Friday, July 30, 2021

 

Ask Ethan: What Danger Is There In Actively Searching For Intelligent Aliens?

Starts With A Bang

One of the most wondrous questions of all concerns our place in the Universe. After 13.8 billion years of cosmic evolution, 4.5 billion years since the formation of Earth, and at least ~4 billion years since life first arose on our planet, human beings have done it. For the first time — at least, that we have any evidence of — planet Earth now houses an intelligent, sentient, technologically advanced civilization. We can receive signals from across the distant Universe, identify their origins and properties, and have even begun exploring outer space beyond the confines of our own planetary home.

Although we’ve been looking for other signs of intelligent life out there in the Universe for more than half a century — searching for extraterrestrial intelligence — we have yet to obtain robust evidence that it exists. Simultaneously, however, many have advocated broadcasting our location and presence aloud, hoping to attract the attention, and make contact with, a similarly advanced civilization elsewhere in the galaxy. Others think this is a horrible, potentially self-destructive strategy. What should we think, and more importantly, what should we do about it? That’s what Gary Davis wants to know, asking:

“I've been thinking about extraterrestrial intelligence for a long time. Everyone's a layperson here. But I was disappointed by [this] exchange between [Michio] Kaku and [Douglas] Vakoch... I'd be delighted to read your thoughtful sense of the issue.”

It’s a fantastic issue to explore, right at the limits of science and the interface of a risk/reward/hazard scenario whose odds are unknown. All of society, and indeed humanity’s very future, may be at stake.

The big hope — and fear — is of making first contact with an alien species. What will it be like? Moreover, what will they be like? Although we won’t know until we find them, there are five major possibilities for how this first discovery will someday occur.

  1. We find simple, microbial-like life in our own cosmic backyard. This occurs by finding fossilized, dormant, or even active life forms of non-Earth origin elsewhere in, or passing through, our Solar System. Exploration missions, or getting lucky and having a chunk of life-containing material landing here on Earth, would lead to this discovery.
  2. We find indirect signs of life on an exoplanet or exomoon around a foreign star. Through either direct imaging or transit spectroscopy, we’ll identify the signatures of a living planet, and conclude that the most likely explanation is that it’s inhabited.
  3. We receive and decode a technosignature from an advanced extraterrestrial civilization. Whether it arrives in the radio band, another electromagnetic frequency, or via some signal we’ve yet to decode — from energetic neutrinos, perhaps — a scientific endeavor such as SETI would uncover this.
  4. We receive a direct visitation from aliens. This is the hope of those investigating unidentified flying objects/aerial phenomena: that somewhere, lying in the gaps of what’s been identified and what’s been seen but not at sufficient resolution to uncover, a spacecraft of intelligent alien origin is waiting to be found.
  5. Or, perhaps, there are aliens out there, waiting to be contacted, but that haven’t actively been broadcasting. They’re awaiting their first message from an alien civilization, and so it’s up to us to send it, so that they can receive it.

Scientists have long been pursuing the first three, and continue to do so. The fourth one continues to consist largely of pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, although a recent effort hopes to change that. But the fifth one, arguably, brings our greatest hopes and fears both to the forefront.

The hope, of course, is that at least one other intelligent civilization has arisen — at some point — within the Milky Way galaxy. Just like us, they became technologically advanced, and began to scour their own nearby neighborhood for what’s out there, curious about what they could or would find.

Perhaps they learned the answer to questions we’re still investigating, such as:

  • what is the secret to sustainable nuclear fusion, and the solution to our energy woes in general?
  • how their species overcame infighting, resource hoarding and overconsumption, and the perils of global war to sustain themselves on their home planet?
  • and just how abundant life actually is in our cosmic backyard: on planets, moons, and even smaller bodies in their own solar system, and even on worlds beyond their own home star?

But perhaps they already looked for technosignatures, exhaustively, and didn’t find any for a long period of time, which caused them to give up. Perhaps, then, the only thing stopping them from contacting us is that they don’t know we’re here, and they’re not actively broadcasting, failing to advertise their presence. If that’s the case, then perhaps all we need to do is announce, “we are here!”

Once our signal arrives at their location — anywhere from a few light-years to a few tens of thousands of light-years — they could send a signal or even a crewed mission back, answering our longstanding question affirmatively: yes, there are other intelligent aliens out there, and here they are.

Of course, for every hope we have, there’s an equal-and-opposite fear. The fear is not:

  • there’s no one out there to receive a signal,
  • that the aliens will hear us and ignore us, deciding not to respond,
  • or that our attempts will be futile, falling below the threshold to reach whatever alien civilization is out there before the signal we send drops below the cosmic noise background.

Instead, the fear is that aliens actually will receive that signal, and head this way with malicious intent. The fear is that, by announcing our presence to the Universe, a predatory, plunderous alien civilization — with technology likely far, far advanced beyond our own — will set out to conquer us.

Given the gap in technology that surely exists, as they’re likely hundreds, thousands, or even millions of years ahead of us, it will be a short, brutal war that ends in extinction or enslavement for humanity. Like the plot of many alien invasion movies, but without an unrealistic victory for us plucky humans, we could be sealing our own demise.

Of course, ever since the first broadcast radio and television signals were transmitted, powerful enough and of the proper frequencies to be capable of traveling beyond Earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and Van Allen belts, humans have — wittingly or unwittingly — been announcing our presence to any sufficiently advanced onlookers for over 80 years. If we were to draw a sphere around the Earth that’s approximately ~80 light-years in radius, we’d find that there are somewhere around 10,000 star systems, most of which remain undiscovered as of today, that could have received a surefire signal of humanity’s presence here on Earth.

