Sunday, October 31, 2021

Why India can't live without coal despite its negative environmental effects

Years of mining in coal-rich hubs have left villages

 struggling for access to water

Coal mining is a major economic driver in Chandrapur, a coal-rich hub in central India, and it isn't expected to stop anytime soon. (Salimah Shivji/CBC)

A lone well sits in the middle of the Bhatali village square in central India's coal-rich Chandrapur district, steps from a massive open-pit mine.

The well is dug 10 times deeper than previous ones, which all ran dry years ago, and the water spurting from it is not safe to drink.

"Our lands have gone to waste," said village leader Subhash Gaurkar, pointing to the coal mining activity that surrounds the town. 

Mining of the highly polluting fossil fuel in Chandrapur, like in many other coal-rich regions of India, has siphoned most of what was, at one time, a plentiful water supply. 

India is the world's second largest producer of coal, behind China. Critics worry that fossil fuel will be the centrepiece of the country's energy production for several decades yet, along with the environmental and health consequences that come with it.   

"Our wells are 30 feet deep and the mines are 80 feet deep," Gaurkar said. "The mines suck all the water, so we don't get that water. How can farmers irrigate their farm then?"  

Subhash Guarkar stands in front of the makeshift water treatment hut where villagers line up to pay for and collect their treated drinking water. The region's groundwater is nearly depleted from decades of excessive coal mining. (Salimah Shivji/CBC)

Manoj Waghmare, 36, doesn't any longer. His field, across the street from the large coal mine, sits empty and devoid of crops. 

"Nothing can grow here now. We have nothing left," he said, claiming silt and water from the nearby mine has seeped into the soil, contaminating it. 

"Our land of 60 years has become completely barren," Waghmare said. 

(The mine has compensated other farmers in the area for loss of land, but Waghmare said he is still waiting for his sum.)  

Water comes at a price

With the area's groundwater depleted, drinking water comes from a small, makeshift treatment hut set up near that lone well — a government-built system that pumps water from the nearby Erai river. 

This lone well is dug 10 times deeper than previous ones which ran dry years ago, with the groundwater depleted from decades of coal mining in the Chandrapur area in central India. (Salimah Shivji/CBC)

Villagers line up to use a pay-by-card system to fill up their large jugs with water. The cost: 20 litres of water for five rupees (roughly eight cents Cdn).

It's emblematic of the harmful effects of coal extraction on local communities, according to Suresh Chopane, president of the Chandrapur-based environmental non-profit Green Planet Society.

"Water everywhere, not a single drop to drink," Chopane said. "This is what the situation is in Chandrapur." 

Coal is king

And yet, India is forging ahead with plans to expand its coal production as demand surges, with new plants under construction even as the price of coal, once seen as the cheapest and easiest option, is spiking. 

The country is third on the list globally for greenhouse gas emissions, even though the average Indian uses far less energy than the average Canadian or American. 

Manoj Waghmare, 36, stands with his father Nirash, near the family's farming field that is no longer able to grow crops, he said, because of the mining activity. (Glen Kugelstadt/CBC)
  

India is also navigating a coal shortage this fall with domestic production falling short of growing demand as its economy emerges from the pandemic. Some of India's power plants reported having only a few days' supply left in October, fuelling the threat of blackouts hitting large cities. 

Coal, the dirtiest of fossil fuels, is the backbone of India's energy grid, providing more than 70 per cent of the country's power. 

'We can't stop it'

The largest coal miner in the world, Coal India Ltd., is owned by the national government, and at least seven of India's states are heavily reliant on the revenues from extraction of the fossil fuel, including Maharashtra state, where Chandrapur is located. 

The industry provides jobs for some four million Indians, as well as strong ripple effects in the economy. 

"We can't stop it," said Kishor Jorgewar, a member of the state of Maharashtra's Legislative Assembly.

"Stopping mining activities is like stopping the prosperity of a nation."

WATCH | Why coal is the backbone of India's energy grid:

India’s coal mines are drying up the groundwater, destroying crops and leaving residents to pay for clean water, but the country still relies on the dirty fuel for power and revenue as it attempts to move toward cleaner energy sources. 3:58

The local politician is adamant that more of the revenues collected from coal should go to the communities adversely affected by mining activity to tackle pollution and water depletion, but he is aware his region's economy would grind to a halt if India were to abandon coal. 

It's a reality even environmentalists like Chopane accept. 

"It will take time," he told CBC News. "We're expecting 10 to 15 [more] years that we will have to depend on coal." 

International pressure is growing on India to further reduce its carbon footprint and commit to getting to a net-zero emissions goal. As the West moves away from coal, it's looking for other nations to do the same. Reducing coal dependence is expected to be a primary focus of the United National climate conference COP26, set to begin next week in Glasgow.

But India is looking for more foreign investment to help meet its climate targets, not pressure from the West, nor does it appreciate being labelled a climate laggard. 

Its negotiators pushed back hard at a fraught G20 meeting earlier this year in Naples, penning a statement that called out those around the table for not focusing on bringing down high per-capita emissions in richer countries. 

India is the world's second-largest coal producer. It accounts for more than 70 per cent of the developing country's energy production. (Salimah Shivji/CBC )

India's stance is complicated. The country has set ambitious renewable energy targets to invest heavily in solar and wind power. Its goal of 450 gigawatts (GW) of renewable capacity by 2030 that environmentalists have lauded, even as India continues to promote coal. 

'Unfair' demands

"This country is heavily dependent on a coal-based economy and the politics around it," said Ashwini K. Swain, a fellow at the New Delhi-based Centre for Policy Research. 

That interdependency is not easy to break. 

Take the national railroad. 

Indian Railways receives nearly half of its revenue from coal, charging more to transport the fossil fuel around the country in order to heavily subsidize train tickets for passengers, making travel accessible for much of the country's poorest. 

According to Swain, it's unfair to expect India to abruptly replace coal with renewable energy when industrialized nations have used the dirty fuel for years with few consequences, driving growth but also driving up emissions that have contributed to a warming planet.

Workers unload coal from a supply truck at a yard on the outskirts of Ahmedabad, India. Some four million Indians depend on coal for their livelihoods, many of them living in the poorest parts of the country. (Amit Dave/REUTERS)

He has calculated that India's added solar and wind power capacity will be for future electricity demand, as the country develops. 

"The question is: what is the alternative economic pathway for India?" he said. 

"The developed countries have something else as an alternative to coal, be it gas in some countries, be it nuclear in other countries," Swain said. 

"India doesn't have anything as of right now." 

Nothing to replace coal yet, with tens of millions of Indians still living without electricity and fully dependent on the dirtiest of fossil fuels.  

