Monday, September 06, 2021

World-renowned architect pushes for an environmentally friendly arena

Disappointed in the 
Kingsway
Entertainment District’s location, Jason McLennan wants to see the new arena at the very least be net-zero.
 
10 h By: Tyler Clarke


 A rundown of environmental features that have been included in the new Climate Pledge Arena in Seattle. (Submitted)Expand

A world-renowned figure in the field of architecture and the green building movement has been watching with great interest as the Kingsway Entertainment District project has proceeded.

“I’d like to see Sudbury thrive and live up to its potential, and that’s why I was disappointed to learn about the idea of moving the arena out of downtown,” Jason McLennan said.

“If you pull the focus away from downtowns you really diminish it and all you do is increase vehicle travel and you create urban sprawl and you hurt public transportation and so on and so forth, and it’s really an unfortunate move.”

Although his base of operations is currently in Seattle, McLennan was born and raised in Sudbury, still has family in the city and wants to see his home community succeed.

Last year, he presented an idea for Sudbury’s Superstack which he envisioned as becoming the world’s tallest solar energy source.

McLennan has not been involved in the Sudbury arena project and clarified he doesn’t want to criticize the people behind the project, as he doesn’t know them and hasn’t spoken with them.

That said, he yields significant expertise in the fields of not only the green building movement but also arenas in particular.

McLennan and his firm McLennan Design, which he is CEO of, served as the lead sustainability consultant for the Climate Pledge Arena in Seattle, Wash. The arena will serve the Seattle Kraken NHL team and come at a cost greater than $1 billion.

“It will be the greenest arena on the planet and sets new benchmarks for sustainability as well as being great for the city,” he said. “It’s a great example of thinking differently about existing assets and making it work. If you can do it for the NHL you can do it for the OHL.”

His nod to the OHL is in reference to the Sudbury Wolves, whose games are poised to shift from the downtown-based Sudbury Community Arena to the Kingsway Entertainment District located off of The Kingsway near the Sudbury Landfill Site after it opens in late 2024.

The arena project is a new build that includes a $100-million capital investment by the municipality and cost-sharing agreements with partners, and has been approved by Greater Sudbury city council, which is expected to receive an update during their Sept. 14 council meeting.

Although the city’s elected officials considered downtown for a new or renovated arena in 2017, a 6-6 vote by the city council of the day defeated the motion, shifting their attention to its currently approved location.

Prior to a decision was made in Seattle, McLennan said the community was shown a report on how their historic arena, built in the 1960s, could be modernized and improve its surrounding area.

“When the community saw that they were incredibly excited about it,” he said. “We were reusing the structure, the roof, the infrastructure.”

In Sudbury, Ward 4 Coun. Geoff McCausland presented a motion in June for city staff to undertake an analysis of potential approaches for modernizing the Sudbury Community Arena, but it was narrowly defeated.

“If I was a citizen of Sudbury, I would have wanted to see beautiful designs and renderings and analysis of how the existing arena could have been updated,” McLennan said.

But, given that shutting down the KED at this point would require a three-quarters vote of council, which doesn’t appear to be their current bend, its currently approved location stands.

McLennan said that if they stay firm on the location, the city should at the very least construct a net-zero building.

“There would be no energy bill, no hydro bill, it would be a living building as I call it; there would be no water bill,” he said, adding that city council’s 2019 unanimous declaration of a climate emergency behooves them to keep environmental stewardship at top of mind.

“It’s not only because of the environmental benefits but also the economic benefits, and there’s a lot of misinformation and old information people have about it having to cost a lot,” he said.

“It’s about making investments in the future. ... The economic returns are very positive, and that’s why we’re seeing more and more facilities going green.”

Those behind the Climate Pledge Arena in Seattle have made a number of environmental commitments, including that the facility be carbon neutral, utilize no single-use plastics, conserve water and produce zero waste.

The arena, McLennan said, will be powered completely by renewable energy and will hook up with solar panels both on-site and off-site.

“We’re even making our ice from rainwater, so we’re capturing rainwater and making what I think will be the greenest ice in the NHL.”

Although he has been watching the KED proceed from afar, McLennan said he’d be eager to speak with city council and stakeholders if they are so inclined.

“I’d be open to sharing my experience and knowledge in working with arenas and with the NHL and working with cities,” he said. “I’ve been a consultant to quite a few cities over the years, and I’m happy to talk to the city.

“I really think the city needs to understand in 10 years from now what this would look like, both in location and truly what it would look like if they did what we did in Seattle and reinvested in existing assets.”

City of Greater Sudbury Energy and Emissions Plan

In response to an inquiry about City of Greater Sudbury policies related to environmentally friendly builds, a communications representative pointed to the Community Energy and Emissions Plan (CEEP).

