Tuesday, October 04, 2022

UK
Tory chaos as Truss refuses to rule out real-terms benefit cuts

PM faces rebellion after going back on earlier Conservative promises

Prime Minister Liz Truss arrives for the Conservative Party annual conference at the International Convention Centre in Birmingham. Picture date: Monday October 3, 2022.

THE Tories plunged into yet more chaos today as Liz Truss faced mounting anger for refusing to commit to increasing benefits in line with inflation.

The Prime Minister faced a new rebellion from within her party amid bitter infighting at the Conservative Party conference after refusing to say she would stick to the promise on benefits given by her predecessor Boris Johnson.

It follows Monday’s humiliating climbdown over heavily criticised plans to give huge tax cuts to the super-rich.

Ms Truss also refused to rule out raising the state retirement age today, saying she was resisting speculation on “all kinds of decisions that haven’t yet been made” but insisted she would “do what it takes” to address the economic outlook.

Labour shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves condemned the Tories, saying: “The idea that the government can afford to give tax cuts to the wealthiest but not uprate benefits in line with inflation, I think, is grotesque.”

The latest policy debacle means the PM has now sparked a split within her Cabinet, a rift with backbenchers and caused a wave of anger among campaign groups. Downing Street has not denied Ms Truss could decide to instead increase benefits in line with wages, which are falling far behind inflation.

Benefits are usually uprated in line with the consumer price index rate of inflation from September, with the rise coming into effect the following April.

Katie Schmuecker of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation said the PM “must be clear that she won’t target cuts at those on the lowest incomes who have been struggling for months to feed their families, cook hot food and heat their homes.”

Marie Curie charity’s Dr Sam Royston warned: “There are no two ways about this: a real-terms cut to benefits would be a direct cut to support for dying people.”

Michael Clarke, head of information programmes at poverty charity Turn2us, said: “Millions of us are already left without enough money to live on. The government must keep its promise to raise benefits to match inflation this April.”

Commons leader Penny Mordaunt, a rival candidate to Ms Truss in the recent leadership contest, was first to break Tory ranks when she told reporters that it makes sense to increase benefits in line with inflation, and Work & Pensions Secretary Chloe Smith is also reported to have deep reservations over benefit cuts.

Wales Secretary Robert Buckland became the second Cabinet member to come out against the leadership’s plans.

He said: “The safety net is an important part of what a one-nation Conservative is all about.”

Former Cabinet ministers Michael Gove and Damian Green have already spoken out against failing to raise benefits in line with inflation.

Mr Green said the PM would probably not get benefit cuts through Parliament and former Tory Party chairman Sir Eric Pickles agreed, saying it was almost certain the government didn’t have the support to win a Commons vote.

Former Tory MP Anna Soubry tweeted: “If this government cuts the value of benefits to fund tax cuts for the wealthiest, we must exercise our democratic right and take our protest to the streets.

“This government has no mandate for such an appalling shift in policy.”

Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng has said the government is committed to maintaining the so-called triple lock on pensions.

The triple lock guarantees that pensions are uprated each year by inflation, earnings or 2.5 per cent, whichever is higher.

British PM Liz Truss refuses to rule out welfare cuts to fund economic plan

ANDREW MACASKILL AND KYLIE MACLELLAN
BIRMINGHAM, ENGLAND
REUTERS

British Prime Minister Liz Truss and Chancellor of the Exchequer 
Kwasi Kwarteng visit a construction site in Birmingham, central England, on Oct. 4.

Britain’s new Prime Minister Liz Truss triggered a fresh row in her party on Tuesday by suggesting that she could limit increases in benefit payments by less than soaring inflation as she seeks ways to fund her tax-cutting growth plan.

Britain’s new leader has endured a tumultuous time since she came to power on Sept. 6, first leading national mourning for Queen Elizabeth before releasing an economic package that immediately roiled financial markets.

Seeking to snap Britain out of more than 10 years of economic stagnation, Truss and her finance minister Kwasi Kwarteng set out £45-billion of unfunded tax cuts on Sept. 23 alongside promises to deregulate the economy to stoke growth.

On Monday they bowed to pressure to scrap the most divisive policy – eliminating the top rate of income tax for the highest earners – and are now working urgently on the full details of the plan and how they will be able to afford it without leaving a huge black hole in the country’s public finances.

“We have to look at these issues in the round. We have to be fiscally responsible,” Truss told BBC Radio when asked whether benefit payments would rise in line with record-high inflation to prevent the poorest in society from becoming poorer.

Immediately lawmakers in Truss’s Conservative Party – some fresh from forcing top tax rate reversal – opposed any move to reduce the increases in benefits at a time when millions are struggling with higher costs of food and energy.

Penny Mordaunt, who is in Truss’s cabinet of senior ministers, said benefits should rise in line with inflation. Damian Green, part of the Conservatives’ centrist faction, said he doubted any real-terms reduction would pass a parliamentary vote.

“I think there will be many of my colleagues who think that when you’re reaching for spending cuts, benefit payments are not the way to do it,” Green told BBC Radio. Another lawmaker, Roger Gale, also signalled his opposition.

Kwarteng has set Nov. 23 as the date for his next fiscal statement but the government is considering bringing that forward.

Truss became Britain’s fourth leader in six years last month, promising to reignite the economy and bring some political stability after the chaotic leadership of Boris Johnson.

Chosen by her party’s members, not the broader electorate, she was not the most popular candidate among the more than 350 Conservative members of parliament and her decision to stake out a tax cut plan and then concede defeat has left lawmakers and investors questioning her judgment and authority.

