Monday, August 05, 2024

SPACE

A big asteroid is coming close to Earth. 
Be excited, not afraid.

Washington Post
By Lizette Ortega
5 Aug, 2024 



While Apophis (not pictured) might never hit Earth's surface, Neil deGrasse Tyson spoke chillingly about what could happen. Photo / 123RF

A massive space rock will go hurtling past Earth in a few years, zooming by 10 times faster than a bullet.

This is the first time an asteroid of its size is coming close enough that people in parts of Western Europe and Africa will see it soaring across the sky like a fast-moving star, no fancy telescopes or binoculars required. Around 2 billion people will get to witness this rare event.

To be clear, the asteroid is not going to hit Earth - not in our lifetime nor our children’s lifetimes, anyway. Instead, as if the universe was making a joke, the space rock will make an eerily close flyby on Friday the 13th in April 2029.

The asteroid is named Apophis, and it will come closer to Earth than the satellites that make weather monitoring possible and about 10 times closer than the moon.

“Nature is performing this once-per-several-thousand-years experiment for us. We have to figure out how to watch,” said Richard P. Binzel, a professor of planetary science at MIT.

Apophis is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to study asteroids like never before. Getting a close-up look at Apophis will help scientists figure out how to protect our planet against an asteroid that wants to throw a punch at Earth in the future.

But missions to space take years to develop and there are less than five years before Apophis makes its close approach to Earth.

“We’re running out of time,” said Jason Kalirai, executive for space formulation at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory.

Apophis is about as wide as the Eiffel Tower is tall. Though scientists do not have pictures of the asteroid yet, they have used radar data to surmise that Apophis is roughly peanut-shaped.

While the rock - which scientists believe has two lobes - is peacefully minding its business in space, that was not the case when it was discovered in June 2004 by scientists at the Kitt Peak National Observatory. Later that year, researchers calculated a 2.7% chance that the asteroid’s encounter with Earth in 2029 would be a violent collision, not a harmless flyby.

“If it was to encounter a populated area, it could take out a city the size of New York,” said Daniella DellaGiustina, lead scientist on a Nasa mission to Apophis called Osiris-Apex.

Apophis made such a bad first impression on the world that it was named after the Egyptian serpentine god of darkness and chaos.

It was not until March 2021 that scientists were able to rule out an Apophis-Earth collision for at least the next 100 years. Using a 70m-long radio antenna in California, scientists collected the data they needed to clear Apophis’s name and remove it from Nasa’s Sentry Impact Risk Table, a list of asteroids with some chance of affecting Earth in the next century.

Apophis will come within 32,000km of Earth - give or take a few miles. When two objects come close in space, they exert forces on each other. Just like Earth experiences tidal forces generated by the moon, Apophis will feel tidal forces generated by Earth.

While the moon’s gravitational pull causes high tides on Earth, Earth’s gravitational pull might cause mini asteroid quakes on Apophis. Apophis’s flyby will mark the first chance to view seismic activity on an asteroid.

A massive space rock will go hurtling past Earth in a few years, zooming by 10 times faster than a bullet. Photo / 123RF
The asteroid space chase

Now that scientists know Apophis will not collide with Earth, they have turned their attention to another problem: how to make it to Apophis in time.

“What are we doing about Apophis? I would say not enough,” Kalirai said.

Though Apophis has been a source of fascination for two decades, no one knows what it actually looks like. Many of its basic properties remain unknown, including its mass and structure.


Recently, Earth’s planetary defense capabilities were put to the test by Nasa’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test, or Dart, in which researchers at Johns Hopkins successfully smashed a spacecraft into an asteroid to change its orbit.

While the researchers are proud of Dart, they emphasised that Earth’s self-defence tool kit is not complete. Planetary defence is not just about throwing celestial upper-cuts. Scientists need to be able to locate asteroids and study their characteristics to mount an effective response.

“Apophis is an opportunity to practice what kinds of characterisation efforts could be done to better understand a particular object. Lessons from that can be applied in the future when we find an asteroid coming our way,” said Terik Daly, a planetary scientist on the Dart and Osiris-Apex missions.

Nasa’s Osiris-Apex mission will redirect an existing spacecraft so that it characterises Apophis after its closest approach to Earth. The mission will study how the asteroid was affected by Earth’s gravity using high-resolution images of Apophis’s surface.

The Osiris-Apex spacecraft can also use its thrusters to kick up dust on the asteroid. With this capability, scientists will learn how strong Apophis’s surface is, which will inform how to deflect it in the future if needed.

If the asteroid has a tough surface that does not break easily, an impact approach like Dart might not be effective in changing the asteroid’s orbit.


A close inspection of asteroids can also help answer long-held questions about the solar system, including where Earth’s water came from. By comparing water on Earth and asteroids, scientists can look for similarities that provide clues about how this important resource arrived on our planet billions of years ago.

But Osiris-Apex cannot stand alone. Since the mission’s spacecraft is already in orbit with limited fuel, it can make it to Apophis only in June, two months after its closest approach to Earth.

If scientists are going to fully understand Apophis and how it was affected by Earth, there need to be missions that study the asteroid before and during its closest approach.

So far, Osiris-Apex is the only confirmed and fully funded mission to Apophis.

‘No bucks, no Bruce Willis’

At Apophis T-5 Years, a two-day workshop to foster international collaboration on Apophis missions, scientists proposed more than 20 spacecraft and payloads combined.

“In an ideal world, we would have a fleet of missions to Apophis,” Kalirai said. But scientists have less than five years to develop, build and launch a mission.



In addition to time, there is a shortage of money to fund missions to Apophis.

“No bucks, no Bruce Willis,” Binzel said.

As a result, many scientists are trying to repurpose old missions to beat the clock and go easy on the wallet.

Experts are urging Nasa to study pre-flyby Apophis with the Janus spacecraft, which were meant to launch in 2023 as part of a separate mission. After delays in that mission, the two spacecraft were put in storage indefinitely.

Scientists at Apophis T-5 Years described a pre-flyby encounter with Apophis as a mission in search of a spacecraft. They believe that need could be met by the Janus satellites, which are spacecraft in search of a mission.

Blue Origin, a private space company founded by Jeff Bezos, reported that its Blue Ring spacecraft could meet Apophis three months before the flyby. The spacecraft has 13 payload slots, allowing the cost of the mission to be shared among multiple parties. (Bezos owns the Washington Post.)


Of all the proposals floating around, a mission developed by the European Space Agency is the closest to fruition. In an act of recycling similar to Osiris-Apex, the ESA’s Rapid Apophis Mission for Space Safety - Ramses - makes use of technology built for the Hera Mission, which is expected to launch this year to study the aftermath of Dart.

Ramses would encounter Apophis two months before its flyby and stay close to watch how it is affected by Earth’s gravity. The mission would monitor how Earth alters Apophis’s rotation, which plays a huge role in what the asteroid’s orbit will look like far into the future.

The Space Safety programme board has given the ESA permission to start working on the mission. However, Ramses is not in the clear yet: the mission awaits final approval for funding by the ESA’s Council of Ministers, who will make their decision at the end of next year.

While space exploration is complicated technically, there have been many advances that make more missions possible and successful. Scientists have even sent a spacecraft to dig into an asteroid and return pieces of it to Earth. As a result, much of the technology needed to explore Apophis exists, making the bottleneck largely financial.

While there is a near-zero chance Earth will meet an asteroid capable of mass extinction soon, there is a 100% probability that a devastating asteroid will risk striking Earth at some point.

“The question is when and whether we’re able to prevent it before that happens,” said Bruce Betts, chief scientist at the Planetary Society, which advocates for space exploration.

Unlike most natural disasters, asteroid collisions are preventable if tools exist to keep track of space rocks and act in self-defence if needed.

Building out Earth’s planetary defence toolkit is not about fear, according to Binzel. “It’s simply about sensible responsibility.”

Joel Achenbach contributed to this report.
 


James Webb Space Telescope captures never-before-seen star behavior


The James Webb Space Telescope has observed stellar outflow that are "all slanted in the same direction, to the same degree, like sleet pouring down during a storm" in the Serpens Nebula, according to ESA/NASA. 

