Friday, August 07, 2020

UPDATE

Lebanon's battered economy dealt fresh blow after port blast hits 'Achilles heel'

Suleiman Al-Khalidi,
Reuters•August 7, 2020



FILE PHOTO: Aftermath of Tuesday's blast in Beirut's port area, LebanonMore

By Suleiman Al-Khalidi

AMMAN (Reuters) - Lebanon's economy, already sinking before the explosion that knocked out its main port, could now shrink by double the rate previously forecast for this year, making it even harder to secure the financing the country needs to get back on its feet.

Economists say Tuesday's blast, which also damaged large parts of commercial Beirut, could lead to a GDP contraction of around 20-25% this year - far beyond the IMF's recent forecast for a 12% decline due to a deepening economic and political crisis.

Lebanese officials have estimated losses due to the blast, which killed 150 people, left thousands injured and rendered tens of thousands homeless, could run into billions of dollars.

A financial crisis had already led Lebanon to enter negotiations with the International Monetary Fund in May this year after it defaulted on its foreign currency debt, but those talks were put on hold in the absence of reforms.

Analysts say the blast highlights negligence in Lebanon's governance and puts more pressure on the government to speed up reforms in order to access aid to rebuild the economy.

While there has been an outpouring of sympathy for the country this week, there has been a notable absence of aid commitments so far, beyond urgent humanitarian aid.

"If reforms are not carried out, Lebanon will continue to sink," French President Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday as he toured the devastation in Beirut port.

Gulf states, which once helped Lebanon, meanwhile have baulked at bailing out a country where Iran-backed Hezbollah is powerful.

"It’s highly unlikely that Lebanon will be able to unlock the financing that it needs to overcome its fundamental economic problems. Some partners may be reluctant to provide support given the influential role of Iran-backed Hezbollah in the Lebanese government," said Jason Tuvey, senior emerging markets economist Capital Economics.

Lebanon's financial crisis came to a head last October as capital inflows slowed down and protests erupted over corruption and bad governance, with a hard currency liquidity crunch leading banks to impose tight curbs on cash withdrawals and transfers abroad.

The blast has put renewed pressure on the Lebanese pound, which was trading at around 8,300 per dollar on the black market after the explosion, against a level of 8,000 beforehand, dealers say.

Economists predict more erosion in the purchasing power of the pound, which has lost nearly 80% of its value since October with skyrocketing inflation topping 56%, accentuating social tensions.

The most urgent reforms that need to be implemented to restart talks with the IMF include tackling a runaway budget, mounting debt and endemic corruption, economists say.

"We think the explosion could delay the reform process as the government tries to deflect blame, eating up the political capital necessary for difficult but urgently needed reforms," said Patrick Curran, senior economist at Tellimer, a UK based research firm.

Businessmen and economists say the port - one of the biggest in the eastern Mediterranean and where over 40% of transshipments went to Syria and the Middle East region - has already lost revenues and business since the blast to other rival ports as shipping lines divert transit cargo.

"The port turned out to be (Lebanon's) weakness," said Jawad Anani, a regional economic consultant and former Jordanian minister. "There was so much dependence on it, so when it was demolished it turned out to be their Achilles heel."

David Sabella, who opened an Italian restaurant and bar, ‘Spicy No7', 18 months ago in Gemmayze close to the port area, saw them both destroyed by the blast.

"The government should have some mercy on us. I have nothing now," he said.

Rising political tensions since the explosion will only make things worse and complicate efforts to speed reforms, pushing the country into uncharted territory.

"It's a bleak outlook with infighting among a political class that lacks consensus on a way out and is unwilling to swallow the bitter pill," said Kamal Hamdan, director of Beirut-based Consultation and Research Institute (CRI).

(Reporting by Suleiman Al-Khalidi Additional reporting by Tom Arnold; Editing by Susan Fenton)
The Beirut explosion was six years in the making and hit a country on its knees

Alexander Smith and Matthew Bodner and Charlene Gubash and Mustafa Kassem,
NBC News•August 6, 2020

The explosion that gouged a crater in Beirut's portside and sent a devastating shockwave through the city would have been a catastrophe for any country.

But it was especially cruel timing for Lebanon — where it killed at least 135 people, injuring more than 4,000 and making another 250,000 homeless. It came right when the country is already buckling under a stack of economic, political and healthcare crises.

The city is no stranger to conflict. On social media people shared photos of the red mushroom cloud hanging over the city following Tuesday's blast, alongside eerily similar images from the country's civil war 1975-1990 and the 2006 conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.

But all the early evidence suggests it was not an attack — despite the unsubstantiated comments by President Donald Trump and numerous conspiracy theorists online. Rather it appears to be a disaster caused or at least enabled by the very forces of negligence and perhaps even corruption that have been responsible for bringing the country to its knees.

Image: Smoke rises after an explosion in Beirut (Social media via Reuters)


The explosion was triggered when a warehouse fire ignited 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate, a chemical used in fertilizer and bombs, according to Lebanese Prime Minister Hassan Diab.

He said the stockpile had been stored at the port for six years without any "preventive measures" to protect it. Other officials said they have tried to sound the alarm about this deadly chemical being quietly stored in the heart of a city of more than 2 million people.

The head of Beirut port and the head of customs both said Wednesday that several letters were sent to the judiciary asking for the dangerous material be removed, but no action was taken.

"We requested that it be re-exported but that did not happen," Badri Daher, director general of Lebanese Customs, told broadcaster LBCI. "We leave it to the experts and those concerned to determine why.

NBC News attempted to contact Albert Serhan, Lebanon's former justice minister until, to ask him about the allegatins but did not get a response.
‘The ship couldn’t take it’

The ammonium nitrate arrived in fall 2013 on a Russian-owned cargo ship, the Rhosus, the ship's then-captain, Boris Prokoshev, told NBC News. It was en route from the Georgian Black Sea port of Batumi to Mozambique where it was to be used as fertilizer, he said.

It stopped off in Beirut but was impounded for safety reasons because it was overloaded and listing, Prokoshev said.

"The ship couldn't take it," he said.

The ship's Russian owner, Igor Grechushkin, abandoned the ship, refusing to pay docking fees, fines, and even salaries and food for the crew, according to the captain and Natalia Sokolova, a representative for the Seafarers Union of Russia, which represented the crew during its dispute with the owner at the time.

NBC News tried but was not able to reach Grechushkin for comment.

