Friday, April 16, 2021

Hollywood Street Protest For Daunte Wright Draws Heavy Police Presence

By Bruce Haring
April 16, 2021 
YouTube

A protest against the death of Minnesota man Daunte Wright in a confrontation with police spilled into Hollywood Thursday night, as several hundred people marched and held a vigil at Sunset and Vine.

Police were out in force to monitor the event, which saw protesters take over the street in a march that started in mid-evening. The marchers chanted Wright’s name and Black Lives Matter.

The street protest follows another earlier this month in Hollywood regarding the death of Louisville, Kentucky resident Breonna Taylor. That protest resulted in a more aggressive police response.


The Thursday night protest in Hollywood was one of many nationwide this week, as Wright’s death and the trial of former police officer Derek Chauvin in Minneapolis for his role in the death of George Floyd has heightened tensions

GO HERE TO SEE EMBEDED TWEETS
Trevor Noah On Racist Police Incidents: “Where Are The Good Apples?”

Greg Evans
Associate Editor/Broadway Critic@GregEvans5

April 15, 2021 

The Daily Show host Trevor Noah bypassed punchlines in the impassioned video he posted yesterday about police brutality, posing the question, “Where are the good apples?”

“We’re told time and time again that these incidents we keep experiencing are because of bad apples” on the police forces, Noah says early in the video.

Noah says the video was prompted by recent news of police encounters with Black men, including the incident in Windsor, Virginia, in which two officers handcuffed and pepper-sprayed Black Latino Army Lt. Caron Nazario. “He’s in military fatigues, he’s one of the troops, and he’s being treated like trash from the cops, and not just as a troop but as a human being,” Noah says.

RELATED STORY
Trevor Noah Examines Mitch McConnell's Take On Showing Him The Money


“They claim they were afraid but there’s only one person exhibiting fear in that video and it’s him.”

The Daily Show host also references the deaths of Daunte Wright, Philando Castile and George Floyd.

“I’m not saying there are no good policeman, don’t get me wrong,” Noah says, “but where are the good apples? Where are the cops who are stopping the cop from putting his knee on that neck? Where are the other cops when Philando Castile is losing his life?”

He continues, “I think there are many people who are good on the police force…but I think it’s because they themselves know if they do something they’re going against the system. The system is more powerful than any individual. The system in policing is doing exactly what it’s meant to do in America and that is to keep poor people in their place. Who happens to be the most poor in America? Black people…”

Noah concludes by stating that the system is not broken because “it’s working the way it was designed to work.”

“We’re not dealing with bad apples,” he says. “We’re dealing with a rotten tree that happens to grow good apples, but for the most part the tree that was planted is bearing the fruit that it was intended to.”



Minneapolis Transit Union Refuses to Transport Arrested BLM Protesters

The transit workers of Amalgamated Transit Union Local 100 issued a statement saying that they refuse to aid police by transporting protestors. These workers stand in solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement following the murder of Daunte Wright by police in Brooklyn Center, MN.

Daunte Wright, only 20 years old, was brutally murdered by the police in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, a suburb just outside Minneapolis, on Sunday afternoon. In the midst of the Derek Chauvin trial, this police murder was yet another brutal reminder that the police murder and terrorize Black people and that Chauvin isn’t just one “bad apple.” 

Following Wright’s murder, the police left his body lying in the streets for hours. Protesters gathered to mourn and have continued to protest every day since. A curfew has been instituted, and the already militarized area has become even more militarized. Armored cars are driving through the streets and the National Guard are stationed in front of places like Walmart to protect private property. They are even calling on public transit buses to be used to transport protesters. 

Left Voice is hosting a panel with Bessemer Amazon worker and Black liberation activist, a member of SEIU Drop the Cops and Robin D.G. Kelly, author of Hammer and Hoe to Black struggle and the labor movement.  Sign up and RSVP to the Facebook event.

But, the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1005 won’t fall in line. They put out a statement today saying that bus drivers should not be called on to transport protesters. As the statement reads, “ATU Local 1005 applauds our members’ stand and continues to support our members in the struggle for Black Lives Matter”. 

This is part of the tradition from the summer’s Black Lives Matter movement, where bus drivers all over the country refused to transport protesters who were in the streets protesting against police terror. Union locals around the country issued statements such as this one, standing on the side of Black people and all oppressed people against the police. 

