Friday, May 17, 2024

Canada sanctions four Israeli 'extremist settlers' accused of attacking Palestinians

THERE ARE 700,000 ILLEGAL SETTLERS ***
IN THE WEST BANK & EAST JERUSALEM 

The Canadian Press
Thu, May 16, 2024 



OTTAWA — Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly is imposing sanctions on Israelis she accuses of "extremist settler violence" in the West Bank, three months after pledging to do so.

"While I was in the region recently, I heard directly from families that have been forced to leave their homes and farming lands as a direct result of violence and threats by extremist settlers," Joly wrote in a statement.

"With these measures, we are sending a clear message that acts of extremist settler violence are unacceptable and that perpetrators of such violence will face consequences."

Joly originally promised these sanctions in February, and calls them "a significant step" in Canada's approach to the region, as it tries to maintain the prospect of a two-state solution involving a Palestinian country living in peace next to Israel.

Israel has occupied the West Bank, which is separate from the Gaza Strip, since 1967, and settlers have increasingly built communities that Canada and many other countries say violate international law.

An attack last October by Hamas in Gaza prompted Israel to bombard that territory, and the United Nations says there has been a sharp uptick in West Bank settlers attacking Palestinians.

The sanctions announced Thursday apply to four men Ottawa accuses of "violent and destabilizing actions against Palestinian civilians and their property in the West Bank." All four were listed by the U.S. and U.K. earlier this year.

They include David Chai Chasdai, whom the U.S. State Department has accused of leading a rampage in which multiple vehicles and buildings were set on fire and one civilian was killed.

Yinon Levi has regularly led settlers to assault Palestinian and Bedouin civilians, Washington says, setting their fields on fire and threatening more violence if they don't leave.

Moshe Sharvit "repeatedly harassed, threatened, and attacked Palestinian civilians and Israeli human rights defenders," according to the State Department, including making 100 Palestinians flee after ordering them to leave.

Zvi Bar Yosef was accused by Washington of "repeated violence against Palestinians" and blocking access to their lands.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has said that Canada will no longer automatically vote against most UN resolutions targeting Israel, because the right-wing coalition government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been thwarting efforts toward a two-state solution.

The Israeli Embassy in Ottawa has been asked for comment.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 16, 2024.

Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press




Canada sanctions 'extremist' Israeli settlers

CBC
Thu, May 16, 2024 

A Palestinian girl looks through her family home's shattered window after a settlers' attack in the West Bank village of al-Mufagara, near Hebron, on Thursday, Sept. 30, 2021. (Nasser Nasser/Associated Press - image credit)


Canada is imposing sanctions on "extremist" Israeli settlers in the West Bank, Global Affairs Canada announced Thursday.

"The sanctions are a response to the grave breach of international peace and security posed by their violent and destabilizing actions against Palestinian civilians and their property in the West Bank," Global Affairs said in a news release.

Canada is sanctioning four people, the department said: David Chai Chasdai, Yinon Levi, Zvi Bar Yosef and Moshe Sharvit. Global Affairs Canada said the four have engaged in violence against Palestinian civilians and their property.

The four men are among the eight people the U.S. sanctioned earlier this year. Canada's sanctions come months after Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly first said the government would be imposing them.

The U.S. government also sanctioned the two outposts the settlers have established: Zvi's Farm, northwest of the West Bank's main city Ramallah, and Moshe's Farm in the Jordan Valley. It also sanctioned agricultural enterprises run out of the outposts. Canada has sanctioned only individuals.

"With these measures, we are sending a clear message that acts of extremist settler violence are unacceptable and that perpetrators of such violence will face consequences," Joly said in a media statement Thursday.

Minister of Foreign Affairs Melanie Joly speaks to reporters in the Foyer of the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on Monday, March 18, 2024.

Minister of Foreign Affairs Melanie Joly speaks to reporters in the foyer of the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on Monday, March 18, 2024. (Spencer Colby/The Canadian Press)

The United Nations has reported an escalation in settler attacks in the Palestinian territories since the Oct. 7 attacks.

Acts of violence by settlers and moves to dispossess Palestinians of their property were on the rise before the attacks and followed the election of the current Netanyahu government at the end of 2022.

That government is dominated by pro-settler parties and includes a number of West Bank settlers in its cabinet. Prominent members of the government have visited and spoken in support of the outposts where the sanctioned settlers live.

About 4,000 Palestinians were displaced from their land and homes in 2023, according to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. It's the highest number recorded in the past 20 years.

"Attacks by extremist Israeli settlers — a long-standing source of tension and conflict in the region — have escalated alarmingly in recent months," the Global Affairs statement said. "This has undermined the human rights of Palestinians, prospects for a two-state solution and posed significant risks to regional security."

Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, it is considered a war crime for a country to move its own population into territory occupied in war. Violations of the Geneva Convention are also offences under Canada's Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act.

Historically, however, little action has been against the more than 700,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank, who include a significant number of Canadian citizens.

Earlier this year, Canada sanctioned nearly a dozen people connected to Hamas's Oct 7 attack on Israel, including Hamas leaders. It was the first time Canada had imposed individual sanctions on non-state actors.

Israel ‘needs to do more’ to stop settlers sacking Gaza aid trucks, US says

John Bowden and Andrew Feinberg
THE INDEPENDENT 
Thu, May 16, 2024 



Israeli officials “need to do more” to stop settlers attacking trucks loaded with food, water and other critical supplies from entering Gaza, a State Department spokesman said on Thursday.

The remarks came after videos emerged on X/Twitter showing Israeli settlers destroying packages of humanitarian assistance held on trucks bound for Gaza.

Vedant Patel, state spokesperson, said that he could not verify the fate of the trucks seen in the video. But he added that Israeli officials “need to do more to hold actors like this accountable when action is taken that is inconsistent with what we know is important, which is getting more humanitarian aid into Gaza”.

“What I can say...humanitarian aid must not, and can not, be restricted, stopped or interefered with,” he said.

