Tuesday, September 24, 2024

Poilievre makes case for taking down the government to restore 'promise of Canada'

Laura Osman
Tue, September 24, 2024



OTTAWA — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre urged MPs to defeat the Liberal government on Tuesday, but opposition parties are turning the debate on his non-confidence motion into a referendum on the Conservative party's policies instead.

Poilievre introduced a non-confidence motion in the opening minutes of the House of Commons sitting Tuesday, delivering a campaign-style speech laying out his vision for Canada under a Conservative government.

He said his plan is "to bring home the promise of Canada, of a powerful paycheque that earns affordable food, gas and homes and safe neighbourhoods where anyone from anywhere can do anything. The biggest and most open land of opportunity the world has ever seen: that is our vision."


Polls have favoured the Conservatives for more than a year now, and if they were to hold true in the next election it could result in a Conservative majority government.

Poilievre told the House if that happens he would lower taxes and eliminate the price on carbon, instead fighting climate change by approving large-scale green projects and using the revenues to reduce government debt.

"We will cap government spending with a dollar-for-dollar law that requires we find $1 of savings for every new dollar of spending," Poilievre said.

"We will cut bureaucracy, waste and consulting contracts."

Poilievre and his party have not been specific about where exactly those cuts will come from. The NDP's Jagmeet Singh asked Poilievre if his government would dismantle the dental-care program the Liberals instituted in co-ordination with the NDP, but the Conservative leader wouldn't say one way or another.

Those unidentified cuts are the very reason Singh said his party wouldn't vote to bring down the government.

"We are going to fight today against Conservative cuts and against the Conservative motion," Singh told the House.

Debate on the motion will conclude Tuesday with the vote scheduled to take place Wednesday afternoon.

Both the NDP and the Bloc Québécois indicated last week they would not support the non-confidence motion because they don't support the Conservatives. If they vote no, the motion will be defeated and the Liberal government will survive its first test since its supply-and-confidence deal with the NDP ended earlier this month.

If the motion were to pass, the government would be defeated and Canadians very likely would see an immediate election.

The Bloc Québécois said they'd rather use the opportunity presented by the minority Parliament to negotiate with the Liberals, rather than trigger an election that would likely install Poilievre as prime minister.

"We listen to the Conservatives and are not sure that we're so eager to see them take power," the Bloc's House leader Alain Therrien told the House in French on Tuesday.

He said Poilievre has no plan to address the challenges of Quebec's distinct society.

"There are situations in Quebec that are quite different from the rest of Canada," he said.

The Bloc has asked the Liberals to green-light the funding for their private member's bill to raise pension payments for seniors under the age of 75.

The government hasn't committed to doing that. The parliamentary budget officer has estimated the proposed change would cost about $16 billion over five years.

The debate in the House more closely resembled a debate over the Conservative vision for Canada than the government's, Liberal House leader Karina Gould said during question period.

"Today what we are doing is demonstrating that this House doesn't have confidence in the Conservative Party of Canada," she said.

The prime minister was not in Ottawa for the debate, and is instead representing Canada at the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

He was asked about the non-confidence motion after U.S. President Joe Biden used his speech at the UN to reflect on his decision to withdraw from his party's ticket in the upcoming election, saying that he chose to think about the people he serves rather than his own power.

"The Conservatives are very much thinking about power right now," Trudeau said in response.

"I'm thinking about how we can best help Canadians. I'm thinking about how to put the best balance sheet in the G7 in service of Canadians, to invest in Canadians. Confident countries invest in their citizens. Right now, Pierre Poilievre is offering cuts."

The Conservatives have another chance to introduce a non-confidence motion on Thursday during a second opposition day in the House of Commons. There are a total of seven opposition days required this fall, of which five will go to the Conservatives.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 24, 2024.

Laura Osman, The Canadian Press





Canada’s Tories target Trudeau as they seek seismic shift in political landscape

Leyland Cecco in Toronto
Tue, September 24, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. MDT·5 min read


Justin Trudeau at a summit at the United Nations headquarters in New York City, on Sunday.Photograph: Caitlin Ochs/Reuters


Canada’s Conservative party will make its first bid to unseat prime minister Justin Trudeau this week, the latest attempt in its decade-long aim of restoring the Tories to power.

