Saturday, September 11, 2021

TAX THE RICH

NDP platform calls for $200 billion in new spending on health care, climate change, Indigenous reconciliation

Party projects lower deficits than Liberals and Tories most years due to taxes on wealthy, corporations

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh takes part in advanced voting during the Canadian federal election campaign in Burnaby, B.C., on Sept. 10. (Jonathan Hayward/The Canadian Press)

The federal NDP is promising $214 billion in new spending over the next five years, according to a costing breakdown of its platform commitments released Saturday.

Much of that spending would be offset by $166 billion in revenue raised during the same period through a series of new taxes and other measures targeted at wealthy individuals and large, profitable corporations.

"I'm proud to say that we are the only party that has a plan that will ensure that we are not going to put any extra burden on working class people, on the middle class, on small businesses," NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh told reporters while campaigning in Vancouver.

"Our plan is the only one with a credible vision to [increase] revenue significantly and substantially so that we can invest in the programs that people need, the help that people need, at the same time as putting us in a better situation to reduce our debt."

  • Find out who's ahead in the latest polls with our Poll Tracker.

The calculation, which is partly based on projections from Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO), estimates how much NDP platform promises would cost over the next five years, and how much revenue new tax measures would bring into federal coffers. 

It attaches specific dollar projections to policy pledges contained in the NDP platform, which the party released earlier this summer, but which was criticized as being long on ambition and short on details.

The PBO in its reports acknowledged uncertainty when it came to the revenue figures.

Singh conceded some uncertainty about the plan, saying it "hasn't been done before" but he argued it's "a real path forward" that "Canadians believe makes sense."

WATCH | Singh pressed on uncertainty around NDP platform costing:

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh acknowledges there is some uncertainty with some of his platform's revenue projections, but says it's because what he's proposing "hasn't been done before." 1:21

No immediate plan to get back to balance

The costed platform calls for $40 billion in additional spending for 2021-22. It predicts a steep deficit of $145 billion in 2021-22, which would shrink to $53 billion the next year before declining gradually to $34 billion in 2025-26.

There is no immediate plan to get back to budgetary balance, but party officials point to the declining debt-to-GDP ratio — which would go from 48% in 2021-22 to 45.8% by 2025-26 — as an indication that the party has a clear path back to balance.

According to party officials speaking on background, the NDP promises are above and beyond what was contained in the 2021-22 budget proposed by the Liberal government and passed by Parliament earlier this year. Even so, the party is projecting lower annual deficits in most years when compared with the Liberal and Conservative platforms, in part, because of an abundance of revenue-generating proposals.

Unlike the Conservative Party platform, which proposes cancelling the Liberal's big-ticket promise to spend $30 billion to build a national child-care program, the NDP plans to honour the existing deals the Liberals have signed with several provinces and to finish building a national system.

The most expensive line item in the NDP costing is $68 billion in new health-care spending over the next five years, which would fund universal prescription drug coverage, expand long-term care and home-care options, and cover dental care and mental health expenses for many Canadians on the lower end of the income spectrum.

The party says this would bring its platform the closest to meeting the provincial and territorial premiers' demand to have the federal government cover 35 per cent of all health-care costs — which would amount to increasing the Canada Health Transfer (CHT) by $28 billion per year. (The Conservative platform would inject $60 billion into health care over the next 10 years with no strings attached, although most of that money would be coming in the latter half of the decade. The Liberals would create a dedicated mental health transfer and say they are willing to negotiate increases the CHT).

The NDP is also proposing to spend $26 billion to fight climate change and support workers who may need to transition out of high-polluting industries such as oil and gas. 

In addition, the party would redirect $35 billion already budgeted for projects with the Canadian Infrastructure Bank into a "climate bank," which would have a mandate to boost investment in renewable energy, energy efficiency and low-carbon technology.

Another $30 billion would go toward efforts to achieve reconciliation with Indigenous people. More than half of that amount would be invested to bring the federal government in compliance with a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal ruling by compensating First Nations families and children who were removed from their homes and placed in the child welfare system.

The release of the NDP's platform costing comes on the second day of advance voting, with nine days left in the campaign before election day.

When asked whether voters would have benefited from having more time to review the party's numbers, Singh responded that Canadians won't be surprised by what they see.

"We have been very consistent that we want to invest in people,"Singh said. "We've said for a long time that we believe we've got to lift up people. We've done that throughout the pandemic.We've proposed that before the election."

New revenue streams

Below are the revenue raising measures and the amounts the party projects each would bring in:

  • $60 billion through a 1% annual tax on households with wealth over $10 million. 

  • $44 billion through raising the capital gains inclusion rate to 75% from 50% .

  • $25 billion through raising the corporate income tax rate  to 18% from 15%. This would apply only to businesses that make more than $500,000 in profit.

  • $14 billion through an "excess profit tax" on companies that made large profits during the COVID-19 pandemic. This would  apply to only some companies that make profit in excess of $10 million per year.

  • $12 billion through cracking down on tax havens. The Canada Revenue Agency would receive $100 million in extra funding to expand its capability to track down such funds.

All of the above revenue items have been costed by the PBO, according to party officials.

