Wednesday, June 26, 2024

New Candu design could boost Canadian GDP, report finds

26 June 2024


Construction of a four-unit Candu Monark plant would boost Canada's GDP by more than CAD90 billion (USD66 billion) and create thousands of jobs over the project's lifetime - and each unit built overseas would have a GDP impact of CAD4.8 billion. So says a new report from the Conference Board of Canada.

The independent report, which was commissioned by AtkinsRéalis, found that the manufacturing, engineering, and construction phase of four Candu Monark units would generate more than CAD40.9 billion of GDP impact for Canada, with CAD49.5 billion of GDP impact during the operation phase. It would generate the equivalent of more than 20,000 "full time, well-paying jobs" and more than 324,000 person-years of employment during manufacturing, engineering and construction and sustain 3,500 full-time equivalent jobs per year over a 70-plus year operating life. The report also found an additional CAD29.1 billion in additional tax revenue across municipal, provincial and federal governments over the life of the project.

AtkinsRéalis unveiled the Candu Monark, a Generation III+ reactor design, in November 2023. The natural uranium-fuelled reactor design builds on the design of currently operating Candu units and features a larger output of 1,000 MW, improved cost per megawatt-hour, a longer operating life of 70 years, and sustainable design principles to minimise environmental impact. The company says it is the easiest reactor design to build, operate and maintain in AtkinsRéalis's Candu nuclear portfolio.

The Candu supply chain underpins a Canadian nuclear ecosystem that already supports more than 76,000 stable and well-remunerated jobs across a wide variety of professional and skilled trades fields, the company said, and is "perfectly suited" to a new build of Monark reactors. The intellectual property for the design is 100% Canadian owned, and the domestic supply chain would benefit "strongly" from exporting the reactor, the report found.

"We have a world-class, made-in-Canada solution in Candu nuclear technology that will allow us to navigate the energy transition successfully and accrue many economic advantages for Canada," said AtkinsRéalis President, Nuclear, Joe St. Julian.

"As Ontario looks to ramp up capacity to meet the 18,000 MW of new nuclear power, large nuclear reactors like Candu reactors will be key to addressing the forecasted demand. Candu reactors will optimise the amount of energy provided from scarce grid-connected regions in Ontario, and if they are designed, built, supplied and serviced from within Canada, it is a win-win for all Canadians," AtkinsRéalis Executive Vice-President, Nuclear, Canada Gary Rose said.

All of Canada's currently operating nuclear power plants use Candu - taken from Canada Deuterium Uranium - technology. The pressurised heavy water reactor design was developed by federal Crown corporation Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd (AECL), in cooperation with Canadian industry, from the late 1950s onwards and the first commercial unit began operation in 1971. AtkinsRéalis is the original equipment manufacturer of Candu technology (SNC-Lavalin Group Inc rebranded to AtkinsRéalis in 2023).

The government of Ontario last year announced the start of pre-development work to build up to 4800 MWe of new nuclear capacity at Bruce Power's existing site, in what would be Canada's first large-scale nuclear build in more than 30 years, in addition to plans to deploy small modular reactors in Ontario, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick and Alberta.

In February, AtkinsRéalis launched the Canadians for CANDU campaign to promote the deployment of Candu nuclear technology at home and abroad in support of Canadian and global efforts to reach net-zero emissions.


OPG expands green financing to include new nuclear

26 June 2024


Ontario Power Generation's new Sustainable Finance Framework replaces its 2021 Green Bond Framework and will permit funding of a broader range of clean energy technologies. It now allows net proceeds from the bond to be used for new nuclear projects as well as to provide funding for existing nuclear facilities.

OPG plans to build SMRs at the Darlington New Nuclear site (Image: OPG)

Green bonds are financial instruments that finance green projects and provide investors with regular or fixed income payments. The key difference between green bonds and regular bonds is that the money raised from investors is used exclusively to finance projects that have a positive environmental impact.

Ontario Power Generation (OPG) was the first Canadian utility to release green bonds in Canada and, together with its subsidies, has issued more than CAD3 billion (USD2.2 billion) of green bonds to date. In 2022, it updated its Green Bond Framework to allow net proceeds from green bonds to be used to finance maintenance and/or refurbishment of existing nuclear facilities, and issued a first-of-its-kind nuclear green bond offering for CAD300 million. The net proceeds from the issuance were allocated to the Darlington nuclear power plant refurbishment project.

OPG says the new Sustainable Finance Framework will permit funding of a broader range of clean energy technologies as well as initiatives to create opportunities for Indigenous communities and businesses. New nuclear projects, such as small modular reactors and large new nuclear, may now be financed from the net proceeds from OPG's sustainable bond issuance, as well as the maintenance or refurbishment of existing facilities.

The sustainable bonds may also be used to finance renewable energy projects like hydro refurbishment, solar, wind and hydrogen production; energy efficiency and management solutions such as energy storage and clean fuel storage; clean transportation initiatives such as zero-emissions vehicles; and developing climate adaptation and resilience capabilities for flood protection and extreme weather.

"As Canada's largest corporate green bond issuer, expanding our eligible use of proceeds from these bonds recognises growing demand for clean electricity and OPG's commitment to advancing economic Reconciliation with Indigenous Nations and communities," said OPG Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Services Officer Aida Cipolla. "Partnerships will be key to achieving economy-wide decarbonisation and lasting environmental benefits."

OPG recently completing early site works for the construction of the first of four BWRX-300 small modular reactors at its Darlington New Nuclear project, as well as being more than half-way through a CAD12.8 billion project to refurbish the four Candu units at its Darlington plant, which is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2026. It is also initiating a project to refurbish units 5-8 at its Pickering plant.

Paladin acquires Fission, creating multi-asset uranium company

24 June 2024


Australia-headquartered Paladin Energy Limited is to acquire Canadian uranium project developer Fission Uranium Corp in a transaction the companies say will create a "globally significant uranium company" listed on Australian and Canadian stock exchanges and will help advance Fission's Patterson Lake South project towards production.

Langer Heinrich returned to commercial operation earlier this year (Image: Paladin)

The combination will mean shareholders of both companies will benefit from an enhanced project development pipeline, with "multi-asset production" expected by 2029, and a diversified presence across leading uranium mining jurisdictions of Canada, Namibia and Australia, they said.

Paladin, which is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), has a 75% ownership of the Langer Heinrich uranium mine in Namibia, which returned to commercial operation earlier this year for the first time since 2018. The company's portfolio of uranium exploration and development assets in Canada and Australia includes the Michelin project in Newfoundland and Labrador, which is at the preliminary economic assessment stage. Fission, listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX), is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South (PLS) high-grade uranium project in Saskatchewan, for which a feasibility study has highlighted the potential for a 10-year mine life with production of 9.1 million pounds U3O8 (3500 tU) per year.

Paladin will acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Fission by way of a court approved plan of arrangement under the Canada Business Corporation Act. On completion of the transaction, Fission shareholders will own 24.0% of Paladin, which will have a pro-forma market capitalisation of approximately USD3.5 billion, the companies said. Paladin has applied for listing of the Paladin Shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange, concurrent with completion of the transaction, so that Fission shareholders will receive TSX-listed Paladin shares.

