Tuesday, April 20, 2021

Cameroon: Controversy around revival churches and Covid-19

Cameroonian authorities are worried about Pentecostal churches in the country in which worshippers are being encouraged to flout social distancing measures. They fear the houses of worship are the sources of super spreader events as the country struggles with a second wave of infections. Our team reports.

‘The ultimate betrayal’: Fans slam creation of European Super League


Issued on: 20/04/2021 
Leeds United fans hold a banner against plans for a European Super League in Leeds, northern England, on April 19, 2021 © Paul Ellis, AFP

Text by: NEWS WIRES


Supporters of the six Premier League clubs leading the breakaway European Super League have slammed the controversial plan, branding it the “ultimate betrayal”.

Liverpool, Manchester United, Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester City and Tottenham are all involved in the new competition, alongside Spanish trio Real Madrid, Barcelona, Atletico Madrid and Italian clubs Juventus, Inter Milan and AC Milan.

The founding sides will share 3.5 billion euros ($4 billion, £3 billion) for infrastructure investment and to offset coronavirus pandemic costs.

They are expected to receive a further 10 billion euros in “solidarity payments” over the life of the initial commitment, convincing them to turn their backs on the Champions League in favour of the new invite-only competition.

Reaction to the incendiary scheme has been furious, with football’s governing bodies FIFA and UEFA, as well as all the leading domestic leagues condemning the “cynical” plan

While their clubs would gain financially from the move, supporters of the Premier League teams involved were united in their contempt for such a nakedly greed-motivated project.


A poll conducted by YouGov found 76 percent of fans of the six clubs involved oppose the proposals. Rejection of the plan rose to 88 percent of fans of the other 14 Premier League clubs.


The Chelsea Supporters’ Trust said in a statement: “Our members and football supporters across the world have experienced the ultimate betrayal.

“The CST is appalled that Chelsea FC (CFC) are among the rumoured teams to have signed up for this alternative competition and hope that these reports are untrue. This proposal would risk CFC from being banned from other competitions and could jeopardise the future of our club.

“This is a decision of greed to line the pockets of those at the top and it has been made with no consideration for the loyal supporters, our history, our future and the future of football in this country. This is unforgivable. Enough is enough.”

‘Cynical and greedy’

Liverpool supporters’ group Spirit of Shankly (SOS) said it was “appalled” by the decision of Fenway Sports Group, the club’s US-based owners, to take part in the plan.

“FSG have ignored fans in their relentless and greedy pursuit of money. Football is ours, not theirs. Our football club is ours not theirs,” they said in a social media post.

SOS chairman Joe Blott added: “It is purely financially, cynically, greedily driven without any thoughts for the football fan, and that’s the challenge that we have.”

The Arsenal Supporters’ Trust called the club’s agreement to join “the death of Arsenal as a sporting institution”.

The Manchester United Supporters’ Trust labelled the plan an insult to the legacy of the players who died in the 1958 Munich air crash.

“A Super League based on a closed shop of self-selected wealthy clubs goes against everything football, and Manchester United, should stand for,” they said.

“To bring forward these proposals without any fan consultation, and in the midst of a global pandemic when people should be pulling together not serving their own selfish interests, just adds insult to injury.


“When Sir Matt Busby led us into the European Cup in the 1950s, the modern Manchester United was founded in the tragedy and triumph that followed.

“To even contemplate walking away from that competition would be a betrayal of everything this club has ever stood for.”

Tottenham Hotspur Supporters’ Trust said the European Super League was a “concept driven by avarice and self-interest at the expense of the intrinsic values of the game we hold so dear”.

(AFP)

Where does the Super League leave the rest of professional football? What consequences? The rift draws attention to an unresolved contradiction of European sports: teams try to turn a profit and answer to leagues that negotiate lucrative TV rights but they also answer to federations, which run as public services and whose members are overwhelmingly amateur. 

That sudden acceleration of the inequality gap between the elite and the muddling mid-table masses sounds awfully familiar in these times of globalisation and Covid-19. And by the way, most of the happy few in this instance happen to swimming in red ink. Perhaps those debts will not matter if the Super League succeeds.

