Tuesday, December 14, 2021

Star-gobbling burp from our Milky Way's black hole is detected by astronomers

By Ashley Strickland, CNN 

There is a slumbering giant at the heart of our galaxy and occasionally, it wakes up and has an outburst.
© NASA, ESA, Gerald Cecil (UNC-Chapel Hill), Joseph DePasquale (STScI) This composite of view shows X-rays and warm, energetic gas near the center of the Milky Way galaxy. Glowing hydrogen gas is revealed in orange and streams show where a jet from the central black hole pushed through.

Astronomers have found evidence of this activity from the supermassive black hole at the heart of the Milky Way.

The black hole, which is 4 million times the mass of our sun, has the remains of a blowtorch-like jet of material from an outburst that occurred several thousand years ago.
Advertisement

As black holes use their gravitational pull to tug material inward, interstellar gas and dust swirls into something called an accretion disk around the black hole. This swiftly rotating material heats up and blasts away from the black hole in jets that flare out across space at nearly the speed of light, accompanied by radiation.

Although our galaxy's black hole is often quiet, occasionally it releases activity, like cosmic burps and hiccups, as it gobbles up stars and gas clouds.

Astronomers used data from multiple telescopes to piece together this astronomical blast from the past to find that the jet's expelled material is still making its mark. A study detailing the findings published last week in the Astrophysical Journal.

In 2013, researchers detected X-rays and radio waves, using NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory in space and the Jansky Very Large Array telescope in New Mexico, that suggested a jet was penetrating gas near the black hole.

This caused Gerald Cecil, a professor in the physics and astronomy department at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, to question if there may be another jet radiating from the black hole in another direction.

Data taken from ground and space-based telescopes, including the Hubble Space Telescope, across multiple wavelengths of light essentially allowed Cecil to see an otherwise invisible and glowing hot bubble of gas that lined up about 35 light-years away from the black hole, as well as an expanding knot of gas that is only 15 light-years away.

When the jets strike gas clouds in the galaxy, the clouds react to the heat by expanding. Material within the gas clouds cause the jet to bend and split off into streams.

"The streams percolate out of the Milky Way's dense gas disk," said Alex Wagner, study coauthor and assistant professor at Tsukuba University in Japan, in a statement. "The jet diverges from a pencil beam into tendrils, like that of an octopus."

These streams led to a chain of expanding gas bubbles that extend for at least 500 light-years, a daisy chain that allowed the researchers to reconstruct past events.

"Like in archeology, you dig and dig to find older and older artifacts until you come upon remnants of a grand civilization," Cecil said.

When Wagner and Cecil ran computer models of the jets within the Milky Way, they were able to reproduce the data from the telescopes.

The black hole at the center of our galaxy is "currently powered down," Cecil said. But if it becomes active again, the jet will likely fire up again, too, and astronomers could observe how far the jet may reach, he said.


We May Finally Know The Cause of 'The Cow', a Freakishly Exciting Space Explosion

The cause of a mysterious cosmic kaboom – so bright it led to the classification of a new type of space explosion – may have now been revealed.
© SDSS The location of AT2018cow, in a galaxy called CGCG 137-068.

According to an analysis of the 2018 event, nicknamed "the Cow" (AT2018cow), it was likely an unusual kind of core-collapse supernova that led to the formation of a compact cosmic object, either a neutron star or a small black hole.

"We have likely discovered the birth of a compact object in a supernova," says astronomer Dheeraj Pasham of MIT's Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research.

"This happens in normal supernovae, but we haven't seen it before because it's such a messy process. We think this new evidence opens possibilities for finding baby black holes or baby neutron stars."

The Cow was detected on 16 June 2018, and was immediately fascinating. It was incredibly brief, and incredibly bright, around 100 times brighter than a typical supernova. That's so bright that the Cow was initially thought to be coming from within the Milky Way. Astronomers were stunned when they figured out it actually emanated from a galaxy 200 million light-years away.

Since the Cow, more explosions with a similar profile have been identified. They have been named Fast Blue Optical Transients, of FBOTs, and astronomers have been keen to get to the bottom of what causes them.

One potential option was a tidal disruption flare from a black hole consuming another dense object, such as a white dwarf; or from an intermediate-mass black hole greater than 850 times the mass of the Sun stripping material from a passing star.

Another option was a type of core-collapse supernova, in which a stellar core, no longer supported by the outward pressure of fusion, collapses under its own gravity into an ultra-dense object.

One way to determine which of these scenarios was the most likely was to take a closer look at the X-ray data, so this is what Pasham and his team did.

"This signal was close and also bright in X-rays, which is what got my attention," Pasham says. "To me, the first thing that comes to mind is, some really energetic phenomenon is going on to generate X-rays. So, I wanted to test out the idea that there is a black hole or compact object at the core of the Cow."

The data they analyzed was from NASA's X-ray telescope Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER), which is attached to the International Space Station. After the detection of the Cow, NICER observed the object for about 60 days to collect X-ray data on its post-nova behavior.