Paladin CEO Ian Purdy said Fission is a "natural fit" for the company's portfolio. "The addition of PLS creates a leading Canadian development hub alongside Paladin's Michelin project, with exploration upside across all Canadian properties," he said. The transaction would also de-risk the development of PLS for Fission shareholders, underpinned by production from Langer Heinrich and Paladin's offtake contract book. "Paladin will bring the required investment to PLS in order to advance it towards production," he added.

Fission President and CEO Ross McElroy said the combination would create a world class diverse uranium producer, adding a class leading development project in a Tier 1 jurisdiction with the ability to expand production and cash flow profiles in the near term. "With commercial production at Langer Heinrich and further development milestones at PLS, this opportunity will create a diverse pureplay uranium company with current production and a deep pipeline of near and mid-term assets available to investors," he added.

The combination will create "one of the largest amongst pure-play uranium companies" with pro-forma U3O8 mineral resources of 544 million pounds U3O8 and ore reserves of 157 mllion pounds across conventional open-pit and high-grade underground orebodies, with multi-asset production expected "by the end of the decade," the companies said.

The transaction is targeted to close in the third quarter of this year, subject to satisfaction of conditions.

Researched and written by World Nuclear News

Exxon, South Korea’s SK On sign non-binding deal for lithium supply

Reuters | June 25, 2024 | 

Image by Harry Green | Adobe Stock.

US energy major Exxon Mobil said on Tuesday it had signed a non-binding agreement to supply lithium from its proposed Arkansas project to South Korean EV battery maker SK On.


The agreement has the potential to be a multi-year offtake deal of up to 100,000 metric tons, the company said.

Exxon in November announced plans to produce lithium from pumped out brine in Arkansas, from regions considered to hold significant deposits of the metal.

SK On, a unit of SK Innovation, intends to use the lithium for making EV batteries in the US.

The company, which supplies to Volkswagen and Ford Motor, operates two facilities for making batteries in Georgia. It is building four more plants jointly with automakers.

“Through this partnership with ExxonMobil, we will continue strengthening battery supply chains in the US,” said Park Jong-jin, executive vice president of strategic procurement at SK On.

(By Sourasis Bose; Editing by Mohammed Safi Shamsi)


Lilac Solutions releases lithium extraction data amid rising competition

Reuters | June 25, 2024 | 

(Image courtesy of Lilac Solutions).

Lilac Solutions said on Tuesday the latest version of its lithium extraction technology can recover more than 90% of the lithium found in many brine formations, and that it has cut the construction cost of its system by 50%.


The release of the long-awaited data on Lilac’s process for recovering lithium – a key component in electric vehicle batteries that is abundant but can be hard to process – is aimed at rebutting claims its technology is inefficient and uneconomical as it works to woo clients across the globe.

Oakland, California-based Lilac, which was founded in 2016 and counts BMW and Breakthrough Energy Ventures as investors, has long been reticent to release data related to its version of a direct lithium extraction (DLE) technology.

Despite growing interest in the DLE sector from Exxon Mobil, Saudi Aramco and others, no DLE technology has worked at commercial scale without the use of traditional evaporation ponds.

Lilac on Tuesday released a 24-page white paper on the fourth generation of its technology, which uses ion exchange ceramic beads to attract lithium in batch cycles – akin to a laundry machine – after which a water-and-acid mixture is used to wash off the metal.

The data release comes as Lilac and its rivals – including International Battery Metals, EnergyX, Sunresin and others – are heavily marketing their DLE technologies to potential customers across the globe.

EnergyX to build lithium plant in US ‘Ark-La-Tex’ region

“Our technology works and I want to show that,” Raef Sully, who became Lilac’s CEO in February, said on the sidelines of the Fastmarkets Lithium Supply and Battery Raw Materials Conference, one of the world’s largest gatherings of lithium producers.

“We’re trying to close that gap between rumor and perception and be like, ‘Hey, here we are. Here’s the data.'”

A short seller in July 2022 attacked Lilac partner Lake Resources for relying on what it called “Lilac’s yet-to-be-proven technology.”

The short seller alleged that Lilac’s beads only work for 150 cycles, making the technology uneconomical. Lilac at the time said the short seller’s report was “inaccurate”, but did not release hard data to refute it.

On Tuesday, the company said that the latest version of its technology works for 4,000 cycles, and can reduce water usage with the use of recycling equipment, Sully said.

Lilac plans to use the latest version of its DLE technology at Utah’s Great Salt Lake, where a pilot plant should be online by October, Sully said. Lilac is also eyeing lithium projects in Arkansas, South America and Europe, he added.

The company’s rivals have also been touting their own DLE data, including Koch Engineered Solutions, which has been testing its technology in Arkansas with partner Standard Lithium that it says has an average lithium recovery rate of 95.9% at certain conditions.

“We’re trying to change the narrative and show this whole ‘phantom DLE’ thing is no longer phantom,” said Garrett Krall, head of Koch’s lithium business. “We now are ready to guarantee our (DLE) process in any brine resource around the world.”

(By Ernest Scheyder; Editing by Jan Harvey)
Trafigura clinches share of major zinc deal snubbed by Glencore

Bloomberg News | June 26, 2024 |

The Kipushi zinc-copper-silver-germanium project in DRC. 
(Image courtesy of Ivanhoe Mines.)

Production from a large new zinc mine in the Democratic Republic of Congo will be split between several new buyers including trading giant Trafigura Group, after rival Glencore Plc backed away from a previous deal for the entire supply.


Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.’s Kipushi zinc mine started production in the past few days and is finalizing deals to sell its zinc to Trafigura, China’s Citic and Boliden AB, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified as the matter isn’t public.

Kipushi is set to be one of the world’s largest zinc mines, with output planned at more than 250,000 tons per year, and will produce a semi-processed form of ore known as concentrate that is currently in tight supply.

Ivanhoe, Gécamines to reopen historic Kipushi mine

For Trafigura, the deal will help cement its position in the zinc concentrates market, with neither of its major competitors Glencore or IXM getting a share of the offtake. Glencore, long a dominant player in the zinc market, has recently been making changes at the top of its zinc unit and taking steps to exit certain investments.

The market for zinc concentrates has been extremely tight, with processing fees paid by miners to smelters plunging as mine supply disappoints and smelters in Europe reopen in the wake of the 2021-2022 energy crisis. On the spot market, the so-called treatment charges have fallen to just $5 a ton, the lowest since at least 2014, according to Fastmarkets, while annually agreed “benchmark” treatment charges dropped 40% this year.

Glencore deal

Ivanhoe last year announced that it had signed a term sheet to sell the entire zinc output of the Kipushi mine to Glencore in exchange for a $250 million financing facility.

But since then, Glencore has pulled back from that deal, the people said, amid several senior changes in its zinc department. Nick Popovic, the co-head of zinc and copper trading who was pictured at the signing ceremony for the Kipushi term sheet, retired from the company a few months later.

