It's positively alpine!' Disbelief in big cities as air pollution falls
Hannah Ellis-Petersen in Delhi, Rebecca Ratcliffe in Bangkok, Sam Cowie in São Paulo,Joe Parkin Daniels in Bogotá and Lily Kuo in Beijing THE GUARDIAN 4/11/2020
The screenshots began to circulate on Delhi WhatsApp groups last week, captioned with varying expressions of disbelief. Having checked the air quality index, something of a sadistic morning ritual among residents of India’s capital, most could not believe their eyes.
Gone was the familiar menacing red banner, indicating how each intake of breath is really just a toxic blast on the lungs, replaced instead by a healthy, cheerful green. Could it really be that Delhi’s pollution levels now fell into the category of … “good”? “It’s positively alpine!” exclaimed one message.
A nationwide lockdown imposed across India almost two weeks ago to stop the spread of the coronavirus – the largest lockdown of its kind attempted anywhere – has led to widespread chaos and suffering, especially among the country’s 300 million poor. Yet in Delhi, the world’s most polluted city, it has also resulted in some of the freshest air the capital has seen in decades.
a large long train on a steel track: An aerial view of empty street on the first day of lockdown in São Paulo, Brazil. Photograph: 3 SLIDES © Provided by The Guardian
An aerial view of empty street on the first day of lockdown in São Paulo, Brazil. Photograph: Reuters
It is a lockdown silver lining being repeated across the world, as toxic megacities such as Bangkok, Beijing, São Paulo and Bogotá, where varying coronavirus restrictions have been imposed, all reported an unprecedented decline in pollution. Yet it is countered with one cruel irony: with most residents of these cities strictly confined to their homes, few have any way to appreciate this newly fresh air, except through an open window or a during speedy trip to the supermarket.
In Delhi, air quality index (AQI) levels are usually a severe 200 on a good day (anything above 25 is deemed unsafe by World Health Organization). During peak pollution periods last year they soared well into a life-threatening 900 and sometimes off the measurable scale. But as Delhi’s 11m registered cars were taken off the roads and factories and construction were ground to a halt, AQI levels have regularly fallen below 20. The skies are suddenly a rare, piercing blue. Even the birdsong seems louder.
Dr Shashi Tharoor, a politician and author who has been vocal on environmental issues, said he hoped that it was a wake-up call. “The blissful sight of blue skies and the joy of breathing clean air provides just the contrast to illustrate what we are doing to ourselves the rest of the time,” said Tharoor. “Today the typical Delhi AQI hovers around 30 and one blissful afternoon, after a spurt of rain, it dropped to 7.”
“Seven,” Tharoor exclaimed again in disbelief. “In Delhi! Pure joy!”.
Tharoor’s sister Smita, who was visiting from London when the lockdown was imposed and found herself stuck in Delhi, was equally effusive. As someone with asthma, she said the city’s air, normally thick with pollution, was usually a health nightmare. But now: “The air is clear, the skies are blue. I see the evening stars with clarity and hear the chirruping of excited birds at this unexpected bonus they have received.”
While India’s powerful car lobby has long disputed that cars are a major cause of Delhi’s pollution, Sunita Narain, director of the Centre for Science and Environment, said the lockdown and resulting rapid drop in pollution showed once and for all just what a polluting role vehicles had in the city.
Narain also stressed that while she wished Delhi was like this “all the time”, adding: “I don’t want people to say ‘Oh, environmentalists are celebrating this lockdown:’ we are not. This is not the solution. But whatever the new normal is post-Covid-19, we have to make sure we take this breath of fresh air and think about the serious efforts we need to deal with pollution in Delhi.”
It is not just Delhi experiencing the clearest skies in years. As pollution dropped to its lowest level in three decades this week this week, residents of Jalandhar in Punjab woke up to an incredible sight in the distance: the Dhauladhar mountain range in Himachal Pradesh. The peaks, which are over 120 miles away, had not been sighted on the Punjab horizon for almost 30 years.
It is the absence of cars on some of the world’s most congested roads that seems to be making the most crucial differences. Thailand’s capital, Bangkok, which only last month had closed schools because the pollution got so bad, has experienced a similar transformation in the air since partial lockdown, mainly due to the fall in road traffic. “We can see quite a big gap between the air quality standard that we have [compared with this time last year],” says Tara Buakamsri, Thailand director for Greenpeace.
But residents of Bangkok lamented how the places to enjoy the fresh air were swiftly disappearing. Playgrounds, sporting grounds and even parks, a rare source of solace in the bustling, intensely urban environs of Bangkok, have all now been shut. “I feel sad for the old people who use the park to hang out and meet friends. I think they will be so sad at home,” said Nantawan Wangudomsuk, 31, a producer who used to run in the parks.
Across South America’s most populous city of São Paulo, ground zero of Brazil’s brewing coronavirus crisis, notorious traffic queues and smoggy horizons are also giving way to calm streets and clearer skies.
During weekday rush-hour, downtown São Paulo’s João Goulart elevated highway – nicknamed Minhocão, the Big Worm – normally heaves with traffic as thousands of cars cram four narrow lanes and beeping motorbikes weave through daringly small spaces. But with the city’s coronavirus lockdown, Minhocão now resembles a small-town avenue instead of a major road in a metropolis of 12 million people.
“The air is certainly better,” said Daniel Guth,an urban mobility consultant. “I’ve felt the improvement in air quality both as a cyclist and as a quarantined citizen,” he laughed. “We should use this as a moment to reflect on what transport methods we should prioritise when this crisis is over.”
Despite being under lockdown, many Paulistas, as the city’s residents are known, are still finding ways to enjoy the cleaner air, taking to windows and apartment balconies for nightly pot-banging protests against Brazil’s far-right President Jair Bolsonaro, who has repeatedly dismissed the coronavirus as just “a little flu”.
Bogotá, the sprawling mountaintop capital of Colombia, is also usually choking with traffic so bad that officials occasionally ban cars for entire days. But since the nationwide coronavirus quarantine took hold on 24 March, exhaust fumes have fallen as the city ground to a halt. Yet the newly fresh air has been taunting Bogotá’s residents, who are allowed to leave home only for food and medicines, not even a daily dose of outdoor exercise. “Without a doubt this pandemic is helping us improve air quality,” said Carolina Urrutia, Bogotá’s district environment secretary. “With the city shut down, we are able to focus our efforts on other environmental factors.”
Cali, Colombia’s third city and usually a smokey, congested metropolis, has also been spared from the usual forest fires, allowing residents to breathe fresher air. “The thick cloud that usually hangs over us has been lifted,” said Christian Camilo Villa, an air quality activist and Cali resident. “The concern is that it will return when the quarantine ends.”
Indeed, the fear among environmentalists and residents is that, rather than attempting to maintain the low levels of pollution in the world’s biggest capitals, when industry and cars kick back into action post-lockdown, the situation will go back to square one, and perhaps even worsen, as people and industry attempt to make up for the lost months.
The signs from China, which is coming out of the other side of the coronavirus outbreak and where lockdowns are loosening up, are not positive. For the first four weeks after the Chinese new year holiday in late January, when the coronavirus outbreak was at its worst, pollution levels fell 25% across the country. But since early March, levels of nitrogen dioxide pollution have begun to inch back up as the country gets back to work with factories, businesses and power plants re-opening and traffic returning.
Lauri Myllyvirta, lead analyst for the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, said: “The big question is whether government stimulus measures lead to pollution levels rebounding above the levels before the crisis, like happened after the 2008 financial crisis.
It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Saturday, April 11, 2020
White House rejects bailout for Postal Service battered by coronavirus
REPUBLICANS HAVE TRIED TO DESTROY OR PRIVATIZE THE USPS FOR DECADES
Jacob Bogage WASHINGTON POST 4/11/2020
Through rain, sleet, hail and even a pandemic, mail carriers serve every address in the United States, but the coronavirus crisis is shaking the foundation of the U.S. Postal Service in new and dire ways.
REPUBLICANS HAVE TRIED TO DESTROY OR PRIVATIZE THE USPS FOR DECADES
THEY SABOTAGED IT EARLY IN THE NEW CENTURY, BY BURDENING IT WITH PAY NOW FOR PENSION BENEFITS LATER,AFTER IT WAS MAKING A PROFIT, (WHICH NO CORPORATION IN AMERICA DOES) CAN'T HAVE THAT FOR THE TAXPAYERS NOW CAN WE IRONICALLY IT WAS THE ANARCHIST KROPOTKIN WHO OBSERVED THAT THE INTERNATIONAL POSTAL UNION WAS A MODEL OF LIBERTARIAN ORGANIZATION OF GOVERNMENT.
Jacob Bogage WASHINGTON POST 4/11/2020
Through rain, sleet, hail and even a pandemic, mail carriers serve every address in the United States, but the coronavirus crisis is shaking the foundation of the U.S. Postal Service in new and dire ways.
© Erik S Lesser/EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock A U.S. Postal Service carrier wears a mask and gloves as personal protective equipment while making deliveries in Washington, D.C., on April 1.