Image: The cargo ship Rhosus (Hasenpusch/dpa via AP)

Authorities in Beirut kept the crew aboard for 11 months to tend to the cargo, according to the captain, who said they felt "trapped" on board, and the labor union representative Sokolova.

"The Beirut port authority would not give them permission to abandon a ship carrying this type of cargo," Sokolova said. "In the end, a court seized the vessel to sell it as a means to pay off the ship owner's debts, and a port agent found locals to unload the cargo and the crew went home."

Beirut Governor Marwan Abboud backed up this account, telling the country's LBCI television station that the chemical was kept in the port under "judicial order" and that "there was nobody who took the responsibility to make a decision to remove it."
'Incomprehensible'

Various Lebanese leaders have promised to bring those responsible to justice.

The presidency tweeted that anyone who "managed the affairs" of the chemical, guarded it or "examined its file" since June 2014 would be put under house arrest. Diab, the prime minister, said that he "will not rest until we find the person responsible for what happened."

But many residents and commentators see the disaster as symptomatic if not directly caused by the general state of upheaval into which the country has slid.

It is currently suffering its worst economic crisis in its modern history, with prices, unemployment and hunger skyrocketing and its currency, the lira, plummeting.

Anti-government protests in recent months have called for a change to what they see as decades of corrupt leadership, with sectarian politics and patronage networks enriching the elite and creating grave inequality. Hezbollah, an Iranian proxy officially designated a terrorist organization by the U.S., is a political group with unrivaled influence in the government.
Image: Police scuffle with protesters in Beirut (Hassan Ammar / AP)

The country was already struggling to cope with the 1.5 million refugees who have fled there from the war in neighboring Syria. These displaced people now make up 30 percent of its population — the highest proportion in the world.

Add to this the coronavirus pandemic, which has shuttered businesses, left thousands unemployed and threatens to overwhelm the country's beleaguered health system.

Tuesday's explosion ripped through a city on its knees. Not only has it wrought widespread damage, it has cripped the country's main port and immolated a month of grain reserves.

Human rights groups were among those to call for an international team to lead the inquiry into how this could have happened.

"The level of devastation in Beirut is incomprehensible, and the responsible authorities should be held accountable," Aya Majzoub, Lebanon researcher at Human Rights Watch, said in a statement.

"Given the Lebanese authorities’ repeated failure to investigate serious government failings and the public’s distrust of government institutions," Majzoub added, "an independent investigation with international experts is the best guarantee that victims of the explosion will get the justice they deserve."





Alexander Smith reported from London, Matthew Bodner reported from Moscow, Charlene Gubash reported from Cairo and Mustafa Kassem reported from Beirut. Reuters contributed to this report.
UPDATED
Mauritius facing catastrophe as oil starts leaking from a shipwreck near pristine coral reefs

Will Brown,The Telegraph•August 7, 2020
People look at MV Wakashio bulk carrier that had run aground and from which oil is leaking near Blue bay Marine Park in southeast Mauritius on August 6, 2020. - L'Express Maurice/AFP via Getty Images

The island nation of Mauritius is facing an environmental crisis after a huge container ship ran aground and started to leak oil into an area home to some of the finest coral reefs in the world.

Efforts to pump oil out of the ship have failed, and now there are fears that the carrier could start to break up, leading to an even greater leak and causing catastrophic damage on the island’s pristine coastline.

“We are in an environmental crisis situation,” said the environment minister, Kavy Ramano,

The carrier MV Wakashio, which belongs to a Japanese company and flew a Panamanian-flagged, was en route from China to Brazil when it ran aground near Pointe d’Esny on the island’s southeastern coast on 25 July.


The vessel’s crew have been evacuated safely and the container was not carrying a cargo load when wrecked. However, the 1,000ft vessel was carrying 90 tonnes of lubricant oil, 200 tonnes of diesel and 3,800 tonnes of bunker fuel, according to local media outlets.

Now the oil is spreading out of the ship rapidly, according to Sunil Dowarkasing, Greengate Consulting, a Mauritian environmental consultancy, who was on the beach in sight of wreck.

“It’s really very bad because now despite all the measures, the oil has already reached the shores of Mauritius and polluted the shorelines. You can see fish dying. The situation is out of control,” Mr Dowarkasing told The Telegraph.

Mr Dowarkasing said that the wreck was near four major wildlife and maritime sanctuaries, which contained flora and fauna unique to the island. He added that there was a 100-year-old ‘brain’ coral nearby in the Blue Bay Marine Park.

“Thousands of species around the pristine lagoons of Blue Bay, Pointe d’Esny and Mahebourg are at risk of drowning in a sea of pollution, with dire consequences for Mauritius’ economy, food security and health,” Happy Khambule from Greenpeace Africa told The Telegraph in a statement.

Mauritius, which lies some 600 miles east of Madagascar in the Indian Ocean, is a major tourist hotspot and tax haven for international corporations and African oligarchs.

The country of 1.2m depends on its seas for food and for tourism, boasting some of the finest coral reefs in the world.

The Mauritian government has asked the French Indian Ocean island of La Reunion for assistance.

“This is the first time that we are faced with a catastrophe of this kind and we are insufficiently equipped to handle this problem,” said fishing minister, Sudheer Maudhoo.

MV Wakashio: Ship aground off Mauritius begins leaking oil
BBC•August 7, 2020


Satellite images show the vessel leaking fuel off Mauritius

The island nation of Mauritius has declared a state of emergency after a vessel offshore began leaking oil into the ocean.

MV Wakashio ran aground on a coral reef off the Indian Ocean island on 25 July and its crew was evacuated.

But the large bulk carrier has since begun leaking tons of fuel into the surrounding waters.

Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth announced a "state of environmental emergency" on Friday.


He also appealed to France and its President, Emmanuel Macron, saying that Mauritius "does not have the skills and expertise to refloat stranded ships".

The French island of Reunion lies near Mauritius in the Indian Ocean.
Map

Mauritius is home to world-renowned coral reefs, and tourism is a crucial part of the nation's economy.

Happy Khambule of Greenpeace Africa said that "thousands" of animal species "are at risk of drowning in a sea of pollution, with dire consequences for Mauritius' economy, food security and health."

