Friday, July 23, 2021

The Game Developers Who Are Also Witches

Chris Priestman
Published 1 week ago:July 13, 2021 
Filed to:AEVEE BEE
Illustration: Angelica Alzona


Kitty Horrorshow was the first game maker to tell me she was a witch, and it wasn’t a joke. On the contrary, Horrorshow was revealing the spirituality that allowed her horror games, ANATOMY and CHYRZA, to have a sense of mystique and danger.

Horrorshow is one of a growing number of young people who practice witchcraft or identify themselves as a witch. As both VICE and The Guardian outline, witches have especially seen a resurgence among women, trans and queer-identifying people recently. Some of them dress up, some cast spells and do tarot, others create webcomics and video games.

Some see witches as icons of feminist power, or women who challenge the rules and boundaries of society. Cultural historian Rictor Norton writes that witches have always been associated with heresy, and were thought to practise unorthodox activities, such as homosexuality, which “was often an important feature of the witches’ real or alleged initiation rituals”.

Accordingly, game maker Solomon Fletcher finds that “even though the term ‘witch’ is usually tied to womanhood, it’s always felt genderless to [them]”. Witches naturally invite genderqueer discourse, and that’s part of the appeal of adopting the philosophy.
An alternative spirituality



One way to approach witchcraft is to adopt it as a spirituality called Wicca, a Pagan religion derived from pre-Christian beliefs. Wicca’s followers believe in both male and female deities, who teach that natural objects contain magical powers that can be channelled by performing rituals.

Horrorshow developed her interest in witchcraft as a way to escape the “super intolerant” upper-middle-class suburb she grew up in. She claims the people there were apprehensive toward anything that didn’t fall into their purview. That led to Horrorshow repressing her trans identity and feeling bad for even having thoughts of living in a different body. But when Horrorshow started reading books about the supernatural effects of burning different colour candles, she found a spirituality that spoke to her in ways her physical environment discouraged.

For Horrorshow, rituals are the gateway to a realm between the conscious and unconscious, where she pulls on invisible energies to create her art. “Sometimes it involves lighting candles and laying out paper and brushing ink across it into patterns that don’t make sense until later,” Horrorshow says. “Sometimes it involves waking myself up prematurely and pouring half-formed words out into a spiral notebook without being able to see what I’m writing.”



At other times, her witchcraft involves writing poems, songs, or making video games. Whatever the medium, Horrorshow’s creations are coloured by her personal experience as a practising witch. Ritual, for example, is a semi-autobiographical game that follows an individual who despises their body so much that they perform a magical ritual to change it. At first, the body becomes powerful, resembling the “goddess of witches”, but then violently disintegrates into nothing. It’s a game that reflects the agony of living in a body that society shuns and the impossible wish for something magical to change that.

Another obvious analogue is Rain, House, Eternity, which has you make a big, personal, choice at an altar. Its narrative speaks to the unfair pressures society puts on our bodies, gendered or otherwise. The choice at the altar is to give up and commit suicide or to become powerful through transition — to change the body through witchcraft. Sigils are also featured throughout the game, which Horrorshow says “comes from a place of personal practice”.


Witchcraft in this context is a “counter spirituality to the religious conservatism that defined many [queer people’s] childhoods,” as game developer Aevee Bee puts it. The visual novel Bee co-created, We Know The Devil, explores what it means to embrace witchcraft through three queer teens who attend a Christian summer camp, where they spend a night in the woods awaiting the devil. “What [the protagonists] encounter in the woods they understand and perceive as the devil because that is what they have been taught to understand their desires, identity, and love as,” Bee says. By embracing the devil, the protagonists find liberation from their religious upbringings, just as someone might by realising it’s acceptable to be queer.

The rise of witchcraft as a spirituality these past few years serves the same function Marilyn Manson did in the ’90s. It’s a way for young people who fall out of mainstream society to find something that speaks to them and accepts them. Specifically, as both Marilyn Manson and witchcraft involve satanic ritual, those drawn to them are likely rebels against religious upbringings. Witchcraft lets them hold on to the comforts of having a spirituality but in a way that serves them rather than shuns them.

Sisters doing it for themselves




Given that witches have been an icon of sisterhood for many years, their most obvious draw is in empowering and bringing women together. From the 15th century to the 18th century, across Europe and America, the witch craze saw women who were disliked or misunderstood by society hunted down and killed by the thousands.

For Arielle Grimes, there are parallels between those persecuted witches and the lives of queer women today. In 2013, the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Program found 72 per cent of hate violence homicides in New York were against transgender women, and that number has since increased. Grimes made a game called 2sWitches, which follows two witches who use the power of sex to open a portal to a safer world. “2sWitches is about rebuilding oneself through shared intimacy with others,” Grimes says. “I found that this resonated strongly with many of my friends and the greater community of queer women processing their identity post-trauma.”

Included in that community are women like Jillian Wakarchuk, the co-creator of the game Crystal Witch Cyber Jamz. For her, witches symbolise fear, and the ugliness of that fear can be reclaimed by exiled women and marginalised people. “There is a lot of power in being feared, in having knowledge, and in having control,” Wakarchuk says. “When women and queer folks have this power, it goes against the patriarchal system of power, which can be a satisfying and cathartic new dynamic.”Witches symbolise fear, and the ugliness of that fear can be reclaimed by exiled women and marginalised people.

This is played out in Crystal Witch Cyber Jamz, in which you are a magical musician trying to reclaim items that have been stolen by a male-dominated technopagan cult. It was made to “explore the power in screaming and being ugly to tear a structure down,” Wakarchuk says. The game is informed by and subverts classic images of crones and the medical history of “female hysteria” diagnoses. For centuries, both of these allowed men to destroy the lives of women: The former forced women to conform to beauty standards, while the latter punished women who simply expressed emotion.



But not all modern witches find power in the monstrous femme. Jennifer Raye, the co-creator of Witchrider Nova, finds her power in colourful cartoon witches. Raye grew up with masculine pressures that denied enjoyment of magical girls; the frilly-dressed heroines of manga and anime who deal with everyday life while possessing supernatural powers. But as Raye began to question her identity as she grew up, she found solace in anime like Sailor Moon and games like Touhou and Cotton. “They represent something I was once afraid to enjoy, and discouraged from, but now I’m free as an adult to do so,” Raye says. She describes Witchrider Nova as “a game for 14-year-old Jenn… something unabashedly feminine, without being exclusive.”

In both cases, whether the witches are ugly or cute, women are reclaiming images that have been used to scorn them in the past. It’s a way of taking power from oppressors and turning it back on them.

Witches as healers




While many witches were believed to kill livestock and poison village waters, another type of witch was essentially a female healer. Proof of this is seen in the witch trial of Jacoba Felicie in 1322, whose accusation read, “she would cure her patient of internal illness… visit the sick assiduously and continue to examine… in the manner of physicians.” As practising medicine was considered a male profession at the time, when a woman healed people, it was a crime punishable by death.

Gabriela Aveiro-Ojeda is a developer who is inspired by her Paraguayan heritage, allowing her to make games with brujas (the Spanish for witch). Brujas are a type of witch-healer that emerged from Hispanic and Native American cultures, and they are seen as people who have been assigned black magic by the gods. Also associated with witches in these regions are the curanderos, who are medicine men that use herbalism and folk remedies to heal people.


While brujas and brujeria have been feared by some, in some cultures they command respect. This is why Aveiro-Ojeda depicts them as healers and protectors who use witchcraft against oppression and to maintain cultural identity.

“Growing up Paraguayan and later as part of the latinx diaspora, brujeria is part of my life,” Aveiro-Ojeda says. “In Paraguay we have some ritualistic practices that are the result of our mestizo culture, such as beliefs about divining the future or protecting one’s home, so to me it’s very important to have depictions of this brujeria that center latinx women (in particular indigenous and afro-latinas) as a way to dispel superstitions around witchcraft and use it for healing and resistance.”