This, they explained, is the city’s long-term plan to reduce carbon emissions. The plan came in response to city council’s 2019 climate emergency declaration and works toward achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

The plan includes 18 goals in eight strategy sectors, including three under the efficient buildings umbrella, including:
Goal 2: Periodically increase the energy efficiency of new buildings until all new buildings in 2030 onward are Passive House energy efficiency compliant.
Goal 3: The existing building stock is retrofit for 50 per cent increased energy efficiency by 2040 and large buildings are routinely recommissioned.
Goal 4: Achieve net-zero emissions in City buildings by 2040.

Under Goal 3, the city is striving to develop an energy efficiency retrofits program for which they recently received $170,000 in funding from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities to do a study comparing home retrofit financing models.

Under Goal 4, the city is developing a prioritized list of municipal buildings to perform energy audits, payback analyzes and retrofits on starting with the highest priority buildings.

As for the KED, the spokesperson noted the city is currently looking at how the CEEP goals will tie into the project, which will be outlined in future reports to city council.

In a July 14 report to city council, it’s noted, “From the perspective of the CEEP, the project respects the objective to minimize the production of greenhouse gases in the operation of new assets.”

Tyler Clarke covers city hall and political affairs for Sudbury.com.
‘No point in anything else’: Gen Z members flock to climate careers

Colleges offer support as young people aim to devote their lives to battling the crisis


Hundreds of protesters march to the White House calling for climate action,
 including a Civilian Climate Corps. 
Photograph: Allison Bailey/Rex/Shutterstock

Supported by


Angela Lashbrook
Mon 6 Sep 2021 

California is facing a drought so devastating, some publications call it “biblical”. Colorado now has “fire years” instead of “fire seasons”. Miami, which sees more dramatic hurricanes each year, is contemplating building a huge seawall in one of the city’s most scenic tourist districts to protect it from storm surges.

“Once you learn how damaged the world’s ecosystems are, it’s not really something you can unsee,” says Rachel Larrivee, 23, a sustainability consultant based in Boston. “To me, there’s no point in pursuing a career – or life for that matter – in any other area.”

Larrivee is one of countless members of Gen Z, a generation that roughly encompasses young people under 25, who are responding to the planet’s rapidly changing climate by committing their lives to finding a solution. Survey after survey shows young people are not just incorporating new climate-conscious behaviors into their day-to-day lives – they’re in it for the long haul. College administrators say surging numbers of students are pursuing environmental-related degrees and careers that were once considered irresponsible, romantic flights of fancy compared to more “stable” paths like business, medicine, or law.


“I cannot imagine a career that isn’t connected to even just being a small part of a solution,” says Mimi Ausland, 25, the founder of Free the Ocean, a company that aims to leverage small actions to remove plastic from the ocean.
Advertisement

Democrats in Washington hope to channel this energy through the proposed Civilian Climate Corps, a federal jobs program for young people to help fight the climate crisis and conserve public lands. While funding for the New Deal-inspired program is tied up in budget negotiations on Capitol Hill, youth activists say they hope it would help kids fresh out of high school land environmental-related jobs.

“The Civilian Climate Corps would actually allow a lot of young people to have a direct pipeline to these careers,” says Matt Ellis-Ramirez, 22, a Chicago-based volunteer for the youth-led environmental activist organization the Sunrise Movement.

Young people are finding their way to these careers, though, with or without the federal government’s support. Brooke Hoese, a 24-year-old undergraduate in Texas pursuing a career in restoration ecology, is taking an interdisciplinary approach. They spent the summer working on a farm that practices regenerative agriculture, a method to restore soil biodiversity, to contribute toward an integrative studies degree involving ecology, literature, and philosophy.

“My goal is to use the lens of literature and philosophy to study and hopefully help repair humans’ relationship to our environments,” they say.

College campuses across the country are now finding new ways to help students like Hoese integrate climate studies across various disciplines. The University of Southern California in Los Angeles, for example, launched the Sustainability Across the Curriculum program earlier this year to teach the college’s 20,000 undergraduate students how their majors intersect with sustainability and the environment.

I think I’m in the last generation who may be able to do anything about climate change
Rachel Larrivee, sustainability consultant


A 2020 USC survey found that 64% of undergraduate students are “very interested” in on-campus sustainability, while 27% are “interested”. They’re also practicing what they preach: 33% of survey respondents say they participate in sustainability activities “daily” and 27% report weekly sustainability practices.

“In the past, interest in the environment and sustainability was probably more of a niche interest, whereas now I see students that are studying in many different fields across campus also have an interest in sustainability,” says Jill Sohm, the director of the Environmental Studies program at USC. She says there’s been an uptick in student enrollment within her department, particularly over the last five to 10 years.