This situation highlights that Daunte Wright’s murderer, who was president of her union local, has no business in the labor movement. Cops have no place in unions. They aren’t workers — they harass and kill workers. Conversely, workers have the power to fight the police at the workplace. They can refuse to transport them, as the ATU has, and they can shut down the ports on the West Coast like the ILWU did last summer. Workers have the most powerful weapon — the strike — when the police harass and murder Black people like Daunte Wright.

The ATU statement ends by saying, “We continue to stand in solidarity with our members as we did last summer during the George Floyd uprising when our members refused to transport young arrested protesters, who are justifiably angered at the injustice of racism, oppression and violence of the inequality inherent in the system we live under.” Solidarity with the transit workers and the protestors demanding justice for Daunte Wright. 

WHITE MAN WHINE
Feminism To Blame For Daunte Wright's Death, Everything Else
April 15, 2021 1
 Wonkette

Just a few weeks after being kicked out of YouTube's Partnership Program for a bizarrely racist rant about Black farmers, conservative "comedian" Steven Crowder now has something to say about the killing of Daunte Wright.










It's not good.


Conservatives have a vested interest in pretending that systemic racism against Black people doesn't exist, particularly in police departments, as well as pretending that there is absolutely no kind of problem with cops killing or otherwise brutalizing unarmed Black people. Because if there is a problem with cops killing unarmed Black people, everything else falls apart. So Steven Crowder has figured out a way for conservatives to be able to admit that maybe Daunte Wright did not deserve to be killed for an out-of-place air freshener.

After seeing the video of the shooting, Crowder determined that the problem wasn't racism, or an extreme overreaction by police officers to an air freshener, but feminism. Because Kimberly Ann Potter is a woman and women shouldn't be police officers, but feminism lied to them and said they could be. Even though it is a job for the menfolk.

This brilliant theory, however, requires that one ignore the many, many examples, even just this year, of male police officers killing unarmed Black people.





Transcript via Media Matters:
The issue here is the accidental shooting and the woman who didn't know the difference between a Taser and a firearm. And not only that, her partner crosses that line of sight on the barrel like three times. This woman was a danger to herself and her partners. And I will tell you this: This is the issue that I have with female officers. Oh, can you say it? What is a female cop going to do if not shoot? Whether it's a Taser or a gun. That guy clearly said, "Oh, this is my chance," the second — the second he was passed from the big, burly male officer to the female officer. "Taser, Taser, Taser, Taser." And she couldn't even tell that she had a loaded firearm aimed at her own partner.

This is something that I think is pretty important. It relates to everything. I was talking about this with you yesterday. It relates to feminism and how they've lied to women. We've seen this, obviously, with the female officers, women in the military where they create gender-neutral fitness tests and then more women fail so they say, "Well, we'll have a gender-neutral test, which we already lowered the bar to make sure more women passed, but now we're going to take into account biological differences." What? And then, by the way, if you claim to be a woman and you're a man, you can take the gender-neutral but biologically different test. "Yeah, we want you to go to the front lines and you don't have to do a tummy tuck, just do planks." Good, September 11, that will keep the terrorists shuddering in their boots, if they have boots over there. Shuddering in their sandals.

A tummy tuck is a surgical procedure meant to remove excess fat and skin from the abdominal area. He's thinking of leg tucks. The leg tuck was in fact the number one most failed requirement for both men and women in the Army's physical fitness test, and because the Army would like more soldiers please, and would also like to be able to keep older active soldiers on duty, they have given everyone the option of doing a plank for two minutes, which also demonstrates core strength.

But hey, Steven Crowder's got sexism to do here. And transphobia. And racism.
Here's the thing, we convince young women that they add value in ways that they don't because we convince young women that they add value in ways that a man would add value. So, let's use this with a female officer there, OK? And I know this isn't a rookie. She's been on the force for over two decades from what I understand. [...]

But this woman probably goes out — you see this a lot with women in the military, women in the police force saying, "Look, I aced my exam." Well, great. You now have reached the bottom rung of men in physical capability. You can't physically subdue somebody, so you have to shoot them, so you have to tase them. Men want a partner in the police force that can watch their back. They don't care that you did well for a woman, they want the most capable person there humanly possible. You add no value if you did the female push-ups. You add no value if you scored off the charts on a written exam if you panic in the field.

