Sunday, February 02, 2020

Fallen Angels: 

Victoria's Secret owner Les Wexner, 82, 'failed to stop Jeffrey Epstein's attempts to recruit women and ignored complaints about exec who told model Bella Hadid 'forget the panties' and groped another's crotch'

New report makes explosive claims about L Brands CEO Les Wexner


Alleges rampant harassment and misconduct at subsidiary Victoria's Secret


Says Victoria's Secret exec Ed Razek was subject of repeated complaints


Claims Razek was allowed to run amok and harass model Bella Hadid


Also accuses Wexner of turning a blind eye to former associate Jeffrey Epstein 


Razek strenuously denies the allegations and Wexner has yet to comment


Comes days after report Wexner is considering stepping down as CEO


A bombshell report has accused Victoria's Secret owner Les Wexner, 82, of ignoring rampant sexual harassment of the line's 'Angel' models and other misconduct within the company.

Wexner and Ed Razek, his right-hand man at parent company L Brands, 'presided over an entrenched culture of misogyny, bullying and harassment' according to the lengthy report on Saturday from the New York Times.

The Times cites interviews with more than 30 current and former executives, employees, contractors and models, as well as court filings and other documents.

The report says that Wexner appeared to turn a blind eye to complaints that Razek harassed Angels including Bella Hadid, and seemed to do nothing about his former associate, the late sex criminal Jefferey Epstein, attempting to recruit women.

A representative for Wexner did not immediately respond to a request for comment from DailyMail.com, and he declined to comment to the Times, through a representative.

Razek strenuously denies the allegations, telling the Times: 'The accusations in this reporting are categorically untrue, misconstrued or taken out of context.'


Bella Hadid walks the runway during the 2018 
Victoria's Secret Fashion Show at Pier 94 on November 8, 2018 in New York City

RELATED ARTICLES
Billionaire Victoria's Secret boss Les Wexner, 82, may step... 
EXCLUSIVE FIRST LOOK: Jeffrey Epstein victim recoils as she...

'I've been fortunate to work with countless, world-class models and gifted professionals and take great pride in the mutual respect we have for each other,' Razek continued, declining to comment on a detailed list of allegations.

Wexner is the founder and CEO of L Brands, which is the parent company of Victoria's Secret, Bath & Body Works, and Pink.

Razek, 71, is the former chief marketing officer of the parent company and for 27 years was in charge of casting the Victoria's Secret Angels. He resigned last summer after public criticism of his reluctance to hire transgender and plus-sized models.

On multiple occasions, Wexner was heard demeaning women, the Times reports, and Razek is accused of more outrageous behavior.

In 2018, supermodel Bella Hadid was being fitted at the annual Victoria's Secret fashion show when Razek said'forget the panties,' according to three people present.

Sitting on a couch, he also wondered aloud whether the TV network would allow her to walk 'down the runway with those perfect t***ies,' the people said — though one disagreed and believes he said 'perfect breasts.'



In 2018, supermodel Bella Hadid (left) was being fitted at the annual Victoria's Secret fashion show when Razek (right) declaimed 'forget the panties,' three people told the Times
Ed Razek reportedly wondered aloud whether the TV network would allow Bella Hadid to walk 'down the runway with those perfect t***ies,'

At the same fitting, Razek placed his hand on another model's underwear-covered crotch, three people said.

A human resources complaint was filed over Razek detailing more than a dozen allegations, the Times reported.

At castings, Razek sometimes asked models in their bras and underwear for their phone numbers, three people who witnessed his advances told the Times. He urged others to sit on his lap.

'What was most alarming to me, as someone who was always raised as an independent woman, was just how ingrained this behavior was,' Casey Crowe Taylor, a former public relations employee at Victoria's Secret who said she had witnessed Razek's conduct firsthand, told the Times on the record.

'This abuse was just laughed off and accepted as normal. It was almost like brainwashing. And anyone who tried to do anything about it wasn't just ignored. They were punished.'

Taylor says that in 2015, Razek confronted her at a company buffet lunch and berated her for getting up for seconds.

He told the 5-foot-10, 140-pound PR staffer that she needed to lay off the pasta and bread as dozens of coworkers looked on, she said.

Taylor says that her complaint to human resources appeared to go nowhere, and that she quit the company a few weeks later. 


+7



Les Wexner and model Stella Maxwell pose at the 2016 Fragrance Foundation Awards
Wexner's connection to Epstein

Epstein, who ran a purported hedge fund, never had any publicly disclosed clients as a money manager, other than the billionaire Wexner.

Last year, Wexner accused Epstein of misappropriating 'vast sums' of his fortune while managing his personal finances, and said he had cut ties with Epstein a decade prior.

'I know now that my trust in him was grossly misplaced, and I deeply regret having ever crossed his path,' Wexner wrote in a letter to members of his charitable foundation, which focuses on the development of Jewish professional and volunteer leaders.

Wexner is known to have sold Epstein the Manhattan mansion where he hosted his infamous parties.

For over a decade, from 1995 through 2006, Epstein lied to aspiring models that he worked for Victoria's Secret and could help them land gigs, according to the Times.


Jeffrey Epstein is seen at the first Victoria's Secret Fashion Show at the Plaza Hotel in 1995

'I had spent all of my savings getting Victoria's Secret lingerie to prepare for what I thought would be my audition,' a woman identified as Jane Doe said in a statement read aloud last summer in a federal court hearing in the Epstein case.

'But instead it seemed like a casting call for prostitution. I felt like I was in hell,' she said.

Three L Brands executives told the Times that Wexner was alerted to Epstein's sick and predatory behavior as early as the mid-1990s — but that there was no sign he ever took action.

Epstein died behind bars in August 2019, a little over a month after he was arrested and charged with sex trafficking dozens of underage girls as young as 14 from at least 2002 to 2005. His death was officially ruled a suicide.

In July 2019, the L Brands board hired an outside law firm to investigate what role Epstein played at the company. The findings have not been made public.

Wexner is the longest-serving CEO of a Standard & Poor's 500 company, having served as CEO for more than five decades.

He founded what would eventually become L Brands in 1963 with one The Limited retail store, according to the company's website.


