Friday, October 16, 2020

GREEN CAPITALI$M

ESG Environmental, Social and Governance

surges everywhere but US


ESG, ESG USESG appears to be passing the scrutiny test with more investors perceiving performance merits.

This is with the exception of investors in the US, where scepticism has grown, according to a survey.

The 2020 RBC Global Asset Management ‘Responsible investment survey’ showed that, compared to 2019, there is an increase in the percentage of institutional investors who believe ESG-integrated portfolios are likely to perform as well or better than non-ESG integrated portfolios.


In Europe this was up to 96% from 92% and Asia to 93% from 78%.

Respondents in the US are more sceptical.  Only 74% were positive for performance, down from 78% in 2019. Over a quarter of US respondents (up from 22% in 2019) believe ESG integrated portfolios perform worse.

Similar scepticism from the US was expressed about the ability of ESG integrated portfolios to generate long-term sustainable alpha and to mitigate risk.

The ongoing Covid-19 pandemic is beginning to influence investors’ views about ESG, the report says.


Over 28% said Covid-19 has made them place more importance on ESG considerations and just over half of investors are looking for companies to disclose more details about worker safety, employee health benefits, workplace culture and other social factors due to the pandemic.


“As we analyse the trends in our year-over-year survey data, we’ve found that a growing majority of institutional investors are convinced of the merits of ESG adoption in their investment approach,” said Melanie Adams, head of corporate governance and responsible investment at RBC GAM.

The survey also shows support for diversity and inclusion targets for corporate boards remains strong, the firm said. More respondents favoured board minority diversity targets (44%) than opposed them (28%). Similarly, more respondents favoured board gender diversity targets (49%) than opposed them (26%).

In total, 809 institutional investors responded from North America, Europe and Asia.


ESG assessments rising in asset management, study finds

esg_investingAsset managers see governance as their central ESG factor - but environment and social issues are gaining importance, research shows.

A report by Russell Investments show that out of 400 asset managers surveyed, 78% now incorporate qualitative or quantitative ESG – or environmental, social and governance – factor assessments into their investment processes, an increase of 5% from last year.

Over 80% of asset managers say that governance is the ESG factor which has the most impact on their investment decisions. 


Environmental and social issues are becoming gradually more pronounced in asset managers’ thinking, however. 

The study showed a 4% increase in the number of managers identifying environmental considerations as the factor that most impacts their investment decisions.

Jihan Diolosa, regional head of responsible investing, said: “ESG is no longer an optional ‘add-on’; it is now an essential consideration that asset managers have to incorporate into their decision-making processes.”

Diolosa added that the industry is moving in the right direction. “Asset managers who do not adapt to the changing landscape will be left behind,” she said. 


ESG: How much return is required to offset guilt?

MillennialMillennial investors who would abandon their ideals surrounding sustainable investing would want a return of 21% to “offset any guilt”.

Schroders found a quarter of millennial investors surveyed would invest against their personal beliefs if the returns were high enough. Three-quarters would not compromise on beliefs.

Schroders' research covered 23,000 people of various ages globally and it is millennials who are more likely to compromise on their personal beliefs in order to benefit from potentially higher returns.

The older people get, the less likely they are to compromise their beliefs for the sake of higher returns. Some 16% of those aged 71 or over would swap ideals for returns, for example. The figures are 20% for baby-boomers and 24% of those classed as Generation X. 

Geographically, people in China, Italy and Portugal are the most likely to stay true to their views, with the least probable being those based in the US, Singapore and Thailand.

Overall, 42% of investors globally did state that investing sustainably was likely to lead to higher returns. Some 47% said they were attracted to investing sustainably due to its wider environmental impact.

Carolina Minio-Paluello, Schroders’ global head of product, solutions and quant, said: “It is exceptionally positive to see that many investors today believe that investing sustainably does not have to come at the expense of performance. People want their values reflected in the way they invest.

“It is our experience that investment performance and returns should not be mutually exclusive. The evidence is increasingly clear that investing sustainably can lead to better long-term outcomes.”

A surprisingly finding was that “just 44%” of European respondents said they invest in sustainable investment funds, as opposed to funds that don’t consider sustainability factors. This lags investors in the Americas (52%) and Asia (49%) and comes, said Schroders, despite the common consensus being that European investors are generally more likely to embrace sustainable investing.

Opinion was split among investors in terms of how asset managers should address challenges that arise from the fossil fuel industry. Just over a third (36%) said managers should withdraw investment from companies in these industries to limit their ability to grow. However, over a quarter (27%) said managers should remain invested to drive change.

Furthermore, investors said that the top three ‘behaviours’ companies should be most focused on were their social responsibility, attention to environmental issues and the treatment of their staff.

The findings are published in Schroders Global Investor Study 2020.


GREEN CAPITALI$M

LGIM to publish list of climate laggards

climate_change_investmentLegal & General Investment Management says it will hold a “far more extensive” number of companies to account over climate change. 

Climate ratings for over 1,000 companies in key sectors will be made publicly available under a ‘traffic light’ system on the fund manager’s website.

The selected companies are responsible for over 60% of the greenhouse gas emissions from listed companies, according to the UK-based fund manager. 

Businesses that fall short of LGIM’s minimum climate risk standards, such as by lacking comprehensive emissions disclosure, will be subject to a vote against and potential divestment from select funds.

Michelle Scrimgeour, LGIM’s CEO and member of UK Government’s COP26 Business Leaders Group, said: “As governments around the world are set to announce new and ambitious climate policies ahead of next year’s COP26 conference, investors must also step up.”

In a statement coinciding with the release of LGIM’s annual ‘Climate Impact Pledge’, the asset manager said it intends to “ratchet up” the stringency of both its standards and sanctions over time.


Asset managers call on companies to cut down on carbon emissions

carbon_emissions_investmentHigh carbon emitting companies have been called on by investment management firms to commit to a net zero future by setting science-based targets.

Over 1,800 companies responsible for 25% of global emissions – including Tesla and mining giant Rio Tinto – have been singled out and asked to set a 1.5°C carbon reduction target to achieve this goal.

Coordinated by non-profit sustainability action group CDP, the financial institutions calling for action include Amundi, Legal & General Investment Management, and Nikko Asset Management. Together, the group represents $20 trillion (€17 trillion) of assets. 

