Friday, March 26, 2021

New study finds birds give people as much happiness as money

It’s the little things — or animals, in this case.

By Anagha Srikanth | March 24, 2021

Story at a glance

Researchers have found that higher incomes may improve people’s day-to-day well-being.

A new study suggests that biological diversity, especially of birds, can increase life satisfaction just as much as income.

During the coronavirus pandemic, nature has emerged as an escape from quarantine and social isolation.


In our pursuit of that elusive thing called happiness, scientists can offer few findings. One is that, contrary to popular belief, money can actually buy happiness. Another, more recent, is that so can birds.

"Europeans are particularly satisfied with their lives if their immediate surroundings host a high species diversity," said the lead author of a recent study published in Science Daily. Joel Methorst, a doctoral researcher at the Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, the iDiv, and the Goethe University in Frankfurt, explained that, "according to our findings, the happiest Europeans are those who can experience numerous different bird species in their daily life, or who live in near-natural surroundings that are home to many species."

The social isolation necessitated by the coronavirus pandemic has pushed many people to escape into the outdoors and reconnect with nature. Research suggests that spending more time in nature and with animals can help people relax and even lessen physical and mental stress.

And the more birds, the better, according to the study, which analyzed data from the "2012 European quality of Life Survey" on life satisfaction in more than 26,000 adults from 26 European countries. A 10 percent increase in the number of bird species in peoples' surroundings increased their life satisfaction as much as an extra 10 percent in the bank, the study found.

"We also examined the socio-economic data of the people that were surveyed, and, much to our surprise, we found that avian diversity is as important for their life satisfaction as is their income," Katrin Böhning-Gaese, director of the Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, professor at the Goethe University in Frankfurt am Main, and member of the iDiv, said in the article.


Climate change, however, is threatening many species’ habitats and the authors pointed to studies of avian species in agricultural landscapes in Europe that show declining biological diversity.

"This poses the risk that human well-being will also suffer from an impoverished nature. Nature conservation therefore not only ensures our material basis of life, but it also constitutes an investment in the well-being of us all," said Methorst.

Published on Mar 24, 2021
Asian Americans faced biggest rise in online hate in 2020, survey finds

BY ARIS FOLLEY - 03/24/21 /THE HILL

© Getty Images

Asian Americans experienced the biggest rise in severe online hate and harassment in the past year in comparison to other groups, a new survey released by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) found.

According to the survey, which was released on Wednesday, 17 percent of Asian Americans polled said they experienced sexual harassment, stalking, physical threats, swatting, doxing or sustained harassment over the past year — a 6 percent from those who said the same the prior year.

Half of Asian American respondents who said they were harassed also said they were harassed due to their race or ethnicity.


The new data comes despite recent efforts made by social media companies to combat hate speech, and as the nation has seen a surge in anti-Asian attacks reported since the coronavirus pandemic took hold in the United States a year ago.

Last week, lawmakers raised alarm over the spike in such attacks in the wake of a shooting spree in Atlanta that left eight people dead, including six Asian women.

In the aftermath of the shooting, a few Democratic lawmakers, including Rep. Grace Meng (D-N.Y.), called out former President Trump in particular for using terms like “Chinese virus” and “Kung flu” to refer to the coronavirus, saying the charged rhetoric helped contribute to a rise in anti-Asian attacks.

In its recent report, the ADL said that the rise in physical violence against Asian-Americans in the nation was “whipped up in large part by bigotry and conspiracy theories that grew online, fanned by national leaders,” including what it referred to as Trump’s “incendiary rhetoric blaming China for the pandemic” and his use of the controversial terms for the coronavirus.

The ADL also said the survey found “a sharp rise in online harassment of African-Americans based on their race, from 42 percent attributing their harassment to their race last year to 59 percent in this year’s survey.”


On Facebook alone, the organization said “derogatory posts against African-Americans quadrupled” in the wake of the fatal police killing of George Floyd in May, which sparked months of continued protests against police brutality and racial injustice.

“They stayed elevated until September, when the pace of protests slowed,” the organization said of the posts.

The survey included troubling findings for other groups as well.

The survey showed that 64 percent of LGBTQ-identifying respondents reported overall harassment this past year, making it the third in the row the bloc has reported higher rates of overall harassment than any other demographic, the organization said.

Thirty-six percent of Jewish respondents reported experiencing online harassment in the survey, compared to 20 percent from the previous year. Thirty-six percent of Muslim respondents also reported experiencing severe harassment online this past year.


Forty-one percent of Americans overall reported experiencing some form of online hate and harassment in the new survey. More than a quarter of respondents that reported experiencing harassment said they were targeted due to their race or ethnicity.

Jonathan A. Greenblatt, CEO of the organization, said in a statement that the survey “shows that even as technology companies insist that they are taking unprecedented steps to moderate hateful content on their social media platforms, the user experience hasn’t changed all that much.”

