Wednesday, October 27, 2021

Western China’s mysterious mummies were local descendants of ice age ancestors
Find suggests Tarim Basin mummies were not strangers from a strange land

27 OCT 2021
BY ANN GIBBONS
This naturally mummified woman from the Xiaohe Cemetery had deep local roots.
WENYING LI/XINJIANG INSTITUTE OF CULTURAL RELICS AND ARCHAEOLOGY


The Tarim Basin mummies have been a mystery ever since European explorers discovered them in northwestern China in the early 20th century. They were tall, wore wool felt hats and leather booties, and some had fair hair—all suggesting they were strangers from a strange land.


But a new study of the mummies’ DNA finds they were locals with deep roots in the region. Indeed, they appear to be relics of an ancient population that disappeared in Eurasia after the last ice age—one that was ancestral to Indigenous peoples living in Siberia and the Americas today.

It’s “fantastic” to learn that these mummies were local Asians, says Alison Betts, an archaeologist of Scottish descent at the University of Sydney who was not involved with the work. “Honest to God, one looks like my granny, with her very elegant bone structure … and her legs in woolen leggings, with blue and orange wrapping and boots like Uggs.”

Anthropologists have floated many theories about the Tarim Basin mummies. One is that they were descendants of the Yamnaya and Afanasievo nomadic herders from the steppes of the Black Sea region of Russia, because of their unusual height, woven woolen clothing, and cattle-centric culture. (The mummies were found in wooden boats covered with cow hides and adorned with horned cow skulls.) Another hypothesis is that they descend from farmers who migrated from desert oases of Bactria, or what is now modern Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, based on similarities of agricultural and irrigation systems. Both ideas suggest these people brought Tocharian, an extinct branch of Indo-European languages, to the region.

To test these hypotheses, molecular anthropologist Yinqiu Cui of Jilin University organized an international team to analyze the DNA across the genomes of 13 of the oldest mummies found at sites such as Xiaohe and Gumugou in the Tarim Basin, dating from 4100 to 3700 years ago. Population geneticist Choongwon Jeong of Seoul National University compared their DNA with that of five even earlier individuals dating to 5000 to 4800 years ago in the neighboring Dzungarian Basin, and with other ancient and living Eurasians, in the first genomic study of prehistoric populations in the region.

Much to the scientists’ surprise, the mummies were most closely related to a previously identified genetic group called the Ancient North Eurasians, a once widespread population of hunter-gatherers that had greatly declined by the end of the last ice age. Researchers have wondered what happened to these people, but it is “totally unexpected” to find them in the Tarim Basin in the early Bronze Age, Jeong says. Today, this population survives only fractionally in the genomes of living people, with Indigenous populations in Siberia and the Americas having the highest proportions.
Mummies were found buried in wooden boats with oars, which were covered with cowhides at this ancient cemetery at Xiaohe in the Tamir Basin.
 WENYING LI/XINJIANG INSTITUTE OF CULTURAL RELICS AND ARCHAEOLOGY

The mummies were remarkably similar genetically, the team reports today in Nature. The DNA from individuals 400 kilometers apart on opposite ends of the Tarim Basin was as similar as that from siblings. Even though the mummies were locals who didn’t intermarry with the migrant herders in nearby mountain valleys, they weren’t culturally isolated. By 4000 years ago, they had already adopted new ideas and culture: They wore woven woolen clothing, built irrigation systems, grew nonnative wheat and millet, and herded sheep and goats, as well as milking cattle to make cheese.

“The Bronze Age people of the Tarim Basin were genetically isolated but culturally incredibly cosmopolitan,” says study co-author Christina Warinner, a molecular archeologist at Harvard University and the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.

“It’s superexciting” to see evidence that new ideas, technology, and culture spread between different cultures before their genes or languages spread, says Michael Frachetti, an archaeologist at Washington University in St. Louis who was not part of the study. “It speaks to the vast trade networks that spread even to these people, isolated in the desert.”
TSMC Founder Considers Washington's $52B Chip Rebuilding Plan Unfeasible; Questions Intel's Intentions


Anusuya Lahiri
Tue, October 26, 2021, 

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (NYSE: TSM) founder Morris Chang for the first time directly and publicly questioned Washington's efforts to rebuild semiconductor manufacturing despite TSM's move to build an advanced chip facility in the U.S. state of Arizona, Nikkei Asia reports

"Even after you spend hundreds of billions of dollars, you will still find the supply chain to be incomplete, and you will find that it will be very high cost, much higher costs than what you currently have," Chang said.

The U.S. Senate recently passed a $52 billion bill to support domestic semiconductor manufacturing and R&D to usher more chip production onto American soil.

