Saturday, September 21, 2024

 

With Two Weeks Left and No Talks, Industry Prepares for ILA Strike

longshore workers
ILA says members are united and it has for a year been preparing for the upcoming strike at US East/Gulf Coast ports (ILA file photo)

Published Sep 17, 2024 5:51 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

 

Today marks two weeks till the likely first day of a crippling strike for containers and Ro-Ro traffic at U.S. East and Gulf Coast ports as the International Longshoremen’s Association has refused to resume negotiations on the master contract. With no signs of government intervention despite urging from shippers, the industry is looking for alternatives while analysts attempt to forecast the impact.

A wide collation of 177 trade associations ranging from manufacturers to farmers, wholesalers, retailers, manufacturers, and many others in the supply chain, issued an open letter to President Joe Biden expressing “significant concern about the state of the negotiations,” saying it is “imperative” for the administration to get the sides back to the negotiating table. 

The ILA, however, issued a new statement focusing entirely on wages and rehashing old wage increases, or the lack thereof, dating back to the 1990s. Citing inflation and years of low increases, the ILA says “spotty yearly increases” are history. The ILA said it will reject the USMX (United States Maritime Alliance) position on new entry wage, and calls for large increases.

The union writes that it has been preparing for over a year and the time is now to take a “stand and fight a higher level of wages.” Without indicating any willingness to resume the negotiations which have been at an impasse since June, the ILA says a strike “seems more likely.”

Terminal operators represented by the USMX have repeatedly called for a resumption of negotiations. Their statements talk of “industry-leading” wage offers, which the ILA rejects as misleading.

“A strike at this point in time would have a devastating impact on the economy, especially as inflation is on the downward trend,” the collation of trade associations predicts in its letter. 

The White House and administration have not indicated that it would be stepping in during the remaining two weeks. Reuters is quoting a source today saying the administration has decided not to invoke the Taft-Hartley Act which would permit it to invoke a cooling-off period to extend negotiations. Last year, however, the White House sent the Acting Secretary of Labor, Julie Su, to assist with the contract talks on the West Coast. She was credited as being instrumental in getting an agreement after a year of negotiations and growing labor actions disrupting the ports.

It will be the first coastwide strike on the East Coast since the 1970s, leaving analysts unsure what will happen. Some are predicting massive worldwide backlogs and repercussions if the strike drags on with the carriers also forecasting a likely wide impact on an industry already under pressure from disruptions.

CMA CGM wrote to customers yesterday saying it knows there will be increasing attention on the negotiations in the next two weeks. It says it is “ready, willing, and able to provide customers with solutions and alternate modalities to keep supply chains moving as best as possible.”

The Port of Long Beach reported yesterday that it had its busiest month ever in August with a 40 percent year-over-year increase in import volumes. They cited cargo diversions and concerns about the U.S. tariff increases on China while saying they were preparing for “the uptick in shipments and continued growth through the rest of the year.”

The ILA however has already cited how it picketed ships on the West Coast that were attempting to divert cargo during its last strike. 

Canadian ports might be able to take some of the U.S. volume. Analysts have also predicted that it could be a significant boost to the air cargo sector. 

Cargo industry analyst Container xChange told customers today, that for container trading and leasing companies, the disruptions could lead to significant delays and port congestion, impacting equipment turnaround times. They noted shippers are in a traditional peak season but many took steps to prepare.

“While the threat of strikes looms large, it’s important to note that U.S. inventories are currently strong due to the pulling forward of orders earlier this year to avoid existing disruptions. This stockpile will act as an essential buffer, mitigating the risk of container rates spiking dramatically due to the strikes,” said Christian Roeloffs, co-founder and CEO of Container xChange. He predicted, “the overall impact will largely depend on the duration of the strikes, with prolonged disruptions having the potential to intensify the implications for supply chains, leading to more pronounced bottlenecks and greater challenges in container availability.”