NOTE THE DATE JANUARY 24,2020 

Bella Hadid looks radiant as she leaves Paris Fashion Week


Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
0:00
Previous
Play
Skip
Mute
Current Time0:00
/
Duration Time0:20
Fullscreen
Need Text
‘Angels’ in Hell: The Culture of Misogyny Inside Victoria’s Secret

A Times investigation found widespread bullying and harassment of employees and models. The company expresses “regret.


On the runway at the 2018 Victoria’s Secret fashion show.

Credit...Timothy A. Clary/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

By Jessica Silver-Greenberg, Katherine Rosman, Sapna Maheshwari and James B. Stewart
Feb. 1, 2020

Victoria’s Secret defined femininity for millions of women. Its catalog and fashion shows were popular touchstones. For models, landing a spot as an “Angel” all but guaranteed international stardom.

But inside the company, two powerful men presided over an entrenched culture of misogyny, bullying and harassment, according to interviews with more than 30 current and former executives, employees, contractors and models, as well as court filings and other documents.

Ed Razek, for decades one of the top executives at L Brands, the parent company of Victoria’s Secret, was the subject of repeated complaints about inappropriate conduct. He tried to kiss models. He asked them to sit on his lap. He touched one’s crotch ahead of the 2018 Victoria’s Secret fashion show.

Executives said they had alerted Leslie Wexner, the billionaire founder and chief executive of L Brands, about his deputy’s pattern of behavior. Some women who complained faced retaliation. One model, Andi Muise, said Victoria’s Secret had stopped hiring her for its fashion shows after she rebuffed Mr. Razek’s advances.

A number of the brand’s models agreed to pose nude, often without being paid, for a prominent Victoria’s Secret photographer who later used some pictures in an expensive coffee-table book — an arrangement that made L Brands executives uncomfortable about women feeling pressured to take their clothes off.

The atmosphere was set at the top. Mr. Razek, the chief marketing officer, was perceived as Mr. Wexner’s proxy, leaving many employees with the impression he was invincible, according to current and former employees. On multiple occasions, Mr. Wexner himself was heard demeaning women.


Image

Leslie Wexner, left, and Ed Razek, the two men who steered 
Victoria’s Secret.Credit...Astrid Stawiarz/Getty Images for
 Fragrance Foundation 2016 Fragrance Foundation Awards
 presented by Hearst Magazines - Show on June 7, 2016 in New York City

“What was most alarming to me, as someone who was always raised as an independent woman, was just how ingrained this behavior was,” said Casey Crowe Taylor, a former public relations employee at Victoria’s Secret who said she had witnessed Mr. Razek’s conduct. “This abuse was just laughed off and accepted as normal. It was almost like brainwashing. And anyone who tried to do anything about it wasn’t just ignored. They were punished.”

The interviews with the models and employees add to a picture of Victoria’s Secret as a troubled organization, an image that was already coming into focus last year when Mr. Wexner’s ties to the sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein became public. Mr. Epstein, who managed Mr. Wexner’s multibillion-dollar fortune, lured some young women by posing as a recruiter for Victoria’s Secret models.

L Brands, the publicly traded company that also owns Bath & Body Works, is on the brink of a high-stakes transition. The annual Victoria’s Secret fashion show has been canceled after nearly two decades on network TV. Mr. Razek, 71, stepped down from L Brands in August. And Mr. Wexner, 82, is exploring plans to retire and to sell the lingerie company, people familiar with the matter said.

As those plans progress, L Brands’ treatment of women is likely to come under even closer scrutiny.

In response to detailed questions from The New York Times, Tammy Roberts Myers, a spokeswoman for L Brands, provided a statement on behalf of the board’s independent directors. She said that the company “is intensely focused” on corporate governance, workplace and compliance practices and that it had “made significant strides.”

“We regret any instance where we did not achieve this objective and are fully committed to continuous improvement and complete accountability,” she said. The statement did not dispute any of The Times’s reporting.

Mr. Razek said in an email: “The accusations in this reporting are categorically untrue, misconstrued or taken out of context. I’ve been fortunate to work with countless, world-class models and gifted professionals and take great pride in the mutual respect we have for each other.” He declined to comment on a detailed list of allegations.

Thomas Davies, a spokesman for Mr. Wexner, declined to comment.


Fiery Explosions

A Victoria’s Secret store in Beijing. Sales have been declining, 
and the parent company’s stock price has dropped sharply
 since 2015.Credit...Ng Han Guan/Associated Press

Victoria’s Secret, which Mr. Wexner bought for $1 million in 1982 and turned into a lingerie powerhouse, is struggling.

The societal norms defining beauty and sexiness have been changing for years, with a greater value on a wide range of body types, skin colors and gender identities. Victoria’s Secret hasn’t kept pace. Some of its ad campaigns, for example, seem more like a stereotypical male fantasy — the director Michael Bay filmed a TV spot in which scantily clad models strutted in front of helicopters, motorcycles and fiery explosions — than a realistic encapsulation of what women want.

With its sales declining, Victoria’s Secret has been closing stores. Shares of L Brands have fallen more than 75 percent from their 2015 peak.

Six current and former executives said in interviews that when they tried to steer the company away from what one called its “porny” image, they were rebuffed. Three said they had been driven out of the company.

Criticism of Victoria’s Secret’s anachronistic marketing went viral in 2018 when Mr. Razek expressed no interest in casting plus-size and “transsexual” models in the fashion show.

Then, last summer, Mr. Epstein was charged with sex trafficking, and the festering business problems at Victoria’s Secret escalated into a public crisis.

Mr. Wexner and Mr. Epstein had been tight. The retail tycoon gave the financier carte blanche to manage his billions, elevating Mr. Epstein’s stature and affording him an opulent lifestyle. Mr. Wexner has said he and Mr. Epstein parted ways around 2007, the year after Florida prosecutors charged him with a sex crime.

On multiple occasions from 1995 through 2006, Mr. Epstein lied to aspiring models that he worked for Victoria’s Secret and could help them land gigs. He invited them for auditions, which at least twice ended with Mr. Epstein assaulting them, according to the women and court filings.