“Americans of many different backgrounds continue to experience online hate and harassment at levels that are totally unacceptable,” Greenbaldt said. “And not surprisingly, after a year where national figures including the president himself routinely scapegoated China and Chinese people for spreading the coronavirus, Asian-Americans experienced heightened levels of harassment online, just as they did offline.”

An overwhelming majority of respondents said they think social media platforms need to step up their actions to combat online hate.

In conjunction with the survey’s release, the ADL said it is also announcing an effort, dubbed the REPAIR Plan, to “hold platforms and individual perpetrators accountable for enabling online hate and extremism.”

The ADL said the survey was conducted by YouGov online between Jan. 7-15, 2021, and polled 2,251 individuals. The organization said the results were weighted and “are representative of all Americans 18 and older.” It said the survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.1 percentage points.

The organization added that it also “included oversamples of respondents who identified as Jewish, Muslim, African-American, Asian-American, Hispanic or Latino, and LGBTQ+” in the survey in “an effort to understand the experiences of individuals who may be especially targeted because of their group identity.”id it is also announcing an effort, dubbed the REPAIR Plan, to “hold platforms and individual perpetrators accountable for enabling online hate and extremism.”

The ADL said the survey was conducted by YouGov online between Jan. 7-15, 2021, and polled 2,251 individuals. The organization said the results were weighted and “are representative of all Americans 18 and older.” It said the survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.1 percentage points.

The organization added that it also “included oversamples of respondents who identified as Jewish, Muslim, African-American, Asian-American, Hispanic or Latino, and LGBTQ+” in the survey in “an effort to understand the experiences of individuals who may be especially targeted because of their group identity.”
Warren presses Yellen to ramp up BlackRock oversight

BY SYLVAN LANE / THE HILL / - 03/24/21 

© Greg Nash


Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) pushed Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on Wednesday to force investment firm BlackRock into tougher federal oversight under the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law.

During a Senate Banking Committee hearing, Warren urged Yellen — the former chair of the Federal Reserve — to put the massive asset manager under strict supervision before the next time financial markets buckle.

“I understand that when the stock market is going up, it is easy to ignore risks that can be building up in the system. That was the mindset of the regulators that led up to the 2008 crash, and that is how taxpayers ended up on the hook for a $700 billion bailout of the giant banks,” Warren said.


“When the party is going strong, it's the job of the regulators to take away the punch bowl,” she added.

Under Dodd-Frank, an interagency group of financial regulators chaired by Yellen called the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) can designate firms as “systemically important financial institutions” (SIFIs) if it determines that the company’s collapse could trigger a broader financial crisis.

Put simply, SIFIs are banks and financial firms that the U.S. government considers “too big to fail.” SIFIs are subject to Fed stress tests and must develop plans for how they could be disassembled without causing a crisis if the firm is on the verge of collapse.

While U.S banks with more than $250 billion in assets are automatically considered SIFIs, Warren is among many Democrats and Wall Street skeptics in favor of applying the designation to BlackRock and other major financial firms.

BlackRock is the world’s largest nonbank investment company and manages nearly $9 trillion in assets — more than the individual gross domestic product of every single country except the U.S. and China.


“Does, potentially, a $9 trillion investment company pose some risk to the American economy if it should fail?” Warren asked Yellen, arguing in favor of BlackRock’s systemic importance.

Yellen, however, said that FSOC would be more likely to focus on specific activities instead of the size of firms.

She said that while asset managers face risks if sharp withdrawals from mutual funds cause fire sales across financial markets, “it’s not obvious to me that designation is the correct tool” to address those risks.

Warren countered that the point of SIFI designation was to give regulators the ability to crack down on certain activities with greater authority over and visibility into large firms.

“Designation is what is what gives the Fed its increased oversight power,” Warren said.


In a statement, BlackRock said that while it supports "financial regulatory reform that increases transparency, protects investors and facilitates responsible growth," the firm did not require special supervision.

"The past two administrations in the US, and numerous global regulators, have studied our industry for a decade and concluded that asset managers should be regulated differently from banks, with the primary focus being on the industry’s products and services," said BlackRock.

The debate between Warren and Yellen — both ardent Dodd-Frank supporters — is one of the earliest instances of Democratic lawmakers pushing the Biden administration to be more aggressive on financial regulation.

Progressives have largely been pleased with Biden’s picks for key financial posts, including several that were aides to Warren. Deputy Treasury Secretary nominee Wally Adeyemo and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director nominee Rohit Chopra were both early officials at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau under Warren, and National Economic Council Deputy Director Bharat Ramamurti was a senior policy advisor for Warren in the Senate.

Even so, Warren and other progressive leaders have pledged to push the Biden administration to crack down on misconduct in the financial sector, tighten protections for consumers and push firms toward stronger climate change and diversity positions.

Updated at 3:06 p.m.
USA
Students of color more likely to be learning virtually during pandemic: survey

BY CELINE CASTRONUOVO - 03/24/21 

© Getty Images

Students of color are more likely to be engaged in virtual learning this year as more schools reopen for in-person classes, according to data released Wednesday by the Department of Education.