Christopher Schlottmann, the global curriculum coordinator at New York University’s environmental studies program, reports similar growth. And while the job market is rough across the board for new grads, Schlottmann says having some form of environmental degree under their belt is an asset, not a hindrance.

“There’s a general reputation that if you do good for the world, nobody’s going to pay you to do it. I don’t think that’s that accurate,” he adds. “If you understand how climate change works, then a bank should actually really want to talk to you because they want to hedge their risk.”

The United States Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that employment opportunities for environmental scientists and “related specialists” will grow 8% over the next 10 years, a rate much faster than growth in other industries. And pay ranges notably above overall median income levels: the 2020 median pay for environmental scientists is $73,230 per year, while environmental lawyers earn a median yearly salary of $122,960. Urban farmers, a career path that doesn’t require a bachelor’s degree, make roughly $71,160 a year.

Extinction Rebellion demonstrators in New York City. 
Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

“We grow up being told that working in environmental fields is a dream that is not accomplishable. And there’s no money in it,” says Ellis-Ramirez. “But as we start to realize that the world that we live in isn’t sustainable, and that corporations will stop making money if we lose the planet, then that funding is going to start showing up.”

Other young people note that a variety of industries now incorporate environmental issues into their work, giving young professionals flexibility to pursue a variety of career paths. “Things like sustainability aren’t fringe – they’re really mainstream,” says Joel Hartter, the director of the new outdoor recreation economy graduate program at the University of Colorado, Boulder. “I think that translates into people seeing that they have career options.”

As attention to the environment grows, so too does Gen Z’s awareness of how the climate crisis and pollution disproportionately harm marginalized communities.

“Environmental issues are not just environmental issues, but rather one avenue to help address other issues in society,” says Brooke Majewski, 23, a recent college graduate who works at a company that helps businesses achieve their sustainability goals. “It is about finding solutions for the planet we are on, but it is also finding solutions for the people being most negatively impacted by climate change.”

Surveys indicate that shifting attitudes toward the crisis often fall along generational lines. A 2021 Pew Research report found that Gen Z is overwhelmingly worried about climate change: 76% of them say that it’s one of their biggest societal concerns, while 37% make it their number one concern.

According to Pew, 32% of Gen Z respondents have participated in at least one major environmental action of the course of the past year, such as donating, volunteering, attending a rally, or contacting an elected official. In contrast, 23% of Gen X and 21% of baby boomers reported participating in such an action during the past year.

“I decided to pursue this industry because I think I’m in the first generation who knows the extent to which climate change poses an existential threat to life on Earth, and also the last generation who may be able to do anything about it,” says Larrivee, the Boston-based environmental consultant.

Solutions to the planet’s grim environmental future are in reach thanks in large part to this army of young people flooding universities, job fairs, and interview rooms with clear-eyed confidence in science, policy, and each other. This enthusiasm is historically unprecedented, says Schlottman.

“This is not a preset problem with a preset solution,” he says. But “their hearts are in the right place, and their minds are really close to in the right place too”.

BIDEN ON CORPORATE TAXES 

Biden with the tweet
'MAYBE' TECH
BMW Shows iX5 Hydrogen Fuel Cell SUV Amid Sea Of BEVs In Munich



Sep 06, 2021 
By: Christopher Smith

BMW will build a few examples, but you can't buy one.

Not all electric vehicles at the 2021 Munich Motor Show feature batteries. We're used to hearing about Hyundai's hydrogen ambitions, but BMW isn't giving up on the fuel-cell technology just yet. Case-in-point is the iX5 Hydrogen, which BMW debuts for the public at IAA Mobility 2021. In fact, BMW is using hydrogen-fueled iX5s as shuttle vehicles for the show.

The iX5 actually shares its exterior look with the bonkers X5 M, but you won't find a 617-horsepower (460-kilowatt) twin-turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 under the hood. Instead, you get a snazzy cover concealing electrical equipment beneath. The hydrogen-fueled SUV generates a far more modest 168 hp (125 kW), though for situations requiring more punch, BMW says the iX5 Hydrogen can bump power up to 369 hp (275 kW) as needed. Efficiency, not performance, is the name of the game here.

Gallery: BMW iX5 Hydrogen Photos, IAA 2021



BMW believes there is a future for hydrogen in motoring, especially in areas where high-speed electric charging isn't accessible. To that end, BMW sees a future where battery-electric vehicles (BEV) exist alongside fuel cell vehicles, not unlike the present-day combination of gasoline and diesel. Of course, that's dependent on a hydrogen infrastructure being built, as it's virtually non-existent at this point. However, with fueling stations available, the iX5 could fill its two carbon-fiber tanks with approximately 13 pounds of hydrogen in about four minutes.

