Tuesday, February 15, 2022

US PROVOCATION
U.S. to halt Mexican avocado imports 'as long as necessary' to ensure US worker safety

David Lawder and Dave Graham
Publishing date:Feb 14, 2022 • 

WASHINGTON/MEXICO CITY — U.S. imports of new Mexican avocado harvests will stay suspended for “as long as necessary” to ensure the safety of U.S. inspectors who were threatened verbally in Mexico’s western Michoacan state, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) said on Monday.

The halt of export inspections on Feb. 11 by the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) marks another source of trade tension between Washington and Mexico City.

All U.S.-bound avocado crops must be inspected for safety, and those approved before Feb. 11 could still be exported, the agency said.

USDA said the suspension was ordered “following a security incident (verbal threat) involving our employees. The suspension will remain in place for as long as necessary to ensure the appropriate actions are taken, to secure the safety of APHIS personnel working in Mexico.”

The details of the incident were not immediately clear. Michoacan, Mexico’s top avocado producing state and the only one certified to export to the United States, has long had security issues linked to problems with drug gangs.

Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador said on Monday authorities are looking at the U.S. decision and suggested there may be political motivations behind the suspension.

Speaking at a regular government news conference, Lopez Obrador said the matter may have been influenced by groups with something to gain from the suspension, without elaborating.

“The truth is, there’s always an economic, a commercial interest behind it,” he said. “Or there’s a political attitude.”

The Biden administration has recently brought a number of complaints about Mexican enforcement of labor rights and environmental standards under the updated U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on trade. The United States also voiced concerns about government regulations in its telecoms and energy sectors.

Lopez Obrador pointed to a recent decision by U.S. trade officials to seek talks with Mexico over its environmental obligations under a North American trade agreement, including protection of the critically endangered vaquita porpoise.

But he said Mexican relations with the U.S. government were “very good.” (Reporting by Dave Graham; Editing by Jan Harvey and Aurora Ellis)

The great avocado affair of 2022: Bans, threats and a Mexican drug war

By Elizabeth Elkin, Carolina Gonzalez and Leslie Patton
February 15, 2022 — 

New York: The great avocado affair of 2022 began with a little-noticed weekend press release from Mexico’s Agriculture and Rural Development Ministry. The US was shutting down imports of avocados from Mexico because one of its inspectors received a threatening phone call.

Details are hard to come by. Who made the threat? What was the threat?

What’s known is this: Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has not taken kindly to the US action.


A client chooses fresh avocados at Michoacan market in Mexico City on Monday. The Mexican President says a US suspension on imports and recent environmental complaints are part of a conspiracy against his country.CREDIT:AP

On Monday (Tuesday AEDT) he said Mexican authorities would look into the allegations but also made clear he believed there was something fishy about the incident. There were political and economic interests, Obrador said, wanting to keep the Mexican avocados out of the US market.

One group that wants the avocados to keep flowing north: US consumers, who now eat more guacamole than ever. It’s only a matter of time before the import halt will squeeze supplies, as Mexico accounts for 80 per cent of the US market, and drive up the price of yet another product in an economy grappling with its worst inflation surge in four decades.

“We could see a significant reduction in availability” of avocados in the US and higher prices as a result, said David Magana, senior analyst for Rabobank International in Fresno, California.

The ban on avocados from Michoacán, a coastal state just west of Mexico City – the only Mexican state fully authorised to export to the US – went into effect on February 11, a day before Mexico issued its statement. The US Department of Agriculture only confirmed its actions on Monday.

“US health authorities ... made the decision after one of their officials, who was carrying out inspections in Uruapan, Michoacan, received a threatening message on his official cellphone,” the department wrote.

Neither side would answer questions on the nature of the alleged threat, but the state has been riddled by violence since drug cartels took over large swathes of the state years ago.

Many Michoacan avocado growers say drug gangs threaten them or their family members with kidnapping or death unless they pay protection money, sometimes amounting to thousands of dollars per acre. The fruit is the state’s most lucrative crop. Extortion of avocado growers has gotten so bad that vigilantes have formed a “self-defence” group and pledged to aid police.

Members of the so-called self-defence group known as United Towns or Pueblos Unidos in Nuevo Urecho, Michoacan, Mexico, in November.CREDIT:AP

The import ban came on the day that the Mexican growers and packers association unveiled its Super Bowl ad for this year. Mexican exporters have taken out the pricey ads for almost a decade in a bid to associate guacamole as a Super Bowl tradition.

