Sunday, September 22, 2024

UK

Richard Burgon: Party leadership needs to ‘listen to members’ on two-child cap and winter fuel


© David Woolfall/CC BY 3.0

Left wing MP Richard Burgon has said the Labour Party leadership needs to “listen to the party members” on issues including the two-child cap, the winter fuel allowance and Gaza.

Speaking before a Campaign for Labour Party Democracy fringe event at this year’s Labour Party Conference, the Leeds East MP acknowledged the government had made a “positive start” on issues including workers’ rights, renters’ rights and railway nationalisation while urging against a return to austerity.

Burgon lost the Labour whip in July along with six other MPs after voting in favour of an SNP-tabled King’s Speech amendment urging the two-child benefit limit to be abolished.

He said: “If you look through our history, whenever the leadership in government or in opposition, has got it wrong, if it listened to the party members, perhaps it wouldn’t have.

“Whether that be on Iraq, whether it be on PFI, whether it be on that 75 pence increase in the pension, whether it be – I’m afraid – of the two-child limit, whether it be – I’m afraid – on the winter fuel allowance, whether it be taking so long to support a ceasefire in Gaza.”

The two-child cap and winter fuel allowance have been topics of heated debate since the party’s return to government this summer – with votes on both issues seeing both open rebellion and quieter disgruntlement in the Labour ranks.

READ MORE: ‘People didn’t vote for doom and gloom’: USDAW’s Paddy Lillis on winter fuel, two-child cap and the PM outdoing Attlee

Keir Starmer has indicated previously he is open to scrapping the two-child benefit limit – a policy which critics say pushes families into poverty – but  Rachel Reeves has also warned there would be no “unfunded” pledge to remove it.

The Prime Minister has defended means-testing the winter fuel allowance as a necessary “unpopular” measure to deal with the fiscal black hole, despite concerns over its impact on poorer pensioners.

Burgon added: “I don’t want to see the party take the choice to continue the failed economic orthodoxy of the last 14 years, or indeed the failed economic orthodoxy that’s ruled the roost since 1979. We must make sure that we don’t pursue a policy of austerity.

“Austerity is always a political choice, not an economic necessity, especially in this one of the richest economies on Earth, and that’s why I was one of the MPs who voted against the cut to winter fuel allowance, because pensioners in my constituency asked me to vote that way.”

The other six MPs who lost the whip in July alongside Burgon were Apsana Begum, Ian Byrne, Imran Hussain, Rebecca Long-Bailey, John McDonnell and Zarah Sultana – with their position set to be reviewed six months later.

Inside America’s prisons: latter-day slavery


 


SEPTEMBER 22, 2024

Mike Phipps reviews Abolition Labor: The Fight to End Prison Slavery, by Andrew Ross, Tommaso Bardelli, And Aiyuba Thomas, published by OR Books.

In February 2016, President Obama signed a bill that banned goods made by certain prisoners and other workers who toil under conditions of forced labour overseas – but not in the US, which holds 20% of the world’s prison population.

Later that year on September 9th, as if in response, the biggest prison strike ever broke out, in large part as a protest against domestic “prison slavery.”  Masterminded by the Free Alabama Movement, it was observed in 24 states. An estimated 57,000 prisoners participated in as many as 46 facilities. 

Alabama

Alabama is worthy of special mention: conditions in its prisons, where the death rate is four times the national average, are arguably the worst in the country. The state is facing a Department of Justice lawsuit over the “violent, cruel and unconstitutional” condition of its prisons. Typically two hundred men might sleep in one dormitory, where fights, stabbings, rats and cockroaches are a daily fact of life. The general lawlessness is exacerbated by the shortage of guards. Serious malpractices include parole being systematically denied, inhumanely long sentences for nonviolent offences and widespread sexual abuse. In this particular state, it was difficult for the authors to find any evidence that “meaningful work” was even a consideration in the administration of the state’s prisons.

The authors explore Alabama’s history of ‘convict leasing’ – forced penal labour that effectively substituted for slavery after the Civil War, which laid the basis for the levels of inhumane treatment today. As possibly the worst state in terms of its treatment of prisoners by just about every yardstick, there is a lot about Alabama in this book.