Ivanhoe taps Glencore for $250 million to start Kipushi zinc mine ahead of schedule

Meanwhile IXM, the metals trader owned by China’s CMOC Group Ltd., had been in advanced negotiations for a share of the offtake from Kipushi but failed to agree a loan deal in time, the people said. IXM’s head of lead and zinc, Xavier-Alexandre Ortiz, left the company last week, with a spokesperson saying that “ambitions for the business differed.”

Ivanhoe declined to comment. The miner had previously said that it had received “significant additional interest” from potential buyers of Kipushi concentrate since agreeing the term sheet with Glencore, and that it was in negotiations with numerous parties for deals that would include financing of “$200 million or higher.”

While the contracts are being finalized, it’s still possible they may not all result in deals.

Spokespeople for Citic Metal, which owns a 24% stake in Ivanhoe, and Trafigura declined to comment. Boliden, which owns zinc smelters in Finland and Norway, said on Tuesday it does not comment on ongoing contract negotiations and had not signed a contract for supply from Kipushi. Glencore and IXM also declined to comment.

Glencore’s failure to go ahead with the deal it had agreed last year comes amid wider changes in its zinc unit — a market where it once dominated, boasting a more than 50% share of the “addressable” market for zinc metal and concentrates in its 2011 IPO prospectus.

In addition to Popovic’s retirement, Glencore earlier this year named a new head of its lead and zinc assets, Suresh Vadnagra, replacing the previous co-heads Denis Hamel and Aline Coté. The company also recently sold its controlling stake in Peruvian zinc miner Volcan Cia Minera SAA.

(By Jack Farchy and Michael J. Kavanagh)


Legal & General unit to sell Glencore stake over thermal coal plans

Reuters | June 26, 2024 |


Image courtesy of Glencore.

Legal & General’s investment management unit said on Wednesday that it is selling its stake in global commodities trader Glencore this year on concerns over its production of thermal coal.


Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) is also selling its stake in New York-listed retailer TJX, it said, raising the number of divestments under its Climate Impact Pledge to 16, applying across funds covering around 176 billion pounds ($223 billion) in assets under management.

“While divestment is one of the many stewardship tools we use as a mechanism for driving change, we see it as a last resort and by no means the last stage of engagement,” Stephen Beer, LGIM senior manager for sustainability and responsible investment, said.

LGIM said that its decision on Glencore followed a shareholder resolution last year, requesting the miner to disclose how its thermal coal production aligns with the Paris Agreement’s objective to limit the global temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

UK-based LGIM has a 0.44% stake in Glencore, according to LSEG data.

“We remain concerned that Glencore does not meet our red line asking mining companies to disclose whether they plan to increase thermal coal capacity,” LGIM said.

Glencore declined to comment on the news, while TJX did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing boomed in 2020 and 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic as low oil prices spurred more investors to diversify beyond fossil fuels, and as fund managers sought to be more climate-conscious.

Through its Climate Impact Pledge, LGIM assesses over 5,000 companies across 20 ‘climate-critical’ sectors. It has also highlighted concerns about climate risk management with Woodside Energy and Nippon Steel in the past.

Glencore mines and trades thermal coal, which is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. The company also has coking coal assets.

It plans to run down its thermal coal mines by the mid-2040s, closing at least 12 by 2035.

($1 = 0.7907 pounds)

(By Echha Jain and Yadarisa Shabong; Editing by Savio D’Souza, Sonia Cheema and Emelia Sithole-Matarise)
De Beers sales drop to $315m amid search for new owner

Cecilia Jamasmie | June 26, 2024 


Roughs diamonds. (Image courtesy of De Beers Group.)

De Beers’ sales of rough diamonds fell for the second time this year, with the Anglo American’s (LON: AAL) unit recording a provisional $315 million, down from $383 million in the previous cycle and $456 million at this time last year.


The world’s largest diamond producer by value attributed the dip to the quieter summer period, but industry experts believe the results show that the diamond market remains in the doldrums.

“With the key China market struggling amid renewed graft investigations, we don’t expect to see much evidence of recovery during 2024,” BMO analyst Colin Hamilton wrote in a brief on Wednesday.

De Beers chief executive Al Cook confirmed the pessimistic outlook. “The recent annual JCK jewelry show in Las Vegas confirmed a resurgence in retailers’ interest in natural diamonds in the United States but ongoing economic growth challenges in China mean we continue to expect a protracted U-shaped recovery in demand,” he said in the statement.

Parent company Anglo American, which recently fended off a takeover by the world’s largest miner BHP (ASX:BHP), is in the midst of selling its 85% stake in De Beers.

The decision, announced in May, is part of a major company-wide restructuring and comes as the diamond sector continues to face declining sales, a sluggish global economy, and the rise of lab-created diamond alternatives.



Source: De Beers Group.

In preparation for the split from Anglo, De Beers— which coined the slogan “Diamonds are Forever”— is ditching man-made stones. This means it would end a six-year experiment to sell lab-grown diamond jewellery through its own brand, Lightbox, created in 2018.

While the miner is not halting the sale of its Lightbox stones right away, it will put the unit under review once it depletes current inventory, which will take about a year.

De Beers is targeting annual core profits of $1.5 billion by 2028. Last year, the business made just $72 million, though traditionally its profits have ranged between $500 million and $1.5 billion as the diamond industry swings from boom to bust.

The diamond miner seems ready to fly alone as it did for 124 of its 136 years of existence. Anglo American acquired a majority stake in De Beers only 13 years ago.

The government of Botswana holds the remaining shares and recently stated it would increase its stake in the company in order to play a central role in selecting a new investor to replace Anglo.
Contango to pour first gold from Alaska mine on July 8

6/25/2024

In September 2020, Contango and Kinross formed the Peak Gold joint venture aimed at developing the namesake deposit (later renamed Manh Choh) located on top of a group of low hills in the northern part of the Tetlin lease.

The JV — led by Kinross as operator — subsequently completed the work leading to a feasibility study in 2022, followed by its successful permitting for the project and construction of the mine.

Mining operations commenced in August of 2023 and ore hauling started in November 2023, leading to a sizeable stockpile of ore at Kinross’ Fort Knox facilities ready to be processed through the mill.

As outlined on the JV’s website, the two small open pits comprising Manh Choh are estimated to be mined concurrently for about 4 to 5 years, producing about 225,000 ounces of gold a year.

