Sunday, June 09, 2024

 

Malaysia: PSM pioneers new ways of organising contract labour

June 5, 2024
GREENLEFT WEEKLY
AUSTRALIA
Issue 
FacebookXPrint
women workers at a help desk, marching at May Day

Dana Langaswaran giving advice to workers. Inset: Participating in

 Kuala Lumpur's May Day march carrying a sign that reads:

 'Living wage'. Photos supplied.

Danaletchumi (Dana) Langaswaran is a socialist and labour rights activist in Perak state, from where she runs a nationwide workers' helpline initiated by the Malaysian Socialist Party (PSM) and the Network of Government Contract Workers (JPKK). She will be one of the international guest speakers at the Ecosocialism 2024 conference, to be held June 28–30 in Boorloo/Perth and online.

Green Left spoke to Dana about the PSM’s experience in organising contract workers, whom she estimates comprise 60‒70% of the country’s workers.

The once-strong left-led trade union movement was violently repressed by the British colonial rulers and then conservative local elites after independence in 1957, leaving it been weak and ineffective. It has failed to defend the interests of most workers, especially those in the private sector.

“The contract system makes it hard for workers to organise through unions because the subcontracting employers keep changing, and that is why we formed a network of contract workers, JPKK, and set up a workers hotline,” said Dana.

“When we receive complaints through the hotline, we take up their case and try to get them to join the network.

“It doesn’t matter if they are cleaners or security workers or other contract workers, they can become members of JPKK.”

The PSM also started a union for hospital cleaners, which since 2022 has expanded to include all contract workers in government buildings.

Most of the complaints received through the hotline — which the PSM set up in 2020 — concern underpayment of wages — a very common practice by subcontracting employers. If individual workers take their complaints directly to the Labour Office they risk losing their jobs.

Job insecurity

“Job security is very low and workers face victimisation from employers if they make complaints,” said Dana.

“So the PSM set up the hotline to create an alternative channel to take up issues in their workplace.

“When we get a complaint we will write to the Labour Office about the matter without revealing the identity of the worker making the complaint. We protect the worker and push the Labour Office to visit the workplace and investigate the employer.”

Dana said that the PSM’s labour bureau gets 20‒30 complaints a month through the hotline.

“In some cases, the worker does not want to lodge a complaint but just needs our advice on their rights.”

Most of the complaints are from security workers or cleaners, because they are the most victimised workers and their contribution to development is undervalued, Dana said.

Privatisation

Most of these jobs were part of the public service until the privatisation carried out under Prime Minister Mohamed Mahathir’s government in the late 1990s.

“Security workers are usually working 12 hours a day. The legal working day is eight hours so they should be paid overtime for four hours. Most of them are also made to work seven days in most weeks and get very few rest days. Only 1 out of 10 security subcontractor employers give their workers a rest day.

“They have to work on public holidays also, so each month they should be paid a lot of overtime rates, but this is the problem because the employers are paying them in monthly lump sums that do not include all the overtime payments they should get.

“If a security worker works 30 days a month, they should get RM3500 [A$1120], but instead they are getting paid only RM1800 [A$570] to RM2200 [A$700].

“If the workers want to claim the wages they are being cheated of they have to file a complaint with the Labour Office, but they are scared to do this because they are afraid their will lose their jobs or be transferred to some far away workplace, which is the most common employer action against a worker who lodges a complaint against them.

“So we encourage the workers to make a group claim so that the employer cannot victimise any individual worker.”

Dana said the PSM has won many cases for security workers and cleaners, but each case can take two to three years to resolve.

In addition, contract workers face greater hardship when they stop working because of age or redundancy. A cleaner who works for a hospital for 20 years but is on a three-year contract will not get termination payments for working 20 years.

The PSM is campaigning to abolish the labour contract system, not only because it is bad for workers and a source of corruption.

“When governments are outsourcing labour, the subcontracting [employer] makes a profit and government officials get illegal commissions," said Dana. "Subcontracting is given to friends or family members of senior officials. It is not a transparent process.”