White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre also addressed the issue of aid convoys being blocked or harrassed on Thursday. “We remain concerned about ongoing limited operations at the Rafah boarding crossing,” she said.

“This level of aid remains insufficient,” said Jean-Pierre at her daily briefing. “And we want to continue to press Israel to increase the level of assistant moving into Gaza. I cannot speak to the prime minister or domestic politics that is for him to speak to, what I can speak to is what we have been working on doing, and how much we understand the importance of getting that humanitarian aid in. And that's what we've been doing.”

A video posted by Axios’s Barak Ravid on Twitter on Monday showed at least a dozen if not more Israelis throwing packages appearing to contain bottled water on the ground, smashing them, as they crossed from the West Bank into Israel, bound for Gaza. Other videos and news reports, such as one from Haaretz this week, have also indicated that truck drivers have been subject to assaults for participating in aid convoys.



The US continues to insist that these incidents (and the inability or unwillingness of Israeli security forces to stop them from occurring) do not amount to officially-sanctioned efforts by Israel’s government to restrict or halt the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza, which would violate international law. But the State Department in particular has faced heavy criticism for that finding, in particular following the publication of a report last week which also found that in some “instances” Israeli forces could be reasonably found to have violated international humanitarian assistance laws.

In general, the Biden administration continues to tread a fine line on the issue of aid to Gaza and Israel’s treatment of Palestinian civilians. The US has repeatedly fought back against accusations that Israel (with US assistance) is committing a genocide in Gaza, and rejected the authority of an International Criminal Court (ICC) investigation into the matter. At the same time, White House and State Department officials have repeatedly publicly pressed Israel’s government to increase aid crossings and to take further steps aimed at protecting civilians from harm, while condemning rhetoric from rightwing Israeli politicians embracing the destruction of Gaza.

President Joe Biden drew his red line for Israel’s conduct in a recent interview with CNN, saying that he would halt the transfer of some weapons to Israel should a major military assault against the city of Rafah in southern Gaza begin. While violence has been reported in the area, State Department officials have told reporters that the Israeli operations in the area are limited and have thus far avoided population centres, skirting the president’s threat.

Israeli officials have pushed back against the US president’s warning and have vowed to move forward with an invasion of Rafah, where more than one million refugees have fled fighting that has utterly leveled large parts of Gaza’s north. More than 35,000 people, with over half being children, are thought to have been killed since the fighting began last year following a deadly Hamas terrorist attack in Israel that killed 1,152 people and resulted in hundreds being taken hostage by militants.

Over the weekend, Secretary of State Antony Blinken was questioned about the US’s handling of relations with Israel during an appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press and denied that the US was avoiding more serious criticism for fear of angering a US ally.

“We don’t have double standards,” Blinken said.“We treat Israel, one of our closest allies and partners, just as we would treat any other country, including in assessing something like international humanitarian law, and its compliance with that law.”




‘Barbaric’: Palestinian lorry drivers recount settlers’ attack on Gaza aid convoy

Lorenzo Tondo, Sufian Taha and Jason Burke in Jerusalem
Thu, May 16, 2024 

A worker clears piles of spilled food parcels scattered across the ground in a lorry park.Photograph: Oren Ziv/AFP/Getty Images

Palestinian lorry drivers delivering aid to Gaza have described “barbaric” scenes after their vehicles were blocked and vandalised by Israeli settlers, preventing humanitarian supplies reaching the territory where much of the population face imminent starvation.

Drivers and contractors who were targeted on Monday at the Tarqumiya checkpoint in the occupied West Bank also said Israeli soldiers escorting the convoy did nothing to stop the attack.

The incident sparked international condemnation after videos emerged on social media that appeared to show Israeli settlers throwing boxes of much-needed supplies on the ground and at least one vehicle being set ablaze.

Yazid al-Zoubi, 26, said between 50 and 60 lorries had set out in the convoy.

“We were carrying oil, sugar and other things and driving from the Tarqumiya crossing,” he said. “We left in a convoy with an army vehicle in front of us and an army vehicle behind us, and we took a special army road that civilians could not cross. Suddenly, after 20 minutes on the road, near the crossing, we were surprised by at least 400 settlers. They attacked us. The rest of the drivers and I escaped from the vehicles after the settlers starting throwing stones at us.’’

Zoubi said the situation escalated when the settlers started breaking the windscreens of the lorries and piercing the tyres, then climbed on to the vehicles and threw packages of food into the road.

Aid agencies have described famine conditions in parts of Gazathat they have said have been caused by Israeli restrictions on aid entering the Palestinian territory. Humanitarian officials say the population of Gaza needs at least 500 daily lorryloads of food, fuel and other essentials but have received a fraction of that amount.

Zoubi said that during Monday’s attack the Israeli soldiers escorting the convoy stood back and watched as the settlers rampaged.

“We are shocked and surprised that the army did not provide us with any kind of protection,” he said. “Even though they were present and watching what was happening. The army was at the service of the settlers.’’

Zoubi said the drivers fled the scene but that when they returned later to retrieve their belongings, they were attacked by the settlers, some of whom were armed.

‘’At that point the army gathered us and ordered us to raise our hands on the walls,” he said. “The settlers were free to terrorise us. I have never been attacked so brutally before.

“The state of terror I experienced is indescribable. Even now I have nightmares at night. My psychological state is broken, I cannot think properly, I can’t sleep. I cannot work. We are not smugglers. We agreed to transport goods legally from the crossing under the watch and supervision of the Israeli authorities.”

Footage of the incident appears to show the Israeli soldiers taking no action against the settlers.

Haitham abu Khairo was also part of the aid convoy and the owner of one the lorries vandalised. He said he had lost approximately 250,000 Israeli shekels (£53,700) in the attack, which came after several trouble-free trips transporting aid for Gaza across the West Bank and Israel from the Jordanian border.

“I managed to escape but what happened is serious. The Israeli government must punish those who commit such an act with the most severe punishment. Because it will affect the country’s economy in the future, as many truck drivers will leave their jobs to ensure their safety,” he said.