This year’s ad shows a Julius Caesar character and a rough bunch of gladiator fans outside what appears to be the Colosseum, soothing their apparently violent differences by enjoying guacamole and avocados.

The association did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ban, which hits an industry with almost $US3 billion ($4.2 billion) in annual exports.

Avocados are already the most expensive in North America for this time of year in government data going back two decades due to the labour shortfalls, higher production costs and wage hikes that have plagued the broader economy. It’s one of the many products helping to push global food prices closer to a record high.


This photo provided by Avocados From Mexico shows a scene from Avocados From Mexico 2022 Super Bowl NFL football spot.
CREDIT:AP

At the same time, demand for the fruit is booming. Per-capita consumption doubled in the 10 years through 2020 to 4 kilograms, and could surpass 4.9kg by 2026, Magana said, citing industry projections.

Separately on Monday, Mexican fishing boats in the Gulf of Mexico were “prohibited from entering US ports, will be denied port access and services,” the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said, in response to years of Mexican boats illegally poaching red snapper in US waters in the Gulf.

That came after the US Trade Representative’s Office filed an environmental complaint against Mexico on Thursday for failing to stop illegal fishing to protect the critically endangered vaquita marina, the world’s smallest porpoise, in the Gulf of California, also known as the Sea of Cortez. Nets set illegally for another fish, the totoaba, drown vaquitas.

The office said it had asked for “environment consultations” with Mexico, the first such case it has filed under the US-Mexico-Canada free trade pact.

Bloomberg, AP

  • Uber Settles Waymo Litigation in Saga That Drew in Thiel, Trump

(Bloomberg) -- Uber Technologies Inc. is close to paying a final price for its troubled recruitment of a star driverless car engineer away from Google.

The ride-hailing firm, which recruited Anthony Levandowski in 2016 from Alphabet Inc.’s self-driving car program, has entered into a global settlement requiring it to pay a “substantial portion” of the $120 million Google clawed back from the engineer, court records show.

The precise sum Uber will pay Google isn’t disclosed in a court filing detailing the deal. But the payment is a central feature of the agreement, which if approved by a judge, would finally resolve a saga of avarice and betrayal that left all involved looking bad.

The fight over Levandowski’s talents started with then-Uber CEO Travis Kalanick and Google co-founder Larry Page, moving to a high-stakes trade secrets trial between Uber and Waymo, followed by a successful criminal prosecution of the engineer. By the end, venture capitalist Peter Thiel and even then-President Donald Trump were drawn in.

Read More: Ex-Google Engineer Levandowski’s Jump to Uber Ends in Prison

“There is very significant business justification for the payment to Google,” the parties said in the filing. Uber’s payment of “a substantial portion” of Google’s claim against Levandowski “is the key to the resolution of the case.”

José Castañeda, a Google spokesperson, said “we can confirm that this matter has been resolved.” 

Uber declined to comment, as did Levandowski’s lawyer. 

The settlement ends a three-way fight between Google, Uber and Levandowski. In 2020, the engineer was ordered to spend 18 months in prison after he pleaded guilty to a single count of trade secret theft from Google as he defected to Uber. It was one of the highest-profile criminal cases to hit Silicon Valley, preceded by the high-stakes civil case resolved mid-trial in 2018 by Uber agreeing to pay Alphabet Inc.’s self-driving company, Waymo, about $245 million in closely held stock.

Last year, just minutes before Levandowski was due to appear before the judge who had sentenced him, his lawyers filed with the court a pardon from Trump. The pardon was supported by Thiel, among others.

While Levandowski had been spared incarceration, Google had separately won a judgment reclaiming a $120 million bonus it paid him. With interest and attorneys’ fees added, the sum totaled $180 million and forced Levandowski to file for bankruptcy.

The global settlement also requires Levandowski to pay Google $25 million. In a letter to the judge who handled his criminal case, Levandowski said his legal battles had been a “grueling lesson in humility.” 

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M

Scottsdale Promoter Of Offering In OTC Drug Stock Defrauded Investors

Bret Butler Reiss of Scottsdale and his affiliated company, Global Capital and Equity, LLC, have been ordered to to pay $436,500 in restitution to investors and a $30,000 administrative penalty by the Arizona Corporation Commission for committing securities fraud.