Produced by Alessandro Xenos, Juliette Laurain and Imen Mellaz.

The climate pledges of the world's top emitters


Issued on: 20/04/2021

Under the Paris deal's "ratchet" mechanism, signatories are required to periodically renew their emission-cutting plans Ina FASSBENDER AFP/File


Paris (AFP)

Under the Paris Agreement on climate, nearly every country will have to drastically reduce their carbon emissions, and they were supposed to submit renewed plans to do so by the end of 2020.

The first raft of "nationally determined contributions" (NDCs) submitted in 2015 would put Earth on course to be at least 3 degrees Celsius hotter than pre-industrial times, a far cry from the Paris temperature cap goal of keeping warming "well below" 2C.

Under the deal's "ratchet" mechanism, signatories are required to periodically renew their emission-cutting plans to drive more rapid decreases in emissions.

Roughly half of countries met the 2020 deadline to do so, but many big emitters -- included the top two, China and the United States -- have yet to do so. Washington has said it will unveil its new targets this week, in anticipation of the delayed COP26 summit in Glasgow in November.

- China -


In its first NDC, China -- by far the largest emitter, responsible for roughly a quarter of all carbon pollution -- promised to reduce the intensity of its emissions by as much as 65 percent by 2030.

Under that scenario, it planned to reach peak emissions at the end of this decade.

In September last year, President Xi Jinping made a surprise announcement at the UN General Assembly: China plans to achieve net-zero emissions by 2060.

But the country's new five-year plan, released in March, doesn't spell out the steps to reaching this goal, nor has Beijing officially submitted its renewed NDC.

- United States -

The second-largest polluter, the US was one of the driving forces behind the Paris deal, with an initial commitment to cut emissions a quarter by 2025, compared with 2005 levels.

President Joe Biden wasted no time in office in rejoining the accord after his predecessor Donald Trump's decision to backtrack on US commitments.

He has set a net-zero date for 2050 and has unveiled a $2 trillion infrastructure spending plan to help achieve it.

The US has still not submitted its renewed NDC, but it is expected to do so either before or during a two-day climate summit this week.

- European Union -

The EU committed in 2015 to reduce its CO2 emissions by at least 40 percent by 2030 compared to 1990 levels.

Member states updated this goal in December, aiming to reduce emissions by "at least 55 percent" by the end of this decade.

Although Britain is leaving the EU, it also has a 2050 net-zero target built into law. It announced in December it would seek to reduce emissions 68 percent by 2030, compared with 1990 levels.

- India -

Like China, India plans to reduce its carbon intensity -- by up to 35 percent this decade compared to 2005 levels.

The world's third-largest polluter has yet to submit a renewed NDC.

- Russia -

Russia formally rejoined the Paris deal in 2019.

Moscow says it plans to achieve pollution levels in 2030 that are 70 percent of 1990 levels -- in reality a drop of only 30 percent.

- Japan -

Japan in 2016 committed to a 26-percent reduction in emissions by 2030. Its renewed NDC, issued in March 2020, had the same figure, eliciting sharp criticism from carbon monitoring research groups.

However new Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga said in October the country would be carbon neutral by 2050.

- The rest -

Among other principal emitters, Brazil, Mexico, Australia and South Korea have all submitted their renewed NDCs, albeit without any significant boost in emissions cuts.

Indonesia, Canada, Saudi Arabia and South Africa have yet to submit their plans for the next five years.

Around 80 nations representing less than 30 percent of emissions met the official deadline for NDC resubmissions.

The UN said that the renewed pledges would see emissions drop less than one percent compared with 1990 levels -- a far cry from the 45-percent cut that the UN's climate panel says is needed to limit warming to 1.5C.

- Carbon neutrality -


More and more countries are committing to achieve net zero emissions -- that is, any remaining carbon pollution will be sequestered or offset -- by 2050.

But according to the United Nations, more than 100 countries representing 65 percent of global emissions have yet to formally set a date by which they must achieve climate neutrality.