Based on over 55,000 metres of drilling to date, the deposit currently has a defined resource of 9.2 million tonnes in the measured and indicated category averaging 4.1 g/t gold and 14 g/t silver, for 1.2 million oz. of contained gold and 4.2 million oz. contained silver.
Newmont the only miner to make TIME's top 100 green firms ranking

25.06.2024 

Newmont (NYSE: NEM, TSX: NGT, ASX: NEM) is the only miner among the world's top 100 most sustainable companies for 2024, according to a new ranking published on Tuesday by TIME and Statista.The gold miner is ranked 84th in the list, led by the French multinational Schneider Electric.According to TIME, the companies at the top of the list have signed on to some of the most respected climate programs, including the 1.5°C target from the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), and have received high scores from CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project). TIME and Statista held companies to high standards for their Scope 1 and 2 emissions and energy consumption relative to company size, emissions reductions in 2021 and 2022, and the proportion of renewable energy used by the company's operations. At the top of the list, Schneider Electric scored 88.86 out of 100. Its environmental initiatives include creating software and services for energy management. Schneider has also set ambitious targets to become carbon neutral by 2025.It is important to note that many highly ranked companies are in industries that don't produce many physical products—such as banking, tech, and consulting. Newmont scored 71.64. Among Newmont's environmental targets for 2030, the company aims to reduce absolute greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 1 and 2) by 32%, reduce GHG emissions intensity (Scope 1 and 2) by 32%, and reduce absolute Scope 3 emissions (joint venture assets, and supply chain) by 30%. Besides Newmont, the ranking includes five other natural resources and mining companies among the top 500, including Hindustan Zinc (ranked 239) and Aurubis (ranked 468).Continue to the full article at Mining.com


Newmont Ranks Among the Top 100 Most Sustainable Companies


By Fernando Mares | Journalist & Industry Analyst
 - Wed, 06/26/2024 - 
MEXICAN BUSINESS NEWS

Newmont, the world’s leading gold miner, has been ranked among TIME and Statista’s Top 100 most sustainable companies globally. The US-based company stands out as the only mining company to secure a spot in the Top 100. Additionally, among the mining companies listed in the Top 500, Newmont is the sole operator with operations in Mexico.

TIME and Statista have introduced a robust methodology to determine the world's most sustainable companies for 2024. This methodology emphasizes tangible, public commitments to environmental improvement and tracks companies' adherence to them.

Top-ranking companies have pledged their adherence to climate initiatives like the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) and have received high scores from the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). Criteria for evaluation include Scope 1 and 2 emissions, energy consumption relative to company size, emissions reductions in recent years, and the proportion of renewable energy used. Ranked 84th on the list, Newmont stands out among the 100 global sustainability leaders, with France-based Schneider Electric leading with a score of 88.86 out of 100. Newmont stands out as a leader in the natural resources and mining sector, achieving a score of 71.64 on the sustainability index. Many high-ranking companies are from sectors that do not produce a significant number of physical products, such as banking, technology, and consulting.

Newmont’s environmental targets for 2030 aim to reduce absolute greenhouse gas emissions in Scope 1 and 2 by 32%, decrease GHG emissions intensity in both Scope 1 and 2 by 32%, and lower absolute Scope 3 emissions, which cover joint venture assets and its supply chain, by 30%.

Alongside Newmont, the ranking features five other natural resources and mining companies within the Top 500. Ireland-based CRH is ranked 162nd, India-based Hindustan Zinc holds the 239th spot, France-based Imerys ranks 296th, and Germany-based Aurubis is positioned at 468th.

Other Companies Listed
While Newmont is the sole mining company listed in the Top 100, the ranking also includes companies that provide services and supplies to the mining industry. SGS holds sixth position, followed by Siemens at 11th, Stantec at 14th, WSP at 53rd, Accenture at 54th, Cisco at 57th, Microsoft at 64th, and Epiroc at 95th.

Some of the products and services offered by these companies to the mining sector directly contribute to reducing the environmental impact of mining operations. At Mexico Mining Forum 2023 ECHO, Joseph Starwood, Director of Industry Digital Strategy for Mining, Microsoft, highlighted how mining companies can utilize the Microsoft Azure platform to monitor equipment at mining sites through sensors. This approach optimizes maintenance practices and reduces emissions by improving fuel efficiency. "The idea of the digital sustainable mine of the future combines the physical mines we know today with new ESG-aligned business models and capabilities, enabled by an intelligent digital fabric,” Starwood said.

Abraham Tacho, Regional Business Leader Mexico, Stantec, has also noted the company’s approach to designing mining projects considering their impact on communities, often linked with water and waste matters. “Sustainability has become critical in recent years. Stantec’s specialized ESG groups and services extend beyond the mining industry to a wide range of clients in various sectors, which significantly enhances our value proposition. The quantity and quality of our experts contribute immensely to this value,” Tacho said in an interview with MBN.

Ganfeng Lithium Initiates Arbitration Against Mexico

By Paloma Duran | Journalist and Industry Analyst 
- Mon, 06/24/2024 - 
MEXICAN BUSINESS

China's Ganfeng Lithium, together with its subsidiaries Bacanora Lithium and Sonora Lithium, have initiated arbitration against the Mexican government following the cancellation of its mining concession for the Sonora Lithium project. This move, registered last Friday on the website of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), marks a significant escalation in the discussion.

The dispute stems from the approval of López Obrador's Mining Law in April 2022, which granted the State exclusive control of lithium exploration and production. Subsequently, President López Obrador cancelled the lithium concessions of the company, claiming that Ganfeng and its subsidiaries did not meet the required investment thresholds. "This decision was driven by both the nationalization of the lithium resources and the failure to meet investment, which led to the withdrawal of our concession," stated Alfonso Durazo Montaño, Governor, Sonora.

The Sonora Lithium project was originally scheduled to begin commercial production in 2023, officially making Mexico a lithium producer. However, political uncertainty has left the future of lithium exploration efforts in Mexico uncertain. While industry stakeholders have supported Ganfeng's position, arguing that the government's decision to revoke the concessions lacked a legal basis, the Ministry of Economy has not changed its stance.

Peter Secker, CEO, Bacanora, stressed that if the matter is not resolved through the courts or through the creation of a new partnership, the project could end up being sold. "No one is going to invest a billion dollars unless they have some kind of security. People will prefer, for these larger projects, to go to lower risk jurisdictions," Secker said.

According to a US Geological Survey's 2024 report, Mexico ranks ninth in lithium reserves with 1.7Mt. Despite Mexico’s lower lithium reserves, experts suggest that with the exploitation of economically viable deposits, Mexico could emerge as a major player in lithium production. However, the country faces two challenges. First, Mexico's lithium reserves are mainly in clay formations- Second, the government has limited the participation of private companies in lithium production.

In July 2023, CONAHCYT began developing a method to separate clay from lithium in Sonora, stating it was a technology previously only held by China, and that CONAHCYT had made 95% progress in this task.

Teck, Taku River Tlingit First Nation, BC partner on Tulsequah Chief mine remediation

 June 25, 2024 

River in Atlin, BC, near the Tulsequah mine. Stock image.

The province of British Columbia, Teck Resources (TSX: TECK:B) and the Taku River Tlingit First Nation (TRTFN) have agreed to jointly advance remediation of the former Tulsequah Chief mine site.

Five years after the Ministry of Energy and Mines first ordered a now-bankrupt junior mining company to clean up an acid rock drainage problem at the Tulsequah mine near Atlin, BC, the provincial government began taking the initial steps to remediate the defunct mine.

