Friday, April 03, 2020

USA
Nurses in multiple states protest over 'lack of preparedness'
"Protecting our patients is our highest priority, but it becomes much harder when we don't have the safe protections," one nurse said.


Nurses protest in front of Research Medical Center April 1, 2020 in Kansas City, Mo. The workers were among several groups nationwide protesting HCA Healthcare hospitals claiming the hospital chain put staff and patients at risk during the coronavirus pandemic because of a lack of personal protective equipment.Charlie Riedel / AP

April 2, 2020, By Janelle Griffith

Nurses at hospitals in multiple states are protesting what they describe as one of the nation's largest hospital chains' "lack of preparedness" amid the coronavirus pandemic.

The National Nurses Union, which represents 10,000 registered nurses at 19 hospitals managed by HCA Healthcare in California, Florida, Kansas, Missouri, Nevada and Texas, is demanding that the hospital chain provide optimal personal protective equipment (PPE) for nurses and other staff.

HCA Healthcare spokesman Harlow Sumerford the company is doing everything it can to equip patient care teams to provide safe, effective care to the people they serve.

"The National Nurses Union is trying to use this crisis to advance its own interest — organizing more members," Sumerford said in a statement to NBC News.

"The pandemic has strained the worldwide supply of personal protective equipment, including masks, face shields and gowns, a challenge that is not unique to HCA Healthcare or any other health system in the United States," Sumerford said, in part. "While we are doing everything in our power to secure additional supplies, and we are following CDC protocols for using and conserving PPE, the worldwide shortage is a reality that we are addressing with realistic, workable solutions."

Nurses at HCA’s Mission Hospital in Asheville, North Carolina, will deliver a petition to hospital managers on Thursday with their concerns about hospital preparedness in the battle against COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus.

Some nurses at HCA hospitals have reported that they have had to work without proper protective equipment and are told to unsafely reuse masks. Nurses at Central Florida Regional Hospital in Sanford, Florida, said they were told they could not wear masks while working because it "scared the patients," according to Jean Ross, a registered nurse and president of National Nurses United.

HCA Healthcare's spokesman did not address specific allegations raised by the National Nurses Union in the company's statement Thursday.

NBC News reached out to Central Florida Regional Hospital for comment about this allegation but did not immediately hear back.

"Protecting our patients is our highest priority, but it becomes much harder when we don't have the safe protections which puts us in danger of becoming infected," Angela Davis, a registered nurse who works in a unit dedicated to treating coronavirus patients at Research Medical Center in Kansas City, Missouri, said in a statement. "If we are no longer able to be at the bedside, who will be there to care for our patients?"irus outbreak

The union president said HCA Healthcare can afford to properly prepare for the pandemic, noting that over the past decade, the hospital chain has made more than $23 billion.

"For the wealthiest hospital corporation in the United States to show such disregard for the health and safety of its caregivers, is disgraceful and unconscionable," Ross said.

Gary Mousseau, a registered nurse who works in endoscopy at Fawcett Memorial Hospital in Port Charlotte, Florida, said it has been "disheartening" for nurses across the country "to see HCA’s poor response" to their concerns while facing the gravest public health crisis in a century.

TWITTER POSTS


Naomi Klein@NaomiAKlein
"The Poor, the Sick, the Homeless, the Children, the Low-Wage Workers": Moral Leaders Demand Coronavirus Relief for Most Vulnerable - https://t.co/sjAkJz59Gv via @commondreams
Twitter 2020-04-02 3:37 p.m.


toomas hendrik@IlvesToomas
KC nurses protest lack of protective gear for coronavirus https://t.co/LrUQFYBDG8
Twitter 2020-04-01 9:28 p.m.


David Middlecamp@DavidMiddlecamp
‘This is not safe.’ Nurses hold vigil in SLO to protest shortage of coronavirus equipment https://t.co/UA9Ash2nKy
Twitter7:59 a.m.


Katrina vandenHeuvel@KatrinaNation
Criminal, Inhumane— Despite Calls for Global Ceasefire, Trump Threatens War With Iran Amid COVID-19 - https://t.co/erVXy1k452 via @commondreams
Twitter 2020-04-01 5:39 p.m.

Published on
by

'When We Are Infected No One Is Safe': Nurses Nationwide Protest Over Lack of Coronavirus Protective Equipment