The survey, the first in the department's series of national studies on learning during the coronavirus pandemic, measured attendance and method of instruction among fourth and eighth graders nationwide as of January into early February.

At the time, about 68 percent of Asian students were only learning remotely, as well as 58 percent of Black students and 56 percent of Hispanic students.


Comparatively, just 27 percent of white students were receiving all-virtual instruction.

The data, collected by Education Department’s research and evaluation arm, the Institute of Education Sciences, indicated that about 23 percent of white students were learning in some sort of “hybrid” setting in which they were attending at least a portion of classes in person, with just 10 percent of Hispanic students, 14 percent of Black students and 16 percent of Asian students doing the same.

While the survey released Wednesday did not specify whether enrollment in virtual versus in-person learning was due to available offerings or personal decisions by parents, the Education Department reported that among the schools surveyed, 77 percent were offering hybrid or full-time in-person learning as of January.

The report is the first major attempt at data collection since the coronavirus pandemic forced schools across the country to close amid lockdown orders and safety restrictions.

The Education Department created the survey in response to one of President Biden’s first-day executive actions, with monthly findings expected through at least July. The reports are expected to determine the long-term impacts of the pandemic on learning, including identifying inequalities.


The first report came the same day Education Secretary Miguel Cardona told NBC’s “Today” that he anticipates all U.S. schools will be able open for in-person learning by the fall.

He added that he will first focus “on getting as many now in the spring.”

"I think if we continue with mitigation strategies that we know work and we utilize the American Rescue Plan funding to put in those safeguards that are needed to provide safe environments for our students, we can really continue to make the progress that we're making to get students [back in school] in the spring,” he said.

However, the push to reopen schools has prompted concerns from teachers unions and minority groups.

On Tuesday, the nation’s second-largest teachers union, the American Federation of Teachers, questioned the Biden administration’s decision to reduce the recommended distance between students in a classroom from 6 feet to 3 feet, saying that they were “not convinced that the evidence supports changing physical distancing requirements at this time.”

Additionally, a Census Bureau report released Monday found that homeschooling, separate from virtual learning, doubled during the pandemic, with a significant increase measured among the Black community from 3.3 percent choosing homeschooling to 16.1 percent.
Newsom picks Filipino American assemblyman for California attorney general

BY REID WILSON - 03/24/21 - THE HILL

© Facebook: Rob Bonta

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) will tap a longtime assemblyman from Oakland to replace Xavier Becerra as the state's next attorney general, he said Wednesday, days after Becerra resigned to become President Biden’s secretary of Health and Human Services.

Assemblyman Rob Bonta (D), long seen as a front-runner for the post, has held a seat in the Assembly since 2012. He is the first Filipino American to serve in California’s legislature, and he would become the first Filipino American attorney general in the state's history.

Bonta will need to be confirmed by the Assembly and the state Senate, though with overwhelming Democratic majorities in both chambers, those votes are likely to be all but ceremonial.

In a tweet announcing his decision, Newsom highlighted Bonta’s heritage at a moment when Asian American representation in politics has been forced into the spotlight amid a rising tide of anti-Asian hate that has emerged since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic.

Last week, eight people were murdered in Atlanta-area spas in an assault that apparently targeted Asian women.

“In this moment of sickening attacks on AAPI [Asian American and Pacific Islander] Californians, there’s no one better to defend CA values,” Newsom wrote on Twitter.

Bonta, 48, was born in Quezon City, Philippines. He has spent his time in Sacramento backing criminal justice reform bills. He co-authored a bill to eliminate cash bail for suspects awaiting trial. In 2019, Newsom signed Bonta’s bill to eliminate private prisons and detention centers.

“I became a lawyer because I saw the law as the best way to make a positive difference for the most people, and it would be an honor of a lifetime to serve as the attorney for the people of this great state,” Bonta said in a statement.
Overlooked detail in border debate: The legal right to seek asylum in the USA


BY GEOFFREY ALAN BOYCE, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — THE HILL - 3/25/2021
© Getty Images

Much hay is being made in the national media about the large number of migrant children and families crossing the southern border to seek safety and asylum in the United States. Multiple debates have coalesced around whether this increase in asylum-seekers represents a response to President Biden’s election and his pledge to reverse some Trump-era border policies, and/or whether it is accurate or appropriate to even describe this current increase as a “crisis” in the first place.

Overlooked in much of this debate is a critical but under-appreciated detail: that those seeking asylum in the United States have a right to do so under U.S. and international law. Those who petition for asylum after crossing the border irregularly are not fundamentally in violation the law – they are, rather, attempting to appeal to the law for protection, by utilizing those processes that are available to them.