The carbon emitting companies in question represent 40% of MSCI’s flagship global equity index. Previous research by CDP has suggested that companies see $1 trillion at risk from climate change, putting investments in jeopardy.


Emily Kreps, global director of capital markets at CDP, said: “Climate change presents material risks to investments, and companies that are failing to set targets grounded in science risk losing out – and causing greater damage to the world economy.”

Amundi’s director of the institutional and corporate clients division and ESG, Jean-Jacques Barberis, added: “Limiting global warming requires collective response; corporate actions and investors’ mobilisation to decarbonise portfolios go hand-in-hand.”

While companies can set science-based targets at any point throughout the year, investors will be engaging with companies until May 2021, when the impact of this campaign will be evaluated.



Third of firms not engaging on climate change, report finds

Climate_changeMore than a third of asset managers are not engaging with the issue of climate change, a report has claimed.

Research conducted by the UK-based investment consultancy Redington found that more than a third (39%) of asset managers were, when asked, unable to provide an example of a climate change related engagement effort.

The research also found that less than two thirds (62%) of asset management firms have an ESG engagement policy in place.

In addition, despite three quarters (76%) of managers surveyed saying they consider climate related risks and opportunities only 60% could provide an example of when climate change factors have actually influenced their buying or selling decisions.

Nick Samuels, head of manager research at Redington, said the discrepancy highlights the fact that, despite engagement seemingly increasing, this is not yet translating into concrete and consistent portfolio decisions.

Samuels said: “Climate change is a widespread and global problem, impacting all sectors of the economy in one way or another.

“We would expect all our managers, regardless of asset class, to have at least one, if not several, examples of climate change related engagements with their portfolio companies."

The firm interviewed a total of 104 managers from across the world, representing over $10 trillion in combined assets under management.


Green finance for SMEs to offer “higher yields” for institutions

Green_energyAmundi is jointly backing a programme to help smaller and medium-sized businesses access green finance and says the debt investments involved will lead to higher yields for investors.

The Paris-based asset manager is partnering with the European Investment Bank (EIB), which issued the world’s first green bond in 2007.

Amundi says the partnership will enable smaller companies to access green finance in contrast to the growing green bond market, which has mainly developed by way of issuances from sovereign, quasi-sovereign and large corporate issuers.  

The Green Credit Continuum investment programme, as it is called, has three components:

  • The creation of a diversified fund that will invest in green high yield corporate bonds, green private debt and green securitised debt.
  • In parallel, a scientific committee of green finance experts will be formed to define and promote environmental guidelines for these three markets in line with international best practice and legislation derived from the European Commission action plan on financing sustainable growth.
  • A green deal network will be put in place to source deals and projects.

The goal of the agreement is to create several funds based on this model and to help establish market standards. It aims to raise €1 billion within three years, including a €60 million initial commitment by the EIB.

Ambroise Fayolle, EIB vice-president said a “significant financing gap persists and huge potential is still waiting to be tapped in some green debt segments”.

Amundi chief executive Yves Perrier, said: “[The programme] offers a particularly innovative investment solution to institutional investors wishing to help finance the energy transition and diversify their sources of yield in a low interest rate environment.”

He said the programme would combating global warming.

Amundi and the EIB said to meet its climate commitments under the Paris Agreement and finance the associated energy transition, Europe is missing an estimated €180 billion in financing a year until 2030. To reach this level of investment, green finance “must mobilise all of the debt capital markets”.


'Mercenary' hacker group runs rampant in Middle East, cybersecurity research shows



By Raphael Satter and Christopher Bing

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Saudi diplomats, Sikh separatists and Indian business executives have been among those targeted by a group of hired hackers, according to research published on Wednesday by software firm BlackBerry Corp.

The report https://www.blackberry.com/us/en/company/newsroom/press-releases/2020/blackberry-uncovers-massive-hack-for-hire-group-targeting-governments-businesses-human-rights-groups-and-influential-individuals on the group, known publicly as Bahamut, the name assigned to the mythical sea monster of Arab lore,*** highlights how cybersecurity researchers are increasingly finding evidence of mercenaries online.


BlackBerry's vice president of research, Eric Milam, said the diversity of Bahamut's activities was such that he assumed it was working for a range of different clients.

"There's too many different things going on across too many different ranges and too many different verticals that it would be a single state," Milam said ahead of the report's release.

In June, Reuters reported on how an obscure Indian IT firm called BellTroX https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN23G1GQ offered its hacking services to help clients spy on more than 10,000 email accounts over seven years, including targeting prominent American investors.

BlackBerry - which absorbed antivirus firm Cylance in 2019 - stitched together digital clues left by other researchers over the years to create a picture of a sophisticated group of hackers. BlackBerry also linked the group to mobile phone applications in the Apple and Google app stores. Those apps, which included a fitness tracker and password manager, may have helped the hackers track their targets, the report said.

A Google spokesman said all the apps in the Google Play Store mentioned in the report had been removed. Apple said two of the seven apps were no longer in its App Store and that it was not provided with enough information about the remaining programs to judge whether they were malicious.

Milam declined to comment on who he thought might be behind Bahamut, but he said he hoped the report would help to sharpen the focus on hackers-for-hire.

Taha Karim, the chief executive of Emirati cybersecurity company tephracore - who was not involved in BlackBerry's research but reviewed the report ahead of publication - said the findings were credible and "they found links that aren't obvious."

THE TARGETS

BlackBerry did not name any of Bahamut's targets directly, but researchers have previously publicly identified Middle Eastern human rights activists, Pakistani military officials, and Gulf Arab businessmen as being in the group's crosshairs. Reuters was also able to identify new targets by cross-referencing data published in BlackBerry's report with boobytrapped webpages preserved by urlscan.io, a cybersecurity tool.

One heavily targeted organization included the New York-based Sikhs for Justice, a separatist group that's campaigning for an independent homeland for Sikhs in India. Its founder, Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, said his campaign websites have been repeatedly hacked and his emails broken into. Others pursued by the hackers included: The United Arab Emirates' Ministry of Defense, its Supreme Council for National Security, and Shaima Gargash, the Emirates' No. 2 diplomat in Washington.

In an email, Gargash said the embassy had no comment.