Doug Ford's government has lost more than a dozen court cases. Here's a list

WHY APPOINTED JUDGES ARE BETTER THAN ELECTED ONES

Judges have repeatedly ruled against the province in challenges to its legislation

Ontario Premier Doug Ford's government has lost a string of court challenges against its legislation. (Nathan Denette/Canadian Press)

Premier Doug Ford's government lost yet another court case this week. It has become a bit of a trend. 

Since taking office in 2018, Ontario's Progressive Conservative government has fought and failed in a succession of high-profile lawsuits. Most of the cases have involved legal challenges against new policies or legislation. 

The most recent courtroom loss: an Ontario Divisional Court ruling that the government violated the province's Environmental Bill of Rights with a piece of COVID-19 recovery legislation.

Why is the government losing court cases with such frequency?  

One theory comes from Michael Bryant, executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, a former attorney general of Ontario in Dalton McGuinty's Liberal government.

Michael Bryant, executive director and general counsel for the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, served as attorney general of Ontario under the Liberal government of Dalton McGuinty. (Jacqueline Hansen/CBC)

Bryant says public interest groups nationwide are showing a greater willingness to defy Canada's tendency to not be litigious.

"It's a legitimate means to access our constitution, to go to the courts, and we're doing it more than ever," Bryant said in an interview.

He also believes the Ford government is giving groups in Ontario plenty of ammunition for court battles by bringing forward "a lot of unconstitutional legislation, and I don't mean that flippantly." 

Bryant says aligning legislation with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms "is less important to this government." 

Ford's Attorney General Doug Downey declined a CBC News request for an interview to respond to the claims, but in a statement his press secretary said the Ontario government is involved in thousands of lawsuits each year.

"Cherry picking 14 cases out of these many thousands may seem convenient for opposition members, but it shows how little they understand about the actual business of governing on behalf of Ontarians," said Natasha Krstajic in the statement.

Doug Downey is Ontario's Attorney General. (Tijana Martin/The Canadian Press)

CBC News has compiled the following list of cases the Ford government has lost in court (along with one major case the government has won, currently under appeal at the Supreme Court of Canada). 

1. Carbon pricing 

Arguably the highest profile loss for the Ford government was a case launched by the government itself: Ontario's Charter challenge of the federal Liberals' carbon pricing program. Ford campaigned on a promise to fight what he called the carbon tax, and budgeted $30 million in taxpayer funds for the court battle.

Ontario lost at every judicial level. In March, the Supreme Court brought an end to the legal challenges by ruling 6-3 that the Trudeau government's carbon pricing regime is constitutional.  

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled the federal government can impose nationwide carbon pricing standards, ending Ontario Premier Doug Ford's legal battle against what he called the carbon tax. (John Rieti/CBC)

2. Election finance rules  

In June, an Ontario Superior Court judge struck down new restrictions on election campaign spending by what the province calls "third parties" (interest groups that are not political parties, such as unions or corporate-funded lobbies). Within days of the ruling, Ford recalled the Legislature for an emergency sitting to push through a bill overriding the court's decision through the use of the Charter's notwithstanding clause. 

3. Ministerial Zoning Orders

In a decision released on Sept. 8, a three-judge panel of Ontario's Superior Court found the government acted "unreasonably and unlawfully" by failing to consult the public in advance of enacting Bill 197, the COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act.

The legislation changes the rules for Ministerial Zoning Orders, which are used to fast-track land development projects. The judges said the minister of municipal affairs was bound by the Environmental Bill of Rights to consult Ontarians before making the changes. 

Gurratan Singh, the New Democrat MPP for Brampton East, is the party's attorney general critic. (Elections Ontario)

"There's a theme here, clearly," said Gurratan Singh, the NDP attorney general critic, in an interview this week. "Doug Ford will do whatever it takes to keep his big developer friends or big business friends happy, despite the cost it is to the public or despite how legal it is."

4. Cap and trade

In a similar finding in October 2019, an Ontario Divisional Court panel found the Ford government broke the law when it scrapped the previous Liberal government's cap-and-trade system without first conducting public consultation. The decision was effectively moot because the ruling did not force the province to reinstate the program, which used financial incentives to force companies to reduce carbon emissions. The case was brought by the environmental group Greenpeace. 

5. Gas pump stickers

The Ontario Superior Court struck down the Ford government's policy that forced gas stations to post stickers vilifying the federal Liberal government's carbon tax. 

In a September 2020 ruling, Justice Edward M. Morgan said the government cannot legislate a requirement that private retailers post material designed to campaign against a political party or another level of government.

The Ford government made it mandatory for service stations to place anti-carbon tax stickers like this on their gas pumps, and threatened them with fines for non-compliance. However in September 2020, an Ontario court struck down the law as unconstitutional. (Kate Bueckert/CBC)

6. Cabinet mandate letters 

The Ford government is pursuing a three-year legal battle to keep secret the premier's mandate letters to his cabinet ministers. The letters lay out a checklist of expectations for each of minister, and the government first refused in August 2018 to release them in response to a request by CBC News. 

In an adjudication decision in 2019, Ontario's Information and Privacy Commissioner ordered the government to release the documents. The government then asked Ontario's Divisional Court to overturn the decision, but lost that case too in 2020, and was ordered to pay the CBC $17,000 in legal costs.

The government then took the matter to the Ontario Court of Appeal. The case was heard in August and it's not yet known when the judges will render their decision.  