© 2021 AFP
#4 EMITTER AND TRYING HARDER
No saving the planet without booming India


Issued on: 20/04/2021 -

  
India is the world's third-biggest carbon emitter, already home to 1.3 billion people, and projected by the UN to become the planet's most populous nation by the middle of the decade Himanshu SHARMA AFP/File


New Delhi (AFP)

Global efforts to arrest climate change and keep Earth liveable will fail without a jumbo-sized effort from India to halt emissions growth that could wipe out ambitious carbon reduction targets elsewhere.

But one thing India doesn't need, its leaders have made clear, is lectures from the West on what path to take.

The world's third-biggest carbon emitter, already home to 1.3 billion people, is projected by the UN to become the planet's most populous nation by the middle of the decade.

Crucially for its carbon footprint, its urban population is set to rise the size of Los Angeles each year, totalling 270 million people by 2040, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).

They will all need homes, built with energy-intensive concrete and steel, vehicles to drive, goods to consume and air-conditioning to survive India's ever-harsher summers.

To meet the associated electricity demand over the next 20 years, India could need to add a power system the size of the European Union's, the IEA believes.

"All roads to successful global clean energy transitions go via India," it said in a recent report. "The stakes could not be higher, for India and the world."

- Sunny side up -

These are sobering statistics ahead of US President Joe Biden's virtual climate summit this week and UN talks in Glasgow set for November.

But India bristles at being told what to do, particularly by Western countries that bear far more historical responsibility for climate change and still have much higher per capita carbon footprints today.

"They emitted and therefore the world is suffering. India is suffering because of actions of others," Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar thundered last week.

"We will not allow anybody to forget it."

India is also acutely aware that climate change is happening: melting Himalayan glaciers, a water crisis, rising temperatures and more frequent cyclones are already wreaking havoc.

Air pollution from vehicles, industry, power generation and farming was meanwhile blamed for over a million premature deaths nationwide in 2019.

And unlike many other countries, India is on track to exceed its voluntary goals under the 2015 Paris climate agreement.

These include improving the economy's emissions intensity 40 percent by 2030, and growing the share of non-fossil fuels in power generation to 60 percent -- well above its 40 percent pledge.

India has also set the ambitious target of reaching 450 gigawatts of renewable capacity by then, including 280 gigawatts from solar power, which is already highly competitive on price compared to coal.

Solar currently accounts for less than four percent of electricity generation, and coal 70 percent. By 2040 solar and coal are on track to each account for around 30 percent, the IEA says.

A recent report by UK energy group Ember even suggested that India's use of coal for power generation may have already peaked three years ago.

- Offsetting Europe -

But carbon emissions are still on track to grow 50 percent by 2040, enough to offset entirely the projected fall in emissions in Europe over the same period.

Emission reductions are possible with major upgrades to India's power infrastructure, including battery storage for solar energy.

But the main reason for the CO2 increase is industry -- making all that steel and concrete for India's booming cities -- and transport, with 25 million more trucks expected on the roads by 2040.

The government is still building more coal power plants and awarding contracts to mine more coal. Already India's output is 700 million tonnes per year, second only to China.

There has been speculation that India -- following the US, EU and China -- might announce a target date for net zero emissions, but this may require changes too far-reaching for the government to stomach.

A study by the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) think-tank said that to achieve net zero by 2050, the share of coal, oil and gas would have to tumble from 73 percent in 2015 to just 5 percent.

It would also cost half a million mining jobs, higher electricity prices and, since Indian Railways relies heavily on coal freight for income, higher fares for millions of train passengers, said Vaibhav Chaturvedi from the CEEW.

A more realistic path would be greater use of existing technologies to cut emissions, like electrifying more trains and vehicles, greener construction materials, rooftop solar panels, using more hydrogen fuel, and capturing emissions for storage.

But this will require $1.4 trillion more than currently in the pipeline, the IEA says -- much of which needs to be provided by richer nations.

"India should do more but it should also get support from the international community," Harjeet Singh from Action Aid Climate told AFP.

"The international community is listening to only half of the story... My worry is that if there is no real money, we will not see real action."

