Thursday, February 06, 2020

UPDATED
American Dirt,’ novel on migrants, ignites literary controversy

DEAR JOHN STEINBECK 

YOU ARE NOT AN OKIE SO WE CANNOT PUBLISH YOUR NOVEL; GRAPES OF WRATH

YOU ARE NOT NEANDERTHAL SO YOU CANNOT WRITE A NOVEL ABOUT PREHISTORIC MAMMOTH HUNTERS
The Clan of the Cave Bear - WikipediaThe Clan of the Cave Bear is an epic work of prehistoric fiction by Jean M. Auel about prehistoric times. It is the first book in the Earth's Children book series which speculates on the possibilities of interactions between Neanderthal and modern Cro-Magnon humans.

Search Results


Featured snippet from the web

DEMOCRACY NOW

Publisher Agrees to Boost Latinx Representation After Backlash to Whitewashed Novel “American Dirt”


STORYFEBRUARY 05, 2020
We look at the massive backlash and criticism against the novel “American Dirt” as a movement led by Latinx writers declares victory, demanding more representation in the publishing industry. Dignidad Literaria, or literary dignity, formed in response to the controversial immigration novel “American Dirt.” The author, Jeanine Cummins, who is not Mexican, received a seven-figure advance for the book, and it was chosen for Oprah’s Book Club. But its critics say “American Dirt” exploits and misrepresents Mexico and the experience of Mexican migrants. Critics also say the novel completely erases the voices of Central Americans. On Monday, the leaders of the literary dignity movement celebrated a successful meeting in New York City with the book’s publisher, Macmillan, the owner of Flatiron Books. The publisher agreed to expand Latinx representation in its staff and its publications. The campaign is also calling for an investigation into discriminatory practices in the publishing industry at large. We speak with two co-founders of Dignidad Literaria: in Los Angeles, Myriam Gurba, Chicana writer, podcaster and artist, who wrote the first viral review of “American Dirt” that ignited criticism of the book, and in New York City, Roberto Lovato, award-winning journalist and author of the forthcoming book “Unforgetting: A Memoir of Revolution and Redemption.”

February 1, 2020 By Agence France-Presse


Hailed by luminaries such as Stephen King and Oprah Winfrey, “American Dirt” was touted as the next “great American novel,” bought for a seven-figure advance, backed by aggressive marketing and launched last week to great fanfare in both English and Spanish.

Instead of glory, however, author Jeanine Cummins finds herself at the heart of a cultural maelstrom, accused by some of exploiting the tragedy of Mexican migrants in a US election year and of validating stereotypes such as those used by President Donald Trump to fuel his anti-immigration rhetoric.

The book tells the story of a Mexican woman who owns a bookshop and flees on the notoriously dangerous cargo train known as “The Beast” that migrants ride to the north. She also survives the slaughter of almost her entire family by drug traffickers at a traditional birthday celebration.

The book’s publication has generated intense debate about cultural appropriation, the marginalization of Hispanic authors by US publishers, the dangers of spreading misrepresentations and the responsible limits of fiction.

The firestorm took publisher Flatiron Books by surprise, and on Wednesday they canceled Cummins’ planned tour of US book stores.

“Based on specific threats to booksellers and the author, we believe there exists real peril to their safety,” said publisher Bob Miller in a statement.

– ‘Exploitative’ –

Horror supremo King described the book as “marvelous” and author Don Winslow compared it to the Steinbeck classic “The Grapes of Wrath”.

It is already being adapted for Hollywood.

But more than 120 writers, including Mexico’s leading novelist Valeria Luiselli and chicana author Myriam Gurba, whose withering review sparked the debate, have signed a letter calling on Oprah not to feature “American Dirt” in her book club, which has historically been a gateway to massive sales.

“This is not a letter calling for silencing, nor censoring,” said the writers, who called the novel “exploitative.”

“But in a time of widespread misinformation, fearmongering, and white-supremacist propaganda related to immigration and to our border, in a time when adults and children are dying in US immigration cages, we believe that a novel blundering so badly in its depiction of marginalized, oppressed people should not be lifted up,” the letter went on to say.

Mexican actress Salma Hayek put out a selfie of herself with the book, unaware of the controversy erupting around it, then quickly apologized for promoting it.

Photos that Cummins herself posted of a lobster luncheon for the book launch, featuring floral arrangements wreathed with barbed wire — a nod to the book’s cover — did little to help.

“Border chic,” said Gurba on Twitter. “Cruel” and “insensitive,” said the authors in their letter to Oprah.

– ‘Ignorance and negligence’ –

“This is a book that oversimplifies Mexico, uses bad Spanish, and in which the protagonist, a Mexican woman, does things that don’t make any sense for a Mexican,” said Ignacio Sanchez Prado, a professor of Latin American studies at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri.

An expert on Mexico, he told AFP he did not believe that only Mexicans can write about the Mexican experience but said that Cummins “did it badly.” He also laid the most blame on the “editorial process,” lashing out at Flatiron’s “ignorance and negligence.”

The author of the book, who describes herself as white but also “Latinx” because she has a Puerto Rican grandmother, has not alluded to the controversy in her posts on social media but told The New York Times “there is a danger sometimes of going too far toward silencing people.”

“No one intends to censor Ms Cummins,” said Daniel Olivas, author of a collection of poems about the US-Mexico border, and one of the signatories of the protest letter sent to Oprah.

“But the promotion of this book as the ‘Great American Novel’ and ‘a dazzling accomplishment’ of John Steinbeck proportions is simply galling when so many brilliant Latinx writers are given a mere fraction of such attention and monetary compensation,” he said.

Flatiron did not respond to an AFP request for comment on the controversy and an interview with the author.

The publishers said in a statement they were “proud” of the book, but Miller acknowledged that the controversy “has exposed deep inadequacies in how we at Flatiron Books address issues of representation.”

“We made serious mistakes in the way we rolled out this book,” Miller admitted.

“The concerns that have been raised, including the question of who gets to tell which stories, are valid ones in relation to literature and we welcome the conversation,” his statement said.

