of all? Breaking one that old, that poisonous, that deluded.


umair haque
March 2, 2023
Misnomers In Legislative Debate Over Price Gouging Penalty

Thu, 03/02/2023 - 
By Jamie Court


When the California Senate Energy Committee took on the price gouging penalty for the first time recently, economists with a track record of working for the oil industry tried to muddy the waters on the real issues in the debate.


Did oil refiners make massive profits off refining California gasoline in 2022? The companies’ own profit reports don’t like lie, unlike some of the so-called economic experts in attendance, who claimed it was the gas station owners’ fault.

We recently sent the following notes to the Energy Committee members to clear up any misnomers during the long hearing. This includes an absurd rant by one committee member, Senator Kelly Seyarto, about how people of color and low income people are not disproportionately impacted by oil drilling in their neighborhoods.

2022 Profits From Gasoline Price Spikes Were At The Refinery Level: Despite discussion of retailer profiteering being a factor in the 2015 price spikes, the 2022 price spike profits showed up at the level of refining margins. Audited data publicly reported by the companies to their investors showed the refining margin – the money made at the refinery -- doubled in 2022, from 33 cents per gallon historically to 66 cents per gallon in 2022. Refiners have only crossed the 50 cent per gallon profit line three times in 20 years. Whatever “mystery surcharge” exists at the retailer level, there was a $3.1 billion “refiner surcharge” if you draw a windfall profits caps at 50 cents per gallon. (For more detail see slides 6 - 10: https://consumerwatchdog.org/sites/default/files/2023-02/Oil%20Refiners%20Slideshow%202-21-23%20v3.pdf )

The Price Gouging Penalty Is A Profits Cap, Not a Price Cap, Targeting The “Refining Surcharge”: The windfall profits cap/penalty applies only after crude costs, environmental costs and taxes are accounted for. If legitimate costs raise the price of gasoline, there is no penalty. The penalty kicks in only when oil refiners’ margins rise to extraordinary levels that have only been met three times in the last twenty years. There is also an exemption process should refiners have legitimate reasons to seek one.

Low income and people of color do live disproportionately near oil wells:
· People of color represent roughly 92% of residents who live near oil wells
· Almost 20% of Californians who live below the poverty line (700k+) also live within a mile of an oil well.
· In LA County, 280,000 people living below the poverty line live within a mile of an oil or well
o % of county population living below the poverty line: 17.5
o % of people living below the poverty line within 1 mile of an oil or gas well: 19.5
· In LA County, 1.1 million people living within one mile of an oil and gas well are people of color. This is 73% of the population living within 1 mile of a well.
· The EPA’s CalEnviro states that Californian’s living within one mile of a well are the most vulnerable to effects of pollution.

DISINFORMATION
Expanded US access to Philippines bases 'not for aggression', defence chief says
US and Philippine soldiers observe a live fire exercise during the annual US-Philippines joint military exercise called "Balikatan" (Shoulder-to-shoulder), in Crow Valley, Capas, Tarlac province, Philippines, Mar 31, 2022. 

03 Mar 2023

MANILA : A decision by the Philippines to grant the United States greater access to its military bases was "not for engaging in war" but meant to enhance its ability to defend itself against external threats, its defence chief said on Thursday (Mar 2).

"The geopolitical situation is becoming more precarious by the day," Carlito Galvez, office-in-charge of the defence ministry, said in a statement.

"We are not preparing for war, rather we are aiming to develop our defence capabilities against eventualities and threats to our security," he added.

His statement came a day after some senators and a provincial governor raised concerns and opposition to President Ferdinand Marcos Jr's decision to give the United States access to four more sites, on top of five locations under a 2014 Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, or EDCA.

EDCA allows US access to Philippine bases for joint training, pre-positioning of equipment and building of facilities such as runways, fuel storage and military housing, but not a permanent presence.