Buoyed by favourable polls, a cost of living crisis and an increasingly unpopular prime minister, the Conservative leader, Pierre Poilievre, will introduce a motion of non-confidence in the minority government: a long-shot bid to force the government to call an election.

The move, which lawmakers will debate on Wednesday, is doomed to fail, with smaller parties agreeing to temporarily support the incumbent Liberal party.

Related: Justin Trudeau under pressure as his party loses Montreal election

But the attack underscores the fragile state of Canada’s governing party and the raw political calculation leaders are making as they jockey for position before the next federal election, which must occur before the fall of 2025.

One polling aggregator has the Conservatives winning a strong majority, relegating all other parties to “also-ran” status. Another has Poilievre’s Tories at 42% support, with the Liberals at 24%.

When Trudeau eked out an electoral victory in 2021, his party was forced into its second consecutive minority government, meaning the Liberals lacked sufficient representation in parliament to pass legislation on their own. In order to implement their agenda, the Liberals were forced to make a “confidence and supply” pact with the leftwing New Democrats (NDP).

But earlier this month, the NDP withdrew from the agreement, saying the Liberals “don’t deserve another chance”. The move cast the country in political uncertainty and reflected a political landscape that has changed dramatically since the agreement was first made.

In his ninth year as prime minister, Trudeau is deeply unpopular and facing calls within his party to step down to avoid a deeply embarrassing electoral loss that could push the party to a distant third-place finish.

“I think you are only here for another year,” a steelworker told Trudeau in a recent exchange that captured the fatigue and frustration many Canadians feel towards the prime minister.

Jagmeet Singh, the NDP leader, has failed to convert his own political popularity into electoral success and also faces evergreen questions over the relevance of a party whose legislative aims seem indistinguishable from those of the Liberals.

“They don’t want to run to election anytime soon,” said Lori Turnbull, director of Dalhousie University’s school of public administration. “They still have to prove that they got something out of this deal and he needs to show that party has its own agenda, apart from what they’ve done for the Liberals for the past two and a half years.”

Related: Canada turning away more foreigners amid rise in anti-immigration sentiment

Poilievre, the combative Conservative leader, has found immense success in his laser-focused attack on Trudeau’s handling of a protracted cost-of-living crisis.

The chief target of Poilievre’s attacks has been Canada’s nationwide carbon tax, a levy once heralded as a global model that is now all but doomed by national politics.

Poilievre’s attacks on the tax have landed him unlikely allies: Singh recently backed away from the carbon levy, after supporting it for years, incorrectly suggesting the revenue-neutral tax put an unfair burden on “working people’s shoulders”. Economists and political scientists agree that lower-income Canadians come out ahead under the scheme, with nearly 80% of residents receiving more in quarterly payments than they pay in tax. Poilievre has also targeted Singh for propping up a Liberal government which Singh himself has suggested is captive to corporate interests.

“He is a fake, a phony and a fraud. How can anyone ever believe what this sellout NDP leader says in the future?” Poilievre said to Singh during a sitting of parliament last week.

Singh’s withdrawal of support for the Liberals might have harmed his own electoral prospects, but inadvertently benefited another leader: Yves-François Blanchet of the sovereigntist Bloc Québécois.

Blanchet has stepped in to fill the void left by the NDP’s exit from the confidence and supply agreement, but he has been open about the hardheaded political calculus behind the move.

“It’s not [about] supporting the government. It’s [about] not having them fall, soon,” Blanchet told CBC News. “First, I will let this vote instigated by the Conservatives go through. They will lose it, and by the way lose face, and this is what they deserve presently because they are not doing politics in a clean way … I ask for things and if I don’t get it, [the government] will fall. And that’s the end to it.”

The Bloc’s rise, in tandem with the renewed popularity of Quebec’s sovereigntist movement, has also come at a cost for the Liberals.

In a surprise byelection defeat last week, Trudeau’s party lost the riding of LaSalle–Émard–Verdun, a district that had been held almost exclusively by Liberals for more than 50 years. It followed another defeat in June, when the Liberals lost a safe seat in downtown Toronto.

Related: After nine years in office, is it time for Justin Trudeau to go?

The two losses reflect a souring public opinion of Trudeau’s government: the cost of living has surged alongside a housing shortage and policy failures and mismanagement have eroded strong support for immigration.

Despite such setbacks, Turnbull said that the Liberals were still in a position of comparative strength.