Shippers Warned of Surcharges and Delays Due to Pending ILA Strike

Hapag vessel Manhattan skyline
The Port of New York - New Jersey would be the largest to be impacted in the strike with carriers moving to impose surcharges due to the strike (Hapag-Lloyd)

Published Sep 19, 2024 5:45 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

 

Carriers are taking further steps to prepare for the increasing likelihood of a strike at U.S. ports along the East Coast and Gulf Coast. With no apparent progress to break the impasse between the International Longshoremen’s Association and the US Maritime Alliance, carriers are announcing surcharges to help address potential disruptions while they expect continued strength in the peak season and warn of congestion already at ports around the world.

Both CMA CGM  and Hapag-Lloyd followed an earlier notification by MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company informing customers of their intent to start charging surcharges for both imports and exports from the impacted ports.  The Federal Maritime Commission requires a 30-day notification to customers of any additional fees.

MSC is calling it an “Emergency Operations Surcharge,” and has timed it to start on October 1 the expected first day of the coastwide strike. It applies to containers coming from Europe and ranges from $1,000 for a standard 20-foot box to $1,500 for a larger 40-foot box. CMA CGM did not give it a fancy name but in a Customer Advisory dated yesterday announced charges ranging between $800 and $1,500 for exports depending on the specifications of the box and a flat $1,500 per TEU for all imports bound for the U.S. East/Gulf Coast ports. CMA CGM’s surcharge is effective starting October 11.

Hapag introduced a new nomenclature warning a “Work Disruption Surcharge (WDS)” is coming up. They told customers the charge would go into effect on October 18 and it amounts to $1,000 per TEU on all imports.

Hapag is telling export customers that it will continue to accept bookings “as long as rail providers and terminals are accepting containers.” For importers, they are encouraging them to expedite documentation and customs clearance to “facilitate the prompt retrieval of your cargo from the terminal before any potential work stoppage.”

These warnings come as Maersk in a new market update said “there is considerable uncertainty attached to Q4 volumes,” while highlighting that its last full-year forecast was for demand growth in the range of 4 to 6 percent range. They reported global container volumes grew by 6.6 percent year-over-year in Q2 2024, supported by robust imports to North America and Latin America, and continued strong exports from the Far East Asia region. 

Maersk continues to warn customers of pockets of port congestion around the world, especially impacting services in the Mediterranean and East Asia. 

The carriers are universal in saying that the supply chain remains fragile and that a U.S. strike could have significant impacts. Maersk has said, “Even a short disruption could require weeks to fully resolve, leading to significant backlogs and delays.”

Analytics firm Sea-Intelligence in its analysis said that it believes the U.S. ports could have 13 percent excess capacity for October beyond the projected 2.3 Million TEU. Sea-Intelligence calculated that a 1-week strike at the beginning of October, would not be cleared until mid-November. They said a 2-week strike, would mean that U.S. ports would not be back to normal operations until 2025.

The carriers in announcing their new surcharges called them “indefinite” in their duration.


Volume Surge Continues at SoCal Ports as They Watch East Coast Developments

containership
Southern California's ports continue to see a volume surge while they watch East Coast developments (file photo)

Published Sep 18, 2024 8:33 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

Southern California's two large ports, which are also the largest in the United States, each reported an ongoing surge in volumes during August and an expectation that volumes will continue to be strong. The ports believe that some cargo has been diverted while persistent strong consumer sales, a positive economy, and efforts to manage by importers, are all contributing to the increases in volumes.

Both ports had strong July results and even stronger August volumes. For Long Beach, it was the busiest month in the 113-year history of the port. Los Angeles came in just below its historic threshold of 1 million TEU reporting what it called “the busiest non-pandemic month ever at the port.”

The port executives varied on their views of the factors contributing to the continued strong increases in import volumes. They agreed it is a strong peak season while emphasizing that the ports have been successful in managing and have the capacity for further increases.

“Cargo diversions and concerns about upcoming tariffs are creating a busy peak season for us,” said Port of Long Beach CEO Mario Cordero. “We’re prepared for the uptick in shipments and continued growth through the rest of the year with a dedicated waterfront workforce, modern infrastructure, and plenty of capacity across our terminals.”

Container volume in Long Beach was up overall 34 percent to nearly 914,000 TEU. Imports were the strongest factor up 40 percent versus a year ago and 5 percent over July.