A train loaded with coal rolls through Chandrapur. Indian Railways receives nearly half of its revenue from moving coal across the country, charging more for that service in order to subsidize cheaper fares for passengers, which makes rail travel across the vast nation more accessible to some of the country's poorest. (Salimah Shivji/CBC)
How industry is depending on carbon capture technology for climate goals

The technology, however, is not yet widely available and is highly expensive.


Author of the article:
Reuters
Cassandra Garrison
Publishing date: Oct 29, 2021 

MEXICO CITY — Industries from cement to mining are creating plans to cap and cut their planet-warming emissions, and many depend on a technology still in development: carbon capture.

There are two main types of carbon capture and storage: Point-source carbon capture and storage (CCS) sequesters CO2 produced at the source, like a smokestack, while direct air capture (DAC) removes carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. Captured CO2 usually is permanently stored underground, although carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) reuses the CO2.

The technology, however, is not yet widely available and is highly expensive.

The capacity of CCS projects grew 48% from 75 million tonnes per annum (mpta) at the end of 2020 to 111 mtpa by September, according to the Australia-based Global CCS Institute. Several groups see a need for billions of tonnes of storage by midcentury; Exxon Mobil Corp expects a $2 trillion market by 2040.

Here’s how four large industries, all major carbon emitters, are using CCS technology.

CEMENT AND CONCRETE

Cement and concrete production accounts for about 8% of global CO2 emissions. Massive kilns that heat raw materials in order to make clinker, a key ingredient of cement, account for the majority of emissions.

The Global Cement and Concrete Association recently announced a road map to net-zero cement by 2050 and pledged 10 industrial-scale carbon capture plants by 2030.

Carbon capture technology is the “elephant in the room,” Fernando Gonzalez, chief executive of Mexico’s Cemex, said in a company presentation this month, referring to the challenges around developing the technology.

Cemex, North America’s largest cement producer, Switzerland-based Holcim AG, formerly LafargeHolcim, and Germany’s HeidelbergCement all are working on projects.

IRON AND STEEL

The process of making iron and steel is energy and carbon intensive due to the use of fossil fuels like coal to power blast furnaces, and output has grown in recent years.

To hit emissions targets, 75% of CO2 produced globally by the sector needs to be captured, according to the World Steel Association. That equates to 14 steel plants with CCS technology built every year from 2030 to 2070. Currently, the world has only one large-scale iron and steel facility with CCS.

ArcelorMittal, one of the world’s largest steelmakers, signed a Memorandum of Understanding this year with Air Liquide, a France-based industrial gases company, to develop carbon capture technologies with the aim of producing low-carbon steel at its Dunkirk site.

OIL AND GAS

Until recently, capturing carbon produced by fossil fuels and injecting it underground has largely been a means to squeeze more oil from aging wells. There are several proposals to build CCS hubs, but few have gone beyond the development stage.

Now, numerous large energy companies are incorporating CCS into their plans for reducing emissions, but the lack of carbon trading markets or tax incentives to make the investment worthwhile has held back U.S. development.

Occidental Petroleum is currently developing with private equity firm Rusheen Capital Management a Direct Air Capture facility in Texas that would pull about 1 million metric tons of CO2 annually from the air – using fans and chemical reactions. Occidental created a business, 1PointFive, to build a demonstration unit and sell direct carbon capture facilities to others.

Chevron has said it plans on using carbon capture and offsets to cut operational emissions to net zero by 2050, with plans to store roughly 25 million tonnes of CO2 annually. It plans on spending roughly $8 billion by 2028 in low-carbon investments that includes carbon capture and offsets.

MINING

Parts of the mining industry sees carbon capture and storage as a way to reduce emissions at coal-fired power plants, the main source of electricity in mining hub Australia. Some mining companies are also studying ways to replace natural gas in operations with hydrogen, which does not produce carbon emissions when burned.

The Minerals Council of Australia called hydrogen production and CCS “critically important technologies” for a country that gets about 65% of its electricity from coal. Gassified coal also can be used to produce hydrogen.

Rio Tinto Ltd, one of the world’s largest mining companies, in October said it would invest $4 million into privately held Carbon Capture Inc, which is developing technology to suck carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and chemically bind it – and thus permanently store it – to rocks. If the technology works at a large scale, it could allow Rio to market copper and other electric vehicles minerals it produces as carbon neutral.

 (Reporting By Cassandra Garrison in Mexico City; additional reporting by Peter Henderson in Oakland, Ernest Scheyder in Houston, Gary McWilliams in Houston and David Gaffen in New York; editing by Peter Henderson and Leslie Adler)

Miners look to carbon capture to move beyond net zero: Andy Home

CREDIT: REUTERS/MATTHIAS RIETSCHEL

The global race to carbon neutrality is a double-edged sword for the metals and mining sector. The world is going to need a lot more of metals such as lithium, copper and nickel to decarbonise, but the mining sector is itself a big carbon emitter.



LONDON, Oct 29 (Reuters) - The global race to carbon neutrality is a double-edged sword for the metals and mining sector.

The world is going to need a lot more of metals such as lithium, copper and nickel to decarbonise, but the mining sector is itself a big carbon emitter.

Mining contributes between 4% and 7% of man-made greenhouse-gases, much of it generated by coal both as a mined resource and as a power source, a 2020 report by consultancy McKinsey found.

The world's mining companies are rushing to reduce their carbon footprint through electrification and a shift to renewable power.

Carbon capture could allow some to move beyond neutrality to become net carbon negative.

The technology for industrial-scale carbon capture and storage is still in its infancy and largely untested.

But some minerals do it naturally. It's just a case of having the right rock and speeding up the process.

Miners tend to be the perennial villains in the environmental debate, but they could yet be the unlikely pioneers of large-scale and permanent carbon storage.

CIRCULAR CARBON

Carbfix, a subsidiary of Iceland's Reykjavik Energy, has since 2014 captured over 73,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide from the Hellisheidi geothermal power plant and pumped it underground.

Iceland's basalt rock formations are perfect for converting the carbon dioxide into carbonate minerals, effectively trapping the gas in a stable form for millennia.

Nature does this all the time. Rocks dissolve with rain-water and flow into rivers, picking up other minerals such as calcium and magnesium along the way before settling on the ocean bed eventually to become carbonate minerals such as limestone.

Such rock weathering absorbs around one gigatonne of carbon dioxide each year. Unfortunately, that's about how much the earth also creates each year in the form of volcanic activity.

The natural process also plays out in painfully slow geological time.

Carbfix's solution is to inject as much carbon dioxide as possible into the water before pumping it into the basalt, which speeds up the mineral reaction time to under two years.

