Tuesday, September 24, 2024

HALT SEA BED MINING

Odyssey wins lawsuit against Mexico to continue seabed mining

The Florida-based company is carrying out phosphate mining off Mexico’s coast.

Alfie Shaw
September 24, 2024
Deep-sea mining activities beyond national jurisdiction are governed by the International Seabed Authority’s (ISA) exploitation regulations.
Credit: divedog/Shutterstock.

Florida-based deep-sea mining company Odyssey Marine Exploration has won a lawsuit against Mexico after the country rejected its environmental permits and shutdown its project without legitimate cause.

After the permits were rejected, the company took Mexico to arbitration and won $37.1m (718.86m pesos) from the country for breaching obligations.

In 2012, Odyssey was granted a concession to mine the Mexican seabed for 50 years. The phosphate deposit, located in waters off the coast of Baja California Sur in the Gulf of Ulloa, is considered one of the biggest in the world.

The extraction process has involved dredging 1km² of the seabed each year without using chemicals. Odyssey said it spent three years working with experts in marine dredging and leading environment scientists to develop an environmentally sustainable development plan, including restoring the seabed back to its original state after dredging and carrying out ecotoxicological tests to demonstrate that dredging has no toxic effects on organisms.

However, the company’s practices have been contested. The Interamerican Association for Environmental Defence, a legal advocacy group, said that phosphate mining is usually carried out on land, and as Odyssey’s offshore project is the first of its kind, it is hard to know what the true environmental impacts will be.

Environmental group Greenpeace is also critical of the lawsuit, fearing its sets a precedent for corporations to overpower local environment groups.

In a statement, the organisation said: “It is unacceptable that [the arbiters] should side with a company that only seeks to continue enriching itself at the expense of the planet’s biodiversity and set a very negative precedent in the fight of civil society against this emerging industry.

“Underwater mining is not acceptable under any circumstances or conditions. There is no place for underwater mining in a sustainable future.”

Odyssey claims its project is necessary to ensure enhanced “fertiliser accessibility to support an ever-growing global population”. Phosphate is a key input in fertilisers.
Operations at Zambia mine suspended after fatality

This is the second death at the open-pit copper and gold mine in the past year.

Regan Slaymaker
September 24, 2024
Credit: Maxar Technologies via Getty Images.

Canadian mining company First Quantum Minerals has revealed it has suspended operations at its Kansanshi copper mine in Zambia after a fatal accident.

The company launched an internal investigation immediately after the accident on Sunday, which involved two mining vehicles that tragically killed an employee.

The company reported revenues of $6.5m (C$8.76m) for the 2023 financial year, a 15.3% decrease from 2022, according to Mining Technology’s parent company GlobalData.

The company released a statement explaining that the area of the accident was immediately secured and mining operations at the site will resume once the investigation has deemed it safe.

This is the second fatality at the Kansanshi mine in the past year following the death of a contractor at another First Quantum facility.

The company’s mining operations in Zambia are now a significant revenue source after its flagship mine in Panama was shut down last December.

The Cobre Panama mine concluded operations after a series of public protests and a court ruling that rescinded First Quantum’s mining contract.

Since the Panama ruling, First Quantum has been forced to restructure its sourcing of capital. It has since signed a $500m, three-year repayment agreement with Chinese mining company Jiangxi Copper to keep the Kansanshi mine operational.



Raspberry Pi profits surge after IPO thanks to new single-board computer

Raspberry Pi's first-half adjusted earnings before nasties jumped by 55%

Orders of its single-board computers and compute modules rose to 3.7m


By Harry Wise
 24 September 2024

Raspberry Pi's profits soared in the first half of 2024 as the group enjoyed strong demand for one of its recently launched single-board computers.

The budget computer maker, which went public on the London markets in June, revealed adjusted earnings before nasties jumped by 55 per cent to $20.9million (£15.6million) in the six months ending June.

It told shareholders it sold 1.1 million units of its Raspberry Pi5 during the period after introducing the product at the end of October last year.

+1


Results: Raspberry Pi revealed its adjusted earnings before nasties jumped by 55 per cent to $20.9million in the six months ending June

This helped drive orders of its single-board computers and compute modules up nearly a third to 3.7 million.

