Thursday, July 18, 2024


Serbia: Protests on the cards if lithium mining goes ahead

Sanja Kljajic
DW


As Olaf Scholz travels to Serbia for a summit on critical raw materials on Friday, Serbian activists have labeled their government's decision to greenlight lithium mining "an epic crime against people and nature."

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic said in June that Serbia could begin mining lithium as early as 2028 following new guarantees from Anglo-Australian mining giant Rio Tinto

In the villages of the Jadar Valley in western Serbia, even recent scorchingly high temperatures haven't stopped farmers from working in the fields. About 18,000 people live in this area, mostly young families with children who rely on the valley's fertile land.

In the last five years, their lives have been turned upside down by the plans of Anglo-Australian mining giant Rio Tinto to open a lithium mine in the area.

The family of vet and farmer Zlatko Kokanovic has lived here for generations. He knows the area like the back of his hand and is certain that the mine and the community cannot exist side by side.

"The plan is that the main processing plant will be here — just a few hundred meters away from our church. Between 4,000 and 5,000 tons of rock material will be crushed there daily, treated with 1,000 tons of sulfuric acid, and washed with huge amounts of water, which will then end up in the River Jadar," Kokanovic told DW.
Fierce local opposition to mining plans

Kokanovic's home is often used as a "crisis HQ" for the association Ne damo Jadar, which means "We won't give up Jadar" and was set up by residents of the Jadar Valley who want to stop the opening of the mine.

The association argues that if locals have to leave their properties, they will not only lose their homes but also their primary source of income, and that the mine will devastate the environment.
The association Ne damo Jadar was set up by Jadar Valley residents opposed to Rio Tinto's lithium mining plans. Pictured here: An activist in the village of Gornje Nedeljice wearing a Ne damo Jadar T-shirtImage: Jelena Djukic Pejic/DW

"Cars for Europe, batteries for the Chinese, and landfills, diseases, cancers and who knows what else for us Serbs. It's better to mine in Serbia than in Germany or France," Dragan Karajcic of the association Ne damo Jadar told DW.
Divided opinions

There has been heated debate about the future of the region's vast lithium deposits for five years now.

For locals and many Serbian citizens, the project poses a significant environmental threat. For others, it constitutes a path to economic prosperity and a development opportunity for Serbia.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Loznica, western Serbia, on June 28, 2024, to protest against lithium mining in the region
Image: VLADIMIR ZIVOJINOVIC/AFP via Getty Images

After mass protests across the country, the Serbian government decided in 2022 to halt the lithium mining project. "With this, as far as the Jadar and Rio Tinto project is concerned, everything is finished. It's over," declared then-Prime Minister Ana Brnabic.
Serbian government U-turn

Earlier this month, however, Serbia's Constitutional Court annulled the government's decision, stating it was "not in accordance with the Constitution or the law." The government has now decided to proceed with the project.

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic indicated in June that lithium extraction could begin as early as 2028, having received new guarantees from mining giant Rio Tinto.

"We believe that the mine will not endanger anyone or anything," said Vucic, "But first, we have to get guarantees from Europe that the environment and the lives of ordinary citizens will be preserved and improved with new jobs and better salaries."

\
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz (left, pictured here with Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic in 2022) plans to travel to Belgrade for a summit on critical raw materials — including lithium — on FridayImage: picture alliance/dpa

Rio Tinto has praised the government's decision, promising compliance with the highest standards of environmental protection and the creation of thousands of jobs.
EU supports lithium mining in Serbia

The European Union has repeatedly expressed its interest in Serbia's lithium deposits. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and European Commission Vice President for Energy Marosh Shevchovich will visit Belgrade on Friday, July 19, to attend the "Critical Raw Materials Summit," during which Serbia and the EU will sign a strategic partnership memorandum that includes provisions for lithium mining.

For opposition MP Aleksandar Jovanovic Cuta, the current situation is "an epic crime against people and nature." He called Scholz a "little American puppet" and says the German chancellor has taken the liberty of displacing people who "feed Serbia" from Gornje Nedeljice, one of the villages that will be most affected by the Rio Tinto mine.

This roadside sign in the village of Gornje Nedeljice, which is near the planned site of the mine, reads 'No mine. Yes life'Image: Jelena Djukic Pejic/DW

"Let Scholz and Shevchovich come to Zlatko Kokanovic and tell him: 'Look, Zlatko, I want lithium. The condition for that is you and your 100,000 liters of milk production disappear, and you move from your field.' Could he say that to a German farmer?" Jovanovic Cuta said to DW. He warns that there will be "a rebellion" in the coming weeks and months.