More From BMW In Munich:

BMW Munich HQ Lightshow Presents Brand's Transformation

"Hydrogen fuel cell technology can be an attractive option for sustainable drivetrains – especially in larger vehicle classes," said Frank Weber, a member of BMW's board of management for development. "That is why road testing of near-standard vehicles with a hydrogen fuel cell drivetrain is an important milestone in our research and development efforts."

While BMW envisions fuel cell vehicles in the future, for now, the iX5 will remain a near-production test vehicle. Several will be built for evaluation, but without a hydrogen fueling infrastructure, the future of fuel cell vehicles is most decidedly an uncertain one.


Hyundai's Major Announcement Is A Big Deal

BY JAY TRAUGOTT INDUSTRY NEWS 

More automakers are expected to follow suit.

The transition to all-electric vehicles and other mobility solutions is changing the world for the better. Some will certainly argue against this, and that's just fine. Criticism is necessary to help keep the world's government and industry decision-makers on the right track. Everyone is accountable for their actions. The main reason for this transition is to curb greenhouse gas emissions, and Hyundai has just announced at this year's Munich Motor Show how it'll continue to do its part.

By the year 2045, the South Korean automaker has pledged to become carbon neutral. This won't be for just the Hyundai brand, but rather the entire Hyundai Motor Company consisting of that namesake brand plus Kia and Genesis.

"Climate change is an undeniable challenge that needs everyone's utmost and urgent attention, said company President Jaehoon (Jay) Chang.

Achieving carbon neutrality requires the automaker to reduce its carbon emissions 75 percent below the 2019 level by 2040. This will be achieved by expanding the emissions-free lineup, developing all-new platforms (such as the recently shown Robotaxi), and investing in various green energy solutions and other related technologies. 

Those attending this year's German event can head over to the Hyundai exhibit where they can check out the new Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kona EV, Nexo, and the Elec City Fuel Cell bus, which is undergoing testing right now in Europe.
CAP & TRADE; WHAT FORD ELIMINATED IN ONTARIO

Philip Cross: Ottawa can't cap oilsands output so Trudeau should stop saying he can

The Liberals ceded direct control over oilsands emissions when it implemented a carbon tax instead of a 'cap-and-trade' system

IT'S UNDER PROVINCIAL JURISDICTION 
SO THE ARGUMENT IS MOOT

Author of the article: Philip Cross
Publishing date: Sep 03, 2021 
After choosing a carbon tax as its tool for lowering emissions, Ottawa is not in a position to directly control the oil industry's output, writes Philip Cross.

IN DEBATING THIS IS CALLED THE ALTERNATIVE ARGUMENT; YOU DISAGREE WITH YOUR OPPONENT BUT INSTEAD OF SAYING SO YOU CREATE AN ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION HENCE CARBON TAX VS. 
CAP & TRADE


 PHOTO BY REUTERS/PATRICK DOYLE


During a weekend campaign stop at Granby, Que., Justin Trudeau defended his government’s purchase of the Trans Mountain pipeline by saying “The biggest concern that people have around the pipeline is, ‘Oh, we’re going to see oilsands expansion.’ No, we’re not.” The promise to curtail the oilsands echoes his famous 2017 remark to a gathering in Peterborough, Ontario, that “We can’t shut down the oilsands tomorrow. We need to phase them out.” This is just the latest example of Trudeau’s penchant during election campaigns to promise whatever the audience wants to hear without considering whether he can conceivably deliver it.

In a recent paper for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, I outlined how oilsands production has powered ahead even after the swan dive of oil prices in 2014. The oilsands have expanded rapidly to account for 70 per cent of all oil produced in Canada, with one-third of their growth occurring since 2015 when Trudeau took office. Capital spending of $8.3 billion a year in the oilsands is four times that of auto manufacturers, whom the prime minister has no trouble subsidizing even as he disparages the fuel that powers almost all of their vehicles.

The oilsands' steady growth almost certainly will continue no matter what Trudeau says

Oilsands production has followed a remarkably stable growth path since 1991. This reflects how its huge capital outlays require a long-term planning horizon that ignores both cyclical downturns in oil prices and electoral cycles in politics. This steady growth almost certainly will continue no matter what Trudeau says. IHS Markit projects that even after the drop in oil prices in 2020, oilsands output will rise from 2.7 million barrels a day to 3.8 million barrels by 2030. Half of the forecast increase comes from existing operations, which suggests the ruling party in Ottawa has no mechanism to prevent more oilsands production no matter who is its leader. The National Energy Board does control the issuance of permits for oil exports, but it is independent of the Prime Minister’s Office.

