Wednesday, October 27, 2021

CONSERVATIVE COLUMNIST
Trudeau sends a signal to Alberta. Cue the squirming.

Jason Markusoff 


Justin Trudeau has appointed a minister for Alberta, and a minister for preoccupied Alberta.
© Used with permission of / © St. Joseph Communications. Trudeau, and Gov. Gen. Mary Simon, pose with Guilbeault at a cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa, on Oct.26, 2021 (Adrian Wyld/CP)

Randy Boissonnault ends the fourth-largest province’s cabinet drought, which coincided with the two years of Alberta having no MPs for Justin Trudeau to choose from.

The Edmonton Centre MP will be the tourism minister, a junior portfolio tucked within the Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. Every Alberta politician should be lucky enough to have regular trips to Banff and Jasper within their mandate.

But as with any modern cabinet, the picks that truly matter to Alberta are the ones governing the oil and gas sector and the carbon it emits by the megatonne. Enter the preoccupation. Enter, quite literally, the activist environment minister. And cue the Alberta squirming.

Steven Guilbeault’s resume is quite well known in the oil-producing province: his extensive experience with environmentalist group Équiterre and campaigning against pipelines and the oil sands, even reported lobbying within Trudeau’s cabinet last year against the doomed Teck Resources bitumen mine. Just as there was relief from Alberta industry when Guilbeault didn’t get his coveted Environment and Climate Change file in 2019, there’s high anxiety that he got it this time.


Premier Jason Kenney, whose moribund approval ratings have suggested he could use an external enemy to rally Albertans against, said Guilbeault’s activist past “suggests somebody who is more of an absolutist than a pragmatist” and forecasts that Ottawa may pursue a “radical agenda that would lead to mass unemployment.”

Trudeau’s appointment of Guilbeault definitely sends a signal, and perhaps anticipates this initial shock and concern from the energy sector and its political boosters. The message may be the same for the crowd gathering next week at the climate conference in Glasgow and the crowd huddling for coffee daily in oil project trailers near Grande Prairie, Alta.—this government itself wants to move further and faster on curbing emissions. Perhaps taking more of an activist tilt. Not a get-arrested-for-scaling-the-CN-Tower-to-label-Canada-climate-killers tilt, as Guilbeault himself did 20 years ago, but there is a directional shift at work here. Trudeau nudged toward a more assertive approach before the election with tougher emissions targets, and with election promises to demand more action from the oil and gas sector, toward lowering its overall carbon pollution rather than merely per-barrel emissions as production expands.

But this isn’t a government that’s going to suddenly go the full Guilbeault and abandon the federally owned Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project, and the new environment minister himself will have to concede this point, too. To parts of the activist world Guilbeault comes from—one U.S. green campaigner fondly tweeted about the 2001 CN Tower stunt Tuesday and called expectations on the minister sky high—the moderate and pragmatic tack Trudeau binds him to will be frustration.

Moderation will also come from new Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson, the Vancouver-area MP who has held Environment for the last two years, and hailed from the tech sector. Even Kenney praised him as a “good-faith partner” for the Alberta government and industry. Ottawa and the business world increasingly see those Natural Resources and Environment ministries as tandem files in the climate change and regulatory fronts—and with Wilkinson’s move, it further lays waste to the old days of those two ministers being at odds with each other as cheerleader and foe of fossil fuel development. Carbon emissions become their common foe.


Alberta tends to get tetchier over rhetoric than it does over actual policy—witness the long memories of a 2017 town-hall remark by Trudeau that he’d “phase out” the oil sands—and this is where Guilbeault’s appointment may remain as incendiary as it seemed Tuesday. Environment and Climate Change can require a diplomat’s deft touch with affected industry leaders, and there’s little to inspire confidence on this front, both because of Guilbeault’s “tar sands campaign” history and his struggles to communicate whatever it was Bill C-10 would actually change. Expect Wilkinson and Trudeau to have to do a fair bit of mop-up, and for Kenney to be summoned regularly to thunder with great, great umbrage.

A major test, past Glasgow, will be how Wilkinson and Guilbeault handle their government’s buzzy term: “just transition.” Natural Resources Canada quietly held a public consultation period this summer on this plan to support the fossil fuel sector through a decarbonizing future without massive disruption and job loss. Like the term “phase out” that got Trudeau into such hot water previously, a “just transition” is notionally supposed to signal a gradual and measured shift. The usual critics have overlooked any such intended nuance, and forecast a rapid and bumpy government-mandated end to Alberta’s most vital and generationally lucrative industry. It will fall in large part to Steven Guilbeault to maintain a steady and reassuring tone that this isn’t the case. His past doesn’t suggest he’s perfectly suited for this task, but it’s the task he now has.
New Deloitte report explains how tech companies have to change to be more ethical

Veronica Combs 2 hrs ago

A new report from Deloitte highlights the choice many tech companies are facing when it comes to business ethics. Is it possible to hold onto business as usual, or is it time to make ethics at least as important as profits?