'Mine your lithium in Germany, Mr. Scholz'

For Zlatko Kokanovic, the current situation does not come as a surprise. Ne damo Jadar repeatedly warned the public that even after the government decided to stop the project, Rio Tinto did not leave the Jadar Valley, but merely reduced its activities.

"There is three times more lithium in Germany, Mr. Scholz, and it is found in underground thermal waters where it is much simpler to exploit and where there would be much less impact on the environment. Go ahead, mine your lithium in Germany," Kokanovic said in a video on the association's Facebook page addressing the German chancellor.

As the largest carmaker in the EU, Germany is highly interested in securing access to lithium, one of the raw materials needed to build electric vehicles. Sourcing lithium from Serbia would allow Germany to reduce its dependence on ChinaImage: John Walton/PA Wire/picture alliance

Kokanovic said that the group is not planning a protest for the arrival of the European delegation, but is focusing on other activities instead.

"We will not chase them around Belgrade and have no intention of wasting our strength and energy because it is clearly the plan and goal of this government to arrest us and put us behind bars. We will not allow them to do that," he said.
Protests and arrests

At the last major protest at the end of June, Ne damo Jadar gave the Serbian government until August 10 to adopt a law permanently banning geological research and the exploitation of lithium and boron in Serbia. Otherwise, members of the association warned, they would block railways and roads again, as protesters have done in the past.

MP Aleksandar Jovanovic Cuta is convinced that Vucic will "break his teeth" on this topic. "We are dealing with a company that no normal country would welcome, but that's why they found Aleksandar Vucic, a great brave fighter, who does not have the courage to defend his people but put himself in the service of Rio Tinto," he told DW.
Abandoned and roofless houses bought by Rio Tinto in the village of Gornje NedeljiceImage: Jelena Djukic Pejic/DW

Meanwhile, Rio Tinto continues its activities. They have already bought 161 hectares of the 854 hectares of land they are planning to buy in the Jadar Valley. Just over 50 households have been displaced so far. Of the 250 that remain, many homeowners say that no amount of money will persuade them to leave their properties.

But the company has also used rather an unusual tactic to persuade residents otherwise: Locals say that the company has offered homeowners an additional 5% on the purchase price if they remove the roof of their house.

These roofless houses create a grim atmosphere in the village: "They are killing us psychologically," says resident Dragan Karajcic, "It is a psychological war."

Edited by: Aingeal Flanagan

Sanja Kljajic Correspondent for DW's Serbian Service based in Novi Sad, Serbia@SSnajaKljajic

WWIII
Philippines to build airport on South China Sea island

Published: 18 Jul 2024 

The USS Gabrielle Giffords receives passing honours by Philippine Navy Officers aboard BRP Gregorio Del Pilar during the 3rd AFP-USINDOPACOM Maritime Cooperative Activity in the disputed South China Sea. 
(Photo by Handout / Armed Forces of the Philippines' Western Command / AFP)

The Philippines is developing an airport on an island it occupies in the South China Sea, as the Southeast Asian nation asserts its claims in the disputed waters amid lingering tensions with Beijing.
Procurement of land for the runway extension is underway for the Pag-asa Island Airport Development Project, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s communications office said in a statement on Thursday.

Pag-asa is the local name of Thitu Island in the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea, where Beijing lays sweeping claims. Once completed, the project is expected to provide an efficient mode of travel to and from the remote island where Filipino civilians and military personnel live, according to the statement.

The plan shows the Philippines’ resolve to keep its presence in contested waters, as China also pushes its claims that have been dashed by a 2016 arbitral ruling. Manila has also been sending vessels in the disputed sea, causing clashes with Beijing.

A military runway on the island of Balabac in Palawan province near the South China Sea is also nearing completion. Balabac is one of the four new sites that the US military can access under a defense agreement that was expanded last year.

"We are in the final stages of working on the Balabac military runway, especially since Palawan will play a big role in national security,” Marcos said.

The infrastructure projects are among priorities under the Marcos administration and are part of efforts to open the region south of the capital to new investments, ease transportation, and strengthen the tourism sector.

A New Chapter in the South China Sea Dispute

Amid tensions between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea, a new chapter has emerged in the region following the defense pact between the Philippines and Japan.

