Thursday, December 23, 2021

Rio Tinto to pause lithium mine in Serbia after protests -report

Thu, December 23, 2021

BELGRADE, Dec 23 (Reuters) - Rio Tinto plans to pause its lithium project in western Serbia after a municipality in the west of the country scrapped a plan to allocate land for the mine, the Beta news agency reported on Thursday, quoting the CEO of Rio's Serbian arm.

The mining group wants to develop the mine near Loznica in the western Jadar river valley to extract lithium, a vital ingredient for batteries for electric vehicles, while another product, borates, are used in solar panels and wind turbines.

But last week Loznica's municipal assembly scrapped a plan which would allocate land for the project.

Beta's report quoted Vesna Prodanovic as saying Rio plans a pause during which it will engage in a public dialogue about the project, which has stirred protests by environmental groups.

"We want to call for a public dialogue, to acquaint residents with all aspects of our project," Beta quoted Prodanovic, who is CEO of Rio Sava Exploration, as saying.

Prodanovic said Rio also plans to "reconsider and possibly improve" technical solutions it wants to use for the mine.

Earlier this year, Rio said any development would meet all domestic and European Union environmental standards but activists say it would cause irreparable damage.

The company's $2.4 billion project is part of Serbian government efforts to bring in more investment and boost economic growth.

In recent weeks, green groups have staged protests and blocked roads across the country, demanding authorities end the project, causing a political headache for the ruling coalition loyal to President Aleksandar Vucic ahead of April elections.

"It is extremely difficult in such an intense anti-mining and negative campaign to have a reasonable debate on any topic," the report quoted Prodanovic as saying.

Vucic has repeatedly said that opening the mine would depend on the outcome of an environmental study and a referendum on it. (Reporting by Aleksandar Vasovic; Editing by Alexander Smith)

'Feminist' foreign policy — what does that mean?

Annalena Baerbock is Germany's first female foreign minister. According to the new government's coalition agreement, she wants to pursue a "feminist foreign policy." But opinions differ as to what that actually means.



Female foreign ministers on the job: Norway's Anniken Scharning Huitfeldt and Germany's Annalena Baerbock

In 2014, the Swedish Social Democrat Margot Wallstrom called for equal rights for women worldwide. She demanded that women be equally represented in politics, business and society, and also have access to the same resources.

She had just been appointed foreign minister, and fairly soon began placing more women into government positions and approving funds earmarked for feminist projects abroad.

"Feminist foreign policy" became the official policy of the Swedish government and found favor in a number of other countries as well, including Canada and the Netherlands.

But the concept remains somewhat fraught.

What about Germany?


In Germany, Kristina Lunz has been at the forefront of this movement. Together with others, the feminist and social activist founded the "Centre for Feminist Foreign Policy" in Berlin, which advises, conducts research and makes policy proposals aimed at forging a different brand of foreign and security policies.

"Feminism tries to smash structures that rely on violence," she told DW. She cites the fight against terrorism as one example: 90% of terrorists operating worldwide are men.

She believes the reason for this is that society promotes aggressive behavior in boys, while raising girls to be more passive. These "patriarchal structures," she thinks, contribute to most terrorists being men.

Terrorist attacks, like that which took place at Berlin's Breitscheidplatz being memorialized here, are committed largely by men

Those who promote feminist foreign policy believe that such patterns are prevalent in foreign and security policies as well. These are predominantly shaped by men and, in Lunz's view, too often rely on force. States arm themselves to take preventive action against such terrorists, while also engaging in violence if necessary.

Feminist foreign policy, on the other hand, calls for the peaceful resolution of conflicts. Lunz is also against stationing nuclear bombs on German soil.
Two schools of thought

Carlo Masalla, an instructor at the German Bundeswehr University in Munich, is no fan of unilateralism when it comes to disarmament. He told Germany's foreign broadcaster that if Western countries spent less on defense, Russia would view this as a weakness and respond with everything but disarmament.