Across the US, forced labour continues as before, and wages have not budged.  Men and women still face punishment, including beatings, lockdowns, sexual assault, loss of family visitation rights, elimination of good time credit, and solitary confinement for refusing to work.

Mass incarceration

Mass incarceration in the US began with the Rockefeller Drug Laws (mandating 15 year minimum terms for the possession of four ounces of narcotics—the same as for second-degree murder) two years after Governor Rockefeller had drowned the Attica prison uprising in a bloody massacre. Soon tough-on-crime policies would be rolled out nationally.

At the height of mass incarceration, more than two million people had effectively been pulled out of the labour market and incapacitated, while most of them were doing work that would generate a great deal of income if performed by free-world workers.  In any other context, this would be classified as wage theft on a grand scale. According to one national estimate, the disparity between the local minimum wage and the penny wages paid in prison amounts to $14 billion annually.

Conditions of work

Donna Fairchild, a native Texan who worked as a manager in a manufacturing plant before she was incarcerated, describes in the book what it meant to be assigned to work in the fields:   

“We worked year round, during the coldest and the hottest. There was one time we were harvesting cabbage in February and some rows were even flooded and it was 31 degrees [Fahrenheit, so below zero C… Everyone was wet from the knees down, and I remember thinking that they don’t really care what happens to me. I felt like I could have died and they would not have cared.”

Meanwhile in the summer, there is no air-conditioning in most of the prisons, and a dozen or more fatalities were attributed to the heatwaves of 2023.   Outside in the fields, conditions can be much worse:

“We were out there in 104 degrees weather… We were made to pull weeds down a row, and the ground would be hard and dry from the sun. And we would have to stand up and bend over at the waist to pick weeds, because you weren’t allowed to squat. If we were picking corn, and you’ve missed an ear of corn, or stand up for too long, that’s a disciplinary case too– it’s a refusal to work. You get an incomplete work assignment, and you go to disciplinary court inside of prison. Punishments for one infraction can range from no phone calls home for 30 days or no outside rec. For three refusals to work, I lost my contact visits for four months, 45 days of no commissary purchases or rec.”

The pressure to keep going comes from other inmates, fearful of being singled out by the guards. It leads to fights among prisoners, which the guards often encourage. As in true slave labour, violence is used to drive productivity. Prisoners report being made to move huge boulders from the bottom to the top of a hill – then back again. Some would deliberately injure themselves – badly – to escape these torments.

During the pandemic, prisoners were making hand sanitizer – which they were not allowed to use themselves. The hazardous nature of prison labour under ‘normal’ circumstances means inmates are forced to handle toxic materials, not regulated by federal occupational safety standards – fumes from which also impact on the health of guards.

Other prisoners are pressurised to sacrifice health and safety to make quotas to earn a little more. Rarely does work done in prison lead to a job in the outside world on release.

A labour movement issue

Prison work is a labour movement issue too. It undercuts outside rates of pay and allows companies to make vast profits. In the past, strong unions opposed some forms of prison work. Today, in a world of privatised prisons and precarious jobs outside, that’s more difficult, with companies using prison work as a union-busting tactic.

Hourly pay in many prisons varies from 15 to 65 cents, the same as it was 30 years ago. Exiting prison with little more than a bus ticket and $40, means ex-prisoners go straight back to the ‘street’, with harmful consequences for their own safety and that of the general public.

Even getting a symbolic change in the law to abolish this latter-day slavery is an uphill battle against lawmakers who are scared of looking ‘soft on crime’. Yet, as with the restoration of ex-prisoners’ voting rights, there have been some significant victories  – including in Alabama. That’s thanks in no small part to the prisoners’ rights movement and the use of strike action by prison labourers, notwithstanding the fierce repression meted out to its organisers.

Quite a lot of this book is about that movement. It’s a story that needs to be shared widely, not least because it displays the underlying humanity of the prisoners, despite all the efforts the system makes to brutalise them. It’s also a significant contribution to the contemporary debate on prison abolitionism.