A report prepared for the ministry in 2020 estimated the capital cost of closing the mine and the reclamation work at C$48 million (about $36m). The cost of annual monitoring and maintenance is estimated at C$27 million ($20m)

The Tulsequah Chief mine site, located within TRTFN territory approximately 100 km southwest of Atlin, is a historic underground copper, lead and zinc mine, which was operated from 1951-57 by Cominco, a predecessor company to Teck, and is currently owned by Chieftain Metals Inc.

The leadership of the TRTFN has been saying since 2018 that the Tulsequah Chief mine needs remediation to prevent further degradation of the Tulsequah River.

Work at the mine was suspended since the Toronto-based Chieftain Metals filed for receivership in 2016, over C$27 million in debt.

“The Taku River Tlingit First Nation is committed to ensuring the Tulsequah Chief Mine is remediated and restored to natural conditions, according to Tlingit values and cultural principles of environmental stewardship,” Charmaine Thom, spokesperson for Taku River Tlingit First Nation, said in a news release.

“The co-operative partnership between the Government of British Columbia, Teck, and TRTFN reinforces the collective commitment to clean abandoned mines to an acceptable condition that meets the standard of both governments, this is an important step toward reconciliation,” Thom said.

Under this approach, Teck will voluntarily undertake and fund site investigation work in 2024-25. Teck will also lead implementation of the final closure plan. The 2024-25 work will include establishing safe site access, assessing underground mine conditions, monitoring water quality and flow, and evaluating waste rock disposal sites.

This work will inform the final Tulsequah Reclamation and Closure Plan, which is being co-developed by Teck and the TRTFN, guided by the TRTFN's vision for their future use of the restored site.

“We look forward to continue working co-operatively with the Province and Taku River Tlingit First Nation to advance remediation of the Tulsequah Chief Mine site,” Teck’s vice-president environment Scott Maloney said in the release.

“While Teck has not been the owner of Tulsequah for some time, we recognize the importance of all parties working together to progress remediation of this historic site, in support of reconciliation and sustainability, and as a reflection of the best practices of today’s modern, responsible mining sector in BC,” Maloney said.

The province said it will work with Teck and the TRTFN to enable the efficient implementation of this approach under B.C.'s regulatory framework. This work, the Ministry said, will help to protect the Tulsequah River, enable the land to be restored as quickly as possible for the TRTFN's beneficial use and ensure TRTFN rights and laws are incorporated into reclamation planning at Tulsequah.

“We are committed to ensuring the Tulsequah Chief Mine site is cleaned up in accordance with the province’s high environmental standards,” said Josie Osborne, Minister of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation.
LithiumBank Announces Largest Known Lithium-Brine Resources in North America and Highest Resource Grade in Alberta

NEWSFILE - NEWSFILE - MON JUN 24, 2024



Calgary, Alberta--(Newsfile Corp. - June 24, 2024)

 - LithiumBank Resources Corp. (TSXV: LBNK) (OTCQX: LBNKF) ("LithiumBank'' or the "Company") is pleased to announce the initial National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") lithium-brine mineral resource estimates of 10,078,000 tonnes of inferred Lithium Carbonate Equivalent ("LCE") at a grade of 79.4 mg/L lithium within the Leduc Formation ("Fm") aquifer, and 11,603,000 tonnes inferred LCE at 80.9 mg/L lithium within the Swan Hills Fm aquifer underlying its 100% owned Park Place lithium brine project ("Park Place") located in west-central Alberta. The initial mineral resource estimate assessments were prepared by global technology company SLB (NYSE: SLB) using 3D static modelling mining workflows. These assessments were then used to determine the resource estimates and reviewed and validated by a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 of Canada. The total inferred mineral resource for the Park Place project is 21,681,000 tonnes LCE between the two formations contained within the license boundaries with a combined average grade of 80.2 mg/L lithium. The Company anticipates filing a NI 43-101-compliant technical report in respect of Park Place on SEDAR+ within 45 days of this announcement.

"LithiumBank spent the past five-years consolidating Park Place brine hosted mineral licenses. This work has now culminated in 100% ownership of the largest LCE inferred mineral resource in North America and with the highest recorded lithium grade in Alberta. This is a remarkable achievement for the Company. The Park Place resource puts LithiumBank's collective lithium brine resources inventory for the Company's Alberta projects at 27.78 million tonnes LCE. This presents district scale potential opportunity for Canada to become a major supplier of lithium in North America," commented LithiumBank CEO, Rob Shewchuk. "The Company will now focus on additional brine sample assaying, completing lithium extraction test work, and initiate a Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") for Park Place. We believe this can be expeditiously achieved as we can make use of our knowledge gained from our Boardwalk PEA, effectively dated February 22, 2024, located approximately 50 km to the north, in which the Leduc Formation brine is similar in chemistry, depth of resource, porosity and permeability. Park Place brine will be chemically and metallurgically evaluated at the Company's, exclusively licensed, 10,000 L/day Direct Lithium Extraction ("DLE") pilot plant in Calgary following a bulk brine sampling program in H2 2024."

Highlights:Park Place is the largest known NI 43-101 inferred lithium brine resource estimate in North America.
Highest known reported lithium-in-brine grades used in a NI 43-101 inferred lithium resource estimate in Alberta.
10,078,000 tonnes inferred LCE within the Leduc Fm aquifer at an average of 79.4 mg/L lithium.
11,603,000 tonnes inferred LCE within the Swan Hills Fm aquifer, which underlies the Leduc Formation, at an average of 80.9 mg/L lithium.
Multiple high porosity areas occur that have a combined Leduc & Swan Hills Fm thickness of over 350 metres, and as high as 510 m, to be studied for potential selection of future PEA.
Subsurface reservoir modelling conducted by SLB included data from 420 wells, 104 km2 of 3D seismic data and 262 km of two-dimensional ("2D") seismic data.
Technical work pertaining to mineral resources to be documented in the technical report was performed by SLB, and overseen by Qualified Persons from Matrix Solutions Inc.
The subsurface reservoir model constructed by SLB will assist in planning well networks and locations in future economic and engineering studies such as a PEA; and
Park Place bulk brine sample collection to occur in H2 2024 to be included in the 10,000 L/day continuous direct lithium extraction ("cDLE") pilot plant test work located in the Company's DLE facility in Calgary, Alberta.


Figure 1: Map of the Park Place project showing Area of Interest ("AOI") and lithium brine samples used in the Park Place NI 43-101 resource estimate along with surface infrastructure.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10140/214147_ce6f8256f4b9fbb1_001full.jpg

The consolidated Park Place project consists of 1,404,558 acres of contiguous Brine Hosted Mineral Licenses ("BHML"). The project is situated between Edson, Fox Creek, and Hinton, approximately 180 km west of Edmonton, and is approximately 50 km to the south of the Company's Boardwalk lithium brine project ("Boardwalk"). This area has seen over 70 years of hydrocarbon extraction resulting in a well-established and well-trained labour force, networks of all-weather gravel roads, drill sites that can be easily accessed from Provincial highways, and electrical transmission lines that run through and adjacent to the project (see Figure 1).

Reservoir Evaluation

The reservoir evaluation was completed by SLB and overseen be Alex Haluszka, M.Sc., P.Geo. of Matrix Solutions Inc., a qualified person ("QP") under NI 43-101.