He believes that feminist foreign policies, as they currently stand, require more clarity. And there's even division among its supporters, he said, between adherents espousing a "maximum version" and those favoring a "realistic approach."

The first group seeks a peaceful, utopian version of foreign policy at all costs; while the other is primarily concerned with getting more women into positions of power in public diplomacy, the military and civil society.

Most foreign policy is dominated by men and therefore marked by agression, the theory goes

Kosovo: a role model


Viola von Cramon is a member of the German Greens in the European Parliament. She told DW that as a pragmatist, she believes feminist foreign policies should place women at the center of negotiations.

Women's issues need to be emphasized more strongly than in the past, she continued. On paper at least, the European Union says it wants an equal number of men and women negotiating the issues of the day. But in reality, this is often not the case.

Von Cramon cites Kosovo as an example of what successful feminist foreign policy looks like. Among Serbs and Kosovar Albanians, she said, there are many socially active women's groups. These remain in close contact with one another and work together in a spirit of cooperation.

According to von Cramon, such groups have been able to make progress that men and their governing structures have so far prevented .


Social groups of women in Kosovo, such as these protesting the murder of women and girls, help bring about change
Divvying up the world more fairly

Von Cramon fears that a certain division of labor that was present within Angela Merkel's government will continue under the new chancellor, Olaf Scholz.

The concern is that the chancellery will continue to take care of the "big players" like the United States, China, France, the EU and Russia, while leaving smaller fish to the Foreign Ministry.

She criticized former Foreign Minister Heiko Maas for allowing himself to be, as she put it, "demoted" in this way. She hopes that Annalena Baerbock will bring more strength to the Foreign Ministry, and not just hand everything over to the chancellery.

Masalla, however, does not think this will happen, and predicts that the chancellery will continue to focus on the "big players." He believes that the old division of labor will continue under the new government, and that Annalena Baerbock will simply have to get used to it.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock (right) should take a tougher line with new Chancellor Olaf Scholz (left) regarding who deals with which country, some think

Aspiration versus reality


The contradictions of feminist foreign policies are quite visible upon taking a closer look at Sweden, Masalla pointed out. In 2014, it vowed to pursue a feminist foreign policy; yet during the last ten years it has been one of only a few European countries to increase defense spending. This is based on a perceived threat from Russia.

Both von Cramon and Masalle agree that Germany's new foreign minister has already adopted a much harder stance towards Russia and China, and appears to be committed to the idea of a feminist foreign policy agenda.

After all, part of the plan is to promote more women within government agencies, including the Foreign Ministry.

Belarus labels broadcaster Radio Liberty as extremist

It is the latest part of a crackdown on independent media in Belarus. Hundreds of news outlets have been branded as "extremist" for the way they have covered anti-government protests.



Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty is the latest media outlet to suffer as part of a government crackdown

Belarus labeled the local service of the United States-funded broadcaster Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty extremist on Thursday.

The interior ministry's decision means that Belarusians who subscribe to RFE/RL online could face up to six years in prison.

As well as adding RFE/RL to its list of extremist organizations, authorities have launched a criminal investigation over the conduct of one of its journalists.
RFE/RL describes a 'continued clampdown'

The broadcaster posted on its website on Thursday: "Belarus' Interior Ministry has added RFE/RL's Belarus Service, known locally as Radio Svaboda, to its registry of extremist organizations, in a continued clampdown on independent media and civil society sparked by an eruption of protests against authoritarian ruler Alexander Lukashenko's claim he won a presidential election last year that the opposition says was rigged."

Earlier this month, a Minsk court ruled that the social media pages of Radio Svaboda were extremist, before adding all of its content to its registry on Thursday.

Journalist being held 'hostage'

Meanwhile, authorities have launched a criminal case against RFE/RL journalist Andrey Kuznechyk, his relatives said on Thursday. It was not immediately clear what the charges are related to.

Kuznechyk, 43, was detained around a month ago and sentenced twice to 10-day jail terms. RFE/RL President Jamie Fly said the journalist remains in custody, despite serving out both jail terms.