Gene Seroka, the Executive Director for the Port of Los Angeles, and George Goldman, the President and CEO of the North America division of CMA CGM, during a press briefing, conceded that there was “some front loading” and some “reallocation of volume” by customers due to the issues in the East Coast labor negotiations. They however also cited the Red Sea diversions and other factors saying the market remains very dynamic. They would not confirm that customers had started shifting cargo fearing a strike by the International Longshoremen’s Association in less than two weeks at U.S. East and Gulf Coast ports.

Los Angeles highlighted that it handled 97 containerships in August including a record 32 each with a capacity above 10,000 TEU. Imports topped 500,000 TEU for the second month in a row with imports up nearly 18 percent over last year and nearly 2 percent over July.

Seroka said he expects that the port will again handle more than a total of 900,000 TEUs in September noting they are already off to a strong start. He thinks there is still some momentum left in an already exceedingly strong peak season.

“Some of the cargo arriving now is replenishing inventories even beyond the year-end holiday season. Combined with a steady flow of manufacturing parts and components, we should continue to see elevated volume in the near term,” said Seroka.

Historically the Port of Los Angeles had a capacity of around 1 million TEU with Seroka saying they are currently running at 80 percent of capacity. He acknowledged a “micro spike” in dwell times at the railroad connections saying they were addressing those issues but that overall, the cargo velocity remains positive in the Prot of Los Angeles.

With recent advancements in technology and management cargo along with and working from lessons learned, he projects the Port of Los Angeles now has a capacity of up to approximately 1.2 million TEU per month. He points to the recent successes in managing the latest surge and is confident they will be able to handle continued growth.

For now, the Port of Los Angeles and CMA CGM said it is “wait and see” while managing the issues as they arise. They are hopeful the employers and ILA will return to the negotiations saying that even a one-day disruption would be too many in a very dynamic supply chain. They said it is critical to have all ports working efficiently as the U.S. economy continues strong.


 

 

GE Vernova Plans to Pull Back on Wind Power Including Large Job Cuts

wind turbine manufacturing
GE Vernova confirmed it was looking to downsize its wind energy operations after recent setbacks (GE)

Published Sep 20, 2024 5:42 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

 

In a potentially critical blow to the development of the wind energy sector, GE Vernova, one of three leading manufacturers of wind turbines, confirmed it is looking at scaling back this portion of its business. The company’s plan would leave only two large Western manufacturers as well as the emerging competition from Chinese companies.

The company confirmed reports that it has made a filing with its European Works Council, which would be the first step toward layoffs for its operations in France. EU labor regulations require the company to notify and involve its unions in any planned reorganization.

The company said it is looking at what it called a “downsizing to transform its offshore business globally into a small, learner, and more profitable business.” The reports say it could involve cutting as many as 900 jobs with a third or more of the cuts reportedly planned for the company’s two facilities in France. The plant in Montoir-de-Bertange which builds nacelles according to reports in the French media could lose more than half its workforce. A second facility in Nantes could be downsized by a third. In total, the reports in France say the company is seeking to cut as many as 360 people.

By management’s own emissions, 2024 has been “a very difficult year” for the wind power segment of the company which was spun out from GE in April 2024 to focus on power, wind, and electrification. Earlier this year the company reported it had decided to shelve a plan to build an 18 MW version of its Haliade-X offshore wind turbines. It said it would instead focus on its 13 and 15 MW units which were called the workhorse of the industry. The retrenchment was cited as the reason New York State canceled three selected projects that planned to use the larger turbines.

The company also suffered a high-profile incident when one of the blades on its turbine at the Vineyard Wind 1 project in Massachusetts fractured sending bits into the ocean. The debris washed up on local beaches leading to more protests over the safety of offshore wind power. GE Vernova later blamed that failure on a manufacturing deviation at its plan in Quebec, Canada. All the blades were being reinspected.

Two failures of blades at the UK’s Dogger Bank wind farm were also for its Haliade turbines. They were blamed on installation problems. 

The failures along with disruptions in the supply chain and higher material costs due to inflation were cited as placing increased pressure on this segment of the company’s business. The supply contracts also have long lead times exposing the company to increased costs.  In September, GE Vernova told investors its wind segment is now expected to generate an approximately $300 million EBITDA loss in the third quarter of 2024 given these costs, despite onshore wind delivering a fifth straight quarter of profitability. The company said it expects the wind segment to be modestly profitable in the fourth quarter.