Migrant workers

According to a 2022 study by the International Organization for Migration, up to a third of the Malaysian workforce are migrant workers, but few have taken advantage of the hotline, said Dana. She only knows of one complaint from a migrant worker that came through the hotline, which they successfully resolved.

“The employers threaten migrant workers if they complain and the unity between migrant and local workers is also quite low. Many migrant workers are frightened of their employers, especially if they don’t have documentation.

“So migrant workers face extra challenges, but we will take up their cases if they contact us on the hotline.”

Minimum wage campaign

The PSM also led the campaign from 2002 for a minimum wage, which was finally won in 2012. It was set then at RM900 (A$290) a month, starting in January 2013.

“It is reviewed every two years and was increased to RM1500 [A$480] in May 2022, but we are still receiving complaints from workers who are not yet receiving this. Out of every 20 complaints we get, two or three will be that they are being paid less than the minimum wage.”

On May Day this year, the government announced a 13% pay rise for public servants, but there was no wage rise for workers in the private sector and the minimum wage is still under review, said Dana. The government says it is having discussions with employer organisations before announcing any change to the minimum wage.

“There is a political agenda here. Most of the public servants are from the Malay community and that is where the government is trying to get more support.”

Dana, who began her political activism at university, is looking forward to exchanging experiences and ideas with activists from six continents participating in Ecosocialism 2024.

Canada: Activists target arms trade, manufacturers

June 5, 2024
GREENLEFT WEEKLY
AUSTRALIA
FacebookXTelegrEmailPrint
protesters and police

Protesting the CANSEC arms trade fair in Ottawa. Photo: pbicanada.org

Protesters took action in Canada in the last week of May against the arming of and profiteering from the Israeli genocide against the Palestinians. This included direct action against weapons manufacturers.

Notably, these actions sought to escalate resistance to the Canadian state and capital in solidarity with Palestinian resistance. Protesters engaged in blockades, pickets, and disruption of critical infrastructure.

While Canada likes to style itself as a “peacekeeping nation”, it has become one of the world’s largest global arms dealers. A substantial proportion of this bloody trade is done with Israel.

Project Ploughshares reports that Canada exported $30,641,495 in military goods to Israel last year — the highest recorded value for any one year. The largest categories of exports were electronic equipment and spacecraft, along with bombs, missiles, rockets and associated components.

While the government claims that it has only authorised permits for transfers of “non-lethal” military goods to Israel since the October attacks, Project Ploughshares notes that no such distinction is made within Canada’s arms control regime.

Unsurprisingly, the stepped-up actions of Palestine solidarity groups have been met with extreme police violence and repression. Canadian police, in addition to being the agents of state repression, have their own direct connections with Israeli forces. Strategies and tactics of movement defence become paramount.

Direct action blocks arms fair in Ottawa

The week of actions started on May 29, with a mass picket outside the EY Centre in Ottawa, which was hosting the annual CANSEC arms trade show of the Canadian Association of Defence and Security Industries (CADSI).

CANSEC grotesquely describes itself as “a one-stop shop for first responders, police, border and security entities and special operations units.” Hundreds of people blocked entrance to the site and red paint was splashed on the pavement.

Protesters were met with a presence of at least 100 Ottawa Police Service (OPS) officers. Police arrested eight protesters. Video circulating on social media showed a CANSEC attendee punching a young Muslim woman protester in the head.

World Beyond War Canada (WBW), which organised the action and put out a call for broad actions against the arms trade, released a statement saying: “The protest was planned to condemn war profiteering in solidarity with Palestinians and people in conflict zones all around the world who have been killed, displaced, and maimed by the weapons being peddled and sold at CANSEC.

“The arms manufacturers exhibiting at CANSEC have raked in record profits from the military violence that has brought misery to millions this year — from Palestine to Sudan, from the Congo to Ukraine, from Afghanistan and West Papua to Ethiopia.”