In those data, the researchers found that something within the Cow was pulsing in soft X-rays, letting out a burst every 4.4 milliseconds, for the entire duration of the 60-day observing period. This periodicity sets pretty stringent constraints on the physical mechanism producing the X-rays; whatever it is can be no larger than 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) across.

"The only thing that can be that small is a compact object – either a neutron star or black hole," Pasham says.

The strength of the signal also places constraints on the object's mass. It can be no greater than 800 times the mass of the Sun, which rules out tidal disruption of an intermediate-mass black hole. This also suggests a core-collapse.

The periodic pulsations could be produced by different mechanisms, depending on what the compact object is. If it's a neutron star, 4.4 milliseconds could be its spin rate. If it's a black hole, the emission could be produced by fallback – material blasted out during the supernova falling back into the newborn black hole, generating X-ray emissions.



There are still some unanswered questions that remain with either model, however. For a neutron star, the narrowness of the frequency range of the emissions is difficult to explain. For a black hole, characteristics such as the X-ray brightness and stability are difficult to explain.

Future studies of the Cow and other FBOTs could help to resolve these outstanding problems.

And they could also help us better understand some of the most extreme objects in the Universe.

"Whenever there's a new phenomenon, there's excitement that it could tell something new about the Universe," Pasham notes.

"For FBOTs, we have shown we can study their pulsations in detail, in a way that's not possible in the optical. So, this is a new way to understand these newborn compact objects."

The research has been published in Nature Astronomy.
UCP EDUCATION; BACK TO THE FIFTIES
Alberta to rewrite its heavily criticized draft social studies curriculum, tweak others
Ashley Joannou 
©
 Provided by Edmonton Journal 
Education Minister Adriana LaGrange in Edmonton on Friday, May 28, 2021.
HER EDUCATION CREDENTIALS; SHE TEACHES SUNDAY SCHOOL

The Alberta government has killed its controversial K-6 draft curriculum in social studies and will be updating plans for a handful of other subjects that were originally slated to be implemented next fall.

Fine arts, French first language and literature, French immersion language arts and literature and science as well as social studies are being put on hold until new drafts can be released in spring 2022, Education Minister Adriana LaGrange announced Monday.

The majority of school boards had refused to pilot the curriculum, which was lambasted by experts for being regressive, not age appropriate, and lacking in diversity.

Updates to math, physical education and English language arts and literature are being implemented as planned this September with some small changes.

“Until now, we have planned to implement all subjects next fall, September of 2022, but we have heard loud and clear from teachers that this was simply not possible due to the workload and resource constraints,” LaGrange said.

“Instead, we will phase in curriculum implementation by staggering subjects starting this fall with three key subjects … Focusing on these subjects will benefit students by targeting foundational reading, writing and numeracy skills that may have been affected due to the learning disruptions caused by the pandemic.”

It’s unclear when the rewritten drafts could see the inside of classrooms. A new implementation advisory group is coming in early 2022 to both make recommendations on how to implement the subjects coming to classrooms in September and provide advice on future implementation in other subject areas.

The government’s plans to revamp the K-6 curriculum across the province received heavy criticism since details were released earlier this year.

Education experts denounced some of the content calling it regressive, faulty, negligent, and plagiarized . The Edmonton Public School Board called for a rewrite and the Métis Nation of Alberta and the Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations rejected it .

In the end only about 360 teachers agreed to pilot parts of the curriculum with about 7,800 students across the province.

Critics said Monday that they were pleased things weren’t going ahead as originally scheduled but that more work needs to be done.

Alberta Teachers’ Association president Jason Schilling called the decision an “important victory” that wouldn’t have been possible without tireless advocacy.

“This is a step in the right direction towards fixing a disastrous draft curriculum. But there’s still significant issues with the proposed content for language arts, math, phys-ed, and wellness program,” he said, pointing to concerns over outdated texts used in English lessons, not enough focus on digital literacy, and not enough variety in teaching methods for math.

In a statement, Edmonton Public School Board chairwoman Trisha Estabrooks also called Monday’s announcement a step in the right direction.

“We remain concerned about rolling out a new math, English language arts, and physical education and wellness curriculum in September that still requires changes and hasn’t had significant field testing for all kindergarten to Grade 6 students,” she said.

NDP education critic Sarah Hoffman said Monday that the government should admit it was wrong and shelve the entire curriculum.

Social studies ‘blueprint’ released

The most significant changes are coming to the province’s proposed social studies curriculum.

A “blueprint” laying out the basics the new social studies curriculum will be built off of was released Monday.

After criticism that subjects were not being taught in an age appropriate order, LaGrange said that the new blueprint pushes some content to later grades to make sure students are ready.

“It will help us draft K-6 social studies content through the lens of developmental and age appropriateness. It also addresses concerns that have been raised regarding diversity, inclusivity and bias language,” she said.

For example, according to the blueprint, lessons on ancient civilizations and world religions are being moved from Grade 2 to Grade 5.