GE Vernova’s scaling back leaves Siemens Gamesa and Vestas Wind Systems as the two leading Western manufacturers. China’s Mingyang and others are growing competitors seeking to make inroads into the Western market. News however that an offshore wind farm in Germany planned to use Mingyang as its supplier triggered a host of political complaints and reports that the contract would be placed under tight scrutiny. 

At the beginning of September, an offshore project planned for New Jersey known as Leading Light Wind asked regulators for a delay citing supply chain problems. The company said it was having problems securing a provider of turbines after GE Vernova canceled its larger turbines. According to the reports, the New Jersey developer decided not to use Vestas while Siemens Gamesa reportedly told them there would be a significant price increase for the turbines.

GE Vernova in its September update to investors cited incremental strength in its Power and Electrification segments saying that it gave it the confidence to reaffirm its full-year 2024 financial guidance despite the challenges in its Wind segment. The company’s stock price was flat today while it was up nearly eight percent for the week. Since the spinoff from GE in April, the stock price is up more than 87 percent.


SOV Servicing UK's Hornsea Wind Farm Hits and Damages Wind Turbine

wind farm SOV
SOV Wind of Hope allided with one of the turbines while servicing a UK wind farm (Cemre Shipyard)

Published Sep 20, 2024 1:36 PM by The Maritime Executive


One of the modern Service Operations Vessels designed specifically to service offshore wind farms was involved in an incident yesterday, September 19. There were no injuries to the crew and technicians aboard but the vessel struck one of the turbines resulting in damage to both the vessel and the base of the turbine.

The SOV is the Wind of Hope, the second of two SOVs built for French company Louis Dreyfus Armateurs (LDA) by the Cemre Shipyard in Turkey. The vessel is 6,500 gross tons and has a length of 275 feet (84 meters) with accommodations for 90 people. The ship was delivered in July 2021 and like the new generation vessels of the class, has dynamic positioning and safety features including a walk-to-work telescopic motion compensated gangway. 

Few details were provided, but according to LDA, the vessel allided with one of the turbines at 1838 last evening in daylight. The contact caused damage to the starboard side of the vessel above the waterline and the helideck. There was also some damage to the base of the turbine.

The Wind of Hope is operating under charter to Ørsted for the Hornsea offshore wind farm located approximately 75 miles east of Hull and Grimsby, UK in the North Sea. Hornsea 1 has been in operation since 2020 with 174 turbines and is part of the largest offshore wind complex which will ultimately consist of four sections. 

The vessel shows that it had departed the base in Grimsby on September 17. LDA reports there are 26 crew members and 46 specialist personnel on board, none of whom were injured. There was no water ingress, nor pollution reported. The vessel is on its way back to Grimsby for a full assessment of the damage.

Ørsted is reported to have created an exclusion zone around the turbine involved in the incident.


Canadian Port Grows as Staging Point for U.S. Offshore Wind

Argentia Canada
Argentia, a former U.S. naval station, is being repurposed and is using its location to marshal parts for offshore wind (Port of Argentia)

Published Sep 20, 2024 6:43 PM by The Maritime Executive


The Port Argentia in the eastern reaches of Canada’s Newfoundland is using its strategic position and available land to develop a business in staging for U.S. offshore wind farms. Port officials reported they have signed a contract with Denmark’s Scan Global Logistics which is responsible for transporting the wind turbine blades which will be staged in 2024 and 2025 before installation.

“Capitalizing on our place as North America’s first monopile marshaling port, we’re now positioned to further expand our capabilities by securing a contract to store and marshal 220 offshore wind turbine blades,” said Scott Penney, CEO of Port of Argentia. “The addition of wind turbine blades demonstrates our unique storage capacity and adds to our portfolio of offshore wind projects.”

The arrangement with Scan Global Logistics, a global transportation and logistics, will see 220 wind turbine blades arrive via heavy transport vessels at Argentia, beginning this fall and continuing into 2025. The port has entered into a lease and services agreement for marshaling and security services utilizing a 12-hectare bonded yard at Argentia.