© 2020 AFP






Author tour for controversial ‘American Dirt’ is canceled
THE DAMAGE SOCIAL MEDIA FLOGGING CAN DO 


This cover image released by Flatiron Books shows "American Dirt," a novel by Jeanine Cummins. (Flatiron Books via AP)

NEW YORK (AP) — The publisher of Jeanine Cummins’ controversial novel “American Dirt” has canceled the remainder of her promotional tour, citing concerns for her safety.
The novel about a Mexican mother and her young son fleeing to the U.S. border had been praised widely before its Jan. 21 release and was chosen by Oprah Winfrey for her book club. But Mexican American writers have been among those strongly criticizing “American Dirt” for stereotypical depictions of Mexicans. Cummins is of Irish and Puerto Rican background and had herself raised questions about the narrative, writing in an author’s note at the end of the book that she had wondered if “someone slightly browner than me” should have done it.
“Jeanine Cummins spent five years of her life writing this book with the intent to shine a spotlight on tragedies facing immigrants,” Bob Miller, president and publisher of Flatiron Books, said in a statement Wednesday. “We are saddened that a work of fiction that was well-intentioned has led to such vitriolic rancor.
“Unfortunately, our concerns about safety have led us to the difficult decision to cancel the book tour.”
Flatiron Books is instead hoping to organize a series of town hall discussions.
Cummins, 45, had made a handful of promotional appearances since her book was released, but over the past few days the St. Louis-based Left Bank Books had called off an event and Flatiron had canceled interviews in California. The tour for her heavily promoted book had been scheduled to last at least through mid-February, with planned stops everywhere from Seattle to Oxford, Mississippi.
Miller says that the town hall gatherings would include Cummins and her critics, calling it “an opportunity to come together and unearth difficult truths to help us move forward as a community.” On Wednesday, a spokesperson for Winfrey confirmed that Winfrey will meet as planned with the author next month and that the discussion will air in March on Apple TV Plus. “American Dirt” was the third novel picked by Winfrey since she began a partnership with Apple last year.
Earlier Wednesday, dozens of authors, including Valeria Luiselli, Viet Thanh Nguyen and Tommy Orange, published an open letter to Winfrey that urged her to reconsider her selection of Cummins’ novel.
“The book club provides a seal of approval that can still, we hope, be changed,” they wrote. “Good intentions do not make good literature particularly not when the execution is so faulty, and the outcome so harmful.”
Winfrey first chose “American Dirt” last fall, before any criticism had emerged and acknowledged in a pre-publication interview with the AP that she was unaware of any controversy. She has since posted a video on Instagram, saying that she had been following the debate and hoped for a broad discussion.
“I’ve spent the past few days listening to members of the Latinx community to get a greater understanding of their concerns, and I hear them. I do,” Winfrey said in the video. “What I want to do is bring people together from all sides to talk about this book.”
“American Dirt” has dramatized ongoing issues of diversity in publishing that mirror criticisms of Hollywood. From publishers and editors to booksellers and agents, the book industry is predominantly white. Miller acknowledged that the novel “exposed deep inadequacies” at Flatiron and apologized for how the novel was promoted.
“We should never have claimed that it was a novel that defined the migrant experience; we should not have said that Jeanine’s husband was an undocumented immigrant while not specifying that he was from Ireland,” he wrote. He also referred to a picture that surfaced on social media from a promotional dinner last May, when table centerpieces included barbed wire decorations based on the book’s cover image.
“We can now see how insensitive those and other decisions were, and we regret them,” Miller said.
Flatiron is a division of Macmillan and has had authors ranging from former Vice President Joe Biden to Winfrey, who also has her own imprint at Flatiron that is releasing an Alicia Keys memoir in March.
One of Cummins’ leading detractors, Myriam Gurba, tweeted Wednesday that she, too, had security concerns. She wrote she had received death threats because of her criticisms and added “Let’s talk about the SAFETY of MIGRANTS and LATINX ppl. That’s what that book was intended to do, right?”
Cummins was defended by Ann Patchett, the author and bookstore owner who runs Parnassus Books in Nashville and gave the book an early blurb. In an email to The Associated Press, she wrote that Cummins had done a “beautiful job talking about the journey she’s been on with this book,” but that she understood the decision to end the tour.---30---“For the record, I loved ‘American Dirt.’ I’ve never in my life seen this kind of public flogging,” she wrote.
Despite the criticism, Cummins’ novel was easily the top-selling work of fiction last week, according to NPD BookScan, which tracks around 85 percent of the print market. “American Dirt” sold more than 48,000 copies during its first week, even topping Delia Owens’ blockbuster “Where the Crawdads Sing,” which sold just under 25,000 copies.


Why people are mad about 'American Dirt,' a new novel about a Mexican family's journey to the US
Ashley Collman
A woman looks at a copy of "American Dirt," at a bookstore in New York on January 27. 2020. LAURA BONILLA CAL/AFP via Getty Images
There has been widespread backlash to the new novel "American Dirt," by Jeanine Cummins.
The novel traces a Mexican mother and son's journey to the US.
Multiple Latinx writers have questioned how Cummins wrote the story and whether it was hers to tell.
Visit Insider's homepage for more stories.
"American Dirt" by Jeanine Cummins. Flatiron BooksIn the last week, you may have noticed a new book becoming the topic of many heated conversations.

"American Dirt," the new novel by Jeanine Cummins, traces the journey a mother and son make to the US, after a cartel kills their family in a massacre at a quinceañera.

The outrage has focused on Cummins, who is of mixed Irish and Puerto Rican heritage, writing about the Mexican and migrant experiences. The fervor reached a critical point on Wednesday, when her publisher, Flatiron Books, decided to cancel the rest of the book tour.

Here's what sparked the backlash.
American Dirt was set to be one of the biggest book releases of the year

Cummins was paid a rare $1 million advance for the book, and Oprah Winfrey chose it as her first book club pick of 2020 — something that almost guarantees a bestseller.

High-profile fellow authors such as John Grisham and Stephen King gave it rave reviews.

"The very best novel I've read about immigrants (and the best novel I've read over the past year)," columnist Barbara Lane wrote in the San Francisco Chronicle.

She added: "'American Dirt' is being compared to 'The Grapes of Wrath,' and the comparison is apt."
But as the book was set to be released, criticism started coming out

Mexican-American author Myriam Gurba was one of the first to give the book a bad review, writing on the blog Tropics of Meta.

In her review, Gurba accuses Cummins of appropriating Latinx culture (Cummins has a Puerto Rican grandmother), filling her book with Mexican stereotypes, and heavily borrowing from other books about the immigrant experience.

"Cummins bombards with clichés from the get-go. Chapter One starts with assassins opening fire on a quinceañera, a fifteenth birthday party, a scene one can easily imagine President Donald Trump breathlessly conjuring at a Midwestern rally, and while Cummins' executioners are certainly animated, their humanity remains shallow," Gurba wrote.
 