Lessons on residential schools are listed in the Grade 4 blueprint despite calls from the national Truth and Reconciliation Commission to have age-appropriate lessons for students as young as kindergarten

LaGrange said the lessons were moved from Grade 5 to Grade 4 and that further revisions are possible.

“That doesn’t negate the fact that there will be content learning on First Nations, Metis and Inuit right from kindergarten onwards. We’re very committed to that,” she said.

Proposed changes coming to other parts of the curriculum include adding dinosaurs to science lessons, and more lessons around climate change. Financial literacy is being shifted to physical education from social studies

Government officials say changes to the timeline mean the new curriculum for Grades 7-12, which was supposed to become mandatory in 2023, has also been pushed back. Officials said work on K-6 needs to be completed first.

– With files from Lauren Boothby

ajoannou@postmedia.com
Elon Musk rips the political class again, saying 'government is inherently not a good steward of capital' even though his companies thrived from government subsidies

asheffey@businessinsider.com (Ayelet Sheffey) 

© Provided by Business Insider Elon Musk. Pool

Elon Musk, the world's richest person, was named TIME's 2021 person of the year.

He said in an interview he does not think the government should be involved in people's assets.

But government subsidies allowed him to grow his wealth through electric vehicles and solar power.

Elon Musk — the world's richest person and TIME's 2021 person of the year — is biting the hand that feeds him.


With a net worth of $297 billion, Musk is a vocal opponent of increased taxes on the rich, including government involvement in all of his financial assets. He responded to Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden's "billionaire's tax" proposal — a tax on wealthy people's assets — with a vulgar response to Wdyen's appearance on Twitter. He's remained firm in his stance that the government should stay out of his wealth.

"They're basically saying they want control of the assets," Musk said in a recent interview with TIME. "This does not result in, actually, the good of the people. You want those who are managing capital to be good stewards of capital. And I think the government is inherently not a good steward of capital."

However, government subsidies are largely to thank for the mountains of money Musk holds today. As the founder of electric vehicle company Tesla, the Wall Street Journal reported that Musk received a $465 million loan from the Energy Department in 2010 that was paid back in 2013. The government's $7,500 tax credit has also made purchasing Tesla vehicles cheaper for consumers, although that credit phased out for the company last year.

Musk's space program has gotten a boost, as well. NASA selected SpaceX — Musk's aerospace company — in April to work toward landing "commercial" humans on the moon with a contract award value of $2.89 billion.

Despite the early government support Tesla received, Musk has still spoken out against government subsidies, writing in a recent tweet that it "has always been Tesla's view that all subsidies should be eliminated."

President Joe Biden's infrastructure bill recently signed into law included $7.5 billion for electric vehicle charging infrastructure — something Musk also opposed during a Wall Street Journal summit.

"Do we need support for gas stations? We don't," Musk said. "There's no need for support for a charging network. I would delete it. Delete."

Despite his resistance to government involvement, it has helped Musk grow his fortune, and his stance remains unchanged even as progressive lawmakers continue to slam his wealth and demand he pay his fair share in taxes. Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who spearheaded a tax on the ultrawealthy, wrote on Twitter that when someone like Musk "makes it big," they should be held accountable for paying all their taxes.


And in response to a tweet last month from Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders demanding the wealthy pay what they owe in taxes, Musk responded: "I keep forgetting that you're still alive."

‘Is this a joke?’: Elon Musk named Time magazine’s Person of the Year

"It’s *TIME* for Elon Musk to pay his fair share in taxes," tweeted Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal.

 by Joe Mellor
2021-12-14 
in MediaNews


Time magazine has named Tesla CEO Elon Musk as its Person of the Year for 2021, while also calling him a “clown, genius, edgelord, visionary, industrialist and showman”.

Mr Musk, who is also the founder and CEO space exploration company SpaceX, recently passed Amazon founder Jeff Bezos as the world’s wealthiest person as the rising price of Tesla pushed his net worth to around $300 billion.

He joins Donald Trump (2016),Adolf Hitler (1938) and Joseph Stalin (1939) among the more controversial inclusions to make the front cover.

“For good or for ill”

Time cited the breadth of Mr Musk’s endeavours, from his founding of SpaceX in 2002, to his hand in the creation of the alternative energy company SolarCity in addition to Tesla, the most valuable car company in the world.

The magazine emphasises that its annual acknowledgement is not an award, but rather, “recognition of the person who had the most influence on the events of the year, for good or for ill”.

The magazine also noted the sway Mr Musk holds over an army of loyal followers (and investors) on social media, where he skewers the powerful and also regulators attempting to keep in check an executive that is far from traditional.

Before his 66 million followers on Twitter, he offers outlandish assistance to the world and drives even his own followers and investors mad by roiling markets.

SpaceX


Though it only became profitable in recent years, Tesla is far and away the world’s most valuable car company, at one point this year crossing the one trillion dollars market capitalisation threshold.

Detroit heavyweights Ford and General Motors are worth less than 200 billion dollars combined.

Mr Musk said last month that SpaceX will attempt to launch its futuristic, bullet-shaped Starship to orbit in January.