Jeffrey Epstein, second from the left, at the first fashion show in 1995.Credit...Patrick McMullan, via Getty Images
Image
 
An “Angel” at the 1998 show, an event that Mr. Razek developed into a cultural phenomenon.Credit...Stephane Cardinale/Sygma, via Getty Images

“I had spent all of my savings getting Victoria’s Secret lingerie to prepare for what I thought would be my audition,” a woman identified as Jane Doe said in a statement read aloud last summer in a federal court hearing in the Epstein case. “But instead it seemed like a casting call for prostitution. I felt like I was in hell.”

Three L Brands executives said Mr. Wexner was alerted in the mid-1990s about Mr. Epstein’s attempts to recruit women. The executives said there was no sign that Mr. Wexner had acted on the complaints.

After Mr. Epstein’s arrest last summer, L Brands said, it hired the law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell to conduct “a thorough review” of the matter at the request of its board of directors. The exact focus of the review is unclear. Mr. Epstein committed suicide in jail in August while he awaited trial on federal sex-trafficking charges.

Davis Polk has worked for L Brands for years. Mr. Wexner’s wife, Abigail, previously worked at the firm. Dennis S. Hersch, a former L Brands board member and a financial adviser to the Wexners, was a longtime partner at Davis Polk. The law firm also has contributed money to Ohio State University’s Wexner Center for the Arts.

Employees interviewed for this article said Davis Polk had not contacted them.

A Davis Polk spokeswoman didn’t respond to requests for comment.
‘Someplace Sexy to Take You’

Mr. Razek, who announced in August that he was leaving
 Victoria’s Secret, backstage at the 2014 fashion show.
Credit...Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg

“With the exception of Les, I’ve been with L Brands longer than anyone,” Mr. Razek wrote to employees in August when he announced he was leaving the company he had joined in 1983.

Mr. Razek was instrumental in selecting the brand’s supermodels — known as “Angels” and bestowed with enormous, feathery wings — and in creating the company’s macho TV ads.

But his biggest legacy was the annual fashion show, which became a global cultural phenomenon.

“That’s really where he sunk his teeth into the business,” said Cynthia Fedus-Fields, the former chief executive of the Victoria’s Secret division responsible for its catalog. By 2000, she said, Mr. Razek had grown so powerful that “he spoke for Les.”

Sometimes Mr. Wexner spoke for himself.

In March, at a meeting at Victoria’s Secret headquarters in Columbus, Ohio, an employee asked Mr. Wexner what he thought about the retail industry’s embrace of different body types. He was dismissive.

“Nobody goes to a plastic surgeon and says, ‘Make me fat,’” Mr. Wexner replied, according to two attendees.

Mr. Razek often reminded models that their careers were in his hands, according to models and current and former executives who heard his remarks.

Alyssa Miller, who had been an occasional Victoria’s Secret model, described Mr. Razek as someone who exuded “toxic masculinity.” She summed up his attitude as: “I am the holder of the power. I can make you or break you.”

Andi Muise in 2007. After rebuffing Mr. Razek’s 
advances, she said, she was left out of the 
2008 Victoria’s Secret show.
Credit...Carlo Buscemi/WireImage

At castings, Mr. Razek sometimes asked models in their bras and underwear for their phone numbers, according to three people who witnessed his advances. He urged others to sit on his lap. Two models said he had asked them to have private dinners with him.

One was Ms. Muise. In 2007, after two years of wearing the coveted angel wings in the Victoria’s Secret runway show, the 19-year-old was invited to dinner with Mr. Razek. She was excited to cultivate a professional relationship with one of the fashion industry’s most powerful men, she said.

Mr. Razek picked her up in a chauffeured car. On the way to the restaurant, he tried to kiss her, she said. Ms. Muise rebuffed him; Mr. Razek persisted.

For months, he sent her intimate emails, which The Times reviewed. At one point he suggested they move in together in his house in Turks and Caicos. Another time, he urged Ms. Muise to help him find a home in the Dominican Republic for them to share.

“I need someplace sexy to take you!” he wrote.

Ms. Muise maintained a polite tone in her emails, trying to protect her career. When Mr. Razek asked her to come to his New York home for dinner, Ms. Muise said the prospect of dining alone with Mr. Razek made her uneasy; she skipped the dinner.

She soon learned that for the first time in four years, Victoria’s Secret had not picked her for its 2008 fashion show.

‘Forget the Panties’

The 2017 fashion show. Mr. Razek’s behavior at a fitting 
a year later led to a complaint to human resources.
Credit...Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images for Victoria's Secret

In 2018, at a fitting ahead of the fashion show, the supermodel Bella Hadid was being measured for underwear that would meet broadcast standards. Mr. Razek sat on a couch, watching.

“Forget the panties,” he declared, according to three people who were there and a fourth who was told about it. The bigger question, he said, was whether the TV network would let Ms. Hadid walk “down the runway with those perfect titties.” (One witness remembered Mr. Razek using the word “breasts,” not “titties.”)

At the same fitting, Mr. Razek placed his hand on another model’s underwear-clad crotch, three people said.

An employee complained to the human resources department about Mr. Razek’s behavior, according to three people. The employee presented H.R. with a document last summer listing more than a dozen allegations about Mr. Razek, including his demeaning comments and inappropriate touching of women, according to a copy of the document reviewed by The Times.

It wasn’t the first H.R. complaint about him.

At a photo shoot in June 2015, the company put out a buffet lunch for staff. Ms. Crowe Taylor, the public relations employee, went to get seconds. Mr. Razek intercepted her, she said. He blocked her path and looked her up and down. Then, with dozens of people watching and Ms. Crowe Taylor holding her empty plate, he tore into her, berating her about her weight and telling her to lay off the pasta and bread.

Ms. Crowe Taylor, who was 5-foot-10 and 140 pounds, fled to a bathroom and burst into tears. She said that she had complained to H.R. but that as far as she could tell, nothing happened. She quit weeks later.

In October, shortly after Mr. Razek had left the company, Monica Mitro, a top public-relations executive at Victoria’s Secret, lodged a harassment complaint against him with a former member of the L Brands board of directors, according to five people familiar with the matter. She told colleagues that she had gone to the former director because she didn’t trust the H.R. department.

The next day, the head of H.R. told Ms. Mitro that she was being placed on administrative leave, the people said. She recently reached a financial settlement with the company, they said.