The Corporation Commission found Reiss and affiliated company solicited investors to purchase shares of stock in Neurocyte, Inc. Investors were told that Neurocyte, Inc. was set to “go public,” representing the company owned the rights to an over-the-counter migraine pain reliever called Migranade. The Corporation Commission found the respondents misrepresented to investors that some ex-NFL football players and a well-known actor had taken Migranade and experienced relief.

The Corporation Commission found that Reiss met some of the 22 investors through an online dating website but did not inquire as to each investor’s net worth or whether or not the investor would qualify as an accredited investor. Reiss and his affiliated company were not registered to offer or sell securities in Arizona.

The Corporation Commission found Reiss and his company represented to investors that they did not have to be registered to sell Neurocyte stock because it was an exempt offering. Further, the respondents did not tell investors if the company Neurocyte stock was required to be registered and frequently created a sense of urgency for investors to purchase shares.

Owners of Mother Bunch Brewing Must Pay Over $600K For Failing To Pay Taxes

Julie Meeker, Jimmie McBride, and Mother Bunch Brewing Inc. were ordered on Monday to pay restitution and fines totaling nearly $657,000 for failing to pay transaction privilege tax (TPT) and failure to pay Arizona individual income tax.

Mother Bunch, a popular brewery and restaurant, closed in 2020 after five years in business.

In separate cases heard in January 2022, Jimmie McBride, Julie Meeker, and Mother Bunch via Julie Meeker each plead guilty to one count of Failure to Pay Tax, for failing to pay tax to the Arizona Department of Revenue between February 1, 2015 and January 31, 2020.
Julie Meeker, Jimmie McBride, and Mother Bunch Brewing Inc., and Arizona Corporation (Mother Bunch) agreed to pay restitution in the amount of $632,806.70, and a fine totaling $10,000, for failing to pay transaction privilege tax (TPT).

In addition, co-defendants Julie Meeker and Jimmie McBride agreed to pay restitution in the amount of $4,494, and fines totaling $9,575, for failing to pay Arizona individual income tax.

As part of their plea agreements, they each agreed to pay restitution in the amount of $632,806.70 and a fine totaling $10,000 for failing to pay transaction privilege tax (TPT). They were also ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $4,494, and fines totaling $9,575, for failing to pay Arizona individual income tax.



Telus International to create 300 new jobs at Irish sites

The company, which formerly acquired Voxpro, is also investing €2m in upgrading its facilities

Tony Barry, vice-president of finance; Miriam Manning, HR director; Taoiseach Micheál Martin; and Roger Clancy, vice-president of operations and general manager, at Telus’s Irish headquarters in Cork. Photograph: Michael O’Sullivan/OSM PHOTO

 

Telus International Ireland is to create 300 additional jobs at its Irish sites over the coming year.

The company, which provides customer experience, technical support and sales operations solutions to international customers such as Google, already employs 2,000 people across facilities in Cork, Dublin and Ballina, Co Mayo.

The new jobs will span a range of areas including tech and customer support, shared services, cloud infrastructure and business intelligence analytics. The roles, recruitment for which is already under way, include onsite, remote, and hybrid working opportunities

The new posts come as the company is also investing €2 million in its Irish facilities.

Headquartered in Vancouver, Canada, Telus previously acquired Voxpro from founders Dan and Linda Kiely in a deal valued at up to $150 million. It rebranded the business in 2019.

Telus has been in expansion mode of late, having made a number of other big-name acquisitions, and going public in 2021 in a move that valued the company at CAD$8.5 billion (€5.9bn ).

Recently-filed accounts show the Irish operation recorded pretax profits of €3.7 million in 2020, having reported a €6.3 million loss the prior year. Revenues slipped to €80.8 million from €81.8 million.

New areas

Speaking to The Irish Times, vice-president of operations and general manager at Telus International Ireland, Roger Clancy, said the Irish operation had grown substantially since it was acquired, with the company expanding into new areas such as AI and data annotation.

“The new jobs are being created as part of a foundation for further growth, and are recognition of the skills and capabilities that are here in Ireland,” he said.

“We’ve really been encouraged to look at the long-term opportunities that are arising as we come out of the pandemic, and this includes moving up the value chain. A lot of the work we do in terms of innovation distinguishes us from our competitors, so it is really about building on that.”

