Monday, September 30, 2024

Documentary praised after U-boat wreck discovery

Elliot Ball
BBC News
Olivia Copeland
BBC Radio Guernsey
The Hunt for Lady Olive and the German Submarine
A German military historian said Britain dealt with war graves "more respectfully" than other nations

A BBC documentary has been hailed as "exemplary" following the discovery of a German U-boat which was found by a team of Guernsey divers.

The comments were made by Christian Lübcke, military historian and regional director of the German War Graves Commission.

Discussing the film, made by Karl Taylor, he said: "The way he's dealt with the discovery has been exemplary and I hope many other filmmakers, British and German, follow suit."

The vessel UC-18 was lost in 1917 after a battle with a secret Royal Navy ship, Lady Olive, which was also sunk.

Designated war grave

Mr Lübcke also praised the UK for "essentially a greater interest in underwater war graves".

He added that Britain dealt with war graves "more respectfully" than other nations.

The historian also said that he had become worried by the lack of connection European society now had with war graves.

"Older people have passed and younger people don't have a personal relationship with those who died in the World Wars," he said.

"Added to this is that many graves, especially underwater ones, are invisible to the general public."

He added: "That's why it's so important never to forget them.

"Karl Taylor's documentary is part of this reminder and I hope there are more documentaries like this in the future."

All findings made in the documentary have been passed to the French authorities and the German Navy.

The French authorities disclosed the UC-18's location to divers as it is a designated war grave.

The Hunt for Lady Olive and the German Submarine is due to air on Wednesday on BBC Four at 21:00 BST.

MSF has and continues to treat more than two victims of sexual violence per hour in DRC

MSF has and continues to treat more than two victims of sexual violence per hour in DRC
A woman stands in the doorway of MSF's clinic to treat victims and survivors of sexual violence in Bulengo displacement camp. North Kivu province, Democratic Republic of Congo, August 2023
.

© MSF/PIERRE-PHILIPPE MARCOU

Press Release
30 September 2024

New data reveals that MSF teams treated more than two victims and survivors of sexual violence every hour in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) during 2023.
The alarming numbers have continued, with teams having treated nearly 70 per cent of the numbers across all of 2023 in just the first five months of 2024.
MSF is calling on international and national stakeholders to invest in to address sexual violence.

Amsterdam/Barcelona/Brussels/Geneva/Paris – In a new retrospective report, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) reveals that – together with the Ministry of Health – we had treated an unprecedented number of victims and survivors of sexual violence in Democratic Republic of Congo in 2023. This upward trend has continued in the first months of 2024. MSF is calling on all national and international stakeholders to take urgent action to better prevent this crisis and improve care for survivors.

In 2023, MSF teams in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) helped treat 25,166 victims and survivors of sexual violence across the country. That’s more than two every hour.

This figure is by far the highest number ever recorded by MSF in DRC. It is based on data from 17 projects set up by MSF, in support of the Ministry of Health, in five Congolese provinces – North Kivu, South Kivu, Ituri, Maniema and Central Kasai. In previous years (2020, 2021, 2022), our teams treated an average of 10,000 victims per year in the country. The year 2023 therefore marks a massive increase in admissions.
'We are calling for help': Sexual violence in DRCpdf — 2.9 MBDownload


This trend accelerated in the first months of 2024. In North Kivu province alone, 17,363 victims and survivors were treated with MSF assistance between January and May. Not even halfway through the year, this already represented 69 per cent of the total number of victims treated in 2023 in the five provinces mentioned above.
Displaced women are the first victims


Analysed and verified over several months, the 2023 data presented in the report, We are calling for help, show that 91 per cent of victims treated with MSF assistance in DRC were admitted in North Kivu province. Clashes between the M23 group, the Congolese army and their respective allies have been raging in the province since late 2021, forcing hundreds of thousands of people to flee.

The vast majority of victims (17,829) were treated in displacement sites around Goma, North Kivu’s capital. The number of displacement sites continued to grow throughout 2023.

“According to the testimonies of patients, two-thirds of them were attacked at gunpoint,” says Christopher Mambula, head of MSF’s programmes in DRC. “These attacks took place on the sites themselves, but also in the surrounding area when women and girls – who accounted for 98 per cent of the victims treated by MSF in DRC in 2023 – went out to collect wood or water, or to work in the fields.”