Mike Phipps’ book Don’t Stop Thinking About Tomorrow: The Labour Party after Jeremy Corbyn (OR Books, 2022) can be ordered here.

Palestine – What Should the UK Government Do?
“An arms embargo, leading to a total cessation of the two-way arms trade – and military and intelligence co-operation – with Israel, would be a seismic shift in Israel’s global standing.”

Hugh Lanning, Labour & Palestine, outlines the actions we must now demand from the Labour Government.

Israel’s reputation is in tatters Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza has highlighted to millions the significance of the decades-long struggle for Palestinian rights and statehood, and has also put the issue at centre stage for the new Labour Government.

Through its actions in Gaza and the West Bank, and its continual refusal to take heed of the United Nations (UN), the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and many other calls for a ceasefire, Israel has totally isolated itself internationally, including amongst many former supporters. Apparently, this is even stretching the patience of Joe Biden – although not enough to result in any meaningful action or pressure. All in all, Israel has torn to shreds its much-cultivated image as the ‘only democracy’ in the Middle East. And, nearly a year later, any pretence at ‘self-defence’ has long since passed.

An issue that matters to voters

Meanwhile the UK has been increasingly isolated – under the Tory Government, and now Labour. Despite latter-day statements in favour of a ceasefire from Labour’s front-bench, these came far too late to assuage the anger of the millions who were watching the carnage on their televisions. Not only did Keir Starmer and David Lammy not speak up for Palestine, but at times they even endorsed Israel’s murderous actions.

Both the local elections and the General Election (GE) showed that Palestine is a significant political issue for many voters. Not just the Muslim population, not just the hundreds of thousands demonstrating, but for the millions of young, old, progressive, trade union, and many other voters who would normally be expected to have voted Labour.

This impact has seen Labour spokespeople admitting the need to rebuild confidence with those alienated by the Party’s stance on Palestine and the ceasefire. And during the GE campaign Keir Starmer even briefed the press on his willingness to recognise a Palestinian state at some indeterminate point in the future, a belated and inadequate fig leaf, and an insult to the tens of thousands of innocent people who’ve died.

The litmus test for Labour’s ethical foreign policy

So what should supporters of Palestine now demand from the Labour Government?

Our impressive mass and longstanding movement for Palestine must demand a change of UK Government policy. The UK must become a public advocate of Palestinian freedom from Israeli oppression and occupation. And we must follow the lead of Spain, Ireland, Norway, and others in immediately recognising a Palestinian state, in line with the overwhelming vote of the UN General Assembly.

Israel is now a rogue nation out of control, and recognition of Palestine must be coupled with action to bring it within the framework of international law. Words are not enough – as has been demonstrated by Israel’s contemptuous response to the rulings of the ICJ and International Criminal Court (ICC), based on its continuing belief in its impunity.

Words are not enough

It is its military might that gives Israel its arrogance, but it is also its Achilles heel. The UK is not its largest arms dealer – the US has that tainted honour – but an arms embargo, leading to a total cessation of the two-way arms trade and military and intelligence co-operation with Israel, would be a seismic shift in Israel’s global standing, coming as it would from the country largely responsible for the creation of the modern Israeli state.

UK funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) has now been restored, but there are many others demands that can and should be made: withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza, plus the reconstruction and independent development of Gaza are all just a start, with Palestinian self-determination the objective.

It is only actions such as the destruction of the Wall, the removal of settlements and settlers, the end of the military occupation and, critically, giving Palestinians back their land together with a return to the internationally-recognised borders of 1967 that a just peace and self-determination can be secured.

These huge steps would also represent a dramatic shift in both Labour and the UK’s policy and practice.

The new Government is an opportunity we must not waste to get Labour to reset its ethical, moral, and political stance on Palestine. It is not an issue that will go away. If Labour fails this challenge, a whole generation of people – not just those on marches, in encampments, or organising local protests – are not going to go away or forget.