Ultimately, vessels will pick up the large constructions and deliver the blades for installation at wind farms off the Eastern Seaboard of the U.S. The name of the project is not revealed due to the sensitive nature of the project which skirts the U.S. Jones Act requirements and demands from U.S. states for the use of union labor and local ports. 

The blades, however, are massive measuring several hundred feet and requiring large storage spaces. It is perfect for the Port of Argentia, which was formerly the site of a U.S. naval base in southeastern Newfoundland. Argentia is being redeveloped into a heavy industrial seaport and seeking opportunities with marine transportation, renewable energy, aquaculture, offshore oil, and mining. 

 

Boskalis vessels began delivering monopiles in 2023 (Argentia)

 

Utilizing its existing infrastructure and vast land assets, the port is making available over 70 hectares of paved runways from the former U.S. naval station, within 6,500 feet of quayside, for the marshaling operation. The first operation began in August 2023, with the arrival of Boskalis’ heavy lift vessels transporting monopiles. The port said it was scheduled to receive and store up to 120 monopiles which would be used for future installation in the U.S.

In 2024, the port also entered into initial agreements with the Port of Hamburg (Germany) as part of the effort to develop a future green hydrogen export business. The governments of Germany and Canada supported the project which calls for the production of green hydrogen in Newfound that would be shipped to Germany as an energy source.

 

Monopiles marshaled at Argentia starting in August 2023 (Argentia)


Gulf of Maine Wind Auction Scheduled as Tribes Seek to Delay Oregon Sale

offshore wind energy
BOEM scheduled its second offshore wind energy auction for October 2024 (BOEM)

Published Sep 16, 2024 2:48 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

The Biden administration continues to move forward aggressively to realize its plans for offshore wind energy generation scheduling the second auction planned for October 2024. The Department of the Interior set October 29 for the first auction of Gulf of Maine areas which would be just two weeks after the scheduled sale on the Oregon coast. A collation of tribes however is trying to delay the Oregon sale.

The Department of the Interior highlights it has conducted five offshore wind lease sales during the Biden administration. This includes the record-setting New York Bight as well as the Central Atlantic, the California coast, and less well-received sales in the Gulf of Mexico. A total of 10 offshore wind farms have won approval with the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) recently highlighting the U.S. had reached approval for more than 15 GW offshore wind energy capacity, halfway to the initial offshore goal. 

The planned sale for the Gulf of Maine would be a critical step as it has the potential for approximately 13 GW of offshore wind energy capacity. The eight areas are on the Outer Continental Shelf off Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maine. BOEM highlights it shaved off another 120,000 acres from the original proposal reflecting input from the community of ocean users. The final call area outlined in April 2024 was nearly 10 million acres.

“The upcoming Gulf of Maine offshore wind energy auction reflects our all-of-government approach for reaching the Biden-Harris Administration’s energy goals while combatting the climate crisis,” said BOEM Director Elizabeth Klein. BOEM is moving forward quickly, having just reported on September 8 that it had completed the environmental review for the area.

The Gulf of Maine sale will come just two weeks after the scheduled first offshore sale for the coast of Oregon. BOEM announced at the end of August plans to offer three areas ranging from Coos Bay to Brandon and Brookings, which will total nearly 200,000 acres. They calculate the potential for 3.1 GW of energy from the sites.

The Oregon sale has faced persistent opposition from the communities that argue BOEM is moving too quickly. Oregon as a state is not expected to complete its road map for offshore wind development till 2025.

The Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians filed a lawsuit on September 13 against BOEM seeking to delay the sale.

“The intent of this lawsuit is to stop the October lease sale and force BOEM to do a comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement that honestly looks at the impact that wind energy will have on Coastal resources,” said Tribal Council Chair Brad Kneaper. “Coastal Tribes have repeatedly met with BOEM urging BOEM to take its time to develop wind energy in a way that does not adversely impact Tribes and the resources which they depend upon.”

