Saturday, February 12, 2022




Opinion: Canadian trucker protests are the latest example of Covid-19 absurdity

Opinion by Abdul El-Sayed - Yesterday 
CNN

We've officially hit peak Covid absurdism.

It's hard to remember that it hasn't even been two years since the pandemic -- and all that came with it -- befell us.

That's because it's been a singular, all-encompassing experience. Generations hence, they'll talk about us like we talked about the generation who lived through the Depression."They lived through the pandemic" will be a shorthand to explain why we reflexively wear a mask on airplanes or ask about a restaurant's air filtration system before its menu.

But one aspect of the pandemic experience that can't simply be explained by the existence of an exceedingly transmissible, deadly virus spreading between us is the sheer absurdity that it brought with it. Whether boarding an airplane with underwear on your face to protest mask requirements, injecting yourself with horse dewormer instead of a safe and effective vaccine or swallowing household disinfectants because the President of the United States unironically suggested that it might help, the pandemic has amplified the frequency and tenor of ridiculous and sometimes alarming behavior.

Nothing typifies that absurdity quite like the trucker protests now gripping Canada.

In late January, a convoy of truckers in Canada headed cross-country, from British Columbia to the nation's capital in Ottawa, to protest a mandate, which requires truckers entering Canada to be vaccinated or else be subjected to testing and quarantine requirements.

The demonstration quickly grew, with thousands of people clogging traffic and obstructing the US-Canada border. A couple of weeks in to the protest, the demands of the loosely organized truckers still remain unclear. Some are calling this specific mandate "unconstitutional," while others have expanded to calling on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to end all Covid restrictions.

To appreciate just how strange this moment is, let's go way back to before Covid-19 was a word. Many of us would have expected that if a deadly virus began to spread among us, we, as a society, would look to doctors and scientists for answers. We'd demand public policy driven by their rational, evidence-based reasoning.

Sure, there'd be differences of opinion on a few key issues and the odd iconoclast or two who'd just never come along. But for the most part, we'd develop a collective approach to defeating the virus and do what needed to be done to get through the pandemic. And, let's be clear, that's exactly what a majority of people did.

Yet, from the jump, echoing the then-President who hid early evidence of how bad the public health crisis was becoming seemingly to protect stock prices, some began to argue that "the cure," meaning precautionary health measures, was "worse than the disease."

They pointed to the ways that lockdowns were hurting small businesses and school closures were robbing young children of the ability to go to learn at school, socialize with their classmates or receive the free school meals on which too many of our children rely. They argued that masks were just annoying. They resented the imposition on their lives.

And, to be sure, they weren't wrong about any of these things: Each of these was a real cost of Covid-19 restrictions. It's just that the cost of viral transmission -- which led to disease and death -- was profoundly and obviously greater.

But what began as fair disagreements started to mutate like the virus itself. Frustration with lockdowns inspired armed militiamen to storm the Michigan state Capitol and allegedly plot to harm elected officials. Around the country, the fight to keep schools open during later waves of Covid-19 exploded into massive protests against the very things that could keep kids in school safely -- masks and vaccines.

The frustration with having to wear masks in public spaces set off adult temper tantrums directed at retail employees and flight attendants.

And that's where the Canadian truckers come in. Their protests have spread to cities across Canada and beyond, effectively grinding to a standstill daily life in communities across the country. Now, they're impeding the Ambassador Bridge between Detroit and Windsor, Ontario, one of the most active arteries for transnational commerce.

Here's what's so absurd about it: The protest over Covid restrictions is now disrupting peoples' everyday lives -- which is what the protest was supposedly aimed at stopping. They've lost the plot.

But perhaps it was the plot the whole time. It's impossible to divorce this moment from the sociopolitical trends that are also shrouded in absurdity -- the emergence of far-right movements around the world, the rash of proto-fascists and autocrats who've come to power, the salience of online conspiracy theories that spilled out of algorithms and into the real world in horrific ways.

In that context, perhaps the pandemic wasn't the substrate for the absurdity we're witnessing, but a catalyst that simply accelerated what had already been happening.

Either way, as the virus begins to ebb and we begin to imagine what post-pandemic life may hold for us, we must understand that the pandemic won't end when the virus recedes -- but when the absurdity that came with it does, too.


© Razi JafriAbdul El-Sayed
Trudeau says ‘everything’ on the table to end blockades, warns of potential violence

Amanda Connolly - Yesterday 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says "everything" is on the table when it comes to ending the blockades paralyzing cross-border trade at multiple locations, and which remain encamped outside Parliament Hill.

And he urged anyone still participating in the convoys, which are demanding an end to COVID-19 public health measures, to go home or face "severe" consequences.

“Unfortunately, we are concerned about violence, so we’re taking every precaution," he said.

“It’s time to go home – especially if you have kids with you.”

For two weeks, members of a convoy that has claimed to represent Canadian truckers have blockaded the streets of downtown Ottawa, frequently blaring air horns at all hours of the day and night until a 10-day court injunction ordered them to stop the noise.


