Friday, March 18, 2022

Rush's Geddy Lee set to guest star on 'Murdoch Mysteries' episode


TORONTO — Geddy Lee is putting down his bass guitar for a guest role on "Murdoch Mysteries."

The former Rush band member will make another case for his occasional acting career with a bit part on an episode of the detective series set to air Monday on CBC and stream on CBC Gem.

The storyline follows the mystery of a murdered blues saxophonist whose death was seemingly foretold in vivid detail through the lyrics of a song.

Lee is part of a subplot, playing a carriage driver who's transporting lead character William Murdoch and his pregnant wife.

The musician's appearance adds to his growing number of cameos and small roles on hit TV series, including "Chicago Fire," "How I Met Your Mother," and the Hollywood comedy "I Love You, Man," where he starred alongside Rush bandmates Alex Lifeson and the late Neil Peart as themselves.

In a promotional clip, Lee explained he first entertained the "Murdoch Mysteries" role while mingling with star Yannick Bisson and his wife at a fundraiser.

"We just got chatting through the course of the evening and he said, 'Why don't you come and hang out with us one day?' And I said, 'Sure sounds like fun.' And here I am," he said.

"I have to use some sort of modest acting skill to fit into the already well-established 'Murdoch Mysteries' scenario," he added with a laugh.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 16, 2022.

David Friend, The Canadian Press
Physicist Eugene Parker, namesake of NASA probe, dies at 94

CHICAGO (AP) — Eugene Parker, a physicist who theorized the existence of solar wind and became the first person to witness the launch of a spacecraft bearing his name, has died, his son and the University of Chicago said Wednesday.

His son, Eric Parker, said Eugene Parker died peacefully at a retirement community in Chicago on Tuesday, about a decade after being diagnosed with Parkinson's disease. He was 94.

NASA administrators and university colleagues hailed Parker as a visionary in his field of heliophysics, focused on the study of the sun and other stars. He is best known for his 1958 theory of the existence of solar wind — a supersonic flow of particles off the sun's surface.

“Dr. Eugene Parker’s contributions to science and to understanding how our universe works touches so much of what we do here at NASA,” NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said in a statement. “Dr. Parker’s legacy will live on through the many active and future NASA missions that build upon his work.”

Parker recalled in 2018 that his solar wind theory was widely criticized and even mocked at publication. He was vindicated in 1962 when a NASA spacecraft mission to Venus confirmed his theory and solar wind's effect on the solar system, including occasional disruptions of communications systems on Earth.

The experience became part of Parker's identity as an educator and mentor.

“If you do something new or innovative, expect trouble,” he said in 2018 when asked to give advice to early career scientists. "But think critically about it because if you’re wrong, you want to be the first one to know that.”

Parker was born in 1927 in Houghton, Michigan. He studied physics at Michigan State University and California Institute of Technology, then worked as an assistant professor at the University of Utah before coming to the University of Chicago in 1955.

Eric Parker said he and his sister, Joyce, simply knew their dad was a scientist and didn't learn about his stature in the field until later in their lives.

The elder Parker would occasionally rise from the dinner table to jot down an idea, his son said. But his children most remember Parker as an involved dad and an avid hiker, camper and craftsman who carved busts of famous figures from wood and made much of the family's furniture.

“He always felt like workaholics were missing out,” Eric Parker said Wednesday. “He loved his job and he would tell you that when he discovered physics, he would have done it as a side gig because he enjoyed it so much. But he would also go on and on that if you’re getting over 40 hours a week in your job, you were missing out on the rest of life.”

In addition to his children, Eugene Parker is survived by his wife, Niesje, and three grandsons.

NASA honored Parker's scientific contributions in 2018 by naming a spacecraft after him that was destined to travel straight into the sun's crown. The Parker Solar Probe's successful launch — which the then-91-year-old Parker attended — has since provided unprecedented close views of the sun.


Angela Olinto, dean of the physical sciences division at the University of Chicago, accompanied Parker to the launch. She recalled his seemingly boundless energy in the early morning hours preceding the launch and his childlike grin when everything went smoothly.

“He was this ideal of a physicist: a person who has a strong intuition, who can see one step ahead and who can then sit down and show the intuition is correct,” Olinto said

Dr. Nicola Fox, director of NASA's Heliophysics Division, said Parker “was a visionary," adding that she will miss sharing the latest data from the probe's travels with him.

“Even though Dr. Parker is no longer with us, his discoveries and legacy will live forever," Fox said.