The process just needs carbon, water and basalt and is a neat way of returning the carbon to the ground from whence it came. And it's cheap at around 15 euros (US$17.50) per tonne.

Carbfix has just announced a tie-up with Rio Tinto RIO.L to scale up the technology at the company's ISAL aluminium smelter, which also sits on basalt rock formations.

The initial injection wells for the Coda Terminal, the world's first mineral carbon storage hub, will be drilled next year with commercial production due in 2025.

Rio will benefit not only from carbon capture within its smelter and power supplier but also from the carbon credits accruing from its basalt-rich land, a significant asset in a market that is already starting to fracture between low- and high-carbon aluminium products.

CARBON-HUNGRY TAILINGS

It doesn't have to be basalt and you don't have to inject carbon dioxide underground for this mineralisation process to work.

As BHP Group BHPB.L has found out at its Nickel West operations in Western Australia.

The tailings at the Mt Keith mine, rich in magnesium oxide, another carbon absorber, have been capturing around 40,000 tonnes per year "accidentally and unknowingly", according to Greg Dipple, the University of British Columbia professor who led a study on the waste material.

Tailings speed up the weathering process because the rock has been crushed, exponentially increasing the surface area for mineral reaction, he told the Canadian Mining Journal.

BHP is now conducting further studies on its tailings dam to see just how much more carbon might be absorbed by tweaking the natural process.

Nickel is a key metallic input for lithium-ion batteries and BHP signed in July a supply deal with Tesla TSLA.O. The company boasts its nickel carries half the carbon footprint of even the newest producers in top supplier Indonesia.

Its green nickel could become greener still thanks to its tailings dam.

GREENER METAL

Nickel and precious group metals are often found in the right sort of rock - ultramafic in geologist speak - for carbon sequestration, adding a new dynamic to project financing.

Talon Metals Corp TLO.TO is hoping its Tamarack nickel-cobalt-copper project in Minnesota will not only supply U.S. battery makers with green metal but will actively absorb carbon while doing so.

The company is studying the potential of carbon capture both via tailings and through injection into the surrounding rock formation.


The first can shift the carbon dial down towards neutrality. Mt Keith's tailings, for example, offset around 11% of its carbon footprint each year, according to Dipple.

The second, actively buying up carbon from nearby industries such as steel makers before injecting it underground, is the way towards becoming net carbon negative.

As with both Rio's Iceland aluminium smelter and BHP's nickel operations, this reinforces the green credentials of the product for discerning buyers such as Tesla's Elon Musk.

But the real significance could be as much about image as economics.


Talon Metals is hoping to fast-track the Tamarack project, which ticks all the Biden Administration's boxes for enhancing domestic supply chains for critical and battery minerals.

However, steering a new mine through the U.S. permitting process is getting increasingly difficult.

The Twin Metals copper-nickel project, also in Minnesota, is facing a potential 20-year ban on the land it wants to mine. Antofagasta ANTO.L, the project owner, is appealing the U.S. Forest Service's proposal.

The fate of the Resolution copper project, a long-stalled joint venture between Rio Tinto and BHP, is also now at an appeals court as Native Indians seek a reversal of the original land agreement.

It's unclear how the Biden Administration can square its green environmental credentials with its vision of a green industrial revival made with domestically-sourced metals.

Carbon capture injects a whole new dimension into the heated debate around new mines and metals plants.

Mining is "the most toxic industry in America", according to Becky Rom, national chair of The Campaign To Save The Boundary Waters, an environmental group opposed to the Twin Metals project.

Would new projects attract such venom if they could prove that they were part of the environmental solution rather than the problem?

We may not have long to find out.

The idea of a nickel mine or aluminium smelter being net negative in terms of carbon emissions may seem far-fetched, but the reality may be coming sooner than you think.

(Editing by Mark Potter)
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.



COACHING IS ABUSE

Opinion: Everyone in the NHL world failed Kyle Beach – and they still can't own up to it

Chris Korman
For The Win

The NHL continues to flub the handling of its sexual abuse scandal in new and astonishing ways.

It’s tragic that I have to point out, up there in the first paragraph, that this isn’t some sort of anomaly; powerful people in sports have made a habit of covering up this sort of abuse. This isn’t some outlier. It’s just the NHL’s turn.

Yet the supposed leaders in various leagues and conferences repeatedly show they have learned nothing, at all, about how to handle the fallout — which guarantees they are not ready to make necessary changes to prevent these things in the future.

If you aren’t yet well-versed in the story of former Blackhawks player Kyle Beach — who was sexually assaulted by a staff member in 2010, reported it and was ignored — catch up with a timeline of the situation.

While two of the leaders from that Blackhawks era have been forced to resign (Stan Bowman as GM in Chicago, Joel Quenneville as the head coach in Florida, where he’d been since 2019), the NHL announced Friday that it would not discipline Kevin Cheveldayoff, now the general manager in Winnipeg.

That makes no sense. You can, and most certainly should, hold someone responsible for not informing proper authorities about allegations of sexual assault. Which is what happened with Cheveldayoff. 

According to the findings released from a team-commissioned independent investigation by Jenner & Block on Tuesday, Cheveldayoff, then Chicago’s assistant GM, was part of a meeting with team leaders who did not act when a player, “John Doe,” alleged former video coach Brad Aldrich sexually assaulted him in 2010.

The May 23 meeting also included former GM Stan Bowman, ex-coach Joel Quenneville and team president John McDonough, who would not report the alleged incident to human resources until June 14, days after the Blackhawks won the Stanley Cup. Human resources allowed Aldrich to resign June 16 instead of face an investigation.

What an awful message NHL commissioner Gary Bettman is sending. This only reinforces the idea that matters like this should be left to “senior” managers, when we have seen, time after time, that those are precisely the people most likely to cover it up.

And, also, the NHL should simply … expect all of its people in positions of power to do the right thing. This is not that hard.

Of course, Cheveldayoff tripped all over himself in a statement:

The words “I’m sorry” do not appear here. The words, “I was wrong” do not appear here. The words “I made a mistake and will regret it forever” do not appear here.

What’s here, though, is an attempt to deflect from his own role in causing Kyle Beach’s pain by calling Beach “incredibly brave.”

That reaction is more than a decade too late, Kev. Why weren’t you courageous enough to believe him then, and have you done anything, at all, to change the way you see things now?

Nobody has handled this well. Jonathan Toews sounded ludicrous when he expressed sorrow for Bowman rather than focusing on Beach and a broader hockey culture that failed him.

Quenneville at least said he wants to learn and improve, but only after distancing himself from Beach by referring to him as “this young man.”

Beach is 31 now. In 2010 he was a rising prospect. He’d been the 11th overall pick in the 2008 draft and had just scored 86 points playing a rugged style (186 penalty minutes) in his final season of junior hockey. Quenneville may not have known him well, but Beach most certainly was not just some “young man.”