Some of the group’s organizers, though, have ties to white supremacy as well as racist and extremist rhetoric. Ottawa police are now probing more than 120 active criminal investigations into alleged conduct by the convoy members, many of whom continue to say they are part of a “peaceful” protest.

Federal, provincial and municipal officials, however, have been clear over recent days: the blockades and activities of the convoy are now "illegal" and "unlawful," and must end.

Read more:
Premier Doug Ford declares state of emergency amid protests at land border and in Ottawa

Ottawa has asked both the provincial and federal governments for up to 1,700 extra officers to keep the protests in the city in check, with Ottawa Police Chief Peter Sloly consistently saying Friday that more resources are needed.

Officers in the city have given up off days, are working 12-hour shifts and are "bone-tired," Sloly said.

However, Trudeau told reporters that he doesn't "accept the contention that the city of Ottawa has exhausted its tools and resources," noting that resources have been given by the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) and the RCMP.

Hundreds of additional officers from the RCMP and other municipal police forces have been deployed to Ottawa.

Read more:
Online fundraising for Ottawa protesters ‘facilitating’ crime, Ottawa police argue in court

In response, Ottawa police board chair Diane Deans said Trudeau's comments were "unfair."

"The federal government have been late to recognizing this is a national crisis," she said.

"I think they are getting up to speed now, but I don’t think suggesting that the Ottawa Police Service has enough resources right now is what he should be doing."

Ontario declared a state of emergency on Friday that allows higher fines and penalties for infractions, but Sloly said without extra resources they will still be difficult to apply.

The blockade at Ambassador Bridge has heightened the pressure on Canadian governments to act.

The bridge is a vital trade route between Canada and the U.S., and both Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and U.S. President Joe Biden have raised concerns about the economic impacts in recent days.

Video: Trucker protests: Psaki says Biden ‘expressed concern’ to Trudeau about how blockades are impacting U.S.

Trudeau said on Friday that allowing the blockades to continue is not an option.

“The border cannot and will not remain closed," he said, and described the decision earlier in the day by Ontario Premier Doug Ford to declare a state of emergency as "responsible and necessary."

“Everything is on the table because this unlawful activity has to end and it will end," Trudeau said.

He added that people should expect to see police applying tougher enforcement of the laws "in a predictable, progressive approach," and that the hope remains that people will leave peacefully.

"Using military forces against civilian populations in Canada or any other democracy is something to avoid having to do at all costs," he said.

"We are a long way from ever having to call in the military, although of course we have to be ready for any eventuality. But it is not something we are seriously contemplating at this time."

For two weeks, since the beginning of the blockade in Ottawa, Trudeau has faced questions about the potential for military intervention to remove the convoy members who have barricaded city streets with big rigs and other vehicles, refusing to move until public health measures are lifted.

While the Canadian Forces can be deployed at home, doing so is extremely rare.

Trudeau's father, the former prime minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, did so under a piece of legislation that no longer exists -- the War Measures Act -- in response to a series of terrorist attacks by the Front de libération du Québec (FLQ) in what is now known as the October Crisis.

It was during that crisis that the infamous quote by the elder Trudeau emerged.

Asked how far he was willing to go in enforcing civil order, Trudeau senior answered: "Just watch me."

The most recent case of the military being deployed against civilians happened in 1990 during the Oka Crisis, and came at the request of the Quebec premier at the time.

On Friday, Trudeau was asked whether his father's experience with backlash over using the War Measures Act has shaped his own willingness to deploy the military in response to the current blockades.

"My values are deeply informed by the way I've been brought up," Trudeau answered.

"But every situation is different."



Trudeau says almost half of protesters' funds from U.S., as they turn to Bitcoin


The Canadian Press

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says about half of the money being raised for protesters blockading Parliament Hill and several border crossings is coming from the United States, but an expert says attempting to stop the flow of cash is like playing a game of whack-a-mole.

An order recently approved by an Ontario court to freeze millions raised through GiveSendGo will be effective at least temporarily in stopping those funds flowing into organizers' hands, said anti-money laundering expert Matthew McGuire.

The order, obtained by the provincial government, prohibits not only the fundraising platform and organizers, but third-party payment processors and financial institutions, from disposing of or dealing with the millions raised.

"The prohibition that really matters is the prohibition against Canadian financial institutions and payment processors dealing with the donations themselves. And so that can lock them in place here," McGuire said.

So far, around US$8.8 million has been raised through the GiveSendGo campaign page, a Christian fundraising platform, and more than $700,000 has rolled in through another page on the website called "Adopt-a-Trucker."

McGuire said the order serves as a notice to institutions like banks that if "you deal with funds related to this subject … you do so at your own peril."

In an affidavit filed along with Ontario's application, Ottawa Police Service detective Chris Rhone outlines how he believes the money raised through these campaigns is offence-related property.

The officer goes on to say the donations "are facilitating the indictable offence of mischief which has been committed, is being committed, and is intended to be committed for so long as there are funds available to keep protesters and their trucks in Ottawa."