Mr. Razek’s son, Scott, also worked at Victoria’s Secret. Sometime after the H.R. department was told about his mistreatment of a female colleague, he was transferred to Bath & Body Works, according to four people familiar with the matter. He didn’t respond to requests for comment.

The woman he mistreated later received a settlement from Victoria’s Secret, according to several current and former employees.

Mr. Wexner was seldom in New York, where much of the fashion show’s staff was based, leaving employees with the impression that Mr. Razek was his proxy. Mr. Razek flaunted that power, invoking Mr. Wexner’s name to get his way.

Even as complaints piled up, the elder Mr. Razek maintained Mr. Wexner’s support. In 2013, Mr. Wexner helped raise a $1.2 million fund in Mr. Razek’s name at Ohio State University’s cancer center.

‘A Voyeuristic Journey’

 
Russell James collected his nude photographs of Victoria’s Secret models in a book 
that sells for $1,800 and $3,600.Credit...Julie Glassberg for The New York Times

Russell James was one of Victoria’s Secret’s go-to photographers. The company at times paid him tens of thousands of dollars a day, according to draft contracts reviewed by The Times.

At the end of sessions with models, Mr. James sometimes asked if they would be photographed nude, according to models and L Brands executives. Mr. James was popular; he had a knack for making women feel comfortable. He also had a close relationship with Mr. Razek. The women often consented.

The nude photo shoots weren’t covered under the models’ contracts with Victoria’s Secret, which meant they weren’t paid for the extra work.

In the industry, “everyone is using their influence to get something,” said Ms. Miller, the model. “With Russell, it was getting girls to pose for his books or portrait series nude.”

In 2014, Mr. James published a glossy collectors’ book, “Angels,” which featured some of the nude photos. The women agreed to have their photos included in the book, according to Martin Singer, a lawyer for Mr. James.

Two versions of the books currently sell on Mr. James’s website for $1,800 and $3,600. Victoria’s Secret hosted a launch event for “Angels” during New York fashion week in 2014. Attendees included supermodels and the company’s chief executive at the time, Sharen Turney.

“This ample volume offers an unprecedented and personal view into James’s most intimate portrait sittings,” the book’s jacket says, noting that Mr. James met many of the women during his 15 years working for Victoria’s Secret. “Readers will be taken on a voyeuristic journey into a world of subtle provocation.”

At one point, a poster-size version of one of the book’s photos was displayed in a Victoria’s Secret store in Las Vegas. The model’s agent complained to Victoria’s Secret that his client’s photo was being used in the store without her consent. Mr. James also complained about it and asked for it to be removed, according to Mr. Singer. The company took down the photo.

In 2010, Alison Nix, a 22-year-old model who had worked occasionally with Victoria’s Secret, was invited to attend a weekend event to raise money for the nonprofit foundation run by Richard Branson’s Virgin Group. The venue was Mr. Branson’s private Necker Island in the Caribbean.

The live-streamed event, hosted by Mr. Branson and Mr. James, was billed as featuring “some of the world’s most stunning supermodels.”

Mr. James with Richard Branson, the Virgin Group billionaire, 
at an event promoting Mr. James’s book “Angels” in 2014.
Credit...Michael Loccisano/Getty Images for Victoria's Secret

Ms. Nix said her agent had told her that if she chose to go on the all-expenses-paid trip, she’d be expected to pose for nude beach photos shot by Mr. James. She said that was fine. She was left with the impression, she said, that “if Russell likes you, you could start working with Victoria’s Secret.”

Mr. Singer, the lawyer for Mr. James, said his client had no influence over whom Victoria’s Secret selected as models. He said models were not required to pose for photos, nude or otherwise. He said Mr. James had agreed to shoot the nude photos at Necker Island at the request of the models and their agents “as a favor and professional courtesy.”

Ms. Nix called Mr. Singer’s comments “absurd.”

She said that she and other models who attended the event were provided with copious amounts of alcohol and were expected to mingle with men, including Mr. Branson.

“We were shipped out there, and all these rich men were flirting with us,” she recalled. She said the models were asking themselves, “Are we here as high-end prostitutes or for charity?”

The last day on the island, Ms. Nix said, she and at least three other models lined up to have their nude photos shot by Mr. James.

A spokeswoman for Mr. Branson said he had “no knowledge of anyone being invited to the event for any reason” beside the charity fund-raiser.

Two photos of Ms. Nix from that weekend — one, in profile, with her breasts obscured but her bare bottom exposed — appeared near the middle of Mr. James’s “Angels” book, with her consent.

Ms. Nix never landed another modeling gig with Victoria’s Secret. Was she disappointed?

“To be honest, I didn’t expect much after the trip,” she said. “I could tell I wasn’t right for the brand.”

Emily Steel and Mike Baker contributed reporting. Susan Beachy contributed research.

Jessica Silver-Greenberg is an investigative reporter on the business desk. She was previously a finance reporter at the Wall Street Journal. @jbsgreenbergFacebook

Katherine Rosman is a features reporter on the Styles desk. She covers media, the business of fitness, and the politics of gender. She joined The Times in 2014. @katierosman

Sapna Maheshwari covers retail. She has won reporting awards from the Society of American Business Editors and Writers and the Newswomen’s Club of New York and was on Time’s list of “140 Best Twitter Feeds of 2014.” @sapnaFacebook

James B. Stewart is a columnist at The Times, a staff writer at The New Yorker and the author of nine books. He won the 1998 Pulitzer Prize for explanatory journalism, and is a professor of business journalism at Columbia University. 

A version of this article appears in print on Feb. 2, 2020, Section A, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: The ‘Angels’ at Victoria’s Secret Suffered a Culture of Misogyny.
Extinction Rebellion Stage Climate Protest at McKinsey's London Office
MAYOR PETE'S OLD EMPLOYER

By Reuters Feb. 1, 2020
LONDON — Civil disobedience group Extinction Rebellion staged a protest outside McKinsey & Company's London office on Friday to demand the consulting firm use its influence over companies and governments to drive far-reaching action on climate change.

At least 30 protesters gathered outside the building holding banners emblazoned with slogans such as "Business As Usual = Death" and "No More Green Wash, Act Now," according to a Reuters photographer on the scene.