Chang alleged Intel Corp (NASDAQ: INTC) CEO Pat Gelsinger, who considered Taiwan, South Korea as unsafe, is driven by self-interest.

"This is going to be a challenge for the Asian semiconductor industry, global semiconductor industry, including Intel."

Rethinking the supply chain will be a challenge for everyone, Chang said. Previously, Chang had said government efforts worldwide to increase chip production could boomerang without specifying which countries.

Europe, Japan, and China also are preparing up to boost production at home with government aid. TSM recently talked about building its first chip facility in Japan.
CHINA'S 1%
Water tycoon is China's richest as wealth crackdown batters Jack Ma

ByAFP
PublishedOctober 27, 2021

Bottled-water tycoon Zhong Shanshan has become China's wealthiest person, worth $60.5 billion - Copyright CNS/AFP STR

Bottled-water tycoon Zhong Shanshan has become China’s wealthiest person, according to an annual ranking released Wednesday, as a government campaign to rein in the super-rich took a big bite out of the fortunes of perennial front-runners like Alibaba co-founder Jack Ma.

Zhong, in his late 60s, has seen his fortune swell following the stock listings last year of his Nongfu Spring mineral water and separate pharma company Wantai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise, which has tapped into massive demand for Covid-19 test kits.

He is worth $60.5 billion, according to the Hurun Rich List, up seven percent.

Ranked third last year, Zhong was propelled to the top spot as the Communist Party government’s drive to redistribute wealth in the name of equality sliced billions from the fortunes of other tycoons.

Ma, last year’s richest, dropped to fifth as his fortune shrank 36 percent to $39.6 billion.

Ma and Alibaba fell out of favour with Beijing soon after he gave a speech late last year criticising China’s financial regulators.

That resulted in Chinese officials spiking what would have been a world record $37 billion initial public offering for Alibaba’s financial group Ant and kicked off a cascade of crackdowns on Chinese tech companies, alleged monopolistic practises, and powerful tycoons.

Pony Ma, boss of gaming giant and WeChat owner Tencent, dropped two spots to fourth as Chinese restrictions on video gaming reduced his fortune by 19 percent.

Second place was taken by TikTok founder Zhang Yiming.

The Hurun Research Institute, which compiles the list, said that for the first time the real estate sector had no names in the Top 10.

The sector’s biggest loser was Xu Jiayin, founder of deeply troubled property giant Evergrande Group.

Xu had topped the list in 2017 and was fifth last year. But he has fallen to 70th with a nearly 70 percent reduction in his wealth to $11.3 billion, according to Hurun.

A liquidity crunch at Evergrande has hammered investor sentiment and rattled the country’s crucial real estate market, while fanning fears of a possible contagion in the wider economy.

Chinese authorities have told Xu to use his dwindling personal wealth to alleviate the embattled company’s debt crisis, according to media reports this week.

However, the overall number of individuals in China worth at least two billion yuan ($310 million) grew by 520 to a total of 2,918, Hurun said.

Growth in the electric vehicle market, in particular, fuelled the rising fortunes of several entrepreneurs, according to the list.


Chinese authorities have told Evergrande's billionaire founder to use his own money to pay down the company's $300 billion debt, Bloomberg reports



Huileng Tan
Tue, October 26, 2021,

Beijing has instructed Evergrande's founder, Hui Ka Yan, to pay the company's debt using his personal funds, Bloomberg reported.

Hui's net worth is about $7.6 billion, according to Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

Evergrande's debt pile is $300 billion.

Authorities in China have told Evergrande's billionaire founder, Hui Ka Yan, to use his own money to pay the company's debt, Bloomberg reported citing people familiar with the matter.

The directive was issued after the real estate behemoth missed an initial Sept. 23 deadline to pay an $84 million coupon on a dollar bond, Bloomberg added. Evergrande later paid the coupon during the note's 30-day grace period.

Hui's fortune alone is unlikely to be enough to rescue the debt-laden property developer.

According to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, Hui's net worth is around $7.6 billion - that's small change compared to Evergrande's $300 billion debt pile as of June this year.

It's also unclear if Hui's personal stash is liquid enough for the mission. His wealth is largely derived from his shares in Evergrande and their cash dividends, Bloomberg added.

Markets the world over have been roiled by Evergrande's debt woes as investors fear contagion across the world economy. The developer has an interest payment worth $45 million due this Friday.

But local governments China are keeping tabs on Evergrande's bank accounts to ensure the company's funds are being used to complete housing projects under construction, rather than being used to pay creditors, Bloomberg added.

Hui did not immediately respond to an Insider request for comment via Evergrande.