The campaigns were quickly put together last week after GoFundMe cancelled an earlier fundraiser that had gathered more than $10 million. The website said it had determined the protest in Ottawa had turned into an "occupation."

Local police and leaders had raised concerns about the crowdfunded cash given how many of the hundreds of the trucks and protesters that rolled into the nation's capital had refused to leave, clogging up streets and sidewalks and resulting in nearby businesses shutting their doors.

Two weeks after their initial arrival, some trucks have left Parliament Hill, but many others haven't budged. Drivers continue to honk their horns, albeit more sporadically, given a 10-day court injunction in place to prevent the incessant honking that residents heard for days.

McGuire said nothing can prevent another campaign from popping up, which would present the same challenge for governments and police.

It's also no wonder convoy organizers are turning to cryptocurrency including Bitcoin to generate funds because it's decentralized, he said.

"You can't serve an order on the Bitcoin system as a whole. There's nobody there to take that instruction."

Earlier in the week, convoy organizers touted Bitcoin as a way for supporters to ensure the protests are sustained, characterizing it as offering financial freedom.

In his affidavit, Rhone references how organizers "are already transitioning from traditional currency fundraising to Bitcoin fundraising" because they feel Bitcoin cannot be confiscated.

McGuire said there are many ways for protesters to use cryptocurrency, including by changing it into other value.

"It's not hard to turn Bitcoin into a gift card," he said. "It's not hard to load it onto a prepaid card and use it like a regular Visa."

Trudeau said Friday that he spoke with U.S. President Joe Biden that morning about the influence of foreign money in funding the "illegal activity" on Parliament Hill and blockades at several border crossings.

"We see that almost half of the funding through certain portals that is flowing to the barricaders here in Canada is coming from the United States," he told reporters.

"Canadian banks are monitoring financial activity very closely and taking action as necessary."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 11, 2022.

Stephanie Taylor, The Canadian Press

Experts say journalists face increasing vitriol from distrustful minority at protests

Many journalists who cover charged pandemic protests across Canada are coming under fire themselves for reporting on incidents of hate and misinformation, say experts who warn such attacks threaten a key pillar of democracy.

While the verbal, and sometimes physical, attacks are limited to a minority of protestors, Brent Jolly of the Canadian Association of Journalists said several reporters covering the trucker convoy in Ottawa have said they've been harassed on the scene and online and feel like they have a "target on their backs."

Jolly says journalists have become easy targets for some, who believe "if facts aren't on their side ... attack the messenger."

"They're trying to not just threaten journalists in a very direct way, but there's also efforts to censor and get journalists to avoid covering these kinds of stories," said Jolly, national president of an organization that promotes excellence in the field, including principles that hold reporters to a duty to serve the public interest.

Fanning the flames is a mountain of misinformation on social media, where the views of a small number of people seem much more prevalent, he said.

"It sure as heck doesn't feel like a minority when you're knee-deep in it," Jolly added. "It feels like you're running up a hill and carrying a Sisyphean boulder behind you."

A Global News journalist in British Columbia posted a video clip on Twitter earlier this month showing her being followed at a protest by a man and woman accusing her news outlet of spreading lies, while a CTV reporter in Edmonton tweeted earlier this week that harassment was so bad there his outlet removed the broadcaster's logo from vehicles "for safety."

A CAJ report released earlier this week suggests the trauma reporters feel from hateful messages and online intimidation has "substantial impacts on Canadian journalism."

It's especially worrisome for racialized journalists, for whom abusive online messages are the norm, it found.

The 11-page document followed a virtual roundtable discussion from October that included first-hand accounts of harassment from journalists across the country, and it noted that politicians and other media members "play a significant role in co-ordinating targeted harassment."

Shanna MacDonald, a communications professor with the University of Waterloo, said the perception some people have of journalists as enemies of the truth has been brewing "for quite some time," calling it a key point of many fascist movements throughout history.

But the idea that media members can't be trusted was recently amplified by Donald Trump's 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, she said, noting Trump often labelled mainstream media as the "liberal elite" in attempts to discredit or deflect negative coverage of himself throughout his run to office, and again through his four-year term as president.

"It's classic playbook — discrediting (institutions) where there are codes of ethics, where you have to tell the truth," MacDonald said. "And once you discredit them, you can infiltrate with other forms of information ... that don't have to be verified or factual.

"It's very insidious."

The negative perception of journalism has spilled across the border as some politicians have stoked similar flames here, Jolly said, noting that People's Party leader Maxime Bernier has targeted certain journalists through his own Twitter account "to score political points."

Social media has given people a forum to share their thoughts on any number of issues, whether they have expertise in the subject or not, and experts say that can be problematic.

"Everybody's voice can be heard if they know how to use the platform well," MacDonald said.

She added that the problem becomes cyclical as people become more entwined in their own social media echo chambers, where algorithms show them posts and news stories that only reinforce their point of view.

MacDonald said policy is needed to push back against the spread of misinformation online, urging governments to "find ways to regulate that."

"The everyday citizen using social media can't fix it," she said. "We can be as critical as we want, we can follow people really broadly in order to dilute our algorithm ... but at the end of the day, that's not our responsibility.