There’s a difference, however, between what we’ve done, and continue to do, inadvertently, and making a concerted effort to reach out to whatever may be present in the galaxy beyond our own backyard. The leading idea falls under the umbrella of METI: Messaging Extraterrestrial Intelligence, which is sometimes referred to as “active SETI,” since it’s not simply passively listening, but is actively broadcasting, including targeted broadcasting at star systems of particular interest. It’s that very effort that has attracted so much attention, as well as criticism and concern.

As far as what’s known, we’ve come a lot farther than most of us could have imagined even a few decades ago. At the start of the 1990s, we only had speculative evidence that planets beyond our own Solar System existed. We didn’t know how common Earth-sized worlds around Sun-like stars were; we didn’t know what types of planets were common or rare in the Universe; we didn’t know whether our Solar System was typical, uncommon, or a cosmic rarity. Today, as of 2021, many of those things have changed.

Our own Milky Way has somewhere around ~400 billion stars, and we’re just one of about 2 trillion galaxies within the observable Universe. Of the stars within our galaxy:

  • 80-100% of them have planets and planetary systems around them,
  • ~20% of those stars are Sun-like, of either the K, G, or F-subtype,
  • 10-20% of those planets are Earth-like in terms of size and mass,
  • and 20-25% of those systems have a planet in what we call the “habitable zone” around them, which means they’d have the right temperatures for liquid water on their surfaces if they had Earth-like atmospheres.

Putting all of those pieces together, we find that there are likely a few billion potentially inhabited worlds in our own galaxy: with the right conditions and ingredients for life to arise on them. That’s a lot of possibilities out there, but what we don’t know still remains substantial, and makes us greatly uncertain about the ultimate of questions: how many intelligent, technologically advanced civilizations are actually out there?

Everyone — including Michio Kaku and Douglas Vakoch, as reported in the New York Times — agrees that it’s naive to assume we must be the only game in town, as far as intelligent life is concerned. After all, we still don’t know the answer to three very, very big questions.

  1. Of the worlds we identify as potentially habitable, how many of them actually have or had life arise on them?
  2. Of the worlds upon which life arises, how many of them have life sustain itself over cosmological timescales, like billions of years, where it evolves to become complex, multicellular, and highly differentiated?
  3. And of the worlds where life survives, thrives, and becomes complex, on how many of those worlds does life actually become intelligent and technologically advanced?

We have billions of possibly inhabited worlds in our Milky Way, as inferred from what we’re capable of measuring so far. But we have to be honest about our ignorance. If the answer to all three of these questions is something like 1%, then intelligent life has arisen within our galaxy thousands of times in the past. If the answer to all three of these questions is more like 0.01% or less, then we might be the first to make it this far in the entire galaxy.

The honest truth is that without more information, and better information about the Universe, we cannot know, but that if even one of these three steps is “hard” in the sense that it’s extremely unlikely, humanity may truly be alone.

So let’s imagine, for the sake of argument, that there are other intelligent civilizations out there. Should we attempt to contact them? Kaku says no, arguing — and I’m boiling this argument down terribly — the following:

“I think the idea of reaching out and advertising our existence is a catastrophically bad idea. In fact, I think it would be the biggest mistake in human history to deliberately try to make contact with an adversary that we know nothing about. The collapse of civilization as we know it could happen... it’s naive to assume that [aliens are] peaceful, that they want to give us the benefit of their technology, when they could be like Cortez.”

Assume, then, that aliens are like Cortez: out for conquest and riches. Not the riches of gold, but for the valuable resources we have here at our disposal. That, honestly, is the biggest problem with this argument: if an alien species can traverse the cosmos, having achieved technological mastery over as complex an endeavor as interstellar travel, what scarce resources could they possibly be after that exists abundantly on Earth and that is otherwise rare?

There are none. Nothing that we have here on Earth is unique to our planet that isn’t just as easily synthesized elsewhere, except for, perhaps, intelligent life itself. We’d have to assume that an advanced extraterrestrial civilization would only be interested in us because we announced our presence, and then would quickly act to wipe us out without a fathomable reason at all, perhaps other than the sociopathic, “maybe they find it fun to step on these technological infants” the same way a child might wantonly burn ants to death with a magnifying glass.

On the other hand, Vakoch argues the opposite point; that being a cosmic “lurker” is the only surefire way to remain isolated on our island world, rather than joining whatever inter-civilization conversations might actually be occurring. To summarize him in his own words:

“Some people would say, well, wait if they already know we’re here, what’s the whole point of reaching out? We’re trying to test what’s called the zoo hypothesis... [imagine we’re at the zoo and] we’re kind of checking out the animals. We know that they’re there already. We’re walking by a bunch of zebras. And one of them turns toward us, looks us directly in the eye, and starts pounding out a series of prime numbers with his hoof. Now I don’t know. Maybe... you guys are going to go look at the wildebeests. I’m going to stay around and try to communicate with that.”

I don’t quite buy this, either. If an alien civilization has found our planet and concluded, “well, it’s definitely inhabited,” the past few hundred years would have stood out as remarkable. Our rapid atmospheric changes, the addition of CO2, the presence of human-created chemicals in our atmosphere, the fact that our night side now gives off visible (artificial) lighting, and the presence of radio signals all indicates the presence of an intelligent, rapidly technologically advancing species.