BYZUBAIR ALI SOOMRO
JULY 17, 2024
MODERN DIPLOMACY

:X @bongbongmarcos

Amid tensions between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea, a new chapter has emerged in the region following the defense pact between the Philippines and Japan. The Reciprocal Access Agreement (RAA) is designed to deploy forces on each other’s soil, to conduct joint military exercises, and Filipino forces will be able to carry out combat training in Japan. The pact is tailored due to the shared threat by China to Japan and the Philippines in the East China Sea and South China Sea, respectively. However, the pact has to be ratified by their respective parliaments. The defense pact carries significance for both signees to create an impression of deterrence and unity against China. Most significantly, the pact is a step to contain the influence of China with the assistance of the United States in the South China Sea.

The pact is the consequence of continuous skirmishes between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea. The most serious happened on June 17, when Chinese coast guard personnel wielding sticks, knives, and an axe surrounded and boarded three Philippine navy boats during a resupply mission to Second Thomas Shoal in the disputed Spratly Island. Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. denounced the actions of China in the South China Sea and warned that the death of any Filipino at the hands of China would be deemed close to an act of war. Besides, the Philippines asked for financial compensation of $1 million for the June collision.

But the Chinese Foreign Ministry termed it provocation and warned to stop it, saying that it was safeguarding its rights and enforcing law. So, the Philippines should bear the consequences of its infringement activities.

Actually, the dispute in the South China Sea has numerous reasons. Firstly, the region is rich with fishing, and with China controlling much of the area, it is becoming one of the largest fishing industries in the world. The fishing industry in China has constructively contributed to the Chinese economy, making her biggest exporter of aquatic products in the world. Secondly, the region is also rich in energy, as the US Geological Survey estimated in 2012 that the entire South China Sea contains around 12 billion barrels of oil and 1900 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Thirdly, control over the South China Sea would guarantee its security in distant waters. Also, China can expand its maritime navigation, which can outmatch US maritime dominance and power in East Asia. The South China Sea connects the Pacific Ocean to the Indian Ocean and helps with global commerce of goods and energy shipments to China, Japan, South Korea, and Russia. Control over this region enables China to thrive through exports. Lastly, China mitigates any vulnerability to be attacked through the South China Sea.

China is engaged in a tussle with the Philippines on four islands, namely the Spratly Islands, Paracel Islands, Macclesfield Bank, and Pratas Island and Reefs. China claims its historical right over these islands, which are covered by a nine-dash line in the South China Sea. Nine-Dash Line covers much of the South China Sea, even cutting half of the exclusive economic zone of the Philippines. The Spratly Islands, having rich marine resources, minerals, and hydrocarbon deposits, have been a bone of contention for standoffs among China, Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei. Reportedly, except Brunei, all others have established garrisons on the Spratly Islands.

China has also constructed artificial islands in the South China Sea to claim much of its territorial water. De facto, the United Nations Convention on Law of Seas (UNCLOS) permits the construction of artificial islands under Article 60, but it allows constructing it in their own exclusive economic zone, with the restriction that the island-constructing country should inform other coastal states nearby and preventing any harm to those countries.

In this regard, the Philippines filed a case in the Permanent Court of Arbitration, where in 2016 court favored the Philippines, declaring nine-dash line without legal basis. But China refused to comply with the decision, saying that the court lacks the jurisdiction to try this case. Notably, the powerful countries do not comply with most of the decisions of international courts or tribunals because they do not have any specific implementing machinery. They comply with the decision if they file a case in contentious jurisdiction, which remains binding on the parties to the case. However, where decisions are implemented by the United Nations Security Council, countries with veto power exercise their veto power to prevent the implementation of such decisions against themselves or their allies.

With this pact, the Philippines is also expected to benefit from the Japanese program, launched in April 2023, that is designed to provide weapons and equipment free of charge to like-minded countries to expand security cooperation, which will at least assist the Philippines in acquiring weapons and other such equipment to engage in any standoff with China effectively but still be unable to outmatch China. Besides, in November, Japan provided the Philippines with five surveillance radars to strengthen its coastal supervision capabilities, which will surely improve the surveillance of the Philippines’s end in the South China Sea.