The Park Place NI 43-101 mineral resource estimate includes inferred mineral resources from both the Leduc and Swan Hills Formations of 21,681,000 tonnes LCE at a weighted average grade of 80.2 mg/L lithium (Table 1). Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

The mineral resource estimate work was prepared within a portion of the Park Place Property (81%) that is defined as the area of interest ("AOI") and totals 1,140,115 acres (Figure 1). The Swan Hills Fm directly underlies the Leduc Fm and appear to be in hydraulic communication based on regionally available pressure data. While they may represent a regionally connected aquifer system, the two formations are evaluated separately due to an identifiable difference in lithology and porosity. The Swan Hills Fm is mapped to from 24 to 264 m in thickness within the claims area and the Leduc Fm immediately overlies the Swan Hills Fm, where present, with a maximum thickness of 366 m within the claims area. The maximum observed combined thickness where the two units overlap within the property is 511 m of highly porous reservoir rock occur that would potentially present ideal locations for consideration within a PEA (Figure 2).



Figure 2: A-A' Cross-section through Park Place (as shown in Figure 3) of the effective porosity model for Leduc Fm and Swan Hills Fm.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10140/214147_ce6f8256f4b9fbb1_002full.jpg

Table 1: Park Place Lithium global in-situ Inferred Mineral Resource Estimations
Reporting parameters Leduc Fm Domain Swan Hills Fm Domain Combined Total
Total Volume (km3)1 501.2 660.5 1,161.7
Pore Volume (km3)2 25.1 28.4 53.5
Average Li Concentration (mg/L) 79.4 80.9 80.23
Average Effective Porosity (%) 5.0 4.3 4.64
Average brine pore space (%) 95 95 95
Total elemental Li resource (tonnes) 1,893,000 2,180,000 4,073,000
Total LCE (tonnes) 10,078,000 11,603,000 21,681,000


1. Total volume of rock and pore space
2. Total volume of effective porosity
3. Calculated using a weighted average (by pore volume) from the average grade of the Leduc and Swan Hills formations
4. Calculated using a weighted average porosity by total formation volume for both Leduc and Swan Hills formations

Note 1: Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by geology, environment, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
Note 2: The weights are reported in metric tonnes (1,000 kg or 2,204.6 lbs).
Note 3: Tonnage numbers are rounded to the nearest 1,000 unit.
Note 4: In a 'confined' aquifer (as reported herein), effective porosity is an appropriate parameter to use for the resource estimate.
Note 5: The resource estimation was completed and reported using a cut-off of 50 mg/L Li.
Note 6: To describe the resource in terms of industry standard, a conversion factor of 5.323 is used to convert elemental Li to Li2CO3, or Lithium Carbonate Equivalent (LCE).

The NI 43-101 mineral resource three-dimensional model utilized over 1,171 wells that have been drilled into the Devonian aged strata being evaluated. Of the 1,171 wells, 420 have good quality data to make stratigraphic picks within the AOI as shown in Figure 3. The dataset consisted of 196 wells intersecting the top of the Leduc Fm, 300 wells intersecting the top of the Swan Hills Fm, and 236 wells intersecting the bottom of the Swan Hills Fm.

SLB constructed 3D geological and porosity models in Petrel™ subsurface software by using existing well logs and a combination of 3D and 2D seismic data acquired throughout the AOI at Park Place. SLB conducted petrophysical analysis of 118 wells, processed and interpreted 3D and 2D seismic data to correlate between acoustic impedance and porosity. Porosity data was parameterized in a 3D grid by distributing the porosity evaluated from well logs using a variogram derived from 3D and 2D seismic impedance data. Log porosity was verified via direct petrophysical correlations to core porosity measurements. This demonstrated that the petrophysical log-based porosity correlates well with effective core porosity.


Figure 3: Tonnage map of the Park Place indicating A-A' cross-section from figure 2 and wells used for stratigraphic picks.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10140/214147_ce6f8256f4b9fbb1_003full.jpg

Total in-place formation brine volume was obtained by multiplying the total rock volume of the Leduc and Swan Hills Fm within the AOI using the estimated porosity volume of the 3D grid.

An analysis of available oil and gas reserves information indicates an original hydrocarbon saturation of these reservoirs of approximately 5%. SLB models provided estimated volumes of each formation within the claims area by summing the effective porosity grid blocks overlapping the claims and assuming 95% of the pore space being brine saturated:The Leduc Fm, within the AOI, hosts 23.8 km3 of lithium-rich brine.
The Swan Hills Fm, within the AOI, hosts 26.9 km3 of lithium-rich brine.
Combined total of 50.8 km3 of brine within the AOI at Park Place.

North American Brine Resources



Figure 4: Comparison of LCE brine resources by select companies. With the addition of the Park Place inferred lithium resource, LithiumBank is now the largest known holder of inferred LCE brine resources by a company in North America.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10140/214147_ce6f8256f4b9fbb1_004full.jpg

Inferred Mineral Resource Calculation Process

During 2022 and 2024, LithiumBank obtained permission from two oil and gas companies to collect Leduc and Swan Hills formations brine samples from 2 separate oil and gas wells for the purpose of analytical testing.Three brine samples were collected from a 72-metre-thick vertical interval at the top of the Leduc Fm from well 100/12-03-059-23W5/00 and returned grades ranging between 71.2 – 82.0 mg/L lithium with an overall average of 77.2 mg/L lithium (Figure 1).
Three brine samples were collected from a 2-metre-thick vertical interval at the top of the Swan Hills Fm in well 100/01-23-062-20W5/00 returning grades between 75.5 – 84.9 mg/L lithium with an overall average of 80.1 mg/L lithium.

Samples were analysed at AGAT Laboratories, an ISO 17025:2017 certified lab, in Calgary Alberta. LithiumBank implemented Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QA/QC) protocols for the analysis. Testing of brine samples from the 2 wells included duplicate samples, sample blanks, and laboratory-prepared sample standards. Samples were collected from the well head by BV Labs technicians (Leduc samples) and AGAT Lab technicians (Swan Hills samples) and couriered to AGAT Laboratories for analysis in Calgary.

The LithiumBank brine sampling and analytical programs showed the Leduc and Swan Hills Formation aquifers underlying the Park Place Property contain elevated concentrations of lithium and the sampling program validated the post-2010s minerals industry exploration Li-brine results, with the exception of the historical Li-brine data compiled by the Government of Alberta ("GoA"). Hence, a total of 40 LithiumBank-derived and historical brine samples were used to determine the grade for the inferred mineral resource estimations (7 brine analyses from the Leduc Fm and 33 brine analyses from the Swan Hills Fm). Furthermore, Roy Eccles, a QP under NI 43-101 was involved in the historical minerals industry Li-brine sample collection campaigns and can therefore validate the collection, chain-of-custody, and analytical procedures that were used to determine select historical lithium-brine values. The QP was not able to validate the GoA data for use in the resource modelling and estimation process.