Nasa has contracted with SpaceX to use Starship for delivering astronauts to the lunar surface as early as 2025. Mr Musk said he plans to use the reusable ships to eventually land people on Mars.

Time highlighted Mr Musk’s recent admission to his Twitter followers that half his tweets were “made on a porcelain throne”.

In its profile of the provocative CEO, Time went on to chronicle one of those toilet tweet storms in detail before concluding: “This is the man who aspires to save our planet and get us a new one to inhabit.”

Musk was a fan of course.

But a lot of people didn’t seem as chuffed as Musk was…

Reactions

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Related: ‘Gross’ Elon Musk criticised for ‘inhumane’ Bernie Sanders tweets




Tesla hit with second sexual harassment lawsuit in a month, worker alleges her manager massaged her and said he 'is big down there'

Grace Kay
Sat, December 11, 2021

Associated Press


A worker filed a lawsuit alleging sexual harassment and retaliation at Tesla's Fremont factory.


It's the second lawsuit alleging sexual harassment against the company from a female worker in less than 30 days.


Tesla and Elon Musk did not respond to a request for comment about the lawsuit.


A Tesla employee filed a lawsuit on Wednesday accusing the electric-carmaker of retaliation and failing to prevent "a pattern of continuous and pervasive" sexual harassment at its Fremont factory.

Erica Cloud, who has worked as an assembly line worker at the Tesla factory, filed a lawsuit in California's Alameda County Superior Court. The lawsuit accuses Tesla and other defendants, including Cloud's former manager, of allowing the worker to be continually subjected to harassment and unwanted advances.

Tesla, the manager cited in the lawsuit, and CEO Elon Musk did not respond to a request for comment from Insider.

Cloud's lawsuit stated that she faced "sexual harassment on a near-daily basis" from her former manager. The lawsuit said the manager would "get on his knees and propose marriage," as well as "hug and massage" her, and that she rejected the advances on multiple occasions. In the spring of 2020, the manager told Cloud "on several occasions that she is 'blackenese' and he 'is big down there,' referring to his penis," according to the suit. The manager's actions were highly aggressive and caused her to "fear for her safety," the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit said that it took two to three months for Tesla's Human Resources department to address Cloud's complaints, after she reported the manager to the team. After Cloud stopped working with the manager, she said she was subjected to "a hostile work environment" as a result of reporting the alleged harassment. The lawsuit said that Cloud was sent home early or asked not to work on several occasions for "arbitrary reasons" and lost wages, bonuses, and benefits as a result.

Cloud and her lawyers say Tesla broke the law, specifically the Fair Employment and Housing Act, by failing to prevent the alleged sexual harassment and retaliating against Cloud after she reported the allegations. Attorneys are seeking compensation and damages, declaratory and injunctive relief, and attorneys' fees.

Cloud's case comes a few weeks after another worker alleged sexual harassment at the factory. In November, Jessica Barraza filed a lawsuit against Tesla that said the company operates like a "frat house." At the time, The Washington Post reported that three current and former Tesla workers at the Fremont factory said they had also witnessed or experienced sexual harassment at the site.

The month before, a court ordered Tesla to pay nearly $137 million after a federal court found an employee at the Fremont plant had been subjected to racial harassment. Tesla is in the process of challenging the verdict.

Read the original article on Business Insider
NDP MP launches bill to lower voting age to 16

Aaron Wherry 
'
© Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press 
NDP MP Taylor Bachrach takes part in a press conference with NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh following a caucus meeting in Ottawa on Wednesday Oct. 30, 2019.

Following in the wake of a recently launched legal challenge to Canada's federal voting age, NDP MP Taylor Bachrach has tabled a private member's bill in the House of Commons that would extend the franchise to 16-year-olds.

"I've been inspired by the young people that are taking the government to court on this topic," the B.C. MP told CBC News. "[And] over the course of my political career I've been inspired by all of the young people I've had a chance to engage with …

"There are so many intelligent, motivated, caring young people out there. I can't help but feel that their voice deserves to be heard."

The legal challenge — supported by lawyers from Justice for Children and Youth and the David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights at the University of Toronto — is asking the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to rule that the current minimum voting age of 18 is an unjustifiable breach of Section 3 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which states that "every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons or of a legislative assembly."


Bachrach's bill mirrors one in the Senate sponsored by Sen. Marilou McPhedran. NDP MP Don Davies has also tabled several private member's bills to lower the voting age going back to 2011, but none of those bills was brought forward for debate.


In 2005, Liberal MP Mark Holland — now the government House leader — brought forward a bill to lower the voting age to 16, but it was defeated at second reading.


Bachrach drew the 29th spot in this month's lottery to determine when backbench MPs could bring forward private member's bills or motions. That means his bill to lower the voting age could come up for debate sometime next year.

"My sense is that every time in our country's history that we've expanded the franchise, there's been an engaged public debate and I expect the same will be on this issue," Bachrach said.