© 2021 AFP

CO2 emissions set to rebound to second-highest in history this year, watchdog warns

Issued on: 20/04/2021
White smoke rises from a plant in Duisburg, western Germany, 
© Ina Fassbender, AFP

Text by: NEWS WIRES

Climate-changing CO2 emissions are set to surge by the second-biggest amount in history this year as the global economy recovers from the Covid-19 pandemic, the IEA warned Tuesday, days before a major climate summit.

The International Energy Agency estimated in its annual Global Energy Review that CO2 emissions will increase by almost five percent this year to 33 billion tonnes, largely reversing the decline registered last year as the pandemic idled swathes of the global economy.

While CO2 emissions are expected to remain below their 2019 level, the IEA expects global energy demand to surpass its 2019 level, with both gas and coal rising above pre-pandemic levels.

“Global carbon emissions are set to jump by 1.5 billion tonnes this year—driven by the resurgence of coal use in the power sector,” the IEA’s Executive Director, Fatih Birol, was quoted as saying in a statement.

“This is a dire warning that the economic recovery from the Covid crisis is currently anything but sustainable for our climate.”

He called the Leaders Summit on Climate to be hosted by US President Joe Biden on Thursday and Friday a critical moment for nations to pledge immediate actions before the UN Climate Change Conference set for November in Glasgow.

“Unless governments around the world move rapidly to start cutting emissions, we are likely to face an even worse situation in 2022,” said Birol.

The IEA sees a 4.5-percent jump in coal demand, surpassing the 2019 level and approaching its all-time peak from 2014, as the biggest reason behind the rise in CO2 emissions.

The electricity sector accounts for three-quarters of this increase.

More than four-fifths of the rise in coal demand is to come from Asia, led by China, although the United States and Europe are also set to see increases.

While the increase in coal use will dwarf that of renewables, electricity generation from renewable sources is still tipped to jump by more than eight percent this year.

The IEA expects both solar and wind to post their largest annual rises ever, at around 17 percent.

It expects renewables will provide 30 percent of electricity generation worldwide in 2021, their biggest share ever and up from less than 27 percent in 2019.

China is expected to account for almost half of that increase.

While demand for oil is rebounding strongly, the IEA expects it to stay below the pre-pandemic level as the aviation sector struggles to recover owing to a slow and patchy vaccine rollout.

(AFP)

CO2 emissions set to surge, IEA warns

A surge in coal use to produce electricity is driving the rebound in CO2 emissions, the IEA says DIMITAR DILKOFF AFP/File


Issued on: 20/04/2021 - 


Paris (AFP)

Climate-changing CO2 emissions are set to surge by the second-biggest amount in history this year as the global economy recovers from the Covid-19 pandemic, the IEA warned Tuesday, days before a major climate summit.

The International Energy Agency estimated in its annual Global Energy Review that CO2 emissions will increase by almost five percent this year to 33 billion tonnes, largely reversing the decline registered last year as the pandemic idled swathes of the global economy.

While CO2 emissions are expected to remain below their 2019 level, the IEA expects global energy demand to surpass its 2019 level, with both gas and coal rising above pre-pandemic levels.

"Global carbon emissions are set to jump by 1.5 billion tonnes this year –- driven by the resurgence of coal use in the power sector," the IEA's Executive Director, Fatih Birol, was quoted as saying in a statement.

"This is a dire warning that the economic recovery from the Covid crisis is currently anything but sustainable for our climate."

He called the Leaders Summit on Climate to be hosted by US President Joe Biden on Thursday and Friday a critical moment for nations to pledge immediate actions before the UN Climate Change Conference set for November in Glasgow.

"Unless governments around the world move rapidly to start cutting emissions, we are likely to face an even worse situation in 2022," said Birol.

The IEA sees a 4.5-percent jump in coal demand, surpassing the 2019 level and approaching its all-time peak from 2014, as the biggest reason behind the rise in CO2 emissions.

The electricity sector accounts for three-quarters of this increase.

More than four-fifths of the rise in coal demand is to come from Asia, led by China, although the United States and Europe are also set to see increases.

While the increase in coal use will dwarf that of renewables, electricity generation from renewable sources is still tipped to jump by more than eight percent this year.