The ship - owned by a Japanese company but registered in Panama - was empty when it ran aground, but had some 4,000 tonnes of fuel aboard.
The ship was en route from China to Brazil when it ran aground
The vessel has some 4,000 tonnes of fuel on board

MV Wakashio is currently lying at Pointe d'Esny, in an area of wetlands near a marine park.

The environment ministry reportedly said attempts to stabilise the vessel and to pump out the oil failed due to rough seas.

Mauritius country profile

"This is the first time that we are faced with a catastrophe of this kind, and we are insufficiently equipped to handle this problem," Fishing Minister Sudheer Maudhoo said.

Police have opened an inquiry into the spill.



Tourist hotspot Mauritius hit by oil spill as ship grounds

Government says bulk carrier ran aground in the southeast of the island, sparking fears of an environmental disaster.


Ecologists fear the ship could break up, which would cause an even greater leak and inflict potentially catastrophic damage on the island's coastline [File- Getty]

Mauritius announced oil is leaking from a bulk carrier that ran aground in the southeast of the island, igniting fears of an environmental catastrophe.

"The ministry has been informed ... that there is a breach in the vessel MV Wakashio and there is a leakage of oil," the environment ministry said in a statement on Thursday.

"The public in general, including boat operators and fishers, are requested not to venture on the beach and in the lagoons of Blue Bay, Pointe d'Esny and Mahebourg."

The carrier, belonging to a Japanese company but Panamanian-flagged, ran aground on July 25 and its crew was evacuated safely.

The ship was carrying 200 tonnes of diesel and 3,800 tonnes of bunker fuel, according to the local press.

The grounding happened at Pointe d'Esny, which is listed under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, and near the marine park of Blue Bay.

Anti-pollution systems have been sent to the two sites, the ministry said, adding the government was asking the French Indian Ocean island of La Reunion for assistance.

"We are in an environmental crisis situation," Environment Minister Kavy Ramano told a news conference.

Shipping websites say the Wakashio was built in 2007 with a gross tonnage of 101,000 and deadweight tonnage of 203,000, and a length of 300 metres (984 feet).

"This is the first time that we are faced with a catastrophe of this kind, and we are insufficiently equipped to handle this problem," said Fishing Minister Sudheer Maudhoo.

The ministers said all attempts to stabilise the ship had failed because of rough seas, and efforts to pump out the oil also failed.

Ecologists fear the ship could break up, which would cause an even greater leak and inflict potentially catastrophic damage on the island's coastline.

The country depends crucially on its seas for food and for tourism, boasting some of the finest coral reefs in the world.

SOURCE: AFP NEWS AGENCY



SEE
https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2020/08/locals-in-mauritius-are-going-to-great.html

https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2020/08/mauritian-prime-minister-seeks.html

https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2020/08/the-oil-spill-at-mauritius-is-disaster.html

https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2020/08/update-mauritius-battles-devastating.html

https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2020/08/oil-spill-off-mauritius-is-visible-from.html

https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2020/08/france-offers-aid-as-mauritius-declares.html



RUSSIA SUPPORTS TRUMP
NORTH KOREA SUPPORTS TRUMP
BRAZIL SUPPORTS TRUMP
SAUDI ARABIA SUPPORTS TRUMP
TURKEY SUPPORTS TRUMP


CHINA, CANADA DESPITE THEIR DIFFERENCESSUPPORT BIDEN, 
SO DOES IRAN AND THE REST
OF THE WORLD!
Fox News Host Sandra Smith Grills Kellyanne Conway on Trump’s COVID ‘Misinformation’
UH OH NOT JUST CNN 
Matt Wilstein,
The Daily Beast•August 6, 2020


On Wednesday, Facebook finally took the long overdue step of removing a piece of Trump campaign content from its platform that pushed misinformation about COVID-19. That didn’t stop Kellyanne Conway from trying to defend it Thursday morning on Fox News.

The claim in question came during the president’s appearance on Fox & Friends that morning, where he falsely stated, “If you look at children, children are almost—and I would almost say definitely—but almost immune from this disease.”

“Of course there is a debate happening about whether Facebook and Twitter should be arbiters of truth and decide what is fact and fiction,” Fox host Sandra Smith began, before sharing the actual facts about confirmed coronavirus cases in children.

According to the CDC, she told Conway, children under the age of 18 now make up 7.4% of total cases in the United States. “So kids are getting this disease, Kellyanne,” she said.

“Yes, they are and thankfully most never make it to a hospital and very few have died,” Conway replied, hastening to add, “and every death is a tragedy.” As she tried to pivot to glimmers of good news about the spread of the virus overall, Smith brought her back to the issue at hand.

“I want to stick to children though,” the host said. “Because the debate right now is over the spread of misinformation by the president about children being ‘nearly immune.’”

Smith cited remarks from the Republican governor of Mississippi, who has just instituted a state-wide mask mandate, as further evidence that kids are transmitting the virus in large numbers before asking, “Is it helpful for the president to tell parents that children are ‘nearly immune’ from this and then have it factually spreading from child to child in places like Mississippi where they’ve opened the doors to their schools?”

Seth Meyers Brutally Mocks Trump’s Kindergarten Coronavirus Death Chart

Instead of defending Trump’s claim, all Conway could do in response was try to highlight other instances when the president didn’t spread misinformation about children’s susceptibility. “So I think the president is making clear that overall the average age of those who pass away from coronavirus is still about 78,” she said, a separate fact that does not mean children are “nearly immune.”

After Conway attempted yet another pivot to attack Joe Biden, Smith again brought her back to Trump and his lies about the virus.

“I get that Kellyanne and that’s another conversation,” the host said. “But the point is that the president said in that interview on Fox & Friends yesterday morning said it’s going to ‘go away, like things go away’ and that is something many people are taking issue with.” She quoted the White House’s own health expert Dr. Anthony Fauci, who said, “I do not believe that it will disappear because it’s such a highly transmissible virus.”

“So is the president listening to the advice of the health experts that he has at his side?” Smith asked.

“Yes he is, and they should be listening to him as well,” Conway replied ominously before accusing those experts of saying things on TV that they didn’t express in classified task force meetings.

Conway had plenty to say after that about Twitter and Facebook, but she could not defend Trump’s claim that COVID-19 will magically disappear.
New Zealand's Ardern kicks off election campaign after taming virus

MICHAEL BRADLEY,
AFP•August 7, 2020


New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is riding high in opinion polls after her leadership through the Christchurch mosque attacks, the White Island volcanic eruption and the coronavirus pandemic

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern kicked off her Labour Party's election campaign Saturday riding high in the opinion polls after a successful response to the coronavirus outbreak.