AP Thomson is another game developer who uses witchcraft as a medium for healing, specifically as a coping mechanism for mental health and gender identity. “At one point, I decided to try doing some tarot readings,” Thomson says. “I found it was actually a pretty good way to center my thoughts, re-contextualize what I was struggling with, and give my anxieties a broader perspective.”



Thomson got the idea for their new game, Fortune-500, from a funny website used to interpret tarot readings. The website reads the cards and presents the outcomes as potential futures for the participant, some of which are “performance reviews”, “home improvement”, and “career advancement”. Thomson came up with a term for this bizarre mix of the corporate world and witch culture: “White collar witchcraft”, and that aesthetic is prominent in Fortune-500.

Fortune-500 has you play as a fortune-telling witch who works for the “Magical Resources” department in a large corporation. The witch has anxiety, and believes that people secretly hate them, or that their work is worthless despite evidence to the contrary. “She’s close to being fired because her co-workers don’t understand what she actually does when compared with the much more obvious elemental magic of her wizard co-workers,” says Thomson. Fortune-500 takes anxieties and lays them out in a format that people can interact with, and hopefully make sense of them.By appropriating images and terms used to scorn and kill women, they can find power, community and inspiration for marginalised people.

Thomson’s aim, along with those of other witch game developers, is reclamation. By appropriating images and terms used to scorn and kill women, they can find power, community and inspiration for marginalised people. The importance of doing this in today’s climate is something Thomson understands well: “Wizards in popular media are often portrayed as wise advisors and mentors who are instrumental in the rise of powerful men (think Merlin and Gandalf). Meanwhile, witches in popular media are often portrayed as being instrumental in the downfall of powerful men (think Macbeth and The Little Mermaid). Given recent events in the world, it’s hopefully more and more obvious why the downfall of powerful men is often necessary and just. Basically, the world needs witches.”
Friday essay: Satan is back (again) — 
the Devil in 5 dark details

July 15, 2021 

His title is the Devil, but he goes by a number of names — Satan, Lucifer, Beliar, Beelzebul or Beelzebub.

He was big in 1970s pop culture (The Exorcist, The Devils) and continues to feature on screen today. A sixth season of the TV show Lucifer is in production and new film The Conjuring 3: The Devil Made Me Do It is showing in cinemas.

Conservative Christianity has a long commitment to the idea of a personal devil. Our Pentecostal Prime Minister Scott Morrison believes the misuse of social media is the work of the Devil. Pope Francis, meanwhile, maintains Satan still exists.

The Devil’s modern resurgence might explain a reported increase in apparent demonic possessions in both conservative Catholic and Protestant churches. The rise has fuelled the growth of church ministries that claim to drive out demons. And the conspiracy theorists of QAnon have notoriously created baseless moral panic about the imagined sexual abuse of children in Satanic cults.

Given the amount of publicity the Devil is currently attracting, it’s worth reviewing his history. Here are five things worth knowing.

1. His story is paradoxical

After the Divine Trinity itself (the Father, Son and Holy Spirit — three identities in one God), the Devil plays the most important role in the Christian story.

He is there before the beginning of the world and he survives its end. He is first and chief among the angels. He is the first to disobey God and, along with his fellow fallen angels, to be expelled from Heaven.

From this moment on, religious history records the conflict between God and his angelic forces and the Devil and his demonic army.

Within the Christian tradition, it was the Devil — in the form of a serpent after his own fall from heaven — who brought about the Fall of humanity in the Garden of Eden. Christ’s death and resurrection signalled the victory over Satan and death.


Christ refused a banquet offered by Satan. William Blake (circa 1816–1820). Wikiart

Yet this story is deeply paradoxical. For in spite of Christ’s apparent win, the Devil remains for Christians a real and present source of cosmic evil and human suffering. “We should not think of the devil as a myth, a representation, a symbol, a figure of speech or an idea,” declared Pope Francis in 2018, lest we “let our guard down”.

On the one hand, the Devil is God’s most implacable enemy, granted the freedom to rebel against him. Thus, Saint Paul advised the Ephesians “to put on the whole armour of God so that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the Devil” (Ephesians 6.11).

But on the other hand, the Devil is also God’s faithful servant who acts only at God’s command, or at least with his endorsement. So God sends Satan to kill Job’s animals, servants and children and to afflict Job with “loathsome sores” in order to test his faith in God (Job 1-2).

‘The court accepts the existence of God every time a witness swears to tell the truth […] It’s about time they accept the existence of the Devil.’





2. He is a master magician

Within the Christian tradition, Satan was a master of illusion. Unlike God, he could not perform miracles because he was bound by natural laws.

Satan was seen as a master of magic. In early Christianity, magic was reprehensible because demons were at the heart of it. For Saint Augustine (354-430), the demonic was present within all magic and superstitious practices in other religions.

For Isidore, bishop of Seville (c.569–636), “the foolery of the magic arts held sway over the entire world for many centuries through the instructions of evil angels […] all of these things are to be avoided by a Christian and entirely repudiated and condemned”.

Thus, witches, magicians, and sorcerers (whether acting benevolently or malevolently) were seen as in league with the Devil.

Thus “demonology”, which developed from the middle of the 13th century, was the “science” of determining the powers of the Devil within nature. From the middle of the 15th century, their research was written up in text books for demon hunters — Demonologies.

Modern conservative Christianity still views magical practices along with a range of popular occult practices — tea leaf reading, horoscopes, seances, tarot cards, and ouija boards — as dangerous dabbling with the Devil.
‘Conjecture is useless. We need a professional witch hunter.’




3. He can be sexy

The Devil has been imagined (and pictured) in many forms. In the television series Lucifer he is a handsome, well-built man.

This tradition goes back to John Milton’s depiction of him as a handsome man in the poem Paradise Lost: “From his lips/Not words alone pleased her”. Poet and painter William Blake depicted the devil as a chiselled Greek god.

In the medieval period, however, because he dwelt on the boundaries between the human and the bestial, he was often depicted in animal form. In Dante’s Inferno (1265-1321) he was imagined like a dragon with “two mighty wings, such as befitting were so great a bird, sails of the sea I never saw so large. No feathers had they, but as of a bat”.

He was often imagined as goat-like and depicted with animal features: cloven hooves, talons, horns, tail, webbed hands.


Satan with creature features. Detail from Jacob de Backer’s The Last Judgement (circa 1580s). Wikiart

In demonological literature he was portrayed as a spiritual being without any bodily form. A master of illusion, he was a shape shifter. It was believed he could change gender and assume a male (incubus) or a female body (succubus).

As a spiritual being, the Devil was unable to create children. But he could assume a female form, steal semen from a man and then, in a male form, deposit it in a woman.

According to that most famous of all the Demonologies, Malleus Maleficarum (1486), the pleasure to be gained by a woman from sex with the Devil was equivalent or better to that with a man.

But the Devil and his angels gained no such pleasure. For them, it was just part of the job of inciting people to evil. Demons transformed themselves, Malleus authors declared, “not for the sake of pleasure, since a spirit does not have flesh or bones,” but “that humans will become more inclined to all faults”.
‘Lucifer’s come a long way. He does his best when you put a little faith in him.’


4. He gets around


As a spiritual being, it was believed the Devil could enter into human beings and possess them. Demonologist Henri Boguet (circa 1550–1619) told of a nun who, in eating a lettuce, swallowed the Devil hidden within it.

Indeed, the Devil most often entered through the mouth. But he could apparently also gain access through other bodily openings or wounds.