© Provided by TechRepublic A new report from Deloitte's Center for Technology, Media & Communications recommends that tech leaders take these steps to develop strong ethical guidelines. Image: Deloitte

© Devonyu, Getty Images/iStockphoto

Fake dictionary, definition of the word Ethics.

The report released on Wednesday, "Beyond good intentions: Navigating the ethical dilemmas facing the technology industry" spells out the contradictory forces at work.

In a survey of tech professionals, 82% strongly agreed that their company was ethical. In the same survey, only 24% strongly agreed that the tech industry takes an ethical approach to the products and services that it creates.

Another Deloitte survey of Millennials and Gen Z found that 70% of both groups think corporations focus more on their own agenda than the impact on society.

According to the report, tech companies will have to make these changes to improve their ethical standings:
Changing long-established mindsets that have been historically beneficial
Discussing the trade-offs between efficiency and performance and a more ethical approach
Balancing existing revenue streams with strong ethical practices
Changing the software engineering process
Investing more money and time in product development to understand unintended consequences
Identifying new ways to evaluate and reward project teams

This list perfectly illustrates the numerous dilemmas that tech companies are dealing with as whistleblowers share internal research and lawmakers start to understand the force and impact of social media platforms. The company will have to change the way it makes money to address many of the ethical charges it is facing.

Paul Silverglate, vice chair and U.S. technology sector leader at Deloitte, wrote the report along with Jessica Kosmowski, Hilary Horn and David Jarvis.

He said that being both ethical and profitable is possible as long as companies are willing to ask not only "Can we?" but "Should we?" He used the example of a product that could be very profitable, but also may have negative impacts to a group of people.

"Fixing the product would take time and money," he said. "Having discussions as early as possible in the product development life cycle and clearly communicating your organization's ethical principles to everyone can help."

Silverglate suggests that the first step in reducing the tension between business as usual and a stronger set of ethics is to identify an "ethical due north." The next step is to manage for both the short- and long-term and consider the potential trade-offs between the two.

Deloitte identified these five areas where tech companies need to do a better job balancing ethics and existing business practices:
Data usage: Do the minimum amount required to comply with data-related regulations, or collect, use and protect data in a more equitable way for everyone?
Environmental sustainability: Meet environmental laws or find new ways to address energy use, supply chain efficiency, manufacturing waste and water use in semiconductor fabrication?
Trustworthy AI: Develop guiding principles that benefit society and avoid issues with bias, fairness, transparency and explainability or prioritize launching products as quickly as possible?
Threats to truth: Address deepfakes, disinformation and misinformation that are rampant and work with governments to clearly outline the responsibilities and standards required for effective regulation?
Physical and mental health: How can the tech industry better understand and measure the impacts of technology to health, as well as the impact on the healthcare industry?

Silverglate said that the industry is waiting for universal data privacy standards to emerge. He sees greater market demand for privacy protections as shown by the significant growth of the privacy tech industry. He recommends that companies take these steps to prepare for data-related regulations that are in the works.

"This includes developing a data governance framework, a way to ensure compliance with current global regulations, strong data protection and cybersecurity practices and an overall robust risk management capability," he said.
Discuss ethics from the start

The report identifies ethical problems that could crop up at each stage of the business life cycle and recommends questions to ask at each phase. This includes defining a company's responsibilities to society at the start of the life cycle, measuring the ethics of the supply chain during development and deployment and thinking about what happens to end-of-life products.

Silverglate said some of these ethical questions are more intellectually challenging and some may be more technically or operationally difficult.

"It is much easier to talk and craft strategies than it is to redesign software or revamp supply chains," he said. "That is why a holistic approach is so important – we want to help enable the industry to more easily make ethical decisions through a more structured approach."

The report recommends taking these steps to develop a holistic approach to ethics in the tech industry:
Integrate ethics across the business life cycle
Invest in specialized ethics talent
Build and train from the top, the bottom and across
Be as predictive and extensive as possible
Collaborate with partners and competitors to improve the industry

Medtronic recently outlined its environmental, social and governance goals for the coming year in an effort to address some of the ethical dilemmas the Deloitte report outlines. Silverglate said ESG reporting can help expose issues and facilitate collaboration and debate. However, reporting is only one component.