The Postal Service’s decades-long financial troubles have worsened dramatically as the volume of the kind of mail that pays the bills at that agency ― first-class and marketing mail ― withers during the pandemic. The USPS needs an infusion of money, and President Trump has blocked potential emergency funding for the agency that employs around 600,000 workers, repeating instead the false claim that higher rates for Internet shipping companies Amazon, FedEx and UPS would right the service’s budget.
Trump threatened to veto the $2.2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security, or Cares, Act if the legislation contained any money to directly bail out the postal agency, according to a senior Trump Administration official and a congressional official.
“We told them very clearly that the president was not going to sign the bill if [money for the Postal Service] was in it,” the Trump Administration official said. “I don’t know if we used the v-bomb but the president was not going to sign it, and we told them that.”
Instead, Sens. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) added a last minute $10 billion Treasury Department loan to the Cares Act, to keep the agency on firmer ground through the spring of 2020, according to a Democratic committee aide.
Lawmakers had originally agreed to a $13 billion direct grant of money to the Postal Service, which wouldn’t have had to be repaid. But that effort was blocked by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who warned such a move could blow up the relief bill. A committee aide said Mnuchin told lawmakers during negotiations: “You can have a loan or you can have nothing at all.”
Only the $10 billion loan to the Postal Service made it into law, over Mnuchin’s objections.
Without the loan, which still has not been approved by the Treasury Department, USPS would be “financially illiquid,” by Sept. 30, according to estimates provided to lawmakers. Advocates for the Postal Service worry the agency is in a vulnerable position. As its main funding source dwindles, the Postal Service could be seen as ripe for a makeover; conservatives have long talked about privatizing the mail delivery in the United States.
The Postal Service projects it will lose $2 billion each month through the coronavirus recession, while postal workers maintain the nationwide service of delivering essential mail and parcels, such as prescriptions, food and household necessities, to fill in the gaps for other delivery companies.
That work often comes at great personal risk. Nearly 500 postal workers have tested positive for the coronavirus and 462 others are presumptive positives, USPS leaders told lawmakers. Nineteen have died; more than 6,000 are in self-quarantine because of exposure.
And while the Trump Administration and Mnuchin pushed through private-sector bailouts in the Cares Act — $350 billion to the Small Business Administration loan program, $29 billion to passenger airlines and air cargo carriers, and economic incentives for the construction, energy and life sciences industries, among others — Mnuchin has signaled any postal relief funds in a “Phase IV” stimulus package currently under negotiation would amount to a poison pill.
Postmaster General Megan Brennan asked lawmakers Thursday for another $50 billion — $25 billion to offset lost revenue from declining mail volume due to the coronavirus and $25 billion for “modernization” — plus another $25 billion Treasury loan and a mechanism to pay down $14 billion in existing public debt.
House Democrats, led by Virginia Rep. Gerald E. Connolly, cautioned that without the funding, the Postal Service may not make it past September without missing payrolls or service interruptions. Senate Republicans insist the $10 billion loan from the Cares Act provided sufficient short-term liquidity, the staffer said, and the Senate would not vote to extend more money to an agency unlikely to make good on its borrowing.
“I’m so frustrated at how difficult it has been for a long time to galvanize attention and action around an essential service,” Connolly said in a phone interview. “And maybe the pandemic forces us all to refocus on this service and how essential it is and how we need to fix it while we can before it gets into critical condition.”
Trump has long been antagonistic of the post office, calling it once in a tweet Amazon’s “delivery boy.” The Postal Service often serves as a vendor for Amazon, UPS, FedEx and other shipping companies, delivering the “last mile” service to often rural and remote areas. It is a crucial service for the Postal Service, for which package delivery is a growing part of its business.
Much of Trump’s invective on the Postal Service is aimed at Amazon’s founder and chief executive Jeff Bezos, who owns The Washington Post. Trump has advocated for increasing the prices on Amazon deliveries, against the recommendation of shipping experts and the agency’s own Board of Governors, a majority of whom Trump appointed.
“They should raise, they have to raise the prices to these companies that walk in and drop thousands of packages on the floor of the post office and say, ‘Deliver it',” Trump said at a news conference Wednesday. “And they make money, but the post office gets killed. Okay? So they ought to do that and we are looking into it and we’ve been pushing them now for over a year.”
But raising rates too much would lead private-sector competitors to develop their own cheaper methods to deliver packages, said Lori Rectanus, director of physical infrastructure at the Government Accountability Office. And even if a rate increase generates revenue, the total would be marginal to the total U.S. Postal Service debt, almost all of which comes from a congressional requirement to prepay pension and retiree health care costs for all employees, even those who haven’t yet retired.
Under normal market conditions, the Postal Service nearly breaks even, save for the pension account debt, despite cratering volume on deliveries in recent years. In 2010, USPS delivered 77.6 billion items of first-class mail, on which it makes a lucrative profit margin. In 2019, it only delivered 54.9 billion first-class items. The service handled 3.1 billion packages in 2010, and 6.2 billion in 2019, although processing packages doesn’t earn the agency as much revenue as first-class mail delivery.
But the coronavirus has completely upended consumer behavior and the quantity of items in the mail. Volume in the first week of March declined 30 percent, postal agency officials told lawmakers. At the end of June, the agency projects volume to be down 50 percent, and it could lose $23 billion over the next 18 months.
“We are at a critical juncture in the life of the Postal Service,” Brennan, the postmaster general, said in a statement. “At a time when America needs the Postal Service more than ever, the reason we are so needed is having a devastating effect on our business.”
The Postal Service has faced financial troubles for more than a decade, as digital communication morphed and took off, giving lawmakers many opportunities to debate its future. The Postal Service is so foundational to the country that it’s enumerated in the Constitution.
The agency’s troubles have renewed conservative conversations about structural changes in the agency that would force it to act more like a corporation, with steps such as eliminating the prepaid pension requirement, and easing its universal service obligation to deliver to every address in the United States, including ones so remote.
“If we’re concerned about the Postal Service and its workers,” said Romina Boccia, an economist at the right-leaning Heritage Foundation, “the best thing we can do is to free up the Postal Service to operate like a business so they can try to get back into the black.”
The Postal Service’s decades-long financial troubles have worsened dramatically as the volume of the kind of mail that pays the bills at that agency ― first-class and marketing mail ― withers during the pandemic. The USPS needs an infusion of money, and President Trump has blocked potential emergency funding for the agency that employs around 600,000 workers, repeating instead the false claim that higher rates for Internet shipping companies Amazon, FedEx and UPS would right the service’s budget.
Trump threatened to veto the $2.2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security, or Cares, Act if the legislation contained any money to directly bail out the postal agency, according to a senior Trump Administration official and a congressional official.
“We told them very clearly that the president was not going to sign the bill if [money for the Postal Service] was in it,” the Trump Administration official said. “I don’t know if we used the v-bomb but the president was not going to sign it, and we told them that.”
Instead, Sens. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) added a last minute $10 billion Treasury Department loan to the Cares Act, to keep the agency on firmer ground through the spring of 2020, according to a Democratic committee aide.
Lawmakers had originally agreed to a $13 billion direct grant of money to the Postal Service, which wouldn’t have had to be repaid. But that effort was blocked by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who warned such a move could blow up the relief bill. A committee aide said Mnuchin told lawmakers during negotiations: “You can have a loan or you can have nothing at all.”
Only the $10 billion loan to the Postal Service made it into law, over Mnuchin’s objections.
Without the loan, which still has not been approved by the Treasury Department, USPS would be “financially illiquid,” by Sept. 30, according to estimates provided to lawmakers. Advocates for the Postal Service worry the agency is in a vulnerable position. As its main funding source dwindles, the Postal Service could be seen as ripe for a makeover; conservatives have long talked about privatizing the mail delivery in the United States.
The Postal Service projects it will lose $2 billion each month through the coronavirus recession, while postal workers maintain the nationwide service of delivering essential mail and parcels, such as prescriptions, food and household necessities, to fill in the gaps for other delivery companies.
That work often comes at great personal risk. Nearly 500 postal workers have tested positive for the coronavirus and 462 others are presumptive positives, USPS leaders told lawmakers. Nineteen have died; more than 6,000 are in self-quarantine because of exposure.
And while the Trump Administration and Mnuchin pushed through private-sector bailouts in the Cares Act — $350 billion to the Small Business Administration loan program, $29 billion to passenger airlines and air cargo carriers, and economic incentives for the construction, energy and life sciences industries, among others — Mnuchin has signaled any postal relief funds in a “Phase IV” stimulus package currently under negotiation would amount to a poison pill.
Postmaster General Megan Brennan asked lawmakers Thursday for another $50 billion — $25 billion to offset lost revenue from declining mail volume due to the coronavirus and $25 billion for “modernization” — plus another $25 billion Treasury loan and a mechanism to pay down $14 billion in existing public debt.