Satan smiting Job with boils. William Blake (1826). Wikiart

Demonologist Francesco Guazzo listed 47 signs of possession in his Compendium Maleficarum (1608). There were natural signs, like crying, gnashing the teeth, foaming at the mouth, extraordinary strength, and violence to the self and others.

There were also supernatural signs — clairvoyance, knowledge of strange languages, levitation, vomiting of strange objects, speaking without moving the mouth in different tones from the normal and the inability to feel pain when pricked.

In the “golden age” of demonic possession, from 1500–1700, experts arose within Catholicism and Protestantism who could cast out demons.

By the year 1600, do-it-yourself exorcism manuals were available. The most successful collection of these, the Thesaurus Exorcismorum (1608) promises “evil spirits, demons and all evil spells are driven from obsessed human bodies as if expelled by whips and clubs”.
5. He can be defeated (sort of)

According to the Christian understanding of history, the Devil, his son the Antichrist and his army of demons will be finally defeated on Judgement Day and sent to hell.

But within the confines of hell, the Demonic paradox continues.

The Devil and his evil angels will be tormented eternally for their rebellion against God. But they still remain God’s enforcers. There is no Biblical source for the idea of Satan and his demons torturing the damned in hell. But from the fourth century, Satan was believed to be the ruler of the underworld, as told in stories of Christ’s descent into Hell before his resurrection.


Detail from Luca Signorelli’s The Damned (circa 1500). Wikimedia Commons

Read more: Five things to know about the Antichrist

The role of Satan and his demons punishing the damned in hell was to become a common image in medieval art.

English philosopher Henry More (1614-87) wrote of gratuitous torture, with demons looking to “satiate their lascivient cruelty with all manner of abuses and torments they can imagine”.


Jack Nicholson plays a charming devil in The Witches of Eastwick. IMDB

But by the end of the 19th century, this demonic story had lost its central role in Western intellectual life. The Devil had largely become a figure of myth.

Ironically, the marginalisation of the Christian story of the Devil in the modern West and in liberal Christianity allowed for a proliferation of devils and demons in popular culture — from The Devil’s Advocate to Rosemary’s Baby to The Witches of Eastwick.

The Devil is metaphorically, if not literally, the “evil” within all of us. As a result, the Devil has new domains, new territories, and new borders in which he “walks about, as a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour” (1 Peter 5.8).


Author
Philip C. Almond
Emeritus Professor in the History of Religious Thought, The University of Queensland




ALEISTER CROWLEY


 What, then, are the Court Cards? This question involves another aspect of the system of development. What was the first mental process? Obliged to describe Nothing, the only way to do so without destroying its integrity was to represent it as the union of a Plus Something with an equivalent Minus Something. One may call these two ideas, the Active and Passive, the Father and Mother. But although the Father and Mother can make a perfect union, thereby returning to Zero, which is a retrogression, they can also go forward into Matter, so that their union produces a Son and a Daughter. The idea works out in practice as a method of describing how the union of any two things produces a third thing which is neither of them. The simplest illustration is in Chemistry. If we take hydrogen gas and chlorine gas, and pass an electric spark through them, an explosion takes place, and hydrochloric acid is produced. Here we have a positive substance, which may be called the Son of the marriage of these elements, and is an advance into Matter. But also, in the ecstasy of the union, Light and Heat are disengaged; these phenomena are not material in the same sense as the hydrochloric acid is material; this product of the union is therefore of a spiritual nature, and corresponds to the Daughter. In the language of the alchemists, these phenomena were classified for convenience under the figure of four "elements". Fire, the purest and most active, corresponds to the Father; Water, still pure but passive, is the Mother; their union results in an element partaking of both natures, yet distinct from either, and this they called 'Air". One must constantly remember that the terms used by ancient and medieval philosophers do not mean at all what they mean nowadays. "Water" does not mean to them the chemical compound H2O; it is an intensely abstract idea, and exists everywhere. The ductability of iron is a watery quality.1 The word "element" does not mean a chemical element; it means a set of ideas; it summarizes certain qualities or properties. It seems hardly possible to define these terms in such a way as to make their meaning clear to the student. He must discover for himself by constant practice what they mean to him. It does not even follow that he will arrive at the same ideas. This will not mean that one mind is right and the other wrong, because each one of us has his own universe all to himself, and it is not the same as anybody else's universe. The moon that A. sees is not the moon that B., standing by him, sees. In this case, the difference is so infinitesimal that it does not exist in practice; yet there is a difference. But if A. and B look at a picture in a gallery, it is very much not the same picture to both, because A's mind has been trained to observe it by his experience of thousands of other pictures; B. has probably seen an entirely different set of pictures. Their experience will coincide only in the matter of a few well-known pictures. Besides this, their minds are essentially different in many other ways. So, if A. dislikes Van Gogh, B. pities him; if C. admires Bougereau, D. shrugs his shoulders. There is no right or wrong about any matter whatsoever. 1Its magnetic virtue (similarly) is fiery, its conductivity airy, and its weight and hardness earthy. Yet, weight is but a function of the curvature of the "space.time Continuum": "Earth is the Throne of Spirit." This is true, even in matters of the strictest science. The scientific description of an object is universally true; and yet it is not completely true for any single observer. The phenomenon called the Daughter is ambiguous. It has been explained above as the spiritual ingredient in the result of the marriage of the Father and the Mother; but this is only one interpretation.



VI. THE LOVERS OR: (THE BROTHERS)

This card and its twin, XIV, Art, are the most obscure and difficult of the Atu. Each of these symbols is in itself double, so that the meanings form a divergent series, and the integration of the Card can only be regained by repeated marriages, identifications, and some form of Hermaphroditism.

Yet the attribution is the essence of simplicity. Atu VI refers to Gemini, ruled by Mercury. It means The Twins. The Hebrew letter corresponding is Zain, which means a Sword, and the framework of the card is therefore the Arch of Swords, beneath which the Royal Marriage takes place.

The Sword is primarily an engine of division. In the intellectual world-which is the world of the Sword suit-it represents analysis. This card and Atu XIV together compose the compre hensive alchemical maxim: Solve et coagula.

This card is consequently one of the most fundamental cards in the Tarot. It is the first card in which more than one figure appears. [The Ape of Thoth in Atu I is only a shadow.] In its original form, it was the story of Creation.

Here is appended, for its historical interest, the description of this card in its primitive form from Liber 418.

"There is an Assyrian legend of a woman with a fish, and also there is a legend of Eve and the Serpent, for Cain was the child of Eve and the Serpent, and not of Eve and Adam; and therefore when he had slain his brother, who was the first murderer, having sacri ficed living things to his demon, had Cain the mark upon his brow, which is the mark of the Beast spoken of in the Apocalypse, and is the sign of Initiation.

"The shedding of blood is necessary, for God did not hear the children of Eve until blood was shed. And that is external religion; but Cain spake not with God, nor had the mark of initiation upon his brow, so that he was shunned of all men, until he had shed blood.

And this blood was the blood of his brother. This is a mystery of the sixth key of the Tarot, which ought not to be called The Lovers, but The Brothers.

"In the middle of the card stands Cain; in his right hand is the Hammer of Thor with which he hath slain his brother, and it is all wet with his blood. And his left hand he holdeth open as a sign of innocence. On his right hand is his mother Eve, around whom the serpent is entwined with his hood spread behind her head; and on his left hand is a figure somewhat like the Hindoo Kali, but much more seductive. Yet I know it to be Lilith. And above him is the Great Sigil of the Arrow, downward, but it is struck through the heart of the child. This child also is Abel. And the meaning of this part of the card is obscure, but that is the correct drawing of the Tarot card; and that is the correct magical fable from which the Hebrew scribes, who were not complete Initiates, stole their legend of the Fall and the subsequent events."