One of the many problems surrounding public discussion of the “oilsands” is the portrayal of all operations as the same. Though every oilsands plant is unique in terms of both emissions and technology there are only two main types of operation. One is the open-pit mining technique that the media loves to picture next to all references to the oilsands, while the other is underground (“in situ”) melting of the bitumen. In situ has become the dominant form of oilsands production despite less than two decades of this innovative Canadian technology being deployed. Most importantly, in situ operations only require provincial permits, making it even harder to see how the federal government could contain their expansion even if it wanted to.

The prime minister went on to say of the oilsands that “We’re not going to see an increase in those emissions.” But oilsands production could expand without necessarily raising emissions if technology continues to improve. Already, oilsands emissions have declined to about the average for oil produced in the U.S., although they vary greatly from project to project even when the same technology is used. Despite these advances, environmentalists continue to demonize the oilsands as if nothing has changed since the 1990s.

The future course of oilsands emissions is not directly controlled by the federal government, so it is misleading for Trudeau to pretend he can dictate their course. His government ceded direct control over emissions when it implemented a carbon tax instead of a “cap-and-trade” system. One of the problems with using a carbon tax to help control emissions is that it targets the price but not the quantity of emissions. The government sets the carbon tax at a level that it expects will reduce emissions by a certain amount, based on the estimated responsiveness of oil demand to price hikes. This is an inherently imprecise exercise in forecasting. If, for example, the price of oil shoots up by enough, firms could decide it is profitable to produce more and let emissions rise while paying the carbon tax

The alternative is the so-called “cap-and-trade” scheme, in which the level of emissions is capped and their price is set in markets in which people trade emissions permits. Cap-and-trade allows the government to directly control the quantity of emissions by foregoing control over the price the permit market places on emissions. The point is not that a carbon tax is superior to cap-and-trade — economists debate the merits of the two systems — but that, after choosing a carbon tax as its tool for lowering emissions, Ottawa is not in a position to directly control industry output.

Posturing about containing oilsands production and emissions panders to environmentalists outraged by Trudeau’s pipeline purchase but makes little difference to global emissions and climate change. As the International Energy Agency’s chief economist put it, the impact of the oilsands on global emissions “is not peanuts, it is a small fraction of peanuts.” The prime minister would serve Canadians better if he used his pulpit to inform the public about the misinformation surrounding the oilsands and explained how their continued development was consistent with both economic growth and an improving environment.


Philip Cross is a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.
Canadian Labour Congress president says parties need plan to protect gig workers


A Foodora courier is pictured as they pick up an order for delivery from a restaurant in Toronto, Thursday, Feb. 27, 2020. 
Nathan Denette / THE CANADIAN PRESS

Jordan Press
The Canadian Press
Monday, September 6, 2021

OTTAWA -- The head of the Canadian Labour Congress says the next government needs to better protect the country's gig workers by giving them access to the social safety net and employee protections.

Federal officials are currently reviewing the EI system and the place of gig workers in that system has become one of the thorniest issues. Officials are wrestling with how to calculate premiums and benefits for gig workers, or how to determine when someone needs aid, given that the nature of gig employment includes ups and downs.

Ahead of Labour Day, CLC president Bea Bruske said whoever forms government after the Sept. 20 vote needs to give gig workers access to the Canada Pension Plan and employment insurance system.

She also said changes are needed to give gig workers the same rights as other workers under employment standards legislation, and health and safety rules.

She took particular aim at one proposal floated on the campaign trail, that from the Conservatives to require gig economy companies to pay the equivalent of what they would pay in CPP and EI premiums into a portable savings account for platform workers.

The Conservatives say the money would grow tax-free and could be withdrawn whenever needed by the worker, but labour groups have panned the proposal and many gig workers have reviewed it with scorn.

She said the idea wouldn't give gig workers the same access to protections and benefits as others in the country and leave them as second-class workers.

"We believe that they need to be classified as workers and be enshrined as employees and therefore have rights and privileges like any other employee would have," Bruske said, "rather than creating a secondary grouping of employees with a separate savings plan that might not benefit them."

New Democrats typically have relied on unions for support at the ballot box, but the Liberals have attempted to forge close ties with labour groups since 2015, and the Conservatives are also attempting to woo workers in this campaign.

All the attention on labour issues is welcome, Bruske said, adding it also highlights how pivotal a time this is for workers after a historic plunge in the labour market that the country has yet to make up.

In July, the economy added 94,000 jobs as public health restrictions continued to be lifted, sending the unemployment rate to its lowest level since March of this year, at 7.5 per cent.

The gain left the country 246,400 jobs, or 1.3 per cent, shy of pre-pandemic employment levels seen in February 2020.

Bruske said the parties have all put forward some idea on how to recoup those jobs and create more, but added lost jobs must be replaced with better ones that offer decent pay, benefits and pathways to unionization.

She also said job losses alone are not the only issue that labour groups are closely watching in the campaign.