The NFL has a big race problem, and it is showing
by Jack Roshco
February 14, 2022
Design by Sam Turner. Buy this photo.

Former Miami Dolphins coach Brian Flores announced Feb. 1 that he had filed a class-action lawsuit against the NFL and three of its teams. He alleged racial discrimination in league hiring practices as well as tanking — a practice by which teams intentionally lose to amass greater draft capital, among other charges. Flores’s lawsuit calls into question the legitimacy of the “Rooney Rule,” which requires all NFL teams to interview at least two external minority candidates for coaching and general manager vacancies.

Flores, however, is essentially calling the rule a sham. He claims that multiple teams engaged him in sham interviews meant only to satisfy the Rooney Rule, and he was not a serious candidate for those jobs. He brought receipts; the lawsuit contained screenshots of a text exchange between Flores and Patriots coach Bill Belichick, whom Flores worked for in New England before taking the Dolphins’ job. Belichick evidently believed he was texting his current offensive coordinator, Brian Daboll, to congratulate him on being hired as coach of the New York Giants. But the text went to Flores, who was set to interview for the Giants’ job himself three days later. Flores did have his interview as scheduled, and shortly thereafter the Giants introduced their new coach: Brian Daboll.

Flores’s claims come with instant credibility, both because of the state of racial representation in the league and because of Flores’s stature as a coach. There are only three active black coaches in the NFL — Pittsburgh Steelers’ Mike Tomlin; the Dolphins’ new coach, Mike McDaniel; and Lovie Smith with the Houston Texans — after Flores and Texans coach David Culley were fired after this season. That alone is a pretty bad look for the league, but context makes it worse. The Texans have a longstanding reputation of institutional racism and those allegations have been repeatedly substantiated.

Late Texans owner Bob McNair even faced severe backlash from his own players for racist comments he made in 2017. Racism seems to be hereditary in the McNair family. Bob McNair’s son Cal, current owner of the team, is no stranger to racially charged controversy himself, and recent rumors have been swirling that Houston was dead-set on hiring former NFL quarterback Josh McCown as coach. They didn’t, but the fact that they were considering a white man in his early 40s with no coaching experience with people like Flores out there is indicative of the larger problem, even if McCown wasn’t ultimately hired.

Flores’s lawyers, justifiably, accused McNair of only hiring Smith to thwart allegations of institutional racism in light of the class-action suit. ESPN’s NFL Insider Adam Schefter chimed in as well, saying “I think (Flores’s lawsuit) changed this (NFL coach-hiring) cycle,” on the network’s Super Bowl LVI “SportsCenter” special on Feb 9. “I think the Texans were tracking — tracking — to hire Josh McCown, and the environment and atmosphere changed once that lawsuit was filed. And I think it would’ve been very difficult for them to hire a guy they, I think, were very interested in, and they ended up hiring Lovie Smith instead.” Given the way the McNair family has spoken — publicly — about minorities, it’s hard to disagree with Flores’s lawyers here. From the outside, it looks like they’re racists using Culley and now Smith as pawns to try to throw fans off the scent.

Tomlin is the league’s longest-tenured coach, and he coaches the franchise owned by the Rooney family, the namesake of the Rooney Rule. None of that is to say Tomlin’s continued presence in Pittsburgh is due to his race. He has long been an elite NFL coach, and the Steelers would be universally ridiculed for firing him. Having said that, Flores had begun to establish himself as an elite coach as well, and his firing by the Dolphins this offseason came as a massive shock both within the league and in the media. He was known as one of the league’s most popular coaches within his own locker room, and is often spoken of as the epitome of a “player’s coach.” Flores led the Dolphins to their first back-to-back winning seasons since 2002 and 2003, and had restored hope to one of the league’s most success-starved franchises.

Flores’s status as a rising star — one who was already producing winning seasons after taking over a franchise mired in two decades of complete and utter irrelevance — is significant. If Flores was a first-time coach who was fired with a record 7-10 games under .500, you could argue that he was just a sore loser seeking to capitalize on America’s racial tensions. But Flores led one of the league’s most perennially embarrassing franchises to a 24-25 record in three seasons, including 19-13 the last two seasons. Whether Flores’s firing and/or his interview experiences were racially influenced remains to be seen, but firing him was so objectively stupid that you almost have to wonder whether the decision may not have been entirely football-related. With the league’s record on race, from blackballing Colin Kaepernick to the conspicuous snubbing of qualified black candidates, all of this is enough to raise an eyebrow or two.