Most importantly, the Philippines is strategically useful for the United States because the South China Sea dispute can drag the USA. So due to its proximity to Taiwan, it is too important for the USA to engage in any possible war on Taiwan since American analysts believe that if not today, China will invade it tomorrow. So, to assist her, the Philippines will play a key role. Thereby, the USA has played an active part in forming this pact to strengthen its allies against China in the region, maintain its influence, and contain the growing influence of China in the world.

For Japan, the pact does not seem too constructive since Japan does not engage with China in any direct dispute, but the presence of its forces on the Philippines’ soil and joint drills may be a deterrent for China and a signal of unity among its antagonists against China.

Japan and China have been in a tussle over a group of islands named Senkaku by Japan and Diaoyu by China. These islands can be frontiers to safeguard China from Japan and the USA. China can use the islands to establish submarine bases, missile bases, and radar systems that will surely expand China’s security and military in the region. As photographs suggested, Mischief Reef was armed with anti-aircraft weapons and a CIWS missile defense system in the South China Sea. In a similar way, this group of islands can be used for defense purposes in the East China Sea.

If the pact is ratified, possibly it will be ratified, it will be a signal that is not too sound but capable of deterring China from any engagement in war, but it will not help the Philippines get its due share in the South China Sea as China claims its historic right over its claimed sea with the help of the nine-dash line.

Inside the Group Behind Project 2025

Project 2025 architect Heritage Foundation isn't a typical think tank. It's built for action, not just debating ideas.


JULY 18, 2024
THE CONVERSATION

Activists protest against Project 2025 across from the Heritage Foundation headquarters in Washington, DC, January 27, 2024. (Image Credit: Elvert Barnes)

As the 2024 presidential election heats up, some people are hearing about the Heritage Foundation for the first time. The conservative think tank has a new, ambitious, and controversial policy plan, Project 2025, which calls for an overhaul of American public policy and government.

Project 2025 lays out many standard conservative ideas — like prioritizing energy production over environmental and climate-change concerns and rejecting the idea of abortion as health care — along with some much more extreme ones, like criminalizing pornography. And it proposes to eliminate or restructure countless government agencies in line with conservative ideology.

While think tanks sometimes have the reputation of being stuffy academic institutions detached from day-to-day politics, Heritage is far different. By design, Heritage was founded to not only develop conservative policy ideas but also to advance them through direct political advocacy.

All think tanks are classified as 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations, which are prohibited from engaging in elections and can take part in only a small amount of political lobbying. But some, like Heritage, also form affiliated 501(c)(4) organizations that allow them to participate in campaigns and lobby extensively. Heritage is one of the sponsors of the Republican National Convention, which wraps up in Milwaukee on July 18, 2024.

In research for my forthcoming book, “Partisan Policy Networks,” I’ve found that a growing share of think tanks are explicitly ideological, aligned with a single political party, and engaged in direct policy advocacy.

Still, Heritage stands out from all of the groups I investigated. It is much more conservative and more closely aligned with former President Donald Trump’s style of Republicanism. Heritage is also more aggressive in its advocacy for conservative ideas, pairing campaign spending with lobbying and large-scale grassroots mobilization.

Americans should expect to hear a lot more about its ideas, like those outlined in Project 2025, if Trump is reelected in November 2024.

A New Type of Think Tank


Two Republican congressional staffers, Ed Feulner and Paul Weyrich, formed Heritage in 1973 as an explicit rebuke to existing think tanks that they thought were either too liberal or too meek in advancing conservative ideas.

Feulner and Weyrich were particularly incensed about how a preeminent conservative think tank at the time, the American Enterprise Institute, or AEI, timed its release of a policy report in 1971 on whether to approve government funding for supersonic transport airplanes, which can fly faster than the speed of sound. AEI published its recommendations several days after Congress voted on the issue, because it “didn’t want to try to affect the outcome of the vote.”

Heritage turns this philosophy on its head. Rather than producing policy research for its own sake, Heritage conducts research, as one employee told me in 2018, “to build a case, to make the argument for policy change.”

For example, Heritage’s affiliated 501(c)(4) advocacy organization, Heritage Action for America, and Sentinel Action Fund, a Super PAC it set up in 2022, spend money to influence elections and lobby elected officials on issues as diverse as taxation, abortion, immigration, and the environment.

For this reason, some scholars and politicos call Heritage and other similar groups “do tanks” rather than “think tanks.”