Kathleen Foody, The Associated Press



THE HUMBLE HANDLE
Early man's greatest invention was the handle, study suggests

Could the humble handle be an invention greater than the wheel?
© Provided by National Post 
Volunteer's movements and oxygen level is tracked while using 'hafted' tools.

According to University of Liverpool researchers, adding handles to stone tools increased their function and required less effort when scraping, chopping and hammering.

The handle’s emergence 500,000 years ago, according to the study, marked a technological leap that may have “shaped human social, cognitive and biological capabilities”. (For comparison, the wheel was invented 6,000 years ago.)

“The transition from hand-held to hafted tool technology marked a significant shift in conceptualizing the construction and function of tools,” they write.

Hafted tools, such as scrapers and axes, are made up of component parts that add up to a more useful whole, contributing to cognitive skills that corresponded with “development of language and extended planning,” the researchers add. Researchers cite a 2015 published in the Journal of Archaeological Science, that found late Middle Palaeolithic flake cleavers were more effective than hand-held cleavers in “tree felling and carcass butchery tasks as measured by number of blows and time required.”

Metal plate fused to 2,000-year-old Peruvian warrior's skull proof of early surgery

Early man’s use of handled tools increased “killing power” and “reduced contact with biological hazards,” the researchers also add.

It’s widespread implementation is also thought to have shaped the functionality of our upper limbs:

“It is assumed that addition of a handle improved the (bio)mechanical properties of a tool and upper limb by offering greater amounts of leverage, force and precision.”

The researchers carried out experiments with 40 volunteers of 24 men and 16 women, each of whom were given a range of tools to try. This included a chopping tool (a hatchet with a steel head and wooden handle) and a shave hook for scraping.

The participants wore trackers to study their muscle contraction and oxygen consumption while using the tools, both with the handles and with the handles removed.

The hatchet was used to chop off as much wood as possible from a 6 cm-thick wooden dowel in under 5 minutes, while the scraper was used to scrape out the fibres from a carpet with a thickness similar to that of animal hide.

The study found that the tools with handles provided leverage enabling “large velocities … without requiring heavy muscular effort.”

It concluded “The energetic and biomechanical benefits of hafting [adding handles] arguably contributed to both the invention and spread of this technology.

“These reductions in physiological and biomechanical demands, as well as demands on energy and time budgets, would enhance both individual and group survival.”

National Post Staff 
Three decades ago world told to 'act now' on climate


With the planet facing the "potentially serious consequences" of global warming, UN experts writing 32 years ago urged an indifferent world to take immediate action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
© Noel Celis
 Current levels of atmospheric CO2 have not been experienced for at least two million years, the IPCC says

Planet-warming carbon pollution has increased ever since.

In 1990 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change produced the first trio of reports in a cycle of climate change assessments -- one on the physical science of warming, one on the impacts and one on solutions -- that has repeated roughly every six years.

While the authors of the most recent IPCC report on impacts, released in February this year, can say the evidence of harm to humanity and the entire planet is "unequivocal", the authors of those first reports 30 years ago could not be as forthright.

But they were clear that the risks were so high we couldn't afford to wait.

"The potentially serious consequences of climate change on the global environment," they said "give sufficient reasons to begin by adopting response strategies that can be justified immediately even in the face of such significant uncertainties".

They said cuts to the planet-warming gases that humans were pumping into the atmosphere should be swift and drastic.

"Because climate change could potentially result in significant impacts on the global environment and human activities, it is important to begin considering now what measures might be taken in response," the report said.

There was never an easy answer.

The scientists writing the 1990 report underscored the need to reduce emissions of different gases -- especially carbon dioxide and methane -- across a range of different sectors, from energy generation to agriculture.

"Our understanding has been refined over 40 years, but the alarm has been ringing since the first IPCC report," said Celine Guivarch, one of the authors of the latest IPCC assessment of solutions, set to be published on April 4.

With each new cycle of climate evaluation, the description of risks in the IPCC reports has become ever clearer and more urgent. The forecasts have become increasingly catastrophic.

Meanwhile, emissions have risen almost every year, only breaking their relentless pace because of major economic crises, such as the one triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic.

As a result, CO2 in the atmosphere has never been higher.

According to data from the Mauna Loa observatory in Hawaii, which has monitored the atmosphere for decades, C02 concentrations reached 416 parts per million in 2021, up from 354 ppm in 1990 when the first IPCC report was published.

Earth has experienced periods of much higher C02 concentrations in the distant past.

