Arabic calligraphy enscribed into UNESCO heritage list
A Pakistani artist works on a Koranic calligraphy project made with gold-plated letters at Arts Council of Pakistan, in port City of Karachi on September 6, 2021 (AFP/Rizwan TABASSUM)
Tue, December 14, 2021,
UNESCO on Tuesday added Arabic calligraphy, a key tradition in the Arab and Islamic worlds, to its Intangible Cultural Heritage list.
A total of 16 Muslim-majority countries, led by Saudi Arabia, presented the nomination to the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, which announced the listing on Twitter.
"Arabic calligraphy is the artistic practice of handwriting Arabic script in a fluid manner to convey harmony, grace and beauty," UNESCO said on its website.
"The fluidity of Arabic script offers infinite possibilities, even within a single word, as letters can be stretched and transformed in numerous ways to create different motifs."
Saudi Culture Minister Prince Badr bin Abdullah bin Farhan Al-Saud welcomed the decision and said it would "contribute to developing this cultural heritage", in a statement carried by the official Saudi Press Agency.
Abdelmajid Mahboub from the Saudi Heritage Preservation Society, which was involved in the proposal, said calligraphy "has always served as a symbol of the Arab-Muslim world".
But he lamented that "many people no longer write by hand due to technological advances", adding that the number of specialised Arab calligraphic artists had dropped sharply.
The UNESCO listing "will certainly have a positive impact" on preserving the tradition, he added.
According to the UNESCO website, intangible cultural heritage "is an important factor in maintaining cultural diversity in the face of growing globalisation".
Its importance "is not the cultural manifestation itself but rather the wealth of knowledge and skills that is transmitted through it from one generation to the next".
mah/tp/lg/hc
It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Tuesday, December 14, 2021
Congolese rumba, soundtrack of African history, added to UNESCO heritage list
Issued on: 14/12/2021 -
Text by: FRANCE 24
The smooth, groove music of Congolese rumba was added Tuesday to UNESCO’s intangible cultural heritage list, sparking delight in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Congo Brazzaville, where the genre has provided the soundtrack for festivities ranging from Independence Day celebrations to birthday parties.
A UNESCO summit on Tuesday approved the two countries' joint application to add rumba to its Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity list, where it joins Cuban rumba, the Central African Republic's polyphonic pygmy music and the drums of Burundi.
"The rumba is used for celebration and mourning, in private, public and religious spaces," said the UNESCO citation. It is an essential and representative part of the identity of Congolese people and their diaspora, the UN’s cultural and scientific agency added.
The addition to the UNESCO list was welcomed by the two countries situated on either side of the Congo River.
“It’s done. The rumba has been registered by UNESCO on its intangible cultural heritage of humanity list. An event to be celebrated on both banks of the Congo River,” tweeted DRC government spokesman Patrick Muyaya.
Issued on: 14/12/2021 -
© Pierre Verdy, AFP/File
Text by: FRANCE 24
The smooth, groove music of Congolese rumba was added Tuesday to UNESCO’s intangible cultural heritage list, sparking delight in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Congo Brazzaville, where the genre has provided the soundtrack for festivities ranging from Independence Day celebrations to birthday parties.
A UNESCO summit on Tuesday approved the two countries' joint application to add rumba to its Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity list, where it joins Cuban rumba, the Central African Republic's polyphonic pygmy music and the drums of Burundi.
"The rumba is used for celebration and mourning, in private, public and religious spaces," said the UNESCO citation. It is an essential and representative part of the identity of Congolese people and their diaspora, the UN’s cultural and scientific agency added.
The addition to the UNESCO list was welcomed by the two countries situated on either side of the Congo River.
“It’s done. The rumba has been registered by UNESCO on its intangible cultural heritage of humanity list. An event to be celebrated on both banks of the Congo River,” tweeted DRC government spokesman Patrick Muyaya.
Out of Africa to South America – and back
Specialists have located rumba's origins in the ancient central African kingdom of Kongo, where people practised a dance called "Nkumba" or “navel” in Kikongo.
Africans brought their music and culture across the Atlantic through the slave trade, eventually giving birth to jazz in North America and rumba in South America.
Traders then brought the music back to Africa through records and guitars in more recent times.
When the music of the slave colonies in Spanish Cuba arrived back in Africa on 78 rpm records, it was immediately recognised as rumba and led to a musical resurgence in the Congo basin area.
One of the best known rumba singles, “Indépendance Cha Cha”, was composed and performed in 1960 by Joseph Kabasele, better known by his stage name, Le Grand Kallé.
It was a smash hit across Africa and the postcolonial world, commemorating “The Year of Africa”, when 17 African nations finally gained independence.
The modern version of rumba lives on cities and bars in the DRC and Congo Brazzaville. Rumba draws on nostalgia, cultural exchange, resistance, resilience and the sharing of pleasure through its flamboyant "sape" dress code.
Of love and politics
Sung mainly in Lingala, rumba songs typically are about love – but political messages have also been a feature of the genre.
There have also been less glorious periods of the Congolese rumba, when the music was exploited as propaganda by those in power.
Rumba stars are occasionally controversial or mired in scandals.
A French court on Monday convicted high-profile DRC performer Koffi Olomide of holding four of his former dancers against their will during tours.
Specialists have located rumba's origins in the ancient central African kingdom of Kongo, where people practised a dance called "Nkumba" or “navel” in Kikongo.
Africans brought their music and culture across the Atlantic through the slave trade, eventually giving birth to jazz in North America and rumba in South America.
Traders then brought the music back to Africa through records and guitars in more recent times.
When the music of the slave colonies in Spanish Cuba arrived back in Africa on 78 rpm records, it was immediately recognised as rumba and led to a musical resurgence in the Congo basin area.
One of the best known rumba singles, “Indépendance Cha Cha”, was composed and performed in 1960 by Joseph Kabasele, better known by his stage name, Le Grand Kallé.
It was a smash hit across Africa and the postcolonial world, commemorating “The Year of Africa”, when 17 African nations finally gained independence.
The modern version of rumba lives on cities and bars in the DRC and Congo Brazzaville. Rumba draws on nostalgia, cultural exchange, resistance, resilience and the sharing of pleasure through its flamboyant "sape" dress code.
Of love and politics
Sung mainly in Lingala, rumba songs typically are about love – but political messages have also been a feature of the genre.
There have also been less glorious periods of the Congolese rumba, when the music was exploited as propaganda by those in power.
Rumba stars are occasionally controversial or mired in scandals.
A French court on Monday convicted high-profile DRC performer Koffi Olomide of holding four of his former dancers against their will during tours.
CANADA
Liberals offer up to $742 million to low income seniors whose GIS was clawed back this year
Peter Zimonjic
Peter Zimonjic
CBC
© Ben Nelms/CBC The federal government is offering one-time cash payments to seniors whose GIS payments were clawed back because they accepted pandemic benefits.
Pressed by its critics to help vulnerable seniors whose Guaranteed Income Supplement payments were cut after they accepted pandemic supports, the federal government is offering cash payments to blunt the effect of the clawback.
"We are committing today to provide Guaranteed Income Supplement or Allowance beneficiaries who also received the Canada Emergency Response Benefit [CERB] with a one-time payment to alleviate the financial hardship they may have faced as a result of an unintended interaction between the two benefits," Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland said in prepared remarks in the House of Commons.
The NDP and Bloc Québécois, along with anti-poverty advocates, have been pressuring the federal government for months to address the issue.
In its 2021 Economic and Fiscal Update, tabled in the House of Commons today, the government earmarks $742.4 million in 2022-23 for the 214,000 seniors aged 60 and over who were affected by the clawback.
GIS is a program meant to help low income seniors make ends meet. The payments are based on income. A single senior earning less than $19,248 qualifies for GIS, while the cutoff for couples can be as high as $46,128, depending on their pension situation. In 2021, the maximum monthly payment under the program was $948.82.
The CERB and the Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB) are both considered taxable income. A large number of seniors who took these benefits did so to supplement their GIS payments when they were no longer able to work part time to top up their income.