Because Sentinel Action Fund is a Super PAC, it can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money to influence elections so long as they do not coordinate with candidate campaigns. Sentinel Action Fund then spent more than $13 million on voter outreach and advertising in the 2022 midterm elections. The fund’s self-described aim was to ensure GOP majorities in the House and Senate by aiding “key conservative fighters” in “tough general elections.”

People, Not Just Money

But it’s the people, even more than money, that make Heritage influential, my research shows.

Heritage has directly worked to place former and current employees in congressional offices and the executive branch. More than 70 former and current Heritage staffers began working for the Trump administration by 2017 — and four current Heritage staffers were members of Trump’s cabinet in 2021.

Heritage also says that it has more than 2 million local, volunteer activists and roughly 20,000 “Sentinel activists” who receive information from Heritage and take part in organized campaigns to push for conservative policies. My interviews show that activists who partner with Heritage take part in strategy calls, contact elected representatives with coordinated messages, and amplify the organization’s messaging on social media.

In one example from 2021, the Heritage Foundation developed a report on election fraud and voter integrity. Heritage Action for America, meanwhile, coordinated volunteers to deliver this report to Georgia legislators, had staffers meet with these legislators to advise them on passing new voting restrictions, and paid for television advertising urging citizens to support such laws.

Heritage, Trump, and Project 2025

All these efforts add up to a great deal of influence within the Republican Party. Heritage has played a key role in pushing Republicans toward more conservative policies since its creation.

When former President Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, for example, the Heritage Foundation had a ready-made conservative agenda for the new administration. By the end of his first term, Reagan executed more than 60 percent of the think tank’s policy recommendations.

When Trump took office in 2016, Heritage was again ready with friendly staffers and a handy policy agenda, called the Blueprint for Reorganization. By the end of Trump’s first year in office, Heritage boasted that he “had embraced 64 percent of our 321 recommendations,” among them key conservative priorities like tax reform, regulatory rollback, and increased defense spending.

Project 2025 is similar to these other sets of recommendations for Republican politicians and presidential candidates. It outlines an agenda for a new president to adopt and a team of experts to help them.

But Project 2025 has taken on a different bent compared with earlier blueprints. Kevin Roberts, the president of Heritage, has described the group’s role as “institutionalizing Trumpism.”

This is probably why Project 2025, and Heritage, have received such an unusually large amount of attention in recent months. The fact that a wonky, 900-page policy memo has been the focus of countless news articles and hundreds of Biden campaign tweets, especially before the 2024 election, is a telling indication of its expected influence.

For its part, the Trump campaign has maintained distance from the project, as Trump himself has implausibly claimed that he knows nothing about it.

He is likely keeping his distance from Project 2025 because parts of the agenda are far too extreme for all but the most die-hard conservative activists. But even if Trump isn’t campaigning on these policies, Americans should expect Heritage ideas to matter greatly in a second Trump administration. The Heritage Foundation is built for this goal.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Zachary Albert is an assistant professor of politics at Brandeis University.
Dangote Refinery Products Inferior To Imported Ones; Nigeria Can't Rely On Them Alone To Avoid Monopoly – Nigerian Agency, NMDPRA


July 18, 2024
NEWS

He addressed concerns about the nationwide supply of petroleum products and denied claims by some media outlets that they were trying to scuttle the Dangote Refinery.

Farouk Ahmed, the Chief Executive of the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) has cautioned Nigerians against over-dependence on products from the Dangote refinery.

Ahmed highlighted concerns over the consistency and standardisation of the refinery's output, stating that the quality of its products was inferior compared to the imported quality products.

He addressed concerns about the nationwide supply of petroleum products and denied claims by some media outlets that they were trying to scuttle the Dangote Refinery.

He said Dangote Refinery was still in the pre-commissioning stage and had not been licensed yet. "We haven't been licensed yet," he added.

"I think we have about 45% completion. We cannot rely heavily on one refinery to feed the nation because Dangote is requesting that we suspend or stop imports, especially of AGO and DPK, and direct all marketers to his refinery.

"That is not good for the nation in terms of energy security, and it is not good for the market because of the monopoly.

Ahmed said that in terms of quality, Dangote's current AGO suffers from the lowest quality in terms of sulfur content, falling short of West Africa's requirement of 50 PPM.

"Dangote Refinery, along with other major refineries, produces between six hundred and fifty to one thousand two hundred parts per million (PPM). Therefore, in terms of quality, their products are inferior to imported ones," he said.



