It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Thursday, December 17, 2020
Two bears will be last animals to leave notorious zoo where Cher's elephant was rescued from Suzie and Bubaloo are in poor health but will soon have a new home
in Jordan.
Wednesday 16 December 2020
VIDEO Last animals to leave Islamabad zoo Two unwell bears are set to be removed from a zoo in Islamabad, Pakistan, and transported to a new home in Jordan.
Two unwell Himalayan brown bears will be the last animals to leave a notorious Pakistan zoo where "the world's loneliest elephant" was relocated from last month.
Suzie and Bubaloo were due to be airlifted from Marghazar Zoo in Islamabad.
The pair, who were badly neglected and kept separately in cramped conditions, are destined for a new home in Jordan.
They will be the final two animals to leave the zoo before it shuts down, following a ruling by the Islamabad High Court earlier this year.
Bubaloo is pictured inside his enclosure before flying to Jordan
Its squalid conditions sparked international outrage and caught the attention of singer Cher, who campaigned for the release of one of its residents - Kaavan - dubbed the world's loneliest elephant.
He is now settling into life in a sanctuary in Cambodia and has been filmed making contact with another elephant for the first time in eight years.
The two bears, both 17-years-old, will live in a sanctuary 3,330ft above sea level, where the cold and snowy conditions will be much closer to their natural habitat.
Dr Amir Khalil is pictured with Bubaloo the bear
They will be making their way there with the help of the Princess Alia Foundation, which is headed by the eldest daughter of the late King Hussein of Jordan.
Both are in poor health, with Bubaloo suffering an abscessed tooth and Suzie severely malnourished and missing all her teeth.
They used to work as "dancing bears", a practice common in Pakistan.
It sees bear cubs forced to stand on a hot plate with their paws protected only by Vaseline.
Kavaan the elephant left the same zoo for Cambodia last month
As they move their feet up and down to avoid the heat, it appears as though they are dancing.
Dr Amir Khalil, of Four Paws International, the global welfare group which has been caring for Marghazar's sick animals, said: "Sadly this continues until this day not just in Pakistan."
He said the pair have "serious health problems" but a "really wonderful nature".
Giving an update on Kavaan the elephant, he added: "The last video I saw Kaavan was taking food from the other female elephant.
"So I see really Kaavan is improving, (but) still a long trip for him to learn how to be a wild elephant."
Exxon is slashing workers and cutting costs as a hobbled oil market slowly recovers.
Here's everything we know.
Exxon CEO Darren Woods
Mark Schiefelbein/Getty; Skye Gould/Business Insider
Exxon is cutting costs and shrinking its workforce to stay afloat amid the worst oil downturn in a generation.
Here's everything we know about the cuts, from layoffs to reduced employee benefits.
Exxon Mobil, the nation's largest oil company, is losing money like never before. For the first time on record, the firm reported a loss three quarters in a row, from January through September. Analysts expect the company to lose money in the last three months of 2020, as well, according to Bloomberg data.
The obvious culprit is the coronavirus, which sapped demand for gasoline and jet fuel, causing the price of oil to plummet. But Exxon's market value began falling years before the pandemic, driven down in part by souring investor interest in fossil fuels.
Now down in market value more than 35% from the start of the year, Exxon is cutting costs. The result is big headcount reductions and other measures. Here's everything we know so far.
As Business Insider first reported, Exxon is slashing its global workforce by 15%, or 14,000 people, through 2022, relative to the company's headcount in 2019. The cuts include both contractors and employees.
Exxon also said it would lay off about 300 workers in Canada, starting in December, according to a public press release and an internal memo we obtained. The cuts are involuntary and most of them will take place by February of 2021, per the memo.
In addition, the company launched a voluntary redundancy program in Australia. It's not clear how many roles the program will impact.
Part of Exxon's approach to shrinking spending is sending jobs overseas to cheap centers of labor, we reported
Leaked audio from an internal meeting suggests not all employees placed in that category were, in fact, poor performers. That's why workers we spoke to called the change to the ranking system a layoff in disguise.