At the annual Conservative Party conference in Birmingham, central England, some lawmakers and commentators have questioned whether she has a mandate to take Britain back to a 1980s-style Reagonomics policy without a national election.

The Conservatives won the 2019 election with Johnson promising to increase spending on public services.

“It is not a great thing to sell the public on one type of package and vision, and then completely flip it and appear not to care,” Rachel Wolf, the co-author of the Conservatives 2019 manifesto, said at the start of the conference.

Investors have also taken fright at the new economic policy direction, hammering the value of British assets so hard that the Bank of England had to intervene last week with a package worth up to £65-billion to shore up the bond market.

Mohamed El-Erian, an adviser to financial services giant Allianz, said the government needed to get its house in order. “We are not a developing country and we need to stop acting like a developing country,” he told Sky News.

The BoE action has calmed markets, at least for now, while investors also took some comfort from the tax U-turn and the hoped-for move to bring forward the publishing date for the next fiscal plan from Nov. 23.

But Boris Glass, senior economist at S&P Global ratings agency, said Britain faced a difficult winter, and spending cuts could counter efforts to boost the economy.

“Unless strong medium-term growth can fully fund the extra spending, medium-term fiscal tightening appears inevitable, which may weigh on future growth,” he said.

Liz Truss Fails To Rule Out More U-Turns As Tory Benefits Rebellion Grows

The Conservative party conference has already seen two major government climbdowns.

By Kevin Schofield
04/10/2022 

Prime Minister Liz Truss leaving the Hyatt hotel in Birmingham, during the Conservative Party annual conference at the International Convention Centre in Birmingham. Picture date: Tuesday October 4, 2022.
JACOB KING VIA PA WIRE/PA IMAGES

Liz Truss has failed to rule out any more government U-turns as the Tory rebellion against plans to cut benefits in real terms gathers pace.

The prime minister was repeatedly asked in radio interviews this morning whether further climbdowns were coming after Kwasi Kwarteng abandoned plans to scrap the 45p income tax rate for the highest earners.

The chancellor then followed that up by bringing forward a Commons statement on how he plans to balance the books from November 23 until later this month

As revealed by HuffPost UK yesterday morning, the government is now coming under fresh pressure from Tory MPs to stick by Boris Johnson’s promise to increase benefits by the rate of inflation.

Asked on LBC whether there would be any more government U-turns, the PM said: “I am determined to carry on with this growth package - that’s what’s important to people - and that we bring the country with us.”

On the benefits bill, Truss refused to be drawn on whether it will increased by average earnings or the more expensive rate of inflation.

She told Radio 4’s Today programme: “We are going to have to make decisions about how we bring down debt as a proportion of GDP in the medium term.

“I am very committed to supporting the most vulnerable; in fact, in addition to the energy price guarantee we’re also providing an extra £1,200 to the poorest households.

“So we have to look at these issues in the round, we have to be fiscally responsible.”

Her comments came as Commons leader Penny Mordaunt became the first minister to publicly say benefits should rise by inflation.

She told Times Radio: “I’ve always supported - whether it’s pensions, whether it’s our welfare system - keeping pace with inflation. It makes sense to do so. That’s what I voted for before.”

Meanwhile, former cabinet minister Damian Green became the latest Tory MP to urge the government not to cut benefits in real terms

He told the Today programme: “If people are already struggling, and many of these people will be, then making them struggle more is not a sensible response to the problems.

“I completely agree with the prime minister when she says you’ve got to see this in the round, but in the round it doesn’t make sense to give an extra £1,200 of help for energy bills to the poorest people in the country and then say but we’re going to claw hundreds of pounds of that back.”

Green said that due to the size of the looming Tory rebellion, Truss would “probably” not be able to get a benefits cut through parliament.

He said: “I think there that will be many of my colleagues who think that when you’re reaching for spending cuts, benefit payments are not the way to do it.”

Liz Truss pledges ‘responsible’ approach to public finances but refused to commit to raising benefits

Liz Truss is facing pressure to increase benefits in line with inflation


By Claire Schofield
Tuesday, 4th October 2022

Liz Truss stressed she must take a “responsible” approach to the public finances as she faces a fresh battle with Tory rebels fighting real-terms cuts to benefits.

The Prime Minister is refusing to rule out a return to austerity or say whether welfare payments will be increased in line with rising inflation.

Critics who forced Truss and Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng to U-turn on plans to abolish the 45p tax rate for top earners on Monday are now stepping up pressure on the government to confirm benefits will be raised.

Mr Kwartneg has already made a second change of course to reassure markets and Tory rebels by bringing forward his medium-term fiscal plan along with independent forecasts, while Ms Truss has committed to increase pensions in line with prices. However, on benefits she said “we have to be fiscally responsible”.

Liz Truss is facing pressure to increase benefits in line with inflation 
(Photo: Getty Images)

What has Liz Truss said about raising benefits?

Benefits are usually uprated in line with the consumer price index (CPI) rate of inflation from September, with the rise coming into effect the following April.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that each percentage point rise in CPI adds £1.6 billion to welfare spending.

In an interview pre-recorded on Monday, Ms Truss told Tuesday’s BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “We are going to have to make decisions about how we bring down debt as a proportion of GDP in the medium term.

“I am very committed to supporting the most vulnerable; in fact, in addition to the energy price guarantee we’re also providing an extra £1,200 to the poorest households.

“So we have to look at these issues in the round, we have to be fiscally responsible.”

Ms Truss told LBC radio that “no decision has been made yet on benefit uprating”, adding that it “will be taken in due course”.

Pressed on why she has committed to increasing pensions but not benefits, she explained: “What I mean is when people are on a fixed income, when they are pensioners, it is quite hard to adjust.


“I think it’s a different situation for people who are in the position to be able to work.”

