Tuesday, February 01, 2022

McAfee Brings $3.3 Billion of Junk Bonds to Finance Buyout

Paula Seligson and Gowri Gurumurthy
Mon, January 31, 2022


(Bloomberg) -- McAfee Corp. came forward with a $3.3 billion two-part bond deal on Monday to help finance its leveraged buyout by a group of private equity firms, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

The cybersecurity software maker is selling $1 billion of seven-year secured notes and $2.32 billion eight-year unsecured bonds, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing a private transaction.

An investor call will be held on Tuesday at 11 a.m. in New York, they added. The deal will market through Thursday with pricing expected thereafter, they said.

A group of private equity firms led by Advent International Corp. and Permira Advisers are buying McAfee in a deal valued at more than $14 billion, including debt. McAfee is also marketing a cross-border leveraged loan as part of the transaction, comprised of a $4.41 billion tranche and a $1.25 billion-equivalent euro portion. Commitments are due on Wednesday.

Early pricing discussions on the deal have increased amid market volatility. In early January, McAfee initially floated a yield of about 4.5% for the secured portion and 6.5% for the unsecured notes, though the levels were subject to change to account for weakness across credit, Bloomberg previously reported. They’ve since increased to the low-5% range for the secured notes and low-7% yield for the unsecured bonds, different people said.

Representatives for Permira, Credit Suisse Group AG, which is leading the secured notes, and Bank of America Corp., which is leading the unsecured bonds, declined to comment. Representatives for McAfee and Advent didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

McAfee’s financing package joins others funding leveraged buyouts in January as companies rush to lock in low borrowing costs before the Federal Reserve raises interest rates, though some are getting dinged by market volatility. The financing for Athenahealth Inc., a health information technology company, wrapped up last week, and the bonds immediately fell below par in secondary trading.

Read more: Wall Street Makes $18 Billion Bet on LBOs as Yields Climb

Covis Pharmaceuticals Inc. added a number of sweeteners to a $900 million junk-debt sale, the latest borrower to struggle to attract demand from investors. The company, owned by Apollo Global Management Inc., on Monday cut the size of one portion of the bond offering to $350 million euros equivalent from $375 million, and scrapped the dollar bonds in favor of an increased $550 million term loan.

Financial information services firm Ion Analytics shelved a junk-bond sale Friday amid a tougher backdrop for borrowers bracing for central bank rate hikes, after originally halving the size of the notes offering.

U.S. junk bonds are poised for their worst January on record with a month-to-date loss of 2.8%. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s hawkish tone helped send yields jumping 109 basis points month-to-date to 5.3%, the highest in 15 months.

  • https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/worst-january-ever-for-junk-bonds-shows...

    2 hours ago · Junk bonds are considered less sensitive to tighter central bank policy than investment-grade debt. And, to be sure, junk did have a better January than the 3.37% plunge experienced by U.S. high-grade debt. But that’s little comfort to high-yield investors now eyeing substantial portfolio losses.

  • https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/junk-bonds

    2021-10-21 · A junk bond, also known as a speculative-grade bond, is a high-yielding fixed income security with a high risk of default on payment. When you buy bonds, you’re lending money to the bond issuer—a...

  • https://www.thebalance.com/what-are-junk-bonds-pros-cons-ratings-3305606

    2006-12-15 · Junk bonds are a type of corporate bond. While you may think of “junk” as that pile of old stuff in the basement that you’ve been meaning to throw out, the term means something very different for bonds. Junk bonds are below-investment-grade corporate bonds with a higher risk and generally a higher yield than other corporate bonds.

    • Occupation: Financial Writer
    • Estimated Reading Time: 7 mins
  • https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-31/mcafee-brings-3-3...

    21 hours ago · Technology McAfee Brings $3.3 Billion of Junk Bonds to Finance Buyout Notes will be marketed to investors through Thursday Early pricing discussions increased amid market volatility McAfee...

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-yield_debt

    In finance, a high-yield bond (non-investment-grade bond, speculative-grade bond, or junk bond) is a bond that is rated below investment grade by credit rating agencies. These bonds have a higher risk of default or other adverse credit events, but offer higher yields than investment-grade bonds in order to compensate for the increased risk.

    Wikipedia · Text under CC-BY-SA license
    1. https://www.investopedia.com/.../history-high-yield-bond-meltdowns.asp
      Image
      This phenomenon isn’t hard to explain. As the economy weakens, opportunities for businesses to secure funding begin to become more and more scarce and the competition for those dwindling opportunities becomes more intense in response. The ability of companies who owe such debts to be able to make good on them b…
      See more on investopedia.com

    1. Wall Street Crime And Punishment: Michael Milken, The ...

      https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/07/22096054/wall-street-crime-and...

      2021-07-23 · The legal team discovered irregularities tied to Drexel’s role as the junk bond issuing underwriter for Kohlberg Kravis Roberts’ leveraged buyout of …


    Global Junk-Bond Markets Wobble, 
    Spelling Risk for M&A Financing

    Laura Benitez and Olivia Raimonde
    Fri., January 28, 2022



    (Bloomberg) -- The inevitability of central bank rate increases is roiling junk-bond markets across the globe, bringing higher costs for companies needing to refinance debt and bankers waiting to sell billions to fund major acquisition deals.

    In the U.S., the Federal Reserve’s months-long signaling of coming rate increases already has reduced new sales of high-yield bonds by 45% from last year’s pace. European junk-debt offerings have decreased by more than 50% so far in 2022, the worst start to a year since 2019, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

    Fed Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday provided even more clarity on the central bank’s plan to reduce liquidity and hike rates this year to combat inflation. While the investment-grade bond market is relatively stable, and Athenahealth Inc. sold high-yield debt this week without a hitch, signs are emerging that junk issuers face investors who demand greater reward for taking on more rate risk.