Full Story: https://www.space.com/james-webb-space-telescope-serpens-nebula-jets-photo


Credit: Directed by: Bethany Downer and Nico Bartmann Editing: Nico Bartmann Web and technical support: Enciso Systems Written by: Bethany Downer Music: Stellardrone - Light Years Footage: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, K. Pontoppidan (NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory), J. Green (Space Telescope Science Institute)



Space photo of the week: A cosmic butterfly emerges from a star's violent death

Jamie Carter
Sun, August 4, 2024 


Credit: International Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA. Image processing: J. Miller (International Gemini Observatory/NSF's NOIRLab), M. Rodriguez (International Gemini Observatory/NSF's NOIRLab) & M. Zamani (NSF's NOIRLab)

What it is: Kohoutek 3-46, a planetary nebula.

Where it is: 7,200 light-years distant in the constellation Cygnus.

When it was shared: July 24, 2024.

Why it's so special:

Death comes violently for massive stars. As they burn through their fuel and begin to cool, pressure drops and gravity takes control. A core collapse can follow, causing a bright supernova explosion.

However, that's not how all stars end their lives. When a smaller star about one to eight times the size of the sun exhausts its fuel, it expands into a cool red giant star. Eventually, it expels its outer layers of atmosphere. Those layers can glow for thousands of years in beautiful colors and shapes, illuminated by light from the star's leftover core, also called a white dwarf.

Related: Space photo of the week: Ring Nebula glistens like a jelly-filled doughnut in Webb telescope's latest images

That's what's happening at Kohoutek 3-46, whose shape resembles a butterfly. It's estimated to be about 20,000 light-years old and is an unusual example of what astronomers call a planetary nebula. The term is misleading because Kohoutek 3-46 has nothing to do with planets. The name, coined by astronomer William Herschel in the 1700s, describes the rough shape of the object (most are circular) when viewed through a small telescope.

Kohoutek 3-46, however, isn't round but a bipolar hourglass shape, which accounts for only about 10 to 20% of planetary nebulas. It was discovered in 1964 by astronomer Luboš Kohoutek, who discovered 300 planetary nebulas throughout his career.

Space photo of the week: A cosmic 'ghost' peers through the universe's past

Space photo of the week: Hubble captures one of our galaxy's oldest objects

32 jaw-dropping James Webb Space Telescope images

This image was captured by the Gemini North telescope in Hawaii, one half of the Gemini Observatory (the other is Gemini South in Chile's Atacama Desert). The Gemini North telescope is supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and operated by NSF NOIRLab.

Kohoutek 3-46 is currently riding high in the Northern Hemisphere's post-sunset night sky. Its constellation, Cygnus, is part of the famous "Summer Triangle" shape of stars (here's how to find it in the sky tonight). Close by is the constellation Lyra, which hosts the famous Ring Nebula (also called M57), a planetary nebula with a more typical shape.


NASA May Be Forced to Send Boeing's Busted Spacecraft Back Empty

Victor Tangermann
Mon, August 5, 2024 

Empty Nester

NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams have been stranded in space since arriving at the International Space Station on June 6, just shy of two months ago.

Their journey was supposed to last just two weeks, but ongoing technical issues with their ride, Boeing's much-maligned Starliner spacecraft, have delayed their return indefinitely. NASA still hasn't announced a return date.

Now, NASA has been discussing the option of having Starliner return back to the surface with neither Wilmore nor Williams on board, CNBC reports, though finding consensus has been difficult and discussions are still ongoing.

This scenario would involve sending a replacement SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule to rescue the two, NASA's flightworthy workhorse that cost a fraction to develop, despite being a part of the same Commercial Crew program as Starliner.

Sending the capsule back empty would be a major vote of no confidence in Boeing following years of delays, technical issues, and a failed launch attempt — not to mention a PR disaster for both NASA and Boeing, which have been adamant that everything has been going according to plan despite the chaos and delays.

Whether an empty return would seal Starliner's fate remains to be seen. Boeing and NASA have already committed a whopping $6.7 billion to the project since 2010 and are unlikely to give up too easily.

Capsule Culture

Over the last two months, NASA has played down the extent of Boeing's issues, with NASA commercial crew program manager Steve Stich arguing that the two astronauts were "not stranded" during a late June press conference.

Several of the capsule's 28 thrusters failed during docking procedures in early June. While NASA has since claimed that all but one are in good working condition, we still don't know the exact root cause.

The space agency and Boeing have painted their ongoing investigations as a way to collect more data, presumably to quell concerns.

But time is running out. Starliner's batteries are only rated to stay in orbit through early September.

The agency is still "evaluating all options," as Ars Technica reported last week, to get the two astronauts back.

"No decisions have been made and the agency will continue to provide updates on its planning," a NASA spokesperson told Ars.

Considering Boeing has lost a whopping $1.6 billion on Starliner, it shouldn't come as a surprise that NASA is still hemming and hawing before giving up.

But the company remains "confident in the Starliner spacecraft and its ability to return safely with crew," a Boeing spokesperson told CNBC last week



‘Not stranded in space’: how Nasa lost control of Boeing Starliner narrative

Richard Luscombe in Miami
Sun, August 4, 2024

Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft docked to the International Space Station’s Harmony module’s forward port in July 2024.Photograph: Nasa

It should have been a welcome public relations triumph for Boeing, an opportunity to show that even if panels were falling from its aircraft, it could still fly humans into space and return them safely to Earth.

And for a while at least, it looked like it had been successful. The majestic June launch of the much-delayed and over-budget Starliner capsule from Florida, ferrying two Nasa astronauts to the International Space Station, offered a glimpse of a bright new future in the heavens for the troubled aerospace giant.

The euphoria, however, was as fleeting as a shooting star. Technical issues with the pioneering spacecraft mean it is still docked to the orbiting outpost, 59 days into a maiden crewed test mission that was originally expected to take up to 10. And alarming – yet inaccurate – headlines that the astronauts are somehow stranded indefinitely in space, like Matt Damon in the Martian, are proliferating.


Related: Nasa rover discovery hints at ancient microbial life on Mars

The saga represents more of a crisis in communications management than any failure of Starliner, which after all is an experimental vehicle suffering similar teething troubles to any preceding generation of spacecraft, from the mighty Apollo moon rockets of the 1960s to the space shuttle, and last year’s “rapid unscheduled disassembly” of Elon Musk’s futuristic Starship.

Announcements in recent days from Nasa and Boeing, partners in the Starliner project as part of the US space agency’s commercial crew program, suggest a return date for the capsule, and the astronauts Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore, is finally imminent. Glitchy thrusters that unexpectedly shut down early in the mission performed well in tests, and several small but persistent helium leaks are no longer considered a constraint for undocking.

“The vehicle is in good shape. I want to make it very clear that Butch and Suni are not stranded in space,” Steve Stich, manager of Nasa’s commercial crew program, told a press conference last week.

Yet a sense of unease remains. Media briefings, initially at least, were scarce, leading to suspicion from some reporters that Boeing and Nasa were downplaying the extent of the technical problems, or the likely duration of the astronauts’ stay, given their initial eight-to-10-day mission estimate.

The most recent press conference became tetchy in places as Stich and Mark Nappi, Boeing’s commercial crew program manager, pushed back. The delays, they insisted, were a routine part of spaceflight, engineers were identifying and solving the issues, and all the while the crew and capsule were never in danger.

Additionally, Stich said, Starliner was cleared to leave the space station at any time in the event of an emergency.

Nappi, however, did admit he had inadvertently fueled the “lost in space” narrative.

Asked how he would handle things differently, he said: “We would not have been so emphatic about [it being] an eight-day mission. It’s my regret that we didn’t just say we’re going to stay up there until we get everything done that we want to go do.”

