Wednesday, April 15, 2020

Canada's bid to beat back coronavirus exposes stark gaps between the provinces

Quebec and Ontario have been hit hardest, but as the virus spreads concern for Canada’s remote Indigenous communities is growing


Leyland Cecco in Toronto THE GUARDIAN Wed 15 Apr 2020
Canadian forces members in Toronto fan out across the
 country to help fight the coronavirus pandemic.
Photograph: Carlos Osorio/Reuters

Every day for nearly a month, Justin Trudeau has emerged from his residence – rain, shine or snow – with a message that the only way for his country to beat back the coronavirus is with a herculean “Team Canada” effort.

His deputy, Chrystia Freeland, has likened fighting the pandemic to a national wartime effort. Even the conservative premier of Ontario, Doug Ford – once a rival to Trudeau’s Liberals – has called for unity.

Trudeau warns Canada's coronavirus shutdown likely to remain for weeks


All of Canada’s provinces have declared states of emergency and called on residents to practice physical distancing, often using the length of a hockey stick as a model. But as the virus moves across the country, vast disparities have emerged as provinces anticipate starkly different caseloads and fatalities.

Quebec has seen 13,500 documented cases of the coronavirus. But in two of the country’s sparsely populated northern territories – the Yukon, Northwest Territories – only 13 confirmed cases have been logged. Not a single case has been reported in the sprawling territory of Nunavut.

Meanwhile, British Columbia appears to have started “flattening” the curve of its outbreak.

These vast regional differences – a function of geography, policy and luck – have only been magnified in recent weeks as Canada reported 26,897 cases and nearly 900 deaths from the coronavirus on Tuesday.

Compared with its southern neighbour, Canada’s response has been largely coordinated and swift: in the United States, critical weeks lagged between the application of lockdowns in different states, but it took only a few days before schools across Canada were shut down and residents were being asked to stay at home.

Nonetheless, tens of thousands of Quebec residents left for Europe and the United States in early March for the province’s spring break – one of the earliest in the country. That accident of timing meant that Quebec went on to become the centre of the country’s outbreak.

On the other side of the country, British Columbia’s spring break wasn’t until mid-March, leaving officials with enough to time to request residents refrain from travelling, order schools shut down and plead for residents to physically distance themselves.

That call, from the province’s top doctor, Bonnie Henry, has taken on a prescient quality: the province’s case numbers remain disproportionally low. “Some parts of it are luck, and some parts of it are being prepared,” she said recently.

In Ontario, where cases continue to increase, Ford also initially encouraged families to enjoy their vacation. “Go away, have a good time, enjoy yourself,” he said – before tempering his message a few days later.

Canada nursing home reels from death of almost half its residents

With the second-highest number of cases in the country, Ontario has previously said its supply of personal protective equipment was run critically low – a challenge exacerbated after American officials temporarily halted a new shipment of respirators.

“We’ve been asked to be more parsimonious with our safety equipment, to not change our masks unless we think that we’ve been exposed or somehow compromised,” said James Maskalyk, an emergency room doctor in downtown Toronto.

“But we have enough for today. And at this point, that’s what matters. We’re mindful that everyone on the planet is in the same situation that we are.”

Resources in Ontario have not yet been fully strained – as they have in hospitals in New York or northern Italy. But Kulvinder Gill, head of Concerned Ontario Doctors, cautioned that celebration would be premature.

“On the frontlines we are essentially blind to the true reality of Covid-19 in our province,” she said. “We have the lowest per capita testing in Canada, so we are only capturing a very tiny fraction of known cases.”

 Justin Trudeau has emphasized his country’s ‘Team Canada’ 
approach to fighting the virus. 
Photograph: Dave Chan/AFP via Getty Images

With current measures remaining in place, Ontario has suggested as many as 15,000 people could die over the course of the pandemic, which officials say could last as long as two years. But experts say the province’s testing is inadequate and fails to capture the spread of the virus.

“Modelling is only as good as the data that you have. And we have such terrible data that it’s impossible to come up with any sort of accurate modelling from it,” said Gill.

In the western Prairie provinces, doctors have watched with a cautious optimism after surveying the battles outside their borders.

“A lot of us feel like it’s the calm before the storm,” said Brittany Ellis, an emergency room physician involved in pandemic response planning in the city of Saskatoon. “But Saskatchewan is more sparsely populated than other regions – and we also have the benefit of time. Many contagious diseases tend to start in places that have extensive international travel. We really don’t have a lot of that.

RIGHT TO LIFE GOVT DOES NOT CARE ABOUT LIFE, JUST OIL
In neighbouring Alberta, which has long tied its fortunes to the price of oil, the provincial government has been forced to manage both an unfolding pandemic and an energy crisis. Last week, the price of Canadian oil dipped below $4 a barrel.

“The shutdown in much of our economy is having a devastating impact,” said the premier, Jason Kenney, who suggested as much as a quarter of the province’s workforce could be out of a job. An unemployment rate of 25% would be worse than anything experienced in the rest of the country. At the same time, the province has forecast as many as 3,100 deaths and hundreds of thousands of Covid-19 infections.


Experts fear that the worst of the pandemic is likely to be felt in remote Indigenous communities, where many residents already suffer from underlying health issues.