“As much as the Liberals look to be in a very weak position – because of the polling, because of the byelection losses, because ministers are leaving and staffers are leaving – even though it’s a complete mess, they still have a really significant minority in the House of Commons,” she said. “In order for there to be a loss of confidence, all three opposition parties would have to agree. And I don’t think we’re there yet.”

In the news today: MPs set to debate Tory non-confidence motion

The Canadian Press
Tue, September 24, 2024 



Here is a roundup of stories from The Canadian Press designed to bring you up to speed...

MPs set to debate Tory non-confidence motion

The House of Commons is set to debate a Conservative non-confidence motion today, as the Tories try to take down Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government.

It's the first test for the minority government since the NDP ended its supply-and-confidence deal with the Liberals earlier this month.

The Bloc Québécois and NDP have already said they will not support the motion, which will be voted on Wednesday.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has been criticizing NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh for his refusal to bring down the Liberals.

That all but eliminates the possibility of a snap election this week.

Here's what else we're watching...

Inquiry to hear parliamentary security officials

A federal inquiry into foreign interference is slated to hear today from parliamentary security officials including House of Commons sergeant-at-arms Patrick McDonell.

The testimony could shed new light on efforts by hostile countries to target parliamentarians via cyberspace and what officials are doing to counter the threats.

The inquiry's latest public hearings are focusing on the capacity of federal agencies to detect, deter and counter foreign meddling.

Chief electoral officer Stéphane Perrault, whose agency has floated several proposals to tighten the security of candidate nominations, is also slated to testify.

Elections Canada has suggested barring non-citizens from helping choose candidates, requiring parties to publish contest rules and explicitly outlawing behaviour such as voting more than once.

Opening arguments expected in Hoggard trial

Opening arguments are expected to get underway today in the sexual assault trial of Canadian musician Jacob Hoggard.

Hoggard is facing a sexual assault charge for an incident alleged to have happened on June 25, 2016, in Kirkland Lake, Ont.

The former Hedley frontman pleaded not guilty to that charge on Monday.

His trial is taking place in nearby Haileybury, a community within Temiskaming Shores in the northeastern part of the province.

Hoggard had elected at the end of last year to be tried by a jury in the Superior Court of Justice.

Schools figuring out new world of cellphone bans

From cellphone "hotels" to patchwork policies to recalibrating lesson plans, teachers and schools across Canada are learning to navigate a classroom without cellphones.

But some say that despite recent bans and restrictions on the phones, little has changed.

A number of provinces, including Saskatchewan, Ontario, Manitoba and Alberta, introduced plans to limit cellphone usage beginning this school year. There is a mix of restrictions along with outright bans.

The changes come as educators try to get students to log off and stay focused, noting online squabbles have forced their way into classrooms and social interactions among youth have dwindled.

It’s early days, with policies still being crafted, leading to some schools finding creative ways to curb students' itchy cellphone fingers.

Home renovations rising in major markets: report

A new report says a boost in spending on home renovations during the pandemic has helped contribute to higher prices for single-family homes despite downward market pressure.

The report by Re/Max Canada looked at the evolution of housing stock and trends affecting home values in the Toronto and Vancouver areas, Canada's two largest real estate markets.

The report, released Tuesday, said national renovation spending increased by an estimated $300 billion between 2019 and 2023, led by home renewal and revitalization projects in the Toronto and Vancouver markets.

That marked an eight per cent jump from the previous five-year period.

The report said revitalization "remains one of the most underestimated factors behind escalating housing values."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 24, 2024.


Minority governments, major stakes: a look at their role in federal politics

Jim Bronskill
Tue, September 24, 2024 at 2:00 a.m. MDT·4 min read




OTTAWA — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's minority government is expected to face its first serious test this week since the NDP withdrew from an agreement to support the Liberals.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has put forward a motion stating the House of Commons has no confidence in the prime minister or the government. Members will debate the motion on Tuesday and vote on it Wednesday.

The New Democrats and Bloc Québécois have said they intend to vote against the motion, avoiding a general election.

What is a minority government?

A minority government lacks a majority of the members of the House of Commons, meaning it depends on support from members of other parties to pass legislation, including budgetary measures.

Are minority governments a rarity?