"Andrey Kuznechyk has completed his sentences," Fly said in a statement. "As far as we know, Belarusian authorities continue to hold him, essentially as a kidnapped hostage. Andrey should be allowed to return to his family immediately. Journalism is not a crime."
More than 300 media outlets labeled 'extremist'

This development is the latest example of the Lukashenko regime's crackdown on media outlets, which are seen as a threat to his near three decades of rule.

More than 300 independent media outlets on the messaging app Telegram have been designated "extremist" in Belarus since covering mass protests that broke out in the wake of a disputed presidential election in August 2020. Official results declared Lukashenko the winner of the ballot, but the West joined opposition leaders in denouncing the result.

Anti-government protests ensued and authorities subsequently targeted independent media, human rights groups, journalists and activists.

A total of 31 Belarusian journalists are currently serving jail terms or awaiting trial.
Thailand: Sea turtles return to shore during Covid-19

Issued on: 23/12/2021 - 

Plastic and discarded fishing lines and nets remain the primary cause of turtles disease and death. 

© AFP   Video by: Mandi HESHMATI

After almost 20 months of Covid travel restrictions in Thailand, several different species of sea turtle have returned to nesting around Phuket, an ultra-popular beach destination before the pandemic. But as the country tentatively begins to reopen its doors to fully vaccinated international tourists, scientists have tempered their optimism.

The Matrix Resurrections review: A Matrix remix with mixed results

Keanu Reeves and Carrie-Anne Moss question reality in an uneven but dizzyingly playful sequel.


Richard Trenholm
CNET CULTURE
Dec. 22, 2021 

Carrie-Anne Moss and Keanu Reeves share some bullet time in The Matrix Resurrections. Warner Bros

It's been 20 years and people just will not shut up about The Matrix. You might expect slick remix The Matrix Resurrections to be just money-grabbing nostalgia, but it's also a comment on money-grabbing nostalgia, a refinement and updating of the original film's ideas, and an exasperated clapback to anyone who missed the damn point these past two decades.

With guns. Lots of guns. And even a few jokes.

The Matrix Resurrections is out now, both in theaters and on streaming service HBO Max. This visually arresting sci-fi flick arrives at a time when the omicron variant threatens, so you need to make an informed decision about visiting theaters. Be sure to check guidance and restrictions in your local area. If you prefer, you can stream the film at home -- shades and leather coats optional.

Keanu Reeves returns as Thomas Anderson, a computer geek living an unfulfilled life and haunted by the idea maybe nothing is real. Strange signs and portents keep showing up in his life, forcing him to make a choice whether to step out of the numbing safety of mundanity or seek a dangerous uncharted path involving something called... The Matrix.

You read that right: The Matrix 4 is very much a reset to the beginning of the series, not just harking back to the first film but reliving and remixing it, turning it upside down and poking at what's inside. Original writer and director Lana Wachowski returns to the world she created with sibling Lilly Wachowski (who isn't involved this time), and the new film feels almost like a director's commentary on the original. The original films already played with layers of reality in a post-modern, self-reflexive way, and Resurrections doubles down with layer upon layer of meta self-awareness -- in fact, comparing it to a director's commentary actually feels too old-timey, too analogue: Resurrections is more like a re-recording and remix of a classic album, in space.

Funnily enough, Resurrections is the second blockbuster sequel this year with a title and subject matter resurrecting an apparently dead film series. Like Ghostbusters: Afterlife, this new Matrix film explicitly addresses its own legacy, as the original real-life thing is also a thing in the story, so the film's characters are fans of the original thing, just like the viewer. The silver screen is a mirror.

In Afterlife, that translated as fan-pleasing tributes which squashed a promising new direction under the weight of gratuitous nostalgia. But in Resurrections, Wachowski refuses to pander to the film's fans. In fact, Resurrections addresses the many and varied ways the original film has been adopted or co-opted. It pokes fun at over-earnest assertions that the film's symbolism and metaphors mean this or that, and exasperatedly rolls its eyes at those who've "missed the point" of the infamous red pill.