House Democrats, led by Virginia Rep. Gerald E. Connolly, cautioned that without the funding, the Postal Service may not make it past September without missing payrolls or service interruptions. Senate Republicans insist the $10 billion loan from the Cares Act provided sufficient short-term liquidity, the staffer said, and the Senate would not vote to extend more money to an agency unlikely to make good on its borrowing.
“I’m so frustrated at how difficult it has been for a long time to galvanize attention and action around an essential service,” Connolly said in a phone interview. “And maybe the pandemic forces us all to refocus on this service and how essential it is and how we need to fix it while we can before it gets into critical condition.”
Trump has long been antagonistic of the post office, calling it once in a tweet Amazon’s “delivery boy.” The Postal Service often serves as a vendor for Amazon, UPS, FedEx and other shipping companies, delivering the “last mile” service to often rural and remote areas. It is a crucial service for the Postal Service, for which package delivery is a growing part of its business.
Much of Trump’s invective on the Postal Service is aimed at Amazon’s founder and chief executive Jeff Bezos, who owns The Washington Post. Trump has advocated for increasing the prices on Amazon deliveries, against the recommendation of shipping experts and the agency’s own Board of Governors, a majority of whom Trump appointed.
“They should raise, they have to raise the prices to these companies that walk in and drop thousands of packages on the floor of the post office and say, ‘Deliver it',” Trump said at a news conference Wednesday. “And they make money, but the post office gets killed. Okay? So they ought to do that and we are looking into it and we’ve been pushing them now for over a year.”
But raising rates too much would lead private-sector competitors to develop their own cheaper methods to deliver packages, said Lori Rectanus, director of physical infrastructure at the Government Accountability Office. And even if a rate increase generates revenue, the total would be marginal to the total U.S. Postal Service debt, almost all of which comes from a congressional requirement to prepay pension and retiree health care costs for all employees, even those who haven’t yet retired.
Under normal market conditions, the Postal Service nearly breaks even, save for the pension account debt, despite cratering volume on deliveries in recent years. In 2010, USPS delivered 77.6 billion items of first-class mail, on which it makes a lucrative profit margin. In 2019, it only delivered 54.9 billion first-class items. The service handled 3.1 billion packages in 2010, and 6.2 billion in 2019, although processing packages doesn’t earn the agency as much revenue as first-class mail delivery.
But the coronavirus has completely upended consumer behavior and the quantity of items in the mail. Volume in the first week of March declined 30 percent, postal agency officials told lawmakers. At the end of June, the agency projects volume to be down 50 percent, and it could lose $23 billion over the next 18 months.
“We are at a critical juncture in the life of the Postal Service,” Brennan, the postmaster general, said in a statement. “At a time when America needs the Postal Service more than ever, the reason we are so needed is having a devastating effect on our business.”
The Postal Service has faced financial troubles for more than a decade, as digital communication morphed and took off, giving lawmakers many opportunities to debate its future. The Postal Service is so foundational to the country that it’s enumerated in the Constitution.
The agency’s troubles have renewed conservative conversations about structural changes in the agency that would force it to act more like a corporation, with steps such as eliminating the prepaid pension requirement, and easing its universal service obligation to deliver to every address in the United States, including ones so remote.
“If we’re concerned about the Postal Service and its workers,” said Romina Boccia, an economist at the right-leaning Heritage Foundation, “the best thing we can do is to free up the Postal Service to operate like a business so they can try to get back into the black.”
BULLSHIT THEY CAN NEVER RUN IN THE BLACK NEVER HAVE NEVER WILL
HENCE THE NAME SERVICE VS. COMPANY, INC OR CORP.
Staff writers Josh Dawsey and Jeff Stein contributed to this report.
Staff writers Josh Dawsey and Jeff Stein contributed to this report.
THE WEEK OF THE PINK SUPER MOON
TRUMP PRIVATIZES LUNA
President Trump has decided to turn his attention to mining the moon during this difficult time for the nation.
According to documents released by the White House, Donald Trump paused his efforts around the growing coronavirus crisis to sign an executive order.
This order will leave the US free to mine the moon for resources.
The document says the order rejects the 1979 global agreement known as the Moon Treaty .
The Moon Treaty of 1979It was deliberated and developed by the Legal Subcommittee for the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) from 1972 to 1979. ... Specifically, the Moon Treaty applies to the Moon and other celestial bodies in the solar system excluding the Earth.Oct 24, 2011
The Moon Treaty: failed international law ... - The Space Review
This treaty says any activity in space should conform with international law.
The order states: "Americans should have the right to engage in commercial exploration, recovery, and use of resources in outer space.
"Outer space is a legally and physically unique domain of human activity, and the United States does not view it as a global commons."
Trump now wants to 'mine the moon for resources' because causing havoc on Earth obviously isn't enough for him
INDEPENDENT UK
Picture: CHRIS KLEPONIS / POOL/iStock/Getty/Twitter
In news that no one expected to read in the middle of a pandemic, Donald Trump has signed an executive order to mine the moon for resources.
Yes, that is something that the president of the United States actually did while hundreds of thousands of his citizens are being impacted by a deadly virus. Priorities!
In a document released by the White House, Trump's order controversially rejects the 1979 global Moon Treaty agreement, which stated that any activity in space should abide by international law.
According to Trump's order, it states that:
Americans should have the right to engage in commercial exploration, recovery, and use of resources in outer space.
Outer space is a legally and physically unique domain of human activity, and the United States does not view it as a global commons.
In response, the Russian space agency has accused Trump of trying to 'privatise space.' In a statement, Roscosmos said:
Attempts to expropriate outer space and aggressive plans to actually seize territories of other planets hardly set the countries (on course for) fruitful cooperation.
For some, this may bring back memories of the Cold War 'space race' between the US and the Soviet Union but for many, they have just been left baffled that Trump would choose to concentrate on this during one of the most testing periods the world has experienced for a generation.
This isn't a million miles away from the premise of the sci-fi film Moon, where mankind attempts to harvest minerals from our lunar friend. Even that movies director, Duncan Jones, was a bit taken aback when he heard this news.
Let's not forget that in June 2018, Donald Trump tweeted that the moon was 'a part of Mars' so we cannot wait to see how this is going to play out.
SEE
DECEPTION POINT DAN BROWN
THE MOON IS A HARSH MISTRESS ROBERT HEINLEIN
CAPITALISM IN SPACE
Moon Treaty - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Moon_Treaty
The Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, better known as the Moon Treaty or Moon Agreement, is a multilateral treaty ... After ten more years of negotiations, the Moon Treaty was created in 1979 as a ... It proposed to do so by having the state parties produce an "international ...
History · Provisions · Legal status · List of parties
Moon Agreement - unoosa
https://www.unoosa.org › oosa › ourwork › spacelaw › treaties › intromoo...
The Agreement was adopted by the General Assembly in 1979 in resolution 34/68. ... of the Outer Space Treaty as applied to the Moon and other celestial bodies, ... are the common heritage of mankind and that an international regime should be ... on Outer Space · Space Object Register · Publications · Did you know?
Outer Space - United Nations Treaty Collection
https://treaties.un.org › Pages › ViewDetails
Agreement governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial ... 34/68of the General Assembly of the United Nations dated 5 December 1979. ... which States are obliged to observe in their international relations, as set forth in ...
The 1979 Moon Agreement - A Space Law analysis on Space ...
https://www.spacelegalissues.com › the-1979-moon-agreement
Jul 17, 2019 - The 1979 Moon Agreement reaffirms and elaborates on many of the ... This text is the genesis of what has become known as “Space Law”. ... not yet parties to the international treaties governing the uses of outer space to ratify ...
Moon Treaty - McGill University
https://www.mcgill.ca › iasl › centre › research › space-law › moon-treaty
The "Moon Treaty" Opened for signature at New York on 18 December 1979 ... International co-operation in pursuance of this Agreement should be as wide as ... prejudice to the international regime referred to in paragraph 5 of this article.
Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and ...
https://www.nti.org › learn › treaties-and-regimes › agreement-governing-...
Oct 26, 2011 - The Moon Agreement was signed in December 1979 following an initiative by the ... The Moon Agreement supplements the Outer Space Treaty and ... as well as the public and the international scientific community, to the ...
The Moon Agreement of 1979: What Relevance to Space ...
https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl › 2010/09 › the-moon-agreement-of-19...
Sep 3, 2010 - It also expresses a desire to prevent the Moon from becoming a source of international conflict. As a follow-on to the Outer Space Treaty, the ...
• Chart: The Countries That Signed The Moon Treaty | Statista
https://www.statista.com › Topics › Space exploration
Jul 19, 2019 - The Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and ... also known as the Moon Treaty or Moon Agreement, was created in 1979 to ... It also seeks to avoid the Moon becoming a space for international conflict.
https://www.mcgill.ca › iasl › centre › research › space-law › moon-treaty
The "Moon Treaty" Opened for signature at New York on 18 December 1979 ... International co-operation in pursuance of this Agreement should be as wide as ... prejudice to the international regime referred to in paragraph 5 of this article.
Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and ...
https://www.nti.org › learn › treaties-and-regimes › agreement-governing-...