By taking pandemic benefits like the CERB — which provided $2,000 a month to claimants — many of these seniors skewed their income for the last fiscal year, which is used to calculate GIS payments.
Seniors told CBC last month that the way the CERB is structured forced them to claim the full monthly benefit, rather than taking only what they needed to replace part-time income.
'A perpetual struggle'
For many seniors, claiming a pandemic benefit pushed their income for the last fiscal year to a level high enough to trigger a cut to GIS this year. Some seniors saw this year's GIS eliminated completely, leaving them struggling to pay rent and bills.
Janet McLeod, who received about $300 a month through the GIS program, said she was told in July that because she had accepted several CERB payments, all her GIS payments for this year would be cancelled.
"I am in a perpetual struggle," she told CBC in November. "So to be cut back $300 a month is very difficult, paying rent and taking care of my other expenses, which are very modest."
In September, the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer told the NDP that taking the CERB and the CRB out of the equation used to calculate GIS — effectively offering a blanket CERB amnesty to low-income seniors — would cost the government $380 million this year and $58 million next year, and would affect about 90,000 seniors.
The Liberal government says it will provide almost twice that amount in relief payments and that the money will go to about 183,000 seniors aged 65 and older and another 21,000 seniors aged 60 to 64.
Relief for students
The Liberal government said that it also would "continue to investigate ways to limit potential benefit reductions for vulnerable seniors who received emergency and recovery benefits."
The federal government is also proposing to help some students who received the CERB even though they were not eligible, and may now find themselves facing "significant repayments."
The debt relief program for students in this situation is estimated to cost the government $69.7 million.
Students who improperly claimed the CERB instead of the Canada Emergency Student Benefit (CESB) will be allowed to offset their CERB debt by applying it against what they would have received in student benefits over the same time period.
Students who got the CESB received $1,250 for a four-week period, for a maximum of 16 weeks, between May 10 and August 29, 2020. Students with disabilities or dependants also got an extra $750 — for a total benefit of $2,000 — for each four-week period.
The relief program will help cut debt for students only by subtracting the amount they qualified for under the student benefit from what they received through CERB.
Pressed by its critics to help vulnerable seniors whose Guaranteed Income Supplement payments were cut after they accepted pandemic supports, the federal government is offering cash payments to blunt the effect of the clawback.
"We are committing today to provide Guaranteed Income Supplement or Allowance beneficiaries who also received the Canada Emergency Response Benefit [CERB] with a one-time payment to alleviate the financial hardship they may have faced as a result of an unintended interaction between the two benefits," Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland said in prepared remarks in the House of Commons.
The NDP and Bloc Québécois, along with anti-poverty advocates, have been pressuring the federal government for months to address the issue.
In its 2021 Economic and Fiscal Update, tabled in the House of Commons today, the government earmarks $742.4 million in 2022-23 for the 214,000 seniors aged 60 and over who were affected by the clawback.
GIS is a program meant to help low income seniors make ends meet. The payments are based on income. A single senior earning less than $19,248 qualifies for GIS, while the cutoff for couples can be as high as $46,128, depending on their pension situation. In 2021, the maximum monthly payment under the program was $948.82.
The CERB and the Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB) are both considered taxable income. A large number of seniors who took these benefits did so to supplement their GIS payments when they were no longer able to work part time to top up their income.
By taking pandemic benefits like the CERB — which provided $2,000 a month to claimants — many of these seniors skewed their income for the last fiscal year, which is used to calculate GIS payments.
Seniors told CBC last month that the way the CERB is structured forced them to claim the full monthly benefit, rather than taking only what they needed to replace part-time income.
'A perpetual struggle'
For many seniors, claiming a pandemic benefit pushed their income for the last fiscal year to a level high enough to trigger a cut to GIS this year. Some seniors saw this year's GIS eliminated completely, leaving them struggling to pay rent and bills.
Janet McLeod, who received about $300 a month through the GIS program, said she was told in July that because she had accepted several CERB payments, all her GIS payments for this year would be cancelled.
"I am in a perpetual struggle," she told CBC in November. "So to be cut back $300 a month is very difficult, paying rent and taking care of my other expenses, which are very modest."
In September, the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer told the NDP that taking the CERB and the CRB out of the equation used to calculate GIS — effectively offering a blanket CERB amnesty to low-income seniors — would cost the government $380 million this year and $58 million next year, and would affect about 90,000 seniors.
The Liberal government says it will provide almost twice that amount in relief payments and that the money will go to about 183,000 seniors aged 65 and older and another 21,000 seniors aged 60 to 64.
Relief for students
The Liberal government said that it also would "continue to investigate ways to limit potential benefit reductions for vulnerable seniors who received emergency and recovery benefits."
The federal government is also proposing to help some students who received the CERB even though they were not eligible, and may now find themselves facing "significant repayments."
The debt relief program for students in this situation is estimated to cost the government $69.7 million.
Students who improperly claimed the CERB instead of the Canada Emergency Student Benefit (CESB) will be allowed to offset their CERB debt by applying it against what they would have received in student benefits over the same time period.
Students who got the CESB received $1,250 for a four-week period, for a maximum of 16 weeks, between May 10 and August 29, 2020. Students with disabilities or dependants also got an extra $750 — for a total benefit of $2,000 — for each four-week period.
The relief program will help cut debt for students only by subtracting the amount they qualified for under the student benefit from what they received through CERB.
Rocket scientists and brain surgeons not necessarily smarter than public, study finds
EG. DR BEN CARSON GOP POTUS CANDIDATE
By Amy Woodyatt, CNN
Brain surgeons and rocket scientists are not necessarily smarter than the general public, researchers reported Monday, as they tried to settle the argument of whether the phrase "it's not brain surgery" or "it's not rocket science" is most deserved.
Brain surgeons and rocket scientists are not necessarily smarter than the general public, researchers reported Monday, as they tried to settle the argument of whether the phrase "it's not brain surgery" or "it's not rocket science" is most deserved.
© Morsa Images/Digital Vision/Getty Images Neurosurgeons were able to solve problems faster than the general population but showed a slower memory recall speed, researchers said.
Researchers sought to find out if one profession had intellectual superiority, and found they were pretty much equally matched.
There were also few differences when comparing aerospace engineers and neurosurgeons with the general population.
Online intelligence tests were administered to both neurosurgeons and aerospace engineers from the United Kingdom, Europe, the United States, and Canada. Responses from 329 aerospace engineers and 72 neurosurgeons were included in the final analysis.
The study, published in the BMJ Christmas issue, was professionally conducted and peer reviewed but this special issue of the British Medical Journal is generally dedicated to light-hearted studies.
"The main purpose of our study was to settle this debate once and for all and to provide rocket scientists and brain surgeons with evidence to support their self-assuredness in the company of the other party," Inga Usher of the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in London and colleagues wrote.
Researchers tested study participants, who had to have completed a degree in the relevant speciality, across several cognitive domains, including emotional discrimination and motor control.
They then assessed the cognitive characteristics of each specialty using the Great British Intelligence Test from the Cognitron platform, which is used to measure distinct aspects of human cognition, spanning planning and reasoning, working memory, attention, and emotion processing abilities.
Aerospace engineers and neurosurgeons were "equally matched across most domains," researchers found, but they differed in two areas. Whereas aerospace engineers showed better mental manipulation skills, neurosurgeons were better at semantic problem solving.
There were also few differences between the two professions and members of the public.
"Compared to the general population, aerospace engineers did not show significant differences in any domains," the study authors wrote.
"Neurosurgeons were able to solve problems faster than the general population but showed a slower memory recall speed."
The researchers suggested that people stop saying "it's not rocket science" as if that means something is especially difficult.
"In situations that do not require rapid problem solving, it might be more correct to use the phrase 'It's not brain surgery,'" they suggested.
"It is possible that both neurosurgeons and aerospace engineers are unnecessarily placed on a pedestal and that 'It's a walk in the park' or another phrase unrelated to careers might be more appropriate," they added.
The team also wanted to challenge public perception of the sectors, which are predicted to be understaffed in coming years, and could benefit from seeming to be less exclusive, researchers suggested.