7. Student fees opt-out

The government's Student Choice Initiative, announced in January 2019, would have allowed post-secondary students to opt out of paying fees for services deemed "non-essential," such as funding for student unions and campus newspapers. 

Successive court rulings went against the government, most recently in August by the province's top court. The measure targeting fees for student associations was "a profound interference in university autonomy," said the decision by a three-judge panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal. 

The court also ordered the government to pay $20,000 in legal costs to the Canadian Federation of Students. 

Student federations won a court challenge against the Ford government's move to make most post-secondary student activity fees optional. The groups argued it unfairly targeted student unions and constituted a politically-motivated attack that threatened the autonomy of universities. (John Last/CBC)
 

8. Failing to consult with First Nation

In a ruling released Sept. 1, an Ontario Superior Court judge found that the province failed in its constitutional duty to consult with the Ginoogaming First Nation before issuing a mineral exploration permit in its traditional territory.  

The judge granted an injunction against mining activities in Wiisinin Zaahgi'igan, an area considered sacred by the people of Ginoogaming, located about 300 kilometres northeast of Thunder Bay. The injunction is temporary, with the judge ordering the First Nation and the province to conduct meaningful consultation and report back in January 2022. 

9. Shielding government from negligence suits

The government lost its appeal of a $30-million class action award related to Ontario jails' use of administrative segregation, a form of solitary confinement. The Ford government fought the case in part by invoking new legislation it had introduced in 2019 that aimed to give the province broader immunity from negligence lawsuits. However, in its March 2021 decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that the operations of government cannot be shielded from liability claims. 

10. Heritage building demolition

In January 2021, a community group won a court injunction that stopped the provincial government from demolishing a group of heritage buildings at the former Dominion Foundry complex in Toronto's West Donlands to clear the way for a new housing development. In August, the city of Toronto reached a deal with the province to preserve two of the buildings considered to have the greatest heritage value.

A Toronto community group won a court injunction in January 2021 to stop the provincial government from demolishing a group of heritage buildings at the former Dominion Foundry complex to clear the way for a new housing development (Submitted by Evan Madill)
 

11. OHIP coverage for snowbirds

The Superior Court of Justice ordered the government in September 2020 to reinstate the Out of Country Travellers' Program, which provided partial coverage for medical expenses incurred outside Canada, through the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP). The Ford government cancelled the program in early 2020, but the court ruled the move violates the Canada Health Act.

12. Wind farm cancellation 

In May 2020, an Ontario Superior Court panel of judges overturned the Ford government's cancellation of the Nation Rise wind energy project near Cornwall. The judges said the move by then-minister of the environment Jeff Yurek to revoke approvals for the project was "unreasonable" and "procedurally unfair."

13. Tesla electric vehicle rebates

In July 2018, just days after taking office, the Ford government scrapped an incentive program offering rebates of up to $14,000 for purchases of electric cars. There was a two-month grace period for those who had ordered cars from dealers but the incentive ended immediately for anyone who ordered their vehicle directly from the manufacturer. That specifically hit Tesla buyers.      

An Ontario Superior Court judge ruled that the government's action was arbitrary and had singled out Tesla for harm.

In July 2018, the Ford government scrapped Ontario's incentive program offering rebates of up to $14,000 for purchases of electric cars. (Ben Margot/The Associated Press)

14. Pay equity for midwives

Ontario's midwives had waged a long-running legal battle over pay equity. The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario ordered the province in early 2020 to provide midwives a back-pay increase of 20 per cent for the years 2011 to 2015. The Ford government took the case to a higher court to try to get the order overturned. In a June 2020 ruling, the Ontario Divisional Court upheld the pay equity award

Ford's biggest court victory

The Ontario Court of Appeal ruled in September 2019 that Ford's government had the "legitimate authority" to cut the size of Toronto city council a few months before the 2018 municipal election.

The City of Toronto took the case to the Supreme Court of Canada. During the hearing in March, lawyers for the city argued that the Ford government "trampled" on democracy with the move, while lawyers for the province argued the ensuing election was free and fair. The court has yet to indicate when it will render its judgment.    


New book debunks Winnipeg-lab conspiracy theory but questions collaboration with Chinese military scientist

Journalist Elaine Dewar found 2019 virus shipment from National Microbiology Lab had no link to coronavirus


Karen Pauls · CBC News · Posted: Aug 31, 2021 9:00 AM CT | Last Updated: September 2

Xiangguo Qiu was escorted out of the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg in July 2019 along with her husband, Keding Cheng, months after the Public Health Agency of Canada reported a 'policy breach' at the lab to the RCMP. The two virologists were fired in January 2021. The RCMP is still investigating, and the reasons behind the firing remain a mystery to the public. (CBC)


A new book concludes co-operation between Canada's National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg and China's Wuhan Institute of Virology played no part in the origin of the coronavirus pandemic but raises questions about links between one of the researchers fired from the lab and a prominent Chinese virologist affiliated with the military.

Toronto-based freelance journalist Elaine Dewar says she set out to investigate the hypothesis that the coronavirus was leaked from the Wuhan lab by looking at the science and financial and geopolitical interests related to the theory.

As part of that, she looked into whether an approved shipment of Ebola and henipah viruses in March 2019 from the Winnipeg lab to Wuhan had anything to do with the pandemic after conspiracy theories suggesting it did surfaced online.