Experts say there is nothing unexpected or unusual about an experimental spaceflight developing problems, or mission managers dedicating time to diagnose and fix them. With Starliner, teams of ground engineers at Nasa’s White Sands facility in New Mexico spent weeks recreating and working through the thruster issues, and Williams and Wilmore boarded the docked capsule last weekend to conduct an in-orbit hot fire test of its propulsion systems.

“It’s defined as a test mission, it’s called a crewed test flight, and one of things is to deal with unplanned issues,” said Jerry Stone, senior associate of the Space Studies Institute and author of One Small Step.

“But the thing to do in a situation like this is not to, I won’t say hide anything because they’re not doing that, but to be much more open, especially with the media, because the media is going to make this out to be as dramatic as possible.”

Stone said it was probably a mistake for Boeing and Nasa to have announced an expected end date for Starliner’s first human mission instead of adopting an “it takes as long as it takes” approach.

“The expected reaction, particularly from the public, is something has gone wrong and they can’t get back. And yes, something has gone wrong. But the statement that they can’t get back is most definitely incorrect.”

Mike Massimino, a retired Nasa astronaut who flew two longer-duration space shuttle missions in 2002 and 2009 to fix the Hubble space telescope, agreed that messaging and perception was more of an issue than solving the technical problems.

“From my perspective as an astronaut engineer, it’s been a successful test flight. You want to wring it out and see what’s going on. There’s no reason to bring the crew back early if they have the supplies, which they do, and the spacecraft is stable. I think this is a good thing, a chance to really work out the kinks.

“[But] because they said it’s going to be between this many days, and this many days, people try to put one and one together. It’s like, all right, so this thing’s longer now, and they have problems, so they’re staying longer because they have problems. And that’s not the case.”

Massimino said Boeing’s fledgling spaceflight troubles would, ultimately, pass quietly into history.

“The first SpaceX launch of the Dragon capsule was delayed by many years too,” he said. “My experience is we don’t remember the delays, but you sure as heck will remember an accident, Challenger, Columbia.

“When things go boom and people are killed, we remember that, the whole country will mourn and so on, and that’s what you want to avoid. This is certainly not an Apollo 13. I’m not saying people won’t remember this, but it’ll be an interesting lesson learned looking back, maybe more so how the communication went.

“They seem to be understanding the problems they have. I have confidence they’re going to understand what those things were, fix them for the next time and get Starliner and the crew back safely.”


2 months after Starliner launched, astronauts still haven’t returned: See timeline


Eric Lagatta, USA TODAY
Mon, August 5, 2024 

Just as a slew of obstacles and mishaps delayed the launch of the Boeing Starliner time after time, so too has the return of the spacecraft's astronaut crew been postponed again and again.

It took a team of engineers about a month just to get Boeing's CST-100 Starliner prepared for its trip to the International Space Station after its initial launch date on May 6 was scrubbed at the last minute. When the capsule finally reached orbit June 5 while perched atop an Atlas V rocket built by United Launch Alliance, things were finally looking up for Boeing – in both a literal and figurative sense.

The company had for years sought to prove that its Starliner could compete with the likes of Elon Musk's SpaceX as one of two companies making routine trips to orbit on NASA’s behalf. After its first uncrewed test flight in 2019, June's launch marked a critical milestone as Starliner first flight with astronauts aboard.

NASA astronauts Barry "Butch" Wilmore and Sunita "Suni" Williams were tentatively scheduled to spend little more than a week aboard the International Space Station once their capsule docked on June 6, a day after launching from the Kennedy Space Station in Cape Canaveral, Florida.

But two months after Starliner launched, the pair still remain in orbit at the space station with no return date set.

Here's a look at the major moments of the Boeing Starliner's inaugural crewed mission, including scrubs, launch and return delays.

DART mission: Images from NASA spacecraft reveal insights into near-Earth asteroid
May 6: Starliner launch called off hours of liftoff

Years in the making, the third and final orbital flight test for Starliner was scheduled for launch until it is called off within hours of liftoff when engineers detected an anomaly on the pressure regulation valve in the liquid oxygen tank of the rocket's upper stage, according to NASA. The United Launch Alliance later says in a statement that the cancellation was "out of an abundance of caution for the safety of the flight and pad crew."

Days later, Wilmore and Williams return to Houston to spend extra time with their families as mission engineers work to fix the issues ailing Starliner.

NASA eyes May 17 as a potential mission launch after the United Launch Alliance initially said that the launch would not be able to take place any earlier than May 10. Mission engineers requested the extended delay in order to have time to replace the faulty value, NASA said.

On May 21, the team is able to replace the valve and re-pressurize the system, but then engineers encountered another obstacle: a small helium leak in Starliner's service module. The issue required the launch date to be pushed back once again, this time indefinitely.
June 1: Starliner prepares to launch again, scrubbed again

On June 1, The Starliner appears poised to finally take off. NASA decided to continue with the launch without repairing the helium leak, as the chemical used in spacecraft thruster systems is not combustible or toxic. However, the launch is once again scrubbed, this time minutes before liftoff due to a computer issue, NASA said on X, formerly Twitter.

The crew passes on a possible launch the next day and NASA instead eyes a launch window beginning June 5.
June 5: Starliner finally launches

On June 5, the Starliner, at long last, launches. Boeing Space shares a post on X at 11:44 a.m. confirming Starliner had reached a stable orbit and had broken away from the Atlas V rocket. From there, the craft began firing its own engines as it powered onward to the International Space Station, NASA said.

The following day, the Starliner docks at 1:34 p.m. EDT on the forward-facing port of the International Space Station's Harmony module. However, the night before, NASA shares an update unveiling that two more helium leaks had been discovered on the spacecraft occurring after Starliner arrived in orbit.
June 9: NASA announces astronauts will not return on date originally planned

Though Wilmore and Williams were only slated to spend a week on the space station, NASA announces on X that the Starliner and its two astronauts would likely land in the New Mexico desert no earlier than June 18. The space agency said the additional time at the space station was for the astronauts to assist with a spacewalk and to allow engineers more time to complete system checkouts of Starliner.
June 14: Astronauts return delayed again

The return is delayed a second time, with the astronauts now slated to undock from the International Space Station no earlier than June 25, landing June 26 at the White Sands Space Harbor in New Mexico, Boeing said in an update. While the spacecraft is cleared for crew emergency return scenarios, Boeing said the extra time allows the team to finalize departure planning and operations.
June 21: And again

Boeing and NASA once again delay the return home of Williams and Wilmore until July at the earliest. This time the agencies cite "a series of planned International Space Station spacewalks while allowing mission teams time to review propulsion system data." However, the agencies explain that the astronauts are by no means stranded in space, as supplies on the space station are plentiful and the pair can assist in station operations.
July 10: Astronauts aren't 'complaining' about being in space

Wilmore and Williams appear in a NASA telecast from the International Space Station. During seperate new conferences, Williams says, "I'm not complaining, Butch isn't complaining that we're here for a couple extra weeks." Meanwhile, scientists and engineers work through testing to better understand and resolve problems that occurred during Starliner's launch and flight, including some misfiring thrusters and helium leaks.

Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore speak to NASA officials during a live streamed event on Monday, June 10.
July 25: NASA, Boeing say there is still no return date

NASA and Boeing say in a press conference that the Starliner still does not yet have an official return date. However, NASA Commercial Crew Program Manager Steve Stich says, "We're making great progress."

Stich also shares that NASA has contingency options for returning Butch and Sunni to Earth, but right now the focus is on finishing up the tasks necessary to do so on Starliner.
August: Astronauts work at ISS while planning for return home

Wilmore and Williams, both Navy test pilots before they joined NASA, were to spend their limited time at the International Space Station testing the Starliner spacecraft and its subsystems.

With their stay indefinitely extended, the astronauts, both of whom had ventured to space twice before, have helped the space station crew with other operations while helping plan a return date when they can, NASA and Boeing have said.

Most recently, NASA and Boeing said engineers completed a hot fire test of the Starliner spacecraft’s reaction control system jets on July 27 to evaluate the spacecraft’s propulsion system. Wilmore and Williams were both seated inside the docked spacecraft during the test.