It is very significant that almost every sentence in this passage seems to reverse the meaning of the previous one. This is because reaction is always equal and opposite to action. This equation is, or should be, simultaneous in the intellectual world, where there is no great time4ag; the formulation of any idea creates its contradictory at almost the same moment. The contradictory of any proposition is implicit in itself. This is necessary to preserve the equilibrium of the Universe. The theory has been explained in the essay on Atu I, the Juggler, but must now be again emphasized in order to interpret this card.

The key is that the Card represents the Creation of the World. The Hierarchs held this secret as of transcendant importance. Con sequently, the Initiates who issued the Tarot, for use during the Aeon of Osiris, superseded the original card above described in "The Vision and the Voice". They were concerned to create a new Universe of their own; they were the fathers of Science. Their methods of working, grouped under the generic term Alchemy, have never been made public. The interesting point is that all developments of modern science in the last fifty years have given intelligent and instructed people the opportunity of reflecting that the whole trend of science has been to return to alchemical aims and (mutatis mutandis) methods.

The secrecy observed by the alchemists was made necessary by the power of persecuting Churches. Bitterly as bigots fought among themselves, they were all equally concerned to destroy the infant Science, which, as they instinctively recognized, would put an end to the ignorance and faith on which their power and wealth depended.

The subject of this card is Analysis, followed by Synthesis. The i first question asked by science is: "Of what are things composed? "This having been answered, the next question is: "How shall we recombine them to our greater advantage?" This resumes the whole policy of the Tarot.

The hooded figure which occupies the centre of the Card is another form of The Hermit, who is further explained in Atu IX. He is himself a form of the god Mercury, described in Atu I; he is closely shrouded, as if to signify that the ultimate reason of things lies in a realm beyond manifestation and intellect. (As elsewhere explained, only two operations are ultimately possible---analysis and synthesis). He is standing in the Sign of the Enterer, as if projecting the mysterious forces of creation. About his arms is a scroll, in dicative of the Word which is alike his essence and his message. But the Sign of the Enterer is also the Sign of Benediction and of Consecration; thus his action in this card is the Celebration of the Hermetic Marriage. Behind him are the figures of Eve, Lilith and Cupid. This symbolism has been incorporated in order to preserve in some measure the original form of the card, and to show its derivation, its heirship, its continuity with the past. On the quiver of Cupid is inscribed the word Thelema, which is the Word of the Law. (See Liber AL, chap. I, verse 39.) His shafts are quanta of Will. It is thus shown that this fundamental formula of magical working, analysis and synthesis, persists through the Aeons.


One may now consider the Hermetic Marriage itself.

This part of the Card has been simplified froni "the Chymical Marriage of Christian Rosenkreutz", a masterpiece too lengthy and diffuse to quote usefully in this place. But the essence of the analysis is the continuous see-saw of contradictory ideas. It is a glyph of duality. The Royal persons concerned are the Black or Moorish King with a golden crown, and the White Queen with a silver crown. He is accompanied by the Red Lion, and she by the White Eagle.

These are symbols of the male and female principles in Nature; they are therefore equally, in various stages of manifestation, Sun and Moon, Fire and Water, Air and Earth. In chemistry they appear as acid and alkali, or (more deeply) metals and non-metals, taking those words in their widest philosophical sense to include hydrogen on the one hand and oxygen on the other. In this aspect, the hooded figure represents the Protean element of carbon, the seed of all organic life.

The symbolism of male and female is carried on still further by the weapons of the King and Queen; he bears the Sacred Lance, and she the Holy Grail; their other hands are joined, as consenting to the Marriage. Their weapons are supported by twin children, whose positions are counterchanged; for the white child not only holds the Cup, but carries roses, while the black child, holding his father's Lance, carries also the club, an equivalent symbol. At the bottom of the whole is the result of the Marriage in primitive and panto morphic form; it is the winged Orphic egg. This egg represents the essence of all that life which comes under this formula of male and female. It carries on the symbolism of the Serpents with which the King's robe is embroidered, and of the Bees which adorn the mantle of the Queen. The egg is grey, mingling white and black; thus it signifies the co-operation of the three Supernals of the Tree of Life. The colour of the Serpent is purple, Mercury in the scale of the Queen. It is the influence of that God manifested in Nature, whereas the wings are tinged with crimson, the colour (in the King scale) of Binah the great Mother. In this symbol is therefore a complete glyph of the equilibrium necessary to begin the Great Work. But, as to the final mystery, that is left unsolved. Perfect is the plan to produce life, but the nature of this life is concealed. It is capable of taking any possible form; but what form? That is dependent upon the in fluences attendant on gestation.




The figure in the air presents some difficulty. The traditional interpretation of the figure is that he is Cupid; and it is not at first clear what Cupid has to do with Gemini. No light is thrown upon this point by consideration of the position of the path upon the Tree of Life, for Gemini leads from Binah to Tiphareth. There accordingly arises the whole question of Cupid. Roman gods usually represent a more material aspect of the Greek gods from whom they are derived; in this case, Eros. Eros is the son of Aphrodite, and tradition varies as to whether his father was Ares, Zeus or Hermes---that is, Mars, Jupiter or Mercury. His appearance in this card suggests that Hermes is the true sire; and this view is confirmed by the fact that it is not altogether easy to distinguish him from the child Mercury, for they have in common wantonness) irresponsibility, and the love of playing tricks. But in this image are peculiar char acteristics. He carries a bow and arrows in a golden quiver. (He is sometimes represented with a torch.) He has golden wings, and is blindfolded. From this, it may appear that he represents the in telligent (and, at the same time, unconscious) will of the soul to unite itself with all and sundry, as has been explained in the general formula with regard to the agony of separateness.

No very special importance is attached to Cupid in alchemical figures. Yet, in one sense, he is the source of all action; the libido to express Zero as Two. From another point of view, he may be regarded as the intellectual aspect of the influence of Binah upon Tiphareth, for (in one tradition) the title of the card is "The Children of the Voice, the Oracle of the Mighty Gods". From this point of view, he is a symbol of inspiration, descending upon the hooded figure, who is, in this instance, a prophet operating the conjunction of the King and Queen. His arrow represents the spiritual intelli gence necessary in alchemical operations, rather than the mere hunger to perform them. On the other hand, the arrow is peculiarly a symbol of direction, and it is, therefore, proper to put the word "Thelema" in Greek letters on the quiver. It is also to be observed that the opposite card, Sagittarius, means the Bearer of the Arrow, or Archer, a figure who does not appear in any form in Atu XIV. These two cards are so complementary that they cannot be studied separately, for full interpretation.


XV. THE DEVIL

This card is attributed to the letter Ayin, which means an Eye, and it refers to Capricornus in the Zodiac. In the Dark Ages of Christianity, it was completely misunderstood. Eliphaz Levi studied it very deeply because of its connection with ceremonial magic, his favourite subject; and he re-drew it, identifying it with Baphomet, the ass-headed idol of the Knights of the Temple.{The Early Christians also were accused of worshipping an Ass, or ass.headed god. See Browning, The Ring and the Book (The Pope).} But at this time archeological research had not gone very far; the nature of Baphomet was not fully understood. (See Atu 0, above.) At least he succeeded in identifying the goat portrayed upon the card with Pan.

On the Tree of Life, Atu XIII and XV are symmetrically placed; they lead from Tiphareth, the human consciousness, to the spheres in which Thought (on the one hand) and Bliss (on the other) are developed. Between them, Atu XIV leads similarly to the sphere which formulates Existence. (See note on Atu X and arrangement.) These three cards may therefore be summed up as a hieroglyph of the processes by which idea manifests as form.