"Other specialties might deserve to be on that pedestal, and future work should aim to determine the most deserving profession."
Researchers sought to find out if one profession had intellectual superiority, and found they were pretty much equally matched.
There were also few differences when comparing aerospace engineers and neurosurgeons with the general population.
Online intelligence tests were administered to both neurosurgeons and aerospace engineers from the United Kingdom, Europe, the United States, and Canada. Responses from 329 aerospace engineers and 72 neurosurgeons were included in the final analysis.
The study, published in the BMJ Christmas issue, was professionally conducted and peer reviewed but this special issue of the British Medical Journal is generally dedicated to light-hearted studies.
"The main purpose of our study was to settle this debate once and for all and to provide rocket scientists and brain surgeons with evidence to support their self-assuredness in the company of the other party," Inga Usher of the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in London and colleagues wrote.
Researchers tested study participants, who had to have completed a degree in the relevant speciality, across several cognitive domains, including emotional discrimination and motor control.
They then assessed the cognitive characteristics of each specialty using the Great British Intelligence Test from the Cognitron platform, which is used to measure distinct aspects of human cognition, spanning planning and reasoning, working memory, attention, and emotion processing abilities.
Aerospace engineers and neurosurgeons were "equally matched across most domains," researchers found, but they differed in two areas. Whereas aerospace engineers showed better mental manipulation skills, neurosurgeons were better at semantic problem solving.
There were also few differences between the two professions and members of the public.
"Compared to the general population, aerospace engineers did not show significant differences in any domains," the study authors wrote.
"Neurosurgeons were able to solve problems faster than the general population but showed a slower memory recall speed."
The researchers suggested that people stop saying "it's not rocket science" as if that means something is especially difficult.
"In situations that do not require rapid problem solving, it might be more correct to use the phrase 'It's not brain surgery,'" they suggested.
"It is possible that both neurosurgeons and aerospace engineers are unnecessarily placed on a pedestal and that 'It's a walk in the park' or another phrase unrelated to careers might be more appropriate," they added.
The team also wanted to challenge public perception of the sectors, which are predicted to be understaffed in coming years, and could benefit from seeming to be less exclusive, researchers suggested.
"Other specialties might deserve to be on that pedestal, and future work should aim to determine the most deserving profession."
Baboons can reproduce social conventions to problem solve: study
It took the baboons about three days to establish a system for choosing the same image
It took the baboons about three days to establish a system for choosing the same image
(AFP/Odd ANDERSEN)
Tue, December 14, 2021
French researchers have observed non-human primates developing social conventions to work together to obtain a reward, in an experiment set up with a group of baboons.
About twenty baboons raised at a primatology centre were given the task in pairs of making the same choice when each presented with a set of two images on touch screens.
If both animals made the same choice, they were rewarded with a treat.
It took the baboons about three days to establish a system for choosing the same image, even when they could not see their partners' choices, says the report, published Monday in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.
While previous research had shown that primates were capable of social conventions like grooming, this is the first to show a new behaviour appearing spontaneously in a group, without human intervention.
The experiment was conducted by French national research institute CNRS and Aix-Marseille University.
Over the course of tens of thousands of tests the baboons developed a hierarchy for the images presented, the researchers noted.
At first the baboons could see what was happening on other animals' screens, but in the second phase of the experiment that visual cue was taken away.
"The group's performance didn't budge," the study's main author, cognitive psychology researcher Anthony Formaux told AFP.
"It surprised us when they continued to choose the same image without being able to imitate each other."
Researchers ruled out the possibility of a simple shared affinity for certain colours by repeating the experiment with black and white designs.
According to the study, for a behaviour to be considered a social convention its benefit must apply to the whole group, it must work consistently, and it must be one among several solutions.
Gestures such as shaking hands, embracing or bowing are social conventions that help groups resolve problems, it says.
"Language is one big convention," said Formaux, "From the beginning, individuals had to agree on the meanings of words."
As to how the baboons managed to share their hierarchy with one another, that remains a mystery.
"We suppose that they agreed on it -- but we don't know how," Formaux said.
juc/uh-nrh/jj
Tue, December 14, 2021
French researchers have observed non-human primates developing social conventions to work together to obtain a reward, in an experiment set up with a group of baboons.
About twenty baboons raised at a primatology centre were given the task in pairs of making the same choice when each presented with a set of two images on touch screens.
If both animals made the same choice, they were rewarded with a treat.
It took the baboons about three days to establish a system for choosing the same image, even when they could not see their partners' choices, says the report, published Monday in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.
While previous research had shown that primates were capable of social conventions like grooming, this is the first to show a new behaviour appearing spontaneously in a group, without human intervention.
The experiment was conducted by French national research institute CNRS and Aix-Marseille University.
Over the course of tens of thousands of tests the baboons developed a hierarchy for the images presented, the researchers noted.
At first the baboons could see what was happening on other animals' screens, but in the second phase of the experiment that visual cue was taken away.
"The group's performance didn't budge," the study's main author, cognitive psychology researcher Anthony Formaux told AFP.
"It surprised us when they continued to choose the same image without being able to imitate each other."
Researchers ruled out the possibility of a simple shared affinity for certain colours by repeating the experiment with black and white designs.
According to the study, for a behaviour to be considered a social convention its benefit must apply to the whole group, it must work consistently, and it must be one among several solutions.
Gestures such as shaking hands, embracing or bowing are social conventions that help groups resolve problems, it says.
"Language is one big convention," said Formaux, "From the beginning, individuals had to agree on the meanings of words."
As to how the baboons managed to share their hierarchy with one another, that remains a mystery.
"We suppose that they agreed on it -- but we don't know how," Formaux said.
juc/uh-nrh/jj
US officials eye fuel supply for advanced nuclear reactors
BOISE, Idaho (AP) — The development of commercial advanced nuclear reactors intended to help combat global warming and enhance national security will need a better supply of the right type of nuclear fuel, U.S. officials said Tuesday.
The U.S. Department of Energy sent out a request to companies that might be interested in participating to send ideas concerning its plans to establish a program to ensure the availability of high-assay low-enriched uranium, or HALEU.
Information received will be used to prepare a report for Congress. It could also lead to the Energy Department taking the next step and asking companies to submit more detailed plans on how they might supply the nuclear fuel.
The $1 trillion infrastructure law President Joe Biden signed last month contains $2.5 billion for the Energy Department to establish the HALEU Availability Program. The goal is to produce enough high-assay low-enriched uranium for civilian domestic research and commercial use in the next wave of advanced reactors currently in development.
“Advanced reactors are an incredible asset to have in our collective fight against climate change,” Dr. Kathryn Huff, principal deputy assistant secretary for the Energy Department's Office of Nuclear Energy, said in a statement. “If we don’t proactively take the steps now to ensure a sufficient and diverse supply of HALEU, then reactor demonstration and deployment projects, like those funded in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, won’t be fueled in time to help us slow the impacts of climate change.”
Efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by developing new technologies with nuclear power began during the Obama administration and have continued under both the Trump and Biden administrations.
The HALEU Availability Program "will help the U.S. maintain our nuclear supply chain, create high-paying manufacturing jobs, and reassert U.S. leadership on the international stage,” Democratic U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia said in a statement.
About 20% of the nation's energy comes from nuclear power produced at just under 100 nuclear power plants. Current reactor fuel, the Energy Department said, uses uranium enriched up to 5%.
Advanced reactors use HALEU enriched between 5% and 20%, which is required to produce more power in advanced reactors that are smaller than traditional nuclear power reactors.
The Energy Department's 890-square-mile (2,300-square-kilometer) site in eastern Idaho that includes the Idaho National Laboratory has been at the forefront in efforts to develop advanced nuclear reactors. The lab has the the Advanced Test Reactor, the world's most powerful test reactor, which produces neutrons so new materials and fuels can be tested to see how they react in high-radiation environments.
The site also contains the Transient Test Reactor, reactivated in 2017 after being put on standby in 1994 as interest in nuclear energy waned. The reactor was restarted to test nuclear fuels.