As part of its five-year strategy, BOEM previously released a schedule for 12 additional offshore wind auctions by 2028. However, at the end of July, BOEM reported it was canceling a planned sale for the Gulf of Mexico. They cited low interest instead proposing moving to an agreement with the sole company that was pursuing the leases.

The Department of the Interior cites the extensive review process used to plan sales. For the Gulf of Maine, they said there were two years of engagement with the information used to shape the Final Sale Notice, which will be published on September 17 in the Federal Register.



 

Cooler heads prevail: New research reveals best way to prevent dogs from overheating




American Veterinary Medical Association
Dr. Cynthia Otto 

image: 

Dr. Cynthia M. Otto, lead researcher and executive director of the Penn Vet Working Dog Center

view more 

Credit: Dr. Cynthia OtFOR MORE INFORMATION





 

(SCHAUMBURG, Illinois) September 19, 2024— As temperatures continue to soar across the country, a simple yet innovative technique could be the key to keeping dogs safe from heat-related illnesses.

 

New research published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (JAVMA) reveals that teaching dogs to voluntarily dunk their heads in water is the most effective method for rapidly cooling them down after exercise. The study, conducted by researchers at the Penn Vet Working Dog Center at the University of Pennsylvania, compared various cooling methods and found that voluntary head dunking not only cooled dogs faster than other techniques but also prevented dangerous post-exercise temperature spikes.

 

This method could be a game-changer for dog owners and handlers, especially in situations where access to large quantities of water is limited.

 

This study changes our understanding of cooling methods in the dog,” said Dr. Cynthia M. Otto, lead author of the study and executive director of the Penn Vet Working Dog Center. “During heat stress, blood flow to the head, nose, tongue and ears is increased. Cooling the tissues of the head allows for rapid cooling of the whole body with limited amounts of water. Furthermore, training the dog to participate in the cooling process can enhance not only its safety, but the human animal bond.”

 

The importance of cooling dogs quickly

Heat-related illness is a serious risk for dogs, especially during warm weather when dogs can quickly overheat during activities, putting them at risk of heat injury or heat stroke. The research emphasizes the critical rule of “Cool first, transport second,” which encourages owners to begin cooling dogs immediately if they show signs of heat stress, before seeking veterinary care.

 

Among the methods tested, only the voluntary head dunking technique, where dogs are trained to dip their heads into water, prevented dangerous post-exercise temperature spikes, while also cooling dogs faster than the other methods.

 

Simple technique, big benefits

As described in the research, voluntary head dunking uses positive reinforcement training to encourage and reward dogs for submerging their heads in a bucket of water to retrieve a toy or treat. Clean room temperature water is added stepwise until the dog is comfortable immersing its head to retrieve the toy or treat.

 

By teaching dogs to perform this task, owners can help their pets flush their noses and eyes of dust and debris while also providing quick relief from overheating. The research found that dogs trained in this technique could cool down more rapidly after exercise compared to other cooling methods. Additionally, the head dunking can help clear debris from a dog's nose and eyes, making it a versatile first-aid tool.

 

The researchers recommend training dogs in this technique, as it could serve as a valuable skill in the event of heat stress, especially during outdoor activities like hiking or running. It's important to note that training may take anywhere from a few days to several weeks, depending on the individual dog's comfort level and motivation.

 

Practical application for dog owners

As summer continues and many pet owners enjoy outdoor activities with their dogs, these studies provide timely and relevant information for pet owners. Whether for canine athletes, working dogs, or pets enjoying a day at the park, the head dunking method offers a simple way to manage heat stress.

 

To learn more about these cooling methods and the cooperative care training involved, dog owners should consult with their veterinarians and consider incorporating these techniques into their pets’ routines.

 

To view the study, visit https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.24.06.0368. In addition, an accompanying tutorial video is available at https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.24.07.0480.

 

Additional hot weather safety tips for pet owners

Pet owners should be aware that if it's hot outside for humans, it's likely even hotter for pets. There's no set temperature where heat becomes dangerous, as risk can vary based on a pet's physical characteristics, age, weight, underlying medical conditions and activity level. In general, pets with longer or darker fur, flat-faced breeds, older pets, obese pets, or those with certain medical conditions may be at increased risk of heat-related illness.