  • Hugh Lanning is Co-founder of Labour & Palestine – follow on X here and Facebook here
  • LIVERPOOL EVENTPalestine – What should the new UK Government do? Central Liverpool venue. Saturday September 21st, 16.30. Register here. With the Palestinian Ambassador to the UK: H.E Husam Zomlot. Plus: Richard Burgon MP, Kim Johnson MP, John McDonnell MP, Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP, Hugh Lanning (Labour & Palestine), Fraser McGuire (‘Arise’), Jess Barnard (Labour NEC member), Maryam Eslamdoust (TSSA General Secretary), Mick Whelan (ASLEF General Secretary) & Matt Wrack.(FBU General Secretary).
  • You can add you name to the petition calling for the new Government to impose an arms embargo on Israel here.
  • This article was originally published in CLPD’s Campaign Briefing Newsletter. Read it in full here.
  • You can also read Labour Outlook’s 2024 Autumn Conference bulletin here.

 UK

Starmer aims to preserve the status quo – prepare for battles ahead, Martin Cavanagh, PCS


“Now is the time for us to keep on the front foot, and demand of a Labour Government the decent pay, jobs, rights, and public services we deserve.”

By Martin Cavanagh, PCS President

If there was any thought that the challenges our movement faced under fourteen years of Tory rule would disappear under Starmer’s Labour government, last week exposed the reality.  

As we headed to Brighton for the annual TUC Congress, many observers were speaking of a “mixed bag” so far from the new administration.  

Their promise to repeal the anti-union laws of 2016, remove the Minimum Service Levels legislation, and to bury the Rwanda Deportation Plan, of course are to be welcomed. And following on from their election manifesto pledge to introduce the greatest package of improvements to workers’ rights since the 1970’s, you can see why it is tempting for some to declare the dawning of a new age of industrial relations. 

This impression was further enhanced with the Chancellor’s early announcements about public sector pay and her willingness to “settle industrial disputes” to kick start the economy. 

Many of us, however, were not fooled and were right to be cautious. If anyone had followed Starmer’s political career and seen the witch-hunt of socialists within the party under his leadership, it was obvious what to expect from him in leading government; decision after decision aimed at preserving the status quo, protecting big business and the political elite, and doubling down on those he sees as a threat. 

This new administration has not only refused to lift the reviled Two Child Benefit Cap, which overnight would help over half a million vulnerable children, but the Prime Minister had also set about making an example of those “rebels” who dared vote against the whip.  

This, allied with Labour’s abhorrent refusal to demand a complete ban on arms sales to Israel, were to be expected.  

However, despite these obvious warning signs, many Trade Union delegates headed to Brighton last week with a sense of hope and optimism. While it is true that the PM delivered a positive narrative on the New Deal for Workers and repealing the 2016 anti-trade union laws, in the space of just a few days, we also saw the harsh reality we face as a movement.  

The breaking news going into the week was the scandalous decision made to remove the Winter Fuel Payments for all pensioners not in receipt of Pension Credit, and the attempt to brush it off as just one of a number of “tough decisions” the government would have to make. 

The PM then delivered the most uninspiring of addresses to Congress itself. The first Premier in 14 years to address TUC Congress should have been a big deal. It should have seen a rousing ovation from delegates, similar to that given to Jeremy Corbyn in 2017, instead nearly half the delegates remained seated and there was no tangible buzz of anticipation.  

In addressing a fringe last Tuesday evening, I said I had been “underwhelmed”, to be kind. Just a week on, I find myself prepared for the battles ahead our movement will inevitably face. 

While the word austerity was not used by the PM, the warnings he gave, “tough decisions”, future pay awards being “shaped” by those decisions, and the threat of things getting “worse before they get better”, are a precursor to austerity. They also tell us that once again a Labour Government will squander the opportunity they have been given to deliver genuine change for the working class of this country. 

Economic growth, the new Government’s stated number one priority, cannot be achieved by suppressing workers wages and impoverishing millions of pensioners and benefit claimants. 

If this wasn’t depressing enough, we have seen all too vividly in recent months what can happen when our communities lose faith, and hope of a better society. As the economy stagnates, and further cuts are made to services to our most vulnerable, the far-right will gladly seek to fill the void, not just on the streets but politically, through Reform; the Party of the far-tight who has found its way into the House of Commons. 