The violence has prompted dozens of Palestinian drivers to refuse to transport supplies to Gaza. Adel Amer, a member of a hauliers’ union based in the West Bank, told Reuters about 15 lorries had been damaged in the attack and that the total damage amounted to about £1.6m.

Monday’s attack sparked strong condemnation from Israel’s allies. The US national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, described the incident as a “total outrage” while the UK foreign secretary, David Cameron, said it was “appalling”.

This month, the UK and EU imposed sanctions against Israeli settlers including some accused of violence towards Palestinians on the West Bank. The US has imposed sanctions on a handful of individuals and organisations linked to attacks on Palestinian civilians, with measures first announced in February then expanded twice in March and April.

The Israeli police said the incident, in which several people were arrested, was being investigated.

The Israeli military said it had worked throughout the seven-month war “to allow and facilitate the entry and delivery of extensive humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip, out of its commitment to international humanitarian law”.

It added: “Each incident involving humanitarian aid convoys, facilities or personnel is being thoroughly examined, including those mentioned in the report, and according to the examination’s findings, lessons are learned and implemented in order to prevent reoccurrence of such incidents and if so required, command, disciplinary and other measures are taken against individuals responsible.”

Monday’s attack was claimed by a group calling itself Order 9, which said it had acted to stop supplies reaching Hamas and accused the Israeli government of giving “gifts” to the Islamist group.

It was not the first time that Israeli settlers have tried to stop the flow of aid to Gaza. Last week, demonstrators blocked a road near the desert town of Mitzpe Ramon to protest against the delivery of aid lorries into Gaza.

This year, there were frequent demonstrations at crossings from Israel into Gaza, which hindered aid shipments into the territory. In March, the international court of justice ordered Israel to allow unimpeded access of food aid into Gaza.

• The second video embedded in this article was amended on 16 May 2024. An earlier version said that a convoy of around 50 trucks carrying oil, sugar and other supplies was attacked by Israeli soldiers; this should have said Israeli settlers.Un.org
www.un.org/unispal/document/human-rights-council-hears-that-700000-israeli-settlers-are-living-illegally-in-the-occupied-west-bank-meeting-summary-excerpts/



*** 
 Human Rights Council Hears that 700,000 Israeli Settlers are Living ...
Mar 28, 2023 ... These settlers lived illegally in 279 Israeli settlements across the occupied West Bank, including 14 settlements in the occupied East ...



Canada provides $40 million in new assistance for Palestinians


The Canadian Press
Thu, May 16, 2024 


OTTAWA — Canada is providing $40 million to help Palestinians in the Gaza Strip amid concern over what it calls a catastrophic humanitarian situation, worsened by an Israeli ground offensive in Rafah.

Ottawa says the funding will support the provision of food, water, emergency medical assistance, protection services and other life-saving assistance in the region.

The money will go to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian refugees, known as UNRWA, as well as trusted partners in the region including the Canadian Red Cross and other Canadian non-governmental organizations.

The government says Canada’s funding has also helped establish an International Committee of the Red Cross field hospital in Rafah.

The hospital is being supported by the Canadian Red Cross with surgical equipment, medicine and supplies, diagnostic equipment, disinfection materials and personnel.

The need for humanitarian aid has become more dire in the last week following a ground offensive in Rafah by Israel, which said it must invade to dismantle Hamas and return hostages.

"Because of our extreme concern about the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, we not only have to step up assistance, but we've also been relentless in our efforts to get more humanitarian aid in," International Development Minister Ahmed Hussen said in an interview.

The $40 million is in addition to a $25-million payment Ottawa recently delivered to UNRWA as part of a multi-year commitment to help Palestinian refugees in the region, including those living in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and the West Bank.

Canada temporarily suspended funding to the agency in January after Israel alleged some UNRWA employees participated in the Oct. 7 attack on southern Israel, when Hamas and other Palestinian militants killed about 1,200 people and seized some 250 as hostages. The attack sparked the Israel-Hamas war, which Gaza's Hamas-run Health Ministry says has killed more than 35,000 Palestinians, including combatants.

Canada lifted that suspension in March.

UN investigators are looking into allegations against 14 of the 19 staffers.

A separate review of UNRWA’s neutrality said last month that Israel had never before expressed concerns about anyone on the staff lists that UNRWA had given Israel every year since 2011.

The report said UNRWA has "robust" procedures to uphold the UN principle of neutrality, but cited serious gaps in implementation, including staff publicly expressing political views, textbooks with "problematic content" in schools the agency runs and staff unions disrupting operations. It made 50 recommendations to improve UNRWA's neutrality.

Canada helped with the report led by former French foreign minister Catherine Colonna, said Hussen.

He said he accepts the report's recommendations and continues to uphold the organization as the "backbone" of aid in the territory.

"UNRWA's network, presence, expertise and logistics, and ability to provide direct support to Palestinians inside Gaza, is unmatched," he said.

"Other organizations also use their network and their connections to reach vulnerable populations inside Gaza, and that's why we're supporting them, because they're very effective."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 16, 2024.

— With files from The Associated Press

Mickey Djuric, The Canadian Press

Opposition says Sask. Party politicians should be investigated for 'cashing in' on gov't contracts

GOOD OLD CROOKED CONS-
- ERVATIVES

CBC
Thu, May 16, 2024 

Saskatchewan NDP politician Meara Conway has requested investigations into the conduct of two Saskatchewan Party politicians. (Alexander Quon/CBC - image credit)


The NDP is accusing two Sask. Party politicians of unethical dealings — suggesting they did not follow appropriate protocol as their private businesses received money from government.

Members of the Legislative Assembly can trigger an investigation if they have reasonable grounds to believe that another has breached the Members' Conflict of Interest Act.

Meara Conway, the Opposition's critic for ethics and democracy, triggered two investigations on Wednesday as she raised concerns about how public money is flowing to private companies connected to politicians.


"The Conflict of Interest Commissioner will have the final word on that," Conway told reporters after question period Wednesday, noting they have 90 days for the review.