Remember: all I'm offering is the truth.
Warner Bros

As a jaded and middle-age Neo suffers from being surrounded by people who can't stop talking at him about what The Matrix really means, the opening scenes of the film play out what life must have been like these past two decades for Reeves, and particularly for the Wachowskis. If you've ever gone back to one of your favorite films from your youth and found it startlingly different seen through older (and hopefully wiser) eyes, you'll understand what Lana Wachowski must be going through. The first half of Resurrection is less trippy sci-fi questions about simulations and simulacra, and more a jittery dissection of art under capitalism. A musing on the artistic recidivism of resurrecting that one lucrative artwork people keep talking about, even if you don't want to. A barbed treatise on the quandary of shoveling content into the voraciously chomping nostalgia-harvester of the digital age.

But, y'know, funny.

This isn't me overthinking some wacky subtextual interpretation, by the way -- the film is literally about Keanu/Anderson being forced to make a literal, actual Matrix sequel by literal, actual Warner Bros. Evoking the famous sad Keanu meme, Anderson suffers in silence while Matrix nerds yell at him. These early scenes are a candid portrait of an artist struggling with the agony and anxiety of success, like 8 1/2 with more shootouts.

Keanu watches The Matrix.
Warner Bros

Speaking of shootouts, one of the big reasons the '90s Matrix was such a game-changer was its jaw-dropping action. On the cusp of the CG revolution and blowing everyone's minds with that innovative bullet time effect, those unforgettably iconic action scenes kicked in the door so the Wachowskis could lob in so many big ideas.

That puts a lot of pressure on this film to come up with something new and gobsmacking. Again, that's part of the film, as character actually discuss how they can top bullet time's cultural impact. Self-mockingly highlighting a problem doesn't solve it, however, and there isn't anything as groundbreaking or even as exciting as the first film. In fact, in the age of CG, even the recreations of the signature gravity-defying Matrix mayhem feel a bit weightless. Later sections of the film feature a digital effect, which is probably exceedingly clever but just looks like a leftover from the recent Terminator movies.

The effects may not be game-changing, but there's still room for the punching and kicking to kick your heart into your mouth. The climax, for example, features one macabre moment impacting with a horrifying idea rather than flashy CG. And yet the fights offer surprisingly inert staging and static camerawork. Sure, it's nice to actually see and follow what's going on in punch-ups that are clearer than the incomprehensible shaky-cam and whiplash-inducing editing that ruins all too many action scenes lately. But several of the fight scenes are essentially re-creations of the original, only without as much energy or even a sense of what's at stake. You get the feeling Wachowski just isn't interested in the banging and crashing any more.

READ MORE
HBO Max: Matrix Resurrections is streaming now, plus everything else to know
Before The Matrix, Johnny Mnemonic and Hackers led the internet movies of the '90s
The Matrix Resurrections post-credits scene, explained

Rather, Resurrections seems to be interested in honing the original films' ideas instead of heading in bold new directions. By the end of the sequels (Reloaded and Revolutions) the series bogged down in ponderous philosophizing, but Resurrections is pleasingly light on its feet in comparison. You don't have to remember any of the sequels' tortuous lore, happily (although once again, anything in the shaved-head-and-chunky-knitwear real world drags on forever).

While there's quite a lot of standing around talking, the new faces bring a nimble zest to proceedings. In the absence of Laurence Fishburne, Morpheus is reincarnated with youthful swagger and eye-popping tailoring by the absurdly watchable (and under-used) Yahya Abdul-Mateen II. Meanwhile, black-suited bad guy Agent Smith is reinvented as a blankly sociopathic/narcissistic tech bro type in the shape of Jonathan Groff. Neil Patrick Harris and Jessica Henwick are also fun to watch. And watch out for old face Lambert Wilson in perhaps the most hilariously socially distanced cameo the pandemic will throw up.