Months after that shipment, in July 2019, NML scientists Xiangguo Qiu and husband Keding Cheng were escorted from the Winnipeg lab and had their security clearances revoked. They were fired last January, and to date, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), which runs Canada's only Level 4 biosafety lab, has not explained why.

Dewar did not find any connections between the 2019 shipment and the pandemic. CBC News has also debunked conspiracy theories making those connections.

"That particular conspiracy theory is nonsense, and there is absolutely no evidence to support it," said Dewar, whose book On the Origin of the Deadliest Pandemic in 100 Years: An Investigation comes out Tuesday.

"But there is evidence to support a very close link between the WIV and certain people at the NML."

WATCH | Journalist Elaine Dewar on some of the connections between labs in Winnipeg and Wuhan



Journalist Elaine Dewar outlines some of the connections between Canada's National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg and China's Wuhan Institute of Virology over the years. 2:34



Co-operation with military virologist


Dewar found that Qiu worked closely with Wei Chen, a prominent Chinese virologist who holds the rank of major-general in the People's Liberation Army, and tested Chen's Ebola vaccine at the Winnipeg lab.

There is no evidence that the work went beyond routine scientific collaboration, but Dewar says the co-operation raises questions about the kind of collaborations the sensitive government lab should undertake.

"When you have civilian researchers studying Ebola, how it works, how people are infected by it, what might be done to protect them against infection, that's one thing. When you have military scientists involved, it becomes a larger question because it can be weaponized," Dewar said during a recent interview at her Toronto home.

"When you have a relationship with a country which is unfriendly … you have to ask the question, do you want leading Chinese experts having access to a lab which requires secret clearance in this country?"

Journalist and author Elaine Dewar investigated whether the dismissal of the two scientists had anything to do with the coronavirus pandemic after conspiracy theories surfaced online. She debunked the theories in her new book, On the Origin of the Deadliest Pandemic in 100 Years: An Investigation. (Danielle Dewar)

Dewar also found that Qiu authored several scientific papers since she was fired from the lab. She says that suggests Qiu continued to have access to NML data, though PHAC says people who no longer work for the agency can still affiliate themselves with it in academic publications that reflect research done while they were there.

One paper, published in March 2020 and co-authored by Qiu, Chen and virologists from NML and the military-affiliated Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, drew on Ebola-related experiments performed while Qiu was at NML.

Chen, who was listed as senior author along with Qiu, is considered a national hero for her work on Ebola vaccines. She and her research team at the Academy of Military Medical Sciences in Beijing are also leading China's coronavirus response.

"When this paper was submitted (in January 2020), Xiangguo Qiu and Keding Cheng had been on suspension for six months. Did PHAC and the RCMP fail to notice that they continued to work with a leading military medical … figure in China even as the RCMP investigated them?" Dewar writes in her book.

She maintains the loss of Qiu's security clearance should have meant she no longer had access to the NML's scientific work.

Chinese President Xi Jinping shakes hands with Wei Chen, top row far left, a celebrated vaccine researcher and a major-general in the People's Liberation Army, in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing in September 2020. Chen is a prominent vaccine researcher whose team at the Academy of Military Medical Sciences is leading China's pandemic response. She collaborated with Qiu on a vaccine against the deadly Ebola virus. 
(Carlos Garcia Rawlins/Reuters)

In a statement provided to CBC News, PHAC said security clearance is mandatory for anyone accessing government networks or data but that access would not have been necessary to publish work based on past research done at the lab.

"All access is blocked if someone's security status/clearance is suspended or revoked," it said. "The analysis and write-up phase of the scientific process can take months to years following the experimental work ending. Final review of completed manuscripts does not require access to the laboratory or network.

"While Dr. Qiu is no longer employed by the Public Health Agency of Canada, her scientific contributions while at PHAC remain."

CBC News was not able to reach Qiu or Chen for comment.

China needed help setting up Level 4 lab

While CBC News and other media have reported on the scientific collaboration between Qiu and Chinese researchers, some of whom have military affiliations, Dewar's book provides some historical context.

China has large investments in regions of Africa impacted by Ebola, which is why it was looking for effective vaccines, treatments and diagnostic tests.

However, Ebola research must be done in a Level 4 lab, and China did not have one until 2018. A Level 4 virology facility is equipped to handle the most serious and deadly human and animal diseases. The Winnipeg lab is one of only a handful in North America capable of handling pathogens requiring the highest level of containment, such as Ebola.

CBC News previously broke the story that Qiu had travelled repeatedly to Wuhan in 2017-18 to help set up the newly built Level 4 lab there, develop safety and operational protocols and train staff.

Meanwhile, scientists from Canada's national lab were doing ground-breaking work on Ebola.

In 2018, Qiu and her then-boss Gary Kobinger won a Governor General's Innovation Award for their work on ZMapp, an Ebola treatment that helped save lives during the outbreaks in West Africa between 2014-2016.

Dewar found research involving Qiu and Chen going back to at least 2015 that shows Qiu tested Chen's Ebola vaccine at the Winnipeg lab.

WATCH | Ebola survivor visits Winnipeg lab in 2016, thanks Qiu for vaccine work:


Xiangguo Qiu and staff at the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg meet Junietta Macauley from Sierra Leone, whose life was saved by ZMapp, the Ebola vaccine they helped develop. 3:46



Details of firing still unclear

Meanwhile, the details of Qiu and Cheng's firing remain a mystery.