Raspberry Pi also benefited from sales of semiconductor products growing to 2.1 million units and a recovery from the pandemic-related shortages that constrained trade during the first half of 2023.

Its revenue expanded by 61 per cent to $144million, with more than half the increase coming from components sales, as the volume of microchips supplied to the firm's licensees rose amid improving supply chain issues.

The Cambridge-based company expects higher unit volumes during the second half of this year, again supported by new product launches, although it believes profitability will be first-half weighted.

Raspberry Pi just introduced a machine-learning hardware product - the Raspberry Pi AI Kit - in collaboration with technology firm Hailo and cloud connectivity product Raspberry Pi Connect.

The AI Kit came to market about a week before Raspberry Pi's very successful initial public offering, which raised £178.9million for the business.

It told investors it would spend the cash on improving its supply chain, engineering projects, and 'other general corporate purposes.'

Eben Upton, chief executive of Raspberry Pi, said the firm's IPO was the 'watershed moment of the first half'.

The Raspberry Pi listing represents a rare victory for the London markets, which have struggled to attract new IPOs and seen multiple companies bought by foreign firms over the past few years.

Only eight new companies went public on the LSE in the first half of 2024, compared to 47 over the same period three years earlier.

Many firms choose to list in the US instead of the UK because they can potentially access much larger capital pools and gain higher valuations.

Since its June listing, Raspberry Pi has entered the FTSE 250 Index, and its shares have climbed by around a third to 369.8p.

Raspberry Pi shares were up 6.2 per cent on Tuesday morning.

Mark Crouch, market analyst at investment platform eToro, said: 'The potential rewards on offer in the AI industry is no secret, and with that comes a lot of competition, looking for a share of the spoils.

'But with recent data suggesting the value of the AI market could be set to grow by as much as ten times by 2030, more tech investors could be eager for a slice of Raspberry Pi.'

Founded in 2009, Raspberry Pi is the highest-selling British computer ever and is particularly well-loved among hobbyists and amateur coders.

More than 60 million of the firm's single-board computers have been bought in the last decade across over 70 countries.

Their products are often used in edge computing, which is the practice of capturing, processing, and analysing data close to where it is created rather than in a centralised data centre.

Analysts at broker Peel Hunt said: 'Recent sentiment does not distract us from our view that edge computing will do to Raspberry Pi what the desktop did to Microsoft, the smartphone did to Apple, and the data centre is doing to NVIDIA.'
Asos puts hundreds of jobs at risk at head office amid bid to return to profitability

By Chloe Mills
24 September 2024


Asos is set to axe hundreds of jobs at its head office amid mounting losses at the online fashion giant as it attempts to return to profitability, according to reports.




More than 200 jobs are at risk of being cut at as Asos faces a shake-up that is looking at “simplifying the organisation” and returning the business to profit, as reported by The Mirror.

It is understood that a consultation period has begun and that business analysts, engineering managers and platform leads among others at the business are at risk.

In a message sent to staff and seen by the newspaper, Asos said its current setup was “no longer suitable for today’s business priorities and context.” It also said: “We need to move faster and deliver more.”

Asos has also reportedly proposed creating additional roles and said it wants to hire more software engineers and product managers at the business.

Asos said in a statement: “We’ve entered into a collective consultation with members of our technology team around a proposed restructure to drive greater innovation and agility. It would be inappropriate to comment further while the consultation is ongoing.”

Retail Week has contacted Asos for comment.

This follows news earlier this month that Asos has sold a majority stake in the Topshop and Topman brands to a holding company of Danish fashion giant Bestseller.

As part of the joint venture, Asos has retained 25% and Heartland will hold a 75% interest in the venture in a deal worth £135m.

Asos also updated on its current trading performance and said it expects full-year adjusted EBITDA to hit the top end of estimates despite sales being anticipated to fall slightly below the previously pledged guidance.

The update comes as Asos remains focused on its ‘back to fashion’ strategy after a turbulent time of deepening losses and declining revenue.