Fox News host questions whether Democrats think assassination attempt was a 'cheap fake'

I KNOW I DO

Daniel Hampton
July 18, 2024 


Screengrab via Fox News

As Fox News hosts debated whether the media is trying to censor photographs showing a defiant — and bloody —former President Donald Trump following a failed assassination attempt, one host appeared to pose a conspiratorial question: do Trump's opponents think it was fake?

The comment came Wednesday on "The Five" after Judge Jeanine Pirro pointed to a photo of Trump's raised fist and said that will be a statue soon, and remarked that some people are even turning it into a tattoo.

"Are you going to get a tattoo Jesse?" she asks co-host Jesse Watters.

"Right on my rear-end, Jeanine," he retorted. "Would you give it to me please?"

Watters said getting shot will "elicit sympathy" from Americans, and remarked that Trump is "vain."

"He didn't want the ear patch," said Watters, later adding "it's not like the Secret Service agents were squeezing little Heinz ketchip packets onto his ear before they got him into the vehicle."

Watters then floated, baselessly, "It seems the photographers are mad Trump's still alive."

He then blasted photographers, saying if they don't want their photos to be used for political gain, "make pottery. Sell it on the side of the street."

It's here where Pirro asks a question, baffling contributor Jessica Tarlov: "You know the Democrats, they coined the phrase 'cheap fake' — are they saying the shooting was a cheap fake or that this is?"

"I don't think so," Tarlov replies. I don't think anyone is disputing that something happened to him. It has been debunked that it was glass, that was certainly the going explanation for an hour or so on Saturday when this happened. But we know what it was."

Tarlov then slams any far-left conspiracy theories floating out there undermining the seriousness of the shooting, but said the average person she talks to doesn't buy them.

"Everyone acknowledges that this happened, it was really serious and is concerned about what it forbodes for the future," she said.

Watch the clip below or at this link.




Lithuania votes to withdraw from Convention on Cluster Munitions, citing security

Humanitarian groups warn against indiscriminate impact of cluster munitions

Leila Nezirevic |18.07.2024 - TRT/AA


LONDON

Lithuania’s parliament voted on Thursday to exit the Convention on Cluster Munitions, citing regional security concerns in the Baltic region and Russia’s war on Ukraine.

The decision comes as Lithuania argues that adherence to the convention has limited its defense capabilities, weakening its combat readiness and deterrence, reported national broadcaster LRT.

The Convention, which prohibits the production, stockpiling, use, and transfer of cluster munitions, has been ratified by over 100 countries, though major powers like the United States, Russia, and Ukraine have not signed it.

Cluster munitions disperse numerous smaller bomblets over a wide area, posing a significant risk to civilian populations due to their indiscriminate nature.

Defense Minister Kasciunas defended the decision, stating, “It would be inappropriate for a country preparing for its defense to foreclose any capabilities. Currently, we cannot procure, train with, or even transfer these munitions to allies who have not ratified the convention,” as reported by LRT.

He added, “Modern technologies have made these capabilities safer and more effective than before.”

Once President Gitanas Nauseda signs the legislation, Lithuania will formally notify the UN secretary-general, the convention’s depository, of its intent to withdraw through diplomatic channels, confirmed LRT.

The Baltic nation plans to complete its withdrawal within six months of the notification, following formal notification to the UN Security Council.

Lithuania’s decision to withdraw from the Convention on Cluster Munitions has drawn criticism from various humanitarian organizations, including the Cluster Munition Coalition, Human Rights Watch, and the Mines Advisory Group.

Currently, among NATO member states bordering Russia, only Lithuania and Norway remain committed to the convention.

Last July, the United States supplied these munitions to Ukraine in its ongoing conflict with Russia since February 2022.

Lithuania acceded to the Convention on Cluster Munitions in 2011.
18 Silk and Great Value brand plant-based milk alternatives recalled in Canada amid listeria deaths, illnesses


By Ahmad Mukhtar
Updated on: July 18, 2024 / CBS News

Toronto —Two people have died in Canada of listeria bacterial infections after consuming plant-based milk alternatives sold under the brands Silk, made by Danone, and Walmart's Great Value, the country's federal health ministry said Wednesday in an updated notice. More than a dozen products have been recalled.

The ministry said 10 more individuals – eight in Ontario and one each in Quebec and Nova Scotia — had fallen ill and were admitted to hospitals between August 2023 and this month in cases possibly linked to the products. Almost 60% of the people with the listeria infections were over the age of 60, the ministry said.