Exxon's performance-based cuts, initiated this summer, put as much as 10% of the company's workforce at risk of losing their jobs. You can find all the details of the ranking system and the April change here.
The government of Singapore is probing Exxon's labor practices after employees raised concerns about the company's performance-based cuts.
Other changes to curb spending
Exxon has said publicly that it began restructuring years before the pandemic drove down the price of oil, in part, to curb spending. In the last few months, however, the firm has made a handful of other changes to cut costs.
Earlier this year the company slashed its capital spending budget for 2020 by $10 billion, or 30%, down to $23 billion. Next year Exxon plans to spend even less.
What we're watching
The job cuts Exxon has announced so far were determined by workforce reviews Exxon has been carrying out on a country-by-country basis. The company could announce results from additional reviews soon.
While Exxon has curbed spending, the firm's "dividend sustainability remains challenged absent higher commodity prices," Morgan Stanley said in early November. We'll be keeping an eye on the dividend.
Exxon is placing a huge bet on Guyana, a small South American country with big oil resources. Expect continued focus there (partly because oil production is cheap).
The company will likely report fourth-quarter earnings in late January. Investors will be watching to see the scale of loss that it reports for the full year.
This story was originally published on November 6. We updated it to include new information on cuts to the firm's workforce and budget.
Ancient DNA continues to rewrite corn's 9,000-year
society-shaping history
Three 2,000-year-old cobs in Honduras show that people brought corn varieties back to Mesoamerica, possibly sparking productivity and shaping civilization
Some 9,000 years ago, corn as it is known today did not exist. Ancient peoples in southwestern Mexico encountered a wild grass called teosinte that offered ears smaller than a pinky finger with just a handful of stony kernels. But by stroke of genius or necessity, these Indigenous cultivators saw potential in the grain, adding it to their diets and putting it on a path to become a domesticated crop that now feeds billions.
Despite how vital corn, or maize, is to modern life, holes remain in the understanding of its journey through space and time. Now, a team co-led by Smithsonian researchers have used ancient DNA to fill in a few of those gaps.
A new study, which reveals details of corn's 9,000-year history, is a prime example of the ways that basic research into ancient DNA can yield insights into human history that would otherwise be inaccessible, said co-lead author Logan Kistler, curator of archaeogenomics and archaeobotany at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History.
"Domestication--the evolution of wild plants over thousands of years into the crops that feed us today--is arguably the most significant process in human history, and maize is one of the most important crops currently grown on the planet," Kistler said. "Understanding more about the evolutionary and cultural context of domestication can give us valuable information about this food we rely on so completely and its role in shaping civilization as we know it."
In the Dec. 14 issue of the journal the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Kistler and an international team of collaborators report the fully sequenced genomes of three roughly 2,000-year-old cobs from the El Gigante rock shelter in Honduras. Analysis of the three genomes reveals that these millennia-old varieties of Central American corn had South American ancestry and adds a new chapter in an emerging complex story of corn's domestication history.
"We show that humans were carrying maize from South America back towards the domestication center in Mexico," Kistler said. "This would have provided an infusion of genetic diversity that may have added resilience or increased productivity. It also underscores that the process of domestication and crop improvement doesn't just travel in a straight line."
Humans first started selectively breeding corn's wild ancestor teosinte around 9,000 years ago in Mexico, but partially domesticated varieties of the crop did not reach the rest of Central and South America for another 1,500 and 2,000 years, respectively.
For many years, conventional thinking among scholars had been that corn was first fully domesticated in Mexico and then spread elsewhere. However, after 5,000-year-old cobs found in Mexico turned out to only be partially domesticated, scholars began to reconsider whether this thinking captured the full story of corn's domestication.
Then, in a landmark 2018 study led by Kistler, scientists used ancient DNA to show that while teosinte's first steps toward domestication occurred in Mexico, the process had not yet been completed when people first began carrying it south to Central and South America. In each of these three regions, the process of domestication and crop improvement moved in parallel but at different speeds.