One reason why this important detail is mostly overlooked is the steady expansion of deterrence strategy and its application under the Obama and Trump presidencies. Although it has antecedents in the origins of the country’s immigration detention system, prior to 2014, this strategy had principally been applied to those attempting unlawful and clandestine border crossing. However, after an increase that year in the arrival of unaccompanied minors, the government began to apply this strategy to asylum seekers as well. This process began in earnest with President Obama’s implementation of family detention and a high-bond policy for asylum-seekers. This policy was expanded further by President Trump’s implementation of metering (which dramatically slowed the number of individuals who could petition for asylum on any given day), the policy of family separation and the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), popularly known as the “remain in Mexico” policy. MPP caused tens of thousands of asylum seekers to remain stranded in squalid and dangerous conditions in Mexico while awaiting court hearings in the United States.


Originating among 18th century criminologists (and famously applied to cold-war era U.S. nuclear strategy) the logic of deterrence relies on the assumption that as individuals we make calculative behavioral choices by continuously monitoring our environment for information about risk and reward.

Following this logic and applying it to asylum-seekers requires, first, having a belief that appeal to existing asylum law is somehow illegitimate, and ought to be discouraged. Second, in order to be successful, it also requires that the risks, hardship and suffering that asylum-seekers are compelled to confront in the course of this appeal come to appear even more severe than those circumstances of violence, danger and persecution that a person may be fleeing in the first place. Such a policy approach is replete with moral hazard, and during the Trump era an overwhelming number of Americans rightfully rejected the extreme forms of official cruelty that resulted.

Arizona governor says Harris 'worst possible choice' to oversee border
Why is Biden stalling refugee resettlement?

Yet, this logic of deterrence still appears to color much of the narrative surrounding contemporary events along the border - such as Sen. Lindsey Graham’s (R-S.C.) assertion that an increase in the number of asylum seekers indicates that the Biden administration is somehow “losing control” of the border; or Rep. Michael Guest’s (R-Miss.) assertion in The Hill that Biden’s relatively minor actions on border policy reflect an “open borders” agenda that is incentivizing human trafficking; or an argument from Tim Kane at the Hoover Institution that these policy changes are really the critical factor “encouraging” asylum-seekers to leave everything behind and to seek refuge in the United States.

These kinds of arguments and the assumptions behind them present a moral and political trap. To break free of this trap, the Biden administration ought to recognize its obligations to treat with dignity and compassion those attempting to obtain international protection from violence and persecution, by allowing such individuals to access those legal mechanisms and processes already established under the law. This would require not only expanding the government’s capacity to quickly and humanely process children and families at the border, but also ending the practice of metering and the use of Title 42 public health exemptions, so that all persons seeking asylum protection can lawfully do so in a safe, rapid and orderly manner at an established port of entry.

Geoffrey Alan Boyce, Ph.D., is academic director of the Earlham College Border Studies Program based in Tucson, Arizona.
USA
After 50-year stalemate, it's time to pass federal LGBTQ nondiscrimination law

BY CLIFFORD ROSKY AND TROY WILLIAMS, OPINION CONTRIBUTORS — 03/24/21
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL


© Getty Images


A growing number of states have introduced legislation targeting transgender youth and their access to school sports and gender-affirming health care. Since January alone, more than two dozen states have introduced bills that would ban transgender girls and women from participating in sports consistent with their gender identity. In 2020, legislation was considered in 18 states. Outside observers may be surprised to learn that these kinds of bills have been blocked in Utah, a state with one of the most conservative legislative bodies in America, thanks in large measure to a veto threat from our Republican governor.

Anyone who knows Utah well wasn’t surprised. For the last six years, our state has consistently sought to advance protections for the LGBTQ community, while also defeating frequent attempts at discrimination. Utah is an example for the nation and the U.S. Congress that religious freedom and LGBTQ rights can coexist. This lesson should also continue to inform the ongoing national debate around federal nondiscrimination protections for all LGBTQ Americans.

In 2015, Utah became the first state with a Republican majority to pass LGBTQ employment and housing nondiscrimination protections through the state legislature. The bill passed with overwhelming bipartisan margins and support from a broad array of religious organizations, including the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In what has become a rarity in U.S. politics, we transcended partisan divisions and came together to underscore what we know to be true: Protecting the dignity and respect of LGBTQ people is not a progressive or a conservative value, it’s an American value.

The Equality Act was first introduced into Congress in 1973. Following the bill’s passage in the U.S. House with a bipartisan majority and the recent Senate Judiciary hearing, this seminal legislation is now closer than ever to becoming law. Republican in the House have also introduced their own version of a nondiscrimination bill, the Fairness for All Act, which also represents a major step forward in recognizing the harms that LGBTQ people endure due to the current lack of nondiscrimination protections at the federal level.

As we’ve listened to critics and defenders of both bills spar about why their bill is better than the other, we are concerned the two sides will remain at loggerheads, carrying on a bitter stalemate until the window of opportunity is closed. And if that were to happen, everyone involved loses – most of all, the LGBTQ people who so desperately need protections in employment, housing, healthcare and public spaces.