A view of a refugee camp in Goma, where thousands of people have been displaced due to ongoing fighting in North Kivu. Democratic Republic of Congo, February 2024. Marion Molinari/MSFShare


While the massive presence of armed men in and around displacement sites explains this explosion in sexual violence, the inadequacy of the humanitarian response and the inhumane living conditions in these sites fuel the phenomenon. The lack of food, water and income-generating activities exacerbates the vulnerable situation of women and girls (1 in 10 victims treated by MSF in 2023 were minors), who are forced to go to neighbouring hills and fields where there are many armed men. The lack of sanitation and safe shelter for women and girls leaves them vulnerable to attack. Others are victims of sexual exploitation to support their families.

“On paper, there seem to be many programmes to prevent and respond to the needs of victims of sexual violence,” says Christopher Mambula. “But on the ground in displacement sites, our teams struggle every day to refer victims who need help.”

“The few programmes that do exist are always too short-lived and grossly under-resourced,” says Mambula. “Much more is needed to protect women and meet the urgent needs of victims.”
Much more is needed to protect women and meet the urgent needs of victims.Christopher Mambula, head of MSF’s programmes in DRC
Share this

Urgent calls for action

Based on the needs expressed by the victims, and building on previous work to solve this long-standing problem in the country, the report lists some 20 urgent actions to be taken by the parties to the conflict, the Congolese authorities – national, provincial and local – as well as international donors and the humanitarian sector. For MSF, there are three main areas of urgent action.

Firstly, we call on all parties to the conflict to ensure respect for international humanitarian law. In particular, we call for the absolute prohibition of acts of sexual violence, but also respect for the civilian nature of displacement sites. The protection of people caught up in the fighting must be a priority. The call to protect civilians from abuse is also addressed to those involved in humanitarian programmes.

Second, MSF calls for the improvement of living conditions in sites for internally displaced people. Access must be improved to meet basic needs – food, water, income-generating activities – as well as improving safe and well-lit sanitation and shelter. These investments must also be accompanied by increased efforts to raise awareness of sexual violence. While humanitarian funding must be sufficiently flexible to respond to emerging and urgent needs, implementing partners must also demonstrate accountability in delivering interventions.
A woman stands in front of the camps of Bulengo and Lushagala. Democratic Republic of Congo, August 2023.MSF/Alexandre MarcouShare


Finally, we call for specific investment in better medical, social, legal and psychological care for victims of sexual violence. This requires long-term funding to improve medical training, the supply of post-rape kits to care facilities, legal support, as well as the provision of shelters for survivors. Funding is also needed for awareness-raising activities to prevent stigmatisation or marginalisation of victims, which sometimes prevents them from seeking help. Given the high number of requests for abortion from victims, MSF is also calling for the adaptation of the national legal framework to guarantee access to comprehensive medical abortion care.

Sexual violence is a major medical and humanitarian emergency in DRC. According to the latest Gender-Based Violence Area of Responsibility DRC information, which compiles data from various humanitarian organisations offering gender-based violence care services in 12 provinces of DRC, 55,500 survivors of sexual violence received medical care in the second quarter of 2024.


... Against. Our Will. Men, Women and Rape. SUSAN BROWNMILLER. Fawcett Columbine • New York. Page 5. Sale of this book without a front cover may be unauthorized. If ...


Botswana to Germany: Accept 20,000 elephants or we will kill them, distribute meat to hungry citizens


By Thulani Mpofu September 30, 2024

Botswana's President Mokgweetsi Masisi has said his government will kill 20,000 elephants and distribute their meat to starving locals if Germany does not accept his proposal to send as many jumbos to the European country, Tass reports.

In April 2024, he offered 20,000 elephants to Germany as a way to manage their population in his country.  

"When people are starving," the Russian publication wrote on September 27, citing a report by Bild, a German paper, "we must feed them. […] I’m afraid we will have to feed some of those elephants or even all of them to the people."

The southern African nation has about 130,000 elephants, the world's largest number in any country.  His government has been trying to convince Western conservationists including German authorities, to support its plan for a more robust approach to reduce the elephant population.  The animals, his government says, are posing an environmental catastrophe as they eat up people's crops, outcompete them at water points and destroy their homes.

The human-elephant competition for food and water is worse this year, as Botswana and other elephants range states in southern Africa, is facing their "worst drought" in 50 years.

Botswana has previously translocated 8,000 elephants to neighbouring Angola and 700 to Mozambique.

"We would like to offer such a gift to Germany," Masisi told Bild in April.

A month earlier, Botswana’s wildlife minister Dumezweni Mthimkhulu had offered to send 10,000 of the giant herbivores to London’s Hyde Park so, BBC wrote then, British people could "have a taste of living alongside" them. 

UK legislators had just voted to support a ban on hunting trophies.