Oct 26, 2011 - The Moon Agreement was signed in December 1979 following an initiative by the ... The Moon Agreement supplements the Outer Space Treaty and ... as well as the public and the international scientific community, to the ...
The Moon Agreement of 1979: What Relevance to Space ...
https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl › 2010/09 › the-moon-agreement-of-19...
Sep 3, 2010 - It also expresses a desire to prevent the Moon from becoming a source of international conflict. As a follow-on to the Outer Space Treaty, the ...
• Chart: The Countries That Signed The Moon Treaty | Statista
https://www.statista.com › Topics › Space exploration
Jul 19, 2019 - The Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and ... also known as the Moon Treaty or Moon Agreement, was created in 1979 to ... It also seeks to avoid the Moon becoming a space for international conflict.
Aug 19, 2015 - Hans-Kurt Lange, who worked as an illustrator in NASA's Future Projects Division , modeled 2001's space suits on NASA's, using the same ...
Mar 27, 1997 - The genius is not in how much Stanley Kubrick does in "2001: A Space Odyssey," but in how little. This is the work of an artist so sublimely ...
Apr 4, 2018 - Kubrick may have set out to make a science-fiction film, but 2001: A Space Odyssey, which turns 50 this week, is closer to home than we think, ...
A doctor shares the right way to take off gloves amid the coronavirus
BUSINESS INSIDER
Dr. Dean Winslow, an infectious diseases specialist at Stanford Health Care, told Business Insider he doesn't personally use gloves when he's not in a medical setting. He said that if you do choose to use them outside, it's important to take them off in the right way.
Here's a step-by-step guide on how to properly put on, wear, and take off gloves, according to Winslow, the World Health Organization, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Though less ubiquitous than masks, gloves are becoming more common in public spaces across the US, especially in areas hit harder by the coronavirus.
The World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendation for non-medical professionals is that washing your hands regularly is more effective in preventing the spread of the coronavirus than donning gloves.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) only recommends personal protective equipment (PPE) such as gloves for healthcare workers or for those with who have or might have COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus. In guidelines for those caring for COVID-19 patients at home, the CDC's guidelines only mention wearing gloves when touching soiled laundry from the patient.
Still, some people are choosing to wear nitrile or latex gloves in the hope that they may offer some protection from the coronavirus.
DO NOT USE LATEX GLOVES THEY ARE NOT CHEMICAL PROOF, THEY TEAR EASILY AND PEOPLE ARE ALLERGIC TO THE LATEX. WEAR NITIRLE GLOVES, DISPOSABLE OR HEAVY DUTY.
ALSO MAKE SURE YOUR GLOVES ARE ONE SIZE LARGER THAN YOUR HAND SO AS NOT TO BE ON TOO TIGHTLY SO IF YOU WEAR SMALL USE MEDIUM, WEAR MEDIUM USE LARGE ETC.
It's important to properly put on and take off gloves to avoid spreading the virus. Wearers should still follow regular social distancing rules and avoid touching their faces, in the same way that they would if they were not wearing them.
It is also important to note that the most important thing that people can do during this time is to abide by shelter in place orders to the greatest extent possible, according to Dr. Dean Winslow, an infectious diseases specialist at Stanford Health Care. If you have to go outside, Winslow told Business Insider, try to keep a safe distance from other people.
—Jessica Layton (@JLaytonTV) April 2, 2020
Here is what to do to safely put on, wear, and take off gloves as recommended by Winslow, the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC and WHO guidelines are originally meant for healthcare professionals, not the public.
Step 1: Wash (and dry) your hands before touching the gloves
If there's one thing to emphasize throughout the coronavirus pandemic, and especially when donning and taking off protective gear, it is this: Wash. Your. Hands. As often as possible, as scrupulously as possible, and for at least the recommended 20 seconds outlined by both the CDC and WHO.
People have recommended that an easy way to keep track is to sing the "Happy Birthday" song two times over. NPR recommends a few alternatives for when that gets old (and it will): Beyonce's "Love on Top" chorus is one example and the chorus of Dolly Parton's "Jolene" also does the trick. The New York Times went the extra mile and had lyricists create not one but two hand-washing songs, which were then sent to Broadway actors to perform and upload videos of.
Washing your hands regularly is by far one of the most important things to do during this pandemic, Dr. Winslow told Business Insider. The CDC emphasizes this point and says that because bacteria can easily multiply in moist environments underneath gloves, glove-wearers "should make sure hands are dry before putting on gloves."
Step 2: Put on your gloves carefully
This one is pretty self explanatory.
Step 3: Avoid touching your face while you have your gloves on
Gloves are not a replacement for scrupulous hand washing, like mentioned above, but they might provide wearers with a false sense of security.
The CDC tells wearers that they should limit opportunities for "touch contamination," which means touching potentially contaminated surfaces (think can of beans at the grocery store, light switches, door handles) and then touching non-contaminated surfaces (your face, glasses, nose, etc.)
Also keep in mind that gloves may "have small defects that are hard to see or may be torn during use."
Step 5: Carefully place your used gloves into the garbage
Do not throw them onto the streets of NYC as pictured below.
Some people are choosing to wear gloves in the hope that they may
offer some protection from the coronavirus. Crystal Cox/Business Insider
Some people in areas hit hard by the coronavirus may choose to wear gloves when out in public spaces, like grocery stores or public transportation, where they may have to touch objects that others may have touched as well
Some people in areas hit hard by the coronavirus may choose to wear gloves when out in public spaces, like grocery stores or public transportation, where they may have to touch objects that others may have touched as well
Dr. Dean Winslow, an infectious diseases specialist at Stanford Health Care, told Business Insider he doesn't personally use gloves when he's not in a medical setting. He said that if you do choose to use them outside, it's important to take them off in the right way.
Here's a step-by-step guide on how to properly put on, wear, and take off gloves, according to Winslow, the World Health Organization, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Though less ubiquitous than masks, gloves are becoming more common in public spaces across the US, especially in areas hit harder by the coronavirus.
The World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendation for non-medical professionals is that washing your hands regularly is more effective in preventing the spread of the coronavirus than donning gloves.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) only recommends personal protective equipment (PPE) such as gloves for healthcare workers or for those with who have or might have COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus. In guidelines for those caring for COVID-19 patients at home, the CDC's guidelines only mention wearing gloves when touching soiled laundry from the patient.
Still, some people are choosing to wear nitrile or latex gloves in the hope that they may offer some protection from the coronavirus.
DO NOT USE LATEX GLOVES THEY ARE NOT CHEMICAL PROOF, THEY TEAR EASILY AND PEOPLE ARE ALLERGIC TO THE LATEX. WEAR NITIRLE GLOVES, DISPOSABLE OR HEAVY DUTY.
ALSO MAKE SURE YOUR GLOVES ARE ONE SIZE LARGER THAN YOUR HAND SO AS NOT TO BE ON TOO TIGHTLY SO IF YOU WEAR SMALL USE MEDIUM, WEAR MEDIUM USE LARGE ETC.
It's important to properly put on and take off gloves to avoid spreading the virus. Wearers should still follow regular social distancing rules and avoid touching their faces, in the same way that they would if they were not wearing them.
It is also important to note that the most important thing that people can do during this time is to abide by shelter in place orders to the greatest extent possible, according to Dr. Dean Winslow, an infectious diseases specialist at Stanford Health Care. If you have to go outside, Winslow told Business Insider, try to keep a safe distance from other people.
—Jessica Layton (@JLaytonTV) April 2, 2020
Here is what to do to safely put on, wear, and take off gloves as recommended by Winslow, the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC and WHO guidelines are originally meant for healthcare professionals, not the public.
Step 1: Wash (and dry) your hands before touching the gloves
If there's one thing to emphasize throughout the coronavirus pandemic, and especially when donning and taking off protective gear, it is this: Wash. Your. Hands. As often as possible, as scrupulously as possible, and for at least the recommended 20 seconds outlined by both the CDC and WHO.
People have recommended that an easy way to keep track is to sing the "Happy Birthday" song two times over. NPR recommends a few alternatives for when that gets old (and it will): Beyonce's "Love on Top" chorus is one example and the chorus of Dolly Parton's "Jolene" also does the trick. The New York Times went the extra mile and had lyricists create not one but two hand-washing songs, which were then sent to Broadway actors to perform and upload videos of.
Washing your hands regularly is by far one of the most important things to do during this pandemic, Dr. Winslow told Business Insider. The CDC emphasizes this point and says that because bacteria can easily multiply in moist environments underneath gloves, glove-wearers "should make sure hands are dry before putting on gloves."
Step 2: Put on your gloves carefully
This one is pretty self explanatory.
Step 3: Avoid touching your face while you have your gloves on
Gloves are not a replacement for scrupulous hand washing, like mentioned above, but they might provide wearers with a false sense of security.
The CDC tells wearers that they should limit opportunities for "touch contamination," which means touching potentially contaminated surfaces (think can of beans at the grocery store, light switches, door handles) and then touching non-contaminated surfaces (your face, glasses, nose, etc.)