The Prime Minister added that she has committed to reducing debt as a proportion of national income over the medium term, adding that she is taking “ fiscal responsibility”.

What have other Tory MPs said?

Commons Leader Penny Mordaunt has publicly backed increasing benefits so that people can afford to pay their bills.


Ms Mordaunt, who ran against Ms Truss in the Tory leadership contest, said it “makes sense” to increase benefits in line with inflation.

She told Times Radio: “We want to make sure that people are looked after and that people can pay their bills.

“We are not about trying to help people with one hand and take away with another.”

Former Cabinet ministers Michael Gove and Damian Green have both spoken out with concerns about any failure to raise benefits in line with inflation, while Mel Stride, Tory chairman of the Treasury Select Committee, said he would have to “think long and hard” if asked to vote to increase benefits in line with earnings rather than inflation.

Mr Stride told Today: “The last time the benefits were uprated, because of the way the mechanism works they’re uprated in April but they’re pegged against the previous September’s inflation, and the way it worked last time was the uprating was just 3.1% because inflation was low the previous September, but of course inflation was much higher than that (in April).

“So we’re coming off the back actually of a kind of quite a strong real-terms squeeze on those benefits already so I think that will be a really tough call to make.”

Liz Truss faces dangerous Cabinet split over benefits cut as Penny Mordaunt breaks ranks amid growing Tory rebellion

Liz Truss has insisted she must take a “responsible” approach to the public finances, refusing to rule out real-terms cuts to benefits as she faces a Cabinet split and a fresh battle with Tory rebels.

By Alexander Brown
Tuesday, 4th October 2022, 

The Prime Minister is refusing to rule out a return to austerity or say whether welfare payments will be increased in line with soaring inflation.

Critics who forced a U-turn over the plan to abolish the 45p tax rate for top earners are now stepping up pressure on the Government to confirm benefits will be raised.

Commons Leader Penny Mordaunt has publicly backed increasing them in line with inflation so that people can pay their bills, warning many Tory colleagues have backed that before.

The Prime Minister Liz Truss has declined to rule out cutting benefits.

Downing Street has not denied suggestions that Ms Truss could resist rebels’ pressure to instead increase benefits in line with earnings, which are far lower than inflation.

Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng has already made a second change of course to reassure markets and Tory rebels by bringing forward his medium-term fiscal plan along with independent forecasts.

Ms Truss has committed to increase pensions in line with prices but on benefits said “we have to be fiscally responsible”.

In response to Ms Mordaunt’s comments, the Prime Minister said no decisions had yet been made.

Penny Mordaunt has publicly backed increasing benefits in line with inflation

During a visit to a construction site in Birmingham, she told broadcasters: “On the subject of benefits we have not yet made that decision.

“Of course there will be discussions about the way forward on commitments like benefits.”


Tory conference: Can Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng survive such a disastrous U-tu
rn


Asked if she was listening to the Cabinet minister, Ms Truss said: “I’m very clear that going into this winter we do need to help the most vulnerable.

“In addition to the energy price guarantee we’ve also made sure the most vulnerable households have an extra £1,200 and this Government will always help people get on in life, whilst making sure the most vulnerable are protected.”

Benefits are usually uprated in line with the consumer price index (CPI) rate of inflation from September, with the rise coming into effect the following April.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that each percentage point rise in CPI adds £1.6 billion to welfare spending.

In an interview pre-recorded on Monday, Ms Truss told Tuesday’s BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “We are going to have to make decisions about how we bring down debt as a proportion of GDP in the medium term…

“So we have to look at these issues in the round, we have to be fiscally responsible.”

Ms Truss conceded her start in No 10 has not been ideal, saying: “Is everything the Government (has) done absolutely perfect? No it’s not. I fully acknowledge that.”

While acknowledging it is a “challenging role,” she told broadcasters she is enjoying the top job.

Asked how she could deliver her policy pledges in the face of opposition from a significant cohort of her own MPs, Ms Truss insisted her Government will “continue to deliver”.

Earlier, when pressed on why she has committed to increasing pensions but not benefits, she told LBC radio: “What I mean is when people are on a fixed income, when they are pensioners, it is quite hard to adjust.

“I think it’s a different situation for people who are in the position to be able to work.”

Asked if she will rule out austerity, she said she has committed to reducing debt as a proportion of national income over the medium term.

“Well, I wouldn’t use the term you describe. What I’m talking about is fiscal responsibility,” she added.

Ms Truss sought to take some of the pressure off Mr Kwarteng as he faces criticism for the doomed plans to axe the 45% tax rate on earnings over £150,000.

She insisted that “we worked on it together” when questioned whose idea it was to abolish the tax.

But she refused to say she trusts her Chancellor when challenged by broadcasters, instead saying the two work “very closely”.

Defending the U-turn, Ms Truss said: “What we’ve done is we’ve listened to what people said on this issue.”

Mr Kwarteng had been planning to wait until November 23 to publish his medium-term fiscal plan and official forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).

But it is understood he will publish them later this month after he told the Tory party conference in Birmingham he will set out more “shortly”.

The Prime Minister did not rule out raising the state pension age beyond 67, telling reporters: “You’re asking me to speculate about all kinds of decisions that haven’t yet been made.”

Asked whether the Government will help with mortgage payments driven up by rising interest rates, she said: “These are difficult times but we will do as a Government what we can to help people get through at the same time as making sure we’re building the positive economy of the future.”

The Daily Mail reported that the Prime Minister plans to raise benefits in line with earnings rather than inflation and tell recipients it is unfair to receive a higher raise than workers.