But in its report on the physical science released in August 2021, the IPCC said the rate the gas has increased in the atmosphere since 1900 "is at least 10 times faster than at any other time during the last 800,000 years".

"Current levels of atmospheric CO2 have not been experienced for at least two million years," it added.

abd/klm/mh/bp

AFP

UN report to lay out options to halt climate crisis

Nearly 200 nations gather on Monday to confront a question that will outlive Russia's invasion of Ukraine: how do we stop carbon pollution overheating the planet and threatening life as we know it?

  
© Nikolay DOYCHINOV 
Current carbon-cutting commitments still put us on a catastrophic path toward 2.7C of warming by 2100

The answer is set to arrive on April 4 after closed-door, virtual negotiations approve the summary of a phonebook-sized report detailing options for drawing down greenhouse gases and extracting them out of thin air.

"The science is crystal clear, the impacts are costly and mounting, but we still have some time to close the window and get ahead of the worst of them if we act now," said Alden Meyer, a senior analyst at climate and energy think tank E3G.

"This report will supply the answers as to what we need if we're serious about getting there."

In August 2021, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) laid out the physical science: changes in global warming and sea level rise, along with shifts in the frequency, duration and intensity of cyclones, heatwaves, droughts and other forms of extreme weather.

That was the first instalment of a three-part assessment, the sixth since 1990. It projected that Earth's surface temperature will rise 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, perhaps within a decade.

A 1.5C cap on global warming -- the aspirational goal of the 2015 Paris climate accord -- has been embraced as a target by most of the world's nations.

Current carbon-cutting commitments under the treaty, however, still put us on a catastrophic path toward 2.7C of warming by 2100.

- A liveable future -

Part two of the more than 10,000-page report -- described by UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres as an "atlas of human suffering" -- catalogued past and future climate impacts on human society and the natural world.

Delaying climate action would severely reduce the chances of a "livable future," it concluded.

Part three -- spread across thousands of pages -- is about how to slow and stop warming, with separate chapters on the key sectors where rapid and deep change is critical: energy, transport, industry, agriculture, among others.

"We are talking about the large-scale transformation of all the major systems," climate economist and co-author Celine Guivarch told AFP.

It also focuses on ways to curb carbon emissions by reducing demand, whether through making buildings more energy efficient or encouraging shifts in lifestyle, such as eating less beef and not flying half-way around the world for a week-long holiday.

The report details more than a dozen techniques for pulling CO2 out of the air, which will be needed to compensate for sectors -- such as aviation and shipping -- that are likely still carbon polluters by mid-century.

"Many things have changed" since the previous three-part report, which came out eight years ago, said Taryn Fransen, an analyst at the World Resources Institute.

The Paris Agreement -- the first climate deal in which all countries pledged action -- was signed.

The world has seen an endless crescendo of deadly climate impacts, from drought to fire to floods.

The price of renewable energy, key to the reducing emissions, has fallen below the cost of fossil fuels in most markets.

- 'Inflamed situation' -

The IPCC "solutions" report draws from hundreds of models projecting development pathways that keep Earth within the bounds of the Paris temperature goals.

"There are scenarios that show high renewables and low nuclear, and scenarios that show the opposite," said Fransen.

"This report lays out those pathways. Now it's up now to our leaders to take that to heart."

Besides feeding into UN political negotiations, which resume in November in Egypt at COP 27, the IPCC findings will also be important "for the conversation going on in the US and Europe around the need to transition away from Russian oil and gas," said Meyer.

The head of the IPCC delegation from Ukraine made this point in a dramatic statement at a closed plenary in February, only days after Russian troops invaded her country.

"Human-induced climate change and the war on Ukraine have the same roots -- fossil fuels -- and our dependence on them," said Svitlana Krakovska, according to multiple sources.

The war in Ukraine will likely come up during the two-week IPCC negotiations starting Monday.

"It's a more enflamed situation," said Meyer. "I don't know how this is gonna play out but it's something to watch."

abd-mh/jm

AFP
Inside the plan to save some of the biggest freshwater fish

Stefan Lovgren 
 National Geographic

Captive-raised specimens of some of the world’s largest and most critically endangered freshwater fish—including a five-foot-long Mekong giant catfish—were released this month into Cambodia’s Tonle Sap, the largest lake in Southeast Asia. Scientists hope the released fish can survive and begin to rebuild wild populations decimated by decades of overfishing, dam building, and other human actions.

© Photograph courtesy Zeb Hogan Zeb Hogan and a Cambodian colleague release a Mekong giant catfish in the Tonle Sap River, Cambodia in November 2007. The more recent release of critically endangered Mekong giant catfish into the Tonle Sap Lake is part of a program to reinstate giant fishes in the wild.