Much of the blame for how the Blackhawks failed here has amorphously been assigned to “hockey culture.” It’s important for those within the sport, though, to explore what actually happened. Blanket condemnations may ring true, but they provide little path toward reconciliation.

There were specific problems here that need to be explored. Toews had been named captain, a position with real power in the NHL, before he could legally drink alcohol. Perhaps it’s not the best idea to have someone so young serve as the representative of the players to the coaching staff.

A more mature player might have set a different tone in the locker room, too:

Is this the reason people in Chicago didn’t take Beach seriously? Did they fail to believe a 6-foot-3, 200-pound power forward could be sexually assaulted by a video coach? Was there no understanding of power dynamics? Or just a callous disregard for any issue that didn’t directly effect the chase for a Stanley Cup?

Bruins winger Taylor Hall was one of several players who delivered a better message in the wake of this story shaking the NHL:

That gives you hope, right? That a player can see it this way. But how do we not also despair, knowing that one of the old boys just skated away, clear and free? He’s still there making decisions that impact the lives of every person in an entire organization, and when it comes time for him to fess up, to say he’s sorry, to admit to what he did wrong and say how he’s going to change, he instead just offers up “empathy” to the man whose life he helped ruin.

How are we supposed to deal with that?


Blackhawks' sexual abuse victim Kyle Beach meets with NHL execs: 

A timeline of the case and its fallout


Beach, 31, discussed sexual assault prevention with NHL commissioner Gary Bettman and NHLPA head Donald Fehr on Saturday

By Wajih AlBaroudi
CBS
USATSI

Fallout from the Chicago Blackhawks' sexual abuse scandal has only grown since the team's 107-page investigation report released Tuesday, most recently with Florida Panthers coach Joel Quenneville resigning after a Thursday meeting with NHL commissioner Gary Bettman. Quenneville -- who coached Chicago to three Stanley Cup championships over 11 seasons -- and five other Blackhawks senior staffers failed to take immediate action against a former video coach who sexually assaulted a player in 2010, according to the report. Former first-round pick Kyle Beach came forward as the victim on Wednesday.

Blackhawks general manager Stan Bowman and senior senior director of hockey administration Al MacIsaac stepped down two days before Quenneville, and Winnipeg Jets general manager Kevin Cheveldayoff -- Chicago's assistant general manager in 2010 -- is expected to meet with Bettman on Monday. The NHL fined the Blackhawks $2 million for their mishandling of the allegations. Here's a chronological look at the case and what to expect next.

May 8-9, 2010 -- The assault on Beach

Former Blackhawks center Kyle Beach and video coach Brad Aldrich engaged in a sexual encounter during the team's Western Conference finals series against the San Jose Sharks. Aldrich told investigators the encounter was consensual, but Beach said it was "entirely non-consensual." According to the report, Aldrich told Beach he would never play in the NHL or walk again if he didn't "act like he enjoyed the sexual encounter." Aldrich then forced himself upon Beach.

May 12-19, 2010 -- Beach confides in skill coach

Later in the Sharks series, Beach told Blackhawks skill coach Paul Vincent about the incident with Aldrich. Vincent -- according to Beach, not the investigators -- reported Beach's claims to the Blackhawks' front office, but Aldrich kept his job through the team's Stanley Cup run. Beach described Vincent as an "amazing man" who "tried to do everything he could do back then." The Blackhawks' inaction after discovering the allegations, however, made Beach "feel like I didn't exist."

May 23, 2010 -- Blackhawks' senior staff meeting

MacIsaac learns of the alleged sexual encounter between Aldirch and Beach from an employee. After the Blackhawks' series-clinching win over the Sharks, MacIsaac joined president John McDonough, Bowman, executive vice president Jay Blunk, assistant general manager Kevin Cheveldayoff, Quenneville and team counselor Jim Gary to discuss the incident. Bowman recalled McDonough and Quenneville brushing the issue aside, with the former hoping to avoid bad publicity during the team's Stanley Cup run and the latter wanting to ensure his team had no distractions.

June 10, 2010 -- Aldrich assaults Blackhawks intern

A day after the Blackhawks' Stanley Cup win, Aldrich allegedly made sexual advances toward a 22-year-old team intern. Aldrich "physically grabbed" the intern during the encounter, according to the report.

June 14-16, 2010 -- Human resources gets involved

McDonough told Blackhawks' human resources about the allegations against Aldrich and the senior managers' May 23 meeting on June 14. Two days later, Aldrich met with the director of human resources. Aldrich neither confirmed nor denied his role in the incident with Beach, forcing the director to give him an ultimatum: an investigation or resignation. After choosing to resign, the Blackhawks gave Aldrich a severance, playoff bonus and championship ring. Aldrich also had his name engraved on the cup, spent a day with the Stanley Cup and attended the team's banner-raising ceremony the following season.

Fall 2012 -- Aldrich assaults two at Miami (Ohio)

Aldrich sexually assaulted two men while serving as Miami (Ohio) University's director of hockey operations. Miami found Aldrich assaulted a Miami student who worked at the rink and a summer hockey camp intern, both after inviting them to sleep on his couch. Aldrich resigned from Miami later that year.

March 2013 -- Aldrich assaults high schooler

While serving as a volunteer hockey coach for a high school team in Houghton, Michigan, Aldrich allegedly sexually assaulted one of his teenage players after a post-game party. Aldrich admitted his sexual advances toward the teen to police shortly after.

September 2013 -- Blackhawks HR stonewalls Houghton Police

Houghton police contacts the Blackhawks' director of human resources for information on Aldrich. The director refused to offer any information on Alrdrich -- other than his resignation -- without a subpoena. Aldrich was eventually convicted of fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct involving a student.

Feb. 13, 2014 -- Aldrich sentenced to jail

Aldrich was sentenced to nine months in Houghton County Jail for his sexual assault on the high school player. Upon his release, Aldrich was required to register as a sex offender, serve five years of probation and pay restitution.

May 7, 2021 -- Beach files lawsuit against Blackhawks

Beach, who was then unnamed and referred to as "John Doe 1," filed a lawsuit against the Blackhawks for their failure to punish Aldrich after his alleged assault in 2010.

June 2021 -- Blackhawks begin independent investigation

Chicago hired former federal prosecutor Redi Schar to conduct an "independent investigation" into Beach's allegations. The investigation released Tuesday and found the Blackhawks violated their own sexual harassment policy by waiting three weeks before taking action (Aldrich's forced resignation), a sharp turn from the team's commitment to investigating such issues "promptly and thoroughly."

