Monday, January 31, 2022

How Thích Nhất Hạnh changed the world beyond Buddhism

The determination that fueled his peace efforts may not square with the soft-spoken teacher many knew.

Coffin of Vietnamese Buddhist monk Thích Nhất Hạnh is carried to the street during his funeral in Hue, Vietnam Saturday, Jan. 29, 2022. A funeral was held Saturday for Thich Nhat Hanh, a week after the renowned Zen master died at the age of 95 in Hue in central Vietnam. (AP Photo/Thanh Vo)

(RNS) — A man once asked a Masai elder, “What makes a good morani?”— a good warrior.

The elder answered, “When the moment calls for fierceness, a good morani is very ferocious. And when the moment calls for kindness, a good morani is utterly tender.” But what makes a great warrior, the elder added, “is knowing which moment is which.”

The Vietnamese Zen Buddhist teacher Thích Nhất Hạnh, who passed away Jan. 21 at 95, may be the personification of this fierce and tender warrior. Over his long life he devoted himself to promoting peace, mindfulness and “Engaged Buddhism,” a term Nhất Hạnh coined to stress the importance of applying Buddhist principles of non-violence and compassion to social, political and environmental action.

The man whom students affectionately called Thay — teacher in Vietnamese — was a greatly beloved and accessible master whose popularity and influence in the Buddhist world is only rivaled by that of His Holiness, the Dalai Lama. Millions of seekers who might not have otherwise engaged with Buddhism have come to his teachings to learn how to apply mindfulness to daily life. As a result, Nhất Hạnh is popularly known as “the father of mindfulness.”


RELATED: Thích Nhất Hạnh, Zen master who preached compassion and nonviolence, dies


Born in 1926 in central Vietnam, Nhất Hạnh, whose given name was Nguyen Xuan Bao, became a novice monk at the age of 16 and later studied science at Saigon University before becoming fully ordained at Tu Hieu Temple in 1949. When the war arrived in Vietnam a few years later, Nhất Hạnh became actively involved in its opposition. On a trip to North America, he met with U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara and asked him to stop bombing Vietnam, later outlining a five-point peace proposal.

The quiet fierceness and determination that fueled his peace efforts in Vietnam and, later, his steadfastness in the face of the Communist government’s persecution of Buddhist sects, may not square with the soft-spoken teacher his followers know today, whose mindfulness practices seem to encapsulate the gentleness that characterized him.

But from the late 1960s, Nhất Hạnh organized to fight the worst effects of the war and the regime that came to power in its wake. He founded the School of Youth for Social Service, a grassroots relief agency of 10,000 volunteers that introduced schooling, health care and basic infrastructure to villages all over Vietnam. And he established the Order of Interbeing, an international community of laypeople and monastics dedicated, as their website says, “to the continuous practice of mindfulness, ethical behavior, and compassionate action in society.”

FILE - In this March 16, 2007 file photo, Vietnamese monk Thích Nhất Hạnh, center, arrives for a Great Chanting Ceremony at Vinh Nghiem Pagoda in Ho Chi Minh City, southern Vietnam. (AP Photo)

FILE – In this March 16, 2007 file photo, Vietnamese monk Thích Nhất Hạnh, center, arrives for a Great Chanting Ceremony at Vinh Nghiem Pagoda in Ho Chi Minh City, southern Vietnam. (AP Photo)

Banned from returning to Vietnam after an American and European teaching tour, Nhất Hạnh settled in France, where he eventually founded Plum Village, a Zen community that hosts over 200 monastics, as well as 8,000 visitors a year.

In addition, Nhất Hạnh also leaves behind nine monasteries and dozens of practice centers around the world, not to mention more than the 100 books he has written.

But his legacy cannot be quantified — or easily overstated. Insisting that for Buddhism to be relevant, it had to be engaged in tandem with the issues of its day, Nhất Hạnh met with fellow peace activists Thomas Merton and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. among others. Nhất Hạnh urged King to publicly oppose the Vietnam War — which King did for the first time in a famous speech given at Riverside Church in New York. King later nominated Nhất Hạnh for the Nobel Peace Prize, but the prize was withheld because King broke the rules by making his nomination public.