Jeanine Cummins speaks at a Washington, DC bookstore on January 22. 
She continued: "By categorizing these characters as 'the modern bogeymen of urban Mexico,' she flattens them. By invoking monsters with English names and European lineages, Cummins reveals the color of her intended audience: white."

David Bowles, a Mexican-American poet, wrote in a Medium post on January 18 that "American Dirt" is "harmful, appropriating, inaccurate, trauma-porn melodrama."
Soon others were piling onto the book on social media
—Silvia Moreno-Garcia (@silviamg) January 26, 2020
—Kath Barbadoro (@kathbarbadoro) January 30, 2020
Then a rash of opinion pieces came out trying to explain the scandal
Former undocumented Mexican immigrant Julissa Arce wrote on BuzzFeed: "As a Latina writer, my petitions were for us to be seen, heard, and understood. For our talent to be recognized and our stories to be honored — for our lived experiences to create a better reality for our community. Jeanine Cummins' novel American Dirt — or 'The Grapes of Wrath for our times,' according to author Don Winslow — is neither the dream I had hoped for nor the vehicle that is going to create the type of change our community deserves."
Tina Vasquez pointed out in the Boston Globe that the majority of migrants who try to cross the US-Mexico border are from Central America, and not Mexico, like the characters in Cummins' novel. "This may seem like a small point of contention, but it seems illustrative of the larger criticism surrounding the novel."
The Los Angeles Times' Esmeralda Bermudez wrote that the book made her "cringe" because she realized it "was not written for people like me," immigrants, but "for everyone else — to enchant them, take them on a wild border-crossing ride, make them feel all fuzzy inside about the immigrant plight. All, unfortunately, with the worst stereotypes, fixations, and inaccuracies about Latinos."
Cummins also faced accusations of plagiarism
On January 24, author David J. Schmidt wrote on the Huffington Post that some of the scenes in "American Dirt" reminded him of nonfiction books he had read.

He said when he first read a scene in "American Dirt" about a boy being crushed to death by a garbage truck, it immediately reminded him of a section in Luis Alberto Urrea's book "By the Lake of Sleeping Children," which is about the author's years of humanitarian work in Tijuana, Mexico.

"Other scenes in 'American Dirt' also bear significant similarity to Urrea's work, and to that of Sonia Nazario, whose 2006 narrative nonfiction book, 'Enrique's Journey,' tells the story of a boy who migrates from Honduras to the United States atop the freight train known as La Bestia," Schmidt wrote.
Some people were angered to learn that Cummins' former illegal immigrant husband was actually from Ireland

Omar El Akkad, one of the authors who wrote advance praise for the book, took to Twitter on Tuesday to say he felt gaslighted by the publisher.

"Through very careful language, the marketing copy for American Dirt implied that the author not only had a personal connection to the material, but that her husband himself had an even more direct connection, being an illegal immigrant himself."

He added: "A few weeks later, I learned the marketing copy was all bull----. There is no personal connection. The author's husband immigrated here from... Ireland."
—sarah j. dudski (@dudski) January 29, 2020
Cummins' barbed wire nail art and book party centerpieces, modeled off her cover, didn't help
—oliver merino (@olivermerino4) January 23, 2020
—Alex P 👹 (@SaddestRobots) January 31, 2020
Some of the people who spoke out said their issue was not with the book, but the lack of diversity it showed in the publishing industry
—viet thanh nguyen (@viet_t_nguyen) January 30, 2020
—Bree Newsome Bass (@BreeNewsome) January 24, 2020
—Aura Bogado (@aurabogado) January 24, 2020

On Wednesday, dozens of authors signed a letter asking Oprah to cancel 'American Dirt' as her book club pick

"This is not a letter calling for silencing, nor censoring," the letter reads. "But in a time of widespread misinformation, fearmongering, and white-supremacist propaganda related to immigration and to our border, in a time when adults and children are dying in US immigration cages, we believe that a novel blundering so badly in its depiction of marginalized, oppressed people should not be lifted up."

Oprah responded with a video on Tuesday, saying she didn't plan to cancel the book but would be having a special discussion about it in March.

"It has become clear to me from the outpouring of very passionate opinions that this selection has struck an emotional chord and created a need for a deeper more substantive discussion," Oprah said.
Cummins' publisher eventually canceled her book tour

In an announcement on Wednesday, Bob Miller, the president and publisher of Flatiron Books, said they would be canceling the rest of the book tour because of safety concerns.

Miller said the negative reaction caught them by surprise and "exposed deep inadequacies in how we at Flatiron Books address issues of representation." He continued:

"On a more specific scale we made serious mistakes in the way we rolled out this book. We should never have claimed that it was a novel that defined the migrant experience; we should not have said that Jeanine's husband was an undocumented immigrant while not specifying that he was from Ireland; we should not have had a centerpiece at our bookseller dinner last May that replicated the book jacket so tastelessly. We can now see how insensitive those and other decisions were, and we regret them."

However, Miller said they were planning town hall events where Cummins will discuss the book with some of the "groups who have raised objections" to it.
A few people have defended Cummins
Oprah Winfret, left, appears on CBS This Morning with Jeanine Cummins, second left, to promote her new book club pick, "American Dirt," on January 21. CBS via Getty
Washington Post book critic Ron Charles found the focus on Cummins' ancestry startling. He wrote:
"Cummins has been attacked for exaggerating her ethnic background and for failing to note that her Irish husband — once an illegal immigrant — didn't belong to a sufficiently repressed minority group. (That complaint is so clouded by historical amnesia that I don't know where to start.)

"Listening to the anger directed at Cummins for having only one Latina grandparent, I suppose future novelists will have to submit their manuscripts along with a 23andMe genetic profile."

Author Ann Patchett also defended Cummins in an email to the Associated Press, saying that she did a "beautiful job talking about the journey she's been on with this book."

"For the record, I loved 'American Dirt,' I've never in my life seen this kind of public flogging," Patchett wrote.
What Cummins has said

At an event at the Politics and Prose bookstore in Washington, D.C., on January 22, Cummins said she put a lot of work into the book:

"I did five years of research. I went to the border. I went to Mexico. I traveled throughout the borderlands. I visited Casa del Migrante in Mexico. I visited orphanages. I volunteered at a desayunador, which is like a soup kitchen for migrants. I met with the people who have devoted their lives on the front line to the work of protecting vulnerable people. ... And despite the fact that it has grown into this crazy moment that I never anticipated and that feels as if I'm in the eye of the hurricane, I know for a fact that this book is moving people."