“You’ve got populations that are malnourished, living in overcrowded conditions with higher levels of co-morbidities – chronic obstructive lung disease, cardiovascular disease and obesity – that are now going to get a virus,” said Anna Banerji, director of global and indigenous health at the University of Toronto’s faculty of medicine. “Especially with the overcrowding, I’m sure this virus will spread quickly.”

She and colleagues have started a petition demanding the federal government allocate more resources to Indigenous communities, many of which are only accessible by air.

On Tuesday, the federal government announced plans to increase funding for communities in the north. An aid package of C$130m ($94m) allocates funds to help the territories prepare their health and social services and subsidize the cost of food and hygiene products. The new funding is separate from the C$305m previously announced with the aim of helping Indigenous communities prepare for the virus.

But territorial leaders worry the funding, which they have requested for weeks, has come too late.

“Nunavut is chronically underfunded, and we cannot be expected to deal with this new global reality from behind the starting line,” said Nunavut premier Joe Savikataaq.

And while regions like Nunavut have so far been spared an outbreak, Banerji believes it is only a matter of time before the virus arrives.

“If a whole bunch of people become sick in the Canadian Arctic or in these remote communities, and these people are getting sick from the coronavirus, then what happens?” she said. “People will die.”
Will coronavirus shock the global economy into long-term thinking?

The state has had to pump in money to prop up a system in which too many people were hanging on by their fingertips

When the market breaks down it returns to Keynesianism 
Larry Elliott Wed 15 Apr 2020 
Larry Elliott is the Guardian’s economics editor
 

‘It would be an act of supreme folly to write off 2020 as an aberration and assume that everything can return to normal.’ Closed shops and businesses in Cardiff, March 2020. Photograph: Matthew Horwood/Getty Images

The financial markets think the worst is over. Share prices have largely been rising for the past week (although on Tuesday they went down) on the basis that some countries are starting to lift the lockdown restrictions imposed to limit the Covid-19 pandemic. Amid sighs of relief all round on Wall Street, the hope is that it will soon be business as usual.

In one sense, it’s not an unreasonable thought because the virulence of this particular strain of the coronavirus could not have been predicted. It was what economists call an exogenous shock: something that has a big impact, but comes from outside the system itself.

So, the argument goes, when the International Monetary Fund says that the global economy is going to suffer its worst year since the Great Depression or the UK’s Office for Budget Responsibility pencils in a slump unmatched for three centuries, that has absolutely nothing to do with the way the world economy is organised or run. Covid-19 does not mean the end of globalisation: it is a freak of nature, that’s all.

The view that nothing fundamental will change as a result of the twin health and economic emergencies may be right. There was, after all, much talk of how global capitalism was going to be fundamentally reformed after the banking crisis of 2008, but that’s all it turned out to be: talk.

In retrospect, the big lesson to be learned from 2008 was that the global economic system was operating on terrifyingly thin margins. Banks were taking ever-bigger bets on products they didn’t really understand but had very little capital in reserve to cover any losses. There was virtually no slack in the system and this almost proved fatal when the bets went spectacularly wrong.

The same applies now, only on a much bigger scale. The financial system may perhaps be more resilient than it was in 2008 but the global economy as a whole operates with the scantiest of safety buffers and with no margin for error. And that’s true from top to bottom: from the ultra-low interest rates that have been keeping the global economy afloat for the past decade to the scramble to find intensive-care beds in the NHS. When politicians say that the fundamentals of the economy are sound, they could not be more wrong.


Here’s the real picture. The past 30 years have seen global markets – especially global financial markets – increase in both size and scope. Long and complicated supply chains have been constructed: goods moving backwards and forwards across borders in the pursuit of efficiency gains; hot money flowing into emerging markets looking for high returns and flowing out again just as quickly at the first sign of trouble.

The development of stronger global institutions might have acted to constrain some of the excesses of transnational capital but not since the 1930s has multilateral cooperation been so lacking. The only effective form of international coordination comes from central banks, which ensure that money is cheap and plentiful. Any attempt to raise interest rates to what would once have been considered more normal levels is met by stock market panic and is quickly reversed.

But this is not just a big-picture story. The reason the UK government has been pumping so much money into the health service, into wage subsidies, into support for the self-employed and for small businesses is that they were all only just managing before the crisis broke.
The weakest decade for real-wage growth since the 19th century meant that millions of workers are only one payday away from penury. For most, self-employment is a daily struggle to make enough to live on. Small businesses, such as family-run restaurants, operate on wafer-thin margins. For them, the cost of taking out an emergency government-backed loan (assuming they could get one) would wipe out their profits for the next two years.

What this amounts to is a world clinging on by its fingertips, even in what passes for the “good times”. Anybody who seriously believes that there are no lessons to be learned from what has happened globally since China warned the World Health Organization on New Year’s Eve that it might have a problem on its hands is living in a bubble. It would be an act of supreme folly to write off 2020 as an aberration and assume that everything can return to normal.
Some changes look inevitable. Companies will shorten their supply chains as a result of the disruption caused by the pandemic. Extra money will have to be found for health systems so that they can operate with more spare capacity. Covid-19 has exposed the risks of a country such as Britain running down its domestic manufacturing base and relying so heavily on financial services. Investment bankers are surplus to requirements when the country is short of testing kits and PPE.