Nhất Hạnh’s influence extended far beyond his high-profile connections, however. It grew out of his deep embodiment of the peace he consistently taught, and anyone fortunate enough to be in the great teacher’s presence felt without a doubt the truth that governed his life: He lived exactly as he preached.

In a conversation with Oprah Winfrey, Nhất Hạnh said that when he was 7 years old, he saw a picture of a peaceful, smiling Buddha in a magazine. “I was impressed,” he said. “People around me were not like that, so I had the desire to be someone like him.” And for the next 88 years, that’s exactly who he was.

Nhất Hạnh taught us Westerners how to walk mindfully, simply for the sake of walking and without a goal in sight. He modeled eating with complete attention, seeing even a tiny raisin as “an ambassador of the cosmos.” He showed us it’s possible to dwell unhurried in each moment and to work with our impatience, our restlessness, our incessant dissatisfaction. He even taught us how to love.

The best thing we have to offer someone we love, Nhất Hạnh said, is our presence. His mantra, “Darling, I am here for you,” was meant to galvanize the quality of attention needed to show someone we care. It’s a deceptively simple teaching with the power to transform our relationships, if only we are courageous enough to take it up.

But if he was an unparalleled popularizer of mindfulness, Nhất Hạnh’s message challenges today’s trendy understanding of it as a technique to de-stress ourselves as we dash through our hectic lives. As Nhất Hạnh taught it, mindfulness is a means to put an end to our own and others’ suffering. It is integrally tied to compassion, to happiness and to peace.


RELATED: Thich Nhat Hanh, who worked for decades to teach mindfulness, approached death in that same spirit


“To be is to inter-be,” he said: We cannot help but affect one another with every one of our actions, every one of our words, and even every one of our thoughts. That’s why, more than any other teacher of his time, Nhất Hạnh understood that the only way to freedom is to live it with every step.

If the Buddha taught that liberation is possible, Nhất Hạnh, with his fierce tenderness and his unrelenting dedication to the practice of mindfulness, peace and compassion in every single moment, showed us how.

(Vanessa Zuisei Goddard is a writer, editor, and lay Zen teacher based in Playa del Carmen, Mexico. She is the author of “Still Running: The Art of Meditation in Motion.” The views expressed in this commentary do not reflect those of Religion News Service.)

Russian media tells Trump they're 'ready to elect him again' amid spat with Biden
Matthew Chapman
January 31, 2022

US President Donald Trump and Russia's President Vladimir Putin shake hands during a meeting on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany, on July 7, 2017 (AFP).

On Monday, The Daily Beast reported that Russian state media is openly longing for another Donald Trump presidency — at exactly the same time that the former president is promoting pro-Russian talking points about the threats to Ukraine.

"Faced with growing U.S. resistance, Russia’s government-funded state TV has become more brazen than ever in its calls to get former President Donald Trump back in the White House," reported Julia Davis.

Specifically, Davis cited comments by Russian TV host Olga Skabeeva, who informed viewers that "Donald already declared that he will become the 47th president of America and will figure things out with Russia and Putin," and then boldly declared, "Donald, we're waiting for you and are ready to elect you again."

This comes as Trump claimed at his "Save America" rally in Conroe, Texas that President Joe Biden's support for Ukraine could cause World War III — a common scare tactic used by Russia against any effort to push back on their policy dating back to the Soviet era.

"Trump’s comments encouraging the abandonment of Ukraine were also praised and repeatedly broadcast on Russian state television," continued the report. "His lambasting of NATO appears to fill Kremlin propagandists with nostalgic memories of what might have been. 'Trump was ready to disband NATO,' Vladimir Soloviev, the host of state TV show The Evening with Vladimir Soloviev, declared this weekend. Covering Trump’s remarks at his recent Texas rally, state media outlet Vesti published a piece entitled 'Trump discussed his friendship with Putin and said that Biden ruined everything.' Kremlin-controlled talking heads seem to be signaling that Russia sees Trump’s potential return as a solution for all of its problems, to the detriment of NATO and the West."