Conway said she believes Education Minister Jeremy Cockrill breached Section 15 of the Act, which prohibits government contracts for elected officials unless they get an exemption.

She said Cockrill managed Fortress Windows and Doors in 2020 and after he was elected he continued with the business in the role of advisor and salesperson. The business received "hundreds of thousands of dollars" in contracts from SaskTel and the Battlefords Housing Authority.

She said Cockrill did not obtain an exemption for this work.

"When he was elected in 2020, he should have stepped away from this company if they were going to continue to do work with government," Conway said. "That's what Section 15 requires, and there's good reason for that. Otherwise it gives rise to concerns, on behalf of the public, that people are using their public offices to derive a public benefit."

Saskatchewan's education minister Jeremy Cockrill said he used a poor choice of words in the private meeting with Taya Thomas.

Saskatchewan's education minister Jeremy Cockrill. (CBC/Radio-Canada)

Conway also said she believes Minister Gary Grewal breached the act by not seeking an exemption from the Commissioner, related to his two motels in Regina.

The NDP said records show Grewal's motels did almost no business with the Ministry of Social Services prior to Grewal's election. However, after he was elected, "government business increased to $731,194 in a few short years."

The party has also accused Grewal of inflating prices when serving Social Services clients.

Conway said the evidence and rationale for her concerns are laid out in public letters to the commissioner.

The Saskatchewan Party did not put up Ministers Cockrill or Grewal for comment after Conway requested the investigations.

Instead, they put up Jim Reiter, Saskatchewan's Minister of Energy and Resources. Reiter broadly criticized the NDP, accusing the Opposition of repeatedly raising allegations against people without evidence.

In regards to the allegations against Cockrill and Grewal, Reiter said Wednesday he wasn't aware of the specifics but the party would "wait for the response from the conflict of interest commissioner. That's how it should be dealt with."

Meanwhile, the Conway tabled five private member's bills aimed at making existing laws require more transparency and documentation. The proposed amendments are:

The Members' Conflict of Interest Amendment Act. The NDP says it would "strengthen the Act and make provincial politicians disclose the business interests of their spouses and relatives that are held in private companies and/or holding companies."


The Lobbyists Transparency Amendment Act. The NDP says it would "close lobbying loopholes and require lobbyists to file monthly activity logs containing information about the dates, participants, particulars, and methods of communication for all lobbying activity, as well as monetary political contributions made within the month."


The Election (Fairness and Accountability) Amendment Act. The NDP says it would "ban out-of-province, corporate, and union donations to Saskatchewan political parties and set a yearly total donation limit of $1,275 for Saskatchewan residents."


The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act Amendment Act. The NDP says it would "make the Saskatchewan government more transparent, including by speeding up and making FOI requests financially accessible, and strengthening the powers of the Privacy Commissioner to force public bodies to release documents."


The Child and Family Services (Betty's Law) Amendment Act. The NDP says it would "require the Minister responsible to preserve all records relating to Indigenous children in residential schools, and make these records more accessible for public inquiries relating to the child's safety, truth and reconciliation, and the pursuit of answers about deceased relatives in care or Indigenous people's grievances."
City of Saint John, NB,  'vicariously liable' for police officer's sexual abuse of children

"This has been going on for 11 years because the city has denied their responsibility every step of the way."

The Canadian Press
Thu, May 16, 2024 



HALIFAX — Hundreds of sexual abuse survivors in New Brunswick could be eligible for compensation following a decision delivered Thursday by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Canada's highest court dismissed a bid by the City of Saint John to overturn a ruling that found the city bears some responsibility for the sexual abuse of children by a member of its police force who served between 1953 and 1975.

As is its practice, the court did not give reasons to justify its decision not to hear the case.

"It is a final decision that the city is now on the hook and is responsible for compensating every single … child that (the police officer) abused while he was a cop in Saint John," Halifax lawyer John McKiggan said in an interview.

"This has been going on for 11 years because the city has denied their responsibility every step of the way."

A spokesperson for the city issued a brief statement Thursday, saying officials had just heard about the decision and were "getting advice on next steps."

In 2013, a private investigation company hired by the city to investigate allegations involving former police Sgt. Kenneth Estabrooks determined the number of potential victims was 263, though 33 people on that list were no longer alive.

Later that year, Saint John resident Robert Hayes, who is now 65, filed a class-action lawsuit alleging he had been sexually assaulted when he was a boy by Estabrooks, who died in 2005. In his statement of claim, Hayes accused the city, the police force and the police commission of failing to act to prevent the abuse in order to protect their reputations.

A key question in the case was whether the city could be held vicariously liable, meaning it was responsible for the actions of someone under its authority.

In March 2023, New Brunswick's Court of King's Bench decided the city was not vicariously liable for harm caused by the police officer, but that decision was overturned by the province's Court of Appeal in September 2023. That's when the city filed an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.

McKiggan, who represents Hayes, said case law prior to the offences in question held that municipalities were not vicariously liable for the actions of officers while carrying out their duties.

McKiggan said the provincial Court of Appeal was aware none of the abuse happened while Estabrooks was actually doing his job, but the three-judge panel decided the city was partly responsible for his actions because it had granted him the authority of a police officer.

"They put him in a position of authority over these children, and he used that authority … to sexually abuse children," McKiggan said in an interview Thursday.

He said his client was thrilled with the decision.

"He was over the moon today," the lawyer said. "He's never wavered in his determination to follow this through to the very end."

McKiggan said the city has the option of negotiating a compensation package or insisting that each survivor appear in court for an individual damages assessment, which could take years to complete.

Allegations against Estabrooks first surfaced in 1975 when he was a 22-year veteran of the Saint John Police Force, and he resigned that year when confronted with sexual abuse allegations from two teenage boys.

Court heard Estabrooks confessed to his superiors about the assaults, but instead of laying criminal charges, the city transferred him to a job with the public works department, where he continued to sexually abuse children. The lower court found the city vicariously liable for Estabrooks's actions as a public works employee.

"He had confessed to abusing these kids, so they knew he was an abuser," McKiggan said.