For months, opposition MPs have been demanding PHAC turn over unredacted documents pertaining to their dismissal, which PHAC had said was related to a "policy breach," and while the government recently dropped its attempt to block the release of the documents, Dewar is not confident we'll ever have all the answers.

"We have, instead of truth, a pile of cover-up going on," she said.

WATCH | Opposition presses government for details of NML firings:


Federal government grilled on microbiologists stripped of security clearance

After two scientists working at the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg were stripped of their security clearance, national security experts have raised concerns about the possibility of espionage and, on Wednesday, MPs demanded answers in the House of Commons. 2:03


PHAC did confirm the NML underwent a physical security vulnerability assessment in May 2019 as part of ongoing reviews but said its screening and security procedures have not been updated independent of the Treasury Board Secretariat policy on government security it is subject to.

May 2019 is when PHAC referred this case to the Manitoba RCMP, which confirmed the investigation is still ongoing.



In this compelling whodunnit, Elaine Dewar reads the science, follows the money, and connects the geopolitical interests to the spin.

When the first TV newscast described a SARS-like flu affecting a distant Chinese metropolis, investigative journalist Elaine Dewar started asking questions: Was SARS-CoV-2 something that came from nature, as leading scientists insisted, or did it come from a lab, and what role might controversial experiments have played in its development? Why was Wuhan the pandemic's ground zero—and why, on the other side of the Atlantic, had two researchers been marched out of a lab in Winnipeg by the RCMP? Why were governments so slow to respond to the emerging pandemic, and why, now, is the government of China refusing to cooperate with the World Health Organization? And who, or what, is DRASTIC?

Locked down in Toronto with the world at a standstill, Dewar pored over newspapers and magazines, preprints and peer-reviewed journals, email chains and blacked-out responses to access to information requests; she conducted Zoom interviews and called telephone numbers until someone answered as she hunted down the truth of the virus’s origin. In this compelling whodunnit, she reads the science, follows the money, connects the geopolitical interests to the spin—and shows how leading science journals got it wrong, leaving it to interested citizens and junior scientists to pull out the truth.


DELHI FLOODING

 

Jane Campion, New Zealand's humble cinema giant



Issued on: 11/09/2021 - 
Campion has already picked up the top prize at Cannes
 Filippo MONTEFORTE AFP


Venice (AFP)

New Zealand's Jane Campion underlined her status as one of the leading film-makers of her generation, taking home the best director trophy at the Venice Film Festival on Saturday.

"The Power of the Dog", an emotionally complex tale about feuding brothers on a 1920s Montana ranch, was Campion's first film in more than a decade and won immediate acclaim from critics.

Campion was already a major figure in the history of cinema as the first woman to win a Palme d'Or at the Cannes Film Festival, for "The Piano", and only the second ever nominated for a directing Oscar.

Benedict Cumberbatch, who stars in her new film, told reporters she was a "key icon" of the women's movement.

"She's a great filmmaker and a very powerful woman in our industry. She handles it all so adeptly, and she's so ridiculously humble about it," he said in Venice.

Campion returned the compliment as she accepted the award on Saturday, saying of Cumberbatch: "He really did go around the world and back again to find this character, to strip himself bare."

Campion was a little-known arthouse filmmaker when she brought "The Piano" to the Cannes Film Festival in 1993.

The New Zealand-set movie about a mute pianist and her daughter starring Holly Hunter, Harvey Keitel, Sam Neill and Anna Paquin, went on to pick up three Oscars and was a huge critical and commercial hit.

"'The Piano' was a massive film for me growing up -- seminal -- all of her work is," said Cumberbatch.

She followed that film with a run of complex films featuring strong-willed women that have established her as one of the foremost auteurs of her generation.

- Early exposure -


Born in Wellington on April 30, 1954, the second of three children, Campion grew up in a theatrical family.

But despite this early exposure –- her mother was a writer and actress, her father a theatre director and producer –- Campion did not set out to become a filmmaker.

Instead, she studied for a degree in anthropology in New Zealand before concentrating on art in London and Sydney.

Only later did Campion find her calling at the Australian Film Television and Radio School between 1981 and 1984.

Head of the Cannes jury Jane Campion, pictured last year in Cannes, made her name portraying complex, strong-willed female protagonists and knows from first-hand experience that the festival is a place where careers are made
 Anne-Christine Poujoulat AFP/File

Many of Campion's films revolve around gender issues, and she has been praised for the innovation, imagination and intelligence of her work.

"The Portrait of a Lady" (1996) was an adaptation of the Henry James novel, starring Nicole Kidman, while "Holy Smoke" (1999) cast Kate Winslet as a woman experiencing a spiritual awakening on a trip to India.

Campion also cast Meg Ryan in "In The Cut" (2003) as a New York writing professor who has an affair with a detective investigating a local murder.

- 'Mythical and exciting' -

She first came to Cannes in 1986 when she won best short film with "Peel".

In 1989, her first feature film "Sweetie" -- the story of a young woman's difficult relationship with her unstable sister -- was selected to compete for the Palme d'Or and she returned with "An Angel at my Table" (1990), based on the autobiographies of New Zealand author Janet Frame.