They're actually quite common. Thirteen minority governments have emerged from federal elections. Two others were a result of governments being replaced between elections. (However, Parliament did not meet during one of the two, the government of Alexander Mackenzie, who soon went on to win a majority.)

Justin Trudeau has presided over two minorities, as did his predecessor, Stephen Harper.

How do they work?

There have been no coalition governments arising from a minority scenario at the federal level.

However, until recently the Liberals and NDP had a supply-and-confidence deal that would keep the minority government led by Trudeau in power and ensure progress on some mutually agreeable policies.

In addition, between 1972 and 1974, the NDP had an informal understanding with the Liberals that kept the government of Pierre Trudeau, Justin's father, in place.

More common are minority governments that secure support for key votes on an ad hoc basis.

Minority governments have also been known to act as if they held a majority, notably the Progressive Conservative governments of John Diefenbaker in the 1950s and '60s and Joe Clark in 1979, as well as the early period of Lester B. Pearson's Liberal government in the '60s.

Do minority governments last as long as majority ones?

Generally, no. A minority government could make it to the end of a traditional four-year mandate. However, they are often defeated on an important vote in the House or pull the plug themselves with the aim of securing a stronger mandate at the ballot box.

The length of minority governments varies dramatically, from the brief tenure of Arthur Meighen's Conservatives in 1926 to the stint of more than three years and seven months of William Lyon Mackenzie King's Liberals from 1921-25.

How do minority governments end?

Parliamentary practice and tradition dictate that if the government is defeated in the House on a question of confidence, voters head to the polls.

"What constitutes a question of confidence in the government varies with the circumstances," says the authoritative volume "House of Commons Procedure and Practice."

"Confidence is not a matter of parliamentary procedure, nor is it something on which the Speaker can be asked to rule."

Does that mean losing a vote in the House spells the end of a minority government?

No. Minority governments of Pearson and Pierre Trudeau each lost a number of votes in House without resigning.

A confidence motion may be clearly worded like the one the Conservatives have proposed this week. It could be a motion on a matter the government declares a question of confidence, or it might be related to government budgetary policy or the reply to the Speech from the Throne.

Even so, Pearson lost a vote on a budget matter but survived upon seeking, and winning, on a clear vote of confidence.

Has there been a particularly memorable defeat for a minority government?

Papers were tossed into the air in the House after Clark's government fell in 1979 in a 139-133 vote on its budget.

"Only six months ago, Canadians voted to change the government of Canada because they wanted to change the direction of this country," Clark told a news conference after the vote. "By their action tonight, the opposition parties are saying that Canadians were wrong to make that decision."

However, the defeat set the stage for the early 1980 return of the Liberals led by Pierre Trudeau with a majority mandate.

(Sources: Transition to the 44th Parliament: Questions and Answers by Andre Barnes and Laurence Brosseau of the Library of Parliament; House of Commons Procedure and Practice, third edition; The Canadian Encyclopedia.)

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 24, 2024.

Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press
On The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, Trudeau says he understands Canadian 'frustration'

CBC
Mon, September 23, 2024 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, left, appeared as a guest on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert on Monday. (Blair Gable/Reuters; Ringo Chiu/Reuters - image credit)


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau used his debut appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert on Monday to make his case for another term despite facing existential challenges to his leadership and mounting "frustration" from Canadians struggling with the cost of living.

Sitting for the late night talk show interview the day before a non-confidence motion against his government, Trudeau was asked why his political opponents might be trying to get him out of office after nearly a decade in power. In response, Trudeau said he believed the cost of living is to blame.

"Well, it is a really tough time in Canada right now. People are hurting. People are having trouble paying for groceries, paying for rent, filling up the tank… We've lost a little ground over the past decades on building houses, so the housing crisis is a little sharper," he said.

People 'sometimes looking at change'

Trudeau said he believes Canada's economic outlook is slightly more positive than the United States' "on a macro level," but conceded Canadians "don't feel it when they're buying groceries.

"People are frustrated and the idea that maybe they want an election now is something that my opponents are trying to bank on because... People are taking a lot out on me for understandable reasons. I've been here and I've been steering us through all these things and people are sometimes looking at change," he continued.

Trudeau said he was determined to "keep fighting" for another term as prime minister.

The exchange was the most pointed during an interview with a largely sunny tone, despite the prime minister facing a far darker mood in Ottawa. Trudeau's government is expected to face a non-confidence motion Tuesday from the Conservative party, which is riding a double-digit advantage in the polls.