Also keep in mind that gloves may "have small defects that are hard to see or may be torn during use."
MOST IMPORTANT STEP
Step 4: Remove your gloves carefully, without touching the outside of the gloves
Here is an excellent step-by-step guide on how to take off gloves without touching the outsides with your hands. Keep in mind that hands easily become contaminated when taking off gloves (CDC) so it's important to be diligent in this last step.
"You should remove your gloves by pinching one from outside with one gloved hand, and using your clean hand to reach inside the glove to remove the other one," Dr. Winslow told Business Insider. "Even after you do that, with good technique, practice good hand hygiene."
Step 4: Remove your gloves carefully, without touching the outside of the gloves
Here is an excellent step-by-step guide on how to take off gloves without touching the outsides with your hands. Keep in mind that hands easily become contaminated when taking off gloves (CDC) so it's important to be diligent in this last step.
"You should remove your gloves by pinching one from outside with one gloved hand, and using your clean hand to reach inside the glove to remove the other one," Dr. Winslow told Business Insider. "Even after you do that, with good technique, practice good hand hygiene."
Step 5: Carefully place your used gloves into the garbage
Do not throw them onto the streets of NYC as pictured below.
Crystal Cox/Business Insider
Step 6: Wash your hands. For 20 seconds. Sing the songs.
If you take away anything from this article it's this: Wash. Your. Hands.
More glove-related resources:
"Important! There's a right way to take off those gloves!" (CBS' Jessica Layton | Twitter)
How to remove gloves (with pictures) (WHO)
Does wearing gloves replace the need for handwashing? (CDC)
PPE Guidance in Healthcare Settings (CDC)
Is wearing rubber gloves while out in the public effective in preventing the new coronavirus infection? (WHO Facebook)
If you take away anything from this article it's this: Wash. Your. Hands.
More glove-related resources:
"Important! There's a right way to take off those gloves!" (CBS' Jessica Layton | Twitter)
How to remove gloves (with pictures) (WHO)
Does wearing gloves replace the need for handwashing? (CDC)
PPE Guidance in Healthcare Settings (CDC)
Is wearing rubber gloves while out in the public effective in preventing the new coronavirus infection? (WHO Facebook)
Amazon employees say they're scared to go to work, but they're not alone — here are 7 big companies facing worker criticism over their coronavirus safety response
Even as many of their colleagues are able to make a living from the relative safety of their homes, these workers are putting themselves at an increased risk of catching COVID-19.
But many say their employers aren't doing enough to minimize those risks, from failing to provide protective gear and clean workplaces to refusing to offer them hazard and sick pay.
Amazon warehouse employees, Uber drivers, and Instacart shoppers are just some of the people who have spoken out against companies they say aren't looking out for them at a time when they need it most.
Around 95% of Americans have been ordered to stay at home to help slow the spread of the coronavirus. But those orders don't apply to "essential" businesses, which has inadvertently created a new category of workers who continue to show up to help the country keep its critical infrastructure functioning — and by doing so, increase their risk of becoming sick.
The definition of an essential business has varied across different locations, and some companies have interpreted states' orders loosely. But even among businesses widely considered to meet the threshold, like grocery stores and transportation companies, coronavirus lockdowns have revealed a stark divide between workers who are able to work remotely and those who aren't.
Those who often can work from home are often higher-paid, full-time employees who enjoy more robust paid sick leave and healthcare benefits, and therefore have a significant leg up in avoiding exposure to the virus and receiving care if they get infected.
But many of those whose jobs can't be done remotely, such as delivery workers, rideshare drivers, retail, and food service employees, are hourly, part-time, or contract workers who lack access to those benefits — or simply can't afford not to work without pay — leaving them with no choice but to go into work.
Some companies have taken bold and proactive action to help employees weather this crisis. Starbucks, for example, said it would pay all US workers for 30 days even if they chose not to come into work. While others have made some efforts to step up cleaning procedures, provide employees with protective equipment, or enforce social distancing measures, many workers still say the steps their employers have taken aren't enough.
Here are some of the companies that have faced criticism from workers over their response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Amazon
Amazon is one of the few companies that have actually seen business boom as a result of the coronavirus. But the surge in online shopping has put additional strain on Amazon's warehouse workers and delivery drivers, who say the company is failing to provide protective equipment, making social distancing unfeasible at work, and not offering paid sick leave. One worker in Houston told Business Insider: "everybody looks scared, but we can't afford not to go to work."
Amazon workers have gone on strike in New York, Chicago, and Italy after colleagues tested positive for COVID-19, New York has opened an investigation into Amazon's firing of an employee who organized a strike to protest the company's coronavirus response, and Democratic lawmakers have repeatedly demanded information from the company about steps it's taking to protect workers.
Amazon has defended conditions in its warehouses, telling Business Insider in a statement that it has ramped up cleaning efforts and is enforcing social distancing. It has said workers with a COVID-19 diagnosis will get sick pay (though CNBC reported that some have struggled to receive that pay). Amazon also changed its policy to allow unlimited unpaid sick leave (workers would previously have been fired for taking too much time off).
GameStop
GameStop, the world's biggest video game retailer, kept its stores operating far longer than most and even argued its business operations were "essential" because they "enable and enhance our customers' experience in working from home."
Employees still working during the pandemic say proper safety measures aren't being taken to ensure they don't get sick. According to a memo sent to GameStop managers and reported by the Boston Globe, employees were reportedly told to cover their hands am arms with plastic bags when interacting with customers.
A GameStop spokesperson told Business Insider that the company has closed all stores to customer access, is processing digital and curbside pick-up orders only, and is assuring employees they do not have to work if they're not comfortable or need to stay home to care for a family member.
Google
While Google has been praised for its preparedness and proactive steps to protect full-time employees, some have raised concerns internally about the company's treatment of its army of around 119,000 contract workers amid the coronavirus pandemic, demanding better and more clear policies for them.
"We're working closely with all our vendor partners to increase the ability for their employees to work from home by rolling out remote access as quickly as possible," a Google spokesperson told Business Insider.
Instacart
While most businesses have closed, grocery stores remain open and extremely crowded, and more people are turning to online delivery as they seek to minimize contact with others. Instacart shoppers went on strike last week, asking for hazard pay and saying the company wasn't providing them with protective and cleaning supplies.
"Instacart has turned this pandemic into a PR campaign, portraying itself the hero of families that are sheltered-in-place, isolated, or quarantined," labor groups Instacart Shoppers and Gig Workers Collective said in a statement.
"Our goal is to offer a safe and flexible earnings opportunity to Shoppers, while also proactively taking the appropriate precautionary measures to operate safely," Instacart told Business Insider, adding that it respects the rights of shoppers to voice their concerns. The company also announced it would ship distribute health and safety kits to shoppers.
McDonald's
Last week, more than 100 McDonald's employees in Florida walked out of work in protest of the company's anti-mask policy (McDonald's said it's now working to source masks for certain workers), while some have argued that the company isn't an essential business and they shouldn't be required to work during the pandemic in the first place.
"Listening to employees, listening to feedback we're getting from customers and others is important," David Tovar, vice president of US communications at McDonald's, told Business Insider. "We know that over the past few weeks as this situation has continued to evolve, we've been willing to listen to make adjustments as we need to."
Uber
Uber drivers have told Business Insider the company's restrictive and inconsistent coronavirus sick pay program is forcing them to choose between their health and their bank accounts, and even those who qualify for compensation have found it difficult to get paid. Since drivers are independent contractors, not direct employees of the company, they don't automatically have paid sick leave or healthcare like Uber's full-time employees.
Drivers who are still on the road say they're making little money and that they're not getting much help from the company in terms of staying safe: cleaning supplies the company promised to provide are nowhere to be found, even as the company offers drivers' services to healthcare workers, potentially increasing their risk of exposure to the virus.
"We remain committed to working with drivers and delivery people around the world to help support them. We will continue to advocate for independent workers," Uber said in a statement to Business Insider, adding that it has paid US drivers $3 million under its sick pay program.
Whole Foods
Workers at Whole Foods staged a "sick-out" to demand paid leave for employees of the Amazon-owned grocery store who stay home during the crisis. The protest came after Whole Foods employees in California, New York City, Chicago, and Louisiana, among other locations, tested positive for COVID-19. The stores remained open, prompting employees to say that the company wasn't looking out for them despite booming business, according to Vice.
"We have taken extensive measures to keep people safe, and in addition to social distancing, enhanced deep cleaning and crowd control measures, we continue rolling out new safety protocols in our stores to protect our Team Members who are on the front lines serving our customers," a Whole Foods spokesperson told Vice.
Business Insider/Jessica Tyler
The coronavirus pandemic has put most of the US on lockdown, but millions of "essential" workers — even outside the healthcare system — are still showing up for their jobs.
The coronavirus pandemic has put most of the US on lockdown, but millions of "essential" workers — even outside the healthcare system — are still showing up for their jobs.
Even as many of their colleagues are able to make a living from the relative safety of their homes, these workers are putting themselves at an increased risk of catching COVID-19.