Ardern's popularity as preferred prime minister -- often referred to as "Jacindamania" -- topped 60 percent in the latest surveys following her leadership through the Christchurch mosque attacks, the White Island volcanic eruption and the pandemic.

Before the virus forced New Zealand to seal its borders, the polls had pointed to a cliffhanger election on September 19, but support swung sharply towards the centre-left Labour Party as the country eliminated community transmission in a matter on months.

In a country of five million people, New Zealand has had only 22 COVID-19 deaths and it has been 99 days since the last recorded case of infection from an unknown source.


"When people ask, is this a COVID election, my answer is yes, it is," the charismatic 40-year-old said as she launched the campaign with a NZ$311 million (US$205 million) pledge to boost jobs.

"Businesses large and small are crucial to our economic recovery."

Labour is the senior partner in a three-party coalition government but if it can maintain the support shown in recent opinion polls, where it has consistently been above 50 percent, it could govern alone after the election.

Ardern was an unheralded MP when thrust into the Labour leadership shortly before the 2017 election when the party was struggling and "there were plenty who thought it couldn't (win)," she said.

"If you had told me then that our launch in 2020 would be in the midst of a global pandemic with our borders closed –- I would have found that very hard to fathom."

The centrepiece of Labour's campaign is to support businesses in hiring at least 40,000 people whose employment has been affected by the coronavirus.

It pledged to expand existing job schemes to help employers hire staff at risk of long-term unemployment.

It will also help out-of-work New Zealanders start a business through an expanded self-employment programme which will provide the equivalent of the minimum wage for up to 30-hours a week.

"The new flexi-wage scheme is a key plank of our economic plan to support businesses to recover and to provide jobs to those who have lost work due to COVID," Ardern said.

"Our team-of-five-million approach to fighting COVID means there is huge willingness in our business community to avoid unemployment rising by retaining staff and taking on new employees where they can, but many just need a little bit of extra support to do that, which this package provides."

cf/amj


New Zealand PM Ardern launches 'COVID election' campaign promising jobs


Reuters•August 7, 2020

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern during a news conference in Christchurch

WELLINGTON (Reuters) - New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern on Saturday launched her re-election campaign promising a "laser-like" focus on boosting jobs and economic growth hit by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The charismatic 40-year-old leader is on track for a comfortable victory in the Sept. 19 election, according to opinion polls, having won global praise for her leadership during the coronavirus pandemic.

It has been 99 days since New Zealand had any domestic transmission of COVID-19, a rare achievement as the pandemic rages globally, and it has re-opened the economy after undergoing a complete shutdown to eradicate the coronavirus.

"When people ask, is this a COVID election, my answer is yes, it is," Ardern told her supporters gathered in Auckland for the launch of her Labour Party's re-election campaign.

In her first campaign speech, Ardern pledged a NZ$311 million ($205.32 million) scheme aimed at getting 40,000 Kiwis back in work, if her party wins the Sept 19 polls.

The funding will allow businesses a subsidy of on average NZ$7500, and up to NZ$22,000, to hire unemployed New Zealanders.

"The new Flexi-wage scheme is a key plank of our economic plan to support businesses to recover and to provide jobs to those who have lost work due to Covid," Ardern said.

New Zealand has been an envy of the world, having eliminated COVID-19 from its shores and successfully re-opening its economy when most of the world is still shuttered.

Recent data suggests unemployment due to COVID-19 was not as dire as expected, and business confidence had improved due to the government's hard and early response to the pandemic.

Introduced to the stage by her partner and fiancé Clark Gayford, Ardern spoke of her unexpected rise to power in 2017, and her handling of a series of tragedies -- a mass shooting at Christchurch mosques, the deadly White Island volcanic eruption and the coronavirus this year.

"If you had told me then that our launch in 2020 would be in the midst of a global pandemic with our borders closed – I would have found that very hard to fathom," she said.

Ardern’s stratospheric rise in 2017 to become New Zealand’s youngest prime minister and third woman to hold the office has been dubbed “Jacinda-mania” by some.

($1 = 1.5147 New Zealand dollars), AUSTRALIAN AND CANADIAN DOLLARS ON PAR

(Reporting by Swati Pandey in Sydney and Praveen Menon in Wellington;; Editing by Michael Perry)
Thai protesters demand the release of anti-government activists

Reuters•August 7, 2020

WITH THE PASSING OF THE OLD KING, AND THE TRADITIONAL FEUDALISTIC RESTRICTIONS ATTENDENDANT WITH HIM WERE LIFTED BY THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES, IN REACTION TO THE NEW KING'S SELF ABSORBED HUBRIS

Pro-democracy protesters stand outside the criminal court building demanding a representative be allowed inside were two leader still detained at the criminal court in Bangkok

BANGKOK (Reuters) - Dozens of protesters gathered in front of a Bangkok court on Saturday to demand the release of activist leaders, vowing to escalate anti-government demonstrations with a call for a protest in the Thai capital.

Human rights lawyer Anon Nampa, 35, and student activist Panupong Jasnok, 23, were arrested on Friday and held overnight in connection with recent protests demanding greater democracy.

"Whom does the court serve in this country?," Parit Cheewarak, a student leader widely known by the nickname Penguin, told 60 to 100 protesters in front of Bangkok's Criminal Court.

"No matter how senior you are, you are not above the taxes that pay your salaries," he said as police watched.


Protesters have returned to Thailand's streets to call for the ouster of the government of 2014 coup leader Prayuth Chan-ocha after a disputed general election last year that activists say was engineered to ensure his hold on power.

Charges against Anon and Panupong include sedition and violating an emergency decree imposed to stop the spread of the coronavirus.

The court declined to process a police request to jail the two men on Friday because it was filed too late. They were instead held overnight at a police station.

At a protest on Monday, Anon had called for reforms to the monarchy in an extremely rare public challenge to the powerful institution. He was not charged over that protest.


(Reporting by Chayut Setboonsarng and Panarat Thepgumpanat; Editing by William Mallard)


         IT'S PRONOUNCED TIE-LAND

https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2020/08/testing-royal-taboos-inside-thailands.html

What to know about the NY AG's attempt to take down the NRA

Jon Campbell, New York State Team,
USA TODAY•August 7, 2020

ALBANY – The National Rifle Association, the nation's most powerful gun rights organization, is in a battle for its very existence.