In an earlier effort to hone in on the details of this richer and more complex domestication story, a team of scientists including Kistler found that 4,300-year-old corn remnants from the Central American El Gigante rock shelter site had come from a fully domesticated and highly productive variety.
Surprised to find fully domesticated corn at El Gigante coexisting in a region not far from where partially domesticated corn had been discovered in Mexico, Kistler and project co-lead Douglas Kennett, an anthropologist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, teamed up to genetically determine where the El Gigante corn originated.
"El Gigante rock shelter is remarkable because it contains well-preserved plant remains spanning the last 11,000 years," Kennett said. "Over 10,000 maize remains, from whole cobs to fragmentary stalks and leaves, have been identified. Many of these remains date late in time, but through an extensive radiocarbon study, we were able to identify some remains dating to as early as 4,300 years ago."
They searched the archaeological strata surrounding the El Gigante rock shelter for cobs, kernels or anything else that might yield genetic material, and the team started working toward sequencing some of the site's 4,300-year-old corn samples--the oldest traces of the crop at El Gigante.
Over two years, the team attempted to sequence 30 samples, but only three were of suitable quality to sequence a full genome. The three viable samples all came from the more recent layer of the rock shelter's occupation--carbon dated between 2,300 and 1,900 years ago.
With the three sequenced genomes of corn from El Gigante, the researchers analyzed them against a panel of 121 published genomes of various corn varieties, including 12 derived from ancient corn cobs and seeds. The comparison revealed snippets of genetic overlap between the three samples from the Honduran rock shelter and corn varieties from South America.
"The genetic link to South America was subtle but consistent," Kistler said. "We repeated the analysis many times using different methods and sample compositions but kept getting the same result."
Kistler, Kennett and their co-authors at collaborating institutions, including Texas A&M University, Pennsylvania State University as well as the Francis Crick Institute and the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom, hypothesize that the reintroduction of these South American varieties to Central America may have jump-started the development of more productive hybrid varieties in the region.
Though the results only cover the El Gigante corn samples dated to around 2,000 years ago, Kistler said the shape and structure of the cobs from the roughly 4,000-year-old layer suggests they were nearly as productive as those he and his co-authors were able to sequence. To Kistler, this means the blockbuster crop improvement likely occurred before rather than during the intervening 2,000 years or so separating these archaeological layers at El Gigante. The team further hypothesizes that it was the introduction of the South American varieties of corn and their genes, likely at least 4,300 years ago, which may have increased the productivity of the region's corn and the prevalence of corn in the diet of the people who lived in the broader region, as discovered in a recent study led by Kennett.
"We are starting to see a confluence of data from multiple studies in Central America indicating that maize was becoming a more productive staple crop of increasing dietary importance between 4,700 and 4,000 years ago," Kennett said.
Taken together with Kennett's recent study, these latest findings suggest that something momentous may have occurred in the domestication of corn about 4,000 years ago in Central America, and that an injection of genetic diversity from South America may have had something to do with it. This proposed timing also lines up with the appearance of the first settled agricultural communities in Mesoamerica that ultimately gave rise to great civilizations in the Americas, the Olmec, Maya, Teotihuacan and the Aztec, though Kistler hastened to point out this idea is still relegated to speculation.
"We can't wait to dig into the details of what exactly happened around the 4,000-year mark," Kistler said. "There are so many archaeological samples of maize which haven't been analyzed genetically. If we started testing more of these samples, we could start to answer these lingering questions about how important this reintroduction of South American varieties was."
###
Funding and support for this research were provided by the Smithsonian, National Science Foundation, Pennsylvania State University and the Francis Crick Institute.