The astronauts then spent Tuesday practicing for undocking during a simulation, Boeing said in a Wednesday update.

Their return to Earth is expected to take place in August ahead of a station crew turnover. Meanwhile, while planning for that return continues into this week, NASA has indicated intentions to host a media briefing to share information about the agency’s "return readiness review preparations."

Once Williams and Wilmore are set to return to Earth, the astronauts will board the capsule, which will land in the American Southwest using parachutes that will slow it down to 4 mph before inflating large airbags.

Boeing Starliner timeline before 2024: Starliner has long struggled to keep up with SpaceX
Starliner mission is crucial for Boeing

A successful mission would provide NASA with a second operational spacecraft to carry astronauts to the International Space Station as the U.S. space agency pivots to more partnerships with private industry.

As part of NASA’s commercial crew program, Boeing was awarded $4.8 billion, while its competitor, SpaceX, was awarded $3.1 billion in 2014 to develop their respective spacecraft, Florida Today reported.

But while Boeing's project has lagged behind schedule for years, racking up $1.5 billion in unplanned development costs along the way – as reported by Reuters – SpaceX has already begun reliably transporting astronauts and supplies to the space station.

Boeing's Starliner had conducted two uncrewed missions before Williams and Wilmore went into orbit aboard the Starliner – each plagued by woes and technical issues.

Dozens of software and engineering issues resulted in the failure of the first attempt in 2019 to send an uncrewed Starliner to the ISS for a week. While it reached orbit, the capsule failed to reach the space station and instead returned to Earth, according to Florida Today.

The follow-up flight test in 2022 met standards of docking to the space station and successfully landed, but not without the discovery of multiple concerns as Boeing crews inspected the spacecraft later, Florida Today reported.

Needless to say, Boeing's ability to join SpaceX and earn certification from NASA for crewed rotation missions to the space station hinges on what comes next with its Starliner.

Contributing: Mary Walrath-HoldridgeGabe HauariEmily DeLetter, James Powel, Mike SniderNatalie Neysa Alund and Jonathan Limehouse, USA TODAY

Eric Lagatta covers breaking and trending news for USA TODAY. Reach him at elagatta@gannett.com

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Starliner astronauts' return still not set: Timeline of launch, issues


SpaceX launches Northrop Grumman mission to ISS

Adam Schrader
Sun, August 4, 2024 


A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket returns to Landing Zone 1 after launching the Northrop Grumman Cygnus spacecraft for NASA at the Kennedy Space Center, Florida on Sunday, August 4, 2024. Photo by Joe Marino/UPI


Aug. 4 (UPI) -- SpaceX successfully launched a resupply mission for the International Space Station on Sunday after it was postponed Saturday because of unfavorable weather.

The space exploration company used a Falcon 9 rocket to launch the Cygnus spacecraft made by Northrop Grumman -- best known as a defense contractor.

Northrop Grumman changed its launch vehicle for Cygnus missions from its own Antares 230+ rocket to SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket after the war in Ukraine ended engine and booster production for the Antares program.

Onboard are tests of water recovery technology and a process to produce stem cells in microgravity, studies of the effects of spaceflight on microorganism DNA and liver tissue growth, and live science demonstrations for students, NASA said in a statement.

Shortly before the launch, SpaceX said that the weather was only 35% favorable for liftoff. Yet the rocket took off from Space Launch Complex-40 at the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida around 11:02 a.m. local time.

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launches the Northrop Grumman Cygnus spacecraft for NASA on a mission designated as NG-21 to the International Space Station at 11:02 AM from Launch Complex 39A at the Kennedy Space Center, Florida on Sunday, August 4, 2024. Photo by Joe Marino/UPI

About 15 minutes later, the Cygnus spacecraft successfully separated to make its way toward the ISS.

"Next up is solar array deployment, expected in about three hours. These solar arrays help power the spacecraft for its journey to the Space Station," NASA said.

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launches the Northrop Grumman Cygnus spacecraft for NASA on a mission designated as NG-21 to the International Space Station at 11:02 AM from Launch Complex 39A at the Kennedy Space Center, Florida on Sunday, August 4, 2024. Photo by Joe Marino/UPI

The Falcon 9 first stage returned to Landing Zone 1 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. This was the 10th flight of the first stage booster supporting this mission, which previously launched Ax-2, Euclid, Ax-3, CRS-30, SES ASTRA 1P, and four Starlink missions.

As for the Cygnus spacecraft, once the cargo haul is unloaded by the ISS crew, it will continue to be used as an extended science lab space for the months it remains docked to the station.



Sławosz Uznański from Poland will fly to International Space Station on fourth Axiom Space mission

05/08/2024

Polish project astronaut Sławosz Uznański is scheduled to fly to the International Space Station on Axiom Mission 4 (Ax-4).

Axiom Space announced that it is partnering with India, Hungary, and with Poland through ESA to send three national astronauts to the International Space Station on Axiom Mission 4 (Ax-4).

ESA project astronaut Sławosz Uznański has been assigned as mission specialist under the command of Axiom Space’s Chief Astronaut Peggy Whitson.

ESA Project Astronaut - Sławosz Uznański

The other two Ax-4 crew members are pilot Shubhanshu Shukla from India, and mission specialist Tibor Kapu from Hungary. The crew deployment to the International Space Station awaits approval from the Multilateral Crew Operations Panel (MCOP). The MCOP's decisions are reached through a consensus among representatives from all five international space station partners: NASA, ESA, Roscosmos, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, and the Canadian Space Agency.

Sławosz Uznański in ESA's Neutral Buoyancy Facility

Ax-4 will be the second commercial human spaceflight mission with an ESA project astronaut. Sponsored by the Polish government and supported by ESA, the Polish Ministry of Economic Development and Technology (MRiT), and the Polish Space Agency (POLSA), this mission includes an ambitious technological and scientific programme. The programme will feature several experiments proposed by the Polish space industry and developed under the lead of ESA.

"ESA is continuing to support its Member States with exploration though commercial access to space. With the upcoming Axiom 4 mission, ESA is working closely with Poland and helping drive forward technological advancements, highlighting Poland's capabilities in space exploration and is a crucial step in advancing its technological expertise,” says ESA’s Director of Human and Robotic Exploration Daniel Neuenschwander.
Sławosz training at the European Astronaut Centre using virtual reality.

“ESA continues to embrace the evolving landscape of space exploration, emphasising the importance of commercial ventures in shaping our journey beyond Earth. This mission signifies our ongoing commitment to innovation and collaboration with commercial partners, driving forward new opportunities for growth and scientific advancement,” says Frank De Winne, ESA’s ISS Programme Manager.

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will launch the Ax-4 crew in a SpaceX Dragon spacecraft in Florida. The crew will spend up to 14 days at the Space Station, conducting microgravity research and educational activities after docking with the orbital laboratory.

Sławosz joined his colleagues from the 2022 Astronaut Class for a series of parabolic flights allowing them to experience what microgravity feels like.

Sławosz Uznański is currently undergoing an intensive training programme to adapt to the challenges of living and working in space, meeting the rigorous standards for human spaceflight. In August, he will begin training at Axiom Space, NASA, and SpaceX facilities in the US with the rest of the crew.


Follow Sławosz’s journey on ESA’s Exploration blogXFacebookLinkedIn, and Instagram.

CHRISTIANS IN SPACE
One church, two astronauts. How a Texas congregation is supporting its members on the space station


HOLLY MEYER
Sun, August 4, 2024 
 

About 10 miles from Johnson Space Center, a Houston-area church takes a moment during Wednesday Bible studies and Sunday evening services to pray for two members who cannot be there.

In fact, there’s no way on Earth for NASA astronauts Barry “Butch” Wilmore and Tracy Dyson to show up at Providence Baptist Church. They’re in space, orbiting the planet. More specifically, these two members are working on the International Space Station together.

Like many astronauts before them, they brought along their faith when they launched into space.


“God uses all of us in pretty neat ways, and I think I get the most joy from what I do thinking about it in those terms,” said Dyson, discussing her job on the “Bible Project” podcast ahead of her March launch on a Russian Soyuz spacecraft.