"For the wealthiest hospital corporation in the United States to show such disregard for the health and safety of its caregivers, is disgraceful and unconscionable."
Nurses and supporters participate in a vigil at UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center, during a shift change for nurses, amid the global coronavirus pandemic on March 30, 2020 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Nurses at 15 hospitals across the country are set to stage protests both Wednesday and Thursday over what they say is a dangerous lack of protections for healthcare workers and demanding their employers provide respirators, gowns, gloves, and other protective equipment to help them safely fight the coronavirus pandemic.
"When we are infected, we become a real danger of infecting everyone else around us, patients, hospital staff, and a risk to our own families."
—Kim Smith, registered nurse
National Nurses United (NNU) helped organize the protests at hospitals run by HCA Healthcare, the country's largest and wealthiest for-profit hospital operator, in seven states. The union represents 10,000 nurses at HCA hospitals, which the union says has left its nurses even less prepared for the pandemic than healthcare providers at most other facilities in the nation.
The union posted a video on social media of nurses detailing their harrowing experiences from the past several weeks as the outbreak has spread to every state in the U.S., killing more than 3,900 people so far.
"PPE, or personal protective equipment, is virtually non-existent at my hospital," one nurse in Oakland, California, said.
"I had a patient who was having respiratory issues and was not able to get a respiratory treatment because the respiratory therapist did not have the proper mask," said another who works in Auburn, California.
"Listen to—and protect—nurses. All our lives are on the line."
—Bonnie Castillo, NNU
Despite making $23 billion in profits in the last decade, NNU said in a statement, HCA Healthcare nurses in states including California, Florida, and Texas have fewer N95 respirators and other equipment to keep them from contracting the new coronavirus, officially known as COVID-19, than healthcare providers at other hospitals.
Just 7% of nurses at HCA Healthcare facilities say they have enough PPE to protect staff and patients if there is a surge in coronavirus patients in their hospital, compared with 19% of nurses in general.
Only 35% of nurses in the HCA network report having access to N95 respirators, compared with 52% of nurses nationwide.
"For the wealthiest hospital corporation in the United States to show such disregard for the health and safety of its caregivers, is disgraceful and unconscionable," said Jean Ross, president of NNU.
"Nurses at various HCA hospitals are reporting that they have had to work without proper protective equipment," Ross added. "Nurses say they are not informed when they are exposed to an infected patient. They are told to unsafely reuse masks and at one hospital they are even being told not to wear masks because it 'scared the patients.'"
One hospital in Florida delayed informing nurses that they had potentially been exposed to the coronavirus, while nurses at Corpus Christi Medical Center in Corpus Christi, Texas say they were told to report to work while waiting for the results of COVID-19 testing, potentially exposing others.
Calling nurses "canaries in the coal mine" in an op-ed published Wednesday at Common Dreams, registered nurse Amy Silverman raised similar concerns, denouncing the lack of transparency at hospitals across the country regarding the exposure of healthcare providers:
You deserve to know the truth: healthcare workers are falling ill by the thousands, some are dying, an unknown number are in critical condition, and there are no tests. Hospitals aren't testing their workers unless they have obvious symptoms, but we all know that sources of infection aren't limited to those of us who seek care in emergency rooms. Hospitals should be testing all of their workers in order to understand how to control infection within their facility—and the White House regularly broadcasts support of this strategy by relaying the message that "everyone who needs a test will get a test" yet the opposite is happening: we are spreading the virus throughout our healthcare systems, within our families and communities. 
HCA Healthcare nurses stressed that allowing them to fall ill due to a lack of protective equipment will put many others in danger.
"When we are infected no one is safe," said Kim Smith, an intensive care nurse in Corpus Christi. "When we are infected, we become a real danger of infecting everyone else around us, patients, hospital staff, and a risk to our own families."

Nurses in USA protest lack of supplies to fight coronavirus•Apr 3, 2020
Nurses and hospital workers dealing with Covid-19 patients in the United States staged protest and shared posts on social media, crying about their lack of supplies like surgical masks and personal protective equipment (PPE) in the fight against the deadly virus.

Please Listen to Nurses Now (square, with captions) from National Nurses United on Vimeo.

HCA nurse protests slam hospital preparation for COVID-19

Registered nurses in seven states protested this week at 15 HCA Healthcare hospitals over what they say is a lack of COVID-19 preparedness, according to the union that represents them. 
National Nurses United, which claims more than 150,000 members nationwide, said it wants Nashville, Tenn.-based HCA to provide healthcare workers with optimal personal protective equipment such as N95 respirators or powered air-purifying respirators and other head-to-toe coverings. 
"Nurses at various HCA hospitals are reporting that they have had to work without proper protective equipment," Jean Ross, RN, president of National Nurses Unite said in a news release.
"Nurses say they are not informed when they are exposed to an infected patient," she said. "They are told to unsafely reuse masks, and at one hospital, they are even being told not to wear masks because it scared the patients."
Registered nurses protested April 1 at facilities in California, Florida, Missouri, Nevada, Texas. Protesting also occurred April 2 at additional Texas and Florida facilities. 
Separately, registered nurses at HCA's Mission Hospital in Asheville, N.C., delivered a petition to hospital officials April 2 expressing their concerns, according to NNU.
HCA, a for-profit hospital operator, pointed to its efforts to equip healthcare workers to provide safe, effective care, and accused the union of "trying to use this crisis to advance its own interest — organizing more members."
"The pandemic has strained the worldwide supply of personal protective equipment, including masks, face shields and gowns, a challenge that is not unique to HCA Healthcare or any other health system in the United States," a statement from HCA said.
"While we are doing everything in our power to secure additional supplies, and we are following CDC protocols for using and conserving PPE, the worldwide shortage is a reality that we are addressing with realistic, workable solutions," HCA added.
HCA said these steps include enacting universal masking for employees; appointing personal protective equipment  stewards in hospitals; and creating strategically located personal protective equipment distribution centers on hospital campuses. The hospital operator said it also has staffing contingency plans to ensure hospitals are prepared for an influx in patients; is ensuring pay for healthcare workers during the pandemic; and is offering scrub-laundering for workers who care for COVID-19 patients.
A full list of protests is available here