"Platforms have designed things this way.... And at the moment, they're controlling the way that we actually experience information."

Allan Thompson, the journalism program head at Carleton University in Ottawa, said he's struck by the "alternate reality that many of the protesters seem to live in when it comes to (how they view) news media."

"(Some) are absolutely convinced that what news organizations produce is biased and a distortion and subject to some sort of conspiracy," he said.

Thompson said he was accosted on Facebook after posting photos he took last weekend of confederate flags and other extremist symbols in the crowd, with commenters suggesting his portrayal of the event was biased and inaccurate.

He worries that social media and political influence is making journalists' jobs increasingly challenging. But Thompson said presenting facts in an unbiased way has become "more important than ever."

"All we can do is try to flood the media space with reporting that is fair and accurate and hope that it has an audience," he said. "But I honestly am not sure how you reach those who have decided that so-called mainstream media cannot be trusted and ... are part of some sort of conspiracy to delude people.

"It really is distressing."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 11, 2022.

Melissa Couto Zuber, The Canadian Press
MY ALMA MATER

U of L Faculty Association begins strike

Erik Bay - Thursday
Global News



As of 11 a.m. Thursday, every one of the roughly 500 members of the University of Lethbridge Faculty Association (ULFA) is on strike after labour negotiations with the board of governors broke down.

According to ULFA president Dan O'Donnell, the two sides haven't been able to find any middle ground on key issues.

"We think this is just a sad day," O'Donnell said.

Read more:
University of Lethbridge faculty vote 92% in favour of strike, negotiations continue

“Unfortunately from the management side, they've seen this as being all about management rights. In fact, the last thing they've said to us as we left the table was we can't budge on management rights and it's going to be a long strike.”

Negotiations have been ongoing for more than 600 days. The association's contract ended in July 2020.

Several organizations and businesses are showing their solidarity for the faculty association, including the Owl Acoustic Lounge, the United Nurses of Alberta, and Public Interest Alberta.

Video: University of Lethbridge Faculty Association to strike Thursday if no settlement reached

“The University looks forward to resuming negotiations with ULFA soon and to discussing more reasonable positions than ULFA's demand for 12% raises," a statement from the school reads. "This is three times the salary increase recently awarded to Alberta's front-line nurses, and not sustainable to the university nor affordable for our students."

The U of L is also closing all workplaces to ULFA members Friday morning.

"As far as we're concerned, the strike can stop this afternoon," O'Donnell said. "It can stop tomorrow, or the week after next. Unfortunately, if we have a university administration who are prepared to harm the students the way they seem intent on doing, we can also sit it out for four weeks, six weeks, eight weeks."

Read more:
Concordia University administration reaches tentative agreement with faculty union

In a previous release, on Monday the U of L said it "expects a prolonged strike, which could threaten (the) semester."

During the strike, students will not attend courses or have assignments.

The university said "it has established contingency plans to help mitigate impacts and support students. These plans are being shared with students and other stakeholders at appropriate times through the strike action."

Video: U of L students push for classes to remain online entire semester

Global News reached out to the University of Lethbridge students' union for comment, but did not receive a reply as of writing.

As for how long the strike will last?

“All bets are off right now, which doesn't mean we're back at square one," O'Donnell said. "It just means everybody's got to go away and think, 'Is there a different way I can organize this?' in order to finally come to an agreement.”
AUPE VS UCP
Alberta labour union takes fight against Critical Infrastructure Defence Act to the Supreme Court of Canada

Paula Tran - Yesterday

Alberta's largest public sector union is taking its constitutional challenge against the UCP government's Bill 1 to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Alberta Union of Provincial Employees (AUPE) said Bill 1, or the Critical Infrastructure Defence Act, violates the rights of Albertans and is an attack on the freedom to take part in peaceful protests.

The union is seeking leave to have the Supreme Court hear an application to overturn a decision made by the Alberta Court of Appeal last December, after the appeal court ruled that AUPE had no standing to bring the claim because no one had yet been charged under the Act.


Read more:
Advanced education minister expects Alberta post-secondary institutions to drop vaccine and mask mandates

The union argues the Alberta Court of Appeal based its decision on hypotheticals, even though AUPE and its members were experiencing a "current chilling effect" from the bill's prohibitions.

"AUPE believes that peaceful protesting is a cornerstone of our democracy and that the aim of the government is to use the Critical Infrastructure Defence Act to silence opposition to its policies," said Patrick Nugent, AUPE's counsel, in an emailed statement on Friday.


AUPE first launched its constitutional challenge against Bill 1 in June 2020, after the bill passed third reading the month prior. The bill was passed in response to the rail and road blockades that were organized in solidarity with the Wet'suwet'en hereditary chiefs protesting the construction of the Coastal Gas Link natural gas pipeline in northern B.C.

Read more:
Comparing Coutts border protest to Indigenous land defenders inaccurate, says Alberta premier

The bill allows law enforcement to arrest and fine anyone trying to shut down critical economic infrastructure, including railways and highways. It also makes it easier for police to intervene at blockades rather than wait for a court injunction.