That last point isn’t some kind of abstract conjecture. There are multiple well-known African-American coordinators who should be coaches right now, and their lack of opportunities is glaring. Schefter noted later in the “SportsCenter” special that the Pittsburgh Steelers’ new defensive coordinator has interviewed for 10 coaching jobs, and hasn’t gotten one of them. Teryl Austin is a respected and experienced coach who is clearly worthy of a chance to lead an organization. Is it that much of a reach to say anybody who’s been asked to interview 10 times for a coaching job is probably qualified for one? Eric Bieniemy, the offensive coordinator for the Kansas City Chiefs, has overseen one of the most prolific offenses of all time, with two Super Bowl appearances and one championship to his name. He has interviewed for multiple vacancies over multiple years. He’s still a coordinator. Bieniemy and Flores were passed over for the New Orleans Saints job, too. New Orleans chose to promote from within earlier this month, going with their defensive coordinator, Dennis Allen.

That seems sensible on its face — to maintain stability in an organization which just lost its legendary longtime coach in Sean Payton. After all, Allen had been with the organization since 2015; has coaching experience, like Flores but unlike Bieniemy; and was seen as Payton’s right-hand man in recent years. That sounds great on paper, but Allen was 8-28 with zero playoff appearances in three years as coach of the Raiders. He gets another chance in the big chair before Flores, who’s had more recent (and far more successful) coaching experience? He gets the nod over Bieniemy, the architect of Patrick Mahomes’s development into an all-time great quarterback? Bieniemy and Flores were passed over for a job that they were both more qualified for than the coach who got it.

Kliff Kingsbury, though? He’s still the coach of the Arizona Cardinals, despite having no business even interviewing for that job in the first place. If there were such a thing as irrefutable anecdotal evidence for Flores’s case, the dichotomy between Kingsbury and these up-and-coming Black coaches would be it. When he was hired by the Cardinals, Kingsbury had only one career coaching job: at Texas Tech University. One would think that a first-time NFL coach — under age 40 and hired straight out of the college game — would have a résumé of sustained dominance at the college level. At this point, you probably know where I’m going with this: Kingsbury was 35-40 at Texas Tech, but … he coached Patrick Mahomes there, and Johnny Manziel and Case Keenum before Mahomes, as an assistant coach. So the Cardinals took a flier on him. Success developing quarterbacks is one thing; winning football games as a coach is another. 35-40 in college, and 24-25-1 in the NFL, and safely entering his fourth season in Arizona; yet Bieniemy sits tight in Kansas City, while Flores will probably never see an NFL sideline again.

Whether you agree with Flores’s case or not, it’s undeniable: The NFL has a race problem pervading its coaching hiring practices that it has gotten away with for decades. Ultimately, winning the battle of public opinion may have just as big of an impact as winning the case in court. Flores would be wise not to let anyone forget that there are some seriously mediocre white guys coaching with completely unwarranted job security (we’re all looking at you, Mike McCarthy and Matt Rhule), while bona fide studs like Flores, Austin, Bieniemy and so many more are shut out entirely.

Jack Roshco is an Opinion Columnist and can be reached at jroshco@umich.edu

Despite Gains, Tribal Nations Seek More Inclusion In National Affairs


National Congress of American Indians President Fawn Sharp, left, posing in 2020 with Sec. Deb Haaland (File photo by McKenzie Sadeghi/Cronkite News)

By Camila Pedrosa

WASHINGTON – Tribal governments have “a foot in the door” with the federal government but they don’t yet have a seat at the table where decisions concerning them are being made, the president of the National Congress of American Indians said Monday.

Fawn Sharp’s comments came during the annual State of Indian Nations Address, in which she outlined the progress made by tribal communities in the last year and NCAI’s priorities for the coming year.

Sharp called on the federal government to respect tribal sovereignty by including Indigenous leaders in discussions on everything from climate change to infrastructure and economic recovery.

“From the administration to federal lawmakers and to state governors, it is your duty to respect our right to self-governance, to work with us for the betterment of the people we serve, and to fully honor the trust and treaty obligations this country holds with tribal nations,” Sharp said.

Leaders of multiple Arizona tribes did not respond to requests for comment on Sharp’s address Monday.