 

It's crucial for pet owners to recognize the signs of heat stress or heat stroke in their animals. These can include:

  • Anxiousness
  • Elongated tongue
  • Flattened, retracted ears
  • Narrowed eyes
  • Shade seeking
  • Excessive panting where the molars are easily visible and drooling – especially thick ropey saliva
  • Vomiting or diarrhea (sign of more serious heat injury)
  • Abnormal gum and tongue color (dark red)
  • Unsteadiness/collapse (collapse is indication of an emergency)

 

If any of these signs are observed, owners should begin cooling efforts immediately and seek emergency veterinary care.

 

To prevent heat-related issues, pet owners should provide constant access to water and shade for outdoor pets. On particularly hot days, it's best to keep pets indoors or limit outdoor time to early morning or evening hours when temperatures are cooler. Never leave pets alone in vehicles, even for short periods, as temperatures can rise dangerously high within minutes.

 

Additionally, be mindful of hot pavement, which can burn paw pads. Consider using protective booties or walking on grass when possible. By taking these precautions and being aware of their pet's individual needs, owners can help ensure their furry companions stay safe and comfortable during warm weather.

 

Pet owners can learn more about warm weather pet safety at https://www.avma.org/resources/pet-owners/petcare/warm-weather-pet-safety.

 

For more information, contact Michael San Filippo, AVMA senior media relations manager, at 847-732-6194 (cell/text) or msanfilippo@avma.org.

 

###

 

About the AVMA

Serving more than 105,000 member veterinarians, the AVMA is the nation's leading representative of the veterinary profession, dedicated to improving the health and wellbeing of animals, humans and the environment. Founded in 1863 and with members in every U.S. state and territory and more than 60 countries, the AVMA is one of the largest veterinary medical organizations in the world.

 

 

Can captive tigers be part of the effort to save wild populations?



Stanford University




Captive tigers in the United States outnumber those living in the wild. The World Wildlife Federation estimates around 5,000 of the big cats reside in the U.S., mostly owned by private citizens.

The health of this population is a genetic mystery for conservation groups and researchers interested in how the captive tigers could help stabilize or restore wild tiger populations. Are the privately owned animals just like tigers in the wild, or do they reflect characteristics popular in the illegal trade? Are they a hodgepodge of wild tiger ancestry, or are they detrimentally inbred?

New research from Stanford University, published Sept. 19 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, digs into these questions and offers a new tool that conservationists and law enforcement can use to protect the animals and prosecute those responsible for their abuse.

“We’re trying to leverage genomic technology to be useful in a conservation context – there are so few tigers. We won’t get a second chance if they go extinct,” said Ellie Armstrong, PhD ’21, who is lead author of the paper.

An unknown population

The study was led by Armstrong, who conducted the research as part of her doctoral studies in biology, with her co-advisors and co-authors Elizabeth Hadly, the Paul S. and Billie Achilles Professor in Environmental Biology, Emerita, and Dmitri Petrov, the Michelle and Kevin Douglas Professor, both in the School of Humanities and Sciences.

The researchers became interested in studying the genetic diversity of privately held tigers – called “generic” because their sources are unknown – after conducting a study on the genetic impact of the isolation of wild tiger populations.

“We were conducting a large study on wild tiger populations and leveraged these data to address the issue of captive tigers in the United States. It was a bit unbelievable, at first, that you could have a tiger living right next door and not know it,’” said Armstrong, who is now an assistant professor of evolution, ecology, and organismal biology at the University of California, Riverside. “We got connected with Tigers in America, and that’s when we realized that there’s an enormous number of these cats outside of accredited facilities that were bred for animal encounters, performed as circus animals, or were trafficked as exotic pets. But we didn’t have any idea what kind of tiger they were or where they came from.”

A hurdle for the research team was the absence of official data on generic tigers. Shows like Netflix’s 2020 Tiger King and the 2009 documentary The Tiger Next Door helped grow public knowledge of the problem of privately owned tigers, but accessing the animals for research purposes was still a challenge.

“There was so much hearsay associated with this captive population and a lot of it contradicts itself. People said, ‘All of the cats are really inbred,’ or ‘All of the cats are genetically diverse,’” said Armstrong. “We had no idea what to expect and thought that genomic technology could help us answer some of these questions.”