But questions arose about the fact that the bill has not been used until Monday, 10 days after protestors arrived in Coutts.

Video: Alberta border blockade remains adamant, demands nationwide mandates lifted

Alberta RCMP has laid charges under the Critical Infrastructure Defence Act against Calgary street preacher Artur Pawlowski, who is being accused of obstructing and interfering with essential infrastructure.

Pawlowski was arrested at his residence by Alberta RCMP and Calgary Police Service officers on Monday. A video of his arrest showed him being handcuffed and taken away by police. Multiple people can also be seen yelling at the police and filming the incident.

Read more:
Alberta NDP calls on UCP to suspend commercial operators licences as Coutts protest enters 13th day

He has been taken before a justice of peace and remains in custody until his next court appearance on Feb. 16, said an RCMP spokesperson.

The AUPE criticized the UCP government's response to the protest, accusing it of only imposing the law against groups they don't like.

“The fact that the government and police waited so long to charge anyone under Bill 1 during the border protests at Coutts and aren’t using the act to shut down the protests entirely suggests that this will be a law that is imposed only on those with whom the government does not agree," said AUPE president Guy Smith.


The Alberta government maintains that the blockades are unlawful and enforcement decisions remain solely in the authority of the police.

Read more:
Manufacturing association says blockades taking big pinch out of Alberta’s economy

"The Alberta government looks forward to defending against these baseless claims. As always, enforcement decisions about statutes such as the Critical Infrastructure Defence Act remain solely in the authority of law enforcement.

"Constitutional rights, such as those of free assembly, have been found by courts to have reasonable limits. The blocking of critical infrastructure is unacceptable, and we believe that the Supreme Court of Canada will agree that the AUPE claim is without merit," said Alex Puddifant, acting Justice Minister Sonya Savage's press secretary.

Alberta loosening COVID-19 restrictions as border protests resume

Earlier this week, Kenney also said comparing police responses at Coutts to police responses to Indigenous land defenders is "inaccurate," calling the situation at Coutts very fluid and complex.

“It is never lawful to block a railway and I’ve seen with much frustration those kinds of blockades go on, sometimes for weeks. I think that is wrong,” he said
Calls grow for Alberta to release data, recommendations used to lift COVID restrictions

Less than a week after unveiling its plans to roll back COVID-19 restrictions, the Alberta government is facing multiple calls to release the data and recommendations it got before making the decision.



© Provided by Edmonton JournalThe Alberta legislature on Nov. 5, 2020.


Ashley Joannou - Yesterday 7:12 p.m.
Edmonton Journal


Former Alberta cabinet ministers have differing opinions on whether the information — which is currently protected under cabinet confidentiality — should be made public.

Alberta is one of several provinces to announce plans to roll back restrictions. Alberta’s mandatory vaccine passport program has already ended and as of Monday, masks will no longer be required for students in the province’s schools. Additional stages lifting more restrictions come into effect on March 1, if hospitalization numbers trend down.

News of the restrictions being loosened has led to requests from municipalities and one of Alberta’s largest school boards to see the province’s data and recommendations made by chief medical officer of health Dr. Deena Hinshaw.

Let us share perspectives: Sohi

Edmonton Mayor Amarjeet Sohi sent a letter requesting the information to Premier Jason Kenney and Health Minister Jason Copping on Friday, after council passed a motion earlier in the week.

“Given that some of the next stages of the plan are tentatively scheduled, we are asking you for an opportunity to share our perspectives, including what we have heard from a wide variety of Edmontonians, on the timing and staging of the relaxations,” Sohi’s letter says.

“To have this discussion, and support city council’s further discussions on this topic, it would be helpful to understand the data which informed the Government of Alberta’s recent plan.”

In Calgary, city council has agreed in principle for Mayor Joyti Gondek to make a similar request but they still need to give it a final sign-off next week before a formal letter could go out.

Edmonton Coun. Andrew Knack said he trusts Hinshaw but doesn’t trust the government to follow medical advice after previous restrictions were lifted too soon.

Knack said city council makes the vast majority of its decisions after debating the facts in public.

“People can see clearly how we came to our decision and that builds trust in the decision-making process — being able to understand why somebody has decided made a decision the way they have, even if they don’t agree,” he said.

On Wednesday, Edmonton Public School Board chairwoman Trisha Estabrooks said the division will be asking Hinshaw to outline the data and rationale for the government’s decision to remove the masking requirement for students.

“That, to me, is critical data that needs to be shared publicly,” Estabrooks said.

At a press conference Thursday, Hinshaw deferred questions about the masking requirement to Copping and said she couldn’t share what recommendations she’s made because she took an oath of cabinet confidence.

Copping did not commit to sharing data with municipalities. He said the government is using a “prudent, phased approach” to lift restrictions.

“We take very seriously the recommendations made by our chief medical officer of health.