An Assortment of Corn Cobs of Varying Ages Found at the El Gigante Rock Shelter Site in Honduras (IMAGE)
Though red squirrels are a solitary and territorial species, a 22-year study of these squirrels in the Yukon suggests that they have a higher chance of survival and a greater number of offspring when living near the same neighbors year after year. Surprisingly, the findings--appearing December 17 in the journal Current Biology--show that it didn't matter whether the squirrels' neighbors were related to them; these fitness benefits instead depended on familiarity, or the length of time the same squirrels lived next to each other. These benefits were even more pronounced in older squirrels, whom the data suggested could sharply offset the effects of aging by maintaining all of their neighbors from one year to the next.
"Red squirrels live on their individual territory, and they rarely come into physical contact with one another, but given the value of familiar neighbors, our study raises this really interesting possibility that they might cooperate with their competitors," says first author Erin Siracusa, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Exeter, who conducted this research as a doctoral candidate at the University of Guelph. "What this cooperation looks like, whether it's sharing of food resources, or actively alarm-calling to warn their neighbors of predators, or potentially even forming coalitions to protect the neighboring territories from usurpers, we don't know. But I would argue based on our findings that despite their solitary nature, red squirrels do engage in social interactions and can have important social relationships."
While it's known that social relationships play a key role for animals that live in groups, Siracusa was interested in learning how social relationships affect solitary, territorial species--who rarely physically interact with their own kind. Through the Kluane Red Squirrel Project, Siracusa and her colleagues from the University of Guelph (Andrew G. McAdam), the University of Alberta (Stan Boutin), the University of Saskatchewan (Jeffrey E. Lane), and the University of Michigan (Ben Dantzer) followed 1,009 individuals over 22 years. Each summer, every squirrel was given colored ear tags so researchers could record who lived where and who shared territory boundaries.
Siracusa had previously observed that red squirrels with stable social relationships--established in part through defensive calls known as "rattles" that the squirrels make to identify themselves--were less likely to intrude on each other's territories and pilfer each other's cache. "Once they live next to each other long enough to agree on these territory boundaries, they sort of enter into this gentleman's agreement, saying, 'Okay, we've established these territory boundaries. We know where they are. We're not going to waste our time and energy fighting over these boundaries anymore,'" she says. This reduced aggression in familiar neighbors, known as the "dear enemy" phenomenon, has been established in many species previously, but researchers haven't been able to easily tie the phenomenon to a fitness advantage.
CAPTION
This photo shows 25 day old red squirrel pups.
In this project, Siracusa and her team set out to discover whether there were any survival and reproduction benefits for squirrels who lived near their blood relatives or lived near non-related squirrels over a number of years. What they found was that living near relatives didn't provide any biological benefits--which was surprising, since animals that share the same genes are generally more likely to act altruistically toward one another. But they did find that regardless of relatedness, the longer squirrels lived with each other, the more likely they were to survive into the next year and produce more offspring.
The benefits of this familiarity among older squirrels were even more pronounced. "The benefits of familiarity were strong enough to completely offset the negative effects of aging," Siracusa says. "For example, for a four-year-old red squirrel that ages by one year, their survival probability decreases from 68% to 59%. But if that same squirrel that ages one year also maintains all of their neighbors, that probability of survival actually increases from 68% to 74%." However, she notes that only a small percentage of squirrels maintain their neighbors from one year to the next, so not all squirrels experience the benefits of familiarity in old age.
To make sure their results reflected the effects of familiarity among neighbors rather than localized areas with a particularly good habitat or low risk of predators, Siracusa and her team tested for spatial correlation in survival and reproductive success and found that it was rare and inconsistent.
More broadly, she suggests that these findings might help us better understand the evolution of territorial systems. They might help explain territorial behaviors such as migratory species returning to the same place year after year, sedentary species maintaining relatively stable territories or home ranges throughout their lifetime, and animal mothers only rarely giving up their territory for the sake of their offspring--all of which could relate to animals not wanting to renegotiate social relationships. "In order for territorial systems to arise, the benefit of being territorial has to outweigh the costs of defending those resources, so it's not surprising that we should see the evolution of a mechanism that works to minimize those costs of territoriality," says Siracusa.