But it's in Keanu's other original co-star, Carrie-Anne Moss, that the film finds its focus. Trinity is now living the life of a wife and mother, a traditional feminine role chafing against her essential inner self ground down by society's rules and expectations. That's clearly a story about which Lana Wachowski had more to say (both Wachowski siblings are transgender women), and it also gives the film a heartbreaking dramatic punch. I found myself less interested in some technical explanation of how the new Matrix worked, instead aching for Neo and Trinity to figure it out together.

As the original trilogy expanded, Resurrections shrinks down tight to essentially a love story. The further it gets from that driving motivation, the middle of the film wobbles off course without a clear sense of direction, threat or urgency. So by the end you'll surely be rooting for Neo and Trinity, that perfect big screen pairing, to kick the Matrix's ass again.

And then maybe people will shut up about it. But probably not.
Mars and Earth likely formed from collisions of moon-sized rocks


By Charles Q. Choi 

Meteorites provided answers to a long-standing mystery about the origins of inner solar system planets.

An artist's depiction of an asteroid hitting Earth. (Image credit: NASA/Don Davis)

Earth and Mars likely arose from collisions between giant moon-size rocks instead of the clumping together of tiny pebbles over time, a new study found.

Previous research suggested there may be two primary ways in which rocky planets such as Earth are built. The classic model proposes that moon-to-Mars-size rocks dubbed planetary embryos once regularly smashed together in the inner solar system, eventually assembling into full-size worlds. A more recent alternative concept envisions tiny pebbles from the outer solar system drifting inward toward the sun, gradually accumulating to form rocky planets, a process thought essential to the formation of the cores of giant planets such as Jupiter and Saturn.

To see which model potentially best explains how the solar system's rocky planets formed, scientists analyzed a total of about 0.77 ounces (22 grams) of material from 17 meteorites that originated from Mars. These rocks were blasted off the Red Planet by impacts of ancient asteroids, eventually finding their way to Earth.

The researchers examined how these samples varied in their isotopic composition. Isotopes are forms of the same chemical element that vary only in the number of neutrons in their nucleus. For instance, uranium-234 has 142 neutrons in its core while uranium-238 has146 neutrons.

The scientists compared levels of titanium, zirconium and molybdenum isotopes from Mars and from Earth with those of different groups of meteorites from the inner and outer solar system. They found the Earth and Martian rocks more closely resembled meteorites from the inner solar system, with only about 4% of their compositions resembling outer solar system material. The large number of Martian meteorites they analyzed helped overcome conflicting results seen in prior work that analyzed smaller numbers of these rocks.

All in all, "we resolve conflicting interpretations of previous studies and show that Earth and Mars were formed from material that largely originated in the inner solar system," study lead author Christoph Burkhardt, a planetary scientist at the University of Münster in Germany, told Space.com. "Only a few percent of the building blocks of these two planets originated beyond Jupiter's orbit. As such, we answer the fundamental question of what the Earth is made of, and this allows [us] to address the even more fundamental question of how Earth formed."

Although pebble accumulation might play a major part in rocky planet formation around other stars, one reason it likely only had a minor role in rocky planet formation in our solar system is Jupiter, which could have devoured much of the pebbles and dust from the outer solar system that normally would have drifted inward toward the sun.

"There is no doubt that Jupiter as the 'king of the planets' had an influence on what was going on in the inner solar system," Burkhardt said. "Without Jupiter, we may sit today on a super-Earth or mini-Neptune planet."

The new findings also suggest that both Earth and Mars likely incorporated material from a group of space rocks that are currently unknown to science, ones originating "most likely sunwards of Earth's orbit," Burkhardt said. "So the hunt is on. Finding a sample with the predicted characteristics among the ungrouped meteorites in our collections would be amazing."

The scientists detailed their findings online Dec. 22 in the journal Science Advances.

 Astronomers Stunned To Find 70 Mysterious ‘Rogue’ Planets In The 13th Constellation

A team of astronomers have discovered at least 70 new “rogue” planets in our Milky Way galaxy. It’s the largest group of these “galactic nomads” found so far and could teach astronomers how these mysterious cosmic oddities came to be.