Sure, it would shock us if a zebra turned out to be intelligent in that regard, but that’s because we’ve studied not only zebras, but many other animals, at length, and have various metrics to rate their intelligence. Unless one of two options is true:

  • aliens are lonely, and have been waiting for someone to talk to,
  • or aliens are waiting for us to reach a certain “achievement” — like the Vulcan civilization from Star Trek waited until a warp signature was created before making first contact — before they reveal themselves to us,

we have no reason to believe that a deliberate broadcast will accomplish anything that our hitherto inadvertent signals have not already done.

Of course, this is a wholly speculative thought exercise, driven largely by our own imaginations and our knowledge solely of past events that have occurred here on Earth. Yet, regardless of whether intelligent aliens exist, regardless of their malevolent or benevolent intents, one fact remains undeniable: for all the problems we have on planet Earth — some self-created, some from external pressures — there is no evidence that anyone else is coming to save us.

No one is coming to solve our energy problems, our resource management problems, our unsustainable treatment of the environment, or problems like war, hunger, nutrient deficiencies or water insecurity. No one is going to help us value the lives of one another, or even our own lives. If we hope to be saved from the problems facing us today, we have to look inward, to ourselves, and outward: not to the stars, but to one another. In all the world, the greatest resource we have is the cumulative knowledge we’ve gleaned and the ability to work together.

The ingredients are there, but it’s up to us to put them together and use them for the good of all. If we want to change the trajectory of our species, seeking knowledge and searching for the true answers to our deepest questions is certainly an essential part of the solution. But we mustn’t rely on either hopes or fears when it comes to the unknown. Instead, we have to rely on the greatest resource of all: a recognition of our shared humanity.


Send in your Ask Ethan questions to startswithabang at gmail dot com!

Follow me on TwitterCheck out my website or some of my other work here

I am a Ph.D. astrophysicist, author, and science communicator, who professes physics and astronomy at various colleges. I have won numerous awards for science writing since 2008 for my blog, Starts With A Bang, including the award for best science blog by the Institute of Physics. My two books, Treknology: The Science of Star Trek from Tricorders to Warp DriveBeyond the Galaxy: How humanity looked beyond our Milky Way and discovered the entire Universe, are available for purchase at Amazon. Follow me on Twitter @startswithabang.

UK cultural landmarks may lose world heritage status, says UNESCO chief

Exclusive: UN body warns ministers they must do more to protect Britain’s historic sites

Traffic passing Stonehenge. Should a planned tunnel get the go-ahead, Wiltshire’s famous stone circle is expected to be placed on Unesco’s ‘in danger’ list. Photograph: Steve Parsons/PA

UK cultural landmarks such as Stonehenge could be stripped of their coveted world heritage status unless the government curbs “ill-advised development” and protects historic sites for future generations, a Unesco chief has warned.

Dr Mechtild Rössler, the director of Unesco’s World Heritage Centre, urged ministers to “do everything” they could to conserve the UK’s treasures after Liverpool became only the third place in nearly 50 years to lose its revered title.

Rössler said developers should be made more aware of the international value of places such as Stonehenge before proposing potentially harmful projects. She said: “These are the most outstanding places we have on Earth. If we are not capable of protecting these, for me the question is what will be left on this planet?”

The intervention came before a crucial high court judgment on whether a two-mile tunnel can be built underneath Stonehenge. Should the development get the green light, Wiltshire’s famous stone circle is expected to be placed on Unesco’s “in danger” list – a precursor to being stripped of world heritage status – in what would be another humiliating blow for Britain.

Rössler, a world-renowned expert in cultural heritage and the history of planning, said the UK government “should take into account the beneficial provisions of the world heritage convention and do everything to protect this heritage for generations to come because we are not protecting this heritage for us today.

“We need to ensure that the generations to come benefit from the same heritage we can benefit from today.”

Heritage bodies have warned that the UK risks losing its reputation for conserving historic sites because controversial developments, such as the Stonehenge tunnel and Everton’s new football stadium, have been allowed to go ahead by the government in recent years.

Rössler said she was surprised that Grant Shapps, the transport secretary, had agreed to the £1.7bn Stonehenge tunnel despite the government’s planning inspectorate concluding it would cause “permanent, irreversible harm” to the world heritage site.

Stonehenge is “one of the most emblematic sites we have on the World Heritage list”, she said, adding that it would have been “much better” if the government had discussed the development further with Unesco’s world heritage bodies before granting approval in November 2020.

She said the government must produce a heritage impact report by February “with a view of [Unesco] putting Stonehenge on the list of world heritage in danger”. “I really encourage the authorities of the UK to get everybody together and to see what the best solution would be because the warning was made several times,” she added.

The high court is expected to rule imminently on whether Shapps’ decision to approve the Stonehenge tunnel was unlawful because it did not properly consider damage that would be done to prehistoric sites and thousands of ancient artefacts. The Department for Transport has said the decision was “correct, lawful and well-informed”.

The stone circle, which attracts nearly a million tourists a year, has been on the world heritage list since 1986. It would be the best-known cultural attraction to be delisted if such a step were taken, giving the UK the ignominious distinction of being the first country to have two historic sites removed from the prestigious list.

Britain’s plethora of historic monuments, which range from prehistoric sites such as Stonehenge to medieval castles and Roman forts, contribute billions of pounds to the economy each year and draw in millions of visitors from around the world.

Rössler, who has led Unesco’s World Heritage Centre for six years, said the decision to strip Liverpool of its title was “a loss for all of us” but that the city’s leaders had failed to address its concerns for years about the Liverpool Waters project by Peel Holdings, the major developer owned by the reclusive billionaire John Whittaker.