Around two-fifths of Universal Credit claimants – some two million people – are in work and inflation has soared to around 10% while wage growth has fallen far behind on closer to 5%.

Ms Mordaunt, who ran against Ms Truss in the Tory leadership contest, said it “makes sense” to increase benefits in line with inflation.

“I’ve always supported, whether it’s pensions, whether it’s our welfare system, keeping pace with inflation. It makes sense to do so. That’s what I voted for before and so have a lot of my colleagues,” she told Times Radio.

“We want to make sure that people are looked after and that people can pay their bills. We are not about trying to help people with one hand and take away with another.”

Former Cabinet ministers Michael Gove and Damian Green have already spoken out with concerns about any failure to raise benefits in line with inflation.

Mel Stride, Tory chairman of the Treasury Select Committee, said he would have to “think long and hard” if asked to vote to increase benefits in line with earnings rather than inflation.

Brilliant Rishi Sunak gotcha catches Liz Truss off guard

ITV's Harry Horton relayed the concerns of a man from Yorkshire during his interview with the prime minister.

 by Jack Peat
2022-10-04 


Conservatives will attempt to shift the focus away from the economy following the humiliation of two U-turns on income tax cuts for the highest earners and the date of a new fiscal plan.

Keynote speeches at the Tory conference in Birmingham on Tuesday by Home Secretary Suella Braverman and Foreign Secretary James Cleverly will aim to set out the Government’s plans on immigration and commitment to support Ukraine.

Liz Truss will be keen to get the annual gathering back on track after she and Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng abandoned their plan to scrap the 45% rate for earnings over £150,000 in an astonishing U-turn to stave off a Tory revolt.

Growing economy


The Prime Minister admitted that it had not been an “easy” week but indicated she was sticking with the rest of the tax-cutting package.

She told the Express newspaper: “Express readers can rest assured: we will reward your trust.

“It has not been an easy week, but we have shown that we listen to people’s concerns and we are determined to deliver on our core plan for economic success and security.

“Our plan for growth is essential to get the British economy moving. Growth is the only way to create jobs, boost wages and fund our vital public services like the NHS.”

Sunak gotcha


Speaking to ITV’s Harry Horton, Truss said she understands why people are concerned about pensions and the economy.

Horton said: “I was listening to a man from Yorkshire recently who accused you of peddling fairy tale economics”, to which Truss responded:

“I understand people are concerned and that’s why we’ve stepped in.”

The ITV presenter said: “That man from Yorkshire was Rishi Sunak. He was right, wasn’t he?”

Scottish rent freeze and eviction ban to be treated as emergency Bill

A LAW that would temporarily freeze rents and ban evictions in Scotland will be treated as an emergency Bill following a vote in Holyrood today.

A motion to treat the Cost of Living (Tenant Protection) (Scotland) Bill as emergency legislation was passed by 86 votes to 28 this afternoon.

The Bill was further debated at stage one and stage two amendments were also taken, with a final vote on Thursday.

Scottish Tories voiced their opposition to the move, citing a lack of time for MSPs to properly understand the Bill – which was introduced and published on Monday evening.

Under the legislation, rent increases will be frozen at 0 per cent until March 31, backdated to September 6, and a moratorium on evictions would be introduced.

Patrick Harvie, the Scottish government’s tenants’ rights minister, said: “The legislation we’re proposing will help keep people in their homes and help stabilise their housing costs during this extraordinary costs crisis.

“We believe the package of measures strikes the right balance between this aim and ensuring landlords can continue to offer properties for rent and manage tenancies sustainably.”

The Bill will cover the private and social rented sector, as well as student accommodation.



Rent Freeze Bill to be treated as emergency legislation despite Tory efforts

By Abbi Garton-Crosbie@agc_reports
Multimedia Political Reporter

George Adam's motion to introduce the rent freeze bill as emergency legislation passed despite Miles Briggs's efforts

THE Scottish Parliament has agreed to treat the Rent Freeze Bill as emergency legislation despite Tory MSPs' efforts.

Ahead of a debate on the Cost of Living (Tenant Protection) (Scotland) Bill in Holyrood on Tuesday afternoon, MSPs were asked to vote on whether or not to treat the legislation as urgent to allow it to be scrutinised faster.

However, Tory MSP Miles Briggs tried twice to intervene and push the legislation into the long grass.


First arguing that the party didn't agree with the suspension of standing orders to allow the legislation to be debated, Briggs also claimed the Government hadn't consulted with the rental sector.

In a later intervention, Briggs tried to question if the bill was within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament but was shut down by the Presiding Officer who confirmed that she had ruled that it was.

The motion passed with 86 votes for yes and 28 for no, with no abstentions.

Moving the motion in Holyrood, Minister for Parliamentary Business George Adam said that the bill should be treated as urgent to "ensure that important protections are in place for people who rent their home".

Briggs, contesting the motion, said that the Tories did not support the suspension of standing orders to allow the Scottish Government to "force" through the bill. He said that there had not been enough time ahead of the debate for MSPs to scrutinise the Government's plans, as they were only revealed on Monday night.

Briggs urged other MSPs not to back the motion to allow the bill to be treated as an emergency

He said: "Scottish housing market is complex and unintended consequences are going to be clear from this bill.

"So the decision by SNP-Green ministers has been made without any consultation with the sector representative bodies, and it has resulted in much frantic activity since the announcement was made by the First Minister to assess the negative impacts this bill will clearly have."

Adam replied that the government "can't win" in the scenario painted by the Tories, after one Tory MSP last week reportedly claimed the legislation had been shared with the sector ahead of time.

He added: "Obviously, we're not actually talking to anyone whatsoever regards it, you know, you can't have it both ways basically.