    “We are now facing the reality of a much more hawkish Fed that will withdraw liquidity faster than expected,” said David Knutson, head of U.S. fixed income product management at Schroders Plc. “This has curtailed demand in the riskier parts of the market as they will be impacted first. The balance between borrowers and lenders is starting to turn in favor of lenders.”

    Covis Pharmaceuticals Inc. is deciding whether to proceed with an $850 million cross-border bond sale that was slated to price Friday, financial information services firm ION Analytics also roughly halved the size of a cross-border junk-debt sale, while Italian football club FC Internazionale Milano SpA was forced to pay a considerably higher price than its existing interest rate to sell bonds earlier this week.

    The market’s tone could prove a challenge for bankers planning to launch transactions driven by buyouts, such as the financing for cybersecurity software maker McAfee Corp. For buyout financing that banks have already funded with pre-arranged terms, the higher costs could potentially eat into their fees.

    Some issuers, such as Fertitta Entertainment Inc., have recently shifted more borrowing into loans from bonds to finance buyouts. “Terms and pricing will become more favorable to investors to bring the market back into balance,” Knutson said.

    The riskiest debt, such as unsecured bonds typically financed in the junk market, are being hit hard. Average yields on U.S. corporate bonds rated in the CCC tier have jumped by at least 50 basis points in the past week to 7.62% to reach levels last seen in early December, according to Bloomberg index data. Single B yields rose the most in six months to a 15-month high of 5.53%.

    CCC bonds trading in the secondary market dropped 0.55% on Thursday, their biggest one-day loss in nine weeks.

    U.S. high-yield funds reported an outflow of $2.8 billion for the week ended Jan. 26, the third straight week of outflows in excess of $2 billion, and the biggest since Nov. 24.

    Skeptical Era

    Debt traders are factoring in a faster pace of global policy tightening following the Fed’s meeting this week, seeing almost five Fed and Bank of England interest-rate increases and the first move from the European Central Bank this year.

    “We’re entering into a more skeptical era now and fixed-rate investors are much more price sensitive and cautious, especially on the lower quality names,” said Ben Thompson, co-head for leveraged finance in Europe at JPMorgan Chase & Co. “The lesser known companies, or ones with history, will be a harder sell this year based on what we’ve seen so far.”

    Risks Mount for Global Credit Markets After Fed’s Hawkish Stance

    Elsewhere in credit markets:

    Americas

    The U.S. corporate bond market may come under pressure as the Fed starts to tighten the money supply in March, and that could come from an unlikely source: home loans.


    Athenahealth’s newly minted junk bonds fell more than 1 cent on the dollar a day after pricing, in another sign of market volatility


    In the investment-grade market, Procter & Gamble -- the only borrower to come to market after the Federal Reserve’s Wednesday announcement -- is seeing both tranches of its deal trading wider


    Gustavo Petro, the front-runner to win Colombia’s presidential election in May, vows he’ll halt oil drilling the day he takes office. Bond investors are taking him seriously, with Ecopetrol SA’s notes posting some of the biggest losses among emerging-market oil companies since August


    Production delays are straining mattress manufacturer Purple Innovation Inc.’s relationship with its wholesale partner, boosting a measure of its default probability in the next year to almost 39%

    EMEA

    Europe’s primary market slowed this week to about 24 billion euros of sales, below the expectations of 86% of respondents to a weekly Bloomberg News survey.


    Offerings on Friday involved four deals to raise at least 1.6 billion euros equivalent, including from Atlas Copco Finance and Bpifrance


    London airport Heathrow flagged to investors a risk to covenants in 2022 if cash flows from passengers are more than 15% below forecast


    Move follows the Civil Aviation Authority’s annual decision on airport charges


    Sustainable-linked issuance could take a greater share of Germany’s Schuldschein market as investors clamor for ethically-focused debt, according to Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen Girozentrale, one of the top arrangers


    Deutsche Bank is targeting 15 billion to 20 billion euros of debt issuance this year, primarily in senior non-preferred notes

    Asia

    Primary issuance in the U.S. currency dropped to $4.1 billion this week from $5.5 billion last week, the lowest such weekly figure so far this year amid high volatility in financial markets as Federal Reserve set the stage for raising interest rates.


    New dollar notes sold by Asian companies outside Japan decreased for a third straight week


    China Cinda Asset Management Co. and Islamic Republic of Pakistan were the biggest borrowers in the market, each selling $1 billion of bonds



    Europe Is Losing Nuclear Power Just When It Really Needs Energy





    Rachel Morison, Jonathan Tirone and Francois De Beaupuy
    Tue, February 1, 2022

    (Bloomberg) -- As the Fukushima disaster unfolded in Japan in 2011, then-German Chancellor Angela Merkel made a dramatic decision that delighted her country’s anti-nuclear movement: all reactors would be ditched.

    What couldn’t have been predicted was that Europe would find itself mired in one of the worst energy crises in its history. A decade later, the continent’s biggest economy has shut down almost all its capacity already. The rest will be switched off at the end of 2022 — at the worst possible time.

    Wholesale power prices are more than four times what they were at the start of the coronavirus pandemic. Governments are having to take emergency action to support domestic and industrial consumers faced with crippling bills, which could rise higher if the tension over Ukraine escalates. The crunch has not only exposed Europe’s supply vulnerabilities, but also the entrenched cultural and political divisions over the nuclear industry and a failure to forge a collective vision.

    Other regions meanwhile are cracking on. China is moving fast on nuclear to try to clean up its air quality. Its suite of reactors is on track to surpass that of the U.S., the world’s largest, by as soon as the middle of this decade. Russia is moving forward with new stations at home and has more than 20 reactors confirmed or planned for export construction, according to the World Nuclear Association.