Those threats still exist, and the released species—the giant catfish, giant barb, and striped catfish—are considered bellwethers of the danger to a larger fishery that sustains millions of Cambodians.


“This release is significant, but it is just the first step of many actions that will be needed for the long-term recovery of these giant fish,” says Zeb Hogan, a fish biologist at the University of Nevada, Reno, who coordinated the release effort for a U.S. Agency for International Development research project he leads, called Wonders of the Mekong.

The Tonle Sap is connected to the Mekong River, which flows through six countries. The Mekong Basin is a global biodiversity hotspot, home to almost 1,000 freshwater fish species, including the world’s largest.

Large freshwater fish are among the most threatened animals globally, studies show. Populations of Mekong giant catfish, which can reach the size of a grizzly bear—660 pounds— and giant barb, a type of carp that can grow to similarly huge proportions, have plummeted by more than 90 percent in recent decades, according to Hogan. Hogan, who has long studied giant fish in the region, has not seen a Mekong giant catfish in the wild since 2015.

© Provided by National Geographic

Another species, the striped catfish, which can grow over four feet long and made up most of the fishes released this month, was once a staple food in the region. But it, too, has seen sharp declines and is now classified as endangered.

“These fish are the first to go as fishing pressure becomes unsustainable,” says Hogan, who is a National Geographic Explorer.

Many large fishes in the Mekong region are now bred in captivity. Introducing them into the wild is problematic, however, because a lack of genetic diversity may make them unable to reproduce successfully.

In contrast, the fish released this month were reared at an aquatic research center in southeastern Cambodia—but weren’t bred there. They were collected in the wild when they were so tiny their species could not be distinguished.

The five-foot-long Mekong giant catfish was one of five donated to the research center by a local fish trader. This trader had collected the fish when they were little more than specks 13 years ago, not knowing they would turn into massive catfish too big for her ponds
.
© Photograph courtesy Zeb Hogan Striped river catfish are introduced into a fish reserve in the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia.

A long journey

© Photograph Courtesy Wonders of the Mekong Project Tach Phanara cradles a Mekong giant catfish in a holding tank prior to its release.

The endangered fishes’ two-day trip back to the wild began around 8 p.m. on March 2, when two vans fitted with oxygenated water tanks departed the research center. One van carried hundreds of striped catfish, along with dozens of juvenile giant barbs, Cambodia’s national fish. In the other van were the two Mekong giant catfish.

Traveling through the night, the vans arrived in the northwestern city of Siem Reap at sunrise. There, the fish were held in ponds and tanks before being taken the following morning by boats into the open waters of the Tonle Sap, where they were released into a government-operated fish reserve. Of the more than 1,500 fish released, only one, a striped catfish, did not survive the ordeal.

For a reintroduction to succeed in the long term, the habitat must be healthy enough to support the fish. A study published in the journal Conservation Biology some years ago concluded that inadequately addressing the initial cause of decline in a fish population was the best predictor of “reintroduction failure.”

Such projects “cannot just stock a higher number of fish, even though this approach is the easiest,” says Jennifer Cochran-Biederman, a biology professor at Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota, and the lead author of that study. “They must tackle broader causes of habitat degradation, such as pollution, climate change, urban development, and dams, which is much more complicated.”


© Photograph Courtesy Wonders of the Mekong Project Chea Seila, Cambodia country manager for the USAID-funded Wonders of the Mekong Project, poses next to juvenile giant barb prior to its release into a fish reserve in the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia.

The Tonle Sap, which provides a fertile feeding ground for many fish, remains relatively intact, despite being disrupted by upstream dam operations and several years of drought exacerbated by climate change (though this year the lake has seen higher water levels). That makes it a good place to reintroduce the fish.

© Photograph courtesy Zeb Hogan Tach Phanara and a colleague from the Cambodian Fisheries Administration collect a DNA sample from a striped river catfish prior to releasing it into the Tonle Sap.

“We know that juveniles of these species historically occur in the lake at this stage in their life cycle,” says Hogan.

The main threat to fish in the lake, where communal fisheries employ hundreds of thousands of people, is overfishing. The use of illegal fishing nets and other gear is widespread—in fact, it’s not even hidden. Large ocean-going fishing vessels have increasingly been seen operating in the lake using huge trawling nets, in violation of fishing regulations.