She pointed to the NDP promise on pharmacare as an example of a broader workers' issue -- one the Liberals spoke about in 2019 but is absent from their 2021 platform -- that could be of acute help.

During the pandemic, many workers saw their hours rolled back as companies experienced declines in revenues linked to lockdowns and public health restrictions, with many businesses still not back to pre-pandemic earnings. As a result, those workers lost their eligibility for benefit plans that often included financial help for medications.

She also pointed to climate change and the effects extreme weather events and forest fires have had on employers and employees as another issue labour groups are closely scrutinizing in platforms.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 6, 2021.
More than half of Canadians uncomfortable with private health care options: Nanos


More than half of Canadians say that they are not comfortable or somewhat not comfortable with having more private health care options.

Brooklyn Neustaeter
CTVNews.ca Writer
Monday, September 6, 2021 

TORONTO -- More than half of Canadians say that they are not comfortable or somewhat not comfortable with having more private health care options, according to new polling from Nanos Research.

The poll, conducted by Nanos Research and sponsored by CTV News and The Globe and Mail, found that 30 per cent of Canadians are not comfortable with having more private health care options and 23 per cent are somewhat not comfortable, totalling 53 per cent of those surveyed.

However, of those surveyed, 30 per cent said they were comfortable with greater privatized health care while 14 percent reported being somewhat comfortable. According to the poll, three per cent of Canadians said they were unsure.

Nanos reported that residents of the Prairies are more likely to be comfortable with increased private health care options compared to other provinces (48 per cent). Those who said they would be uncomfortable with this were mostly found in Quebec (55 per cent) and Ontario (57 per cent).

The poll found that men are more likely to be comfortable with increased private health care services at 37 per cent compared to 24 per cent of women.

As well, 49 per cent of Canadians said that having more private health care options will make the country's health care system weaker while 34 per cent said this would make the system stronger.

According to the polling, those who live in the Prairies (46 per cent) are more likely to say it will strengthen the system than residents of other provinces.

Only nine per cent reported that there would be no impact to the overall health care system, and eight per cent said they were unsure.

The poll found that men were more likely to say privatized health care options would make the system stronger (40 per cent) compared to women (28 per cent).

Canada has a universal health care system, which is paid for through taxes, and provides coverage for necessary health services on the basis of need, rather than the ability to pay.

While all of the party leaders support universal health care, Conservative Leader Erin O'Toole has also advocated for privatized options that go much further than, or is contrary to, what other parties support.

On the party's election platform, the Conservatives say they will “partner with the private sector rather than over-rely on government. We know that there are some things best done by the private sector and will be faster to reach out for help.”

However, O’Toole has been generally vague about what kind of medical care could be privatized

STANCE ON CHILD CARE



The new polling from Nanos also found that Canadians are more likely to prefer subsidized child-care spaces (50 per cent), such as those proposed by the Liberal and NDP parties, than a tax deduction on child-care expenses (40 per cent), like that promised by the Conservative Party.

Of those surveyed, 10 per cent of Canadians said they were unsure of which child-care plan they would prefer.

According to the polling, those who reside in Atlantic Canada are more likely to prefer subsidized child-care spaces at 62 per cent, while those living in the Prairies prefer a tax deduction at 55 per cent.

Women are more likely to prefer the proposals for subsidized child-care spaces (52 per cent), while those between the ages of 18 and 34 (56 per cent) also favoured this promise over a tax deduction on child-care expenses.

The Liberals have promised to reduce fees for child care by 50 per cent, on average, in the next year and introduce $10 a day daycare within five years. Like the Liberals, the NDP are promising a $10 a day child-care system across Canada, although the timeline for it has not been made clear.

Instead of a universal child-care program, the Conservatives are promising a refundable tax credit of between $4,500 and $6,000 per child, with an aim to cover up to 75 per cent of the cost of child care for low-income families.

METHODOLOGY

Nanos conducted an RDD dual frame (land-and cell-lines) hybrid telephone and online random survey of 1,029 Canadians, 18 years of age or older, between August 28 and 30, 2021 as part of an omnibus survey. Participants were randomly recruited by telephone using live agents and administered a survey online. The sample included both land- and cell-lines across Canada. The results were statistically checked and weighted by age and gender using the latest Census information and the sample is geographically stratified to be representative of Canada. Individuals were randomly called using random digit dialling with a maximum of five call backs.

The margin of error for this survey is ±3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. This study was commissioned by CTV News and the Globe and Mail and the research was conducted by Nanos Research.

Reports of 6.5 earthquake in B.C. Monday appear to have been sent in error

Magnitude 6.5 earthquake Canada

 
Author: Eamonn Sheridan | 

164 km SSE of Kitimat, Canada

  • Depth15.0 km
I have not heard of any tsunami alert, which would seem unlikely. Nor have reports of injuries/damage been incoming. So far so good but we await news of course. 