Related Articles


43,000 healthcare jobs lost in March

Healthcare lost 43,000 jobs in March, with job losses primarily in ambulatory healthcare services, according to the latest jobs report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The job losses — which occurred the same month the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic — included offices of physicians (-12,000), dentists (-17,000) and other healthcare practitioners (-7,000). At the same time, hospitals added only 200 jobs last month, compared to the 7,800 positions they added to the U.S. economy in February.
U.S. Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia issued a statement on the March jobs report, saying it reflects the initial effect on U.S. jobs of the public health measures being taken to fight against COVID-19.
"It should be noted the report’s surveys only reference the week and pay periods that include March 12; we know that our report next month will show more extensive job losses, based on the high number of state unemployment claims reported yesterday and the week before," said Mr. Scalia.
Overall, healthcare employment had been growing. In the 12 months prior to March, industry employment had grown by 374,000, according to the bureau. 
This story was updated at 9:50 a.m. CDT April 3.

‘When we are infected no one is safe’: Nurses nationwide protest over lack of coronavirus protective equipment
April 1, 2020 By Common Dreams


“For the wealthiest hospital corporation in the United States to show such disregard for the health and safety of its caregivers, is disgraceful and unconscionable.”

Nurses at 15 hospitals across the country are set to stage protests both Wednesday and Thursday over what they say is a dangerous lack of protections for healthcare workers and demanding their employers provide respirators, gowns, gloves, and other protective equipment to help them safely fight the coronavirus pandemic.

When we are infected, we become a real danger of infecting everyone else around us, patients, hospital staff, and a risk to our own families.”
—Kim Smith, registered nurse

National Nurses United (NNU) helped organize the protests at hospitals run by HCA Healthcare, the country’s largest and wealthiest for-profit hospital operator, in seven states. The union represents 10,000 nurses at HCA hospitals, which the union says has left its nurses even less prepared for the pandemic than healthcare providers at most other facilities in the nation.

The union posted a video on social media of nurses detailing their harrowing experiences from the past several weeks as the outbreak has spread to every state in the U.S., killing more than 3,900 people so far.

Listen to––and protect––nurses. All our lives are on the line.
Full video https://t.co/8uIniRXctU #COVID19 pic.twitter.com/9mebUEibin
— Bonnie Castillo (@NNUBonnie) April 1, 2020

“PPE, or personal protective equipment, is virtually non-existent at my hospital,” one nurse in Oakland, California, said.

“I had a patient who was having respiratory issues and was not able to get a respiratory treatment because the respiratory therapist did not have the proper mask,” said another who works in Auburn, California.

“Listen to—and protect—nurses. All our lives are on the line.”
—Bonnie Castillo, NNU

Despite making $23 billion in profits in the last decade, NNU said in a statement, HCA Healthcare nurses in states including California, Florida, and Texas have fewer N95 respirators and other equipment to keep them from contracting the new coronavirus, officially known as COVID-19, than healthcare providers at other hospitals.

Just 7% of nurses at HCA Healthcare facilities say they have enough PPE to protect staff and patients if there is a surge in coronavirus patients in their hospital, compared with 19% of nurses in general.

Only 35% of nurses in the HCA network report having access to N95 respirators, compared with 52% of nurses nationwide.

“For the wealthiest hospital corporation in the United States to show such disregard for the health and safety of its caregivers, is disgraceful and unconscionable,” said Jean Ross, president of NNU.

“Nurses at various HCA hospitals are reporting that they have had to work without proper protective equipment,” Ross added. “Nurses say they are not informed when they are exposed to an infected patient. They are told to unsafely reuse masks and at one hospital they are even being told not to wear masks because it ‘scared the patients.'”

One hospital in Florida delayed informing nurses that they had potentially been exposed to the coronavirus, while nurses at Corpus Christi Medical Center in Corpus Christi, Texas say they were told to report to work while waiting for the results of COVID-19 testing, potentially exposing others.

Calling nurses “canaries in the coal mine” in an op-ed published Wednesday at Common Dreams, registered nurse Amy Silverman raised similar concerns, denouncing the lack of transparency at hospitals across the country regarding the exposure of healthcare providers:

You deserve to know the truth: healthcare workers are falling ill by the thousands, some are dying, an unknown number are in critical condition, and there are no tests. Hospitals aren’t testing their workers unless they have obvious symptoms, but we all know that sources of infection aren’t limited to those of us who seek care in emergency rooms. Hospitals should be testing all of their workers in order to understand how to control infection within their facility—and the White House regularly broadcasts support of this strategy by relaying the message that “everyone who needs a test will get a test” yet the opposite is happening: we are spreading the virus throughout our healthcare systems, within our families and communities.