But the Tonle Sap also has one of the world’s largest network of inland fish reserves, designated areas where fishing is not allowed. In addition to a string of government-operated ones established a decade ago, there are several hundred smaller community reserves. Such areas, conservationists say, have proved successful shelters for many fish species, especially large ones.

“Although these reserves aren’t as old as others in Southeast Asia, they’re showing comparable benefits, with more fish inside the reserves than in areas where fishing is allowed,” says Aaron Koning, a University of Nevada conservation ecologist (and National Geographic Explorer) who studies the efficacy of fish reserves.

But he and others stress that even if regulations are enforced—which most observers agree is spotty in the Tonle Sap, the world’s largest inland fishery—reserves alone cannot protect migratory fish that move large distances in the river system to complete their life cycles. “The likelihood of the fish getting caught once they move out of the reserves and even the lake is very high,” says Koning.

Community effort


The fish that were released were tagged so that researchers could track them and gather information if the fish are recaptured. Fishers will be rewarded for returning the tags with information about the capture.

“This information tells us the level of fishing intensity in the lake, which is critically useful to inform management interventions,” says Ngor Peng Bun, a fish ecologist and fisheries science dean at Cambodia’s Royal University of Agriculture.

Presiding at the fish release ceremony, which was attended by a large group of local officials, Poum Sotha, director-general of the Cambodian Fisheries Administration, urged fishers to help the research effort, while also suggesting that if anyone were caught who had killed tagged fish, they would face legal consequences.

There are early signs that fishers are willing to assist. In the days following the release, many fish captures were reported, including one of the giant barbs. It had been ensnared in a trap and was ultimately released into a different sanctuary.

More releases are planned, and researchers hope to fit the next batch of fish with tags that emit soundwaves, in order to track them more actively. They also want to release fish in other locations, such as the deep pools of the Mekong River in northern Cambodia, where many of the migratory fish are believed to spawn.

“This release is just the tip of the iceberg,” says Hogan. “It’s necessary to do more, to see what works and what doesn’t, and keep learning and improving if we want to save these iconic fish.”

He and his colleagues will closely monitor what happens to the two Mekong giant catfish before deciding whether to release those still being held in captivity. Hogan is confident that if the largest of the two, in particular, is caught, the catch will be reported and the fish will be re-released.

“It’s such a large and unique fish. People recognize it as something special,” he says. For extra protection, the researchers named it Samnang—the Cambodian word for “lucky.”



The National Geographic Society, committed to illuminating and protecting the wonder of our world, funded explorer Zeb Hogan’s work. Learn more about the Society’s support of explorers highlighting and protecting critical species. Hogan and Stefan Lovgren are co-authors of the forthcoming book Chasing Giants: The Search for the World’s Largest Freshwater Fish.
In Peru, skull of 'marine monster' points to fearsome ancient predator

By Marco Aquino and Carlos Valdez
© Reuters/SEBASTIAN CASTANEDA 36 million-year-old Basilosaurus whale fossil displayed in Lima

LIMA (Reuters) - Paleontologists have unearthed the skull of a ferocious marine predator, an ancient ancestor of modern-day whales, which once lived in a prehistoric ocean that covered part of what is now Peru, scientists announced on Thursday.
© Reuters/SEBASTIAN CASTANEDA 36 million-year-old Basilosaurus whale fossil displayed in Lima

The roughly 36-million-year-old well-preserved skull was dug up intact last year from the bone-dry rocks of Peru's southern Ocucaje desert, with rows of long, pointy teeth, Rodolfo Salas, chief of paleontology at Peru's National University of San Marcos, told reporters at a news conference

.
© Reuters/SEBASTIAN CASTANEDA 36 million-year-old Basilosaurus whale fossil displayed in Lima

Scientists think the ancient mammal was a basilosaurus, part of the aquatic cetacean family, whose contemporary descendents include whales, dolphins and porpoises.

Basilosaurus means "king lizard," although the animal was not a reptile, though its long body might have moved like a giant snake.

The one-time top predator likely measured some 12 meters (39 feet) long, or about the height of a four-story building.

"It was a marine monster," said Salas, adding the skull, which has already been put on display at the university's museum, may belong to a new species of basilosaurus.

© Reuters/SEBASTIAN CASTANEDA 36 million-year-old Basilosaurus whale fossil displayed in Lima

"When it was searching for its food, it surely did a lot of damage," added Salas.

Scientists believe the first cetaceans evolved from mammals that lived on land some 55 million years ago, about 10 million years after an asteroid struck just off what is now Mexico's Yucatan peninsula, wiping out most life on Earth, including the dinosaurs.