This card represents creative energy in its most material form; in the Zodiac, Capricornus occupies the Zenith. It is the most exalted of the signs; it is the goat leaping with lust upon the summits of earth. The sigu is ruled by Saturn, who makes for selfhood and perpetuity. In this sign, Mars is exalted, showing in its best form the fiery, inaterial energy of creation. The card represents Pan Pangenetor, the Ml-Begetter. It is the Tree of Life as seen against a background of the exquisitely tenuous, complex, and fantastic forms of madness, the divine madness of spring, already foreseen in the meditative madness of winter; for the Sun turns northwards on entering this sign. The roots of the Tree are made transparent, in order to show the innumerable leapings of the sap; before it stands the Himalayan goat, with an eye in the centre of his forehead, representing the god Pan upon the highest and most secret mountains of the earth. His creative energy is veiled in the symbol of the Wand of the Chief Adept, crowned with the winged globe and the twin serpents of Horus and Osiris.

"Hear me, Lord of the Stars, For thee have I worshipped ever With stains and sorrows and scars, With joyful, joyful Endeavour. Hear me, 0 lilywhite goat Crisp as a thicket of thorns, With a collar of gold for thy throat, A scarlet bow for thy horns."

The sign of Capricornus is rough, harsh, dark, even blind; the impulse to create takes no account of reason, custom, or foresight. It is divinely unscrupulous, sublimely careless of result. "thou hast no right but to do thy will. Do that, and no other shall say nay. For pure will, unassuaged of purpose, delivered from the lust of result, is every way perfect." AL. I, 42-4.

It is further to be remarked that the trunk of the Tree pierces the heavens; about it is indicated the ring of the body of Nuith. Similarly, the shaft of the Wand goes down indefinitely to the centre of earth. "If I lift up my head, I and my Nuit are one. If 1 droop down mine head, and shoot forth venom, then is rapture of the earth, and I and the earth are one." (AL. II, 26).

The formula of this card is then the complete appreciation of all existing things. He rejoices in the rugged and the barren no less than in the smooth and the fertile. All things equally exalt him. He represents the finding of ecstasy in every phenomenon, however naturally repugnant; he transcends all limitations; he is Pan; he is All.

It is important to notice some other correspondences. The three vowel-consonants of the Hebrew alphabet, Aleph, Yod, 'Ayin, these three letters form the sacred name of God, I A 0. These three Atu, IX, 0, and XV, thus offer a threefold explanation of the male creative energy; but this card especially represents the masculine energy at its most masculine. Saturn, the ruler, is Set, the ass-headed god of the Egyptian deserts; he is the god of the south. The name refers to all gods containing these consonants, such as Shaitan, or Satan. (See Magick pp.336-7). Essential to the symbolism are the surroundings - barren places, especially high places. The cult of the mountain is an exact parallel. The Old Testament is full of attacks upon kings who celebrated worship in "high places"; this, although Zion itself was a mountain! This feeling persisted, even to the days of the Witches' Sabbath, held, if possible, on a desolate summit, but (if none were available) at least in a wild spot, uncontaminated by the artfulness of men.

Note that Shabbathai, the "sphere of Saturn", is the Sabbath. Historically, the animus against witches pertains to the fear of the Jews; whose rites, supplanted by the Christian forms of Magic, had become mysterious and terrible. Panic suggested that Christian children were stolen, sacrificed, and eaten. The belief persists to this day.

In every symbol of this card there is the allusion to the highest things and most remote. Even the horns of the goat are spiral, to represent the movement of the all-pervading energy. Zoroaster defines God as "having a spiral force". Compare the more recent, if less profound, writings of Einstein 


{Compare Saturn, at one end of the Seven Sacred Wanderers, with the Moon at the other: the aged man and the young girl -see "The Formula of Tetragrammaton". They are linked as no other two planets, since 32=9, and each contains in itself the extremes of its own idea. (See also Appendix: Atu xxi.)}.


Chapter III The Formula of Tetragrammaton. - Book 4 - The ...

https://hermetic.com/crowley/book-4/chap3

2017-08-15 · This formula is of most universal aspect, as all things are necessarily comprehended in it; but its use in a magical ceremony is little understood. The climax of the formula is in one sense before even the formulation of the Yod. For the Yod is the most divine aspect of the Force — the remaining letters are but a solidification of the same thing.


  1. Tetragrammaton - LAShTAL – The Aleister Crowley Society

    https://www.lashtal.com/wiki/Tetragrammaton

    The correspondence of these four elements to the Qabalistic formula of the Tetragrammaton becomes a complex structure of interdependent metaphysical concepts. The Theory Of Tetragrammaton. On 18th November, 1898 e.v., Aleister Crowley was initiated into the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn.


  1. Aleister Crowley - Internet Archive THE BOOK OF THOTH

    https://ia802508.us.archive.org/13/items/AleisterCrowleyTheBookOfT… · PDF file

    Manuscripts; 3. The Tarot and the "Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn"; 4. The Nature of the Evidence; Summary of the Questions Hitherto Discussed. II. The Tarot and the Holy Qabalah; The Naples Arrangement; The Tarot and the Formula of TetragrammatonThe Tarot and the Elements; The Twenty-two Keys, Atu, or Trumps of the Tarot


Slagging Surrealism

Money for arts 

"Surrealism itself was divided on the issue of what relation, if any, it should have to commerce. It was all very well to say, as some did, that the movement was born of a marriage of Freudian psychoanalysis with Marxist critiques of capitalism; certainly there had been a long flirtation with [Leon] Trotsky on the part of some surrealists in the 1920s and 1930s. ... 

 "But artists have to earn a living. In 1926, both Max Ernst and Joan Miro did backdrop designs for a production of 'Romeo and Juliet,' by Serge Diaghilev's Ballets Russes. ... 

Most of the surrealists, including [Andre] Breton, made their living by dealing, 'art advising,' involvement in photography, advertising and the fashion industry. Indeed, without the patronage of fashion, it is hard to see how surrealism would have made its way in Paris at all. "[Salvador] Dali, in particular, received a lot of flak for his relations with the rich. But he never made any pretense about this, unlike [Pablo] Picasso, whose communist sympathies were mostly wind. 'Picasso is a genius!' Dali would later exclaim. 'Me too! Picasso is a Spaniard! Me too! Picasso is a communist! Me neither!' " 

 — Robert Hughes, writing on "L'Amour Fou," in the Guardian

Musings of Hagbard Celine

The Theory; The Privately Funded Warships of the U. S. Navy: Blowing Holes in Public Goods Theory Earlier work on privateering by Sechrest (2003) has already demonstrated that, at least insofar as naval warfare is concerned, there need be no government monopoly on defense services. For some seven centuries, privateers--- private ships of war---constituted an effective, reliable, and highly profitable means of crippling the maritime trade of an enemy nation. So effective were privateers’ techniques that they appear to have been emulated during both world wars by the commerce raiders---both surface ships and submarines---that the Germans sent to sea. Skeptics might grant the overwhelming evidence on the effectiveness of privateers, but still question their overall value on two grounds. First, one might insist that privateers would be of little worth unless the enemy depended to a significant extent on the transportation of goods by sea. This follows from the fact that the profitability of privateering was principally derived from selling the enemy ships and cargoes which the privateers captured. Second, one might claim that the deciding factor in a naval war is always the defeat of the enemy’s warships in formal battle, not the destruction or capture of commercial ships. Privateers were seldom designed to engage in combat with naval vessels. They were usually small, fast, highly maneuverable craft which could readily capture merchant ships, but which were often too lightly armed with cannon to engage powerful ships of war. Thus one could conclude that privateering does not obviate the need for a public navy.. 