Dyson's six-month mission isn't scheduled to end until September, but Wilmore and his fellow NASA test pilot, Suni Williams, should have been back weeks ago. They are staying longer than expected following thruster failures and helium leaks on Boeing’s inaugural crew flight for its Starliner capsule. Wilmore and Williams have said they are confident the capsule will return them home safely; engineers are still poring over Starliner test data.

There's no return date yet, which means the congregation’s worries have subsided for now since they are safe aboard the space station, said Tommy Dahn. He is a pastor for the Pasadena, Texas, church where Dyson worships as a newer member and Wilmore is a longtime elder.

It’s the launch and return days that ratchet up their anxieties — and prayers.

“We will definitely be on vigil as we find out when that’s going to happen,” said Dahn, who is in close contact with Wilmore and his wife during the latest mission.

Wilmore paused before boarding the Starliner on each launch attempt, huddling in prayer with technicians and Williams. He acknowledged the risks of spaceflight — especially on a test flight like his.

“Our families have been a part of this from the beginning. ... As far as preparing them, they’re prepared. We trust in sovereign God. Whatever the plan is, we’re ready for it, whatever that might be,” he told reporters ahead of the flight.

Wilmore's faith that God is in control gives his family great peace, his wife, Deanna Wilmore, said via text message. He is content on the space station, neither worrying nor fretting, she said.

“We’re not saying this means that nothing bad will happen or the Starliner will bring Barry home safely, but whatever the Lord does, will be for our good and for His glory," even if they don't fully understand it, she said.

The U.S. space program has had stunning achievements and devastating tragedies.

Former NASA astronaut Mike Hopkins knew space exploration was high-risk, but didn’t feel its full weight until his first assignment. A life insurance company drove that home ahead of his Soyuz rocket launch in September 2013, Hopkins said, recalling being told they didn’t insure astronauts.

Hopkins realized he was not spiritually ready. Between trainings, he began converting to Catholicism, a faith he’d been immersed in since he began dating his Catholic wife but insisted he would never join.

“It’s the idea of being an astronaut and recognizing the risks that we take,” he said. “It felt like something was missing for me.”

When he received Communion for the first time, he was overcome with a clarity and peace that he wanted to take into space. With his priests' help, Hopkins secured permission to take a pyx of consecrated hosts. He administered weekly Communion to himself and on long, intense spacewalk days.

“It just set the tone for the day,” he said. “Then, you just go through the step-by-step process of executing the spacewalk but doing it knowing that Christ is with me.”

Others have taken Communion in space, including Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin after landing on the moon with Neil Armstrong in 1969.

The Rev. Wencil Pavlovsky, pastor of St. Paul the Apostle Catholic Church in the Houston area, helped former astronaut Mark Vande Hei bring Communion into orbit. Vande Hei was aboard the space station in 2017 when Pope Francis called it.

Pavlovsky says ministering to astronauts isn’t much different than supporting others: “What I do find unique and what I truly, truly appreciate is that they have a very different perspective because they get to look back at us the way God does.”

Relatedly, there is a phenomenon that philosopher Frank White calls the Overview Effect, when someone’s worldview shifts after looking at Earth from space.

Thirty-six St. Paul the Apostle parishioners have been astronauts, Pavlovsky said. Established in the 1960s to serve the growing space community, the church embraces its history, including with stained-glass windows designed from Hubble Telescope images and its curated collection of space travel memorabilia.

It is unknown how many have practiced their faith in orbit, according to NASA, because some keep it private. But flight-certified religious items are permitted. In 2023, astronaut Jasmin Moghbeli celebrated Hannukah on the space station, sharing a video featuring a menorah, a spinning dreidel and her view of Earth.

Houston Rabbi Shaul Osadchey encouraged a member of his congregation and then astronaut Jeffrey Hoffman to bring the first Torah into space on his final shuttle mission in 1996. Osadchey tracked down a miniature scroll, and he and about 40 synagogue members attended the launch in Florida.

“We bring our culture and our backgrounds with us where we go,” said Osadchey, noting Hoffman read from the Torah, the start of Genesis specifically, on Shabbat. “Jeff brought the Jewish tradition into a new domain — new world that is being conquered by humans.”

The three astronauts aboard Apollo 8 broadcasted their reading from Genesis on Christmas Eve as they flew around the moon, starting with “In the beginning, God created the heaven and the Earth.”

NASA says it helps observant astronauts stay connected to their faith community. Because of Dyson and Wilmore, their Southern Baptist congregation, which numbers around 250 people on any given Sunday, has had unique opportunities.

Despite the distance, women in the church arranged a care package of sorts — notes of encouragement — for Dyson, said Dahn.

“Barry, he ministers to us almost,” he said, noting how Wilmore makes encouraging calls to congregants while in space.

After Wilmore arrived on the space station in early June, he and Dyson appeared live via video at a Providence Baptist Sunday service and gave the congregation a tour of the station, Dahn said. Wilmore taught a lesson before he and others aboard the space station led the congregation in singing “Amazing Grace.”

“It’s kind of thrilling,” said Dahn, adding that thoughts of God come easily when the astronauts show Earth through the space station’s window. Like other theologically conservative Christians, he believes God is the creator of the universe as depicted in the Bible, not the Big Bang or other theories.

“It’s confirming. I don’t want to be crass, but it kind of makes us laugh at the ‘Flat Earthers,'” he said.

Wilmore uses his experience in space to enhance people’s understanding of their Christian beliefs, said Dahn, noting his speaking engagements with the Answers in Genesis ministry, which runs the Creation Museum and Ark Encounter, evangelical attractions in Kentucky.

Few others can do what Dyson and Wilmore do, although they are unlikely to say so themselves, said Corey Johnson, another Providence Baptist pastor. He thinks of how Wilmore organized a group to build a fence at his home, and how Dyson gladly read his sons a book while visiting.

“These are uniquely gifted individuals,” he said, but “there’s more to them than what they do for their day job.”

___

Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.

What happens if someone dies in space?

Emmanuel Urquieta, Baylor College of Medicine
Sat, August 3, 2024 
THE CONVERSATION

An artist's depiction of two astronauts on Mars. cokada/E+ via Getty Images




Curious Kids is a series for children of all ages. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, send it to curiouskidsus@theconversation.com.

 

What happens if someone dies in space? – Guillermo, Palm Beach, Florida


There’s no question that sending human beings to space is an extraordinarily difficult and perilous proposition.

Since human space exploration began just over 60 years ago, 20 people have died – 14 in the NASA space shuttle tragedies of 1986 and 2003, three cosmonauts during the 1971 Soyuz 11 mission, and three astronauts in the Apollo 1 launch pad fire in 1967.

Given how complicated human spaceflight is, it’s actually remarkable how few people have lost their lives so far. But NASA plans to send a crew to the Moon in 2025 and astronauts to Mars in the next decade. Commercial spaceflight is becoming routine. As space travel becomes more common, so does the possibility that someone might die along the way.

It brings to mind a gloomy but necessary question to ask: If someone dies in space – what happens to the body?



In the future, NASA and other space agencies, along with private industry, hope to establish colonies on Mars. janiecbros/E! via Getty Images

Death on the Moon and Mars

As a space medical doctor who works to find new ways to keep astronauts healthy, I and my team at the Translational Research Institute for Space Health want to make sure space explorers are as healthy as they can be for space missions.

Here is how death in space would be handled today: If someone died on a low-Earth-orbit mission – such as aboard the International Space Station – the crew could return the body to Earth in a capsule within a matter of hours.

If it happened on the Moon, the crew could return home with the body in just a few days. NASA already has detailed protocols in place for such events.

Because of that quick return, it’s likely that preservation of the body would not be NASA’s major concern; instead, the No. 1 priority would be making sure the remaining crew returns safely to Earth.

Things would be different if an astronaut died during the 300 million-mile trip to Mars.

In that scenario, the crew probably wouldn’t be able to turn around and go back. Instead, the body would likely return to Earth along with the crew at the end of the mission, which would be a couple of years later.