Speaking earlier this month, Asos boss José Antonio Ramos Calamonte called the beginning of the year a period of “transformation” for the business and said he believes “with a lot of optimism” that the changes being made at the business are “generating the right output”.

Fog of (Dis)Information in Escalating Israel-Lebanon Conflict


NAKED CAPITALISM

As many commentators have noted, Israel’s exploding pager/walkie-talkie attacks, followed by air strikes on a Hezbollah command post and then broadly across Lebanon are a gambit to try to get Lebanon to respond in a manner that would get the US to come in more formally on Israel’s side as the Axis of Resistance is inflicting costs on Israel over its Gaza genocide.

However, the reporting on the large scale terrorist act of the communication-devices-turned-bombs illustrates how corrupted this information environment is. Israel and its cheerleaders have attempted to justify this act as part of an intended military operation, to disrupt Hezbollah’s operations. The only “bad” thing was they executed prematurely.

In fact, as we’ll unpack further below, this tech-bombing was even worse than you imagined. The military wing of Hezbollah does not use pager or walkie talkies. They’ve used their own fiber optic network since 2006, and otherwise rely on couriers. These devices were in the hands of civilian Hezbollah workers, such as members of its large social services effort. Yes, military members may have been hurt too, but that was dumb luck, like being in proximity to blown-up pager-user or picking up a ringing device on behalf of someone else.

Needless to say, this also means that the device attacks were pure terrorism, with no remotely colorable military purpose whatsoeverRemember, the press has brayed that Israel has been working on this caper for 15 years. But Hezbollah moved its military comms to fiber optic before that. And Israel surely knew that. So that means this entire enterprise was from its outset a terrorist scheme and never a military operation.

But why should that be a surprise? This is how Israel has rolled since its Stern Gang days.

Because we are in what Lambert would call an overly-dynamic situation, rather than attempt a state-of-play account, it seemed more productive to alert readers to how the deeply polluted state of Anglosphere reporting. It should be no surprise that it is coming to resemble Western reporting on the Ukraine conflict, as overstating Israeli successes and underplaying or ignoring Hezbollah/Axis of Resistance wins.

This matters because if Israel’s efforts to subdue the Axis of Resistance fall short, which seems likely, the campaign to get the US committed to the conflict will only intensify. Mind you, in reality, it’s not as if we could do all that much even if we wanted to, ex possibly commit more air power. As Associated Press pointed out yesterday, the US has only 40,000 men in the entire theater. They presumably already have things to do. It takes 6+ months to move more men and the needed logistical support in were we to deploy more than say some Special Forces types. And the US is low on materiel world-wide, thanks to having drained our stockpiles to back Ukraine. For instance, one thing the US is short on globally is Patriot air defense missiles, and at least as of now, we are prioritizing Ukraine.

The general tendency for Western reporting to favor our allies dovetails with Israeli press censorship. The Israeli government finds it important to restore if at all possible the image of the IDF as formidable, both to restore its citizens’ once central belief that Israel was safe place for Jews, and to project power in the region.

Yours truly in now finding it necessary to listen to Alastair Crooke’s Monday morning talks on Judge Napolitano to sanity check Israeli claims. Readers may recall that a few weeks ago, we showcased one of these interviews immediately after some much-ballyhooed Israel air strikes into Lebanon. The claim was that Israel had sent in 100 planes and destroyed Hezbollah rocket launchers right before a planned Hezbollah attack, defanging it.

This is what Crooke reported:

Whatever you’ve read is almost certainly wrong. It’s a narrative…..First of all, it all happened at around 4 o’clock in the morning on Sunday. The Israelis started to see people moving in Lebanon and moving towards platforms. Hezbollah was planning the operation to fire drones and rockets at 5:15 on Sunday morning. And Israel started to, an attack, a direct attack. It involved I think about a hundred aircraft.

But contrary to what the Israeli propagandists at the IDF are saying, and I know this not from Hezbollah but I know this from inside Lebanon, people who are on the ground there, it was chaotic twenty minutes. Israel just bombed various valleys where they imagined the ballistic missiles were. But they’d been cleared out of there some time ago. There were no ballistic missiles. You can check that, there are people on the ground who know what’s happened. There are no missiles. So when they said they destroyed thousands of missile launchers, this is a complete lie. Because first of all, there are no missiles, no ballistic missiles, no large missiles south of the Litani River. What you have is drones and small rockets. And none of these have launchers. And they destroyed none of them. It was just a show, a show of force and it only lasted about twenty minutes…..