A lawsuit filed this week by New York Attorney General Letitia James seeks to formally dissolve the longstanding gun rights organization, alleging a wide array of corruption and fraud that helped the NRA diminish its assets by $64 million from 2015 through 2018.

The legal filing singled out longtime CEO Wayne LaPierre for allegedly using the organization to fund his lavish lifestyle, spending millions on private travel for him and his family, including eight trips to the Bahamas that sometimes included the use of a yacht with four staterooms, a jet boat and two jet skis.

If it's successful, the NRA would be forced to close and distribute its assets to other charitable outlets, including a valuable member list the organization says includes more than 5 million people. LaPierre and other leaders would be removed and barred from serving other New York-based charities.

The NRA, however, is not giving up without a fight.

The organization launched a counter suit Thursday alleging a political conspiracy, noting James, a Democrat, had labeled the organization a "criminal enterprise" before she ever took office and launched an investigation.

How will it all play out?

Here's the answer to some frequently asked questions about the battle over the NRA's future.

More: NRA, accused of wasting millions, faces shutdown attempt by NY attorney general
What is the NRA accused of?

A wide array of fraud, corruption and shoddy financial management that saw its leaders live lavish lifestyles at the expense of the organization.

James' 169-page lawsuit lays out a litany of law-breaking, much of it centered on LaPierre using the NRA's assets to benefit himself and his family. (Three other former and current NRA leaders — Joshua Powell, John Frazer and Wilson "Woody" Phillips — are also named in the suit.)

Among the highlights:


LaPierre is accused of spending millions of NRA dollars on private travel for him and his family, including numerous private flights that sometimes shepherded a niece and other extended family members without him on board.


He is also accused of making repeated trips to the Bahamas on the NRA or an NRA vendor's dime. Sometimes it was for a "celebrity retreat" in December; Other times, the NRA vendor granted him use of a 108-foot yacht named "Illusions" with a full crew, four staterooms and a 16-foot jet boat, which he never disclosed to the NRA.


LaPierre also secured a post-employment contract worth at least $17 million without NRA board approval, guaranteeing him lifetime compensation from the organization even if he's fired.

LaPierre and the NRA are also accused of hiding spending in a number of ways, including by having Ackerman McQueen — the NRA's longtime advertising firm — cover travel and entertainment expenses and billing the organization.

That allegedly fraudulent relationship allowed LaPierre to file false personal tax returns, according to the lawsuit.

More: ICE blocked from civil arrests at New York state courthouses, judge rules
What did the NRA do in response to the lawsuit?
Looking down the barrel of a firearm at the 2019 NRA convention exhibits at the Indiana Convention Center, Friday, April 26, 2019.

The NRA filed a lawsuit of its own seeking to use James' own words against her.

In the NRA's legal filings, the organization pointed to a number of statements James made during her 2018 run for attorney general.

During her campaign, James was repeatedly critical of the organization, at one point referring to it as a "criminal enterprise" before she ever took office and launched an investigation.

"We need to again take on the NRA, which holds itself out as a charitable organization," James told Our Time Press in September 2018. "But, in fact, they are not. They are nothing more than a criminal enterprise."

The lawsuit claims James and Gov. Andrew Cuomo, both vocal supporters of gun-control measures and critics of the NRA, are attacking the organization for its political views, violating its First Amendment rights.

"The NYAG’s actions are an affront to democracy and freedom,” LaPierre said in a statement. “This is an unconstitutional, premeditated attack aiming to dismantle and destroy the NRA"

James said her lawsuit is not affected by her position on gun control and will continue on.

"The facts speak for themselves and our lawsuit will continue undeterred," she said.
Why is this playing out in New York?
New York Attorney General Letitia James has filed a suit seeking to dissolve the NRA following a fraud investigation.

For that answer, we have to go all the way back to the 19th century.

The NRA's beginnings date back to 1871, when a pair of Union soldiers founded the association to promote marksmanship training. A year later, they opened the Creedmor Rifle Range in what is now Queens, according to the organization.

The NRA was granted a charter in New York in November 1871. It's been chartered in New York ever since.

That's what gave James her opening.

In New York, the Attorney General's Office oversees charities in New York. The NRA is a 501c4 charity headquartered in the state, so James is able to investigate and, if necessary, seek sanctions.

"The attorney general has significant power over New York's not-for-profit corporations," said Ted De Barbieri, an associate professor at Albany Law School. "It is entirely within her discretion and power to bring regulatory enforcement action."
Is there a precedent for this?

In 2018, then-Attorney General Barbara Underwood filed a lawsuit accusing the Donald J. Trump Foundation of mismanagement, accusing the president and his children of using the charity to illegally promote his presidential campaign.

The Trump Foundation ultimately agreed to a settlement that saw it dissolve and its assets redistributed to other charities.

It's not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison, however.

The NRA is a far larger and more powerful organization than the Trump Foundation. And the NRA's actions thus far do not suggest it is amenable to dissolving, as the Trump Foundation was.
Why isn't this in the criminal courts?

James lawsuit lays out conduct that could be interpreted as criminal — most notably the issues surrounding LaPierre's allegedly false tax returns.

But James would have to refer her findings to a district attorney or another prosecutor in order for a criminal prosecution.

Asked Thursday about the tax issues uncovered in the investigation, James said she would refer her findings to the IRS. She also said the investigation is "ongoing" and findings could be referred to the Manhattan district attorney in the future.

"If we uncover any criminal activity, we will refer it to the Manhattan district attorney," James said.
How long will the NRA's legal battle take?
Smith & Wesson guns are seen at the 2019 NRA convention exhibits at the Indiana Convention Center, Friday, April 26, 2019.

The NRA's counter lawsuit suggests the organization intends to fight James' claims every step of the way, which could drag on the legal battle for quite some time.

It has the potential to stretch out for many months, if not years, within state Supreme Court in Manhattan.

"Absolutely," De Barbieri said of whether it will take a long time to settle.

"The complaint has serious allegations based on facts and investigations, and it seeks a remedy that is within the power of the Attorney General's Office ... because of the allegations of waste and abuse that are in the complaint."
President Trump said the NRA should move to Texas. Is that possible?
National Rifle Associations Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer Wayne LaPierre listens at right as President Donald Trump speaks in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington in 2017.