Salas explained that when the ancient basilosaurus died, its skull likely sunk to the bottom of the sea floor, where it was quickly buried and preserved.

"Back during this age, the conditions for fossilization were very good in Ocucaje," he said.

(Reporting by Marco Aquino and Carlos Valdez; Writing by David Alire Garcia; Editing by Karishma Singh)


ICE HUNT
JAMES ROLLINS
RELEASED ON: Jul 01, 2003
Carved into a moving island of ice twice the size of the United States, Ice Station Grendel has been abandoned for more than seventy years. The twisted brainchild of the finest minds of the former Soviet Union, it was designed to be inaccessible and virtually invisible.
But an American undersea research vessel has inadvertently pulled too close – and something has been sighted moving inside the allegedly deserted facility, something whose survival defies every natural law. And now, as scientists, soldiers, intelligence operatives, and unsuspecting civilians are drawn into Grendel’s lethal vortex, the most extreme measures possible will be undertaken to protect its dark mysteries – because the terrible truths locked behind submerged walls of ice and steel could end human life on Earth.
A new, armored dinosaur species was found in southwestern China

By Megan Marples, CNN 

A new dinosaur species from the early Jurassic period was discovered in southwestern China, according to a study published Tuesday in the journal eLife.
© courtesy Yu Chen
 Yuxisaurus kopchicki remains included pieces of its skull, jaws, limbs and armor plates.

Scientists originally found remains of an armored dinosaur, which they named Yuxisaurus kopchicki, in 2017 in the Yuxi region of Yunnan province, an area that has been a hotspot for dinosaur discoveries. Research on the specimens began in 2019, according to study author Shundong Bi, professor at Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

The ancient creature belongs to the thyreophoran group, the same as its distant cousin the Stegosaurus, said study author Paul Barrett, merit researcher at the Natural History Museum in London.

It likely lived 192 million to 174 million years ago and is the first thyreophoran from that time period to be recognized in the region, according to the study.

"This is the first early armoured dinosaur to be named from the entire Asian continent and helps to show how the group spread around the world shortly after its origin just a few million years earlier," Barrett said via email.

Yuxisaurus kopchicki likely spanned 6.6 to 9.8 feet (2 to 3 meters) in length and ate low-growing plants like ferns and cycads, he said.

A collection of diverse fossils

A series of bone plates encased the animal, covering its neck, back and limbs, with large spikes scattered on top of the armor, Barrett said.

The spikes served multiple purposes: deflecting the jaws and teeth of most predators while also possibly being a tool for showing off to other members of its own species during territorial or mate disputes, he explained.

A couple modern-day animals that behave similarly are porcupines and hedgehogs, Bi said.

More than 120 bone deposits were retrieved from the dig site, giving the researchers enough material to confirm a new species, he said.

The remains included multiple fragments of a single skeleton, including parts of the armor plates, limbs, jaws and skull. The dinosaur's heavy build and distinctive armor hinted that the researchers had a new species on their hands, Bi said.

Additionally, the findings show how diverse the group of dinosaurs was and how rapidly they spread across the northern hemisphere, he said.

The armored dinosaur's closest relatives are the herbivorous Scelidosaurus and the Emausaurus -- both of which originated in Europe during the Jurassic period, Barrett said.
Alberta looks to name ammolite its official gemstone
Ashley Joannou 15 hrs ago
© Provided by Edmonton Journal 
Alberta Culture Minister Ron Orr speaks about an amendment to the Emblems of Alberta Act to designate ammolite as the official gemstone of Alberta during a news conference in Edmonton, on Thursday, March 17, 2022. He's wearing an ammolite pin shaped like the province.

The Alberta government wants to make ammolite the official gemstone of the province.

If passed, Bill 6, tabled in the legislature Thursday, would amend the Emblems of Alberta Act to give ammolite the designation alongside more than a dozen other “official” things, including the province’s official bird (great horned owl), official mammal (Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep), official fish (bull trout), and official stone (petrified wood).

In a statement, Culture Minister Ron Orr said ammolite is an important part of Alberta’s heritage and economy.

“Recognizing ammolite as Alberta’s official gemstone reflects the unique nature of the stone and of our province,” he said.

Found mostly in southern Alberta, ammolite is created when fossilized shells of molluscs, known as ammonites, sink to the seabed and get covered in mud that hardens over millions of years to become shale.