On top of that, the Hezbollah attack that Sunday morning, in retaliation for the assassination of senior Hezbollah military official Fuad Shukr in Beirut, did take place. Israel immediately clamped down on all reports. At first, Israel claimed the Hezbollah strikes were ineffective (there was Twitter fun about Hezbollah striking a chicken coop, which does seem to have occurred). However, it finally came out that Hezbollah was successful in striking a building in the military airport near Tel Avis that housed Unit 8200, which is akin to our NSA. Hezbollah believed Unit 8200 planned the killing of Fuad Shukr. “Successful” as in some Unit 8200 members died (there is speculation that Hezbollah got a very top level official; I’ve not seen anything convincing either way).

Now let us turn to the series of exchanges that started with barbarism-by-pager. Per Moon of Alabama:

Last week Israel launched a terror attack on Hizbullah operatives who were using pagers to receive alarms and orders. These people were part of the civil administration side of Hizbullah and not its armed fighters.

But since a new trope coming out of the bogus claim that the Hezbollah militia used pagers and didn’t even inspect them is (just like Russians!) that this proves that they are incompetent. So let’s again turn to Alastair Crooke:

The notion that Hizbullah’s communications are crippled is wishful thinking that fails to distinguish between what may be called civil-society Hizbullah, and its military arm.

Hizbullah is a civil movement, as well as a military power. It is the Authority over a significant slice of Beirut and a country – a responsibility that requires the Movement to provide civil order and security. The pagers and radios were used primarily by its civil security forces (effectively a civil police managing security and order in Hizbullah-controlled parts of Lebanon), as well as used by its logistics and support branches. Since these personnel are not combat forces, they were not seen to require truly secure communications.

Even before the 2006 war, Hizbullah ended all cellphone and landline communications in favour of their own dedicated optic cable system and hand-courier messaging for the military cadres. In short, Hizbullah’s communications at the civil level took a major hit, but this will not unduly impact upon its military forces. For years, the Movement has operated on the basis that units could continue with combat, even in the event of a complete rupture of optic communications, or the loss of a HQ.

So again in a close parallel to Ukraine, the real reason for this attack appears to be to try to break the will of the long-suffering Lebanese people and turn them against Hezbollah, just as some collective Ukraine officials fantasize that if they cause enough pain to Russian civilians, they will turn on Putin. At least so far, Lebanese citizens instead appear to be pulling together. Journalist Laith Marouf, now in Beirut, told Rachel Blevins that thousands of citizens came to hospitals offering to donate one of their eyes to a victim of the cyber attack (starting at 9:20). Even though that’s beyond current medical technology, it’s an indication of the depth of public support. Marouf also contends that the Lebanese know what they are up against, that wars of decolonization take years.

A second leg of the attack, coming shortly after the device carnage, was an assassination attempt via precision air strike in Beirut against Hezbollah paramilitary leader Ali Karaki, reportedly one of the top three on Israel’s kill list. The press cheered his death. That turns out to have been premature. From Military Watch:

A senior commander for the Lebanese paramilitary group Hezbollah, Ali Karaki, has survived an Israeli assassination attempt, after a precision strike on a military headquarters in the capital Beirut was launched to eliminate him… Confirmation of his survival follows multiple reports from Western media outlets, citing Lebanese military sources, that the commander was eliminated during an Israeli attack on Beirut’s Madi neighbourhood.

It was a nice touch for Military Watch to point out that the initial Anglosphere accounts cited (or made up) “Lebanese military sources”. Admittedly, it is possible this was disinfo while Karaki was being moved to safety.