In the meantime, the crew would presumably preserve the body in a separate chamber or specialized body bag. The steady temperature and humidity inside the space vehicle would theoretically help preserve the body.

But all those scenarios would apply only if someone died in a pressurized environment, like a space station or a spacecraft.

What would happen if someone stepped outside into space without the protection of a spacesuit?

The astronaut would die almost instantly. The loss of pressure and the exposure to the vacuum of space would make it impossible for the astronaut to breathe, and blood and other body fluids would boil.

What would happen if an astronaut stepped out onto the Moon or Mars without a spacesuit?

The Moon has nearly no atmosphere – a very tiny amount. Mars has a very thin atmosphere, and almost no oxygen. So the result would be about the same as exposure to open space: suffocation and boiling blood.

What about burial?

Suppose the astronaut died after landing, while on the surface of Mars.

Cremation isn’t desirable; it requires too much energy that the surviving crew needs for other purposes. And burial isn’t a good idea, either. Bacteria and other organisms from the body could contaminate the Martian surface. Instead, the crew would likely preserve the body in a specialized body bag until it could be returned to Earth.

There are still many unknowns about how explorers would deal with a death. It’s not just the question of what to do with the body. Helping the crew deal with the loss, and helping the grieving families back on Earth, are just as important as handling the remains of the person who died. But to truly colonize other worlds – whether the Moon, Mars or a planet outside our solar system – this grim scenario will require planning and protocols.


Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you’d like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com. Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live.

And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you’re wondering, too. We won’t be able to answer every question, but we will do our best.

This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Emmanuel UrquietaBaylor College of Medicine

Read more:

Emmanuel Urquieta is supported by the Translational Research Institute for Space Health.


Reclusive tribe attacks loggers suspected of encroaching on their land in Peru’s Amazon


5 Aug 2024

Peru’s reclusive Mashco Piro ethnic group recently used bows and arrows to attack loggers suspected of encroaching on their territory in the Amazon, according to a regional Indigenous organization.

FENAMAD, representing 39 Indigenous communities in the Cusco and Madre de Dios regions, said Monday that it believes illegal logging was taking place on Mashco Piro territory and that one logger was injured in the July 27 attack.

A few weeks ago, photos emerged of the uncontacted tribe searching for food on a beach in the Peruvian Amazon, which some experts say was evidence logging concessions are “dangerously close” to its territory

“It is presumably illegal because the area where the incident occurred is a forestry concession that belonged to Wood Tropical Forest until November 2022, and we are not aware of a concession that has requested or granted enabling rights in the same area,” said a FENAMAD representative, speaking anonymously out of personal security concerns.

The organization says that a lack of protection measures by the Peruvian government and the increased activity of companies and illegal operators on the Mashco Piro territory could produce “devastating consequences,” such as the transmission of diseases and increased violence.

Two loggers were shot with arrows while fishing in 2022, one fatally, in an encounter with tribal members, and there have been several other previous reports of conflicts.

Peru’s Ministry of Culture, responsible for the protection of Indigenous peoples, did not immediately respond to a message Monday seeking comment on the attack and their protection efforts.

Survival International, an advocacy group for Indigenous peoples which closely follows the Mashco Piro’s issues, says it is pressuring the Peruvian government to move deeper into these areas of the Amazon to help control the situation.

“This is a permanent emergency. For the last month we have been seeing the Mascho Piro every two weeks at different points, and in all of them they are surrounded by loggers,” Teresa Mayo, a researcher at Survival International, said in a phone call.

“It’s truly a matter of life and death. And only the government can and has the duty to stop it,” Mayo said.

___

The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
NEW ZEALAND

Failed Tauranga car parking building: Engineers accused of negligence before disciplinary board

By
Jeremy Wilkinson
Open Justice multimedia journalist, Palmerston North
5 Aug, 2024 12:29 AM5 mins to read
SaveShare


The unfinished Harrington St parking building. Photo / George Novak

A car parking building that cost $19 million to build was riddled with structural errors meaning its owner had to cut its losses and sell it for just $1.

Now, three engineers who did the maths on the building that was ultimately deemed too expensive to fix have been accused of negligence.

The site between Harington and Hamilton Sts in downtown Tauranga was once intended for a multi-storey public transport hub with 550 parks plus showers and lockers, intended to ease some of the city’s parking woes.

However, construction stalled in 2018 when serious structural issues were found. The Tauranga City Council abandoned construction in 2020, having already spent $19m.

Rather than demolishing the half-built hub, in 2021 the council sold the site and structure for $1 to developers and cut its losses.

Mayor Tenby Powell said at the time the cost of fixing the problems would likely blow out past the original $29m budget.

Discover more
Engineers face disciplinary hearing over failed transport ...
Auckland Council urgently reviewing 42 properties worked ...
Taupō District Council reviews consents after engineering ...
Man accused of forging qualified engineers’ signatures ...

“As unpalatable as it is to abandon a project which has already cost $19 million, our expert advice makes it clear that the completion options available to us would simply be sending good money after bad,” Powell said.

Since that decision to abandon the building, Tauranga City Council lodged a complaint with Engineering New Zealand (ENZ) about the conduct of three engineers who had a hand in designing it.

Engineers before Disciplinary Committee


Today, a Disciplinary Committee convened in Wellington where the lead engineer who did the original designs is charged with acting outside his area of competency and performing engineering services negligently or incompetently.

That engineer, who has interim name suppression, has denied any wrongdoing in the litany of errors identified with the building’s designs.

A second engineer who peer-reviewed his designs is facing similar charges, while a third engineer - and a colleague of the first - who also peer-reviewed the work has admitted he made errors in regard to the seismic strengthening.

“Something has gone seriously awry at the design consenting stage,” said Sean McCusker, counsel for ENZ’s investigating Committee which brought the charges against the three engineers.

“That critical process was missed and that has led to significant consequences for the ratepayers of Tauranga.”

Tauranga City Council abandoned the building in 2020. Photo / George Novak

McCusker said part of the issue was whether the original design was flawed, or whether subsequent redesignes caused the issues.

“There are important checks and safeguards and building owners and consent authorities are entitled to place reliance on those,” he said.

The lead engineer claims his designs were accurate and that it was a colleague at his firm’s redesigns that caused the structural issues.

McCusker however said the committee had concerns with those original designs, which is why they’ve levelled charges against the lead engineer.

Signing off compliance


The lead engineer led the design of the foundations and superstructure of the building and signed them off as being compliant with the building code.

It’s alleged that he acted outside his area of expertise in regards to the way he designed the building’s seismic strengthening.

It’s also alleged that he was negligent or incompetent in designing a range of aspects of the building including the lateral bracing, retaining walls, and structural steel columns.

When the lead engineer left the firm his calculations were peer-reviewed by a second engineer at a separate firm who also signed off the designs.

It’s alleged he worked outside his skillset in regards to a seismic strengthening design used, and that he was negligent in reviewing the original design and rubber-stamping it.

A Disciplinary Committee of Engineering New Zealand convened in Wellington for a two-week hearing. Photo / Jeremy Wilkinson

This engineer has accepted liability for some aspects of the errors but has disputed others.

The third engineer was a colleague of the lead designer and after problems with the original design were discovered he signed off on revisions intended to address those errors.

That engineer has admitted liability for failing to take into consideration seismic gaps for the ramps in the carpark and for signing off on the revised designs which also had errors.

Rob Jury, the chief engineer at Beca, was called as a witness on Monday and said the early designs, which were two-dimensional, were “quite light” on analysis and in his opinion needed to be more sophisticated.

He said that, in his opinion, it would have been difficult for construction workers to pick up those gaps in the design or to follow the instructions.
Three engineers are facing disciplinary action after structural issues forced the Tauranga City Council to abandon the building. Photo / George Novak

“The constructor can be expected to pick up issues around geometry… but he cannot pick up issues around design,” he said.

Jury, who has 40 years of experience in the industry, wasn’t aware of the Innovative Dissipative (INERD) bracing design system that was used for seismic strengthening.