    “I don’t think we’re ever going to see consensus across Europe with regards to the continued running of existing assets, let alone the construction of new ones,” said Peter Osbaldstone, research director for power and renewables at Wood Mackenzie Group Ltd. in the U.K. “It’s such a massive polarizer of opinions that national energy policy is required in strength over a sustained period to support new nuclear investment.”

    France, Europe’s most prolific nuclear energy producer, is promising an atomic renaissance as its output becomes less reliable. Britain plans to replace aging plants in the quest for cleaner, more reliable energy sources. The Netherlands wants to add more capacity, Poland also is seeking to join the nuclear club, and Finland is starting to produce electricity later this month from its first new plant in four decades.

    Belgium and Spain, meanwhile, are following Germany’s lead in abandoning nuclear, albeit on different timeframes. Austria rejected it in a referendum in 1978.

    Nuclear power is seen by its proponents as vital to reaching net-zero targets. Once built, reactors supply low-carbon electricity all the time, unlike intermittent wind or solar.

    Plants, though, take a decade or more to construct at best and the risk is high of running over time and over budget. Finland’s new Olkiluoto-3 unit is coming on line after a 12-year delay and billions of euros in financial overruns. Then there’s the waste, which stays hazardous for 100,000 years.

    “Despite growing international calls to address climate change and a growing number of national net-zero pledges, the global nuclear industry remains largely on its heels,” said Chris Gadomski, head of nuclear research at Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

    Indeed, European Union members are still quarreling over whether nuclear even counts as sustainable. Electorates are also split. Polling by YouGov Plc published in December found that Danes, Germans and Italians were far more nuclear-skeptic than the French, British or Spanish.

    “It comes down to politics,” said Vince Zabielski, partner at New York-based law firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, who was a nuclear engineer for 15 years. “Everything political ebbs and flows, but when the lights start going off people have a completely different perspective.”

    What’s Behind Europe’s Skyrocketing Energy Prices

    There’s a risk of rolling blackouts this winter. Supply concerns plaguing Europe have sent gas and electricity prices to record levels and inflation has ballooned. There’s also mounting tension with Russia over a possible invasion of Ukraine, which could lead to disrupted supplies of gas. All this is strengthening the argument that Europe needs to reduce its dependence on international sources of gas.

    Europe will need to invest 500 billion euros ($568 billion) in nuclear over the next 30 years to meet growing demand for electricity and achieve its carbon reduction targets, according to Thierry Breton, the EU’s internal market commissioner. His comments come after the bloc unveiled plans last month to allow certain natural gas and nuclear energy projects to be classified as sustainable investments.

    “Nuclear power is a very long-term investment and investors need some kind of guarantee that it will generate a payoff,” said Elina Brutschin at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. In order to survive in liberalized economies like the EU, the technology needs policy support to help protect investors, she said.

    That already looks like a tall order. The European Commission has been told by a key expert group that the labeling risks raising greenhouse gas emissions and undermining the bloc’s reputation as a bastion for environmentally friendly finance.

    Austria has threatened to sue the European Commission over attempts to label atomic energy as green. The nation previously attempted a legal challenge, when the U.K. was still an EU member, to stop the construction of Electricite de France SA’s Hinkley Point C plant, in the west of England. It has also commenced litigation against new Russia-backed projects in neighboring Hungary.

    Germany, which has missed its carbon emissions targets for the past two years, has been criticized by some environmentalists and climate scientists for shutting down a supply of clean power at the worst time. Its final three reactors will be halted this year. Yet that was never going to be reversed with the Greens part of the new coalition government.

    The contribution of renewables in Germany has almost tripled since the year before Fukushima, and was 42% of supply last year. That’s a drop from 46% from the year before and means the country’s new government will have to install some 3 gigawatts of renewables — equivalent to the generating capacity of three nuclear reactors — every year this decade to hit the country's 80% goal.

    “Other countries don’t have this strong political background that goes back to three decades of anti-nuclear protests,” said Manuel Koehler, managing director of Aurora Energy Research Ltd., a company analyzing power markets and founded by Oxford University academics.

    At the heart of the issue is that countries with a history of nuclear weapons will be more likely to use the fuel for power generation. They will also have built an industry and jobs in civil engineering around that.

    Germany’s Greens grew out of anti-nuclear protest movements against the stationing of U.S. nuclear missiles in West Germany. The 1986 Chernobyl meltdown, which sent plumes of radioactive fallout wafting over parts of western Europe, helped galvanize the broader population. Nuclear phase-out plans were originally laid out in 2002, but were put on hold by the country’s conservative governments. The 2011 Fukushima meltdowns reinvigorated public debate, ultimately prompting Merkel to implement them.

    It’s not easy to undo that commitment, said Mark Hibbs, a Bonn, Germany-based nuclear analyst at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: “These are strategic decisions, that have been taken long in advance.”

    In France, President Emmanuel Macron is about to embark on a renewed embrace of nuclear power. The nation produces about two-thirds of its power from reactors and is the biggest exporter of electricity in Europe. Notably, that includes anti-nuclear Germany and Austria.

    EDF, the world’s biggest nuclear plant operator, is urging the French government to support construction of six new large-scale reactors at an estimated cost of about 50 billion euros. The first of them would start generating in 2035.

    But even France has faced setbacks. Development of new projects has been put on hold after years of technical issues at the Flamanville-3 project in Normandy. The plant is now scheduled to be completed next year.

    In the U.K., Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng said that the global gas price crisis underscores the need for more home-generated clean power. By 2024, five of Britain’s eight plants will be shuttered because they are too old. Hinkley Point C is due to be finished in 2026 and the government will make a final decision on another station before an election due in 2024.