Now to the next Israel move, widespread air strikes that extended into Syria. The claim was that they were targeting rocket launchers, So far, they have killed nearly 500. But as for the rockets, we again turn to Alastair Crooke, here on Judge Napolitano. Starting at 9:00:

But for the moment, they have bet on escalation dominance, “escalating to de-escalate,” first the pagers, then the assassination on its heels, and then they’re banking on intelligence and firepower to push Hezbollah into an agreement. But first of all, there was no agreement. Amos Hochstein was in Lebanon but he was acting more for the Israelis and for the Americans, but it was a complete failure, the attempt for some sort of diplomatic route. I mean there isn’t one. It’s been talked about, but there was no agreement, Americans know that, Israelis know that too. So this is really what they are betting on is they can either push Hezbollah in. And to this extent, we’re seeing this massive air attacks taking place in the south and in the Bekka, that you just spoke about. But really what we’re talking about is ineffectiveness of air firepower in these circumstances, when put against deep, deep buried rockets and missiles. In the beginning, in ’23, Hezbollah was looking at losing about 10 men a day. Now they’re not really losing any. There were about 2 Hezbollah who were supposed to be killed but they were religious figures, they din’t have to do with Hezbollah per se, they sadly will be civilian losses.

They are heavily bombing the area, and although it’s being presented as being by intelligence as if they’re knocking out rocket launchers, that too is pretty much bunk. Because they too basically try and find launchers by combing the forest, because this is mountain area, forest area. Very difficult terrain. Deep valleys, little nooks and crannies. So they film all of this, looking for movements, and then they use artificial intelligence detection methodology to try to find where someone has moved. It’s not done by spies or intelligence per se. It is done by using AI, again, to spot some sort of movement. And Hezbollah for years, since 2006, have been adept at putting up ghosts and fake missile launchers, fake men, moving them around, fooling the Israelis who are basically bombing every spot in the forest, hills and valleys where it thinks possibly going to be a rocket launcher….

Crooke also stressed that even the death of a senior commander would only be a tactical loss. As 7:40, he explains that every top Hezbollah officer trains his successor.

Crooke turned to the Hezbollah response, which is to increase the range of territory in Israel that they consider to be fair game for attack. At 14:20:

Hezbollah has escalated too, just to be clear. Because one of the things they are facing again is Israel has put another big blackout notice on everything, no filming, no photos, no reporting at all from anywhere north of Haifa, which is in the center, right on the coast of Israel. No news is allowed to be presented. But you do get some because there are Israelis in the settlements that are sending videos. The point here is there is major destruction in Haifa, a major port. Hezbollah’s reported an attack on an airbase, there are attacks going on, there are rocket continuing. So with all this bombing, all this so-called carpet bombing, it’s actually quite ineffective. It’s not stopping Hezbollah. I emphasize here htat we are seeing rockets, [not sure of name] 1 and 2, which are probably similar to a HIMARS. They’re not guided, they’re not smart. Hezbollah hasn’t even begun to use its smart missiles. They’re using the rockets to create destruction of houses. Nearly a million Israelis were in the shelters last night [Sunday].

Dmitry Liscaris claims in this interview (at 15:13) that Hezbollah attacks took out one of Israel’s three airbases, the Ramat David airbase in the Golan Heights, and a major arms making plant, Rafael Military Industries complex, which makes air defense equipment, as well as hitting targets near Tel Aviv. He also said waves of drones were coming from Iraq.

It has not gotten as much mention in the (far from comprehensive) press I follow, but Twitter does confirm the drone attack:

Without trying to give a comprehensive account of the latest strikes and counter-strikes, Arab News reports a new attack on Beirut killed a different top Hezbollah commander, Ibrahim Qubaisi. With the news blackout in Israel, we don’t (and won’t for a while) have much news on damage and deaths there. Even though Crooke depicted Hezbollah as making a discrete, as opposed to open-ended escalation, such niceties may not count for much

Motel 6 chain sold for $525 million


It was announced Friday that India-based Oyo had acquired G6 Hospitality, Motel 6's parent company. Photo courtesy of Motel 6/Website


Sept. 22 (UPI) -- Motel 6, known for its bare-bones motel rooms, low prices and blue sign emblazoned with a red "6," has been sold for $525 million to India-based hotel operator Oyo, Blackstone Real Estate has announced.