"Hopefully, it can spur companies to build out their measurement capabilities, determine clear lines of responsibility and drive behavioral changes," he said. "I think that it is also important to note, with ESG reporting, it is not just about the 'letter of the law,' but the 'spirit of the law as well.
CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
Exclusive-Fiat Chrysler nears plea deal in U.S. emissions fraud probe - sources

By Mike Spector and David Shepardson
© Reuters/Rebecca Cook FILE PHOTO: FILE PHOTO: 
Ram pickup trucks are on display at the FCA Sterling Heights Assembly Plant in Sterling Heights, Michigan

(Reuters) -Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) is nearing an agreement to plead guilty to criminal conduct to resolve a multiyear emissions fraud probe surrounding Ram pickup trucks and Jeep sport-utility vehicles with diesel engines, people familiar with the matter said.

FCA lawyers and U.S. Justice Department officials are brokering a plea deal that could be unveiled in coming weeks and include financial penalties totaling between $250 million and $300 million, the people said.

Such a resolution with FCA, which is now part of Stellantis NV, would come more than four years after Volkswagen AG pleaded guilty to criminal charges https://www.reuters.com/article/us-volkswagen-emissions/volkswagen-pleads-guilty-in-u-s-court-in-diesel-emissions-scandal-idUSKBN16H1W4 to resolve its own diesel-emissions scandal involving nearly 600,000 vehicles.It would also mark the final significant chapter in the government crackdown on automakers' emissions practices that was precipitated by Volkswagen's deception, which became known as "Dieselgate."

The FCA investigation focuses on roughly 100,000 diesel-powered vehicles that allegedly evaded emissions requirements. The plea negotiations are fluid and some terms, including the size of any financial penalties, could change as discussions continue, the people said.

Justice Department officials are preparing paperwork that will likely be negotiated with FCA to finalize the plea deal, which could result in changes and also present an outside chance for the agreement to fall apart, the people said.

A plea agreement would cap a series of investigations dating back to 2015 surrounding diesel-powered vehicles in FCA's U.S. lineup. The current criminal investigation targets the U.S unit of the Italian-American automaker. The affected vehicles span model years 2014 to 2016.

Representatives for FCA parent Stellantis and the Justice Department declined to comment.

The scandals over emissions cheating tarnished diesel technology and accelerated the industry's shift to electric vehicles.

The European automakers had promoted "clean diesel" technology as a way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and ease a transition to an all-electric future. When regulators on both sides of the Atlantic uncovered evidence that diesel vehicles polluted far more in real world driving, the argument for a slower transition to battery electric vehicles was shredded.

Now, automakers are accelerating battery electric vehicle development to comply with tougher, post-Dieselgate pollution standards.

TRIAL SET FOR 2022

The FCA discussions are heating up as one of its employees prepares to face trial next year on charges he misled regulators https://www.reuters.com/article/cbusiness-us-fiat-chrysler-emissions-idCAKBN1W9217-OCABS about pollution from the vehicles, and continued the deception even after officials caught Volkswagen cheating on government emissions tests.

In April, the Justice Department unveiled charges against two additional FCA employees in the alleged emissions fraud. Italian authorities arrested https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/italys-police-arrest-stellantis-manager-us-diesel-emissions-enquiry-2021-09-29 one of the two additional employees in September.

An indictment alleges the employees conspired to install illegal software known as defeat devices in vehicles so they could dupe government emissions tests and then pollute beyond legal limits on roadways.

FCA has previously resolved related civil allegations while denying it deliberately attempted to cheat on emissions tests.

Other legal troubles have also dogged the automaker. In March, the company pleaded guilty to violating U.S. labor law, admitting it conspired to make illegal payments to union officials.

The current plea negotiations in the emissions probe come on the heels of other changes at FCA. The company earlier this year sealed a merger with French Peugeot maker PSA to form Stellantis. In September, Stellantis said FCA's former top boss would depart to become chief executive of AutoNation Inc, the largest U.S. dealership chain.

In the emissions probe, the criminal case against FCA is expected to track closely with one against Volkswagen that the Justice Department unveiled in 2017, the people said.

Volkswagen admitted to cheating on government emissions tests with diesel-powered vehicles, in the process misleading the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and customers. The German automaker pleaded guilty to charges including conspiracy to defraud the United States, commit wire fraud and violate the Clean Air Act.

Volkswagen agreed to pay $2.8 billion to resolve that criminal case, and billions of dollars more to settle Justice Department civil allegations and lawsuits from vehicle owners and state officials.