"But it's an important one and I believe there are compelling reasons to give young people a seat at the table, particularly at a time when our country is facing such consequential issues. The decisions that the federal government is making and will be making over the coming years are some of the most important one's in our country's history. And on no issue is that more true than climate change, the impacts of which today's young people are going to inherit."
Only 8.5 million of the two billion trees promised by PM have been planted so far

OTTAWA — The federal government has planted less than half a per cent of the two billion trees it pledged to put in the ground across Canada by 2030, The Canadian Press has learned.
 
© Provided by The Canadian Press

Figures obtained through an access to information request show 8.5 million trees had been planted as of mid-November, representing just over 0.4 per cent of what the Liberals have repeatedly promised.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made the pledge during the 2019 election campaign, and the goal was repeated during the government's 2020 throne speech setting out policy objectives.

It asserts the two billion trees would help Canada meet its climate-change targets while creating roughly 4,300 new jobs.

Despite the sluggish start to the tree-planting effort, the Natural Resources Department said the program isn't falling behind.

"There will be about 30 million trees planted by the end of this year. Tree planting as part of this program will continue to ramp up," said Joanna Sivasankaran of Natural Resources Canada.

Partners have pledged to grow those 30 million trees, according to the department, which has not yet received or validated all the figures.

Green MP Mike Morrice said the disclosure that only 8.5 million trees have so far been planted was "incredibly disappointing” but “not a complete surprise."

“We’ve seen a pattern from this government of making grandiose promises around elections, but not following through, this being the most recent example," Morrice said. "Planting trees is one of the cheapest forms of climate action, while regenerating forests can also reduce erosion.”

The government said it's planning a big tree-planting push by the end of December, with a call to register new partners to plant an extra 250 to 350 million trees annually.

It blamed the slow start on sourcing seedlings, which can take between two and three years to grow. Tree planting is a seasonal activity that cannot take place all year round.

In its reply to the access to information request, Natural Resources said it had received 120 expressions of interest from organizations to plant trees in February 2021 and is “finalizing agreements to support the planting of over 30 million trees across the country, in both urban and rural areas."

According to government data, 7.6 million of the 8.5 million trees planted since the prime minister made his pledge were in British Columbia. In Ontario, 89,000 extra trees have been planted, with 60,400 in Saskatchewan, 238,000 in Alberta, almost 350,000 in Quebec and 235,000 in New Brunswick.

A wide variety of trees have been planted including millions of conifers, according to the government's data. In B.C., 2.8 million spruce and 3.9 million lodgepole pines have taken root. In Ontario, 18,500 oak trees, including white oak, have been planted alongside maple, hickory and black walnut trees.

Once planted, the young trees will be monitored annually to make sure they are surviving, until they are seven years old, Natural Resources Canada said.

Natural Resources said the figures obtained through the access to information request represent "the most recent compilation of 2021 planting data" up to mid-November. It said it would have final figures for trees planted this year by next spring and is expecting more to be added to the final tally from other planting sites.

The pledge to plant an extra two billion trees by 2030 means that an additional 200 million should be added every year, over and above the usual 500 million seedlings planted annually, including by the forestry industry.

The NDP's natural resources spokesman, Charlie Angus, said Trudeau has "no credibility" on tackling climate change.

"Justin Trudeau’s failure to keep his promise to plant trees is an example of the utter ridiculousness of making promises without delivering on the climate crisis," he said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 13, 2021.

Marie Woolf, The Canadian Press
U.S. Senate committee faults FAA oversight of Boeing

By David Shepardson
© Reuters/PAULO WHITAKER FILE PHOTO: 
The Boeing logo is pictured at the LABACE fair in Sao Paulo

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. Senate report released on Monday said the Federal Aviation Administration must do a better job overseeing Boeing Co and the certification of new airplanes, as well as review allegations raised by seven industry whistleblowers.

The 97-page Commerce Committee report from Senator Maria Cantwell includes concerns raised in the wake of two fatal Boeing 737 MAX crashes in a five-month period that prompted the plane's 20-month grounding. Congress also passed sweeping reforms in December 2020 to how the FAA certifies new airplanes that the agency is still implementing.

"FAA’s oversight of the certification process has eroded," the report found, saying the agency "over time, increasingly delegated away its authority" to Boeing and others.

The FAA, the report said, "should take immediate action to address undue pressure at the Boeing" safety oversight office, adding that it is "chronically understaffed."

Boeing said it is reviewing the report. "Boeing teammates are encouraged to speak up whenever they have safety or quality concerns," the planemaker said, adding that many issues in the report "have been previously publicized, and Boeing has worked to address them with oversight" by the FAA.

"FAA’s certification process suffers from undue pressure on line engineers and production staff," the report said. It said the FAA Boeing oversight office lacks enough safety engineers, and it must improve its safety culture.

Cantwell wrote FAA Administrator Steve Dickson asking him to review the "concerns raised by these whistleblowers, and implement necessary changes to improve safety in the aviation industry." She said she plans more hearings on aviation issues in 2022.

The FAA said Monday it "takes all whistleblower allegations seriously and does not tolerate retaliation against those who raise safety concerns."