Saudi officials were also targeted by the hackers. Cached phishing pages preserved by services such as urlscan and reviewed by Reuters showed that the cyber spies targeted Mawthouq, the Saudi government's email service, half a dozen Saudi government ministries, and the Saudi Center for International Strategic Partnerships, a Riyadh-based body aimed at helping coordinate the petrostate's foreign policy.

The Saudi Embassy in Washington declined comment.

The hackers pursued royals and business executives in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Qatar. In August 2019 they attempted to compromise an employee of major Indian energy conglomerate Reliance Industries around the time that the company was negotiating the sale of a stake in its oil-to-chemicals business to Saudi Aramco.

Reliance did not return repeated messages. Attempts to reach the hackers were unsuccessful.

(Reporting by Raphael Satter and Christopher Bing in Washington; editing by Grant McCool and Marguerita Choy)

*** Bahamut - Mythical Creature in Arabian Mythology | Mythology ...
mythology.net › mythical-creatures › bahamut
Oct 12, 2016 — In Arabic mythology, Bahamut is usually described as an ... Occasionally, he is given a more monstrous form, appearing as a sea-serpent with limbs and ... A variation of Bahamut appears in Hebrew legend, under the name Behemoth. ... and the Haggadah, expand upon Behemoth's lore by describing the ...


Credit Suisse Apologizes for Black Janitor Act at Chairman Party
Black performer dressed as janitor at chairman event last year
Former CEO Tidjane Thiam left the room, according to NYT

Photographer: Stefan Wermuth/Bloomberg

Credit Suisse Group AG apologized for “any offense” caused by a performer who dressed as a janitor at a party for the bank’s chairman last year, causing former Chief Executive Officer Tidjane Thiam to leave the room.

The New York Times on Saturday reported that chairman Urs Rohner held a party at a Zurich restaurant to celebrate his 60th birthday last November. Thiam left after a Black performer came onstage dressed as a janitor, and began to dance to music while sweeping the floor, the newspaper reported, adding that the festivities had a Studio 54 theme, with 1970s costumes.


Tidjane Thiam
Photographer: Stefan Wermuth/Bloomberg

“There was never any intention to cause offense, and we are sorry for any offense caused,” a bank spokesperson said on Wednesday. “This is a total mis-characterization of the evening.” Rohner, via the spokesperson, referred to the lender’s statement.

The incident has sparked a debate about racism within banking and in Switzerland as Credit Suisse seeks to move beyond one of the most damaging episodes in its recent history after it spied on former wealth management head Iqbal Khan, who was leaving for rival UBS Group AG. Last year’s scandal tainted the bank’s reputation, led to the ouster of Thiam after a power struggle, and rattled the usually reserved world of Swiss banking.

“Credit Suisse is strongly committed to equality, diversity and supporting all our employees,” the bank said in a statement. “Over the past year Credit Suisse has taken additional strides to show our commitment to under-represented groups within the firm, and is putting in place broader initiatives to further this. As a company, we are proud to be a geographically and culturally diverse group, and we strive to further strengthen this culture, which supports all our colleagues.”
A woman's inspiring journey from janitor to health care worker

By Mallika Kallingal, CNN Sat October 10, 2020


(CNN)Jaines Andrades started working at Baystate Medical in Springfield, Massachusetts, as a janitor. But she worked her way through nursing school, and now ten years later she has returned as a nurse practitioner.

"It's tough to be the person that cleans. If I had to go back and do it again, I would. It's so worth it," Andrades told CNN affiliate WBZ-TV.

In a Facebook post, Andrades wrote about her journey from hospital custodian to nurse practitioner and posted a picture of all three of her IDs.

She said her journey at the Springfield hospital started when she got a call for an interview. At the time she had been working at a fast food restaurant, according to WBZ-TV.

She said she always wanted to help people. "Even if it was cleaning, as long as I was near patient care I'd be able to observe things. I thought it was a good idea," she said.

Her favorite part of nursing is bringing relief and comfort to her patients. "I just really love the intimacy with people," Andrades told the CNN affiliate.

And now she has realized her dream. She became a Baystate nurse, and then a nurse practitioner in the very same place she used to clean.

"Nurses and providers, we get the credit more often but people in environmental and phlebotomy and dietary all of them have such a huge role. I couldn't do my job without them," Andrades said.

And she says she feels happy her story is inspiring others.

"I'm so appreciative and like in awe that my story can inspire people," Andrades told WBZ-TV. "I'm so glad. If I can inspire anyone, that in itself made the journey worth it."

Woman Becomes Nurse Practitioner at Same Hospital Where She Was Once a Custodian: 'Worth It!'


Over a 10-year period, Jaines Andrades worked her way up from janitor to registered nurse and now, nurse practitioner

By Joelle Goldstein  October 12, 2020


Share: The Inspiring Story of How One Woman Went From Custodian to Trauma Surgery Nurse Practitioner

A Massachusetts woman is showing the world the true meaning of perseverance after she worked her way up from being a custodian at a local hospital to now treating its patients as a nurse practitioner.

Ten years ago, Jaines Andrades started her career at Baystate Medical Center working in environmental services, where she cleaned up operating rooms as a janitor, Meredith Corporation station WGGB reported.

Today, instead of cleaning the operating rooms, she is one of the leaders inside them as a certified nurse practitioner in trauma surgery, according to the outlet.

"At one point, I dreamed of the position I have today," Andrades told WGGB of her incredible journey, which started when she was just 19 years old.

Jaines Andrades
BAYSTATE HEALTH

In 2014 — four years after Andrades began her career at Baystate as a custodian — the Springfield resident earned her nursing degree, WGGB reported.

RELATED: Former Security Guard Becomes Medical Student at Louisiana Hospital Where He Worked

She continued working in environmental services until an opportunity to work as a registered nurse arose.

"I stayed, actually, in environmental, despite being a nurse because I didn’t immediately get a nursing job at Baystate, so I wanted to keep my foot in the door," she explained to the outlet.


Jaines Andrades (L)
BAYSTATE HEALTH

Eventually, Andrades decided to go back to school to become a nurse practitioner (NP) and once she completed her degree, was offered a job at Baystate yet again.

"Once I start something, I have to see it through, so if I’m going to be a custodian and then be a nurse, it only makes sense to be a nurse practitioner there," she told WGGB of working at Baystate all these years.