The IEA expects both solar and wind to post their largest annual rises ever, at around 17 percent.

It expects renewables will provide 30 percent of electricity generation worldwide in 2021, their biggest share ever and up from less than 27 percent in 2019.

China is expected to account for almost half of that increase.

While demand for oil is rebounding strongly, the IEA expects it to stay below the pre-pandemic level as the aviation sector struggles to recover owing to a slow and patchy vaccine rollout.

© 2021 AFP

Extreme melt reduced Greenland ice sheet storage: study


Issued on: 20/04/2021 -
Authors of the research said it showed how one-off or rare weather
 events could have a lasting impact on Earth's frozen spaces and a 
knock on effect on global sea levels 
Drew Angerer GETTY 

Paris (AFP)

The vast melting of Greenland's ice sheet caused by unusually high temperatures in 2012 had a lasting impact on its ability to absorb and store future meltwater, new research showed Tuesday.

Authors of the research said it was evidence of how one-off or rare weather events could have a lasting impact on Earth's frozen spaces and a knock-on effect on global sea levels.

In summer 2012, much of the Arctic sweltered in a rare heatwave that saw blue lakes glimmering across Greenland's previously frozen ice sheet.

Using advanced modelling techniques, a team of researchers in the US reanalysed radar data collected by flights from NASA's Operation IceBridge between 2012-2017 to interpret melting near the surface of the ice sheet.

Ice sheet regions that haven't undergone extreme melting can store meltwater throughout their upper 50 metres or so, preventing it from flowing into the ocean.

But the team found that the melting in 2012 had refrozen into a layer of slick ice, creating slippery conditions that can speed up its movement and send chunks into the ocean.

In some parts of the Greenland Ice Sheet, the team found that the melt layer had reduced its storage capacity to just five metres.

"When you have these extreme, one-off melt years, it's not just adding more to Greenland's contribution to sea-level rise in that year," said lead study author Riley Culberg, from Stanford University.

"It's also creating these persistent structural changes in the ice sheet itself."

- 'Structural changes' -

The Greenland Ice Sheet has experienced five record-breaking melt seasons since 2000, most recently in 2019.

Satellite data from 2021 showed that in the course of just a few July days, as much as 97 percent of the ice sheet surface had thawed.

And with the poles warming significantly faster than the rest of the planet, more extreme and regular hot weather over the Arctic is set to increase Greenland melt events.

"Normally we'd say the ice sheet would just shrug off weather -- ice sheets tend to be big, calm, slow things," said Dustin Schroeder, assistant professor of geophysics at Stanford's School of Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences.

"This really is one of the first cases where you can say, shockingly in some ways, these slow, calm ice sheets care a lot about a single extreme event in a particularly warm year."

The Greenland Ice Sheet contains enough frozen water to raise global sea levels around six metres, and along with the vast ice shelves of Antarctica is among the most complex elements to factor into climate models.

Authors of the study, published in the journal Nature Communications, could contain lessons applicable to Antarctica as the continent experiences hotter temperatures.

"The melt event in 2012 is impacting the way the ice sheet responds to surface melt even now," said Culberg.

"These structural changes mean the way the ice sheet responds to surface melting is going to be impacted longer term."

© 2021 AFP

Brazil’s supreme court upholds decision annulling Lula conviction


Issued on: 16/04/2021 - 
  
A supporter of Brazil's former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva takes part in a protest in front of the Supreme Court in Brasilia, Brazil, April 15, 2021. © Adriano Machado, Reuters

Text by: NEWS WIRES

Brazil’s full Supreme Court upheld a ruling Thursday annulling former president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva’s corruption convictions, which cleared the way for him to run for a new presidential term next year
In an 8-3 ruling, the court upheld Justice Edson Fachin’s March 8 decision quashing Lula’s convictions on procedural grounds, which has upended Brazilian politics as far-right President Jair Bolsonaro gears up to seek reelection in October 2022.

“Thank you to the Brazilian people! #LulaInnocent,” the leftist leader’s Workers’ Party wrote on Twitter.