After nearly 50 years, a solution is long overdue. It’s now time for Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives, to come together to pass the most robust protections possible.

Utahns have seen from experience what can happen when everyone comes to the table ready to reach an understanding. We got buy-in from all sides, implemented reasonable considerations to preserve religious freedom without violating LGBTQ liberty, and protected people from discrimination. This approach has also helped change the hearts and minds of Utahns. In 2019, a Public Religion Research Institute poll revealed that 77 percent of Utahns support LGBTQ nondiscrimination laws. We ranked the second highest level of support in the nation, just behind New Hampshire, and well ahead of California and New York.

 And there’s more.

The passage of this historic law laid the groundwork for more steps forward for the LGBTQ community. In 2017, we repealed the so-called “No Promo Homo” law that prohibited teachers from discussing LGBTQ issues in our public schools. In 2018, we worked with the State Board of Education to strengthen anti-bullying protections for LGBTQ students. In 2019, we passed an LGBTQ inclusive hate crimes law. In 2020, we became the 19th state in the nation to ban the harmful practice of conversion therapy upon minors. Gov. Spencer Cox (R) made national headlines last month by speaking movingly about the need to listen to and protect transgender youth. He also oversaw the drafting and funding of a statewide LGBTQ Suicide Prevention Plan.

As a country, we have to find a middle ground and stop pretending that protections for LGBTQ people and freedom for religious people are fundamentally and eternally at odds. There are ways to protect the LGBTQ community and ensure religious people can live out their faith freely. There is a way to respect religious voices without oppressing LGBTQ people. We can and must do both. We have been protecting both of these values in all of our nation’s anti-discrimination laws since the 1960s.

If we don’t act now, we will delay critical protections for years, possibly even decades.

Working together is the only path forward. It's what's possible in the current Congress when all of us come together to tackle the very real problem of LGBTQ discrimination. Codifying nondiscrimination protections into federal law will strengthen our country and make this a safer place for all LGBTQ people and the people who love us. It’s time.

Clifford Rosky is a professor of law at the University of Utah's S.J. Quinney College of Law.

Troy Williams is the executive director of Equality Utah.

Democrats to introduce bill to regulate toxic heavy metals in baby food

The proposed legislation would apply regulation to oversee chemical content in baby food.

By Alexandra Kelley |THE HILL | March 25, 2021

Story at a glance

Democrat lawmakers, including Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Tammy Duckworth, introduced the Baby Food Safety Act of 2021.

It will regulate chemical limits in baby food.


A group of Democrat lawmakers are planning to introduce new legislation into the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday, March 26, that aims to tackle dangerous chemicals found in certain baby food brands.


Dubbed the Baby Food Safety Act of 2021, the forthcoming bill will be introduced by the U.S. Sens. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) and Amy Klobuchar, along with Reps. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL-08) and Tony Cárdenas (D-CA-29).

The bill specifically focuses on the trace amounts of inorganic arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury that are not regulated in baby food by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). If passed, the FDA would be required to oversee and set maximum levels of each chemical to be permitted in baby food.

“Parents deserve to have peace of mind that the baby and toddler food they purchase is safe and nutritious,” Duckworth said in a press release. “Reports that many types of commonly sold baby and toddler food products may contain levels of harmful metals that pose potential risk to babies, such as arsenic and lead, are deeply troubling. That’s one of the reasons why I’m proud to help introduce legislation today to address this issue, and I look forward to working with my colleagues and the FDA on making sure what we feed our children will help them grow up safe and healthy.”

In addition to regulating the levels of chemicals found in baby food, the bill would also authorize $50 million in federal funding for research on agricultural methods of reducing heavy metal presence in crops.

An accompanying public outreach campaign would be deployed as well, run through the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The chemicals targeted in the bill are known to have neurotoxic effects. Even low-level exposure is linked to decreases in IQ and diminished future economic productivity, as well as behavioral issues in children.

Advocacy groups working in children’s and environmental sectors have spoken out in support of the proposed law.

“The Baby Food Safety Act is an important step forward in recognizing the unique vulnerabilities of infants and children,” Jaclyn Bowen, the executive director of the Clean Label Project said. “Food safety is not JUST about microbial and pathogen contaminants. It's about fostering healthy nutrition during the critical period of brain and immune system development.”

Charlotte Brody, the national director of the Healthy Babies Bright Futures coalition, also praised the bill.

“The Baby Food Safety Act of 2021 will do just what its title states it will do: It will make baby food safer,” she stated. “It’s not just a piece of legislation. It’s a solution to a problem that parents can’t solve without the government’s help.”
Africa's two elephant species are declared endangered, one critically

Conservationists are calling for an urgent end to poaching.


By Joseph Guzman | THE HILL | March 25, 2021

Story at a glance

The International Union for Conservation of Nature now lists the African forest elephant as critically endangered and the African savanna elephant as endangered.