Other reforms look tougher. There is a need for a stronger international system to both manage the fight against the pandemic and minimise the economic damage it has caused. No country can operate a go-it-alone approach to Covid-19, despite what Donald Trump might think.
Ultimately, the shock from the banking crisis was not big enough to effect real change. This one might be different, and not simply because people are losing their lives in such numbers. Avowedly free-market governments like the UK’s have not gone a long way to nationalising their labour markets because they have had a Damascene conversion to socialism: they have done so because of the inherently fragile nature of their economies. The best argument those pressing for capital controls, wealth taxes and – like me – a green new deal, is that they will make the world more resilient in the next time of crisis. Because, as things stand, there will be a next time.
Some changes look inevitable. Companies will shorten their supply chains as a result of the disruption caused by the pandemic. Extra money will have to be found for health systems so that they can operate with more spare capacity. Covid-19 has exposed the risks of a country such as Britain running down its domestic manufacturing base and relying so heavily on financial services. Investment bankers are surplus to requirements when the country is short of testing kits and PPE.
Other reforms look tougher. There is a need for a stronger international system to both manage the fight against the pandemic and minimise the economic damage it has caused. No country can operate a go-it-alone approach to Covid-19, despite what Donald Trump might think.

Ultimately, the shock from the banking crisis was not big enough to effect real change. This one might be different, and not simply because people are losing their lives in such numbers. Avowedly free-market governments like the UK’s have not gone a long way to nationalising their labour markets because they have had a Damascene conversion to socialism: they have done so because of the inherently fragile nature of their economies. The best argument those pressing for capital controls, wealth taxes and – like me – a green new deal, is that they will make the world more resilient in the next time of crisis. Because, as things stand, there will be a next time.
Rita Wilson tells of 'extreme side effects' of experimental Covid-19 drug chloroquine
The singer, who was admitted to an Australian hospital with husband Tom Hanks, says she was given chloroquine after developing a fever of 38.9C



Naaman Zhou@naamanzhou Wed 15 Apr 2020 

 
Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson tested positive for coronavirus in March in Australia. The singer says she suffered ‘extreme side effects’ from chloroquine. Photograph: Monica Almeida/Reuters

The singer Rita Wilson has claimed to have suffered “extreme side effects” after being treated with the experimental Covid-19 drug chloroquine in an Australian hospital.

Wilson, who was touring Australia, and her husband, Tom Hanks, who was filming a Baz Luhrmann film about Elvis Presley, both tested positive for Covid-19 on 12 March while in Australia.

The drugs chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are used to treat malaria, but their ability to treat Covid-19 is still disputed by experts, despite being touted by the US president, Donald Trump, as a “gamechanger”.


Wilson and Hanks were admitted to Gold Coast University hospital in Queensland for treatment, where Wilson said she was given chloroquine after she developed a fever of 38.9C.

“They gave me chloroquine,” she told American TV channel CBS. “I know people have been talking about this drug. But I can only tell you that – I don’t know if the drug worked or if it was just time for the fever to break.

“My fever did break but the chloroquine had such extreme side effects, I was completely nauseous, I had vertigo and my muscles felt very weak … I think people have to be very considerate about that drug.”

A spokeswoman for Gold Coast University hospital would not confirm whether Hanks and Wilson were given chloroquine, but said that “selected patients” did receive the drug.

“Gold Coast Health has used a variety of medication in patients with more severe Covid-19,” a spokeswoman said. “Chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir-ritonavir have been used on selected patients.”
Trump proclaimed the chemical’s effectiveness in March, but the US’s top infectious diseases adviser, Dr Anthony Fauci, has warned that there is not enough medical evidence to prove that it is useful.


2:59 Trump grilled over continued promotion of hydroxychloroquine to treat coronavirus – video


Australian researchers have also said it could cause potentially life-threatening side-effects, such as heart damage.

In March, a man in Arizona died after taking chloroquine phosphate – a chemical used to clean fish tanks – after Trump’s advice. “Trump kept saying it was basically pretty much a cure,” his wife told NBC.

Last week, the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee – the expert panel on health emergencies – recommended against using the drugs in hospitals, contradicting the federal health department.

The department has told hospitals they can prescribe the drug “in a controlled environment in the treatment of severely ill patients in hospital”, after the government waived therapeutic goods registration requirements to fast-track their import into Australia.

Wilson and Hanks have both recovered from the illness, and said their blood had been taken for a study to determine the level of antibodies they developed.
CBS This Morning(@CBSThisMorning)

WATCH: In her first interview since her COVID-19 diagnosis, @RitaWilson says she's feeling great — and giving back.