No, according to James.

New York not-for-profit corporations need certain state approvals before they can switch their state of incorporation.

With the NRA under an ongoing investigation and legal battle, it wouldn't be possible for it to just pick up and move.

"To be clear, no charity registered in New York state, including the NRA, can dissolve and relocate to another state without approval of my office or of the Supreme Court of New York," James said in a statement Friday.

"As long as our lawsuit continues, the NRA must stay right where it is and answer for their deep-rooted fraud."

Trump on Thursday said the NRA should move to Texas or some other state and live a "very good and beautiful life."

Jon Campbell is a New York state government reporter for the USA TODAY Network. He can be reached at JCAMPBELL1@Gannett.com or on Twitter at @JonCampbellGAN.

This article originally appeared on New York State Team: NRA lawsuit: What to know about the NY AG's attempt to take down the NRA
The National Rifle Association faces its worst nightmare: accountability

Shannon Watts, Opinion contributor,
USA TODAY Opinion•August 7, 2020

On Thursday, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against the National Rifle Association for breaking New York charities law — the result of an investigation into the NRA’s finances that began in April 2019. The complaint seeks dissolution, meaning that if the NRA is found guilty, it could be disbanded by the state of New York.

You don’t have to be a lawyer to see how the NRA got into this mess. Even casual observers have watched it morph from a safety-focused, non-profit into a front group for gun manufacturers and a personal piggy bank for its leadership.

Since 2018, NRA executive pay has skyrocketed, money has flowed to supposedly ‘unpaid’ board members, and CEO Wayne LaPierre has reportedly used member dues to pay for millions of dollars’ worth of Italian suits and private jet trips. Meanwhile, in 2018 less than 10% of NRA funds were spent on the NRA’s supposed “core functions” of gun safety, education, and training — leaving little wonder why AG James decided the NRA ran afoul of the law.
NRA misusing funds

As it turns out, you can only buy so many Italian suits from Zegna in Beverly Hills with organizational money before the organization stops being a nonprofit and starts being a slush fund.

But AG James is far from the NRA’s only concern — the NRA is losing money and power so quickly that by the end of this case, there might not be anything left to dissolve. Legally, the organization is mired in litigation with former partners and sued by the attorney general of D.C. Financially, the NRA is laying off employees by the hundreds, and Wayne LaPierre was recently caught on tape saying the organization needed to be taken “down to the studs” to “survive.” And politically, the NRA had to strip its once-coveted candidate-grading-system from the internet because politicians were ashamed to be affiliated with them.

Protest outside the NRA headquarters in 2017 in Fairfax, Virginia.

In fact, the NRA is just as out of touch with voters as it seems to be with New York law. NRA-backed candidates lost big in the 2018 midterms, and the NRA lost its home state of Virginia in 2019, leading to several gun safety laws being passed in their own backyard. Even more notably, the Trump administration has begun “hedg[ing] its bets” on the NRA by “reaching out to other gun groups,” despite the NRA being the single largest outside spender on Donald Trump’s 2016 election. That should tell you all you need to know about the NRA’s political future.

The NRA has had this reckoning coming for a long time –– not only because of its rampant corruption, but because it is perhaps more responsible than any other group or individual for America’s deadly gun violence epidemic.

Dayton mayor on one-year anniversary of mass shooting: Why haven't we done something?

That is particularly evident this week, which marks one year since the country mourned the tragic shootings in Dayton and El Paso that killed 32 Americans and wounded 40 more in less than 24 hours. In the aftermath of those shootings, even Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell pledged that they were finally ready to act. But then Wayne LaPierre reportedly stopped by the White House, and ordered Trump to “stop the games” on gun safety. That’s all it took for Republicans to cave, one by one.
Gun violence in America

In the year since that fateful meeting, nearly 40,000 Americans have been killed by gun violence, and twice that many have been wounded. Worse still, in the past four years, with NRA allies controlling the Senate and the White House, the death toll is over 140,000 — nearly the same number of Americans that have died from COVID-19, and many more than were killed in the Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam wars combined. And yet, Trump, McConnell and the NRA have still failed to act.

At times, the NRA has become such a side-show in the last year, so entangled in financial and legal turmoil, that it can be hard to remember the organization's true, destructive nature. But this is the same organization whose officials have spent recent months spreading conspiracy theories about COVID-19, defending Confederate monuments, and comparing the Black Lives Matter movement to the Nazi Party and ISIS. And make no mistake: it’s because of the NRA that gun safety bills are dying in the U.S. Senate while people continue to die in the streets.

As the founder of Moms Demand Action, I’ve been fighting the NRA for years — they have even encouraged threats of violence and death against me among their supporters. And while I’ve been flatteringly referred to as the NRA’s worst nightmare, the truth is that the NRA’s worst nightmare is exactly what seems to be coming for them after this November: complete irrelevance.

When politics hits home: Pandemic moms are descendants of soccer and votes-for-women moms

Between AG James’ lawsuit, the NRA’s own incompetence, politicians rightly distancing themselves from the NRA, and the coming election, the NRA as we know it may be headed for extinction and federal gun safety laws finally appear to be on the horizon.

So today, as we mark what might be the beginning of the end of the NRA, I offer it the same support that it has offered so many, so often: “thoughts and prayers.” May those hollow words be as futile for the NRA as they’ve been for the rest of us.

Shannon Watts is the founder of Moms Demand Action, which is the nation’s largest grassroots group fighting for stronger gun laws. Watts is a mom of five.