“We, as a cabinet committee, are balancing the needs of Albertans not only protecting health and protecting people from Delta, and Omicron and COVID, but also mental health, because of the cost that we have with putting in restrictive measures, and then also the overall economy.”
Former cabinet ministers weigh in

Former Alberta justice minister and Progressive Conservative MLA Jonathan Denis said cabinet confidentiality allows for free discussion of many competing views and he’s concerned about the precedent that would be set if information discussed in cabinet could be made public.

“You would not have the same free-flowing discussions and high-level decision making if the actors, in this case the ministers of the Crown, would know that this type of information could actually be disclosed,” said Denis, a Calgary lawyer, adding that provincial and federal governments of every stripe uphold the same rules.

“Having sat at the cabinet table before in five different ministries, there are often very many competing interests. There’s often competing data, competing studies that you have.”

If a municipal government wants to gather its own information, they can do that, he said.

“I know no situation where one government goes and asks for confidential information from another government.”

Retired Alberta politician Brian Mason, a former leader of the provincial NDP who was also the transportation minister in the Notley government, acknowledged that Hinshaw’s recommendations would be covered under cabinet confidence but said the government could and should voluntarily release them to restore confidence in the decision making process after restrictions were previously lifted too soon.

“Nobody’s suggesting that the government release the individual comments of cabinet ministers in a confidential cabinet meeting. They’re just suggesting that the information provided to the government upon which it claims to be making this decision be made publicly available, and that’s not a slippery slope,” he said.

ajoannou@postmedia.com

twitter.com/ashleyjoannou
Opinion: Dropping COVID restrictions puts the health of children at greater risk

Sabrina Eliason , Tehseen Ladha , Sam Wong - 
Yesterday 
Edmonton Journal

As the Alberta Medical Association Section of Pediatrics, we are very disappointed and concerned about the plan announced by our premier on Feb. 8, to lift public health protections. This announcement comes while our health system remains under significant strain due to staff shortages, test positivity rates are still in the 30-per-cent range and there continues to be unsustainably high rates of daily hospitalizations, ICU admission and deaths due to COVID.


© Provided by Edmonton Journal
Children in the school yard outside Garneau School in Edmonton on Thursday January 20, 2022.

Lifting these protections now will only increase the strain on our already strained health-care system. Meanwhile, the re-allocation of resources to meet the “surge” demand of COVID hospitalizations has come and will continue to come at the cost of health-care services for other patients, including children.

Although COVID is often milder in children, it is not harmless. We have seen increased hospitalizations in extremely young children with COVID and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) in older children. We have watched pediatric ICU beds be used for adult ICU patients. We have seen youth suffering prolonged symptoms after mild COVID infections.

We have seen therapies for children with disabilities cancelled due to redeployment of staff to support the surge of COVID patients. We have supported children experiencing mental health and developmental issues exacerbated by the unmitigated spread of COVID causing school and activity disruptions. We have been left wondering what resources will be left for children with complex developmental, medical and mental health conditions and what impact the lack of access to these supports will be on their lives and their families.

There have been significant negative impacts on children and their families, not only from the public health measures themselves, but from having to put these measures in place because of uncontrolled spread of COVID due to premature removal of public health protections by our government.

We have watched for two years as the health of children has been put behind the health of adults with COVID. The cost of this is reaching a point of crisis and will not improve if COVID cases continue to rise. Our government’s plans for removal of public health measures have come without the necessary commitment to investing in protecting our children and communities.

We need our government to prioritize the community accessibility of COVID vaccination for all eligible children along with concomitant education and awareness campaigns. This could happen through school vaccination sites, public-transit accessible vaccine sites and community outreach programs. We need a strong and clear message from our government that acknowledges the evidence that COVID vaccines are safe and one of the best ways to protect our children.

We also need a commitment to other evidence-based mitigations such as masking in schools to reduce the transmission of COVID amongst children and their families. There is currently no evidence that masking in these situations negatively impacts children’s mental health or development.

Until we are at a point where larger numbers of children are vaccinated and case rates are consistently low, it is vitally important that we keep in place the protections that have led to Canada having one of the lowest death rates per capita among the developed countries of the world. This means continuance of masking in indoor spaces including schools, optimizing ventilation, isolating when symptomatic or COVID positive, using rapid tests appropriately, and getting booster doses of the COVID vaccine when eligible.

Without adequate control of COVID infection rates, families risk daycare shut-downs, school closures and activity cancellations due to outbreaks and health resources will continue to be redirected from children to treat hospitalized COVID patients. Rampant COVID transmission in the community is a major factor in families’ decisions to keep their children home to avoid exposures that may occur via activities and socialization.

The long-term health and development of Alberta’s children is dependent on consistent and adequate mitigation of COVID. It is time for our province to truly start putting children first.

Authored by: Drs. Sabrina Eliason and Tehseen Ladha, members-at-large, and Dr. Sam Wong, current president of the AMA Section of Pediatrics executive. The AMA Section of Pediatrics represents the almost 300 doctors who care for children in Alberta.

Co-signed by: Drs. Bonnie Islam, Mary-Pat Schlosser, Hasu Rajani, Christopher W. Andrews, Catherine Macneil, Charlotte Foulston, Natalie Forbes, Kyle McKenzie, Elsa Fiedrich, Breanne Frohlich, Juan Pablo Appendino.