The Reality: Merchant marine shares stories from the sea On LaCour’s first voyage in the South Pacific at Guadalcanal, his ship failed to stop in time and rammed into a Navy supply ship in port. On another occasion, his ship failed to stop in a timely manner and almost ran into a mountain. The crew managed to patch up their ship and made it back to the shipyard in Seattle, Wash. LaCour said with a grin that one civilian looked at the condition of the ship upon arrival to Washington and asked him if ‘they sank any ships.’ He made his way back home to Beaumont and joined up with a ship out of Houston. The ship caught up with 150 other ships on a convoy in the Atlantic. He said he’ll never forget how they all came to a dead stop for two hours while four Canadian corvettes dropped depth charges. LaCour and his shipmates could see debris surface where the depth charges were released. Toward the end of his maritime career, he was on a ship in which the pipes were so rusted that 6 inches of aviation fuel poured into his compartment while he and his other comrades used plastic buckets to pick up the fuel and pour it back into the tank. LaCour said his branch of service had the highest casualty rate in the war. In fact, according to statistics from the Apostleship of the Sea of the United States of America, one in 26 mariners was killed in action, 1,500 ships sunk, 9,300 mariners were killed and 12,000 wounded. In addition, 243 were killed in action prior to Pearl Harbor and were among the first prisoners of war. They were also among the last to return, with 54 ships damaged by mines after V-E and V-J Day.

Jo Labadie; the AFL and IWW

TRADES UNIONISM AS I UNDERSTAND IT

Samuel Gompers commissioned an article by Labadie, "Trades Unionism As I Understand It," for the American Federation of Labor journal, American Federationist. It appeared in the April, 1894, issue. As an anarchist, Labadie was insistent that trade unions stay away from political action, including lobbying and demands for pro-labor legislation. This stance was philosophically in tune with Gompers, who believed in voluntary methods and feared government intervention:


Trades unionism as I understand it is a co-operative effort on the part of wage earners to better their economic conditions in a special way. It is one of the many ways pointed out by social and political economists for the betterment of the race. It is not its province to attempt to do everything that is good, any more than should one person attempt to do all the things that it is possible for one man to do. We have learned by experience that it is more economical, more effective, for each person to do one particular thing than it is for each person to do everything that is necessary to be done, if that were not possible. There was a time when almost every person was Jack of all trades and master of none, but that time has long since gone by. The division of labor has made it possible for one person to be master of one trade, or at least one branch of a trade, and the result is that the productivity of labor has increased to a wonderful degree. This specializing of efforts has taken place in almost every avenue of life, and so far has been one of the greatest actors in progress and civilization.

There is a tendency among trades unionists to fly in the face of this law of progress, and to have the trades unions take upon themselves multitudinous functions. It seems to me that a trade union should confine its efforts strictly to those things that are peculiar to the trade of which the union is formed...The failure of the K. of L. {Knights of Labor] to succeed on trade lines was largely because the members of one trade attempted to settle disputes in other trades, instead of letting each trade settle its own disputes.

Trades unions are so named because they were intended, and rightly so, to do that for the tradesman which a mixed body could not do so well, and which is peculiar to the particular trade organized. Those things which are not peculiar to any particular trades have no right to be introduced into a trade union. Hence no political or religious problem has any business in a trade union, because these are questions which affect the whole body of citizens, whether they be tradesmen or not....We must separate the trade organization from the political or the religious organization to be in harmony with the law of progress and to invite the largest degree of success.

Because this is so does not preclude workingmen from taking political action, if they so choose, but they must organize for that especial purpose. And I question the policy of organizing for political action on class lines. If the lines between the three classes of society--workingmen, beggarmen, thieves--were clearly drawn and easily recognized by the mass of the people this doubt would not exist, but it requires no argument to prove that this is not yet so...


JOSEPH A. LABADIE BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

In 1878, Labadie, who called himself "Jo", was chosen by Knights of Labor official Charles Litchman to organize Detroit's first assembly, L.A. 901. It was camouflaged as the Washington Literary Society in line with the organization's secrecy. Labadie also joined the Greenback financial reform movement, ran an unsuccessful campaign for mayor on the Greenback-Labor ticket, and served as delegate to the divisive 1880 Greenback-Labor convention in Chicago.

That year he also was instrumental in organizing the Detroit Trades Council, a city-wide assembly of trades unions, and served as its president while continuing as an official of the Knights of Labor and Socialist Labor Party. With Grenell, Labadie continued issuing a succession of labor papers, including the nationally influential Advance and Labor Leaf, and was a widely-published columnist for the labor press, recognized for his forthright style and originality of thought.

In 1883, Labadie abandoned socialism and embraced individualist anarchism. He became a close associate of Benjamin Tucker and a frequent contributor to the latter's Liberty. Despite Labadie's outspoken opposition to government, he was appointed clerk at Michigan's new Bureau of Labor in Lansing, and served there a year.

After the 1886 Haymarket bombing in Chicago triggered an anti-anarchist hysteria, which was echoed by Knights of Labor leader Terence Powderly, Labadie became Powderly's enemy. He condemned the Knights' leaders for a series of blunders and accused them of corruption. He visited the imprisoned Haymarket anarchists in Chicago on his way to the 1887 Knights of Labor convention in Minneapolis as delegate from Detroit. After Powderly opposed a clemency resolution for the Haymarket defendants, Labadie delivered a scathing indictment of Powderly and his ring.

Disillusioned with the Knights of Labor, Labadie in 1888 organized with Sam Goldwater the Michigan Federation of Labor, became its first president, and forged an alliance with Samuel Gompers.

Joseph A. Labadie

from Men Against the State

Joseph A. Labadie was among the contributors to Benjamin Tucker's publication Liberty who "brought to Tucker's paper a quality of radical writing unsurpassed in its own time, and rarely approached since...A Detroit printer and writer for a number of socialist labor papers, including [B.G.] Haskell's Truth, and the Detroit papers Today and the Advance and Labor Leaf, among others, his relations with other portions of the radical and reform movement remained partially intact during his participation in Tucker's literary experiment. A contributor as early as June, 1883, he still remained as secretary of the national board of supervision of the Socialist Labor Party a year later. During this period he gradually lost faith in reconciliation between the various fragments of the socialist movement but retained a strong interest in the fortunes of the labor movement. In this however he gradually became the exponent of anarchist measures, and argued the anti-statist case with their leaders and before their conventions when he attended.
"Most of Labadie's ideas in Liberty were presented through the medium of a column, "Cranky Notions." In agreement with Tucker on most points, he still clung to the belief that the labor movement could produce benefits, primarily in obtaining reductions in the hours worked, with neither raises nor reductions in pay. Admitting his loss of faith in socialism during the fall of 1888, he still considered it expedient for the government to control "natural monopolies" such as water works, streets and railroads; but he thought that schools, banks, post offices, and like institutions should best be left to operation by individuals. Like Tucker, he backed the assertion that the best way to prevent monopolies would be to withhold the grant of franchises.
"Politically, Labadie inclined to a policy of compromise also, in the hope of extracting some gain from a situation which was bound to remain deadlocked as the result of insistence upon total realization of ideals. Unimpressed with voting as utilized under universal suffrage, which he described as 'a process by which truth is established by numbers,' he considered that anarchists might use it to advance the 'principles of liberty.' 'All political questions mean either more or less government,' said Labadie, in defending the participation of anarchists in voting in order to forestall more positive legislation. Nationally, he was shocked by the Republican program, which he said was that of 'establishing a nation with a big N and crushing out local autonomies.' Under their sponsorship he saw the realization of Hamiltonian authoritarianism in its greatest severity, and for this reason inclined to favor the Democrats, whom he saw as still opposed to the centralizing of power. Throughout his gradual swing to anarchism, Labadie retained friendly relations with the Knights of Labor and other workingmen's organizations. It was his belief that his persistence was responsible for weakening the faith of some of Detroit's most active and intelligent labor leaders in the principle of government control. It was not necessary to 'desert one's area of agitation' on becoming an anarchist, Labadie held, and under this impression remained one of Tucker's closest associates, a relationship which even the end of Liberty did not terminate..."