This summer has seen racists, Islamophobes, and fascists emboldened more than at any time in years. Our movement has responded yet again, it has to be said with varying degrees of success, to try and quell the politics of hate. The reality, however, is that with the gloomy forecast given by the PM, far-right rhetoric will again be spread amongst the poorest in our communities and our job of educating the disenfranchised remains as urgent as ever.  

The immediate task has to be one of mass mobilisation. Both at the Reform Party Conference in Birmingham later this week, and on the 26th October, to counter the Tommy Robinson led demonstration in London. 

My union, PCS, has a proud record of not only campaigning for and defending our members interests, but also for looking outwards and standing up for the most vulnerable. 

It is why we campaign for a fairer social security system and tax justice, while at the same time being prepared to challenge the government of the day on issues such as immigration and asylum. I am immensely proud of the role our union played alongside others in defeating both the Channel Push Back Policy and the Rwanda Deportation Plan, and the formulation of our Safe Passage Policy which we will continue to pursue politically. 

Equally, I and other PCS activists, have been honoured to stand on platforms in front of hundreds of thousands of people, demanding an end to the genocide and an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Palestine. We have called for an end to all arms sales to Israel, and for the illegal occupation of Palestine to cease. Our voices will continue to be heard loudly as we seek an end to the killing of innocent children, women, and men, and our members will not be silenced. 

We in the movement had every right to hope for better following the demise of the Tories’ 14-year assault on our class. But the struggle remains.  

Now is the time for us to keep on the front foot, and demand of a Labour Government the decent pay, jobs, rights, and public services we deserve. If unions and other activists co-ordinate our campaigns, we can show this Government that we will hold them to account every bit as much as we did the Conservatives.  

Workers, the unemployed, the sick and disabled, our pensioners and children, asylum seekers, and the oppressed across the globe, also have every right to expect better from a Labour Government than we had from the Tories. It is still our role to fight for that, and I know we can build the biggest coalition yet and rise to the challenge. 


 UK

Diane Abbott: Safe & legal routes are the alternative to Tory asylum-seeker policies #Lab24


“The notion we are being ‘swamped’ by asylum-seekers is untrue & offensive. Around 60,000 people a year are granted asylum because they are legally entitled to it, far less than in other countries.”

By Diane Abbott MP

A cynical Tory distraction

Tory policies attacking asylumseekers were immoral, illegal, and unworkable. But they weren’t designed to be practical. Instead, they have long been part of the Tory arsenal of tricks and distractions designed to draw attention away from their other policies. It has been the most cynical type of politics, and their impracticality was highlighted by the fact that there were no Rwanda deportation flights ahead of the election. In reality, the deportation flights were designed to appeal to the Tory base, rather than to be an effective policy.

In their Alice in Wonderland politics, Parliament passed a law to assert that Rwanda is a safe country because the law says it is a safe country. We also had the spectacle of ministers railing against European courts when human rights abuses carried out during deportations were blocked by courts in this country. One of the strangest aspects of this reactionary charade is that it was frequently claimed that there is no alternative to the policy. This is completely untrue, and the incoming Labour Government rightly put a stop to it immediately.

We are not being ‘swamped’

First, we must remember that seeking asylum is a right given to all. It goes back to ancient times, so that in the Christian world it was enough only for a refugee to touch the church door to be granted asylum. Other cultures have similarly enshrined rights. In the modern era, the right to asylum is set out in Article 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Britain was not just one of the signatories but one of the authors of the Declaration, which was the world’s response to the horrors of World War II, and specifically to the Holocaust. It was the codification of the slogan ‘never again’. Opponents of the right to asylum for the victims of war or persecution seem to have forgotten all this.

And contrary to Tory assertions, most asylum applications are successful. Two-thirds of initial applications are granted. On appeal (of applications initially refused), the proportion of successful applicants rises to over three-quarters. And the notion we are being ‘swamped’ by asylum-seekers is untrue and offensive. Around 60,000 people a year are granted asylum because they are legally entitled to it, far less than in other countries.

The need for safe and legal routes

There is a long-standing alternative that I and others have advocated for some time. It is backed by nearly all the charities and NGOs working in this area. It can be reduced to a mantra precisely so it can be readily understood and reiterated: the establishment of safe and legal routes for asylum-seekers.