Rogue planets are planets that move through space without orbiting a star. Often described as free-floating, they’re isolated bodies that are planet-like, having possibly been ejected from a star system. Another theory is that rogue planets can form from the collapse of a gas cloud that is too small to lead to the formation of a star.

MORE FROM FORBESFour Homeless 'Rogue Planets' Of Earth-Mass Found Using A Long-Dead Telescope

“We did not know how many to expect and are excited to have found so many,” said Núria Miret-Roig, an astronomer at the Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Bordeaux, France and the University of Vienna, Austria, and the first author of the new study published today in Nature Astronomy.

So how did they find them? Though dark and cold—and therefore impossible to find—Miret-Roig and her team used the fact that rogue planets are still hot enough to glow in the few million years after their formation. So they can be detected by sensitive cameras on large telescopes. “We measured the tiny motions, the colours and luminosities of tens of millions of sources in a large area of the sky,” said Miret-Roig. “These measurements allowed us to securely identify the faintest objects in this region, the rogue planets.”

All 70 new rogue planets have masses comparable to Jupiter’s in a star-forming region in the Upper Scorpius and Ophiuchus constellations. Ophiuchus is known as the 13th constellation because despite being a large constellation on the ecliptic—so therefore hosting the Sun just like Leo, Taurus and all the others—it was the victim of ancient Babylonians hatred of the number 13.

To find the rogue planets the team used data from 20 years and from a range of telescopes, including the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (VLT), the Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA), the VLT Survey Telescope (VST) and the MPG/ESO 2.2-metre telescope in Chile.

“We used tens of thousands of wide-field images from ESO facilities, corresponding to hundreds of hours of observations, and literally tens of terabytes of data,” said Hervé Bouy, an astronomer at the Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Bordeaux, France, and project leader of the new research. The team also used data from the European Space Agency’s Gaia satellite.

Could there be more rogue planets? “There could be several billions of these free-floating giant planets roaming freely in the Milky Way without a host star,” said Bouy. However, to find more scientists will require a bigger, even more sensitive telescope. Cue the ESO’s forthcoming Extremely Large Telescope (ELT), which is currently under construction in Chile. “These objects are extremely faint and little can be done to study them with current facilities,” said Bouy. “The ELT will be absolutely crucial to gathering more information about most of the rogue planets we have found.”

Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.

Follow me on Twitter or LinkedInCheck out my website or some of my other work here

I'm an experienced science, technology and travel journalist and stargazer writing about exploring the night sky, solar and lunar eclipses, moon-gazing, astro-travel, astronomy and space exploration. I'm the editor of WhenIsTheNextEclipse.com and the author of "A Stargazing Program for Beginners: A Pocket Field Guide" (Springer, 2015), as well as many eclipse-chasing guides. 

Despite scrapped IPO, Babbel sees fast growth for its language learning service

 

Berlin-based language learning service Babbel was supposed to IPO on the Frankfurt stock exchange in late September. But only a few days before the initial listing the company pulled the plug with an eye on the developing Evergrande debt crisis that made the global stock markets very nervous. It has yet to announce a new date, but as Babbel CEO Arne Schepker told me, the company continues to monitor the markets.

Scrapping the IPO was clearly unexpected for everybody, though. “It was disappointing for the team that worked on it — worked hard and long — and we were doing really well,” Schepker said. “We had our books covered, we were on the right trajectory, met more than 100 super-interesting investors, got fantastic feedback — and then the Evergrande situation unraveled, which pulled the plug on most of the IPO markets. We were faced with a very conscious decision of do we launch ourselves into that market, yes or no?”

Schepker is confident that the company made the right decision, something the team was able to do because Babbel is well-funded and has plenty of cash in the bank, as well as other financing options to continue to invest in its products and make acquisitions as opportunities arise.