The QP assessed both within-property and adjacent property Li-brine data using historical mineral industry- and LithiumBank-derived Li-brine values. In the QPs opinion average Li-brine concentrations of 79.4 mg/L Li and 80.9 mg/L Li should be used to estimate the Li-brine mineral resources for the Leduc and Swan Hills aquifers, respectively, underlying the Park Place property. Additional brine sampling and assay testing is required at Park Place to provide additional confidence to the distribution of lithium within the Leduc Fm and Swan Hills Fm aquifers.

Resource Estimate Calculation

The NI 43-101 mineral resource estimates were calculated as a global in-situ resource within the Leduc and underlying Swan Hills formations. The Park Place Li-brine resource estimate is classified as an inferred mineral resource in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum definition standards and best practice guidelines (2014, 2019) and the disclosure rule NI 43-101 as adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators.

Combined, the Leduc and Swan Hills Fm aquifers consist of a total of 1,161.7 cubic kilometres (Leduc Fm = 501.2 km3 and Swan Hills 660.5 km3). Within the aquifers, the Leduc Fm hosts 23.8 km3 of brine with a lithium concentration of 79.4 mg/L and the Swan Hills Fm hosts 26.9 km3 of brine with a lithium concentration of 80.9 mg/L. Total elemental lithium in the Leduc Fm is 1,893,000 tonnes and 2,180,000 million tonnes in the Swan Hills Fm. To determine the amount of elemental lithium the following formula was used:

RLi = A x T x P x C

With RLi = lithium resources of selected reservoir(kg), A = surface area (km2), T = thickness (m), P = effective porosity (expressed between 0 and 1), C = average concentration (mg/l).

Multiplying the elemental lithium by a factor of 5.323 determines the LCE quantities that are stated to be 9,643,000 tonnes inferred LCE in the Leduc Fm and 11,372,000 tonnes inferred LCE in the Swan Hills Fm. The combined inferred lithium-brine resource estimate of both the Leduc and Swan Hills Formations is 21,681,000 tonnes LCE with a weighted average lithium grade of 80.2 mg/L. Figure 3 illustrates the combined (Leduc and Swan Hills Fm) tonnage map of the AOI with hotter colours indicating areas of higher combined tonnage.

An evaluation of permeability of the reservoir was completed in addition to the reservoir pore volume. The QP for reservoir evaluation believes there is sufficient permeability and pressure within the reservoir that brine production wells can be completed to deliver brine to surface for consideration in future economic assessment scoping studies

Lithium Extraction Evaluation

The evaluation of the suitability of applying DLE as a mineral processing technology for Park Place has been overseen by Maurice Shevalier, P.Chem, of Matrix Solutions Inc., QP as defined in NI 43-101.

LithiumBank has yet to conduct mineral processing test work on brine from Park Place; however, brine characteristics of the Leduc Fm and the Swan Hills Fm at Park Place are similar enough to the brine at Boardwalk to safely assume the DLE technology used to extract lithium from the brine will be successful at Park Place. The Company is expected to conduct a bulk brine sampling program from both the Leduc and Swan Hills formations in H2 2024. Park Place will benefit from an existing, exclusive licensing agreement with G2L Greenview Resources Ltd. ("G2L") and piloting with their cDLE® Ion Exchange ("IX") technology. The G2L IX technology is unique in that it is designed to work at high flow rates while maintaining a very high recovery of lithium (98%) and achieving a high purity (70%) lithium eluate, as reported in the Boardwalk PEA dated effective February 22, 2024. The Boardwalk PEA demonstrates that lower cost and readily available reagents such as quick lime (CaO) and sulphuric acid (H2SO4) can produce a high purity lithium sulphate eluate and lowering the cost of downstream processing of an LHM.

The scientific and technical information relating to the Park Place mineral resources presented in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Alex Haluszka P. Geol. of Matrix Solutions Inc. Mr. Alex Haluszka is independent of LithiumBank and the Park Place property, and a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101.

The scientific and technical information relating to the Park Place mineral resources, related to the potential of lithium extraction, presented in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Maurice Shevalier, P.Chem, of Matrix Solutions Inc. Mr. Maurice Shevalier, P.Chem, is independent of LithiumBank and the Park Place property, and a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101.

The scientific and technical information relating to the brine sampling and lithium grade validation for the Park Place mineral resources presented in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Roy Eccles P. Geol. of APEX Geoscience Ltd. Mr. Eccles is independent of LithiumBank and the Park Place Property, and a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101.

Risks and Uncertainties

There is no guarantee that a company can successfully extract lithium from Alberta's Devonian petroleum system in a commercial capacity. Initial mineral processing bench-scale and/or demonstration pilot test work may not translate to a full-scale commercial operation.

LithiumBank has been dependent on petro-companies to access brine for chemical analysis. In the absence of not owning their own wells, LithiumBank must work with petro-companies to obtain small and bulk brine samples to build on its current data set. The Company is currently negotiating to selectively acquire existing wells within the AOI, similar to what the Company has done at Boardwalk (news release, May 16, 2024) to allow for additional brine sampling.

The information used to quantify the reservoir effective porosity was historical information collected through petroleum exploration in the study area. Therefore, there is an implicit bias in this dataset towards portions of the reservoir that are hydrocarbon saturated. Although the QP believes the reservoir properties are sufficiently representative of the bulk formation, this will need to be confirmed through continued exploration and data collection. The existing measurements come from a combination of secondary physical properties (geophysics) and core analysis that were upscaled to the bulk reservoir volume. The bulk reservoir properties have not yet been confirmed through targeted exploration drilling and pumping tests from the brine resource interval. Furthermore, DLE technologies have not been tested directly as an extraction technique for the Park Place brines. At the current time, DLE applicability has been inferred from testing activities completed at LithiumBank's other properties.

About LithiumBank Resources Corp.

LithiumBank Resources Corp. (TSXV: LBNK) (OTCQX: LBNKF), is a publicly traded lithium company that is focused on developing its two flagship projects, Boardwalk and Park Place, in Western Canada. The Company holds 2,130,470 acres of brown-field lithium brine licenses, across three (3) districts in Alberta and Saskatchewan. The Company has licensed a DLE technology from Go2Lithium.

About G2L Greenview Resources Inc. (Go2Lithium)

G2L Greenview Resources Inc is a 100% owned subsidiary of Go2Lithium Inc. Go2Lithium Inc. was formed in early 2023 as a 50/50 joint venture between Computational Geosciences Inc (CGI), a subsidiary of the Robert Friedland-chaired Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (NYSE: IE) and Clean TeQ Water (ASX: CNQ). Please see Clean TeQ's website (www.cleanteqwater.com) for additional information on their suite of water treatment and metal extraction technologies.
END SEA BED MINING
Japan finds over 200 million tonnes of battery metals in seabed

Cecilia Jamasmie | June 25, 2024 |

Nodules collector vehicle. Image courtesy of The Metals Company.)

Japanese researchers have found more than 200 million tonnes of manganese nodules rich in battery metals in the Pacific Ocean, within the country’s exclusive economic zone.