RELATED: Man Graduates with Nursing Degree from University Where He Was Once a Janitor: 'I Never Gave Up'

On Sept. 28, Andrades reflected on the accomplishment by posting a photo of her three work badges on Facebook. Though they all have her name and photo on them, each one has her different job title and shows Andrades' career progression over the years.

"10 years of work but it was worth it! I’m a provider at the same place I use to clean," she captioned the post, which has been shared over 10,000 times and liked over 12,000 times.

Reflecting on her career, Andrades told WGGB that having such diverse experiences at the Springfield medical center has kept her humble while interacting with others.

"I remember those times where I saw interactions as a custodian to remind myself that everyone’s human," she explained. "Your academic success or your professional success, obviously, it deserves praise and you should be proud of that, but it doesn’t make you a better person."

"As a human being," she added to the outlet, "I’m still that girl who used to clean."


For more on Andrades' journey, tune into PEOPLE (the TV Show!) on Monday night.
https://people.com/human-interest/woman-becomes-nurse-practitioner-at-hospital-she-was-custodian/
PEOPLE (the TV Show!) is a half-hour daily TV show inspired by the brand's unique combination of the most popular celebrity and inspirational human-interest stories, including entertainment news, exclusive interviews, feature stories, beauty and style, true crime and more.  The show is hosted by Kay Adams and Lawrence K. Jackson with correspondents Jeremy Parsons and Sandra Vergara. You can also stream the show daily at 7 p.m. ET/4 p.m. PT on People.com, PeopleTV app (OTT) and PEOPLE’s Facebook, Twitter and YouTube accounts.

BOOK REVIEW:

War Communism? Corona, Climate, Chronic Emergency


Tuesday 13 October 2020, by Simon Butler  

Andreas Malm 
CORONA, CLIMATE, CHRONIC EMERGENCY: War Communism in the Twenty-First Century, Verso, London, 2020.

There appears to be a big difference between capitalist governments’ collective response to the Covid-19 pandemic and their response to the climate emergency. Covid has prompted rapid, draconian inroads on the functioning of many businesses and even entire industries. In country after country, large parts of the economy have been shuttered and production has been redirected to social needs, such as personal protective equipment, hand sanitizers and ventilators.

There are obvious differences between countries, but many governments appear to have made uncharacteristic decisions that put human life and welfare ahead of profit making.

In Corona, Climate, Chronic Emergency, Andreas Malm begins by asking why capitalist governments have seemingly been willing to pitch the world into recession to fight Covid, while they have been so resistant to calls to cut carbon pollution sharply. After all, Malm muses, “no champion of radical emissions cuts has ever asked people to submit to something as unpleasant as a lockdown.”

He offers several explanations for the seeming disparity. Unlike climate disruption, which is already hitting the global south first and hardest, Covid hit Western countries early on. Were Covid mainly confined to poorer countries it’s unlikely Western governments would have treated it as a global crisis. Covid also spread quickly, preventing capitalists from mounting a public relations campaign to defend their profits in the same way that the fossil fuel industry has financed climate change denial.

Another explanation for the difference is that capitalist states’ tough border restrictions and ‘war against the virus’ rhetoric fit neatly within conservative nationalist ideologies. The same cannot be said of radical action on climate change, which is internationalist by definition and requires the historically biggest polluters of the rich world to cut emissions the most.

Furthermore, while every oil or coal company, agribusiness giant and car-maker seeks to expand higher emissions is the business plan, Covid is not a direct product of the day-to-day functioning of the capitalist economy.

The state-led response to Covid is a sharp disruption to capital accumulation, but it is still a temporary measure. By contrast, climate action is forever, a serious response to climate change is a direct challenge to private property and the commodification of nature.
Global sickening

Malm argues that comparing the current Covid response with climate inaction is not comparing like with like. “The contrast between coronavirus vigilance and climate complacency is illusionary,” he says. Rather, “Covid-19 is one manifestation of a secular trend running parallel to the climate crises, a global sickening to match the global heating.”

For many years, scientists have warned about the threat posed by rising “zoonotic spillover” — the process by which a virus can leap to humans from another species. Their warnings of potential pandemics have been ignored.

Outbreaks of new infectious diseases have been on the rise since the 1940s, accelerating to unprecedented heights after the 1980s. Most result from zoonotic spillover. Along with Covid, which originated with bats, other modern diseases such as AIDS, Ebola, SARS, MERS and Zika also originated in animals.

Spillover is a higher risk today for several reasons. A major cause is the huge disruptions and encroachments made on natural environments, such as deforestation and urbanization. This brings wild animals in closer contact with human populations than before.

“That strange new diseases should emerge from the wild is, in a manner of speaking, logical: beyond human dominion is where unknown pathogens reside. But that realm could be left in some peace. If it weren’t for the economy operated by humans constantly assailing the wild, encroaching upon it, tearing into it, chopping it up, destroying it with a zeal bordering on lust for extermination, these things wouldn’t happen. The pathogens would not come leaping towards us. They would be secure among their natural hosts. But when those hosts are cornered, stressed, expelled and killed, they have two options: go extinct or jump.”

The relentless commodification and caging of wild animals adds to the risk of zoonotic spillover. Modern livestock and aquaculture industries, which cram thousands of animals into confined spaces, are perfect breeding grounds for pathogens that can jump to humans.

Climate change itself is also disrupting animal populations. Warmer temperatures encourage them to migrate away from the equator, further increasing the chance of new interactions between animals and humans, and hence more zoonotic spillover.

Given this, Malm concludes that the response to Covid-19 has a lot in common with how capitalist states respond to other ecological problems — treating the symptoms while ignoring the causes.

“Ears have been as deaf to the science of spillover as to that of climate, if not more so. One might regard Covid-19 as the first boomerang from the sixth mass extinction to hit humanity in the forehead.”

The likelihood of similar, or even worse, pandemics coinciding with extreme climate change amount to a single “chronic emergency.”

Emergency and ‘war communism’

The final part of Malm’s book discusses the political responses and actions needed to truly address the root causes of this chronic emergency. Without decisive action we face a dangerous world of future pandemics colliding with immense ecological disasters. This means that the hope that gradual reforms will tame capitalism is less relevant than ever.