Sharp, a member of the Quinault Indian Nation, also noted the fact that six Native Americans have been named to offices in the Biden administration, which she said is the most ever. But that is just a start, she said.

“It isn’t enough to have a foot in the door,” Sharp said. “Tribal nations must have a seat at the table where key decisions are being made.”

RELATED STORY

Indigenous representatives are also making inroads in Congress, with five current House members who belong to tribes or are Native Hawaiian. Among them is Rep. Sharice Davids, D-Kan., who gave this year’s congressional response to Sharp’s address.

Davids, a member of the Ho-Chunk Nation, leads the bipartisan Congressional Native American Caucus with Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., who is a member of the Chickasaw Nation. She said the caucus is working to educate Congress on issues facing tribal communities and ensuring that their priorities are being centered during policy discussions.

One of the priorities that Sharp emphasized is engaging tribes in the development of vital infrastructure on Native lands.

She praised Congress for passing the bipartisan infrastructure bill last November, which includes $13 billion for projects like developing clean water resources and expanding broadband services on Native lands. But Sharp said the federal government still needs to support conversations with tribal leaders and work to efficiently implement these resources.

“Consultation is simply not negotiable,” she said. “I call on the Biden administration to ensure that tribal nations are consulted with free, prior and informed consent, to ensure the infrastructure planning that’s occurring across this country has tribal nations’ feedback embedded within each blueprint.”

Sharp attributed the law’s investment in Native lands to the work Indigenous leaders and advocates have done in demanding the federal government’s support. Davids agreed, saying caucus members “worked diligently” to guarantee that the infrastructure bill included the funding Indian Country needs.

RELATED STORY

“I absolutely made sure to communicate at every single meeting we had during negotiations … those resources need to be there,” Davids said.

Sharp also said Native people are key to advancing the fight against climate change. Traditional land-management systems developed by Indigenous communities can help protect tribal land and resources from natural disaster, she said, citing wildfire prevention measures California adopted from the Karuk tribe.

“It is our sovereign right to manage and protect our resources,” Sharp said. “And it’s the federal government’s responsibility to ensure that is carried out through cooperative agreements concerning both state and federal lands.”

She said Indigenous people’s deep knowledge of the Earth’s biodiversity also gives them a unique chance to aid in the climate crisis on an international scale.

Last year, Sharp was the first tribal leader to be part of the U.S. delegation at the United Nations Climate Change Conference, which she said sets a precedent for the inclusion of Indigenous people at future international climate conferences.

“There is a new opportunity on the horizon for tribal nations in the post pandemic economic recovery world to be part of this global conversation,” Sharp said. “Our tribal nations’ sovereign standing demands that we are part of the discussion.”

THE ARCTIC IS A GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY
US senators call for comprehensive Arctic strategy
‘It is imperative the Arctic receives the appropriate attention to promote American interests’


This March 28, 2009, photo shows Apex overlooking Frobisher Bay, Nunavut. 
(AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Nathan Denette, File)



Joaqlin Estus
Indian Country Today

Arctic Indigenous peoples – including Inuit, Inupiaq, Athabascan, Yup’ik, Chukchi and Sami – are resilient but will be increasingly challenged by climate change. That’s according to the United Nations Environmental Program. A group of U.S. senators is asking the Biden administration to step up its attention to Arctic affairs.

The University of Lapland Arctic Center estimates Indigenous peoples make up about 10 percent of the populations of the Arctic nations of Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Russia, Canada and the U.S. (Alaska). Greenland is 80 percent Inuit. Arctic and sub-Arctic communities in Alaska are 60 to 98 percent Inupiaq, Yup’ik, and Athabascan. Indigenous peoples of Alaska and in other countries depend on wildlife for subsistence.

However, the Arctic is heating up at four times the rate of the rest of the planet. The ocean is warming, impacting fish and marine mammals. Wildlife is threatened by higher temperatures and habitat destruction. And infrastructure is being put at risk due to melting permafrost. Melting sea ice is opening the door to increased fishing and to development of minerals, including oil and gas, in Arctic waters.

The value of those resources has caught the attention of Russia and China. Presidents Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping last week announced plans to strengthen and continue their strategic partnership on resource development in the Arctic. Russia for several years has been building military ports and facilities on its Arctic coast, and has invested in dozens of icebreakers. The United States, meanwhile, has only one icebreaker, which is perhaps symbolic of its relative inattention to the Arctic.