Image Credits: Babbel

One of the company’s fastest-growing businesses is its live classes, which augment the service’s app-based language learning tools. Launched earlier this year, Babbel Live saw a 300% increase in subscriptions and a 400% increase in revenue in the second half of 2021 compared to the first half. With tens of thousands of learners, Babbel Live now hosts 15,000 classes each month and Schepker tells me that for about 25% of these learners, the live platform is the first touchpoint for these users, while 75% get started with the app.

Babbel Live and the company’s B2B Babbel for Business services now account for 9% of the company’s revenue. And business overall is looking good, too, with billable sales in November surpassing $20 million, up 30% from 2020.

It helps, Schepker noted, that the company is able to recruit some of the best teachers, thanks to its reputation for a high-quality product. “We push the frontiers of innovation and we always tried to make the best of the human intelligence and the artificial intelligence. So we’re neither fully human nor fully tech and I think that’s what makes us very attractive for live tutoring classroom teachers,” he said.

Image Credits: Babbel

As for the company’s B2B side, Babbel signed up 5,000 new corporate learners in November and the company now works with more than 1,000 companies. It took Babbel a while to build up this business, which was only available in Germany for a long time and only recently expanded to Italy. The plan is to soon expand it to other European markets and then the U.S., too. Schepker noted that corporate language learning is about a third of the overall language learning market, so this represents quite a growth opportunity for the company.

Looking ahead, the Babbel team is specifically looking at how it can create more integrations between its different platforms, so that a teacher on Babbel Live can see what a student has learned in the app between classes, for example. Add to that Babbel’s podcasts, in-app games and other touchpoints and Babbel already offers quite a rich ecosystem of language learning tools. The question now is how it can bring all of those into a more cohesive platform.

“Users tend to stitch together their own ecosystem of learning methods, but I call that creative chaos because we never really learned how to do that — and it’s not integrated,” Schepker said. “So the different learning methods don’t get the benefit of knowing what Arne has just done on his app as Arne walks into a classroom. That’s the added value that we see in the ecosystem, both for the learner as well as for the teachers and for us as a language learning company: to make sure that we can actually get you further in your learning journey because we stitch together your ecosystem for you.”

Harvard Will Reopen Campus Child Care Centers Following Outcry from Parents

Harvard announced Wednesday that it will reopen its child care centers on Jan. 12.
 By Ryan N. Gajarawala

By Cara J. Chang, Crimson Staff Writer


Harvard reversed its decision to close campus day care centers during the first three weeks of January on Wednesday after more than 120 families signed onto an open letter calling on the University to continue providing child care services while it moves most operations online.

Campus Child Care, the non-profit that manages Harvard’s six day care centers, will reopen on Jan. 12 following a 12-day closure. The school had originally planned to close its child care centers during the first three weeks of the new year as campus operations move online due to the pandemic.

The University announced Wednesday that the centers, which provide services to more than 400 children, will reopen with reduced hours and prorated tuition.

The change comes after 121 parents signed onto an open letter to University President Lawrence S. Bacow and other top administrators calling on the school to implement “a revised plan” as soon as possible.

The letter called child care an “essential service” enabling affiliates to continue fulfilling all work-related responsibilities without compromising on their children’s wellbeing.

“We are exhausted,” the open letter said. “We cannot put in the work for Harvard if Harvard does not support us in the care of our children.”

The letter noted that the child care centers remained open through the pandemic with daily symptom checks, indoor masking, and testing. With the new requirement that Harvard affiliates get Covid-19 booster shots, the letter added “the risk to [Campus Child Care] community members is as well-mitigated as possible.”

In an email to Campus Child Care staff and families on Wednesday, University Human Resources Vice President Manuel Cuevas-Trisan and Faculty Development and Diversity Senior Vice Provost Judith D. Singer apologized for the added anxiety created by the initial announcement.

“We sincerely appreciate the concerns both teachers and parents have raised following our initial announcement that the centers would be closed during this period,” the administrators wrote. “We are mindful that this announcement added to the anxiety already experienced by both center families and center teaching staff due to the continued unpredictability of the pandemic, and for that we apologize.”