Jack Ma Tours Netherlands in Farming Technology Quest, SCMP Says





Felix Tam
Tue, October 26, 2021, 9:48 PM·1 min read

(Bloomberg) -- Jack Ma, the co-founder of Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., is visiting research institutions in the Netherlands to further his interest in agriculture-related technology, South China Morning Post reported Tuesday.

Ma, who is traveling to Europe for the first time since a bruising Chinese government crackdown on his tech empire, was photographed visiting a number of institutes in the Netherlands, including aluminum extrusions and greenhouse roofs specialist BOAL Group, the newspaper said, citing unidentified people. He is undertaking the tour in his personal capacity, it said.

The 57-year-old billionaire will continue traveling in Europe to visit more companies and research ­centers involved in agricultural infrastructure and plant breeding, according to the report. Ma had visited Spain after a stop in Hong Kong, the Post said last week.

Ma was inspired by what he saw in Europe and ­believed that a combination of farming knowledge and Alibaba’s technologies would create “tremendous potential” for the ­modernization of agriculture in China, the Post said, adding that he wanted to dedicate his post-retirement days to philanthropy, rural education and pursue his interest in reviving China’s countryside.

Alibaba spokesmen declined to comment to the Post, saying Ma was no longer involved in the company’s daily operations.

China kicked off sweeping reforms of the private sector a year ago by pulling the plug on a planned initial public offering by Ant Group Co., an Alibaba affiliate also founded by Ma. That was followed by an antitrust probe of the e-commerce giant for alleged abuses of its market power. Ma, who typically kept a prominent profile, largely disappeared from public view in the months that followed.





Australia’s loyalty to the coal industry puts any concerns over global warming in last place


ByKaren Graham
Published October 23, 2021

Smokestacks belch noxious fumes into the air from a massive coal-fired power plant on the Indonesian coast, a stark illustration of Asia's addiction to the fossil fuel which is threatening climate targets - Copyright AFP Michele Spatari

With COP26 taking place in Glasgow in a couple of weeks, Australia is already being considered the “bad guy” by many world leaders because instead of phasing out coal – the worst fossil fuel – Australia is committed to digging more.

According to the BBC, Australia “is one of the dirtiest countries per head of population and a massive global supplier of fossil fuels.” Only Indonesia sells more coal than Australia globally.

To date, Australia has made no pledge to reduce carbon emissions to net-zero by 2050, unlike many of its Western counterparts. Australia’s 2030 emissions target is a paltry 26 percent cut based on 2005 levels, less than half of US and UK benchmarks.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s government is under huge pressure to do more, but the coal mining industry has helped to drive Australia’seconomy for years and years. Coal continues to be the country’s second-largest export, behind iron ore.

And while the government credits coal for much of the country’s wealth, analysts argue this may be overblown. Coal exports totaled A$55 billion (£29bn; $40bn) last year, but most of this wealth was kept by mining companies. Less than a tenth went to Australia directly – that’s about 1 percent of national revenue.

And the total workforce in Australia’s coal sector is around 40,000 – about half the size of McDonald’s workforce in Australia. Australian Resources Minister Keith Pitt is very bullish on the government’s commitment to coal workers.

“The reality is that global demand for Australian coal is increasing and forecast to continue rising into the next decade at least,” Pitt said in a statement in September, per Phys.org, promising coal industry workers they had a “long-term commitment” from the government

.
Coral not coal protest at India Finance Minister Arun Jaitley Visit to Australia in 2016. Source – Takver from Australia, CC SA 2.0.

The demise of coal is a stark reality

Coal production and usage has already plunged in North America and Europe. China, as well as many banks, have committed to stop financing overseas coal projects. Australia, in the meantime, approved its third coal mine extension in a month and bolstered partnerships for long-term coal exports, according to Oilprice.com.

In September, Environment Minister Sussan Ley approved extensions for the Whitehaven Coal and Wollonggong Coal mines. The latest extension approval was for the Glencore Mangoola thermal coal mine in New South Wales.

“Australia knows the party is over. But the police haven’t been called yet. So they’ll continue to party on until they’re stopped,” says Richie Merzian, a climate expert at the Australia Institute.

Environmentalists argue inaction on climate change could cost Australia’s economy billions of dollars as the country suffers more intense bushfires, storms, and floods.

Op-Ed: Senator Joe Manchin will kill America’s chance to tackle climate change

By Karen Graham
Published October 26, 2021

Dried up Little Washoe Lake in Nevada is seen in July 2021 after prolonged drought. — © AFP

It seems that not a day passes lately where West Virginia’s Democratic Senator, Joe Manchin is making headlines, as he continues to hold President Joe Biden’s Build Back Better Agenda — a $3.5 trillion plan to help working families and create green energy, hostage.