Namibia and Zimbabwe announced in August and September, respectively, their intentions to kill hundreds of animals, including the huge herbivores, to not only manage their booming populations but also feed the people who are hungry following the regional drought. 

A bloc of 16 southern African nations issued an international appeal in May for $5.5bn to help mobilise food aid for about 68mn people rendered food-insecure by the drought.

Namibia said it would cull 723 animals among them 83 elephants, 30 hippos, 60 buffalo and 300 zebras and distributing their meat to the needy.

Zimbabwe has an estimated 100,000 elephants, up to 45,000 of which are in Hwange National Park, west of the country.  The total population is twice as large as the country should optimally have to ensure environmental sustainability, the government says.

The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, has restrictions on the culling and trade in elephants and elephant products on Zimbabwe, Botswana and Namibia.

Germans should "live together with the animals, in the way you are trying to tell us to," Masisi noted in April. "This is no joke."

Closing in on the Kill: Heat and the Breadth of Land Animal Vulnerability Including People, Bison, Grizzlies, and Moose



 September 30, 2024
Facebook

Bison in Grand Teton National Park. Photo: Jeffrey St. Clair.

While this article will be nowhere near a comprehensive review, a sampling of just three studies offers an introductory glimpse into heat’s broad capacity to govern and regulate behavior, health and death across the realm of Earth’s land animals. Some further detail will surface in subsequent paragraphs.

For a first example of heat’s broad impacts across animal species, the October 13 2008 issue of Science published an informative review article under the title, “Physiology and Climate.” The authors remind readers that “All organisms live within a limited range of body temperatures. They further explain that “the direct effects of rising temperatures include “impairments in growth, reproduction, foraging, immune competence, behaviors and competitiveness.”

The Journal of Animal Ecology picked up the story in January 2014. The authors confirm that “organisms have a physiological response to temperature, and these responses have important consequences.”  “They go on to explain that “biological rates and times (e.g. metabolic rate, growth, reproduction, mortality and activity) vary with temperature.”

A third and final example comes from the September 20, 2024, issue of ScienceAuthors traced the history of CO2 and temperature across the last 485 million years. Authors discovered that our current era is cooler than much of this history, and C02 levels lower.

In a plain language news release, one of the authors explains that, because we are addling 40 billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere, “We are changing the climate into a place that is really out of context for humans. The planet has been and can be warmer – but humans and animals can’t adapt that fast.”

Humans as a species of special interest

As a first example, little is more certain than that heat can kill us, and many, if not all, outdoors-minded readers have noticed news reports of hikers dying during a heat wave. Reports have included the 10-year-old boy who died after he suffered a heat-related medical emergency during a hike in Arizona.

Given the headline stories of heat-driven human mortality in the great outdoors, it’s likely no surprise that The Outdoor Industry Association would ask ”Why Does Climate Change Matter to the Outdoor Industry?”

Candidly answering its question, the Association says, “Climate change is having a direct impact on outdoor recreation. The quality of outdoor experiences are suffering as summers grow longer and hotter, winter and snowpack become more unpredictable, river flows are diminished, and devastating natural disasters become more frequent.”

The risks don’t end there.

Heat steals our food

The authors of a January 9, 2009 Science article cited evidence that “In temperate regions, the hottest seasons on record will represent the future norm in many locations.” They add, “Coping with the short-run challenge of food price volatility is daunting. But the longer-term challenge of avoiding a perpetual food crisis under conditions of global warming is far more serious.”

A Nature journal, Communications Earth & Environment, went to the heart of the pricing matter in a study titled, “Global warming and heat extremes to enhance inflationary pressures” in its March 21, 2024 issue. The article’s authors found that “Higher temperatures increase food and headline inflation persistently over 12 months in both higher- and lower-income countries.”

To the inflation of food prices, add the risk involved in simply eating and digesting it. Because digesting forces body temperature higher, how much we eat on a hot day can push our temperatures toward lethal levels.

Hail batters our solar energy

A study by Northern Illinois University researchers projects that the frequency of hailstones roughly 1½ inches or larger will rise by 15% to 75%, depending on how much greenhouse gas pollution humans emit.

Risk and Insurance journal cites researchers who found that “The solar panels rapidly being deployed across the country are vulnerable to damage from hail.”

Similarly, the Department of Energy reports that “Hail can cause invisible damage through solar cell cracking at hail diameters and speeds less than that which would break the glass..”