Oyo, a global travel company, owns 320 hotels in 20 states, and is now adding G6 Hospitality, Motel 6's parent company, to its portfolio. It has been expanding its footprint in the United States in recent years, and is expected to add an additional 250 properties this year.

"This acquisition is a significant milestone for a startup company like us to strengthen our international presence," Gautam Swaroop, Oyo International CEO, said in a release Friday when the deal was announced.

"Motel 6's strong brand recognition, financial profile and network in the U.S., combined with Oyo's entrepreneurial spirit, will be instrumental in charting a sustainable path forward for the company, which will continue to operate as a separate entity."

Related


Motel 6 bars locations from giving guest information to ICE

There are about 1,500 Motel 6 and Studio 6 properties in Canada and the United States. They have undergone substantial renovation and updating under Blackstone in preparation for the sale. Motel 6's franchise network produces gross room revenues of $1.7 billion, according to Blackstone.

"We are grateful for our successful partnership with Blackstone and the transformation that has positioned us well for this new chapter," said Julie Arrowsmith, president and CEO at G6 Hospitality, which is owned by Blackstone.

"Oyo's innovative approach to hospitality will allow us to enhance our offerings and great value to our guests while maintaining the iconic Motel 6 brand that travelers have trusted for over six decades," she continued.

Motel 6 became widely known for its marketing catchphrase "We'll leave the light on for you," which was ad-libbed by Alaska radio announcer Tom Bodett in 1986. Bodett was the company's first and only spokesman.
AMERIKA

Sheriffs define law and order for their counties -- and most are White Republican men

By Mirya Holman, University of Houston & Emily Farris, Texas Christian University
THE CONVERSATION
Sept. 23, 2024 


While there are exceptions, sheriffs have a long history of using their power to maintain a particular, unequal balance of power in society, often along racial and class lines. Photo by Kindel Media/Pexels

Many Americans will find on their November ballot a space to vote for an important office: local sheriff. While there are exceptions, sheriffs have a long history of using their power to maintain a particular, unequal balance of power in society, often along racial and class lines.

A recent example of this arose on Sept. 13, when Bruce Zuchowski, sheriff of Portage County, Ohio, posted a message on a Facebook page headed by a graphic that included his official portrait and which was labeled with his official title. Zuchowski called for the public to write down the addresses of people who have campaign signs supporting Democratic nominee Vice President Kamala Harris in their yards

That way, he said, when immigrants arrive and need housing, "We'll already have the addresses of the ... families ... who supported their arrival."
Advertisement

The post, which Zuchowski later claimed appeared on his "personal Facebook page," used derogatory terms for immigrants and for Harris. It also included screenshots of two Fox News stories about migrants in Aurora, Colo., and Springfield, Ohio, which are both places that former President Donald Trump, the Republican nominee, and his running mate JD Vance have falsely claimed to be sites of dangerous activity by immigrants.

Sheriffs in the United States don't often get national news attention, but Zuchowski's request was covered in The Washington Post, NBC News and The Guardian, among others.

There are more than 3,000 sheriffs elected at the county level in the United States, each of whom has authority and autonomy to both set and enforce law enforcement policy. For example, sheriffs in many states can decide whether their deputies will wear body cameras and what happens to the footage recorded during routine stops.

In our book, The Power of the Badge: Sheriffs and Inequality in the United States, we provide a comprehensive look at this office and detail the history of sheriffs enforcing inequality both by using formal powers of their office, such as cooperating with federal immigration officers, and with informal powers, such as communicating about who belongs in their community.

Zuchowski's post, which vilifies immigrants and targets people who support immigrant rights, is just part of that long history of sheriffs using their power as a tool of social control, as we document in our book.

Various sheriffs have participated in social control throughout American history. For instance, in the 18th century, an Alabama sheriff ran slave auctions and Georgia sheriffs played a central role in enforcing slave codes. In the 19th century, a Pennsylvania sheriff quashed union efforts to protect workers' rights against exploitative businesses. In the 20th century, Southern sheriffs' roles in voter suppression during the Civil Rights Movement are well documented. In the 21st century, racial profiling has been a problem in the enforcement of traffic laws by sheriffs in Arizona and California, among other states. Zuchowski is just one 21st-century sheriff entering the debate over immigration policy and immigrants' rights.