HCA Healthcare nurses stressed that allowing them to fall ill due to a lack of protective equipment will put many others in danger.

“When we are infected no one is safe,” said Kim Smith, an intensive care nurse in Corpus Christi. “When we are infected, we become a real danger of infecting everyone else around us, patients, hospital staff, and a risk to our own families.”
CALIFORNIA TENANTS UNION
Seeking an eviction moratorium in coronavirus pandemic, protesters target Garcetti’s house

By DAKOTA SMITH STAFF WRITER LA TIMES APRIL 1, 2020

Housing activists held a drive-by protest at Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti’s residence Wednesday morning, honking their horns and shouting from their windows to urge him to pass a blanket moratorium on residential evictions during the coronavirus pandemic.

A parade of about 20 vehicles circled Getty House in Windsor Square for more than a half hour, snaking around the block until Los Angeles Police Department officers arrived and parked two large vehicles in a nearby intersection.

LAPD spokesman Josh Rubenstein said traffic could still flow in the area. “According to a supervisor on the scene, the patrol vehicles partially blocked the intersection to control the flow of traffic, ensuring safe travels on the street,” Rubenstein said. “Cars were not blocked.”

After police parked in the intersection, a crowd of more than 40 housing activists then took to the sidewalks in front of Getty House. “It’s not a real moratorium,” protesters yelled. “No wages, no rent,” others shouted, while some held signs that read, “Freeze all rents.”

Albert Corado, 31, who came from Atwater Village to join the protest, said he was frustrated by the city’s new eviction policy, arguing that what the mayor and L.A. City Council have done doesn’t go far enough.

“What the city has done is really ineffectual,” Corado said.

It’s unclear if Garcetti was home during the 7 a.m. protest. His spokesman, Alex Comisar, said that the mayor and L.A. City Council have “taken quick, aggressive action” to freeze rents and prevent evictions during the crisis.

“The mayor stands with all Angelenos and he will continue taking every possible step to support them through this emergency,” Comisar said.

The City Council last week approved a temporary ban on evictions for renters who are unable to pay rent because of the coronavirus. The council also waived late fees and gave renters up to a year to pay back rent after the city’s emergency order for the pandemic expires.

Council members, however, rejected a blanket ban on all evictions. Instead, to qualify, renters who are unable to pay rent must demonstrate how they have been harmed by the coronavirus, which critics say is too onerous a task given that many may be unable to get tested for the coronavirus or see a doctor.

Renters may also have a hard time proving that their work hours were cut, for example, because of the economic upheaval caused by the pandemic.

Garcetti went further this week, announcing that landlords would not be allowed to increase the rent for tenants who live in apartments that fall under the city’s rent stabilization program. The announcement covers about 624,000 apartments and it’s unclear how many of those units would have been subject to annual rent increases during the pandemic.

Organizers said that Wednesday’s protest was expected to attract members of L.A. Tenants Union, Chinatown Community for Equitable Development, NOlympics LA and other groups. The protesters said they want a moratorium on all evictions during the crisis, complete rent forgiveness and/or rent suspension, and the immediate use of hotel and motel rooms to provide permanent housing to unhoused residents.

Protesters held a similar rally outside Garcetti’s residence Sunday.

Separately, tenant activist groups held “rent strike” protests in several cities Wednesday, vowing to skip payments because of the economic downturn from the coronavirus pandemic.

Times staff writer Liam Dillon contributed to this report.

CHUTZPAH
Uber Asks US Government to Give Its Workers Health Insurance

In a desperate bid, Uber wants a federal fix to the problem of its drivers wanting livable wages and healthcare coverage.


By Edward Ongweso Jr Mar 23 2020

SOPA IMAGES / CONTRIBUTOR

In a letter to the President, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi asked Donald Trump to do something Khosrowshahi has refused to do for years: provide "more social protections" like health insurance to gig workers:

"The current binary system of employment classification means that either a worker is an employee who is provided significant social benefits or an independent worker who is provided relatively few.

For independent workers like drivers and delivery people, and for work platforms like Uber, this presents a dilemma: reclassifying these workers as employees could result in the provision of more social protections, but the reality of employment means it would eliminate a key value proposition of this type of work. Instead of true flexibility—where workers need not report at a certain time or place, can start or stop working at the tap of a button, and can work on multiple platforms simultaneously—driving or delivering would come to resemble the kind of shift-based work that many people cannot fit into their lives."

The problem is, however, working for Uber is neither flexible nor independent. Uber functions exactly like an employer but doesn’t give its drivers any of the benefits many employers do. In New York City, Uber abandoned flexibility and imposed a shift-based quota system that restricted drivers' access to the app. As it grew increasingly more strict, some drivers were pushed to sleep in their cars to meet its demands. On the question of independence, drivers are algorithmically managed in ways that often go beyond traditional employment. Uber drivers are flexible and independent in the sense that, more so than most workers in our economy, they are expected to make do with fewer wages, less social benefits, and less control over their own labor and livelihood.