And Manchin has been against the Clean Electricity Payment Program, or CEPP, a $150 billion plan that would incentivize utilities to switch to clean energy sources like solar, wind, and nuclear and penalize those continuing to burn fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas.

Just a couple of weeks ago, Manchin said he would “forgo the prosperity of his constituents and their descendants by refusing to vote for a climate measure billed as the nation’s last-ditch effort to secure a livable future,” according to the Sierra Club.

Now, it seems that the Senator is not even sure which political party he wants to belong to, Manchin, asked during an Economic Club of Washington, D.C., event about switching parties, said his life “would be much easier” if he flipped, according to The Hill.

“[But] is that the purpose of being involved in public service?” Manchin said. “You think that having a ‘D’ or an ‘I’ or an ‘R’ is going to change who I am?”

“I don’t think the R’s would be any more happier with me than the D’s right now … I don’t know where in the hell I belong,” Manchin added, sparking laughter from the audience.

Right now, Manchin is the odd-man-out in the Senate and everyone lawmaker, including the president, is very careful in how they are handling him. But as I said earlier, he is holding an important piece of legislation hostage, and for a long while, even I wondered why.

But I should have figured out where the hell Manchin was coming from. Environmentalists have criticized Manchin for his family ties to the coal industry. He served as president of Energysystems in the late 1990s before becoming active in politics, handing the reins of the business to his son.

Now if you think he put those interests aside – you’re wrong. On his financial disclosures in 2009 and 2010, his reported earnings from the company were $1,363,916 and $417,255, respectively. And just last year, he earned dividends of close to half a million dollars.

Manchin has always been in favor of the Keystone XL pipeline being built, saying, “We are literally sitting on top of tremendous potential with the Marcellus shale. We need to work together to chart a path forward in a safe and responsible way that lets us produce energy right here in America.”

In 2011, Manchin was the only Democratic senator to support the Energy Tax Prevention Act, which sought to prohibit the EPA from regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

In 2018, Manchin criticized Obama’s environmental regulations as a “war on coal” and demanded what he called a proper balance between the needs of the environment and the coal business. The Los Angeles Times wrote that while professing environmental concerns, he has consistently stood up for coal, saying “no one is going to stop using fossil fuels for a long time.”

The years leading up to the present time have shown that Manchin has consistently voted against or voiced resistance to any legislation or spending on clean energy solutions and mitigation of climate change.

And while it may seem that the good senator is sometimes talking out of both sides of his mouth, things in the world we live in today have changed drastically. Whereas Manchin might have believed 10 years ago that fossil fuels had to be in first place for U.S. energy needs, it is just not true anymore.

In February 2019, Mitch McConnell called for a vote on the Green New Deal. Manchin expressed opposition to the plan

“The Green New Deal is a dream, it’s not a deal. It’s a dream. And that’s fine. People should have dreams in the perfect world what they’d like to see. I’ve got to work in realities and I’ve got to work in the practical, what I have in front of me. I’ve got to make sure that our country has affordable, dependable, reliable energy 24/7, but you can’t just be a denier and say, ‘Well, I’m not going to use coal. I’m not going to use natural gas. I’m not going to use oil.'”

Here is something that I find particularly interesting – Polling shows a vast majority of Manchin’s West Virginia constituents support the full Biden package, clean energy and all, including 56 percent of Republican likely voters.

WRITTEN BY
Karen Graham  is Digital Journal's Editor-at-Large for environmental news. Karen's view of what is happening in our world is colored by her love of history and how the past influences events taking place today. Her belief in man's part in the care of the planet and our environment has led her to focus on the need for action in dealing with climate change. It was said by Geoffrey C. Ward, "Journalism is merely history's first draft." Everyone who writes about what is happening today is indeed, writing a small part of our history.


ILLEGAL OCCUPATION
Israel gives final OK to 1,800 West Bank settler homes

By AFP
PublishedOctober 27, 2021

Construction work is pictured on January 21, 2021 in the Israeli settlement of Givat Zeev, near the Palestinian city of Ramallah in the occupied West Bank - Copyright AFP Arif ALI

Israel on Wednesday advanced plans for building more than 3,000 settler homes in the occupied West Bank, a move condemned by the Palestinians that came a day after the US forcefully criticised such construction.

The Civil Administration’s high planning committee gave final approval to 1,800 homes and initial endorsement for another 1,344, a spokesman for the military body that oversees civilian matters in the Palestinian territories told AFP.

Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas in a statement voiced “strong rejection” of the approvals, and said the US needed “to implement its pledge to reject settlements and unilateral (Israeli) measures.”

About 475,000 Israeli Jews already live in settlements in the West Bank, which are considered illegal under international law, on land Palestinians claim as part of their future state.

The approvals came a day after Washington criticised Israel for its policy of building settlements. President Joe Biden’s administration said it “strongly” opposed new construction in the West Bank.

The policy stands in stark contrast to that of his predecessor Donald Trump, whose presidency endorsed Israel’s activity on occupied Palestinian territory.

“We are deeply concerned about the Israeli government’s plan to advance thousands of settlement units,” State Department spokesman Ned Price had said on Tuesday, ahead of Israel’s announcement on final and preliminary approvals.

Price stopped short of saying the matter would jeopardise relations with the Jewish state, a major US ally.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken also raised the settlement approvals in a call with Israel’s Defence Minister Benny Gantz on Tuesday, a senior State Department official said.



– ‘Falling asleep’ –



The locations of the Jewish homes approved on Wednesday were spread across the West Bank, from the suburbs of Jerusalem to new neighbourhoods of settlements deep inside the territory.

Some are proposed but others have already been built and received retroactive approval.

Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank and east Jerusalem has been a policy of every Israeli government since 1967, when it occupied these areas in the Six Day War. It later annexed east Jerusalem.

Israel’s housing ministry had separately on Sunday published tenders to build 1,355 new homes in the West Bank.

While moving forward the plans for Israeli settler homes, the Civil Administration is also scheduled on Sunday to advance plans for the construction of 1,301 residences for Palestinians in Israeli-controlled parts of the West Bank.

Critics say that move is an attempt to allay criticism from Israeli allies and the anger of left-wing partners in an unwieldy coalition government headed by right-wing Prime Minister Naftali Bennett.

It is the first time that the Civil Administration, the military rulers of the West Bank, has approved settlement construction under Bennett’s government.

He came to power in June as the head of an ideologically disparate eight-party coalition with members ranging from the Jewish religious far-right to Israel’s Islamist party.

The former head of a settler lobby group, Bennett opposes Palestinian statehood.

He has ruled out formal peace talks with the Palestinian Authority during his tenure, saying he prefers to focus on economic improvements.

Israeli anti-occupation group Peace Now accused the government of “violating the status-quo” over the settlements, and charged proponents of the two-state solution in Bennett’s coalition with “falling asleep on their shift.”
FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailShare

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M; THE GRIFTER
Elizabeth Holmes Totally Fooled Betsy DeVos and Pumped Her Family For Millions, Says Witness

Kate Briquelet
Tue, October 26, 2021

Alex Wong/Getty Images

The family of former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos invested nearly $100 million in Theranos after a marathon meeting with the biotech startup’s founder Elizabeth Holmes, a director of the billionaire’s family office testified on Tuesday.

Lisa Peterson, who manages private equity investments for the DeVos clan’s RDV Corporation, told jurors at Holmes’ California wire fraud trial that she and members of the Michigan-based dynasty flew to Silicon Valley in 2014 to meet Holmes and Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, the company’s former president and Holmes’ ex-boyfriend.

Peterson testified that Holmes was “hand picking” uber-wealthy families to invest in the Palo Alto company, which claimed its portable blood-testing devices could screen for scores of diseases with just the prick of a patient’s finger. (But, according to federal prosecutors, Holmes and Balwani knew their technology didn’t work as advertised, even as they peddled it to consumers and high-powered investors.)

Elizabeth Holmes Wrote Bad Love Poetry as Theranos Tanked

According to Peterson, Holmes told the DeVoses that she was courting a small number of private backers to avoid pressure from larger investment firms to take Theranos public. When prosecutor Robert Leach asked whether she believed Holmes was singling out the family office as a long-term investor, Peterson answered, “Very much so.”

In October 2014, the DeVos family visited Theranos headquarters for an almost five-hour huddle which included Betsy’s sister-in-law Cheri DeVos getting a finger stick test. “To my knowledge, she received the results,” Peterson testified, adding that she didn’t personally review the lab work, according to courtroom press reports.

Shortly after this meeting, Peterson and DeVos family members gathered in the Theranos parking lot to discuss their planned $50 million investment, which they ultimately doubled, the Wall Street Journal reported. (On Tuesday, the defense presented an email from Peterson that said RDV Corporation, with the blessing of siblings Doug and Cheri DeVos, had agreed to give Theranos $100 million “on the spot.”)

The DeVoses were just one prominent investor in the now-defunct blood-testing company. As former Theranos project manager Daniel Edlin testified last week, the tech unicorn also wooed media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who invested $125 million.