Extinction Rebellion activists also wheeled a mock-up of an elephant to McKinsey's office to symbolize what they see as "the elephant in the room" of the climate crisis.

McKinsey did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The protest was the latest in a series held outside McKinsey on alternate Friday mornings since November by Extinction Rebellion, which wants companies and governments to take rapid action to stabilize the Earth's climate by slashing greenhouse gas emissions and preserving collapsing ecosystems.

Extinction Rebellion says it wants McKinsey's global managing partner Kevin Sneader to publicly declare a "a climate and ecological emergency" which contains explicit warnings about the prospect of runaway global warming.

The movement also wants the firm to publish a science-based target for reducing its greenhouse gas emissions and disclose what percentage of its clients by sector are on track for reducing their emissions in line with global temperature goals.

"Extinction Rebellion's latest target is McKinsey & Co, the world’s leading management consultants, high priests of global capitalism," Extinction Rebellion said in a statement.

"XR is demanding that McKinsey use its enormous influence over governments and business to effect drastic reduction of global carbon emissions and prevent the worst effects of climate breakdown," the group, also known as XR, said.

A Reuters photographer on the scene said the protest was peaceful with no sign of any confrontation between activists and workers arriving at the building.

(Reporting by Matthew Green; editing by Michael Holden and Hugh Lawson)







Mathematicians, geeks celebrated rare palindrome day 2/ 2/ 2020

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Mathematicians and geeks everywhere celebrated a rare occurrence Sunday, 02/02/2020, a kind of 8-digit palindrome that hasn’t happened for more than 900 years.
A palindrome is any sequence, phrase or word that reads the same backward as forward. And 02/02/2020 is considered a “universal palindrome” because it reads the same whether written as “Month/Day/Year” as the United States does, or “Day/Month/Year” as many other countries do.
The last universal palindrome occurred on 11/11/1111. The next one won’t come until 12/12/2121.
“It’s possible to live your entire life without ever having gone through a universal palindrome, so it’s pretty cool to have one in your lifetime,” said Heather Pierce, a mathematics lecturer at Emmanuel College in Boston.
The date was cause for celebration on Twitter, where even those who don’t specialize in math got a kick out of the rare global palindrome.
“Another one won’t happen for 101 years, so make the most of this one! ” tweeted actor Mark Hamill of “Star Wars” fame.
“Are you guys pumped? The big day is finally here!!” tweeted musical comedian “Weird Al” Yankovic.
“Right now people all across the country are getting together with friends and loved ones to celebrate - so exciting. Anyway, from my house to yours, Happy Palindrome Day!”
The Royal Wedding Chapel in Las Vegas was hoping the date would have special meaning for many couples. The chapel noted in its advertising that couples who marry on 02/02/2020 would have their two-year anniversaries on 02/02/2022. “Two being the ultimate symbolic number representing you and your spouse to be.”


Saturday, February 01, 2020


Secret Israeli doc reveals plan to maintain Arabs off their lands – Israel Information



Israel’s protection institution has for years endeavored to hide historic documentation in numerous archives across the nation, as was revealed in an article in Haaretz final July.
That article, which adopted up on a research by the Akevot Institute for Israeli-Palestinian Battle Analysis, famous that for closed to 20 years, the employees at Malmab – the Protection Ministry’s secretive safety division (the identify is a Hebrew acronym for “director of safety of the protection institution”) – had been visiting public and private archives and forcing their directors to mothball documents relating to Israeli history, with particular emphasis on the Arab-Israeli battle. This was accomplished with out authorized authority. The article sparked a furor, and dozens of researchers and historians urged the protection minister of the time, Benjamin Netanyahu, to halt the clandestine criminal activity. Their enchantment acquired no response.
Secret Israeli Document Reveals Plan to Keep Arabs Off Their Lands 
Adam Raz Jan 31, 2020 
A document unsealed after 60 years reveals the Israeli government’s secret intentions behind the imposition of a military government on the country’s Arab citizens in 1948: not to enhance security but to ensure Jewish control of the land
 Israel s defense establishment has for years endeavored to conceal historical documentation in various archives around the country, as was revealed in an article in Haaretz last July.


Secret 60 year-old document reveals israel had no security concerns but a definitive plan to seize control of as much of Palestine as possible

For many young evangelicals in Iowa, climate is front and centre

As Iowa kicks off 2020 US presidential primary and caucus season, young evangelicals are demanding climate action.
Protesters in Des Moines, Iowa, demand climate action [Teresa Krug/Al Jazeera]

Pella, Iowa, United States - Seated around long tables over lunch, two dozen students at Iowa's Central College opened their monthly meeting on sustainability by discussing the upcoming Iowa caucuses. Among other things, the group has organised marches to the mayor's office and written letters to the elected officials.

There was no official endorsement, but Efrain Garcia reminded students to register and show up.

"This is a really big election, because we have a real shot at electing a person, you can determine who that person is, that really supports sustainability," Garcia said.

Iowans will gather at different sites around the state on Monday evening to choose candidates for the 2020 United States presidential elections.

For this group of students at Central College, a school affiliated with the Reformed Church of America, the election is just as much, if not more, about engaging with an issue many did grow up talking about as it is about the issues that have historically driven evangelicals and other Christians to the polls.

"I come from a very conservative family and a very conservative background, and so I used to think the sustainability movement was a very liberal agenda and a very liberal idea. And I was very turned off to the idea that I was required to take a sustainability class, because it wasn't something that I was interested in," said Carter Terpstra, who lives in one of the green pods on campus, where residents are required to present projects in order to keep living there, such as examining the recycling system in the athletic facilities. All students are required to take a class on sustainability.

Terpstra started to change his mind when he saw the issues that the sustainability movement was trying to address some of the things he cared about as a Christian.

"They're fighting for justice. Why wouldn't I be on board with that? But at the same time, there were some things where I was like, well, I agree and disagree with even within the whole spectrum of what sustainability is," Terpstra said. "In hindsight now, it's better that I was educated on it than not. Because now I know what it's all about. My preconceived ideas did not meet reality."

Efrain Garcia speaks to Claire Ackerman and Savanna Henning at Central College [Teresa Krug/Al Jazeera]

Claire Ackerman declined to say what political party she affiliates with, but said her Christian faith compelled her to consider protection for the earth.