Personal views affect public service

In the wake of Zuchowski's post, The Portager, a news website in his community, reported residents saying the sheriff's post constituted voter intimidation. Some residents have called for investigations of the sheriff's office by local, state and national agencies, including the Department of Justice's civil rights division.

So far, the Ohio Secretary of State's Office says the sheriff has broken no laws.

In both our book and previous work, we document through two national surveys how variations in sheriffs' views on race and ethnicity may shape their office's policies and practices.

Zuchowski's comments about immigrants, including calling them "Illegal human 'Locust,'" denies their humanity by comparing immigrants to animals.

In our research, we have found that sheriffs' negative attitudes toward immigrants are statistically correlated to their offices' anti-immigrant policies. For instance, sheriffs with more negative attitudes are more likely to have an official policy to check the immigration status of crime victims and witnesses. That relationship held even after we controlled potential influence of other factors such as political partisanship and the share of the native-born population in a sheriff's county.

Similarly, as we show in our book, sheriffs with racist views were less likely to report to us their deputies have been trained to reduce racial and ethnic bias in traffic enforcement. That issue is a problem in Portage County, according to the local NAACP, which in 2023 released a report claiming the sheriff's office unfairly targets Black drivers.

Politics plays a role

Since his initial post, Zuchowski has defended himself on social media, writing:

"If the citizens of Portage County want to elect an individual who has supported open borders (which I've personally visited Twice!) and neglected to enforce the laws of our Country ... then that is their prerogative. With elections, there are consequences. That being said ... I believe that those who vote for individuals with liberal policies have to accept responsibility for their actions! I am a Law Man ... Not a Politician!"

Despite Zuchowski's claims, he is indeed a politician. Like other sheriffs in the United States, he was elected by voters. He was the Republican nominee in 2020 and is running for reelection in 2024.

Like sheriffs across the country, Zuchowski had extensive law enforcement experience, including working in the Portage County Sheriff's Office prior to running to head the office. We found that more than 85% of sheriffs worked for the previous sheriff before seeking election. And like most other sheriffs, Zuchowski is a White Republican man. We and others find that more than 90% of sheriffs are White and over 98% are men.

Across the United States, sheriffs will ask voters for their support this fall to remain in office. In most counties, these elections are uncompetitive: Sheriffs usually run either unopposed or against weak candidates.

In this way, Portage County is an exception. Zuchowski's first election was a competitive race for an open seat, and he faces a challenger to his reelection bid in the 2024 election. His Democratic opponent, Jon Barber, is similarly a White man with a law enforcement background.

But Barber's campaign website highlights another common challenge for voters: how to pick a good sheriff. His site focuses on transparency, accountability and community policing, with no discussion of immigration. Voters don't get a clear message about any substantive differences that might exist between the two candidates.

Will Zuchowski's comments matter for voters? Elsewhere around the country, voters have reelected sheriffs who have made anti-immigrant and racist comments.

Mirya Holman is an associate professor of public policy at University of Houston. Emily Farris is an associate professor of political science at Texas Christian University.
Advertisement

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.




Study: Kids born during COVID-19 pandemicdon't have higher autism risk


 HealthDay News
Sept. 23, 2024 

Kids born during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic appear to have no higher risk of autism, even if they were exposed to COVID in the womb, a new study finds. Photo by Adobe Stock/HealthDay News

Kids born during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic appear to have no higher risk of autism, even if they were exposed to COVID in the womb, a new study finds.

The study offers reassurance to doctors and parents who've been worried about the developmental health of children born during the pandemic, said senior researcher Dr. Dani Dumitriu, an associate professor of pediatrics and psychiatry at Columbia University in New York City.

"Autism risk is known to increase with virtually any kind of insult to mom during pregnancy, including infection and stress," Dumitriu explained in a university news release. "The scale of the COVID pandemic had pediatricians, researchers and developmental scientists worried that we would see an uptick in autism rates."

"But, reassuringly, we didn't find any indication of such an increase in our study," Dumitriu added.