The motion would be the first step toward an early election if passed, but it is destined to fail as the NDP and Bloc Quebecois have already said they will vote it down and allow the Liberals to survive.


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, flanked by his security, waves as he arrives to the CBS studios for the filming of "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" in New York on Sept. 23, 2024.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, flanked by his security, waves as he arrives to the CBS studios for the filming of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert in New York on Monday. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Still, the political play is another test of Trudeau's leadership after a bruising summer that ended with the Liberals losing the governance agreement with the NDP and two long-held seats in a pair of byelections.

Aside from the brief exchange about the non-confidence vote, Colbert and Trudeau bantered throughout most of the interview Monday about trivial questions Americans might have for Canadians — like why Canadian change ends up in Americans' pockets, whether Canadian bacon is the same as ham and whether the nation "burned" money with the image of the late Queen Elizabeth after her death in 2022.

Trudeau did not take an opportunity to criticize Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre when Colbert said the latter has been referred to as "Canada's Trump." Instead, the prime minister responded with common campaign points about the Liberals' policies on climate change, dental care and $10-a-day childcare.

Trudeau also sidestepped a joke about a conspiracy theory falsely claiming Haitian immigrants were eating cats and dogs in Springfield, Ohio, which was repeated by former U.S. president Donald Trump during a presidential debate.

"I'm gonna move right past that one," Trudeau said.

Colbert did not otherwise ask Trudeau to weigh in on the U.S. presidential election between Trump and Vice-President Kamala Harris.

The interview was shot during Trudeau's trip to New York, where Trudeau met with leaders ahead of the 78th gathering of the United Nations General Assembly. The Late Show is largely tailored to an American audience but airs in Canada. Interview clips are also shared across Instagram and TikTok, where the show has nearly five million followers.

RuPaul Charles, the host of the show RuPaul's Drag Race, was also a guest on Monday but did not interact with Trudeau. The prime minister made an appearance on the Canadian version of the drag queen competition series last year.



Donald Trump and JD Vance’s Pet-Eating Hoax Bites Back With Charges Against Them

Josh Fiallo
Tue, September 24, 2024 

Mike Segar/Reuters

A Haitian nonprofit group has filed charges against GOP nominees Donald Trump and JD Vance for their peddling of a pet-eating hoax that has turned Springfield, Ohio, upside over the last month.

The Haitian Bridge Alliance, based in California, announced Tuesday that it has taken advantage of a Ohio law that allows private citizens to file charges without first going through police or prosecutors.

The charges filed against the Republican candidates included disrupting public services, making false alarms, telecommunications harassment, complicity, and aggravated menacing.

Lawyers for the group filed motions asking the Clark County Municipal Court to affirm probable cause and to issue arrest warrants for Vance and Trump, just over a month before Election Day. That request will force the court to have a hearing before it can reject the affidavits, reported News 5 Cleveland.

Subodh Chandra, the Haitian Bridge Alliance’s lead attorney, told NBC 4 that the group hoped to hold Trump and Vance accountable as anyone would be if they spread conspiracies that lead to bomb threats, school closures, and disrupted city services.

“If anyone other than Trump and Vance had relentlessly disseminated false information,” he said. “They would have been arrested by now. So the only question is whether Trump and Vance will be held accountable to the rule of the law like the rest of us.”

Baseless claims about Haitian immigrants were stealing and eating pets in Springfield first spread in August. The hoax was initially limited to niche Republican circles but went mainstream after Trump repeated it during his debate against Vice President Kamala Harris.

Another missing pet claim—the mysterious disappearance of Miss Sassy from a home with Haitian immigrants for neighbors—was debunked after the “missing” kitty was found in the owner’s basement.

Vance has now also admitted that he’s just been making stuff up to get attention. In an interview with CNN’s Dana Bash, he conceded that he kept spreading the harmful pet-eating conspiracy despite it having no legs.

“If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do,” he told Bash.


Haitian rights group wants Trump, Vance arrested over false claims in Springfield, Ohio


Jacqueline Charles
Tue, September 24, 2024 


Megan Smith/Megan Smith / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

A Haitian rights organization is seeking the arrest of former President Donald J. Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, and running mate JD Vance for false statements about Haitians in Springfield, Ohio, which has led to a wave of bomb threats and other disruptions in public service in the small Midwestern town.