"I don't really feel a tension between my political party and my belief in climate change," said Claire Ackerman.

Through one campus ministry she is a member of, Savanna Henning said she and others organised a campus fair that hosted businesses that promote sustainable and ethical business practices.

"I guess I got really passionate about engaging with faith communities when I started seeing people that combined faith with politics and claimed things that aren't true," said Savanna Henning. "I would see things on Twitter where people would say, 'Hey, like even if climate change is real, who cares? It's all in God's hands.' That kind of thing, and I was like, 'Hey, that's not what I stand for. That's not what I believe. We wouldn't say that about people who are impoverished.'"

Stickers and a candidate worksheet at Central College [Teresa Krug/Al Jazeera]

For many of the students who came from religious backgrounds, conversations around climate change were not only absent, they were previously discouraged.

"[In church] we received at least this implicit message on climate change that we needed to keep that out of the church; it was too politicised, it was too liberal, because many of us grew up in more conservative context," said Kyle Meyaard-Schaap, national organiser and spokesman with Young Evangelicals for Climate Action (YECA), a group has been around for less than a decade, and doesn't advocate for one political party over another.
A choice between issues?

Because Iowa kicks off the presidential primary and caucus season every four years, much ado is usually made over the influence that evangelicals have, though most major polls indicate the overall religiosity of the state as "average" for the US. It's not as religious as the southern part of the US, but more religious than the East and West coasts. While Republicans are seen as more vocal when it comes to discussing their faith, a few Democratic candidates - especially former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg - has talked openly about attending church regularly and has called on the Democratic Party not to shy away from this issue.

In general, the last decade has seen a decline in those who identify as Christian. But their influence is still felt, because they reliably show up and vote.

Older evangelicals are generally far more likely to deny climate change is happening than the general public. While there isn't much data on younger evangelicals' opinions of climate change, many people who study this demographic say that in general this group more closely aligns with others in their generation who believe that climate change is a "major threat".

Savanna Henning marches in a climate change protest in Des Moines, Iowa [Teresa Krug/Al Jazeera]

Nationally, the majority of white evangelicals lean conservative and now constitute a third of the Republican base. President Donald Trump, has rolled back many regulations regarding the environment, but has also been applauded by Christian leaders for restricting funding for abortion access and installing new conservative judges on the federal bench.

In a recent poll by the Public Religion Research Institute, 77 percent of white evangelical Protestants approve of the job Trump is doing. That number slides to about half (54 percent ) among white mainline Protestants and white Catholics (48 percent) and overwhelmingly disapproval among Hispanic Catholics (72 percent) and black Protestants (86 percent).

Ryan Burge, assistant professor of political science at Eastern Illinois University, said he doesn't see climate change yet translating into a big enough issue for young, conservative evangelicals to prioritise it over other partisan issues, including abortion and smaller government.

"I think that they would like the Republican party to not be full of climate deniers, but it's not enough for almost any of them to change who they vote for," Burge said.

YECA's Meyaard-Schaap said many newcomers to the climate action movement see climate change as an extension of them living out their faith, rather than separate from it, and view it as another pro-life issue.

"I think for younger evangelicals, the choice is not to resist climate action and remain sceptical or go all in on climate action. I think the choice is to leave the church and be active on climate issues or remain in the church and be active on climate issues," Meyaard-Schaap said, adding, however, that he does see young people's views on climate change "complicating" their approach to voting.
'Loud and proud'

Unlike in primaries, counting in Democratic caucuses in Iowa is done publicly, which means the event tends to draw more vocal activists: people who are less concerned with which neighbours see for who and how they vote.

If they do decide to caucus, Burge said he would expect to see younger evangelicals, who have warmed to the issue of same-sex marriages more than their parents, choose a more moderate candidate like Buttigieg than more progressive candidates like Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.

"If you see evangelicals caucus for the Democrats, they're gonna be loud and proud. They can't do it quietly, because you're gonna have to have people talk about it," said Burge. "I think it's worth watching, but white evangelicals are not going to vote for a Democrat over a Republican over the environment. If they don't vote for Trump, it's because they're not voting for Trump because they dislike him as a person, his morality or his policies."

Protesters march through Des, Moines, Iowa to demand climate action [Teresa Krug/Al Jazeera]

Zach Bonner, lecturer of political science at Iowa State University, agreed with Burge that younger evangelicals are considering issues like climate change in a way that runs contrary to their parents, but it's not yet a big enough issue to sway that many votes.

He also pointed out that while climate change has gotten some attention this election from several Democratic candidates, the issue is also not the Democratic Party's number one concern.

"I think the Democratic side has taken it on as a main party platform issue more so than the Republican side, but I think there's still plenty of other issues that are more front and centre, such as dealing with healthcare or gun violence," Bonner said.

As for Henning, who did not divulge her political affiliation, she said she is only considering candidates who consider the environment. Moroever, she said she and other young evangelicals - conservative and liberal - are pushing for more than just what happens at the ballot box.

"It's about changing the mindset of a nation," Henning said.


SOURCE: AL JAZEERA NEWS
Thousands protest in US cities against India citizenship law
Indian Americans, joined by civil rights groups, hold demonstrations in 30 US cities demanding repeal of CAA.


by Mohammad Ali 27 Jan 2020
Protesters have accused the Modi government of waging a war against Muslims, students, Dalits and marginalised sections of society [Mohammad Ali/Al Jazeera]

New York, United States - Thousands of Indian Americans, joined by several civil rights organisations, have staged protests across dozens of US cities against policies of Prime Minister Narendra Modi that critics say undermine the country's secular constitution.

On Sunday, which marked India's Republic Day, Mohammad Mustaqeem and his eight-year-old son, along with thousands of others, gathered outside the Indian embassy in New York to protest against the recently passed citizenship law that makes faith a basis for attaining Indian citizenship.
More:

Protests mark Republic Day celebrations

India's anti-CAA protesters launch postcards to PM Modi campaign

India's Supreme Court refuses to strike down citizenship law

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) coupled with a plan to implement a nationwide counting of citizenship (National Register of Citizens or NRC) by India's Hindu nationalist government has triggered widespread protests in the South Asian nation.