Marcos' decision, announced during last month's visit by US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, came amid concern over China's assertiveness in the South China Sea and tension over self-ruled Taiwan.

Galvez has not publicly identified the sites that would be opened to US access.

A former Philippine military chief had said the United States had asked for access to bases in Isabela, Zambales and Cagayan, all on the island of Luzon, facing north towards Taiwan, and on Palawan in the southwest, near the disputed Spratly Islands in the South China Sea.

Cagayan Governor Manuel Mamba has opposed the addition of new sites and told a senate hearing that he did not want EDCA to create problems with China.

"Do not let us tell them that they are our enemies because of the US," said Mamba. "Let them have their own war."

China has said greater US access to Philippine military bases undermined regional stability and raised tensions.

Galvez said EDCA and its defence partnerships "are not intended for aggression".

House GOP Oversight Chair Blasted for Attacking President Biden’s Deceased Son

MAGA Republican Oversight Committee Chair James Comer is being blasted from all corners for his despicable attack on President Biden’s deceased son, with veterans calling on Comer to apologize to the Biden family, and military members and veterans, for disparaging Beau Biden’s service and legacy. 

Here’s a look at what they’re saying: 

Common Defense

“Unacceptable that @RepJamesComer would attack the character of the late Beau Biden, who served with courage and distinction. We’re calling on Rep. Comer to issue an apology to the Beau Biden family, and our military families, for disparaging his service and legacy.”

Daily Beast: House Oversight Chair Laments That Joe Biden’s Dead Son Was Never Prosecuted

“House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer invoked the late son of President Joe Biden on Tuesday, lamenting that Beau Biden was never prosecuted over an investigation into illegal contributions involving his father’s 2008 presidential campaign. […] Comer’s invocation of the president’s late son runs contrary to the GOP congressman’s repeated claims that he’s not interested in digging into any Bidens but the president himself.”

Washington Post: White House slams ‘despicable’ suggestion Beau Biden should have been indicted

“Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) criticized a Trump-appointed U.S. attorney for not prosecuting President Biden’s late son when he was still alive, a notion the White House slammed as ‘despicable.’”

HuffPost: White House Slams Republican’s ‘Incredibly Ugly’ Remark About Biden’s Late Son

“When asked about the remarks during Wednesday’s press briefing, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said, ‘It says a lot about the chairman, which is not good, by the way.’

‘To make the statement that he did is incredibly ugly and inappropriate,’ she added.

“Instead of House Republicans focusing on attacking the president and his family, why don’t they actually focus on what the American people put them in office to do, which is to deliver for them, which is to actually work with their colleagues … to actually put forth pieces of legislation or put forth policies that’s going to make a difference in their lives,” Jean-Pierre continued.”

MSNBC: White House slams GOP’s Comer over comments about Beau Biden

“It’s no secret that the Oversight Committee chairman appears fixated on the president’s family, but given the Kentuckian’s latest comments, it seems Comer should choose a new hobby.”

Daily Mail: White House tears into Republican Rep. James Comer’s ‘ugly’ and ‘despicable’ claims that Biden’s dead son Beau should have been indicted in connection to Delaware campaign finance case

“The White House on Wednesday tore into Republican Rep. James Comer’s ‘ugly’ and ‘despicable’ claims that President Joe Biden’s dead son Beau should have been indicted alongside a Delaware man who violated campaign finance laws.  […] A request for comment from Comer’s office has yet to be returned.”  

American Independent: Rep. James Comer criticizes U.S. attorney for not investigating Biden’s dead son

“The House Oversight Committee chair’s comments about Beau Biden are the latest in the House Republicans’ search for dirt on the Biden family.”

Kate Bedingfield:

“On a human level, that’s appalling. It’s despicable. And frankly it says quite a lot – none of it good – about James Comer.”

DNC Chair Jaime Harrison

“Disgusting new low for the MAGA Republican majority.”