"I find it quite strange that they would actually use that tact because, call me a cynic presiding officer, but I do not believe they believe in the legislation to start with and I think that is the fundamental difference between us."

When Adam tried to go on to discuss the impact of rising rents, particularly those on lower incomes, Briggs tried to intervene.

He fired back: "No, I think you should listen about people on lower incomes."

Briggs then raised a point of order, asking the presiding officer to confirm that the legislation is ECHR compliant and if amid rumours the bill will face a legal challenge had the Scottish Government informed Parliament that it would be competent to withstand such a challenge.

Alison Johnstone replied: "Thank you, Mr Briggs. I can confirm that I have published my statement to the effect that the bill is within the legislative competence of this Parliament."

MSPs are set to debate the emergency legislation on Tuesday afternoon following the motion passing.

Scottish bill to protect tenants through cost of living crisis




Author: Dan Benn

Job Title: Journalist

Company: Public Sector Executive

Published: October 4th 2022


The Scottish Government has confirmed that it has presented legislation to the Scottish Parliament that is looking to increase the amount of protection that tenants get from potential rent rises, as well as eviction action, during the current cost of living crisis.

The Cost of Living (Tenant Protection) (Scotland) Bill would see Ministers given the temporary power to cap rents for both private and social tenancies, with the cap set at 0% until at least 31st March 2023. This would effectively freeze rents, whilst the bill also includes further power to maintain or vary the rent ap over another two six-month periods.

Patrick Harvie, Tenants’ Rights Minister, said:

The cost of living crisis is an emergency situation demanding an emergency response. Even as energy, food bills and other day-to-day basics become more expensive, today’s legislation freezing rents and protecting tenants from eviction will give tenants stability in their homes and confidence about their housing costs.

“People who rent their homes ae more likely to live in poverty or be on low incomes than homeowners. As such they are particularly exposed to rising prices, and it is imperative that we bring in support for them urgently.

“We know that many landlords have been doing what they can to protect their tenants, but some tenants are being hit with large rent increases that are hard to justify. This legislation aims to protect all tenants from substantial increases, balancing the protections that are urgently needed for tenants with safeguards for those landlords who may also be impacted by the cost crisis.”

The protection from evictions will see the damages for unlawful evictions increased to a maximum of 36 months’ worth of rent, whilst also preventing enforcement of eviction actions that come about due to the cost of living crisis.

It is also worth noting that this legislation will also apply to students who are living in college or university halls of residence or other forms off purpose-built accommodation.
'Nobody' questioned slavery: DeSantis roasted for remarks about early U.S. history

Tiffany Terrell
October 03, 2022

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis visits 2019 Miami 
Open at the Hard Rock Stadium in 2019
. (Leonard Zhukovsky / Shutterstock.com)

A recent speech by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) is drawing criticism after he posted it to Twitter.

Multiple historians have accused Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) of misconstruing facts — in which he declared that "nobody had questioned" slavery until the American revolution.

DeSantis made the remarks Sept. 20. He argued that it was the "American revolution that caused people to question slavery."
roar-assets-auto.rbl.ms

"Nobody had questioned it before we decided as Americans that we are endowed by our creator with inalienable rights and that we are all created equal," he added. "Then that birthed abolition movements."

After making his speech, DeSantis posted a portion of it via Twitter and it quickly surpassed 900,000 views. It also attracted criticism. Speaking to Newsweek, historians weighed in with critical assessments of the Florida governor's remarks.

Professor Karin Wulf, who focuses on the study of eighteenth-century British American history at Brown University, said, "On at least three levels this is wrong. The idea of natural rights didn't originate with the American revolutionaries; they were reflecting ideas that were widespread among political thinkers, perhaps most obviously the 17th-century English political philosopher John Locke.

"The United States as a government did not act against slavery in any form until 1807 (prohibition of the Atlantic slave trade) and acted in key ways to protect it right up to the Civil War (the fugitive slave act)," she added.

"Most egregiously, the idea that 'no one' questioned slavery erases enslaved people themselves who were active in resisting slavery both as individuals and collectively and in refusing the logic and legality of their enslavement."

Seth Rockman, a Brown University associate professor who researches slavery economics, suggested that DeSantis' comments about Black Americans are part of a greater agenda stemming from white nationalism.

"DeSantis clearly has not done the reading for class, but his error here goes beyond ignorance of the last several decades of research on anti-slavery thinking and organizing over the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries," Rockman said. "What DeSantis does here is more pernicious because it places Black people outside the category of 'we' and 'Americans'— a move that can only be understood as part of DeSantis's strategy to ride white nationalism to higher office.

"This statement is yet another deliberate DeSantis move to 'trigger' or 'own the libs,' but let's think about the implications of DeSantis's statement here: When DeSantis says 'no one' he pretends that enslaved African and African-descended people aren't worth taking seriously as people whose opinions about slavery might matter, then or now," Rockman continued.

"The slaves who staged massive revolts in New York, South Carolina, and other mainland colonies throughout the colonial era, were they not questioning slavery?"
Wolves and beavers may be the key to restoring ecosystems in the American West

October 03, 2022
Celeste Headlee
Julia Corcoran
Allison Hagan

A beaver swims in the forest near Puerto Williams, Chile on February 05, 2020. 
(Pablo Cozzaglio/AFP via Getty Images)

Scientists have a plan to help restore wildlife habitat in the American West by moving grazing livestock off public lands and reintroducing two controversial species: wolves and beavers.

In a recent study published in the journal Bioscience, ecologists and biologists focus on what they call the Western Rewilding Network — 500,000 acres of federal public lands spread across 11 Western states. The plan is a response to the Biden administration's call to conserve 30% of American lands and waters by 2030.