The ruling, which was made on procedural grounds, does not find Lula innocent. But it essentially puts prosecutors back to square one by sending the cases to another court.

Lula, the popular but tarnished leftist who led Brazil through an economic boom from 2003 to 2010, was jailed in 2018 on charges of taking bribes from companies seeking juicy contracts at state oil giant Petrobras

The cases felled him just as he was gearing up to seek a new presidential term, in elections Bolsonaro ultimately won.

Lula maintains he is innocent and that the case against him was a conspiracy to sideline him politically.

“A historic day. It took a long time, but it arrived,” tweeted the president of Lula’s party, Gleisi Hoffmann.

“Thank you to everyone who stood by us during this struggle.”

Judge accused of bias


The charges against Lula grew out of “Operation Car Wash,” an investigation that blew the lid off a massive corruption scheme in which top politicians and business executives systematically siphoned billions of dollars from Petrobras.

Fachin ruled the court in the southern state of Parana that handled the Car Wash cases did not have jurisdiction for Lula’s charges because they were not directly related to the Petrobras scheme.

He ordered the four cases—two convictions and two pending judgments—transferred to another court in Brasilia.

Prosecutors had asked the Supreme Court to at a minimum reinstate the two convictions, arguing they were legally sound and that Lula was “named as the ringleader” of the Petrobras scheme—an accusation they have struggled to pin on him in court.

Lula spent 18 months in jail before being freed in 2019 pending appeal.

The full Supreme Court is also due to rule on prosecutors’ appeal of a decision that found the lead Car Wash judge, Sergio Moro, was biased in convicting Lula.

They set deliberations on that case for next Thursday.

Moro controversially accepted the post of justice minister in Bolsonaro’s government when the latter won the 2018 election.

That fueled accusations he colluded to sideline Lula and get Bolsonaro elected.

Moro later had a falling-out with Bolsonaro, accusing the president of interfering in federal police investigations. He resigned in April 2020.
Brazil's Bolsonaro promises Biden to end deforestation, seeks financial help


Issued on: 15/04/2021 - 
An aerial view of logs of wood seized by the Amazon Military Police at the Manacapuru River in is seen in Manacupuru, Amazonas State, Brazil on July 16, 2020 aftert he Amazon Military Police seized about 900 logs of wood cut t by illegal loggers Ricardo Oliveira AFP/File

Brasília (AFP)

President Jair Bolsonaro wrote a letter to his US counterpart Joe Biden pledging to end illegal deforestation in Brazil by 2030 and seeking "considerable" financial assistance to get there, officials said Thursday.

The letter comes a week before Biden hosts a virtual climate summit with 40 world leaders, including Bolsonaro -- a far-right climate-change skeptic with whom he previously clashed on the issue of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon.

"In an unequivocal measure of support for your efforts, we wish to reaffirm our commitment to eliminate illegal deforestation in Brazil by 2030," said Bolsonaro's seven-page letter, dated Wednesday.

"However, achieving this goal will require considerable resources," including from "the international community, governments and the private sector," it said.

"Brazil deserves to be fairly compensated for the environmental services its citizens provide for the planet."

The Bolsonaro and Biden administrations have reportedly been holding talks on a plan in which Brazil would receive international funding to better protect the Amazon, a crucial resource in fighting climate change.

That prompted the Climate Observatory, a coalition of 198 Brazilian environmental groups, to warn this month against closed-door deals with Bolsonaro, whom it called the "worst enemy" of the world's biggest rainforest.

Wednesday's letter marks a change in tone for Bolsonaro, who clashed with Biden on deforestation during the latter's presidential campaign.

During Biden's first debate with former president Donald Trump last September, the Democratic candidate outlined a plan to offer Brazil $20 billion in international funding to "stop tearing down the forest."

"And if you don't, then you're going to have significant economic consequences," he said.

Bolsonaro fired back the next day that Brazil would not accept "coward threats," calling Biden's remarks "disastrous and unnecessary."

Bolsonaro, an ardent Trump fan, was among the last world leaders to congratulate Biden when he won.

But he said in his letter he hoped to count on Biden's "personal support" on ending deforestation.