“Social democracy works on the assumption that time is on our side. But if catastrophe strikes, and if it is the status quo that produces it, then the reformist calendar is shredded.”

Malm also writes a chronic emergency obituary for anarchism, with its deep antagonism to the state. To get through the dire situation ahead and bring about the rapid changes needed, we will need state power on our side.

Nor is there any point holding on to dreams about “luxury communism” or vast material abundance under socialism. Even if we succeed in dismantling capitalism there’s no reason to think a society of lavishness and plenty will be possible on a planet impoverished by extreme climate heating and mass extinction.

Instead, the overriding priority is a project for dignified survival in a time of ominous emergency. Malm calls this project “ecological Leninism”, which he summarizes under three principles.

First, it “means turning the crises of symptoms into crises of the causes”, much like how Lenin urged the Bolsheviks to transform the outbreak of World War I into an opportunity to undermine the system that produced such horrible wars.

Second, “speed [is] a paramount virtue.” Given the state of the crisis, delay and half-measures are equal to welcoming disaster.

Third, ecological Leninism “leaps at any opportunity to wrest the state in this direction, break with business-as-usual as sharply as required and subject the regions of the economy working towards catastrophe to direct public control”.

The transition to a sustainable, ecologically sane society won’t look much like luxury communism. It will be more like “war communism” — a reference to the policies adopted by the Bolsheviks in early years of the Russian Revolution. In a time of civil war, facing near total economic collapse, a foreign blockade, and widespread famine, encircled by better armed and resourced enemies, the young worker’s state rapidly undertook widespread nationalisations of the economy. Against the odds, it survived the emergency and won the civil war.

Malm warns that his analogy is not to be taken literally. For instance, he says he no more endorses the most unsavoury aspects of War Communism than climate activists who use World War II analogies want to drop atomic weapons on Japan.

Instead, he is arguing for a planned emergency program of action, in which democratically-constituted state organizes and carries out the necessary steps to ensure human survival in a severely damaged planetary biosphere.

“Ecological war communism … means learning to live without fossil fuels in no time, breaking the resistance of dominant classes, transforming the economy for the duration, refusing to give up even if all the worst-case scenarios come true, rising out of the ruins with the force and the compromises required, organizing the transitional period of restoration, staying with the dilemma.”

Readers of Malm’s eloquent and important book need not agree that “war communism” is the best way to sum up the transitional measures needed to bring about an ecological society. I prefer plain ecosocialism myself — it carries a lot less baggage. But the great strength of Corona, Climate, Chronic Emergency is that it gets the origins and the scale of the cascading ecological crises we face exactly right. Compared with most other books that discuss the crisis, its solutions are more realistic because they are more radical.

As Malm concludes, the measures he proposes “are exactly as utopian as survival.”

Source Climate & Capitalism.

Attached documents
war-communism-corona-climate-chronic-emergency_a6842.pdf (PDF - 363.2 kb)
Extraction PDF [->article6842]

Ecology and the Environment
Intersecting crises and the impact in Britain
Global Fever
Fires ravage Brazil’s wetlands
The Fires Currently Raging in California, and Climate Change
South African movement adopts Climate Justice Charter
Covid-19 Pandemic
Capitalism Made Women of Color More Vulnerable to the COVID Recession
Situation of Garment Factory Workers in Katunayaka – COVID-19 Update
Pandemic, Polarization, and Resistance in the US
Opening Up the Schools?
The crisis triggered by the pandemic and the economic policy of the European Union








Right wing fuses anti-Semitism with 
anti-communism in its conspiracy theories

October 9, 2020 BY AMIAD HOROWITZ

A man with a sign reading "No cultural marxism" taunts a group of protesters rallying at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City with Black Lives Matter messages, Sept. 27, 2017. 'Cultural Marxism' has become the new code among anti-Semitic propagandists. | Trent Nelson / The Salt Lake Tribune via AP


It’s hard for anyone reading any reactionary publication to avoid the name George Soros. Many right-wingers claim that Soros, a billionaire Jewish businessman, is funding radical leftists. They claim that Soros pays Black Lives Matter protesters, and some say he helps coordinate leftist activities around the world. Of course, anyone who does the slightest bit of research can easily discover that these accusations are not true. Despite this, millions of Americans believe these lies and repeat them regularly. Why is this, and why is it so easy to convince so many people of something that is obviously not true? The answer is that this lie plays into the long history of the fusing of anti-communism with anti-Semitism that is ingrained in much of American right-wing thought.

From the moment Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published The Communist Manifesto in 1848, anti-communism has gone hand-in-hand with anti-Semitism. Many of Marx’s enemies (both on the right and the left) used his Jewish heritage to disparage his ideas and followers. However, the joining of anti-Semitism and anti-communism reached its zenith after the Russian Revolution and the rise of the Bolsheviks in 1917.
Fox News TV host Glenn Beck ran a series on his program in 2010 depicting billionaire Jewish businessman George Soros as a ‘puppet master’ who pulled the strings of the radical left and Democrats. The connection of anti-Semitism and anti-communism remains a staple of right-wing conspiracy theories. | via YouTube


By the start of the 20th century, the Russian Empire was the third largest empire in history. Its expansion had not only increased the landmass of the country, but also diversified the population of the empire. One of the largest minority groups now under the rule of the Tsar were the Jews, who were seen as second class at best, or as foreign and unwanted at worse. Russian Jews were subject to all kinds of abuse, both official and unofficial. There were laws restricting where Jews could live, and most infamously, they were subject to pogroms. Pogroms were repeated, large scale, violent attacks conducted by Russians against Jewish communities. These attacks were often incited by the anti-Semitic rhetoric of the authorities and the local churches. In the years leading up to 1917, thousands of Jews were murdered, even larger numbers injured and assaulted, and more still had their homes and possession destroyed.



After the October Revolution, Russia descended into Civil War. On the one side, there were the Bolshevik-led forces known as the Red Army. On the other side, there were various anti-Bolshevik groups, the largest being known as the White Army. The White Army was made up of monarchists, conservatives, and other reactionary, anti-revolutionary forces. Some of the elite in the White Army knew that they could use the existing, high levels of anti-Semitism to their advantage. To that end, they sought to merge anti-Semitism with anti-Bolshevism in order to increase their base.