FCA, meanwhile, spoke with senior Justice Department officials in recent months to push back against a demand that the company plead guilty, the people familiar with the matter said.

The automaker instead argued for a so-called deferred prosecution agreement, the people said. In such agreements, a company is criminally charged and agrees to monitoring and other conditions instead of pleading guilty. If the company abides by the agreement, prosecutors later ask a judge to dismiss the charges.

Justice Department officials rejected FCA's request for the more lenient treatment.

In talks with U.S. prosecutors, FCA has emphasized the automaker's January 2019 agreement to pay roughly $800 million to settle civil litigation brought by the Justice Department, state officials and consumers alleging the company’s vehicles evaded emissions requirements, one of the people said.

Separately, FCA this year resolved legal claims from customers who opted out of the earlier settlement with consumers, according to court records.

(Reporting by Mike Spector in New York and David Shepardson in Washington; additional reporting by Joe White in Detroit; editing by Edward Tobin)
Volkswagen labour leader lashes out at CEO ahead of board meeting

FRANKFURT (Reuters) - Volkswagen's labour leader took aim at Chief Executive Herbert Diess, accusing him of not taking an interest in workers' concerns and rekindling a long-standing conflict ahead of a supervisory board meeting on Wednesday.

© Reuters/ALY SONG FILE PHOTO: A Volkswagen ID.6 X is displayed ahead of the Shanghai Auto Show, in Shanghai

Emotions at Europe's largest carmaker are running high ever since Diess told a supervisory board meeting last month that the company could lose 30,000 jobs if it transitioned too slowly to electric vehicles.

The comments on Wednesday by Daniela Cavallo -- who became Volkswagen's works council head this year and replaced Bernd Osterloh, a fierce opponent of Diess -- mark a fresh low point in a relationship that has for years been fraught with conflict.

They come after it became clear that Diess, who is aggressively pushing Volkswagen to catch up and overtake Tesla, would not take part in a staff meeting scheduled for Nov. 4 and instead meet with investors and politicians in the United States.

"The reason for the cancellation is telling. Herbert Diess is preferring Wall Street investors over the company's workforce - this behaviour is unprecedented in the history of our group and once again shows that even in times of crisis the group chief executive has no empathy or sense for the situation of the workforce," Cavallo said.

"He is simply not taking an interest in the concerns of the workforce."


A VW spokesperson said Diess' U.S. trip had been planned for some time and could not be rescheduled at short notice. Diess, meantime, has invited staff at Volkswagen's Wolfsburg plant to a Q&A session on Oct. 28, the day of third-quarter results.

The conflict is expected to be discussed at a supervisory board meeting scheduled for later on Wednesday, which will centre around the carmaker's investment plans for the next five years. Those are scheduled to be agreed on Nov. 12.

(Reporting by Christoph Steitz and Jan Schwartz; Editing by Emelia Sithole-Matarise)
USA
Big Oil to Testify on Climate Change Disinformation—What This Could Mean for Green Economy

Alex J. Rouhandeh 

This Thursday, executives representing some of the world's largest oil companies will appear before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform to answer questions for the first time regarding the industry's alleged efforts to obscure science on the role of fossil fuels in global warming.
Green New Deal Network Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-Calif.) will lead the Wednesday hearing focussed on Big Oil's role in disinformation around climate change. Above, Khanna speaks at Go Bigger on Climate, Care, and Justice! on July 20, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Memos obtained from companies like Exxon Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell show that oils firms have possessed scientific knowledge of the devastating role of fossil fuel emissions since the 1980s. Nonetheless, companies allegedly promoted disinformation around the harm of their products through lobbying campaigns and secretly funding studies aimed to combat data affirming climate change.

These efforts recently came under greater scrutiny after an investigation by Greenpeace U.K. brought renewed attention to the issue.

An undercover Greenpeace journalist spoke with Keith McCoy, a senior director in Exxon's Washington D.C. government affairs team, over Zoom. During this conversation, McCoy admitted the company worked with "shadow groups" to thwart early climate change efforts and also put up a "fight" against some of the science.

In wake of this report, California Congressman Ro Khanna, who chairs the Oversight Committee's Subcommittee on Environment, told Greenpeace he planned to make Exxon and its peers answer before Congress. With this moment upon him, he told Newsweek that he feels these hearings could represent a turning point in public opinion.

"Most Americans aren't aware that these companies have (engaged in climate denialism) or are continuing to do it. Once they're made aware of it, the polling is off the charts that they are shocked by it and oppose it," Khanna said. "What we need to do is expose these companies to start to turn American public opinion."