Primary obstacles U.S. officials face in revamping nuclear power are making nuclear power plants economically competitive and changing public perception among some that nuclear power is unsafe.
Critics of nuclear power say facilities for fuel production as well as power plants can be vulnerable to accidents and sabotage, and that the nuclear material itself could be used to make bombs.
Keith Ridler, The Associated Press
BOISE, Idaho (AP) — The development of commercial advanced nuclear reactors intended to help combat global warming and enhance national security will need a better supply of the right type of nuclear fuel, U.S. officials said Tuesday.
The U.S. Department of Energy sent out a request to companies that might be interested in participating to send ideas concerning its plans to establish a program to ensure the availability of high-assay low-enriched uranium, or HALEU.
Information received will be used to prepare a report for Congress. It could also lead to the Energy Department taking the next step and asking companies to submit more detailed plans on how they might supply the nuclear fuel.
The $1 trillion infrastructure law President Joe Biden signed last month contains $2.5 billion for the Energy Department to establish the HALEU Availability Program. The goal is to produce enough high-assay low-enriched uranium for civilian domestic research and commercial use in the next wave of advanced reactors currently in development.
“Advanced reactors are an incredible asset to have in our collective fight against climate change,” Dr. Kathryn Huff, principal deputy assistant secretary for the Energy Department's Office of Nuclear Energy, said in a statement. “If we don’t proactively take the steps now to ensure a sufficient and diverse supply of HALEU, then reactor demonstration and deployment projects, like those funded in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, won’t be fueled in time to help us slow the impacts of climate change.”
Efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by developing new technologies with nuclear power began during the Obama administration and have continued under both the Trump and Biden administrations.
The HALEU Availability Program "will help the U.S. maintain our nuclear supply chain, create high-paying manufacturing jobs, and reassert U.S. leadership on the international stage,” Democratic U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia said in a statement.
About 20% of the nation's energy comes from nuclear power produced at just under 100 nuclear power plants. Current reactor fuel, the Energy Department said, uses uranium enriched up to 5%.
Advanced reactors use HALEU enriched between 5% and 20%, which is required to produce more power in advanced reactors that are smaller than traditional nuclear power reactors.
The Energy Department's 890-square-mile (2,300-square-kilometer) site in eastern Idaho that includes the Idaho National Laboratory has been at the forefront in efforts to develop advanced nuclear reactors. The lab has the the Advanced Test Reactor, the world's most powerful test reactor, which produces neutrons so new materials and fuels can be tested to see how they react in high-radiation environments.
The site also contains the Transient Test Reactor, reactivated in 2017 after being put on standby in 1994 as interest in nuclear energy waned. The reactor was restarted to test nuclear fuels.
Primary obstacles U.S. officials face in revamping nuclear power are making nuclear power plants economically competitive and changing public perception among some that nuclear power is unsafe.
Critics of nuclear power say facilities for fuel production as well as power plants can be vulnerable to accidents and sabotage, and that the nuclear material itself could be used to make bombs.
Keith Ridler, The Associated Press
Non-religious surge in US as Christianity declines
Rev. Patrick Mahoney (C), director of the Christian Defense Coalition, leads a group in prayer as he holds a Good Friday service ahead of the Easter holiday outside the US Capitol in Washington, DC, April 10, 2020 (AFP/SAUL LOEB)
Tue, December 14, 2021, 11:53 AM·1 min read
The number of Americans who identify as non-religious is soaring in the profoundly Christian United States, according to a Pew Research Center study published Tuesday.
Some 29 percent of American adults are now religiously unaffiliated -- up from 16 percent 14 years ago -- the survey found.
America is home to a powerful, socially conservative Christian right-wing political faction and Christianity remains the overwhelmingly dominant religion in the country.
But the religion is declining markedly, the Pew results showed.
Seventy-eight percent of US adults identified as Christian in 2007. Now, some 63 percent do, according to the research.
In 2007, Pew began tracking religious "nones" -- people who describe themselves as atheist, agnostic or "nothing in particular."
Then, Christians outnumbered nones by almost five-to-one. Today it is closer to two-to-one, the researchers said.
Pew's researchers did not give reasons for the trend, but it is in line with the wider decline in Christianity across the West.
In 2019, the center said the growth of religious nones in America was particularly evident among younger people.
Pew's latest survey found that the secular shift was concentrated amongst Protestant communities, with the Catholic share of the population holding relatively steady in recent years.
Some 60 percent of Protestants described themselves as born-again or evangelical Christian, Pew said.
White evangelical Christians are among former president Donald Trump's most ardent supporters, with 84 percent of the group voting for him in last year's election, Pew said previously.
Researchers quizzed almost 4,000 respondents between May and August this year for the survey released Tuesday.
pdh/caw
Rev. Patrick Mahoney (C), director of the Christian Defense Coalition, leads a group in prayer as he holds a Good Friday service ahead of the Easter holiday outside the US Capitol in Washington, DC, April 10, 2020 (AFP/SAUL LOEB)
Tue, December 14, 2021, 11:53 AM·1 min read
The number of Americans who identify as non-religious is soaring in the profoundly Christian United States, according to a Pew Research Center study published Tuesday.
Some 29 percent of American adults are now religiously unaffiliated -- up from 16 percent 14 years ago -- the survey found.
America is home to a powerful, socially conservative Christian right-wing political faction and Christianity remains the overwhelmingly dominant religion in the country.
But the religion is declining markedly, the Pew results showed.
Seventy-eight percent of US adults identified as Christian in 2007. Now, some 63 percent do, according to the research.
In 2007, Pew began tracking religious "nones" -- people who describe themselves as atheist, agnostic or "nothing in particular."
Then, Christians outnumbered nones by almost five-to-one. Today it is closer to two-to-one, the researchers said.
Pew's researchers did not give reasons for the trend, but it is in line with the wider decline in Christianity across the West.
In 2019, the center said the growth of religious nones in America was particularly evident among younger people.
Pew's latest survey found that the secular shift was concentrated amongst Protestant communities, with the Catholic share of the population holding relatively steady in recent years.
Some 60 percent of Protestants described themselves as born-again or evangelical Christian, Pew said.
White evangelical Christians are among former president Donald Trump's most ardent supporters, with 84 percent of the group voting for him in last year's election, Pew said previously.
Researchers quizzed almost 4,000 respondents between May and August this year for the survey released Tuesday.
pdh/caw
'Tis the season, once again: Evangelicals must save Christmas from an imaginary enemy
Nathaniel Manderson, Salon
December 12, 2021
Woman wearing Christmas hat covering her ears (Shutterstock)
Here comes my favorite season of the evangelical political calendar. It's time for the righteous war to save Christmas from the evil progressives with their "Happy Holidays" and their zero-tolerance policy for nativity scenes. Those heartless liberals will attempt once again to destroy the true meaning of Christmas, burn down all the Christmas trees (not just the one outside the Fox News building), spell it as "Xmas" and generally rip all mention of God from this holiest of holidays.
No of course I don't believe any of that, despite my personal background as an evangelical pastor. In truth, this yet another political and cultural issue that has been created entirely out of whole cloth by the great distaction agents of the evangelical Republican machine. I believe this issue perfectly illustrates the blueprint behind the evangelical approach to politics. They start with a fake issue that requires no grounding in scripture, zero biblical evidence and zero change for anyone within their own group. It is easily identifiable and pushes emotional buttons, which makes it an easy money-raising grift for politicians and pastors, and reliably provides a seasonal ratings boost for Fox News. It's another issue where evangelicals get to pretend they are fighting for God's cause while in fact ignoring every issue that affects God's people. Lastly, they get to declare victory every year because, no matter what Donald Trump and any number of leading evangelicals may claim, there never was a war on Christmas conducted by liberals, atheists, Muslims, Jews, godless Communists and other infidels.