“The warning was in 2012,” she said. “There was no feedback in terms of complying with the request from the world heritage committee to stop the situation which leads to the loss of outstanding universal value. That is the problem”.

Asked whether Unesco was concerned about the UK’s management of its historic landmarks, she said: “The UK has all the policies in place, you have the institutional bodies … and management plans for most of the sites in place.

“However, I have to say sometimes there is ill-advised development. What I would like to see for the future of world heritage [is] that everybody is in the same boat. That includes developers to be better aware of what the values of the sites are so that projects don’t threaten the OUV [outstanding universal value] of these places. That is a challenge we have everywhere and we have it also in the UK.”

Rössler called for more financial support for the UK’s world heritage sites, which on average receive only about £1m a year from central government and often rely on volunteers. Unlike other countries, the UK has not established a national foundation to fund these treasured sites, as it has been encouraged to do under the Unesco world heritage convention.

She added: “I think there needs to be more support for world heritage but in which way authorities are doing that is really left to the national authorities and to the local authorities.”

A government spokesperson said: “The UK is a world leader in cultural heritage protection with 33 Unesco world heritage status sites on the list, including the slate landscape of north-west Wales, which was added this week.

“We welcome the confirmation that the world heritage committee does not recommend that Stonehenge be added to the list of world heritage in danger this year. Protecting the heritage and archaeology of the Stonehenge site is a priority and we will continue to work closely with Unesco, Icomos [the International Council on Monuments and Sites] and the heritage and scientific community on next steps.”

4,000-year-old city discovered in Iraq
A group of Russian archaeologists made an impressive discovery in Iraq’s Dhi Qar governorate, where an ancient settlement about 4,000 years old was found.


A woman walks toward the Great Ziggurat Temple, a massive Sumerian stepped mudbrick construction dedicated to the moon god Nanna that dates back to 2100 B.C. in the ancient city of Ur, Dhi Qar province, Iraq, June 15, 2020. - Asaad Niazi/AFP via Getty Image


Adnan Abu Zeed
July 9, 2021

A group of Russian archaeologists discovered June 24 an ancient settlement about 4,000 years old in Dhi Qar governorate in southern Iraq. The discovery was made in the area of Tell al-Duhaila, which is home to more than 1,200 archaeological sites, including the Great Ziggurat of Ur site from the Sumerian era, and the royal tomb. Treasures similar to the ones that were found in the tomb of Egypt’s Tutankhamun’ tomb were unearthed.

Alexei Jankowski-Diakonoff, head of the Russian excavation mission, told Al-Monitor, “The works started in April 2021, which was the first full round of field archaeological research in southern Mesopotamia. The first two rounds took place in 2019 and 2020.”

He said, “The discovered city is an urban settlement in Tell al-Duhaila, located on the banks of a watercourse. According to initial speculation, the city could be the capital of a state founded following the political collapse at the end of the ancient Babylonian era [around the middle of the second millennium B.C.], which caused the systematic destruction of the Sumerian civilization’s urban life.”


Commenting on the significance of research in the area, he noted, “Researching the cities of southern Mesopotamia at the end of the ancient Babylonian era — and the Tell al-Duhaila site in particular — opens the secret of an unknown page in the history of the oldest civilization on the planet. The area of Tell al-Duhaila and the ancient city of Mashkan Shabir survived the mass robberies that began in 1991.”

Jankowski-Diakonoff added, “This site also reveals the first development in agriculture using silt in Mesopotamia. The site contains remains of the material from the period that preceded the emergence of the Sumerian civilization."

He expects a real opportunity to “find cuneiform documents in an undisturbed archaeological context, which will be extremely important not only to Russian scientists but Mesopotamian archaeologists as well.”

The mission also discovered an ancient port where ships used to anchor and the remains of a temple wall about 4 meters (13 feet) wide. “We also discovered an oxidized arrowhead, traces of tandoor stoves and clay camel statues dating back to the early Iron Age,” he said.

Talking about the history of the discoveries, the Russian archaeologist said, “According to the study of the oldest architectural building in the city and based on the design features and huge construction blocks, the edifice was most likely built during the ancient Babylonian era. It mainly reflects slave culture, the Neolithic period and Early Copper ages.”

Jankowski-Diakonoff said, “In 2019, the joint Russian-Iraqi mission obtained an official permit from the Directorate of Antiquities within the Iraqi Ministry of Culture to conduct archaeological research at two sites in southern Iraq — in the governorates of Maysan and Dhi Qar, which cover the modern delta area in Mesopotamia, the cradle of the most ancient history on earth.”

Amer Abdel Razak, antiquity director in Dhi Qar, told Al-Monitor, “The discovered city is located 70 kilometers [43 miles] southwest of the city of Nasiriyah [in the south] in the Sulaibiya depression, which is home to a large number of unexcavated archaeological sites. It is close to the city of Eridu — the oldest and greatest city where kings are said to have descended from heaven, according to Sumerian legends.”

He said, “The site was discovered before the arrival of the Russian mission. It was registered in the Dhi Qar Antiquity Department as an extremely significant archaeological site."

Abdel Razak noted that, despite the hardships and obstacles in working on-site because of the coronavirus pandemic, the Russian mission was able to make important discoveries.

“Land surveys showed that the site dates back to the ancient Babylonian era. The mission, however, believes that it might go back to more ancient ages given the pottery pieces and statues in the form of camels and other animals that were found on-site,” he said.