Cantwell's report also cites whistleblowers who said GE Aviation’s GE9X engine program "suffered from undue pressure on production staff acting on behalf of the FAA." A GE spokesman said the company "thoroughly investigated these claims" and "found no undue influence."

Last month, three U.S. House Democrats asked Dickson to provide more details on the agency's oversight of the Boeing 737 MAX and questioned whether the manufacturer had been held fully accountable.

The Senate report said the 737 MAX crashes and U.S. grounding, lifted in late 2020, "cost Boeing more than $20 billion and inflicted significant reputational harm to the U.S. aviation safety oversight system."

Boeing agreed to a deferred prosecution agreement with the Justice Department in January, including $2.5 billion in fines and compensation stemming from the 737 MAX crashes.

Dickson said in November "Boeing is not the same as it was two years ago, but they have more to work to do."

Last month, the acting head of the FAA office that oversees Boeing told the company that appointees performing work for the agency did not have required expertise and some were not meeting FAA expectations.

He said the FAA was delegating fewer responsibilities to Boeing for aircraft certification and was "demanding more transparency" from manufacturers.

The FAA is currently scrutinizing a number of issues involving Boeing airplanes.

(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Dan Grebler)
Harvard Study Finds Lower Vehicle Emissions Cut Deaths by the Thousands, But More Work Ahead

Erin Brady 

In Harvard University's decade-long study of decreasing emissions' impact on public health, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that if vehicles continued to emit 2008's level of air pollution up until 2017, deaths would have been 2.4 times higher. Deaths attributed in some way to air pollution dropped from 2008's 27,700 to 19,800 in 2017, but thousands of more lives lives could have been saved over the decade if emissions had dipped even further.

 Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images 
Cars make their way down the aging 110 freeway toward downtown L.A. during the morning commute on April 22, 2021 in Los Angeles, California.

The study found that light-duty vehicles reducing emissions they create can be attributed to the lower death toll. Despite this encouraging sign, aging drivers and a steady increase in driving resulted in the potential benefits being diminished.

"Despite substantial progress in reducing emissions, you have this counteracting effect of population and larger vehicles," said the study's lead author Ernani Choma. "So it will be hard to achieve substantial progress if we don't enact more stringent policies."

This study could potentially be the clearest depiction yet of how carbon emissions affect public health. Air quality researcher Sumil Thakrar told the Associated Press that understanding the correlation between emissions and health is critical.

"Good environmental policy has drastically reduced transportation emissions over the past decade," said the University of Minnesota researcher. "But getting a good understanding of the benefits of those emissions controls is hard because it requires keeping track of a lot of other moving parts. And I think the authors do a remarkable job."

The study also looked at the climate benefits that resulted from curbing air pollution from vehicles, but found that those benefits only made up 3% to 19% of the overall economic gains.

That's because most approaches for reducing transportation emissions in the U.S. have been aimed at curbing air pollution, not climate change, said Susan Anenberg, associate professor of environmental and occupational and global health at George Washington University.

"Catalytic converters, diesel particulate filters, those are taking pollutants out of the (environment), but those aren't doing anything for (carbon dioxide)," she said.

That's one reason Choma and his colleagues recommend tougher policies to curb emissions. Another reason, he said, is that if the upward trends in population and vehicle size and use continue, the same policies that created the health benefits highlighted in the study won't be as effective in the future.

"If we look ahead to 2030 and nothing has changed, you're only going to see a modest drop" in deaths from vehicle emissions, he said. "So that's the case for more stringent policies."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Traffic travels along the Hollywood Freeway in Los Angeles on Dec. 12, 2018. According to a report published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on Monday, Dec. 13, 2021, researchers who study the environment and public health say that thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars have been saved in the United States by recent reductions in emissions from vehicles. 
AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes, File
Exclusive-HSBC says clients must have plan to exit coal by end-2023


By Lawrence White and Simon Jessop
Reuters/Reinhard Krause
The HSBC bank logo is seen at their offices in the Canary Wharf financial district in London

LONDON (Reuters) -HSBC, Europe's leading banker to corporate Asia, laid out its long-awaited policy on financing thermal coal on Tuesday, and said it expected all its clients to have a plan in place to exit the fossil fuel by the end of 2023.

Coal is contentious for governments across Asia as they look to move away from the cheap and widely used, but carbon-intensive energy source to help meet a global commitment to cut emissions in the fight against climate change.

Under its plan, HSBC will cut exposure to thermal coal financing by at least 25% by 2025 and 50% by 2030, although non-EU or non-OECD-based clients could be funded until a global phase-out by 2040, its sustainability chief told Reuters.

However, groups which had campaigned for HSBC to issue an explicit policy on thermal coal said the bank's plan did not go far enough and still lacked sufficient "urgency".

Building on an existing pledge not to finance new coal-fired power plants or thermal coal mines, HSBC said its policy would help phase out existing coal use in line with the science of climate change and be reviewed annually.

"We need to tackle some of the hard issues head on. Coal is one of the big issues. It contributes 25% of global greenhouse gas emissions," HSBC Group Chief Sustainability Officer Celine Herweijer said.