The idea that somehow Christ's birthday — which definitely wasn't on Dec. 25, by the way — requires any form of annual celebration has no connection to Christ, his teachings or the Bible. I cannot even figure out what aspect of the "traditional" Christmas celebration has anything to do with Jesus. The madhouse shopping (both online and in person), the tree, the lights, the tinsel, the consumerist orgy of Black Friday and Cyber Monday and whatever other special days the marketing people can come up with this holiday season is a celebration of everything that money can purchase, and has literally nothing to do with the ministry of Jesus. Last I heard, according to Christian theology you cannot serve both God and money, and far too many are trying to do just that during the Christmas season — and for that matter all year round. Christ was removed from the Christmas season a long time ago, no matter what you call the holiday.
RELATED: Meghan McCain suggests Fox Christmas tree arson attack is worse than GOP's assault on democracy
No issue better exemplifies the misdeeds of the evangelical political machine than the fight to "save" Christmas from imaginary enemies who are supposedly trying to crush the joy out of the holiday with too much wokeness (or whatever). The enemy is said to be everywhere, yet somehow the fight is easily winnable. You will hear a handful of folks who announce, "I proudly say Merry Christmas," as if some committee of socialists or feminists were trying to prevent them from saying it. It is difficult for me to imagine Jesus Christ walking around an American town saying, "Hey, where's my nativity scene?" It's easier for me to imagine Jesus wondering why this country so many people claim is a "Christian nation" can ignore the plight of the poor, the sick and those newly arrived among us.
Fighting the war on Christmas also allows the evangelical movement to ignore larger issues that plague millions of Americans during this time of year. The Christmas season is known pose specific difficulties for homeless veterans, for people without health insurance, for those who are struggling to get by, and for the sick, lonely and desperate. If I'm not mistaken, those are the people Christ called his followers to serve — but fighting to save Christmas from the liberals allows the evangelicals to ignore that urgent call.
The annual declaration of victory is my favorite hypocritical element of this ritual war. At one point some years ago, former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly declared he had personally won this fight, saving Christmas for all real Americans. There could hardly be a better example of everything that is wrong with this movement: O'Reilly got his followers worked up about saving Christmas, while in his own life he was sexually harassing numerous women he worked with. That's very much like the evangelical movement: Find an issue to draw attention away from what you're doing in secret, very likely being acts of cruelty, oppression and ignorance. Victory is easily declared because there was no fight, except in the overheated evangelical imagination. Christmas always comes around every year and fake victory follows, along with great ratings for Fox News, fundraising for sanctimonious Republicans and big money flowing into evangelical churches.
So, yes, for the next few weeks the battle will be joined again, and evangelical believers will once again be told the fight is difficult — but in the end (spoiler alert!) Christmas will be saved yet again. In truth, nothing much will occur to make this holiday season different: We will see no new laws enacted to help those in need, heal the sick, welcome the foreigner and serve the poor. But at least we get to say "Merry Christmas" — which of course we always did — and somehow that will make up for all our lost opportunities to make real change in Christ's name.
I don't begrudge anyone the "Christmas spirit." But as I said earlier, nothing about our current Christmas culture has anything to do with Jesus, no matter what we may call the season. The life of Christ had nothing to do with decorated fir trees, expensive electronic gadgets or ugly sweaters. Maybe we could say it had something to do with giving and receiving gifts — but not in the literal or material sense. If we were truly to celebrate the ministry of Jesus in America, that would mean a celebration of sacrifice, mercy, forgiveness and humility. We're a pretty long way from that right now.
Nathaniel Manderson, Salon
December 12, 2021
Woman wearing Christmas hat covering her ears (Shutterstock)
Here comes my favorite season of the evangelical political calendar. It's time for the righteous war to save Christmas from the evil progressives with their "Happy Holidays" and their zero-tolerance policy for nativity scenes. Those heartless liberals will attempt once again to destroy the true meaning of Christmas, burn down all the Christmas trees (not just the one outside the Fox News building), spell it as "Xmas" and generally rip all mention of God from this holiest of holidays.
No of course I don't believe any of that, despite my personal background as an evangelical pastor. In truth, this yet another political and cultural issue that has been created entirely out of whole cloth by the great distaction agents of the evangelical Republican machine. I believe this issue perfectly illustrates the blueprint behind the evangelical approach to politics. They start with a fake issue that requires no grounding in scripture, zero biblical evidence and zero change for anyone within their own group. It is easily identifiable and pushes emotional buttons, which makes it an easy money-raising grift for politicians and pastors, and reliably provides a seasonal ratings boost for Fox News. It's another issue where evangelicals get to pretend they are fighting for God's cause while in fact ignoring every issue that affects God's people. Lastly, they get to declare victory every year because, no matter what Donald Trump and any number of leading evangelicals may claim, there never was a war on Christmas conducted by liberals, atheists, Muslims, Jews, godless Communists and other infidels.
The idea that somehow Christ's birthday — which definitely wasn't on Dec. 25, by the way — requires any form of annual celebration has no connection to Christ, his teachings or the Bible. I cannot even figure out what aspect of the "traditional" Christmas celebration has anything to do with Jesus. The madhouse shopping (both online and in person), the tree, the lights, the tinsel, the consumerist orgy of Black Friday and Cyber Monday and whatever other special days the marketing people can come up with this holiday season is a celebration of everything that money can purchase, and has literally nothing to do with the ministry of Jesus. Last I heard, according to Christian theology you cannot serve both God and money, and far too many are trying to do just that during the Christmas season — and for that matter all year round. Christ was removed from the Christmas season a long time ago, no matter what you call the holiday.
RELATED: Meghan McCain suggests Fox Christmas tree arson attack is worse than GOP's assault on democracy
No issue better exemplifies the misdeeds of the evangelical political machine than the fight to "save" Christmas from imaginary enemies who are supposedly trying to crush the joy out of the holiday with too much wokeness (or whatever). The enemy is said to be everywhere, yet somehow the fight is easily winnable. You will hear a handful of folks who announce, "I proudly say Merry Christmas," as if some committee of socialists or feminists were trying to prevent them from saying it. It is difficult for me to imagine Jesus Christ walking around an American town saying, "Hey, where's my nativity scene?" It's easier for me to imagine Jesus wondering why this country so many people claim is a "Christian nation" can ignore the plight of the poor, the sick and those newly arrived among us.
Fighting the war on Christmas also allows the evangelical movement to ignore larger issues that plague millions of Americans during this time of year. The Christmas season is known pose specific difficulties for homeless veterans, for people without health insurance, for those who are struggling to get by, and for the sick, lonely and desperate. If I'm not mistaken, those are the people Christ called his followers to serve — but fighting to save Christmas from the liberals allows the evangelicals to ignore that urgent call.
The annual declaration of victory is my favorite hypocritical element of this ritual war. At one point some years ago, former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly declared he had personally won this fight, saving Christmas for all real Americans. There could hardly be a better example of everything that is wrong with this movement: O'Reilly got his followers worked up about saving Christmas, while in his own life he was sexually harassing numerous women he worked with. That's very much like the evangelical movement: Find an issue to draw attention away from what you're doing in secret, very likely being acts of cruelty, oppression and ignorance. Victory is easily declared because there was no fight, except in the overheated evangelical imagination. Christmas always comes around every year and fake victory follows, along with great ratings for Fox News, fundraising for sanctimonious Republicans and big money flowing into evangelical churches.
So, yes, for the next few weeks the battle will be joined again, and evangelical believers will once again be told the fight is difficult — but in the end (spoiler alert!) Christmas will be saved yet again. In truth, nothing much will occur to make this holiday season different: We will see no new laws enacted to help those in need, heal the sick, welcome the foreigner and serve the poor. But at least we get to say "Merry Christmas" — which of course we always did — and somehow that will make up for all our lost opportunities to make real change in Christ's name.
I don't begrudge anyone the "Christmas spirit." But as I said earlier, nothing about our current Christmas culture has anything to do with Jesus, no matter what we may call the season. The life of Christ had nothing to do with decorated fir trees, expensive electronic gadgets or ugly sweaters. Maybe we could say it had something to do with giving and receiving gifts — but not in the literal or material sense. If we were truly to celebrate the ministry of Jesus in America, that would mean a celebration of sacrifice, mercy, forgiveness and humility. We're a pretty long way from that right now.