In 1999, Estabrooks was convicted of indecently assaulting four young people between 1957 and 1982 and he was sentenced to six years in prison.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 16, 2024.

— By Michael MacDonald in Halifax.

Michael MacDonald, The Canadian Press

DEMILITARIZE, DISARM, DEFUND
Crown declines to lay charges against Edmonton police officer who fatally shot unarmed man

DEMAND FEDERAL HATE CRIME CHARGES

CBC
Thu, May 16, 2024 

From left, Steven Nguyen's brother, nephew, mother and sister outside the Edmonton courthouse on May 15, 2024. (Madeline Smith/CBC - image credit)


An Edmonton police officer won't face charges for fatally shooting an unarmed man in 2021, despite Alberta's police watchdog finding reasonable grounds that the officer committed a crime.

The Alberta Serious Incident Response Team (ASIRT) investigation concluded there are "problematic" pieces about the officer's account of what happened.

The family of Steven Nguyen identified him as the 33-year-old man who was killed in the north-central Rosslyn neighbourhood on the night of June 5, 2021. They've filed a lawsuit against the Edmonton Police Service, and the officer who shot Nguyen, who is identified in court documents as Const. Alexander Doduk.


The officer shot Nguyen four times "within seconds" of encountering him, according to the ASIRT report, released Wednesday.

"In this case while [the officer] subjectively believed that it was reasonable to shoot [Nguyen], objectively this belief is lacking," ASIRT executive director Michael Ewenson wrote in the report.

Doduk and his EPS partner were responding to a report from a resident who said he saw a man with a weapon that looked like a screwdriver or a knife.

The man who called 911 described the person he saw acting erratically, but not aggressively. A toxicology report later showed Nguyen had methamphetamine in his system at the time.

Steven Nguyen was fatally shot in Edmonton's Rosslyn neighbourhood on the night of June 5, 2021.

Steven Nguyen was fatally shot in Edmonton's Rosslyn neighbourhood on the night of June 5, 2021. (Submitted by Melisa Solano)

The agency referred the case to the Alberta Crown Prosecution Service to consider a culpable homicide charge, but after a review, the Crown won't pursue a criminal case.

In a statement to CBC News, an ACPS spokesperson said the Crown prosecutor who assessed the case determined it couldn't be proven that the officer's actions were unreasonable.

"In hindsight, the perception of the constable was mistaken, and the result was tragic, but the action taken could not be proven to be criminal."

Nguyen's family members said Wednesday the decision left them shocked.

"What happened to him was not right. It was not fair. … We want the public to be aware of what is happening," Nguyen's sister Melisa Solano said.

Maria Nguyen leans on her grandson Christian Nguyen as she speaks about her son, Steven Nguyen, who was shot and killed by a police officer in 2021.

Maria Nguyen leans on her grandson Christian Nguyen as she speaks about her son, Steven Nguyen, who was shot and killed by a police officer in 2021. (Madeline Smith/CBC)

His brother, Chris Nguyen, said the family plans to keep seeking justice.

"Nobody deserves to die from the people that are supposed to protect and serve our community."

Doduk is facing assault charges in an unrelated case, and is scheduled to go to trial next year. According to an EPS spokesperson, he's currently on unrelated paid leave.

Details of the investigation

Doduk refused an interview with ASIRT investigators, but he provided his police report and notes. He wrote that Nguyen was reaching into his pocket despite commands to stop, and he pulled out a "black rectangular object" that the officer believed was a gun.

The object was actually a cell phone, the ASIRT report says.

A photo of the phone that Steven Nguyen was carrying the night he was killed is included in the ASIRT report investigating his death.

A photo of the phone that Steven Nguyen was carrying the night he was killed is included in the ASIRT report investigating his death. (ASIRT)

A blue barbecue lighter was also in Nguyen's pocket, which the report says could have been what the person who called 911 mistook for a weapon.

"No weapon of any sort was located on [Nguyen], and [the officer's] justification for shooting is that an item resembling a firearm was pointed at him in poor lighting conditions," Ewenson wrote.

According to the ASIRT report, a senior officer showed up after the shooting and told Doduk to leave the scene, but Doduk returned and took a photo of the phone found near Nguyen on the ground.

Ewenson wrote that Doduk's subsequent description of what he felt was a firearm "may be purposely tailored to fit the description of his photo of the phone."

Doduk's notes also repeatedly describe Nguyen being "engulfed in shadow" on the residential street where the officers found him past 11 p.m., with trees and bushes blocking the nearby streetlights and making it difficult to see.

Part of the ASIRT investigation included a recreation of the lighting conditions at the scene, finding they were "markedly better" than Doduk claimed.

The officer also said he didn't use his flashlight, but video from an EPS helicopter "captures a discarded and operational flashlight on the ground in close proximity to where [he] would have been standing when he fired the shots."

Lawyers call for transparency

Samantha Labahn, one of the lawyers representing the Nguyen family in their civil suit, said the Crown's decision not to lay charges in the case is "perverse."

"The Alberta Crown's refusal to explain itself most importantly to the Nguyen family, as well as Steven's loved ones, is reprehensible," she said.

"To make matters worse, we have no way to scrutinize it. … We're left wondering, why did the Crown make that choice?"

The ASIRT report says the agency received an opinion from the Crown about whether charges should be laid. The ACPS told CBC News that opinion won't be publicly provided because it's privileged, and therefore confidential.

Ewenson notes that ASIRT and the Crown are bound by different standards when they assess cases, and that can result in different outcomes.

Defence lawyer Tom Engel is one of the lawyers for the Nguyen family in a civil lawsuit. (Madeline Smith/CBC)

The decision follows two recent Edmonton-area cases where the Crown declined to prosecute police after ASIRT concluded charges should be considered.

In March, the ACPS didn't pursue a criminal case against RCMP officers who arrested an autistic 16-year-old boy in St. Albert. He was injured while in custody, and ASIRT concluded he was unlawfully detained.