"The failure to promptly and thoroughly investigate the matter and the decision to take no action from May 23 to June 14 had consequences," the report read. "During that period, Aldrich continued to work with and travel with the team. Aldrich engaged in an unwanted sexual advance on a Blackhawks intern—physically grabbing the intern in a sexual manner. And Aldrich continued to participate in team activities and celebrations, in the presence of John Doe. Even after the allegations were finally reported to the Director of Human Resources, still no investigation occurred, and Aldrich was permitted to resign his position and to continue participating in Stanley Cup victory events."

Oct. 26, 2021 -- Bowman and MacIsaac step down

The Blackhawks announced Bowman and MacIsaac, the lone members of the May 2010 senior meeting that remain with the team, stepped down from their respective roles. Vice president of hockey strategy and analytics Kyle Davidson took over as Chicago's interim general manager.

"The report is both disturbing and difficult to read," said Blackhawks CEO Danny Wirtz, who added the team's senior executives didn't take adequate action in 2010. "It speaks for itself. (Blackhawks owner Rocky Wirtz) and our leadership team reviewed the report and we have had important and difficult conversations about how our organization will move forward."

Later that day, the NHL announced it was fining the Blackhawks $2 million for their "inadequate internal procedures and insufficient and untimely response in the handling of matters related to former video coach Brad Aldrich's employment with the Club and ultimate departure in 2010." The NHL and Blackhawks agreed to send $1 million of the fine money to Chicago organizations dedicated to supporting or assisting survivors of sexual and other forms of abuse.

USA Hockey also announced Bowman stepped down as the team's general manager for the 2022 Winter Olympics.



Oct. 27, 2021

Beach comes forward as the "John Doe" in the Blackhawks' sexual assault case. The 31-year-old who is currently playing in Germany told TSN "it was a day of many emotions. I cried, I smiled, I laughed, I cried some more. My girlfriend and I, we didn't really know how to feel, we didn't really know how to think."

Oct. 28, 2021 -- Quenneville resigns

Quenneville resigned after meeting with NHL commissioner Gary Bettman in New York to discuss his involvement in the Blackhawks' sexual assault case. Andrew Brunette will serve as the team's interim head coach. Bettman said in a statement after Quenneville's resignation that the coach wouldn't receive any further punishment from the league -- unless he tries to re-enter it.

"Should he wish to re-enter the league in some capacity in the future, I will require a meeting with him in advance in order to determine the appropriate conditions under which such new employment might take place."

Beach also took to social media to thank fans for their "endless love and support" but admitted "my battle is really just beginning as the Blackhawks continue to attempt to destroy my case in court." He hopes to "promote safety, as well as the health and well being of society as a whole" through his lawsuit.



Oct. 30 -- Bettman speaks with Bettman, NHLPA head Donald Fehr

Bettman met with Beach to discuss how to prevent further sexual misconduct within the league. Susan Loggans, Beach's attorney, told the AP that Bettman conveyed his "sincere regret" over Beach's experience and offered the league's physcological services. Beach also met with NHL players' association executive director Donald Fehr via a video conference call later that day.

Nov. 1, 2021 -- Cheveldayoff meets with Bettman

Cheveldayoff, the Winnipeg Jets' general manager, is slated to meet Bettman on Monday. The NHL has yet to announce any punishment for Cheveldayoff.

Panthers' Joel Quenneville resigns amid Blackhawks sexual assault scandal after meeting with Gary Bettman

A Chicago Blackhawks investigation found Quenneville ignored a player's sexual assault claims against a coach in 2010

By Wajih AlBaroudi
Oct 28, 2021 

Florida Panthers coach Joel Quenneville resigned on Thursday amid the Chicago Blackhawks' sexual assault scandal. The 63-year-old coach met with NHL commissioner Gary Bettman that afternoon to discuss his involvement in the case. A Blackhawks-commissioned investigation found Quenneville and numerous other Chicago senior staffers ignored allegations of a coach sexually assaulting a player during the team's 2010 Stanley Cup run.

Multiple reports indicate Andrew Brunette will serve as the Panthers interim head coach until the team finds an outside replacement.

"After the release of the Jenner & Block investigative report on Tuesday afternoon, we have continued to diligently review the information within that report, in addition to new information that has recently become available," the Panthers announced in a statement. "It should go without saying that the conduct described in that report is troubling and inexcusable. It stands in direct contrast to our values as an organization and what the Florida Panthers stand for. No one should ever have to endure what Kyle Beach experienced during, and long after, his time in Chicago. Quite simply, he was failed. We praise his bravery and courage in coming forward.

"Following a meeting today with Commissioner Bettman at National Hockey League offices, which was part of the league's process to decide how to move forward, Joel made the decision to resign and the Florida Panthers accepted that resignation."

Bettman said in a statement "all parties agreed it was no longer appropriate that (Quenneville) continue to serve as Florida's head coach." The commissioner added the NHL won't pursue any further action against Quenneville at the moment, but he might face some if he attempts to get back into the league.

"Should he wish to re-enter the league in some capacity in the future, I will require a meeting with him in advance in order to determine the appropriate conditions under which such new employment might take place."

Quenneville released a statement of his own after his resignation, announcing the move with "deep regret and contrition."

"I want to express my sorrow for the pain this young man, Kyle Beach, has suffered," the statement read. "My former team the Blackhawks failed Kyle and I own share of that. I want to reflect on how all this happened and take the time to educate myself on ensuring hockey spaces are safe for everyone."

Former Blackhawks center Kyle Beach accused video coach Brad Aldrich of sexual assault during the team's 2010 Western Conference finals series against the San Jose Sharks. After learning of the allegations, Quenneville met with senior director of hockey administration Al MacIsaac, president John McDonough, general manager Stan Bowman, executive vice president Jay Blunk, assistant general manager Kevin Cheveldayoff and team counselor Jim Gary to discuss the incident and their path forward.

Quenneville chose to ignore the incident, with Bowman later telling investigators he "shook his head and said that it was hard for the team to get to where they were [the playoffs] and they could not deal with this issue now." The Blackhawks eventually won the first of three Stanley Cups under Quenneville that season. Aldrich -- who resigned three weeks later -- remained on the staff throughout the 2010 title run, earning a championship ring, a day with the Stanley Cup and an invitation to the team's banner-raising ceremony the following season.

"Stan Bowman has quoted Joel Quenneville saying -- and this is not a quote, this is my words -- saying that the playoffs, the Stanley Cup playoffs and trying to win a Stanley Cup was more important than sexual assault," Beach, who came forward as Aldrich's victim this week, told TSN on Wednesday. "And I can't believe that. As a human being, I cannot believe that, and I cannot accept that."