According to former George W. Bush speechwriter David Frum, the Ukraine crisis is rapidly becoming a point of division in the GOP, between the old neoconservative guard who supports protecting U.S. interests at any military cost, and Trump loyalists who have adopted the president's fondness for the Russian regime.

You can read more here.

 Palestinian youths clash with Israeli troops - in pictures (thenationalnews.com)






Opinion: Biden’s DOJ continues to defend bad cops and wrongful convictions


By Radley Balko
Columnist

During the George Floyd protests, then-presidential candidate Joe Biden forcefully condemned the violent eviction of protesters from D.C.'s Lafayette Square just before President Donald Trump’s photo op at St. John’s Church. Biden declared that the police had violated the First Amendment and decried the “violence that’s being done by the incumbent president to our democracy and to the pursuit of justice.” But last summer, Biden’s Justice Department successfully argued that Trump, former attorney general William P. Barr and the officers who cleared the park should be immune from civil liability.

That wasn’t an anomaly for Biden’s first year in office. Despite voicing support for criminal justice reform, his administration has argued that federal officers should receive near total immunity, even for egregious abuse. Why?

One explanation would be the traditions around the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), which represents the federal government before the Supreme Court. Though the OSG typically argues the position of the current administration, the OSG is expected to argue in favor of any federal law whose constitutionality is challenged in court, to side with police and prosecutors when they’ve been sued for misconduct and to retain a consistent position on cases as they move through the courts, even if a new administration with opposing views takes over in the meantime.

These customs might seem confusing — why should a new president uphold a predecessor’s policies they believe are unconstitutional? But it’s a widely held view in Washington, where the Office of the Solicitor General has a cherished nonpartisan reputation. After Barack Obama succeeded George W. Bush, acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal reviewed the outgoing administration’s legal positions. “We decided we were not going to switch in a single one of them,” Katyal recently told NPR. “Not one.”

As a result, the Obama administration argued Bush administration positions on issues such as the unlawful detainments of terrorism suspects, whether police should be excused for entering the wrong home without a warrant, whether states were obligated to provide physical evidence for post-conviction DNA testing, absolute immunity for prosecutors (even those who manufacture evidence that causes a wrongful conviction), limitations on Miranda rights and a particularly odious civil forfeiture law in Illinois. But if Obama and his administration truly disagreed with the Bush administration’s position on a case, it meant they put custom and the reputation of the OSG’s office above, for example, the righting of wrongful convictions.

And in early 2011, the Obama administration did break with OSG custom — in a big and conspicuous way — when Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. announced that the Justice Department would not defend (but also not oppose) the Defense of Marriage Act in federal court. By Obama’s second term, the OSG had reversed course from the George W. Bush administration in several cases.

If Obama put a crack in OSG norms, the Trump administration broke them wide open, effectively weaponizing the Justice Department and the solicitor general’s office to push Trump’s agenda through the court. I disagree with most of the Trump administration’s positions, and Trump’s use of the Justice Department to advance his personal interests was particularly dangerous. But when it comes to policy, it makes sense that the office that argues on behalf of the federal government would be in sync with the people who run the federal government.

So far, the Biden administration has contradicted the Trump administration on some positions, such as the use of public funds to pay tuition for private schools. But not when it comes to criminal justice issues. The administration argued to reinstate the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, for example, despite previously issuing a moratorium on federal executions. And though Biden has denounced police brutality, so far, his administration has reliably defended federal law enforcement (as well as state and local officers who work on joint task forces).

Inaction can also be as important as action. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit recently ruled that there is no established First Amendment right to record the police, contradicting every other federal court in the country to rule on the matter. The man detained for recording police officers asked the Supreme Court to overturn the ruling. The Biden administration didn’t take a position, and the court declined to hear the case. (It’s at least possible, admittedly, that the OSG didn’t ask the court to review the case because it fears the current makeup of the court would produce the wrong outcome.)

The administration has also mostly sat out cases in which state prisoners have asked the federal courts to review their convictions for constitutional violations. The most recent example is Shinn v. Ramirez, which involves an Arizona death row prisoner who is likely innocent. That case, which was argued in the Supreme Court last month, particularly stands out because when restrictions on federal review of state convictions were passed in 1996, Biden vocally opposed them, explicitly citing the possibility of wrongful convictions.