This push for a “third category,” then, makes sense as part of Uber’s fight for the right to misclassify workers, minimize labor costs, and someday achieve profitability. In California, where Assembly Bill 5 promises to outright reclassify gig workers as employees, Uber launched a $110 million ballot initiative (with help from Lyft, DoorDash, Postmates, and Instacart) that seeks to enshrine this third category. Here is Uber’s in its own IPO filing stating, in no uncertain terms, that reclassification would pose an existential threat:
"If, as a result of legislation or judicial decisions, we are required to classify Drivers as employees (or as workers or quasi-employees where those statuses exist), we would incur significant additional expenses for compensating Drivers, potentially including expenses associated with the application of wage and hour laws (including minimum wage, overtime, and meal and rest period requirements), employee benefits, social security contributions, taxes, and penalties. Further, any such reclassification would require us to fundamentally change our business model, and consequently have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition."

When you take all of this into account, it’s easy to see what Khosrowshahi is doing here—it’s what Uber has been doing this past decade: begging for more subsidies to continue this unsustainable business model. The U.S. should be moving toward universal free healthcare for all, but that’s not currently the world we live in. And so all Khosrowshahi is acknowledging in his letter is that the business model his company pioneered has left millions of people around the country vulnerable and his company has done little to fix it.

Uber’s core business is ride-hailing, which relies on subsidies from drivers classified as “independent contractors” who rent or own the vehicles Uber needs for revenue, who assume every expense related to these vehicles, and who drive the vehicles for low wages without pesky benefits like health insurance. Uber’s core financing has come from private investors—it’s received more than $20 billion in investment that it has used to artificially suppress fares to attract and retain customers. Most importantly, these low fares undercut competitors. It’s not just ride-hail: Uber has expanded the model to freight operations and food delivery, on-demand labor, and scooters.
A third category wouldn’t guarantee a minimum wage, sick leave, paid vacation time, Social Security and Medicare, the right to unionize, protection from sexual harassment or gender discrimination, or a host of other civil rights for workers. It would, however, offload basic protections it should already be giving to the government.


San Francisco Says Coronavirus Has Made Gig Economy’s Labor Abuses Untenable

"Denying workers their rights during a public health crisis is immoral, irresponsible, and we cannot and will not stand for it.”


By Edward Ongweso Jr Mar 25 2020, BLOOMBERG / CONTRIBUTOR

On Tuesday, San Francisco lawmakers introduced a resolution condemning “app-based employers” such as Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and Postmates for illegally misclassifying their employees as contractors, calling for emergency injunctive relief in addition to enforcement of Assembly Bill 5.

In a press conference with San Francisco Supervisors Gordon Mar, Matt Haney, and Rafael Mandelman, alongside gig workers and representatives from labor coalitions like Jobs with Justice San Francisco, We Drive Progress and Gig Workers Rising, speakers laid out the rationale behind the resolution.

“By not complying with AB5 and misclassifying their employees as contractors, gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash have been putting drivers and passengers at risk during the coronavirus era and long before,” said Edan Alva, a Lyft driver for five years and an activist within Gig Workers Rising. “These large corporations are preying on the most vulnerable population while utilizing them as a workforce by paying them less than minimum wage, exposing them to significantly enhanced risks, and yet not providing them with basic worker protections required by law.”

Passed in September, Assembly Bill 5 is a California law that imposes a test to determine whether workers have enough autonomy to be declared independent contractors, or are actually employees being deprived of rights and benefits. The law also gives city attorneys the power to take companies violating the law to court and force reclassification of their workers, as has already been done with Instacart in San Diego. In a series of desperate attempts to avoid the same scrutiny and outcome, Uber has changed its app in California to give the appearance of more driver autonomy, launched a $110 million ballot initiative to kill AB5, and written a letter to Trump begging for a third category with the “flexibility” of contractors and only some of the “social benefits” of employees.

“This resolution is calling for a few things, things that should be very basic. One is we are simply asking that California enforces the law—that we actually start to classify gig workers correctly,” Supervisor Harney added. “Second, workers in these companies should be given the same rights and privileges as any other worker ... We are demanding that state officials protect gig workers during this pandemic by fully enforcing AB5 and ensuring workers have access to benefits like paid sick leave, disability, family paid leave, and unemployment insurance.”

“Lastly, we need to make sure there are minimal standards—basic foundational standards—for health and safety guidelines for these workers,” added Supervisor Harney. “If they are coming in and interacting with customers on a regular basis, dropping things off and picking things up, they need to be given access to cleaning supplies. They need to be supported if they do get sick, they need to have workers compensation benefits if they’re exposed in some way to the virus.”

The collective refusal of these gig platform companies to comply with AB5 and stop classifying their employees as contractors has created a public health crisis. Gig workers are pushed to constantly risk exposure precisely because they can’t afford to stay home, but they’re also a group of workers unable to afford getting sick either in terms of treatment or being suspended from their platforms for weeks.