Protesters later demonstrated outside the Israeli embassy and then on Parliament Hill. The Parliament Hill protest became a sit-in with participants calling for an inquiry into the arms trade in Canada. When attempts to set up wooden barricades were made, police broke up the demonstration. One person was pushed to the ground and arrested.

People marched to the Elgin Street police station to do jail solidarity for their arrested comrades.

Actions, police repression in Vancouver

Several actions were held over days in Metro Vancouver, starting with a protest at the offices of Thales. Thales is a longtime military supplier to Israel, providing numerous systems and components for Israel’s air, naval and ground forces.

A simultaneous action was held at Boeing in nearby Richmond. Boeing, the world’s third largest military company, manufactures weapon systems for the Israeli military, including fighter jets, attack helicopters, missiles and bombs.

Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) officers showed up in huge numbers to protect Boeing.

Vancouver Police Department (VPD) officers, with support from Canadian National Rail Police and Metro Vancouver Transit Police, brutally broke up a rail blockade on May 31, beating several people and arresting 14. Two people were sent to hospital.

Video showed police forcing people to the ground and putting their knees on the necks of those who had been subdued. Charges against those arrested included mischief and obstruction.

More than 100 people occupied the tracks on a key logistical route in the city that morning, holding them for about three hours. Protesters laid hundreds of sets of children’s clothes on the tracks to memorialise the thousands of children killed in Israeli assaults on Gaza since October.

Blockaders told the media they were acting to get the Canadian government to impose full sanctions on and cut diplomatic ties with Israel.

The day before the rail blockade, several hundred people participated in a rally at a Scotiabank branch in downtown Vancouver. While there were no arrests, police turned out in large numbers and dozens of officers formed a phalanx to protect private property.

This was held as an organising action. Diverse groups, from United in Struggle, to migrant rights group Migrante BC, to Labor 4 Palestine, to police abolitionists Defund 604 were present. Participants were invited to meet and discuss organising with any groups they were interested in learning about.

The British Columbia Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA) spoke out against this latest repression by the VPD against Palestine solidarity movements, freedom of assembly and expression.

Vibert Jack, BCCLA director of litigation, said: “Generally, we’ve seen across the country that they seem to be acting more swiftly with more force, using the Criminal Code inappropriately in cases that involve solidarity with Palestine and protests to that effect. That creates a chilling effect for people who are trying to stand in solidarity with Palestine.”

This is entirely in keeping with the role of policing as the force of suppression of resistance movements. As I have discussed in detail, the VPD in particular have longstanding connections with Israeli forces.

Calls for arms embargo against Israel

These actions took place as grassroots Palestine solidarity movements, unions, student groups and others intensified calls for an end to the arms trade between Canada and Israel and directed attention and action against arms manufacturing and sale in Canada.

The Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC), one of the largest unions in the country, passed an emergency resolution at its annual convention, at the end of May, calling for an arms embargo against trade with Israel.

PSAC, along with the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW), the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) and the National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE), released a joint statement in April, calling on the Canadian government to immediately suspend the trade of arms and military equipment with Israel.

Organised labour needs to take a leading role in the movements against arms manufacturing and sales — not only to Israel. There needs to be leadership through actions, not just resolutions.

Such actions could include work refusals against the production, loading, or transport of arms companies’ products as well as solidarity strikes and pickets.

There have been suggestions to bring back “hot cargo” lists and refusal by workers to touch anything destined for Israel. This could be extended across sectors, including academic exchange refusals, for example. At the very least, unions should be providing infrastructure and resources for broader direct actions.

 

European Left Party delegation in Palestine for peace and international justice


“The recognition of the Palestinian state by some European countries is a first step, but there is an urgent need for action from the European Union, with the establishment of sanctions towards the Israeli government to stop the massacres in Gaza.”
Walter Baier, President of the Party of the European Left

By Guillem Marcé, Party of the European Left

A delegation of the European Left Party, with president and lead candidate for the 2024 European Elections, Walter Baier, Inger Johansen, Anna Camposampiero and Piera Muccigrosso travelled last weekend to Israel and Palestine to get a better understanding of the situation and to show solidarity with those forces who are in favour of peace in the region.