In 1917, they published a pamphlet titled Jewish Bolshevism, which used traditional racist propaganda to vilify Jews and, by proxy, Communists. This was followed by the mass publication of the 1903 Protocols of the Elders of Zion, one of the most infamous publications of the 20th century. The Protocols were produced by the Tsarist secret police, claiming to prove a massive conspiracy by the Jewish people for world domination. The document was arguably the single most influential anti-Semitic publication in modern history, and it threw fuel onto the already raging fire that was the early 20th-century hatred of Jews.
Kornilov’s Shock Detachment, the White Army’s elite Shock Regiment during the Russian Civil War. | Wikimedia Commons

With the success of the Bolshevik-led working class revolution in Russia, reactionary powers and capitalists around the world began to fear communist uprisings in their own countries. In no country was this truer than the United States. The U.S. government began a campaign of persecution and slander against communists, initiating a period now known as “The First Red Scare.” As part of this effort, a White Army officer brought a copy of The Protocols from Russia to the U.S. for distribution. There were many versions, with some freely switching between the words “Jew” and “Bolshevik” in their translation.

Rabid Jew-hater and reactionary Henry Ford—of Ford Motor Co. fame—made it his personal mission to spread the joint anti-communist/anti-Semitic plot. The automobile mogul published excerpts from The Protocols, along with other anti-communist and anti-Jewish pieces, in his newspaper, The Dearborn Independent, as part of a series called, “The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem.” He also paid for the book’s translation into various languages and its printing for distribution around the world. Ford knew that he could appeal to people’s existing anti-Semitism to help stoke the fear of communism, and thereby protect his wealth and the wealth of the rest of the capitalist class.


Related Stories:

Democratic outreach to Jewish voters cites rising anti-Semitism under Trump

Republicans’ rabid anti-communism is a sign of their political weakness

Trump turns to neo-Nazi symbols to attract racist votes

Don’t ignore Trump fanning the flames of QAnon conspiracy theories

Without a doubt, the most infamous purveyors of the idea of “Jewish Bolshevism” was the German National Socialist (Nazi) Party. The idea that they would protect the “Aryan race” from “the Communist plot led by world Jewry” was at the center of their ideology and propaganda. In fact, exterminating the large Jewish population in Eastern Europe was a significant impetus for the invasion of the Soviet Union, as was the prospect of destroying the world’s only Communist-led state.  
Automobile titan Henry Ford funded the publication and distribution of massive amounts of anti-Semitic propaganda, including ‘The Protocols.’ Here is the front page of a 1920 edition of his ‘Dearborn Independent’ newspaper. | Wikimedia CommonsMany people imagine that the story of this fused hatred ends with the defeat of the Third Reich. Although the Nazis might have been the loudest propagandizers against “Jewish Bolshevism,” they were not the last. The right continued to push this conspiracy theory throughout the Cold War and into modern times. Right-wing authors such as Elizabeth Dilling and Frank L. Britton published works throughout the Cold War warning against a Jewish-Communist plan to take over America.

In the immediate post-war years, the most deplorable instance of this carefully composed fusion of right-wing fantasies came in the high-stakes atom bomb spy trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg who, despite worldwide appeals for clemency, were executed by the U.S. government on June 19, 1953, under a cloud of manufactured evidence and perjured testimony. Historians have pointed out that although most of the principals in the case were Jewish—the defendants, lawyers, judge—there was not a single Jew allowed to serve on the jury in the densely Jewish city of New York. A prominent advisor for the prosecution was lawyer Roy Cohn, who would later become a mentor to the young Donald Trump.

At the beginning of the 1990s, with the collapse of the USSR, the propagators of “Judeo- Bolshevism” needed to rebrand, and “cultural Marxism” became its stand-in. The meaning, however, remained the same. The so called “moderate right” in the USA would like people to believe that this problem only exists on its fringes, but many mainstream conservative and reactionary personalities openly and loudly promote this conspiracy theory.

Pat Buchanan, a prominent Republican and frequent presidential candidate throughout the 1970s, ’80s, and ’90s, has warned his followers against the “threat of cultural Marxism” and its “de-Christianizing of America.” Jordan Peterson, a pseudo-intellectual with a large right-wing following whose books have become best sellers in the U.S. and around the world, often rants about how “cultural Marxism” is destroying “Western Civilization.”

In 2017, at the so called “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Va., the marchers were recorded chanting “Jews will not replace us.” This is a direct reference to the idea of “Judeo-Bolshevism” in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The next day, President Trump referred to the marchers as “very fine people.” An idea does not get any more mainstream than when it is condoned by the president of the United States and head of the Republican Party.
In this photo taken Friday, Aug. 11, 2017, multiple white nationalist groups march with torches through the UVA campus in Charlottesville, Va., for the so-called ‘Unite the Right’ rally. Pitched as a protest against the radical left, the event prominently featured anti-Semitic and anti-communist themes, as well as the chanct ‘Jews will not replace us.’ One anti-fascist demonstrator, Heather Heyer, was murdered by a right-wing extremist the following day. | Mykal McEldowney / The Indianapolis Star via AP

This tactic of using pre-existing prejudices to build support for reactionary ideas has been very successful for the right. It has been so successful that they are expanding its use in the contemporary USA. While dog whistles like George Soros conspiracy theories are still used, the rhetoric about dangerous conspiracies between Marxists and racial minorities has been expanded to include and focus on the Black Lives Matter movement. BLM is constantly accused of being a radical left organization and Marxist, despite no evidence supporting this claim.

However, when Trump and his minions declare that BLM is a “Marxist group,” what he is doing is telling the many racists in the USA that they should be afraid of communism. At the same time, he is telling those who have already fallen for the red-scare tactics used over the past century to be afraid of BLM.

We now stand at the threshold of a new Cold War. The Trump administration is telling Americans to be afraid of communism, to be afraid of BLM, and to be afraid of China. This coincides with an emboldening of white supremacists across the USA, as well as the growing anti-racist movement to counter the right. We must be aware of the long-used tactic of the reactionary right that links minority groups with Communist thought and uses already-existing racism and bigotry to swell the ranks of anti-communists so that we are better prepared to both recognize it when we see it and combat it successfully.