Wilson told @GayleKing about the story behind her #HipHopHooray remix benefiting @MusiCares, her journey to recovery, and her symptoms when she first got sick. pic.twitter.com/yF3IZrFjCSApril 14, 2020

Q&A

What is hydroxychloroquine



Hydroxychloroquine, also known by its brand name, Plaquenil, is a drug used to treat malaria. It is a less toxic version of chloroquine, another malaria drug, which itself is related to quinine, an ingredient in tonic water.
A widely publicized study in France where 40 coronavirus patients were given hydroxychloroquine, with more than half experiencing the clearing of their airways within three to six days has led to it being touted in some quarters as a potential cure for Covid-19. This apparent improvement is important as it would curtail the timeframe in which infected people could spread Covid-19 to others.
However, experts have warned that the study is small and lacks sufficient rigour to be classed as evidence of a potential treatment. The French study followed work by Chinese researchers which suggested that hydroxychloroquine can slow infections by blocking the virus behind Covid-19 from entering cells in the body. But more recent, albeit small-scale, research from China has shown that patients who were treated with the drugs fought off coronavirus no more quickly than those who didn’t get it. Indeed, one patient given hydroxychloroquine severely worsened in condition while four patients on the medicine developed signs of liver damage and experienced diarrhoea.
Regardless of these findings, any drug being used for a certain purpose before full clinical trials are completed is, by definition, untested and unproven. It’s too early to say if hydroxychloroquine can have a major benefit or not. The European Medicines Agency, an agency of the EU, has said hydroxychloroquine should not be taken by coronavirus patients except for clinical trials or emergency use programs.
We scientists said lock down. But UK politicians refused to listen   

For 11 fateful days in March, the government ignored the best coronavirus advice. It must learn from that mistake

Helen Ward is professor of public health at Imperial College London
Wed 15 Apr 2020
‘On 12 March, the government alarmed public health experts by abandoning containment, community case-finding and contact-tracing would stop.’ Boris Johnson arrives at a news conference on 12 March. Photograph: Simon Dawson/PA

In mid-February a colleague mentioned that for the first time in his life he was more concerned than his mother, who had been relatively blase about the risks of Covid-19. It felt odd for him to be telling her to take care. We are both professors in a department of infectious disease epidemiology, and we were worried.

Two months on, that anxiety has not gone, although it’s also been joined by a sense of sadness. It’s now clear that so many people have died, and so many more are desperately ill, simply because our politicians refused to listen to and act on advice. Scientists like us said lock down earlier; we said test, trace, isolate. But they decided they knew better.

Am I being unfair? The government assures us that its decisions and timing are based on science, as if it is a neutral, value-free process resulting in a specific set of instructions. In reality, the science around coronavirus is in its infancy and developing daily, with researchers across the world trying to understand how the virus spreads, how the body responds – and how to treat it and control it. The speed at which our knowledge has increased is impressive, from the sequencing of the virus in January through to having candidate vaccines in early February.

Mathematical models are being refined to predict the extent and speed of spread and estimate the impact of control methods. My own group is studying the response of communities, showing how the epidemic is amplifying existing social inequalities. People with the lowest household income are far less likely, but no less willing, to be able to work from home or to self-isolate.

But while scientists carry out observations and experiments, testing, iterating and discovering new knowledge, it is the role of policymakers to act on the best available evidence. In the context of a rapidly growing threat, that means listening to experts with experience of responding to previous epidemics.

When I say that politicians “refused to listen”, I am referring to the advice and recommendations coming from the World Health Organization, from China and from Italy. The WHO advice, based on decades of experience and widely accepted by public health leaders and scientists around the world was clear – use every possible tool to suppress transmission. That meant testing and isolating cases, tracing and quarantining contacts, and ramping up hygiene efforts.

The UK did well in the early phase, but then, on 12 March, the government alarmed many public health experts by abruptly abandoning containment and announcing that community case-finding and contact-tracing would stop. The aim was no longer to stop people getting it, but to slow it down while protecting the vulnerable.

The evidence underpinning the government’s decision appears in a report from 9 March summarising the potential impact of behavioural and social interventions. The report did not consider the impact of case-finding and contact-tracing, but it did suggest that the biggest impact on cases and deaths would come from social distancing and the protection of vulnerable groups.

And yet social distancing was not recommended then. That day, 12 March, after hearing with disbelief the government announcement that didn’t include widespread social distancing, I recommended to my team at Imperial that they should work from home for the foreseeable future. Indeed, I have not been to my office since.

Neither the advice nor the science were followed that week. My colleagues, led by Neil Ferguson, published a report on 16 March estimating that without strong suppression, 250,000 people could die in the UK. The government responded that day with a recommendation for social distancing, avoiding pubs and working from home if possible. But there was still no enforcement, and it was left up to individuals and employers to decide what to do. Many people were willing but unable to comply as we showed in a report on 20 March. It was only on 23 March that a more stringent lockdown and economic support was announced.

Between 12 and 23 March, tens, if not hundreds of thousands, of people will have been infected. Boris Johnson himself may well have been infected that week, and his stay in the intensive care unit may have been avoided if the government had shifted to remote working on 12 March. The current best estimate is that around 1% of those infected will die.

So where to now? Once again, public health experience, including modelling, leads to some very clear recommendations. First, find cases in the community as well as hospitals and care homes; isolate them, and trace their contacts using a combination of local public health teams and digital tools.

Second, know your epidemic. Track the epidemic nationally and locally using NHS, public health and digital surveillance to see where cases are continuing to spread. This will be essential so that we can start to lift the lockdown while shielding the population from hotspots of transmission. Build community resilience by providing local support for vulnerable people affected by the virus and the negative impact of the control measures.