Peterson took the stand during the eighth week of Holmes’ criminal trial, which has thus far heard testimony from Marine Gen. Jim Mattis, former Walgreens CFO Wade Miquelon, ex-Safeway chief executive Steven Burd, and former employees including Theranos’ onetime lab director Adam Rosendorff, who was a key whistleblower for investigative reporter John Carreyrou’s bombshell stories on the startup.

On Tuesday, Peterson testified that she and her bosses were impressed by Theranos’ revenue projections of $140 million in 2014 and $990 million in 2015, and that she didn’t realize the firm had zero income in 2012 and 2013.

Peterson said Theranos provided materials to RDV that indicated 10 of the 15 largest pharmaceutical companies had “comprehensively validated” the startup over a seven-year period and falsely claimed the devices could run up to 300 blood tests on its own machines.

Theranos Tests Told Her She’d Miscarried—But She Was Still Pregnant.

Theranos also provided a copy of a study with Pfizer’s logo, which suggested the pharma giant approved of the devices, Peterson added. (Last week, Pfizer scientist Shane Weber testified that he recommended the corporation decline a partnership with Theranos in 2008, and that the startup used Pfizer’s logo without permission.)

When Holmes discussed potential risks with RDV, Peterson added, the tech wunderkind didn’t mention any issues with Theranos’ technology or disclose that the firm was using third-party machines for its blood tests. Peterson said Holmes only referred to the risk of Theranos accomplishing its rollout of kiosks in Walgreens pharmacy locations.

After Carreyrou’s Wall Street Journal reports raised questions about Theranos’ technology, Peterson and estate attorney Dan Mosley—another investor who lost $6 million in the biotech firm—discussed the bad press with Holmes and Theranos staff. Peterson testified that Theranos had “downplayed” the media reports.

Peterson told the court that she volunteered to work on the Theranos deal after learning about the firm from RDV Corporation’s CEO Jerry Tubergen, who met Holmes and her brother Christian. (Tubergen is also a potential witness on the government's list.)

During cross examination, Holmes’ attorney Lance Wade impugned Peterson’s due diligence in researching Theranos before recommending the company to the DeVos family.

Wade questioned Peterson on whether the DeVoses read the memos she had prepared on Theranos before they decided to invest, and Peterson said she didn’t know. The defense lawyer also pointed out Peterson’s memo appeared to include sentences lifted from a Fortune magazine article about Holmes.

When Wade asked whether Peterson had ever visited Theranos’ Walgreens clinics or read Theranos’ 2013 press release on this collaboration with the pharmacy chain, she answered no. That press release mentioned Theranos would use “traditional” blood draws alongside its own finger stick tests, Wade said.

Meanwhile, Peterson testified that the DeVos family office was concerned that if their investigation into Theranos was too thorough, the firm would rescind the invitation to invest in what was billed as a groundbreaking technology.

The defense also presented to jurors an email that indicated Tubergen told Rich DeVos that the Walton family, of Walmart fame, was also a major investor in Theranos.

Wade suggested that nothing stopped Peterson or RDV Corporation from enlisting any outside regulatory or medical experts to help scrutinize Theranos.

“We didn’t think we needed it,” Peterson testified.


THE SAGE THAT USES YAGE
Des Moines church fights IRS over 'religious' use of hallucinogenic drug ayahuasca

Clark Kauffman, Iowa Captial Dispatch
October 27, 2021

Geometry of the Soul series two. Background design of human profile and abstract elements on the subject of spirituality, science, creativity and the mind (Shutterstock)

A Des Moines-based church that uses a hallucinogenic drug in religious ceremonies is challenging the Internal Revenue Service's decision to deny it tax-exempt status.

According to the lawsuit, filed recently in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the Iowaska Church of Healing was formed in Iowa as a non-profit corporation in September 2018.

Corporate records indicate the church is run by Admir Dado Kantarevic, along with Billy Benskin and Merzuk Ramic, and its official location is Kantarevic's home, located at 4114 27th St., Des Moines. The lawsuit makes references to the church having 20 members at one point in time.

The church's teachings are built around the use of ayahuasca, which is brewed from the leaves of the shrubs and vines found in the Amazon. Elements of those plants have powerful hallucinogenic properties, which the church says can be used to awaken “the Third Eye" of its followers.

The Third Eye is described by the church on its website as “an organ that no one speaks about at school or in private" and which is “secretly protected in the geometric center of your skull."

In court filings, the church says that in January 2019 it filed an application with the IRS seeking tax-exempt status and was denied. With the assistance of U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley's office, the lawsuit alleges, the appeals process at the IRS was expedited and an appeal conference was held in April of this year.