The Haitian Bridge Alliance filed an affidavit Tuesday in the Clark County Municipal Court asking a judge to charge both men with violating seven Ohio laws and to arrest them. Under an Ohio statute, a private citizen with knowledge that someone has committed a crime can ask a court to affirm there is probable cause a crime was committed and issue an arrest warrant.

The affidavit was filed by Guerline Jozef, the co-founder and executive director of the Alliance, a Haitian-rights organization based in San Diego that has been trying to help members of the growing Haitian community in Springfield deal with the fallout of the false claims. In its legal filing, it asks for a judge, and not the prosecutor’s office, to review its request.

“The prosecuting attorney has not yet acted to protect the community and hold Trump and Vance accountable for the harm they have instigated,” the affidavit says. “Thus, the Haitian Bridge Alliance and Ms. Jozef respectfully request this Court, independently, to find probable cause based on the facts presented and issue warrants for both Trump and Vance.”

Jozef and the Haitian Bridge Alliance are represented by Ohio-based civil-rights attorney Subodh Chandra, who represented the family of 12-year-old Tamir Rice in a case against Cleveland police after he was shot and killed by officers in 2014. Jozef is asking for a decision to be made before Trump visits Springfield, which he has announced for this week, though no specific date has been set.

Springfield city officials estimate they have an immigrant population of between 12,000 and 15,000, though they do not specify how many are Haitians. Most of the Haitians are in the United States under legal protections afforded by the Biden administration through extensions of Temporary Protected Status for countries where it’s unsafe for nationals to return, and through a two-year humanitarian visa for nationals of Haiti, Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela. In interviews, residents told the Miami Herald that they moved to Springfield based-on-word of mouth from other Haitians who had moved to the city because of job opportunities and lower cost of living compared to Florida and New York, two states with sizable Haitian communities.

Yet the Trump campaign has insisted on describing the community as “illegal” and as being “dumped” there by the Biden administration.

“President Trump is rightfully highlighting the failed immigration system that Kamala Harris has overseen, bringing thousands of illegal immigrants pouring into communities like Springfield and many others across the country,” Steven Cheung, communications director for the Trump campaign, told the Herald in response to the affidavit. “President Trump will secure our border and put an end to the chaos that illegal immigration brings to our communities.”

The Midwestern city was thrust into the national spotlight and presidential campaign earlier this month when both Trump and Vance, the junior senator from Ohio, amplified a debunked claim that Haitian immigrants in Springfield have been eating their neighbors’ dogs and cats as well as wild animals. City officials have said there is no evidence Haitians have been doing this, but Trump and Vance have repeated the falsehoods. Trump mentioned it during his presidential debate with Harris, the vice president and Democratic nominee, earlier this month.

“In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs — the people that came in. They’re eating the cats. They’re eating the pets of the people that live there. And this is what’s happening in our country, and it’s a shame,” Trump said at the debate.

The false claims triggered a string of bomb threats that led to the closure of schools, stores and government offices including city hall. As a result, the city’s growing Haitian population has felt increasingly vulnerable and worried about their safety.

“Trump and Vance have knowingly spread a false and dangerous narrative by claiming that Springfield, Ohio’s, Haitian community is criminally killing and eating neighbors’ dogs and cats, and killing and eating geese,” the affidavit says. “They accused Springfield’s Haitians of bearing deadly disease. They repeated such lies during the presidential debate, at campaign rallies, during interviews on national television, and on social media.”

Jozef accused Trump and Vance of violating several statutes, including making false claims that led to “massive disruptions to public services” after the bomb threats caused shutdowns; knowingly causing alarm in Springfield by continuing to repeat lies that state and local officials have said were false; committing aggravated menacing by knowingly making intimidating statements with the intent to abuse, threaten, or harass, and by knowingly causing others to falsely believe that members of Springfield’s Haitian community would cause serious harm to others in Springfield. She also accused both men of violating the prohibition against complicity by conspiring with one another and spreading vicious lies that caused innocent people to be parties to the crimes.

Jozef said the impact of Trump and Vance’s lies cannot be overstated. There have been at least 33 bomb threats during the last two wees, forcing many public institutions to evacuate, she said.