Fox News accused of being ‘Jussie Smollett of cable’ after host claimed it was the victim of a 'hate crime'
Brian Kilmeade
Alex Henderson December 13, 2021
Ever since an arsonist set a giant Christmas tree ablaze outside of the News Corps/Fox News building in Manhattan, pundits on the show have engaged in melodramatic, over-the-top hyperventilating about the attack. The Toronto Star’s Vinay Menon, in a recent column, argues that all this melodrama over the fire has made Fox News the “Jussie Smollett of cable.”
Smollett is the actor who was convicted on five felony counts after, according to prosecutors, lying to law enforcement about being violently attacked by Donald Trump supporters in Chicago. The hate crime that Smollett reported, according to prosecutors, was a total fabrication.
The Christmas tree fire was not a fabrication; the tree really was set ablaze. But Menon stresses that Fox News went way overboard with its coverage, noting that the right-wing cable channel hasn’t given the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol Building nearly as much coverage as it has given the Christmas tree blaze — a point that has also been made by CNN’s Brianna Keilar.
Menon writes, “One of the network’s contributors, Rev. Jacques DeGraff, compared the tree inferno to the attack on Pearl Harbor…. But it was ‘Fox & Friends’ co-host Brian Kilmeade who blasted the snowflake pearl-clutching to Mars. While discussing this reckless vandalism by a troubled man of no fixed address, Kilmeade asked: ‘Who says it’s not a hate crime against us, against Fox News?’ And just like that, Fox News became the Jussie Smollett of cable.”
Menon adds, “A hate crime?.... Are you seriously suggesting tree destruction is comparable to the murder of Emmett Till? Give your dopey head a shake.”
Brian Kilmeade
Alex Henderson December 13, 2021
Ever since an arsonist set a giant Christmas tree ablaze outside of the News Corps/Fox News building in Manhattan, pundits on the show have engaged in melodramatic, over-the-top hyperventilating about the attack. The Toronto Star’s Vinay Menon, in a recent column, argues that all this melodrama over the fire has made Fox News the “Jussie Smollett of cable.”
Smollett is the actor who was convicted on five felony counts after, according to prosecutors, lying to law enforcement about being violently attacked by Donald Trump supporters in Chicago. The hate crime that Smollett reported, according to prosecutors, was a total fabrication.
The Christmas tree fire was not a fabrication; the tree really was set ablaze. But Menon stresses that Fox News went way overboard with its coverage, noting that the right-wing cable channel hasn’t given the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol Building nearly as much coverage as it has given the Christmas tree blaze — a point that has also been made by CNN’s Brianna Keilar.
Menon writes, “One of the network’s contributors, Rev. Jacques DeGraff, compared the tree inferno to the attack on Pearl Harbor…. But it was ‘Fox & Friends’ co-host Brian Kilmeade who blasted the snowflake pearl-clutching to Mars. While discussing this reckless vandalism by a troubled man of no fixed address, Kilmeade asked: ‘Who says it’s not a hate crime against us, against Fox News?’ And just like that, Fox News became the Jussie Smollett of cable.”
Menon adds, “A hate crime?.... Are you seriously suggesting tree destruction is comparable to the murder of Emmett Till? Give your dopey head a shake.”
FROM YOUR SITE ARTICLES
- 'Fox News Christmas tree' goes up in flames as man is arrested for ... ›
- Meghan McCain melts down over Fox News Christmas tree fire ... ›
- CNN airs brutal supercut exposing Fox News's glaring hypocrisy ... ›
RELATED ARTICLES AROUND THE WEB
US prep schools held student exchanges with elite Nazi academies
The Conversation
December 14, 2021
Hitler's Youth march in Nuremberg in 1937 (German Federal Archives)
In the summer of 1935, the Nazi government hijacked a student exchange program between leading American and German schools.
The International Schoolboy Fellowship, as it was known, was first set up by Walter Huston Lillard, the headmaster of Tabor Academy in Massachusetts, in 1927 to foster better relations between all nations through schoolboy exchange. Participating countries included the U.S., Germany, France and Great Britain.
Lillard believed “that misunderstandings and quarrels between nations often arise through long-distance misjudgments,” and that “the development of contacts … will tend to promote cordial relations and lasting friendships.”
But by 1935, officials in charge of the Third Reich’s new elite schools, the National Political Education Institutes, or Napolas, had plans to appropriate the exchange program to promote National Socialist aims.
These Nazi institutions were modeled on elite British public schools, the Prussian cadet corps and ancient Sparta. The schools educated boys aged 10 to 19, training them as future leaders.
A story about the early days of the exchange program was published in The New York Times on Feb. 10, 1933.
New York Times archive screenshot.
On Feb. 12, 1935, Lillard and the International Schoolboy Fellowship were informed by the Napola authorities that they would exchange 10 American boys for 10 Napola pupils from July to December 1935.
As I describe in my new book, “The Third Reich’s Elite Schools – A History of the Napolas,” the American exchange organizers were unaware that the German pupils and staff were charged with an explicitly propagandistic mission. The Germans’ aim: Counteract and neutralize the effect of anti-Nazi reporting in the American media, and favorably influence public opinion of the Third Reich.
By 1938, 18 American prep schools were taking part in the Napola exchanges.
Breaking the Olympic boycott
Reinhard Pfundtner, the 17-year-old son of a high-ranking civil servant in the Third Reich’s Interior Ministry, was one of the first German boys selected for the exchange program. His participation helped ensure the effectiveness of this pro-Nazi propaganda campaign at the highest level.
An account from one student at The Lawrenceville School of his time at a Napola school in the late 1930s.
Courtesy of The Lawrenceville School Stephan Archives
In his role as state secretary of the Third Reich’s ministry of the interior, Reinhard’s father, Hans Pfundtner, was one of the key architects of the Nuremberg Laws, which demoted Jews and Gypsies to a pariah status within Nazi Germany, and which were instrumental in the Holocaust’s genesis. Hans Pfundtner was also a member of the Olympic Committee. He intended to use the exchange as an opportunity to persuade Lillard, his son’s American headmaster, to lobby in favor of U.S. participation in the upcoming 1936 Winter Olympic Games in Germany.
Hans Pfundtner and Lillard left letters, now preserved in the German Federal Archives, that show that the Tabor Academy principal was completely swayed by the Pfundtners’ pretense of disinterested friendship.
In one letter dated Nov. 23, 1935, Lillard assured Pfundtner that his “excellent letter replying to … questions about the Olympic Games” had been “quoted by several of our good newspapers, and was included in the Associated Press service throughout the country. … Undoubtedly, this message of yours will be very helpful in submerging some of the false propaganda.”
German students at the Rügen Napola school, on the island of Putbus, at shooting practice in 1944.
Dietrich Schulz, Author provided
Failed hopes for peace
Many leading American prep schools took part in the Napola exchange program each year following 1935, including Phillips Academy Andover and Phillips Academy Exeter in New Hampshire, St. Andrew’s in Delaware, Choate and the Loomis School in Connecticut, and New Jersey’s The Lawrenceville School. Between 1936 and 1938, 15 American pupils each year learned at the Nazi elite schools for 10 months, while 30 Napola pupils spent five months each at the American schools.
Even after the “Night of Broken Glass” pogrom in November 1938, in which over 7,000 Jewish businesses and over 250 synagogues in German territories were destroyed, Lillard still urged principals at the prep schools that were part of the Napola-ISF exchange to continue the program into the 1939-40 academic year.
In a letter written after that event, Lillard said “If we continue to bring the boys together, something constructive may be accomplished; whereas, if we abandon all efforts in the direction of Germany, we are closing the opportunity for the future leaders to be enlightened … .”
Despite the controversial nature of the exchange program, many of the schools whose archives I consulted for my book were most helpful and curious to learn more about their institutions’ unsuspected connections with the Third Reich.
Trojan horse propaganda
Given these exchanges, the Napola program appeared to have achieved some success in persuading their American partners to give the Nazi regime the benefit of the doubt, at least in the short term.