At best, the Biden administration may have diverged from the Obama administration in that while Obama’s DOJ actively inserted itself into cases involving state police and prosecutors — in defense of the police and prosecutors — the Biden administration has intervened only to defend federal law enforcement (and the local cops who work with them).

Despite his vocal support for police reform and other criminal justice reforms over the past couple years, Biden has been a reliably law-and-order politician for nearly his entire time in public life. So it’s certainly possible that Biden’s OSG is reflecting his positions on these issues and not merely adhering to custom or tradition. It might also be that Biden’s administration just doesn’t prioritize these issues enough to breach decorum. Either way, the administration’s position seems to be to denounce the criminal justice system’s excesses while urging the courts to close their doors to its victims.


Opinion by Radley BalkoRadley Balko reports on criminal justice, the drug war and civil liberties for The Washington Post. Previously, he was an investigative reporter for the Huffington Post and a writer and editor for Reason magazine. His most recent book is "The Cadaver King and the Country Dentist: A True Story of Injustice in the American South." Twitter


Fox News' Tomi Lahren told officers at a policing conference that prominent police killings could have been avoided if people 'would just comply'

tomi lahren
Tomi Lahren in Pasadena, California.Colin Young-Wolff/Invision/AP
  • Tomi Lahren was among several who spoke at a police training conference in Atlantic City in October.

  • Lahren described Black Lives Matter as "thugs, felons, and criminals" and as a "terrorist organization."

  • She went on to say police shootings could be avoided if people "would just comply with police."

Fox News personality Tomi Lahren told police officers that significant numbers of police brutality cases could have been avoided "if people would just comply with police, would follow orders, and not resist arrest."

The Washington Post reported that Lahren, a political commentator for the Fox Nation shows "Final Thoughts" and "No Interruption," made the comments in October at the Street Cop Training Conference in Atlantic City, New Jersey.

More than 1,000 police officers from departments across New Jersey and other states attended the conference, The Post reported. During her speech, Lahren described Black Lives Matter as "thugs, felons, and criminals" and a "terrorist organization."

"If I'm wrong, please point it out," Lahren said, according to a sound clip of her remarks shared by The Post. "But all these major headline incidents that we've had in this country involving law enforcement in the last, at least, five years could have all been prevented if people would just comply with police, would follow orders, and not resist arrest."

The audience can be heard applauding and cheering in the clip.

Her comments were consistent with previous statements she has made on her shows and social media.

The Post's investigation found Lahren's sentiments were typical of those made in commercial police training settings, even as calls for reform grow. The outlet spoke with 18 trainers and experts in addition to watching or attending conferences in New Jersey and Idaho, many of whom balked at police reform.

Several blamed the media for overplaying the public's desire for reform and dismissed reformers as a small cohort, The Post found. The outlet also said many portrayed violence as an inherent part of policing.

"The curriculum is that you are a good person and reveling in violence and being an expert in violence is not morally wrong," Michael Sierra-Arévalo, a sociology professor at the University of Texas at Austin who attended the Street Cop Conference, told The Post. "In fact, it's your moral duty because you're a paladin. You are this kind of warrior."

Calls for police reform grew during the racial justice protests in the summer of 2020 after the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer.

Congress engaged in bipartisan talks about a potential police reform bill last summer, but they fell apart without reaching a deal.

Sources told NBC News that President Joe Biden plans to sign executive orders on police reform as early as this month.



GUN CONTROL GOOD

Anjum Coffland's Husband Killed Their Twin Girls and Shot Her. Now She's Fighting to Keep Guns from Abusers

The Illinois resident is opening up about her harrowing ordeal in
 honor of National Gun Violence Survivors’ Week from Feb. 1-7
Anjum Coffland is pictured in her St. Charles home
Anjum Coffland in her St. Charles home
 
| CREDIT: SANDY BRESSNER/SHAW MEDIA

At just 16, Anjum Coffland's twin daughters, Brittany and Tiffany, had their career paths already mapped out.