Khanna hopes that by making these companies publicly answer to these alleged transgressions that they will become "incentivized to stop their disinformation and lobbying and actually change their actions."

Whereas in the past oil companies often conducted their own PR and lobbying efforts, today these companies elect to carry out some of these efforts through trade associations like the American Petroleum Institute (API), a nonprofit that conducts congressional lobbying and boasts revenue of nearly $239 million, according to its most recent tax filing.

 While in the 1980s less Americans were familiar with climate change, many citizens now see it as a life or death issue, forcing petroleum companies to respond. In this photo, an aerial view shows Marathon Petroleum Corp's Los Angeles Refinery, the state's largest producer of gasoline, on April 22, 2020 in Carson, California. Photo by David McNew/Getty Images

During his conversation with Greenpeace, McCoy referred to firms like API as the oil industry's "whipping boys," deployed to influence policy in a manner that allows the companies to avoid public scrutiny as they deploy climate-conscious messaging. Over the years, the API has faced a growing number of lawsuits, including one from the state of Minnesota, for its alleged role in "downplaying the threat of climate change."

"What our hearing in part wants to expose is to get the money trail to stop," Khanna told Newsweek. "But, that's difficult because the big oil companies can engage in greenwashing while letting other people do their dirty work."

Oil companies have collectively pledged to prepare for "lower-carbon" futures. While European companies British Petroleum (BP) and Shell are working toward this through billion-dollar investments in renewables, American giants Chevron and Exxon remain focused on finding a future for fossil fuels, investing in technologies aimed to suck carbon from the air.

America continues to lag behind Europe in meeting its climate goals. Seventy-eight percent of Europeans expressed concern over climate issues as opposed to 63 percent of Americans, a poll by the European Investment Bank found. With a number of state economies tied heavily to the industry, moving the needle on the issue could stand as a major challenge in certain areas. Khanna said that spurring action after these hearings requires working around that challenge.

States including Texas, North Dakota, West Virginia, and Kentucky derive large portions of economic wealth from the fossil fuel sector, leaving many workers reliant on the industry. Here, flared natural gas is burned off at Apache Corporations operations at the Deadwood natural gas plant in the Permian Basin on February 5, 2015 in Garden City, Texas. Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images

"We've got to make them a jobs guarantee because their concerns are legitimate," Khanna said. "We've got to show them the proof. We should say 100,000 guaranteed high-paying, good jobs in clean technology will be in states like West Virginia and Kentucky."

Khanna believes that once these individuals see these jobs rooted into the fabric of their communities, they will become more willing to embrace "bold climate action." Rather than tackling this issue through "think tank speech" and Washington lectures, he said these actions should be taken through grassroots conversations with these constituencies.

The Endless Frontier Act, sponsored by Khanna in the House and Majority Leader Chuck Schumer in the Senate, aims to do just that. Through the creation of a Directorate for Technology and Innovation in the National Science Foundation, the bill would allow for the designation of "regional technology hubs" designed to facilitate economic in certain areas of the country.

Right now, that bill has been referred to the House Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce where it will sit before being put up to vote. While the upcoming hearings may very well open a new chapter in America's relationship with the oil industry, Khanna stresses the need for these economic policies, like the Endless Frontier Act, to be implanted during this moment. When it comes to uniting the country around clean energy, he said everyone must walk away with a "win."

"We have to really incentivize those states to have a win. We need a moment like Lincoln during the passage of the 13th Amendment where he went and he figured out what states and legislators needed then gave it to them," Khanna said. "We just have to figure out what it is that we can give these states or individual legislators to make (clean energy) a win."

A spokesperson for Shell told Newsweek in a statement: "We're working hard to provide the Committee with materials and look forward to answering their questions. In a very short time, we have delivered to the Committee thousands of pages of documents that speak directly to Shell's position on climate change over several decades, our strong support for the Paris Agreement, and our efforts to be an industry leader in the transition to a lower-carbon future."

Newsweek contacted the API, Exxon, Chevron and BP for comment.

Oil companies have looked to from a more climate-conscious identity in recent years, with Shell and BP investing heavily in renewables. This photo shows, BP's oil refinery complex continues on November 1, 2004 at Grangemouth in central Scotland. Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

Related Articles


THAT MEANS 75% OF AMERICANS DO BELIEVE IN CLIMATE CHANGE 

The racist theory that is animating some Trump backers (opinion)

Opinion by Michael D'Antonio and James Cohen 

In former President Donald Trump's world, a high-speed cycle of influence can move radical ideas from the fringe to his personal agenda in short order. While other candidates and politicians use experts to screen out bad ideas -- Obama used a whole group just for health care issues, for instance -- Trump's filter seems calibrated to select themes like his false claims of voter fraud that excite or alarm his supporters. Follow the pattern, and there is a risk of a Trump 2024 campaign powered by the White Replacement Theory.

© Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) walks out of the committee room during a hearing with the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Cyber, Innovative Technologies, and Information System in the Rayburn House Office Building on May 14, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Also known as the Great Replacement Theory, this idea lurked behind the "Unite the Right" rally of August 2017, which saw a small army of young White nationalist men carrying tiki torches while chanting "You will not replace us!" and "Jews will not replace us!" as they paraded in Charlottesville, Virginia. (The next day, a rally-goer rammed his car into a crowd of counterprotesters and killed a woman.)

Flash forward to 2021, and you find the concept, on Trump's favorite major network, in postings from far-Right internet influencers and coming from the mouths of his fellow Republicans.

We have been here before. In the 2016 election campaign, it was the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones who fed Trump ridiculous notions he used to woo voters. The process surprised even those who worked on Jones's InfoWars program. On PBS' Frontline, one of them said, "...really Trump, really? You're taking his word for it?"

With the midterm elections on the horizon, influential talkers on Fox News and some of Trump's more prominent surrogates are pushing the "Replacement Theory" in ways the former president could hardly miss. Tucker Carlson has even gone so far as to declare the Democrats are implementing an actual plan to change the nation's racial makeup for some malign purpose.

"In political terms, this policy is called the great replacement, the replacement of legacy Americans with more obedient people from faraway countries," said Carlson last month. He was immediately echoed by a fellow Trump booster, Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, who took to Twitter to declare Carlson was "CORRECT about Replacement Theory as he explains what is happening to America."

What is actually happening is a decades-long demographic shift which has seen the non-White population grow due to higher birthrates and immigration patterns, while White birthrates have declined. The claim that these newcomers would somehow be more "obedient" is Carlson's way of saying he assumes they would automatically vote for Democrats.

Trump has voiced racist paranoia about today's new immigrants, referring to immigrants as rapists, drug traffickers and criminals, complaining of people coming to America from "sh****** countries" with large Black populations and suggested four Black and Brown women in Congress "go back and fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came." Trump was, of course, imprecise. Three of the women he targeted were born in the US. But the point wasn't precision, it was posturing in a way that showed.

Add Trump's musing about wanting more immigrants from Norway and his vow to "take back our country" and it's easy to see he has already stepped up to the thin line that separates him from White Replacement Theory. He might as well have said America should welcome White immigrants while barring others and even exiling some who are already citizens.

Thanks to networked technology, the cycle which can deliver paranoia to the masses spins at the speed of light. However, American nativism of this sort can be traced to a much slower age. Back in the 19th century, Irish immigrants were targeted with claims they would be more loyal to the Pope than their new country. In the same period Asians were so feared, a mob in Los Angeles carried out a massacre in Chinatown and Congress targeted Chinese women with its first anti-immigrant law.

White America's fears of being subsumed by other racial groups were later supported in pseudoscientific terms with the 1916 publication of The Passing of the Great Race by Madison Grant, who warned against immigration and interracial marriage. Grant's book, which expanded on ideas that originated from economist William Ripley, informed lawmakers who approved laws banning interracial marriage. He was also cited publicly by Adolf Hitler.

Just as Grant borrowed from Ripley, advocates of today's White Replacement Theory borrowed from French author Renaud Camus to make arguments now resonating with Republican officials, including Rep. Brian Babin of Texas and Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania. In comments on Fox News last month, Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick told host Laura Ingraham President Joe Biden is purposely letting immigrants try to "take over our country without firing a shot."

Ingraham is not just receptive to those spouting Replacement Theory, she is also a leading voice for this concept. In 2018, she said "In some parts of the country, it does seem like the America that we know and love doesn't exist anymore." She added, "Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people and they're changes that none of us ever voted for and most of us don't like."

Although she subsequently said she wasn't referring to race, and White nationalism is "antithetical" to her beliefs, Ingraham was embraced by racist agitator David Duke and later claimed on her show that a White supremacist was being "censored on social media."

Before Ingraham and others mainstreamed it, Replacement Theory bounced around the internet. YouTube influencers, like Lauren Southern, built careers on attracting audiences with alarming claims. (Before it was taken down, her post titled The Great Replacement was viewed more than 500,000 times.)