    One solution is to build small modular reactors, or SMRs, which are quicker to construct and cheaper. The U.S. is at the forefront of efforts to design smaller nuclear systems with plans also underway in the U.K. and France. Yet they too have faced delays. SMR designs have existed for decades though face the same challenging economic metrics and safety and security regulations of big plants.

    The trouble, as ever, is time. “Any investment decisions you make now aren’t going to come to fruition until the 2030s,” said Osbaldstone, the research director at Wood Mackenzie. “Nuclear isn’t an answer to the current energy crisis.”

    Bitcoin (BTC) Mining Back in the News with New CO2 Emission Numbers

    Bob Mason
    Mon, January 31, 2022

    At the turn of the year, Bitcoin (BTC) mining has once again faced the scorn of lawmakers. The increased level of interest followed Bitcoin’s surge to a November ATH $68,979. Rising prices draw in greater mining activity, thus having “a greater impact on the environment”.

    Bitcoin Mining and Government Action

    Last summer, the Chinese government banned Bitcoin mining as the government looks to be carbon neutral by 2060. Other governments have since temporarily or permanently banned crypto mining. These include Kosovo and Georgia, with Russia’s central bank also proposing to ban crypto mining.

    Last month, a U.S Congress sub-committee hearing explored crypto mining, focusing on Bitcoin and Proof-of-Work mining. From the hearing, it was evident that lawmakers leaned against Proof-of-Work mining, which could prove to be another challenge for Bitcoin miners. According to Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, the U.S was the largest Bitcoin mining nation, accounting for 35.4% of the global hashrate in August 2021.
    Bitcoin Mining Statistics Support Government Concerns

    For governments with carbon neutral aspirations, the statistics have continued to place Bitcoin mining in the spotlight. Some key mining stats worth considering include:

    According to Columbia Climate School, Bitcoin (BTC) is thought to consume 707KwH per transaction. In addition, there are also mining computers that heat up and need cooling.

    The University of Cambridge estimated that Bitcoin (BTC) mining consumes 121.36 terawatt-hours (TWh) per year. Based on this estimate, if Bitcoin were a country, it would be a top 30 energy consumer.

    Estimates show that Bitcoin (BTC) mining yields 22m to 22.9m metric tons of CO2 emissions each year.

    In terms of global warming, Bitcoin (BTC) mining could push global warming above 2 degrees centigrade in less than 3-decades.

    The following numbers were presented in last month’s crypto mining sub-committee briefing memorandum:

    The estimated annual energy usage of the Bitcoin network alone grew from 77.78 Terawatt-hours (TWh) on 2nd January 2021 to more than 198 TWh on 26th November 2021.

    Over the same period, the Ethereum (ETH) network’s annual energy usage grew from 14.81 TWh to more than 92 TWh.

    A single ETH transaction added more than 90 pounds of CO2 to the atmosphere, while a single BTC transaction added more than 1,000 pounds.

    The global 2021 CO2 emissions of ETH and BTC mining is equivalent to tailpipe emissions from more than 15.5m gasoline powered cars on the road every year.
    U.S Climate Aspirations Point to Action on Bitcoin Mining

    President Joe Biden announced a new target for the U.S “to achieve a 50-52% reduction from 2005 levels in economy-wide net greenhouse gas pollution in 2030”. Upon taking office, President Biden rejoined the Paris Agreement, aiming to tackle the climate crisis both domestically and abroad. The U.S has a goal of reaching net zero emissions by 2050.

    The EU has also voiced concerns, with European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) vice-chair Erik Thedeen calling for a ban on Proof-of-Work mining. As was evident on Capitol Hill, Thedeen was also in favor of Proof-of-Stake protocols due to the “significantly lower energy profile”.

    U.S Mining Activity Rises Amidst Lawmaker Scrutiny

    At the start of the week, CoinShares published a paper titled “The Bitcoin Mining Network, Energy and Carbon Impact”. Key statistics from the paper included:

    Total known power draw of global mining countries (Dec-2021) had the U.S ranked 1st, with a power draw of 1,380 MW. Kazakhstan ranked 2nd, with a power draw of 787 MW, followed by Canada (529 MW), and Russia (268 MW).



    The Bitcoin mining network emitted 36 Mt of CO2 in 2020 and 39 Mt in 2021. This accounts for less than 0.08% of a global total 49,360 Mt CO2 emissions.

    To put things into perspective, CoinShare also provided the following facts and figures:

    The U.S and China had emitted 5,830 Mt and 11,580 Mt of CO2 emissions in 2016 respectively.

    Emissions estimates for minting and printing fiat currency sit at approximately 8 Mt of CO2 emissions per year.

    The gold industry is estimated to generate between 100 and 145 Mt of CO2 emissions annually.

    For the global banking system, power usage estimates sit at 264 TWh (2019). This translates to 130 Mt of CO2 emissions each year.

    While U.S mining activity has been on the rise, the latest facts and figures reflect a very contrasting view to that of the University of Cambridge, Columbia Climate school, and numbers shared by the sub-committee hearing in January. The numbers suggest that lawmakers will need to carry out further study before imposing restrictions or outright bans on Proof-of-Work mining.

    This article was originally posted on FX Empire
    RUTHLESS CAPITALI$M
    More Zillow employees in Colorado hit by iBuying layoffs

    In November last year, the Seattle company said it was shutting down its Zillow Offers line of business.


    Zillow is exiting the "instant buyer" market after recording significant losses.

    By Jensen Werley – Reporter, Denver Business Journal
    Jan 31, 2022 Updated Jan 31, 2022, 3:50pm MST

    Zillow Group Inc. (Nasdaq: Z) is laying off 36 total employees in the Denver area due to ending its iBuying service.