“Paid sick leave, unemployment insurance, and family medical leave aren’t just nice to have, they’re the difference between workers being able to feed their families or not—and during this pandemic, they’re essential to public health,” said Supervisor Mar, who wrote the resolution.

“Denying workers their rights during a public health crisis is immoral, irresponsible, and we cannot and will not stand for it.”

Elizabeth Warren Calls on Uber, Instacart to Reclassify Workers as Employees

“You have a responsibility to protect their health and the public’s health.”


By Edward Ongweso Jr Apr 1 2020


In a letter to the CEOs of Uber, Instacart, DoorDash, and Grubhub, Senator Elizabeth Warren called on the gig companies to do something they've fought for years: providing gig workers with "basic rights and protections" that might protect them during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Because these workers perform essential delivery work and are critical to serving customers who cannot leave home during the pandemic, you have a responsibility to protect their health and the public’s health. To do so, I urge you to reclassify your delivery workers as employees, rather than independent contractors, and ensure they are provided a full suite of employee protections and benefits.”

For years now, it has grown increasingly difficult to ignore the precariousness of gig workers. With the worsening pandemic, the truth is all but unavoidable now: “essential” goods and services are made cheap, ubiquitous, and convenient by the exploitation of a vulnerable group of workers (along with a healthy dose of investor subsidies). These gig companies have deepened our public health crisis, not because they employ a significant number of the population (they don’t) but because their unprofitable business models which demand minimal labor costs (paid sick leave, minimum wages, health and safety protections, etc.) and maximum production (e.g. more deliveries made or more ride-hail trips completed) have been adopted at an alarming rate thanks to coronavirus.

“Your company’s misclassification of your workers as independent contractors rather than employees creates inherent risk for workers, who are denied access to unemployment insurance and workers compensation, a minimum wage and overtime, health care benefits, the right to be represented by a union, and the legal protections of the Occupational Safety and Health Act,” Warren wrote. “Lawsuits and state legislation, including California’s Assembly Bill 5 and the Massachusetts Independent Contractor Law, have sought to protect workers from being exploited by employer misclassification. The impact your misclassification has on workers, and the precarious circumstances it puts them in, is amplified by this pandemic.”

Whether it be intentional misclassification as contractors or replacing traditional bosses with algorithmic overseers, gig workers are left unable to make ends meet, let alone afford to take time off during a pandemic.

On Monday, Instacart shoppers launched a nationwide strike demanding hazard pay and health protection, while Amazon warehouse workers in Staten Island, N.Y. walked out over the company’s poor response to coronavirus and General Electric workers held protests demanding the company produce ventilators instead of laying off workers and closing factories. On Tuesday, Amazon's Whole Foods employees held a nationwide strike protesting the company's lack of coronavirus protections by calling in sick, just weeks after Whole Foods suggested employees settle for sharing paid time off instead of sick paid leave.

None of this is lost on gig companies who have, to varying degrees, tried to anticipate and undermine the upswell of labor militancy that threatens a business model that demands essential workers be denied essential protections. As Warren points out in her letter, Uber and DoorDash have both announced new paid sick leaves and both have failed to adequately roll out these policies for drivers. Last week, Uber’s CEO Dara Khosrowshahi wrote a desperate letter to President Trump that begged for a bailout to shift the burden of worker healthcare from gig companies to federal and state governments.

But while these companies debate the merits of putting workers before profits, workers are dying. An Uber driver died from coronavirus in the U.S. just last week, and a 25-year-old driver in Brazil died of an illness suspected to be coronavirus.

Warren's letter addresses one front of the information asymmetry that these companies use to escape regulatory scrutiny: wage data. "By classifying your workers as independent contractors, rather than employees, you are not mandated to report this data to the state," Warren writes, "but failing to do so creates a 'monthslong bureaucratic process' for workers to prove their employment status and secure unemployment benefits."

Complying with unemployment insurance regulation is a slippery slope that goes well beyond making sure gig workers are able to put food on the table: it opens the company to tens of millions in each of its major states, reclassification of its workforce as employees in entire states, and large bills for unpaid unemployment and disability taxes. In New Jersey, Uber was accused of misclassifying its workers as contractors to duck out of unemployment and disability taxes, and the state left the company with a $650 million tax bill. The ride-hail giant’s attempts to drag its feet in states like New York, where Uber and Lyft drivers are already legally entitled to tens of millions of dollars in unemployment insurance, make sense when thought of as a hedge against a wave of states issuing tax bills similar to New Jersey’s.

This, then, is why Khosrowshahi celebrated the Senate’s passage of the coronavirus stimulus package: it provides federal unemployment funds to misclassified contractors who aren’t eligible for their state’s unemployment coverage. Instead of states paying for unemployment coverage—but only after reclassifying the contractors as employees, then defending that classification in court, then suing the employers for unpaid unemployment taxes—states are incentivized to simply let the federal government pick up the bill and let gig companies off the hook for the billions they likely owe in unpaid taxes.