The more visible alarmists like Ingraham and Carlson can function as the final link in a chain which leads from the likes of Southern to Trump. Last year, Axios documented five instances of what it termed a "mind meld" between Trump and Carlson. In each case, Trump seized upon issues Carslon stressed and used the terms he deployed to discuss them.

Trump has long made use of more general racist terms and attitudes. If he seizes upon White Replacement Theory, he will embrace an obviously paranoid and dangerous view of the future that has a ready-built network of supporters who are likely to be excited to hear he is joining them. A recent poll by the Public Religion Research Institute found White evangelical Protestants, who form a significant portion of Trump's base, are particularly open to the idea that America is for people like them.

Slightly more than half agreed with the notion "God intended America to be a new promised land where European Christians could create a society that could be an example to the rest of the world" and most of them agreed today's immigrants are "replacing our cultural and ethnic background."

A shrewd politician who is willing to use fearmongering and racism to energize his supporters might use the language of Replacement Theory in an election campaign. Know anyone like that?

This version has been updated with a fuller description of the chants at the Charlottesville rally.
USA
Ilhan Omar is fed up with Biden's Education Dept. dragging its feet on cancelling student debt: 'Release the memo'
asheffey@businessinsider.com (Ayelet Sheffey) 
© Provided by Business Insider Rep. Ilhan Omar. Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Rep. Ilhan Omar asked the Education Dept. to release a memo by Oct. 22 on Biden's legal ability to cancel student debt.

The department did not respond, and Omar told Insider borrowers "desperately" need that relief.

This comes as borrowers are facing student-loan payments beginning again in February after a nearly two-year pause.


Over two weeks ago, Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar led a group of her Democratic colleagues in calling on the Education Department to release a memo reviewing President Joe Biden's legal ability to cancel student debt broadly by October 22.

But October 22 came and went with no response from the Education Department, and Omar told Insider its response is overdue.


"Millions of borrowers across the country are desperately asking for student debt relief," Omar said. "We know the President can do it with the stroke of a pen. We were told over six months ago that they were just waiting on a memo to determine whether they would give relief, and weeks since we sent a letter asking them to do so. Release the memo. Cancel student debt."


An Education Department spokesperson told Insider they plan to respond to the letter.

Biden campaigned on canceling $10,000 in student debt per borrower, but he expressed concerns with his legality to cancel a larger amount, like $50,000 - which Omar and other Democrats have called for. To get a resolution on those concerns, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said in February Biden would ask the Justice Department to review his authority to use executive action to cancel student debt.

While it's unclear when the Justice Department actually began that review, White House chief of staff Ron Klain told Politico in April that Biden had also asked Education Sec. Miguel Cardona to create a memo on the president's legal authority to forgive $50,000 in student loans per person.

But it's been almost seven months since the department began that review, which prompted Omar to lead her colleagues, including New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Massachusetts Rep. Ayanna Pressley, in demanding answers.

"Doing so will benefit every citizen and support our communities," they wrote in the letter. "With a single signature, you can improve the economy, create new jobs, transform the lives of 45 million Americans, narrow the racial wealth gap, and maintain the trust of voters."

Biden has canceled student debt for targeted group of people, like borrowers with disabilities and those defrauded by for-profit schools, but he has remained quiet on whether broad student debt cancellation is coming anytime soon, even as borrowers are preparing to restart student loan payments after what will be nearly two years on February 1.

"It's a priority for me and for President Biden to make sure that part of the conversation is examining loan forgiveness," Cardona said at The Atlantic's Education Summit on Tuesday. "And those conversations are continuing."
Colonial art: Cambridge hands over looted bronze to Nigeria

LONDON (AP) — A Cambridge University college handed over a bronze cockerel looted from Africa in the 19th century to Nigerian authorities on Wednesday, as part of a modest but growing effort in some European countries to return African art taken by colonial powers

.
© Provided by The Canadian Press

Jesus College is the first U.K. institution to give back one of the artifacts known as the Benin Bronzes. British colonial forces took the Okukor statue in 1897 from the Court of Benin in what is now Nigeria – among thousands of artworks seized by occupying troops -- and it was given to the college in 1905.

The college removed it from public view in 2016 after students protested, saying it represented a colonial narrative. The college set up a working group that concluded the statue belongs to the Oba of Benin, head of the historic Eweka dynasty of the Benin Empire. The empire centered on Benin City in modern-day Nigeria.