    The company has filed a notice with the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment announcing additional Denver-area layoffs, on top of what was announced in November, following the closure of Zillow Offers.


    As previously announced, the Seattle-based tech company said 20 individuals were laid off starting on Jan. 3 from the company’s Centennial office.

    According to the letter filed on Jan. 20 as part of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, an additional person was laid off on Jan. 17. Starting on March 21, 15 more people will be impacted. The layoffs will wind down over the course of the year and could involve more Denver area employees.


    A Zillow spokesperson told Denver Business Journal that "laying off employees is always our last choice and not something we take lightly.”

    "We intend to make the transition as smooth as possible for everyone affected," the spokesperson said. "Employees are receiving a severance package that includes at least 10 weeks of pay, six months of benefit costs covered, the value of the their next stock vesting paid directly to them, and outplacement services."

    In November 2021, Zillow announced that it would end its direct buying service model, also known as iBuying. The company brought that service, which it called Zillow Offers, to the Denver market three years prior to the closure. Through iBuying, a homeowner can sell their home through a real estate tech company without having to list it or show it, in exchange for a service fee to the iBuyer.

    Zillow first opened its Centennial office, located at 10771 E. Easter Ave., Suite 100, in 2015 after it acquired Trulia Inc. Zillow acquired Trulia for $2.5 billion, according to past DBJ reporting. Zillow had about 500 workers in the Centennial office as of July 2020, but at that time the company moved to a permanent remote-work model. The company told the DBJ on Nov. 3, 2021 that being full-remote makes the exact number of employees in Colorado harder to calculate.

    When Zillow announced it was closing Zillow Offers, it said it expected to let go of about 25% of its workforce nationwide.

    Shutting down the business is expected to take place over several quarters and will include offloading its current assets. As of Nov. 24, Zillow had canceled nearly 400 transactions of the 8,172 contracts it had with home sellers.

    "For a small subset of customers closing later in 2022, we determined we can no longer support their closing and are releasing our earnest money to them," said Zillow spokesperson Matt Kreamer at the time. "Typically, homes close in 30 to 45 days."

    The company first notified the state of Colorado it would permanently eliminate certain positions due to the closure on Nov. 4.

    Denver is one of the top 20 best cities for buying homes online, according to home inspection calculator website Repair Pricer in an analysis based in part on Zillow data. Denver has a high number of home listings offering an online 3D tour, for example.

    Zillow, meanwhile, is continuing with its other services, including putting out its market research.

    A new study from Zillow shows that the combined value of Denver-area homes has skyrocketed, growing more than $400 billion since 2012. The metro area’s total housing market value in 2021 was $635 billion — the 17th highest in the nation, and a figure that puts Denver among metros like Portland, Oregon, Sacramento, California and Houston.

    Colorado had a housing market worth $1.2 trillion, marking the first time the state’s housing market passed $1 trillion. It is one of 14 states with combined home values that high. It also gained the third-most market share in the country, just behind Florida and Texas.

    AOC: Corporate 'price gouging' is fueling inflation

    Progressive Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) told Yahoo Finance in an exclusive interview that corporate "price gouging" has fueled inflation, placing the blame largely on dominant companies that hike prices and rake in profits without fear of competition. 

    She strongly rejected claims that government stimulus in response to COVID-19 has caused the price spike, warning that such a diagnosis of the problem could lead to spending cuts with dire consequences for millions of people dependent on federal support. 

     "A lot of these price increases are potentially due to just straight price gouging by corporations," says Ocasio-Cortez, who focused her attention especially on industries with high corporate concentrations.

    The remarks from Ocasio-Cortez, who spoke to Yahoo Finance on Jan. 27, came a day after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell signaled that the central bank will likely raise interest rates at its next policy-setting meeting in mid-March in an effort to rein in inflation.

    A Commerce Department report on Friday showed that prices jumped 5.8% last year, the sharpest rise since 1982.

    To be sure, Ocasio-Cortez acknowledged other reasons for inflation such as pandemic-related supply chain disruptions and labor shortages. 

    But her criticism of corporate behavior echoes comments in recent weeks from Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and the White House, all of whom have identified exorbitant profits as a contributing factor behind the rise in prices. 

    Ocasio-Cortez, a critic of corporate power since she joined the House in 2019, called for policy action on antitrust enforcement and worker protections as a means to address inflation. 

    "If we say there are real antitrust issues here — there's a lot of corporate abuse of power leading to price-gouging," she says. "Then that allows us to pursue lanes such as antitrust and also pursue labor protections, COVID protections, that can help people get back into the workplace and stay safe in the workplace." 

    Ocasio-Cortez rose to prominence in June 2018 with a surprise upset of incumbent Rep. Joseph Crowley, then the No. 4 Democrat in the House and a potential successor to Speaker Nancy Pelosi. When she took office the following year at the age of 29, she became the youngest woman ever to serve in Congress.   

    She has amassed nearly 13 million Twitter followers, giving her one of the largest online platforms of a U.S. elected official.

    The analysis of inflation from Ocasio-Cortez starkly contrasts with that of Republicans like House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), who have blamed federal spending for the rise in prices. 

    Economist Larry Summers, former Treasury Secretary under Bill Clinton and director of the National Economic Council under Barack Obama, has also pointed to pandemic-related government stimulus as a driver of inflation.

    In response to the notion that federal spending has caused inflation, Ocasio-Cortez said: "I couldn't disagree more with that assessment."

    "The danger here is that if we say we're helping working people too much and say that the cause of this is, 'Oh, it's because we provided too much assistance during the American Rescue Plan. Stimulus checks were too generous,'" she says.