Congressman Don Beyer

“This is disgraceful and Comer should be ashamed. Beau Biden served this country honorably and died years ago of brain cancer. I know Republicans have a feverish hatred of the President but this is completely unacceptable.”

Charlie Sykes

“For this congressman… to smear a dead war hero because his name is Biden- despicable doesn’t seem a strong enough word about it. This is one of those have you no shame moments.”

Mike Barnicle

“Their mission – Comer just expressed it with the phrase – ‘to go after the Bidens.’ …It’s pretty simple, that’s their mission. They’re not interested in governing, they’re not interested in issues that affect you, other people around this country every single day, their families, their kid’s schools, school lunch programs, Social Security, none of those liveable issues. They’re not interested in it, their mission is to go after the Biden’s. Dead or alive.”

One year on from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, where does the ‘cyberwar’ stand?

MARCH 2, 2023
CJR
Ukrainian flag displayed on a laptop screen and binary code code displayed on a screen are seen in this multiple exposure illustration photo taken in Krakow, Poland on February 16, 2022. 
(Photo illustration by Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via AP)

After Russian troops invaded Ukraine a little over a year ago, the latter country set out to reinforce a second front in the war—a digital one. As I reported for CJR at the time, the Ukrainian government posted appeals in online hacker forums, asking for volunteers to protect Ukrainian infrastructure and conduct digital missions against Russia. The posts asked hackers to “get involved in the cyber defense of our country.” According to Foreign Policy, within a couple of months, more than four hundred thousand people had joined the informal hacker army.

Cybersecurity experts say Ukraine had one important thing going for it when Russia attacked a year ago, at least in terms of computer warfare: it was already well aware of the risk of Russian hacking. In 2015, a digital attack crippled Ukraine’s power plants and left hundreds of thousands without electricity; experts believe that hackers affiliated with the Russian government caused the outage. In 2017, a ransomware attack known as NotPetya, which many experts believe was created by Russian entities, caused an estimated ten billion dollars in damages globally, much of it in Ukraine. In the year since Russia’s invasion, there have been thousands more digital skirmishes between the two countries. But it’s unclear who, if anyone, is actually winning, or what impact all this cyber-rattling has had on the larger war.

According to a recent presentation by Yurii Shchyhol, the head of Ukraine’s State Service of Special Communications and Information Protection, the country’s Computer Emergency Response Team responded to over two thousand “cyber incidents” last year. A quarter of these targeted the federal government and local authorities, Computer Weekly magazine reported; the rest involved defense and other security sectors, as well as energy, financial services, IT and telecom, and logistics. On the opposite side of the ledger, Russians in close to a dozen cities were greeted one day last week by radio messages, text warnings, and sirens alerting them to an air raid or missile strikes that never came. Russian officials said that the alerts were the work of hackers.

Google’s internal Threat Analysis Group says that hacking and other forms of computerized warfare have continued to play a “prominent role” in the war. Last month, the company released a report entitled, Fog of War: How the Ukraine Conflict Transformed the Cyber Threat Landscape. It concluded that there has been a dramatic increase in digital attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure since 2020, with code names like Shadylook, Skyfall, and DarkCrystal. The targeting of internet users in Ukraine by Russian hackers was twice as high last year as in 2020, Google said, and the targeting of NATO countries was more than three times as high. The Threat Analysis Group said that it had also tracked a series of “self-described news entities” with ties to Russian intelligence—including News Front, ANNA News, and UKR Leaks—promoting narratives that, for example, blame the US and NATO for instigating the war and characterize the Ukrainian government as “Nazis.” The Internet Research Agency, which became infamous for running a disinformation campaign around the 2016 US election, is also still active, Google’s experts say, but has shifted its activity “from a range of domestic Russian political issues to focus almost exclusively on Ukraine and mobilization.”