For the study, researchers tracked the health of nearly 2,000 children born at two NewYork-Presbyterian hospitals, Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital and Allen Hospital, between January 2018 and September 2021.

Parents filled out screening questionnaires designed to help pediatricians assess a toddler's behavior and development.

Researchers found no difference in autism screenings between children born before and after the onset of the pandemic.

"COVID is still quite prevalent, so this is comforting news for pregnant individuals who are worried about getting sick and the potential impact on autism risk," Dumitriu noted.

Based on these results, Dumitriu thinks it's unlikely an uptick in autism related to COVID will occur.

"Children who were in the womb early in the pandemic are now reaching the age when early indicators of autism would emerge, and we're not seeing them in this study," Dumitriu said. "And because it's well-known that autism is influenced by the prenatal environment, this is highly reassuring."

It is important to note that the study didn't look directly at diagnoses of autism, only at the risk of autism assessed by the screening questionnaires, Dumitriu added.

"It's too early to have definitive diagnostic numbers," she said. "But this screener is predictive, and it's not showing that prenatal exposure to COVID or the pandemic increases the likelihood of autism."

Previous studies of babies born in the wake of other pandemics, natural disasters, famines and wars have shown that developmental conditions like autism can be potentially triggered by a mom's exposure to stress, researchers noted.

Those conditions often don't emerge until the teen years or even young adulthood.

"We need to acknowledge the unique experience and environment of children who were born during the pandemic -- including parental stress and social isolation -- and continue to monitor them for potential developmental or psychiatric differences," said lead investigator Morgan Firestein, an associate research scientist in psychiatry at Columbia.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on the pandemic and autism diagnosis.

Copyright © 2024 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Massive ocean sunfish washes up in Oregon

Sept. 23 (UPI) -- A giant fish described as looking "like the invention of a mad scientist" washed up on an Oregon beach -- the third such incident since June.

The Seaside Aquarium said on social media that a mola mola, also known as an ocean sunfish, was found at Hug Point State Park in Clatsop County.




The fish "has been dead for some time" and measured nearly 7 feet long, the aquarium said. The species can grow up to 10 feet long and weigh up to 5,000 pounds.

The Monterey Bay Aquarium describes the fish as looking "like the invention of a mad scientist," with a "tiny mouth and big eyes."

The discovery comes after a mola tecta, or hoodwinker sunfish, washed up in Oregon in June and another mola mola washed up in the state August.
WOMAN LIFE FREEDOM

Study: Surrogate pregnancies have higher rate of complications

REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS



HealthDay News
Sept. 24, 2024 

Surrogate moms have a higher risk of pregnancy complications than other pregnant women, a new study finds. Photo by Adobe Stock/HealthDay News

Surrogate moms have a higher risk of pregnancy complications than other pregnant women, a new study finds.

About 8% of surrogate mothers developed a severe complication like high blood pressure or serious bleeding during delivery, Canadian researchers report.

By comparison, only 2% of women who conceive naturally and 4% of women who conceive via IVF develop similar complications, researchers found.

This is one of the first large-scale studies to compare outcomes between the three different types of pregnancy, they noted.

"Clinicians involved in the care of individuals and couples who need a gestational carrier to build their family should counsel their patients and the gestational carriers about the potential risk during pregnancy and early postpartum," said lead researcher Dr. Maria Velez, an adjunct scientist with the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Services in Kingston, Ontario.

For the study, researchers analyzed data on more than 863,000 births in Ontario, Canada, between 2012 and 2021. Nearly 98% of pregnancies involved natural conception, compared with 1.8% conception with IVF and 0.1% a surrogate.

Overall risk of complications is higher for surrogates, researchers found, and surrogates have a specifically higher risk of high blood pressure and bleeding after delivery.

Surrogates were also more likely to have a preterm birth, results show.

The new study was published Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Further study is needed to figure out why surrogate moms are at greater risk for complications, researchers said.

"There are guidelines about the eligibility criteria to minimize the risk of pregnancy complications among gestational carriers," Velez said in an institute news release. "However, these guidelines are not always strictly followed."

More information

Yale Medicine has more on surrogacy.

Copyright © 2024 HealthDay. All rights reserved.