NDP indigenous relations critic Richard Feehan said in a statement that ammolite has an important history with deeply rooted traditions for many Indigenous cultures

“I hope that honouring these traditions and practices will help us reflect on our relationship as treaty people,” he said

SCIENCE SEZ;
Canada’s top doctors still recommend wearing a mask — even as provinces ditch mandates

Rachel Gilmore 
© (Credit Image: © Zou Zheng/Xinhua via ZUMA Press) TORONTO, Feb. 23, 2022 People wearing face masks walk past screens reminding people to wear face masks at a subway station in Toronto, Canada, on Feb. 22, 2022.

Canada's top doctors say you should keep wearing your mask, even as provinces increasingly drop their COVID-19 mask mandates.

Saskatchewan, Alberta, B.C. and Manitoba have all lifted mask mandates in most indoor spaces.

Ontario is poised to drop its masking rules in most places on Monday, while Quebec plans to do so by mid-April. Most of these jurisdictions, however, still require masking in some high-risk settings.

Provinces have cited dropping COVID-19 cases and high vaccination rates as justification for the decision to ditch mandatory masks.

Read more:
Is Canada dropping its COVID-19 guard too quickly? Experts weigh in

Despite the moves to ditch mandated face coverings, Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Theresa Tam said on Friday that wearing a mask is still a very good idea.

She recommended that Canadians "continue wearing a well-constructed, well-fitting mask as an important added layer of protection, even if not required by local authorities."

"We're in a period of uncertainty where the the virus is still undergoing evolution," Tam said.

"So getting vaccines plus wearing a mask is still a really good idea."

Wearing a mask isn't only a decision that impacts you, Deputy Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Howard Njoo added, but one that protects other as well.

"Wearing a well-constructed and well-fitting mask is an important, proven personal protection measure. Even if there's no mandate...it's still a good idea, certainly, in some contexts," Njoo said, speaking in French.

Masking protects the wearer by cutting down the number of respiratory particles they inhale, according to Health Canada. But it protects others, too, as fewer of the wearer's respiratory particles will circulate in a given space.

On Thursday, Ontario’s COVID-19 Science Advisory Table released projections that further proved this fact. They found masks are an "effective public health measure to reduce COVID-19 transmission."

“Recent studies from the United States analyzed the impact of mask-wearing on SARS-CoV-2 community transmission: mandatory masking reduced the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection consistently,” the science table noted.

And while cases have declined in recent weeks, the latest figures show the case counts are levelling off, Tam said on Friday.

That's "not unexpected" as provinces ease restrictions, but the more-transmissible Omicron subvariant, known as BA.2, is also spreading in areas with lower vaccination rates or that didn't have higher rates of prior COVID-19 spread.

Read more:
Studies show mask mandates ‘consistently’ reduce COVID transmission, Ontario science table says

Dr. Gerald Evans, a professor at Queen’s University who specializes in infectious diseases, says masking and capacity limits should remain in place until the full impact of BA.2 is known.

“I think it’s just been rushed a little bit too quickly,” he told Global News. “If we’re not quick to reduce restrictions … we could probably keep that BA.2 wave down a little bit.

There are more than 115,000 positive COVID-19 cases in Canada right now, and more than 13 per cent of tests taken are coming back positive — a number that suggests many cases are going undocumented in Canadian communities, infectious disease specialists have warned.

In Ontario, where mask mandates are slated to end in just three days, officials say masking is still highly recommended for the immunocompromised or those at high risk of a severe outcome from COVID-19.

Video: Vancouver businesses face backlash for requiring masks

Ontario Premier Doug Ford added that "anyone who wants to wear a mask" is "more than welcome to."

"It’s going to be up to the people,” Ford said last week.

He said he'll continue wearing his mask to work for "a few days" after the mandate lifts.

“Everyone’s going to follow the proper protocols and if you want to keep your mask on, God bless you. You can keep your mask on. And if you don’t, then that’s fine too," Ford said.

Whether you choose to follow PHAC's advice or not, Tam said Canadians should respect people's comfort levels as they navigate the latest phase of the pandemic.

"I encourage Canadians to show each other compassion and respect that we make decisions to protect ourselves, our families and our communities, especially those at highest risk," she said.

"These times of transition can be challenging and stressful to navigate."

— with files from Global News' Sean Boynton, Ryan Rocca, Gabby Rodrigues and Aya Al-Hakim
TINA TO A CARBON TAX
Ontario's plan to sell 'clean energy' credits doesn't wash with environmental groups

Mike Crawley 

Premier Doug Ford's government is working on a plan to sell "clean energy credits" to companies wanting to lower their carbon footprint, but environmental groups say the move would do nothing to reduce Ontario's carbon dioxide emissions.