A cheerleader and gymnast, Brittany wanted to work in hospitality — a natural choice for her outgoing, gregarious daughter, says Anjum, 51, of St. Charles, Ill.

"She was a mini-me," Anjum tells PEOPLE in this week's issue. "Very much an 'I want-to-be-friends-with-everyone' kind of girl. Brittany made friends very easily. And she loved life."

Tiffany, a serious student who aced her AP classes, got a job at a local pet store to gain experience for a career working with animals.

"She thought about being a vet, but said, 'I don't want to put animals to sleep, mom,'" Anjum recalls.

"She loved dogs and animals," says Anjum. "I think she loved animals more than people because she could sense that people could hurt her, but animals just love people unconditionally."

Anjum loved her girls unconditionally and then some. But the sisters' dreams — and Anjum's dreams for their futures — were forever shattered by unimaginable tragedy.

On March 10, 2017, just four days before their 17th birthdays, their father, Randall, shot each sister in the head, killing them instantly.

Unhappy that he and Anjum were separating, Randall told her that their daughters were "already dead" before pointing the gun at Anjum's legs.

"I want you to live — and suffer," he sneered at her before pulling the trigger, shooting her with a single bullet that tore through both thighs.

"The second he shot me, I knew my girls were dead," she says.

Randall then turned the gun on himself.

As the sole survivor of that dark day, Anjum has dedicated her life to keeping guns out of the hands of domestic abusers.

"I want people to understand the gun laws are not there to take the guns away from people who need to protect themselves," she says. "They're actually there to stop the guns from getting into people's hands like Randall."

For more on Anjum Coffland's harrowing story of survival and determination to help others, subscribe now to PEOPLE or pick up this week's issue, on newsstands Friday.

As a member of Everytown's Survivor Network, Anjum is sharing her story to spotlight National Gun Violence Survivors' Week from Feb. 1 through Feb. 7.

Started in February 2019, National Gun Violence Survivors Week honors the 58 percent of Americans who've reported that they've experienced gun violence firsthand — or that someone they care for has personally experienced gun violence, a recent national poll shows, according to Everytown for Gun Safety.

Anjum first joined Moms Demand Action in 2018 while struggling with the gaping hole left behind by her daughters' senseless murders. She later became a member Everytown for Gun Safety's Survivor Network, speaking to other members and publicly about her harrowing ordeal.

Her hope is to strengthen gun laws by extending waiting times to get a weapon, particularly if the purchaser has mental health issues or is in a volatile relationship.

Anjum Coffland and her family
Anjum Coffland with her twin daughters
 
| CREDIT: COURTESY ANJUM COFFLAND

In the month before Randall killed the girls, he'd been spiraling downward with a potent mix of alcohol and antidepressants.

He bought the gun he used to kill the girls and himself — the first one he ever purchased — about a month before the shooting, she says.

"I had no idea he bought a gun," she says.

Years earlier, she learned, he had gotten his Firearm Owners Identification (FOID) card from the Illinois State Police, which residents must apply for to legally own firearms or ammunition.

"Then all of a sudden," in 2017, "he's asking for a gun," says Anjum.

"Nobody said, 'Why is he getting a gun now?" she asks. "He never got a gun before. No red flags were raised."

She is also pushing for laws that would require anyone buying a gun to present references certifying that they aren't dangerous, like Randall was.

"If he had put me down as a person to contact if he ever bought a gun, guess what I would have told them?" she asks. "I would have said, 'We're going through a divorce. Please do not give him a gun.'"

Anjum relies on her memories of Brittany and Tiffany to help her get through each day.

"I love my girls," she says. "They were sweet, sweet kids. They were good kids. I miss them."

Little has helped ease the pain of their deaths.

"The only way to make me feel like I'm going to be okay is by bringing my kids back," she says. "And that will never happen."






CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
British tech magnate Mike Lynch loses HP fraud case and could be extradited to US in days

Disgraced entrepreneur will be appealing as he faces a potential prison sentence of up to 20 years


Mike Lynch was once lauded by academics and scientists, and was even asked to advise the government on technology and innovation.
Reuters

The National
Jan 29, 2022

Mike Lynch, the British technology entrepreneur, lost a multi-billion-dollar court case against US conglomerate Hewlett-Packard after a London judge ruled he orchestrated an elaborate fraud to inflate the value of his company Autonomy before it was purchased by HP in 2011 for $11 billion.