And what about all the men who "panic in the field"? Because there sure seem to be a lot of them. Very regularly, these big burly male police officers say they just panicked. Is male panicking different from female panicking somehow? Because it seems like it is not.

Contrary to what Crowder would like to get at here, there is not actually a widespread issue with female officers "panicking" and shooting people or mistaking guns for tasers. Rather, female officers are far less likely to discharge their weapon while on duty. A 2017 Pew survey found that while 30 percent of male officers have used their gun while on duty, only 11 percent of female officers have done the same. Male officers are also more likely to believe that aggression is more effective than courtesy "in certain parts of the city," and are more likely to "agree that some people can only be brought to reason the hard, physical way."


Men were also more likely to say that the job had made them callous.

There is, however, a widespread issue with police officers in general, regardless of gender, overreacting to perceived threats when a Black person is involved and then killing them as a result of that overreaction. Why? For one, due to the deeply ingrained belief that Black people, Black men in particular, are more of a threat to them than are white people. Which is racist. For another, because they find it easy to detach themselves from the humanity of the Black people they are dealing with, and that makes it a lot easier to ignore them when they are crying for their mothers and saying they can't breathe. Which is also racist.

Now, we could say that Steven Crowder's ability to look at case after case of mostly male police officers killing unarmed Black people, see one female cop, and shout that it's because of feminism, has something to do with him being a man. Perhaps on some level it does — but that doesn't mean he couldn't be just as bad at looking at evidence and drawing the wrong conclusions if he were a woman. After all, Laura Ingraham exists.

[Media Matters]


Killed over a Car Air Freshener: Outrage Grows over Police Shooting of Daunte Wright in Minnesota

•Apr 13, 2021

Democracy Now!


Protests continue in the Minneapolis area after a white police officer shot and killed a 20-year-old Black man, Daunte Wright, during a traffic stop Sunday in the suburb of Brooklyn Center. The deadly shooting took place about 10 miles from where former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is on trial for killing George Floyd. Just before he was killed, Wright called his mother to say he was being pulled over — allegedly because an air freshener was obscuring his rearview mirror. The Brooklyn Center police chief claims Kimberly Potter, a 26-year police veteran who has served as the police union president for the department, accidentally pulled a gun instead of a Taser. 

The Star Tribune reports Daunte Wright is the sixth person killed by Brooklyn Center police since 2012. Five of the six have been men of color. "Unfortunately, there has not been a serious attempt to change the phenomenon of driving while Black, which is something that happens to Black people on a routine basis in the Twin Cities and across the state of Minnesota," says Minneapolis-based civil rights attorney and activist Nekima Levy Armstrong. We also speak with Jaylani Hussein, executive director of the Minnesota chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, who says policing in the United States is as dangerous to Black and Brown people as ever. "They are deadly. They kill Black and Brown people," says Hussein.



TRIGGER WARNING: SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER WITH RECORD OF KILLING BLACK MEN CAUGHT ON CAMERA

by Christian Spencer
April 8, 2021 

Police line at a crime scene [istockphoto.com]

A motorist’s camera footage will be used as evidence against a San Francisco Bay Area police officer who shot and killed a homeless Black man.

On March 11, Tyrell Wilson was allegedly gunned down by officer Andrew Hall in Danville. According to ABC News, the Wilson family’s lawyer, John Burris, claims that the officer violated the man’s civil rights and he plans to file a federal civil rights suit against the officer.

Related Stories: POLICE KILLED AT LEAST 164 BLACK PEOPLE IN THE FIRST EIGHT MONTHS OF 2020

Wilson, a 37-year-old homeless man with schizophrenia, was reportedly throwing rocks from an overpass onto a highway. Hall arrived on the scene and noticed Wilson was armed with a folding knife in his right hand and a bag in his left hand.

Hall took swift action to subdue Wilson, but the video shows Wilson appearing to walk backward while Hall advances forward. Wilson was shot in a parking lot used for carpoolers—it was also his home.

Wilson died March 17 at a nearby hospital, ABC News reported.