Third, ensure transmission is suppressed in hospitals, care homes and workplaces through the right protective equipment, testing, distancing and hygiene. Investigate the differential effects on black and minority ethnic groups, and provide appropriate protection.

Fourth, ensure that the most vulnerable, socially and medically, are fully protected through simple access to a basic income, rights for migrants, and safety for those affected by domestic violence.

Many, including the Labour leader, Keir Starmer, say that now is not the time for blame. I am not looking to blame – but for scrutiny so that lessons can be learned to guide our response. We need to avoid further mistakes, and ensure that the government is hearing, and acting on, the best advice.


How coronavirus changed the world in three months – video

Brazil congress demands JairJair Bolsonaro releases results of his Covid-19 tests

  • President has consistently downplayed threat of coronavirus
  • 23 people who accompanied Bolsonaro on US trip tested positive
 President Jair Bolsonaro dispenses with a mask and touches his face as he visits a temporary field hospital, amid the coronavirus outbreak, in Aguas Lindas, state of Goiás,Brazil, at the weekend, Photograph: Adriano Machado/Reuters
Brazil’s congress has given President Jair Bolsonaro an ultimatum to release the results of his coronavirus tests within 30 days, amid widespread speculation that he has been infected with Covid-19.
“Brazil needs the truth! Was the president infected?” said the motion proposed by the leftist congressman Rogério Correa and agreed by leaders of the chamber of deputies.
The motion noted that 23 people who accompanied Bolsonaro on a visit to the US in March have since tested positive. Several of them attended a dinner at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort.
Since then, Bolsonaro has refused to share the outcome of two coronavirus tests he underwent – even refusing a freedom of information act request – leading to widespread speculation that he had contracted some form of Covid-19.
In March, he said that his athletic background meant that if he did catch coronavirus he “wouldn’t feel anything or at the very worst it would be like a little flu or a bit of a cold”.
Bolsonaro has attacked social isolation measures and state governors who introduced them, ignoring the advice of his own health minister, Luiz Mandetta, to mingle with supporters. Last week he was filmed shaking an elderly woman’s hand after wiping his nose on the back of his wrist.
“If it shows he had the disease it shows how irresponsible his behaviour was and how he put these people’s lives at risk,” said Maurício Santoro, a professor of international relations at the State University of Rio de Janeiro. “It creates a whole political discussion about truth and transparency.”
For more than a week, Bolsonaro has reportedly been on the verge of sacking Mandetta for indirectly criticising his behaviour and the mixed messages the government has sent out.
On Wednesday Mandetta appeared to accept that he would soon be out of the job, telling reporters that Bolsonaro wanted a different approach from his own, which was “based on the information that we have, based on science.”
Brazil has more than 28,000 confirmed coronavirus cases and 1,736 deaths.
If the presidency minister, Jorge Oliveira, fails to comply with congress’s order, he could be charged with a “crime of responsibility” but there is no direct threat to Bolsonaro’s mandate, said Eloísa Machado, a professor of constitutional law at São Paulo’s Getúlio Vargas Foundation. But the move “damages the president’s position against isolation”, she said.


US JOINT CHIEF'S CHAIRMAN SAYS:
 'Weight of evidence' that Covid-19 did not originate in a lab

Julian Borger in Washington, The Guardian•April 14, 2020


The Pentagon’s top general has said that US intelligence has looked into the possibility that the coronavirus outbreak could have started in a Chinese laboratory, but that the “weight of evidence” so far pointed towards “natural” origins.

The chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, Gen Mark Milley, was speaking on the day of a Washington Post report about state department cables in 2018 in which US diplomats raised safety concerns about the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) which was conducting studies of coronavirus from bats.

“During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory,” a cable dated 19 January 2018 said, according to the Post.

The diplomats urged further US support for the laboratory to address the concerns, but no support was given, at a time when the Trump administration was cutting back on the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) outreach abroad.

Related: Trump scapegoating of WHO obscures its key role in tackling pandemic

Beijing’s official version of the start outbreak was the Covid-19 virus (Sars-CoV-2) was transmitted to humans from animals at Wuhan’s wild animal markets, though some Chinese officials have circulated conspiracy theories suggesting it was engineered in a US bioweapons laboratory.

The cables reported by the Washington Post have emerged at a time when the administration is seeking to focus blame for the pandemic on China and the World Health Organization. The Republican senator Tom Cotton has raised the possibility that the pandemic was a deliberate Chinese bioweapon attack, though he has argued natural transmission from animals to humans, or a lab accident, were more likely scenarios.
“There’s a lot of rumour and speculation in a wide variety of media, blog sites, etc,” Milley told reporters at the Pentagon on Tuesday. “It should be no surprise to you that we’ve taken a keen interest in that, and we’ve had a lot of intelligence look at that. And I would just say at this point, it’s inconclusive, although the weight of evidence seems to indicate natural. But we don’t know for certain.”

Most scientists say that this coronavirus probably originated in bats but found its way to humans through an intermediary animal.