The delegation met with Palestinian and Israeli forces and actors, among others, with Rawhi Fattouh from the Palestinian National Authority, with Standing Together, a grassroots movement mobilizing Jewish and Palestinian citizens of Israel in pursuit of peace, equality, and social and climate justice, Adam Bouloukos, the Director of UNRWA Affairs West Bank, and MPs Ofer Cassif and Aida Touma-Sliman of Hadash, the left political coalition in Israel, in the Knesset in Jerusalem. In these meetings the EL delegation could sense how dramatic the situation is, not only in Gaza but also in the West Bank, and what are the next steps for achieving a lasting peace in the region. 

“We have seen that the situation in Palestine is dramatic from a humanitarian point of view, not only in Gaza but also in the West Bank”, declared Walter Baier. “We at the European Left reiterate our position: ceasefire, release of hostages, and an immediate end to the massacres in Gaza, aiming at establishing a two-state solution along the lines of the UN resolutions – securing the rights of the Palestinian people to their own state on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, and with the right of return for the Palestinian refugees. The recognition of the Palestinian state by some European countries is a first step, but there is an urgent need for action from the European Union, with the establishment of sanctions towards the Israeli government to stop the massacres in Gaza”.


  • This article was originally published by the European Left press team on 29th May, 2024
UK
‘We’ll keep marching during election’: 175,000 join Palestine march in London
It is the biggest active mobilisation of the general election campaign



The front of the Palestine march in London (Picture; Guy Smallman)

We want Palestine on the election agenda, but the election doesn’t mean we are stopping agitation on the streets. That was the mood among wide sections of the march for Palestine in London on Saturday.

And many marchers say their fury at Keir Starmer means they will vote independent or Green, not Labour.

At 4pm organisers said the march was around 175,000. Although slightly smaller than last time, it’s still a very big march—and guaranteed to be the biggest active mobilisation of the election campaign. Those involved outnumber any party’s canvassing teams.

The demonstration won’t get one percent of the media attention lavished, for example, on the racist Nigel Farage. But this movement has the power to keep changing politics if it escalates during and after the 4 July vote.

It can help drive out the Tories and put pressure on Starmer. It can insist on change from whoever is in 10 Downing Street and contribute to building the much bigger socialist force we lack at the moment.

There was a large student bloc chanting loudly for Intifada and revolution. There were student banners from several different encampments.

There was a large “Queers for Palestine” bloc. The spread of the movement came through with a trade union section including banners and delegations from Unite, Unison, UCU, CWU and other unions, trades councils and groups of health workers.

Also on the march were “Gardeners for a free Palestine” and “Skaters for a free Palestine”.

Shamil, who works for Friends of Al-Alqsa, said, “We are here to pressure our government. Those in parliament don’t represent the masses—politicians are always the last to react to injustice.”

And Shamil argued that he “wants people to go into parliament to represent us on Palestine. Most people in Britain want a ceasefire.” “The key question is, ‘Do our MPs stand for Gaza? I want people in parliament to represent justice.’”

Sharmin, a council worker from London, said, “The election is a focal point for the Palestine movement. It is a test of whether politicians represent us.”

She said, “Our system is an example of a rigged system that exploits the vulnerable. Capitalism functions in the same way regardless of who’s in office. We don’t live in a real democracy—it’s a farce.

“I’m going to vote independent. That’s the only way I can authentically vote.”

James is a worker from Tunbridge Wells who has attended every national demonstration. He said, “There’s nothing to distinguish the major parties on Palestine. The majority of Muslim people are probably very disillusioned, but I doubt if this will damage Labour to any real degree.

“There are no easy options—where do you go, if Labour is the only feasible opposition?”