"It's not good enough to have a policy on no new coal. We need to turn our attention to the urgent phase-out of coal alongside the scientific timelines."

As one of Europe's largest banks and with exposure to the industry in emerging markets in Asia and elsewhere, HSBC has faced pressure from investors and activists to cut funding to those using coal, the dirtiest of fossil fuels.

Jeanne Martin, senior campaign manager at ShareAction, a group that aims to improve corporate action on environmental, social and governance issues, said the fact HSBC had introduced a coal phase-out policy was in itself a victory for shareholder engagement with banks on climate, but more was needed.

"Whilst an important step forward, the policy lacks the urgency and rigour required to avert the climate crisis," she said.

MAIN DRIVER OF GLOBAL WARMING


At the most-recent round of global climate talks https://www.reuters.com/article/climate-un-idCNL1N2S405F in Scotland last month, governments for the first time acknowledged that fossil fuels were the main driver of global warming, although coal-dependent countries, including India and China, would only agree to "phase down" coal-fired power.

While HSBC, in common with peers, had previously set out a high-level commitment to reach net zero carbon emissions across its customer base by 2050, activists had criticised the strength and detail of its policies.

That prompted some investors to back a planned shareholder vote on the issue at the company's annual meeting this year, although they withdrew the threat after the company pledged to release details on coal by the end of this year.

In a victory for campaigners, HSBC said its new policy would apply to all parts of its business, including its $621 billion asset management arm, and cover all aspects of financing, including refinancing and advisory services.

The bank said it would next year announce a science-based target for coal-fired power in line with capping global warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial averages, with progress on cutting thermal coal financing to be published annually.

The bank said it would withdraw services from any client that seeks to expand thermal coal production after Jan. 1, 2021, and would no longer finance clients in EU/OECD markets for which thermal coal makes up more than 40% of revenues, or 30% from 2025, unless the money is explicitly used for clean technology or infrastructure.

While peers including Standard Chartered and Natwest have set tougher targets, HSBC is more exposed to energy clients with a heavy reliance on coal and says it needs to work with them to help them shift to greener energy.

"What will make or break the world's ability to get to this 1.5 degree target is... (for) the energy transition in Asia to happen at the speed and scale it needs to happen, and we need to be at the heart of influencing that."

For clients outside the EU and OECD, HSBC said it would evaluate their transition plans before deciding whether to offer finance, acknowledging the infrastructure, policy and resource obstacles many face compared to developed market peers.

HSBC said it expects clients to publish their own transition plans, although campaigners, including ShareAction, have previously said such language would leave HSBC too much wiggle room.

The "spirit of the policy" would also cover intermediaries and the parent group of any client that falls outside the policy, and HSBC would ask for a commitment that no finance flowed to that entity, Herweijer said.

"We are not expecting every client to have a credible transition plan... in those cases, we will have to move away from those relationships," Herweijer said.

(Reporting by Lawrence White and Simon Jessop; editing by Barbara Lewis and Susan Fenton)
USA
One year of vaccines: Many lives saved, many needlessly lost


1 of 11
 Boxes containing the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine are prepared to be shipped at the Pfizer Global Supply Kalamazoo manufacturing plant in Portage, Mich., Dec. 13, 2020. The nation’s COVID-19 death toll stands at around 800,000 as the anniversary of the U.S. vaccine rollout arrives. A year ago it stood at 300,000. What might have been a time to celebrate a scientific achievement is fraught with discord and mourning.
 (AP Photo/Morry Gash, Pool, File)

One year ago, the biggest vaccination drive in American history began with a flush of excitement in an otherwise gloomy December. Trucks loaded with freezer-packed vials of a COVID-19 vaccine that had proved wildly successful in clinical trials fanned out across the land, bringing shots that many hoped would spell the end of the crisis.

That hasn’t happened. A year later, too many Americans remain unvaccinated and too many are dying.

The nation’s COVID-19 death toll stands at around 800,000 as the anniversary of the U.S. vaccine rollout arrives. A year ago it stood at 300,000. An untold number of lives, perhaps tens of thousands, have been saved by vaccination. But what might have been a time to celebrate a scientific achievement is fraught with discord and mourning.

National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins said scientists and health officials may have underestimated how the spread of misinformation could hobble the “astounding achievement” of the vaccines.

“Deaths continue ... most of them unvaccinated, most of the unvaccinated because somebody somewhere fed them information that was categorically wrong and dangerous,” Collins said.

Developed and rolled out at blistering speed, the vaccines have proved incredibly safe and highly effective at preventing deaths and hospitalizations. Unvaccinated people have a 14 times higher risk of dying compared to fully vaccinated people, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated based on available data from September.

Their effectiveness has held up for the most part, allowing schools to reopen, restaurants to welcome diners and families to gather for the holidays. At last count, 95% of Americans 65 and older had had at least one shot.

“In terms of scientific, public health and logistical achievements, this is in the same category as putting a man on the moon,” said Dr. David Dowdy, an infectious-disease epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

The vaccines’ first year has been rocky with the disappointment of breakthrough infections, the political strife over mandates and, now, worries about whether the mutant omicron will evade protection.