A senior White House official said the administration "welcomed" Bolsonaro's commitment on deforestation and that Brazil "has a responsibility to lead" on climate issues.

Brazil pledged to end illegal deforestation by 2030 in the Paris climate agreement in 2015, but Bolsonaro's election win three years later cast doubt on the plan.

The far-right leader has slashed funding for environmental protection programs in Brazil and pushed to open protected lands to mining and agribusiness.

In the 12 months to August 2020, deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon increased 9.5 percent, destroying an area bigger than Jamaica, according to government data.

© 2021 AFP

French parliament approves landmark bill setting age of sexual consent at 15


Issued on: 15/04/2021 - 21:02
Justice Minister Éric Dupond-Moretti said the vote sent
a clear message: 'Children are off-limits.' © Alain Jocard, AFP

Text by:FRANCE 24

French lawmakers gave final approval on Thursday to legislation setting the minimum age of sexual consent at 15, following a wave of allegations of sexual abuse and incest described as France's second #MeToo movement.

In a second reading of the bill, members of the lower house of parliament voted unanimously to bring France's consent laws in line with most other Western countries.

Under the legislation, sex with children under 15 is considered rape, punishable by up to
20 years in prison, unless there is a small age gap between the two partners.

The bill also makes it illegal for an adult to have sex with a relative aged under 18.


Justice Minister Éric Dupond-Moretti said the vote sent a clear message: "Children are off-limits."

Under current French law, prosecutors had to prove that a minor was forced, threatened or tricked into having sex with an adult in order to bring charges of rape or sexual
assault.

The draft law was initiated by members of the Senate, who had suggested the age of consent be set at 13, which would have been one of the lowest in Europe.

But President Emmanuel Macron's government pushed for it to be set higher.

>> 'Finally': France seeks to establish age of consent at 15

The bill does allow for sex between a teen and a young adult up to five years older – a gap criticised by some MPs as too large but which Dupond-Moretti defended, saying he did not want "to put a youngster aged 18 on trial because he had consensual sex with a girl aged fourteen and a half."

The legislation also cracks down on online paedophilia, with any person caught trying to groom children aged under 15 for sexual acts over the internet facing up to 10 years in prison and a fine of €150,000 ($180,000).

The issue of consent has repeatedly come up for debate since 2018 when it emerged that a 28-year-old man, who had sex with an 11-year-old girl he met in a park, had initially been charged with a lesser sexual offence, not rape.

The case caused a public outcry in France, where sex between adults and minors has previously often been shrugged off as harmless in cases where the encounter was presented as consensual, usually by the adult.


Thursday's vote comes on the heels of an incest scandal that has brought down one of France’s most prominent intellectuals after he was accused of sexually abusing his stepson.

Olivier Duhamel, a former head of France's top political science institute and a regular pundit on French television, had been accused by his daughter-in-law Camille Kouchner of abusing her twin brother when they were in their early teens.

Duhamel confessed to the allegations on Tuesday in an interview with a special police unit that investigates crimes committed against minors, sources close to the inquiry told AFP.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)

CANADA HAD 14 AS THE AGE OF CONSENT SINCE JACQUES CARTIER GOT MARRIED IN QUEBEC CITY, UNTIL THE HARPER CONSERVATUVE GOVT 2006-2015 RAISED IT TO 16 WHILE AGE OF CONSENT FOR LGBT IS 19

  • History of Canada's Age of Consent Legislation

    www.files.efc-canada.net/si/Age of Consent/AgeofConsent_History.pdf · PDF file

    1890, when the age limit was raised to 14. With the advent of the Criminal Code in 1892, the strict prohibition against sexual intercourse was retained for girls under 14 (not married to the accused) and the law was strengthened to make an accused’s belief about the young woman’s age irrelevant.

  • Jacques Cartier | The Canadian Encyclopedia

    https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/jacques-cartier

    2013-08-29 · Jacques Cartier, navigator (born between 7 June and 23 December 1491 in Saint-Malo, France; died 1 September 1557 in Saint-Malo, France). From 1534 to 1542, Cartier led three maritime