There is no conclusive evidence that this happened at Wuhan’s notorious “wet” markets where wild animals were sold for meat. Analysis of the first 41 Covid-19 patients in medical journal the Lancet found that 27 of them had direct exposure to the Wuhan market. But the same analysis found that the first known case did not.
Universal Denies WGA East’s “Union Busting” Accusation In Dispute Over Now-Defunct Peacock Productions – Update

David Robb,Deadline•April 15, 2020 NBC












Click here to read the full article.

UPDATED with NBCUniversal response, 1:49 PM: The WGA East today accused NBCUniversal of “union busting” in a dispute over the shuttering of its now-defunct Peacock Productions, formerly the in-house nonfiction production wing of NBC News. The guild, which had a contract with Peacock, says that many of the unit’s former writer-producers have been reassigned to the newly created NBC News Studios, which doesn’t have a contract with the guild.

The guild, which filed an unfair labor practices (ULP) complaint last month with the National Labor Relations Board, filed another one today.

“NBC News is continuing the work of Peacock Productions under a different banner, using Peacock Productions employees,” the guild claims. “There is one key difference: the company is refusing to apply the WGAE collective bargaining agreement to any of those employees.”

“This cynical maneuver is intended to bust the union, to continue the company’s years-long effort to reject its employees’ decision to be part of the WGAE, and to bargaining collectively on critical workplace issues,” said Lowell Peterson, the guild’s executive director. “Freelance employees creating nonfiction programs must be covered by the WGAE collective bargaining agreement, which was the product of years of struggle by freelance writer-producers, and which protects their interests and reflects real gains in employment terms and conditions.”

NBCUniversal denied the allegations in issued a statement Wednesday afternoon. “We have not seen the filing yet, but based on what’s in press reports, we strongly refute what’s being alleged,” a spokesperson said. “We have, in writing, requested to meet several times with the WGA East, and they have not responded. We continue to welcome the opportunity to have a meaningful conversation with them.”

Peacock Productions, which closed down on March 2, was part of NBC News operations that created nonfiction television series for NBC and other networks. “A number of years ago,” the guild said, “the writer-producers at Peacock unionized with the WGA East. Management refused to honor the employees’ decision and spent years fighting against it at the NLRB. Ultimately, the NLRB ordered the company to recognize the WGAE as the employees’ collective bargaining representative, and negotiations ensued. In January 2019, the employees ratified their first WGAE collective bargaining agreement, which included many gains unique in the nonfiction television world, like portable health care.”

But in January 2020, Peacock notified the guild that it would no longer employ writer-producers. “Instead, the company said it would continue to produce nonfiction programs at another part of the NBC News operation, which apparently will have the name ‘NBC News Studios,’” the guild said in a statement. “The WGAE asked for clarification and details. Because the company refused to provide all of the information, last month the union had to file a ULP with the NLRB – after which the company admitted that a number of former ‘Peacock’ employees would now work at ‘NBC News Studios’ producing nonfiction programs. In fact, the guild learned that all the key leadership from ‘Peacock’ will remain at the helm of ‘NBC News Studios,’ in addition to many Peacock writer-producers.

“In response to what the guild learned from last month’s ULP, the WGAE today filed another ULP against NBC at the NLRB. As that charge states, the guild contract must be applied to the freelance producers and associate producers who are hired, and who will be hired in the future, to craft nonfiction programs at ‘NBC News Studios’ – or whatever new label the company might use to cover nonfiction television production. That’s what the writer-producers struggled for so many years to achieve, and that’s what the law requires.”
As deaths mount, delivery workers say they're kept in the dark over who's sick
Lisa Riordan Seville and Adiel Kaplan and Samantha Springer,NBC News•April 14, 2020

Rumors about the manager with the virus started to spread around Worldport, UPS' sprawling air hub in Louisville, Kentucky, earlier this month. Employees texted one another to ask whether they'd heard about Roml Ellis, the well-liked 55-year-old who worked the night shift. They'd heard he was sick, that he'd been hospitalized and then that he'd died.

UPS employees said that despite asking management repeatedly about their sick co-worker, they were kept in the dark as the company cited medical privacy concerns. On April 6, in response to a question from reporters, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear confirmed that a UPS employee had died from COVID-19, the disease associated with the coronavirus. On Friday, after rumors began to fly between workers online, UPS announced that a second employee had died.

"It was all hush-hush," said a Worldport employee, one of more than two dozen delivery workers interviewed for this story who asked that their names be withheld for fear of losing their jobs. "The only reason we got the full details was because it was reported on the local news station."

As the coronavirus spreads through the ranks of the nation's delivery workers, employees and union representatives across the country said there has been a frustrating lack of communication with front-line employees about coronavirus cases from UPS and FedEx. Employees and union officials said that has bred fear and anxiety among more than 600,000 "essential workers" at the country's two largest corporate delivery companies.
IMAGE: FedEx in Washington, D.C.

At least three delivery workers have died from COVID-19 within the past week.

FedEx confirmed the death of one of its pilots. UPS said two employees at the Worldport hub have died within the last week, although a spokesperson declined to confirm their causes of death. Beshear confirmed that the first was linked to COVID-19, and the second death was also due to the virus, according to four employees and an internal UPS document provided to NBC News.