Building a genetic database

Through relationships with sanctuaries that had rescued generic tigers, the team obtained samples and learned about the tigers, including the rescue locations for many animals.

The researchers collected samples from 154 generic tigers and used another 100 available wild tiger samples existing in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. From their previous work, the team knew that there are six wild subspecies of tigers. With these data, they developed a reference panel for tigers that was used to accurately distinguish individual animals and assign their genetic ancestry. Armstrong compares it to the popular genetic ancestry tests for humans.

“When we do 23andMe, we’re not sequencing the whole genome – we’re sequencing a portion of it that informs us about your health and ancestry,” she said. “That’s what we want to be able to do, but for tigers. It’s difficult and expensive to sequence and analyze a whole genome, especially in a conservation context. The workflow we built allows you to sequence a portion of the genome and get answers about the tiger individual and its ancestry.”

A boon to law enforcement

Knowing a tiger’s ancestry has uses beyond conservation and breeding programs – law enforcement can use it to prosecute.

The Big Cat Public Safety Act went into effect Dec. 20, 2022, ending the private ownership of big cats as pets and placing restrictions on breeding, commerce, possession, and use of certain species, including tigers. (Individuals who owned cats prior to the law passing must register the animals.) Still, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has storerooms full of confiscated tiger pelts, bones, teeth, etc., and cases they are unable to prosecute because they are unable to positively identify the origin and ancestry of the samples. The agency has already requested to work with the researchers.

“We’ll be working with law enforcement to try to apply this in a forensic context to prosecute wildlife crimes like those seen in Tiger King, monitor the populations in the U.S., and track the illegal trade,” Armstrong said. “Materials like teeth and pelts have limited DNA in them, and the reference panel we built here can allow wildlife agencies to determine the ancestry and identity of confiscated samples, even by only sequencing a small portion of the genome. That’s been the most rewarding part of this research – we know that this work mattered and has immediate future applications.”

Putting rumors to rest

As for those wondering, “What are these animals?” the researchers feel they can put this question to rest. The U.S. captive tiger population did not show widespread inbreeding relative to wild tiger populations. Nor did they show that the generic tigers maintain single subspecies ancestry as is true of zoo-bred tigers or tigers in the wild. These generic tigers are a mix of different tiger subspecies. Armstrong and colleagues also show that the non-zoo captive tiger population in the United States does not harbor more genetic diversity than that found in wild populations.

“This absence of unique genetic diversity in captive tigers means that there will be no ‘genetic rescue’ of wild tigers with individuals now in captivity,” Hadly said. “In other words, the genetic diversity of wild tigers is all that evolution has to work with going into the future.”

DNA is the only way to identify a tiger subspecies – there are no distinguishable physical differences in the six recognized subspecies. If the unique evolutionary histories of individual tiger subspecies remain a priority for tiger management, and we can overcome the enormous hurdles of releasing captive animals back into the wild, the reference panel could be used to identify individuals that do not have mixed ancestry.

Said Armstrong, “This technology is usually a ‘for fun’ thing for humans, to find out more about your genetic ancestry, but we can use genomics in a very serious way to help our wildlife populations thrive in the wild and keep them from being exploited.”

Additional Stanford co-authors of this research include former CEHG/NSF postdoctoral fellow Jazlyn A. Mooney, now Gabilan Assistant Professor at the University of Southern California in the Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology; former postdoctoral scholar Katie Solari; professor emeritus of genetics Gregory Barsh; genetics researcher Christopher B. Kaelin; postdoctoral scholar Bernard Y. Kim; doctoral student Victoria Grant; Noah Rosenberg, the Stanford Professor in Population Genetics and Society and professor of biology in the School of Humanities and Sciences; and researcher Tsuya Yokoyama. Hadly is also a member of Stanford Bio-X, a senior fellow at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute professor. Petrov is also a member of Bio-X, the Maternal & Child Health Research Institute, the Stanford Cancer Institute, and the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.

Other co-authors of this work are from HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Gencove Inc., the San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, and the National Centre for Biological Sciences, India.

This research was funded by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program.