Anarchism: What It Is and What It Is Not

by Joseph A. Labadie


So you want me to tell you what Anarchism is, do you? I can do no less than make the attempt, and in my own simple way try to make you understand at least that it is not what the uninformed and the capitalistic newspapers, liars, fools and villains generally say it is.

In the first place, let me urge upon all who desire to learn the truth about Anarchism not to go to its enemies for information, but to talk with Anarchists and read anarchistic literature. And it is not always safe to take what one, two or even a dozen persons may say about it, either, though they call themselves Anarchists. Take what a goodly number of them say and then cancel those statements in which they are not in accord. What remains in all probability is true. For example, what is Christianity? Ask a dozen or more people and it is likely their answers will not agree in every particular. They may, however, agree upon some fundamental propositions. This more likely to be the correct position of Christianity than the statements made by any one of them. This process of cancellation is the best way of finding out what any philosophy is. This I have done in determining what Anarchism is, and it is a fair presumption that I have arrived tolerably near the truth.

Anarchism, in the language of Benjamin R. Tucker, may be described as the doctrine that "all the affairs of men should be managed by individuals or voluntary associations, and that the state should be abolished."

The state is "the embodiment of the principle of invasion in an individual, or a band of individuals, assuming to act as representatives or masters of the entire people within a given area."

Government is "the subjection of the noninvasive individual to an external will."

Now, keep these definitions in mind, and don't use the word "state" or "government" or "Anarchy" in any other sense than that in which the Anarchist himself uses it. Mr. Tucker's definitions are generally accepted by Anarchists everywhere.

The state, according to Herbert Spencer and others, originated in war, aggressive war, violence, and has always been maintained by violence. The function of the state has always been to govern - to make the non-ruling classes do what the ruling classes want done. The state is the king in a monarchy, the king and parliament in a limited monarchy, elected representatives in such a republic as exists in the United States, and the majority of the voters in a democracy as in Switzerland. History shows that the masses are always improved in mental, moral, and material conditions as the powers of the state over the individuals are reduced. As man becomes more enlightened regarding his interests, individual and collective, he insists that forcible authority over him and his conduct shall be abolished. He points to the fact that the church has improved in its material affairs, to say nothing of the spiritual, since the individual is not compelled to support it and accept its doctrines or be declared a heretic and burned at the stake or otherwise maltreated; to the fact that people are better dressed since the state has annulled the laws regulating dress; to the fact that people are happier married since each person can choose his own mate; to the fact that people are better in every way since the laws were abolished regulating the individual's hair-cut, his traveling, his trade, the number of window panes in his house, chewing tobacco or kissing on Sundays, and so on without number. In Russia and some other countries even now you would not be allowed to go into the country or come out of it without legal permission, to print or read books or papers except those permitted by law, to keep anyone in your house over night without notifying the police, and in a thousand ways the individual is hampered in his movements. Even in the freest countries the individual is robbed by the tax-collector, is beaten by the police, is fined and jailed by courts - is browbeated by the authority in many ways when his conduct is not aggressive or in violation of equal freedom.

It is a mistake often made, even by some Anarchists, to say that Anarchism aims to establish absolute freedom. Anarchism is a practical philosophy, and is not striving to do the impossible. What Anarchism aims to do, however, is to make equal freedom applicable to every human creature. The majority under this rule has no more rights than the minority, the millions no greater rights than one. It assumes that every human being should have equal rights to all the products of nature without money and without price; that what one produces would belong to himself, and that not individual or collection of persons, be they outlaw or state, should take any portion of it without his knowledge or consent; that every person should be allowed to exchange his own products wherever he wills; that he should be allowed to co-operate with his fellows if he chooses, or to compete against them in whatever field he elects; that no restrictions whatsoever should be put upon him in what he prints or reads or drinks or eats or does, so long as he does not invade the equal rights of his fellows.

It is often remarked that Anarchism is an impractical theory imported into the United States by a lot of ignorant foreigners. Of course, those who make this statement are as much mistaken as though they made it while conscious of its falsity. The doctrine of personal freedom is an American doctrine, in so far as the attempt to put it into practice is concerned, as Paine, Franklin, Jefferson and others understood it quite well. Even the Puritans had a faint idea of it, as they came here to exercise the right of private judgement in religious matters. The right to exercise private judgement in religion is Anarchy in religion. The first to formulate the doctrine of individual sovereignty was a blue-bellied Yankee, as Josiah Warren was a descendant of the Revolutionary General Warren. We have Anarchy in trade between the states in this country, as free trade is simply commercial Anarchy.

No one who commits crime can be an Anarchist, because crime is the doing of injury to another by aggression - the opposite of Anarchism.

No one can kill another, except in self-defense, and be an Anarchist, because that would be invading another's equal right to live - the antithesis of Anarchism.

Hence assassins and criminals generally are called Anarchists only by the ignorant and malicious.

You can't be an Anarchist and do the things which Anarchism condemns.

Anarchism would make occupancy and use the sole title to land, thereby abolishing rent for land.

It would guarantee to each individual or association the right to issue money as a medium of exchange, thereby abolishing interest on money in so far as co-operation and competition can do it.

It denies the justice of patent and copyrights, and would abolish monopoly by abolishing patent rights.

It denies the right of any body of people to tax the individual for anything he does not want, but that taxation should be voluntary, such as is now done by churches, trade unions, insurance societies and all other voluntary associations.

It believes that freedom in every walk of life is the greatest possible means of elevating the human race to happier conditions.

It is said that Anarchism is not socialism. This is a mistake. Anarchism is voluntary Socialism. There are two kinds of Socialism, archistic and anarchistic, authoritarian and libertarian, state and free. Indeed, every proposition for social betterment is either to increase or decrease the powers of external wills and forces over the individual. As they increase they are archistic; as they decrease they are anarchistic.

Anarchy is a synonym for liberty, freedom, independence, free play, self-government, non-interference, mind your own business and let your neighbor's alone, laissez faire, ungoverned, autonomy, and so on.

Now that I am done, I find that you have been given only a faint outline of what Anarchism is and is not. Those who desire to pursue the subject further will find food for intellectual adults in Tucker's Instead of a Book; Proudhon's What is Property? and Economical Contradictions; Tandy's Voluntary Socialism; Mackay's The Anarchists; Auberon Herbert's Free Life; The Demonstrator; Lucifer, and a lot of other books, papers and pamphlets which may be had by addressing Henry Bool, Ithaca, NY, E.C. Walker, 244 West 143rd Street, NYC, "Liberty," Box 1312, New York, or "Mother Earth," P.O. Box 217, Madison Square Station, New York City.

online pamphlets from the labadie collection



CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M 
Former Davy boss to reap €79m in sale of tainted firm

Brian McKiernan resigned in March after the Central Bank fined the firm over conflict of interest


Brian McKiernan, who quit as chief executive, is believed to be the biggest shareholder in Davy


Jon Ihle
July 23 2021 

The former Davy CEO who was forced to resign over his role in a bond trading scandal at the firm is set to get paid nearly €79m for his stake in the stockbroker from its sale to Bank of Ireland.

The details of the deal also reveal that staff at the stockbroker will not be subject to pay caps and bonus bans that apply to bailed-out banks even after Bank of Ireland takes over in 2022.

Furthermore, up to 80 staff at the bank will transfer to Davy after the deal concludes, meaning they will also be in line for bonuses and escape the €500,000 a year pay ceiling. Up to 12 staff per annum can transfer after that.