The outage doesn't seem to have impacted sales

Flatiron increased the first printing to 500,000 books from 300,000, and the book appeared on more than a dozen lists of anticipated books for 2020, according to The New York Times.

For the week of January 26, it was the top-selling fiction book on Amazon. It's also at the top of the Times' best-seller list.



BOOKS UPDATED JAN. 30, 2020

Why Is Everyone Arguing About the Novel American Dirt?
By Rebecca Alter

American Dirt was released on January 21, 2020. Photo: Vulture

On January 21, Oprah Winfrey announced her latest Oprah’s Book Club pick, the new novel American Dirt by Jeanine Cummins. Winfrey tweeted: “From the first sentence, I was IN … Like so many of us, I’ve read newspaper articles and watched television news stories and seen movies about the plight of families looking for a better life, but this story changed the way I see what it means to be a migrant in a whole new way.” Winfrey also posted a video of her endorsement to the Oprah’s Book Club Twitter account, saying, “I was opened, I was shook up, it woke me up, and I feel that everybody who reads this book is actually going to be immersed in the experience of what it means to be a migrant on the run for freedom. So I want you to read. Come read with us, and then join the conversation with Jeanine Cummins on Apple TV+ coming this March.”


Hello, fellow book lovers! My next @oprahsbookclub selection is “American Dirt” by @jeaninecummins. From the first sentence, I was IN. pic.twitter.com/uonqIa3QRK— Oprah Winfrey (@Oprah) January 21, 2020


Our next book club selection is “American Dirt” by @jeaninecummins. It’s a heart-wrenching page-turner, and you won’t be able to put it down.

Download your copy on @applebooks and #ReadWithUshttps://t.co/w62380H4Lz #AmericanDirt@Flatironbooks @Oprah pic.twitter.com/v6K23tEyPM— Oprah's Book Club (@oprahsbookclub) January 21, 2020

Book Twitter reacted to the announcement with swiftness, although perhaps not in the way Oprah’s team would have wanted, citing the recent #OwnVoices movement. American Dirt has been the subject of controversy and criticism since 2019, when early readers first offered their opinions after seeing advance copies. The book has been called “stereotypical,” and “appropriative” for “opportunistically, selfishly, and parasitically” telling the fictional story of a Mexican mother and son’s journey to the border after a cartel murders the rest of their family. One of the more common knocks is that the book engages in “brownface,” incorporating a nominally Mexican perspective that was written by a woman who — as recently as 2016 — identified as “white.” In the lead-up to American Dirt’s release, Cummins revealed she has a Puerto Rican grandmother. The conversation surrounding American Dirt’s “ripped from the headlines” approach to telling this migrant story in an American voice for American readers places it within ongoing debates in the lit world about who can tell what stories.

Some professional critics also had at American Dirt in the days before its January 21 release. New York Times book critic Parul Sehgal said that the “rapturous and demented praise” the book has received in the press might be owed in part to the fact that “tortured sentences aside, American Dirt is enviably easy to read” and “determinedly apolitical. The deep roots of these forced migrations are never interrogated; the American reader can read without fear of uncomfortable self-reproach.” Some of that praise also comes from the Times; in the Book Review, Lauren Groff was ultimately ambivalent but called the book “propulsive” and “swift,” and regarded its polemical “uncomplicated moral universe” as a feature rather than a bug. Groff (who, for the record, is white) praises Cummins’s efforts and excuses her appropriation, whereas Sehgal (who is not) questions Cummins’s stated motivation in writing this story:

Shouldn’t the story matter, her effort to individuate people portrayed as a “faceless brown mass” (her words)? In the book’s afterword, she agonizes about not being the right person to write the book (“I wished someone slightly browner than me would write it”) but decides that she has a moral obligation to the story.

Groff caused an even further Twitter stir when the New York Times Books account tweeted a link to her review with this (since-deleted) pull quote: “‘American Dirt’ is one of the most wrenching books I have read in a few years, with the ferocity and political reach of the best of Theodore Dreiser’s novel.” Groff responded: “Please take this down and post my actual review.” Apparently this quote was from an “early version” of her review, to which she had made “radical changes.” Still, this gaffe was enough to ignite Twitter discourse about who should have the platform to review certain stories, in addition to who should write them.


https://t.co/dlJZWJHFxL pic.twitter.com/egaYkd7BGT— bradley babendir (@therealbradbabs) January 19, 2020

After Oprah announced Jeanine Cummins’s controversial American Dirt as her latest Book Club pick, immigration reporter Aura Bogado shared a tweet the author posted back in November, showcasing a “pretty” nail-art interpretation of her book jacket, which features a barbed-wire design. Bogado critiqued Cummins’s “vulgar pleasure of proudly wearing this exact symbol of oppression as a fashion statement,” sparking a new wave of outrage over what’s seen as a blatant visual representation of how Cummins is insensitively capitalizing on immigrant trauma.


Jeanine Cummins got a barbwire manicure. The fetish here, the vulgar pleasure of proudly wearing this exact symbol of oppression as a fashion statement and claiming it's "pretty," is literally making me nauseous. I wanna throw up. https://t.co/AdOlPwz6mw— Aura Bogado (@aurabogado) January 23, 2020


What is wrong with all of you? Barbed wire manis? Are you intentionally trolling for bad press or just legit this dumb and or like actually cruel?— Chelsea Peretti (@chelseaperetti) January 23, 2020

Then on January 26, Oprah posted a two-minute video to the Oprah’s Book Club Instagram, announcing that as a response to the “outpouring … of very passionate opinions,” she spoke with members of the Latinx community about their concerns with American Dirt and will air an Apple TV+ event in March to “bring people together from all sides to talk about this book, and who gets to publish what stories. I’m hoping that that is going to resonate with many of you and your concerns.”

After this announcement, writers Roberto Lovato, David Bowles, and Myriam Gurba began tweeting under the hashtag #DignidadLiteraria as a “call to politico-literary action,” and many authors and activists are using the hashtag along with #ownvoices in their calls for better representation. Vox reported that Immigrant Youth Group United We Dream is petitioning Oprah to include more Latinx and immigrant authors in the Book Club. On January 27, the Oprah’s Book Club Instagram account moved forward as usual, posting the reading schedule for American Dirt. The account posted the schedule with the caption: “Over the next several weeks we will be using this platform to share a diverse array of content, including books by Mexican and Latinx authors. More to come.”