Last year, no charges were laid against an Edmonton police officer who kicked an Indigenous teenager in the head, leaving him with life-altering injuries.

Tom Engel, also representing the Nguyen family, said there should be policy changes to ensure these decisions are publicly explained.

"The broader issue is the integrity of the criminal justice system when it comes to decisions made whether to prosecute police officers," he said.

"Because they're not transparent, they're opaque, I think the public is left with the inescapable conclusion that there's a double standard."
Poilievre would rather 'watch the country burn' than fight climate change: Trudeau

The Canadian Press
Thu, May 16, 2024 
 


MAY 12,2024 --- ALL MPS ARE CONSERVATIVES








Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says Opposition Leader Pierre Poilievre's pledges to axe carbon pricing come at a time of wildfires and other disasters and Poilievre would rather "watch the country burn" than continue the fight against climate change.

Trudeau says when Poilievre talks about scrapping the price on carbon, it would also mean the end of the rebate cheques that most families receive.

He says the parliamentary budget officer had confirmed that 80 per cent of families get more back through the Canada carbon rebate program than the extra they pay for gas and home heating because of the price on carbon.

His remarks come after Poilievre called for a "vacation" from carbon pricing from the upcoming Victoria Day long weekend to Labour Day.

Poilievre told a news conference at a gas station in Vancouver that his vacation proposal would lower gas prices by 35.6 cents per litre on average.

But Trudeau says his Liberal government designed the carbon pricing program to make sure pollution isn't free, while giving more money back to Canadians.

"Eight out of 10 families in regions where the federal carbon backstop applies do better with the cheques that come in through the Canada carbon rebate four times a year than it costs them extra on a tank of gas, or to heat their homes," he says.

Trudeau says Poilievre would scrap the price on pollution and take those cheques away at a time when Canadians are struggling with the cost of living, and as wildfires, flooding and other extremes are affecting people across the country.

"His ideology is so strong, he would rather watch the country burn and Canadians suffer than continue to fight against climate change and put the Canada carbon rebate in their pockets," the prime minister says of the Opposition leader.

Poilievre has said that in government he aims to "axe the tax" and greenlight large resource projects to bring production home to what is "the most environmentally responsible country on Earth."

"We will liquefy gas and send it over to Asia to shut down coal-fired plants there," he said.

Poilievre was also asked Thursday about the use of the expression "climate criminal" to describe people who work in extractive industries or drive large trucks.

He responded by saying people who use such "incendiary language" are trying to intimidate taxpayers. "We see this kind of really radical, extreme and wacko language from the Trudeau Liberals, where they attack people for driving automobiles, they say they want to ban roads," Poilievre said.

"Meanwhile, Trudeau and the NDP have no problem importing more products made by coal-burning dictatorships like China, which is responsible for the largest emissions of any country on planet Earth."

Poilievre said the Liberal government, with the support of the New Democrats, has been "piling on punishing carbon taxes," while "the vast majority of Canadians are struggling just to eat, heat and house themselves."

"Canadians are struggling, and they are unable to even afford a vacation. They need a break."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 16, 2024.

TOP PHOTO:  NORTHERN ALBERTA MAY 14, 2024

GRAPHICS THE WEATHERCHANNEL







WTF?! ATTACKING THE UCP BASE
The Rural Municipalities of Alberta fear trio of provincial bills are a power grab

FASCISTS DISUISED AS LIBERTARIANS

The Canadian Press
Wed, May 15, 2024 


EDMONTON — Alberta's rural municipalities are teeing off on a trilogy of provincial bills they say erode trust and attack local authority.

Paul McLauchlin, head of the Rural Municipalities of Alberta, says proposed legislation giving the province the ability to take control of local emergency responses isn't salvageable.

He says Premier Danielle Smith’s government hasn't offered a clear explanation as to how this change will do anything other than confuse and complicate critical situations.

"They never really listened to what we wanted, which was better financial clarity as it relates to disasters -- more certainly financially when it comes to disasters -- and increased communication,” McLauchlin said in an interview.

The emergencies bill is one of three pieces of proposed legislation introduced in the spring sitting that sparked concern Smith's United Conservatives are making a gratuitous, unnecessary power grab.

One bill would give the province gatekeeping power to veto federal funding deals with cities and towns while another would give Smith's cabinet broad authority to fire councillors and overturn local bylaws.

Despite assurances from the government that the bills maintain the status quo, McLauchlin said he’s “starting to get paranoid.”

"Are you just trying to move authority more and more into ministerial positions, and (cabinet) ministers can start making these decisions without any input of municipalities?" he said.

Public Safety Minister Mike Ellis said the emergencies bill is about clarifying existing powers, not creating new ones.

"Paul (McLauchlin) is quite frankly incorrect,” Ellis told reporters in the legislature Tuesday, calling the negative reaction “misinformation.”

“We are just creating a reporting structure, which is very common in any sort of critical incident.

"There is nothing nefarious in any of these bills.”

Ellis also promised that if the province does take over an emergency response, it will pick up the costs.

Last week, Municipal Affairs Minister Ric McIver, a former three-term councillor in Calgary, also rejected the suggestion the bills are an overreach.

He noted the province already has legal authority over municipalities.

“That is our reach,” said McIver.

“Not only our reach, it is our responsibility. They may not like the bills, I accept that, but using the phrase 'overreach' seems inappropriate.”

McLauchlin said he views the bills differently.

"We're being put into a smaller and smaller box and the government is taking more and more authority away from us, which makes no sense based upon our past relationship with this government," he said.

"It is extremely hard for a conservative government to make rural Alberta mad, and they've done that successfully in three acts.”

One contentious element of the emergencies bill would allow cabinet, during a crisis, to quickly direct water use and allow temporary low-risk water transfers between major water basins without the possibility for an appeal to the Environmental Appeals Board.

That board is an independent body that hears complaints about ministry decisions on things like water licenses and environmental protection orders.

Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz pledged last week that the government will engage with municipalities before approving large-scale inter-basin transfers.