Mr Lynch's woes were further compounded almost immediately following the long drawn-out legal battle after the British government's interior ministry ordered for him to be extradited to the United States, where he will be facing criminal charges, including wire and securities fraud, that carry a prison sentence of up to 20 years.

High Court Justice Robert Hildyard said HP "substantially succeeded in their claims" against Mr Lynch in a one-hour summary of his much longer judgment, following a nine-month trial and a two-year wait for his decision.

“I have found that both defendants knew that the accounts and the representations they made in this regard gave a misleading picture of Autonomy’s OEM [original equipment manufacturer] business," Judge Hildyard said, referring to both Mr Lynch and Sushovan Hussain, Mr Lynch's finance director who was convicted of fraud in the US and sentenced to five years in prison in 2019.

The duo had fraudulently concealed a "fire sale" of hardware and engaged in convoluted reselling schemes to mask a shortfall in sales of Autonomy's software, the business HP coveted, he added.

That had enabled Autonomy to meet quarterly financial forecasts and maintain its high share price before the HP acquisition.

I have found that both defendants knew that the accounts and the representations they made in this regard gave a misleading picture of Autonomy’s OEM business
High Court Justice Robert Hildyard

The damages will be announced at a later date, although they are expected to be significantly smaller than the $5bn demanded by HP.

Mr Lynch will be appealing, said Kelwin Nicholls, one of his lawyers, who added that the court's ruling was "disappointing".

Another member of Mr Lynch's legal team, Chris Morvillo, said his client "firmly denies the charges brought against him in the US and will continue to fight to establish his innocence".

Mr Lynch was "a British citizen who ran a British company in Britain, subject to British laws and rules and that is where the matter should be resolved", Mr Morvillo added.

"This is not the end of the battle — far from it. Dr Lynch will now file an appeal to the High Court in London."

Fall from grace


The high-profile case surrounding one of the UK's biggest technology deals culminated in a spectacular fall from grace for Mr Lynch, who was considered Britain's most successful technology leader.

The 56-year-old turned ground-breaking research at Cambridge University into the foundation of Autonomy, which would eventually become Britain's biggest software company and a member of the blue-chip FTSE 100 index.

He was lauded by academics and scientists, and was even asked to advise the government on technology and innovation.

Autonomy's "almost magical" capability, as it was once described by HP, was to search and organise unstructured information for clients, a killer application in a world of unlimited data and artificial intelligence.

This is not the end of the battle — far from it. Dr Lynch will now file an appeal to the High Court in London
Chris Morvillo, lawyer for Mike Lynch

It was then bought by HP, described by the judge as being in the doldrums at the time, in a move that was designed to transform the computer and printer maker into a more profitable business focused on software.

But the acquisition turned sour almost immediately. HP wrote down the value of Autonomy by $8.8bn within a year and sought damages from Mr Lynch and Mr Hussain.

Mr Lynch fired back, saying HP did not know what it was doing, and was out of its depth in understanding his technology.

"HPE is pleased that the judge has held them accountable," a spokesman for Hewlett-Packard Enterprise said after the London court ruling.

Mr Lynch was also central to the creation of cyber security firm DarkTrace, which listed on the stock market last year and has a market capitalisation of around $2.8bn today. Mr Lynch and his wife Angela Bacares own nearly 16 per cent of DarkTrace.

HP sold the remnants of Autonomy along with other assets to British company Micro Focus in 2016.

Updated: January 29th 2022, 3:19 AM
Security agency director urges governors to teach cybersecurity basics

By Hannah Schoenbaum, Medill News Service

Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, chairman of the governors' association, called the country’s lack of cybersecurity education a “national security issue.” Photo by Hannah Schoenbaum/Medill News Service

WASHINGTON, Jan. 29 (UPI) -- As the nation's governors consider how to spend funds from President Joe Biden's bipartisan infrastructure law, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency is encouraging investments in cybersecurity education for Americans of all ages, including public officials and their staffs.