Both species have experienced sharp declines in their numbers due to an increase in poaching for ivory, as well as habitat 

Populations of the two species combined are estimated to be around 415,000.

Elephant populations across Africa are becoming increasingly threatened with extinction due to poaching and destruction of their habitat, according to a new assessment from conservation group the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

The IUCN’s Red List of Threatened Species now lists the African forest elephant as critically endangered — the highest category before extinction in the wild — and the African savanna elephant as endangered due to the animals declining numbers. Both species were previously considered vulnerable, just one level down from the endangered designation.

America is changing faster than ever! Add Changing America to your Facebook or Twitter feed to stay on top of the news.

The group said it’s the first time the African elephants were assessed as two separate species, following the emergence of new genetic evidence gathered over the past decade. Forest elephants are found in Central Africa’s tropical forests while savanna elephants roam the open grasslands and deserts in Sub-Saharan Africa.

According to the IUCN, both species have experienced sharp declines in their numbers due to an increase in poaching for ivory, as well as habitat loss. Populations of forest elephants dropped by more than 86 percent over more than three decades while savanna elephants have seen a 60 percent decline in their numbers over the last 50 years. Populations of the two species combined are estimated to be around 415,000.

“We must urgently put an end to poaching and ensure that sufficient suitable habitat for both forest and savanna elephants is conserved,” Bruno Oberle, IUCN director general, said in a statement.

“Several African countries have led the way in recent years, proving that we can reverse elephant declines, and we must work together to ensure their example can be followed,” Oberle said.

The conservation’s group Red List includes 134,425 species with 37,480 considered to be threatened with extinction.

 Indigenous shaman has a warning about the Amazon and all life on Earth

Davi Kopenawa is a messenger for our time.

By Cyril Christo | March 24, 2021

THE HILL , Opinion Contributor

The forest is alive. It can only die if the whites continue destroying it. If they do, rivers will disappear under the earth, the soil will crumble, the trees will wither, and the stones will melt in the heat. A desiccated earth will become empty and silent. The Xapiri spirits who came down from the mountains to play on their mirrors will flee far away. Their fathers, the shamans, will no longer be able to call them and to make them dance to protect us. They will be unable to push back the smoke of the epidemics that are devouring us. They will no longer be able to contain the evil spirits that will turn the forest into chaos. We will die one after the other, the white as much as us. All the shamans will finish by dying out. If none of them survive to hold on to it, the sky will fall.”                               

                                     Davi Kopenawa Yanomami Shaman

It is a most vital and perhaps the most urgent singular Indigenous voice Davi Kopenawa brings to the outside world in his book “The Falling Sky” published in 2010: it is the conscience of the rainforest itself unlike anything we have witnessed this century. It embodies the mind of the Amazon and narrates the journey into the rarefied, inner landscape of the shamanic world. Davi, called the Dalai Lama of the Rainforest, speaks words composed of myth, of thunder and lightning and spirit beings honored since time immemorial, whose chorus is dwindling in light of what remains of the largest rainforest on Earth. Narrated by a Yanomami shaman it is a revelation of an Indigenous people facing the onslaught of the dominant society felling and desecrating their forest home. Davi wants white people and foreigners of the world to know what is happening to the forest and his people the Yanomami of southern Venezuela and Northern Brazil, a tribe of about 35,000, and what will ultimately happen to us all if the life force of the Amazon is lost.

About 30 years ago, miners killed 16 of their tribe, including a baby in Haximu village. Five miners were guilty of genocide. More recently miners from northern Brazil were confronted by two Yanomami, who died in the encounter. 2019 finally launched the global campaign to expel 20,000 gold miners who are illegally prospecting on Yanomami land. The future of the Yanomami may very well rest on how this epic struggle is resolved.

Thomas Lovejoy, who has been teaching climate change biology for 30 years and introduced the term biological diversity, along with other ecologists have long warned that mining, palm plantations, and cattle could destroy the hydrological cycle of the Amazon. Some even believe the time is now to monetize the forest in a green economy, which includes aquaculture, medical and plant knowledge and a resources base that actually looks to make the Amazon invaluable for the future. The time is now to put a price on what can renewably be cultivated from biodiversity’s “greatest showroom” the “living library” of the Amazon according to Lovejoy.

The Swiss firm Re estimates that half of the global GDP of $42 trillion depends on resilient biodiversity. Robert Costanza, an ecological economist, says the ecosystem yearly yields a return of 100 to 1. Some like Timothy Weiskel, formerly at the Harvard Divinity School, are outraged by the notion of affixing a price tag or cost benefit analysis to ecosystems. But Costanza believes it is a way of seeing nature in a pragmatic way, by putting numbers on the overall destruction and loss that results in biospheric damage. Acting on this will be the hard part but perhaps a key way to persuade policymakers to see the actual cost of exploitation. Planetary accounting writ very large.