“What this change allows us to do is enable or approve a low-risk inter-basin transfer for the purposes of providing drinking water to a municipality,” she said, a move that has rarely been made.

McLaughlin said with industrial users wanting to siphon water for things like fracking during droughts, the move from the government demands more debate.

"Creating legislation to deal with rare instances is not the best way to govern a society,” he said.

The emergencies bill, if passed, would also move the fixed election date to October 2027 instead of May that year in an effort to dodge the potential disruption of natural disasters.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 15, 2024.

Lisa Johnson, The Canadian Press

Trudeau calls New Brunswick's Conservative government 'a disgrace' on women's rights

The Canadian Press
Thu, May 16, 2024 


CARAQUET, N.B. — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau assailed New Brunswick's premier and other conservative leaders on Thursday, calling out the provincial government's position on abortion, LGBTQ youth and climate change.

During a news conference in Caraquet, N.B., Trudeau delivered his attack in response to a question about whether he would be campaigning with the New Brunswick Liberals ahead of the upcoming provincial election, which has to be held by October.

Despite his desire to "work with any government" in Canada, the prime minister said, "I do have issues with the current government of New Brunswick."

He said Progressive Conservative Premier Blaine Higgs doesn't respect a "woman's right to choose." The prime minister was referring to a New Brunswick regulation that prohibits public funding for abortions administered outside hospitals, a rule that was blamed for the closure earlier this year of Clinic 554, a private care provider in Fredericton.

The closure of that clinic, Trudeau said, and "the unwillingness to engage in allowing women to actually choose what happens to their future and their bodies is a disgrace."

"I will continue to call out the government of New Brunswick and any conservative leader who continues to go after women's rights."

Higgs's office did not return a request for comment. But in January after Clinic 554 closed, a provincial Health Department spokesman said abortions are publicly funded in the province by way of surgical abortion in hospitals or medical abortion with the pill Mifegymiso. Surgical abortions are offered at two hospitals in Moncton and one in Bathurst.

"The introduction of Mifegymiso as an alternative means of abortion has reduced demand for surgical abortions in New Brunswick," spokesman Sean Hatchard said at the time. "It is now the predominant form of abortion in our province and accounts for two-thirds of all abortions in New Brunswick."

Trudeau brought up the 2022 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the constitutional right to an abortion in that country, saying Canada could suffer similar restrictions if conservatives are in power.

Restrictions on abortion, Trudeau said, are "more likely to happen in Canada, particularly with conservative leaders who continue to not stand up for women's rights."

The prime minister also criticized the Higgs government's changes to the provincial policy on gender identity in schools. The revised policy requires teachers to have parental consent before they can use the preferred names and pronouns of transgender and nonbinary students under 16.

Trudeau said Higgs and other conservatives in the country are trying to score political points off "incredibly vulnerable" transgender and nonbinary children.

Higgs, for his part, maintains that parents have a right to be informed if their children are questioning their gender identity.

Finally, Trudeau lashed out at Higgs's calls for the removal of the federal carbon price, saying the premier wanted to "scrap" Canada's fight against climate change.

In February, shortly before the carbon price went into effect in New Brunswick, Higgs said, "the federal carbon tax has and will continue to result in higher prices on everything."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 16, 2024.

Lyndsay Armstrong, The Canadian Press

Eby warns about United-Conservative merger, says B.C. voters face 'starkest choice'

The Canadian Press
Thu, May 16, 2024 


VICTORIA — British Columbia's election campaign was unofficially launched on Thursday, five months ahead of the Oct. 19 vote, with Premier David Eby depicting it as "the starkest choice of a generation," between the NDP and two opposition parties flirting with a merger.

The final day of the spring legislative session saw Eby summon his New Democrat MLAs and party staff members to the caucus meeting room at the legislature where he delivered an election-style speech focused on the months ahead.

Eby said BC United Leader Kevin Falcon and Conservative Leader John Rustad had "let the mask slip" this week that exploratory talks were underway about putting forward a co-ordinated centre-right political opponent to the New Democrats.


"They told us whose side they are on and it's not your side," Eby said.

He said "powerful interests are trying to arrange a marriage of convenience" between Rustad and Falcon.

"Well, I've got a message for these lobbyists and John Rustad and Kevin Falcon, the next election will be decided at the kitchen table, not the board room table."

Eby said to applause and cheers that Rustad and Falcon both represent the same interests and that if elected "people will pay the price with higher fees, fewer services and fewer supports at the time when they need it the most."

Falcon said Thursday that BC United had sent two envoys in recent weeks to find “common ground” with Rustad's Conservatives but a merger was not likely.

However, he said he was consistently approached by people who say, “can you please, please don’t allow an NDP government to be re-elected on the basis of vote splitting."

Historically, centre-right parties have repeatedly been elected in B.C. after successfully uniting the right-of-centre vote, including the former Social Credit and B.C. Liberals governments.

The New Democrats have meanwhile benefited in other elections by splits on the right of the political spectrum.

Falcon said he was committed to doing whatever he could to prevent an NDP re-election, but a merger with the B.C. Conservatives is "problematic."

"There's also real challenges," he said. "There won't be a merger as I've said before. There's practical reasons why, but there's also many of their candidates (who) are frankly too extreme. I can't merge with a party that has candidates that equate vaccination with Nazism and apartheid.

"It's just not going to work," said Falcon. "Or candidates that say getting a vaccine shot, a COVID-19 shot, is going to turn you into a magnet."

Rustad also said talks between the two parties had occurred recently, but the B.C. Conservatives plan to run candidates in each of the province's 93 ridings in the fall.

BC United bluntly turned down overtures by the B.C. Conservatives to work together late last year, Rustad said.

Falcon ejected Rustad from the B.C. Liberals, now BC United, in August 2022 after the former cabinet minister started posting views on social media rejecting the idea that climate change was due to carbon dioxide emissions.

"There's some people who have talked at a backroom level between the two parties about there being some sort of opportunity," Rustad said. "I'm always open to having conversations because obviously we want to bring everybody together (that) we can to defeat this NDP government in October, but as far as the Conservative Party stands we will be running 93 candidates in this next election."