Abdel Razak added, “Dhi Qar is expecting visits by international universities and museums in October, including 10 Italian, American, French, British and Russian missions that are set to explore this vast area.”

Gaith Salem, professor of ancient history and civilization at Al-Mustansiriya University, told Al-Monitor, “There are many cities that have been discovered in southern Iraq over different periods of time but there has not been much talk about them.”

He called for “the development of systematic work within a fixed program to unearth the treasures of history, which are not important only to Iraq, but all humanity.”

He said, “This recent discovery is of paramount importance because it introduces the world to one of the Sumerian cities overlooking the seaports. Most cities used to have a view to the sea but have turned today into a vast desert."

Karrar al-Rawazeq, an archaeologist and member of the Muthanna antiquity rescue team, who participated in several excavations, told Al-Monitor, “Exploration and excavation works in the area will yield economic and cultural benefits only if the site was turned into a tourist and investment destination, which would attract funds and tourists.”

In this regard, Sumaya al-Ghallab, head of the Culture, Tourism and Antiquity Committee in the Iraqi parliament, spoke to Al-Monitor and called for “securing the necessary funds and protection for excavation teams, and following a strategy for an excavation and research process covering the entire archaeological map in Iraq.”

Read more: https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2021/07/4000-year-old-city-discovered-iraq#ixzz726fWYwwi
US sanctions on Turkey-backed Syria faction offer solace to Kurdish victims

Hevrin Khalaf's mother, Souad Mohammad, is seen with an image 
of her daughter in this undated photo. - TWITTER/EndiZentarmi

Amberin Zaman
@amberinzaman


July 29, 2021

On Oct. 12, 2019, three days after Turkish forces invaded northeastern Syria with President Donald Trump’s blessings, a rising young Kurdish politician named Hevrin Khalaf was ambushed by Ahrar al-Sharqiyah, a Turkish-backed armed Sunni brigade, and savagely executed. When the militants were done with the 35-year-old, her body was riddled with bullets, the flesh from her scalp ripped off, and her leg and skull fractured from repeated blows. Apparently unworried about retribution, the militants posted a video of the war crime online.

On Wednesday, the Biden administration rolled out its first sanctions directed at Syria. They targeted Ahrar al-Sharqiyah and its boss, Ahmed Ihsan Rayyad al-Hayes, better known by his nom de guerre, Abu Hatem Shaqra, who was present during Khalaf’s murder. The sanctions also targeted eight Syrian prisons, five officials in President Bashar al-Assad’s regime who run them, and a pro-regime militia. Ahrar al-Sharqiyah also was accused by the US Treasury Department of recruiting members of the Islamic State and of killing multiple civilians in northeast Syria.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said, “These sanctions underscore the US commitment to promote respect for human rights and accountability for abuse against Syrians.” Some of the sanctioned prisons, including the notorious Saydnaya, appeared in a cache of gruesome photographs provided by the Syrian defector known as “Caesar.” A slew of sanctions to financially punish the Assad regime introduced by the Trump administration was named after this defector.

The announcement offered a measure of solace to Khalaf’s mother, Souad Mohammad, who said her daughter’s face had been so badly mutilated by her killers that all that was left intact was her jaw.

America's quiet acquiescence in the face of Turkey’s “Peace Spring” blitz against the United States' Syrian Democratic Forces allies helped contribute to the displacement of half a million Syrian Kurds and left countless others who thought they enjoyed US protection feeling betrayed. There was none more so, perhaps, than Mohammad.

Contacted via WhatsApp at her home in the town of Derik in northeast Syria, Mohammad said, “I am happy about what America has done, to expose the murderers of Hevrin Khalaf. It’s an important step. So, I thank the Biden administration.”

“However,” she added, “the real perpetrators, the real forces behind my daughter’s death, ought to be punished. I mean Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The leader of Turkey.”

One reason it took so long for the United States to act against Ahrar al-Sharqiyah, the first Turkish-backed opposition brigade to ever be sanctioned, is because of fierce resistance from officials in the Trump administration. Their line was that this would strain ties with Turkey, a NATO ally. Ankara’s protagonists within the Trump administration would claim that the brigades were the victims of disinformation campaigns and when confronted with the evidence would say the timing was not right or that the administration had other bilateral priorities.

The Turkish-backed factions operate under the banner of the Syrian National Army (SNA). The SNA, in turn, reports to the opposition-led Syrian Interim Government in Istanbul. They have participated in all three of Turkey’s major military interventions in north and northeast Syria and help enforce the Turkish occupation. Senior figures in many of these groups, including Hayes, are believed to have been granted Turkish citizenship and operate commercial enterprises within Turkey.

“Abu Hatem Shaqra and his brother have made millions from pillage, extortion, smuggling and kidnappings for ransom,” said Elizabeth Tsurkov, a doctoral student at Princeton University and a fellow at the Newlines Institute for Strategy and Policy who is counted among the most knowledgeable sources on the Syrian opposition factions.

The Biden administration has set a markedly different tone in its dealings with Turkey and enjoys bipartisan support in Congress for its tougher line. The State Department has criticized Ankara over its dismal human rights record on numerous occasions. In July, the department placed Turkey on the list of countries that deploy child soldiers; this was in connection with another Sunni brigade, Sultan Murad, which has also committed gross abuses. Sultan Murad has recruited minors to fight against United Arab Emirates-backed forces in Libya on Ankara’s behalf. Turkey issued an angry rebuttal over the designation but has not commented on Wednesday’s sanctions.