Monday, 13 bipartisan senators asked the Biden administration to elevate Arctic affairs. In the letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken, the senators said the state department needs to take a stronger role in diplomacy, internal organization, and to develop a comprehensive Arctic strategy. The letter was signed by six Democrats, six Republicans and one Independent.

“It is imperative the Arctic receives the appropriate attention to promote American interests in a world where we compete for ideas, resources, and relationships,” the senators stated.

They asked that the state department’s lead person for the Arctic be promoted from the position of Arctic coordinator to ambassador level or higher, saying, “The U.S. is the only Arctic nation without a dedicated ambassador to the region. While we know other nations will always hear our perspective because of our international standing, it is important to demonstrate the sincerity our government holds in its engagement by ensuring the position is given a title commensurate with its responsibilities.”


The senators called the State department’s approach to Arctic affairs “disjointed,” and criticized communication across bureaus in the department.

They said the department has no comprehensive strategic plan, unlike the military.

“The Department of Defense (DOD) recently established a deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Arctic Affairs and Global Resilience. DOD released an Arctic Strategy in 2019 and each military service branch has subsequently released their own Arctic strategies. We understand no such strategic document exists for the Department of State. As the lead agency in international affairs, we ask that you ensure the Arctic receives the attention required of our nation’s leading agency,” said the senators.

The senators asked Blinken to report to them on “1) the future of the Arctic Coordinator position, 2) the status of a comprehensive and holistic Arctic strategy for the Department, and 3) how the Secretary is aligning or redistributing assets, resources, and personnel within the Department to address issues identified in a recent Inspector General’s report.”

The letter was signed by Senate Arctic Caucus co-chairs Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Angus King (I-ME), as well as Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Chris Coons (D-DE), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Susan Collins (R-ME), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Bill Hagerty (R-TN), and Kevin Cramer (R-ND).




BY JOAQLIN ESTUS
Tlingit, is a national correspondent for Indian Country Today. Based in Anchorage, Alaska, she is a longtime journalist. Follow her on Twitter @estus_m or email her at jestus@indiancountrytoday.com.

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M

Falsified test results for US submarine steel land metallurgist in prison

A woman is convicted of fraud for falsifying test results for high-strength steel used in US Navy subs
Falsified test results for US submarine steel land metallurgist in prison











An American metallurgist who fraudulently altered the results of strength tests on steel used to make US Navy submarine hulls has been sentenced to two-and-a-half years in prison for what a federal judge called “a crime of pride and ego.”

US District Court Judge Benjamin Settle sentenced 67-year-old Elaine Thomas on Monday in Tacoma, Washington, noting that even after an exhaustive Navy investigation, “we don’t know the full ramifications of this fraud.” Prosecutor Nick Brown said Thomas betrayed the Navy’s trust for 32 years, “knowingly placing its sailors and military operations at risk.”

Thomas, formerly lab director for military steel supplier Bradken Inc., was accused of allowing inferior steel to be used on Navy subs on half the orders she reviewed. She reportedly told investigators that she believed a test in which steel was cooled to minus 100 degrees Fahrenheit and struck with a pendulum was “stupid” because subs don’t operate in such temperatures. She allegedly falsified about 240 tests, altering failing scores to passing, over a period of more than three decades.

Settle called the case “baffling,” saying, “It seems this was a crime of pride and ego, that in some way she knew better than those who set the standards.”

A lawyer for the metallurgist argued that she’s “a good person who let a number of work pressures cause her to make bad decisions.” Those pressures included sexism in a male-dominated work environment, said the lawyer, John Carpenter. Thomas was reportedly the first woman to earn a metallurgy degree from Washington State University and won a prestigious industry award.

Her falsifications of test results first came to light in 2017, and the Navy incurred $14 million in costs to examine whether its submarine hulls are safe. Additional monitoring of the 30 hulls with steel tested by Thomas will be required indefinitely.

Bradken fired Thomas after discovering the false test results. It also notified investigators of testing discrepancies, but the defense contractor failed to immediately disclose that the falsified data stemmed from fraud. The company reached a civil settlement with the federal government, agreeing to pay $10.9 million.