But he added the movement must “make our presence felt to remind the world that our eyes are on Israel”, regardless of who wins the general election.

On a Palestine Solidarity Campaign coach from Sheffield, people spoke about the election.

Shereen Kamil, a teacher and NEU union member, said, “I’ve voted Labour in the past. But the activism I’ve been involved in the last few years has meant I won’t be voting Labour again.

“The politicians want to move Palestine off the agenda, but a huge movement has been mobilised and isn’t going away.”

Davindar from Sheffield said, “It’s really good to see Corbyn is finally standing as an independent. I’ll probably vote Green for the first time.

“But I’m sure I’ll keep protesting for Palestine long after the election, I hope the movement keeps growing through the summer.”


Palestine campaigners in Cardiff hit back after police attacks
Read More

On the demonstration, Ibrahim said, “I’m voting for whoever backs Palestine. I will keep protesting for Palestine and I think the movement can grow through the summer.”

Marina from north London said, “Neither Labour nor the Tories deserve to be elected. We need to force some morality into parliament.”

Not many marchers were prepared to say openly that they are voting Labour. That’s not surprising given Starmer’s backing for Israel’s genocidal policies.

Protester, Laura, said, “The Tories should be kicked out of government. Doing that might mean voting for Labour.”

But she added that “Starmer is complicit in genocide, and people should remember that fact even if they do vote for Labour.

“I won’t vote for a party of genocide, so I’ll probably vote for my Green candidate because of their stance on Palestine, but I understand why people want to vote Labour.”

Eloise, who works in publishing, lives in east London in a seat that the Tories currently hold.“For me the main thing is getting the Tories out. People are heartbroken by the Labour Party, but we don’t want another four years of Tory rule,” she said.

But she wanted a lot more than the present lack of real choice.

Abid, a lawyer in London, had respect for Labour MPs such as Zarah Sultana from Coventry. But he said, “People might say Labour is the lesser of two evils. But I can’t vote Labour, I just can’t.

“What’s the point of voting for the lesser of two evils, it’s still someone who justified war crimes. I’d rather vote for independents who support basic human rights.”

Protester Caroline, from London, said, “I think there’s far too much posturing around the election. There are more important things to do than vote, like being here.

“To deal with the issues we’re facing, whether that’s in Gaza or Sudan, we need an alternative to elections.

“I watched some of the debate last night but I turned it off. It’s just politicians getting at each other.”

The Palestine movement must seek to seize the election debate. But becoming obsessed with the arguments over voting will divert from the bigger and most urgent task of growing the movement and its militancy—and driving it deeper into the working class.Sunday 9 June, Stop The War trade union conference 10.30am-4.30pm @ ITF House, 49-60 Borough Road, London, SE1 1DR

The record of a social explosion

National demonstrations for Palestine in London:

14 Oct: 150,000

21 Oct: 300,000

28 Oct: 500,000

11 Nov: 800,000 to one million

25 Nov: 300,000

9 Dec: 120,000

13 Jan: 500,000

3 Feb: 225,000

17 Feb: 250,000

9 Mar: 450,000

30 Mar: 200,000

27 Apr: 200,000

18 May: 250,000

8 June: 175,000
Palestine: Keep on the streets & up the pressure on Starmer to end arms sales!

“This is a movement we should be proud of… which continues to shake up the system here and internationally.”


By Matt Willgress, Labour & Palestine

This week, it was revealed that Israel’s forced starvation in Gaza has killed dozens of children, in addition to all the children killed directly in their illegal war so far.

After nearly eight months of war crimes, over 36,000 Palestinians have now been killed, and 1.7 million people have been internally displaced, with many fleeing to Rafah – a city the Israeli authorities had declared “safe”. The city now hosts 1.2 million people – 600,000 of whom are children – who are now being attacked by Israel’s latest offensive on the crossing. As the army attacks one of the most densely populated areas in the world in what is being labelled by many as a plausible case of genocide, it’s time to escalate our demands for an immediate embargo on trading arms with Israel.