As with all op-eds published by People’s World, this article reflects the opinions of its author.


ONTARIO
Workers, families hold protest for long-term care changes


Protests happened in 20 municipalities across Ontario

Julie Ireton · CBC News · Posted: Oct 08, 2020

Amy Ayers, a personal support worker at Almonte Country Haven, has worked throughout the pandemic, except for 14 days when she was sick with COVID-19 herself. (Francis Ferland/CBC)


Workers, unions and families gathered in Almonte, Ont., Thursday to call for immediate action by the Ford government to recruit staff and to improve working conditions in Ontario's long-term care homes.

Amy Ayers, a personal support worker at Almonte Country Haven who helped organize the day of action, has been at the long-term care facility throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and she even contracted the virus herself last spring.

"What we're doing here is coming out to make people who are unaware, aware of the crisis in long-term care centres," said Ayers.

Similar protests happened in more than 20 municipalities across Ontario.

Last spring, 72 of 82 residents, along with several staff members at Almonte Country Haven, tested positive for COVID-19. There are currently no cases in the long-term care home right now.

"I'm kind of coming out of my shell to speak up about the very damaged system and I hear a lot from coworkers, other PSWs ... they're afraid to come out, talk and stand up for what they believe is right. So I'm here to say, it's OK," said Ayers.
More needs to be done

The Ontario Health Coalition said the problems include understaffing, testing backlogs, sharing of four-person rooms, and insufficient infection control provisions. It's calling for a minimum daily standard of four hours of hands-on care for every resident.

Ayers says a lot of lessons have been learned, but more is needed across the care system.

"Number one would be more staffing per ratio of residents. With that we can give more quality of care," said Ayers. "Our elderly in long term care deserve better. They deserve to have top notch care. I can't stress that part enough."

Mae Wilson died of COVID-19 at Almonte Country Haven in the spring. (Submitted by Grant Wilson/Karen Thompson)

Mae Wilson lived at Almonte Country Haven for four years until she died of COVID-19 in May.

Her daughter, Karen Thompson, attended the day of action with her own signs and ideas about how the system can be improved now.

"We have to make the system better. We're going into the second wave, and we haven't really done a thing to make it better," said Thompson.
Patient ombudsman report

The day of action for long term care in Ontario happened on the same day as the province's patient ombudsman released a report.

The report details complaints about the safety of residents and staff and points to a crisis in the province's long-term care homes.

At Queen's Park on Thursday, Ontario's minister of long-term care, Merilee Fullerton was asked when changes in nursing homes can be expected.

"Staffing is a priority and our government is putting dollars behind that as we speak," said Fullerton in the legislature.

Karen Thompson's mom died of COVID-19 at Almonte Country Haven in the spring. She wants the system to change to better care for residents and staff. (Francis Ferland/CBC)

Karen Thompson hopes the system improves but she is worried that the government doesn't have an accurate account of what's going on inside many care homes because workers like Amy Ayers who speak out, are rare.

"Everyone clams up. I know a lot of the PSWs. They say everything is fine. They just can't talk. They're afraid to say stuff and then get in trouble later and get fired," said Thompson.
Legal Evictions Are Banned During The Pandemic, But ‘Invisible’ Evictions Are On The Rise

PART OF THE AFFORDABILITY DESK
Ally Schweitzer

DCIST | OCT 15

In D.C., evictions can’t be legally carried out during the pandemic. That didn’t help Denis Gallegos, whose landlord locked him out after he lost his job.
Tyrone Turner / WAMU

Denis Gallegos was two months behind on rent when he came home to find his locks had been changed.

The 34-year-old immigrant from Honduras was sharing a townhouse on Trenton Place SE with a young family, paying them $500 in cash each month for a small room. But when the pandemic hit in March, Gallegos lost his job at an upscale restaurant in Georgetown. He couldn’t afford to pay his rent. Neither could his roommates. The landlord started turning up at the house, insisting they pay or move out.

“I told him I couldn’t go because we were in the middle of a pandemic,” Gallegos says.

So the landlord called the authorities.

A police report shows that the landlord, Abiyot Hirui, called to report a burglary at the townhouse on June 17. Police entered the home late and found Gallegos inside. He told them he was a tenant, not a burglar, and that Hirui had been harassing him and his housemates for weeks. The police informed Hirui that evictions were a civil matter and there was nothing they could do, and left.

The following day, Gallegos says, he found the locks changed at the house. All of his belongings, including his HIV medication, were inside.

Gallegos says he slept at Casa Ruby, a safe space for at-risk LGBTQ youth, that night. On June 19, he filed a complaint for wrongful eviction in D.C. Superior Court. The judge ordered Hirui to give Gallegos keys to the house that same day. But Gallegos didn’t want to stay there, he says, and he soon moved out. He’s now crashing at a friend’s home in Northwest D.C., occupying a small room off the back of the house, not sure where he’ll go next. And he’s still shaken from his experience.

“It was a very ugly thing for me,” Gallegos tells WAMU/DCist through an interpreter. “I had nightmares. I couldn’t sleep. I couldn’t eat.”

Hirui did not respond to a request for comment, and his attorney referred WAMU/DCist to transcripts of his court hearings.



Denis Gallegos, who was locked out of his home in June, now lives in the back of a friend’s house in Northwest D.C.Tyrone Turner / WAMU

Lawyers who represent low-income renters in the D.C. area say they’re encountering more stories like this as the pandemic lurches into its seventh month.

The reason, they say, is the extreme economic uncertainty wrought by the crisis, combined with waning government assistance. The region’s jobless rate was close to 7% in August, unemployment benefits are running out, and as many as 715,000 renters in D.C., Maryland and Virginia are now at risk of eviction, according to the Aspen Institute. Some landlords have become desperate to replace out-of-work residents with new ones who can pay the rent. Consequently, more are evicting tenants without court orders, which is illegal.

There are restrictions on evictions during the pandemic. A sweeping national mandate from the Centers for Disease Control halts evictions for renters who earn less than $99,000 annually until the end of the year. In D.C., landlords are barred from evicting tenants for any reason while the city remains under a state of emergency. But these measures only prevent legal evictions. Landlords who choose to evict tenants illegally may not have gone through the courts anyway, advocates say.