"Many people who became sick reported drinking recalled plant-based beverages before their illnesses occurred," Health Canada said.

The French food giant Danone, which owns the Silk brand, said on its website that the recalled drinks were made in a third-party manufacturing facility. It said the factory was closed for all operations while work continued to confirm the origin of the listeria infections.

"Although the investigation is still underway to determine the exact cause, we have acted quickly, preventatively recalling all Silk refrigerated beverage products produced in this third-party manufacturing facility," Silk Canada said on its website. "We will not resume operations there until the investigation has been completed and we are satisfied with the resolution."


"The news in this notice is devastating and our most sincere sympathies go out to the families and loved ones during this difficult time," Danone Canada president Frédéric Guichard said in a statement, according to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

Walmart Canada listed the recall notice, which includes three of the company's Great Value brand products sold in the country, on its website.

Listeria infection, or Listeriosis, is a bacterial illness that can affect anyone who consumes contaminated food. It can cause serious illness, including infections that can spread to the brain and or the blood. Symptoms include fever, diarrhea, vomiting, muscle aches, confusion and loss of balance in severe cases, according to the Health Canada advisory.

"While healthy individuals can fall ill from listeria infection, the disease can be fatal for unborn babies, newborns, individuals over age 60, and those with weakened immune system," according to Health Canada.


Last week, Canada's food inspection agency announced a recall of 18 Silk and Great Value refrigerated beverages due to possible listeria contamination. According to the notice, the drinks included oat, almond, and coconut refrigerated beverages.

 

Young people's evolving perception of volunteering and the barriers they face in participation

volunteer
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

A new discussion paper from the Monash Center for Youth Policy and Education Practice (CYPEP) explores positive opportunities to engage young people in volunteering.

As Australia faces a shortage of volunteers, and volunteering organizations find it difficult to attract and engage , this discussion paper examines how and why young people participate in volunteering to provide organizations with valuable insights on how to best engage with them.

To inform the discussion and the opportunities, the paper draws heavily on data from the Australian Youth Barometers, which has been conducted by CYPEP each year since 2021.

Key findings showed that:

  • Young people see volunteering as part of a broader understanding of social participation, which includes many forms of unpaid community, social or  across a variety of forms and mediums.
  • Young people who experience higher political anxiety may be more motivated to volunteer. Constant exposure to political events can bring about negative emotional reactions associated with worsening well-being, but greater motivation to take  (e.g., volunteer, protest) to change the causes of these negative emotions.
  • Political anxiety is associated negatively with mental health. Whereas volunteering is positively associated with  and higher life satisfaction.
  • Young people understand volunteering as having many benefits, but face a range of potential barriers to their participation including: , lack of time or money, bureaucratic obstacles and feeling that young people were not taken seriously.

When speaking of his experiences volunteering, a 24-year-old male participant said, "I volunteer quite a bit, and I think that's one way I can also contribute to changes like when you do things like run events, or help younger students, help them with things that you can actually help the next generation grow."

A 24-year-old male participant from Victoria said, "I would say get involved in elections, local and state, federal, and, you know, be an activist for the things you care about. Getting involved on  is definitely a way you can make your voice heard."

Lead author, Dr. Thuc Bao Huynh said, "Formal political participation may not appeal to young people, but they are finding new ways to be involved and make  in their communities. These need to be recognized and supported.

"Young Australians want to get involved, but many face barriers to their participation. Rather than viewing young people as disengaged, these barriers must be understood and mitigated."

Professor Walsh, Director of the Monash Center for Youth Policy and Education Practice and co-author said the report highlights deep political anxieties that young people are experiencing in the present and the future.

"Young people continue to be painted in stereotypes that depict them as disengaged or self-absorbed. Our research on their attitudes to volunteering and civic participation shows that these are untrue. Instead, we identify how engagement in shaping a young person's world through volunteering is good for their well-being and society in general," said Professor Walsh.

The report highlights how young Australians have a wider understanding of what volunteering entails than is generally accepted. These findings can provide insights for volunteering organizations as to how to best engage young people in volunteering in the ways that are most appealing and appropriate to them.

More information: Paper: Anxiety, wellbeing and engaging young people in volunteering

Performers threatening to strike a week before Paris Olympics opening ceremony

DRC military spending rose fastest in the world in 2023 -- Sipri

In this file photo taken on May 25, 2022, a Congolese military tank heads towards the front line near Kibumba, in the area surrounding the North Kivu city of Goma, during clashes between the army and M23 rebels. 