But many say their employers aren't doing enough to minimize those risks, from failing to provide protective gear and clean workplaces to refusing to offer them hazard and sick pay.
Amazon warehouse employees, Uber drivers, and Instacart shoppers are just some of the people who have spoken out against companies they say aren't looking out for them at a time when they need it most.
Around 95% of Americans have been ordered to stay at home to help slow the spread of the coronavirus. But those orders don't apply to "essential" businesses, which has inadvertently created a new category of workers who continue to show up to help the country keep its critical infrastructure functioning — and by doing so, increase their risk of becoming sick.
The definition of an essential business has varied across different locations, and some companies have interpreted states' orders loosely. But even among businesses widely considered to meet the threshold, like grocery stores and transportation companies, coronavirus lockdowns have revealed a stark divide between workers who are able to work remotely and those who aren't.
Those who often can work from home are often higher-paid, full-time employees who enjoy more robust paid sick leave and healthcare benefits, and therefore have a significant leg up in avoiding exposure to the virus and receiving care if they get infected.
But many of those whose jobs can't be done remotely, such as delivery workers, rideshare drivers, retail, and food service employees, are hourly, part-time, or contract workers who lack access to those benefits — or simply can't afford not to work without pay — leaving them with no choice but to go into work.
Some companies have taken bold and proactive action to help employees weather this crisis. Starbucks, for example, said it would pay all US workers for 30 days even if they chose not to come into work. While others have made some efforts to step up cleaning procedures, provide employees with protective equipment, or enforce social distancing measures, many workers still say the steps their employers have taken aren't enough.
Here are some of the companies that have faced criticism from workers over their response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Amazon
Amazon is one of the few companies that have actually seen business boom as a result of the coronavirus. But the surge in online shopping has put additional strain on Amazon's warehouse workers and delivery drivers, who say the company is failing to provide protective equipment, making social distancing unfeasible at work, and not offering paid sick leave. One worker in Houston told Business Insider: "everybody looks scared, but we can't afford not to go to work."
Amazon workers have gone on strike in New York, Chicago, and Italy after colleagues tested positive for COVID-19, New York has opened an investigation into Amazon's firing of an employee who organized a strike to protest the company's coronavirus response, and Democratic lawmakers have repeatedly demanded information from the company about steps it's taking to protect workers.
Amazon has defended conditions in its warehouses, telling Business Insider in a statement that it has ramped up cleaning efforts and is enforcing social distancing. It has said workers with a COVID-19 diagnosis will get sick pay (though CNBC reported that some have struggled to receive that pay). Amazon also changed its policy to allow unlimited unpaid sick leave (workers would previously have been fired for taking too much time off).
GameStop
GameStop, the world's biggest video game retailer, kept its stores operating far longer than most and even argued its business operations were "essential" because they "enable and enhance our customers' experience in working from home."
Employees still working during the pandemic say proper safety measures aren't being taken to ensure they don't get sick. According to a memo sent to GameStop managers and reported by the Boston Globe, employees were reportedly told to cover their hands am arms with plastic bags when interacting with customers.
A GameStop spokesperson told Business Insider that the company has closed all stores to customer access, is processing digital and curbside pick-up orders only, and is assuring employees they do not have to work if they're not comfortable or need to stay home to care for a family member.
While Google has been praised for its preparedness and proactive steps to protect full-time employees, some have raised concerns internally about the company's treatment of its army of around 119,000 contract workers amid the coronavirus pandemic, demanding better and more clear policies for them.
"We're working closely with all our vendor partners to increase the ability for their employees to work from home by rolling out remote access as quickly as possible," a Google spokesperson told Business Insider.
Instacart
While most businesses have closed, grocery stores remain open and extremely crowded, and more people are turning to online delivery as they seek to minimize contact with others. Instacart shoppers went on strike last week, asking for hazard pay and saying the company wasn't providing them with protective and cleaning supplies.
"Instacart has turned this pandemic into a PR campaign, portraying itself the hero of families that are sheltered-in-place, isolated, or quarantined," labor groups Instacart Shoppers and Gig Workers Collective said in a statement.
"Our goal is to offer a safe and flexible earnings opportunity to Shoppers, while also proactively taking the appropriate precautionary measures to operate safely," Instacart told Business Insider, adding that it respects the rights of shoppers to voice their concerns. The company also announced it would ship distribute health and safety kits to shoppers.
McDonald's
Last week, more than 100 McDonald's employees in Florida walked out of work in protest of the company's anti-mask policy (McDonald's said it's now working to source masks for certain workers), while some have argued that the company isn't an essential business and they shouldn't be required to work during the pandemic in the first place.
"Listening to employees, listening to feedback we're getting from customers and others is important," David Tovar, vice president of US communications at McDonald's, told Business Insider. "We know that over the past few weeks as this situation has continued to evolve, we've been willing to listen to make adjustments as we need to."
Uber
Uber drivers have told Business Insider the company's restrictive and inconsistent coronavirus sick pay program is forcing them to choose between their health and their bank accounts, and even those who qualify for compensation have found it difficult to get paid. Since drivers are independent contractors, not direct employees of the company, they don't automatically have paid sick leave or healthcare like Uber's full-time employees.
Drivers who are still on the road say they're making little money and that they're not getting much help from the company in terms of staying safe: cleaning supplies the company promised to provide are nowhere to be found, even as the company offers drivers' services to healthcare workers, potentially increasing their risk of exposure to the virus.
"We remain committed to working with drivers and delivery people around the world to help support them. We will continue to advocate for independent workers," Uber said in a statement to Business Insider, adding that it has paid US drivers $3 million under its sick pay program.
Whole Foods
Workers at Whole Foods staged a "sick-out" to demand paid leave for employees of the Amazon-owned grocery store who stay home during the crisis. The protest came after Whole Foods employees in California, New York City, Chicago, and Louisiana, among other locations, tested positive for COVID-19. The stores remained open, prompting employees to say that the company wasn't looking out for them despite booming business, according to Vice.
"We have taken extensive measures to keep people safe, and in addition to social distancing, enhanced deep cleaning and crowd control measures, we continue rolling out new safety protocols in our stores to protect our Team Members who are on the front lines serving our customers," a Whole Foods spokesperson told Vice.
10 shocking things that Trump's new press secretary Kayleigh McEnany has actually said
Picture: Zach Boyden-Holmes/AP
Donald Trump has shaken up his White House press team by replacing Stephanie Grisham with Kayleigh McEnany as his press secretary.
The 31-year-old was a spokesperson for Trump's re-election campaign has contributed to CNN and is a graduate from the prestigious Harvard Law School.
She has also used Obama as a scapegoat for Islamophobia. In 2016 she attacked his claimed that Islam was a peaceful religion by falsely claiming that Muslims were responsible for a 'genocide' against Christians in Iraq.
As Middle East Eye reports the drop in Iraqi Christians was mostly down to the unrest created by the 2003 Iraq war and sectarian violence.
Following on from that, in an article for The Hill, shortly after the 2017 London Bridge terror attack, she said that although most Muslims were peaceful, a 'political correctness' in Western Europe had allowed extremism to thrive.
A toxic and deadly political correctness has enveloped Western Europe and enabled an unending wave of terrorist attacks. Refusing to utter the words 'radical Islamic extremism,' opening the door to millions of half-vetted refugees and decrying the concepts of borders and assimilation have resulted in a culture in crisis – a culture without democratic, freedom-loving identity and constantly under murderous attack from cancers within.
The article also attacked the incumbent mayor of London, Sadiq Kahn, who has a long-running feud with Donald Trump.
Moving on to more current topics and you might not be shocked to learn that McEnany has some pretty interesting views about coronavirus and like the president, has mostly downplayed the pandemic.
During an appearance on Fox Business in April, McEnany claimed that Trump was the 'best authority' to deal with the crisis and not somebody like National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci.
If that wasn't alarming enough, on February 25 she appeared on Fox News' Trish Regan Primetime, to defiantly say that Covid-19 would never arrive in the United States. To date, the country has recorded more than 330,000 cases of the disease, more than any other nation in the world.
By now, it would appear to be pretty obvious that McEnany is willing to defend Trump on any issue, even when he has blatantly lied to the US public. In August 2019, she appeared on CNN to claim with a straight face, that the president had told any fibs to the American public.
On slightly less controversial topics (depending on your political persuasion) McEnany has a lot of things to say about pizza. Like, loads.
In tweets ranging from 2011 to 2013, she would regularly give her approval to Dominos pizza, claiming that it was better than any pizza in New York City.
In fact, she just seems to love everything about Dominos.
All in all, after reading these tweets, it's little wonder her new boss hired her.
Picture: Zach Boyden-Holmes/AP
Donald Trump has shaken up his White House press team by replacing Stephanie Grisham with Kayleigh McEnany as his press secretary.
The 31-year-old was a spokesperson for Trump's re-election campaign has contributed to CNN and is a graduate from the prestigious Harvard Law School.