Walter Huston Lillard, the Tabor Academy headmaster who supported the student exchange program.
Wikipedia
In response to negative media coverage on the violent persecution of Jewish Germans and other minorities that was taking place under the Nazi regime, the Napola pupils attempted to actively discredit these accounts as biased or as “Jewish propaganda.”
According to accounts in surviving school newsletters, the Napola pupils were often able to convince their American hosts that events in Germany were not nearly as dire as press reports might lead them to believe. They were often given the opportunity to present their own political views, in speech and in writing.
For instance, one exchange student at Tabor Academy, Wolfgang Korten, wrote in “The Tabor Log” in June 1939, “I was glad to talk to the American as a German about Germany, and to give him some ideas about my homeland, different from those he reads in his papers.” He also stressed that to wholly reject “fascism” and “Nazism” in the name of “democracy” was a mistake.
Newsletter reports on both sides also suggest that the American pupils enjoyed getting to know the “new Germany” and could quite easily become sympathetic to their hosts’ political perspectives.
One American pupil who attended the Napola in Plön, Germany, wrote in 1938 that the year he had spent there was the “greatest experience” of his life. Another was even discovered by his fellow Napola pupils practicing the Hitler salute in front of his mirror. Meanwhile, many staff and students at the U.S. academies kept in touch with their German partner schools even after the outbreak of war in 1939.
To a present-day reader, the attitudes toward Nazi Germany depicted here might seem highly naïve. At the time, however, many educated Americans shared similar sentiments – curious, trusting in German good faith and willing to downplay or disregard prior reports of Nazi atrocities.
That is, until the Nazis’ desire for war became impossible to ignore.
Helen Roche, Associate Professor of Modern European Cultural History, Durham University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The Conversation
December 14, 2021
Hitler's Youth march in Nuremberg in 1937 (German Federal Archives)
In the summer of 1935, the Nazi government hijacked a student exchange program between leading American and German schools.
The International Schoolboy Fellowship, as it was known, was first set up by Walter Huston Lillard, the headmaster of Tabor Academy in Massachusetts, in 1927 to foster better relations between all nations through schoolboy exchange. Participating countries included the U.S., Germany, France and Great Britain.
Lillard believed “that misunderstandings and quarrels between nations often arise through long-distance misjudgments,” and that “the development of contacts … will tend to promote cordial relations and lasting friendships.”
But by 1935, officials in charge of the Third Reich’s new elite schools, the National Political Education Institutes, or Napolas, had plans to appropriate the exchange program to promote National Socialist aims.
These Nazi institutions were modeled on elite British public schools, the Prussian cadet corps and ancient Sparta. The schools educated boys aged 10 to 19, training them as future leaders.
A story about the early days of the exchange program was published in The New York Times on Feb. 10, 1933.
New York Times archive screenshot.
On Feb. 12, 1935, Lillard and the International Schoolboy Fellowship were informed by the Napola authorities that they would exchange 10 American boys for 10 Napola pupils from July to December 1935.
As I describe in my new book, “The Third Reich’s Elite Schools – A History of the Napolas,” the American exchange organizers were unaware that the German pupils and staff were charged with an explicitly propagandistic mission. The Germans’ aim: Counteract and neutralize the effect of anti-Nazi reporting in the American media, and favorably influence public opinion of the Third Reich.
By 1938, 18 American prep schools were taking part in the Napola exchanges.
Breaking the Olympic boycott
Reinhard Pfundtner, the 17-year-old son of a high-ranking civil servant in the Third Reich’s Interior Ministry, was one of the first German boys selected for the exchange program. His participation helped ensure the effectiveness of this pro-Nazi propaganda campaign at the highest level.
An account from one student at The Lawrenceville School of his time at a Napola school in the late 1930s.
Courtesy of The Lawrenceville School Stephan Archives
In his role as state secretary of the Third Reich’s ministry of the interior, Reinhard’s father, Hans Pfundtner, was one of the key architects of the Nuremberg Laws, which demoted Jews and Gypsies to a pariah status within Nazi Germany, and which were instrumental in the Holocaust’s genesis. Hans Pfundtner was also a member of the Olympic Committee. He intended to use the exchange as an opportunity to persuade Lillard, his son’s American headmaster, to lobby in favor of U.S. participation in the upcoming 1936 Winter Olympic Games in Germany.
Hans Pfundtner and Lillard left letters, now preserved in the German Federal Archives, that show that the Tabor Academy principal was completely swayed by the Pfundtners’ pretense of disinterested friendship.
In one letter dated Nov. 23, 1935, Lillard assured Pfundtner that his “excellent letter replying to … questions about the Olympic Games” had been “quoted by several of our good newspapers, and was included in the Associated Press service throughout the country. … Undoubtedly, this message of yours will be very helpful in submerging some of the false propaganda.”
German students at the Rügen Napola school, on the island of Putbus, at shooting practice in 1944.
Dietrich Schulz, Author provided
Failed hopes for peace
Many leading American prep schools took part in the Napola exchange program each year following 1935, including Phillips Academy Andover and Phillips Academy Exeter in New Hampshire, St. Andrew’s in Delaware, Choate and the Loomis School in Connecticut, and New Jersey’s The Lawrenceville School. Between 1936 and 1938, 15 American pupils each year learned at the Nazi elite schools for 10 months, while 30 Napola pupils spent five months each at the American schools.
Even after the “Night of Broken Glass” pogrom in November 1938, in which over 7,000 Jewish businesses and over 250 synagogues in German territories were destroyed, Lillard still urged principals at the prep schools that were part of the Napola-ISF exchange to continue the program into the 1939-40 academic year.
In a letter written after that event, Lillard said “If we continue to bring the boys together, something constructive may be accomplished; whereas, if we abandon all efforts in the direction of Germany, we are closing the opportunity for the future leaders to be enlightened … .”
Despite the controversial nature of the exchange program, many of the schools whose archives I consulted for my book were most helpful and curious to learn more about their institutions’ unsuspected connections with the Third Reich.
Trojan horse propaganda
Given these exchanges, the Napola program appeared to have achieved some success in persuading their American partners to give the Nazi regime the benefit of the doubt, at least in the short term.
Walter Huston Lillard, the Tabor Academy headmaster who supported the student exchange program.
Wikipedia
In response to negative media coverage on the violent persecution of Jewish Germans and other minorities that was taking place under the Nazi regime, the Napola pupils attempted to actively discredit these accounts as biased or as “Jewish propaganda.”
According to accounts in surviving school newsletters, the Napola pupils were often able to convince their American hosts that events in Germany were not nearly as dire as press reports might lead them to believe. They were often given the opportunity to present their own political views, in speech and in writing.
For instance, one exchange student at Tabor Academy, Wolfgang Korten, wrote in “The Tabor Log” in June 1939, “I was glad to talk to the American as a German about Germany, and to give him some ideas about my homeland, different from those he reads in his papers.” He also stressed that to wholly reject “fascism” and “Nazism” in the name of “democracy” was a mistake.
Newsletter reports on both sides also suggest that the American pupils enjoyed getting to know the “new Germany” and could quite easily become sympathetic to their hosts’ political perspectives.
One American pupil who attended the Napola in Plön, Germany, wrote in 1938 that the year he had spent there was the “greatest experience” of his life. Another was even discovered by his fellow Napola pupils practicing the Hitler salute in front of his mirror. Meanwhile, many staff and students at the U.S. academies kept in touch with their German partner schools even after the outbreak of war in 1939.
To a present-day reader, the attitudes toward Nazi Germany depicted here might seem highly naïve. At the time, however, many educated Americans shared similar sentiments – curious, trusting in German good faith and willing to downplay or disregard prior reports of Nazi atrocities.
That is, until the Nazis’ desire for war became impossible to ignore.
Helen Roche, Associate Professor of Modern European Cultural History, Durham University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Michigan high school massacre: Another tragic example of how white privilege kills white people
December 13, 2021
Students, parents, teachers, and community members gather for a vigil at the Lake Point Community Church following a shooting at Oxford High School in Oxford, Michigan that left four students dead.(AFP)
There is no area of American life that has not been impacted by the color line in a society where white people are granted unearned advantages over nonwhite people. This is not an opinion, but an empirical fact. American society is literally structured by racism and white supremacy.