Submarine steel is required to meet exacting standards to ensure that hulls hold up in extreme conditions and “wartime scenarios,” prosecutors said. Subs also face risks of collisions, such as when the USS Connecticut struck an undersea mountain in the South China Sea last October, injuring 12 crew members. A similar incident occurred in 2005, killing one sailor and leaving most of the other 136 crew members injured.

 

Canada wins record-breaking semifinal, U.S. beats Finland in women's ice hockey

(Xinhua09:03, February 15, 2022

BEIJING, Feb. 14 (Xinhua) -- Ice hockey powerhouse Canada overwhelmed Switzerland 10-3 in the women's ice hockey semifinal of Beijing 2022 Olympic Winter Games on Monday, breaking their own Olympic scoring record.

The United States fended off Finland 4-1 to book the other final berth.

Canada used a little more than 10 minutes to get a 5-0 lead. Erin Ambrose scored the team's fifth goal in the match and 49th goal in the tournament, which means Canada broke the 48-goal record for women's ice hockey in a single Winter Olympics. The previous record was set by Canada at Vancouver 2010.

It was heading for a thrashing until Switzerland pulled one back thanks to the goal from captain Lara Stalder in the 19th minute of the first period.

The second period started with another goal for the Swiss. Alina Muller shot the puck into the net during a fast break to close the gap at 5-2.

Both teams fought hard on both sides, and the second period ended with Canada leading 8-3.

The final period finished with another two goals from Canada, and the four-time Olympic champion got the easy victory by a seven-goal margin.

"I think a lot of the credit is for our coach, Troy [Ryan]," said Canadian forward Brianne Jenner about the 54 goals so far on the tournament. "I think he's given us some great systems that allow us to be creative."

Canada managed to get into the finals of all the seven Winter Games since 1998 when women's ice hockey was included in the Olympic program for the first time.

"It's not easy to get to this point," said Jenner. "It's been building and building and building for years."

Canada has won four Olympic golds and two silvers, and they will seek to avenge the final defeat to the United States four years ago in PyeongChang.

The other semifinal turned out to be a much tougher one. The U.S. out-shot Finland 12-6 in the first period, but couldn't open the scoring.

The second period saw a more aggressive U.S. team. The defending champion led 2-0 thanks to goals from Cayla Barnes and Hilary Knight.

Finland struggled hard to fight back, but the U.S. played solid defense to wrap up the victory 4-1.

The women's ice hockey final will take place on Thursday.

Canada has a 3-2 head-to-head record against the U.S. in their five encounters in the Olympic final of the previous six Games. Four years ago, the U.S. beat Canada 3-2 through shoot-off to win the gold medal. 

(Web editor: Peng Yukai, Liang Jun)

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M BANK ROBBERS

Morgan Stanley Among Block-Trading Firms Facing U.S. Probe

(Bloomberg) -- U.S. authorities are scrutinizing how Wall Street firms including Morgan Stanley handle block trades, as part of a long-running probe into stock transactions typically big enough to move markets, according to people with direct knowledge of the matter.

The behind-the-scenes inquiry has been looking into how banks execute the trades with help from outside market makers, the people said. The Securities and Exchange Commission began investigating in 2018, and after initial inquiries and what appeared to some outsiders as a lull in the case, officials sought more information, with the Justice Department opening its own probe, the people said. It’s unclear what evidence prompted the additional inquiry.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. also has received requests for documents, the Wall Street Journal noted in a report on the probe earlier Monday. 

Spokespeople for the SEC, Justice Department, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs declined to comment. The opening of investigations does not mean charges will necessarily follow. While multiple firms have received inquiries, it’s not clear which, if any of them, may be suspected of wrongdoing.

Investment banks typically spearhead block trades. The firms acquire a slug of stock from an investor -- such as hedge funds, private equity firms or venture capital firms -- at a discount, before parceling the shares out discreetly to buyers. The aim is to price the blocks at a slim premium, and to avoid sending a stock’s price into a dive before the transaction is completed, which can inflict losses.

Banks have long strived to keep a lid on the unregistered stock offerings, typically negotiating them outside of market hours to reduce the potential for stocks to drop while arrangements are being made. 

Yet price declines before the trades have raised concerns for years that some investors may be abusing access to confidential information.

Some funds that have received subpoenas from the government serve as banks’ “liquidity providers” for the deals, ready to buy up blocks, including those that have few interested buyers, the Journal reported, citing unidentified people with knowledge of the matter.

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.