Danville Police Officer Shoots Homeless Black Man Tyrell Wilson

Apr 6, 2021



“The video and witness accounts show this was a cold murder. Wilson never had a chance,” Burris said in a statement.

Pending an investigation, Hall is on paid administrative leave, and if he returns to the police department, he has requested a new assignment outside of Danville, his attorney Michael Rains told the San Francisco Chronicle.

“[The video] tells nothing about what occurred there,” Rains said, describing the video as unsteady and weirdly positioned.

There is a history of suspicion against Hall, who similarly shot and killed another Black man in 2018— Laudemar Arboleda, 33.





In that case, Hall testified that he was afraid for his life that Arboleda would run him over, but it was reported by the East Bay Times that Hall did not yell any commands.

Burris did not represent Arboleda, but at the time, he spoke at news conference and said that Hall was reckless and negligent when he shot into a moving car.

Prosecutors with the Contra Costa District Attorney’s Office are still investigating the 2018 shooting.

“They didn’t and now he has killed another innocent man. Enough is enough. This officer is a menace,” Burris said about Hall.
Iowa Troopers Arrest BLM Activist as Group Rallies Against Bills Increasing Protest-Related Penalties

US Lorenz Duchamps Apr 9, 2021
The Iowa State Capitol building is seen on Oct. 09, 2019 in Des Moines, Iowa. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

A Black Lives Matter activist was taken into custody inside the Iowa State Capitol on Thursday after protesters stormed the building to urge lawmakers to reject legislation they oppose.

Police arrested 18-year-old Josephine Mulvihill, a high school student of Des Moines, and charged her with assaulting a police officer, according to a tweet posted by journalist Andy Ngô.  
ANDY NGO IS A RIGHT WING TROLL NOT A JOURNALIST

In a criminal complaint obtained by the Des Moines Register, the officer who arrested Mulvihill, identified as Iowa State Patrol Trooper Dylan Hernandez, said she pushed his arm in order to get his attention after trying to obtain the names and badge numbers of him and a fellow trooper.

A flyer that was posted by Black Lives Matter in order to invite activists to the protest and reject at least four proposals was posted on Twitter, claiming the state is passing “racist and dangerous bills.”

Dozens of activists gathered at the government building to oppose the bills that include Senate File 476, which passed the state Senate in March and now sits in the House. The bill is intended to strengthen “qualified immunity” for law enforcement officers.

The second legislation the activists rallied against is Senate File 534, which seeks to raise penalties for protest-related crimes, as well as give immunity to the driver of a vehicle, “who is exercising due care,” and accidentally hits a protester or rioter blocking the traffic on a public street or is unlawfully assembling.

Other bills opposed by the activists are House File 802, which will limit diversity and inclusion lessons that teach “divisive concepts” such as that Iowa is “fundamentally or systematically racist or sexist,” as well as Senate File 479, which seeks to withhold state funds from cities that defund police budgets.

In the video posted on Twitter by Ngô, the protesters are heard shouting popular slogans by Marxist groups like “no police” before Trooper Hernandez forces Mulvihill to the ground and arrests her.   
NGO IS A RIGHT WING TROLL

Troopers are then seen clashing with the activists as Mulvihill is getting escorted out of the building before being put into the passenger seat of a police vehicle.

Angelina Ramirez, who co-organized the April 8 event named “Advocates for Social Justice,” claims state lawmakers passing these bills don’t care about Iowans of color.

She told Iowa Public Radio, “I’m telling you from firsthand exposure to the legislators that are passing these bills—they won’t care about their Black and brown constituents unless they’re forced to. Unless they’re pressured to.”

Majority of Americans Against ‘Defunding the Police’


According to a poll released in March, only 18 percent of Americans support slashing funding to the police.

Another 58 percent of respondents said they oppose the “defund the police” movement, which is often synonymous with the Black Lives Matter movement, according to the Ipsos/USA Today survey.

Just 28 percent of black respondents and 34 percent of respondents who identify as Democrats support the movement to cut police funding, in addition to 67 percent of white respondents and 84 percent of Republican ones.

“Don’t defund the police department. We need them here to keep law and order,” Kevin Hayworth, 66, of Garner, Iowa, told USA Today . “We need our police department just as they are.”

Zachary Stieber contributed to this report.