Bowman and MacIsaac, the lone members of the Blackhawks' senior staff remaining from the 2010 Stanley Cup team, both stepped down shortly after the Blackhawks released their 107-page report on Tuesday. Quenneville, however, was allowed to coach the Panthers on Wednesday, sparking social-media outrage.

  




Panthers general manager Bill Zito and team president Matt Caldwell reportedly accompanied Quenneville to Thursday's meeting. The Quenneville-led Panthers have won their first seven games this season, a feat only 13 teams accomplished before them.

Cheveldayoff will meet with Bettman on Monday.

Quenneville has coached the Blackhawks, Panthers, St. Louis Blues and Colorado Avalanche over his 25-year career. The 63-year-old won three Stanley Cups over 11 years with the Blackhawks and earned the Jack Adams award -- the NHL's Coach of the Year award -- with the St. Louis Blues in 1999-2000.

With 969 career wins, Quenneville trails only Scotty Bowman (1244) for the most in NHL history. Scotty Bowman is Stan Bowman's father and served as the senior advisor to hockey operations during the 2009-10 season.
ALBERTA/SASKATCHEWAN
Labour shortage big problem for smaller meat processors

By Alex McCuaig
Published: October 28, 2021

Current labour shortages have prompted one smaller meat processor owner to say the only pre-requisite to work at his facility is a pulse. | File photo

Labour shortages are proving difficult to overcome for small- and mid-sized meat processors on the Prairies.

For Pine View Farms co-owners Melanie and Kevin Boldt, that shortage has become desperate.

“There is only one pre-requisite,” said Kevin of getting a job at the Osler, Sask., specialty meat processor. “If you have a pulse.”

Next door in Alberta, a meat processing facility in Claresholm is being underutilized after millions of dollars were invested to rescue the building following a foreclosure.

Now for sale by new owners, there has been lots of interest, but realtor Robert Le Bosquain said the facility is missing one major component.

“They need a project manager,” he said. “It’s someone who can handle the whole processing system and knowing exactly what needs to be done and where and how.”

Le Bosquain said the facility is capable of processing up to 100 head of cattle a day, but it’ll take an experienced manager to be able to attract and retain labour.

The current owner, a Calgary-based grocer, is even willing to be a major customer of the new operator. At an asking price of $6.9 million, dozens of potential buyers have shown interest in the plant from as far away as China to supply its domestic market.

Perry Deering of Deerview Meats in Irvine, Alta., blames the labour shortage on a general apathy for work among a younger generation and government supports, which he said stunt the need for a job.

“They just don’t want to work. They don’t have to work,” said Deering of trying to hire younger employees he can train. “There is no work ethic. There is no commitment. This is our future.”

Out of 50 people who might apply for a job at his meat processing and retail business, maybe one might work out.

Deering said he is proud of his former employees who have gone on to get jobs as meat inspectors at the provincial and federal level, as well as a couple who learned enough from working at Deerview to start their own businesses.

There are opportunities for people at a smaller processor like Deerview, which is prepared to help younger workers train for a future in the business but, “the clog in the wheel that’s broken is that we can’t find help to make this thing functional,” said Deering.

Melanie Boldt said COVID-19 has caused additional problems after they lost restaurant business during pandemic restrictions. That activitity was replaced by a huge influx of consumer orders, but Pine View couldn’t find enough people to hire, she said.

Now the appearance of the COVID-19 delta variant has set things back again, said Boldt.

“We have to work hard to protect our employees to make sure they don’t become sick and miss weeks of work, which again creates more challenges for a plant that needs to keep producing meat because the animals keep growing.”

She said the pandemic has sparked a conversation among consumers, many of whom “really started to think about where their food came from. I think that’s an important conversation that needs to keep going: what do we want our food system to look like.”

For now, however, the impacts of the labour shortage look to continue with Deering saying his operation is so backed up with orders stretching into next year that Deerview Meats has made the difficult decision to not process any game this year as hunting season begins.
A shocking way to terminate plants without herbicide interventions

By Ron Lyseng
Published: October 21, 2021

An application of conductive liquid is made ahead of the tractor, while the rear-mounted generator and electrically charged panels do the plant termination at the back end. | Nucrop photo

The first people to try electricity to kill unwanted vegetation were the United States-based railroads in the 1890s. Scientists working for the railroads discovered that their new technology, high-voltage electricity, killed weeds dead.

Today, 130 years later, scientists are still working to perfect and commercialize electric weed-killing technology.

Hybrid electric desiccation is one of the most promising systems, and one that is already being used on a dozen European commercial farms. This system does not use herbicides or tillage.

Hybrid electric electrocution uses a highly conductive liquid that’s sprayed on the weed just before the zapper comes along. The liquid is designed to increase the power and spread of the electric jolt. A 5,000-volt jolt ruptures the weeds’ cell walls so water cannot move within the plant. Hybrid electric desiccation is a joint project with partners Crop.Zone in Germany and Nufarm of Australia. The electrophysical weeder project is known as Nucrop.

According to an email from Crop.Zone chief executive officer Dirk Vandenhirtz, pre-treating plants with the conductive liquid called Volt.fuel will efficiently control weeds and reduce energy use compared to conventional weeding technologies or other electric weeding technologies.

The Nucrop tool can be used in broadacre or row crop applications. As a non-selective tool it can replace chemistries used for desication, crop termination or pre-planing burn-off. | Nucrop photo

Volt.fuel is not a chemical herbicide.

“The Volt.fuel active ingredient must reach the site of action as effectively as possible so the electric current penetrates the contacted leaves with the least amount power loss. Volt.fuel bridges leaf hairs and irregularities on the leaves, softens wax layers and thus increases electrical conductivity,” he said.

Current up to 5,000 volts is generated by the tractor with a power take-off generator and purpose-built high-voltage units. Using special applicators, the current is passed through the above-ground plant, plus through the roots and soil.
The Nucrop system will work with a wide variety of crop types and heights. | Nucrop photo

This destroys the water supply to the plants, killing them. Thistle taproots are killed to a depth of six inches. Depth of destruction depends on type of applicator, soil moisture, plant species and the amount of energy applied.




Click here to download a larger version of the diagram above in PDF format.

Experiments have shown that electrophysical treatment has no significant impact on earthworms in the soil. Nucrop is conducting ongoing ecotoxicological trials in 2021.

“At this stage we are planning to have two Nucrop systems for the desiccation season running in Canada. I will keep you posted on this development.”
Fertilizer Canada report goes astray

By Darrin Qualman
NFU
Published: October 28, 2021
Opinion


The National Farmers Union argues that a recent report on how federal greenhouse gas emission targets would affect fertilizer use is based on false assumptions. | File photo


Fertilizer Canada and Meyers Norris Penny recently released a report called Implications of a Total Emissions Reduction Target on Fertilizer.