A final determination letter denying tax-exempt status was issued in June of this year, stating that the church's use of the “Sacrament of Ayahuasca" in its religious practices was illegal, the lawsuit claims.


In court filings, the church acknowledges that under the federal Controlled Substances Act, an ingredient of ayahuasca called dimethyltryptamine or DMT, is a Schedule I drug and a hallucinogenic alkaloid, and that there is no statutory exemption allowing for its use in religious ceremonies.

According to the church, however, the IRS decision to withhold tax-exempt status “directly contradicts" a past U.S. Supreme Court ruling and also violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993.

The case that was heard by the Supreme Court involves a different church whose members received communion by drinking ayahuasca in the form of a tea brewed from plants found in the Amazon rainforest. After U.S. Customs seized a shipment of ayahuasca that was being shipped to the church, federal authorities threatened criminal prosecution and the church filed a lawsuit for injunctive relief.

The government conceded that while the sacramental use of ayahuasca was an exercise of religion, te sacramental use of the substance was still prohibited by law. The Supreme Court ruled the government's actions violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and it affirmed a lower court's preliminary injunction in favor of the church.

According to the lawsuit, the IRS has stated the Des Moines church has been formed for an illegal purpose – the distribution of a controlled substance.

The Iowaska Church of Healing disputes that and says its mission is to help individuals “attain healing of the mind, body and spirit through the sacred Sacrament of Ayahuasca under the guidelines of North and South American indigenous traditions and cultural values."'

Church leader convicted in high-profile drug case

The lawsuit states that ayahuasca is consumed in the form of a tea during the church's religious ceremonies and that its services also “involve prayers, smudging and spiritual music." The basis of its doctrine emanates from the Ayahuasca Manifesto, a document that details the role of ayahuasca in the expansion of consciousness, the church says.

In February 2019, the church filed a request with the Drug Enforcement Administration, seeking a religious exemption from the Controlled Substance Act. To date, the church alleges, the DEA has delivered no “substantive response" to the request, despite repeated follow-up inquiries, including one sent by Grassley's office.

The IRS has yet to file a response to the lawsuit.

Court records indicate that in December 2005, Kantarevic, then a personal trainer, was convicted of possession of anabolic steroids and sentenced to one year of probation. He was charged in connection with a federal investigation into the illegal importation of steroids for bodybuilders.

In his written guilty plea, Kantarevic acknowledged having received more than 3,500 grams of anabolic steroids through the mail in Des Moines, from both Thailand and California, with the intent of keeping some of the drug and mailing the rest to others.

As part of his plea, he acknowledged that it was his understanding the drugs came from Milos Sarcev and were to be paid for by Dennis James.

At the time, Sarcev and James were internationally known, competitive bodybuilders. Sarcev was a two-time holder of the title Mr. Yugoslavia, and James was a top competitor in the 2004 Mr. Universe contest.

Both men later pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess anabolic steroids.

Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com. Follow Iowa Capital Dispatch on Facebook and Twitter.
Czech Documentary Maker Reveals an Orphanage System Out of Control

Will Tizard 

© Courtesy of Linda Kallistova Jablonska

When doc director Linda Kallistova Jablonska began exploring the state orphanage system in the Czech Republic, she confesses she didn’t expect to find ordinary girls living in institutions for years – children who would likely not have been separated from their families in any other EU nation. Filming her subjects for eight years, the filmmaker spent a decade on “Leaving Beginnings Behind,” screening in the Czech Joy section of the Ji.hlava International Documentary Film Festival.

The project grew out of what began as a short film in 2011 for Czech TV as Jablonska moved onto following her three subjects who age out of the system at 18 as they struggle to find their way in the real world – but discover they are seriously under-equipped to handle it.

How did you first find yourself immersed in this story of dangerously overzealous institutions?

I was just driving around this place and was wondering what was inside. In Czech if you say pastak, the word for this kind of institution where troubled kids end up, it has really bad connotations. Like where really troubled kids who stole something or killed someone end up. But what I found was completely different. These girls were basically there because they ran away from some other institutions. They were just Roma so they put them there. There were some serious cases, of course, but most of the kids were completely okay, just from another type of institution.

How did you manage to get access to filming inside these orphanages and, later, halfway houses?

There was a really nice director of this place and he suggested I shoot these girls you see in the film. And I found them interesting because they talk and have a very specific sense of humor. Then as life went on I was curious what was going to happen to them. After five years I shot a film about small children in institutions called “In the Child’s Best Interests,” about newborn kids who end up in institutions. Then I found there’s a connection between these two things. If a baby ends up in an institution, it’s very likely this child will end up in some kind of institution afterwards – even if it’s adopted. So the experience up to age 3 has a big influence over grownup life.