164 km SSE of Kitimat, Canada
























By Amy Judd Global News
Posted September 6, 2021 5:02 pm

The USGS Tweet Earthquake Dispatch Twitter account sent out this tweet on Monday afternoon. Twitter

Reports of a 6.5 magnitude earthquake off the west coast of B.C. Monday afternoon appear to have been sent out in error.


The U.S. Geological Survey tweeted at 2:24 p.m. that a preliminary 6.5 magnitude earthquake struck at a depth of 15 km about 164 km south-southeast of Kitimat.

However, the report was quickly removed from the USGS website.

Global News has reached out to the USGS for more information.

According to The Canadian Press, a computer glitch appears to have led to the erroneous report.

Alison Bird of Natural Resources Canada told the agency the automated system is not perfect at processing data and it’s possible two small earthquakes at different locations were detected as one event.

Canada not on board with U.S. earthquake early warning system

Emergency Management BC confirmed to Global News that they saw the tweet and noticed the event disappeared very quickly.

They said no one at the organization received any report of an earthquake in B.C. Monday and they suspect it was sent in error.


Whoops! USGS Issues Alert for Magnitude 6.5 Quake in Canada But Deletes Bulletin Shortly After

According to the preliminary data, the focus of the earthquake was located at a depth of 15 km in the western part of the British Columbia province, near the cities of Kitimat and Bella Coola.

The US Geological Survey reported on Monday that a significant 6.5 magnitude earthquake struck western Canada, near Queen Charlotte Sound.

There were no immediate reports on casualties or damage inflicted by tremors.
"This alert was falsely generated by an automatic system. It was quickly confirmed to be false and manually deleted. We will update this page when we know details of the error," the USGS explained the error in a statement soon after.

Many users, however, at first expressed confusion about the event's disappearance from the service's website, asking residents of British Columbia whether there really were tremors.

According to the Earthquake Track, there have been five minor tremors registered in British Columbia over the past seven days.

The last earthquake reported by the Canadian government service occurred on August 13, about 6 km from the city of Victoria, on the southern tip of Vancouver Island with a magnitude of 2.0. 

​However, a short time after the preliminary report, the USGS deleted the event from its records, leaving the event unconfirmed. The reason for the non-confirmation of the earthquake could possibly be a failure of the monitoring equipment.

 
 
  

  

  


 

Students urged to go into trades as industry faces labour shortage

Retirements, hot housing market leading to lack of skilled workers

The homebuilding industry has been sounding the alarm for the last decade about a shortage of skilled tradespeople, and with the market remaining hot during the COVID-19 pandemic that demand hasn't abated. (Andrew Lee/CBC)

As students return to school, an employment shortage has Ottawa's skilled labour industry encouraging them to consider the trades as a career path. 

Many tradespeople are hitting retirement age, industry experts say, and there aren't enough young people signing up to fill those jobs.

"We're feeling the effects now from an entire generation or two, you know, not going into the trades in the numbers that we needed them to," said Jason Burggraaf, executive director of the Greater Ottawa Home Builders Association.

The industry has been sounding the alarm bells for the last decade, Burggraaf said, and with the housing market remaining hot during the COVID-19 pandemic, the demand for labour hasn't abated.

He said the issue is especially clear when builders subcontract out certain jobs like framing or roofing, and the companies doing those jobs are also short on workers. 

"You can't necessarily rely on the long-standing relationships you have with some companies, because they just don't have the manpower," Burggraaf said.

It's an issue being felt across different trade sectors, and it's delaying the timelines of some projects. 

Buildforce Canada, an organization that tracks labour market information, estimates that by the end of the decade the industry will need to hire, train, and retain more than 116,000 additional workers to keep pace with expected demand growth and retirements.

Ontario will need to see at least 800 new workers a year enter the industry, Burggraaf said, something he doesn't believe will happen.

Adam Melnick, program director with the Unionized Building and Construction Trades Council of Eastern Ontario and Western Quebec, says while the industry is in need of more workers, it needs to be clear about where it needs them — and not oversaturate certain sectors.

"The amount of construction that we're forecasting five years from now, it's wonderful it if stays exactly the way it is. But it could become more or it could become less," Melnick said.

Certain trades are more popular or more in demand in parts of the province than others, said Melnick, which can make people think the scope of opportunities is smaller than it actually is.

Ultimately, the industry needs to start appealing to younger generations about a career in the trades, and then provide them with the necessary support to become apprentices, Melnick said.

"It's certainly a new environment for a lot of people when they pursue a career in construction or apprenticeship," Melnick said. "Most cases, they don't have a lot of exposure to it, and they probably certainly haven't done work similar to it. So it tends to be a whole new world."