You can read diverse opinions from our Board of Contributors and other writers on the Opinion front page, on Twitter @USATOpinion and in our daily Opinion newsletter. To respond to a column, submit a comment to letters@usatoday.com.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: NRA: having financial troubles and facing lawsuits and investigations


UPDATED 

NY AG Accuses NRA Of "Massive Fraud", Seeks To "Dismantle" Guns-Rights Organization




Update (1140ET): James is starting off the hearing by detailing a state lawsuit against the NRA and seeking the dissolution of the pro-second amendment organization, one of several subjects she was expected to address today.
James alleges the the organization violated non-profit laws by diverting "millions of dollars away from the charitable mission of the organization for personal use by senior leadership," who awarded contracts that benefited friends and family. That would be a slam-dunk if she were going after politicians. But at a non-profit, things are more blurry.
BBG published an update on the lawsuit almost immediately, suggesting that the financial news organization - owned by a former mayor of NYC - had the story under embargo ahead of time. Here's a snippet from their reporting, which accuses NRA of "massive fraud".
New York is seeking to dissolve the National Rifle Associationas the state attorney general accused the gun rights group and four senior officials of engaging in a massive fraud against donors.
A sprawling lawsuit filed Thursday in state court in Manhattan alleges the NRA diverted charitable donations for years to enrich the organization’s top executives in violation of laws governing nonprofits, New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. The state is also demanding millions of dollars in restitution and penalties.
The case may pose one of the biggest legal threats the NRA has faced since its founding in New York in 1871. The turmoil began with a power struggle last year between former NRA president Oliver North and longtime leader Wayne LaPierre, which led to allegations of self dealing. A subsequent state probe found wrongdoing blamed for more than $64 million in losses in the last three years alone, James said.
“The NRA’s influence has been so powerful that the organization went unchecked for decades while top executives funneled millions into their own pockets,” James, a Democrat, said in the statement. “The NRA is fraught with fraud and abuse.”




For those who aren't familiar, this is the culmination of what Trump once called "an illegal investigation" by Cuomo and the AG, which stems from a power struggle that rocked the NRA last year.
The news sent shares of gun makers lower.
The NRA must "get its act together quickly, stop the internal fighting, & get back to GREATNESS - FAST!" Trump tweeted at the time.
We imagine he'll be chiming in on Twitter about this new lawsuit any minute now.

N.Y. attorney general sues to dissolve NRA over 'unchecked power'
B
Clyde Hughes


A sign promoting the National Rifle Association and CEO Wayne LaPierre is seen at the annual convention in Dallas, Texas, on May 5, 2018. File Photo by Sergio Flores/UPI | License Photo

Aug. 6 (UPI) -- New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit Thursday seeking to dissolve the National Rifle Association, accusing it of illegally diverting millions from charity to benefit senior leadership, families and associates.

The lawsuit names NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre, former Chief Financial Officer Wilson "Woody" Phillips, former chief of staff Joshua Powell and General Counsel John Frazier, as well as the gun-rights organization as a whole.

James said the NRA has operated as a New York non-profit since 1871, even though its headquarters is in Fairfax, Va.

"The NRA's influence has been so powerful that the organization went unchecked for decades while top executives funneled millions into their own pockets," James, a longtime Democrat and former New York City councilor, said in a statement. "The NRA is fraught with fraud and abuse, which is why, today, we seek to dissolve the NRA, because no organization is above the law."


RELATED NRA suit asks California to declare gun shops 'essential businesses' amid shutdown

LaPierre, who is one of the major focal points of the suit, is accused of using charitable funds for personal gain -- including a post-employment contract valued at more than $17 million that was never approved by the NRA's board of directors.

James's office said the NRA fostered a culture of "self-dealing, mismanagement and negligent oversight" that was illegal, oppressive and fraudulent.

"They overrode and evaded internal controls to allow themselves, their families, favored board members, employees, and vendors to benefit through reimbursed expenses, related party transactions, excess compensation, side deals, and waste of charitable assets without regard to the NRA's best interests."

RELATED NRA sues San Francisco over 'domestic terrorist' designation

The organization, which has endorsed President Donald Trump for re-election, did not immediately respond publicly to the suit. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, however, responded with an invitation for the NRA to move its operations to his state.

"The NRA has been instrumental in defending our Second Amendment rights and we would welcome them with open arms to relocate to Texas," Paxton tweeted.

upi.com/7027208


New York seeks to break up National Rifle Association, alleging financial mismanagement
Daniel Trotta, David Shepardson

(Reuters) - New York state’s attorney general sued to dissolve the National Rifle Association on Thursday, alleging senior leaders of the non-profit group diverted millions of dollars for personal use and to buy the silence and loyalty of former employees.


New York State Attorney General, Letitia James, speaks during a news conference, to announce a suit to dissolve the National Rifle Association, In New York, U.S., August 6, 2020. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

The lawsuit announced by Attorney General Letitia James alleges NRA leaders paid for family trips to the Bahamas, private jets and expensive meals that contributed to a $64 million (48.6 million pounds) reduction in the NRA’s balance sheet in three years, turning a surplus into a deficit.

James alleged in a statement that NRA leaders “used millions upon millions from NRA reserves for personal use,” failing to comply with the NRA’s own internal policies in addition to state and federal law.

RELATED COVERAGE
Trump says Texas would be great place for NRA to relocate


In announcing the lawsuit, James told reporters the NRA “has operated as a breeding ground for greed, abuse and brazen illegality.” She added “no one is above the law” - including the NRA.

At the same time, the attorney general for Washington, D.C., filed suit against the NRA and its foundation, alleging the misuse of charitable funds and wasteful spending.

The confrontation pits James, a Democrat, against the largest and most powerful gun organization in the United States, one that is closely aligned with President Donald Trump’s Republican Party.

Briefing reporters, James denied the suit was motivated by the NRA’s support for Trump

The action is certain to further polarize a country where the NRA is revered by conservatives as a champion of the U.S. Constitutional right to keep and bear arms and vilified by liberals as an enabler of rampant gun violence.

“The NRA’s influence has been so powerful that the organization went unchecked for decades while top executives funneled millions into their own pockets,” James said in a statement. “The NRA is fraught with fraud and abuse, which is why, today, we seek to dissolve the NRA, because no organization is above the law.”

The NRA, which teaches gun safety in addition to advocating laws making it easier for Americans to own guns and ammunition, is subject to New York law because it is registered as a non-profit organization in New York, where it conducts most of its financial transactions.

The NRA, which has its national headquarters in Fairfax, Virginia, about 20 miles (30 km) west of Washington, D.C., did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

New York state and the NRA have tangled before. The state has taken legal action against NRA-branded insurance policies sold to gun owners, and the NRA is suing the state for closing gun stores under an executive order to halt the spread of COVID-19.

The latest lawsuit names the NRA as a whole and four senior executives of the group including Wayne LaPierre, the executive vice-president who has been atop the leadership for decades.

It also names former Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer Wilson Phillips, former Chief of Staff and Executive Director of General Operations Joshua Powell, and Corporate Secretary and General Counsel John Frazer.


Slideshow (2 Images)

The suit charges the NRA with “awarding contracts to the financial gain of close associates and family, and appearing to dole out lucrative no-show contracts to former employees in order to buy their silence and continued loyalty,” James’s office said in a statement.