THIS IS EPOCH NEWS RIGHT WING MULTIMEDIA SITE

EPOCH NEWS IS THE ORGAN OF THE GALUN FONG CULT

House committee votes to approve Washington, D.C. statehood
PUERTO RICO NEXT

The Washington Monument is seen amid a field of flags representing all 50 states and U.S. territories, on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., on January 18. File Photo by Pat Benic/UPI | License Photo


April 15 (UPI) -- Following a contentious floor debate, the House oversight and reform committee approved legislation to grant Washington, D.C., statehood, paving the way 
for a full House vote.

 

The Democrat-backed bill H.R. 51 to make Washington, D.C., the 51st state passed 25-19 by the House committee on oversight and reform on Wednesday with no Republican support.


"Statehood for D.C. is about equality, fairness and ensuring that the dreams of our founders are realized despite over 200 years of delayed justice," Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., said in her closing remarks. "Our nation is founded upon the idea that all people should have a voice in their government. But without voting representation in Congress, the people of D.C. are denied that most basic right."

The bill was introduced by Eleanor Holmes Norton, Washington, D.C.'s non-voting delegate, amid reinvigorated national calls for racial equality. It has met staunch resistance from Republicans. A similar bill passed the Democratic-led House before the Republican-led Senate decided to pass on it.

On Wednesday, the debate became contentious at times as Republicans accused Democrats of attempting to re-engineer the political landscape in their favor with the bill, while Democrats accused Republicans of attempting to disenfranchise voters by voting against it.

Rep. Jody Hice, R-Ga., rejected the notion that the bill is about voting representation, and said it is part of a broader Democratic plan to "change the playing field of American politics to enact their radical, progressive agenda."

"That is what this is all about," he said. "And when we talk about the benefits ... what really is being referred to is more senators. That's the benefit. That's what enables this radical, progressive agenda to be crammed down the throats of the American people."

Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., retorted that his colleagues across the aisle speak as if the Republican Party will be destroyed if D.C. is given statehood, a framework they push to obfuscate from their true intention, which is to disenfranchise voters, particularly voters of color.

"It is better to disenfranchise, deny than to compete for those votes," he said. "It's a subterfuge for a powerful dynamic -- sadly, tragically -- to make it harder for people of color to vote in this great democracy because they're afraid they'll lose elections when that happens."

He said the bill seeks to franchise the more than 700,000 residents of the district.

RELATED Senate confirms Gary Gensler as SEC chairman over GOP opposition

The American Civil Liberties Union, a longtime supporter of D.C. statehood, celebrated the passing on Wednesday.

"Onward to the House floor next week," the organization tweeted. "It's time to end this historical wrong and bring full and equal rights to the 712,000 residents of D.C.!"

The bill, which would rename the district the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth, after politician, writer and statesman Frederick Douglass, has the support of more than 120 civil rights, federal workers and other such groups, as well as D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and President Joe Biden.

"He believes they deserve representation," White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki told reporters last month. "That's why he supports D.C. statehood."

After the bill was passed Wednesday, Norton said the bill's 215 cosponsors "virtually" guarantees it'll pass the House.

"With Democrats controlling the House, the Senate and the White House, we have never been closer to statehood," she said in a statement.
House panel approves bill to pave way for slavery reparations


House judiciary committee member Sheila Jackson Lee urged Republicans on Wednesday to vote in favor of her bill to create a commission to study the lasting effects of slavery.  
File Photo by Shawn Thew/UPI | License Photo

April 15 (UPI) -- A House committee approved legislation late Wednesday to pave the way to pay reparations to ancestors of enslaved Black Americans, though the bill has an uphill battle to become law.

The House judiciary committee voted along party lines 25 to 17 in favor of bill H.R. 40 that would establish a 13-member commission to study the history and effects of slavery in the United States and its colonies from 1619 to 1865, as well as the ensuing discrimination, aiming to recommend remedies, including reparations.


The bill was first introduced nearly three decades ago by the late Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., and was named after the 40-acre plots of land Gen. William T. Sherman promised in 1865 to redistribute to formerly enslaved people.


Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., described the bill before the vote Wednesday as "historic legislation" that does not mandate financial payments nor recommend how to properly atone for the legacy of slavery -- it intends to begin a conversation about the mistreatment of Black people in the United States.