In practical terms, establishing safe and legal routes for asylum-seekers means the creation of processing centres for asylum applications in a number of countries. There would be a network of such centres near the main conflict zones, and successful claimants would then be legally entitled to enter this country and could be given assistance to do so. France, for one, has long made it clear that it is willing to allow such a centre to be created, and it has been British ministers who have previously baulked at the idea.

Processing claims in this way would then overcome the compulsion to cross the Channel in small boats, one of the most hazardous possible ends to a long and dangerous journey for people seeking asylum.

Our alternative is practical, moral and workable. It upholds the best traditions of our society.


  • Diane Abbot is MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington.
  • This article was originally published in CLPD’s Campaign Briefing Newsletter. Read it in full here.
  • You can also read Diane in Labour Outlook’s 2024 Autumn Conference bulletin here.

 

Ireland: change sweeps the north


Now is the time to seize the opportunity to work together to build a brighter and better future for everyone who calls our island home.

By Pat Cullen MP

The recent election on 4 July saw Sinn Féin return as the largest party in Westminster, alongside being the largest party in local councils and the Assembly. Michelle O’Neill is now in place as First Minister for All, and leading our team of ministers in the Executive to deliver for people in all communities.

Since 2022, our electoral successes have strengthened our mandate and most importantly, our ability to deliver for workers and families. In the Westminster election, we stood on a platform of strong leadership, positive change, and a commitment to work for every single citizen across the north. We offered voters the opportunity to endorse decisions about their lives being made in Ireland by Irish people.

We believe change will only be delivered in the north by working together in the Executive, Assembly and Local
Government, alongside a strong all-island Sinn Féin team, working alongside our team of TDs, Senators, Councillors and MEPs in Brussels. This message was received across the north, and voters spoke resoundingly. In North Belfast, John Finucane doubled his majority from 2019 and is now beginning his second term as an MP having made history five years ago.

In South Down, Chris Hazzard ensured his majority increased from just under 2,000 votes to over 9,000 votes. In Newry & Armagh, West Tyrone, Mid Ulster and West Belfast, voters came out in their droves to back Sinn Féin’s positive and progressive message. And in my constituency of Fermanagh and South Tyrone, we turned a 57 vote lead into a majority of over four and a half thousand.

Overall, Sinn Féin increased its percentage share of the vote by over 4%, and in East Derry Kathleen McGurk came within a whisker of unseating the DUP’s Gregory Campbell. In the immediate aftermath of the election, we got down to the business of delivery. We have already met the new British Secretary of State for the north Hilary Benn and the British Prime Minister, Keir Starmer.

In these discussions, we strongly made the case for fairer funding to be provided urgently for health, education and public services in the north. For too long, workers and families have borne the brunt of savage Tory cuts and austerity.

We also reiterated the need for immediate funding to be released to build Casement Park. This would allow us to
seize the enormous economic opportunities created by hosting Euro 2028 – a once in a lifetime opportunity that we cannot afford to miss. We welcomed the commitment of the new British Prime Minister to scrap the shameful Legacy Act, which has failed victims and survivors, and now look forward to seeing the details of what their approach will be in the time ahead.

And we urged him to back efforts to work for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the West Bank, an end to the genocide and collective punishment of the Palestinians, the release of all hostages and the establishment of a viable Palestinian state. These meetings marked a historic change, and a new opportunity to foster positive relations between Britain and Ireland. In the north, change is sweeping across the island, and now is the time to seize the opportunity to work together to build a brighter and better future for everyone who calls our island home.

The conversation around what a new Ireland would look like is growing by the day and is flowing throughout all sections of society. We are clear – planning and preparation should start now. The Irish government must lead those preparations and establish a Citizens’ Assembly. One where everyone is welcome, everyone is included, and one where people can openly share their ideas, their hopes, and their ambitions.

There is now a real opportunity to shape a more prosperous future in a stronger, better and fairer Ireland. An opportunity to create an efficient all-Ireland national health service, a sustainable housing system, affordable childcare, and a fair and just transition to a carbon neutral economy. As well as full resumption of EU membership which the Tories’ disastrous Brexit pulled away from our citizens against their wishes.