Alberta plan to phase out all COVID-19 restrictions reckless: public health faculty


EDMONTON — Faculty members from the University of Alberta School of Public Health, saying it could prolong the pandemic, are voicing strong opposition to what they call the rapid relaxation of COVID-19 health measures in the province.

In an open letter sent to Premier Jason Kenney and top-ranking United Conservative officials, about 25 experts with varied experience in public health, infectious diseases and social epidemiology say the government is using selective data to support its policies.

"We know and agree that restrictions have had deleterious effects on our society. However, this extreme back and forth of on-again, off-again restrictions only serves to prolong the course of this pandemic," the letter reads.

"We cannot tell what the future will hold, but the history of other pandemics, our immediate experience with Omicron and the fourth wave, and the wealth of evidence should teach us that a cautious, slow easing of restrictions would be the prudent way to proceed."

Premier Jason Kenney announced earlier this week a phased, but speedy approach to dropping all pandemic health measures. Kenney said the threat of COVID-19 to public health no longer outweighs the damaging impact of restrictions.

Alberta's vaccine passport is already a thing of the past and masking requirements for children 12 and under, as well as for all students, are to end Monday. Most remaining measures are to be lifted in March should pressure on hospitals continue to ease.

Steve Buick, press secretary to Health Minister Jason Copping, said the letter released Friday gives a "distorted view" by ignoring that other jurisdictions in Canada are taking similar approaches.

"Restrictions take a heavy toll on society, from workers earning modest wages in service businesses to students who have seen their education compromised by the change to online classes. The letter takes an unbalanced view, with almost no acknowledgment of that impact," said Buick in a statement.

"The letter calls for restrictions to continue but distorts the basis for them. The justification for restrictions is to prevent the health system from being overwhelmed. That has not happened."

COVID-19 hospitalizations decreased by 20 to 1,566 Thursday with no significant changes to intensive care admissions. The seven-day average positivity rate was about 32 per cent.

The letter says the province's plan is reckless when waning immunity after two vaccine doses, slow uptake for booster shots and lagging vaccination of children are considered.

It says it's time to expand vaccine mandates to include third doses, rather than ditch them altogether. The group also expresses concerns that the government is removing the freedom of municipalities, post-secondary institutions and school boards to make their own decisions.

Education Minister Adriana LaGrange told school boards Tuesday that they will not be able to bring in their own mask mandates. Advanced Education Minister Demetrios Nicolaides similarly informed post-secondary schools that he expects them to return to pre-pandemic rules when more measures are expected to be lifted March 1.

That phase would see an end to keeping students in cohorts at schools, capacity limits and the indoor mask mandate.

Letter co-author Dr. Simon Otto, who specializes in epidemiology and infectious diseases, said in an interview that he is concerned government decisions are being driven by politics rather than all available evidence-based data.

"We speak from a position of expertise," he said. "We're training the next generation of public health professionals and we train them to think in this way, so we really feel it's important for the government to hear from us."

Otto said the government should release the data it is using to guide its decision-making and be more transparent with the public about crafting COVID-19 policies.

"Ignoring the evidence and dismissing the concerns and fears of parents, students and educators is a dangerous and irresponsible overstep by the government," the letter says.

"Now is absolutely not the time to make these drastic changes."

— By Alanna Smith in Calgary

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 11, 2022.

The Canadian Press

LABOUR NEWS ALBERTA TELL KENNEY TO KEEP COVID PROTECTIONS

LabourNEWS

The pandemic is not over but this week, Kenney announced he was removing the vaccine passport immediately and masking rules for students in Alberta schools and children under 12 on Monday. At the same press conference, Dr. Deena Hinshaw reported 1,623 people in hospital with COVID-19, including 129 in intensive care, and 13 people died in the past 24 hours, yesterday, 22 people died. 

Action

Demand safe schools in Alberta!

The relaxing of school safety protections by the UCP government is premature and the AFL is partnering with Support our Students Alberta on an email tool to demand that the Alberta government adopt a more rational approach to ensure schools are safe for every child and education worker!  

Tell Kenney to keep COVID-19 protections in schools until hospitalizations are down and ventilation is improved. Take action.


News

Alberta health care workers call on their fellow citizens to help them push back against the UCP’s reckless decision to prematurely remove COVID-19 protections

The following joint statement released was today from a coalition of Alberta health care unions:

“On behalf of the more than 75,000 health care workers who we represent in Alberta, we want to express our profound concern about the provincial government’s recently announced plan to end the vaccine passport program, remove mask mandates in schools and begin treating COVID-19 as another seasonal illness like influenza. We believe these decisions are premature, reckless and irresponsible. We have no doubt they will lead to increased illness, disability and death. We also think they were clearly based on political considerations, rather than on science or the kind of concern for the public good that citizens should reasonably be able to expect from their governments. Read more.

 


Alberta's plan to remove COVID-19-related restrictions: What you need to know

Albertans are no longer required to show proof of vaccination under the first step of the provincial government's three-part plan to phase out most public health measures by March 1.