Thomas Rid, a professor of strategic studies at Johns Hopkins University, said on Twitter that the Google report represented “impressive work” by a company that has “more comprehensive telemetry than most SIGINT (signal intelligence) agencies today.” One of the most interesting aspects of the Google report, Rid wrote, is the “hack-and-leak integration, and the very old-school exploitation and collaboration with activists, often with disinformation and forgeries mixed in.” Rid also had some criticisms, though—the report, he said, focuses on Russian activities in or related to Ukraine, but “that’s highly likely just one part of the picture, and probably not the most impressive part.”

Meanwhile, some experts have expressed skepticism that all these attacks and counterattacks in cyberspace are materially altering the course of the war. A report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a research organization based in the US, stated last June that “It may offend the cyber community to say it, but cyberattacks are overrated. While invaluable for espionage and crime, they are far from decisive in armed conflict. A pure cyberattack is inadequate to compel any but the most fragile opponent to accept defeat. No one has ever been killed by a cyberattack, and there are very few instances of tangible damage.” However, the report did allow that cyber operations “are very useful to conduct espionage, to gain advance knowledge of opponent planning and capabilities, and to mislead.”

Then, in August, researchers from the University of Cambridge, the University of Strathclyde, and the University of Edinburgh, in the UK, released a research paper in which they argued that “the widely-held narrative of a cyberwar fought by committed civilians and volunteer ‘hacktivists’ linked to cybercrime groups is misleading.” The researchers collected data on thousands of hacking attempts and conducted interviews with hackers, concluding that “the role of these players in so-called cyberwarfare is minor, and they do not resemble the ‘hacktivists’ imagined in popular accounts.” Contrary to some predictions, the report said, the involvement of civilian hackers “appears to have been minor and short-lived; it is unlikely to escalate further.”

For all the talk about the risk of cyber warfare over the past several decades, “this is the first time you’ve been able to see in real time how cyber contributes to an overall military campaign,” Tim Stevens, a senior lecturer in global security at King’s College London, told Euronews recently. “Yes, it can be useful under certain circumstances, but it’s not going to win you a war.” In other words, one year in, hackers don’t seem likely to dramatically change the outcome of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, for all the James Bond-style nicknames. The fighting on the ground will matter more.

Other notable stories:New York’s Gabriel Debenedetti profiled Kate Bedingfield, whose last day as President Biden’s communications director was yesterday. Bedingfield has amassed significant influence within Biden’s inner circle, Debenedetti writes, while keeping a lid on White House leaks and explaining “the obsessions of the voracious press to a president who still reads print newspapers.” Bedingfield’s replacement will be Ben LaBolt, a former Obama staffer who most recently worked for Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta. Politico assessed the growing West Wing influence of officials with ties to that company.

The Washington Post’s Jada Yuan explains how Jill Biden’s recent trip to Africa—which was intended to highlight food insecurity, among other issues—got overshadowed in the US press after she essentially confirmed in an interview there that her husband will run for reelection. The trip, Yuan writes, “was a perfect encapsulation of Biden’s time as first lady, promoting noble causes and being generally uncontroversial, but ultimately less interesting to American media outlets than a single decision of her husband’s.”

The Newark Star-Ledger moved to shutter its DC bureau—the only such newsroom still maintained by a New Jersey newspaper—and let go of Jonathan D. Salant, its veteran political reporter. According to the New Jersey Globe’s David Wildstein, eleven members of New Jersey’s Congressional delegation, including senators Cory Booker and Bob Menendez, have since written to the Star-Ledger in protest of the decision.

The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project named Miranda Patrucic as its new editor in chief, succeeding Drew Sullivan, who will stay on as publisher. Elsewhere in the world of investigative journalism, the Center for Public Integrity announced that it will acquire and expand the Accountability Project, “an innovative platform that allows journalists to search 1.8 billion public records” and organize resulting data for analysis.

And according to D magazine, the Dallas Morning News fired Meghan Mangrum, an education reporter, after she addressed the city’s mayor as “bruh” in a Twitter post pushing back on his criticism of local-media coverage of crime. Mangrum was fired for a supposed violation of the paper’s social-media policy on the same day that she had helped to organize a union protest outside the paper’s headquarters.