In the northeast Indian state of Assam, nearly two million people were dropped from the citizenship list in 2019 and many fear a nationwide NRC will possibly render millions of Indians stateless.

Mustaqeem from the eastern Indian state of Bihar says his nephew Mohammad Irfan was among those injured last month when police stormed the library inside Jamia Millia Islamia university in New Delhi.
'Modi has started war against Muslims'

Mustaqeem says his nephew's left leg and right hand were fractured in the police action, which caused a public outcry. The students were protesting against the CAA and the NRC that activists say discriminates against India's Muslims.

"I can't go back to India right now. But I have come here to protest against the war Modi has started against India's Muslims," Mustaqeem told Al Jazeera.

He accused the Modi government of waging a war against Muslims, students, Dalits and marginalised sections of society.

"Instead of studying, my nephew is under treatment in Araria [Bihar state]. Is this the India we want to hand over to our next generation?" Mustaqeem asked.

India American protesters hold banners at an anti-CAA demonstration in New York City [Mohammad Ali/Al Jazeera]

Waving hundreds of Indian flags, protesters raised banners against Prime Minister Modi, Home Minister Amit Shah, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its ideological parent, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).

The New York protest was part of nationwide protests and marches organised by the recently formed Coalition to Stop Genocide - a broad coalition of Indian Americans and US-based civil rights organisations such as the Indian American Muslim Council, Hindus for Human Rights, Equity Labs, Shri Guru Ravidass Sabha of New York, Black Lives Matter and the Jewish Voice for Peace.

The protesters demanded the repeal of the CAA in India, and called for action by the US government, including possible sanctions on India's Home Minister Shah, as recommended by the US Commission on International Religious Freedom.

"What is happening in India, is happening in the name of Hinduism. But the Hinduism that we practise is inclusive and has love at its centre. Whereas the Hindu nationalism is exclusive by definition and seems to have hatred at its centre," said Sunita Viswanath from Hindus for Human Rights.

The protesting men, women and children of all ages held banners and shouted slogans against the Indian government's right-wing policies. They unfurled the Indian flag and recited the national anthem to mark their Republic Day.

A poster said "Hindu + Muslim = India’s greatest love stories. You can't change that," while another said, "When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty." Many posters referred to "Martin Luther King’s dream vs India's Nazi vision".
'We, the people of India'

With a banner flaunting Dalit icons like Saint Ravidas along with Baba Bhimrao Ambedkar – the architect of India's constitution - Sitaram joined the protest along with his friends from Connecticut.

"It is wrong to assume that the CAA is only against Muslim community. Laws like CAA and provisions like NRC and NPR represent the destruction of the constitution brick by brick by Narendra Modi," the 52-year-old said.

"If we don't speak now, there will be nothing and no one left to speak for," said Sitaram, who is associated with the International Bahujan Organization - a Dalit group.

He and other protesters read the preamble of the Indian Constitution reminding Modi that India belonged to "We, the people of India", as Modi has been accused of pushing a Hindu supremacist agenda.

Shaik Ubaid, one of the organisers, said that protests were happening not only in India but around the world and it represented a global consensus against the "draconian" policies of the Modi government.

"They are also a clear indication that the world will not stand idly by while Hindutva's supremacist worldview takes India down the path of fascism," said Ubaid who was part of an initiative which led to a ban on Modi's entry into the US after the 2002 Gujarat religious riots.

Reverend Chloe Breyer, Executive Director of the Interfaith Center of New York, said that Martin Luther King Junior, who was inspired by Mahatma Gandhi, "called to speak for the voiceless".

"The CAA makes an enemy of India's own precious people, damaging the pluralistic democracy that has existed since 1947 and has been such an inspiration to the world," Breyer told Al Jazeera.

Hope

Students of Harvard University and representatives from the Indian diaspora also staged a 24-hour protest at Harvard Square in Boston to coincide with India's Republic Day.

"A lot of times I get tokenised because of my Dalit identity. It becomes almost a vulgarised presentation of Dalit body on a stage. But this protest I feel like I have agency and I am part of a larger dialogue," said Suraj Yengde, a researcher at Harvard University.

"But I would also hope that now that Dalits are coming for Muslims, there will be reciprocity in future," Yengde, author of a recent book, Caste Matters, told Al Jazeera by phone.

The protesters in Washington DC marched to the Indian Embassy.

"The brutal crackdown by government in India on the anti-CAA and anti-NRC protests has created a situation in which women in large numbers have come out on the streets to challenge the divisive-communal-fascist agenda of the government," said rights activist and Magsaysay Award winner Sandeep Pandey, who travelled to Washington, DC from India.

"It gives a hope that democracy and constitution can ultimately be saved by the common people from a government which is bent upon destroying them," he added.

A protest was also organised outside the Indian consulate in San Francisco.

"Indian Americans and people of conscience in the US are seeking accountability from the Hindu nationalist regime that wants to turn Indian Muslims into foreigners and render them stateless," said Ahsan Khan, President of the Indian American Muslim Council.


‘I’ll destroy your family’: India’s activists tell of false arrest and torture in custody

Uttar Pradesh’s leading protesters against new citizenship law believe they were rounded up to quell further dissent


The Observer
India
Hannah Ellis-Petersen in Delhi and Shaikh Azizur Rahman in Lucknow
Sat 1 Feb 2020 

 
Police officers confront protesters in Lucknow on 19 December. Photograph: STRINGER/Reuters

At 73 years old, Mohammad Shoaib had grown used to harassment from police. As one of India’s highest-profile activists, he had made a name fighting for Muslims falsely accused of being terrorists by the police, earning him powerful enemies.

But in late December, as he was brought into the police station in Lucknow, in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh, in the middle of the night, he felt something had shifted. “Police officers abused me badly while I was in their custody and they threatened me in many ways,” he said. “One [senior officer] said to me at the police station: ‘I will fuck your mother. I am going to throw all your family members in jail where they will rot for life. I will destroy your family’.”

As India erupted in protest over a controversial new citizenship bill late last year, Shoaib was among dozens of leading social and legal activists who began to be systematically and illegally targeted, rounded up and detained by police, with several tortured and most kept in prison on fabricated charges, without ever being presented to a magistrate, as the law requires.