On January 29, American Dirt’s publisher Flatiron Books released a statement from its president, Bob Miller, about how they were “surprised by the anger that has emerged from members of the Latinx and publishing communities” in response to the book’s release and Flatiron’s role in tone-deaf publicity. Miller acknowledges “serious mistakes,” such as barbed-wire centerpieces at a bookseller dinner, and that they “should not have said that Jeanine’s husband was an undocumented immigrant while not specifying that he was from Ireland.” In the statement, Miller announced that Flatiron will cancel the book tour, citing “concerns about safety” and “specific threats to booksellers and the author.”


Statement from Bob Miller (President & Publisher, Flatiron Books) regarding AMERICAN DIRT: pic.twitter.com/S4sQetyS2s— Flatiron Books (@Flatironbooks) January 29, 2020

Many replies to this statement find it to be inadequate, using language of “white privilege,” “victimhood,” and “dog whistling” to frame Latinx concerns about the book as violent and scary, rather than simply writing an apology with a promise to improve their practices. Many commenters took issue with passages from the statement, like “it’s unfortunate that she is the recipient of hatred from within the very communities she sought to honor. We are saddened that a work of fiction that was well-intentioned has led to such vitriolic rancor.”


Flatiron Books: “We apologize...”

“Well that’s a start.”

Flatiron Books: “...for how savage & horrible black and brown people in the Latinx community are acting towards us.” pic.twitter.com/3gLSO6tUGU— X (@XLNB) January 30, 2020


Just say you messed up. Organziers, activists, writers like us who are also committed to social justice and change do not threaten harm the fact that you are using this stereotype to cancel the tour reinforces your unwillingness to be accountable.— Rosa A. Clemente (@rosaclemente) January 29, 2020

At the end of the statement, Miller announced that in place of the book tour, Flatiron Books will organize a town-hall series “where Jeanine will be joined by some of the groups who have raised objections to the book.” There are no further details yet about this series of meetings.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, American Dirt has already been optioned for a movie adaptation by Charles Leavitt, the writer of Blood Diamond, and Imperative Entertainment, the production company behind Clint Eastwood’s The Mule. While you wait for that come out, you can add your name to a 150-plus person hold list for American Dirt at your local library and catch Oprah’s Apple TV+ feature on it in March.

This post has been updated throughout.
RELATED
Who Gave You the Right to Tell That Story?
Oprah Wants to ‘Hear All Sides’ in American Dirt Controversy

Opinion

‘American Dirt’ Has Us Talking. That’s a Good Thing.

The publishing industry changed its opinion of Mexican immigrant stories only after someone outside our community wrote one.
By Reyna Grande
Ms. Grande is a Mexican-American author.
Jan. 30, 2020


A portion of the United States-Mexico border fence in El Paso.

Credit...Tamir Kalifa for The New York Times

Last fall, I was sent an advance copy of Jeanine Cummins’s new novel, “American Dirt,” and a request for an endorsement. As a Mexican-American woman and an immigrant, it was clear to me that I was not the intended audience for this story. And yet, I found it compelling. I noticed its shortcomings, the things she got wrong about our culture and experience, but saw past them. I felt that a book like this could complement the Latino immigrant literature that has and will continue to be written by Latino writers, myself included.

I was born in Mexico, in the troubled state of Guerrero, where the main characters of “American Dirt” are from. It was in my hometown, Iguala, where 43 college students were abducted and disappeared in 2014, so the violence rang true to me. I am a native Spanish speaker, but my own books are riddled with Spanish mistakes because I was in fifth grade when I came to the United States.

I hoped that “American Dirt” would generate more discussion about the border and the anti-immigrant mentality that has dominated our society for too long. And it is doing just that, but in an unexpected way. It is raising awareness about another kind of border — the walls that the publishing industry puts up for Latino writers.

I’m no stranger to borders. When I was 9, I left my home in Guerrero and risked my life to cross the United States-Mexico border on foot with my father and siblings. With the help of the coyote, the guide my father hired, we got past la migra, the border agents patrolling the unforgiving no man’s land just north of the border with Tijuana. After we crossed, the coyote drove us up Interstate 5 to our new home in Los Angeles. I remember sighing with relief, thinking the worst was behind me.

I was wrong. I learned that American society is very good at hindering its immigrant population by putting up barriers — real and metaphorical. I soon discovered there were more borders to cross — cultural, linguistic, legal, educational, economic and more. When I chose to pursue a career in writing, a field that is predominantly white, I realized that the publishing industry too had borders and people who patrol them. A 2019 survey of diversity in publishing found that 78 percent of executives, 85 percent of editors, 80 percent of critics and 80 percent of agents are white.

Once upon a time, being a border crosser was a source of shame for me. But when I got older, I realized that it was my superpower. When I began my journey toward my dream of writing professionally, I told myself, “If I could successfully cross the U.S.-Mexico border, I can cross any border!”

It took me three tries to cross that geographical border. It took me 27 attempts to get past the gatekeepers of the publishing industry who time and time again make Latino writers feel that our stories don’t matter. We are often told that there are no readers for our immigrant tales, that “these kinds” of stories about our pain and suffering don’t sell well, that immigrant stories have been told enough times and why can’t we write something new and different, something more marketable?

After 26 rejections, I finally got across the publishing border because an African-American editor felt that my novel about a Mexican immigrant girl was worthy of being read, that my voice deserved to be heard. She gave me a $20,000 book deal and her blessing.

I considered myself lucky. There are so many more Latino writers who never get across — whose writing dreams perish in the unwelcoming literary landscape.

Editors’ Picks
Pakistan’s First Social Media Star and the Forces That Enabled Her Murder


For the last 13 years, I’ve traveled the country talking about my immigrant experience. On stages across the United States, I bare my soul and relive the trauma of moments I’d rather forget, to help people understand that immigration is not a crime but an act of survival, that immigrants are not criminals but human beings who deserve to be treated with dignity and compassion.