"What we want to do is communicate about this topic in a way where people are not scared to death of it," CISA Director Jen Easterly said Saturday at the National Governors Association winter meeting.

"What we need to do is really reclaim that territory and make cybersecurity and, most importantly cyber hygiene, a kitchen table issue."

The $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure law, signed by the president in November, allocates $1 billion in grant money for states to bolster their cyber defenses. As each state is assessing its individual needs, cybersecurity experts are encouraging partnerships with the private sector and nationwide improvements in cyber literacy.

RELATED White House to add water sector to cybersecurity initiative

"We're only as strong as the weakest link in the chain," said Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee, who chairs the governors association Pandemic and Disaster Response Task Force.

According to CISA, more than 99% of all cyberattacks could have been prevented with multi-factor authentication, a simple security measure that requires the user to present two or more forms of identification to gain access to their account.

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the cybersecurity crisis confronting everyday Americans, Easterly said, noting an uptick in ransomware attacks against businesses and transit systems.

"You had a global health crisis that, in many ways, became a cybersecurity crisis because you saw entrepreneurial cyberthreat actors take advantage of the fact that so many people are now working from home in ostensibly less secure environments," she said.

In Biden's first year in office, hackers also targeted New York City's Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the Steamship Authority of Massachusetts ferry service and the Port of Houston.

CISA released a resource guide Friday that outlines how state government officials can request federal support in response to future cyber threats.

RELATED U.S. mayors pressed to address cybersecurity precautions

Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, chairman of the governors' association, called the country's lack of cybersecurity education a "national security issue." He said K-12 computer science education is necessary in every school to equip the next generation of American cybersecurity professionals.

"Either we're going to fall behind in our technology development and our innovation, or we're simply going to acquire all the talent from overseas," Hutchinson told reporters. "And the third option, which I endorse, is to say, 'We're going to lead in the United States of America in training the talent for the digital age.'"
Hell Is a Very Small Place: Voices from Solitary Confinement

The first major trade book on solitary confinement brings together first-hand accounts of life in solitary with analysis by leading experts.

Order now as a paperback, hardcover, or e-book.

NOW ALSO AVAILABLE: FREE READING GUIDE FOR READING GROUPS, EDUCATORS, AND STUDENTS, with discussion questions and activities.

About HELL IS A VERY SMALL PLACE:


Hell Is a Very Small Place: Voices from Solitary Confinement
Now available as a paperback, hardcover, or e-book.

President Barack Obama, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, and Pope Francis have all criticized the widespread use of solitary confinement in prisons and jails. UN Special Rapporteur on Torture Juan E. Méndez has denounced the use of solitary beyond fifteen days as a form of cruel and degrading treatment that often rises to the level of torture. Yet the United States holds more than eighty thousand people in isolation on any given day.

In a book that will add a startling new dimension to the debates around human rights and prison reform, 16 men and women currently and formerly former imprisoned in solitary confinement describe its devastating effects on their minds and bodies, as well as the solidarity expressed between individuals who live side by side for years without ever meeting one another face to face, the ever-present specters of madness and suicide, and the struggle to maintain hope and humanity in the face of crippling isolation and deprivation.

These firsthand accounts are supplemented by the writing of noted experts, exploring the psychological, legal, ethical, and political dimensions of solitary confinement. Solitary Watch’s James Ridgeway and Jean Casella provide a comprehensive introduction, and Sarah Shourd, herself a survivor of more than a year of solitary confinement, writes eloquently in a preface about an experience that changed her life. The powerful cover art is by renowned political artist Molly Crabapple.
Reviews:

Kirkus Reviews: “The founders of a watchdog group dedicated to stopping the practice of solitary confinement gather voices from victims of this hellish punishment [and] make their arguments with undeniable efficacy…In collecting essays from prisoners and mental health experts, the editors dig deep into the frailties of the human mind as well as the savagery of the American penal system and its ilk. Many of the men and women whose voices are captured here measure their time in solitary not in years but in decades. Some are soul-deadening…Other writers are startlingly articulate and unnervingly funny, despite the violence and grief spilled out on the page…The stories by people victimized by solitary confinement are followed by articulate essays by medical and legal professionals about the human costs of the practice…A potent cry of anguish from men and women buried way down in the hole.”