It is unlikely the CEOs targeted by Warren’s letter will listen. After all, at no point in their tenures have they ever made a decision prioritizing workers over yet-to-materialize profits. You are reading this precisely because that is not the case. But Warren’s endorsement of gig workers’ demands and struggles should spell out the writing on the wall: gig workers won’t stop until their basic needs are met. Gig companies are running out of excuses and gig workers are running out of patience




April 1, 2020 

Dara Khosrowshahi
 Chief Executive Officer Uber 
1455 Market St. San Francisco,
 CA 94103 

Dear Mr. Khosrowshahi:

 I am writing to request that, during the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, you provide your front line delivery workers with the basic rights and protections they would be guaranteed if you classified them as employees rather than independent contractors, including paid sick leave, minimum wages, and essential health and safety protections. Because these workers perform essential delivery work and are critical to serving customers who cannot leave home during the pandemic, you have a responsibility to protect their health and the public’s health. 

To do so, I urge you to reclassify your delivery workers as employees, rather than independent contractors, and ensure they are provided a full suite of employee protections and benefits. On Monday, Instacart workers staged an emergency walk-off1 to protest that the company had “not provided essential protections to Shoppers on the front lines that could prevent them from becoming carriers, falling ill themselves, or worse.”

 Worker demands include free, company-provided safety precautions, an expanded paid leave policy, and additional hazard pay—organizers declared that “workers should not be risking their lives for pocket change.” DoorDash and Uber have announced new paid sick leave policies, but workers report that requests to access this leave are being denied.

 Delivery workers are experiencing serious health and economic vulnerabilities as a result of their jobs, and your company is failing to provide appropriate and necessary protections. 

REFERENCES 
Washington Post, “Workers protest at Instacart, Amazon and Whole Foods for health protections and hazard pay,” Nitasha Tiku and Jay Greene, March 30, 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/03/30/workerstrike-instacart-amazon-whole-foods/. 

Medium, “Instacart Emergency Walk Off,” Gig Workers Collective, March 27, 2020, https://medium.com/@GigWorkersCollective/instacart-emergency-walk-off-ebdf11b6995a 

Medium, “Instacart’s ‘Response’ is a Sick Joke — The Strike is Still On,” Gig Workers Collective, March 29, 2020, 

Los Angeles Times, “Delivery workers are keeping California fed. They say no one’s keeping them safe,” Johana Bhuiyan, March 28, 2020, https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2020-03-28/coronavirus-deliveryworkers-sick-leave-protection/

Reuters, “Delivery drivers face pandemic without sick pay, insurance, sanitizer,” Chris Kirkham and Jeffrey Dastin, March 25, 2020, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-deliverydrivers-i/delivery-drivers-face-pandemic-without-sick-pay-insurance-sanitizer-idUSKBN21C1CJ.


Governor of Jalisco fails to convince president to support business

 
Jalisco Governor Alfaro urged the president to reconsider support for the private sector.

Published on Thursday, April 2, 2020



Coronavirus crisis is temporary one that the people will overcome: AMLO

Total cases at 1,378 after Wednesday's increase, the biggest yet in a single day

\López Obrador: 'People are behaving as they should.' 
López Obrador: 'People are behaving as they should.'
A day after Mexico recorded its largest single day increase in the number of confirmed cases of Covid-19, President López Obrador described the coronavirus crisis as a “fleeting situation” that the country will overcome soon.
“I want to provide confidence and certainty to the people of Mexico that this is a fleeting situation … a temporary public health and economic crisis. A temporary crisis – that means that we’ll overcome it soon,” López Obrador told reporters at his regular news conference on Thursday morning.
Declaring that the situation is not a disaster, the president asserted that the strength and culture of the Mexican people will allow them to “confront this adversity.”
“The people of Mexico are extraordinary. I want to thank the people a lot … because they’re complying with the [social distancing] measures that were established to avoid more infections. The people are behaving 100% [as they should], they’re showing that the people of Mexico are sensible, not irresponsible,” he said.
López Obrador’s remarks followed the Health Ministry’s announcement on Wednesday night that 163 new Covid-19 cases had been detected, taking the country’s total to 1,378. Director of Epidemiology José Luis Alomia also told a press conference that the coronavirus-related death toll had risen by eight to 37.
He said that there are 3,827 suspected cases of Covid-19 and that 7,073 people had tested negative for the disease. The total number of people that have been tested increased by 1,270 to 12,278.
Mexico City has the highest number of cases in the country, with 296, followed by México state with 157. There are 99 confirmed cases in Jalisco, 97 in Puebla, 78 in Nuevo León and 57 in Coahuila. With just three confirmed coronavirus cases, the small Pacific coast state of Colima is the least affected in the country.
Mexico City has also recorded the highest number of coronavirus-related deaths, with eight, while Sinaloa has seen four and three Covid-19 patients have died in each of Jalisco and Hidalgo.
Nineteen of Mexico’s 32 federal entities have now recorded at least one coronavirus-related death. Hypertension, diabetes, obesity and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have been the four most common existing diseases suffered by those who have died.
Of the 1,378 people confirmed to have Covid-19, 58% are men and 42% are women. Of the 37 deaths, 32 have been of men and just five of women.
As the number of coronavirus cases rises, the pressure on Mexico’s healthcare system will only increase but López Obrador stressed Thursday that the government is taking the necessary steps to prepare for an influx of Covid-19 patients.
“We are dedicated to that full time, it’s the priority of the government … We’re preparing so that we won’t lack beds or ventilators and we can attend to the serious cases,” he said.
López Obrador on Wednesday reiterated that the government’s coronavirus response strategy – criticized by some experts for failing to carry out widespread Covid-19 testing – is developed and managed by medical and scientific experts.
He called on state governors and all other authorities to “align” their response to Covid-19 with the federal strategy.
“My recommendation continues to be the same: we all have to align, respect the recommendations of the specialists, the scientists. It’s not time for bright ideas, this is a very serious matter,” López Obrador said.
He appealed to his political opponents earlier this week for a month-long “truce” as the country faces a dual health and economic crisis caused by the growing outbreak of Covid-19 and the emergency measures put in place to contain it.
“The conservatives have wanted to encourage division, polarize [people] … I call for unity, I even call for unity from my adversaries, from the conservatives. The homeland comes first, they should dial [their attacks on the government] down a notch.”
Source: Milenio (sp), El Universal (sp) 