WBUR is a nonprofit news organization. Our coverage relies on your financial support. If you value articles like the one you're reading right now, give today.

Ecologist George Wuerthner, executive director of Public Lands Media, co-authored the study and says the plan aims to address a significant loss of biodiversity in the U.S. by protecting the species’ habitats. The plan also provides a cost-effective way to store carbon in soil that can address extreme weather events like wildfires in the West, hurricanes back East and melting ice in the Arctic.

Wolves and beavers have massive impacts on their environments and other critters but are not always beloved by humans who live nearby.

“Both wolves and beavers are what we consider keystone species. Keystone refers to the idea of an archway and the last stone that goes in and holds the whole arch together,” Wuerthner says. “Certain species are like that for their ecosystems.”

For decades, wolves have been one of the most hotly debated issues in the West. By eating certain prey species, wolves have effects throughout the ecosystem. In Yellowstone National Park, for example, bringing back wolves caused red fox populations to increase because the number of coyotes declined.

As the top predator, wolves require large spaces, so reintroducing the species creates a big reserve area. Without wolves, livestock and some native species like elk can over-graze riparian areas, Wuerthner says.

“Riparian areas are the wetlands and vegetation affected by water along streams and waterways that are very crucial in Western landscapes for all kinds of wildlife,” he says. “Up to 70% of the native species in the West rely on riparian areas at some point in their lifecycle, so recovering riparian areas is really essential to this whole idea of trying to bring back habitat for wildlife.”

Humans often complain about industrious beavers, whose dams sometimes flood roads and areas people want to keep dry. These “ecosystem engineers” lived across the West at one point in history, Wuerthner says.

On federal lands, the impact on individuals from beavers causing floods would be minimal, he says.

“[Beavers’] dams slowed the flow of water, so we had less flooding,” he says. “The way that the dams trap sediment meant the water quality was better and the creation of these wetlands and protection of the repaired areas provided all this habitat for wildlife.”

Reducing the amount of livestock on public land would reduce the number of conflicts with species like wolves, Wuerthner says. That solution might sound great to environmentalists and biologists, but ranchers may not agree.

Back in 2016, there was a standoff with the federal government at the Mellon National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon. And another conflict over grazing areas for livestock on public land broke out on the Bundy ranch in Nevada in 2014. Ecologists like Wuerthner are proposing a buyout for ranchers who graze on these public lands.

“The thing to remember is that it is public land and it means it's owned by all citizens. And any use by commercial industry, including the livestock industry, is a privilege,” he says. “It is not something that is guaranteed.”

Cattle make ranchers a marginal profit in the West because of the arid climate — which is also the reason why the animals do so much damage to the landscape, Wuerthner says. Ranchers can use the buyout money to retire or buy more private land to continue raising cattle, he says.

And the federal government spends more administering grazing allotments than it makes back from the fees, he says.

“Carbon storage is worth far more on these lands,” Wuerthner says, “and that would be improved by the elimination of cattle.”

Julia Corcoran produced and edited this interview for broadcast with Peter O'Dowd. Allison Hagan adapted it for the web.


This segment aired on October 3, 2022.

Dr. Bob Bond grew up going to Priest Lake, the remote Idaho wetlands at center of Supreme Court case

October 03, 2022
Bob and Georgene Bond's property on Lake Priest. (Bob and Georgene Bond)

On Monday, the first day of its new term, the Supreme Court is hearing a big environmental case. It involves a couple who tried to fill in wetlands on their property to build a house until the Environmental Protection Agency said stop.

The court's ruling could have significant repercussions on how the government regulates wetlands and handles attempts to develop them. The wetlands at issue in the Supreme Court case are near Priest Lake, a remote spot in northern Idaho.


"This case implicates millions of acres of wetlands throughout the entire country," said Camille Pannu, associate professor at Columbia Law School. "So it's a really critical case in terms of how we protect wetlands and also the role that wetlands play when we think about protecting our freshwater sources."

Here & Now's Celeste Headlee speaks with Dr. Bob Bond, who has been coming to the lake since 1939 shortly after he was born. He's now 83. His Dad built a cabin there, not on wetlands, where Bond and his wife live for part of the year.

This segment aired on October 3, 2022.

Hurricane Fiona exposes social inequality in Puerto Rico

On September 16, two days before Hurricane Fiona hit Puerto Rico, a video El Apagón—Aquí vive gente was posted in YouTube, featuring “Apagón” (Blackout), a song by Puerto Rican singer Bad Bunny about the blackout crisis on the island. 

The video, with its powerful message denouncing the growing inequality on the island, exposes the power crisis, which followed the privatization of the public utility after Hurricane Maria and the bankruptcy restructuring of the island. At the time LUMA Energy promised reliable, better and less expensive service. All three assurances had long been exposed as lies when the video documentary was released. 

People clean debris from a road after a mudslide caused by
 Hurricane Fiona in Cayey, Puerto Rico, Sunday, September 18, 2022.
[AP Photo/Stephanie Rojas]

“Apagón” depicts the popular anger that exists in Puerto Rico, long before the hurricane that hit two days after its release. Five days after its release “Apagón” had been shared 6.4 million times.

“God has been good to us and kept us safe this time when things could have been much worse,” said Vice-Governor Anya Williams, downplaying the disastrous flooding and mudslides and the wholly inadequate response by federal and local authorities and LUMA management. 

No disaster is purely a natural event; it also has political and social content. The frequency and severity of hurricanes is bound up with climate change and the refusal of capitalist governments to take any serious measures to address it. Moreover, the catastrophic impact that Hurricanes Katrina (New Orleans, 2005), Maria, Fiona and so many others is conditioned by the vast socioeconomic inequality that defines Puerto Rico, the United States and the rest of the world. 