Tracking, and stopping, illegal evictions can be challenging. Eviction filings in Northern Virginia were down 85% earlier this year compared to 2018, according to the RVA Eviction Lab, likely because the state’s high court issued a series of temporary eviction bans through September. But the data don’t capture evictions that take place outside the courts. A recent national survey of legal aid and civil rights attorneys showed widespread reports of illegal lockouts. Some advocates call these “invisible evictions” because they don’t leave a paper trail.

“We’re hearing stuff like this pretty steadily now,” says Elaine Poon, managing attorney at Legal Aid in Charlottesville. She says her office received three calls about illegal evictions just last week. “It’s kind of at an all-time high.”

In one case brought to Poon’s office, a renter reported that after their landlord lost his eviction case in court, he threatened to come to their house every day until they vacated the property. Poon suspects that many renters facing intimidation from their landlords simply move out to avoid a fight.

“What ends up happening is a lot of landlords get away with it,” she says.

Invisible evictions, Poon says, often affect immigrant households.

Renters facing intimidation from their landlords will often move to avoid a fight. “A lot of landlords get away with it,” says attorney Elaine Poon.

“They don’t always know what the law is here, and it might be that in [their] home country, there isn’t a lot of protection,” the attorney says. “They just assume, ‘I’d better get out of here.’”

Immigrants and other vulnerable renters are also affected by what’s known as self-eviction. That’s when a tenant moves out after receiving their first eviction notice, even though they’re not legally required to. Anecdotal evidence suggests self-eviction is on the rise during the pandemic, too. When Legal Aid staff recently visited the homes of Charlottesville residents slated for legal evictions, Poon says, they often found they had arrived too late.

“Almost every single time, a huge percentage of the people had moved out already,” she says.

The D.C. Council passed a temporary ban on issuing tenants eviction notices in September after hearing stories of self-eviction from advocates in the District. There’s no such ban in Virginia or Maryland. And the protections that do exist in those states aren’t perfect, advocates say. In order to seek protection under the CDC mandate, renters must sign a declaration affirming their lack of income and other details, and present it to their landlord. That requires a certain level of know-how, says Matt Hill, an attorney with the Public Justice Center in Baltimore.

“The biggest problem [with the CDC order] is that folks really don’t know about it,” Hill says. “We see a real lack of outreach and education.”

There’s also a significant loophole in landlord-tenant law that isn’t addressed by the mandate, Hill says. In Maryland and Virginia, landlords can simply terminate the leases of renters who fall behind on payments, then seek to evict them for overstaying their lease. (D.C.’s “just cause” eviction law bans this practice in the city.) Hill says these “holdover” tenants aren’t necessarily covered under the federal eviction order.

“There’s an open question, at least to some judges, about whether the CDC order applies in those cases,” Hill says. “The order isn’t drafted as clearly as we would like.”

Regardless of how renters get evicted, they often wind up in one of three different situations: They move in with friends or family, often in crowded living conditions; bounce between temporary accommodations or shelters; or wind up on the streets. None of these outcomes are ideal under normal circumstances, let alone during a pandemic, Hill says.

“We know that evictions lead to homelessness,” he says, “so we need to do everything we can to stop evictions.”

“Landlords don’t want to evict anyone, ever, let alone evict in the winter,” says Patrick Algyer with the Northern Virginia Apartment Association.

Landlords and their surrogates don’t necessarily disagree, says Patrick Algyer, executive director of the Northern Virginia Apartment Association. He says most property owners view eviction as a last resort.

“Landlords don’t want to evict anyone, ever, let alone evict in the winter,” Algyer says. “That’s just a horrible time.”

Still, Algyer says, landlords who have gone months without some or all of their rental revenue have to pay their mortgages, bills, maintenance expenses and taxes and without relief from local or national governments, they’re reliant on tenants, who are often struggling. Rent collection at professionally managed buildings across the country has fallen slightly during the health emergency, according to the National Multifamily Housing Council. Small, independent landlords have anecdotally reported losing rental income, too, though there’s no comprehensive data on rent collection at properties owned by “mom-and-pop” landlords.

Without income, some landlords — especially small ones — risk defaulting on their mortgages. To avoid foreclosure, some may decide to sell their properties to condo developers, taking housing out of the already strained rental market.

Like D.C. and Maryland, Virginia has committed millions of dollars to help struggling tenants pay their rent. But Algyer says Virginia’s $50 million rental assistance program — paid for by the CARES Act — hasn’t gone nearly far enough. At first, funds were only available to tenants, not landlords, so property owners had to wait for tenants to navigate the process of applying for, and receiving, payments. And because Virginians owed an estimated $169 million to $211 million in missed rent as of September, according to the RVA Eviction Lab, the assistance won’t reach everyone who needs it.

“As this continues to snowball, we really have to start providing the landlords with more relief to help them get through this,” Algyer says. “All we’re doing with this program is just kicking the can down the road.”

Landlords have lobbied Congress for economic relief, but they’ve hit a wall with Senate Republicans, many of whom oppose another coronavirus relief package. Real-estate interests have also mounted legal challenges to eviction bans on the state and federal level. In one high-profile federal suit, landlords argue that federal agencies lack the authority to waive state laws, and that the CDC eviction ban encroaches on private property rights. Advocacy organizations including the National Housing Law Project and Legal Services of Northern Virginia have urged the court to deny the motion.

But landlords and tenant advocates agree on at least one thing: the importance of large-scale rental assistance. Without it, they say, both landlords and renters will continue to struggle. Elaine Poon with Legal Aid in Charlottesville says renters temporarily saved by the CDC order could still become homeless once the mandate expires Dec. 31.

“They will be evicted New Year’s Day in the dead of winter, and I doubt the pandemic will be gone by then,” she says.

Denis Gallegos says his lockout experience was traumatic, but he thanks God that he had somewhere else to go.

“It’s not comfortable,” he says. “But I’m inside.”

Martin Austermuhle contributed Spanish language interpretation to this report.

This article is part of our 2020 contribution to the DC Homeless Crisis Reporting Project, in collaboration with other local newsrooms. The collective works will be published throughout the day at DCHomelessCrisis.press. You can also join the public Facebook group or follow #DCHomelessCrisis on Twitter to discuss further.

This story originally appeared on DCist.