Clean energy credits are similar to carbon offset schemes, such as those offered by airlines to passengers who want to pay extra to compensate for the emissions generated by their flight.

The government is aiming to create a market for clean energy credits tied to Ontario's electricity generating system, which is 94 per cent emission-free.

Ontario's proposal would mean businesses could buy the credits voluntarily and count them toward any corporate target they set for reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.

However, it's far from clear that the sale of the credits will actually cut emissions or make Ontario's electricity system any greener.

Criticism of the plan is coming from The Atmospheric Fund, a non-partisan public agency that works with government and the private sector on climate change issues in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton area.

Bryan Purcell, vice-president of policy and programs for The Atmospheric Fund, said the government's proposal has fundamental flaws that undermine any environmental benefit.

As Purcell sees it, the government's plans for the revenue from selling the credits are central to the flaws. The revenue would be earmarked to subsidizing electricity prices, with no commitment of putting it toward the cost of building new clean power plants.

"Whether they know it or not, companies would be buying a credit that does nothing to reduce actual emissions in real life and just simply allows them to claim a lower carbon footprint," said Purcell.

Purcell argues that making electricity cheaper through subsidies increases consumption. In Ontario's current system, the more demand there is for electricity, the more that gas-fired power plants contribute to the supply.

"So if we are putting all this money from the clean energy credits into subsidizing electricity for everyone else … that's actually driving increased carbon emissions from the electricity system in Ontario," Purcell said.

© Mike Crawley/CBC Ontario's electricity system is currently 94 per cent free of CO2 emissions. However, the province's long term energy plan envisions boosting gas-fired power to become 25 per cent of the electricity mix by 2040.

With the clean energy credit market still in development, the government hasn't actually ruled out putting it toward new clean generating facilities.

In January, Energy Minister Todd Smith assigned the province's Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) to develop a plan. The agency is to provide a report to the government by early July, about a month after the provincial election, with the aim for the market to launch early next year.

Smith was not available for an interview, but in a statement said a clean energy credits market would leverage Ontario's electricity system to attract businesses that are committed to environmental goals.

Such a market "could return funds raised through the purchase of these credits to Ontario ratepayers to reduce rates and would support future clean energy generation in the province," said Smith in the statement.

"We know increased electrification is key to displacing carbon based fuels and lowering emissions, and affordable clean electricity is the best tool we have to achieve this."

© Matthew Pierce/CBC 
Ontario's Energy Minister Todd Smith is looking to create a market for clean energy credits in the province. The plan would see businesses voluntarily buying the credits to count as a reduction in their carbon emissions.

Under the government's latest long-term energy plan, gas-fired power plants are forecast to ramp up to providing 25 per cent of Ontario's electricity mix by 2040. Smith has asked the IESO to assess the alternative of a moratorium on new natural gas generation and moving toward a zero-emission electricity grid.
Assessing potential demand

Pitching the green credentials of Ontario's electricity system could be seen as a departure for the Progressive Conservatives. Scrapping the previous government's Green Energy Act was one of Ford's first orders of business after winning the election in 2018.

That Liberal government initiative was focused on boosting wind and solar energy generation, at premium prices. The province also ended coal-fired electricity generation, significantly reducing Ontario's CO2 emissions.

But over the past decade, electricity prices rose sharply. The government now puts in $6.5 billion in taxpayer funds annually to subsidize hydro bills.

There's no indication how much money the government expects to bring in from selling clean energy credits. The IESO is currently assessing the potential demand from companies.

© CBC News 
The Darlington nuclear generating station, run by Ontario Power Generation, in Courtice, 60 kilometres east of Toronto. Ontario's nuclear generating stations provide more than half of the province's electricity needs.

"We're seeing businesses across Ontario establish clean energy goals, electrification and decarbonization goals. Clean energy credits are a mechanism by which businesses can achieve both goals," said Katherine Sparkes, the IESO's director of innovation, research and development.

"It's really important that we understand what are the clean energy goals of businesses across Ontario. We need to understand the magnitude and the timing of those goals so that we can understand what volume they might be looking to purchase."

The activist group Environmental Defence is dismissing the government's proposed clean energy credit system as a form of greenwashing.

"It allows companies to claim credit for existing clean electricity generation resources instead of actually greening their own power consumption," said Lana Goldberg, the group's Ontario climate program manager, in an email to CBC News.

Goldberg said the government needs a plan to transition to a fully clean electricity grid rather than ramping up gas plant usage.