That report is a response to the December 2020 federal government announcement that it would “set a national emission reduction target (for 2030) of 30 percent below 2020 levels from fertilizers and work with fertilizer manufacturers, farmers,” and others to meet that target.

The MNP and Fertilizer Canada report presents a model that assumes that a 30 percent reduction in fertilizer-related emissions requires a 20 percent reduction in fertilizer tonnage (especially nitrogen) and that, in turn, would lead to a 20 percent reduction in crop yield. The report calculates that this yield reduction would lead to billions in lost revenues.

Unfortunately, the report is based on simplistic, flawed assumptions and seems intended to stoke fear among farmers, rather than contribute to fruitful discussions regarding pathways to agricultural emissions reduction.

The following examines some of the report’s false assumptions:

Less fertilizer must equal less crop. False.

The report disregards the sophisticated management capacities of farmers, the potential for innovation and adaptation and the many ways that farmers can reduce fertilizer requirements, including better soil testing, variable-rate application, enhanced rotations, split application, or biological nutrient sources. It assumes that a 20 percent reduction in fertilizer use will result in a 20 percent reduction in yields.

To the contrary, research indicates that farmers could significantly reduce fertilizer use with little or no impact on yields. This is because there is now a tendency to calculate fertilizer requirements based on target yields rather than actual or profit-maximizing yields. Not all rates are based on soil tests and factors other than nutrient availability (precipitation) are often the limiting factor in plant growth.

Fertilizer Canada’s report repeatedly refers to a fixed ratio between fertilizer and grain in terms of “pounds per bushel.” In effect, the report assumes that fertilizer is being used with maximum efficiency, rates are optimized, soil testing is universal, and that every unit of reduced fertilizer input must result in a unit of reduced crop output. Such assumptions are false.

Reducing fertilizer use will reduce farmers’ net incomes. False on most farms
.

The report claims to measure “direct financial impacts” on farmers but does not do so. It quantifies alleged negative impacts on gross revenues but omits cost savings from reduced fertilizer purchases.

Contrary to the report’s assertions, it is very likely that a well-managed transition to optimizing fertilizer use via better placement and timing, and other factors will enable farmers to reduce fertilizer rates, emissions, and costs; maintain yields and revenues; and thus increase margins and net incomes.

Business as usual (BAU) is an option. False.

Fertilizer Canada uses a BAU scenario incompatible with Canada’s emission-reduction commitments and incompatible with the stable climate farmers need. Its BAU scenario projects a crop tonnage increase of 34 percent by 2030. By the report’s own logic, this must mean that fertilizer tonnage must also increase by 34 percent. It follows that greenhouse gas emissions from fertilizer would increase by a similar percentage.

Canada, however, has committed to cut economy-wide emissions by 40 percent by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050. Fertilizer Canada’s BAU scenario of ever-rising emissions is simply impossible as we move toward 2030 and beyond.

The interface between climate, farm economics, global prices, emission-reduction commitments, input-use efficiency, soil biology, plant genetics, adoption of agronomic practices, government policies and programs, and other factors is complex.

Unfortunately, Fertilizer Canada and MNP ignored these complexities and produced a simplistic, self-serving model that does nothing to illuminate the actual path that farmers must follow to reduce emissions in line with the requirements of Canada’s international commitments and the maintenance of a stable climate.

This report provides no useful insights into how farmers might contribute to Canada’s low-emission future and prosper as they do so.

Darrin Qualman is the National Farmers Union’s director of climate crisis policy and action.


Dollars in the dirt: Big Ag pays farmers for control of their soil-bound carbon


By Karl Plume, Reuters News Service, Rod Nickel
Published: October 25, 2021

Fertilizer producers Nutrien Ltd and Yara, agribusiness giant Cargill Inc, and seed and chemical dealers Corteva Inc and Bayer AG are paying growers for every acre of land dedicated to trapping carbon underground. | File photo


WINNIPEG, Manitoba/CHICAGO, Oct 25 (Reuters) - The biggest global agriculture companies are competing on a new front: enticing farmers to join programs that keep atmosphere-warming carbon dioxide in the soil.

Fertilizer producers Nutrien Ltd and Yara, agribusiness giant Cargill Inc, and seed and chemical dealers Corteva Inc and Bayer AG are paying growers for every acre of land dedicated to trapping carbon underground, known as sequestering it. The companies' ambitions stretch from the United States to Canada, Brazil, Europe and India, executives told Reuters.

Farmers capture carbon by planting off-season crops, tilling the ground less and using fertilizer more efficiently. They log their practices on digital platforms to generate a carbon credit. Agricultural companies use the credits to offset the climate impact of other parts of their businesses or sell them to companies looking to reduce their own carbon footprints.

Agriculture covers nearly 40 percent of the world's land and is responsible for 17 percent of global emissions, according to the United Nations. Changes to farm practices could sequester as much as 250 million tonnes of carbon dioxide annually in the United States, or 4 percent of the country's emissions, according to a 2019 report https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25259/negative-emissions-technologies-and-reliable-sequestration-a-research-agenda by the National Academy of Sciences.

Agriculture is therefore increasingly seen as a potential ally as companies and governments attempt to meet lower greenhouse gas emission targets and fight global warming.

Some farmers view the programs run by the giant agricultural corporations with suspicion - as a method to harvest their data that will be used to sell them more products, according to interviews with more than a dozen farmers, analysts and farm groups. Other critics question whether it is even possible for farmers to guarantee they are keeping carbon underground because simply turning the soil can undo efforts to store it.

Sequestering carbon, however, can provide a new revenue stream for farmers looking to diversify in a volatile industry. The farming techniques required by such programs offer the additional promise of realizing higher yields from healthier soils that are less reliant on chemicals.

Hoping to be rewarded for reducing tillage and planting a cover crop on his central Illinois farm, Matt Tracy enrolled 548 acres in Cargill's RegenConnect program, choosing it over a similar one offered by Bayer due to its short, single-season contract term.

He remains happy with his decision even after Bayer, whose program requires a 10-year commitment, began offering sign-up bonuses of up to $1,000.

"I didn't want to be tied up for too many years in a contract … I want to see how it goes before I jump in whole-hog," he said. "I think these programs could become more and more popular and we're going to get paid more than we are now."

Agriculture companies can measure success through the number of acres farmers devote to their programs and commitments from other corporations to eventually buy the credits generated, said Alejandro Plastina, associate professor in economics at Iowa State University. Most of the corporate commitments are vague, however, and the acres in pilot projects remain small, he said.