As well as features, Campion has branched out into documentaries such as "Abduction: The Megumi Yokota Story" (2006) about a Japanese student kidnapped by a North Korean agent in 1977.

Her television mini-series "Top of the Lake", with Elizabeth Moss as a detective returning to her home town to investigate a child abuse case, was a hit with audiences and won a string of awards.

In 2014, she served as head of the jury at Cannes, and described the festival as a "mythical and exciting" place where "amazing things can happen".

"I know this because that is what happened to me," she added.

burs-er/jj

Italy: Palermo puts migrant children center stage

Veteran mayor Leoluca Orlando has transformed the Sicilian capital from a Mafia stronghold into a beacon of migrants' rights, and opera has been key. But Palermo's inclusive vision may be about to die.

When the Rainbow Choir reunited for its first rehearsals after the pandemic last summer, the sense of excitement was palpable. "Louder," bellowed the ensemble's maestro, snapping his fingers as he paced around the room. The young singers needed little encouragement — grinning in unison, they soared through another verse of an Italian movie soundtrack.

Run by the Teatro Massimo, Palermo's majestic opera house, the Rainbow Choir unites children from the city's many migrant communities, from Romanian to Philippine to Bangladeshi. The ensemble's appearances in concerts and international opera productions can provide life-changing experiences for its often disadvantaged members. And, after a long, grueling lockdown, the young singers were keen to get back to work.

"When I sing, I feel like I have been reborn," said Carmela, an 11-year-old Ghanaian member (photo above). "I want to do opera, I hope to become a professional [...] I also want to go to the conservatory."

The choir was launched in 2014 by the Teatro Massimo and the Consulta delle Culture, an elected body representing migrants' interests. Initially intended to draw migrant parents into the theater, the ensemble ultimately became a lifeline for many of its young members.


Leoluca Orlando has been a force in Palermo politics for decades

The initiative is a testament to the pioneering vision of Leoluca Orlando, Palermo's veteran mayor. Since freeing the city from the grip of the Mafia in the 1980s and 1990s, Orlando has sought to transform the Sicilian capital into a beacon of migrants' rights. However, with Italian right-wing leader Matteo Salvini's popularity growing locally, and Orlando preparing to step down before local elections in spring 2022, the long-term survival of the mayor's project hangs by a thread.

Migrants find a home

Few Italian cities appear as welcoming to migrants as Palermo. With residents from 127 countries and an immigrant population that has almost tripled in nearly two decades, to 24,000, Palermo is Italy's most ethnically diverse city. The walls of its historic center are plastered with multilingual street signs in Italian, Hebrew and Arabic. An architectural patchwork of Moorish domes, sweeping Norman arches and dazzling Byzantine mosaics testifies to centuries of sociocultural and ethnic mixing.

Yet Italy's bureaucracy turns many undocumented migrants — they numbered roughly 600,000 in 2020, according to government estimates — into second-class citizens. Those without work or residence permits are often forced into illegal employment and barred from access to public health care and social services, said Ibrahima Kobena, president of the Consulta delle Culture, in an interview. Moreover, Italy's birthright laws do not bestow citizenship on children who do not have an Italian parent. Despite being born in Italy, Carmela, who lives with Sicilian foster parents, will not be entitled to Italian citizenship until she is 18.

The choir has helped redress the balance. "Italians feel like the boss. If your skin is a different color, they treat you badly," said Angela Assare, a 13-year-old member who is also from Ghana. "In the choir, we are all equals. It helps us understand that we are not animals."


The Rainbow Choir sings in Palermo's grand Teatro Massimo

Whole families have been lifted by the choir's work. One parent, Rudy Chateau, relocated from Mauritius to Palermo as an undocumented migrant in the early 2000s, picking up irregular work at a parking lot, and supporting his family on €500 ($587) a week. Rudy and his wife, Stephanie, would skip meals to feed their son, Niguel. Today, they have work permits and steady jobs. "When the conductor chose Niguel [to sing in the choir] we were so proud," said a beaming Stefania. "We entered the theater for the first time, and we were like 'Wow.'"

The choir is one of a rich array of local policies and initiatives benefiting migrants. Orlando has described Italy's residence permit as a "new form of slavery," offered newcomers to Palermo "honorary citizenship" and, in 2018, locally overruled the then-Interior Minister Salvini's order to close Italy's ports to migrant boats. Launched by Orlando's administration in 2013, the Consulta delle Culture has united Christian and Muslim leaders in mosques, organized multicultural parades through the city and helped draft Palermo's pro-migrant manifesto.

Populist politics threatens mayor

But a battle for the heart and soul of Palermo is brewing ahead of next year's elections. A string of defections of conservative politicians to Salvini's League hint that the party is on the way to becoming the dominant right-wing force in Palermo. Meanwhile, Orlando's popularity has slumped. After an economically suffocating pandemic and perceived chaos at city hall, which culminated a year ago with the resignation of two deputy mayors, in July the veteran was voted the third least popular of 105 mayors in a poll by newspaper Il Sole 24 Ore.

Last summer, many in the city's impoverished historic center voiced open dissent. "Palermo is not like once upon a time. Now there are foreigners here, and we don't get on well," said Ottavio Pensionato, 70, in the working-class Capo district. "Orlando has abandoned us. He doesn't think about us Palermitans," said Francesco Paolo, an unemployed 30-year-old, in a piazza surrounded by crumbling buildings in the Vucciria district. "Salvini's first concern is the Italians. He's getting my vote."