ICYMI: Fred Ritchin on AI and the threat to photojournalism no one is talking about

Mathew Ingram is CJR’s chief digital writer. Previously, he was a senior writer with Fortune magazine. He has written about the intersection between media and technology since the earliest days of the commercial internet. His writing has been published in the Washington Post and the Financial Times as well as by Reuters and Bloomberg.
Passenger planes nearly collided on runway for fifth time this year. Why does this keep happening? An aviation expert explains.

A near-miss between a private jet and a commercial JetBlue flight at Boston Logan International Airport is being investigated by the FAA.



JetBlue tails at Logan Airport in Boston, MA on April 5, 2022.
 (Photo by David L. Ryan/The Boston Globe via Getty Images) 


Rebecca Corey
·Writer and Reporter
Thu, March 2, 2023 

The Federal Aviation Administration said it’s investigating “a close call” between a private jet and a commercial JetBlue flight that narrowly avoided colliding on a runway at Boston Logan International Airport on Monday evening.

According to a preliminary statement from the FAA, the incident took place when the pilot of a Learjet 60 operated by Hop-A-Jet, a private charter company, “took off without clearance while JetBlue Flight 206 was preparing to land on an intersecting runway.”

“An air traffic controller instructed the pilot of the Learjet to line up and wait on Runway 9 while the JetBlue Embraer 190 landed on Runway 4-Right, which intersects Runway 9. The Learjet pilot read back the instructions clearly but began a takeoff roll instead,” the statement said.

The pilot of the JetBlue flight “took evasive action and initiated a climb-out as the Learjet crossed the intersection.”

According to a preliminary review of the data by Flightradar24, “the closest the two aircraft came was approximately 565 feet,” and the Learjet “cleared the intersection of the two runways seconds before” the JetBlue flight. The Learjet continued on to its destination, landing in Florida two hours and 50 minutes after the incident, while the JetBlue flight “conducted a go-around and landed safely 11 minutes after the incident.”

On Wednesday, the National Transportation Safety Board announced that they would also be investigating, making it the fifth close call on a runway that the agency has looked into this year. Other near-misses have occurred in Honolulu; Austin, Texas; and at the JFK International Airport in New York.

Yahoo News spoke with Michael J. McCormick, a former FAA official and assistant professor of air traffic management at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, to better understand what went wrong and how mishaps like this can be avoided. Some responses have been edited for length and clarity.

Can you describe exactly what happened at the Boston airport on Monday?


“Boston Logan International Airport, like many of the United States airports that were built before World War II, is constrained or landlocked in its ability to grow as an airport. Therefore, it has a very small footprint and the runways all intersect, meaning that in order to take off or land on those runways, you’re going to cross the path of another runway," McCormick said.

“In this instance, there was one aircraft that was landing on an intersecting runway, and there was another aircraft that was told to line up and wait, which is a procedure where the aircraft goes out onto the runway and waits for takeoff. Unfortunately, the Learjet, which is a chartered Learjet, went out on the runway and started its departure just as JetBlue was coming in to land on the intersecting runway. JetBlue recognized the conflict and executed what’s known as a ‘missed approach’ in order to avoid any problems with the other aircraft.

“So this is a case where we have a human error involved in that cockpit. And this is where the NTSB needs to take an in-depth look at the human factors involved and what was going on in the cockpit at the time of the event that would contribute to an error like this."
This is the fifth time this year that commercial aircraft have been involved in a near collision on a runway. Why does this keep happening?

“Runway collisions are one of the most significant accidents that can occur in aviation. Therefore, the FAA closely monitors what’s known as ‘runway incursions,’ where a vehicle, an aircraft or a pedestrian can go out on a runway when they’re not supposed to be there," McCormick said.