Neither FedEx nor UPS would say how many employees had been diagnosed with or died from COVID-19. FedEx said employees had been diagnosed "across the enterprise." UPS employees and union representatives said they had heard of confirmed cases in more than a dozen states.
UPS and FedEx have been touting their roles in the federal response to the pandemic. Both are participating in Project Airbridge, a new operation run by the White House's coronavirus task force to help distribute medical supplies across the country to help fight COVID-19.

But workers said their employers' refusal to share crucial information is leaving them vulnerable in their workplaces.

"How are any of us supposed to get ahead of a virus when we don't even know who's sick?" a Worldport employee asked.

As much of the country remains shut down, delivery workers have become even more vital, delivering food, medication and cleaning supplies to medical facilities and households across the U.S.

But as with many hospitals and the federal government, the swift spread of the virus caught the delivery industry on its heels. In recent weeks, the companies have scrambled to adjust, creating leave policies, figuring out how to practice social distancing and trying to find and distribute protective equipment and cleaning supplies.

Workers at both companies said they have begun to be provided masks, gloves and cleaning supplies. However, they said many are still working in close proximity — in the bellies of planes, in delivery trucks and in warehouses — and want to know whether their co-workers are sick so they can keep themselves and their families safe.

"We don't want to know people's names, but we do want to know if we were working in direct contact with somebody who's contagious," said a longtime UPS employee who works at the Worldport facility. "All we get from the supervisors is 'the only thing we know is what management tells us.'"

Workers at Worldport said that they received masks only the day after news of Ellis' death broke and that areas of the facility where about 11,000 people work are still not disinfected consistently. (Ellis' family members didn't respond to requests for comment.)

Less than a week after Ellis died, UPS announced that a second employee, who had been absent for 10 days, had passed away with COVID-19, according to four employees and a copy of the announcement provided to NBC News.

Citing its privacy policy, UPS declined to confirm the cause of death of the second employee, which was first reported by WDRB-TV of Louisville. But the company told NBC News that the health of its employees is a top priority.

"We are vigilantly taking steps to protect the health and welfare of our employees, customers, and the general public," spokesman Matt O'Connor wrote in an email.

The company said it alerts co-workers who may have come in close contact without disclosing the workers' identities and works with health officials to trace any potential spread. It also said that it makes sure to "clean and disinfect the work areas where that employee worked according to public health department recommendations before work resumes" and that it has increased disinfecting at its facilities generally.

O'Connor added that UPS informs local unions when a case is diagnosed but not all workers onsite, "as this is beyond the scope of guidance provided by public health officials."

Union officials in New York, Philadelphia and Arizona said they aren't always being told of cases, leaving their members feeling tense and vulnerable, including in areas like New York, the center of the pandemic.

"I don't know how they can say they're communicating when they are not," said Lou Barbone, a business agent with Teamsters local 804, which represents UPS workers in the New York City area. "The stewards don't know. I don't know. Members don't know."

"A lot of members are grateful to have jobs," Barbone added. "They're just genuinely concerned about their health and their families."

UPS said it has daily calls with labor representatives and informs them of cases at the facilities they represent. "We encourage union leaders who claim not to be receiving information to discuss this with their respective UPS labor relations representatives," O'Connor told NBC News.

Workers at FedEx said there's a similar lack of communication. At a Minnesota facility, for instance, two employees on different shifts said one was informed about a positive case in the building while the other wasn't.

"To be quite frank, there aren't any policies in place," said a manager for FedEx Ground in Nashville, Tennessee, who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution. "Every time any one of us brings up a concern about how to make the workers safer ... it's always a matter of 'oh, let's run this up the chain.'"

FedEx's structure poses an additional challenge. An estimated 100,000 employees who deliver around the country for FedEx Ground are employed through a network of contractors, in addition to the estimated 200,000 people the company employs directly. Those contract employees often don't get health insurance or sick leave through their jobs, and while FedEx may inform the contractor when someone comes up positive, the information may not move down the chain.

"There's no communication about what to do if you're sick," said a FedEx Ground driver in the Kansas City, Missouri, area. "No mention of if we'll still get paid if we get sick."

A FedEx spokesperson told NBC News that "the safety and well-being of our team members and customers is our top priority." The company said it has bought and distributed millions of masks and is "actively promoting social distancing on the job," including changing work processes where possible.

But package handlers who move thousands of boxes a day said it's virtually impossible to stay 6 feet apart. Some worry that it will only get worse as FedEx hires more people to keep up with growing demand sparked by the pandemic.

"We're pushing more people into the same space with no measures to protect the people we have working there now," the Nashville manager said. "It's like sardines in a can."

'Social unrest' warning as Modi looks to extend India's lockdown



Shoppers buy supplies at a market in AhmedabadShoppers buy supplies at a market in Ahmedabad (AFP Photo/SAM PANTHAKY)


Devotees light lamps on the 399th birth anniversary of the ninth Guru, Teg Bahadur, at the Golden Temple in AmritsarDevotees light lamps on the 399th birth anniversary of the ninth Guru, Teg Bahadur, at the Golden Temple in Amritsar (AFP Photo/NARINDER NANU)

April 12, 2020

Key industries are warning of social unrest unless India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi makes concessions when he announces any extension Tuesday to a three-week pandemic-lockdown for the country's 1.3 billion people.