Costanza notes that the biosphere can yearly be valued at 33 trillion dollars not as mere commodity but in terms of renewable value. The value for humanity and life on Earth may seem counterintuitive, because it is ultimately priceless, but if one attaches a monetary value to the resource base of let’s say a forest, then it becomes more tangible. One of the challenges we face is to calculate the metrics of what ecosystems are worth in monetary terms. It would be mandated by government in everything from bond markets to investment banking so that nature, our life support system, is included in the decision-making financial system. So far nature has been left out of the economic balance sheet. If humanity wishes to survive, some say, we can no longer allow this separation.

As for the president of Brazil, for the crimes he has encouraged in burning the Amazon, Jair Bolsonaro’s possible trial looms at the Hague. The world might finally take heed of punishing those who have allowed almost 17 percent of the Amazon to go up in smoke. Just 20-25 percent loss, experts say, would be the point of no return for the greatest rainforest on Earth. It would turn to savanna and one of the most irreplaceable carbon sinks on Earth will be no more. The Amazon may already have become a net emitter of carbon, at humanity’s immense peril. The vastest jungle on Earth may have already reached the tipping point. But Lovejoy also underscores that despite increasing droughts in the Amazon, it is still possible to reforest some of the destruction that has been imposed on the jungle and bring back some “margin of safety against dieback.” He encourages all the Amazon countries to come together and create an integrated management plan for the future of the Amazon. But they have to do it soon. The hydroelectric dams and the roads that have sliced through the jungle since the 1970s have fragmented the Amazon. It is very late in the game but some are finally coming to understand the immense importance of the hydrological cycle of the largest jungle on the planet. There is simply less moisture being created in the Amazon. As forests burn around the world, the implications for the world are beyond enormous.


Photo credit: Cyril Christo and Marie Wilkinson

Davi’s understanding of the rainforest, issues from an ancient and cellular order of being, the other worlds he has penetrated beyond the surface and outer reality of what we perceive. Beyond the digital surface of our super specialized technological society, is a wide web of inner vision, the larger fabric of life that spans the animate and the perceptual. Very few have access to this inner world. In this time of gold diggers and cattle rustlers it is time the world listened to the first peoples of the world, before their world and ours disappears.

To read Davi’s book is to listen to a cosmological missive to the world, as close to the heart of Earth’s mind as is possible. Years ago not far from the Yanomami territory we had just heard of Davi’s people but little else. We had occasion to see, before the great tumult in Venezuela, the majestic Angel Falls, the tallest on Earth at 970 meters, its sheer height, like the tresses of a goddess dissolving into mist from the impossible height of the Tepui formations made of Precambrian sandstone rocks. We only heard hints of a people on the far frontier of Venezuela and Brazil, people who as Davi describes, had dreams such as we the “civilized people” did not have.

In fact, Davi acknowledges that white people do not think very far ahead. The Yanomami’s world is directed by paths in the jungle rather than merchandise. We live on different planets. “White people think we are ignorant because we don’t possess paper on which to write our words. What lies. We will only really become ignorant only when we no longer have shamans. It is from the yakoana (plant) and the spirits of the forest that we learn. We can see lands very far away, we can enter the body of the sky or descend into the subterranean world,” he says. The visions of supervening forces and energies that tie life together as one web is not something most of us are privy to. Without entering or having the consciousness or the images of the beings of the first time, we cannot begin to understand what Davi has seen or alludes to. It is very reminiscent of what the Aboriginal elders referred to as the Dreamtime and the Creator Beings, wavelengths of formative primal energies we cannot really fathom because it is a psychodynamic and sensual reality we long ago lost touch with in the modern world and energies that all our technological prowess cannot see or feel.

Some of the “witches,” healers, wisdom keepers, the messengers of nature in Europe had a connection with the planet. And what did we did do to them? Many we burned at the stake because they represented another understanding entirely, another way of seeing born of the much older pagan world and not the world view of the Church. Today we are burning the world for trinkets, for the lackluster realm of the modern economic system, for vast soy bean plantations and cattle and mining operations. It is among the greatest follies of our civilization and literally costing humanity the lifeline to life itself. In Davi’s eyes, in his spiritual sight especially, the gambling machine of the business world is built on quicksand. Our civilization is burning itself to the ground. It is not just his peoples who are disappearing. It is also us.

Omama, the primal energy, is still the stuff of science fiction even for most specialists and those frequencies of consciousness we attempt to see with instruments cannot penetrate the veil of the shaman’s inner vision. Perhaps the oldest essential way of communing with nature, shamanism is a “sight” we are on the verge of losing as a species. What we are experiencing worldwide is partially due to the loss of this larger vision that a few elders still encompass. They live in a manifold world of many colors, songs and dimensions while we inhabit the world of the economic sphere and its short term returns. The two live on different planets. And worldwide, the elders are dying of the virus. What indeed will remain of their vision?

Davi is worried that the younger generation will not only lose the forest, but also that they will be beholden to the machine and motor vehicles, having to trace words on paper because our spirits are forgetful and will no longer remember our original instructions, which is to take care of the world.