“I felt immediately that the various features of that system was an appropriate concept but didn’t have enough backup in the calculations,” he said.

“It left a lot of questions.

“Even his [the lead engineer] colleagues didn’t recognise what the intent was, because they went and changed it all.”

Jury said that in his view the design was signed off despite “unfinished business” and there was no hold placed on the drawings despite this.

Two weeks have been set down for the hearing, which continues tomorrow.

Jeremy Wilkinson is an Open Justice reporter based in Manawatū covering courts and justice issues with an interest in tribunals. He has been a journalist for nearly a decade and has worked for NZME since 2022.

Turkiye to join genocide case against Israel at International Court of Justice on Wednesday: FM


August 6, 2024

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan meets with the staff of Turkish Crescent, Turkish Ministry of Health and the State Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD) in Arish, Egypt on August 04, 2024 [Murat Gök – Anadolu Agency]

Turkiye will file to join the genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice at The Hague, the country’s Foreign Minister announced on Monday, Anadolu Agency reports.

“We will submit our prepared file to join the genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice at The Hague on Wednesday,” Hakan Fidan told a news conference alongside his Egyptian counterpart in Cairo.

His remarks came after a meeting with his Egyptian counterpart, Badr Abdelatty.

Emphasizing that Israel’s “unconditional” supporters were the main culprits in undermining the foundations of the international order, Fidan said those who condemn Russia for its war on Ukraine were turning a blind eye to Tel Aviv’s continued Occupation of Palestinian lands.

He said Palestinians have had a constructive attitude during the negotiation process, while Israel has been the “spoiler”, adding that last week, Israel conducted a “treacherous assassination” of the chief negotiator in talks for a ceasefire in Gaza, referring to Palestinian group Hamas’ Political Bureau chief, Dr. Ismail Haniyeh.

READ: Turkiye blocks Freedom Flotilla setting sail for Gaza

“This assassination clearly shows that Netanyahu does not want peace. Netanyahu wants to set the entire region on fire. Israel is pursuing violence and expansionism,” Fidan further added.

Referring to the numerous applauses Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, received during a recent visit to the US Congress, Fidan said: “War crimes have no place on the parliamentary podium. The only place for war crimes should be, without exception, the defendant’s seat. ”

Urging supporters of Israel to “correct the mistake”, Fidan said that not only the region but the entire world would pay a heavy price “if the massacre in Gaza is not stopped.”

He stated that it was no longer acceptable for the US to “mitigate” every wrongdoing of Israel, urging Tel Aviv’s “owners” to “hold onto its leash”.

He also warned that the region can no longer tolerate Israel’s “provocations”, referring to its attacks in Lebanon and Iran that have raised fears of the conflict in Gaza spilling over into the region.

“The constant lecturing of Muslim countries on other unnecessary issues, over democracy and human rights, has long exceeded the limits of tolerance. The West has lost all moral superiority in this region because of the Israeli issue,” he added.

Ankara and Cairo have made every effort to prevent the spread of war in the region, the Turkish Foreign Minister said.

“As responsible countries in the region, we will not be mere observers of the issues we face. Acting with a spirit of regional ownership, we are systematically working to provide all possible solutions to the region’s problems,” he added.

Highlighting that Turkiye has sent over 56,000 tons of humanitarian aid to Gaza, more than any other country, Fidan said the delivery of relief to Gaza disturbed Tel Aviv.

He pointed out that Gazans who survive Israel’s bombs were being systematically starved, underlining: “The path to peace in the Middle East truly lies in the establishment of a genuine Palestinian State.”

He reaffirmed his call for the establishment of an independent sovereign Palestinian State with geographic integrity and East Jerusalem as its capital.

“This is their most natural right. We oppose any imposition by Israeli or Western countries on this matter. The Palestinian people are capable of determining their own path and choosing their own leaders,” he added.

Fidan began his two-day visit to Egypt on Sunday.
U.N. fires Gaza staff, citing possible involvement in attack on Israel

An internal investigation determined the employees ‘may have been involved’ in the Oct. 7 Hamas-led assault that set off the war.



By Karen DeYoung
August 5, 2024 

The United Nations has officially closed its internal investigation of Israeli allegations that staff members of UNRWA, the main U.N. relief agency in Gaza, participated in the Oct. 7 Hamas invasion of southern Israel after determining that nine of 19 accused “may have been involved” in the attack. The nine have been fired, according to U.N. statements.

Investigators determined there was “insufficient” evidence to support Israel’s charges against another nine of the accused, and “no evidence” against one, a spokesman for Secretary General António Guterres said Monday.

The Israeli allegations, initially made in January, led more than a dozen countries to suspend support donations to UNRWA. All except the United States, which in the past has supplied at least a third of all UNRWA funding, have since resumed their support. After the Biden administration paused U.S. funding, Congress voted to eliminate all donations to the agency until at least March 2025.

The report by the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services remains confidential, although member states can ask to see it. Asked Monday about the U.N. statements on its conclusions, State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said he would have no comment until the administration has a “chance to review” the document.

Middle East conflict

Israel is sending a delegation to resume negotiations after weeks of deadlock over a cease-fire deal in Gaza, the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed, as a senior U.S. administration official hailed “a breakthrough on a critical impasse.”

Israel has long accused UNRWA, and the United Nations in general, of being biased. Since the October attack, which sparked the ongoing Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, senior Israeli officials have used numbers ranging from dozens to thousands in charging that UNRWA is an instrument of Hamas.

For its part, UNRWA has charged that Israel has long sought to eliminate the agency, whose official mission is to care for Palestinian “refugees.” Israel claims that Palestinians forced to leave their homes at the creation of the Israeli state in 1948 and in subsequent territorial wars — totaling, with their descendants, almost 6 million — should not be classified as refugees.

In addition to Gaza, UNRWA also provides education, health care and humanitarian aid to Palestinians in the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Syria, Lebanon and Jordan. Of its 30,000 employees, 13,000 work in Gaza. More than 200 have been killed in ongoing Israeli attacks, according to the United Nations.

“The U.N. is incapable of running a state-like enterprise in Gaza without being infiltrated by terrorist organizations,” the Israeli government said in a statement last week. “UNRWA in Gaza can and should be replaced, without hampering the humanitarian assistance … Donor countries that continue to fund UNRWA are indirectly funding Hamas.”

Amid an escalating humanitarian crisis in Gaza, UNRWA and other international aid agencies have accused Israel of blocking assistance to more than 2 million Gazans, most of whom have relocated numerous times inside the enclave to try to avoid Israeli fighting. Israel has countered by calling UNRWA “incompetent” and accusing Hamas of looting aid convoys. The United States, along with the aid agencies, have rejected those charges and called on Israel to allow more assistance to enter Gaza.

The OIOS report appeared to have added fuel to the long-standing war of both actions and words between Israel and the United Nations. In a statement Monday, Israel’s ambassador, Gilad Erdan, called the investigation “a disgrace.” According to Israeli media, he said the document “ignored the thousands of agency employees involved in Hamas terrorism.”

Calling for UNRWA to be shut down, Erdan said that Israel “gave the U.N. the precise details on over 100 UNRWA employees who are members of Hamas.”

In his own statement on the report, UNRWA Commissioner General Philippe Lazzarini said that only 19 cases were ever brought to U.N. attention by Israel. He has previously charged Israel with an “insidious” campaign to destroy UNWRA and has repeatedly said that Israel refused to supply evidence of its charges.

The OIOS investigation, Lazzarini said, found that “in one case, no evidence was obtained by OIOS to support the allegations of the staff member’s involvement. That staff member has rejoined the Agency.

“In nine other cases, the evidence obtained by OIOS was insufficient to support the staff members’ involvement and the OIOS investigation of them is now closed.”

“For the remaining nine cases, the evidence — if authenticated and corroborated — could indicate that the UNRWA staff members may have been involved in the attacks of 7 October. I have decided in the case of the remaining nine staff members, they cannot work for UNRWA. All contracts of these staff members will be terminated in the interest of the Agency.”