The cover of “American Dirt” by Jeanine Cummins.Credit...Flatiron Books, via Associated Press

Sometimes, my words help open minds and hearts. Other times, they don’t. Recently, “The Moth Radio Hour” aired my story about a chance encounter on an airplane with a Guatemalan asylum seeker. An email later appeared in my inbox, and when I read it, I thought of “American Dirt” and its intended white audience:

You are an excellent speaker and clearly very sincere. However, I and many others completely disagree with your point of view. Illegals in the country, that is adults that came into the USA without proper permission should all be deported as soon as practicable and there never should be any amnesty in the future for anybody [shouldn’t have happened in the past eather] the young man you talked about should have been removed and sent back to where he came from, I do not want him here in my country. and no Dreamers that came here illegally should never be allowed to be citizens. And if it was up to me their children would not be alow to become citizens ether.

Maybe I am being naïve in thinking that this man and others like him might be more willing to show compassion toward immigrants if they heard it from someone other than a first- or second-generation immigrant. But after having spent my entire writing career advocating immigrant rights, I appreciate when another writer joins the fight. We need all the voices we can get, within and outside our community — perhaps especially from outside our community. I had hoped Ms. Cummins’s words would germinate in the toxic American dirt where my own words, and those of other Latino writers, have often failed to take root.

When I read “American Dirt,” I didn’t know the back story — the bidding war, the seven-figure advance, the proclamation that this was the immigration book of its time. When I found out, I confess it offended me and hurt me. I felt undervalued and deceived. The publishing industry had changed its opinion of Mexican immigrant stories — but not until it was someone from outside our community who had written one. I had seen Ms. Cummins as a writer who could speak with us, not for us. Instead, the publishing machine decided to put her book on a pedestal.

It is unfortunate that the publisher canceled the author’s future book events. That denies audiences across the country the opportunity to participate in face-to-face discussions with Ms. Cummins about the issues that are being raised around cultural appropriation and who gets to tell our stories. The reasons the publisher cited for the cancellation — “safety concerns” — and its dismissal of the legitimate concerns raised as “vitriolic rancor,” further denigrates the Latino community. Now is not the time to shut down conversations, but to encourage speaking out and listening to one another.

To me the issue is neither with the book nor its author, but rather with those institutions that silence some voices while elevating others. One positive outcome is that publishers have shown they are willing to pay top dollar and use the full strength of their marketing machine to promote the immigrant experience. They can’t back away from that now. Immigrant-written stories deserve the same treatment.
‘American Dirt’ Is Proof the Publishing Industry Is BrokenJan. 27, 2020

As ‘American Dirt’ Racks Up Sales, Its Author Becomes the Story Jan. 25, 2020

\Reyna Grande, @reynagrande, is the author of “A Dream Called Home.”

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

The report card is in: Green orgs are improving staff diversity, but still don’t reflect America


Grist / Getty Images

COLOR OF CHANGE

By Rachel Ramirez on Feb 6, 2020 

People of color are on the frontlines of the climate crisis: They live in areas disproportionately impacted by pollution, deadly heat waves, and extreme storms. So it stands to reason that the staffers and leaders of major environmental organizations should reflect the demographics of the communities most relevant to their work.

The Green 2.0 initiative, which was launched in 2013 to promote racial and gender diversity in the environmental movement, released its third annual diversity report card for the top 40 major non-governmental organizations and foundations on Wednesday. For the first time in its short history, the report brought good news: an overall increase in people of color and women on staff and boards of directors since Green 2.0 started collecting and releasing data in 2017.

According to the report, each green organization that provided data added 11 people of color to its staff between 2017 and 2019, on average. As for senior staffers, each organization added an average of two people of color to its upper ranks, while the number of women on senior staff remained unchanged over the same two-year period. (Overall, people of color constitute close to 30 percent of organizational staff; women constitute about 64 percent.) Each organization also added, on average, one woman and one person of color to its board. These improvements were determined to be statistically significant — though the numbers do exclude one unnamed outlier that skewed the results in a different direction.

Whitney Tome, the executive director of Green 2.0, said in a press call that the organization is “cautiously optimistic” after reviewing the findings. “We want the trend to continue and we want it to accelerate, so that it can match the racial demographics of the country,” she said.

Tome also highlighted the importance of further improvements to board composition. “When it comes to membership of the board, it is critically important that people of color sit on that stage,” Tome said. “The board needs to be as diverse as the country to ensure that its next leaders are people of color.”

For three years, Green 2.0 has surveyed the top 40 environmental NGOs and top 40 foundations across the country. NGOs were generally more active and willing to share their data than foundations. In fact, the participation rate among the top 40 NGOs increased from 82.5 percent to 90 percent between 2017 and 2019. Green 2.0 specifically called out the Pew Charitable Trusts, one of largest nonprofits with a mission to improve public policy by collecting data for research, for declining to participate in the survey multiple times. “It’s hypocritical,” Tome said in the press call.

Meanwhile, the participation rate among foundations remains stagnant at 35 percent, making it difficult for Green 2.0 to provide a concrete set of trends on the demographic composition of foundations.

Foundations funnel money to push policies, grants, and other resources as part of the environmental movement, so diverse viewpoints among their staff members are leaders are of critical importance. Ironically, many foundations ask grantees for their own demographic data, Tome pointed out — but the foundations themselves are unwilling to disclose their own data to the public.

“We recognize the environmental movement hasn’t always been as attentive to frontline communities and communities of color throughout its history,” Tome said. “So we really want to continue to push and advocate for having people of color in those senior leadership places, and for them to hopefully have a tremendous impact in policies going forward.”

---30---
Magnitude 5.0 Earthquake Rattles Puerto Rico
HEADLINE FEB 05, 2020

A magnitude 5.0 earthquake rattled Puerto Rico Tuesday as residents are still recovering from a magnitude 6.4 earthquake last month that destroyed homes, left 300,000 people without water and knocked out the power for two-thirds of the island. Tuesday’s quake was the 11th earthquake to hit Puerto Rico in the last month.


Do cruise companies’ green claims hold water?




Carnival's AIDAnova is the world's first cruise ship to run on
 liquified natural gas. AIDA Cruises


SHIPPING NEWS
Do cruise companies’ green claims hold water?
By Maria Gallucci on Feb 5, 2020

Carnival Cruise Line’s latest ship is a behemoth. The Mardi Gras sports 20 decks, 5,200 rooms, and as if that wasn’t enough, a swooping outdoor roller coaster. Unlike most of the company’s fleet, it won’t be running on oil. The vessel, which first hit the water in Finland late last month, will run entirely on liquefied natural gas when it starts sailing from Florida to the Caribbean Sea this fall.