“There have not been a significant number of increases in runway incursions. In fact, this year the numbers of runway incursions are lower than they were last year. What we’re experiencing is more tracking of these types of events, so we know when they're occurring and they garner a lot more attention as a result. Websites such as FlightAware and Flightradar24 are providing real-time analysis of data, then they’re sharing that data with the public. And that’s how we gain greater awareness of what’s occurring.”
We’ve also witnessed the recent failure of a computer system that grounded flights nationwide. Why does commercial air travel seem to be such a mess right now?

“What we saw during the holidays, and even going into last summer, is that due to staffing shortfalls and equipment shortfalls post-pandemic, the airlines are no longer as resilient as they were. That means that when something happens, such as bad weather or a thunderstorm or snowfall, it causes such a disturbance in the individual airline’s system that they don’t have the flexibility in staffing and in equipment to recover from that. So that means that they’re struggling to keep up with the post-pandemic demand for air travel,” McCormick said.

“The outage of the computer system Notice to Air Missions, or NOTAMs, was due to an error on the part of a contractor performing routine maintenance during the midnight shift. And the FAA normally schedules this type of maintenance on a midnight shift so the impact can be minimized. Unfortunately, in this case, the contractor made a duplicate error on the backup system, and the backup system also did not work, which required what’s known as a “cold start” in order to restore the entire database, which took about two hours. And to ensure the highest level of safety, all air traffic was stopped on the ground until the system was clearly up and running.”

What needs to change so that close calls on the runway can be avoided?

“I think the first and most important change that needs to happen is the FAA needs permanent leadership. They currently have an acting administrator, who’s doing a good job, but an acting administrator does not have the ability to establish and set a vision and long-term priorities in terms of infrastructure investment and investment in systems that can help prevent and alert controllers when things like this happen,” McCormick said.

“The second thing is that the FAA needs a reliable and secure funding stream. For the past several years, the FAA has had to suffer through numerous occasions where funding was cut off due to budget impasses. And as a result, upgrades to systems and system software could not take place — they had to stop and then restart, stop and then restart. So I think those two crucial aspects will help ensure the integrity and the safety of the National Airspace System.

“And of course, airlines need to adjust their schedules in order to try to meet the demand that’s taking place and not overschedule and work beyond their ability to handle any disturbances that occur within their airline systems.”

Should airline passengers think twice about booking their next flight?


“One of the things that the United States is privileged to enjoy is the safest air transportation system in the world. And air transportation is by far, by orders of thousands, safer than other forms of transportation in the United States,” McCormick said. “There has not been anything that would lead me to believe that there’s been any decrease in the integrity of the safety of that system, and I would be very comfortable traveling myself and traveling with my family.”
Indigenous woman will lead the US Department of Treasury’s Office of Tribal and Native Affairs

PAULY DENETCLAW 
Indian Country Today
Mar 2, 2023


U.S. Treasurer Lynn Malerba, Mohegan Tribe, and Fatima Abbas, director of the Office of Tribal and Native Affairs, during a visit with young people from the Center for Native American Youth.Photo courtesy of the U.S. Treasury

WASHINGTON — An Indigenous woman will become the first director of the Office of Tribal and Native Affairs at the U.S. Treasury. The tribal affairs office is first of its kind for the department and a permanent fixture.

Fatima Abbas, Haliwa Saponi, who was previously interim director of the office, will take over as the permanent director.
The office will work closely with Indigenous nations to address specific needs identified by tribal leaders and to work with the Treasury Tribal Advisory Committee, a seven-member group that advises Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on “taxation of Indians, the training of Internal Revenue Service field agents, and the provisions of training and technical assistance to Native American financial officers,” according to the Treasury.

“She can pave the way and set the stage for all of the good things that will happen within Treasury and that's what's going to be so important,” Chief Lynn Malerba, U.S. Treasurer, said to ICT. “She is standing up this office. She has the ability to create a vision for this office that will endure long after the two of us are gone.”