A senior Biden administration official speaking on background to Al-Monitor declined to comment on the Trump team’s advocacy of Ankara. The official said, “I won’t speak to any of the actions of the previous administration except to say with this particular action we wanted to make clear that we were going after groups that were responsible for perpetuating human rights abuses and that includes actors on all sides.”

The official laid out the administration’s Syria strategy as “one where we are prioritizing mitigating suffering of the Syrian people.” This included its unsuccessful push for Russia to allow the resumption of UN humanitarian aid flows through three Syrian border crossings, with Iraq, Jordan and Turkey.

“For the last few months, we have built, brick by brick, a broad strategy that utilizes our presence in the [Kurdish-controlled] northeast to fight [the Islamic State], expands humanitarian access throughout the country and works to sustain cease-fire agreements that are in place in the [rebel-held] northwest and the northeast, and with today’s action, makes clear that elevating human rights remains a priority even as we work to ensure that sanctions do not block or impede any type of humanitarian activity,” the official said.

The official continued, “Ahrar al-Sharqiyah is one of the most egregious actors and has shown a consistent pattern of abuse against Syrian civilians in areas it controls and specifically targeted minority groups in Syria to include Yazidis and Kurds. We assessed that this group was worthy of particular singling out for the abuses that they have carried and continue to carry out.”

The reason it had taken so much time to sanction Ahrar al-Sharqiyah was because accumulating unimpeachable evidence “takes a very long time.”

The official added, “I would also say that behind the scenes, we worked very hard to engage various elements within the Syrian Interim Government and the Syrian National Army about our persistent concerns over these human rights abuses.” The pressure had no effect.

“With Ahrar al-Sharqiyah in particular I have not seen a change in their behavior. I am not aware that our engagement has any discernible impact and that’s why we thought it was important to send a clear message that this group in particular was a group of concern and I absolutely would not paint every Syrian National Army faction with the same brush,” the official said.

Hayes’ recent commercial ventures allegedly include smuggling the wives and children of foreign Islamic State fighters from the al-Hol camp in northeast Syria to Turkey, according to a militant from the Sultan Suleiman Shah Brigade who briefed Al-Monitor on the clandestine activities of the factions, on condition that he not be identified by name.

Two individuals linked with al-Qaeda and Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, the jihadi group that controls Idlib, were also named in the sanctions list. Hayat Tahrir al-Sham is designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the State Department, the United Nations and Turkey. However, it’s no secret that Turkish security services work closely with Hayat Tahrir al-Sham in a tactical, if strained, alliance that benefits both sides.

Ankara has facilitated passage for several journalists in recent months to interview Hayat Tahrir al-Sham leader Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, who is seeking to rebrand himself as an Islamist moderate in a push to become part of the internationally recognized Syrian opposition. Washington is unimpressed.

The senior administration official briefing Al-Monitor said the US position on Hayat Tahrir al-Sham “has not changed. Jolani specifically remains designated by the United States and as you know there is information out for his arrest.” The official added that the Biden administration supports a cease-fire in Idlib province, does not want to see any kind of Russian or regime offensive and also does not want to see Hayat Tahrir al-Sham used as a pretext for any offensive. “We are not open to normalizing or engaging or changing our posture towards that group.”

It remains to be seen what practical and immediate effect Wednesday's sanctions will have.

Roger Lu Phillips, legal director for Syrians for Justice and Accountability, a Washington-based organization that is documenting rights abuses in Syria, told Al-Monitor, “Symbolically it's a good thing to name entities and their branches committing violations. But as far as Turkey is concerned, it’s very difficult to measure what impact it will have.”

He said, “The United States is faced with a very difficult balancing act. How do you impose sanctions on Turkish-backed militia groups without creating tensions with Turkey with which you have a lot of shared interests? There was a very clear effort to distinguish between Turkish military forces and the Syrian militias intertwined with these forces. How are you going to seize or control funds [of the sanctioned factions] without having some better leverage than naming them alone? That is not going to solve the problem.”

The Biden administration is currently in talks with Turkish officials over securing Kabul airport.

Turkey has offered to retain its troops there after the United States pulls out all of its own by a Sept. 11 deadline. This has spurred speculation that the Biden administration is now less inclined to assail Turkey over human rights violations for fear of torpedoing the negotiations.

Despite such caveats, the Kurdish led administration in northeast Syria welcomed the sanctions package and said it expected more of them. Sinam Mohammed, the Washington representative of the Syrian Democratic Council, which shares power in northeast Syria, called the action “a great success.” She told Al-Monitor, “I am looking forward to seeing the other groups being sanctioned as well, such as the al-Hamza Brigade, Sultan Murad, Sultan Suleiman Shah Brigade, who committed crimes, rape, murder and robbed my property in Afrin."

Tsurkov said she believes there is ground for optimism, saying, “The sanctions placed on Ahrar al-Sharqiyah will have an actual impact. First, it will make it difficult for leaders of the faction to engage in any future political process. In addition, their access to the dollar-denominated banking system will be cut off.”

She argued that the sanctions will give Turkey leverage to rein in the abuses. “I am hearing from sources within the Syrian National Army that the commanders of other factions, which have all engaged in similar abuses, are concerned they are next.”

Back in Derik, Khalaf’s mother insists that the United States could have prevented her daughter’s death. “Still,” she added, “we the Kurds, we say, ‘Sehid Na Mirin.’” That is Kurdish for “martyrs never die.”