Cruise and cargo shipping companies are increasingly switching to the super-chilled fuel, which produces much less air pollution compared with the dirty “bunker fuel” that previously powered most ships. By 2025, Carnival says it will have 11 vessels running on liquefied natural gas, or LNG, including the AIDANova, the world’s first LNG-powered cruise ship.

But the overall benefits of switching to natural gas aren’t entirely clear. A new study found that using the fuel may do little to curb the shipping industry’s greenhouse gas emissions in coming decades. In certain cases, it might actually be worse for the climate than another conventional marine fuel, researchers said.

The report, by the International Council on Clean Transportation, or ICCT, adds to the debate about whether natural gas should play a role in the industry’s shift to cleaner fuels.

Many environmental groups and academic experts argue that LNG is a costly distraction, one that siphons investment away from technologies that could cut a ship’s emissions to zero, and it locks ships into relying on fossil fuels at a time when climate scientists say we should leave them in the ground. For proponents, the fuel is one of few readily available alternatives to bunker fuel — the longtime industry favorite that is mostly banned from oceangoing ships. Compared to that sludgy old staple, LNG produces much less air pollution and carbon dioxide.

The main problem with LNG is methane, a potent greenhouse gas that traps significantly more heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. The ICCT team found that high amounts of unburned methane can leak from some LNG marine engines. Extracting gas, liquefying it, and transporting the fuel also results in methane leaks and CO2 emissions. Added up over a 20-year period, LNG emits far more lifecycle emissions — between 70 and 82 percent — than “marine gas oil,” a common petroleum product, researchers said.

“That’s the missing part of the equation that [the industry] is not accounting for right now,” said Bryan Comer, a senior researcher in ICCT’s marine program who co-authored the report. “If you account for how much methane is escaping from marine engines, you get a much different picture of what the total climate impacts could be of using LNG as a marine fuel.”

The ICCT study, funded by environmental group Stand.earth, builds on earlier reports that question LNG’s potential benefits. In 2018, researchers at the University College London’s Energy Institute found that “there is no significant CO2-equivalent reduction achieved through the use of LNG as marine fuel,” in large part because of the “upstream” emissions from producing natural gas.

“It’s a dead end,” said Tristan Smith, who researches low-carbon shipping technologies at the institute.

The global shipping industry moves trillions of dollars’ worth of goods every year and accounts for about 3 percent of total annual greenhouse gas emissions. That number is projected to soar in coming decades if vessels don’t use cleaner fuels. Cruise and cargo ships have historically contributed significant amounts of sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides, which can damage people’s hearts and lungs, especially in waterfront communities.

In response, regulators have started clamping down on maritime pollution. Since the start of the year, the International Maritime Organization, a United Nations body, requires vessels to burn only low-sulfur fuels. Newly built ships must follow energy-efficiency design standards, while the industry as a whole is working to cut emissions in half by 2050 compared with 2008 levels.

Today, most ships burn blends of low-sulfur petroleum products, including marine gas oil and “very-low-sulfur fuel oil,” in their diesel engines. About 4,000 ships, or 4 percent of the global fleet, either have or will have scrubbers on their smokestacks, which allows them to keep burning high-sulfur bunker fuel.

About 750 vessels today can run on LNG, double the amount available in 2012. Last fall, French shipping giant CMA CGM launched the world’s largest container ship to run on LNG, the 1,310-foot-long Jacques Saadé, the first of nine such vessels. Although new LNG ships can cost 10 to 30 percent more to build than similar diesel-powered ones, rising natural gas production is driving down fuel prices, making LNG slightly cheaper than marine gas oil.

Peter Keller, a former executive at TOTE Maritime, said the U.S.-based company decided in 2012 to switch to LNG to get ahead of any potential environmental rules. LNG produces little nitrogen oxide, virtually no sulfur dioxide and nearly zero “black carbon” — soot that absorbs the sun’s heat and directly warms the atmosphere. LNG is also estimated to curb onboard CO2 emissions by about 20 percent.

“We said, ‘OK, what gives us as much comfort as we can get in the future that we won’t get regulated out of using a fuel?’” Keller recalled. TOTE Maritime now operates two LNG-fueled containerships between Florida and Puerto Rico and is converting other vessels in Alaska.

Carnival considers the super-chilled liquid to be “the cleanest fuel with no visible emissions widely available,” the company told Grist. As the company builds new LNG ships, most of its existing fleet still uses bunker fuel with scrubbers at sea and marine gas oil near shore.

Proponents said they still consider LNG to be a way to help curb carbon emissions, despite the new ICCT research. Keller is chairman of SEA-LNG, an industry group that promotes LNG adoption. Last year, his group commissioned a report that said LNG could reduce lifecycle emissions by between 7 to 21 percent compared to heavy bunker fuel, depending on the engine.

That report, produced by the consulting firm Thinkstep, differs from the ICCT study in a key way. Thinkstep analyzed methane over a 100-year time frame, which is common for climate studies. Methane intensively warms the planet soon after it’s emitted then decays into carbon dioxide. (CO2 is less potent but persists in the air for hundreds or thousands of years.) Over 100 years, methane traps 34 more heat in the atmosphere than CO2.

In its first 20 years, however, methane traps 86 times more heat. ICCT researchers emphasized this timeframe, under which LNG delivers no emissions-reduction benefits in any scenario. The team said this metric reflects the “urgent need” to slash emissions within decades to limit global warming.

Comer, the ICCT researcher, said that rather than spending billions of dollars on engines, storage tanks, and refueling infrastructure to switch to LNG, the shipping industry would be better off improving diesel ships and investing heavily in clean-energy technology. New and existing ships could run on marine gas oil and use energy-saving technologies — such as air lubrication for ship hulls and wind-powered rotor sails — to minimize fuel use.

Carnival said it’s working with manufacturers of LNG engines to reduce methane leaks. The company is also piloting fuel cell technologies and large battery storage systems; in the future, its LNG ships might run on liquefied biomethane or liquefied synthetic methane, two renewable fuels in scarce supply.