Alongside this, the recent revelation that Tory ministers David Cameron and Kemi Badenoch authorised British arms sales to Israel right after an airstrike killed three British charity workers in Gaza has further exposed how complicit ‘our’ Government is in Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

Additionally, the Government is also refusing to rule out whether British machinery was used in the killing of the aid workers.

And in particular, we must now target this demand for an end to arms sales to Israel at the likely incoming Labour Government, as done by the Artists for Palestine letter to Keir Starmer this week, who argued that, “By suspending arms sales to Israel, particularly while its leader faces arrest warrants from the ICC, you can send a clear message that the UK will not tolerate human rights abuses and will stand up for the oppressed.”

As Ben Jamal of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign said in response to the letter, “Keir Starmer needs to make clear if he takes international law seriously. If he does, then the course of action is clear – a Labour government would end arms sales to Israel.”

All of this further underlines why it’s so important that we remain active on the streets and throughout the labour and trade union movement, speaking up for Palestine, including during and beyond the General Election Campaign – starting with  this Saturday’s March for Palestine in Central London (June 8.)

As Zarah Sultana recently said – in an important Early Day Motion before Parliament dissolved –“in light of plausible breaches of the Genocide Convention, [we] call on the UK Government to demand an immediate ceasefire and suspend all arms exports to Israel.”

But the desperate situation we now face is not only that Britain is arming Israel’s assault on Gaza about which the United Nations Secretary-General, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and many others have said Israel has committed grave violations of international law, but that the Labour Opposition – which is set to win big if the polls are to be believed – has not committed to ending these arms sales, or to joining Ireland, Spain, Norway and others in recognising a Palestinian state.

On both these matters, the views of the Tory and Labour frontbenches are in opposition to the clear majority of British public opinion – meaning that our movement on the streets, workplaces, through the campus encampments and beyond can continue to help crack open the Political Establishment’s front-bench consensus on the issue.

In this context – and with further horrific Israeli aggression against Rafah seemingly being prepared despite the ‘crocodile tears’ of Biden and his international supporters– we must never forget the people of Palestine.

We have seen demonstration after demonstration nationally for Palestine on an unprecedented scale. There have been 13 national marches since October, with a total attendance of over 4 million. This is a movement we should be proud of, and which continues to shake up the system here and internationally.

Our message then is clear. Despite the Labour front bench’s shameful line – namely still not joining the growing calls to halt the trade of arms with Israel being used illegally in the war – we will keep speaking up for Palestine!


  • The National March for Gaza – End the Genocide – Stop Arming Israel takes place this Saturday, June 8th, assembling in Russell Square, Central London from 12.30PMMore info here.
  • You can join Labour & Palestine in calling on Keir Starmer to back an immediate ceasefire in Gaza here, and You can follow Labour & Palestine on Facebook and Twitter/X.
  • If you support Labour Outlook’s work amplifying the voices of left movements and struggles here and internationally, please consider becoming a supporter on Patreon.

UK

 

‘A dangerous waste’: CND condemns Starmer’s commitment to nuclear weapons and militarism


“It’s time for a change of policy. The old one has failed – we need to look to the future with a vision to work for peace internationally, improve people’s lives & make us genuinely secure, not an impoverished nuclear target.”
Kate Hudson, CND

By the Campaign For Nuclear Disarmament

CND condemns Keir Starmer and Labour’s commitment to a “triple lock” on Britain’s nuclear weapons, as well as the decision to keep the Tory government’s pledge to spend 2.5% of our GDP on Britain’s military.

Speaking in the north-west of England today, Starmer maintains that Britain will build four new nuclear-armed Dreadnought submarines to replace the current Vanguard fleet, will keep one vessel permanently at-sea and able to launch a nuclear attack, and commits Labour to upgrading the fleet throughout its lifetime. CND estimates the lifetime cost of the Dreadnought programme will be at least £205 billion.