Forest fires rage in Lebanon, Syria and Turkey
At least four people were killed in the fires.


Volunteers help to extinguish a forest fire in the Qoubaiyat area of northern Lebanon's
 remote Akkar region on July 29, 2021. - JOSEPH EID/AFP via Getty Images

Al-Monitor Staff

TOPICS COVERED
Environment and nature
July 30, 2021

Forest fires continued to wreak havoc in Lebanon, Syria and Turkey on Thursday.

The wildfires in Lebanon took place in the north of the country, specifically in and around the town of Qoubaiyat in Akkar governorate near the Syrian border. The fires were still not under control as of 5 p.m. Thursday as firefighters worked to extinguish them, the official National News Agency reported.

The Arabic-language hashtag “Akkar is burning” trended on Twitter on Thursday. Some users posted videos of the blaze, which reached people’s homes in some areas. Other videos showed local residents using water to extinguish the flames themselves.


The fires began in Lebanon on Wednesday. At least one person — a 15-year-old boy — was killed in relation to the fires, according to the Lebanese news outlet Naharnet.

Lebanon’s fires also spread to neighboring Syria, specifically the Homs countryside in the southwest of the country, according to Syria’s official SANA news outlet.

There also were a number of forest fires in Turkey’s Mediterranean province of Antalya and other Turkish areas Thursday. Three people were killed; authorities said many buildings, vehicles and farms were destroyed and a number of people were evacuated.

Lebanon also experienced wildfires in October 2019, as did Iran in June of last year. The Associated Press reported that wildfires commonly occur during dry summer months in the Mediterranean and Aegean regions of Turkey.

Coincidentally, the grand imam of the Al-Azhar mosque in Egypt, Sheikh Ahmed el-Tayeb, warned this week about the effects of climate change in the region and mentioned rising temperatures.

The situation in Lebanon could be compounded by water issues. Last week, the United Nations warned that the public water supply system in the country is on the verge of collapse, and that 1.7 million Lebanese already only have access to 35 liters (nine gallons) a day.

Read more: https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2021/07/forest-fires-rage-lebanon-syria-and-turkey#ixzz726dHRqT2





Deadly wildfires deal new blow to Turkish tourism



Issued on: 30/07/2021 - 

Blazes that erupted Wednesday to the east of the tourist hotspot Antalya on Turkey's scenic southern coast have officially killed four people and injured nearly 200
 Ilyas AKENGIN AFP/File

Manavgat (Turkey) (AFP)

Turkish firefighters made progress Friday containing deadly wildfires that forced the evacuation of entire villages and Mediterranean coast hotels already reeling from the shock of the coronavirus pandemic.

Blazes that erupted Wednesday to the east of the tourist hotspot Antalya on Turkey's scenic southern coast have officially killed four people and injured nearly 200.

But they have also threatened to scare off tourists who had only just started to return to Turkey in what President Recep Tayyip Erdogan had hoped would be a boon for the developing country's fragile economy.


The soaring flames turned summer skies dark orange over five-star hotels and villages dotting rolling hills that have been parched by another dry summer.

They had spread by Thursday evening to the Aegean Sea on Turkey's western coast and spanned a region stretching 300 kilometres (185 miles) and covering most of the country's top resorts.

Local resident Gulen Dede Tekin came with his family to a five-star hotel in the Mediterranean coast city of Manavgat on Thursday morning and at first thought nothing of the fires raging beyond the hills.

"In the evening, we realised how serious things were when they cut off the electricity and the ventilation at the hotel," Tekin told AFP.

"This morning, we woke up to a rain of ash."

- Arrests -

The government said 57 of the 71 fires had been contained or entirely put out by Friday morning.#photo1

"The situation is improving in all active fires," Agriculture Minister Bekir Pakdemirli told reporters during a visit to the affected region.

But he also confirmed that Turkey no longer had a firefighting plane in its inventory and was only in the process acquiring one under orders from Erdogan.

Russia has sent three giant aircraft and Turkey's historic rival Greece -- at odds with its neighbour on a wide range of regional disputes -- said it was "read to help".

The blow the fires threaten to deal to Turkey's tourism-dependent economy and the admission that the country had no firefighting planes has put Erdogan's government under pressure.

His office has officially blamed the fires on arson and unspecified "attacks".

Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu announced the arrest of five people on suspicions of starting one of the blazes in the southern city of Osmaniye.

"Who started these fires," he asked in televised comments. "We, as well as our citizens, have our suspicions."

The private DHA news agency said two children -- one eight and the other 10 years old -- admitted under questioning in the presence of their teacher that they accidentally started one of the fires by burning their books.

© 2021 AFP



UK

The Tories Are on a Mission to Destroy Black Lives Matter

They're going all out.

by Kimi Chaddah
26 July 2021

THIS APPLIES TO ALL TORIES/CONSERVATIVES EVERYWHERE, LIKE IN CANADA & USA



Henry Nicholls/Reuters



In the current culture wars, the Tories have made delegitimising the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement one of their top priorities.

The movement gained traction in the UK back in 2016, when protesters blocked the motorway leading to Heathrow the day after the anniversary of Mark Duggan’s murder by police. Its presence grew as it began exposing the endemic nature of institutional racism within the UK. This culminated in the explosion of protests last summer in response to George Floyd’s murder, with protesters not only condemning America’s racism but their own country’s too, exemplified in the rallying cry “the UK is not innocent”.