Heat can abort human pregnancies

Some disruptions are more pressing than others. Right alongside the prospects for pricier food, and costly hail damage to solar panels, we have to include risk of aborted pregnancies. According to the National Institute of Health’s National Library of Medicine, one research team “observed that exposure to high ambient temperature (mean > 25°C) in early pregnancy increased unobserved pregnancy loss rates. In a case–control study conducted in Nanjing, Zhao et al. found a non-linear association between high ambient temperature and increased risk of spontaneous abortions.

Heat is already forcing costs on human health and mortality

As of January 30, 2024, Nature Medicine could run a report under the title, “After millions of preventable deaths, climate change must be treated like a health emergency.”

The urgency of these findings was underscored in an Energies article, “Quantifying Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Human Deaths to Guide Energy Policy,” in which the authors report that “Several studies are consistent with the ‘1000-ton rule,’ according to which a future person is killed every time 1000 tons of fossil carbon are burned (order-of-magnitude estimate). If warming reaches or exceeds 2 °C this century, mainly richer humans will be responsible for killing roughly 1 billion mainly poorer humans through anthropogenic global warming, which is comparable with involuntary or negligent manslaughter.”

Similarly, authors of a 2024 Harvard Law Review analysis conclude that “in jurisdictions across the United States, fossil fuel companies could be prosecuted for every type of homicide short of first degree murder.”

We humans aren’t the only ones we’ve put at risk

A broad trend was underscored in June 13, 2022, when The Conversation published “We know heatwaves kill animals. But new research shows the survivors don’t get off scot-free.”

The authors report that “Extreme heat waves can cause birds and mammals to die en masse. But it’s more common for an animal to experience relatively mild heat stress that doesn’t kill it. Our new findings suggest that unfortunately, these individuals can suffer long-term health damage.”

Authors of a related 2024 study on the effects of hot nights conclude that “ Given the major role of sleep in health, our results suggest that global warming and the associated increase in extreme climatic events are likely to negatively impact sleep, and consequently health, in wildlife.

Bison, grizzlies, and moose

A December 2022 Ecology and Evolution study found that temperature predicted bison movement better than any other factor measured. It increased movement, but only up to a point where it put on the brakes.

Authors suggest that increased movement was driven by searching for grasses that grow better with heat, which is important if only because the bison get much of their water from foraging. However, once the temperature rose above 83F, bison movement stopped, and they rested in the shade or near cooling water, which may have saved them from heat stroke.

It’s likely not a coincidence that grizzlies choose well-shaded daybeds in the thick cover of dense forest. Under protective canopy, temperatures are at lease a bit cooler than out under direct sunlight. According to studies referred to by  Western Wildlife Outreach, “In the heat of the day, grizzly bears will rest in day beds in dense vegetation.” Moreover, a Functional Ecology article reports that grizzlies can dissipate excess body heat by taking a dip in chilly water.

Reducing body heat is just as crucial to moose. A recent study in the Journal of Animal Ecology tested the hypothesis that a moose’s allocation of energy to the likes of foraging and travel can face a barrier in the form of heat dissipation limit. Under this limit, feeding and movement are impaired until an overheated animal can lose, shed, or dissipate at least some body heat.

Up to a point, a moose will be able to shed some heat in the shade alone. However, beyond that point, they narrow their bedding choice to shaded surfaces with moist soils because those soils facilitate the release of body heat. However, the authors point out that “… the importance of dissipating endogenous heat loads conductively through wet soil suggests riparian habitats also are critical thermal refuges for moose.” They quickly add that “Such refuges may be especially important in the face of a warming climate in which both high environmental temperatures and drier conditions will likely exacerbate limits to heat dissipation, especially for large, heat-sensitive animals.”

While the above strategies can save these four species from heat-determined mortality, their usefulness seems likely to diminish as heat and, with it, drought become more extreme. A 2013 Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences study found that if the surrounding air temperature gets hot enough, an animal could die of starvation — as a consequence of trying to avoid overheating.

Plainly enough, things won’t have to go that far to start getting ugly. Still, the extreme case cuts to the chase, and the risk of heat-driven mortality across a wide range of domestic and wild animals is a factor even now.

Lance Olsen, a Montana native, was president of the Missoula, Montana-based Great Bear Foundation from 1982-1992. He has also served on the governing council of the Montana Wilderness Association and the advisory council of the Alliance for the Wild Rockies. He was previously a college teacher and associate of the American Psychological Association and its Division on Population and Environmental Psychology, and the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues. Now retired, he runs a restricted listserv of global scope for climate researchers, wildlife researchers, agency staff, graduate students, and NGOs concerned about the consequences of a changing climate. He can be contacted at lancolsn@gmail.com