The Rainbow Choir performed in Richard Wagner's opera 'Parsifal' in 2019

Orlando remains resolute: "There is only one way to combat populism. By having respect for time," he said during an interview in the sumptuous villa of Palermo's mayors. Yet time may be running out. "There is no indication that the mayor's vision will continue," said Kobena. "If there is no successor, the Palermo he has created will die."

A victory for the right would spell the end of the Mediterranean's most ambitious integration project. Yet Orlando's legacy will live on in those lives that have been transformed. "We are all from different nations," said Carmela of the Rainbow Choir. "We are many different voices that come together as a single, more beautiful voice."

DW VIDEO PALERMO RAINBOW CHOIR


Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder most common health effect of 9/11

Two decades after the collapse of the World Trade Center, people are still coming forward to report illnesses that might be related to the terror attack. Dr. Carol Tosone, professor of social work at New York University, explains how post-traumatic stress disorder has emerged as one of the most common, persistent health conditions.

Horwath pushes Ford to reconvene legislature to stop hospital protests
WANNA PROTEST, GO TO QUEENS PARK

Fri., September 10, 2021

Ontario NDP leader Andrea Horwath says the 'violent vitriolic harassment and intimidation' that is happening to healthcare workers must be stopped.
 (Frank Gunn/The Canadian Press - image credit)

With anti-vaccination protests becoming a frequent occurrence in Ontario — including outside hospitals, where demonstrators have shouted down patients and staff — provincial NDP leader Andrea Horwath is pushing for Premier Doug Ford to reconvene the legislature to put a stop to such "vitriolic harassment by anti-vaxxer mobs."

Horwath, MPP for Hamilton Centre, was outside McMaster Children's Hospital Friday, promoting a proposal that would create "safety zones" around hospitals and businesses where protests have escalated into harassment.

The bill, which can't be tabled until the legislature returns from an extended summer break, would make targeted harassment of people and businesses upholding public health rules in designated safety zones a provincial offence, punishable by a fine of up to $25,000.


"I believe in the right for people to protest, but what we have to stop is really violent vitriolic harassment and intimidation that's happening in these situations," she told CBC Hamilton on Friday, citing a recent incident at a Kingston hospital where a cancer patient was accosted by protesters. "It has to stop. We have tools we can engage to make that happen."


Gian Paolo Mendoza/CBC

The protests have escalated over the federal election period, while Ford has kept out of the spotlight, pushing back the return to the legislature to Oct. 4, after initially setting it for Sept. 13.

Horwath says she'd like him to call MPPs back early to stop the harassment, which is targeting sick people and healthcare providers, who have no recourse or power to do anything about the situation.

'Healthcare workers do not make policy'


Horwath's Friday event follows recent protests outside Joseph Brant Hospital in Burlington and the home of that city's mayor Marianne Meed Ward, which "included harmful messages, harassment and misinformation targeted against our medical and healthcare professionals, resulting in emotional distress and moral injury," according to a statement from "Burlington's community leaders" posted on the hospital's website.

"This type of protest undermines the hard work and sacrifices of hospital staff, physicians and first responders over the past year and a half and as we head into the fourth wave of this pandemic," states the release. "We condemn, in the strongest of terms, this targeted and misdirected abuse and harassment of healthcare workers that has occurred during these recent protests."

The statement asked protesters to take their messaging to decision-makers and away from private homes and healthcare providers.
"We also ask you to be considerate of those who need access to our hospital for life-saving treatments and those visiting their loved ones. Healthcare workers do not make policy."

There were also reports on social media showing pictures of an anti-vaccination and anti-vaccine mandate rally marching through downtown Hamilton Friday afternoon.

Hamilton doctor receiving threats


Dr. Amit Arya, a palliative care physician and assistant clinical professor of palliative care at McMaster University, says he's had numerous online threats of violence against him and his family after posting on Twitter about the pandemic and vaccines.

He says he's received racist attacks and death threats, from people questioning his expertise or suggesting he's in the pocket of "big pharma."

He's also had someone call the hospital where he works to try to speak with him directly about one of his tweets, which he says was simply factual information about vaccines.

Dr. Arya welcomes legislation that would put a protective bubble around hospitals, saying he's had several conversations with colleagues worried about the day protesters materialize at the facilities where they work.

"It's not just because health workers are scared of being harassed, we're scared for our patients," he said. "We are not legislators in the hospital. If people are unhappy, they should go to Queen's Park."
Disappointing response to Indigenous issues in federal election leadership debate

Fri., September 10, 2021,

Indigenous people got little more than platitudes from the leaders of the five major parties in last night’s one and only English-language federal election debate, and that’s why Assembly of First Nations National Chief RoseAnne Archibald tried to push organizers for an Indigenous-issues only debate.

“That would be the space where we could really get a sense of what these leaders are prepared to do, what commitments they can make,” she said. It’s a place where Archibald could hear where leaders and the parties stand on inherent and treaty rights.

Archibald watched the debate after coming off the water in Nova Scotia where she boarded a Mi’kmaw fishing boat as the treaty-rights bearing fishers were surrounded by department of Fisheries and Oceans officials. Their lobster traps were seized by DFO.