Starmer added that Labour in power will maintain Rishi Sunak’s promise to spend 2.5% of GDP “as soon as resources allow.” During the last budget, the Conservatives said this pledge would be met by 2030 – amounting to £87 billion per year.

CND General Secretary Kate Hudson said:

“After 14 years of Tory misrule, the Labour party has the opportunity to present a bold new security vision to the electorate. However, this policy just mirrors that of the existing government – more war, more military spending and more nuclear weapons. Patently obviously this approach is not bringing peace and prosperity in its wake. On the contrary. Billions are being wasted that should be rebuilding our decaying public services and improving people’s lives. It’s time for a change of policy. The old one has failed – we need to look to the future with a vision to work for peace internationally, improve people’s lives and make us genuinely secure, not an impoverished nuclear target.”

CND Chair Tom Unterrainer said:

“Keir Starmer is trying to make this election about security but has given no justification for how nuclear weapons ensure this. The risk of nuclear war has risen exponentially in the last two years but he offers no real account for how this has developed. For a man who claims to care about international law, there is no mention how expanding and modernising Britain’s nuclear arsenal goes against these norms. We need a bold vision for what real security means: one that puts climate, food security, and people at its heart, not more militarism and conflict.”




‘Change’ means ditching the two-party consensus on nukes

‘As the election goes on, let’s continue to oppose the rush to war and argue for proper investment in people and our public services’

Ben Hayes

Labour Outlook’s Ben Hayes writes on Starmer’s latest election commitment to nuclear weapons.

It has become a regular fixture of general election coverage for journalists to ask in lurid tones whether party leaders would be willing to use Britain’s nuclear weapons arsenal, consigning potentially millions of people to a painful death, and many more to life-changing injuries. That was the context when, yesterday, as the parties hit their campaigning stride, Keir Starmer said he would be prepared to push the nuclear button and outlined his “triple-lock commitment” to maintaining Britain’s nuclear weapons system. Despite a campaign slogan of “change”, this puts Labour frontbench policy broadly in line with the Tory Party on the issue of military spending and nuclear weapons.

The announcement recommits him to a pledge in the Daily Mail some weeks ago, accompanied by a promise not only to complete the new Dreadnought class submarines at Barrow, but maintain a continuous-at-sea nuclear weapons operation, and to deliver upgrades in the future – despite an on-paper pledge to achieve nuclear disarmament.

It can be seen as part of a wider view – expressed in the I newspaper – that a Labour government would seek to increase military spending to 2.5% of GDP. This would carry our military spending not only above NATO’s demand of 2% of GDP but above the 2.3% figure the Conservative government has already committed for the current year. The announcement by Rishi Sunak that UK defence spending will reach 2.5% of GDP by 2025 is evidence of an arms race between the two main parties.

It comes as the doomsday clock – monitored and examined by the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists – is set at 90 seconds to midnight, the closest we have ever stood towards catastrophe since the bulletin was created by Einstein and Oppenheimer in the 1940s. The bulletin itself has attributed this to the continuing war in Ukraine, the continuation of the global climate breakdown, and the potential for the ongoing attacks on Gaza to transform into a broader regional conflict as we have already seen through the Israeli attacks on Yemen and Iran.

Britain, whilst spending less than a tenth of the US budget – the world’s largest – already has the largest military budget in Europe at around £52bn per year and remains close to Russian spending levels before the Ukraine conflict, despite Russia’s huge nuclear arsenal. The Dreadnought submarine programme to deliver British nuclear weapons is estimated by the Ministry of Defence to cost £31bn but the programme has already spent 20% of a further £10bn allocated as contingency. The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament estimates its lifetime cost at over £200billion.

The nuclear weapons programme is one of numerous major projects to enhance British war-fighting capabilities. Other commitments include fixing the troubled Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers and other navy ships, addressing the delays in developing the Ajax fighting vehicle and other army transport, and servicing the AUKUS Treaty submarine alliance with Australia. The National Audit Office has said the Ministry of Defence’s 2023 Equipment Plan is ‘unaffordable’, hence the need to drive a spending arms race by the main political parties.