PROVING THAT WHITE FOLKS GOING TO HARVARD IS ALL ABOUT $$$$$$$$$$$$ NOT SMARTS
You would hope that with some of those credentials that McEnany would be a considerable step up from the likes of Sean Spicer, Sarah Sanders and Stephanie Grisham who have proceeded her in the job.
Unfortunately, we are saddened to report that judging by her history and Twitter account McEnany is possibly just as bad as her predecessors.
Despite being in her role for less than a day, many historic tweets and eye-opening quotes from McEnany have already resurfaced, ranging from subjects such as racism, birtherism, Islamophobia, coronavirus and pizza, lots of pizza.
One of McEnany's prime obsessions is with Barack Obama and, like Trump, she is in doubt as to where the former president was born.
Throughout 2012, McEnany engaged with conspiracy theories that Obama was born in Kenya, rather than his actual birthplace of Hawaii, resulting in several tweets of an offensive nature.
Speaking of Obama, she once falsely accused him of going to play golf after the death of journalist Daniel Pearl, who was executed after being abducted while reporting in Pakistan in 2002. At the time, Obama was still a senator and wasn't elected to the White House until 2008.
You would hope that with some of those credentials that McEnany would be a considerable step up from the likes of Sean Spicer, Sarah Sanders and Stephanie Grisham who have proceeded her in the job.
Unfortunately, we are saddened to report that judging by her history and Twitter account McEnany is possibly just as bad as her predecessors.
Despite being in her role for less than a day, many historic tweets and eye-opening quotes from McEnany have already resurfaced, ranging from subjects such as racism, birtherism, Islamophobia, coronavirus and pizza, lots of pizza.
One of McEnany's prime obsessions is with Barack Obama and, like Trump, she is in doubt as to where the former president was born.
Throughout 2012, McEnany engaged with conspiracy theories that Obama was born in Kenya, rather than his actual birthplace of Hawaii, resulting in several tweets of an offensive nature.
Speaking of Obama, she once falsely accused him of going to play golf after the death of journalist Daniel Pearl, who was executed after being abducted while reporting in Pakistan in 2002. At the time, Obama was still a senator and wasn't elected to the White House until 2008.
She has also used Obama as a scapegoat for Islamophobia. In 2016 she attacked his claimed that Islam was a peaceful religion by falsely claiming that Muslims were responsible for a 'genocide' against Christians in Iraq.
As Middle East Eye reports the drop in Iraqi Christians was mostly down to the unrest created by the 2003 Iraq war and sectarian violence.
Following on from that, in an article for The Hill, shortly after the 2017 London Bridge terror attack, she said that although most Muslims were peaceful, a 'political correctness' in Western Europe had allowed extremism to thrive.
A toxic and deadly political correctness has enveloped Western Europe and enabled an unending wave of terrorist attacks. Refusing to utter the words 'radical Islamic extremism,' opening the door to millions of half-vetted refugees and decrying the concepts of borders and assimilation have resulted in a culture in crisis – a culture without democratic, freedom-loving identity and constantly under murderous attack from cancers within.
The article also attacked the incumbent mayor of London, Sadiq Kahn, who has a long-running feud with Donald Trump.
Moving on to more current topics and you might not be shocked to learn that McEnany has some pretty interesting views about coronavirus and like the president, has mostly downplayed the pandemic.
During an appearance on Fox Business in April, McEnany claimed that Trump was the 'best authority' to deal with the crisis and not somebody like National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci.
If that wasn't alarming enough, on February 25 she appeared on Fox News' Trish Regan Primetime, to defiantly say that Covid-19 would never arrive in the United States. To date, the country has recorded more than 330,000 cases of the disease, more than any other nation in the world.
By now, it would appear to be pretty obvious that McEnany is willing to defend Trump on any issue, even when he has blatantly lied to the US public. In August 2019, she appeared on CNN to claim with a straight face, that the president had told any fibs to the American public.
On slightly less controversial topics (depending on your political persuasion) McEnany has a lot of things to say about pizza. Like, loads.
In tweets ranging from 2011 to 2013, she would regularly give her approval to Dominos pizza, claiming that it was better than any pizza in New York City.
In fact, she just seems to love everything about Dominos.
All in all, after reading these tweets, it's little wonder her new boss hired her.
TAKES ONE TO KNOW ONE
Trump raves about coronavirus being a 'genius', says antibiotics don't work because it's 'too brilliant'
PERFECTLY STABLE GENIUS COMPLEMENTS MICROBE
Posted 4/11/2020 Sirena Bergman in news
At a coronavirus briefing yesterday, Donald Trump went on a bizarre rant in which he seemed to be... bragging (?!) about how intelligent coronavirus is, saying the virus is "so brilliant" it's outsmarted antibiotics.
It was a strange way to describe a non-IQ-having virus, but more importantly, betrayed a worrying lack of understanding of even basic biology: as most of us know, antibiotics are used to treat bacterial infections. They are – and have always been – useless against viruses, regardless of how "smart" they are.
A widely circulated clip shows an even-more-confused-than-usual Trump raving about the virus's ability to stand up to antibiotics, which he claims "used to solve every problem".
These are his words exactly. And no, we haven't got confused in our transcription. This ridiculous word salad of nonsense is what the actual president said.
"This is a very brilliant enemy, you know. It's a brilliant enemy. They develop drugs like the antibiotics, you see? Antibiotics used to solve every problem. Now one of the biggest problems the world has is... the germ has gotten so brilliant that the antibiotic can't keep up with it!"
"And they're constantly trying to come up with a new... people go to a hospital and they catch... they go for a heart operation – that's no problem – but they end up dying from... from... problems! You know the problems I'm talking about."
"There's a whole genius to it! We're fighting... not only is it hidden but it's very smart, OK? It's invisible! And it's hidden! But it's very smart."
While it's true that antibiotic-resistant bacteria is a cause for concern, this has absolutely nothing to do with coronavirus, which – you may have gathered from its name – is a virus, not a bacteria.
No need to take our word for it, people on Twitter jumped at the chance to fact-check Trump's latest nonsense:
Trump has repeatedly appeared to get the basic facts of coronavirus confused, spreading such dangerous misinformation during his briefings that some TV networks have even decided to stop airing them live in order to be able to fact-check them.
Seems nothing is changing.
More AboutDonald TrumpCoronavirusAntibiotics
At a coronavirus briefing yesterday, Donald Trump went on a bizarre rant in which he seemed to be... bragging (?!) about how intelligent coronavirus is, saying the virus is "so brilliant" it's outsmarted antibiotics.
It was a strange way to describe a non-IQ-having virus, but more importantly, betrayed a worrying lack of understanding of even basic biology: as most of us know, antibiotics are used to treat bacterial infections. They are – and have always been – useless against viruses, regardless of how "smart" they are.
A widely circulated clip shows an even-more-confused-than-usual Trump raving about the virus's ability to stand up to antibiotics, which he claims "used to solve every problem".
These are his words exactly. And no, we haven't got confused in our transcription. This ridiculous word salad of nonsense is what the actual president said.
"This is a very brilliant enemy, you know. It's a brilliant enemy. They develop drugs like the antibiotics, you see? Antibiotics used to solve every problem. Now one of the biggest problems the world has is... the germ has gotten so brilliant that the antibiotic can't keep up with it!"
"And they're constantly trying to come up with a new... people go to a hospital and they catch... they go for a heart operation – that's no problem – but they end up dying from... from... problems! You know the problems I'm talking about."
"There's a whole genius to it! We're fighting... not only is it hidden but it's very smart, OK? It's invisible! And it's hidden! But it's very smart."
While it's true that antibiotic-resistant bacteria is a cause for concern, this has absolutely nothing to do with coronavirus, which – you may have gathered from its name – is a virus, not a bacteria.
No need to take our word for it, people on Twitter jumped at the chance to fact-check Trump's latest nonsense:
Trump has repeatedly appeared to get the basic facts of coronavirus confused, spreading such dangerous misinformation during his briefings that some TV networks have even decided to stop airing them live in order to be able to fact-check them.
Seems nothing is changing.
More AboutDonald TrumpCoronavirusAntibiotics
White people are discovering what police harassment feels like for the first time
4/11/2020 Moya Lothian-McLean
iStock
Last week, the UK’s police forces were issued a stark warning against “overreaching” in the use of new lockdown enforcement powers.
“This is what a police state is like,” remarked former supreme court judge Lord Sumpton after reports of officers curtailing (perfectly legal) exercise and quibbling over the definition of an “essential” item. “It is a state in which a government can issue orders or express preferences with no legal authority and the police will enforce ministers’ wishes.”
In particular, Sumpton singled out Derbyshire Police, who filmed hikers in the Peak District and uploaded the footage to Twitter. Their actions had “shamed our policing traditions” Sumpton said.
Except what Derbyshire Police did was actually very in keeping with certain traditions – they just happen to be ones that almost 86 per cent of the UK don’t tend to experience on a regular basis.
Overpolicing, unfairly targeted harassment, arbitrary searches; these are all far more common experiences at the hands of those charged with keeping the peace if you’re a member of an ethnic minority, particularly if you are a young, black man.