"At the risk of waxing poetic about squirrels," she says, "I think there is a sort of interesting lesson here that red squirrels can teach us about the value of social relationships. Red squirrels don't like their neighbors. They're in constant competition with them for food and mates and resources. And yet, they have to get along to survive. In the world right now, we're seeing a lot of strife and division, but perhaps this is a lesson worth bearing in mind: red squirrels need their neighbors, and maybe we do too."
This audio demonstrates squirrel rattles - individually unique vocalizations that red squirrels use to communicate with their neighbors and maintain territory boundaries.
###
The researchers are very grateful to the Champagne and Aishihik First Nations on whose land this work was conducted. Without their past and ongoing support and willingness to share their land with the team, none of this long-term research would have been possible.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation, Discovery Grants and Northern Research Supplements from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada as well as funding from the University of Michigan, and Grants-in-Aid of research from the American Society of Mammalogists and the Arctic Institute of North America.
Current Biology (@CurrentBiology), published by Cell Press, is a bimonthly journal that features papers across all areas of biology. Current Biology strives to foster communication across fields of biology, both by publishing important findings of general interest and through highly accessible front matter for non-specialists. Visit: http://www.cell.com/current-biology. To receive Cell Press media alerts, contact press@cell.com.
Living beside familiar neighbours boosts a squirrel's chances of survival and successful breeding, new research shows.
The study measured year-to-year survival of North American red squirrels - and found keeping the same neighbours was so beneficial that it outweighed the negative effects of growing a year older.
However, living near genetic relatives did not improve survival rates.
The research - part of the Kluane Red Squirrel Project - used 22 years of data on squirrels in Yukon, Canada, within the traditional territory of the Champagne and Aishihik First Nations.
"These squirrels are solitary - each defending a territory with a 'midden' (food stash) at the centre - so we might assume they don't cooperate," said lead author Dr Erin Siracusa, of the Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour at the University of Exeter.
"However, our findings suggest that - far from breeding contempt - familiarity with neighbours is mutually beneficial.
"Defending a territory is costly - it uses both energy and time that could be spent gathering food or raising pups.
"It may be that, after a certain time living next to one another, squirrels reach a sort of 'agreement' on boundaries, reducing the need for aggression.
"Competition is the rule in nature, but the benefits identified here might explain the evolution of cooperation even among adversarial neighbours."
The study looked at the "neighbourhood" within 130 metres of a central territory, examining both "kinship" (how closely related the squirrels were) and "familiarity" (how long individual squirrels occupied adjacent territories).
Researchers also studied survival rates and breeding success - for males this was measured by number of pups sired, and for females it meant pups surviving their first winter.
The team were surprised to find the benefits of familiar neighbours outweighed the effects of ageing.
Ageing alone reduced annual survival rates from 68% (age four) to 59% (age five).
However, squirrels that maintained all their neighbours had a 74% chance of surviving a year from age five.
"Although we don't have evidence of direct cooperation among familiar neighbours - such as working together to fight off an intruder - it's clear that neither benefits if their neighbours die," Dr Siracusa said.
"Whatever the nature of their interactions, our study shows that even solitary species have important social relationships."
Dr Siracusa said the lack of evidence in the study for kinship being beneficial doesn't necessarily mean related individuals do not cooperate.
"Genetic relatedness in the neighbourhoods we studied was relatively low, and it's possible that kin might be important at a smaller scale than the 130m radius we used," she said.
"Other studies have found that related squirrels are less likely to rattle (an aggressive sound) at each other, and kin will sometimes share a nest to survive the winter."
###
The Kluane Red Squirrel Project was started at the University of Alberta and has been led by researchers at the University of Alberta, University of Guelph, University of Michigan and University of Saskatchewan.
Funders included the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the National Science Foundation, the American Society of Mammalogists and the Arctic Institute of North America.
The study, published in the journal Current Biology, is entitled: "Familiar neighbors, but not relatives, enhance fitness in a territorial mammal."