That is not to say that racism, white supremacy and white privilege benefit all people deemed "white" in the same way or to the same extent. Likewise, those same societal forces do not impact all people deemed "Black" or "brown" or otherwise not white in the same way either.
In the United States, racism and white supremacy constitute a power relationship that both actively and passively causes harm to Black and brown people because of the color of their skin and the value Western societies have assigned to it.
But they are not the only ones damaged. However counterintuitive this fact may be for some people, racism and white supremacy often hurt white people too.
Let's examine one recent example. On Nov. 30, a 15-year-old high school student named Ethan Crumbley allegedly went on a shooting rampage at his high school in Oxford, Michigan, killing four of his fellow students and injuring seven other people. Crumbley surrendered to law enforcement — which is somewhat unusual in mass shootings of this kind — and has been charged with terrorism and first-degree murder, among other crimes.
His alleged rampage was not a total surprise, but part of a much larger pattern of behavior. There had been indications for weeks (including posts on social media) that Crumbley appeared to be mentally unwell and a danger to himself and others.
Teachers and school administrators met with the young man and his parents about his behavior, which included violent drawings and verbal threats, and also spoke with him separately on several occasions. One meeting with Ethan Crumbley and his parents took place only hours before the shootings. Law enforcement could have been included in the meetings by school officials but were not, and the young man's backpack was not searched on the day of the shooting. If it had been, presumably school officials would have found his gun.
A teacher had also alerted school authorities that Ethan Crumbley was searching the internet on his phone for information about various types of ammunition. Instead of punishing him or seeking help, his mother, Jennifer Crumbley, sent him a text that read, "LOL, I'm not mad at you. You have to learn not to get caught."
With that behavior, Jennifer Crumbley showed herself to be exactly the kind of mother that Rep. Madison Cawthorn, the far-right North Carolina Republican, has publicly encouraged to raise their sons as "monsters."
Ethan Crumbley was allowed to return to class after his meetings with school officials, including on the day of the massacre. He allegedly used a 9mm semiautomatic pistol that his father, James Crumbley, gave him as a gift four days before the killings.
After their son was arrested for his alleged crimes, James and Jennifer Crumbley fled the area. They were eventually found hiding in a partly abandoned industrial building in Detroit, about 45 miles south of their hometown. If these fugitive suspects had been Black, brown or Muslim it is entirely likely that they would have been killed by law enforcement. Instead, they were arrested unharmed. Their son was afforded the same type of privilege after allegedly committing mass murder.
Crumbley's parents have been charged with involuntary manslaughter and other crimes. They have also been given the option of going free on bail before their trial — even after they already violated the law by (apparently) attempting to escape to Canada. Again, if the Crumbleys were not white, bail would either not be granted or imposed at an extortionate level.
How many lives might have been spared in Oxford, Michigan, if not for the power of racism, white supremacy and white privilege?
Because gun violence is not generally treated as a public health emergency, and because white privilege tends to erase the role of whiteness and white masculinity in gun violence, this society-wide problem has not been properly addressed — except for the ritual stupidity of "thoughts and prayers."
The vast majority of school mass shootings are committed by white boys and white young men. As a result, they are seen as individual, anomalous events, rather than as a societal problem demanding intervention and resolution.
When it comes to Black and brown young people accused or suspected of even minor criminal activity, white supremacy punishes them -- all too often in extreme ways. Through what has been called "adultification," Black and brown children, even when extremely young, are perceived as inherently dangerous, and not permitted the presumed innocence, vulnerability and need for care, concern and love that society typically grants white children and other young people.
As a result, Ethan Crumbley was presumed to be innocent and incapable of hurting others. By comparison, Tamir Rice, who was 12 years old and playing with a toy gun in a park in Cleveland, was shot and killed by police only seconds after their arrival. Trayvon Martin, 17 years old, was stalked and killed by a street vigilante who was later acquitted of murder.
Black and brown boys and girls are punished much more severely in American schools, compared to white students, for the same offenses.
Ethan Crumbley and his parents are the product of an American gun culture rooted in a centuries-long history where guns were used to commit genocide against the continent's indigenous peoples and also to dominate and control Black people, whether enslaved or free. Guns were also central to a larger project of empire and expansion that involved the subjugation of nonwhite people in many different parts of the world. White America's relationship to guns and violence as an exclusive element of "white freedom" is also central to the Republican fascist project.
Quite predictably, Ethan Crumbley's mother is a member of Donald Trump's political cult, a movement fueled by white supremacy, misogyny, sadism, anti-intellectualism and other antisocial tendencies. In a letter to Trump, Jennifer Crumbley wrote:
Mr. Trump, I actually love that you are a bad public speaker because that showed sincerity, and humility. You changed your mind, and you said "so what." You made the famous "grab them in the pussy" comment, did it offend me? No. I say things all the time that people take the wrong way, do I mean them, not always. Do I agree that you should of shown your tax returns? No. I don't care what you do or maybe don't pay in taxes, I think those are personal and if the Gov't can lock someone up over $10,000 of unpaid taxes and you slipped on by, then that shows the corruption. I like that you have failed. I love it even more that those failures taught lessons and made you one of the most successful Business Men in my history.
I love that you are not from the political spotlight, maybe you are the hope that can really uncover the politicians for what I believe they really are. I have high hopes you will shut down Big Pharma, make health care affordable for me and my MIDDLE CLASS family again. I hope you uncover the cure for cancer, because there is one, we all know it, but you are the one to prove it. I'm not scared of your big personality and quick temper….
My parents teach at a school where their kids come from illegal immigrant parents. Most of their parents are locked up. They don't care about learning and threaten to kill my mom for caring about their grades. Do you realize Mr. Trump that they get free tutors, free tablets from our Government so they can succeed. Why cant my son get those things, do we as hard working Americans not deserve that too?...
I believe YOU are the President who will make these things happen. I have NEVER had this much belief in one person, and you are it.
If this blog even makes it to your eyes…thank you. From the bottom of my heart.
Yours Truly,
A hard working Middle Class Law Abiding Citizen who is sick of getting fucked in the ass and would rather be grabbed by the pussy.
Moreover, discussions of the Crumbley family in mainstream news media offer an example of how even the lethal and criminal behavior of individual white people is never presented as representative of white people as a group or whiteness as a social identity. If the Crumbleys were Black or brown or Muslim, or members of some other marginalized community, the dominant narrative would focus in on their "bad" or "neglectful" parenting with questions about "the family" and "fathers and male role models," "irresponsible mothers" and "the values of the larger community." Fox News and the larger right-wing echo chamber would have turned them into horrifying bogeymen, and focused on them for weeks.
In his book "Dying of Whiteness," public health expert Jonathan Metzl explains the connections between whiteness, white identity politics, masculinity, guns, violence and death:
The allure of this notion of armed white male power makes sense in many ways. Who wouldn't be tempted by a platform that claimed to increase one's privilege, power, safety, and authority? However, again, the math and the graphs suggest the dangerous, mortal underside of linking privilege so closely to instruments of warfare and of then supporting politicians and policies that all allow these instruments to be ever-more easily allowed into people's everyday lives and intimate spaces. The data overwhelmingly suggests that more guns mean more deaths, and particularly so for those very people whose privileges and potencies Man Cards and pro-guns policies claim to restore….
As this process plays out, the peril to white men comes not just from the instrument, the impulse, or even the legislation. Rather, privilege itself becomes a liability. White men themselves become the biggest threats to … themselves. Danger emerges from who they are and from what they wish to be.
American's public discourse does not create space for the kind of language that would be necessary to persuade white people that racism, white supremacy and white privilege are hurting them too. Indeed, as we see in the tragic gun massacre at Oxford High School and far too many similar incidents, white privilege is literally killing white people. For too many white people, this has become impossible to see: They value the psychological and material wages of whiteness — which are not dispensed equally among all white people — more than they value their own lives and those of their children, their families and their communities.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)