In a briefing at the United Nations, Guterres spokesman Farhan Haq said that as part of its investigation, OIOS investigators held discussions with Israeli officials, examined UNRWA documents and records, reviewed technical information, communications data and public sources.

“However,” Haq said, “one thing I’d like to point out is that since information used by Israeli officials to support the allegations have remained in Israeli custody, OIOS was not able to independently authenticate most of the information provided to it.”


Asked about the U.N. public wording that the nine “may have been involved” in the Hamas attack, Haq indicated that his hands were tied in offering more information because of the confidential nature of the finding. “That is my words as summarizing the investigation’s words. But it is the words I’ve been given to tell you which have been very precisely written for me.”


The nine were terminated, he said, because “we have sufficient information in order to take the actions that we’re taking … Beyond that, we will need to evaluate what further steps are needed in order to fully corroborate and evaluate the situation.”
EDITORIAL | Global Efforts Needed in Middle East to De-escalate Conflict

The assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh raises the potential for continued violent confrontations in the Middle East.



on August 6, 2024
By Editorial Board,

Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (center) attended the funeral for Ismail Haniyeh, top leader of Hamas, in Tehran, Iran on August 1. (Beit-e Rahbari [Office of Ayatollah Khamenei], ©Getty via Kyodo)



Ismail Haniyeh was killed while on a visit to Iran. He was the political leader of the Islamic fundamentalist organization Hamas, the Middle East group responsible for a large-scale surprise attack on Israel in October 2023.

Israel has not admitted to carrying out the assassination. However, Hamas and Iran, its chief supporter, have blamed Israel and promised to avenge Haniyeh's death.

Haniyeh was based in Qatar, although he was visiting Tehran to attend the inauguration of Iran's new president. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei also said it was "Iran's duty to revenge his (Haniyeh's) blood."

Additionally, a senior leader of Hezbollah was recently killed during an Israeli attack. Hezbollah is a Lebanon-based radical militia with close ties to Iran. Furthermore, the Israeli military also recently announced that the head of Hamas's military wing was killed in an attack it had carried out in July. Therefore, Iran and pro-Iran militias throughout the Middle East are expected to intensify their efforts to retaliate against Israel.
Hamas' political leader Ismail Haniyeh addresses supporters in Gaza City in March 2014 (©Reuters/Kyodo News)


Destabilizing Instincts of 'Revenge'

If Israel did kill Haniyeh, then Israel probably held him responsible for the massive terror attack in October 2023. In that case, the government of Benjamin Netanyahu likely determined that Hamas is a terrorist organization unable to become a partner in negotiations and therefore must be destroyed. Fighting between Israel and Iran, along with pro-Iran militant groups, seems almost certain to intensify in the days to come.

There was a similar situation in April following the Iranian missile attack. As in April, all efforts are required to avoid an escalation of these tensions into a "Fifth Middle East War."

Continued violent confrontations, even without a major conflict, would still hugely impact the entire world. That includes Japan. After all, Japan relies upon the Middle East region for over 90% of its crude oil imports.
An emergency meeting of the Security Council was held following the assassination of the supreme leader of the Islamic organization Hamas on July 31 at the United Nations Headquarters in New York (©Kyodo News)

International Efforts to Manage the Crisis

There is a risk that this situation could develop into a global energy security emergency. That could impact economic conditions worldwide, and even the safety of Japanese nationals in the region.

Depending on how the situation develops, further precautions may be necessary. Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's Cabinet should not hesitate to hold National Security Council (NSC) meetings and review necessary preparations for the evacuation of Japanese nationals as required. Japanese companies too should ensure their readiness regarding crisis management.

The foreign ministry of Iran has charged that the United States, which supports Israel, is also responsible for Haniyeh's assassination. However, this is pointless venting of anger. All the parties should refrain from such behavior to avoid escalating the present explosive situation.

We earnestly hope that Japan will work with various Western nations and the United Nations to encourage both Israel and Iran to exercise restraint. 

Boys hold up a photo of Hamas Leader Haniyeh on July 31 in Gaza City, northern Gaza Strip. (©Getty Images via Kyodo)

RELATED:
Frustration with Netanyahu mounts as Gaza talks falter


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has denied introducing new terms in ceasefire proposals and traded blame with Hamas over the stalemate.

Reuters
PUBLISHED ONAUGUST 05, 2024 

JERUSALEM — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing mounting frustration within Israel and abroad over his handling of faltering talks aimed at securing a Gaza hostage release and ceasefire deal, according to three Israeli officials.

Divisions between Netanyahu and the defence establishment over the deal have also surfaced in public remarks and behind closed doors, in angry exchanges leaked on Aug 3 to the Israeli press.

Over the previous four weeks, three Israeli officials, one in the negotiating team and two with close knowledge of the talks, have voiced concern that politics was undermining the chances of a deal.


"The feeling is that the prime minister is avoiding making a decision about the deal and is not pushing for it full force," one of the officials told Reuters on Aug 4.

Some of Netanyahu's far-right coalition partners have threatened government stability should the war end before Hamas is defeated.

Netanyahu has repeatedly said the release of the remaining 115 hostages held in Gaza since the Hamas-led Oct 7 assault on Israel that triggered the war was a top priority.

The Oct 7 attackers killed 1,200 people and took more than 250 captive, according to Israeli tallies. Gaza's health authorities say more than 39,000 Palestinians have since been killed in fighting in the densely populated coastal enclave.
Tensions laid bare

Tensions between Netanyahu - who insists he is safeguarding Israel's security - and some in his negotiating team, were laid bare in his public remarks on Aug 4.

"I am prepared to go very far to release all of our hostages, while maintaining the security of Israel," Netanyahu said in televised remarks at his cabinet meeting.

"Our commitment stands in complete contrast to the leaks and mendacious briefings on the issue of our hostages."
Efforts by the United States, Egypt and Qatar to secure a deal between Israel and Hamas had gained momentum over July but have since ground to a near halt after new terms were introduced to an agreed framework presented by Washington in May.

The framework involves three phases, with the first seeing a six-week ceasefire and the release of women, the elderly and wounded hostages in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners held by Israel.

But sources have told Reuters a new Israeli condition that displaced Palestinians should be screened as they return to the enclave's north when the ceasefire begins was among the sticking points.

The killing on July 31 of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran has further complicated matters, though the militant group has not shut the door entirely on negotiators.

"We will continue to apply military pressure on Hamas and its senior figures, until the return of all of our hostages and achieving all of the war goals," Netanyahu said.

"Anyone who wants the release of our hostages must pressure Hamas, not the government of Israel."

Netanyahu's remarks came in response to a flurry of reports over the weekend.

One, by N12 News, quoted US President Joe Biden telling Netanyahu in an Aug 1 phone call to "stop bullshitting me" about advancing the talks.

Netanyahu's office said he does not comment on his conversations with the US president. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the remarks, which were also reported by Haaretz newspaper, citing a senior Biden administration official.

"The people who are leaking these things out of meetings want to pressure the prime minister to make a bad deal. But what these leaks are doing is encouraging Hamas to add more and more demands," a fourth Israeli official told Reuters on Aug 5.
Red lines

A second N12 report cited Israeli security chiefs, including Defence Minister Yoav Gallant and the head of the Shin Bet domestic security service Ronen Bar, casting doubt during a July 31 meeting on Netanyahu's commitment to a hostage deal.

Gallant, according to the report, told Netanyahu that the new terms he introduced have made a deal impossible. The Shin Bet declined to comment on closed door discussions. Gallant's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

But in public remarks, Gallant and Israel's military chief Herzi Halevi have made a point of noting that, after months of battering Hamas in Gaza, forces can handle any challenges posed by a ceasefire, at the same time stressing the importance of sealing a deal that would see hostages freed.

Their messaging over the past few weeks has been in stark contrast to Netanyahu frequently citing his "red lines" on Israel's security in any deal. He has denied introducing new terms and has traded blame with Hamas over the stalemate.

"We have insisted on our red lines, and we will continue to insist on them - both in the face of our enemies and our friends," Netanyahu said on Aug 4.