KENNEY & UCP BACKPEDAL (AGAIN)
Alberta cancels plans to end COVID-19 testing, isolating; province to ramp up sewage monitoring program Oct. 1

Author of the article: Lauren Boothby
Publishing date: Sep 06, 2021 
The Gold Bar Wastewater Treatment Plant in Edmonton on Sept. 5, 2021. 
PHOTO BY LARRY WONG /Postmedia

Alberta has cancelled plans to end routine COVID-19 swab testing and isolation rules amid a rising fourth wave, as it also ramps up coronavirus sewage monitoring to cover most of the province by Oct. 1.

Chris Bourdeau, an Alberta Health spokesman, told Postmedia on Sunday testing people with COVID-19 symptoms will continue in its current form past Sept. 27. This is the second time the government has reversed course on halting routine testing. Cases have surged in recent weeks, as has criticism of the province’s plans to end COVID-19 protocols like testing, tracing and isolation.

Bourdeau also confirmed Monday that 10-day mandatory isolation for those who test positive for COVID-19 or who have symptoms, as well as mandatory masking orders in public transit, taxis and ride-shares, will remain in place beyond Sept. 27. A new date to end these rules hasn’t been set.

Alberta brought back an indoor mask mandate and liquor sales curfew on Friday.


Virus levels in sewage

Meanwhile, another way of tracking the waves of the pandemic is growing next month.

University of Alberta researchers have confirmed that they, along with the University of Calgary, will be expanding the wastewater testing programs to cover about 70 per cent of the population of Alberta. Samples collected measure the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 — the virus that causes COVID-19 — found in sewage at wastewater collection points.

This will include major and mid-sized cities with more than 50,000 people, some small cities or large towns, some First Nations communities, as well as spot testing for some high-risk settings like jails. The program is backed by the provincial government but funding details are still being firmed up.

The Gold Bar Wastewater Treatment Plant in Edmonton on Sept. 5, 2021.
 PHOTO BY LARRY WONG /Postmedia

Experts behind the project say this kind of monitoring does not replace clinical testing.

Steve Hrudey, one of the researchers behind the U of A study, says watching to see when gene copies from the virus start to spike can serve as an early warning. These levels rise shortly before the number of reported COVID-19 cases starts going up.

Unlike swab testing that requires people to sign up, sewage samples include nearly everyone, and if they have the virus it will show up in waste even before they have symptoms.

“Every toilet that flushes in the city of Edmonton ends up at the Gold Bar Wastewater Treatment Plant … people will shed the virus in feces so it shows up in wastewater while they’re still asymptomatic,” said Hrudey, who is a professor emeritus in the U of A’s laboratory medicine and pathology department.

He said the data is most useful for tracking trends, which follow the waves discovered with clinical testing.

“We’re measuring a signal of how much virus is out there … the trends over time are very consistent,” he said.

But Hrudey cautioned that wastewater testing can’t identify the individuals who are sick, how many people are infected, vaccination status, or how sick each person is.

“Wastewater testing is not, I repeat not, N-O-T, a replacement for clinical testing. Never. Not intended to be, and definitely is not an alternative,” he said.

In an email, Bourdeau said individual testing and wastewater monitoring are two different ways the government is looking at the impacts of COVID-19 on a region, and sewage testing gives public health officials insight into the level of the virus in a community.

“In fact, it can provide more accurate data on the intensity of COVID in a community, where individual testing only reflects the results of those who choose to get tested,” he said. “We know that there are individuals who have COVID but never get tested, so they are unreported.”

He said other types of virus surveillance are “used together to provide public health with the information it requires to monitor the pandemic and transition to endemic COVID 19.”

The University of Alberta has also been working on a similar study monitoring for outbreaks in long-term care by sampling manholes directly connected to a site. Researchers also hope this type of testing could be used to monitor other viral outbreaks in the future.

Virus levels high


Lilly Pang, one of the U of A study’s principal investigators, said in an email that generally the amount of virus in the water increases between five and seven days before the number of reported cases start to climb.

Her lab considers the amount of virus in a community to be low and undetectable when samples show fewer than 100 copies of SARS-CoV-2 RNA per 100 millilitres, and very high over 10,000.

The most recent tests done in the U of A’s survey areas showed between 1,000 to 10,000 copies per 100 ml, with variations in the regions participating, she wrote.

In her town hall with doctors last month, chief medical officer of health Dr. Deena Hinshaw said AHS has been sharing wastewater testing results with municipalities, local health officials and the provincial government to help them make decisions throughout the pandemic.

The public will be able to see wastewater test results online, she said. The University of Calgary already hosts this data for the Calgary area on its website.