The lockdown ends at midnight Tuesday, but several state chief ministers have already said they plan to extend it for at least two more weeks.

With time running out, the government has not laid out any national plan.

Modi, who is to make a nationwide address at 0430 GMT Tuesday, is caught between growing fears over the pandemic -- cases have surged in recent days to more than 9,150 with 308 deaths -- and the need to get the economy moving again.

Reserve Bank of India governor Shaktikanta Das called the coronavirus an "invisible assassin" that could cause havoc with the economy.

The national restaurants association, which said its members employed seven million people, warned Monday there could be "social unrest" if it did not receive financial relief.

The government is considering making people stay at home in Delhi, Mumbai and other major cities while opening up rural parts of the country that have so far been relatively untainted by coronavirus, according to some reports.

Media have predicted it would be relaxed for key sectors such as agriculture.

With thousands of trucks carrying food and other essential produce being stuck at internal borders, the home ministry has already sent out new orders to states calling for better movement of essentials.

Farms, still the bedrock of the economy, are heading into their most important harvest time of the year with massive transport of crops that earn money to finance many villages for months.

The commerce ministry has also reportedly urged the government to consider opening more activities "with reasonable safeguards" even if the lockdown is extended.

The government has a long list of sectors which want to start work again.

The car industry, already hit by the economic slowdown, has been pressing to reopen factories.

The possibility of arranging staggered shifts for different sectors is also being considered by authorities as a way of cutting down contact between workers.

Economic growth slowed to about five percent in months ahead of the coronavirus crisis.

Now some analysts say growth could slump to 1.5-2.0 percent this year -- way below the minimum needed to provide jobs for the millions coming onto India's labour market each month.
India's poor hit hardest as coronavirus spreads and lockdown is extended

Arshad R. Zargar,CBS News•April 14, 2020


New Delhi — Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced Tuesday that India's nationwide lockdown would be extended until May 3 to fight the spread of the coronavirus. The lockdown that began on March 25 was originally scheduled to end Tuesday, but Modi said all state governments and experts had agreed that it must be extended.

The country of over 1.3 billion people has started to see a sharp rise in the number of COVID-19 cases: Modi's announcement came as the number of confirmed cases in the country passed 10,000, with almost 350 deaths.
Sudhakar Kumar, (center wearing a mask) a laborer from central India's Uttar Pradesh state, is seen with family members on a sidewalk in New Delhi, India, where they've been living since the country's nationwide coronavirus lockdown put him out of work. CBS/Arshad R. Zargar

The prime minister promised, however, some relaxation of the lockdown after April 20 in areas where there is success in curbing the coronavirus. He said limited economic activity would be allowed to resume in such areas.

India, like every nation with a major outbreak, is walking a tightrope as the government weighs tough measures to save lives against the damage inflicted on a shutdown economy.

While the vast majority of businesses have been ordered to close, more than 450 million Indians work in informal sectors, and most of them have also been left jobless under the lockdown. Millions of these workers were already poor and, along with a daunting homeless population, they've been hit hard by the epidemic.

The government is running community kitchens and providing free bulk grain to the poor and homeless, but it's not reaching everyone.


Abdul Aziz sits on the rickshaw he would normally drive to earn money in New Delhi, India, on April 13, 2020, almost three weeks into a government shutdown aimed at slowing the spread of the coronavirus that has put him out of work. CBS/Arshad R. Zargar

Abdul Aziz, who pulls a rickshaw in New Delhi, has been without work since the lockdown began. He told CBS News on Monday that he's started begging to feed his family. "I haven't earned a penny since the lockdown," he said.

There are hundreds of millions of daily wage earners like Aziz across India — many of them living hand-to-mouth even before the anti-virus measures took away their livelihoods.

For Sudhakar Kumar, a 33-year-old from central India's Uttar Pradesh state, work as a daily laborer in Delhi dried up when the virus struck. Like thousands of other migrant workers in India's big cities, he had no way to get back to his hometown hundreds of miles away when the lockdown was implemented, so he decided to stay in Delhi.

Now he's living with his wife and two children on a sidewalk in the crowded capital, begging for food and money to survive.

"I am desperate to go to my hometown in Uttar Pradesh. At least we will get some food there," Kumar told CBS News, wondering aloud when public transport might be allowed to resume.


Sudhakar Kumar, a 33-year-old laborer from central India's Uttar Pradesh state who has been forced to live on the streets of Delhi, begging to survive, with his wife and two children after his work dried up amid a nationwide lockdown to curb the spread of the coronavirus, is seen on April 13, 2020. CBS/Arshad R. Zargar

Modi has acknowledged the lockdown's heavy toll, but says it's necessary to save lives. He says the measures have been successful in helping to contain the virus, and that India is doing much better than many developed nations.

"India's efforts are being lauded," he said. "If we had not acted fast, it is frightening to think what it would have been like today."

Last week the government claimed that, had the lockdown not been imposed, the number of coronavirus cases in India would have risen to 820,000 by April 15.

The government is expected to issue guidelines Wednesday night on how lockdown measures will be relaxed in areas that show sufficient improvement in the fight against the disease.