The team of experts from the University of Tokyo and the Nippon Foundation said the fist-sized nodules cover an extensive area of the seabed near Minamitorishima, a remote Tokyo Island.

These metals-rich rocks are located at depths of about 5,500 metres and are thought to be very similar to the polymetallic nodules found in the Clarion-Clipperton zone in the Pacific, as they hold cobalt, nickel and copper in addition to manganese.

The team estimates the deposit contains 610,000 tonnes of cobalt (equivalent to 75 years of Japan’s consumption) and 740,000 tonnes of nickel (11 years), according to the Japan Times.

The Nippon Foundation and other entities expect to start large-scale extraction of nodules next year, to be delivered to Japanese companies with the capability to process them. Starting in 2026, the non-profit plans to set up a joint venture with multiple Japanese companies to develop the minerals as locally sourced materials.

The University of Tokyo will contribute to the project from an academic standpoint by conducting detailed analysis of the material extracted from the seabed.
Polymetallic nodules collected by The Metals Company during a deep sea trial in the Pacific Ocean in November 2022. (Image: The Metals Company.)

The presence of manganese nodules in the area was first found during a survey in 2016, which involved a team from the university and other organizations.

A thorough sampling survey was carried out from late April to early June this year to calculate the deposit estimates.

BMO analyst Colin Hamilton said the depth at which the nodules are found makes mining them more complex than it sounds. “Extraction will not be simple, and we see this as a potential test case for the benefits versus disadvantages of deep sea mining of materials relating to the global fuel to materials transition,” he wrote in a brief on Tuesday.

Hamilton noted that several key metals consumers have already stated they will not buy deep-sea-sourced materials until further studies are conducted on the potential impact of these activities

Polymetallic nodules, also called manganese nodules, contain four essential battery metals: cobalt, nickel, copper and manganese, in a single ore. (Image courtesy of The Metals Company.)

Major global banks such Credit Suisse, Lloyds, NatWest, and Standard Chartered, Dutch bank ABN Amro, and Spanish group Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, have also make a point. They have all recently introduced policies that rule out funding deep-sea exploration and extraction.

Demand for nickel and cobalt is expected to surge in the coming decades. According to a White House paper, the demand for these metals is estimated to increase by 400% to 600% as battery-powered technology replaces oil and gas-powered systems.

The Metals Company (Nasdaq: TMC), one of the most advanced firms scooping up nodules from the seafloor, announced in early June that it had successfully produced the world’s first cobalt sulphate derived exclusively from seafloor polymetallic nodules.

The International Seabed Authority (ISA) is currently working on the world’s initial regulations for underwater mining, with plans to finalize the code by 2025. Despite the absence of formal rules, deep sea mining could technically start as soon as July, coinciding with the ISA’s upcoming meeting.

Norway to award Arctic blocks for seabed mining in 2025

By Reuters
June 26, 2024

A view shows active chimney venting at the Loki's Castle Vent Field on the Arctic Mid-Oceanic Ridge, and white microbial mats can be seen on the chimney at a depth of around 2,500m, in this undated handout picture. 
University of Bergen, Centre for Deep Sea Research/Handout via REUTERS /File Photo

OSLO, June 26 (Reuters) - Norway offered large areas of the Arctic region for its inaugural seabed mineral licensing round on Wednesday and aims to award exploration permits during the first half of 2025, the country's energy ministry said.
Norway may become the first country in the world to start commercial deepsea mining, hoping to extract minerals needed for solar panels, wind turbines and electric car batteries needed to replace fossil fuel energy.

"The world needs minerals for the green transition, and the government wants to explore if it is possible to extract seabed minerals in a sustainable manner from the Norwegian continental shelf," Energy Minister Terje Aasland said in a statement.
The government has previously said preliminary official resource estimates showed substantial accumulations of metals and minerals, ranging from copper to rare earth elements.

In January, the Norwegian parliament voted in favour of opening about 280,000 square kms (108,000 square miles) of ocean areas between Jan Mayen island and the Svalbard archipelago for seabed mineral exploration.
The 386 blocks proposed on Wednesday cover about 38% of the total area opened by parliament, and the selection was based on industry input, the energy ministry said.

Reuters Graphics
Seabed mining, however, has attracted criticism from environmentalists concerned at the prospect the pursuit of profit will disrupt one of the last parts of the natural environment that is relatively pristine and is little understood. They are challenging Norway's plans in court.

WWF, which filed the lawsuit in May, condemned the proposal on Wednesady, saying it was a significant blow to the country's reputation as responsible steward of the oceans.
Greenpeace, also on Wednesday, said the proposed blocks constituted a "shockingly large" area, given previous warnings from scientists regarding the potential impact on fragile ecosystems.
Seabed mineral exploration plans also face opposition from a number of countries, including France, that have called for a global moratorium to take more time to better understand the impact on deepsea organisms.

The Council of the European Union on Tuesday "noted, opens new tab with concern" Norway's seabed mining plans, emphasising the need for a thorough impact assessment.
The Norwegian government has said the initial exploration stage will have a minimal impact on seabed organisms and that companies will need separate consents before any production can start.

Oslo prepares first licensing round for seabed mining

The Norwegian government is ready to look thousands of meters into the abyss for precious mineral and metals, and now announces public consultations for a first licensing round.


Norway eyes extraction of seabed minerals in the North Atlantic. 
Photo: screenshot of video from the Norwegian Shelf Directorate

By Atle Staalesen
June 26, 2024
BARENTS OBSERVER 

Amid mounting domestic and international criticism, the Norwegian Ministry of Energy is starting preparations for a first licensing round on seabed minerals.

“The world needs minerals for the green transition, and the government wants to explore if it is possible to extract seabed minerals in a sustainable manner from the Norwegian continental shelf,” Energy Minister Terje Aslant says in a statement.

“Today, we are presenting our proposal for areas to be announced in the first licensing round for seabed minerals for public consultation. We plan to award licenses in the first half of 2025,” he explains.

The proposal includes large areas in the Norwegian Sea and the Greenland Sea.

Norway is among the first countries in the world to open up for commercial seabed mineral mining.

The controversial mining is supported by a solid majority in the Storting, the Norwegian parliament. But environmentalists and international experts warn about potential devastating consequences.

“I am not proud of being part of the ‘sea nation Norway’ today,” says Truls Gulowsen, leader of Friends of the Earth Norway.

“I believe researchers, environmentalists and the rest of the world looks strange at us,” he says in a comment on Facebook.

Also the Norwegian Sámi Parliament expresses opposition to the mining plans.

“For the Sámi and other Indigenous Peoples, the ocean is not just a resource, but a foundation of life, culture, and sustenance. The potential environmental degradation caused by deep sea mining could severely impact our food security, disrupt our traditional practices, and undermine our cultural heritage,” a statement from the Sami Council reads.

Also the EU is skeptical. Following Norway’s decision to greenlight seabed mining in early January 2024, the European Parliament voted in favour of a resolution against the plans.

With the resolution, the Parliament’s reaffirmed its support for a seabed mining moratorium and called on the EU Commission, Member States and all countries to apply a precautionary approach.