“Like those who falsely shout ‘fire!’ in a crowded theater,” the affidavit says, “Trump and Vance do not color within the lines of the First Amendment. They commit criminal acts.”

Haitians Want Trump Arrested For 'Harmful Lies.' The Campaign Responded With Another Lie.

Pocharapon Neammanee
Tue, September 24, 2024 


Haitians Want Trump Arrested For 'Harmful Lies.' The Campaign Responded With Another Lie.


Leaders of a Haitian nonprofit group in Springfield, Ohio, filed a criminal affidavit Tuesday against former President Donald Trump and his Republican running mate, Sen. JD Vance, seeking their arrest over racist lies that Haitian immigrants were “eating the cats, dogs, and pets of people” in the community.

The affidavit, filed in Clark County Municipal Court by Guerline Jozef, co-founder of the Haitian Bridge Alliance, alleged the former president and the Ohio senator had violated criminal laws including disrupting public services, making false alarms, complicity, aggravated menacing and telecommunications harassment and complicity.

Under Ohio law, private citizens are permitted to file an affidavit asking the courts to find probable cause that alleged offenders have committed a crime.

Subodh Chandra, Jozef’s lead counsel, told HuffPost on Tuesday that the organization was “tired of waiting for the prosecutor to act to vindicate the rule of law and protect the community.”

He added that Trump and Vance “know exactly what they’re doing” when they spread the lies, calling their actions “unapologetic serial criminal activity.”

“I mean, they know what the power of their words is, they know that they have a megaphone and a platform that is so powerful that if they are irresponsible with it, it can wreak havoc,” Chandra said. “They know it, and they’ve seen it as a result of what they’ve done here, and yet they double down and triple down and quadruple down.”

In a statement to HuffPost on Tuesday, Steven Cheung, the communications director for Trump’s campaign, responded to the affidavit with yet another lie.

“President Trump is rightfully highlighting the failed immigration system that Kamala Harris has overseen, bringing thousands of illegal immigrants pouring into communities like Springfield and many others across the country,” Cheung said. “President Trump will secure our border and put an end to the chaos that illegal immigration brings to our communities.”

The city has said that the Haitian immigrants in Springfield live there legally.

Now that the affidavit has been filed, Chandra said a judge must determine if there’s probable cause to support the charges and issue arrest warrants or refer the case to the prosecutor’s office for further investigation.

The Haitian Bridge Alliance claimed in the affidavit that criminal charges are warranted because of the “harmful lies repeatedly spewed” by Trump and Vance and the serious effects on the community.

“HBA is non-partisan, this is not about one candidate or political party. This is about confronting white supremacy, anti-Black rhetoric, and hate speech that seems to be a constant in U.S. politics and that continues to cause suffering. No one is above the law,” Jozef said in a statement announcing the charges.

Vance earlier this month spread the racist — and later debunked — rumor that the pets of residents in Springfield have been “abducted and eaten by people who shouldn’t be in this country.”

A day later, during the Sept. 10 presidential debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump repeated Vance’s baseless claim.

This is about confronting white supremacy, anti-Black rhetoric, and hate speech that seems to be a constant in U.S. politics and that continues to cause suffering.Guerline Jozef, co-founder of the Haitian Bridge Alliance

“In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs,” Trump said. “The people that came in, they’re eating the cats. They’re eating the pets of the people that live there. And this is what’s happening in our country. And it’s a shame.”

The former president was quickly fact-checked by ABC News moderator David Muir, who said the city manager of Springfield told ABC there was no evidence of pets being kidnapped and eaten by immigrants.

Since then, the Haitian Bridge Alliance have attributed more than 30 “widespread bomb and other threats” against their community as Trump and Vance have continued to spread the racist lie.

Last week, while speaking in California, Trump vowed to begin mass deportations in Springfield, in spite of the Haitians’ legal status, if he’s elected president in November.

“We’re going to have the largest deportation in the history of our country,” Trump said. “And we’re going to start with Springfield and Aurora, [Colorado].”

The affidavit alleges that Trump’s and Vance’s remarks are criminal acts and “do not color within the lines of the First Amendment.”

The affidavit argued that the two knowingly caused “others to falsely believe that members of the Springfield, Ohio Haitian community would cause serious physical harm to the person or property of others within the community.”