Both Governor Pedro Pierluisi and the electricity monopoly LUMA Energy had to walk back their promise that electricity would be restored within days. Predictably, the wealthy neighborhoods in San Juan and the beach condos were first in line.

This week, President Biden pledged “100 percent assistance” for Puerto Rico. What has in fact been offered is a pittance in “emergency aid.” Deanne Criswell, who heads Biden’s Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA), told Governor Pedro Pierluisi that it was making available an insulting $700 in aid per household. Criswell went out of her way to emphasize that this was way over the $500 offered in 2017 after the landing of Hurricane Maria.

This is Biden’s version of the infamous tossing of rolls of paper towels to people by President Trump five years ago. Despite all assurances in 2017, five years later less than one-third of the promised reconstruction has taken place and the island’s electricity grid is in the hands of a profit-driven private firm. 

President Biden also appoints the voting members of the Financial Control Board, which has placed the Puerto Rican economy on rations since the 2017 bankruptcy.

A week after the hurricane, 62 percent of households are still without power and face fuel shortages to power their generators, if they have them. Forty percent of households still lack running water. One thousand people are stuck in public shelters. Those most affected live in working class urban and rural municipalities. 

As with Hurricanes Irma and Maria, the real human cost of this storm is being concealed. Five years ago, between 3,000 and 5,000 people died from Hurricane Maria, which did not flood the island like Fiona has done. Over 30 inches (76 centimeters) of water fell in parts of the island. The report of only four casualties has been met with skepticism.

As flood waters recede, the devastating impact of this storm is becoming clearer. A preliminary estimate from the Puerto Rican Agriculture Department is that wind and flood damage exceeds $100 million, including the loss of this year’s banana and coffee crops and green vegetables. In addition, the storm virtually wiped out the bee industry. The Agriculture Department warned that when the full data is in, actual damages will surely exceed Friday’s account.

The collapse of roads and bridges from the flooding left scores of households isolated in six municipalities. Short on resources, local authorities report having to rely on volunteers, religious groups, NGOs (non-governmental organizations) and individuals to deliver food and first aid while waiting for government and FEMA assistance to clear roads and repair bridges.

Mexico City’s El Proceso news magazine interviewed Manuel Veguilla in a mountain region near Caguas, south of San Juan. “We are all incommunicado,” declared Veguilla, adding that he was worried about the elderly residents of the municipality, including his brother, who lack the strength to walk to the nearest community. Veguilla doubted that city workers would be able to reach the area, describing large boulders that have been left by the receding flood waters. Meanwhile neighbors are sharing water and food left by a volunteer group. The community still lacks electricity and must rely on spring water.

On September 1, two weeks before the hurricane hit, a mass protest of workers and students took place in San Juan denouncing the LUMA Energy debacle and social inequality. In addition to demanding that LUMA’s 15-year contract be rescinded, protesters carried signs calling for the restoration of social services, including the reopening of hundreds of schools that had been closed in the last decade. 

This was the latest in a series of protests, marches and rallies against the devastating social conditions in the US territory. Eighteen days ahead of Hurricane Fiona’s appearance, one demonstrator, José Rodriguez from Río Piedras, said he had come to the rally during the hurricane season because he was afraid that a total blackout would take place. “As an individual, I can survive,” declared Rodriguez, “but I must think about the more than 30,000, which are bed-ridden. I must think about what happened after Hurricane Maria.”

US could make green card process easier,

changes for H-1B too. Here's how


US Green Card: The commission's recommendations on the

green card include reducing the adjudication and processing

time for the applications to just six months.

Green Card: The recommendations were made in May this year.(Reuters File)
Green Card: The recommendations were made in May this year.(Reuters File)

As the White House looks into recommendations of a commission to reduce adjudication and processing of Green Card applications, it could become easier for immigrants to US to get the Green Card. The Green Card, known as a Permanent Resident Card, is issued to immigrants to the US as evidence of permanent residency.

The commission's recommendations on the green card include reducing the adjudication and processing time for the applications to just six months. Removing all backlogs by April next year is also part of the recommendations, PTI reported.

“If there is a query or more information is needed, USCIS (the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services) and the Department of State (DOS) shall continue to process the applications outside the six-month goal and adjudicate decisions in a timely fashion. If an application is not completed in six months, then it will not be terminated and will continue to be processed in a timely fashion ongoing,” the commission said.

The recommendations would be very helpful as amid Covid related closures resulting in staff cuts, processing of green cards has been slow and difficult.

Out of the annual 226,000 green cards available, only 65,452 family-based preference green cards were issued in 2021.

The commission said in its report that family-based visa backlog exceeds 7.5 million applications and therefore speeding up the process was important. 

Additionally, the commission also recommended automatic extension of work permit renewal to 365 days. Work permit holders apply for renewals for an automatic 180-day extension if their authorisation lapses.

Additionally, the committee has also recommended adjudicating requests for temporary work programmes, such as the H-1B and H-2A visas within two months.

Former Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel wins UN refugee agency prize over welcome of Syrians

Angela Merkel, the former German Chancellor, received the prestigious awards for her efforts in welcoming more than 1 million refugees into the country, notably Syrians fleeing the country's civil war.


The UNHCR Nansen Refugee Award - received by Merkel - honours individuals, groups or organisations that go "above and beyond the call of duty" to protect refugees and stateless people [Getty]

The UN refugee agency said Tuesday it's giving its highest award to former German Chancellor Angela Merkel for her efforts to welcome more than 1 million refugees - mostly from Syria - into Germany, despite some criticism both at home and abroad.