Publishers Weekly: “In this grim, no-holds-barred exposé, 21 essays and academic papers critique the use of solitary confinement in prison, looking at the ruinous effects on those forced to endure it for weeks, months, years, or even decades at a time…These stories pack a visceral punch and make a convincing case for more humane conditions, better oversight, and continuing prison reform.”

New York Review of Books (review by Martin Garbus): “For readers who have no sense of the nature of the punishment that is exacted in their name, this collection offers an unforgettable look at the peculiar horrors and humiliations involved in solitary confinement.”

Los Angeles Review of Books: “Hell Is a Very Small Place is composed of communication and observation that is not supposed to exist: it is a book as a minor act of rebellion…Writing and publishing this book was a form of defiance against repression, and reading and discussing it constitutes a minor form of solidarity with those still inside.”
Praise:

“A book that people of conscience must read and share. The stories in it will not simply haunt us. They will inspire us to act.” — HEATHER ANN THOMPSON, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Blood in the Water, choosing her Favorite Book of 2016 in Publishers Weekly

“We will never achieve justice in this country until we have the courage to look unblinkingly into the hidden corners of our system of mass incarceration, where men and women are locked away and forgotten—stored like meat in a freezer. This book does just that.” —VAN JONES, author of Rebuild the Dream

“An extraordinary collection of testimonials from men and women who have endured solitary confinement and, unlike many others, survived. . . . Hell is a Very Small Place probes the darkest corners of a prison system where, all too often, the urge to punish has prevailed over law, morality, and human decency.” —DAVID C. FATHI, director, ACLU National Prison Project

“A devastating look in the mirror for a society that has hidden the depths of its cruelty behind concrete and steel. Hell is a Very Small Place puts us face with the smells, the sounds, and the profound despair of solitary confinement, and is a call to moral outrage, repentance, and action.”
—REV. LAURA MARKLE DOWNTON, former U.S. policy director, National Religious Campaign Against Torture

“Confronts the moral catastrophe of solitary confinement through compelling and courageous testimonies by the world’s premier experts on the matter: the confined themselves.” —GLENN E. MARTIN, founder and president, Just Leadership USA

“This important book leaves no doubt that solitary confinement has no place in a civilized society. The story of each person subject to solitary shows that he or she is somebody and that the life that is thrown away is not beyond redemption. Together they demonstrate the urgency of turning from hatred to understanding and from vengeance to reconciliation if we are doing to have a decent, moral and compassionate society.” —STEPHEN BRIGHT, president and senior counsel, Southern Center for Human Rights

“Please take the time to read these haunting voices of people in solitary, along with experts and activists. It is vitally important.” —RALPH NADER

“The personal accounts by prisoners contained in this book are some of the most disturbing that I have ever read. There were many points throughout the book when my emotions became very overwhelming, and I had to pause and catch my breath.” —CHELSEA MANNING
About the Authors:

JEAN CASELLA is co-director of Solitary Watch, a web-based watchdog project, and a Soros Justice Fellow. Her writing on solitary confinement has appeared in The Guardian, The Nation, Mother Jones, and other publications. She is the editor of two previous anthologies and lives in Brooklyn, New York.

JAMES RIDGEWAY has been an investigative journalist for more than fifty years and is the author of eighteen previous books. He is co-director of Solitary Watch and recent recipient of a Soros Justice Fellowship, Alicia Patterson Fellowship, and Media for a Just Society Award. He lives in Washington, D.C.

SARAH SHOURD, a journalist and playwright, was held as a political hostage by the Iranian government, including 410 days in solitary, an experience she chronicled in A Sliver of Light: Three Americans Imprisoned in Iran. She lives in Oakland, California.
Publication Information:

240 pages, 5 ½ x 8 ½”

Paperback: September 5, 2017, $17.95, ISBN 978-1620973516

Hardcover: February 2, 2016, $25.95, ISBN 978-1-62097-137-6

E-Book: February 2, 2016, $9.99, ASIN B016TX4F16