Several Haitian immigrants who live in Springfield have said that before Trump’s and Vance’s comments, people in the city had been “welcoming, nice, and helpful” to them, the affidavit said.

However, now they are “receiving hostile comments and feel like they are constantly being watched by people at work and in their neighborhoods,” according to the affidavit.

“Many of the people we have spoken to left Haiti because they suffered politically motivated violence and persecution, and they have reported feeling scared for their physical safety all the time because of Trump and Vance’s comments,” the document said. “They are terrified that, if Trump and Vance win the elections, they will be harassed even more and even become victims of violence.”

Some Haitians in Springfield have stopped going to work, going out at night or asking for directions, and some have left Ohio, according to the affidavit. Springfield officials also said that City Hall had received a bomb threat, prompting evacuation and a law enforcement response.

“If it were anyone else who had wreaked the kind of havoc that Trump and Vance have wreaked with their persistent and relentless falsehoods, namely, schools, colleges and City Hall being evacuated and closed, threats against the mayor and his family, and 33 bomb threats, you can be assured that that person would have been arrested by now,” Chandra said.

Despite multiple reports disproving the racist claim, Vance has justified his stance and attacked the media for refuting it.

“I wish the American media was half as interested in the stress on the local schools, the stress on the hospitals and unaffordable housing as they are in debunking a story that comes from the residents of Springfield,” Vance said at a rally in North Carolina on Monday.
Related...


Haitian group in Springfield, Ohio, files citizen criminal charges against Trump and Vance

Julie Carr Smyth
Tue, September 24, 2024 

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — The leader of a nonprofit representing the Haitian community of Springfield, Ohio, filed criminal charges Tuesday against former President Donald Trump and his running mate, JD Vance, over the chaos and threats experienced by the city since Trump first spread false claims about legal immigrants there during a presidential debate.

The Haitian Bridge Alliance invoked its private-citizen right to file the charges in the wake of inaction by the local prosecutor, said their attorney, Subodh Chandra of the Cleveland-based Chandra Law Firm.

Trump and Vance, a U.S. senator from Ohio, are charged with disrupting public services, making false alarms, telecommunications harassment, aggravated menacing and complicity. The filing asks the Clark County Municipal Court to affirm that there is probable cause and to either refer the case for further investigation or to issue arrest warrants against Trump and Vance.

“Their persistence and relentlessness, even in the face of the governor and the mayor saying this is false, that shows intent,” Chandra said. “It's knowing, willful flouting of criminal law.”

A Trump-Vance campaign spokesman didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.

More than 30 bomb threats were directed at state and local government buildings and schools, prompting closures, the assignment of additional law enforcement protection and security cameras. Some of the city's Haitian residents have also said they feared for their safety as public vitriol grew, and Mayor Rob Rue has received death threats.

“If it were anyone else other than Trump and Vance who had done what they’ve done — wreak havoc on Springfield, resulting in bomb threats, evacuated and closed government buildings and schools, threats to the mayor and his family — they would have been arrested by now,” Chandra said. “So, really, the only question is whether the court and then the prosecutors would treat Trump and Vance the way anyone else would be treated. They are not above the law.”

Chandra said the U.S. Supreme Court's July ruling granting ex-presidents broad immunity from criminal prosecution doesn't apply in this case because Trump is currently a private citizen and Vance did not amplify the rumors that members of Springfield's 15,000-member Haitian community were eating people's pets in his capacity as a senator.

Specifically, the affidavit alleges Trump and Vance: — Disrupted public service “by causing widespread bomb and other threats that resulted in massive disruptions” to Springfield's public services;

— Made false alarms “by knowingly causing alarm in the Springfield community by continuing to repeat lies that state and local officials have said were false”;

— Committed telecommunications harassment “by spreading claims they know to be false during the presidential debate, campaign rallies, nationally televised interviews, and social media”;

— Committed aggravated menacing “by knowingly making intimidating statements with the intent to abuse, threaten, or harass the recipients, including Trump’s threat to deport immigrants who are here legally to Venezuela, a land they have never known”;

— Committed aggravated menacing “by knowingly causing others to falsely believe that members of Springfield’s Haitian community would cause serious physical harm to the person or property of others in Springfield;” and

— Violated the prohibition against complicity “by conspiring with one another and spreading vicious lies that caused innocent parties to be parties to their various crimes.”

Julie Carr Smyth, The Associated Press