What effects from living in these places could you see on the girls you filmed?

The institutions are very bad for young kids. In the case of Kristyna, who spent the first year of her life there, she’s a very good example of how it affects adult life. It’s very hard for her to be a part of society – to have a proper job and a proper family and to trust in herself as a mother.

The Czech Republic recently passed a law that will end placing the youngest children in these institutions. Were you driven by what you saw to push for these changes?

We founded an organization called Good Start – myself and three other women – and we made a big effort to get politicians to pass this law. I’m very happy that it actually went through. So this subject has been influencing my life for years.

There were a lot of other people but I’d say our organization does have an influence.

What will the law do to make it harder for the state to take infants and toddlers away from their families?

The new law says no baby under 3 years old can end up in institutional care after the year 2025. The institutions for little children would basically come to an end. They won’t really end but will have to transform themselves so you can imagine these big houses full of small children could be, say, for young mothers who have been abandoned by everyone and they could stay there with their babies for some time. A resource to help kids stay in their biological family when they can’t deal with things.

How extensive is this problem in the Czech Republic comparatively?

There were sometimes a hundred small children in a place with five women attending them or one nurse with five kids. So this would all end. There has to be a lot more support for the biological families because currently in the Czech Republic there are an enormous number of kids who are taken away – even in cases where their families would be able to cope if they had some help.

And of course more people need to become involved in foster care, both long-term and short-term. We are one of the last countries in the EU that has this kind of kojenecky ustav, orphanages for kids under 3. They don’t exist in Bulgaria, Slovakia…and in Slovakia there’s a law that children under 6 can’t be in institutions. There are about 150-200 children in them here now.

How did you approach filming in such a restricted environment?

At the beginning I shot it myself because I didn’t have money or a crew and also I could be closer to the girls. Then as time went by and I had more support from Czech TV and the producer we had a crew. By that time the girls were more and more okay with a crew around. There were several DPs on it over the 10 years.

You clearly encountered a lot of heartbreaking days while filming. Which was the toughest?

The most difficult day was after Kristyna’s son had fallen into a fire. It was quite tough to go there to the hospital and to be with her. For the film, the most difficult moment was when Denisa, one of the girls, decided she didn’t want to let us film her any more. We didn’t know what to do but we ended up back with Kristyna and she told me she was going to be part of this TV show and I thought, ‘Well, that’s a great start.’ So we shot that and we found that Kristyna is quite an interesting character as well.

What is it about her that helps convey the effects of the orphanage crisis?

She was interesting because she brought a new baby into the film and somehow when I was watching the film I realized when the girls are just being themselves we don’t feel so sorry for them. It’s just their life. They’re not gong to die of hunger or anything like that. But when you see the small baby in the pushchair you realize there’s another life. It’s a completely new perspective when the baby’s around.

These moments in the film are some of the most suspenseful as you wonder whether these babies are going to be any better off than their mothers.

It’s a big question, the cycle – it’s very likely the children of an orphanage will have children that end up in an orphanage. This cycle has to be broken.
SPACE MALL
Bezos’ dream for the first commercial space station is a suburban nightmare

MobileSyrup 

Jeff Bezos’ aerospace company Blue Origin has unveiled its initial plans for the world’s first-ever commercial space station
.
© Source: Shutterstock https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/typical-light-industrial-small-busines... Bezos’ dream for the first commercial space station is a suburban nightmare

While specifics are still scarce, the space station will be modeled after “business parks,” i.e. the blight of the suburbs.

As Mashable wearily reports, “a business park is a collection of office buildings, with some grass or hey even a water feature or two in between structures, if you’re lucky.”

For context, the first-ever business park has its roots in segregation, wealth and white flight, opening in “an upper-class white suburb of Birmingham, [Alabama], in the early 1950s as commuters became uneasy with simmering racial tension in city centers.”

In the years that followed, business parks received further criticism for their negative impact on surrounding communities and suburban sprawl, and tendency towards being abandoned and left in vacant disrepair.

For its part, Blue Origin says that its bold creative vision for humanity’s first permanent steps into that hallowed final frontier will “provide the essential infrastructure needed to scale economic activity and open new markets in space.” Yikes.

The station, tentatively named the “Orbital Reef”, is scheduled to be up and orbiting sometime between 2025-2030.

Blue Origin has so far completed two successful tourist flights into space — or more specifically, into low Earth orbit.

Passengers have included Bezos himself, naturally, and Canadian sci-fi legend William Shatner.

Source: Mashable