By THE CONVERSATION

The East African
THURSDAY JULY 18 2024


Global military expenditure is dominated by the United States and China, with 49 percent of total spending between them. According to the most recent report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, global military spending reached $2.4 trillion in 2023, a 6.8 percent increase on 2022.

Africa’s military expenditure is comparatively low. In 2023, African countries spent $51.6 billion, accounting for 2.1 percent of the world total. Still, this figure was a huge jump of 22 percent from the previous year.

Two countries in Africa – the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and South Sudan – registered the highest year-on-year increases in the world.

The growth in spending is also reflected in overall government budget priorities. The average military spending as a share of government expenditure by African countries increased from 6.6 percent in 2022 to 7.2 percent in 2023, a rise of 0.6 percentage points.

The huge 2023 jump was mainly driven by two countries ravaged by internal conflict – the DRC and South Sudan – and Algeria, which is experiencing a fossil fuel export boom. Together, their increases accounted for 87 percent of the overall rise in Africa’s spending.

The DRC’s military spending had the highest increase in the world in 2023. Its $794 million spending was 105 percent higher than in 2022. South Sudan had the second-highest increase. Following a 108 percentincrease in 2022, military spending rose by another 78 percent in 2023, reaching $1.1 billion.

Related

EU to send $21m military support to Kenya

Read: African countries increase military spending: report

My research interests include the causes and impact of civil conflict and the links between conflict and military spending. My current work includes assessing the demand and consequences of military spending and issues related to transparency and budgeting for military-related matters.

It’s my view that investments in the defence sector are necessary for national security and internal stability. They can also help create job opportunities which can contribute to economic growth and development. However, military spending has been found to create fewer jobs than the same amount of money would have if invested in sectors such as clean energy or education.

Morever, higher military expenditures can divert resources away from essential socio-economic areas such as education, healthcare and infrastructure. This may hinder efforts to improve living standards, reduce poverty and promote human development. That, in turn, can feed a cycle of instability and insecurity in a country or region.
Responding to conflict

The increase in the DRC’s military spending coincides with growing tensions between the country and its neighbour, Rwanda, and clashes over territory and natural resources involving the DRC armed forces and militia groups such as the M23.

For example, in 2023, the DRC procured Chinese unmanned drones to combat the M23 in the east of the country. The spending also reflects the country’s plan to enhance military capabilities following its request for the UN’s DRC mission, Monusco, to leave.

South Sudan’s growth figures relate to the escalation of violence in the Abyei region over oil rights and land infringements and the security crisis in neighbouring Sudan.

In 2023, clashes between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces in Sudan led millions of refugees to flee to South Sudan and added to regional security challenges.

In contrast to the DRC, the UN arms embargo meant that the increase in South Sudan’s spending went mostly to personnel expenditure. It is bolstering its military presence near the Sudanese border.

Security at what cost?

The increase in military spending by the DRC and South Sudan in 2023 comes at an important time. Both countries need to address growing insecurity, but there is a trade-off with scarce resources needed for critical societal issues.

The DRC (180th) and South Sudan (192nd) both rank low on the United Nations Human Development Index of 193 countries. The index, which takes in education and health outcomes as well as gross national income, provides an overview of a country’s development status. Given their low Human Development Index rankings, investment in health, education and economic growth is essential to improving development outcomes. An extra dollar spent on the military potentially crowds out spending for human development.

What’s more, the DRC hosted 7.1 million displaced people in 2023, making it the African country with the second-highest number of displaced people, after Sudan. South Sudan currently hosts 4.6 million displaced people, the highest percentage of displaced people in its total population in Africa. Both countries need substantial financial resources to support these displaced populations.

Political power of military

The military has the crucial role of ensuring national security and internal stability. But upward military spending trends have implications that should not be overlooked.

In addition to the trade-off effects between military and socioeconomic development, governments that allocate substantial resources to the military can inadvertently increase the political power of the military. This will in turn lower both civilian control and oversight and increase the risk of an unconstitutional change of government. The effect might be cases like Burkina Faso and Mali, with growing state repression and human rights violations.

Nan Tian is Senior Researcher and Acting Programme Director, Military Expenditure and Arms Production Programme, Sipri.