The centers will remain completely closed for the first nine days of January, during which teachers will be tested for Covid-19 three times and receive booster shots if they have not already. All families will be refunded for this period. Any family that opts to keep their children home during the first three weeks of January will also receive a refund.

The centers will reopen for staff on Jan. 10 before welcoming families back on Jan. 12. Children will be required to present a negative Covid test taken within one day of returning to day care and undergo daily symptom checks.

Harvard Kennedy School Professor Maya Sen ’00, whose 2-year-old child attends day care at Harvard, wrote that she “would suspend or cut back on research and writing” without Campus Child Care. The revised plan, she wrote, addresses some of her concerns.

“It’s a huge relief to know faculty parents with kids enrolled in on-campus day care won’t be out of work for most of January, but the possibility of sudden, prolonged closures is still really worrisome,” Sen wrote.

Conor J. Walsh, a professor of Engineering and Applied Sciences whose two children attend Harvard day care, also said the revised plan is an improvement. But he added that he is still unsure what his family will do during the 12-day closure.

“With the revised plan, while it does provide the possibility for more child care in January that was originally planned, it’s still a massive blow to not have child care [for part of January],” Walsh said.

Laura H. Owen ’06, the editor of the Nieman Journalism Lab whose 22-month-old child attends Campus Child Care, wrote in an email that she was “overall satisfied” with the change.

“I think the revised plan is reasonable,” Owen wrote. “A week and a half of working without childcare is still really hard, but at least for my family, it is inconvenient, not catastrophic.”

Owen added that she hopes Harvard administrators will include parents and teachers in decision-making processes around child care earlier on.

The school also announced Wednesday that it will establish a child care working group “to focus on ways we can continue to build trust and strengthen relationships with all members of our community.”

“Going forward, I hope that Harvard’s administration will include parents — and teachers — in decisions about the youngest members of its community early on in the decision-making process,” Owen wrote. “We will come up with better ideas when we work together.”

—Staff writer Cara J. Chang can be reached at cara.chang@thecrimson.com. Follow her on Twitter @CaraChang20.
Organizers Say Tokyo Olympics Cost $1.8B Less Than Expected — Though Twice Initial Estimates

Official estimates over the last year said the costs would be $15.4 billion


By Stephen Wade • Published 58 mins ago
Kazuhiro Nogi/AFP via Getty Images
In this Aug. 8, 2021, file photo, fireworks go off around the Olympic Stadium during the closing ceremony of the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games, as seen from outside the venue in Tokyo.

The Tokyo Olympics cost $1.8 billion less than anticipated, local organizers said Wednesday, 4 1/2 months after the Games ended.

Organizers said the estimated official costs were $13.6 billion. Officials said part of the reduction was because there were no fans — forced by the pandemic — and therefore vastly reduced labor costs. They also said other outlays were lower than expected.

Official estimates over the last year said the costs would be $15.4 billion. However, government audits over several years suggested the real costs were much higher — perhaps twice the official estimates.

Olympics costs are notoriously difficult to track, and there is always debate about what are and what are not Olympic costs. A study by the University of Oxford concluded that Tokyo was the most expensive Olympics on record.

Organizers indicated final expense figures would not be available until after spring 2022 with venues still being restored and contracts still subject to revision.

The biggest blow to the budget was the loss of $800 million in ticket sales, a shortfall that has to be made up by Japanese government entities.

Officials said the privately financed part of the budget — more than $3 billion coming from sponsors, the IOC and other sources — amounted to $5.9 billion.

The rest of the money was supplied by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government and the government of Japan. This amounts to about 60% of the overall funding if the current estimate is creditable.

The International Olympic Committee contributed about $1.5 billion to the total cost of running the Games. Its payoff, however, comes in billions of dollars in income from the sale to broadcast rights and sponsorships.

Despite the reported savings, the estimated costs are about twice as much as organizers said they would be when the IOC awarded Tokyo the Games in 2013 in Buenos Aires, Argentina.


Some of the higher costs are because of the one-year delay caused by the pandemic.