This antiracist spirit was revived once again this summer, when the England men’s football took the knee during the Euros. With the decision receiving widespread support – even from rightwingers like Piers Morgan – it’s clear the Tories understand the power the movement holds and its potential to upend their agenda.


As a result, the Conservatives have launched an attack on the movement. From health secretary Sajid Javid claiming it is “not a force for good”, to home secretary Priti Patel describing BLM protests as “dreadful“ and full of “hooliganism“, government ministers have made every effort to further the impression of a subversive, divisive and dangerous organisation.

With a global aim of “eradicat[ing] white supremacy and build[ing] local power to intervene in violence inflicted on Black communities by the state and vigilantes”, there is no mention of Marxism in Black Lives Matter’s mission statement. This, however, hasn’t stopped the Tories from deliberately conflating the movement with Marxism, and other ‘extreme’ leftwing ideologies.

This came to a head last year during the George Floyd protests. Once again, Javid was on the attack, describing the rallies’ organisers as “neo-Marxist”. Meanwhile, foreign secretary Dominic Raab claimed that the widely used action of ‘taking the knee’ was a “symbol of subjugation”.

And the rightwing press is in on it too, with newspapers like the Telegraph frequently describing BLM as a “radical neo-Marxist organisation“.


Another red scare.


Of course, this isn’t anything new. Historically, such redbaiting tactics are frequently deployed to discredit antiracist movements. Most notably, the US government aggressively targeted the civil rights movement during the 1950s-70s in an attempt to root out those with Communist leanings. This onslaught led Martin Luther King, Jr., one of the FBI’s prime – and totally unsubstantiated – suspects, to declare, “There are as many Communists in this freedom movement as there are Eskimos in Florida.

“The government is in the midst of a sustained ideological attack on the anti-racist movement,” says a spokesperson for BLM UK. “The pejorative use of ‘Marxist’ [acts] as a red scare-style tactic intended to whip up a moral panic around the anti-racist movement.” However, they are also quick to stress that “BLM is not a ‘Marxist organisation”, explaining that “while some of the members of BLM UK are Marxists, not all members are. We are, however, anti-capitalists, and are committed to dismantling class as well as gender and racial domination”.

Beyond verbal attacks on the movement and its organisers, the Tories are also indirectly waging a war on BLM through their policies – particularly in terms of their attempt to pass the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, which will effectively criminalise protest. The bill itself appears in part to be a response to the BLM and Extinction Rebellion protests of last year with Patel describing them as acts of “thuggery“.

It’s no secret that the bill will disproportionately target people of colour. With excessive use of force, racial discrimination and failures in duty of care already all prevalent at last year’s BLM protests, the stifling of dissent will enable – and legitimise – even more discriminatory policing. 55% of people in the UK already claim that last summer’s protests increased racial tensions – likely due to the unfavourable way in which demonstrators were portrayed by factions of the mainstream press. If protesting is criminalised, it is extremely likely that this figure will only go up.


Indeed, the Tories have consistently relied on this lack of education around antiracist politics and movements to stoke up fears and anxieties in the British public. In schools, the government has gone as far as to actively suppress knowledge dissemination on the subject for that very reason.

We saw this most clearly in October, when equalities minister Kemi Badenoch declared that any school teaching elements of critical race theory would be breaking the law, arguing that supporters of critical race theory wish to create a “segregated society“. Meanwhile, the Department for Education told schools in England that they were prohibited from using materials produced by anti-capitalist groups, or to teach “victim narratives that are harmful to British society” – the implication being that critical race theory implies whiteness is oppression and Blackness is victimhood.

“Political education has historically served as a tool for liberation, and the right knows this just as well as we do,” says a spokesperson for BLM UK. “Guidelines that restrict the teaching of Black Lives Matter materials, of critical race theory, and of so-called victim narratives are a direct response to the dissent we saw last summer. In an attempt to quash future resistance, the government is depriving young people of the tools to understand and dismantle structural racism”.
Resisting racism.

But where there is repression there is also resistance. In response to the Tories’ attempts to silence antiracist political thought, there has been a welcome and noticeable growth in small-scale activism. All Black Lives UK, Tribe named Athari and United For Black Lives all emerged out of the 2020 protests and are working to resist the government’s racist rhetoric and policies.

And outside of England, resistance is happening at an establishment level too, with the Welsh government working with charities like Show Racism the Red Card in order to dismantle racism in the education system and create a more racially and culturally representative curriculum. Consequently, the Welsh government recently announced that colonialism and Black history will be mandatory parts of the new school curriculum, set to be introduced in 2022.

“It’s important we develop a generation of anti-racist ambassadors that will go on to challenge the historic injustice of racism throughout society wherever they might find themselves as they grow; in their future workplaces, universities, communities and institutions,” explains a spokesperson for Show Racism the Red Card. “Racism is largely perpetuated through ignorance. Education is our greatest weapon to break down that [ignorance]”.

The government is working hard to create an atmosphere of denial around racism’s existence. This is seen perhaps most clearly in its recent report, which found racism in the UK to no longer be an issue.


On the surface, the country might look like it’s making progress. Sure, we have the most racially diverse government cabinet in history, but that doesn’t matter when the people of colour in positions of power – people like Patel and Javid – wield it to promote racist agendas.

BLM is a vital organisation and movement. The Tories’ campaign to destroy it only confirms why it must exist. It is absolutely vital that we challenge damaging racist discourses and the politicians that uphold them. Black lives matter. We must not allow the Tories to get away with pretending they don’t.

Kimi Chaddah is a freelance journalist whose work covers government policy, education and inequality.