Now is the time to plan for the future. A future filled with hope and optimism. A future our children and grandchildren can enjoy, cherish and prosper in.

Go raibh míle maith agaibh go léir!


  • This article was originally published in the September/October 2024 edition of Labour Briefing magazine.
  • Pat Cullen is the MP for Fermanagh & South Tyrone and former General Secretary of the Royal College of Nursing- you can follow her on FacebookTwitter/X and Instagram.

 UK

We Need Public Investment, Not Cuts- Andrew Fisher

No Cuts placard.

“Labour’s plans mean more austerity for public services, which depresses growth.”

By Andrew Fisher

19th September 2024

When Keir Starmer announced his “mission” for the UK to achieve “the highest sustained growth in the G7”, the cornerstone policy was “a Green Prosperity Plan that will provide the catalytic investment needed to become a clean energy superpower”.

At Conference in 2023, Starmer assured delegates he would “speed ahead” with green investment, lambasting Rishi Sunak for rowing back on his commitments. Labour’s Green Prosperity Plan had been launched at Conference in 2021, promising an “additional £28bn of capital investment in our country’s green transition for each and every year of this decade”, funding new energy infrastructure, green transport, and better home insulation.

But in February this year, the plan was decimated and funding stripped out. And when the manifesto was published the plan was left with just an extra £4.7bn investment. The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) think-tank said it means “both the Conservatives and Labour plan to reduce government investment over the Question marks over Labour’s economics next parliamentary term.”

‘Growth’ and ‘change’

‘Growth’ was the buzzword of Labour’s election campaign. That and ‘change’. It would certainly be a change to have some decent economic growth. Since the banking crash, the UK economy has grown by only 1% a year on average – the worst period for growth since before the Second World War.

But with only a threadbare green investment plan, does Labour have a plan for growth? Its mission remains the highest sustained growth in the G7. Its argument rests on two claims: (1) the mere fact of having some stable government after years of Tory chaos; and (2) some liberalisation of planning laws (especially around housing and energy infrastructure) which will trigger greater private investment and therefore create jobs.

This might work. Whether it’s enough to generate “the highest sustained growth in the G7” is less certain. However, two prerequisites for sustained stable growth remain unresolved in Labour’s plans: rising investment and rising wages.

The lack of public investment…

The UK has long lagged behind other nations in terms of public investment. Labour’s diluted investment plans are now focused on levering in extra private investment, but that is always the way: where public investment leads, the private sector follows. So it becomes a question of scale: is what Labour is proposing sufficient to stimulate sustained higher growth?

…And low wages

Real wages fell under the last Government. In an economy that is 80% service sector, if people don’t have much spare money in their pockets they can’t spend it and the economy doesn’t grow. Businesses large and small tighten their belts and cut costs rather than invest. That is a big part of the problem. Without boosting wages or social security benefits (there is no money allocated in Labour’s ‘fully costed’ manifesto to do so), or significantly boosting public investment, it’s hard to confidently predict sustained higher growth.

Likewise, the lack of available public services means more people who could be in work are trapped on NHS waiting lists, and due to the lack of social care many people are being forced to reduce hours or give up work entirely to care for loved ones. Investing in public services could also stimulate growth – skills training needs a massive boost after the huge cuts of the Tory years. Labour’s plans, as spelled out in the manifesto, mean more austerity for public services, which depresses growth.

Taking a punt on planning laws

Labour is ultimately taking a punt on the liberalisation of planning laws. That assumes it can overcome local opposition to building on green belt land, and deliver onshore wind and other infrastructure – and that private investors have the labour force to deliver it. With Labour allocating no extra resources to skills training and promising to cut immigration, it’s not obvious that the capacity to expand significantly actually exists. All in all, there are huge question marks about Labour’s strategy for growth.


  • You can follow Andrew Fisher on Twitter here.
  • This article was originally published in CLPD’s Campaign Briefing Newsletter. Read it in full here.
  • You can also read Labour Outlook’s 2024 Autumn Conference bulletin here.