“The failure of the NRA to comply with multiple fiduciary responsibilities and state and federal laws resulted in the NRA seeing substantial losses on its balance sheet: going from a surplus of $27,802,714 in 2015 to a net deficit of $36,276,779 in 2018 - contributing to a total loss of more than $64 million in just three years,” the statement said.

In addition to attempting to close down a group that has existed since 1871, James seeks to recover millions of dollars in lost assets and to stop the four executives from serving on he board of any other not-for-profit group in the state.


Reporting by Daniel Trotta and David Shepardson; Editing by Howard Goller

OPENSECRETS NEWS
With legal troubles mounting and spending slowing, NRA promises to boost Trump


By Ian Karbal and Anna Massoglia

President Donald Trump sits with NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre (Michael Reynolds – Pool/Getty Images)

The National Rifle Association plans to pour millions of dollars into President Donald Trump’s 2020 re-election effort despite escalating legal turmoil and plummeting cash flow leaving its election spending lagging behind recent cycles.

The NRA was having a bad year even before New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit on Thursday with the aim of dissolving the group entirely.

Within hours of the New York Attorney General’s announcement, however, the NRA announced plans of its own to “spend tens of millions of dollars” on 2020 elections in an interview with the Washington Free Beacon. Jason Ouimet, who runs the NRA’s lobbying arm and political action committee, said the NRA plans to “spend heavily in battleground states to help reelect President Donald Trump” with a focus on Arizona, Colorado, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Wisconsin.

While the NRA’s ambitious 2020 electoral strategy projects tens of millions of dollars in political spending, the gun rights group’s spending at this point in the 2020 election cycle hardly comes close to that amount.

The leading gun rights advocacy group has yet to even crack $1 million in outside spending reported to the Federal Election Commission since the start of the 2020 election cycle, shelling out roughly $900,000 through the first week of August. The NRA reported spending nearly twice that amount with more than $1.6 million on 2018 elections by this point last cycle and over nine times that amount at this point in the 2016 election cycle with more than $8.2 million.

Altogether, the NRA reported more than $54 million in record-breaking political spending supporting Republican candidates in the 2016 election cycle with most of that supporting Trump over Hillary Clinton.

As in 2016, most of the NRA’s 2020 political spending reported to the FEC has gone to support Trump by boosting his re-election efforts with activities including canvassing and peer-to-peer text campaigns, but at a fraction of the scale. The rest of the NRA’s 2020 federal political spending is mostly flowing to support Republicans in hotly-contested U.S. Senate races.

The NRA’s lagging spending has allowed gun control groups to outpace gun rights groups on political spending in the 2020 elections so far, spending $2.2 million compared to $1.4 million from their pro-gun counterparts. Last cycle was the first in at least a decade that saw gun control groups outspend gun rights groups, due mostly to a massive decrease in NRA spending from previous years.

The NRA has also spent less money lobbying than it has in the first half of any year in more than a decade, even as the organization fought to have gun stores and gun ranges included on lists of essential businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The NRA spent more than $2.2 million buying digital ads through its main Facebook page during the 2020 election as well with roughly $750,000 more going to Google ads. The ads are a mix of fundraising solicitations, issue ads, retail and political messaging boosting candidates at multiple levels of government. Other official NRA-branded pages have also spent hundreds of thousands more on digital ads, according to OpenSecrets’ online ad spending data.

The New York Attorney General’s lawsuit alleges NRA executives “looted or wasted” the lobbying group’s assets to the tune of $63 million between 2015 and 2018, part of a larger pattern spanning NRA Chief Executive Wayne LaPierre’s three-decade tenure. Allegations describe a pattern of “excessive” personal spending on behalf of a handful of executives, often without disclosure and seemingly unchecked by the group’s board. The lawsuit’s introduction marked the end of one of several similar investigations that had cost the group $100 million in legal fees by January.

Within hours of the New York Attorney General’s lawsuit announcement, Washington, D.C., Attorney General Karl Racine announced that his office is suing the NRA Foundation for misuse of charitable funds. That office alleges that the NRA Foundation illegally diverted funds to the NRA’s lobbying arm in order to cover LaPierre’s spending. The NRA stands accused of “inappropriate spending,” “self-dealing” and other questionable transactions.

While the New York Attorney General’s office pursues dissolution of the NRA, suggesting a diversion of their remaining funds to other charities with similar missions, their D.C. counterpart is seeking enforcement actions of its own. The D.C. Attorney General’s lawsuit seeks to modify NRA Foundation policies to ensure the foundation has “proper independence” from the NRA, force NRA officials who might otherwise be unjustly enriched to transfer money improperly diverted to the NRA to the intended parties, and to mandate nonprofit governance training for NRA officials.

NRA Foundation payments to the NRA’s main lobbying arm listed as reimbursements increased to more than $17.4 million in its most recently filed tax return, according to an earlier OpenSecrets investigation, the largest amount in at least a decade and nearly three times the $6 million reported in reimbursements the prior year.

The organization responded to the New York Attorney General’s lawsuit with a tweet stating “This was a baseless, premeditated attack on our organization and the Second Amendment freedoms it fights to defend.”

The NRA has already filed a countersuit against the New York Attorney General alleging the lawsuit is politically motivated and claiming that an NRA director was warned of the office’s intent to investigate the gun rights group as early as 2017. The investigation was not made public until 2019.

The cases against the NRA follow a series of scandals that had called the NRA’s continued efficacy into question. A 2019 leadership struggle between LaPierre and former NRA president Oliver North spurred a series of leaks bringing to light the questionable use of funds. Reports of LaPierre’s use of tax-exempt money to fund his lavish lifestyle grew throughout 2019, many of which were central to the New York Attorney General’s office complaint. What emerged Thursday was a much fuller picture of how NRA money was allegedly used on private jet trips, five-star hotels, flashy Christmas gifts, golf club memberships and lucrative consulting fees for little work done, often to the benefit of LaPierre and his family.

The NRA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The New York Attorney General’s office used the 2019 dissolution of the Trump Foundation as one of two recent examples of similar action to dissolve a nonprofit. The Trump Foundation, which Donald Trump was listed as president of during his entire first year in the White House, agreed to pay $2 million after admitting to misusing funds from the tax-exempt charitable organization to further Trump’s personal and political interests in the 2016 presidential election.