While the BJP government is notoriously intolerant of critics, the systematic crackdown on some of the most recognisable civil society activists has been unprecedented in both scale and fervour. It has also been concentrated in Uttar Pradesh, where the BJP government led by chief minister Yogi Adityanath, known for his anti-Muslim and staunchly Hindu nationalist rhetoric, vowed “revenge” on those who had taken to the streets to protest at the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Police have been accused of firing on protesters, rounding up hundreds of innocent Muslims in the state and torturing men, women and children in custody.

In seven cases recounted to the Observer, activists alleged they had been detained on entirely falsified charges by police. For Shoaib, his detention was particularly farcical. He stands accused of leading a protest that turned violent in Lucknow on 19 December, despite the fact it occurred while he was under police house arrest, having been detained the night before. “Police kept my house under watch and restrained me from going out. How could I possibly be present at the protest site, away from my home that afternoon?” he said. “Yet, the police charged me with attempted murder, arson and rioting. For years many police officers have viewed me as their enemy and now they are portraying me as a conspirator and violent rioter, without any basis.” 

FacebookTwitterPinterest Mohammad Shoaib, 73, was accused of leading the Lucknow protest while he was under house arrest Photograph: Shaikh Azizur Rahman

After police failed to produce any evidence before a judge, Shoaib was bailed last month, following weeks behind bars. But the charges have not been dropped. “Activists are facing an increased level of pressure or crackdown,” he said of the past three months. “The government is trying to silence all types of dissent and shrink the space for activism. It is trying to break the backbone of activism in the state.” Sadaf Jafar, another prominent activist in Uttar Pradesh and spokesperson for the Congress political party, wept as she recounted the torture she says she endured when arrested on 19 December.

She says she was arrested while protesting peacefully at the Lucknow rally against the new citizenship law, and was among those later facing 20 charges, including inciting violence and attempted murder. She was detained until early January, when a judge granted her bail due to lack of evidence. While in the police station, Jafar said, officers subjected her to relentless racist and Islamophobic slurs. “They started slapping and beating me, calling me ‘Pakistani’ and other language I could never repeat.

“One of the female officers, who was filled with this anger, shouted: ‘I am going to beat you so hard I draw blood’,” said Jafar. “She pulled my hair and clawed my face and hands. And then another senior male officer told me he had seen me ‘talking big’ at the protest and that he would teach me a lesson; that he would charge me with attempted murder and make sure I ‘rotted in prison’. He pulled me down by my hair, kicked me in my stomach and knees… I have spent my life fighting for people’s rights but I never imagined the police would act in this way.”

It is not just Muslim activists who report torture. Deepak Kabir, 46, a prominent Hindu poet and activist, said he had been arrested and badly beaten after he went into a police station to look for fellow activists. “They are going after activists because we are willing to fight,” he said. “It’s a very thought out process to target well-known faces because if they crush us, then everyone else is immediately intimidated.” SR Darapuri, 76, a former senior police officer turned activist, who has long irritated authorities in Uttar Pradesh with his outspoken comments about extrajudicial killings by police, alleged the police had gone to “extreme lengths” to arrest and then charge him with rioting, attempted murder and criminal conspiracy related to Lucknow protests that turned violent. “For 46 hours they kept me without food,” he said. “I am a retired senior police officer from the rank as high as inspector general and I was forced to endure such torture.” Darapuri described how, after his arrest at home on 20 December, police brought him before a magistrate, as is legally required before he could be sent to jail. But the magistrate refused to grant permission, citing lack of evidence, and criticised the officers for Darapuri’s “wrongful arrest”. But that did not stop them. “After taking me back to Hazratganj police station, the police officer recorded a report in which he stated that I had been taken to a magistrate but he was not available,” he said. “This was not the truth. The magistrate refused to remand me in custody because he believed I was innocent. 

\Activist Sadaf Jafar says she was kicked in the stomach and knee by a senior police officer and told she would ‘rot in prison’. Photograph: Shaikh Azizur Rahman

The same day, Darapuri was taken to jail where he was kept until 5 December, when he was bailed. At the hearing the Uttar Pradesh police failed to produce any evidence against him, claiming video footage of his alleged offences was “too hazy or grainy and none of the people there could be identified”.

The Uttar Pradesh police and government have denied any wrongful and illegal arrests and torture in custody. Uttar Pradesh BJP spokesperson Rakesh Tripathi said: “Bail doesn’t mean that Sadaf and Darapuri have been given a clean chit. They will have to face trial in court. The statements made by them after release are objectionable, baseless and provocative.”

Yet the arrests of activists have continued. Last Wednesday, hours before he was due to address an anti-CAA rally in Mumbai, activist Dr Kafeel Khan was arrested by Uttar Pradesh Police Special Task Force for allegedly delivering a “provocative” speech in Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, at a rally on 12 December. On Friday, police filed new complaints against Shoaib, Kabir and several other activists after they staged a peaceful candlelit vigil against the act.

Sandeep Pandey, another prominent Lucknow-based activist involved in the anti-CAA protests described the escalation in attacks on critics. “My emails and phones have been kept under surveillance by the government,” he said. “We have been jailed before for activism-related activities but we used to get bail and come out of jail. Police didn’t misbehave with us. Now, in recent months, police have changed their attitude towards us and we are being badly abused by them… The rights activists are facing the worst crackdown in Uttar Pradesh; in no other state in India is the situation is as bad,” he said. “This is out and out a fascist regime.”

The passing of the citizenship amendment act in December has led to India’s greatest unrest for more than four decades. The law says all Hindu, Christian, Jain, Buddhist and Sikh migrants who arrived from Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan before 2014 can claim citizenship. But the same does not apply to Muslim migrants. Many believe the act brazenly discriminates against Muslims and could tear apart the secular foundations of India. There are also fears that associated plans for a national register of citizens will require only Muslims to produce evidence of their nationality, and could lead to detentions and deportation. Over the past month, millions have taken to the streets every week in the first backlash against Narendra Modi and his Hindu nationalist BJP government, and the response has increasingly been one of force, with public gatherings banned and peaceful student protesters met with violence and openly communal and anti-Muslim rhetoric used in the BJP campaign for the Delhi state elections which will be held next weekend.
---30---