Premier Jason Kenney, Health Minister Jason Copping and Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Deena Hinshaw laid out the plan Tuesday, saying hospitalization trends will be monitored as restrictions are relaxed.


Alberta businesses wrestle with fate of vaccine passports

Some entrepreneurs worry ditching the system too quickly could lead to another resurgence in cases — mirroring the province’s reopening of the economy last summer — and potentially trigger more public health measures down the road.

Labour leaders say they’re concerned with the province taking steps to end the vaccine passport at this point.

“Removing these protections will make workplaces less safe,” said Alberta Federation of Labour president Gil McGowan. “This is all about politics.”


Listen to AFL President Gil McGowan talk about the "freedom convoy" on Global radio 770 CHQR & read his statement: 

The authoritarian bullies who are terrorizing Ottawa do NOT represent Alberta workers

“On numerous occasions over the past week, the so-called “Freedom Convoy” has been portrayed as an uprising of ordinary Canadian workers, particularly truckers. I want to make it clear that the people who descended on Ottawa this weekend – and who continue to essentially occupy and terrorize the city – are in no way, shape or form representative of the vast majority of working Canadians or Albertans, including truckers. 

The workers who I know and represent are at work today, not intimidating innocent citizens or rubbing shoulders with known white supremacists and other extremists. Instead of supporting what’s going on in Ottawa, all but a tiny sliver of Canadian workers are doing what they do every day: providing health care, educating our children, making our cities and municipalities work, producing and moving goods, working on construction projects, stocking shelves, serving customers and doing the myriad of other things that make our economy run."  Read more. Listen to radio interview.

'They Are Firing the Entire Committee!' Memphis Workers Say Starbucks Targeting Union Organizers

"The arc of Starbucks' union-busting is long, but it bends toward losing," said Starbucks Workers United.




Nikki Taylor, a shift supervisor at the Poplar and Highland Starbucks in Memphis, Tennessee, was one of numerous workers fired by the coffee chain for what they say are their union organizing efforts.
(Photo: More Perfect Union/YouTube/screen grab)

BRETT WILKINS
February 8, 2022

Workers at a Memphis Starbucks who were fired Tuesday after launching a unionization effort vowed to carry on their fight, with one employee invoking the legacy of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.—who was assassinated in the Tennessee city while campaigning for workers' rights.

"Starbucks has been fighting desperately to silence us because we did not back down or let them shake us."

"I was fired by Starbucks today for 'policies' that I've never heard of before and that I've never been written up about before," Nikki Taylor, a shift supervisor at the Poplar and Highland store, said in a statement.

"This is a clear attempt by Starbucks to retaliate against those of us who are leading the union effort at our store and scare other partners," she added. "Starbucks will not get away with this—the entire country will be outraged."



Taylor tweeted: "This is an outrage! They are firing the entire committee!"

Beto Sanchez, another shift supervisor at the store, said that "Starbucks has been fighting desperately to silence us because we did not back down or let them shake us."

A Starbucks representative told The New York Times that the workers were fired for violations including allowing at least one reporter inside the store to conduct an after-hours interview in which some of the employees were unmasked.

Starbucks Workers United, which is representing company employees seeking to unionize at various locations around the country, said that "in their most blatant act of union-busting yet, Starbucks is retaliating against the union organizing committee at the Poplar and Highland store after they allowed the media to conduct interviews in their store after hours."

The group added that "Starbucks is using policies that have never been enforced, such as going behind a counter when a partner is not officially working, to fire workers. Starbucks chose to selectively enforce policies, that have not previously been consistently enforced, as a subterfuge to fire union leaders. Many of these workers did not have any prior offenses or write-ups."



Starbucks Workers United said it would file charges against the company at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

Last year, an NLRB administrative judge found that Starbucks had illegally retaliated against two baristas at a Philadelphia Starbucks who sought to unionize.

According to the NLRB, the judge, Andrew Gollin, "found that Starbucks closely monitored their public social media activity, attempted to gauge employees' support for the employees' efforts, and unlawfully spied on protected conversations one of the employees initiated with coworkers."

The agency added that Gollin "concluded Starbucks retaliated against the employees and discharged them in an attempt to quell the organizing drive."


The Memphis terminations come amid a wave of unionization efforts at dozens of Starbucks locations around the nation.

The Poplar and Highland workers chose January 17, Martin Luther King Jr. Day, to launch their unionization drive. King was assassinated in Memphis in 1968 while participating in a sanitation workers' strike. The store employees are demanding higher pay—including a minimum wage of at least $15 an hour—better working conditions, and improved Covid-19 safety precautions.

"This store is a family, and an attack on one of us is an attack on all of us. We as partners should not be afraid to speak to the media, to organize our stores, or to fight for our right to have a union," said Sanchez, noting that King "was killed in our very city while fighting for the right to organize a union."


"We have no intentions [of] backing down or wavering," Sanchez added, "and we're ready for the rest of the community and other stores to join us in our fight for workers' rights."