For little cost, agriculture companies get to showcase their social responsibility, while securing farmers' loyalty to their digital platforms that can turn into greater farm supply sales down the road, Plastina said.

"It gives (ag companies) the opportunity to associate their brands with caring for the world," Plastina said. "I don't expect them to make money on these projects anytime soon."

Bayer is an early leader with around 1.5 million acres enrolled in sustainable agriculture programs globally, mostly in the United States.

Bayer's program is unique in that it compensates growers for planting cover crops and reducing tillage, rather than paying them for how many tonnes of verified carbon they sequester.

"The idea was to get something that farmers feel comfortable with and certain of so they can have a line of sight in terms of how much money they can make," said Leo Bastos, head of Bayer's carbon business.

Nutrien's program has secured 200,000 acres in the United States and Canada this year. Nutrien expects to make a profit from the start, because enrolment involves selling farmers high-margin products like crop treatments composed of insect-killing bacteria or controlled-release fertilizer, said Mark Thompson, the company's Chief Strategy and Sustainability officer.

Such products also generate higher yields for farmers, Thompson said.

Cargill aims to reduce its supply-chain emissions 30 percent by 2030 in part by enrolling 10 million acres in small-scale regenerative agriculture programs.

Corteva's partnership with farm technology and services provider Indigo Ag rewards farmers for better crop nutrient management, which could encourage purchases of products such as nitrogen stabilizers, which make more efficient use of fertilizer.

"Corteva sees that as a way to deepen their relationship" with farmers, said Chris Harbourt, Indigo's global head of carbon.

Norway-based Yara is running a pilot program on 50,000 U.S. acres and plans to have 1 million U.S. acres under contract by year-end.

Brazil and India, where farmers harvest multiple crops each year, could generate larger volumes of sequestered carbon than the United States under Yara's program in as little as three years, said Alex Bell, chief executive of the program, called Agoro Carbon Alliance.

Agoro has an edge over some competitors because it is signing farmers to longer contracts, ten years, that should yield higher prices for their carbon, Bell said.

"It's a tough thing to ask of farmers, but that's what (credit) buyers actually value," Bell said. With the average U.S. farmer nearing retirement age, some are reluctant to lock in long-term, he said.

Yara is launching its program at a loss and may break even within three years, Bell said.

Farmers, however, give the programs mixed reviews.

"I smell complete bullshit - it's a terrible idea," said Manitoba farmer Gunter Jochum, president of the Western Canadian Wheat Growers Association. In return for small payments to farmers, ag companies gain access to valuable data, he said.

The programs' principle is "essentially unworkable," because carbon sequestration is not permanent, especially in a warming climate, Canada's National Farmers Union said in a submission to the Canadian government.

But North Dakota farmer Justin Topp decided to give carbon farming a try. He committed 12,000 acres, or 80 percent of his land to Nutrien's program, choosing it over four others.

"Everybody's talking about it. I'm curious about what shakes out."
New Brunswick

A sampling of highest and lowest-paid workers on N.B. picket lines

CUPE workers are barely scraping by or they're raking in 

 the dough, depending on your perspective

CUPE pickets try to attract public's attention on Friday, the first day of a strike by thousands of public employees in New Brunswick. (Roger Cosman/CBC)

Wages are a central issue in the contract dispute between the Higgs government and 10 locals of the Canadian Union of Public Employees whose members went on strike Friday.

And depending on who you talk to, they wages are either very low, or very high.

Some of the workers represented are "the lowest-paid of the lowest-paid in Canada," according to Steve Drost, CUPE New Brunswick president.

Some are working two jobs to make ends meet, he said, and have only $20 left for two weeks of groceries after paying their bills.

Two per cent raises a year would only amount to an additional $2.50/hour over the span of the contract for some, Drost said.

CUPE is looking for pay increases of three per cent a year over four years.

On the other hand, said Premier Blaine Higgs, some of the workers on strike are making 30 to 40 per cent more than their counterparts in the private sector.

Higgs said his government's offer of a total increase of 8.5 per cent over five years is reasonable and was recently accepted by three other bargaining units. Those who settled include medical specialists, professional support workers in schools and Crown prosecutors.

Combined with benefits, vacation and sick days, he said, it's "very fair."

Here's a closer look at a few of the highest and lowest-paying jobs at issue — and how they stack up to what's paid across the country.

Lowest

Laundry workers in Local 1251 (not hospitals) — $16.99 to $18.29/hour

Across Canada, in the private and public sectors, average wages for this job class are $12.50 to $21.00 an hour, according to the federal government's Job Bank. 

A current posting for a government laundry job in British Columbia has wages of $19.68 to $21.35/hour. 

A posting for a position at a private resort in P.E.I. is offering $13.00 an hour for 30 to 40 hours a week.

CUPE pickets out on the sidewalk in Fredericton on Friday. (Edwin Hunter/CBC)

Labourers from Local 1190 — $17.54 an hour

Average wages for construction labourers across Canada in the public and private sectors are $15 to $34/hour, according to the Job Bank. 

In Nova Scotia, government labourer wages as of March 31 were $20.68 to $21.90 an hour. Their government work week is 37.5 hours, compared to New Brunswick's 36.25 hours.

Current postings for jobs in the private sector in New Brunswick are offering $12 to $20 an hour.

Custodians in Local 1251 (those working in jails and other places, but not schools or hospitals) —  $17.96 to 19.52 an hour.

Average wages for this job class, public and private, across Canada are $13 to $27 an hour.

In Nova Scotia, janitors get $1,367.46 to $1,395.03 biweekly, or $18.23 to 18.60 an hour. 

Highest 

Clinical psychologists — $31 to $40 an hour. 

The Job Bank lists no rates lower than that in other provinces. 

The national average is $20 to $60 an hour.

Recent postings for government positions in Nova Scotia and P.E.I. advertised rates of $46.65 to $59.71 an hour.

Social workers —  $24-$41 an hour. 

The national average range is $21 to 45 an hour.

Nova Scotia social workers are paid $1,805.02 to $3,288.59 biweekly, or $24.07 to $43.85 an hour.

Job postings in Saskatchewan are advertising $31.86 to $44.65 an hour. 

A health authority in Newfoundland and Labrador is offering $35.40 to $39.61 an hour

WorkSafeNB adjudicators and investigators — $29.94 to $35.70

Adjudicators for workers' compensation in Nova Scotia get $2,385.81 biweekly, or $31.81 an hour.

At WorkplaceNL In Newfoundland and Labrador, investigators are paid $56,564 to 62,405 a year. Their work week is 35 hours long. 

Intake adjudicators are paid $63,767 to $70,351 a year. Extended services adjudicators are paid $52,571 to $58,000.

With files from Information Morning Moncton and Fredericton