There is no excuse not to test, says infectious disease expert.

Experts say Mexico hasn’t done enough virus testing; case numbers may be higher

One suggests politics might have been a factor


 
Published on Wednesday, April 1, 2020
Full coronavirus coverage here

The federal government continues to face criticism for its response to the coronavirus pandemic even though it declared a health emergency on Monday that stipulated stricter measures to contain the spread of the disease.

Some experts believe that Mexico is acting too late and not carrying out enough Covid-19 tests to prevent a widespread outbreak such as that seen across the northern border in the United States.

Health authorities announced on Tuesday night that there are 1,215 confirmed cases of Covid-19 in Mexico and that a total of 11,008 tests have been completed. Many experts believe that the real number of cases is much higher – hidden by the lack of testing that has taken place.

The number of tests carried out to date is low compared to many other countries and even dwarfed by New York state, where more than 205,000 tests had been performed as of Tuesday.

Janine Ramsey, an infectious disease expert with Mexico’s National Institute of Public Health, told the Associated Press that widespread Covid-19 testing should have occurred in February and March. She suggested that politics may have been a factor in the lack of testing to date.

“Politics is very, very much involved in the decision-making going on right now. Mexico, politically, does not value scientific evidence. Why? Because it takes decision-making away from the politicians,” Ramsey said.

“For most of us, especially those of us who work with infectious pathogens, there is absolutely no excuse not to test,” she added, explaining that widespread testing is the only way to determine how fast a disease is spreading.

Dr. Joseph Eisenberg, chair of the Epidemiology Department at the University of Michigan’s School of Public Health, also said that Mexico should have started testing more widely earlier.

“Testing is really our eyes, otherwise we’re kind of blind,” he told AP.

“The only way you can really understand where the disease is and where you really need to focus your energies with respect to control is to be able to know where the infections are. And the only way to know that is through testing.”

For its part, the government has defended its response to the virus, stating that on-the-ground health surveillance provides much of the information it needs to determine how the coronavirus epidemic is evolving. Deputy Health Minister Hugo López-Gatell said on Tuesday that he expects the epidemic curve to begin flattening soon as a result of the government’s social distancing recommendations.

Authorities have ramped up their “stay at home” message in recent days, with President López Obrador urging Mexicans to avoid going out as much as possible in a video message posted to social media on Friday.

The next day, López-Gatell delivered his most emphatic exhortation for people to stay at home and the government on Monday declared a health emergency that stipulated the suspension of non-essential activities until April 30. It also prohibited events seeking to gather more than 50 people, among other measures.

But the measures announced on Monday are “too late,” according to Dr. Miguel Betancourt, president of the Mexican Society of Public Health, who said that they should have been announced two weeks earlier when the epidemic curve began to steepen.

“We still have time to avoid an outbreak that grows out of control but we all have to do our part,” Betancourt said.

However, without federal authorities threatening to impose penalties on people who flout the directive to stay at home, and with millions of Mexicans not in a position to follow it because they are unable to support themselves if they don’t continue to work, it remains to be seen how effective the emergency declaration measures will be.

Susana Ruiz, a vegetable vendor in a market in the north of Mexico City, told AP that she couldn’t stop working because she has no other way to earn a living and the government hasn’t provided any other options.

Esperanza Rivas, a 50-year-old Mexico City resident, downplayed the threat of Covid-19.

“If this virus were so dangerous, I think they would have already closed the metro,” she said referring to the capital’s subway system.

Source: AP (en)