Matthew Saltmarsh, spokesman for the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, said Merkel had been selected as the latest recipient for the Nansen award, which is handed out annually by the Geneva-based UN agency.

"Under the then-Federal Chancellor Merkel’s leadership, Germany welcomed more than 1.2 million refugees and asylum-seekers in 2015 and 2016, which, as you will remember, was the height of the conflict in Syria, and there was deadly violence in other parts of the world," Saltmarsh told reporters. "Dr. Merkel helped to highlight the plight of refugees globally".

RELATED

Merkel's decision to let in so many migrants boosted the far-right Alternative for Germany party and resulted in protests by a vocal minority. She was also blasted by some governments for being too friendly to refugees, when some European Union partner states were closing borders to refugees and asylum-seekers.

The award includes a $150,000 prize. Merkel is expected to travel to Geneva next Monday to receive the award, Saltmarsh said. Four regional winners were also announced.

The UNHCR Nansen Refugee Award honours individuals, groups or organisations that go "above and beyond the call of duty" to protect refugees, other displaced and stateless people, the agency says.

More than 60 laureates have received the award since it was founded in 1954 to celebrate Fridtjof Nansen, a Norwegian scientist, explorer and diplomat who was the first commissioner for refugees in the League of Nations - the predecessor of the United Nations

The recipient in 2021 was the Jeel Albena Association for Humanitarian Development in Yemen, for its support for displaced Yemenis.
Bangladesh's national grid collapses, causes blackout in several districts

Bangladesh's national power transmission grid failed on Tuesday afternoon, causing a nationwide blackout and leaving millions of people in the dark.

ANI | Dhaka | Updated: 04-10-2022

Bangladesh's national power transmission grid failed on Tuesday afternoon, causing a nationwide blackout and leaving millions of people in the dark. The grid which failed at 2 pm local time caused the widespread blackout, barring some northern parts of the country, Dhaka Tribune reported.

The transmission line tripped somewhere in the eastern part of the country, especially in districts on the east of Jamuna river, according to the officials at Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB) and Power Grid Company of Bangladesh (PGCB). The power supply will be fully restored by 8 pm, said Bangladesh's State Minister of ICT Division Zunaid Ahmed Palak.

Bangladesh's national trade organization, representing all mobile telecom operators, said telecommunication services may disrupt some parts of the country due to a national power grid failure. "Due to national power grid failure, telecommunication services may disrupt in some parts of the country. We are sorry for the inconvenience," AMTOB said in a statement.

Bangladesh State Minister for Power and Energy Nasrul Hamid told United News Bangladesh that the power supply is expected to be fully restored by 7 pm, according to Dhaka Tribune. "We have already restored electricity supply at Bangabhaban and Ganabhaban and also some parts in Mirpur and other areas," he said.

Back in May 2017, a similar incident of grid failure happened in 32 districts. (ANI)
GOING, GOING....
Shares in leading Swiss bank Credit Suisse plunge 10pc after its executives try to reassure investors that it is sound


Swiss and UK regulators are monitoring the situation and working together


Credit Suisse's new CEO Ulrich Koerner


Oliver Hirt and Michael Shields
October 04 2022 

Shares in Swiss banking giant Credit Suisse slid by as much as 10pc yesterday, reflecting market concerns ahead of a restructuring plan due to come with third-quarter results at the end of October.

Swiss regulator FINMA and the Bank of England in London, where the lender has a major hub, were monitoring the situation at Credit Suisse and working closely together, a source familiar with the situation said.

Credit Suisse’s recent problems were well known and there had been no major recent developments, the source added.

The Bank of England, FINMA and the Swiss finance ministry declined to comment.

CEO Ulrich Koerner last week told staff that Credit Suisse, whose market capitalisation had dropped to 9.73bn Swiss francs (€10bn) on Monday, has solid capital and liquidity.

And bank executives spent the weekend reassuring large clients, counterparties and investors about its liquidity and capital, the Financial Times reported on Sunday.

A Credit Suisse spokesman declined to comment on the FT report, which said the weekend calls followed a sharp rise in spreads on the bank’s credit default swaps (CDS), which offer protection against a company defaulting on its debt.

Credit Suisse’s euro-denominated bonds dropped to record lows, with the Swiss bank’s longer-dated bonds suffering the sharpest declines.


In July, Credit Suisse announced its second strategy review in a year and replaced its CEO, bringing in restructuring expert Mr Koerner to scale back investment banking and cut more than $1bn (€1.02bn) in costs.

It has said it was considering measures to strengthen its flagship wealth management franchise, scale back its investment bank into a “capital-light, advisory-led” business, and evaluate strategic options for the securitised products business.

Citing people familiar with the situation, Reuters reported last month that Credit Suisse was sounding out investors for fresh cash as it attempts its overhaul.


JP Morgan analysts said in a research note that, based on its financials at the end of the second quarter, they view Credit Suisse’s capital and liquidity as “healthy”.

Given the bank has indicated a near-term intention to keep its CET1 capital ratio at 13pc to 14pc, the second-quarter end ratio is well within that range and the liquidity coverage ratio is well above requirements, the analysts added.

Credit Suisse had total assets of 727bn Swiss franc (€750bn) at the end of the second quarter, of which 159bn francs was in cash and due from banks, while 101bn was trading assets, it noted.

While Credit Suisse’s CDS spreads have widened, this should be seen in the context of widening credit spreads across the sector, which was expected in an environment of rising interest rates with ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty, the analysts said.

Over the past three quarters, Credit Suisse’s losses have added up to nearly 4bn Swiss francs. The bank’s financing costs have surged. Deutsche Bank analysts in August estimated a capital shortfall of at least 4bn francs.