Despite all that, Dowdy said, “we’re going to look back and say the vaccines were a huge success story.”

On the very day that an eager nation began rolling up its sleeves, Dec. 14, 2020, the U.S. death toll from COVID-19 hit 300,000. And deaths were running at an average of more than 2,500 a day and rising fast, worse than what the country witnessed during the harrowing spring of 2020, when New York City was the epicenter of the U.S. outbreak.

By late February total U.S. deaths had crossed 500,000, but the daily death count was plummeting from the horrible heights of early January. With hopes rising in early March, some states began reopening, lifting mask mandates and limits on indoor dining. Former President Donald Trump assured his supporters during a Fox News interview that the vaccine was safe and urged them to get it.

But by June, with the threat from COVID-19 seemingly fading, demand for vaccines had slipped and states and companies had turned to incentives to try to restore interest in vaccination.

It was too little, too late. Delta, a highly contagious mutated form of coronavirus, had silently arrived and had begun to spread quickly, finding plenty of unvaccinated victims.

“You have to be almost perfect almost all the time to beat this virus,” said Andrew Noymer, a public health professor at the University of California, Irvine. “The vaccine alone is not causing the pandemic to crash back to Earth.”

One of the great missed opportunities of the COVID-19 pandemic is the shunning of vaccination by many Americans.

This fall, Rachel McKibbens, 45, lost her father and brother to COVID-19. Both had refused the protection of vaccination because they believed false conspiracy theories that the shots contained poison.

“What an embarrassment of a tragedy,” McKibbens said. “It didn’t have to be this way.”

More than 228,500 Americans have died from COVID-19 since April 19, the date when all U.S. adults were eligible to be vaccinated. That’s about 29% of the count since the first U.S. coronavirus deaths were recorded in February 2020, according to an Associated Press analysis.

In all, two states — Florida and Texas — contributed more than 52,000 deaths since that date. Alaska, Hawaii, Oregon, Wyoming and Idaho also saw outsize death tolls after mid-April.

Red states were more likely than blue states to have greater than average death tolls since then.

“I see the U.S. as being in camps,” Noymer said. “The vaccines have become a litmus test for trust in government.”

Wyoming and West Virginia, the states with the highest vote percentages for Donald Trump in 2016, have recorded about 50% of their total COVID-19 deaths since all adults were declared eligible for the vaccine in those states. In Oklahoma, nearly 60% of COVID-19 deaths occurred after all adults were vaccine-eligible.

There are exceptions: Notably, Hawaii and Oregon are the only Joe Biden-supporting states where more than half of the COVID-19 deaths came after shots were thrown open to all adults. North Dakota and South Dakota — both ardent Trump states — have kept their share of deaths after the vaccine became available across the board to under 25%.

California has seen more than 15,000 COVID-19 deaths since the state opened eligibility to all adults in mid-April. McKibbens’ father and brother died in Santa Ana, California, in their shared home.

McKibbens pieced together what happened from text messages on her brother’s phone. Some of the texts she read after his death, including back-and-forth messages with a cousin who cited TikTok as the source of bad advice.

“My brother did not seek medical attention for my dad,” keeping him lying on his back, even as his breathing began to sound like a broken-down motor, said McKibbens, who lives across the country in Rochester, New York.

Her father, Pete Camacho, died Oct. 22 at age 67. McKibbens flew to California to help with arrangements.

Her brother was sick, too, but “he refused to let me into the house because he said I shed coronavirus because I was vaccinated,” McKibbens recalled. “It was a strange new belief I had never heard before.”

A friend found her brother’s body after noticing food deliveries untouched on the porch. Peter Camacho, named for his father, died Nov. 8 at age 44.

“For me to have lost two-thirds of my family, it just levels you,” McKibbens said.

Important advice came too late for some. Seven months pregnant and unvaccinated, Tamara Alves Rodriguez tested positive for the coronavirus Aug. 9. Two days later, with many pregnant women falling seriously ill, U.S. health officials strengthened their guidance to urge all mothers-to-be to get vaccinated.

Rodriguez had tried to get vaccinated weeks earlier but was told at a pharmacy she needed authorization from her doctor. “She never returned,” said her sister, Tanya Alves of Weston, Florida.

Six days after testing positive, Rodriguez had to have a breathing tube inserted down her throat at a hospital near her home in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Her baby girl was delivered by emergency cesarean section Aug. 16.

The young mother never held her child. Rodriguez died Oct. 30 at age 24. She left behind her husband, two other children and an extended family.

“Her children ask for her constantly,” Alves said. “I literally feel like a piece of me has been ripped out of me and even those words aren’t enough to describe it.”

She urges others to get vaccinated: “If you would know the terror of being hospitalized or having a loved one there ... if people would know, they would be afraid of this instead of fearing the vaccine.”

___

AP data journalist Angeliki Kastanis and AP medical writer Lauran Neergaard contributed.

___

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education. The AP is solely responsible for all content.