    "What that's going to result in is a pullback in the assistance that some families need the most right now," she adds. 

    'Facebook should be broken up': 

    Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

    New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez sits down with Yahoo Finance Editor-in-Chief Andy Serwer to describe her strategy when grilling chief executives on Capitol Hill.

    Video Transcript

    ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ: When you look at a company like Facebook-- you can't kind of put them all in a-- in the same boat. They do different things. But when you look at a company like Facebook and the completely corrosive ways that they have exercised an abuse, I believe, in-- in civil society writ large-- not just our democracies.

    But you look at, for example, what we're hearing from other countries when we talk about production of vaccines or perhaps like what we can do to export, help them, they-- they say-- it's not just-- there are some things that the United States provide that are welcome. There's also things that we want the United States to stop exporting. And one of those things is disinformation and disinformation through US-founded companies like Facebook that have absolutely slowed and frankly sabotaged the global effort to fight against the coronavirus.

    And we see this both-- this disinformation used both in-- in the public health sphere. We've also seen-- social scientists have truly shown the impact that Facebook has had in contributing to social violence and perhaps even accelerating at large scale very dangerous and some would call genocidal activities in places like South Asia, et cetera, human rights abuses and also hate here at home.

    ANDY SERWER: But I'm curious what do you think we should do about them or what we should do to them, I guess.

    ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ: Well, Facebook should be broken up. We should pursue antitrust activity on Facebook, and there are so many different reasons why. They are acting as an advertiser. They are acting as both platform and vendor. They are a communications-- they are a communications platform, which has historically been a well-established domain of antitrust. And so because they are so many businesses and industries in one, the case is-- I believe-- right there in and of itself as to why they should be subject to antitrust activity.

    AOC: ‘Not sure’ why Biden hasn’t

    forgiven student loan debt

    New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez joins 'Influencers with Andy Serwer' to discuss how student loan debt is weighing on the U.S. economy.

    Video Transcript

    ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ: I cannot understate the danger and the risk economically, politically, and just where we are right now as a country of allowing the moratorium on student loan payments to lapse in May. If we just allow a-- a full, just continuation of student loan payments, we are talking about a catastrophic development for millions, the over-- almost 50 million student loan borrowers in this country. There were millions of student loan borrowers that were already defaulting going into the pandemic.

    But more than that, we are at such a delicate point in the financial and just general economic recovery post-COVID that to then restart payments that are essentially the size of a mortgage payment, sometimes even larger, on a generation that was already so devastated not just by this but the recession, et cetera, I believe it could very-- it could throw out of balance already what is a very fragile recovery.

    And not only that, but this forgiveness is on-- I mean, forgiveness is-- is the just thing to do. It's the right thing to do. Why the president hasn't done it yet, I'm not sure, but I-- I do think that this is an issue of increasing urgency. He has already indicated an openness to it. And he has actually already used his authority to forgive student loan debt in certain small, very narrow cases.

    ANDY SERWER: Because there are people who suggest he doesn't have the authority. Is that a legitimate argument or just maybe a smokescreen?

    ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ: I don't think it's a legitimate argument. We've seen-- in fact, we've seen him use-- the same legal authority that-- that the president has used to suspend student loan payments is the same authority that he would use to cancel them. And not only that, but he has used that authority. He has indicated a willingness to use the authority. And I think that it would be extraordinarily important and urgent for him to do so.

    ANDY SERWER: And what about the argument that it's a moral hazard? In other words, you're letting people off the hook by forgiving the debt?

    ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ: Well what I think is the true moral hazard here is the surging costs of education in the United States. What has actually created the moral hazard is this guarantee of saying, we will issue minors hundreds of thousands of dollars in student loan debt at almost any level with almost no limit. And we will allow colleges and universities to dramatically increase the costs of their tuition with the guarantee of that loan value on 17-year-olds.

    So what is the actual true moral hazard here in the situation is the controls on the cost of education in the United States. And one very important control in this to that note is tuition-free public colleges and universities. Because then what that does is that it introduces competition into the market to which private universities have to actually meet a lower baseline. But people act as though it's just fancy public schools that are extremely expensive now. But public college tuition has also increased dramatically far beyond the pace of inflation.






    GOODS & RAIL INSURED

    LA councilman blasts train theft 'chaos,' calls them 'a threat to our economy'

    Brazen freight train thefts have spiked in Los Angeles, with images of looted packages and abandoned containers capturing headlines and captivating social media — and putting pressure on California Governor Gavin Newsom to address conditions even he likened to "a third world country."

    The thefts have sparked a war of words between law enforcement and Union Pacific (UNP), which owns the railroad and has called for stronger deterrence. But the growing problem has become a rallying cry for at least one local official, who is calling for stiffer penalties against criminals exploiting a weak link in the nation's supply chain crisis

    Los Angeles City Councilman Joe Buscaino told Yahoo Finance in a recent interview that he's "never seen anything like this. We're seeing more chaos with fewer consequences for those who are committing these acts."

    The issue has become more of a problem during the past three months – raising new criticism around L.A. County's no cash bail policy, which has worsened the problem by making it easier for thieves to get released — if they get charged at all.

    In a letter to the LA County District Attorney last month, Adrian Guerrero, UP's director of public affairs, noted that rail thefts have skyrocketed by 160% in the county over the past year. On average, 90 containers were compromised every day, the company said.

    “As a local elected official representing the port of Los Angeles, whenever there's a threat to divert cargo away from this region, it's a threat to our local economy,” Buscaino said.

    'What the hell is going on?'