But under coronavirus regulations, white people are finally getting a taste en masse of what it feels like to be automatically seen as a suspect. And it’s a sour medicine.
This week, Cambridgeshire Police were met by outcry after they tweeted about patrolling a local Tesco.
“Good to see everyone was abiding by social distancing measures and the non essential aisles were empty,” they wrote.
The backlash was swift and furious, with thousands outraged at the thought of officers sifting through their baskets to arrest them on suspicion of buying Hob Knobs.
“There is no law which prevents retailers selling 'non essential' items,” wrote human rights barrister Adam Wagner. “There is a list of retailers which can stay open and they can sell what they sell. And even if there were, who defines 'non-essential'?”
Who indeed? Quite the infringement on our basic individual liberties. And people are right to oppose it.
But this sort of overzealous policing is familiar knowledge in the UK to Bame communities, with black people bearing the brunt of it (who can forget Bristol Police tasing their own race relations adviser?).
You’re nearly 10 times more likely to be subject to an intrusive police stop and search in England and Wales if you’re black. And if a Section 60 order – which allows officers in an area to conduct “suspicionless” searches for a limited period – is in place, that rises to a shocking 40 times more likely. Figures from London also show that black individuals are 12 times more likely to suffer through more intrusive searches, which meant they were forced to remove more than just a coat or jacket.
Despite this overrepresentation, outcome rates are similar whatever someone’s ethnicity: 25 per cent of searches result in action being taken. And although the use of Section 60 orders was expanded in order to specifically tackle knife crime, a recent investigation by The Times discovered that increased stop and search showed no consistent correlation with reduction in knife crime.
Moreover, the yawning racial chasm regarding who stop and search targets has not improved in recent years – it’s actually got worse. Not to mention the racial disparity in those on the receiving end of police violence; from 2017 to 2018, black people experienced 12 per cent of police force incidents, despite only accounting for 3.33 per cent of the population. It’s massively disproportionate.
As many are discovering for the first time under lockdown, being treated with constant suspicion by the police is a harrowing and psychologically stressful ordeal.
A report by StopWatch, a UK organisation campaigning for fairer policing, collected the experiences of black and Asian individuals who’d been subjected to stop and search. Participants spoke of feeling fear, anger and helplessness during and after the experience.
“The impact it had on me was huge, huge; and it was negative,” said Paul Mortimer, a former footballer and anti-racism campaigner who has been stopped more than 20 times.
“I felt that I needed a shower after. I felt really inadequate, I felt dirty. You’re looked at a certain way, you are treated a certain way, as if you are actually guilty”.
Others in the report remarked on the lingering distrust they felt towards the police as a body.
“If you’re an eight-year-old child and you go to play football, and [a] police officer stops and searches you, if you experience that from the age of eight, all the way through your secondary school career, then you’re not going to have a positive view of the police. You will not invest faith in the police if something happens to you,” said Kwabena Oduro-Ayim. “For my entire childhood I would never have turned to the police for any assistance."
It’s a point we’re seeing reflected now in current lockdown discourse. “Genuinely bemused some police officers straying so clearly beyond their powers,” tweeted Gavin Phillipson, professor of Law at Bristol University, referring to the Cambridgeshire Police shopping debacle.
“First don't they have enough on their plates just enforcing the actual, legal restrictions? Second, don't they realise this kind of thing undermines public trust and thus hampers policing by consent?
Well clearly not, because they’ve been doing it to minority communities for years. It’s only now that police officers are starting to be held to account by a large swathe of the general public, and not just dedicated action groups, that they’re having to backtrack so publicly to avoid swinging a wrecking ball through their relations with the UK population at a time when they’re requesting more cooperation than ever.
Clearly, it should not have taken a pandemic to wake a nation up to the reality of targeted and often unlawful harassment at the hands of the police
A problem as persistent as this one should be top of the agenda, whether it affects white people or not. But now that so many understand what it’s like to carry the terrible, crushing weight of being viewed as a suspect for simply going about their (perfectly lawful) daily business, it must spark action.
Because empathy isn’t enough when human rights are being erased.
4/11/2020 Moya Lothian-McLean
iStock
Last week, the UK’s police forces were issued a stark warning against “overreaching” in the use of new lockdown enforcement powers.
“This is what a police state is like,” remarked former supreme court judge Lord Sumpton after reports of officers curtailing (perfectly legal) exercise and quibbling over the definition of an “essential” item. “It is a state in which a government can issue orders or express preferences with no legal authority and the police will enforce ministers’ wishes.”
In particular, Sumpton singled out Derbyshire Police, who filmed hikers in the Peak District and uploaded the footage to Twitter. Their actions had “shamed our policing traditions” Sumpton said.
Except what Derbyshire Police did was actually very in keeping with certain traditions – they just happen to be ones that almost 86 per cent of the UK don’t tend to experience on a regular basis.
Overpolicing, unfairly targeted harassment, arbitrary searches; these are all far more common experiences at the hands of those charged with keeping the peace if you’re a member of an ethnic minority, particularly if you are a young, black man.
But under coronavirus regulations, white people are finally getting a taste en masse of what it feels like to be automatically seen as a suspect. And it’s a sour medicine.
This week, Cambridgeshire Police were met by outcry after they tweeted about patrolling a local Tesco.
“Good to see everyone was abiding by social distancing measures and the non essential aisles were empty,” they wrote.
The backlash was swift and furious, with thousands outraged at the thought of officers sifting through their baskets to arrest them on suspicion of buying Hob Knobs.
“There is no law which prevents retailers selling 'non essential' items,” wrote human rights barrister Adam Wagner. “There is a list of retailers which can stay open and they can sell what they sell. And even if there were, who defines 'non-essential'?”
Who indeed? Quite the infringement on our basic individual liberties. And people are right to oppose it.
But this sort of overzealous policing is familiar knowledge in the UK to Bame communities, with black people bearing the brunt of it (who can forget Bristol Police tasing their own race relations adviser?).
You’re nearly 10 times more likely to be subject to an intrusive police stop and search in England and Wales if you’re black. And if a Section 60 order – which allows officers in an area to conduct “suspicionless” searches for a limited period – is in place, that rises to a shocking 40 times more likely. Figures from London also show that black individuals are 12 times more likely to suffer through more intrusive searches, which meant they were forced to remove more than just a coat or jacket.
Despite this overrepresentation, outcome rates are similar whatever someone’s ethnicity: 25 per cent of searches result in action being taken. And although the use of Section 60 orders was expanded in order to specifically tackle knife crime, a recent investigation by The Times discovered that increased stop and search showed no consistent correlation with reduction in knife crime.
Moreover, the yawning racial chasm regarding who stop and search targets has not improved in recent years – it’s actually got worse. Not to mention the racial disparity in those on the receiving end of police violence; from 2017 to 2018, black people experienced 12 per cent of police force incidents, despite only accounting for 3.33 per cent of the population. It’s massively disproportionate.
As many are discovering for the first time under lockdown, being treated with constant suspicion by the police is a harrowing and psychologically stressful ordeal.
A report by StopWatch, a UK organisation campaigning for fairer policing, collected the experiences of black and Asian individuals who’d been subjected to stop and search. Participants spoke of feeling fear, anger and helplessness during and after the experience.
“The impact it had on me was huge, huge; and it was negative,” said Paul Mortimer, a former footballer and anti-racism campaigner who has been stopped more than 20 times.
“I felt that I needed a shower after. I felt really inadequate, I felt dirty. You’re looked at a certain way, you are treated a certain way, as if you are actually guilty”.
Others in the report remarked on the lingering distrust they felt towards the police as a body.
“If you’re an eight-year-old child and you go to play football, and [a] police officer stops and searches you, if you experience that from the age of eight, all the way through your secondary school career, then you’re not going to have a positive view of the police. You will not invest faith in the police if something happens to you,” said Kwabena Oduro-Ayim. “For my entire childhood I would never have turned to the police for any assistance."
It’s a point we’re seeing reflected now in current lockdown discourse. “Genuinely bemused some police officers straying so clearly beyond their powers,” tweeted Gavin Phillipson, professor of Law at Bristol University, referring to the Cambridgeshire Police shopping debacle.
“First don't they have enough on their plates just enforcing the actual, legal restrictions? Second, don't they realise this kind of thing undermines public trust and thus hampers policing by consent?
Well clearly not, because they’ve been doing it to minority communities for years. It’s only now that police officers are starting to be held to account by a large swathe of the general public, and not just dedicated action groups, that they’re having to backtrack so publicly to avoid swinging a wrecking ball through their relations with the UK population at a time when they’re requesting more cooperation than ever.
Clearly, it should not have taken a pandemic to wake a nation up to the reality of targeted and often unlawful harassment at the hands of the police
A problem as persistent as this one should be top of the agenda, whether it affects white people or not. But now that so many understand what it’s like to carry the terrible, crushing weight of being viewed as a suspect for simply going about their (perfectly lawful) daily business, it must spark action.
Because empathy isn’t enough when human rights are being erased.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)