Photo credit: Cyril Christo and Marie Wilkinson

Even if these realities seem arcane and primal beyond the highly specialized and fragmented modern industrial reality, the Yanomami, whose men are warriors and who can be brutal have lived in the forests for thousands of years without overwhelming their habitat. The recent invasion of 20,000 gold miners in the Orinoco basin is an affront to their way of life and is extinguishing a society much older than civilization. In light of the microbes our species has to confront and the threat of future pandemics, which could arise from the tropics, Davi’s words speak of a covenant with the very fabric of cellular memory embedded in the plants and the radical light that suffuses Creation. The extraordinary death toll Brazilians have had to endure in such cities as Manaus, in the middle of the Amazon, gives enormous relevance to Davi’s words. If we are still arguing over what we must do at the end of this decade, it will be too late.

Davi exclaims, “With these words, I want to simply warn the white man that the bad things they extract from the earth will not make them rich very long! The value of our dead will be very high and they will certainly not be able to compensate us with their paper skins (their contracts). There is no money that can buy the forest, the hills and the rivers. Their money will be worth nothing…They must understand this. The ghosts of the old shamans and their evil spirits have already started to take vengeance on far way lands by provoking droughts and endless floods. It is why, if the whites do not make us all die, we will continue to call on the spirits to consolidate the forest and prevent the sky from falling.

“The forest is intelligent and has thought identical to ours. I listen to the words of my spirits who ask with anger, ‘Why are the whites so hostile? Why do they want us to die? What do they have against us that, we have done nothing to them. Is it only because we are other peoples, the peoples of the jungle? Do not worry, they will kill you, maybe, but they will not long stay unharmed by their destruction!’ It is so. We are saddened by the idea of disappearing. But our thoughts are quieted by the thought that the spirits are innumerable and will never die.

“If we disappear, the whites will not live long after us. Even if there are many of them, they are not made of strong, any more than us. Their life breath is as short as ours. They can suppress us today, but later, when they will want to move in places where we once lived, they will be devoured in their turn, by all sorts of bad spirits. We will see if they are as powerful as they think! We will plunge them in darkness and storms. We will break the sky and its fall will sweep them away. Be finally warned! Stop pillaging our earth, because the smoke of your epidemic will finish us all off and when you build your towns on our forgotten vestiges in the forest, you will destroy yourselves. The spirits of the shamans you have killed will avenge themselves.

“If you destroy the forest, the sky will break and it will fall on the earth. The whites are not afraid, as we are, to be crushed by the falling sky. But one day, they will fear it as much as we do. The shamans know what bad things menace human beings. There is only one sky, and one has to worry because if it becomes sick, everything will be finished.”

Since a child, Davi has been warned of foreigners and missionaries who considered the Yanomani primitive heathens, and has been wary of the white man’s God. “Maybe God will punish me and will cause me to die. It doesn’t matter, I’m not white. I do not want to know anything about him. He has no friendship with the inhabitants of the forest. He doesn’t cure our children. He doesn’t defend our earth against gold miners and ranchers. It is not he who makes us happy. His words only know threats and fear. Even today, the people of God haven’t stopped terrifying me. When I have the occasion to meet them they tell me - Davi, your thinking is obscure. You are possessed by Satan. If you keep listening to his words you will burn in the fire pit. Stop answering the spirts so your thoughts can blossom anew with the words of God. It he who will really protect you.”


Photo credit: Cyril Christo and Marie Wilkinson

The God of foreigners have been setting the Amazon on fire for years. Everything the forest has taught the Yanomami and countless other tribes for generations is under threat ecologically and also spiritually due to the rampage of the pandemic, which is killing off elders all over the world. Their knowledge translates to perhaps 25,000 years of experiential wisdom that will never be brought back if lost. In this time of climate change their understanding of the planetary “mind” is among the most sophisticated on Earth. Davi has heard of original sin from those who preach the gospel and yet what has happened, is happening and could continue to ravage the forest, is the greatest scourge of our time. Davi defends himself against the foreign God by saying, “We are not bad. We are simply not Whites. We are such as our ancestors have always been. For us all the words of the White Man are in vain. God must be lazy because he makes no effort to cure us, even when we are in agony. We are dying without them caring in the least.”

With the word in upheaval it is time, it might seem, to listen to those who have not destroyed their world. We are beholden to “sad leaves” as Davi calls money. But Davi has known that whatever befalls his people will also befall modern civilization. This is the decade of reckoning. Either we pull back from the brink or the sky will crumble and so will the Earth. In listening to the shamans and the elders of the jungle, we might learn something about life on Earth, that might actually save us.

As Davi says, “If there are no longer any shamans in the forests, the white man will consume himself before becoming blind. He will end by suffocating, reduced to a state of a ghost, and will fall to pieces. Then we will all be carried into the darkness of the subterranean world, the Whites as well as us. There is only one sky and one has to take care of it, because if it becomes sick, everything will be finished.”