RELATED Judge rules Harvard owns slave images, not descendants

"This moment of national reckoning comes at a time when our nation must find constructive ways to confront a rising tide of racial and ethnic division," he said. "Reparations in the context of H.R. 40 are ultimately about respect and reconciliation -- and the hope that one day all Americans can walk together toward a more just future."

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, who reintroduced the bill, told her colleagues across the aisle to not ignore the pain and history of Black people in the United States and the reasonableness of the commission.

"The goal of this historical commission and its investigation is to bring American society to the new reckoning of how our past affects the current conditions of African Americans and make America a better place to help and truly study the disadvantage," she said. "The reparations moment does not focus only on payments, but it focuses on remedies that can be created in many forms necessary to equitably address the many kinds of injuries sustained from the chattel slavery and its continuing vestiges."

RELATED Chicago suburb approves housing reparations for Black residents

To focus on financial reparation is an "empty gesture," she argued, stating they only want others to see the pain, violence and brutality Black Americans have experienced to create a pathway to reconciliation.

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said the bill would put the country on the wrong track.

"We have utterly destroyed Black families. We have utterly ripped fathers and people that children should be able to look up to in their families from the homes of Black families in the name of government paternalism," he said. "And that, I'm afraid, is where this kind of legislation takes us -- it takes us away from the important dream of judging people by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin."

RELATED New California law forms panel to examine reparations for slavery

The bill has not been advanced to a floor vote, but it has received support from President Joe Biden, whose press secretary, Jen Psaki, told reporters in February that he would be in favor of such a commission.

"He certainly would support a study of reparations," she said, stopping short of saying he'd sign it if it landed on his desk, adding they would wait to "see what happens through the legislative process."

The vote on the bill came less than a month after Evanston, Ill., a Chicago suburb, approved legislation to make available hundreds of thousands of dollars to right decades of wrongs committed by the city's discriminatory housing practices against its Black residents as part of a reparations program.
(0) Leave a comment

upi.com/7090451

Capitol Police IG says dept. needs reform, culture change after Jan. 6 attack

APRIL 15, 2021 



Rioters breach the security perimeter the U.S. Capitol to protest against the Electoral College vote count, in Washington, D.C., on January 6. File Photo by Ken Cedeno/UPI | License Photo






April 15 (UPI) -- Officers were not prepared to deal with the mob that attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, despite warnings of potential violence, according to the Capitol Police inspector general in congressional testimony he's set to give Thursday.

Inspector General Michael Bolton will detail the January attack when he testifies before the House Administration Committee, according to his opening statement. The hearing is scheduled to begin at 1 p.m. EDT.

The Capitol attack directly killed five people and led to the second impeachment of President Donald Trump. Radical Trump supporters perpetrated the violence.

Bolton has produced two reports on the Capitol Police response, and a third will be issued later this month. One says top officers in the department overlooked intelligence information that indicated congressional lawmakers themselves could be targets.

In his opening statement, Bolton describes the attack as a "takeover" and says Capitol Police lacked necessary relevant policies for its civil disturbance and intelligence divisions.

"As our work continues, my office sees continuing areas in our findings that [Capitol Police] needs [to] address," he says in his opening remarks. "Those areas are intelligence, training, operational planning, and culture change."

"We see that the department needs to move away from the thought process as a traditional police department and move to the posture as a protective agency," he adds. "A police department is a reactive force. A crime is committed; police respond and make an arrest. Whereas, a protective agency is postured to being proactive to prevent events such as January 6."

RELATED Capitol riot: FBI arrests former Salt Lake City officer

Bolton says the department also had faulty equipment, including munitions that were kept beyond their expiration date. He also notes there was a lack of agreement about the reality of the Jan. 6 threat.

"Certain officials believed [Capitol Police] intelligence products indicated there may be threats, but did not identify anything specific, while other officials believed it would be inaccurate to state that there were no known specific threats," Bolton says in his statement.

In his second report on the attack, Bolton said Capitol Police received a warning from the Department of Homeland Security more than two weeks before the attack.

RELATED Slain Capitol Police officer to lie in honor in Capitol Rotunda

As the department's inspector general, Bolton has promised to file a new report each month detailing the latest findings of investigations into the attack. His next report is expected April 30.