“There’s a real underlying issue (of) … inherent and treaty rights being ignored. First Nations sovereignty and jurisdiction are not being addressed adequately in my view, and I would have liked to have heard the leadership of the parties on how they would begin to create the mechanisms so that we can really have true peace here on Turtle Island because these conflicts … are really about lands and waters and resources,” she said.

Dismantling the Indian Act and ensuring that Canada lives up to its constitutional obligations to Indigenous peoples were among the topics pursued by APTN journalist Melissa Ridgen, who led the Reconciliation section of the debate.

However, the answers to her questions provided few details beyond parties hoping to build partnerships and their stated need to listen to Indigenous leaders.

Liberal leader and incumbent Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said his government was committed to dismantling the Indian Act and how that happened would vary from community to community depending on which jurisdictions each wanted to first tackle.

NDP leader Jagmeet Singh said the solution would have to be “Indigenous led.”

Conservative leader Erin O’Toole said he would work with Indigenous leaders from non-profits, the private sector, industry and academia, while Green Party leader Annamie Paul said Indigenous MPs would provide direction.

Archibald points out that none of the answers—whether on this question or others—included getting direction from the AFN, the Métis National Council or the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, which reflects an “ongoing colonial approach, an ongoing patriarchal and paternalistic approach” to solving issues.

“I did notice that generally the parties feel they’re consulting with somebody. I don’t know who it is. I certainly was not asked as a national chief to have input into party platforms, where I stood on particular issues (and) that’s a problem because the issues that we’re facing, the longstanding ongoing problems and challenges, the solutions to those issues are actually in First Nations,” said Archibald.

Bloc Québécois leader Yves-Francois Blanchet faced a question about systemic racism in Quebec, with specific reference to Atikamekw woman Joyce Echaquan who recorded and posted the racist treatment she received in a hospital just prior to her death. It was the second question of the night that Blanchet had received about discrimination in his home province. He refused to answer.

Archibald said she recently did a tour of communities in western and southwestern Quebec with AFN Regional Chief Ghislain Picard.

“It’s very clear to me that there is not only systemic racism in Quebec, there’s outright racism and that racism is impacting the rights of First Nations people in that province,” she said.

Archibald said the Quebec government had made little progress in resolving land issues on unsurrendered and unceded territories of the Algonquin people, which infringes upon their rights and access to resources.

“To me that really speaks to a province, a provincial government, that isn’t doing enough to begin to solve the problems of their province as it relates to First Nations right holders,” she said.

All the leaders made it clear that reconciliation was a priority, but few were specific on the issues raised through the questions asked by both Ridgen and debate moderator Shachi Kurl, which included building respectful nation-to-nation relationships with Indigenous peoples; addressing the disproportionate violence faced by Indigenous women and girls; addressing poverty and trauma in order to keep children out of the child welfare system; and ensuring money spent to address Indigenous concerns gets results.

The section on reconciliation, which was one of five debate topics for the evening, was kicked off by 18-year-old Ojibway man, Marek McLeod of Sault Ste. Marie, who asked how the leaders would build trust with Indigenous peoples after 150 years of failure.

“Relationship,” “partnership,” “engagement” and “action” were the buzzwords for the answers, but nothing specific was offered to follow those words.

Paul, the only woman on the debate floor, made it clear “political will” was needed to tackle violence against Indigenous women and girls and to ensure that poverty and trauma were addressed in order to keep children out of the child welfare system.

“The Indigenous leadership is there; it is ready to guide all of these processes. We have all of the recommendations we need. What we're missing is political will,” she said.

As for the other topics of the night—Affordability, Climate, COVID-19 recovery, and Leadership and Accountability—Archibald says these all pertain to First Nations people as well, although the solutions differ.

“That’s where we’ve got to start charting the path forward with all of these parties, is helping them to understand that First Nations people want the same thing that regular Canadians want. We want our children to be healthy and happy, surrounded by the love and care of their families in safe and vibrant communities. We all want that. The solutions of how to get there are actually in our communities,” she said.

While the choppy format of the debate did not allow for prolonged discussion among the leaders, Archibald said she was impressed with the work done by Ridgen, who offered up strong, detailed questions. Ridgen is the first Indigenous journalist to ever be included in a federal leadership debate.

“I hope by APTN being here, asking the questions that we asked, regardless of what the answers were, I think that the questions should be enough to get people thinking and I hope to see that people get educated,” said Ridgen, speaking after the debate in a special follow-up broadcast by APTN.

Prior to the debate, Archibald released the AFN’s The Healing Path Forward: 2021 Federal Election Priorities for First Nations and Canada, which outlined five priorities: truth, reconciliation and healing for First Nations and all Canadians; climate and conservation leadership with First Nations; economic growth, prosperity, and wealth building for First Nations; promoting peace by respecting First Nations jurisdiction; and rebuilding and strengthening First Nations.

She said she had received no formal response from any of the leaders, although Trudeau had phoned and told her they were “analyzing and looking at” the document.

“What I did let him know is that we want to make sure that even though party platforms have come out, that they are hopefully living documents where they can begin to adjust them based upon input they’re hearing directly from First Nations,” she said.

Windspeaker.com

By Shari Narine, Local Journalist