    California Governor Gavin Newsom visits the site where multiple train looting has occurred along the freight train tracks in Los Angeles, California U.S., January 20, 2022 . REUTERS/David Swanson
    California Governor Gavin Newsom visits the site where multiple train looting has occurred along the freight train tracks in Los Angeles, California U.S., January 20, 2022 . REUTERS/David Swanson

    Amid a surge in smash and grab retail thefts plaguing California, the train crisis caught Newsom's attention, who in late January visited tracks strewn with garbage. The governor promised statewide coordination as law enforcement and prosecutors pursue petty thieves and organized criminals who have been raiding cargo containers.

    "The images looked like a Third World country," Newsom told reporters. "What you saw here in the last week is just not acceptable. So, I took off the suit and tie and said I'm coming because I couldn't take it. I can't turn on the news anymore. What the hell is going on?"

    The thefts have exposed a rift between UP and local law enforcement. In a letter released last month, L.A. County DA George Gascon shifted blame on the company for doing "little to secure or lock trains," while insisting the number of cases involving the rail company fell last year. Meanwhile, according to LAPD Deputy Chief Al Labrada, “UP has significantly decreased law enforcement staffing.”

    Gascon, a progressive former San Francisco top prosecutor who was came into office in 2020, insisted that it was “very telling that other major railroad operations in the area are not facing the same level of theft at their facilities as UP."

    Yet the company defended itself, saying it has "brought in dozens of special agents from across our 23-state network into the Los Angeles area, starting last year. But these agents cannot totally supplant the expertise and investigative skills of the LAPD, especially when it comes to organized theft of cargo," a spokesperson from UP told Yahoo Finance in an email.

    Gascon's progressive policies, however, have him facing a recall effort that was officially approved by the Los Angeles County Registrar on Thursday. The effort was spurred by some of his orders that included the elimination of sentence enhancement charges, zero-bail policies and not prosecuting juveniles as adults for many crimes.

    'This needs to stop'

    Meanwhile, the cargo looting has taken on an added dimension of risk. While most of the stolen property are consumer goods, more than 80 newly manufactured guns were among the items stolen recently, local police officials said last week. 

    The pilfered firearms included at least 36 pistols and 46 semi-automatic shotguns that were taken from a burglarized container car in August and bound for Tennessee, LAPD said. Only two of those weapons have been recovered thus far, they said.

    And last month, Yahoo Finance discovered that one stolen package was addressed to Oregon State Police from BPS Tactical Inc., a custom Law Enforcement gear company. 

    Buscaino told Yahoo Finance that the prosecutorial response needed to be more stringent. “It's about holding people accountable and whether it's installing heavy duty locks or when someone is caught by committing the theft, they need to be prosecuted."

    Buscaino is seeking more transparency on package thefts from UP, while directing the Chief Legislative Analyst to report on thefts that include arrests made, whether the cases were referred for prosecution by the City Attorney’s Office, District Attorney’s Office or U.S. Attorney’s office.

    Measures would also include bolstering police presence in the area, and preventative measures to deter thefts and trespassing.

    Buscaino blasted "finger pointing" between the company and law enforcement officials, adding "I'm tired of it. I'm tired of the letters being sent to various departments and entities, let's get everyone at the table." 

    While Union Pacific agents have made hundreds of arrests, the company said the partnership with local and state law enforcement, and elected pubic officials is necessary. 

    The railroad company has been working with its clients to enhance security, testing drones and other high-tech tools. But "criminals [are] out there who are countering the drone deployment by knocking 'em down or shooting 'em down," Buscaino told Yahoo Finance.

    "This needs to stop. This is an embarrassment to our city [and] our county," he added.

    Dani Romero is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Twitter: @daniromerotv

    California is set to dismantle the largest death row in the US and transform it into a 'positive, healing environment'

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom
    California Governor Gavin Newsom at a June 2021 press conference.Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images
    • CA Gov. Gavin Newsom said Monday the state will dismantle the death row at San Quentin State Prison.

    • Inmates in the country's largest death row will be moved to the general population in other prisons.

    • Newsom said "wealth and race" are bigger factors to being on death row than "guilt or innocence."

    Gov. Gavin Newsom of California announced the state will dismantle San Quentin State Prison's death row and turn it into a "positive, healing environment" over the next two years, the Associated Press reported Monday.

    The inmates on death row in San Quentin — the country's largest death row — will be transferred to prisons that "typically house people serving life-without-parole sentences," Vicky Waters, a spokesperson for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, told Insider.

    The vacant space at San Quentin will be transformed into a "positive, healing environment to provide increased rehabilitative, educational, and health care opportunities," according to a proposed budget.

    "The prospect of your ending up on death row has more to do with your wealth and race than it does your guilt or innocence," Newsom said Monday. "We talk about justice, we preach justice, but as a nation, we don't practice it on death row."

    While Newsom put a moratorium on state executions in 2019, the state hasn't executed any inmates since 2006.

    California has the highest number of death row prisoners in the country, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, with 694 inmates.

    Waters told the AP that the transformation will be "innovative and anchored in rehabilitation."

    "For the first time in California's history, eligible death-sentenced individuals may be housed in general population areas where they can have more access to job opportunities, enabling them to pay court-ordered restitution to their victims when applicable," Waters told Insider.

    "People on death row will not be resentenced, and would be rehoused following thorough reviews by Institutional Classification Committees, which will take several factors into account, including their security level, their behavior, and any safety concerns," she added.

    A representative for Newsom did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.

    THIRD WORLD USA
    Exclusive-U.S. diabetes deaths top 100,000 for second straight year, federal panel urges new strategy

     
    Insulin supplies are pictured in the Manhattan borough of New York City,

    Mon, January 31, 2022
    By Chad Terhune and Robin Respaut

    (Reuters) - More than 100,000 Americans died from diabetes in 2021, marking the second consecutive year for that grim milestone and spurring a call for a federal mobilization similar to the fight against HIV/AIDS.