His Royal Majesty, Oba of Benin, Omo N’Oba N’Edo Uku Akpolokpolo, Ewuare II, welcomed the handover decision. “We truly hope that others will expedite the return of our artworks, which in many cases are of religious importance to us,” he said when it was announced.

Hundreds of seized Benin Bronzes ended up in the British Museum in London, and hundreds more were sold to other collections such as the Ethnological Museum in Berlin. Germany this year said it would return the items in its possession.

The British Museum said on Monday it is working on a collaboration with Nigeria, linked to the construction of a new museum in the West African country, which will allow to “reunite Benin artworks from international collections.” The museum is also in a decades-long tug-of-war with the Greek government over a restitution of the Elgin, or Parthenon, Marbles.

Meanwhile France next month will hand over 26 looted colonial-era artifacts to the government of Benin – some of the estimated 90,000 African artworks held in French museums.

The wooden anthropomorphic statues, royal thrones and sacred altars from the collection known as the “Abomey Treasures” were pilfered by the French army 129 years ago, and are currently on display in Paris.

President Emmanuel Macron is visiting the exhibit on Wednesday with Benin authorities. Macron has called for more such returns, lamenting in 2017 “that a large part of many African countries’ cultural heritage lies in France.”

Such returns are controversial in Europe where many museums hold works acquired during colonial times. So far, France has only turned over one item — a sword handed to the Army Museum in Senegal.

The Associated Press

Benin art restitution: France returning 26 looted colonial-era treasures




Issued on: 27/10/2021


Video by: FRANCE 24

A Paris museum on Tuesday exhibited over a dozen colonial-era treasures taken from Benin, the last time they will be shown in France before being handed back in a landmark gesture. The 26 pieces, from a trove of objects snatched by French forces in 1892, are being shown for just six days at the Quai Branly museum before being shipped to the West African country later this month.
Blackstone CEO predicts the energy crisis will worsen inflation and prompt social unrest

htan@insider.com (Huileng Tan)
 Sorry No Fuel Left' sign seen at an empty Texaco gas station in central London. 
(Photo by Vuk Valcic/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

The energy shortage is severe enough that it could cause a lot of unhappiness and social unrest, said Blackstone CEO, Stephen Schwarzman.
Benchmark US oil futures are around $85 a barrel after surging about 75% year-to-date.
Oil could rise to $100 a barrel, said BlackRock CEO Larry Fink.

The global energy crisis is severe enough that it could fuel social unrest, said the CEO of asset management company Blackstone on Monday.

Stephen Schwarzman was speaking at the Future Investment Initiative conference in Saudi Arabia.

Schwarzman, who is also co-founder of the investment firm, said: "We're going to end up with a real shortage of energy. And when you have a shortage, it's just going to cost more and it's probably going to cost a lot more," as reported by Bloomberg and CNN.

When that happens, "you're going to get very unhappy people around the world," particularly in the emerging markets, he continued.

Oil prices have surged this year on the back of a demand recovery and energy supply crunch.

Benchmark US crude oil futures are up 75% year-to-date, around $85 a barrel - and they could gain more, pushing up energy prices and everything else downstream.

Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, also spoke at the conference. He told the audience there was a reasonable chance oil prices would reach $100 a barrel, Bloomberg reported.

"Inflation, we are in a new regime," he said. "There are many structural reasons for that. Short-term policy related to environmentalism, in terms of restricting the supply of hydrocarbons, has created energy inflation, and we are going to be living with that for some time."

"We're not focusing on long-term solutions. We're not trying to change the world on a granular basis," Fink continued. "We have these visions we could go from a brown world, and we could wake up tomorrow there'd be a green world, and that is not going to happen."

Underground fuel spill found next to Iqaluit's water treatment plant


IQALUIT, Nunavut — The City of Iqaluit says an old underground spill is likely responsible for fuel that is contaminating the community's tap water.
 
City officials said in a news release Tuesday that they found signs of a historic spill next to the water treatment plant in an inaccessible hole in the ground.

The capital city's water has been undrinkable even if boiled since Oct. 12 when traces of fuel were found in the plant.

The city of about 8,000 people has been under a state of emergency since then and thousands of bottles of water have been flown in.

Testing is now being done to confirm the spill is the source of the contamination.

The city said it has reported the spill to the Nunavut government and hired a professional firm to clean it up. A site remediation plan is also underway.

There is still no timeline for when city residents will be able to drink their tap water again.

The Canadian Armed Forces arrived in Iqaluit last weekend to help with the ongoing emergency.

The military has said it will set up reverse osmosis water purification units in the city but is still in the process of testing water at proposed sites.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 26, 2021.

The Canadian Press