The agreement is the same as AIB’s bonus carve-out for its €138m acquisition of Davy’s rival Goodbody, which was announced in early March amidst the fall-out from the bond scandal, except it allows many more bank employees to move over.

By letting this backdoor swing open so wide at Bank of Ireland, in which the State is the largest shareholder with a 14pc stake, Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe has effectively ended the decade-old ban on banker bonuses.

While the Government is gradually selling down its shareholding this year as part of a phased exit from Bank of Ireland, analysts expect the State to still own between 5pc and 10pc of the bank’s stock by the end of the year.

Brian McKiernan, who ran Davy Group from 2015 until March of this year, is understood to have a 13pc stake in the business, which is being sold to Bank of Ireland for €440m plus €125m in cash to be generated from the sale of Davy’s funds business.

Mr McKiernan resigned his role at the firm in early March, alongside several other senior figures, after the Central Bank fined Davy €4.13m - just one-eighth of 2020 profits - for breaching conflict of interest rules on a major bond transaction.

He was part of a group of 16 Davy employees behind a heavily discounted deal to sell €27m in Anglo Irish Bank bonds on behalf of Belfast businessman Patrick Kearney without telling him they were also the buyers. The Davy staff then sold the assets at a much higher price.

The disclosure of the details of the deal and the resulting reprimand and enforcement action by the Central Bank prompted a cascade of consequences for the firm, including the departures of Mr McKiernan and deputy chairman Kyran McLaughlin.

The National Treasury Management Agency fired Davy from its panel of primary dealers for Goverment bond sales. Interim CEO Bernard Byrne then shut down Davy’s bond desk, with the loss of four staff members who the firm said were involved in the inappropriate bond deal.

An independent review by consultants Alvarez & Marsal into staff dealing at Davy found that a small clique of employees were involved in a high frequency of trades for substantial amounts of money up until the end of last year. A&M recommended in its report that the “total value of trades being executed in staff accounts in future should be significantly less than values up to year end 2020”.

Five members of the Davy 16 – Mr McKiernan, Mr McLaughlin, former chief executive Tony Garry, former head of bonds Barry Nangle and former head of equities David Smith – are believed to own about a third of Davy Group between them.

Their stakes will now cash out at roughly €200m.

The rest of the proceeds of the sale will go to the large number of shareholders among its 700 staff and numerous ex-employees who held onto their stakes in the firm after departing for new jobs at other companies or retiring.

The deal is expected to conclude in early 2022, subject to regulatory approval, and will initially release 75pc of the sale price on completion.

The remainder is due to be paid in 2024, conditional on the performance of the business and “the management of risks or legal issues which might arise”, according to a Bank of Ireland spokesperson.

An additional €40m has been set aside by Bank of Ireland for the retention of key staff in the firm who hit “stretch performance” targets by 2025 and is not being distributed generally to all shareholders.
UK 
COVID-19: Around 10,000 food supply chain workers will become exempt from self-isolation rules as daily testing is phased in

It comes as Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng admitted the government is "very concerned" as more than 600,000 individuals were pinged in a week by the coronavirus app in the week to 14 July.


Sophie Morris
Political reporter @itssophiemorris
Friday 23 July 2021  UK


Eustice - 10,000 workers set to avoid self-isolation


Around 10,000 workers in the food supply chain industry are to become exempt from coronavirus self-isolation rules - but this will not include supermarket staff, the government has said.

Environment Secretary George Eustice said "up to 500" distribution centres and food supply chain hubs have been identified where workers could be part of the scheme.

Anyone involved will soon not have to isolate for up to 10 days if they come into contact with a positive coronavirus case.

Mr Eustice said the exemption will begin for 15 "priority testing sites" on Friday, with workers there moving on to a daily testing regime enabling them to go into work if they test negative each day, instead of having to quarantine.

Image:Empty shelves have been spotted in recent days as many workers have been forced into self-isolation after being pinged by the app

The system will then be rolled out to a further 150 supermarket depots next week and "several hundred" food manufacturers thereafter, Mr Eustice said.


"We recognise there are some staff absences in the food supply chain so what we are announcing is for the top sort of 400 or so sites, things like supermarket depots and some of the key food manufacturers, we're going to change the system and enable them to test to return to work.

"So someone who is contacted in future by Test and Trace or is pinged will be able to have daily contact testing for seven days and [will] be able to carry on working providing their test remains negative."

Mr Eustice said the new exemption will apply to "probably close to 10,000, possibly more staff" including supermarket depots and distribution centres.

Image:George Eustice said the plan would not apply to shop floor supermarket staff as this would see a 'major departure' from the test, trace and isolate scheme

"Anybody who is working at one of these sites but who is currently isolating would be able to return to work and go into this testing regime instead of continuing to isolate," Mr Eustice said.

Pressed on why supermarket store staff are not included in the plans, the environment secretary said that would be "a big departure" from the current test, trace and isolate approach.

It comes as firms have warned of increasing staff shortages caused by people being forced to self-isolate by the NHS COVID app.

Analysis: Isolation exemption plan makes sense but government approach has been 'chaotic'

Iceland said on Monday that it has had to shut some stores as a result and other retailers said they are under "increasing pressure" to keep shelves fully stocked due to the so-called "pingdemic".

Business group the CBI said supply issues could hamper the country's economic recovery from COVID-19.

But on Thursday at a meeting with supermarket leaders, Mr Eustice and newly-appointed Health Secretary Sajid Javid outlined plans for daily contact testing for workers in the food and drink industries.

The government has said people do not need to panic buy

If they test positive, they must still self-isolate for the full 10 days.

The government said it will continue to "engage" with the food sector and "provide all support needed".

Mr Eustice described food businesses as the "hidden heroes of the pandemic".

"We are working closely with industry to allow staff to go about their essential work safely with daily testing," he said.

Workers from 16 sectors could be exempt from isolation


"The last 18 months have demonstrated that we have a highly resilient food supply chain. There are sufficient food supplies in the system and people can and should shop as normal."

And Mr Javid added that food and drink sector workers have "overcome enormous challenges and done everything they can to keep our shelves stocked and our fridges full".

"As we manage this virus and do everything we can to break chains of transmission, daily contact testing of workers in this vital sector will help to minimise the disruption caused by rising cases in the coming weeks, while ensuring workers are not put at risk," he said.

Govt 'very concerned' over 'pingdemic'

The Business Secretary has told Sky News he's not ruling out having COVID restrictions in place England after 16 August.

The government added that "critical roles in the food supply chain" will also apply to the new isolation rule.

"Employers are already in contact with Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) and approvals will follow shortly for named critical workers to attend their workplaces when they're fully vaccinated and the contact of a positive case," they said.

Earlier on Thursday, Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng told Kay Burley on Sky News the list of those exempt from isolation would be "quite narrow".

Responding to the announcement, Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the British Retail Consortium, said: "We welcome the government's rapid response to this unfolding 'pingdemic', which has impacted shops and distribution centres.

"Retailers are working closely with government to identify hundreds of key distribution sites that will benefit from the new daily contact testing scheme. It is absolutely vital that government makes up for lost time and rolls out this new scheme as fast as possible.

"Disruption is limited at the moment, and retailers are monitoring the situation closely. Government will need to continue to listen to the concerns of the retail industry in the coming days and must be prepared to take further action if necessary."

Hannah Essex, from the British Chambers of Commerce, said: "While the announcement of a process which may exempt select critical workers from self-isolation in England will be a relief to some businesses, it will leave many more still facing critical staff shortages and lost revenue as the number of people being asked to isolate remains high."

Confederation of British Industry director general Tony Danker said: "The current approach to self-isolation is closing down the economy rather than opening it up."