    The new figures come as an expert panel urges Congress to overhaul diabetes care and prevention, including recommendations to move beyond a reliance on medical interventions alone. A report released earlier this month calls for far broader policy changes to stem the diabetes epidemic, such as promoting consumption of healthier foods, ensuring paid maternal leave from the workplace, levying taxes on sugary drinks and expanding access to affordable housing, among other areas.

    In 2019, diabetes was the seventh-leading cause of death in America and claimed more than 87,000 lives, reflecting a long-running failure to address the illness and leaving many more vulnerable when the COVID-19 pandemic hit, creating new hurdles to accessing care.

    Since then, the nation’s toll from diabetes has increased sharply, surpassing 100,000 deaths in each of the last two years and representing a new record-high level, according to a Reuters analysis of provisional death data compiled by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Diabetes-related deaths surged 17% in 2020 and 15% in 2021 compared to the prepandemic level in 2019. That excluded deaths directly attributed to COVID-19. The CDC concurred with the Reuters analysis and said additional deaths from 2021 are still being tallied.

    "The large number of diabetes deaths for a second year in a row is certainly a cause for alarm," said Dr. Paul Hsu, an epidemiologist at UCLA's Fielding School of Public Health. "Type 2 diabetes itself is relatively preventable, so it's even more tragic that so many deaths are occurring."

    In a new report, the National Clinical Care Commission created by Congress said that the United States must adopt a more comprehensive approach to prevent more people from developing type 2 diabetes, the most common form, and to help people who are already diagnosed avoid life-threatening complications. About 37 million Americans, or 11% of the population, have diabetes, and one in three Americans will develop the chronic disease in their lifetime if current trends persist, according to the commission.

    "Diabetes in the U.S. cannot simply be viewed as a medical or health care problem, but also must be addressed as a societal problem that cuts across many sectors, including food, housing, commerce, transportation and the environment," the commission wrote in its Jan. 5 report to Congress and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

    The federal panel recommended Congress create an Office of National Diabetes Policy that would coordinate efforts across the government and oversee changes outside health policy. It would be separate from HHS and could be similar to the White House Office of National AIDS Policy, according to Dr. William Herman, commission chairman and a professor of internal medicine and epidemiology at the University of Michigan.

    "We aren’t going to cure the problem of diabetes in the United States with medical interventions," Herman told Reuters. "The idea is to pull something together across federal agencies, so they are systematically talking to one another."

    U.S. Senator Patty Murray, a Democrat from Washington who chairs the Senate health committee, helped create the commission in 2017 and said she is studying the recommendations closely.

    "People with diabetes and other chronic illnesses were already facing challenges well before the pandemic hit, and COVID has only made these problems worse," Murray said in a statement to Reuters. "It is absolutely crucial to research and find solutions to better support diabetes patients and get them the care they need."

    MORE CASES, WORSE PROGNOSIS

    As Reuters reported last year in a series, diabetes represents a major public health failure in the United States. The number of Americans with the disease has exploded in recent decades, and their prognosis has worsened, even though spending on new treatments has soared.

    The pandemic has proven especially deadly for people with diabetes. People with poorly controlled diabetes have at least a two-fold greater risk of death from COVID-19, according to the report. And diabetes and its complications are more common in low-income Americans and people of color, longstanding disparities that were further exposed during the pandemic.

    Dr. Shari Bolen, a commission member and an associate professor of medicine at Case Western Reserve University and the MetroHealth System in Cleveland, said the staggering number of diabetes deaths is "disheartening but also a call to action."

    The federal panel's report marked the first such review on diabetes since 1975. During that time, the prevalence of diabetes among U.S. adults has increased from 5.3% in the late 1970s to 14.3% in 2018, it said. Direct medical costs related to diabetes were $237 billion in 2017, and there was an estimated $90 billion lost to lower productivity in the United States.

    High costs for doctor's visits, medications and supplies force many diabetes patients to forgo or delay routine care. Many patients and U.S. lawmakers have expressed outrage at the rising price of insulin, which type 1 diabetes patients must take their entire lives and which is sometimes required to keep type 2 patients’ disease under control. The commission endorsed proposals such as capping insulin price increases to the rate of inflation and government negotiation of drug prices.

    Murray and other lawmakers have pushed for a provision in the Biden administration's proposed Build Back Better legislation that would cap the cost of insulin at $35 for many patients.

    To further ease financial barriers, the panel recommended that patients’ out-of-pocket costs be waived for other "high-value" treatments, including certain diabetes drugs, continuous glucose monitors, basic supplies and diabetes education.

    The commission also highlighted the risks of overtreatment in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Reuters wrote about that risk in November and how a drug industry campaign for an aggressive treatment target led to an epidemic of potentially lethal incidents of low blood sugar, or hypoglycemia. The panel asked federal health officials to track overtreatment among Medicare patients to "reduce the incidence of severe hypoglycemia and improve patient safety."

    The commission said the United States should better promote the purchase of fruits and vegetables in food assistance programs and ensure mothers have paid family leave to aid breastfeeding, which can help reduce the risk of diabetes in mothers and is associated with a reduced risk of obesity and diabetes in children. The panel also recommended imposing taxes on sugary drinks that would raise their shelf price by 10% to 20% and using the revenue to expand access to clean drinking water and fund similar programs.

    HHS deferred comment to Herman. In a statement, the CDC said the report's recommendations offer a detailed roadmap to "addressing rising health-care costs attributed to diabetes, and reducing racial, ethnic, and income-related disparities in diabetes outcomes."

    (Reporting by Chad Terhune and Robin Respaut; Editing by Daniel Wallis)