The prioritisation of weapons spending is having a dramatic effect on both the current living conditions and the potential futures of young people across Britain and Europe more broadly. While the two largest-spending government departments, health and education, are formally declared as ‘protected’ from spending cuts, the reality is that both are suffering. Other departments providing vital public services, particularly local government and housing, face major cuts in the coming years.

Research from Unison shows that councils in Britain and the devolved nations face a collective funding shortfall of £3.56 billion for the coming financial year with many effectively becoming bankrupt. This funding shortfall has seen many essential public services cut to the bone, such as in Nottingham, where the council is threatening “the closure of our libraries, community centres, and the loss of 500 jobs directly” over the next six months.

There is a similar picture in education. We’ve seen the increase in the number of Free School Meal (FSM) eligible students soar to over 2 million eligible students across Britain in early 2024. We know that at least £12.2bn is needed to restore school spending power just to 2010 levels nationally. This chronic lack of funding has clearly had an impact on schools this year with children in more than 100 schools not being able to start school on time in September because ceilings were falling in and posing a risk to their lives.

The spending war over the defence budget stands in stark contrast. The British government has always, and even now continues, to drum up funds for war and militarisation with reports that Ministry of Defence spending topped £25bn for the first time in the last financial year. All this, while public sector trade unionists in Unison, the RCN, the BMA, the NEU or PCS are repeatedly told there is no money for a much deserved and earned increase in pay or investment in their services.

It’s vital that socialists and progressives inside and outside the Labour party and across the movement reject the prioritisation of warfare over public services, and urgently take up the cause of peace. Join the demonstrations, such as for a ceasefire in Gaza and an arms embargo of Israel; strengthen organisations such as the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and Stop the War Coalition by affiliating your union or party branches or organisations; and support motions calling for our movement to stand against increased military spending. As the election goes on, let’s continue to oppose the rush to war and argue for proper investment in people and our public services.


  • Ben Hayes is a regular contributor to Labour Outlook

 UK

Junior doctors take strike action ahead of General Election


By the BMA media team

Junior doctors in England have announced new strike dates ahead of the General Election as Rishi Sunak continues to refuse to meet junior doctors’ demands for a roadmap to restore pay lost over the last 15 years.  

After 3 months of talks between junior doctors in England and the Government, the Prime Minister has still made no credible offer to junior doctors.   

After the general election was called last week the BMA gave the Government a final opportunity to make an offer and avoid strikes. This opportunity has not been taken up. 

As a result, the BMA’s junior doctors committee has decided to announce further strike dates which will take place in the run up to the General Election. This will involve a full walkout by junior doctors beginning at 7am 27th June 2024 and ending 7am 2nd July. 

BMA junior doctors committee co-chairs Dr Robert Laurenson and Dr Vivek Trivedi said:  

“We made clear to the Government that we would strike unless discussions ended in a credible pay offer. For more than 18 months we have been asking Rishi Sunak to put forward proposals to restore the pay junior doctors have lost over the past 15 years – equal to more than a quarter in real terms.  

“When we entered mediation with Government this month we did so under the impression that we had a functioning government that would soon be making an offer. Clearly no offer is now forthcoming. Junior doctors are fed up and out of patience. 

“Even at this late stage Mr Sunak has the opportunity to show that he cares about the NHS and its workers. It is finally time for him to make a concrete commitment to restore doctors’ pay. If during this campaign he makes such a public commitment that is acceptable to the BMA’s junior doctors committee, then no strikes need go ahead.”


  • This article was originally published by the BMA on 29 May, 2024.
  • The British Medical Association (BMA) is a professional association and trade union representing and negotiating on behalf of all doctors in the UK. You can follow the BMA on FacebookTwitter and Instagram.