“We recognise that fossil LNG is not the final solution for decarbonization,” Carnival said by email. But the company considers it “an important stepping stone to our industry’s ongoing objective to reduce its carbon footprint.”
---30---

Today's Earthquakes in Canada - Earthquake Track
Sorted: Recent
Filter By Magnitude
Nearby Places
Canada has had: (M1.5 or greater)
0 earthquakes in the past 24 hours
9 earthquakes in the past 7 days
36 earthquakes in the past 30 days
320 earthquakes in the past 365 days

The largest earthquake in Canada:
this week: 4.3 in Happy Valley-Goose Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
this month: 4.5 in Ucluelet, British Columbia, Canada
this year: 6.3 in Tofino, British Columbia, Canada


https://earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca/index-en.php

Earthquake Details (2020-02-03)
Monday February 03, 2020

Approximate Location of Earthquake: Labrador Coast. 18 km E from Postville, NL
Local Time:
13:58:50 AST
Magnitude:
4.3 MN
Latitude:
54.88 North
Longitude:
59.51 West
Depth:
18.00 km
UT Date
and Time:

2020/02/03
17:58:50 UT
Did you feel it?
Fill out our questionnaire.
Earthquake details 
Nearby locations 
Regional seismicity 
Regional seismograph stations 
Did you feel the earthquake? 
Other recent earthquake reports 


Indigenous tribes are at the forefront of climate change planning in the U.S.


A Nez Perce tribal member fishes for Chinook Salmon in Idaho
in May 2001. Bill Schaefer / Getty Images
 Indigenous tribes are at the forefront of climate change planning in the U.S.
By Naveena Sadasivam on Feb 4, 2020
Temperatures in Idaho’s Columbia, Snake, and Salmon rivers were so warm in 2015 that they cooked millions of salmon and steelhead to death. As climate change leads to consistently warmer temperatures and lower river flows, researchers expect that fish kills like this will become much more common. Tribal members living on the Nez Perce reservation are preparing for this new normal.
“The biggest and most poignant impact for Nez Perce tribal members has been the loss of fishing and fish,” said Stefanie Krantz, the climate change coordinator for the tribe. “For tribal peoples, they are absolutely essential for survival.”
After the 2015 fish kills, the tribe decided to hire Krantz to work full-time to assess the many ways that a warming planet threatens their way of life. The tribe has about 3,500 enrolled members, and its reservation spans 750,000 acres. For the last three years, Krantz has been conducting a vulnerability assessment and working on a new climate adaptation plan. The tribal government is expected to formally adopt Krantz’s plan after it has been finalized.
As other North American tribes have begun to experience the effects of climate change over the past decade, they too have started to adopt climate resilience and adaptation plans. According to a database maintained by the University of Oregon, at least 50 tribes across the U.S. have assessed climate risks and developed plans to tackle them. With more than 570 federally recognized tribes controlling 50 million combined acres, these adaptation plans could prove a crucial element in building resilient communities that can thrive despite weather-related catastrophes and changes to the natural environment.
“Tribes, because they are a separate sovereign, have a unique capacity to give us a lot of guidance,” said Elizabeth Kronk Warner, dean of the S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah. Federally-recognized tribes are sovereign governments and therefore can set climate policies independently of federal or state governments. The laws passed and programs adopted by tribes have the potential to significantly improve their resilience in the face of climate risks.
Warner has been researching the effects of climate change on indigenous peoples for about a decade and has noticed a “big, big increase” in the number of climate adaptation plans developed over the past five years in particular. “Increasingly, we’re seeing the impacts of climate change in Indian country,” she told Grist. “As more tribes get into the field and are able to look at what other tribes have done, it increases the likelihood of proliferation.”
The process often begins with a community assessment to estimate the natural and cultural resources at risk from climate hazards. Following the assessment, consultants or in-house tribal staff can develop a specific plan to protect these resources. Tribes have conducted studies to understand how climate hazards — such as shoreline erosion from sea level rise and more frequent wildfires — might affect them, physically moved to higher ground to avoid being inundated by floods, and begun testing shellfish to ensure they are not poisonous due to phytoplankton growth caused by warmer temperatures.
The assessments vary widely from tribe to tribe, depending largely on geography and local environmental factors. Tribes in Western states, for instance, are particularly vulnerable to the impact of rising temperatures and its effect on water availability. Coastal reservations, such as the Swinomish on Washington state’s Fidalgo Island, are more concerned with adapting to rising seas.

Krantz, the climate change coordinator for the Nez Perce tribe, said that tribal members in particular are vulnerable to climate change because of their close ties to the land. Nez Perce tribal members, for example, pick berries, roots, and medicinal plants. As a result, they have a uniquely deep knowledge of the timing of ecological processes, such as the flowering of plants and migratory patterns of birds, she said.
“But those things are all changing,” said Krantz, and seasonal shifts are causing plants to move north and upslope. “Tribes have local, place-based cultures and their cultural survival depends on the land and the plants and animals.”
Indigenous ecological knowledge is a key component of many adaptation plans, and conversations with tribal elders and other community members often inform the assessments. After Yurok elders advised their tribe to “follow the water” in the wake of a massive fish kill on California’s Klamath River in 2002, the Yurok Tribe focused its attention and resources on aquatic habitats, drinking water, and the different species of fish that they rely on for sustenance.
The tribe has since developed a fish monitoring program that can detect diseases early. Since some diseases are worsened by higher temperatures and low water flows, the tribe relays information about the disease to the Bureau of Reclamation, a federal agency that manages dams on the Klamath River. The agency, which makes decisions about the amount of water released from behind the dam, may ultimately help decrease the spread of fish diseases. The tribe also lights controlled fires to reduce water use by thirsty plants on river banks and has been fighting to remove four dams from the Klamath by 2020.
The University of Utah’s Warner, who is a citizen of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, also pointed out that tribal adaptation plans differ from state and local governments’ plans because they often examine the effect of climate risks on the community as a whole. “Usually [state plans] focus on the impact to the individual,” she said.
For instance, the Jamestown S’klallam tribe’s 2013 climate adaptation plan discusses the loss of salmon as both a nutrient-rich and culturally important species, unlike state plans which tend to focus on their economic benefits. Salmon not only provides a cultural connection with other tribes in the Pacific Northwest — it also provides a source of good fatty acids and protein that can counter diabetes and heart disease. In order to combat the spread of invasive species that threaten salmon habitat in the Dungeness River, the tribe has been mapping the presence of weeds and tracking the effectiveness of herbicides.
Tribes are innovators in this area, and local and federal governments can learn from their community-based approaches and use of traditional ecological knowledge, Warner said. Including community members early in the planning and implementation process, for instance, can increase buy-in and reduce costs through volunteer networks.
 
“Typically, we have a tendency to think of tribes as learning from the federal government, but this is definitely a situation where other sovereigns can learn from tribes,” she said.

---30---