Eby took aim at the Conservatives earlier this week on the issue of child care, mentioning Rustad and his party 10 times, while referring once to the Opposition BC United, signalling which party the NDP considers their main political threat.

The current standings in B.C.'s 87-seat legislature are 55 New Democrats, 26 BC United, two Conservatives, two Greens and two Independents.

In his remarks to the caucus, Eby said he wanted to quote Dolly Parton: "We cannot direct the winds but we can adjust the sails."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 16, 2024.

Dirk Meissner, The Canadian Press
MAGA Rep’s Insane Biden Claim Is Too Much Even for Maria Bartiromo

Justin Baragona
Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:33 a.m. MDT·3 min read


Fox Business Network


Rep. Greg Murphy (R-NC) made a bizarre claim Thursday, insisting that he has “evidence” to support his allegation that President Joe Biden was “jacked up on something” during the State of the Union address. He even offered to show his so-called proof to Fox Business Network host Maria Bartiromo “offline.”

The MAGA congressman’s wild accusation seemed to go too far for the pro-Trump conspiracy-loving Bartiromo, who once relied on “wackadoodle” claims made by a woman who thinks she’s a ghost to peddle 2020 election lies on Fox airwaves that eventually led the network to settle a massive defamation lawsuit.

Appearing on Fox Business’ Mornings with Maria, Murphy—a co-chair of the GOP Doctors Caucus— was asked to put his “doctor’s hat on” and give his take on the recently announced presidential debates between Biden and former President Donald Trump.

“Trump says he wants both of them to be standing for the two hours,” Bartiromo noted. “Biden says he doesn’t want a live audience, and it just has to be Trump and Biden, no [Robert F. Kennedy Jr]. How does this play out from your perspective?”

The North Carolina lawmaker immediately took a conspiratorial path that even Bartiromo wasn’t willing to fully follow.

Maria Bartiromo’s Strange Trip From ‘Money Honey’ to One of Trump’s Top Boosters

“I’ll just be very plain and simple. I was at the State of the Union address and Joe Biden must have been jacked up on something that day,” Murphy declared. “I absolutely believe that from a medical viewpoint, and have a good bit of knowledge that happened. He can’t stand, and he can’t stand under the lights for that long, and I don’t think he can keep a concept in his brain for that long.”

The congressman would go on to offer advice for Trump in the upcoming debates, urging the 2024 GOP hopeful to “stay presidential” and to “stay in his lane.” Bartiromo, however, wanted to get back to Murphy’s allegation about Biden receiving a pre-SOTU booster, asking what he meant about the president being “jacked up” at his speech.

“I believe they gave him something to sustain the lights and sustain the vigor that he had. That was not Joe Biden. I was in there. He screamed for two hours,” he replied.

While Fox News stars and Republicans have suggested the 81-year-old president was caffeinated or even given illicit substances for his fiery address, with Sean Hannity going so far as calling him “Jacked Up Joe,” none of them have claimed to have actual proof. Despite his bombshell allegations, Murphy wasn’t willing to reveal his hand publicly even as Bartiromo pressed him on air.

“Maybe we can talk offline and I’ll show you something that proves that,” he proclaimed, prompting a stunned Bartiromo to wonder what exactly he’d show her.

“I think I can have some evidence that shows that he was given something before,” the congressman responded.

With Bartiromo continuing to press Murphy on whether he meant “in terms of medicine,” the pro-Trump lawmaker pivoted to the octogenarian president’s physical appearance and purported “facelift” before alleging a vast Democratic-led conspiracy to prop up Biden.

“He’s been manufactured and puppeteered by the Democratic Party to be president of the United States, and I fully believe that has to do with pharmacology,” Murphy concluded. The Fox Business star, for her part, noted that she would follow up on his “compelling” accusations.

The congressman’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment asking if he could provide further details about his supposed hidden proof of drug use.

 The Daily Beast.

Vladimir Putin Is Promoting A Bonkers Conspiracy Theory About Earth Yet Again

Kate Nicholson
Wed, May 15, 2024 

Russian president Vladimir Putin is a firm believer in the dubious "golden billion" conspiracy theory. MIKHAIL KLIMENTYEV via Getty Images

Vladimir Putin has once again pulled out his favourite conspiracy theory in a new interview with a Chinese outlet to bash the West.

Speaking to news agency Xinhua last night, the Russian president said: “Earth is the cradle of humanity, our common home, and we are all equal as its inhabitants.

“I am convinced that this view is shared by most people on the planet.

“However, the countries that affiliate themselves with the so-called ‘golden billion’ do not seem to think so.”

According to NPR, the “golden billion” is a conspiracy theory that Putin has often referred to in his public speeches, although it dates back to the last few years of the Soviet Union.

The theory claims there is a secret faction of one billion global elites looking to hoard the world’s money and resources, while depriving everyone else.

Putin has regularly deployed this theory as a means to attack the West, and has previously described the supposed plot of the “golden billion” as “racist and neocolonial in its essence”.
















Putin, an authoritarian leader who held a sham presidential election in March after eliminating all feasible opponents, is reportedly very wealthy, although it’s not clear how he has made his millions.

The Russian president also told the Chinese outlet that Moscow and its partners “reject Western attempts to impose an order based on lies and hypocrisy, on some mythical rules of no one knows whose making”.

He said: “We advocate for the primacy of international law, equal, indivisible, comprehensive and sustainable security at both the global and regional level with the UN’s central coordinating role.”

Putin overlooked his own role in causing international disruption by invading Ukraine more than two years ago in a conflict he rarely acknowledges as a fully-blown war.

The UN has openly criticised Russia’s illegal invasion, accusing Moscow of “unspeaking suffering and destruction”.

Naturally, Putin also took a direct pop at the US in his interview, saying: “US-led Western elites refuse to respect civilisational and cultural diversity and reject centuries-old traditional values.”

The interview was published just before Putin’s state visit to China, which the president called Russia’s “good neighbour and trusted friend”.